Geospatial Python: Do you need to learn it? – Geospatial World

Python is believed to be a great language for geospatial projects. Anita Graseris a legendary open-source geospatialPython expert. Shes been working withQGISand Python since 2008 as an integration solution to automate mapping and to look at data in different fashions, not just from the command line or in graphs but also in maps.Lets hear from her why Python may or may not be a good option for your GIS project.

A. It wasnt always clear thatPython would bethe best language for GIS. Not until ArcPy and PyQGIS came out around 12 years ago. These two implementations taught us that Python isversatileandeasy to learn, and you can manipulate data with it.Who in the GIS world wouldnt want to use a flexible tool for wrangling their data from a file or a database into something usable? Python does precisely that.

Its alsoeasy to interfaceit withPostgreSQL and PostGIS, andthe possibilities are endlessfrom then on for automating workflows with scripts. For model builders, for example, its possible to export models as Python scripts or write them from scratch in whichever workflow you prefer. There is also a vast opportunity of building extensions for desktop GIS and server-side GIS applications using Python with plugins in open-source as well as in proprietary systems.

There are many reasons why Python is now the universal language of GIS its a glue that holds things together.Once you know Python and realize its usefulness for geospatial data manipulation,you are no longer just pushing buttonsprovided to you, you are in control and have the freedom tocreate your own tools and processes. It has an element of self-documentation thats hard to find. You cant forget to document a certain parameter when youre writing code, and you can look it up later if you need to go back. This is helpful in cases when you inherit someone elses workflow.

Python is widely adopted in the geospatial worldand as such geospatial processes written in python are sharable and repeatable. While there may be different environmental variables that need to be tweaked and data that also needs to be shared, it is possible to share your work and let others use your code and build on top of your work.

A. If you already know some programming language, its possible to get into geospatial and apply Python specifics as you go because itsnot a hard language to learn.

If you dont have a programming background, youd be smart to cover the basics first, such as loops, functions, classes.

In both cases, most users,especially GIS people, do better if they have geospatial specific motivation and inspiration.They want to see something on a map, really quick. They want the first steps into this new, unknown to be related to what they do in geospatial.

A good intro to writing Python code is to create a model in a graphical model building and then export it a Python script. You can play around with feeding data the different parameters in the script and see how they affect the outcome. This also gives you an understanding of how Python code is structured and how the different components are chained together.

When people see that theyre not tied to the standard tools in the graphical interface, they realize how flexible programming is and how much they can get out of a model builder. This is real motivation.

Model builder scripts are only the first step. Once you start executing things outside of the program, like manipulating parameters, youll come across things you cant solve quickly with a model builder. Knowing Python and howyou can program something from scratch is a great motivation.

A. Scalais efficient and advanced. Knowing Scala and Java is immensely helpful they are related and can be used in combination with each other. Either of those would be able to solve challenges for large datasets that need to be manipulated effectively in distributed computing environments.

A. GeoPandas is a relatively new, open-source library thats a spatial extension for another library calledPandas.Its been around since 2008, and its been designed to make data analysis easy.

Pandas uses a concept called data frames theyre tables of data or time series of data if indexed by timestamp. Pandas acts like a database by putting on indexes to filter the data.

It comes with convenient functions to read and write files with missing numbers. If you have null values (no measurements have been recorded in a time series, for example), Pandas gives you options to calculate values for those rows or correctly interpret the null value in the same way a database would.

Thiscould be the last observed value or the interpolation between the previously observed value and the following value thats in the data set. Who doesnt want these functions when working with real-world data?

The Pandas library also comes with the ability to pivot and reshape tables and groups, do merges and plot.

Theres a lot you can then do in Python that generally requires a database. You can write a standalone script and no longer depend on a database or having to carry out your data analysis in cookie-cutter ways.

In 2013, GeoPandas entered the scene and made it possible to store geometries in the data frames (much like Postgres and PostGIS) by building on the existing Pandas libraries. Libraries such as:

GeoPandas is a fantastic tool for geospatial programmers because its easy to write standalone code that can be used outside of the typical desktop GIS environment. Its a good choice for non-GIS programmers who are familiar with Pandas and it makes it easier to build geospatial capabilities into existing python codebases without the need to install desktop environments like QGIS or ArcGIS.

Good programmers take whats working (GeoPandas) and build on top of it or extend it. There is no need to reinvent the wheel every time. Use whats already working and build a component yourself that will solve your particular problem. If Fiona has been reading your geospatial file formats for years, integrate that.Assemble compatible modules the nature of models is evolving, and versions keep changing so remember to check their compatibility!

A. You should always follow the installation instructions of the respective library you use.They know the current working configuration best. In the case of GeoPandas, useConda installation. (Python installations come with PIP for package installing.

PIP, however, doesnt work with some of the GeoPandas dependencies, particularly on Windows.) Conda is therefore recommended by GeoPandas to cover all major operating systems. You can run Conda from the command line or use a desktop application,Anaconda, with a graphical user interface. It lists available packages, and you can click the ones you want. It will automatically resolve dependencies and install the correct versions to ensure a working environment.

