Why the Open Source Security Foundation was a long time coming – ARNnet

The Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF) is a few months old now, but the question is why it isnt years old.

After years of attackers exploiting bugs in OpenSSL, Apache Struts, and countless other projects, along with our laziness in patching them, it seems that long ago we would have combined to protect the open source supply chain upon which every organisation depends.

But we havent. It wasnt until 2020 that we decided as an industry to stop piece-mealing our approach to security.

Why?

Thats the question I asked Kim Lewandowski, a Google product manager and member of the OpenSSFs governing board. According to Lewandowski, We all depend on open source, and theres no reason for us to all try to solve this individually or in a silo. Shes right, but why did it take us so long to get to this point?

You and you and you and

One of the problems with open source security is that its not any one companys problem. Goldman Sachs, for example, wants the software on which it depends to be secure, but why should it bear the brunt of paying to secure software that everyone uses? Ditto Google, which has contributed and uses a great deal of open source software.

As Lewandowski stated, Google is not going to go in and rewrite every single open source software package that exists on the internet today that our customers and we are using.

Even if Google wanted to do so, it really couldnt. Theres simply too much. Sure, the company could fix OpenSSL or Apache Struts or whichever project is currently compromised, but the universe of open source code is gargantuan and always expanding.

This simply isnt a task that any one company can reasonably tackle alone.

Different projects, different needs

This fact is complicated by the diverse needs of each project. According to Lewandowski, each project is different and as convenient as it would be to throw money at the security problem, that doesnt necessarily work. Weve seen some maintainers where they dont want the money, or cant take the money, or simply cant apply it for things that we need.

Other projects need help with security audits, which the OpenSSF plans to enable. Such audits currently take place within the CNCF and other foundations or organisations, but theyre incomplete as they are.

According to Lewandowski, the audits weve seen have been great and have uncovered a lot of things, but then the projects can get stuck with a bunch of work that needs to be fixed if [the auditor] doesnt see [the audit] all the way through to remediation. And sometimes, she continued, Folks will fix bugs just to pass the audit or as a quick fix and the deeper underlying security issue is still there.

So how can a community rally to not only find but also fix problems?

Lewandowski explained that the OpenSSF is currently considering different models to engage contributors to help resolve security vulnerabilities. It turns out its not necessarily straightforward, however.

Some organisations, for example, want to contribute the expertise of their engineers to help fix the bugs, which is great, but how can OpenSSF hold them accountable?

If a number of member organisations pledge five engineers each, for example, how do you show accountability such that all of those engineers are doing exactly what we hoped they would do inside the Foundation? These are tough problems, and more help is needed.

Despite the daunting challenges, progress is being made. In partnership with ISRG, for example, the popular cURL is getting a new back end written in Rust that promises to deliver even better security. Such a collaboration is a great example of the kind of thing OpenSSF can foster.

But why did it take so long?

Better late than never

Its kind of eerie how many similarities you can draw to the current pandemic, Lewandowski pointed out. Its like no one really cared to do too much about it until theres this huge outbreak impacting us all.

While there wasnt any trigger event for OpenSSF, there has been a steady drumbeat alerting us to the need for years. From time to time, weve reacted. The Heartbleed rupture of OpenSSL, for example, gave rise to the Core Infrastructure Initiative, led by the Linux Foundation. Similar objectives arose elsewhere in response to different threats.

Even so, they were still largely siloed efforts.

Some of those silos spring from companies running open source in (periodically not so blissful) ignorance.

Organisations might think theyre paying for proprietary software but, as WhiteSource and others have highlighted, upwards of 95 per cent of all software includes open source components. No matter what the outward license, theres open source inside. Always.

This fact is starting to sink in, making now the perfect time for the OpenSSF to make a significant impact on the industry. Of course, as Lewandowski stressed, Its a delicate balance on how you talk about it. You want to drive awareness, but you cant scare everyone away.

So lets say it this way: Open source is foundational to all software today, which software increasingly powers even the most remote aspects of our lives. The process behind open source the process by which we find and fix bugs is the right way to tackle software security, but it can be that much better if we coordinate our efforts.

