Bitcoin price is surging as investors turn back to cryptocurrency – Metro.co.uk

Bitcoin is on the up right now (Photo by Omar Marques / SOPA Images/Sipa USA)

Bitcoin, the digital cryptocurrency, appears to be rising in value again right as the UK enters a deep recession.

The value of bitcoin increased 3% over the last 24 hours, taking its value up to $12,000 for the first time in over a year. It has fallen briefly again to under that amount at time of writing but followers seem bullish.

The virtual currency is a long way off the $20,000 high it hit in 2017 but it nevertheless is continuing to grow in value.

The origins of bitcoin mean theres a finite supply so, similar to gold, it cant be changed by inflationary measures like quantitative easing. Whats more, because bitcoin is decentralised, it doesnt come under the control of any one government or entity.

Its quite possible that investors are seeing the cryptocurrency (along with other such digital currencies) as a kind of safe haven in turbulent times created by coronavirus.

Inflation is currently low but real yields are across the board negative negative real yields and the monetary stimulus/spending has driven investors to seek out inflation hedges such as gold, Seamus Donoghue, vice president of sales and business development at METACO, told Bloomberg.

Given its limited supply and growing institutional acceptance, Bitcoin will also likely benefit from the market seeking inflation hedges.

The rest is here:
Bitcoin price is surging as investors turn back to cryptocurrency - Metro.co.uk

John McAfee Ditches Ghost Crypto Project: He Says It Will Fail | News – Bitcoin News

Two-time U.S. presidential candidate John McAfee has announced that he is leaving the ghost cryptocurrency project, claiming that it will fail without a doubt and his reputation has been damaged. His Ghost phone service, however, will be launched as planned, he emphasized, adding that there will be a new cryptocurrency for the Ghost ecosystem.

John McAfee, who has been building the Ghost ecosystem that includes the privacy-centric ghost cryptocurrency, an exchange, and phone service, has announced that he is no longer supporting the ghost cryptocurrency. He tweeted Wednesday: I am abandoning the Ghost project. Management is incapable of making a success of the project. It will, without a doubt fail. He then apologized to those he led astray.

The antivirus tycoon insisted that he really believed in the ghost cryptocurrency but Switch CEO Josh Case ruined everything. Josh controlled the project. He was killing it, McAfee told his Twitter followers. Josh is an idiot, he continued to tweet. I added Ghost to my Ghost ecosystem because I had his assurance that he would be 100% focused on ghost. He never fulfilled that promise. I could no longer support a project managed by someone working on Clearpoll, Ethershare etc.

To explain why his hands are tied, McAfee posted a private message he said he sent to Case. If you had told me, from the beginning, that making money for you, myself and everyone involved in Ghost, was of no interest to you and you merely wanted a piss around with worthless projects, like Ethershare, from your past that never made you, nor anyone else a dime, then I would never have given you legal control over ghost, the message reads, adding:

Now I have to find another coin for the Ghost ecosystem and you have damaged my reputation through your inability to focus exclusively on the task at hand.

The Ghost ecosystem also consists of the Ghost phone service which McAfee announced in July. It claims to help subscribers be invisible, noting that it will be the first 4G data service to make connections to the network untraceable. After meeting with the Ghost executive team, McAfee confirmed: Our Ghost phone service coming Sept. 30, is the foundation of our ecosystem and nothing will change with the service. We are, though, dropping GHOST as our privacy coin and will replace it.

The ghost cryptocurrency launched in June and the Bitcoin.com exchange listed the ESH token at the end of May prior to McAfee airdropping some ghost coins to ESH holders. In the same month, the Ghost team announced a partnership with the digital currency payment processor Ivendpay that allows 60 vending machines in Hong Kong to accept the ghost cryptocurrency for payments along with other cryptocurrencies, such as BTC, ETH, BCH, and BNB.

Responding to McAfees departure announcement, the Ghost by McAfee team clarified on Wednesday: We will be dropping the by John McAfee soon and will just be called Ghost John is in no way involved in any day to day operations, nor has he ever been involved with any of the tech or building of Ghost. The price of the ghost cryptocurrency has fallen about 63% from its Wednesday high to $0.266391 at the time of this writing.

What do you think about McAfees trouble with the ghost crypto? Let us know in the comments section below.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons, John McAfee, Twitter

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

See the original post:
John McAfee Ditches Ghost Crypto Project: He Says It Will Fail | News - Bitcoin News

Tether retakes top 3 cryptocurrency spot over XRP – Decrypt

Tether (USDT) has become the third-largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization today, pushing Ripples XRP down to the fourth place, according to crypto analytics platforms Messari and Coin Metrics.

If you multiple the number of coins in a cryptocurrency by its current price, you get its market capitalization. Its a way of comparing assets that have wildly different supplies. Since Tether is a stablecoin and its price doesnt really movethe price of a single USDT is designed to be mostly equal to $1the only way to increase its market cap is to mint new coins.

As Decrypt reported, Tethers market capitalization exceeded $12 billion just recently after increasing by $1 billion in one week. Today, it has already reached $13.14 billion, noted Coin Metric analyst Lucas Nuzzi in a tweet.

Nuzzi also listed the top five stablecoins by their year-to-date growth.

This is not the first time Tether has replaced XRP as the third-largest crypto. Amid the market meltdown back in March, USDT briefly overtook XRP after surpassing $5 billion in market cap.

Tethers growth comes despite its parent company dealing with several court cases. Currently, Tether and its sister company, crypto exchange Bitfinex, are in the middle of a fraud investigation led by the New York Attorney Generals office over allegations that they conspired to mask an $850 million dollar void in Bitfinexs finances.

A class-action lawsuit also accused Tether of damages of $1.4 million for printing billions of dollars worth of the cryptocurrency and for manipulating the price of Bitcoin in 2017.

But in the meantime, Tether keeps growing.

Read this article:
Tether retakes top 3 cryptocurrency spot over XRP - Decrypt

Steem vs Tron: The rebellion against a cryptocurrency empire – Decrypt

One spring day four years ago, Dan Notestein, a self-made millionaire and coder, padded down the wooden stairs to the basement of his ranch home in Blacksburg, Virginia. He sat down across from three other devs who were working on a startup called Steemit. Notestein, who was a contract worker on the project, settled in for what he figured would be just another day.