Once youve done your set up, Anaconda has multiple IDEs (Integrated Development Environment) or editors.SpyderandPyCharmare two options, they are available for free or with a free community edition, respectively. PyCharm has the advantage that it has the exact same layout as IntelliJ a popular Java editor that Java developers are familiar with. It has convenient functions for refactoring and making it easy to read code thats self-explanatory.

A. If you work with movement data, you need a specific tool. There is a library calledMovingPandas, and if you have vehicles, people, or goods that move and you need to track them or analyze the data, its a library you should go to and use.

A. Python has proven to be a reliable companion to data scientists from variousdifferent backgrounds. Libraries like GeoPandas fill the gap between nonspatial data scientists and people with geospatial expertise. They can work together on integrating spatial analysis capabilities and machine learning, deep learning, and AI that most data scientists work with.

For research, there is considerable potential toimprove reproducibility, particularly with technologies such asJupyter Notebooks. You can record and analyze step by step and show the intermediate results and the plots you might generate for a report or for a scientific paper in the context of that code.

In the past, you wrote a script, you ran it, and it dumped images into a directory. You then looked at both sides to find a figure in the output directory and decide if it made sense and reflected on what was going on.

In Jupyter Notebooks, you execute one part of the notebook, called a cell, and it will immediately plot the output under that cell. It can be text or interactive graphs, such as a leaflet map or a plot. You can see how this would make it easier to debug issues and understand the data analysis flow. If youve ever had the honor to inherit someone elses data processing workflow, youll appreciate this step by step debugging functionality and managing the code.

Pythons popularity is stillon the rise, and there arent many contenders on the horizon. There is something for everyone in Python.Its easy to get intoas a beginner, and itsefficient, especially if you can write some parts in CPython, which is what under the hood users see, and its much more performant. Once you get into Python, there arent too many reasons why youd want to abandon it.

People from the Java community, and people who work in Big Data settings (Hadoop and Spark), have started tobuild a bridge to Python. PySpark allows Python to interface with these Java Virtual Machine worlds and Big Data settings it will be around for a long time, and I encourage people to learn Python.

A. If youre working with a pre-established system thats a Java-based language, its not recommended that you introduce this interface without a valid reason to do so. Youd be better off sticking to the Java world. There are libraries for geospatial use such as GeoTools.Mixing and matching languages isnt a good idea.

If you are starting from scratch, and your work is related to data science, then use Python.

Thus, the reasons to learn Python are many. Hope you feel inspired to begin your journey to discovery!

See the article here:
Geospatial Python: Do you need to learn it? - Geospatial World

Gamers.Vote, MTV’s Vote For Your Life and VENN Team Up Ahead of Vote Early Day for "Fall-o’-Ween", a First-Ever Voter Turnout Event -…

Shot as a live production from VENN's state-of-the-art broadcast studio in Los Angeles, VENN's on-camera stars Chrissy Costanza (Host of Guest House and Lead Singer for Against the Current) and Daniel 'dGon' Gonzalez (The Download) will host and cast the event. Viewers will be treated to celebrity appearances from Felicia Day and Tee Grizzley, and many more surprises to come. During the headline Fall Guys tournament, a star-studded roster of 40 professional athletes, streamers, and musicians will compete as teams of four, vying for $40,000 in prizes for their team's charity of choice - all to drive voter turnout among young gaming audiences ahead of the first Vote Early Day.

Celebrities from across the entertainment spectrum are coming together for Fall-o'-Ween to encourage gamers to vote on Vote Early Day. This one-of-a-kind event will see iconic esports organizations 100 Thieves and Dignitas pitted against each other and sharing a stage with NBA players like Josh Hart and platinum recording artists, Wallows.

"For decades now, MTV has led the charge to mobilize young people to channel their passion into action during critical times for our country," said Erika Soto Lamb, Vice President of Social Impact at MTV. "The 2020 election is no different so we're innovating and expanding our reach by partnering with VENN and Gamers.Vote to meet young people where they are to make sure the engaged and passionate gaming community is ready to 'Vote for Your Life' ahead of Vote Early Day."

"Our goal at Gamers.Vote is to make sure that every single person in the gaming community that wants to vote has the information they need," said Christie St. Martin, CEO of Gamers.Vote. "This election is shaping up to have the highest voter turnout in American history - and young, engaged audiences are critical to determining our future. Early voting is essential to ensuring all votes are counted and all voices heard."

"The VENN production teams are responsible for some of the most important tentpole global events in gaming and esports history," said Ariel Horn, Co-CEO of VENN. "Partnering with MTV and their rich legacy of social impact initiatives, and Gamers.Vote and their critical cause of encouraging early turnout, is both an honor and a commitment we take seriously."

