Victory! Court Protects Anonymity of Security Researchers Who Reported Apparent Communications Between Russian Bank and Trump Organization – EFF

Security researchers who reported observing Internet communications between the Russian financial firm Alfa Bank and the Trump Organization in 2016 can remain anonymous, an Indiana trial court ruled last week.

The ruling protects the First Amendment anonymous speech rights of the researchers, whose analysis prompted significant media attention and debate in 2016 about the meaning of digital records that reportedly showed computer servers linked to the Moscow-based bank and the Trump Organization in communication.

In response to these reports, Alfa Bank filed a lawsuit in Florida state court alleging that unidentified individuals illegally fabricated the connections between the servers. Importantly, Alfa Banks lawsuit asserts that the alleged bad actors who fabricated the servers communications are different people than the anonymous security researchers who discovered the servers communications and reported their observations to journalists and academics.

Yet that distinction did not stop Alfa Bank from seeking the security researchers identities through a subpoena issued to Indiana University Professor L. Jean Camp, who had contacts with at least one of the security researchers and helped make their findings public.

Prof. Camp filed a motion to quash the subpoena. EFF filed a friend-of-the-court brief in support of the motion to ensure the court understood that the security researchers had the right to speak anonymously under both the First Amendment and Indianas state constitution.

The brief argues:

By sharing their observations anonymously, the researchers were able to contribute to the electorates understanding of a matter of extraordinary public concern, while protecting their reputations, families, and livelihoods from potential retaliation. That is exactly the freedom that the First Amendment seeks to safeguard by protecting the right to anonymous speech.

Its not unusual for companies embarrassed by security researchers findings to attempt to retaliate against them, which is what Alfa Bank tried to do. Thats why EFFs brief also asked the court to recognize that Alfa Banks subpoena was a pretext:

[T]he true motive of the litigation and the instant subpoena is to retaliate against the anonymous computer security researchers for speaking out. In seeking to impose consequences on these speakers, Alfa Bank is violating their First Amendment rights to speak anonymously.

In rejecting Alfa Banks subpoena, the Indiana court ruled that the information Alfa Bank sought to identify the security researchers is protected speech under Indiana law and that the bank had failed to meet the high bar required to justify the disclosure of the individuals identities.

EFF is grateful that the court protected the identities of the anonymous researchers and rejected Alfa Banks subpoena. We would also like to thank our co-counsel Colleen M. Newbill, Joseph A. Tomain, and D. Michael Allen of Mallor Grodner LLP for their help on the brief.

Read more:

Victory! Court Protects Anonymity of Security Researchers Who Reported Apparent Communications Between Russian Bank and Trump Organization - EFF

COMMUNITY VOICE: Of wrong horses and counterpoints | Community Voices – YourGV.com

Views expressed in community voicesdo not represent opinions of The Gazette-Virginian or staff members.

Writers need critics if for no other reason, to help us see when we have failed to communicate the main thing. The Nov. 11 and 18 editions of community voice, a response to my Nov. 4 piece on the Virginia Values Act titled Velvet covered tyranny, served that purpose for me.

So, allow me to be blunt. The Democrat-controlled legislature and Virginias executive branch are stripping your first amendment rights of free speech and religious liberty.

It does not matter if you consider yourself conservative or liberal, libertarian or progressive, or agree with me on same-sex marriage or anything else.

My critics and I are coming from such completely different worldviews that Im sure any topic I address, be it the right to life, legalized recreational marijuana, legalized gambling, etc., would provoke similar disagreement.

The point is that we have the constitutionally protected freedom not only to express those opinions in the public square but also do our jobs, run our businesses and churches, and non-profit ministries, all while following the dictates of our religiously informed consciences. The Virginia Values Act denies those rights.

Here is the second and equally important point. If a state government can strip my first amendment rights, it can strip yours. If it can deny our first amendment rights, it can revoke any of the others.

Those are the main things. But four other items need clarification.

First, I am a Christian and a pastor, not a therapist. My article, Im not gay and you probably arent either (seedaneskelton.comunder the LGBTQ category) is not an attempt at conversion therapy.

Instead, it is my testimony and invitation to any young person struggling with unwanted same-sex attraction to know that there is another way. They have the right to hear that. But if people like me are silenced, they will not hear it.

Other memoirs, like Rosaria Butterfields Secret thoughts of an unlikely convert and Dennis Jernigans Sing over me, tell similar stories and offer identical hope.

Second, regarding pushing my views and values on others, the shoe is on the other foot. I would not publicly address this issue except for two things. LGBTQ activists intend to deny all biblical Christians the rights mentioned above and have been for many years. Many sources validate that statement.

But for starters, look up Jonathon V. Lasts You Will Be Assimilated: The Same-Sex Marriage Bait and Switch, published in The Weekly Standard and Washington Examiner, June 22, 2015.

Or see lesbian conservative radio talk-show hostTammy Bruces responseto the 2014 Arizona Religious Freedom Bill, where she coined the phrase Gay Gestapo.

Third, I was happy to learn that Alliance Defending Freedom had $55M for their work. They earned Charity Navigators Platinum Seal of Transparency for 2020. I commend them to you. SeeADFLEGAL.ORG. For perspective, the ACLU, which usually argues opposite ADF, reported $202M in total assets for 2019 reporting.

Fourth, the Regnerus study I referenced has taken up too much time and was not the main point. As for its funding, You get what you pay for applies to all such research.

But it was not flawed or debunked. It was disputed and discredited by people who disagreed with the findings. But his sample size was larger than any other study of its kind at the time. Fifteen thousand people between ages 18-39. Only when the results were found politically incorrect did his department chair and others disavow it.

Heres what Regnerus said about the study in aninterview with Warren Smith. Its never been retracted. I havent retracted it. The journal hasnt retracted it. Its hard to debunk what is basically an overview snapshot of a fairly large, complex dataset. Other people analyze the data and say, Hey, Mark, its all about the instability in these families, which would be illuminating if I hadnt already said that. I said that years ago. Likely, the key variable here is the profound instability of the households in which the parents had same-sex relationships. People want to say, Oh, today its going to be Theres more of a gay or lesbian bourgeois family that will be much more stable. Its possible. I say, Show me the data. Some of this stuff well have to track for a decade or two before we get a good sense of it.

Evangelicals like me are the canary in the coalmine for America. Start paying attention to what your government is doing. Stand up for your constitutional rights. Do not stop when it gets hard and people insult you. If we fail, our freedoms are going to evaporate.

Skelton is the pastor at Faith Community Church in South Boston.

Read this article:

COMMUNITY VOICE: Of wrong horses and counterpoints | Community Voices - YourGV.com

8th Circuit upholds dismissal of lawsuit over change in University of Arkansas tenure policy – Arkansas Times

8th Circuit upholds dismissal of lawsuit over change in University of Arkansas tenure policy - Arkansas Times

On

The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals today affirmed without comment District Judge James Moodys dismissal earlier this year of a class-action lawsuit challenging changes in University of Arkansas personnel and tenure policy.

Faculty members from three campuses UAMS, Monticello and UA Little Rock had alleged changes in promotion, review and tenure policies limited academic freedom and put faculty members at greater risk of discipline, including termination, even for statements made outside the campus setting.

Moody dismissed the case in March. He said the university board of trustees was immune from some elements of the complaint. But his key ruling was that the case wasnt ripe. That is, the plaintiffs didnt allege that theyd suffered from the policy, only that they might.