The OpenSSF offers us a chance to do that, and needs involvement not just from software vendors, but also from companies like JP Morgan Chase, Facebook, Uber, and, hopefully, you.

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags open sourcesecurity

See the article here:
Why the Open Source Security Foundation was a long time coming - ARNnet

Adopting open source in the face of fragmentation – Techerati

Open source fragmentation is enabling innovation and efficiency, but also increasing security risks, writes Lech Sandecki, Product Manager at Canonical the publisher of Ubuntu

In 2020, 99 percent of enterprise codebases contain open source components. Businesses have come to realise that the collective approach of open source toward innovation has incredible benefits, and will help them to integrate technologies such as cloud computing, artificial intelligence (AI), machine-learning (ML), and microservices into their solutions.

But with this goldrush, which has brought a sharp rise in new applications, its becoming more difficult to see, or simply just to know, how many open source components are involved. This fragmentation is consequently hurting compliance officers, who are unable to keep up with the software supply chain. These same officers are struggling with visibility and cannot keep up pace.

The challenge is that the landscape is unrecognisable from just a decade ago. Back then, a much smaller pool of commercial open source vendors licensed their software to customers, understood everything about the code, and dealt with every security patch.

Today, however, the risk landscape has become increasingly fragmented, with many old or unpatched subcomponent versions used in applications. Whilst innovation and efficiency is consistently growing on account of fragmentation, so do the security risks.

Open source is on the rise, and its growth has continued even throughout Covid-19, as developers, in particular, continue to recognise the vast benefits. But these benefits are being undermined by the cybersecurity issues which arise when open source components are not kept up to date or or properly maintained. Sonatype recently found that there has been a 430% surge in next-gen cyber-attacks aimed at infiltrating open source software supply chains, revealing a lack of understanding when it comes down to open source security.

Nobody could have predicted just how fast the expansion of open source would be, and now comes the growing challenge of adopting it safely and within wider compliance frameworks. For compliance officers and IT teams, there are of course ways to successfully manage the transition securely and effectively.

At the very least, compliance officers should always track the open source components being used. With full visibility and oversight over the process, it is far easier to understand and pinpoint vulnerabilities with accuracy. In manufacturing, businesses have a comprehensive inventory of all the materials and parts needed to make a product. If one is found to be defective, the manufacturer can pinpoint the wider impact immediately.

By adopting a similar approach, enterprises can garner insight into the clutter of open source components that their developers are using. As a result, they can take control of ensuring that their open source components are secure, rather than relying on information from the community.

Many organisations are now turning to automation to help manage the day-to-day side of security. Compliance officers themselves are stretched. Automating core security processes, which will prioritise vulnerabilities, can give time back to compliance officers and security workers, so that they can work on more pressing issues.

Organisations can consequently boost security posture. Businesses should prioritise integrating automation within the production environment, as this can often seem an easy target to attackers. CI / CD pipelines usually contain a path to what is given in production, which is why restrictive access controls based on multi-factor authentication must be implemented.

Officers should also select trusted proxies whenever they can. Good Linux publishers usually have a comprehensive program to review, prioritise, and fix their software packages for vulnerabilities. Although not all open source applications might be covered by default, it is worth checking which open source packages and versions can benefit from security patching, long term support (LTS), or extended security maintenance (ESM).

OS publishers maintain their own databases to track remediation of the latest public vulnerabilities from various sources, including MITRE, NIST NVD, and others. If an open-source provider has these qualities, it is likely you can trust it and make use of these tools through the adoption process.

To stay competitive, businesses are feeling the pressure to deploy new applications, but this should never come at a security cost. This is why every company should embrace DevSecOps, which applies better hygiene to application delivery, by introducing security earlier in the application life cycle and requiring security tests and verification at every step. This approach views security as an integral part of DevOps automated CI / CD pipeline, and not just a step at the end of the journey.

