Amazon is censoring: We need your help to distribute this book! – Workers World

Capitalism on a Ventilator is a new anthology comparing the effective Chinese response to COVID-19 to the disastrous response in the U.S. This book pushes back against the racist anti-China campaign in U.S. media.

However, Amazon is currently censoring the books distribution. We need your support to get the book out and to fight back against censorship!

Just released! Download free at workers.org/books.

Make a tax-deductible $25 contribution to oppose Amazon and youll be sent a free copy. The books table of contents and list of authors, along with four chapters and a donation button, are available at wp.me/p4Yme1-404.

The U.S. establishment continues its growing hostility toward China, with an accompanying surge in anti-Asian racism. The effort to place this challenging book on a corporate website has turned into a struggle against censorship. Amazon, the worlds largest online bookseller, claims ease of placement and lack of censorship but failed to deliver.

Instead, the company sent a notice censoring this book and its up-to-date information about COVID-19: Amazon reserves the right to determine what content we offer according to our content guidelines. Your book does not comply with our guidelines. As a result, we are not offering your book for sale.

The notice claimed Amazon refers people only to official sources for advice on the COVID-19 virus. But the corporation has accepted books with wild pandemic conspiracy theories that the virus is exaggerated, a hoax or human-made, and that masks and quarantines are useless.

Readers are urged to break the ban on Capitalism on a Ventilator by sharing the link widely on social media, along with your short reviews. Maintain pressure against Amazon banning books with a left perspective by tweeting the Washington Post @JeffBezos.

Capitalism on a Ventilator was written by people around the world, edited by a U.S. activist and a Chinese activist, and answers a question working people worldwide are asking: Why has China done so much better in containing COVID-19 and saving lives?

Evidence and available data provide a very different answer from that given by the corporate media. China contained the virus because its free medical care and planned economic system are science based and intensely cooperative. By every statistic, countries building socialism have done far better in combating the virus: Cuba, China, Laos, Vietnam and North Korea, to name a few.

We hope you read Capitalism on a Ventilator and explore the reasons why China and other countries building socialism are doing better in this pandemic than the capitalist world. Please share the preview chapters: wp.me/p4Yme1-404.

And your tax-deductible $25 contribution to this campaign against censorship will qualify you for a free copy!

Make a tax free donation at tinyurl.com/y6pleh23.

Read more:

Amazon is censoring: We need your help to distribute this book! - Workers World

Web of Control: Will social media be regulated by censor? – The Financial Express

These would continue to be administered by Meity as before. It was under this Act that the government some months back blocked a host of Chinese apps.

While over-the-top (OTT) players like Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, Disney+Hotstar, etc, have now come under the ambit of information and broadcasting ministry for regulation purposes, there is no similar clarity with regard to the regulation of intermediaries like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, WhatsApp, etc. This is because they continue to be under the jurisdiction of ministry of electronics and information technology (Meity) which administers them under the relevant sections of Information Technology Act.

However, experts say since intermediaries also have user-generated content and since I&B has become a content regulator now for OTTs apart from being one for cinema and TV, it is also empowered to make laws which can regulate content on the intermediaries.

Just to illustrate, currently user-generated content on any of the intermediaries is governed under Section 79 of the IT Act. This Act basically provides intermediaries certain exemptions from liabilities with regard to content, data and communication, since these are not generated or owned by it but are third-party generated. In such cases if anything unlawful is noticed, Meity directs the intermediary concerned to remove the unlawful content within a specified period of time.

Only if the intermediary concerned fails to do the same expeditiously or it is found that it has conspired, abetted or aided in the generation of such content, can the government take action against it.

However, with the OTTs coming under I&B ministry, the latter has got powers to make rules for user-generated content, which, apart from being transmitted on OTTs, can also be transmitted on intermediaries. For example, any user can generate content and put it on any of the intermediaries. In such cases, even the I&B ministry now has the power to frame rules to regulate content on intermediaries.

Experts say these are early days and clarity on regulation of content, be it on OTTs or intermediaries and any overlap in the case of latter with Meity, would be clear only once the I&B ministry frames rules. Certain fine-tuning of intermediary guidelines is also in the works at the end of Meity so one needs to wait for it also.