It turned out to be anything but.

The devs were building what had been billed by its co-founders, CEO Ned Scott and CTO Dan Larimer, as a new kind of social media platform. Steemit was intended to be the first social network to reward its users with cryptocurrency when they upvoted a post. The big idea was that postinggreat posting, smart posting, honest postingwas super valuable content to a community. (Hence steem, which stood for esteemed author.)

Specifically, the men in Notesteins semi-finished basement were putting the final touches on a blockchain, called Steem, and its tokens (also called STEEM) that would, in turn, gamify Steemit and create one big virtuous circle.

The blockchain was supposed to launch in a week, at the end of March. Today was only March 23, 2016.

Imagine then the crazy, wild surprise that swept through Notesteins basement when one developer saw that the blockchain had already gone live. The mainnet was up and running; the genesis block had been verified.

"They were all angry about it, and it showed in different ways. One of the guys was so upset, I was concerned he was going to cry," Notestein later recalled.

A week later, Notestein realized that Scott and Larimer had used the surprise launch to give themselves a head start to mine 80% of the supply of Steem tokens. Typically, when a blockchain like this launches, everyone knows the launch date in advance, which levels the playing field, and can ensure that the tokens are evenly distributed among investors. But that didnt happen here.

The pile of tokens would become known as the ninjamined stake on account of the fact that it was mined covertly. It would become the Chekovs gun in the story of Steem, foreshadowing a problem that would, years later, all but obliterate one of the most interesting and vital communities ever built on a blockchain. The stake would pit the Tron Foundations CEO, Justin Sun, the P.T. Barnum of crypto, against an angry, activated, networked mob of thousands. Some $5 million dollars would be seized, a lawsuit would be launched and an anonymous hero would tryand failto save it all.

"The drama with Steem is probably the most important thing happening in crypto now."

Ari Paul, CIO of Blocktower Capital

At the end of it all, Steem would be riven in two. The Steem Wars also raised disturbing questionsabout how blockchains should be governed, the role of whales with venal interests, and whether crypto exchanges who trade in the tokens affected have any right to get involved in these sorts of community disputes.

This is the story of Steem and its brutal fight for survival.

Despite its awkward birth, Steemit quickly blossomed into a bustling, active community. More than a million people joined, with around 4,000 of them posting daily on everything from technical analysis to discussing Steems most popular game SplinterlandsSteem Monsters. The blockchain grew in value too, reaching a peak market cap of $1.9 billion.

In the Web 3.0 world, where very few consumer-facing projects ever get traction, Steemit was a success story.

In late 2019, Tron Foundation CEO Justin Sun, a young Chinese millionaire and outrageous marketer, best known for paying $4.6 million to dine with billionaire investor Warren Buffett, saw how valuable the burgeoning community could be to Tron, a cryptocurrency platform largely made up of gambling apps. He decided to buy Steemit with the hope of bringing the social network, its cryptocurrency and community to his Tron blockchain ecosystem. The move seemed like a clever way to expand his own growing crypto empire.

Larimer was long gone by this point, so Sun made a deal with Scott: He offered just shy of $8 million to buy the company and the ninjamined stake, according to sources with knowledge of the deal. (Sun declined to be interviewed for this story, as did Larimer and Scott.)

Though the number of tokens had dwindled and the stake now represented some 30% of the total token supply, it was easily enough to establish a massive voting share in Steem's on-chain governance system.

Sun had one condition, however: He said he would only pay 70% upfront, with the balance due once the Steem token was transferred to the Tron blockchain. His plan was to have the Steem token keep its name but run on the Tron network instead.

What happened next was a little like what occurs when Wall Street investors find out about a hostile takeover: When the deal was announced on February 14, the price of Steem tokens rose to $0.30, doubling the value of Suns newly acquired stash of 65 million Steem tokensthe ninjamined staketo $19 million. It was an early, big win for Sun.

But Steems community smelled a rat.

It is clear that the intention is to dissolve Steem, wrote community member Anthony Davis on Steemit. He argued that the community must revolt to prevent the ninjamined stake being used to facilitate a hostile takeover with the express intent to collapse our chain to be assimilated into the Tron blockchain.

Steemians were irked that the social network had been sold in secret. They were worried that Sun now had a huge supply of Steem tokens and were furious that he wanted to rip their token out and stick it on his own blockchain.

In particular, Steem is governed by elected witnesses, who are voted in with Steem tokens via its blockchain-based governance system. The top 20 witnesses with the most votes oversee the blockchain and keep things running smoothly. They felt especially proprietary about the platform. It was theirs, and they wanted to keep it that way.

So they orchestrated a secret planand made a massive first strike.

Imagine being Justin Sun and suddenly finding out that your 63 million tokens, worth $13 million at the time, had been frozen.

Thats what happened on February 23. The Steem community had quietly passed an upgrade that not only stopped Sun from voting with his coins, it prevented him from accessing them at all.

Specifically, the witnesses were able to unilaterally lock out Sun after a simple majority vote passed 19 to 1. They had orchestrated the plan in a private Slack group, ran a software upgrade on the blockchain and froze the Tron Foundation CEOs funds.

It was like shooting first and then talking with them, one Steem community member recently complained to Decrypt. The personwho is actually a Sun supporterasked that his real name be withheld because he had received death threats.

In public at least, Sun appeared to take the coup in stride. He pecked out a letter to Steems community the next day, asking the top witnesses to join a group call on March 6, with the intention of sorting it all out.

I feel it is important to show you guys I am here and ready to begin building with you, Sun wrote, amiably. I am hoping to hear from many Steemian Witness voices to learn and understand how they think we can grow Steem together, and how Steemit Inc can communicate with the witnesses on a regular basis.

Behind the scenes, however, Sun was working on a more cunning scheme. He had decided on a daring move that, if it succeeded, would seize control of the blockchain and rescue his riches.

The Tron CEO started by lining up allies at some of Asias biggest crypto exchanges. The exchanges held huge supplies of Steem tokens on behalf of their traders, which Sun would need to reclaim the blockchain. He could use these cryptocurrency tokens to vote for his own witnesses instead of the community-run ones.