In a one-paragraph unsigned opinion, the 8th Circuit panel said, Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal.

The plaintiffs had argued on appeal that they did have the standing to challenge the loss of vested contract rights. They also said the changes effectively violated due process and limited First Amendment freedom. Said the plaintiffs brief in response to the UA Board of Trustees argument on the free speech claim:

the Board laments and proclaims their disapproval of the Plaintiffs open discussion of this lawsuit with media outlets, serving as a prime example of the Boards belief that it can limit Plaintiffs First Amendment rights however it pleases with its policies. This belief ties into the Boards attempt to characterize the standing requirements for a First Amendment claim in a way that would make it an impossible burden to meet. Although the Board points to language in the Revised Policy to say it protects Plaintiffs rights, that summary assertion does not change the fact that it is simply not the case. The Board, through the Revised Policy, limits and infringes Plaintiffs First Amendment rights by protecting only those topics which the Board deems related to scholarship, the subject matter of their assigned teaching duties, and employment related service.

Here is the original post:

8th Circuit upholds dismissal of lawsuit over change in University of Arkansas tenure policy - Arkansas Times

Should Donald Trump pardon Edward Snowden and Julian Assange? Heres why Internet wants only one of them saved – MEAWW

Ahead of Thanksgiving, President Donald Trump pardoned his former national security adviser Michael Flynn, who had pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about communication with the Russian ambassador to the United States before Trumps inauguration in January 2017. The president's November 25 move to pardon the retired general who pleaded guilty twice has made people wonder if he would similarly pardon NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden or WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.

Trump tweeted, "It is my Great Honor to announce that General Michael T. Flynn has been granted a Full Pardon. Congratulations to @GenFlynn and his wonderful family, I know you will now have a truly fantastic Thanksgiving!

It is my Great Honor to announce that General Michael T. Flynn has been granted a Full Pardon. Congratulations to @GenFlynn and his wonderful family, I know you will now have a truly fantastic Thanksgiving!

The former Army General's sentencing had been deferred a number of times and he moved to withdraw his guilty plea in January 2020 claiming that his plea agreement had been breached. The case was placed on hold by Federal district judge Emmet G Sullivan in May and The United States Department of Justice announced that it intended to drop all charges against Flynn.A significant number of people have shown their support to the former CIA employee, who disclosed highly classified information from the National Security Agency in 2013 to journalists Glenn Greenwald, Laura Poitras, Barton Gellman, and Wen MacAskill.

Coming to the two men being the topic of hot discussion on social media, here's a brief reminder about Snowden. In June 2013, the United States Department of Justice charged Snowden with two counts of violating the Espionage Act 1917 and theft of government property when he had leaked a trove of documents about top-secret surveillance programs. He was granted a temporary right of asylum in Russia which was made permanent in October 2020.

After Trump pardoned Flynn, Snowden started to trend on Twitter as more and more people tried to bring this to the POTUS' attention, with many hailing him as a "hero" for his act. One social media user wrote, "PARDON SNOWDEN! He's a whistle blowing hero. The people calling him a criminal are the people he blew the whistle on. We know we can't believe them." Another added, "@Snowden I for sure think you should be pardoned but I think you should come live in Canada , don't go back to USA" Adding to that another tweeted, "Sorry, everything I've heard about the dude is that he's a complete scumbag. I despise hero worship. If he gets pardoned I couldn't care less. I'd far rather see Snowden pardoned."

PARDON SNOWDEN!He's a whistle blowing hero.

The people calling him a criminal are the people he blew the whistle on.

We know we can't believe them.

@Snowden I for sure think you should be pardoned but I think you should come live in Canada , don't go back to USA

Sorry, everything I've heard about the dude is that he's a complete scumbag. I despise hero worship.

If he gets pardoned I couldn't care less.

I'd far rather see Snowden pardoned.

Besides Snowden, the WikiLeaks owner, Assange was also trending on Twitter as people discussed if he deserves to be pardoned for leaking the information provided by US Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning in 2010. In the same year, an international arrest warrant was issued against Assange over sexual assault allegations. He reportedly sought asylum in the Embassy of Ecuador in London in June 2012 to avoid extradition to Sweden. He was arrested in April 2019 after his political asylum was revoked. He was charged with violating the Espionage Act of 1917 in May 2019 and is incarcerated in HM Prison.

One Twitter user wrote, "Not to mention Assange is also indicted for sexual assault. But sure, pardon him, anything to own a lib. Right?" Another wrote, "People clamoring for Trump to pardon sleaze merchant and sexual predator, Julian Assange, next? No." One tweeted, "I would love us to pardon Snowden. Unlike ASSange, he actually did this country a service. We *needed* to know the NSA was overstepping its bounds. Flynn and Trump? F**k 'em."

Not to mention Assange is also indicted for sexual assault.

But sure, pardon him, anything to own a lib. Right?

People clamoring for Trump to pardon sleaze merchant and sexual predator, Julian Assange, next?

No.

I would love us to pardon Snowden. Unlike ASSange, he actually did this country a service. We *needed* to know the NSA was overstepping its bounds.

Flynn and Trump? Fuck 'em. https://t.co/BiSnL30HqY

Read the rest here:

Should Donald Trump pardon Edward Snowden and Julian Assange? Heres why Internet wants only one of them saved - MEAWW

Edward Snowden Says ‘War on Whistleblowers’ Trend Shows a ‘Criminalization of Journalism’ – Newsweek

Edward Snowden said the "war on whistleblowers" trend in the U.S. that expanded during former President Barack Obama's administration and continued under President Donald Trump is evidence of a growing "criminalization of journalism."

Snowden spoke about the freedom of the press during a video interview with Glenn Greenwald, one of the journalists who first helped Snowden expose information from the National Security Agency when Snowden took his first steps toward becoming an internationally recognized government whistleblower in 2013. Greenwald shared the interview on his Substack platform on Wednesday.

"The threats against the press go far beyond physical violence," Snowden said, pointing to the spike in attacks on journalists catalogued by the U.S. Press Freedom Tracker. Snowden serves on the board of directors of the Freedom of the Press Foundation, which oversees the tracker. "What we see is an increasing tendency to silence journalists who say things that are in the minority," he said.

"You see threats against journalismparticularly female journalistsonline, social media, just because people don't like what's being reported. They don't like the facts that are being brought to them," Snowden said. "Then there's this whole other step, which is, what is the government doing against it? And in nowhere is this more clear, I think, than the war on whistleblowers."

Snowden said that after starting under former President George W. Bush, the "war on whistleblowers" escalated during Obama's administration and continued throughout Trump's time in office. "This is not a partisan issue; these people are backers of Obama, and we all know about the things that have happened under the Trump administration," he said. "But when you look at this as a trend, as a dynamic, what you see is the criminalization of journalism."

Snowden pointed to Julian Assange, the WikiLeaks founder who is currently in prison in London. Assange could be extradited to the U.S. next year to face charges related to WikiLeaks' data dump in 2010, which included documents shared by Chelsea Manning, a former intelligence analyst with the U.S. Army.

Snowden referred to Assange's WikiLeaks work in 2010 as "the greatest act of journalism that he ever did" and noted that Assange has been widely awarded for that work. Assange is an example of the way that the U.S. government tries to distinguish between traditional reporters who work for distinguished media outlets and journalists who find other methods to share information, Snowden said.

