Here Are the Top Public Companies That Have Adopted Bitcoin as a Reserve Asset | News – Bitcoin News

When Microstrategy Inc. bought $425 million bitcoin in the last two months, the decision became an important stamp of institutional approval of the top cryptos credentials as a mature, safe-haven asset. The American technology firm had just made bitcoin its primary reserve asset to hedge against fiat inflation. Now, it appears major global companies are following Microstrategys bitcoin strategy.

The website bitcointreasuries.org is curating bitcoin treasures held in reserve by publicly traded companies from across the world. At the time of writing, 13 companies with a combined total 598,237 BTC, or 2.85% of the total supply of 21 million BTC, are listed on the page. Here is a closer look at some of the entities.

Grayscale Investments is, perhaps, an unsurprising pacesetter in this regard. Through its Bitcoin Trust Fund (GBTC), which owns and tracks the price of bitcoin, the New York-based firm now holds 449,596 BTC, valued at $5.1 billion currently, and representing 2.14% of the digital assets total circulating supply. Listed on the OTCQX market, the Trust has snapped up 70% of all newly minted bitcoin in 2020, almost doubling its portfolio in the process.

It is noteworthy that Gbtc holds this BTC on behalf of accredited corporate investors, who typically value privacy and bitcoins store of value credentials while calculatively reluctant to gain direct exposure to the asset. Grayscales bitcoin trust became the first publicly quoted securities solely invested in, and deriving value from, the price of bitcoin when it launched in 2013. The company operates ten crypto investment products focused on institutional investors. Funds cover ethereum (ETH), bitcoin cash (BCH), zcash, XRP, and more.

Grayscale may be a pioneer, but it is Microstrategy thats grabbed all the headlines in recent weeks. The Nasdaq-listed company, which develops mobile software as well as provide cloud-based services, bought $425 million worth of bitcoin in August and September, making BTC Microstrategys main reserve asset.

The multi-billion-dollar U.S. firm now holds a total 38,250 BTC, in a move that signals increasing corporate adoption. At current exchange rates, the portfolio is worth more than $433 million a gain of $8 million, coming as it does against a backdrop of increased stimulus spending that has sent global fiat currencies into a tailspin. Microstrategy CEO Michael Saylor is particularly upbeat.

This investment reflects our belief that bitcoin, as the worlds most widely adopted cryptocurrency, is a dependable store of value and an attractive investment asset with more long-term appreciation potential than holding cash, he says.

Corporate adoption may not be considered a trend just yet, but news that Jack Dorseys Square Inc. moved one percent of its total assets into bitcoin suggests something may be building up. On Oct. 8, the New York Stock Exchange-listed mobile payments firm announced it spent $50 million buying 4,709 bitcoin. According to Amrita Ahuja, chief financial officer of Square, bitcoin has the potential to be a more ubiquitous currency in the future.

On this account, the company intends that as it (bitcoin) grows in adoption, we intend to learn and participate in a disciplined way. For a company that is building products based on a more inclusive future, this investment is a step on that journey. Bitcoin reacted positively to Squares news, soaring 8% in the last 72 hours to more than $11,300 from $10,500. With a market capitalization of over $83 billion, Square provides software and hardware payment solutions. In 2019, the company reported revenue of $4.7 billion. It has offices in the U.S., Canada, Australia, Japan, and the United Kingdom.

Coinshares Ltd is a U.K.- based investment fund that is primarily focused on direct and indirect exposure to bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. The company manages over $1 billion in digital assets, with bitcoin making up nearly 80% of this. Coinshares currently holds on behalf of investors a total 69,730 BTC, valued at $790 million, according to bitcointreasuries.org.

Through its subsidiary XBT Provider, Coinshares offers two globally traded exchange-traded notes (ETNs) in bitcoin and ethereum, Bitcoin Tracker One and BTC Tracker Euro, and ethereum, Ether Tracker One and ETH Tracker Euro, respectively. Its ETNs are listed on the Nasdaq Nordic in Stockholm, Sweden and retail investors can buy the instruments. However, the product suffered a blow when the U.K. financial regulator banned the sale of ETNs to retail clients in the country recently.

Several other publicly traded companies are listed on the bitcoin treasuries website. They include bitcoin miners Hut 8 Mining, which trades on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX), and Argo Blockchain of the London Stock Exchange. Both companies hold bitcoin as a reserve asset. At the end of June, Hut 8 held 2,954 BTC while Argo Blockchain had 126 BTC by the end of September. Another mining entity, Riot Blockchain, Inc had 1,053 bitcoin in its reserves in June.

Mike Novogratzs Galaxy Digital Holdings, a TSX-listed firm that seeks to institutionalize the digital asset and blockchain space, holds 16,651 BTC, worth about $188 million at prevailing market prices. The company provides asset management, investing, advisory and trading services as well as making principal investments. Voyager Digital Ltd, Cypherpunk Holdings, and DigitalX also make the list of those public companies holding bitcoin as a hedge against fiat inflation.

What do you think about the bitcoin held by public firms in reserve? Let us know in the comments section below.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons, bitcointreasuries.org

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

Read the original here:
Here Are the Top Public Companies That Have Adopted Bitcoin as a Reserve Asset | News - Bitcoin News

The Silk Road Balance Sheet Discrepancy: Bitcoin Worth $4.8 Billion Still Missing | Featured – Bitcoin News

The original Silk Road marketplace has been shut down for well over seven years now and to this day, 444,000 bitcoin worth $4.8 billion is still missing. Just recently, a report focused on those funds discusses one of the markets biggest mysteries and how people have seemingly forgotten about this massive stash.

A number of people understand that the Silk Road marketplace was shut down by global law enforcement (LE) in October 2013 and LE subsequently arrested Ross Ulbricht shortly after. Individuals are also familiar with the 173,991 BTC ($1.9B) from the Silk Road coins that were seized and later auctioned by the U.S. Marshalls.

However, the public is not wholly aware of the estimated 444,000 BTC ($4.8B) missing from the Silk Road and a recent study from mysteryarchive.com discusses the lost coins at length.

What many people dont know about the Silk Road story, is that the balance sheet does not add up, and everybody just seems to be okay with this fact, the mysteryarchive.com report notes. The author further adds:

Generally speaking, you dont close a case with $4.8B just unaccounted for and this remains the Silk Roads greatest mystery as nobody can answer this simple question.