He reached out to Huobis operations team via WeChat, according to Huobi Vice President Ciara Sun, along with crypto exchange Binance and his own exchange Poloniex. Ciara Sun said he warned Huobi that the network was under attack, that funds had been frozen and there was a backdoor in the code that let the attackers freeze anyones funds.

Sun asked Huobi to use its Steem tokens to take over the network so he could pass a crucial upgrade to keep it safe. Ciara Sun said that he didnt mention that the funds involved were his own.

There was, however, one tricky aspect. Steem tokens must be turned into Steem Power to vote for witnesses, a process that takes seconds to do and 13 weeks to unwind. As a result, the exchanges wouldnt get their tokens back for months. Sun offered to try to make the redemption process quicker.

On March 2, they carried out the plan. Sun used the exchanges Steem tokens to rig the voting system, take control of the blockchain and pass an upgrade freeing his moneyputting the full power of the ninjamined stake back in his hands.

He then lashed out. #STEEM has successfully defeated the hackers & all funds are super #SAFU, he tweeted, adding, @SteemNetwork and @steemit community is (sic) now stronger than ever since we united & solved the difficulties!

Such actions are against every aspect of the core value of humanity & decentralization & sanctity of private property. We needed to act immediately to safeguard the #STEEM blockchain & ecosystem when we still had the chance, he added.

But he remained somewhat optimistic, posting on Steemit, This will be nothing but an exciting future.

Later that same day, in Baja, Mexico, Steem community member Dan Hensley, an energetic 63 millionaire with slicked-back dark hair, woke up in his seafront house and saw the news on his phone. Hensley was not a witness but owned millions of Steem tokens and was hugely influential in the community.

He was shocked to see Sun had taken control of the blockchain and thought, This is crazy. This is illegal. What is Sun doing? he later told Decrypt.

What infuriated him was that his own tokens were being used against him. His tokens, thought to be held securely on Binance, were being used to vote him out. They ended up using my Steem poweralmost a millionand locked it up for weeks, he recalled.

Other members of the community were similarly flabbergasted. No one thought in a million years that would ever happen. That Binance would lock up its Steem for 13 weeks, said Matt Rosen, co-founder of Steems most popular app, Splinterlands.

The next day, Hensley sat down at his desk overlooking the Pacific Ocean and fired up his gaming computer for a Zoom call. The chat, with Sun, his representative Roy Liu and members of the Steem community, had been organized to help repair relations among them.

It was during this discussion when Liu revealed that, contractually, Sun was free to do what he wanted with the ninjamined stake. There was nothing in the contract that said otherwise. The community argued he had been misled and that the money was for building out Steemit.

Sun chimed in. He explained that he saw Steemit as a venture capital investment. He wanted to invest in the project for the long term, grow the value of his tokens and sell them at a profit. He told the community, Im not interested in power at all, I just want to make money.

Hensley appreciated the honesty, but was dismayed by Suns approach. After all, you cant just buy a community.

But you can buy votes.

While negotiations were underway, Sun and the community wrestled over the Steem blockchain. The aim of the game was to control all of the top 20 witnessesthose with the most votesbecause, together, they have full control over the blockchain.

Sun had freed the ninjamined stake and was now using it to vote for his 20 witnesses, keeping them in the top spots and giving him the starting advantage.

In return, Hensley rallied the troops. He marched around his room, speaking to community member Acidyo in his wireless headphones. They concocted a plan to mobilize Steems whales, who had millions of tokens, and get them to vote. He got on his computer and sent messages on Twitter, Discord, Steemiteven on the blockchainto anyone sympathetic to the cause.

The plan: Get everyone voting for a few designated witnesses who were hostile to the Sun/Tron takeover.

On March 4, there was a breakthrough when Splinterlandss Rosen, a long time witness, broke into the top 20. It nearly moved him to tears. Soon six more anti-Sun witnesses broke through. I saw people who hated each other, they banded together. It was like an alien invasion, it was really amazing, Hensley said.

"Do you like Justin Sun or you just want to fuck him?"

Tron CEO Justin Sun

In a March 5 post on Steemit, Sun offered to vote for other witnesses so he could try to give back control over the blockchain to any community members that were on his side. He outlined 11 conditions for any that wanted his vote. But he was irascible: his questions read like complaints directed at the Steem witnesses who were defying him. One of his questions: Do you like Justin Sun or you just want to fuck him?

On March 7, Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao announced that his exchange would start powering down its funds, weakening Suns grip on the blockchain. There was a glimpse of hope. Hensley tweeted, I think we're going to pull this off Steemians.

The next day, the community managed to get 10 of their witnesses into the top 20splitting the vote evenly with Sun.

On March 9, Hensley tweeted, UPDATE: We lost two spots last night, we're down to 8 now. Each day we have hit an ATH in voting for our #1 witness, approaching 94mil [Steem Power] now! No one said this will be easy, but we won't surrender & we're prepared for glory.

During the voting war, Hensley spent $400,000 buying Steem tokens to boost the communitys voting power but each time he did, it would significantly bump the cryptocurrencys pricemaking it more expensive to buy. On a call, Steemits managing director Elizabeth Powell told him that Sun was buying 300,000 Steem tokens ($60,000) a day, in response, to keep his witnesses at the top.

On March 15, Sun voted a newly created witness into the top 20 spots. A Steem witness tweeted that he had been a witness for four years and had 11,000 Steemians voting for him, while this new witness had just 29. At the end of the day, it was a stalemate again.

But Sun had one final trick up his sleeve. On March 16, he received a huge supply of 2.6 million Steem tokens ($520,000) from Binance. He used them to increase the votes for his top witnesses and take back control of the whole network.

It was impossible to buy 4 million Steem at that time, said Hensley. Thats when we felt like it was a losing blow.

But there was another way out.

On March 20, Notestein was back in his ranch home, tapping away in his semi-basement. Next to him were two developers coding the future of social media. Only this time, they were his own developers, and they werent building Steemthey were cloning it.

The nearly identical blockchain was called Hive and it would be used to build the social network that the community had always wanted. It would be censorship-free, with embedded cryptocurrency, and everything that made them love Steemit.