A DevSecOps culture, as well as having the right skills in place, will make open source adoption all the smoother. Enterprises will either need to more aggressively develop new security skills internally or look to external organisations that already have these capabilities in place.

Research from digital risk protection specialist Skurio this summer found that 50% of UK firms were looking to outsource security services, while 80 percent had problems with team skills and knowledge. The uptick in cyber incidences and increased security risks mean that it has never been so important for teams to ensure security specialists are in place throughout the adoption process.

Along with great developers, organisations crucially require great compliance officers that can tackle fragmentation head on. It is often overlooked just how fundamental compliance offers are as ultimately, they can make or break the success of open source adoption. A change in skills and culture, to prioritise compliance and security, whilst simultaneously allowing developers to run with the innovation involved, will be key to the growth of the industry.

Originally posted here:
Adopting open source in the face of fragmentation - Techerati

Bitcoin price metric that called 2020 bull runs flashes buy again – Cointelegraph

An elegant Bitcoin (BTC) metric that predicted its run to $12,000 in August has flashed bullish again for the first time since July.

As noted by creator Charles Edwards on Dec. 3, the Hash Ribbons indicator is now signaling for buyers to enter the Bitcoin market.

Uploading an annotated chart to social media, Edwards, who is also the founder of digital asset manager Capriole, noted similarities between Bitcoin now and before the previous bullish upticks throughout this year.

Look what I found. A blue dot, he commented, identifying the new entry point.

Hash ribbons are based on Bitcoins network hash rate behavior and designed to tell investors when price is due to experience upside.

In theory, when miners capitulate due to events such as a major price correction, hash rate declines, only to revive thanks to Bitcoins automated difficulty readjustments. Hash ribbons demonstrate that around midway through this miner capitulation is an optimal time to take positions.

As the saying goes, Price follows hash rate in Bitcoin, hash ribbons lend technical proof to the popular mantra.

Edwards blue dot occurs when the 30-day hash rate value crosses the 60-day value, indicating a recovery is underway.

Hash Ribbon is setting up for a buy signal soon, Rafael Schultze-Kraft, chief technical officer of on-chain analytics resource Glassnode, continued with a further chart.

Schultze-Kraft described hash ribbons as elegant for the indicators reliability. In July, the time of the previous blue dot event, Bitcoin took a matter of weeks to post highs not seen in over a year.

The signal comes as Bitcoin continues to range below $20,000, having seen considerable volatility while getting rejected at just above all-time highs.

Major selling pressure remains, while conversely, successfully overcoming resistance would give Bitcoin a clean sweep to the likely next level of resistance at $22,000, exchange orderbook data shows.

At press time, BTC/USD circled $19,300, having been unable thus far to retake $19,500.

Go here to read the rest:
Bitcoin price metric that called 2020 bull runs flashes buy again - Cointelegraph

Bitcoin Price Targets by Analysts for 2021 and Beyond – Barron’s

Text size

Bitcoin hit another new all-time high Tuesday, touching $19,920 in the morning before slipping to the low $19,000s later in the day. Analysts and investors have been issuing new price targets for the cryptocurrency, often predicting that it will skyrocket to many multiples of the current price.

But the underpinning of those estimates is still hazyBitcoin produces no cash flows and is hardly used for transactions. Its a software that allows people to transact, and is controlled by no single entitythe software operates on computers set up around the world.

Although Bitcoin still sometimes moves as much 5% in an hour, it can be hard to pinpoint exactly why.

Analysts used to claim the price had something to do with the difficulty of mining Bitcointhe cost of the electricity and equipment it takes to complete the equations necessary to create new Bitcoins. Given the assets volatility and unpredictability, however, few still cite this metric.

New metrics are emerging. BTIG analyst Julian Emanuel analyzed Bitcoins price in part by comparing it to the Nasdaq 100 (NDX), which first peaked in the dot-com bubble and then took years to reach that peak again. With that in mind, he thinks its feasible the price goes to $50,000 by the end of next year.