Greenwald asked Snowden about his concerns regarding the incoming administration of President-elect Joe Biden, who was part of the Obama administration that Snowden said saw the escalation of the "war on whistleblowers." Snowden said the freedom of the press will "continue to decline" until there is "an actual policy shift."

"Trying to silence the publication of factswhich are valuable and important to the public, to the continuation of democracy, but uncomfortable to governmentwhen they understand that that is something that must be accepted, that is what defines a democracy, rather than going, 'No, we need to shut these people up; we're going to throw them in a hole, we're going to ruin their life, whatever. We're going to de-platform them,' or whatever the new tactic is, this is going to continue to be a problem, and the freedom of our press is going to continue to decline," Snowden said.

Newsweek reached out to Biden's transition team for comment but did not receive a response in time for publication.

Read more:
Edward Snowden Says 'War on Whistleblowers' Trend Shows a 'Criminalization of Journalism' - Newsweek

Roger Stone on His Conviction, Trump, Vote Fraud, and Faith – thepress.net

Anyone who follows politics is familiar with the long, colorful career of Roger Stone. On Feb. 20, that career reached its nadir when the unconventional Republican operativewassentencedto 40 months in prison for lying to Congress, obstruction, and witness tampering. Widely reported was U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jacksons statement that Stone was not prosecuted for standing up for the president; he was prosecuted for covering up for the president. Stone and his lawyers were quick to point out that covering up was not among the official charges.

Given Stones more than four-decade personal and professional relationship with the president, it was no surprise when the president commuted his sentence -- just days before he was to report to prison.

Now, amid all the post-election legal wrangling, Stone is doing all he can, unofficially, to keep Trump in office. Curious about his plans going forward, I requested a Q&A with the man who is often called a dirty trickster but now publicly speaks about his faith in Jesus.He agreed; what follows is our exchange, which has been edited for length.

Myra Adams: On July 10, President Trump commuted your sentence, which means your conviction on seven felonies still stands. Are you anticipating that the president will issue you a pardon?

Roger Stone: At midnight on Election Day, the Department of Justice released the unredacted portions of the Mueller Report, which now prove definitively that Muellers hit squad had no evidence whatsoever of my having advanced knowledge of the source or content of the WikiLeaks disclosures [about hacked Democratic emails] or any evidence of coordination or collaboration between me and WikiLeaks or Julian Assange. This information was withheld from us at trial so that federal prosecutors could insinuate throughout my trial that I had lied to Congress regarding my coordination with WikiLeaks which they now admit there is no evidence of, and even BuzzFeed said I was vindicated!

It is a fantasy of the left that I somehow traded my silence regarding alleged misconduct with the president in return for clemency. That is false and there is no corroborated evidence to support this contention. I did say that I refused to give false testimony against the president in return for leniency.

I only reluctantly dropped the appeal of my conviction. While the willful misconduct of the jury forewoman who attacked me by name in social media postings in 2019; kept these posts on a private setting during jury selection and the trial, and deleted them afterwards would have been among the strongest issues on appeal. The judges pretrial ruling that I could not raise the issue of misconduct by the special counsel, the FBI, the DOJ, or any member of Congress was also highly unconstitutional.

Despite these strong legal arguments, it became clear that the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals was so politicized that I could never get a new trial and, even if I had won a new trial, it would have been before the same judge who demonstrated her bias repeatedly.

In fact, no misstatement I made to Congress hid any underlying crime. I had no motive to lie. Its clear that my prosecution was political and contrived to pressure me to bear false witness against the president, which I refused to do.

In view of all of this, I hope the president will consider granting me a pardon so that I can clear my name.

MA: Have you been in contact with President Trump, either directly or indirectly, since he began all the post-election controversy?

RS: No.

MA: On Nov. 14, the Palm Beach Post reported that you spoke at a Stop the Steal rally attended by 500 Trump supporters in Delray Beach, Fla. [an upscale community 20 miles south of Palm Beach]. Here are some quotes from the Posts report:

Stone suggested the CIA changed vote tallies to benefit Democrat Joe Biden.

He [Stone] then hit on how the CIA used a supercomputer called the Hammer and a program dubbed Scorecard to alter the vote.

Can you elaborate?

RS: As I wrote instonecoldtruth.com, I believe there is both overwhelming and compelling evidence of extensive election fraud of the old-fashioned variety to include abuses in the mail-in ballot system; ballot harvesting; dead people voting; people voting multiple times; and the wholesale manufacture of ballots after the polls had closed since Democrats knew the margins by which Trump won.

I believe that there will also be substantial hard evidence of cyber manipulation of the 2020 vote. I raised the question of the Hammer and Scorecard programs, which [CIA] whistleblower Dennis Montgomery who designed the [latter] program specifically said was created for the purpose of voter manipulation in foreign countries. In fact, confidential audio recordings released by U.S. District Judge G. Murray Snow in November 2015, revealed that this computer program was used by the Obama campaign on Florida state election computers to steal the 2012 presidential election for Obama and Vice President Joe Biden.

I believe there is also substantial evidence of cyber manipulation of the 2020 vote by Dominion Voting Services, among others. The company has been subjected to substantive allegations in the past. Its funny to see Democrats who told us for four years that our elections were being interfered with through the cyber efforts of the Russians now insisting that such a thing is impossible.

MA: Why have Trump's lawyers been unable to confirm a single example of voter fraud?

RS: I reject the premise of your question. The presidents lawyers have produced multiple examples of voter fraud in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan and elsewhere. Dont give into the mass hypnosis of the fake news media. If you want to see proof of this evidence you can go here.

MA: Lets move ahead to Jan. 20, 2021. From the following scenarios, select the one that you believe is most likely to happen:

RS: As a general rule, I try to avoid answering hypothetical questions. I dont think there is any evidence under which President Trump will abandon his correct belief that he won a majority oflegalvotes cast.

Should he ultimately have to vacate the White House, it is clear that 73.7 million people will always believe was cheated out of the presidency and he will still enjoy the bully pulpit of a former president. He will always have the ability to make news and rally his movement against the misguided policies of an illegitimate successor.

Donald Trump is at heart an entrepreneur and he likes making money. The presidency has been an extraordinary financial burden on him. So, if he is no longer president, I do expect he will return to his business pursuits.

Meanwhile, the Trump movement has changed the face of the Republican Party, forever. Elitist country club Republicans like former Gov. John Kasich and Sen. Ben Sasse are dreaming if they think that the Trump Revolution is an aberration and that they will retake control of the Republican Party.

Should there be a Biden administration, I am certain that a former President Trump will be a most effective critic of the new presidents handling of COVID-19, the economy, foreign affairs, and trade deals. If Biden ever becomes president, his economic policies will make Herbert Hoover look popular.

MA: Where do you think Trump will rank among our presidents?

RS: When Trump became president we were told by the economic experts that the revival of Americas economy to be a world leader again was structurally impossible. They were wrong. President Donald Trump gave us record job growth, record wage growth, and the highest levels of employment among every group of Americans in our history. He rebuilt our military strength. He renegotiated trade deals, which have benefited the United States and fostered job creation here rather than abroad. The liberals will hate this, but win or lose Trump will rank among Americas greatest presidents.Trumps personal style, which grates on the political class, will long be forgotten while his great accomplishments are remembered.