The findings discuss how the U.S. federal agents managed to seize the 173k BTC and that its quite possible the rest of the funds were stored on another computer. 144k BTC out of the seized stash was found on Ulbrichts laptop, which gave LE full access to the Mastermind dashboard and a list of SR payroll expenses from 2011 to 2013.

Mysteryarchive.com stresses that another computer seems likely, as it is common practice to not put all your wealth in one place. The report is not the only account of the hundreds of thousands of Silk Road BTC still missing from the darknet marketplace.

In 2015, news.Bitcoin.com shared an account from the alleged Silk Road mentor, Variety Jones, who told a tale about an estimated 300,000 to 400k BTC stash. According to Jones, a rogue FBI agent dubbed Diamond was harassing him with an attempt to obtain the hoard of Silk Road coins LE never seized.

My back of the envelope calculations for SR [Silk Road] show that there was easily close to 400,000 BTC that wasnt accounted for yet, Jones wrote at the time. I certainly dont have it, its gotta be somewhere, and Diamond (the rogue FBI agent) is certainly willing to move heaven and earth to get the passphrase for it.

Jones had said the rogue LE official was trying to extort him and the agent was also making an average of $1,000,000 a month, committing felonies with wild abandon, just because he can. Variety Jones, whose real name is Roger Clark, was arrested in Thailand in December 2015.

Oddly enough, Clark wasnt charged for his association with the Silk Road (SR) or his crimes until the end of January 2020. Moreover, two rogue federal agents working with the SR investigation stole thousands of bitcoins acting as double agents.

The recent report details that the missing stash of hundreds of thousands of SR bitcoins may have been lost during the Mt Gox breach. A number of studies over the years have shown a great deal of bitcoins from the darknet marketplace might have found their way into the now-defunct Mt Gox exchange.

Alongside this, Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) agent Jared Der-Yeghiayan discovered interesting connections between Mt Gox and the SR marketplace. A summary of Der-Yeghiayans account was published on Freeross.org in a story called Silk Road Case: The Real, Untold Story.

Der-Yeghiayan had identified multiple accounts belonging to the Silk Road operators that contained bitcoins worth millions of U.S. dollars, the Untold Story studys author notes.

The crypto community may never find out where this stash of BTC went, and can only speculate on how much really went missing. The mysteryarchive.com report concludes that it is noteworthy that Mark Karpeles (CEO of Mt Gox) helped LE with the federal investigation into the SR marketplace. Moreover, the author adds that Karpeles was also once a lead suspect in the case and was accused of being the SR leader at one point as well.

What do you think about the mysterious missing SR bitcoins? Let us know what you think about this story in the comments below.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons, Mysteryarchive.com

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

Go here to read the rest:
The Silk Road Balance Sheet Discrepancy: Bitcoin Worth $4.8 Billion Still Missing | Featured - Bitcoin News

Strong Crypto Again the Target of Western Governments – BankInfoSecurity.com

Encryption & Key Management , Endpoint Security , Governance & Risk Management

Stop me if you think that you've heard this one before: Some governments in the West and beyond are continuing to pretend that criminals will get a free pass - and police won't be able to crack cases - so long as legitimate services that offer end-to-end communications continue to safeguard them using strong encryption.

See Also: Live Webinar | Unlocking the Full Potential of Public Key Infrastructure

On Sunday, the Five Eyes intelligence alliance governments - Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States - as well as India and Japan, published a letter calling on technology companies to only use weak encryption.

The letter begins by stating the importance of strong encryption, noting that it "plays a crucial role in protecting personal data, privacy, intellectual property, trade secrets and cybersecurity," as well as "serves a vital purpose in repressive states to protect journalists, human rights defenders and other vulnerable people."

That is all true. But in a bait-and-switch move, the signatories say any system that uses encryption should allow for law enforcement access.

Cryptographers have a name for encryption systems that facilitate this so-called backdoor or "lawful" access: weak crypto. Here's another name: poor security.

The letter also overlooks another solid use case for strong encryption: to protect individuals from mass surveillance. Indeed, it's worth remembering that Apple and Facebook began building strong encryption into their products and services only after Edward Snowden's leaks revealed a massive U.S. surveillance dragnet, including taps on all of the big service providers' data centers. Captured information, including email content and phone metadata, was being shared across the Five Eyes partnership.

Only strong encryption - free from backdoors - offers the protection consumers and businesses alike require. That's because weak crypto can be easily cracked by everyone from unscrupulous business competitors and organized crime gangs to bored teenagers and unfriendly nation-states. Backdoor access also doesn't prevent malicious insiders - including individuals with law enforcement day jobs - from abusing such access.

For too long, encrypted communications have served as a straw man for governments, for example, when their intelligence services fail to prevent terrorist attacks. Rather than asking if inadequate funding, poor public services, inadequate information sharing or legacy intelligence silos might have been a culprit, it's easier to single out Apple, Facebook or WhatsApp for blame.

The same goes for online child exploitation, which governments often cite as a reason for why strong encryption should not be allowed to exist. Child abuse is horrible - full stop - but outlawing encryption won't magically allow police to identify and arrest every perpetrator.

Proportionality is also key. Just because criminals can abuse a system, does that mean it should be made unsafe for everyone in the name of making it easier for law enforcement agents to eavesdrop?

In fact, numerous law enforcement investigations succeed even when encrypted communications or other systems are in use. Witness the takedown of innumerable darknet marketplaces; busts of illicit narcotics buyers and sellers who interact using legitimate, encrypted messaging apps, such as Telegram, Discord, Jabber and Wickr; or takedowns of numerous encrypted communication systems - and arrests of their operators - which have been designed to serve criminals.

Focusing on how criminals might use strong, legitimate services also overlooks their ability to create their own encrypted communications systems or to choose from a multitude of off-the-shelf offerings produced outside the countries attempting to ban or otherwise curtail strong crypto.

Indeed, four years ago, a team of security experts conducted "A Worldwide Survey of Encryption Products" and found that 865 hardware or software products used encryption. Those products had been developed in 55 countries. Thus, any attempt to restrict the use of strong crypto by criminals or terrorists would fail, argued authors Bruce Schneier, Kathleen Seidel and Saranya Vijayakumar.

The signatories to the Sunday letter, which include U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr and U.K. Home Secretary Priti Patel, aren't just targeting end-to-end encrypted communications services but also "device encryption, custom encrypted applications and encryption across integrated platforms."