About MTV's Vote For Your Life

Vote For Your Lifeis a mass voter registration, early voting, and get-out-the-vote campaign created in response to the specific challenges of the 2020 election season. The campaign provides voters with the tools to make it easy to quickly check registration status, request a ballot and make a plan to vote early. http://www.voteforyourlife.com

About Gamers.Vote

Gamers.Vote, a nonpartisan, non-profit organization that encourages and supports the act of participation, Gamers.Vote leads a coalition of various organizations as a unifying brand to make voting a priority. We hope gamers will register and vote so that their voices may be heard.

About VENN

VENN is a live 24/7 network for gaming, streaming, esports and entertainment audiences. Launched in August 2020 and broadcasting live from Playa Studios in Los Angeles, VENN is universally distributed across a broad range of media platforms, creating a frictionless "watch everywhere, instantly" viewing experience for the digital generations. VENN offers original programming produced in-house and in partnership with some of the biggest names and creators across the gaming, pop culture and lifestyle spaces. Watch now at http://www.venn.tv and follow at @watchvenn across all social platforms.

About Vote Early Day

Vote Early Day, October 24th, 2020, is a collaboration among over 2,500 media companies, nonprofits, technology platforms, election administrators, influencers, and other businesses to help all eligible voters learn about their early voting options and celebrate the act of voting early. This collaborative, open-source model - similar to Giving Tuesday and National Voter Registration Day - will ensure that millions more Americans take advantage of their options to vote early. http://voteearlyday.org/

The Story Mob for VENN: [emailprotected] DKC for VENN: [emailprotected]

SOURCE VENN

https://www.venn.tv

View original post here:
Gamers.Vote, MTV's Vote For Your Life and VENN Team Up Ahead of Vote Early Day for "Fall-o'-Ween", a First-Ever Voter Turnout Event -...

IBM Call for Code Names Winner of 2020 Global Challenge and Announces New Initiative to Combat Racial Injustice – CSRwire.com

Published 8 hours ago

Submitted by IBM

IBM News Room

ARMONK, N.Y.,October 20, 2020/CSRwire/- Where most people see challenges, developers see possibilities. That's certainly been the case in 2020. Today,Call for Codefounding partner IBM (NYSE: IBM) and its creator,David Clark Cause, announced the winner of the 2020 Call for Code Global Challenge. The top prize went to Agrolly, an application to help the world's small farmers cope with the environmental and business challenges of climate change.

Call for Code also introduced a new initiativeCall for Code for Racial Justiceto urge its international community of hundreds of thousands of developers to contribute to solutions to confront racial inequalities.

The announcements came during a virtual event, the "2020 Call for Code Awards: A Global Celebration of Tech for Good." A full replay can be watchedhere.

The 2020 Call for Code Global Challenge had asked developers to create solutions to help communities fight back against climate change and COVID-19. A panel ofindustry leaders and judgesawardedAgrollythe grand prize while announcing four other winnersone that also created a response to climate change, and three others aimed at the global coronavirus pandemic.

Agrolly will receive$200,000, support from IBM Service Corps and technical experts, and ecosystem partners to incubate, test and deploy their solution. Agrolly will also receive assistance from The Linux Foundation to open-source their application so developers across the world can improve and scale the technology.

Call for Codeunites hundreds of thousands of developers to create and deploy applications powered by open source technology that can tackle some of the world's biggest challenges. Since its launch in 2018, this movement has grown to more than 400,000 developers and problem solvers across 179 nations, and has generated more than fifteen thousand solutions using technology including Red Hat OpenShift, IBM Cloud, IBM Watson, IBM Blockchain, data from The Weather Company, and APIs from ecosystem partners like HERE Technologies and IntelePeer.

Top Solutions Tackling Effects of Climate Change and COVID-19

Agrolly was created by a distributed team of developers fromBrazil,India,MongoliaandTaiwanwho met atPace University in New York City. Powered by IBM Cloud Object Storage, IBM Watson Studio, and IBM Watson Assistant, Agrolly aims to fill information gaps so farmers with limited resources can make more informed decisions, and obtain the necessary financing to help improve their economic outcomes.

By combining weather forecasts from The Weather Company and historical data from NASA with crop requirements published by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Agrolly's platform provides tailored information for each farmer by location, crop type and even the plants' stage of development during the growing season. The Agrollyteam, as part of their response to the Call for Code Challenge, has made the solution available as an app in the Googlestore, free of charge.

Another climate change solution,OffShip, received fifth place and was awarded$10,000.

Three COVID-19 solutions were also honored. Second place went toBusiness Buddy, which will receive$25,000.Safe Queuewas given third place and$25,000;SchoolListItwas awarded fourth place and$10,000.

Safe Queue, an app that enables a safer way to manage entry during COVID-19 at shopping centers, small businesses, and polling places by replacing physical lines with on-demand virtual lines, had been recognized in early May as one of the top solutions in the Call for Code accelerated COVID-19 track. Since May, IBM specialists and partners have worked to further incubate, test, anddeploySafe Queue's solution with organizations across the country.