Theres no confusion, however, regarding another law which relates to blocking Internet sites, apps, etc, engaged in activities prejudicial to sovereignty and integrity of the country, its defence, security of state and public order, under Section 69A of the IT Act. These would continue to be administered by Meity as before. It was under this Act that the government some months back blocked a host of Chinese apps.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know markets Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.

See original here:

Web of Control: Will social media be regulated by censor? - The Financial Express

What The Politics?! Ep. 9: Censorship and content moderation – WNCT

by: Emily Cervarich and Victoria Holmes

GREENVILLE, N.C. (WNCT) Over the past few elections, social media has become more and more prevalent. And theres no doubt it held a large role in this years presidential election.

With so many social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and more, how are these companies ensuring safe and transparent information for their users? Should certain ads be banned or restricted? What are the rules on censorship?

Its clear that social media has opened the door for different generations and people from all walks of life to join in the conversation, and receive new information about all sorts of topics.

So what role did social media have in this years election? And what are some of the issues surrounding censorship these platforms?

For this episode of What The Politics?!, Victoria and Emily are joined by Professor Daniel Kreiss. He is an associate professor in the Hussman School of Journalism and Media at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Kreiss is also a principal researcher of the UNC Center for Information, Technology, and Public Life.

Kreiss main field of study is how emerging technologies and social media impact politics, elections, and civic affairs. Kreiss is an affiliated fellow of the Information Society Project at Yale Law School. He received a Ph.D. In Communication from Stanford University.

Recently, Kreiss expertise has been cited in The New York Times, Yahoo Finance, and The Washington Post, among others.

Kreiss has also written two books related to the topic:

Taking Our Country Back: The Crafting of Networked Politics from Howard Dean to Barack Obama (Oxford University Press, 2012.)

Prototype Politics: Technology-Intensive Campaigning and the Data of Democracy (Oxford University Press, 2016.)

New episodes every Tuesday. Join the conversation!Click here to subscribe onSpotifyand onApple Podcasts.

See the article here:

What The Politics?! Ep. 9: Censorship and content moderation - WNCT

Iqbal Khan: OTT self-censorship shouldn’t come at cost of creative freedom – Daijiworld.com

Mumbai, Nov 22 (IANS): Actor Iqbal Khan says OTT platforms create space for stories and experimentation. While content creators should be responsible, self-censorship should not limit storytelling.

Iqbal, who was last seen in the web series "Crackdown", is currently shooting an upcoming series in the scenic hill town.

"OTT has taken stories to mobiles and laptops, and can be enjoyed anytime and anywhere. I believe that over a period of time synergies will work out between these platforms. Content can be customised for the platforms. As the authorities are mulling self-censorship on OTT platforms, cognisance will be taken of the nature of content being released by responsible content creators. I believe that such censorship would not come at the cost of creative freedom."

Starting his career with music videos, Iqbal worked in several television serials before he made his digital debut with the show "The Bull Of Dalal Street" earlier this year. This was followed by "Crackdown".

"The initial success of OTT prompted me to go for more. I believe that in a short period of time OTT platforms have been able to blur the boundaries of language and geography. Now, good content in any language can be viewed and enjoyed in any part of the world. There are so many stories being told online that good actors can explore much more compared to television or films. However, I always choose a project based on content, irrespective of the exhibition platform or the language," Iqbal mentioned.

Read more:

Iqbal Khan: OTT self-censorship shouldn't come at cost of creative freedom - Daijiworld.com

New Restrictions, More QE, Higher Bitcoin Prices – Seeking Alpha

Introduction

The past few weeks were marked by a tremendous acceleration in bitcoin price, that recently broke the 18,000 level, nearly doubling in value since early December. We previously saw that the massive liquidity injections from major central banks and especially the Federal Reserve has led to a sharp recovery in most of the asset classes since mid-March and a sharp consolidation on the US dollar, with the DXY down 10%. Figure 1 shows the performance of a diversity of assets since the market reached its low on March 20th; Bitcoin is by far the asset that experienced the most drastic recovery, up 380%, followed by the 'FANGs' stocks, up 125% since their bottom.

Hence, investors have been asking themselves the following question: is the move done on bitcoin or should we experience much higher prices in the medium term?