MA: Do you foresee any circumstances where Trump fades from the scene and allows Biden to take center stage?

RS: No.

MA: Can you talk about any plans you have for 2021?

RS: I intend to host a weekly syndicated radio show as well as doing a daily podcast atStoneColdTruth.com. Currently, I am writing the definitive book regarding my political prosecution because I was unconstitutionally gagged through much of the process and have never had an opportunity to lay out the abuses and misconduct by the prosecutors both during my trial and in its aftermath.

MA: How are you earning a living at this time?

RS: This almost three-year ordeal has essentially bankrupted me and my family. Last week when the IRS released a tax lien of $1.5 million against me in Miami-Dade County, Florida (where I do not live), a dozen media outlets reported that Trump had canceled a $1.5 million tax debt. None of these media outlets reported that within minutes the IRS refiled the exact same lien in Broward County. where I do live.

On the day of my commutation, Facebook announced that based on the entirely false claim that I owned over 100 fake Facebook profiles, I would be banned from Facebook and Instagram for life.

Between being banned on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram, I lost well over one million followers. These are the people who bought my books, which was a substantial portion of my income. My wife and I are struggling to rebuild our finances and I have been doing some paid speaking for both political and non-political groups, deriving some income from my Cameo profile, where you can get a customized video that can be a shout-out, a birthday or anniversary congratulations, or even the answer to a political question.

MA: Our RealClearPolitics interview back in April focused on your new-found faith in Jesus as you prayed for a pardon. Now, how is your faith journey impacting your everyday life?

RS: I have been very forthright about the fact that I believe that God spared my life for a specific purpose, and I have rededicated my life to Jesus Christ and will continue to do my best to walk in His way. I recognize that because of my 40-year career as a hardboiled political operative that many elites, who dont believe in God anyway, will scoff at this. I dont really care, as He knows whats in my heart. I intend to continue speaking out about the awesome power and mercy of Jesus Christ and invite others who have problems to invite Him into their lives.

See the rest here:
Roger Stone on His Conviction, Trump, Vote Fraud, and Faith - thepress.net

Here’s the Truth: The Oligarchy Loves This Democratic Decay and Politics of Lies – Common Dreams

Joe Bidens victory instantly obliterated the Democratic Partys longstanding charge that Russia was hijacking and compromising US elections. The Biden victory, the Democratic Party leaders and their courtiers in the media now insist, is evidence that the democratic process is strong and untainted, that the system works. The elections ratified the will of the people.

But imagine if Donald Trump had been reelected. Would the Democrats and pundits at The New York Times, CNN and MSNBC pay homage to a fair electoral process? Or, having spent four years trying to impugn the integrity of the 2016 presidential race, would they once again haul out the blunt instrument of Russian interference to paint Trump as Vladimir Putins Manchurian candidate?

Trump and Giuliani are vulgar and buffoonish, but they play the same slimy game as their Democratic opponents.The Republicans scapegoat the deep state, communists and now, bizarrely, Venezuela; the Democrats scapegoat Russia. The widening disconnect from reality by the ruling elite is intended to mask their complicity in the seizure of power by predatory global corporations and billionaires.

"The two warring factions within the ruling elite, which fight primarily over the spoils of power while abjectly serving corporate interests, peddle alternative realities."

This is a disgraceful thing that was done in this country, Giuliani said at his recent bad-hair-day press conference. Probably not much more disgraceful than the things these people did in office, which you didnt and dont bother to cover and you conceal from the American people, but we let this happen, we use largely a Venezuelan voting machine in essence to count our vote. We let this happen. Were going to become Venezuela. We cannot let this happen to us. We cannot allow these crooks, because thats what they are, to steal an election from the American people. They elected Donald Trump. They didnt elect Joe Biden. Joe Biden is in the lead because of the fraudulent ballots, the illegal ballots, that were produced and that were allowed to be used, after the election was over.

Giulianis rant was topped by those of Sidney Powell, until yesterday another of Trumps lawyers, who blamed software designed for Hugo Chavez, who died in 2013, for Trumps loss, as well as the massive influence of Communist money. The software was created so Hugo Chavez would never lose another election, and he did not after that software was created, Powell said. He won every single election and then they exported it to Argentina and other countries in South America, and then they brought it here.

Compare this to how Hillary Clinton, during the recent primary campaign, warned that the Russians were grooming a female candidate, widely assumed to be Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, to run as a third-party candidate to serve Russian interests. Previously, Clinton called the 2016 Green Party candidate Jill Stein a Russian asset. She insisted, although the Special Counsel Robert Mueller and his prosecutors found no evidence to support her charge, that the Trump campaign worked closely in 2016 with Moscow and WikiLeaks which she insists is a Russian front to defeat her. Hillarys staff put together a hit list in the final days of her 2008 campaign, according to the book, Shattered: Inside Hillary Clintons Doomed Campaign by Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes, listing those who were loyal to the Clintons those who were not. They used a scale of 1 to 7.

Step back and think about it, Clinton wrote in her book, What Happened, about the 2016 election. The Russians hacked our election systems. They got inside. They tried to delete or alter voter information. This should send a shiver down the spine of every American.

Never mind that both ruling parties are silent about themassive interference in our elections byIsrael, which uses its lobbying groups to lavishly fund political candidates in both parties and flies members of Congress and their families to Israel for junkets at seaside resorts. Israels intrusion in our political process, including when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed Congress in 2015, without informing then President Barack Obama, to attack the presidents Iran nuclear deal, dwarfs that of any other country, including Russia.

The two warring factions within the ruling elite, which fight primarily over the spoils of power while abjectly serving corporate interests, peddle alternative realities. If the deep state and Venezuelan socialists or Russia intelligence operatives are pulling the strings no one in power is accountable for the rage and alienation caused by the social inequality, the unassailability of corporate power, the legalized bribery that defines our political process, the endless wars, austerity and de-industrialization. The social breakdown is, instead, the fault of shadowy phantom enemies manipulating groups such as Black Lives Matters or the Green Party.

The people who run this country have run out of workable myths with which to distract the public, and in a moment of extreme crisis have chosen to stoke civil war and defame the rest of us black and white rather than admit to a generation of corruption, betrayal, and mismanagement, Matt Taibbi writes.

These fictional narratives are dangerous. They erode the credibility of democratic institutions and electoral politics. They posit that news and facts are no longer true or false. Information is accepted or discarded based on whether it hurts or promotes one faction over another. While outlets such as Fox News have always existed as an arm of the Republican Party, this partisanship has now infected nearly all news organizations, including publications such as The New York Times and The Washington Post, along with the major tech platforms that disseminate information and news. A fragmented public with no common narrative believes whatever it wants to believe.

I first assumed this job posting from The New York Times for a Moscow correspondent was a parody posted by the Onion. It wasnt. It speaks volumes about the self-immolation of The New York Times and the press.

Of course, every charge leveled here against Russia regarding foreign interference can be leveled in spades against the United States, both in the present and past, and even the implied criticism of its pandemic response seems like a textbook case of projection. More to the point, why should the Times even send someone to Moscow to report on what Russians think, feel and how they view themselves and the world if they have already decided they are a cartoon villain? Why have a Moscow bureau at all?