"All of the submissions in this year's global challenge clearly show the immense potential of technologies based on hybrid cloud, AI and open source to address critical issues like climate change, COVID-19 and more," saidBob Lord, Senior Vice President, Cognitive Applications and Ecosystems, IBM. "We know the developer community has the skills, desire and ingenuity to tackle the world's thorniest issues. What we're providing through Call for Code is a catalyst to galvanize that community to take on specific societal challenges, as well as the open source-powered products and technologies to bring their vision to reality. Through this powerful combination, brilliant ideas like Agrolly can be transformed into the scalable solutions the world needs today."

Winners in the University Category

Chelsea Clinton, Vice Chair,Clinton Foundation, announced the inaugural winner of the Call for Code University Edition, a collaboration between IBM and the Clinton Global Initiative University.

Pandemap, created by a team of students from UC Berkeley to monitor and manage crowd flow and promote social distancing during COVID-19 will receive$10,000.Lupe, created by university students in theUnited Kingdom, was named runner-up. Team members from Pandemap and Lupe also receive the opportunity to interview for a potential role at IBM.

"Now, more than ever, the scope and urgency of the issues we're encountering demand diverse perspectives and expertise and we're proud to partner with IBM for the second year to advance university efforts that are committed to doing just that," Clinton said. "Reaching over 53,000 students from more than 45 nations in 2020, we saw a tremendous and inspiring movement of young people, investing their time and talent during Call for Code. The passion, collaboration and innovation of our students is what will help unite and propel our society forward."

Advancing Racial Justice

The announcement of Call for Code for Racial Justice follows three years of successful global programs addressing natural disasters, climate change and COVID-19. Call for Code for Racial Justice encourages the adoption and innovationof open source projects to drive progress in three key areas of focus: Police & Judicial Reform and Accountability; Diverse Representation; and Policy & Legislation Reform.

Together with partners likeBlack Girls Code, Collab Capital, Dream Corps, The United Way Worldwide, American Airlines, Cloud Native Computing Foundation and Red Hat, Call for Code for Racial Justice is inviting developers to apply their skills and ingenuity to combat systemic racism.

The tragic deaths ofGeorge Floyd, Amaud Arbery,Breonna Taylor, and many others, serve as a reminder that silent carriers help spread racism, and the fight against it is as urgent as ever. The new initiative began with Black IBMers and allies taking action with an internal IBM program called theCall for Code Emb(race)Challenge. Solutions created and developed through that program are now being opened to the world to build upon through Call for Code for Racial Justice.

"Black Girls Code was created to introduce programming and technology to a new generation of coders, and we believe that a new generation of coders will shape our futures,'' saidAnesha Grant, Director of Alumnae and Educational Programs, Black Girls Code. "We're excited to participate in Call for Code for Racial Justice and to spark meaningful change."

Call for Code for Racial Justice is planned for launch at the virtualAll Things OpenonOctober 19.

"Each year I'm amazed by how this global community of developers comes together to help solve some of the world's most pressing issues, and this year is no different," said Call for Code creatorDavid Clark. "Through the support of UN Human Rights, IBM, The Linux Foundation, the Call for Code ecosystem, world leaders, tech icons, celebrities, and the amazing developers that drive innovation, Call for Code has become the defining tech for good platform the world turns to for results."

About Call for Code Global Challenge

Developers have revolutionized the way people live and interact with virtually everyone and everything. Where most people see challenges, developers see possibilities. That's whyDavid Clark, the CEO of David Clark Cause, created Call for Code in 2018, and launched it alongside Founding Partner IBM and their partner UN Human rights.

This five-year,$30 millionglobal initiative is a rallying cry to developers to use their mastery of the latest technologies to drive positive and long-lasting change across the world through code. The Call for Code community includes United Nations Human Rights, The Linux Foundation, United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, Clinton Foundation and Clinton Global Initiative University, Cloud Native Computing Foundation, Verizon, Persistent Systems, Arrow Electronics, HERE Technologies, Ingram Micro, IntelePeer, Consumer Technology Association Foundation, World Bank, Caribbean Girls Hack, Kode With Klossy, World Institute on Disability, and many more.

Call for Code global winning solutions are further developed, incubated, and deployed as sustainable open source projects to ensure they can drive positive change.

Media Contact:Deirdre Leahy(845) 863-4552deirdre.leahy@ibm.com

Innovation joining invention and insight to produce important, new value is at the heart of what we are as a company. And, today, IBM is leading an evolution in corporate citizenship by contributing innovative solutions and strategies that will help transform and empower our global communities.

Our diverse and sustained programs support education, workforce development, arts and culture, and communities in need through targeted grants of technology and project funds. To learn more about our work in the context of IBM's broader corporate responsibility efforts, please visit Innovations in Corporate Responsibility.

More from IBM

Read the rest here:
IBM Call for Code Names Winner of 2020 Global Challenge and Announces New Initiative to Combat Racial Injustice - CSRwire.com

Social media censorship threatens to widen rift in U.S. – Boston Herald

This week, social media giants Twitter and Facebook proved that their monopolistic malpractice is a big problem for politics and culture in America.