They write: "We challenge the assertion that public safety cannot be protected without compromising privacy or cybersecurity. We strongly believe that approaches protecting each of these important values are possible and strive to work with industry to collaborate on mutually agreeable solutions."

But here's the bottom line: Weakening security does not allow for strong security - even if politicians continue to pretend otherwise.

Yes, giving everyone access to strong encryption by default - which criminals will continue to access even when governments ban or otherwise restrict it - can complicate some police and intelligence investigations. But to maximize individuals' privacy and the security of their personal data and the systems they rely on, there is no good or acceptable alternative to strong encryption.

Read more:
Strong Crypto Again the Target of Western Governments - BankInfoSecurity.com

QAnon was on the fringe until this Citigroup executive came along – The Australian Financial Review

Even so, the movement had been contained mostly to the internets trollish fringes until around the time Gelinas came along. In 2018, while doing his job at Citi, he created, as an anonymous side project, a website dedicated to bringing QAnon to a wider audience soccer mums, white-collar workers and other normies, as he boasted.

A Citigroup executive helped turn an obscure and incoherent cult into an incoherent cult with mainstream political implications.

By mid-2020, the site, QMap.pub, was drawing 10 million visitors each month, according to the traffic-tracking firm SimilarWeb, and was credited by researchers with playing a key role in what might be the most unlikely political story in a year full of unlikely political stories: a Citigroup executive helped turn an obscure and incoherent cult into an incoherent cult with mainstream political implications.

In January the House of Representatives will almost certainly welcome its first QAnon supporter, Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene, whos running without serious competition in a district in north-west Georgia, and many other candidates for public office have professed support for aspects of the movement.

The Trump campaign has sometimes asked people not to display QAnon signs at rallies, but they show up all the time anyway. QAnon supporters were also ready with an easy spin on the biggest threat to the Presidents hold on power: his own COVID-19 diagnosis. Trump wasnt sick, the theory goes, he merely retreated from the public eye so that the Storm could begin.

Because its so much more involved than a typical conspiracy theory, QAnon has often been described as a religious movement and, like many religions, the core of the belief system stems from revelations in a foundational text. In this case, that text didnt appear on stone tablets handed down on a mountaintop or on golden plates buried in the ground in upstate New York, but through a series of cryptic postings on a website best known for racist memes and the manifestos of mass shooters. Ironically, for a movement obsessed with the evils of paedophilia, the site, 4chan, was also known as a place to download child pornography.

QAnon supporter, Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene, right, is running for a US House seat without serious competition in a district in north-west Georgia.AP

The revelation was delivered on October 28, 2017, and came from a user calling him or herself QAnon. This person, who claimed to be a government employee with top-secret q-level clearance (a real thing in the Department of Energy), said Clinton would be arrested in two days and that the event would set off massive organised riots.

At the time, 4chan was full of similar nonsense attributed to highly placed government officials. But QAnon or simply Q caught on in a way that competing accounts such as FBIAnon and CIAAnon didnt. The user became the narrator of a tale that cast Trump as the central hero in an epic global struggle, doling out the story in thousands of posts known as Q drops, first on 4chan, then on the even more outr 8chan and its successor site, 8kun.

The identity of Q has been a subject of speculation since the beginning. The theories are all over the place, variously suggesting that Q is Edward Snowden, or former national security adviser Michael Flynn, or the conspiracy-minded radio host Alex Jones, or even Trump himself. One self-published book, which Amazon includes free as part of its Kindle Unlimited subscription, claims to have used a mathematical model to determine that Q is former National Security Agency official Thomas Drake. Drake has denied this but Q would do that, wouldnt he?

If Qs drops are the new movements divine revelations, its rites involve the production and consumption of videos and social media posts often screenshots annotated with arrows and circles revealing hidden connections designed to interpret them. Digging deeper, Qs followers often call it.

Just a few minutes before 1pm on Fathers Day 2018, for instance, Q and Trump each posted a Happy Fathers Day message. Coincidence? Or how about this August, when Trump visited a Whirlpool plant in Ohio and posed in front of 17 washing machines? Q is the 17th letter of the alphabet. Surely this was the President signalling that Q was going to clean things up. Or maybe it had something to do with money laundering?

At first, the primary documents for Q were available only to the bravest of web surfers. Most regular people dont spend much time on 8kun, which is awful in terms of content and interface design. The need to spread the word beyond core users led to the creation of aggregator sites, which would scrape the Q drops and repost them in friendlier environs after determining authenticity. (The ability to post as Q has repeatedly been compromised, and some posts have had to be culled from the canon.) This task, Gelinas once told a friend, could be his calling from God.

On April 5, 2018, Q posted a short message drop No.1030 insinuating that a recent spate of military aircraft crashes was part of a silent war. Later that night, Gelinas registered QMap.pub. His intention, as he later explained on Patreon, the crowdfunding website widely used by musicians, podcasters and other artists, was to make memes, which are harder to police than tweets or Facebook text posts. Memes are awesome, Gelinas wrote. They also bypass big tech censorship. (Social media companies are, at least in theory, opposed to disinformation, and QAnon posts sometimes get removed. On October 6, Facebook banned QAnon-affiliated groups and pages from the service.)

Its times like these that cults can thrive. We have leadership that has tried very hard to change our relationship with reality.

Janja Lalich, sociologist

Gelinas raised thousands of dollars on Patreon each month, posting updates using his pseudonym, QAppAnon. Like many of you, I felt that something wasnt right in the world, that our country was headed in the wrong direction, he wrote. Then something magical happened in 2016 that defied expectations a complete outsider to the political establishment, Donald J Trump, won the presidential election! Amazing. A glimmer of light in the darkness. A few months into the Trump administration, Gelinas changed his party affiliation to Republican, and this spring he contributed $US200 ($280) to Trumps re-election efforts his first-ever political contribution, according to federal disclosures.

QMap developed into a central place for fans to read the drops, to plot and to commiserate on the sites Where We Go One We Go All Prayer Wall. The site wasnt just a repository of QAnon posts; Gelinas served as an active co-author in the movements growing mythology. The clean, minimalist site was designed around tiles dedicated to each Q drop, which Gelinas titled to make them easier to understand. Tabs across the top enabled users to sort by theme or tags, and the hidden players and themes were explicated along the left side with a series of icons a few chess pieces, a globe, a skull. Brief descriptions sorted players by category. (French President Emmanuel Macron and New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman are in the Traitor/Pawn category; Senator Ted Cruz is a Patriot.)