A parody response circulating on the internet imagined a parallel posting by Pravda for a U.S. correspondent:

JOB DESCRIPTION: Donald Trumps America remains one of the biggest stories in the world. It sends out its armies, its drones, and its agents around the world to kill its enemies. It has its cyber agents sow chaos and disharmony, undermining and overthrowing regimes, while promoting its faux version of democracy. It has deployed private military contractors around the globe to secretly spread its influence. At home, its hospitals are filling up fast with Covid patients as its president hides out on the golf course. If that sounds like a place you want to cover, then we have good news. We will have an opening for a new correspondent.

I was a foreign correspondent for twenty years, fifteen of them with The New York Times. My job was to become bicultural, which requires hundreds of hours of language classes, to see the world from the perspective of those I covered and reflect it back to an American audience. But this type of reporting is now anachronistic. The paper might as well rehire the con artist Jayson Blair to sit in his apartment and snort coke while filing fictional variants on the preordained narrative the paper demands. Or maybe computer algorithms can do the job.

I guess I should not be surprised. After all, it was the Times that produced a ten-part podcast by its reporter Rukmini Callimachi based on interviews with a Muslim identified as Abu Huzayfah al-Kanadi who claimed to have been a member of ISIS in the Middle East. He provided lurid accounts of murders and crucifixions he supposedly carried out. His stories, catering to the rampant Islamophobia that poisons American society, were the audio version of snuff films. They were also a lie. The Canadian Abu Huzayfah, whose real name was Shehroze Chaudhry, was arrested in September 2020 by Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) and charged under Canadian hoax laws for fabricating his story.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

Get our best delivered to your inbox.

The flagrant partisanship and discrediting of truth across the political spectrum are swiftly fueling the rise of an authoritarian state. The credibility of democratic institutions and electoral politics, already deeply corrupted by PACs, the electoral college, lobbyists, the disenfranchisement of third-party candidates, gerrymandering and voter suppression, is being eviscerated.

Silicon Valley billionaires, including Facebook cofounder Dustin Moskovitz and ex-Google CEO Eric Schmidt, donated more than $100 million to a Democratic super PAC that created a torrent of anti-Trump TV ads in the final weeks of the campaign to elect Biden. The heavy infusion of corporate money to support Biden wasnt done to protect democracy. It was done because these corporations and billionaires know a Biden administration will serve their interests.

"The press, meanwhile, has largely given up on journalism. It has retreated into competing echo chambers that only speak to true believers."

The press, meanwhile, has largely given up on journalism. It has retreated into competing echo chambers that only speak to true believers. This catering exclusively to one demographic, which it sets against another demographic, is commercially profitable. But it also guarantees the balkanization of the United States and edges us closer and closer to fratricide.

When Trump leaves the White House millions of his enraged supports, hermetically sealed inside hyperventilating media platforms that feed back to them their rage and hate, will see the vote as fraudulent, the political system as rigged, and the establishment press as propaganda. They will target, I fear, through violence, the Democratic Party politicians, mainstream media outlets and those they demonize as conspiratorial members of the deep state, such as Dr. Anthony Fauci. The Democratic Party is as much to blame for this disintegration as Trump and the Republican Party.

The election of Biden is also very bad news for journalists such as Matt Taibbi, Glen Ford, Margaret Kimberley, Glenn Greenwald, Jeffrey St. Clair or Robert Scheer who refuse to be courtiers to the ruling elites. Journalists that do not spew the approved narrative of the right-wing, or, alternatively, the approved narrative of the Democratic Party, have a credibility the ruling elite fears. The worse things get and they will get worse as the pandemic leaves hundreds of thousands dead and thrusts millions of Americans into severe economic distress the more those who seek to hold the ruling elites, and in particular the Democratic Party, accountable will be targeted and censored in ways familiar to WikiLeaks and Julian Assange, now in a London prison and facing possible extradition to the United States and life imprisonment.

Barack Obamas assault on civil liberties, which included the repeated misuse of the Espionage Act to prosecute whistleblowers, the passage of Section 1021 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) to permit the military to act as a domestic police force and the ordering of the assassination of U.S. citizens deemed to be terrorists in Yemen, was far worse than those of George W. Bush. Bidens assault on civil liberties, I suspect, will surpass those of the Obama administration.

The censorship was heavy handed during the campaign. Digital media platforms, including Google, Twitter, YouTube and Facebook, along with the establishment press worked shamelessly as propaganda arms for the Biden campaign. They were determined not to make the mistake they made in 2016 when they reported on the damaging emails, released by WikiLeaks, from Hillary Clintons campaign chairman John Podesta. Although the emails were genuine, papers such as The New York Times routinely refer to the Podesta emails as disinformation. This, no doubt, pleases its readership, 91 percent of whom identify as Democrats according to the Pew Research Center. But it is another example of journalistic malfeasance.

Following the election of Trump, the media outlets that cater to a Democratic Party readership made amends. The New York Times was one of the principal platforms that amplified Russiagate conspiracies, most of which turned out to be false. At the same time, the paper largely ignored the plight of the disposed working class that supported Trump. When the Russiagate story collapsed, the paper pivoted to focus on race, embodied in the 1619 Project. The root cause of social disintegration the neoliberal order, austerity and deindustrialization was ignored since naming it would alienate the papers corporate advertisers and the elites on whom the paper depends for access.

Once the 2020 election started, The New York Times and other mainstream outlets censored and discredited information that could hurt Biden, including a tape of Joe Biden speaking with former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, which appears to be authentic. They gave credibility to any rumor, however spurious, which was unfavorable to Trump. Twitter and Facebook blocked access to a New York Post story about the emails allegedly found on Hunter Bidens discarded laptop. Twitter locked the New York Post out of its own account for over a week. Glenn Greenwald, whose article on Hunter Biden was censored by his editors at The Intercept, which he helped found, resigned. He released the email exchanges with his editors over his article. Ignoring the textual evidence of censorship, editors and writers at The Intercept engaged in a public campaign of character assassination against Greenwald. This sordid behavior by self-identified progressive journalists is a page out of the Trump playbook and a sad commentary on the collapse of journalistic integrity.

The censorship and manipulation of information was honed and perfected against WikiLeaks. When WikiLeaks tries to release information, it is hit with botnets or distributed denial of service attacks. Malware attacks WikiLeaks domain and website. The WikiLeaks site is routinely shut down or unable to serve its content to its readers. Attempts by WikiLeaks to hold press conferences see the audio distorted and the visual images corrupted. Links to WikiLeaks events are delayed or cut. Algorithms block the dissemination of WikiLeaks content. Hosting services, including Amazon, removed WikiLeaks from its servers. Julian Assange, after releasing the Iraqi war logs, saw his bank accounts and credit cards frozen. WikiLeaks PayPal accounts were disabled to cut off donations. The Freedom of the Press Foundation in December 2017 closed down the anonymous funding channel to WikiLeaks which was set up to protect the anonymity of donors. A well-orchestrated smear campaign against Assange was amplified and given credibility by the mass media and filmmakers such as Alex Gibney. Assange and WikiLeaks were first. We are next

Democratic Senator Chris Murphy told CNN during this campaign that Russian disinformation efforts are more problematic than in 2016. He warned that this time around, the Russians have decided to cultivate U.S. citizens as assets. They are attempting to try to spread their propaganda in the mainstream media.