When the New York Post published a story about suspicious emails that had been allegedly discovered between Hunter Biden and officials at the Ukrainian energy company Burisma, where he was paid tens of thousands of dollars a month to serve on the board, the revelations were remarkable.

In one alleged missive from 2015, a Burisma adviser named Vadym Pozharskyi thanked the vice presidents son for inviting me to DC and giving an opportunity to meet your father and spent (sic) some time together. Its realty (sic) an honor and pleasure.

The Biden campaign has insisted that no such meeting was found to be on the official schedule, but they do not outright dispute the content of the emails or deny that an informal meeting could have occurred.

A year earlier, right after the younger Biden had been added to the companys board, Pozharskyi asked him for advice on how you could use your influence to convey a message/signal to put a stop to an investigation into the company. Later, Vice President Biden bragged he had been able to get the prosecutor fired.

The trove of correspondence was passed on to the Post by Rudy Giuliani who has been loudly trying to draw connections of corruption between interests in Ukraine and Joe Biden via his son, Hunter.

According the the New York Post, the emails were recovered from a computer that was dropped off at a Delaware repair shop and never retrieved. It is not known who dropped the machine off.

What makes all this most newsworthy is that Joe Biden, the Democratic nominee for president, has been denying that hed ever taken part in his sons business overseas or that he was even aware of what that business was.

These emails go directly to refuting that and suggest that Biden was used by his son for payment in exchange for influence.

Thus, the story ran and was distributed through social media until prominent, anti-Trump users demanded that it stop.

Kyle Griffin, an MSNBC producer with more than 900,000 followers tweeted, No one should link to or share that NY Post report. You can discuss the obvious flaws and unanswerable questions in the report without amplifying what appears to be disinformation.

Andy Stone, who works in the communications department at Facebook but has a long resume featuring jobs with various Democratic organizations was also containing the story. While I will intentionally not link to the New York Post, Stone tweeted, I want be clear that this story is eligible to be fact checked by Facebooks third-party fact checking partners. In the meantime, we are reducing its distribution on our platform.

By the afternoon, Twitter started blocking sharing of the article in any form, warning users away from the link, and locking prominent accounts that shared it, including that of the New York Post itself, Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany and the Trump campaign account @teamtrump.

In doing so, they turned a shady October surprise leak that would have been ignored by many in the mainstream into a major story that is reverberating through the country. What, many Americans wonder, do these massive tech companies want so badly to hide from them?

The selective censorship by social media monopolies threatens to divide our nation to a degree we have never seen before.

Read the original:

Social media censorship threatens to widen rift in U.S. - Boston Herald

Twitter Limited The Sharing Of New York Post Story Is It Social Media Censorship? – Forbes

Social media platforms Twitter and Facebook limited the distribution of a story that appeared in The ... [+] New York Post this week.

On Wednesday the social media platforms Twitter and Facebook limited the distribution of a story that appeared in The New York Post, which reported an unconfirmed claim about Democratic Presidential nominee and former Vice President Joe Biden. The Biden campaign had pushed on the report that Joe Biden met with a representative of the Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings in 2015.

As the story, which ran on the front page of the paper under the headline "Biden Secret E-mails," began to make the rounds on social media it was quickly shuttered. Facebook limited the distribution of the story after its outside fact-checkers reviewed the claims, and as a result the platform's algorithms wouldn't place posts linking to the story as high up in an individual's news feed. That would reduce the number of users who might ever see the story.

Twitter went even further, and blocked users from linking to the Post's two stories about the Biden e-mails, while it also blocked users from posting pictures of the alleged emails mentioned in those stories. Attempts to share the story on Twitter were met with a message, "Tweet failed to send. Your Tweet couldn't be sent right now and has been saved as a draft. Please try sending it again later."

#TwitterCensorship Makes the Rounds

The actions by the social media platforms, especially those of Twitter, have prompted complaints from conservatives that information critical of Joe Biden and his son Hunter was being censored. This of course prompted a new round of tweets on Twitter with the hashtag #TwitterCensorship.

User Brian (@brainfortrump) tweeted, "FACEBOOK AND TWITTER are the ICS NETWORK from THE RUNNING MAN!" A clear reference to the 1987 Arnold Schwarzenegger science fiction film The Running Man, which featured a dystopian society where misinformation is spread via TV.

Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) (@tedcruz) took it further and tweeted, "My letter to @jack regarding @Twitter's censorship of the @nypost," where the Senator called out Twitter's CEO directly along with an image of the letter that was sent to the company.

Many other users on social media also accused Twitter as well as Facebook of censorship. One user, #IAmAntifa #BlackLivesMatter (@Freethoughts212) addressed this debate from another direction and tweeted, "@jack funny you censor stories about Joe and Hunter Biden yet haven't gotten around to terminating proud boys and white supremacists accounts! We see you Jack ass!" Almost ironically this tweet, which clearly called for individuals and groups to be silenced, was accompanied with #TwitterCensorship and #CensorshiopIsBadActually.