Figure 1

Source: Eikon Reuters

With most of the European nations under national lockdowns, which is also expected to be announced in the US in the near term, investors have been speculating that economies will strongly rely on governments' support in the next few months, which implies a significant increase in central banks' assets. We saw that assets from the top major 5 central banks (Fed, ECB, BoJ, PBoC, and BoE) have grown by over 7 trillion USD this year, which has clearly supported most of the markets and resulted in a sharp recovery in asset prices and fundamentals. Figure 2 shows a very strong relationship between the annual change in CBs assets and the price of Bitcoin; as more restrictions imply more debt financed by central banks (i.e. QE), the cryptocurrency has surged as some investors have been looking at bitcoin as a hedge against currency 'debasement'.

Figure 2

Source: Eikon Reuters, RR calculations

Another interesting development has been the strong divergence between bitcoin and FANGs stocks in recent weeks; figure 3 shows that while the FANG+ index has been oscillating around 5,300 since the start of September, bitcoin has surged from $10,000 to $18,000. We saw that in the past, bitcoin prices were very sensitive to equity moves (especially the mega-cap growth stocks) and were strongly correlated during upside momentum but also during equity drawdowns. Bitcoin went down 60% during the February/March episode and was also down nearly 20% during the early September bear consolidation.

Hence, investors will be curious in the future to see if bitcoin prices can hold if tech stocks start to fall.

Figure 3

Source: Eikon Reuters

Even though US real interest rates seem to have found their low back in August, with the 5Y real IR trading at -1.4% back then (currently at -1.25%), the amount of negative-yielding debt has continued to surge in recent months. After peaking at 17tr USD in August 2019 (when the 2Y10Y US yield curve inverted), the amount of negative yielding debt had fallen dramatically until March 2020 to 8tr USD and then started to skyrocket again. The negative-yielding debt could be seen as a 'real-time gauge' of the economic activity; more debt yielding below 0 percent simply means growing concerns over the economic outlook. Therefore, we could also link the rise in bitcoin to the constant increase in the amount of negative-yielding debt around the world.

Interestingly, gold, which has also shown a strong co-movement with the negative-yielding debt in the past few years, has been following the US real rate in recent weeks and constantly testing new lows, which implies that the precious metal is still very sensitive to US real rates in the current environment.

Figure 4

Source: Eikon Reuters

In the medium to long term, we are strongly bullish on bitcoin as we think it could act as a strong hedge against currency depreciation and inflationary pressures. In figure 5, we look at the equity curve of the top asset in each decade of the past 50 years; we first had gold in the 1970s due to the unexpected sudden rise in inflation coming from the oil shocks, then came the Japanese stocks in the 1980s with Japan's economic miracle, then the US boom in the 1990s led to a titanic performance in US growth stocks, then the double-digit growth in China led to an outperformance of consumer staples in the 2000s, and then the prominent growth of new Internet companies led to a strong performance in Tech stocks in the past decade. If we look at the cumulative returns of each asset in the past 50 years, a person who invested $100 would have accumulated over USD 1.3 million of wealth, averaging 22.2% in annual return for a volatility of 25.3% (Sharpe ratio of 0.88).

We are strongly convinced that cryptos (especially bitcoin) could be the best pick for the next 10 years and that investors should hold some bitcoin in their portfolio as it could eventually act as a good diversifier and generate significant returns from current levels.

Figure 5

Source: Eikon Reuters, RR calculations

In the short run, we could see a small consolidation as bitcoin approaches its ST resistance at 19,500 (December 2017 high) as investors start to take profit on the cryptocurrency. We think that any significant bounce on bitcoin should be considered as a good opportunity to buy the dip.

Disclosure: I am/we are long BTC, GBPUSD. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

See the original post:
New Restrictions, More QE, Higher Bitcoin Prices - Seeking Alpha

Think Bitcoin Is On The Run? Sushi Cryptocurrency Has Surged Nearly 100% In A Week – Benzinga

Bitcoin (BTC) being on a bull run may be hounding all the attention but the world's apex cryptocurrency is getting outdone by several decentralized finance, or "DeFi," projects.

What Happened: SushiSwap (SUSHI), one such DeFi cryptocurrency,has surged 96.24% in a 7-day period up to press time beating Bitcoin, which is up 12.86%.

DeFi has seen rising popularity in the cryptocurrency community, with some dubbing it as a fad. A lot of DeFi projects may be in a bubble, but that doesn't mean that "DeFi will eventually disappear entirely,"Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao said this week, as reported by Cointelegraph.