But there would be no ninjamined stake, no company controlling it and anyone who voted for Suns witnesses (largely Steemit's Korean community) would get no tokens. It was a fresh start.

And unlike the surprisingly premature launch of Steem, the developers were on hand to celebrate when the Hive blockchainwhich had cost Notestein $500,000 to buildwent live as scheduled, at 10 AM.

Today a dedicated, decentralized community launched the Hive network in response to a centralized attack. I have no idea where token prices will go, but I'm so proud of those who put in the work to make this happen, tweeted former Steem witness Luke Stokes.

When the members of the Korean community saw the code, they realised that many of them had been left out. We had less than 10 million Hive tokens that were distributed to the Korean community. And 4 million tokens erased from users who had voted for at least two witnesses from Tron, an anonymous witness, who was part of the Korean community, later told Decrypt.

But the Steem community argued it was a new blockchain and they were free to give cryptocurrency out selectively. Its the difference between, you walk into a bank and you give out $100 bills to half the people there. Thats perfectly legal. Its not legal to walk into a bank and take $100 from the other half of the people there, said Andrew Hamilton, a lawyer and community member.

There was a backlash on Steemit too. The social networklargely run by Tron developers now since most Steemit team members had quitchanged the terms and conditions to forbid mention of any other network. The day after Hive launched, Sun downvoted a single post about Hive by so much that it showed as a $370 downvote (normally downvotes come to around $1) hiding it from view. Subsequently, any post about Hive was hidden from the site.

It was pretty much everything Steem had stood for was destroyed overnight. It was supposed to be censorship-resistant and the company behind it was actively censoring, said TheMarkyMark, a Steemit stalwart, with 25,930 posts to his name. If you go to my feed, its empty. Everything Ive worked for and done over the last three years has been erased.

Now that Hive was built, some of those left behind on the Steem blockchain found themselves in a world of hurt.

While they had received new Hive tokens when it was launched, they were still in possession of their old Steem tokens. Most community members had already started powering down their tokens, getting a thirteenth of them back each week and selling them for Hive tokens. But during this process, their remaining funds were still at risk.

By April 2, Sun claimed that he had removed all of his witnesses, stating, We will try our best to stay neutral and we will not engage with community decisions in the future. Hensley laughed when he saw that because Suns funds were still keeping the new witnesses in place. Regardless of whether he was running them, he still controlled the blockchain.

On April 4, the Steem witnessesrepresenting Suns votesfroze eight accounts holding $3.2 million of Steem, including Notesteins. Five of the witnesses had never made a single post on Steemit.

But it lit a fire under Hive. In the weeks that followed, Hive grew three times bigger than Steem, reaching a market cap of $234 million.

Witness the rise of crypto anarchy! The most impressive part of this story is not the Proof of Stake power play by Sun. It's that those who dissented exited the network they considered compromised and created one that was EVEN MORE VALUABLE. tweeted Casa CTO Jameson Lopp.

On May 19, the current Steem witnessesstill voted in by Sun, who continued to deny that he was playing a roleannounced further retribution. The next upgrade would not just freeze accounts, but it would forcibly take cryptocurrency out of peoples accounts for supposed criminal activity. Some 23 million Steem tokens, worth $5 million and belonging to 65 accounts, were on the chopping block.

Hensley was furious and reached out to some of the Korean witnesses whom he had met before, asking them how they could do this to him. Some of them later dropped out before the upgrade happened. By the time it went through, Hensley said he could only recognize two of the witnesses as real people; the others were likely fake.

Hensley stayed up all night and stared at the clock as the hour hand moved to 7 AM. He checked his Steem wallet. Then, just like that, his cryptocurrency was gone. He said he felt embarrassed because he was unable to stop his money from being taken in full view of the rest of the world.

They didn't just steal my stake I spent over a million dollars on, they stole my time, my blood, sweat and tears, he said.

Then he did a double take.

The tokens had moved. Not once, but twice. They were no longer sitting in the designated wallet, but had been sent to crypto exchange Bittrex with a message that the funds should be returned to their rightful owners.

The money was saved!

He tweeted, Holy shit did someone just pull the most gangster white hat hack ever?

The anonymous benefactor posted a picture of himself as fictional outlaw Robin Hood. When someone commented, asking what character would be used to play him if this was a movie, he replied, I'd expect no less than Rami Malek, aka Elliot from Mr Robot, referring to the cybersecurity engineer and vigilante hacker in the 2015 TV series.

Robin Hood also sent another transaction to Suns own Steem wallet with a message in Korean that said, Stealing is bad.

But Robin Hood didnt quite save the day. Bittrex refused to hand the funds back to their original owners, putting them under review. On June 16, Notestein, Hensley and other witnesses filed a breach of bailment lawsuitwhere property has been passed to a third personagainst the exchange, in the US District Court for the Western District of Virginia. They hope to get their funds returned but its a long shot.

On July 8, Notestein was yet again in his basement. A whirring fan threatened to blow an empty Citrus Drops can off his desk. He had spent the last two days writing 3,000 words on the future of Hive and it was time to publish it, and see how the community responded.

My vision is to make Hive the most attractive platform for the development of innovative, decentralized applications, he wrote, before diving into the technical details.

It wasnt just a pipe dream. Notestein had the technical expertise, a willing community and no obstacles in his way. The bomb that was the ninjamined stake had exploded, causing a difficultand expensivefallout, and obliterating a once thriving community.

But his dream for this social network was still very much alive.

Update: This article has been updated to clarify how the downvoting system works on Steemit.

Read more here:
Steem vs Tron: The rebellion against a cryptocurrency empire - Decrypt

Cryptocurrency gaining traction in mainstream – Jim Duffy comment – The Scotsman

BusinessBanks are an important element of how we live.

Wednesday, 19th August 2020, 7:30 am

For the last 50 years, they have dominated our high streets. They have been the linchpins in local communities ensuring we can bank our money, save, take loans or sort out financial issues. We have to trust banks to keep our money safe, to stay solvent and to offer services that help us.

Banking has had tough times as there have been a few bad actors and some financial crashes that have left them in tatters. But, they remain, for now, intact. Because we still trust them.