Is This Really Censorship

Cleary a lot of people see this as censorship and even some think that perhaps a few individuals or groups should be silenced. Yet, this isn't really a case of censorship and we've been down this road before. It was just a year ago that YouTube was called out for removing a controversial video.

"Social media companies, like other companies, have the freedom to choose how they want to run their business, as long as they comply with applicable law," Robert Foehl, executive in residence for the business law and ethics department at the Ohio University Online Master of Business Administration program, explained at the time.

"A significant concern that has been raised over the last few years relates to freedom of speech, censorship, and social media's role in the free expression of ideas," Foehl added. "There is increasing concern about the impact that social media content decisions have on that freedom. However, it is important to remember that the constitutional right to freedom of speech in the United States only protects against inappropriate restrictions of speech by state actors (government and related institutions).Our freedom of speech rights do not generally apply to non-governmental entities, like private companies. As such, the right to free speech does not apply to speech contained in social media platforms."

Senator Cruz, who served as longest serving Solicitor General of Texas from 2003 to 2008 after graduating magna cum laude in 1995 with a Juris Doctor degree from Harvard Law School, should know the answer far more than the average American. Twitter can't really be accused of censorship, at least not in the way that the government could be.

At least one individual on Twitter (@katypicklejar) asked a valid question: "Would ya rather have #TwitterCensorship or government Censorship?"

See the rest here:

Twitter Limited The Sharing Of New York Post Story Is It Social Media Censorship? - Forbes

Censoring for the good of the people – Daily Mountain Eagle

Daniel L. Gardner

Allum Bokharis just released book, DELETED, makes an impressive case that the Internet has become the transit that tech companies use to censor everything we read, hear, say, or think.

In one chapter Bokhari wrote about Dr. Robert Epstein, former editor in chief of Psychology Today, who has studied potential effects of search engine results on political decision-making for years. In 2013 Epstein selected a diverse set of American participants and presented them with a choice between two political candidates.

Participants were given brief profiles of the candidates, and asked to rate each one according to five measurements. Votes for the two candidates were evenly split among the participants who were then divided into three groups. Two groups were given programmed search engines with heavily biased information toward one or the other candidate. The third group was given balanced information, and each group was given 15 minutes to search the Internet.

Results: The proportion of people favoring the search engines topranked candidate increased by 48.4 percent, and all five of our measures shifted toward that candidate. Whats more, 75 percent of the people in the bias groups seemed to have been completely unaware that they were viewing biased search rankings.

Bokhari wrote, As a result of his research, Epstein has called Google the most powerful mind-control engine ever created. He believes that the vast power of search engines to alter our political preferences stems from the fact that the users of the technology dont perceive search results to be biased.

In a later chapter Bokhari wrote about The Good Censor, an inside document leaked out of Google in October 2018. Quoting the document he wrote, big tech firms [the document cites Google, Facebook, and Twitter] have gradually shifted away from unmediated free speech and towards censorship and moderation. (Please note that Google, Facebook, and Twitter lean hard LEFT favoring Biden and undermining Trump.)

The document itself admits these companies control the majority of online communication. Authors of the document discuss only two models of controlling speech on the Internet: one that prioritizes free speech for democracy, and another that favors dignity over liberty and civility over freedom. The document also says that since 2016 all major tech platforms have shifted their control away from free speech and toward dignity and civility, i.e. censorship.

During the pandemic weve heard a lot of debate from those who value liberty (Bill of Rights) vs. those who value safety (follow the science). These days we cant have it both ways given the governments new orders and authority.

For example, Kenneth Cleveland, M.D., Executive Director of Mississippi State Board of Medical Licensure sent the following memo to All Licensees of the Medical Board, after receiving complaints about licensees advice not being consistent with the guidance and/ or orders coming from MS Department of Health (MSDH) and the Governors office.

Cleveland continued, Orders from the MSDH and the Governors office are legally binding orders and should be obeyed to the greatest extent possible. If you are asked to advise a public or private institution, or for that matter if you are advising a patient, you should base your advice on evidence-based medicine and not personal views.

At every political level authorities are making us do it what they deem best. We are being mislead and divided.

__

Daniel L. Gardner is a syndicated columnist who lives in Starkville, Miss. You may contact him at PJandMe2@gmail.com.

See the original post:

Censoring for the good of the people - Daily Mountain Eagle

Opinion/Letter: Left-wing media is censoring the truth – Seacoastonline.com

opinion

Oct. 15 To the Editor:

Lately, if you have noticed, opinion letters submitted to the editor from those on the left have far outweighed those sent in by writers on the right. It has come to my attention that a number of letters forwarded for publication by right leaning writers never made it to print. In recent months, two of my submissions were not published. Reasons given were they either inflammatory or not fact based. For the record, my letters are always steeped in fact and, yes, many contain a certain edge.