It took NDX 14 years to rise above its parabolic blowoff top, then 6 years to rise a further 150%, he wrote. Bitcoin appears poised to exceed its 2017 parabolic blowoff top in a mere 3 years. Should Bitcoins speed of ascent keep pace with the past three years and the degree of the rally approximate that of NDX, $50,000 per Bitcoin is a reasonable year end 2021 Price Target.

Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, large Bitcoin holders who founded cryptocurrency exchange and custodian Gemini, recently predicted that the price could go to $500,000 one day on the theory that it eventually replaces gold, which is now worth over $10 trillion.

Others also see the total value of Bitcoin one day rising into the trillions, from its current levels around $350 billion. Michael Saylor, CEO of software firm Microstrategy (MSTR) and a recent Bitcoin bull, said in an interview with Barrons that Bitcoin solves a $250 trillion problem -- thats the total value of fiat currency in the world, which he thinks is being devalued rapidly because governments are printing money.

If Bitcoin ends up becoming the trusted financial mechanism for solving that devaluation problem it could be worth half of that $250 trillion, he contends. If its total value was $125 trillion, each Bitcoin would be worth about $6 million. I think its possible, Saylor said.

Justin dAnethan, a sales manager at digital asset firm Diginex, said he doesnt like to put a price target on Bitcoin, because he believes the price is simply based on public sentiment about the value of having a decentralized, scarce digital asset. Gold is the closest corollary. If we take that approach, the potential for BTC is huge, not only because there is plenty of room to catch up to golds total value, but because it could outgrow it, he wrote in an email to Barrons.

That is why valuing Bitcoin can feel like a circular argument. Its worth more because people think its worth moreand even discussing such big numbers can egg investors on. That, of course, makes it dangerous too. Reversals in sentiment happen fast. And its why many fund managers continue to tell clients that there is a number they also need to consider when looking at Bitcoin: $0. It isnt inconceivable that their investment could be completely wiped out, either because of government action or a catastrophic software issue like a hack (although attempts to hack Bitcoin so far have been unsuccessful). Unlike a real asset, there would be nothing left to sell for scrap.

Write to Avi Salzman at avi.salzman@barrons.com

Read more from the original source:
Bitcoin Price Targets by Analysts for 2021 and Beyond - Barron's

Why Ethereum and Bitcoin Are Very Different Investments – CoinDesk – CoinDesk

Those new to crypto, such as the institutional investors recently buying into bitcoins digital gold narrative, might now be looking around for the next big thing.

With the long-anticipated arrival of phase 0 of the Ethereum 2.0 upgrade launching on Dec. 1, that could be the networks native token, ether (ETH). But analysts say ether should be judged on its own merits and not as a bitcoin replacement.

Ive always thought this digital asset space is huge and its not just bitcoin because there are going to be different applications for different things, Raoul Pal, CEO and co-founder of financial media group Real Vision, said in Real Visions documentary Ethereum An Investigation, which was released on Nov. 30. I think of the two [bitcoin and ether] as having a very nice combined asset allocation.

For Pal, an early bitcoin investor, the rationale seems even more plausible these days: As bitcoins price hits a new all-time high, the number one cryptocurrency by market capitalization is now more expensive and thus potentially a riskier bet for new investors.

It can be expected investors are looking for a new opportunity in crypto at affordable prices. Given that ether is trading roughly 59% below its all-time high of $1,432.88, it is tempting to believe theres a bargain to be had. Whats more, the Ethereum 2.0 upgrade to increase the networks scalability, security and energy efficiency has generated a lot of hype.

However, at least for now, analysts and traders who spoke with CoinDesk dont think ether will replace the FOMO over bitcoin.

For institutional investors, they are buying BTC for the digital gold narrative, Ryan Watkins, senior research analyst at Messari, told CoinDesk. ETH just isnt in that conversation yet.

Ether benefits from spillover and likely has more conversation around it from crypto-natives, Vishal Shah, founder of derivatives exchange Alpha5, told CoinDesk. For the uninitiated, [it is] hard to see how bitcoin is not the sole on-ramp.