This will be the official mantra of the Democratic Party, a vicious redbaiting campaign without actual reds, especially as the country spirals out of control. The reason I have a show on Russia-funded RT America is the same reason Vaclav Havel could only be heard on the US-funded Voice of America during the communist control of Czechoslovakia. I did not choose to leave the mainstream media. I was pushed out. And once anyone is pushed out, the ruling elite is relentless about discrediting the few platforms left willing to give them, and the issues they raise, a hearing.

If the problem is American citizens being cultivated as assets trying to put interference in the mainstream media, the logical next step is to start asking Internet platforms to shut down accounts belonging to any American journalist with the temerity to report material leaked by foreigners (the wrong foreigners, of course it will continue to be okay to report things like the black ledger), writes Taibbi, who has done some of the best reporting on the emerging censorship. FromFoxor theDaily Calleron the right,to left-leaning outlets likeConsortiumor theWorld Socialist Web Site,to writers like me even were all now clearly in range of new speech restrictions, even if we stick to long-ago-established factual standards.

Taibbi argues that the precedent for overt censorship took place when the major digital platforms Facebook, Twitter, Google, Spotify, YouTube in a coordinated move blacklisted the right-wing talk show host Alex Jones.

Liberal America cheered, Taibbi told me when I interviewed him for my show, On Contact:

They said Well this is a noxious figure. This is a great thing. Finally, someones taking action. What they didnt realize is that we were trading an old system of speech regulation for a new one without any public discussion. You and I were raised in a system where you got punished for speech if you committed libel or slander or if there was imminent incitement to lawless action, right? That was the standard that the Supreme Court set, but that was done through litigation. There was an open process where you had a chance to rebut charges. That is all gone now. Now, basically theres a handful of these tech distribution platforms that control how people get their media. Theyve been pressured by the Senate, which has called all of their CEOs in, and basically ordered them, We need you to come up with a plan to prevent the sowing of discord and spreading of misinformation. This has finally come into fruition. You see a major reputable news organization like the New York Post with a 200-year history locked out of its own Twitter account. The story [Hunter Bidens emails] has not been disproven. Its not disinformation or misinformation. Its been suppressed as it would be suppressed in a Third World country. Its a remarkable historic moment. The danger is that we end up with a one-party informational system. Theres going to be approved dialogue and unapproved dialogue that you can only get through certain fringe avenues. Thats the problem. We let these companies get this monopolistic share of the distribution system. Now theyre exercising that power.

In the Soviet Union the truth was passed, often hand to hand, in underground samizdat documents, clandestine copies of news and literature banned by the state. The truth will endure. It will be heard by those who seek it out. It will expose the mendacity of the powerful, however hard it will be to obtain. Despotisms fear the truth. They know it is a mortal threat. If we remain determined to live in truth, no matter the cost, we have a chance.

See the rest here:
Here's the Truth: The Oligarchy Loves This Democratic Decay and Politics of Lies - Common Dreams

Memetic Warfare: How the Targeted Propaganda of QAnon Weaponised COVID-19 – Byline Times

Daniel Morrison looks at the Trump campaign origins of the gamified global conspiracy theory which has now evolved into active Coronavirus denialism

The influence of perception is one of the defining features of modern life. Ever sinceThomas Barrattused a nice painting to make Pears Soap more appealing, people have competed to change our minds about things.De Beerscreated the idea that diamonds had something to do with marriage.Edward Bernaysput cigarettes in the hands of marching suffragettes to make them Torches of Freedom.

Political campaigns also employ agencies to influence public perception of their clients. Take the case of Donald Trump, who prior to announcing he was running for President has a chequered reputation nepotistic, a history ofbankruptcies, allegations oftax fraudandopenlybraggedabout sexual assault. His campaign would require the creation of a completely Alternative Reality. One where he was a strong, powerful, righteous hero, on a selfless mission to save the world from the clutches of an evil democratic cabal of deep state operatives.

Step forward curious character called Q, who claimed to be from military intelligence, with inside information on how it was all going to go down.

Lets start by going back to 2016.Roger Stonehad finally succeeded inmakingDonald Trump the Republican candidate for President. Stones whole career (and partnership with Trumps campaign manageerPaul Manafort) had been a long list of dirty tricks, and this job was going to be no exception. And in an election, political propaganda isnt just about building your guy up. Taking the other side down is just as effective. And so he set his sights on the democratic candidate: Hillary Clinton.

Again, with a candidate as qualified as her, it was going to take the creation of an Alternative Reality. And with the advent of the internet, that was easier than ever.

Jeff Gieseawas a digital businessman, pro-Trumpagitator, and associate ofPeter Thielwho, drawing on the ideas ofChuck Johnson, published a paper called Its time to embrace memetic warfare. In context, it was pitched as a way to fight ISIS. In practice, it would become a key part of the Trump campaignsstrategy.

There is now anentireindustryservingthisspace.Psy Groupis anIsraelicompanyfounded byJoel Zamel, which specialised in online perception management, through social media manipulation, influence campaigns, opposition research, honey traps, as well asclandestineon-the-groundactivities.

In April 2016, during the Republican primaries, Trump Campaign offical Rick GatesaskedPsy Group for a proposal. They responded with aquotefor $3,125,000 plus media costs, and promised to make it virtually untraceable.

Three months later,ErikPrincearranged ameetingbetween Zamel, Donald Trump Jr., andGeorge Nader(an emissary for two wealthy Arab princes) in Trump Tower.

The Deep Web that the brochure above refers to, likely refers to Anonymous message boards like4chan. 4chan is a place with basically no rules. Its afascinatingenvironment that gives people a chance to express themselves in a way they never could, forbetterorworse. The tradition that we will focus on here is known as LARPing. The term comes fromLive Action Role Playing, which is where people dress up as characters from a film, book, game or series that they like, and go out and enact the storylines.

Online, however, you dont have to sew a costume and go outside. You just need a keyboard and an internet connection. People would pose as anyone they wanted, including people purporting to be from inside government agencies.

On 2 July 2016, when the FBI was conducting their investigation into Hillary Clintons use of a personal email server, a characterappeared, who will come to be known asFBIanon.

Over hundreds of posts from July to October 2016, FBIanon systematically created and nurtured the idea that there was actually far more going on with the Democratic candidate including occult rituals, and abusing trafficked children. If it had stopped there, perhaps we could consider it to be a LARP/prank. But it didnt stop there. Because a handful of people on 4chan isnt going to be able to make a difference in an election, FBIanon gave the following instructions (over many posts which are edited together here):

The task is this:unleash every meme, image, and horrible story about HRC that you can musterIn order to be effective,you must proselytize For example:Start a website aggregating the images/factsand then try to get it linked to Drudge. Shove the images down every news anchor/journalists throat.Push out to peoplewho you normally would have nothing to do with Why dont youinvade their circles? We should be spreading memesto subs on Reddit.blitz Twitter, Tumblr, and all social media with memes on the Clinton Foundationtonight, the last night of the DNC We need TrumpGen with us, and the meme division blasting the Tumblr tags. Bring up the old methods that /b/ used to use during their Tumblr raidsWere going to wartonight Repeat something often enough and it becomes the truth. Repeat after me: Hillary is evil and will destroy the planet.

Its possible that a passionate volunteer had the same singular devotion to getting Trump in office as Roger Stone. But they also intimated:

More leaks will come. The time is not right yet. Expect an October Surprise.

And when the second leaks did come, they added:

When you are reading Podestas e-mails, remember that the Clintons deal in weapons, drugs, and people. Some terminology in use is far more nefarious than many of you suspect.