Part of that trust is the fiat currency they trade in. These currencies comprising for example, a 10 note or a $100 bill, are exactly what money is all about. We can buy groceries, a newspaper, petrol and even a three-piece suite if we have the cash.

You, the buyer, have cash in hand, while the newsagent, the vendor, accepts that your cash is worth something and it can be banked. Its all about trust. So, while this is all working, we as a society can function.

But, what happens when that trust is eroded to the point of breaking? What happens when we view cash as having little or no value? Many of you who read these pages will know I am an advocate of cryptocurrencies. I invest in things like Bitcoin, Cardano, Reserve and VeChain. Along with many my age and with the younger crowd, working with cryptocurrencies no longer feels alien or weird.

I would use the analogy of the cash machine. When ATMs were first introduced to Scotland, that was ground-breaking technology. Punching a code into a machine that recognised you, trusted you and provided you with your cash quickly and with a receipt was pioneering within banking.

Cryptocurrency is the next iteration of this old bank technology. But, hey, it will never catch on, right? Businesses will never want to deal in such hocus pocus. Right up until now

Wall Street in New York City is all about banking, cash, money, investments, and wealth. Stock market updates swirl around neon banners on the corners of big buildings. The Dow, The Nasdaq, commodities all matter in this city. Banking and trading is at the core of this global financial district. The US dollar is king and as the global reserve currency it knows it.

Big banks like JP Morgan Chase and Bank of America dominate. Yes, it has been safe to say that cash is king here. Well, that may not be strictly true as a tremor rocked the Big Apple last week. A Nasdaq-quoted business analytics company decided it wanted to change how it banked. In short, it swapped its $250 million cash reserves from US dollars into Bitcoin.

What this signalled is that the trust in the US Dollar, banking or fiat currency is under threat. MicroStrategy is the largest independent publicly traded business intelligence company in the USA. Three months of strategising on gold, silver or Bitcoin resulted in this pioneering company buying 21,454 Bitcoins or 0.1 per cent of all available Bitcoin.

There will only ever be 21 million bitcoin minted. And this helped this Goliath decide to repurpose its corporate treasury programme from cash on its balance sheet to cryptocurrency. This is huge in the crypto and traditional banking world. Not least for the investors in MicroStrategy. It trusted Bitcoin over cash as macroeconomic factors such as the Feds money printing and banking uncertainties were taken into account.

This will not be the last big corporation to consider and execute a cryptocurrency move. I predict major announcements in coming months as confidence in the trust we place in banks and cash dwindles. Historically for bankers, cryptocurrency was the devil.

But consider this. JP Morgan is now providing banking for the one of the largest cryptocurrency changes in the world Coinbase. So, while our banks still look after our cash, there is a sea change taking place in some spaces in corporate America. Cryptocurrency and Bitcoin just got a big leg-up. Perhaps Scotland should now have a real good think about where it wants to be positioned in the next 25 years.

Jim Duffy MBE, Create Special

A message from the Editor:

Thank you for reading this story on our website. While I have your attention, I also have an important request to make of you.

The dramatic events of 2020 are having a major impact on many of our advertisers - and consequently the revenue we receive. We are now more reliant than ever on you taking out a digital subscription to support our journalism.

Subscribe to scotsman.com and enjoy unlimited access to Scottish news and information online and on our app. Visit https://www.scotsman.com/subscriptions now to sign up. By supporting us, we are able to support you in providing trusted, fact-checked content for this website.

Link:
Cryptocurrency gaining traction in mainstream - Jim Duffy comment - The Scotsman

Cryptocurrency Mining Hardware Market 2020 | Know the Latest COVID19 Impact Analysis And Strategies of Key Players: The major vendors covered:,…

Overview of the worldwide Cryptocurrency Mining Hardware market:There is coverage of Cryptocurrency Mining Hardware market dynamics at the country level in the respective regional segments. The report comprises competitive analysis with a focus on key players and participants of Cryptocurrency Mining Hardware Industry covering in-depth data related to the competitive landscape, positioning, company profiles, key strategies adopted, and product-profiling with focus on market growth and potential.

Request For Exclusive Sample PDF along with few company profileshttps://inforgrowth.com/sample-request/6461536/cryptocurrency-mining-hardware-market

The Top players are

Market Segmentation:

By Product Type:

On the basis of the end users/applications,

Get Chance of 20% Extra Discount, If your Company is Listed in Above Key Players List; https://inforgrowth.com/discount/6461536/cryptocurrency-mining-hardware-market

Impact of COVID-19:

Cryptocurrency Mining Hardware Market report analyses the impact of Coronavirus (COVID-19) on the Cryptocurrency Mining Hardware industry. Since the COVID-19 virus outbreak in December 2019, the disease has spread to almost 180+ countries around the globe with the World Health Organization declaring it a public health emergency. The global impacts of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are already starting to be felt, and will significantly affect the Cryptocurrency Mining Hardware market in 2020.

The outbreak of COVID-19 has brought effects on many aspects, like flight cancellations; travel bans and quarantines; restaurants closed; all indoor events restricted; emergency declared in many countries; massive slowing of the supply chain; stock market unpredictability; falling business assurance, growing panic among the population, and uncertainty about future.

COVID-19 can affect the global economy in 3 main ways: by directly affecting production and demand, by creating supply chain and market disturbance, and by its financial impact on firms and financial markets.

Download Sample ToC to understand the CORONA Virus/COVID19 impact and be smart in redefining business strategies. https://inforgrowth.com/CovidImpact-Request/6461536/cryptocurrency-mining-hardware-market

The market research report covers the analysis of key stakeholders of the Cryptocurrency Mining Hardware market. Some of the leading players profiled in the report include:

Research Objective

The report is useful in providing answers to several critical questions that are important for the industry stakeholders such as manufacturers and partners, end-users, etc., besides allowing them in strategizing investments and capitalizing on market opportunities.