QMap also had a tab for suspicious deaths. John McCain didnt die from brain cancer, according to QMap. One theory is that he was secretly tried [by] military tribunal and sentenced to death, the site said. Q had never made these claims explicitly; they were insinuated by his posts, then interpreted by QMap. It was all laid out in a way where someone could easily start to believe its all true, says Joe Ondrak, a researcher for Logically.ai, a fact-checking website that follows the movement. It was like a red pill factory. (Red pill is a reference to the movie The Matrix, in which characters who want to see the world as it actually is take a tablet of that colour. Its been adopted by right-wing activists to connote the conversion of new believers.)

One young QAnon supporter encouraged QMap to annotate posts with supporting evidence and links to additional reading materials, providing background info for the uninformed so that even his grandma could understand whats going on, Gelinas wrote approvingly on Patreon in the summer of 2018. What a great idea. Its hard to jump into Q if you havent been following it closely.

On Patreon, he laid out a plan to add a team, which he hoped would be staffed by disaffected software developers. Facebook devs: how mad are you. Youve been lied to, Gelinas wrote on Twitter in March 2019. Your talents have been used/abused for evil purposes. Lets build a new platform for the GOOD of Humanity.

By this point, Gelinas claimed he was the No. 2 figure in the movement, behind only Q, according to a friend, and began to dream about turning his QAnon hobby into his main gig. Who knows, maybe QMAP becomes the media platform of the future one day? 🙂 he mused in early September.

By now, QMaps growth had attracted an enemy. Frederick Brennan, a 26-year-old polymath with a rare bone disease, had decided to unmask the person behind QMap. Brennan was a reformed troll. Hed created 8chan, but had a change of heart after the man responsible for the 2019 mass shootings at two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, posted his manifesto on the forum in advance and inscribed 8chan memes on the weapons he used to kill 56 people.

Brennan had come to believe that Jim Watkins, an American entrepreneur whod taken over 8chan and its successor site, 8kun, was somehow involved in QAnon. The mixture of regret over what the sites hed started had become and the grudge against Watkins, who runs 8kun from his pig farm in the Philippines, had sent Brennan on a mission to bring down the site and QAnon. Watkins did not respond to a request for comment.

Brennan started by trying to figure out which companies were operating servers that hosted 8chans content. Then he would post public messages, on Twitter and elsewhere, urging the companies to cut ties with the site. After 8chan was dropped by the cybersecurity company Cloudflare, which protected it from denial of service, or DDoS, attacks, it found safe harbour in a new US-based DDoS protection company, VanwaTech, which had taken an extremely permissive attitude towards controversial content. If its legal, I dont care, says 23-year-old chief executive officer Nick Lim.

This summer, Gelinas also moved his site to VanwaTech. This made him a target of Brennan, who also began pressuring Patreon to block Gelinas site. He referred to QMap in a tweet as the main vector for Q radicalisation. QMap, Brennan explains in an interview, helped turn this anonymous format into a way people can be notified immediately.

Patreon never banned QMap, and Gelinas took down all his posts on the crowdfunding site after he was identified as QMaps owner. In messages exchanged over WhatsApp, he told Bloomberg Businessweek that he has no connection to Watkins and has never met him. He said he began using VanwaTech because it protected QMap from frequent DDoS attacks.

Ondrak, the fact-checker, and Nick Backovic, another Logically.ai researcher, joined Brennans hunt. It took Ondrak and Backovic only a few days to trace an email address associated with Patriot Platforms, which had been listed as the publisher of a QMap mobile app in Googles Android app store, to a post office box in Berkeley Heights, New Jersey.

The next day, the pair published a story outing Gelinas as the operator of QMap. Public records show that Gelinas is the sole employee associated with Patriot Platforms, and New Jersey business records obtained by Bloomberg Businessweek list the companys address as a house in the same town, a few miles from the post office box.

On the morning of September 10, a reporter drove to the house. It was a beautiful day in suburban New Jersey. Gelinas, in shorts and an American flag cap, was in the front yard, filling up a wheelbarrow with cut-up tree stumps.

Gelinas is tall and fit at age 43. He clearly didnt want to talk. He paced around his yard, mostly evading questions, while the reporter stood in the grass. He first said he wasnt Q, though he did allow that he was familiar with QAnon, which he described as a patriotic movement to save the country. Finally, his wife opened the front door and rescued him with a vague request for technical assistance. I dont want to get involved, I want to stay out of it, Gelinas said before he disappeared into the house and, rather than asking the reporter to leave, called the authorities. A few minutes later, after the reporter had left the property, two police SUVs showed up.

That afternoon, QMap.pub and the social media profiles of Gelinas and his wife disappeared from the internet. Within days, Citi had put him on administrative leave and his name was removed from the companys internal directory. He was later terminated. Mr Gelinas is no longer employed by Citi, the company says in a statement. Our code of conduct includes specific policies that employees are required to adhere to, and when breaches are identified, the firm takes action.

In the weeks after he was outed, Gelinas mostly ignored reporters calls and text messages, though he did acknowledge he was the only developer for QMap and clarified several other points. Im not going to talk about my own story right now, he said. When the time is right, it will come out.

QMaps disappearance has been a significant but temporary setback for the QAnon movement. Its not going to be a death blow to the QAnon community, but it is a disruption, says Travis View, a conspiracy theory researcher who hosts a podcast dedicated to QAnon. QMap popped back online a few days later, but it now consists entirely of links to other QAnon aggregator websites.

Google has tried to make it harder to find such QAnon sites by keeping them from showing up in searches, and Facebook and Twitter have blocked links to them, though posts about Q are easy to find on Facebook and other social networks such as Telegram. Followers also sometimes spread the word about Q-related sites by writing their URLs on signs and holding them up at Trump rallies.

Meanwhile, Gelinas project of bringing the gospel of Q to the mainstream is alive and well. Late this northern hemisphere summer and early this autumn, Q supporters organised a wave of in-person rallies, ostensibly to combat human trafficking, many of them under the social media hashtag #SaveTheChildren. Some established anti-trafficking groups, including the real Save the Children, a 101-year-old British non-profit, complained they were being co-opted in dangerous ways.