Zhao advocated cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin saying it was the money of freedom for millions of people worldwide.

Why It Matters: SushiSwap, the DeFi protocol supported by SUSHI,has been among the most popular such projects. SUSHI had surged 331% to $11.17 in September before its anonymousfounder cashed out $6 million worth of tokens, tanking the cryptocurrency.

Yearn Finance (YFI), another DeFi cryptocurrency, which offers yield farming, surpassed Bitcoins 7-day gains this week.At press time, YFI is up 13.1% in the 24-hour trailing period and 49.3% over seven days at $24,667.87.

SUSHI traded 16.85% higher at $1.33 at press time, while Bitcoin traded 0.51% higher at $17,756.63.

See Also:Bitcoin Storms Past $18,000

2020 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Read this article:
Think Bitcoin Is On The Run? Sushi Cryptocurrency Has Surged Nearly 100% In A Week - Benzinga

Cryptocurrency Mining Market to Observe Strong Growth to Generate Massive Revenue in Coming Years 2020 to 2027 – re:Jerusalem

Stratagem Market Insights has recently published abusiness research report titled, Global Cryptocurrency Mining Market by Size, Share, Growth, Manufacturers, Type, and Application, Forecast to 2027in its research database with report summary, table of content, research methodologies, and data sources. The investigative report represented in an organized format in charts, graphs, tables, and figures to impart a detailed understanding of the Cryptocurrency Mining market in an easy manner.

The report includes CAGR, market shares, sales, gross margin, value, volume, and other vital market figures that give an exact picture of the growth of the global Cryptocurrency Mining market.We have also focused on SWOT, PESTLE, and Porters Five Forces analyses of the global Cryptocurrency Mining market.

The major market players that are operating in the Cryptocurrency Mining market are AntPool, Ebot, BTC Top, Genesis Mining, BTC.com, F2Pool Hashing 24, ViaBTC, Bitmain Technologies Ltd., and Hashflare..

The Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has affected every aspect of life worldwide. The report considers the impact of COVID-19 on market growth. Furthermore, it covers the present and future impact of the pandemic and offers a post-COVID-19 scenario to provide a deeper understanding of the dynamic changes in trends and market scenarios.

Need a report that reflects how COVID-19 has impacted this market and its growth?

Competitive Landscape:

Competitor analysis is one of the best sections of the report that compares the progress of leading players based on crucial parameters, including market share, new developments, global reach, local competition, price, and production. The degree of competition among leading global companies has been elaborated by examining various leading key players operating across the global regions An expert team of research analysts sheds light on various attributes such as global market competition, market share, latest industry developments, innovative product launches, partnerships, mergers or acquisitions by leading companies in the Cryptocurrency Mining Market.

Geographically Regions Analysis:

The report provides an extensive analysis of the key geographical regions of the industry. The regional analysis covers North America, Latin America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Middle East & Africa. The report offers insightful information like production and consumption ratio, demand and supply, import and export ratio, and demand trends in each region. The report also covers a country-wise analysis of the segments and sub-segments of the market. Europe and North America regions are anticipated to show an upward and downward growth in the years to come. While Cryptocurrency Mining Market in Asia Pacific regions is likely to show remarkable growth during the forecasted period. Cryptocurrency Mining Market in the South, America region is also expected to grow in the near future.

Table of Content (TOC):Chapter 1 Introduction and OverviewChapter 2 Industry Cost Structure and Economic ImpactChapter 3 Rising Trends and New Technologies with Major key playersChapter 4 Global Cryptocurrency Mining Market Analysis, Trends, Growth FactorChapter 5 Cryptocurrency Mining Market Application and Business with Potential AnalysisChapter 6 Global Cryptocurrency Mining Market Segment, Type, ApplicationChapter 7 Global Cryptocurrency Mining Market Analysis (by Application, Type, End-User)Chapter 8 Major Key Vendors Analysis of Cryptocurrency Mining MarketChapter 9 Development Trend of AnalysisChapter 10 Conclusion

Key questions answered in the report:

About Stratagem Market Insights:

Stratagem Market Insights is a management consulting organization providing market intelligence and consulting services worldwide. The firm has been providing quantified B2B research and currently offers services to over 350+ customers worldwide.