Key target audience:

Get Chance of 20% Extra Discount, If your Company is Listed in Above Key Players List AT

https://inforgrowth.com/enquiry/6461536/cryptocurrency-mining-hardware-market

FOR ALL YOUR RESEARCH NEEDS, REACH OUT TO US AT:Address: 6400 Village Pkwy suite # 104, Dublin, CA 94568, USAContact Name: Rohan S.Email:[emailprotected]Phone: +1-909-329-2808UK: +44 (203) 743 1898Website: http://www.inforgrowth.com

View original post here:
Cryptocurrency Mining Hardware Market 2020 | Know the Latest COVID19 Impact Analysis And Strategies of Key Players: The major vendors covered:,...

Cryptocurrency Market 2020: Potential Growth, Challenges, And Know The Companies List Could Potentially Benefit Or Loose Out From The Impact Of…

Global Cryptocurrency Market report forecast to 2026 investigate the Impact of COVID-19 on Industry further market size, manufactures, types, applications and key regions focuses on the consumption of Cryptocurrency in these regions. This report also studies the global Cryptocurrency market share, competition landscape, status share, growth rate, future trends, market drivers, opportunities and challenges, sales channels and distributors.

COVID-19 can affect the global economy in 3 main ways: by directly affecting production and demand, by creating supply chain and market disturbance, and by its financial impact on firms and financial markets.

Get SampleCopy in your mail within 24 Hrs- https://www.worldwidemarketreports.com/sample/346902

Leading Players from the market are covered in this report- Bitmain, NVIDIA Corporation, Xilinx, Intel, Advanced Micro Devices

Impact of Covid-19 on Cryptocurrency Industry 2020

Cryptocurrency Market report analyses the impact of Coronavirus (COVID-19) on the Cryptocurrency industry. Since the COVID-19 virus outbreak in December 2019, the disease has spread to almost 180+ countries around the globe with the World Health Organization declaring it a public health emergency. The global impacts of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are already starting to be felt, and will significantly affect the Cryptocurrency market in 2020.

The outbreak of COVID-19 has brought effects on many aspects, like flight cancellations; travel bans and quarantines; restaurants closed; all indoor events restricted; emergency declared in many countries; massive slowing of the supply chain; stock market unpredictability; falling business assurance, growing panic among the population, and uncertainty about future.

Download Sample TOC to understand the CORONA Virus/COVID19 impact and be smart in redefining business strategies-https://www.worldwidemarketreports.com/covidimpact/346902

Market Segments:

Based on Types, the Cryptocurrency Market is Classsified as Type 1, Tpye 2, etc (details in sample)

Based on Application, this report focuses on the status and outlook for major applications/end users, consumption (sales), market share and growth rate for each application, including Application 1, Application 2, etc (Details in sample copy

Cryptocurrency Market Report Provides Comprehensive Analysis as Following:

Study on Table of Contents:

During thePandemic, get Discount upto 50% https://www.worldwidemarketreports.com/discount/346902

Contact Us:

Mr. ShahWorldwide Market ReportsSeattle, WA 98154,U.S.Email: [emailprotected]

Read more:
Cryptocurrency Market 2020: Potential Growth, Challenges, And Know The Companies List Could Potentially Benefit Or Loose Out From The Impact Of...

How Intel helped give the worlds first cyborg a voice – The Next Web

On a cold November day in 2016, Dr Peter Scott-Morgan was having a long, hot soak in the bath. After stepping out of the tub, he gave his foot a shake to get the water off. But his foot wouldnt move.

Peter was diagnosed with motor neurone disease (MND), the same incurable illness that killed Stephen Hawking.

The disease degenerates the nerve cells that enable us to move, speak, breathe, and swallow.In time, it can render a person physically paralyzed while their brain remains alert, locked into a body it can no longer control.Peter was given two years to live.

But Peter had a plan to beat the prognosis. He was going to become a cyborg.

Peter had a headstart in his race against the illness. He had the first PhDgrantedby a robotics faculty in the UK, a bachelors degree in computing science, and a post-graduate diploma in AI. Hed also written a book titledThe Robotics Revolution.

He used this experience to develop a vision for what he calls Peter 2.0, a cyborg who would not just stay alive, but also thrive.

Hed escape starvation by piping nutrients into his stomach, and avoid suffocation by breathing through a tube. His paralyzed face would be replaced by an avatar, and his disabled body would be wrapped in an exoskeleton standing atop a self-driving vehicle.

He also needed a new voice.

In early 2019, Peter gave a speech at aconference in London. Among the listeners was Lama Nachman, the head of Intels Anticipatory Computing Lab.

Lama had her ownexperience with MND. Her team had upgraded thecommunication system that poweredStephen Hawkings iconic computerized voice.

For Hawking, Intelattached an infra-red sensor to his glasses that detected movements from his cheek, which he used to select characters on a computer. Over time, the system learned from Hawkings diction to predict the next words hed want to use in a sentence.

As a result, Hawking only had to type under 20% of all thecharacters he needed to talk. This helped him double his speech rate anddramatically improve his ability to perform everyday tasks, such as browsing the web or opening documents.

Intel named the software the Assistive Context-Aware Toolbox (ACAT). The company laterreleased it to the public as open-source code,so developers could add new features to the system.

But Lamainitially didnt want to adapt ACAT to Peters needs.

Peter could already use gaze-tracking technology to write and control computers with his eyes. Developing a new one seemed like a waste of Intels resources.

But then we realized the original premise of ACAT, whichwas essentially an open system for innovation,was exactly what was needed, Lama told TNW.

Her team decided to use ACAT to connect all the pieces of Peters cyborg vision: the gaze-tracking, synthetic voice, animated avatar, and autonomous vehicle.

We shifted to do two threads:one was research on the responsive generation system, and the other one was essentially taking ACAT and adding gaze control support.

But Peter still needed a new voice.

Hawking had famously chosen to keep his synthetic voice. I keep it because I have not heard a voice I like better and because I have identified with it, he said in 2006.But Peter wanted to replicate the sound of his biologicalspeech.

Dr Matthew Aylett, a world-renowned expert on speech synthesis, thought he could help.

He recorded Peter saying thousands of words, which he would use to create a replica voice. Peter would then use his eye movements to control anavatar that spoke in his own voice.

Aylett had limited time to work. Peter would soon need a laryngectomy that would allow him to breathe through a tube emerging above his chest. But the operation would mean he could never speak again.

Three months before Peter was due to have surgery, the clone was ready.