This indicated that whoever was posting as FBIanon was working with Wikileaks and/or Roger Stone. Russia hadhackedinto the DNC, and given the contents to Wikileaks, who told the Trump team. Sure enough, a few weeks later, right before the election, Wikileaksreleased20,000 of Clinton campaign manager John Podestas emails.

While it was handy for the Republicans to have the other sides material, there was literally nothing incriminating in there.

But if you change some of the words, andtellpeople its sinister, an Alternative Reality begins to emerge, in which ultimately people are less likely to vote for Clinton.

Pizzagate wasnt their only trick. They also created the story thatSeth Rich was assassinated and a story that other key people in the campaign had anillegitimate child. Its important to keep an eye on the people at the centre of creating these narratives such as Erik Prince,Ed Butowsky,Matt Couch,Sean Hannity,Steve Pieczenik,Jerome Corsi,and Julian Assange.

The influence campaign obviously didnt stop after the election. There was an administration to sustain, and eventual re-election to run for, amid mounting investigations into allegations of corruption.

In late October 2017, the day after Manafort and his associate Rick Gates were indicted, anothercharacterappeared on 4chan, who would come to be known as Q.

There are a few things that set QAnon apart from other Live Action Role Playing on 4chan. The first is that, like FBIanon, it is so dedicated in driving support for a candidate it is functionally indistinguishable from a professional campaign.

The second is that instead of answering questions, itaskedthem. This pointed the narrative outward, into the world.

The third is that it had an oddly specific policy agenda at the outset: attacking the Global Engagement Center a new body devoted to fighting Russian meddling in elections. (It doesnthaveto be a Russian Psy-Op for the people responsible to besympathetictoRussianinterests.)

The fourth is how staggeringlyeffectiveit has gone on to be. Despite having a protagonist as terrible as Trump, it has convinced millions of people that he is quite literally Gods Gift, and broken countless families in the process.

In light of this, its important to examine this and try to understand whats happened. We need to analyse some of the mechanics involved. And what we find when we look under the hood, is essentially an elaborategame. A lot of it seems to boil down to the fact that puzzles are fun.

Over the last 30 years, story telling has taken on a new dimension interactivity. Plots that involve the reader, sending them on a treasure hunt, or asking them to solveriddlesto advance the narrative. They bridge a gap between the fantasy world and the real world, using multiple forms of media to create a Game in an Alternative Reality. So they are known as Alternative Reality Games, or ARGs. They have a relatively brief but fascinatingly rich history:I Love Bees, The Art of the Heist, Last Call Poker, Perplex City, etc.

Thisis not anaccident, it is not acoincidence, and it is not ajoke. This is a ARG-based propaganda campaign infull flight, created by people using sophisticated psychological manipulation techniques. The foundation of a very similar strategy was explicitly articulated in a pitchdeckfromWikistrat, another digital influence company founded by Joel Zamel:

A campaign like this is powerful of course, but its not much use if it doesnt reach the right people. And this is where companies likeCambridge Analytica(orEmerdata, or whatever else has succeededSCL, andGloo) come into the picture. As well ascreatingcampaigns, they use unprecedented volumes ofBig Datato aim content at the right market with surgical precision formaximum impact. And at the end of 2016, CAsigneda memorandum ofunderstandingwithPsy Group

Now were about to understand one of the biggest mysteries of all: how a bunch of hippies in the wellness community came to support Donald Trump. Because remember, this is about building political capital. The right-wing activist Proud Boys and Boogaloos groups are easy, they were already there. The next step is reaching anewaudience, who otherwise would have been unlikely to vote for him, and converting them. The ones who doyoga, wearlinen, and talk about aligningchakrasandcrystals. Who believe the world is ripe for spiritual ascension.

They watch documentaries like Thrive and Gaia Latest. They are people who are prepared to challenge what theyve been told, and like to think for themselves; who dont trust the government, who think banks do have too much power, that the media does lie to us; who are ready to go with one and with all, towards a great awakening.

In other words, this is a platform primed for Q content. And thats exactly whats happened.

Amongst those icons is the International Tribunal for Human Justice. Its a faux court set up in 2015 which functions as a platform for the propagation of various conspiracy theories, including 5G, coronavirus, and the idea that children are being tortured for their adrenochrome otherwise known as Blood Libel.

There was one important step in between though. People dont usually go from zero to Blood Libel in so short a time. They need some sort of a gateway. And on the 4 May 2020, a man calledMiki Willisreleased the infamous film Plandemic whichthrewthe world into chaos and primed the pump for the outbreak of the Conspiracy Narrative Virus. That infected enough people to be able to go on and believe the #savethechildren conspiracy, and then the rest of the Satanic Cabal of Qanon.

It was promoted heavily, and almost exclusively by Breitbart. The idea that the virus was man-made came from a paper published by a think-tank called the Rule of Law Institute. Which was also funded bySteve Bannon.

And thus we now have all the pieces in place for this to wreak absolute havoc with the shared notions of truth and reality we need for society to function. QAnon content was pumped through these channels, and with everyone locked inside it spread like wildfire through these networks.

On top of all that, Russia amplifies it in ways both big and small. Either byhosting the infrastructureof 8kun,amplifyingcontentwithbot networks, creating fake spiritual facebook pages to pepper with propaganda, or broadcasting the Lockdown/QAnon crossover protests.There doesnt have to be collusion for this to have an impact. When the goals align, the effect is the same.

The disinformation machine is a dangerous threat to our democracy. If and when Q goes away, the power to create this phenomenon will remain. We must be prepared.

QAnon is propaganda. And we know whos responsible.

A longer and more detailed version of this analysis by Daniel Morrison first appeared on Medium

Read the original post:
Memetic Warfare: How the Targeted Propaganda of QAnon Weaponised COVID-19 - Byline Times

This AI tool tells a conspiracy theory from a true conspiracy by how easily the story falls apart – Stuff Magazines

The audio on the otherwise shakybody camera footageis unusually clear. As police officers search a handcuffed man who moments before had fired a shot inside a pizza parlor, an officer asks him why he was there. The man says to investigate a pedophile ring. Incredulous, the officer asks again. Another officer chimes in, Pizzagate. Hes talking about Pizzagate.

In that brief, chilling interaction in 2016, it becomes clear that conspiracy theories, long relegated to the fringes of society, had moved into the real world in a very dangerous way.

Conspiracy theories, which have the potential tocause significant harm, have found awelcome home on social media, where forums free from moderation allow like-minded individuals to converse. There they can develop their theories and propose actions to counteract the threats they uncover.

But how can you tell if an emerging narrative on social media is an unfounded conspiracy theory? It turns out that its possible to distinguish between conspiracy theories and true conspiracies by using machine learning tools to graph the elements and connections of a narrative. These tools could form the basis of an early warning system to alert authorities to online narratives that pose a threat in the real world.

The culture analytics group at the University of California, whichIandVwani Roychowdhurylead, has developed an automated approach to determining when conversations on social media reflect the telltale signs of conspiracy theorizing. We have applied these methods successfully to the study ofPizzagate, theCOVID-19 pandemicandanti-vaccination movements. Were currently using these methods to studyQAnon.

Actual conspiracies are deliberately hidden, real-life actions of people working together for their own malign purposes. In contrast, conspiracy theories are collaboratively constructed and develop in the open.