In contrast, I look at at letters sent in by those on the left. They are not hard to identify. A great proportion of these letters are merely opinions not backed by any facts. Many are inflammatory and contain lies and innuendos. Just look at submissions made by Robert Azzi. His letters, which contain indecipherable parables, are laser focused when it comes to disparaging the President. Yet, every week or so he is granted space to inject his venom. My last letter countered one of Azzis offerings but the opinion editor never let it see the light of day. I do wonder if the lefts letters are treated in the same fashion.

Now I look at the New York Posts expose which alleges that Hunter Biden got his hands caught in the Russian and Chinese money jars. The question then becomes what did Joe Biden know and when did he know it. If true, Joe Biden instantly becomes a counterintelligence threat to this country. The Russian hoax pales in comparison to possibilities raised here. What is particularly unnerving is the fact this story is being treated in an Orwellian manner by media platforms. It is being censored. The media, corrupt as it is, is all in on Biden winning the Presidency. It is Big Tech that calls the shots on just what news it wants to see and hear. This alone should scare you half to death but I guess if youre left-leaning you care less about the censorship which is now taking place.

Fosters, I believe, is contributing to the censorship issue by cherry-picking what opinion letters it wants to publish. Well thought out letters from the right side of the ledger see the waste paper basket while outrageous letters from the left find their way to print. 1984 has finally arrived and the thought police are roaming around the social media platforms. Soon enough the mantra you might hear is Censorship is the cornerstone of a free society. Is journalism dead? Fosters, look in the mirror and honestly answer the question. Live free or die.

Dan Hurley

Dover

Editor's note: Our papers receive more than 100 letters each week and we do our best to publish all of them. If your letter does not appear in a timely manner please send a follow-up email to opinion@seacoastonline.com and we'll track it down. We do reserve the right to edit letters for length, clarityand to verfify statements of fact. While we try to publish all letters in print and online, the longer the letter the more difficult to run it in print.

Follow this link:

Opinion/Letter: Left-wing media is censoring the truth - Seacoastonline.com

How Not to Respond to Twitter and Facebook’s Alarming Censorship of the New York Post | Yal Ossowski – Foundation for Economic Education

Call it election interference, censorship, or simple editorializing, but Twitter and Facebook's throttlingof several New York Post articles this week has drawn lots of criticism.

The storiesallegethat Hunter Biden, former Vice President Joe Bidens son, introduced Ukrainian energy adviser Vadym Pozharskyi to his father after receiving acushy$50,000 a month board seat at the company Burisma. (Other outlets have contested the report).

There is no question that the social networks in question made a bad call. Disabling the link on the various platforms made even more people seek it out, creating a Streisand Effect of mass proportions.

But the content of the articles isn't what really matters.

The reaction to the New York Post report reveals just how much pressure is put on social networks to perform roles far beyond what they were intended for. We want them to simultaneously police speech online, keep the networks free for open discussion, and be mindful of fake news" that spreads rapidly.

So, it is important to understand why Facebook and Twitter felt they had to censor the story in the first placeand why all of us are actually to blame. For the last several years, campaigners, activists, and politicians have primed us all to accept the byzantine expectations and regulations put on social networks.

From Netflix documentaries such asThe Social Dilemma andThe Great Hack to the criticisms of surveillance capitalism, many voices are callingfor further regulation of social media networks.

Some on the Right smirk as Sen. Josh Hawley pens legislation torepealSection 230 of the Communications Decency Act or tobaninfinite scrolling on social media apps. Meanwhile, some on the Left cheer as technology CEOs aredraggedbefore congressional committees and castigated for allowing Trump to win in 2016.

This week, it wasrevealed that the New York State Department of Financial Services wants a dedicated regulator to oversee social media platforms. Other states will likely follow suit.

But what were all too loath to admit is that these firms do what any of us would do when under scrutiny: they pivot, they engage in damage control, and they aim to please those with pitchforks outside their doors. Its the same whether its Black Lives Matter or President Trump.

Facebook has committed toendingall political advertising online (hurting non-profit advocacy groups like mine) and Twitter already implemented a similar policylast year, lauded by political figures such as Hillary Clinton and Andrew Yang.

Of course, when tech giants censor or delete stories that we perceive to advance or hurt our political team, we are all up in arms. But protecting a free and open internet means not using punitive regulations or policies to hamstring social networks because of the scandal of the day.

Internet policy remedies dreamed up in Washington, D.C. will almost always end up hurting those of us who dont have power or deep pockets. It harms the small businesses that use social networks for advertising, and it sets up more roadblocks for ordinary users who simply want to check in with friends and family.

Big Tech isnt powerful because it has money, but because it has delivered superior products, those that have left platforms such as AOL, Myspace, and Yahoo in their wake.

Social networks have evolved from places to connect and share information across borders to intellectual and political battlefields where we wage digital wars.

Of course, there should be regulation in some respect. But it should be smart regulation that keeps platforms relatively free and open and provides incentives for future innovation. The powerful platforms of today can afford to comply with cumbersome rules, while new market entrants cannot.