Weakening correlation between bitcoin and ether

Some analysts say that as more institutions pour money into bitcoin and push up its price, ether and other cryptocurrencies will gradually decouple from bitcoin.

Indeed, while bitcoin this week logged a record high price, ether isnt even close to its all-time high of $1,448.18. Data from CoinDesk shows the 90-day correlation coefficient between the prices of the top two cryptocurrencies, while still strong, has gradually weakened a bit since the summer from as high as 0.93 to nearly 0.7 at the beginning of December.

The thing about correlation is it can disappear at any time, Ashwath Balakrishnan, research analyst at digital asset research firm Delphi Digital, told CoinDesk. In that case, you want to understandthe core fundamentals of what you hold because if you hold ether as a proxy [to your] bitcoin exposure, and [when] prices decouple, you are now exposed to something very different.

Bitcoin has been used by many investors this year as a hedge against a drop in the purchasing power of U.S. dollars. Ether is considered the currency of the world computer, which aims to build an ecosystem of decentralized applications.

The close historical correlation between bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies may be due to how tiny the digital-asset ecosystem is relative to the global economy. The total market capitalization of crypto assets is estimated at $562 billion, a mere 1.7% of the S&P 500 stock indexs combined market cap of $32.2 trillion. With almost every crypto asset built on different fundamentals, non-bitcoin cryptocurrencies may be trending with bitcoin prices simply because the nascent market is still so small and insular.

Correlation data doesnt tell the whole story. Prices may move in tandem but the degree to which that happens is another matter. When the explosive decentralized finance (DeFi) boom hit the market during the summer, ethers price rallied to its highest in more than two years because most DeFi projects are built on the Ethereum blockchain. At the time, bitcoin was struggling to break a similar two-year record.

What Ethereum 2.0 could mean for investors

The market will have to wait and see what kind of real impact the ongoing Ethereum upgrade could have on its native currency because the final phase of the process is scheduled to be completed in 2023. But a major fundamental upgrade on the network underpinning ether could lead its price to move on its own fundamentals, instead of merely following bitcoins price.

The heart of ETH 2.0, which makes the entire system possible, is ether, according to a report by Messari. ETH will not only be Ethereums native store of value asset and fuel for transactions, but will also be Ethereums ultimate source of security from its role in the [proof-of-stake] system.

Thus, while bitcoin can be seen as somewhere between a store of value and a commodity on the asset superclass triangle, ether could ultimately become the first asset to be a combination of all three classes of assets: capital assets, commodities and stores of value.

When ethers price starts to be driven by its own catalysts, holding it as a proxy to having BTC exposure will not work as expected, Balakrishnan added.

See the rest here:
Why Ethereum and Bitcoin Are Very Different Investments - CoinDesk - CoinDesk

3 reasons why Bitcoin price violently rejected near $20,000 – Cointelegraph

Bitcoin (BTC) finally managed to secure a new all-time high, but the digital asset rejected strongly near $20,000. On-chain analysts say a sell-off from whales and miners, combined with the $20,000 level acting as a resistance level caused a fierce drop.

For whales and high-net-worth investors, liquidity is the most important factor. Because they deal with large orders, they need to calculate the slippage their sell orders will cause.

Typically, the best period for whales to sell is when there is peak euphoria in the market met with large buyer demand. This allows whales to more efficiently sell their holdings without causing massive volatility.

When the price of Bitcoin officially surpassed its all-time high on Coinbase, it caused the market sentiment to become highly bullish. Shortly thereafter, whales started to sell, causing large liquidations across major exchanges.

CryptoQuant CEO Ki Young Ju explained that whale withdrawals were slowing down on Nov. 30. He said:

The confluence of whales keeping BTC on exchanges, which means higher selling pressure, and the sell-off from miners amplified BTCs downturn.

Ki also noted that whales began to deposit Bitcoin into exchanges once again, which happens when whales want to sell their holdings.

The price of BTC recovered swiftly after dropping to around $18,200, surging back above $19,400 within hours.