Janja Lalich, a professor emerita of sociology at California State University at Chico whos studied cults for decades, says internet movements such as QAnon have grown at an alarming rate, because of a political debate thats become increasingly unmoored from a set of universally agreed-upon facts. Its times like these that cults can thrive, she says. We have leadership that has tried very hard to change our relationship with reality, and people are grasping at straws. The last four years have been precedent-setting in creating an atmosphere of disbelief.

Returning from that collective delusion, Lalich insists, wont be easy. Its very daunting, she says. You have to give up everything you believed in and decide what to believe again.

Bloomberg Businessweek

See the rest here:
QAnon was on the fringe until this Citigroup executive came along - The Australian Financial Review

Heroes & Villains: Witnessing the Assange Hearing Byline Times – Byline Times

James Doleman reflects on the Old Bailey hearing into the Wikileaks co-founders contested extradition to the US for the publication of classified documents

Every story needs a hero is the quote that kept going round and round in my head when I tried to sum up the four weeks I spent covering the Julian Assange extradition hearing in London.

For the protestors outside, the hero was clear. They chanted and spoke about how Assange was a hero of the modern age, the man who created the intelligence agency of the people. Inside the halls of the Old Bailey, the court heard from witness after witness about the importance of the information that Wikileaks revealed: the exposure of crimes and torture by the US and its allies in the post-9/11 wars.

Yet, Assange himself remains a controversial figure, not least due to his response to sexual assault allegations in Sweden dropped by prosecutors last year and his alleged support for Donald Trump during the 2016 US Presidential Election.

It wasnt hard finding the villain in the tale: the US Government.

We heard in detail about its actions; its original crimes revealed by Wikileaks; torture; the extradition of a German citizen; Khaled El-Masri, who was kidnapped from Macedonia, tortured, taken to a black site in Afghanistan only for four months later to be hooded, put on a plane and landed in Hungary, where he was left. When he returned home to Frankfurt, his family was gone, having assumed he was dead.

Daniel Ellsberg, the former US marine who leaked the Pentagon Papers, which many believe helped to end the Vietnam War by revealing just how the American people had been lied to over the course of the conflict, testified in the second week via video link. He noted that, when he worked at the top level of the American Government, accounts of war crimes in Vietnam were held at the highest level of secrecy, with only a few people having access to the information.

In this case, he testified, the accounts leaked were held on a computer system that could be accessed by more than 100,000 people which he described as a sign that torture and assassination have been normalised.

It was not a normal trial.

Usually a witness stands up in court, gives their evidence, and is cross-examined. In this hearing, the presiding district judge, Vanessa Baraitser, had ruled that evidence would be presented through witness statements.

Witness statements are present in every trial they are produced so that both the prosecution and defence have an idea of what a witness night say, in order for both sides to prepare. They may be referred to by opposing barristers, but usually only to point out if a statement varies from what has been testified from the witness stand. In this case, the statements were the evidence.

This led to the odd situation whereby a witness was only heard from if the US Government wanted to challenge the evidence being presented. Perhaps accidentally, in this way, it led to the American side having an effective veto over what the court heard. The prosecution could simply state that it did not wish to challenge a piece of testimony, while not accepting it was true, and then a summary of it, the gist, was just read out and we all moved on.

The US prison system, which could await Assange, also had its day in court.

The regime facing the Wikileaks co-founder for a potential 170-year prison sentence was that of a US supermax, we were told a jail under the oh so blandly named Special Administrative Measures (SAMs).

The court heard from Maureen Baird, the former warden of the Metropolitan Correctional Centre in New York, who had a unit containing SAMS prisoners. She described a regime of a prisoner being locked for 23 hours a day in a cell the size of a parking space, with their only exercise being taken from that cell and locked in another empty one for an hour and then returned. She told the court that staff were instructed not to interact with the inmates and that the unit was generally speaking unmanned as the prisoners were under lockdown.

You can scream and no one hears you, she said.

There are many other issues in this case to be discussed, but Ill finish with this.

Ive not forgotten about the hero. As the month went on, it was clear that there was one and her name was Chelsea Manning.

Manning was a 22-year-old sergeant in Iraq, working as an intelligence analyst. Watching the evidence of war crimes crossing her desk, she tried to alert her superiors, but they ignored her, so she gave Wikileaks the Iraq and Afghanistan war logs. They revealed what was really happening in our wars of choice, to show the true cost, as she told her court martial.

For that, she was sentenced to 35 years in jail, under Special Administrative Measures.

She served seven years before having her sentence commuted by President Barack Obama in 2017.

In February 2019, she was re-imprisoned for refusing to testify against Assange and spent another year in solitary confinement. She was only released in March 2020.

Every story needs a hero and, in this one, its Chelsea Manning.

A judgement is expected in Julian Assanges extradition hearing on 4 January 2021.

James Dolemans coverage was made possible by Bridges For Media Freedom

Read the original here:

Heroes & Villains: Witnessing the Assange Hearing Byline Times - Byline Times

All Stella Moris wants is to free the man she loves – 9Honey

All Stella Moris wants is for the man she loves to be allowed to come home. Instead the couple are in the fight of their life and trying to avoid his extradition to the United States where he will face charges for treason for his work, even though he is not a US citizen.

Her partner, Australian Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, is facing 175 years in prison for what Moris calls "publishing the most important journalistic scoops in the past fifty years".

"We miss each other terribly," she tells 9Honey. "We talk several times a day and he is able to speak to the boys regularly. It keeps him afloat. But it's been a very long time now and it's very hard.

"We are all suffering and once we are reunited, I hope to go back to a quiet life," she says.

Moris, 37, met Assange, 48, while he was in asylum at Embassy of Ecuador in London from which he was recently removed. He was placed in notorious HM Prison in Belmarsh and is reportedly in ill health. He is now fighting extradition to the United States where he is facing treason charges.

RELATED: Julian Assange to hear UK judge's verdict on US extradition in January

They have two children - Gabriel, two, and Max, one.

"If Julian is extradited our children will be fatherless," Moris says. "I will lose him forever, but so will the rest of the world.

"The children don't yet understand what is happening to their father and I want to shield them as much as possible from this nightmare," she continues. "They know daddy loves them and misses them and wants to come home."

Moris says she tells them their "daddy is a hero".

"I don't tell them he's in a prison, just that he can't come home with us when we go to visit him in the 'big house'."