Conspiracy theories are deliberately complex and reflect an all-encompassing worldview. Instead of trying to explain one thing, a conspiracy theory tries to explain everything, discovering connections across domains of human interaction that are otherwise hidden mostly because they do not exist.

While the popular image of the conspiracy theorist is of a lone wolf piecing together puzzling connections with photographs and red string, that image no longer applies in the age of social media. Conspiracy theorizing has moved online and is now theend-product of a collective storytelling. The participants work out the parameters of a narrative framework: the people, places and things of a story and their relationships.

The online nature of conspiracy theorizing provides an opportunity for researchers to trace the development of these theories from their origins as a series of often disjointed rumors and story pieces to a comprehensive narrative. For our work, Pizzagate presented the perfect subject.

Pizzagate began to develop in late October 2016 during the runup to the presidential election. Within a month, it was fully formed, with a complete cast of characters drawn from a series of otherwise unlinked domains: Democratic politics, the private lives of the Podesta brothers, casual family dining and satanic pedophilic trafficking. The connecting narrative thread among these otherwise disparate domains was the fanciful interpretation of the leaked emails of the Democratic National Committeedumped by WikiLeaksin the final week of October 2016.

We developed a model a set ofmachine learningtools that canidentify narrativesbased on sets of people, places and things and their relationships. Machine learning algorithms process large amounts of data to determine the categories of things in the data and then identify which categories particular things belong to.

We analyzed 17,498 posts from April 2016 through February 2018 on the Reddit and 4chan forums where Pizzagate was discussed. The model treats each post as a fragment of a hidden story and sets about to uncover the narrative. The software identifies the people, places and things in the posts and determines which are major elements, which are minor elements and how theyre all connected.

The model determines the main layers of the narrative in the case of Pizzagate, Democratic politics, the Podesta brothers, casual dining, satanism and WikiLeaks and how the layers come together to form the narrative as a whole.

To ensure that our methods produced accurate output, we compared the narrative framework graph produced by our model withillustrations published in The New York Times. Our graph aligned with those illustrations, and also offered finer levels of detail about the people, places and things and their relationships.

To see if we could distinguish between a conspiracy theory and an actual conspiracy, we examinedBridgegate, a political payback operation launched by staff members of Republican Gov. Chris Christies administration against the Democratic mayor of Fort Lee, New Jersey.

As we compared the results of our machine learning system using the two separate collections, two distinguishing features of a conspiracy theorys narrative framework stood out.

First, while the narrative graph for Bridgegate took from 2013 to 2020 to develop, Pizzagates graph was fully formed and stable within a month. Second, Bridgegates graph survived having elements removed, implying that New Jersey politics would continue as a single, connected network even if key figures and relationships from the scandal were deleted.

The Pizzagate graph, in contrast, was easily fractured into smaller subgraphs. When we removed the people, places, things and relationships that came directly from the interpretations of the WikiLeaks emails, the graph fell apart into what in reality were the unconnected domains of politics, casual dining, the private lives of the Podestas and the odd world of satanism.

In the illustration below, the green planes are the major layers of the narrative, the dots are the major elements of the narrative, the blue lines are connections among elements within a layer and the red lines are connections among elements across the layers. The purple plane shows all the layers combined, showing how the dots are all connected. Removing the WikiLeaks plane yields a purple plane with dots connected only in small groups.

There are clear ethical challenges that our work raises. Our methods, for instance, could be used to generate additional posts to a conspiracy theory discussion that fit the narrative framework at the root of the discussion. Similarly, given any set of domains, someone could use the tool to develop an entirely new conspiracy theory.

However, this weaponization of storytelling is already occurring without automatic methods, as our study of social media forums makes clear. There is a role for the research community to help others understand how that weaponization occurs and to develop tools for people and organizations who protect public safety and democratic institutions.

Developing an early warning system that tracks the emergence and alignment of conspiracy theory narratives could alert researchers and authorities to real-world actions people might take based on these narratives. Perhaps with such a system in place, the arresting officer in the Pizzagate case would not have been baffled by the gunmans response when asked why hed shown up at a pizza parlor armed with an AR-15 rifle.

Continue reading here:
This AI tool tells a conspiracy theory from a true conspiracy by how easily the story falls apart - Stuff Magazines

First Trump pardons the turkey, then Flynn, next himself? – Sydney Morning Herald

Flynn was forced to resign from the role when it was revealed he misled Vice-President Mike Pence about his conversations with Russian ambassador to the US Sergey Kislyak after the 2016 election. Flynn insisted he and Kislyak had not discussed Russian sanctions on America when they actually had. He later pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about his conversations with Kislyak.

Trump has maintained ever since that Flynn had suffered enough by losing his job. So it was only the speed of his decision to pardon Flynn, rather than the pardon itself, that came as a surprise. In his tweet announcing the move, Trump said: "Congratulations to @GenFlynn and his wonderful family, I know you will now have a truly fantastic Thanksgiving!"

Then-presidential candidate Donald Trump gives a thumbs up as he speaks with Michael Flynn at a campaign event in 2016.Credit:AP

There will almost certainly be many more pardons to come. Unrestrained by the desire to win re-election, its common for outgoing presidents to use the "lame duck" period before departure to issue a high number of pardons and commutations. Often they are controversial.

Bill Clinton famously issued 140 pardons on his last day in office. The recipients included several Democratic Party politicians, Clintons brother Roger, and Marc Rich, a fugitive who had been charged with 51 counts related to tax fraud. It just so happened that Richs former wife had donated to Hillary Clintons Senate campaign and the Clinton Library. Former Democratic president Jimmy Carter called Bill Clinton's pardons "disgraceful".

Two days before the end of his presidency, Barack Obama pardoned 64 people and commuted the sentences of 209 others including Chelsea Manning, who was jailed for leaking highly sensitive information to WikiLeaks. On his final day in office, Obama commuted the sentences of 330 prisoners, including many who had been jailed for drug offences.

(Pardons are usually awarded to people who have finished their sentences or are awaiting trial, while commutations apply to those currently in jail. A pardon also erases the conviction, while a commutation does not.)

It would be unsurprising if Trump were to commute the sentence of Paul Manafort, his former campaign manager, who was sentenced to 7 years in jail for obstructing justice and violating lobbying laws. Manafort was charged as part of the Mueller inquiry into Russian election interference, which Trump maintains was a "witch hunt".

He may also pardon George Papadopoulos, who famously triggered the FBI's investigation into Trump's ties with Russia by holding an indiscreet meeting with Alexander Downer, then Australia's high commissioner to the United Kingdom, in London. Papadopoulos served 12 days in prison for lying to the FBI.

Loading

Trump may even consider pre-emptively pardoning himself, which would be a first in US history. He has said he believes he has "an absolute right to pardon myself". Many legal scholars disagree, saying the pardon powers outlined in the constitution imply two different people. But Trump may try anyway and leave it to the Supreme Court to decide.

Crucially, any pardon would only protect Trump from federal prosecution. State officials such as those in New York, who are probing into his business dealings could still charge him with crimes when he leaves the White House.

Understand the election result and its aftermath with expert analysis from US correspondent Matthew Knott. Sign up to The Sydney Morning Herald's newsletter here, The Age's here, Brisbane Times' here and WAtoday's here.

Matthew Knott is North America correspondent for The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age.

Read this article:
First Trump pardons the turkey, then Flynn, next himself? - Sydney Morning Herald