That means that with every new proposal to roll back Section 230 protections or require quasi-governmental fact-checking functions around Election Day, were depriving consumers of choice and entrepreneurs of the ability to innovate.

Of course, targeted censorship of certain accounts or stories on social media networks is bad. But policy "solutions" dreamed up by technologically illiterate bureaucrats and power-hungry politicians would no doubt be even worse.

Read the original:

How Not to Respond to Twitter and Facebook's Alarming Censorship of the New York Post | Yal Ossowski - Foundation for Economic Education

800 and falling prey to crowd censorship – The New Indian Express

Tamil actor Vijay Sethupathis decision to opt out of 800, a biopic on Sri Lankan cricket player Muthiah Muralitharan, was not surprising, coming as it did in the aftermath of a week-long social media storm kicked up by the film and political fraternity. The actor put out a cryptic tweet on Monday, indicating that he is drawing stumps just when he was getting ready to spin a dream role. It came in response to a request from Muralitharan to step down and end the controversy.

The initial bouncer came from Tamil filmmaker Bharathiraja last week, when he asked the actor to junk the project, saying it was based on the life of the cricketer who had glorified the Tamil genocide in Sri Lanka in 2009.

Soon, more voices in the gallery lent support to this cry. Muralitharan, a Tamilian whose ancestors had gone to Sri Lanka as plantation workers during the 19th and early 20th centuries, is seen to be a supporter of MahindaRajapaksa, the prime minister of Sri Lanka, and his brother Gotabaya Rajapaksa, its current president. The plantation workers, referred to as estate Tamils, live in central Sri Lanka while the Jaffna Tamils or Eelam Tamils consider themselves descendants of the old Jaffna kingdom and mostly live in north and east Sri Lanka.

Though they are both Tamils, their caste dynamics and role in the political landscape are varied. Films as a medium of creative expression have now become frequent targets of crowd censorship. Trolling and hounding in social media has been dictating the narrative of art and the artists creative expression, and, unfortunately, been succeeding in its pursuit, the recent pulling down of a jewellery advertisement being a case in point.

The latest pressure on Sethupathi is no different, as it comes from chauvinists who claim to preserve native pride. The point being missed is that the biopic is on the sportsman, tracking his rise in becoming a world-class spinner who bagged a record 800 wickets in Test cricket, a feat that is yet to be matched. His journey involving hard work and determination would have been inspirational to the enthusiastic, cricket-crazy subcontinent. A final word to be noted is that Muralitharan is the mentor of IPLs Sunrisers Hyderabad team owned by the Sun Network, whose Kalanithi Maran is the grand-nephew of former CM M Karunanidhi.

Go here to see the original:

800 and falling prey to crowd censorship - The New Indian Express

Jacobin contributor: Calls for NBC not to air Trump townhall won’t succeed in ‘deplatforming’ the president | TheHill – The Hill

Philosophy professor and liberal magazine Jacobin contributor Ben Burgis said Thursday that calls for NBC not to air President TrumpDonald John TrumpLatest Mnuchin-Pelosi call produces 'encouraging news on testing' for stimulus package China warns it will detain American nationals following DOJ prosecution of Chinese scholars: report Musician John Fogerty issues cease and desist over Trump use of 'Fortunate Son' MOREs townhall Thursday evening were not an effective strategy to deplatform the president, adding that Trump already has the biggest megaphone.

Burgis explained onHill.TVs Rising that while some people responded to NBCs announcement of the townhall by complaining that viewers would have to choose between it and ABCs townhall with Democratic presidential nominee Joe BidenJoe BidenConservatives seize on New York Post story to push Section 230 reform Trump wishes Harris 'the best' after aide tests positive for COVID-19 Pennsylvania rejects 372K mail-in ballot applications following primary confusion: report MORE, NBC staffers interviewed by the Daily Beast saidthe network should not be giving Trump a platform at all.

It almost seems like a hear no evil, see no evil thing, like that theyre going to get people to not go along with whatever Trump is saying... that theyre going to just not give him the platform in the first place, which this seems like a really extreme version of that attempt of kind of forcing a media bubble, Burgis explained.

It almost seems like this cant be the strategy to get people to not buy what hes saying or not go along with what hes saying, to just say, oh, well well just deny him the megaphone, that seems like a really bankrupt way of doing that, he added.

Its just not going to work hes the president of the United States, he continued. You cant make him go away by deplatforming him.

Thursday morning, more than 100 Hollywood stars signed onto an open letter to NBC and Comcast executives asking them to run Trumps townhall either prior to or after Bidens so that American voters can have the opportunity to watch both.

However, NBCUniversal News Group Chairman Cesar Conde stood by the decision to air the townhall at the same time as ABCs, writing in a statement that if NBC were to move our town hall with President Trump to a later timeslot we would be violating our commitment to offer both campaigns access to the same audience and the same forum.

Watch more of the interview above.

More here:

Jacobin contributor: Calls for NBC not to air Trump townhall won't succeed in 'deplatforming' the president | TheHill - The Hill