Before going public with their relationship on Nine's 60 Minutes in June, Moris feared for their safety but felt she had to speak out following the most recent attempts to extradite him to the US.

She has been in court each and every day of the hearing and her contact with Assange is limited to one phone call each day.

"He is brought to court each day in a security van, which is effectively a vertical coffin. It's a claustrophobic hour and a half every morning and afternoon," she says. "He's handcuffed, strip searched and x-rayed. The court proceedings are chaotic."

RELATED: Everything we know about Julian Assange's fiance Stella Moris

She feels frustrated at how Assange is currently being treated, saying he hadn't seen his lawyers for six months when these hearings started.

"The first time he saw them was when the hearings started two and a half weeks ago," she says. "He's a spectator not a participant. The judge has ruled he will not sit with his lawyers, so he can barely speak to them.

"He's in a glass box in the court room. His defence is grossly disadvantaged for these and other reasons."

She says it's hard going to court each day knowing "he will be taken away at the end of the day rather than come home".

"I know that to bring him home I need to raise awareness, so I try to stay focused on that," she says.

Moris wants people to know the Assange she does, a "good, thoughtful man" and "the most principled man I know".

"He feels it is a duty to strengthen democratic accountability by exposing wrongdoing, uncovering war crimes and holding governments and corporations to account," she says.

Moris say she feels "heartened by the growing support" for Assange's plight.

"The cross-party parliamentary group in Australia has done incredible work," she says. "It lifts Julian's spirits to know that there is support from all sides of politics, in the leadership and the grass roots."

She isn't so complimentary of the Australian Government, saying they must "step in to save it's citizen from this situation".

"The Australian government must also step in to show that it really does believe in the right to freedom of expression and the freedom of journalists and publishers to reveal inconvenient truths without fear of a political persecution," she says.

"Scott Morrison can call up his counterpart and tell him the Australian government is opposed to this extradition going ahead," she says.

"The public can also press the government that if Julian wins this case, the Australian government will act to ensure we are safe and refuse any future attempts by the US to extradite Julian if we live there," she says.

On 2 May hearings began into the US government's request to extradite him with a decision expected on 4 January 2021.

Moris says she won't stop fighting for Assange's freedom.

"Whatever happens, we need to continue to fight for Julian's freedom for as long as it takes," she says. "If we lose, we will appeal against the decision and continue the fight in the courts."

Email Jo Abi at jabi@nine.com.au.

Original post:

All Stella Moris wants is to free the man she loves - 9Honey

Travesty! A presence of evil pervading the Assange trial destroys all confidence in British justice – Redress Information & Analysis

Stuart Littlewood writes:

This morning [12 October] I was catching up as usual on the ever-reliable Craig Murrays day-to-day reports of what passes for a trial at the Old Bailey under the shabby standards now governing British justice. Im talking of course about the trial to extradite Julian Assange which is nearing its nauseating climax.

Murray has been extraordinarily dedicated and resourceful in bringing out the truth from a cruelly fixed process to which public access has been suppressed.

Here is an extract from his piece Where is my final Assange report? which for me sums up the disgraceful performance put on to appease the American administration in its lust for revenge for having its vile secrets exposed. Murrays words are a chilling indictment.

In that courtroom, you were in the presence of evil. With a civilised veneer, a pretence at process, and even displays of bonhommie, the entire destruction of a human being was in process. Julian was being destroyed as a person before my eyes. For the crime of publishing the truth. He had to sit there listening to days of calm discussion as to the incredible torture that would await him in a US supermax prison, deprived of all meaningful human contact for years on end, in solitary in a cell just 50 square feet.

Fifty square feet. Mark that out yourself now. Three paces by two. Of all the terrible things I heard, Warden Baird explaining that the single hour a day allowed out of the cell is alone in another, absolutely identical cell called the recreation cell was perhaps the most chilling. That and the foul government expert Dr Blackwood describing how Julian might be sufficiently medicated and physically deprived of the means of suicide to keep him alive for years of this.

I encountered evil in Uzbekistan when the mother brought me the photos of her son tortured to death by immersion in boiling liquid. The US government was also implicated in that, through the CIA cooperation with the Uzbek Security Services; it happened just outside the US military base at Karshi-Khanabad. Here was that same evil paraded in the centre of London, under the panoply of Crown justice.

And who is the Justice Secretary responsible for this nasty charade? Robert Buckland. If anyone deserves a good smacking he surely does.

And so does the journalism profession if they still have the nerve to call themselves that. The Assange case is about journalism true journalism; why werent the mainstream insisting on access and covering it?

More here:

Travesty! A presence of evil pervading the Assange trial destroys all confidence in British justice - Redress Information & Analysis

The Australian Government has to get involved: Greg Barns SC on the plight of Julian Assange – Criminal Law – Australia – Mondaq News Alerts

To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Last week marked the close of evidence in the currentproceedings involving Julian Assange. The United States isattempting to have the Australian journalist and publisherextradited from the UK, under the UK-US Extradition Treaty.

This is somewhat suspect as the treaty specifically rules out extradition when the criminal charges involved arepolitical in nature. And seventeen of the eighteen charges laidagainst the Wikileaks founder are espionage related.

Another stark anomaly is that the US government has reachedacross international borders and arrested an Australian citizenover publishing material that took place on foreign soil. Andmeanwhile, the UK has remanded Julian in prison for over a year now.

Presiding over the case in the Old Bailey, Judge VanessaBaraitser indicated at the end of the hearings that she won'tbe handing down her final decision until 4 January: two months after the US presidentialelection.

The eighteen charges Assange is facing carry maximum penaltiesthat add up to 175 years. And the court heard last week that if theAustralian journalist is extradited and subsequently convicted, he's likely to be sent to the federal supermax prison inColorado: the nation's toughest.

Also known as ADX Colorado, this maximum security facility is reserved for those who've been convicted of the mostheinous crimes: the Mexican drug lord El Chapo, the Unabomber, anOklahoma bombing conspirator and the coordinator of the World TradeCentre bombing.

If incarcerated in this centre, Julian would also likely beplaced on the special administrative measures regime or SAMS. This wouldinvolve no communications with other inmates or the outside world,except for one half hour phone call a month.

SAMS also involves being placed in continuous solitaryconfinement, with limited exercise time, which is taken alone. Thisconstitutes torture in most rationally minded books, including theUN'sMandela Rules on the minimum standard treatment ofprisoners.