Contact Us:Mr. ShahStratagem Market InsightsTel: US +1 415 871 0703 / JAPAN +81-50-5539-1737Email:sales@stratagemmarketinsights.com

Visit Our Blog:Shubham

Read this article:
Cryptocurrency Mining Market to Observe Strong Growth to Generate Massive Revenue in Coming Years 2020 to 2027 - re:Jerusalem

Impact of Outbreak of Coronavirus (Covid-19) on Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Market 2020-2027| Intel Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, NVIDIA…

The report titled, Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Market boons an in-depth synopsis of the competitive landscape of the market globally, thus helping establishments understand the primary threats and prospects that vendors in the market are dealt with. It also incorporates thorough business profiles of some of the prime vendors in the market. The report includes vast data relating to the recent discovery and technological expansions perceived in the market, wide-ranging with an examination of the impact of these intrusions on the markets future development.

Sample Report with Latest Industry Trends @ https://www.theresearchcorporation.com/request-sample.php?id=55174

Top Key Companies Players in this Report are: Intel Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, NVIDIA Corporation, BitFury Group Limited, Alphapoint Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices, Xilinx, BitGo, Ripple, BTL Group Ltd.

The scope of the Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Market report is as follows the report provides information on growth segments and opportunities for investment and Benchmark performance against key competitors. Geographically, the global mobile application market has been segmented into four regions such as North America, Europe, Asia Pacific and the rest of the world.

This report gives an in depth and broad understanding of Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Market. With accurate data covering all key features of the prevailing market, this report offers prevailing data of leading companies. Appreciative of the market state by amenability of accurate historical data regarding each and every sector for the forecast period is mentioned. Driving forces, restraints and opportunities are given to help give an improved picture of this market investment for the forecast period of 2020 to 2027.

Finally, all aspects of the Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Market are quantitatively as well qualitatively assessed to study the Global as well as regional market comparatively. This market study presents critical information and factual data about the market providing an overall statistical study of this market on the basis of market drivers, limitations and its future prospects. The report supplies the international economic competition with the assistance of Porters Five Forces Analysis and SWOT Analysis.

Get Reasonable Discount on this Premium Report @ https://www.theresearchcorporation.com/ask-for-discount.php?id=55174

In This Study, The Years Considered to Estimate the Size of Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Market are as Follows:

History Year: 2014-2019

Base Year: 2019

Estimated Year: 2020

Forecast Year 2020 to 2027

Table of Contents:

Lastly, this report provides market intelligence in the most comprehensive way. The report structure has been kept such that it offers maximum business value. It provides critical insights on the market dynamics and will enable strategic decision making for the existing market players as well as those willing to enter the market.

Get Detailed Information About Full Report before Buying @ https://www.theresearchcorporation.com/enquiry-before-buying.php?id=55174

If you have any special requirements, please let us know and we will offer you the report as per your requirements.

See original here:
Impact of Outbreak of Coronavirus (Covid-19) on Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Market 2020-2027| Intel Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, NVIDIA...

The SEC Swats Cryptocurrency Flies While The Chinese Government Takes The Farm. – Forbes

A battle for currency supremacy is underway as China doles out millions of digital yuan.

Cryptocurrencies offer innovative payment and security solutions for commerce, supply chains, and manufacturing. They make global payments faster, safer, more efficient, and more transparent. For years, Washington has neglected or misunderstood this most promising U.S. innovation, leaving American start-ups lost in a maze of regulatory uncertainty. Now that blockchain and cryptocurrency solutions have entered the real economy, revolutionizing money and payments, regulatory confusion has set the cryptocurrency community ablaze.Meanwhile, the Chinese are poised to capitalize on US policy mistakes yet again.

The leading American innovators in blockchain solutions are on the verge of leaving the US in frustration.Why?Because Washington has failed to develop a clear regulatory framework that would keep them in the US and ensure American leadership.This is the declaration of the CEO of Ripple, Americas leading cryptocurreny firm, who says the US is losing the tech war to China.

While Americas Constitution supports the flourishing of new technology, the administrative state has killed many important innovations in the cradle. This happens as obsolete agencies look for new things to regulate and join forces with protected industries to stifle competition, the process of regulatory capture described by Nobel economist George Stigler. At least eight US federal regulatory bodies have asserted jurisdiction over new fintech and digital currencies.This is not to say there should be no accountability in financial innovation, but the right policy should focus on achieving the objective in the most efficient, least intrusive way. Policymakers should think intelligently about the function they are trying to perform, not copy-paste paper-based bureaucracy on anything new.