Aylett gave Peter a demo of it singing a song:Pure Imagination from the 1971 film Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory.

Peters operation would take place in the month in which hed originally been told he was likely to die.The night before his operation, Peter tweeted a goodbye message alongside a photo with his husband.

The operation was a success. But Peter would remain mute until his communication system was ready. By this point,the exoskeleton and autonomous vehicle had been shelved, but the electronic voice and avatar were still part of the plan.

The system soon arrived. It came witha keyboard hed control by looking at an interface, and anavatarsynchronized with his speech. Peter 2.0 was ready to go.

There was another big difference between Peter and Hawkings visions for their systems. WhileHawking wanted to retain control over the AI, Peter was more concerned about the speed of communication.

Ideally, Peter would choose exactly what the system said. But the more control the AI is given, the more it can help.

A lot of the time, we think when we give people the control, its up to them what they do, said Lama. But if theyre limited in what they can do, youre really not giving them the control.

However, ceding control to the AI could come at a big human cost: it riskssacrificing a degree of Peters agency.

Over time, the system starts to move in a certain direction, because youre reinforcing that behavior over and over and over again.

One solution is training the AI to understand what Peter desires at any given moment. Ultimately, it could take temporary control when Peter wants to speed up a conversation, without making a permanent change to how it operates.

Lama aims tostrike that delicate balance in the next addition to Peters transformation: an AI that analyzes his conversations and suggests responses based on his personality.

The system could make Peter even more of a cyborg which is exactly what he wants.

Peter: The Human Cyborg, a documentary chronicling his transformation, airs on the UKs Channel 4 on August 26.

So you like our media brand Neural? You should join our Neural event track at TNW2020, where youll hear how artificial intelligenceis transforming industries and businesses.

Published August 21, 2020 19:04 UTC

See more here:

How Intel helped give the worlds first cyborg a voice - The Next Web

Open Source and Open Standards: The Recipe for Success Featured – The Fast Mode

Over the last ten years, technological advancements across the world have been remarkable, with the number of things that can be connected growing exponentially. By 2025, it is expected that more than 75 billion devices will be connected to the Internet worldwide. As the decade unfolds, demand will only increase for different types of streaming services and high bandwidth-consuming applications. Therefore, the need to support these coming applications will continue to mount.

To effectively do this, operators and vendors must focus on lowering costs for service deployment, fostering greater interoperability for deployment flexibility, and shortening service deployment times for market agility, whilst maintaining Quality of Experience (QoE). Paving the way for these new requirements is Broadband Forum, which is unifying the best of open standards and open source to deliver the agile technologies that enable the necessary network transformations and services of the future.

The rise of cloudification

Emerging technologies such as 5G and the proliferation of devices driven by the Internet of Things (IoT) have applied significant pressures to the network architecture. As a result, cloud technologies including Software Defined Networking (SDN) and Network Functions Virtualization (NFV) have become a key business consideration.

By introducing cloud concepts into the Central Office (CO), operators can make their networks more agile and scalable by improving flow control and enhancing functional flexibility. With operators well-versed in the benefits of this, it is no surprise how quickly the number of networks leveraging these technologies has grown. For example, the global telecoms cloud market is expected to grow from 9 billion dollars in 2016 to $29 billion dollars by 2021.

However, the challenges around deployment, migrating to a cloud-based CO and how new and old technologies can co-exist remain.

Overcoming the challenges

Addressing these challenges through standardization is Broadband Forums Cloud Central Office (CloudCO) initiative. This open interface is a recasting of the Central Office hosting infrastructure that utilizes NFV, SDN and cloud technologies to support network functions. The CloudCOs functionality can be accessed through a northbound API, allowing Operators, or third parties, to consume its functionality, while hiding how the functionality is achieved from the API consumer. The system acts as a foundation for an ecosystem to evolve, helping the thriving community of suppliers and service providers in their quest to embrace the cloud with all the benefits that interoperability brings.

Unifying open source and open standards in this way is key for network automation and ensuring the efficient delivery of broadband access technologies like cloud, NFV and SDN. Open standards are needed in order to align the industry on common architecture and migration approaches. Without these standards, operators would not be able to protect their existing asset investments and launch new opportunities for service development. Together with open source, standardization will enable seamless co-existence, by ensuring existing equipment can interoperate with new technologies, eliminating the need for all the equipment to be replaced.

Part of CloudCO, one open source solution which has gained significant traction is Broadband Forums Open Broadband - Broadband Access Abstraction (OB-BAA). This allows accelerated deployment of cloud-based access infrastructure and services and facilitates co-existence and migration. OB-BAA can be adapted to many software defined access models and the speed at which service providers can now deploy standardized cloud-based infrastructures has notably improved. This added functionality has enabled flexible solutions needed by SDN/NFV-based networks.

The OB-BAA project is designed to be deployed within the Forums CloudCO environment as one or more virtualized network functions (VNFs). It specifies Northbound Interfaces (NBI), Core Components and Southbound Adaptation Interfaces (SAI) for functions associated with the access network devices that have been virtualized. Building on previous releases of the OB-BAA code distributions, Broadband Forum has most recently published Release 3.0 of its Open Broadband - Broadband Access Abstraction (OB-BAA) open-source project. Release 3.0 provides capabilities to manage Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) based Access Nodes via the vendor's adapters, thus accelerating migration to SDN-based automation platforms. Release 3.0 aims to take OB-BAA to the next level, providing operators with the tools to monitor and enhance network performance, cost-effectively and efficiently.

Collaboration is key

The revolution of the broadband industry is now upon us - and a wide variety of different requirements have to be addressed by operators across the world. The involvement of the whole industry in the standards process is needed to ensure that the new standards developed for the world of automation are scalable and far-reaching.

Overall, OB-BAA will make it possible for operators to migrate to and manage programmable network environments, where new services can be deployed rapidly through interaction with the common abstraction of Access Nodes. Operators and equipment manufacturers will be able to reap the benefits of greater networking flexibility and be able to streamline development by implementing standard interfaces, while differentiating their service offering via stable standardized platforms.

Facilitating an agile, flexible and integrated approach, OB-BAA allows service providers to embrace the best of open source and open standards, creating a programmable broadband network which delivers on the promise of next-generation broadband, while reducing service providers costs and protecting their investments.