Australian barrister Greg Barns co-signed the Lawyers forAssange openletter in mid-August, calling on the UK government to releaseJulian, and calling out the torturous treatment the Australiancitizen is already subjected to in London's BelmarshPrison.

As an advisor to the Assange campaign, Mr Barns is keenly awareof the injustices and inconsistencies that are involved in the caseof the man who revolutionised journalism, only to be persecuted forit.

And Barns asserts the Australian government needs to step in toassist the Townsville-born man.

SydneyCriminal Lawyers spoke to Greg Barns SC about the Kafkaesquenature of the extradition trial, the reasons Assange's plightshould be of concern to all Australians, and why it's timelocal journalists put the pressure on foreign minister MarisePayne.

There is no doubt this case is a travesty of justice, at anumber of levels. Firstly, the charges themselves are inherentlypolitical.

It needs to be remembered that the United States are seeking toextradite Assange because he revealed serious war crimes committedby the US in the theatres of war of Iraq and Afghanistan, mostgraphically illustrated by the video CollateralMurder.

It also needs to be remembered that this is the first occasionthe United States has sought to use domestic espionage laws againsta person who has not entered the United States jurisdiction, is nota citizen of the United States, and who has published materialwhich is seen to be adverse to the interests of the UnitedStates.

So, the precedent that's set is quite dangerous for anyother person including journalists who publishmaterial which the United States considers to be adverse to itsinterests, in circumstances where that person never enters theUnited States jurisdiction physically or even in an onlinesense.

The other issue is in relation to the fact that JulianAssange's lawyers in London have had a difficult time beingable to access their client.

He's being held at Belmarsh Prison, which is maximumsecurity. He's being held in conditions which are clearlyinhumane, including effective solitary confinement.

And his lawyers have been acting in circumstances wherethey've had great difficulties in getting access to theirclient.

They're three of the most obvious points that can be madeabout this particular process.

Firstly, it's a complex case, and I'm not privy to thejudge's workload. Although it would have been preferable tohave this matter resolved before Christmas and the new year. But itwill be resolved on 4 January in terms of this court.

Again, this proves the point that this case is inherentlypolitical, as there's no doubt there may be some shift inposition on the part of the United States Department of Justiceafter the election.

But you would not want to take that risk, because at the end ofthe day, if Julian is extradited to the United States, he faces aneffective death penalty of 175 years.

So, simply waiting for a new administration in the United Statesto get around to looking at the Assange case is not in my viewsufficient.

There is an urgency about this case for a whole range ofreasons, including the fact that it's a threat to freedom ofspeech, and it needs to be resolved quickly.

One would have thought that there's sufficient technologytoday to ensure that more people get bail, and that includes JulianAssange.

There's no doubt that his detention has led to adeterioration in his mental and physical health. There was evidenceof that in the hearing. And his detention has made life verydifficult for his lawyers in terms of obtaining instructions.

So, it does mean that there's an inherent unfairness aboutthe way in which the proceedings are being conducted.

That evidence was extraordinary, and it confirmed what a numberof us have been saying for many years: that if Julian Assange isextradited to the United States, he will face on a daily basiscruel and unusual punishment and torture, and he will face aneffective death penalty.

The real issue here is, why does the Australian government standaside from this process, sit on its hands and refuse to assist anAustralian citizen in circumstances when that's the future forthem.

If this was a case where Julian Assange was being extradited toChina, the Australian government would be pulling out allstops.

It has to get involved in this case, if for no other reason thanthat sort of punishment should not be tolerated and no Australian in fact, no person should have to endure it.

Successive governments have failed to deal with Julian'scase. I would say a notable exception was Julie Bishop, who, in mydealings with her indirectly, treated this matter more seriouslythan others.

Australia's alliance with the United States is such that theAustralian government thinks for some reason this is not a matterthat it can put on the table for negotiation.

Well, that is wrong.

There is no loyaler ally, as Bob Carr, the former foreignerminister, has said. And therefore, there's no ally in a betterposition to ensure that one of its citizens is not subjected to aneffective death penalty. And that's what needs to happen.

Every Australian should be concerned. It could be you. It couldbe any of us. And that is not an exaggeration.

I am surprised that more Australian journalists have not beenpushing foreign minister Marise Payne on this issue, because thiscase represents a direct threat to freedom of speech for thereasons I've outlined earlier.

It's fundamentally important that the Australian mediainvolve themselves more in this case. They did so in the case ofDavid Hicks some years ago now, in different circumstances. Andthey need to do so again, because it's a direct threat tofreedom of the press.

But it's also a direct threat to the life of an Australiancitizen.

The content of this article is intended to provide a generalguide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be soughtabout your specific circumstances.

Go here to read the rest:

The Australian Government has to get involved: Greg Barns SC on the plight of Julian Assange - Criminal Law - Australia - Mondaq News Alerts

We need to smash Starmer and Johnsons disgusting duopoly. Thats why Im running for London mayor. – The Canary

Boom. Bam. You know who it is. This is Drillminister, aka Young Drilly writing for The Canary. People know me for using my music to fight back against political violence; using words as a weapon against the repression of the poorest people in our society:

But now, Ive got to take it to another level.

Since Jeremy Corbyn was hounded out of the Labour Party by the right-wing guard dogs in our billionaire-owned mainstream media, our chances for a fair and equal Britain have been torn from the bones of our society.

Its been replaced by an opposition that does not oppose; forcing its members to abstain from voting against the Overseas Operations Bill legislation that could literally make it easier to commit war crimes.

We have a resistance that doesnt resist. Its one that says nothing, as journalists like Julian Assange who expose war crimes are sat up in the dock like a criminal.

Oh wait, hold on.

Wasnt Sir Keir Starmer head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) when they contacted Assanges Swedish prosecutors to tell them not to drop the case?

And if thats whats left for us, whats on the right?

An openly racist, blonde buffoon, leading a party that has punished poor and disabled people with benefit sanctions. A party thats left people to starve to death in one of the richest countries in the world.

A governing party, whose chief advisor can openly break the law without getting any shit.

And why not?

If its legal for the government to sell arms to Saudi Arabia and train pilots thatll help to bomb civilians in Yemen the poorest country in the Middle East with tens of millions of men, women, and children in need of humanitarian aid then what?

If its legal to give out government contracts worth billions of pounds to businesses linked to high-ranking members of government without competition and in a time of national crisis then what?