Other countries are not immune to capture, but they are smart enough to not kill the golden goose. They have developed market-friendly frameworks to welcome crypto innovation to their shores, but the talent and scalability of the US market made the risk worthwhile until now.Crypto entrepreneurs hoped that after their billions of dollars in investments and development of innovative products that Washington would wake up, but no. Meanwhile China has advanced to garner increasing share of US and global financial markets.

The coming year will make or break cryptocurrency in the US. It depends on whether Congress and the Executive Branch can resolve their conflicting views of financial innovation, stop the grab bag of regulatory enforcement, and build a coherent policy framework. Bad actors have always found ways to exploit new developments, but that is not an excuse to deny consumers the fruits of new technologies. Law enforcement exists to prevent and punish crime, not to stop enterprise. Indeed, digital currency can reduce certain financial crimes.

Sadly, the current administration, purporting to promote the interests of Main Street investors, has been at war with itself on cryptocurrency. Outgoing Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman Jay Clayton treated cryptocurrencies and other fintech startups like flies, swatting innovators with more than 50 enforcements. This contrasts with SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce who sees crypto as the next great technology. Again, the issue is not that poor conduct should not be addressed; its a question of priorities. For years, the SEC has done busy work while the Chinese government has exploited Americas stock exchanges and US technology.

As a new report from Congress bipartisan U.S. China Commission (USCC) notes, 217 Chinese companies are listed on US exchanges with a total market capitalization of $2.2 trillion, including 13 Chinese state-owned enterprises. According to the USCC, these companies endanger US national security through censorship and surveillance, evade American standards of transparency, and jeopardize the wealth of American investors. The SEC has not been able to perform oversight on the audits of these companies because of systematic blocking by the Chinese government. Meanwhile the number and size of these Chinese companies traded in the US has ballooned. Failing to deal with the real threats to Americas financial system, the SEC has directed its energy to homegrown startups.

The US lost the race on Bitcoin, and China now controls 65 percent of the computing power to mine the currency. The next battle is underway as the Chinese government has piloted a program to distribute digital yuan, a digital currency backed by Chinas central bank.It is only a matter of time before Chinas digital currency is offered to billions across the globe coupled with Chinese payment solutions copied from U.S. innovators.The US wont be able to block the proliferation of digital yuan. It can only win by making a better solution and getting to market first.

The SECs Clayton will step down at the end of the year, providing an opportunity confirm a Chair who will recognize the value that cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology, will step up stop Chinas abuse of Americas exchanges, and put American consumers first. Americans, not the Chinese government, should be first in line for American technological innovation. The new SEC Chair will be critical to ensuring whether the U.S. dollar retains its position as the worlds reserve currency.US policymakers should promote crypto, not crush it. Otherwise and once again, China will pick up the technology that the US discards.

See the original post:
The SEC Swats Cryptocurrency Flies While The Chinese Government Takes The Farm. - Forbes

Representatives question the OCC’s cryptocurrency and stablecoin efforts – Lexology

On November 10, six members of the U.S. House of Representatives wrote to Acting Comptroller of the Currency Brian Brooks raising concerns about the OCCs recent unilateral actions to regulate cryptocurrencies. In the letter, the members question the OCCs regulatory priorities. For example, the members highlight that, through recent actions, such as its advance notice of proposed rulemaking on digital activities (covered by InfoBytes here), the OCC has sought to serve those already-banked with better payments options while potentially overlooking opportunities for assisting the unbanked and underbanked to participate in the economy and the banking system. Additionally, the members note that the OCCs interpretive decisions, which authorize financial institutions to hold cryptocurrency and stablecoins for customers (covered by InfoBytes here and here), may have broad implications for the future of banking and are best made in collaboration with your fellow regulators and with Congress to ensure we avoid potential harms to institutional safety and soundness and equity and inclusion. In closing, the members ask the OCC to answer a number of questions, including (i) whether stablecoin reserves will be segregated from calculating the capital requirements of large banks; (ii) what consumer protections the agency will impose on stablecoin providers; and (iii) whether the OCC has collaborated with other federal regulators on their recent decisions.

Continued here:
Representatives question the OCC's cryptocurrency and stablecoin efforts - Lexology