To learn more about Broadband Forums work on Open Broadband Software, please click here.

View post:

Open Source and Open Standards: The Recipe for Success Featured - The Fast Mode

Coding within company constraints – ComputerWeekly.com

Assuming that there is at least some level of software development occurring in every business, it needs to be run optimally, be of high quality and be as cost-efficient as possible. At the same time, the pandemic has shown that some software may be called upon to do things that go way beyond its original design goals.

There seems to be a few areas of technology that resonate among the experts Computer Weekly has spoken to about what defines modern software development. Topping the list is containerised microservices. One of the main benefits of this approach is that code can be developed, tested, deployed and run in production in a manner that limits its impact on the stability of the overall IT system.

Conways law states that any organisation that designs a system will produce a design whose structure is a copy of the organisations communications structure. According to Perry Krug, director for customer success at Couchbase, Conways law cannot be fought, but he believes that by understanding its influence, it is possible to work within its constraints.

Its influence extends to the realms of software development, which means modern software development practices need to be cognisant of the organisational structure that exists within a business.

At one level, this may seem to contradict the more collaborative working practices that define modern software development. You need to collaborate to successfully develop applications, says Krug. If new ways of working make close collaboration difficult, collaborate loosely. If shared resources are causing constraints and bottlenecks, couple software more loosely to its foundations. Trends like microservices are an explicit recognition of these constraints and should now be coming into their own.

Some industry experts believe that microservices architecture empowers software innovation.

One of these is Arup Chakrabarti, senior director of engineering at PagerDuty. Microservices enable a far greater focus on customer experience than was previously the case, he says. Isolating areas of the overall code base enables the creation of mini innovation factories across the business each operating at its own pace. With less to integrate, theres less stepping on toes.

However, in Chakrabartis experience, the use of microservices can itself lead to an explosion in complexity and all the challenges that come with that.

Bloomberg, for instance, has split some of its monolithic applications into containerised microservices that run as part of a service mesh. But this architecture has brought its own set of challenges, particularly as it can sometimes be hard for developers to fully understand what is actually going on.

Peter Wainwright, senior engineer on the developer experience (DevX) team at Bloomberg, says distributed trace can help, since it allows an engineer to see all of a services dependencies. Downstream services can also see which upstream services rely on them.

A prime example is our company-wide securities field computation service. Calculations around the universe of securities can take place in many places. Knowing where to route requests for such computations is non-trivial, so we use a sort of smart proxy that becomes a black box router for requests, he says.

Services provide data for requests without needing to know whos asking. Unfortunately, this presents an obstacle when there are performance problems. Distributed trace restores visibility into who I am calling and who is calling me that the monolith previously gave engineers implicitly.

To ensure its engineers could focus on their applications, Bloomberg has built scalable platforms using open source products like Kubernetes, Redis, Kafka and Chef. This, says Wainwright, enables developers to use turnkey infrastructure for the heavy lifting and drop in their application code.

In terms of reducing bugs, there is plenty that can be gleaned from how open source code is tested.

Successful open source projects, like the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) that builds large parts of a Linux distribution, for decades have required running a test suite before submitting a patch for inclusion, says Gerald Pfeifer, chief technology officer (CTO) at SUSE.

He says open source projects like LibreOffice use tools such as Gerrit to track changes and tightly integrate those with automation tools such as Jenkins that conduct builds and tests.

For such integration testing to be effective long term, we need to take it seriously and neither skip it, nor ignore regressions introduced, says Pfeifer.

He believes extensive automation is a key success factor, as is enforcing policies, to ensure code quality. If your workflow involves code reviews and approvals, doing automated testing before the review process even starts is a good approach, he says.

According to Pfeifer, LibreOffice and GCC share an important trait with other successful projects focusing on quality. Whenever a bug is fixed, a new test is added to their ever-growing and evolving regression test suites, he says. That ensures the net which is cast constantly becomes better at catching and hence avoiding, not only old issues creeping in again, but also new ones from permeating. The same should apply to new features, though when the same developers contribute both new code and test coverage for those, there tends to be a risk of having a blind eye.

Describing how its service mesh architecture is tested, Bloombergs Wainwright says: Instead of bundling changes on a fixed schedule, better testing enables us to make changes more rapidly. Changes are smaller, so theres less that can go wrong and mitigation is simpler.

While code quality is often measured in terms of defect rates, error budgets and the like, Wainwright belies the real benefit of easier testing is psychological. Teams confident that their tools have their back will make more progress in a shorter time, he says. That means we deliver more value to our customers faster.

However, as PagerDutys Chakrabarti points out, one of the biggest changes of recent years is customers intolerance for anything less than perfection when it comes to performance. Many believe engineers have their own hundred millisecond rule to contend with. Come back later is no longer an acceptable response, he says.

According to Chakrabarti, the idea of engineering web-scale applications is pretty much taken as given these days, particularly in the wake of the coronavirus, which has seen companies scrambling to support new ways of working. Data from PagerDuty shows that new code and heavier volumes of traffic have resulted in more incidents as much as 11 times more in some sectors.

As an industry, weve got better at fixing things without affecting customer experience, including through an automated approach to digital operations management. Its still early days for auto-remediation, but we are starting to hand over more control to technology. With time and further advances in machine learning, we ought to be able to teach some of our systems to self-heal based on past events even in circumstances that only occur once in a blue moon, says Chakrabarti.

Beyond the technical aspects of developing bug-free code, built in a modern way, such as the self-contained IT architectures and microservices approach discussed earlier, the coronavirus pandemic has made team communications a top priority.

In a socially distanced world, product managers are more important than ever. Developers will know what needs to be done to create a solution if they know what theyre supposed to solve, says Couchbases Krug. However, solving these issues means getting inside the customers head. Expecting developers to become psychologists is a step too far. Instead, there needs to be clear communication between product managers and developers over what customers issues are and ideally what they want their end state to be.

This means fast communication with distributed teams is essential, adds Krug. If it isnt in place, a priority for all teams in a business should be making sure it is.

Follow this link:

Coding within company constraints - ComputerWeekly.com