If its legal to allow the worlds biggest companies to avoid paying tax, losing the country billions of pounds every year then what?

Then, maybe we need new laws. Maybe we need new leaders.

I am running for London mayor in 2021 because we need a change from this disgusting duopoly that our political system has become.

I am building a manifesto that comes from the bottom up; building a better London by working with those who are currently experiencing the worst of it.

Our campaign needs to hear from those the elites want to ignore.

So, if you want justice justice for Grenfell, justice for poor people, and justice for minorities vote for Drillminister.

Watch Drillminister explain further why he is running for London mayor in 2021:

Featured image and additional images via Drillminister

Go here to read the rest:

We need to smash Starmer and Johnsons disgusting duopoly. Thats why Im running for London mayor. - The Canary

The Time to Tell – ArtsHub UK

If, a few years ago, youd told the story of 2020, it would have been of the cli-fi genre, a hypothetical, highly fictive tale of climates changing, pandemics pressing and power atomising. In six months, reality has overtaken the fictive and normalised in the new Normal. Except nothings normal and no-one knows whos in control of the story.

Back in 2017, I interviewed Julian Assange at a public event in Australia as he was sequestered in the Ecuadorean Embassy, London. Over the course of 82 minutes he described the conditions of living in the modern, democratic world, a story of an increasingly problematic relationship between government and the people in which the people live under the illusion of governments promise to protect and defend when, in fact, government is serving a set of interests that are almost exclusively private. As his extradition hearings play out in the UK, Ive recalled the emotions in the room that day as the story unfolded, pennies collectively dropping in the audience as confusion gave way to clarity, scepticism to conviction, bemusement to horror. It was a compelling, persuasive reconfiguration of facts, values and principles that contested the dominant world view.

Read: When fiction and life collide

Assanges narrative went further, suggesting an illusory fog had been created to hide the fact that our governments and large corporations were no longer in control of the technology they deployed and invested in, and that this represented an existential threat. Three years ago, it seemed a bridge too far, the stuff of fiction, but it lines up almost perfectly with the story collectively told in The Social Dilemma by a bunch of insiders at Google, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and YouTube a counter-narrative to that of their former employers involving the evolution of algorithms that are no longer in the control of their creators and that leverage our base instincts above our better ones for profit. According to former Google Design Ethicist, Tristan Harris, the existential threat has moved from Assanges them, to us. Over 94 minutes, the documentary evinces a similar cocktail of responses in the viewer: fear, horror, confusion and anger.

Contesting the narrative is the sport of our times. Controlling it is an obsession.

It has been made ever more complex by social media platforms that carry a cacophony of multiple texts comprising whole-truths, half-truths, fake news and rants that have atomised the narrative, dispersing it into millions of parts for consumption and cultivation in echo-chambers, chat groups and dark web sites.

I asked Assange whether being cooped up in the one place had altered his ability to tell his own story. He said it was impossible to control your narrative but being physically confined he felt the need to project himself out into the world and, for him, that was through social media. Those platforms did not serve him well. There were many missteps, own goals and traps set by adversaries.

The main problem is the medium.

Truth struggles to be told in sound bites, tweets and memes; they serve bullshit much better. The whistle-blowers of The Social Dilemma attest to that; the algorithm thrives on our base instincts. Unsurprisingly, Donald Trump is a master of the social medium. He holds truth in contempt.

Time is also a casualty, more specifically, the time we devote to things, our attention-span. Reception is reduced to click, swipe and scroll and what was onscreen and in the mind a flick ago, is no longer there now. We are goldfish.

Truth needs time to be told. 94 minutes on the machinations of social media; 82 minutes on the existential threat of technology. The US Government wants to put away Assange to ensure he never has the time to tell his story again. If they can imprison him, his time will be on endless pause.

The arts are not without its own constraints. We often feel that we are on the right side of things, fighting battles against the wrong side of things. We often feel ours is the space of affect, of emotions, indeed of harnessing emotions to make a better world. The fact is that our artistic dramaturgies are beholden to a financial dramaturgy that is vested in powerful interests. Self-censorship is implicit in many of our artistic and governance relations. Climate change is a good example.

In her 2019 film, Fossil Fuels and the Arts, contemporary artist Gabrielle de Vietri brilliantly tells a story many of us refuse to listen to and deliberately turn away from: a disturbing intimacy between the arts sector and fossil-fuel producers via board representation, sponsorship and partnership arrangements. The film is only 31 minutes and features a cameo from Australia Council for the Arts Chair and former Rio Tinto CEO, Sam Walsh. It tells a tale that resonates in complexity with the counter-narratives of Harris and Assange. It is not an easy tale for a young artist to tell.

Read: When to say no to sponsorship

These stories stick, they contest vested interests, disrupt the status quo, seek to represent a truth that is alternative to the absolutes enshrined in triumphalist narratives. They are stories that demand our attention across time.

This is an equation that aptly describes the practice of many artists. We need our publics, readers, audiences, spectators to attend to our work in real time. What we make is hard to process and contain. How we make it is an alchemical process that challenges order with its essential elements chaos, irrationality, incompleteness. It needs attention. It requires time. Unfashionable elements in our contemporary world.

Of the three protagonists in this story, only de Vietri is an artist although she is on a professional hiatus, pursuing a career in politics. De Vietri is of special note because of her leadership in the boycott of the 2014 Sydney Biennale, told here in 47 minutes. But there are many artists who tell difficult stories in their own time. I recently worked with novelist Claire G Coleman whose vision of an Australia 10 years into the future is mapped through the conquest of white supremacy spoken in a tick over 15 minutes.

Theres performance artist Casey Jenkins who announced recently on her FB page that the grant for her self-insemination performance, IMMACULATE which can take up to 30 minutes has been rescinded by the Australia Council for the Arts. Theres visual artist Baiducao whose 2020 exhibition titled Made in Hong Kong, Banned In China was shown in Australia 18 months after being made in Hong Kong and banned in China.

Read: China's pursuit of diaspora artists

The world is re-calibrating its matter, direction and values at an exponential rate. It is the task of artists to bend time so that new and alternative narratives can be drawn and attended to, despite the fear and favour meted out by authority. It is also time that we defend each other for doing so.

Art in real time is the most transgressive of contemporary experiences.

Art sends signals that pierce the noise.

Continued here:

The Time to Tell - ArtsHub UK