The speedy recovery likely occurred due to the nature of the drop. As the price declined, exchanges saw cascading long liquidations. As such, BTC likely dropped harder than it should have if it werent for the large liquidations.

The recovery was equally intense to the upside for that reason. Late short-sellers could have gotten aggressive as BTC dropped, leading to a short-term short squeeze.

In the near term, Bitcoin could see two major scenarios. First, it could consolidate above $19,000, which would allow the derivatives market to find composure and the open interest to rebuild.

Second, BTC could continue to drop as traders anticipate a blow-off top after achieving an all-time high.

But the macro outlook on Bitcoin still remains highly optimistic. Scott Melker, a cryptocurrency trader, emphasized that the monthly candle for November closed at BTCs all-time high, which paints a positive long-term picture for BTC. He said:

In the near term, the key support levels for Bitcoin are $18,200, $17,700 and $16,200. There are still large whale clusters in these areas, which could cause a reaction from buyers.

Link:
3 reasons why Bitcoin price violently rejected near $20,000 - Cointelegraph

This family bet everything on bitcoin when it was $900 and bought more when it crashed in 2018 – CNBC

Didi Taihuttu, his wife, and three kids bet all they have on bitcoin.

In 2017, CNBC spoke to the Dutch family of five when they were in the process of liquidating their assets from a profitable business and 2,500-square-foot house, to their shoes and trading it all in for the popular cryptocurrency and a life on the road.

Nearly four years and 40 countries later, Taihuttu and his family still don't have bank accounts, a house, or all that much by way of personal possessions. All of the family's savings remain tied up in highly volatile cryptocurrencies.

"We stepped into bitcoin, because we wanted to change our lives," said the 42-year-old father of three.

When the price of bitcoin collapsed in 2018, Taihuttu added more to his investment portfolio. He says he was always a firm believer that the cryptocurrency was poised for a major rebound. "I think in this bull cycle, we are going to see a minimal peak of $100,000. I won't be surprised if it hits $200,000 by 2022."

I won't be surprised if [bitcoin] hits $200,000 by 2022.

The price of bitcoin reached an all-time high on Monday, as it closed in on $20,000. And some analysts say the cryptocurrency still has a lot of room to run higher.

Mike Novogratz, CEO of investment firm Galaxy Digital, thinks this comeback rally is only just getting started. He sees bitcoin rising to $60,000 by next year.

And Tom Fitzpatrick, global head of CitiFXTechnicals, said the charts signaled that bitcoin could reach $318,000 by December 2021, in a report meant for Citibank's institutional clients and obtained by CNBC.

Taihuttu bought the bulk of his bitcoin holdings when it was was trading at around $900 in early 2017, just months before it reached nearly $20,000 a coin.

Even as bitcoin peaked, the family stayed invested in the cryptocurrency. Once the bubble burst, and the price tumbled down to about $3,000 in early 2018, Taihuttu and his family weren't deterred. "When bitcoin dipped, we started to buy more."

When I asked Taihuttu on our Skype call whether he was worried that we could be in the midst of another bitcoin bubble, he doubled down on his investment. "I don't see demand going down," he added. "I think we're headed for a supply crisis."

Part of what's different about bitcoin's rally in 2020 versus 2017 is that institutional investors are now adopting bitcoin, lending it newfound legitimacy and helping to erase the reputational risk of investing in the cryptocurrency.

"The 2017 rally was largely driven by retail investors, whereas this year we're seeing a massive influx from corporate entities and institutional money managers," said Mati Greenspan, portfolio manager and founder of Quantum Economics.

Old-school, billionaire hedge fund managers Stanley Druckenmiller and Paul Tudor Jones now own bitcoin and big fintech players like Square and PayPal are also adding crypto products.

This kind of mainstream adoption is hugely important, because cryptocurrencies like bitcoin aren't backed by an asset, nor do they have the full faith and backing of the government. They're valuable because people believe they're valuable. So it goes a long way when bitcoin gets buy-in from some of the biggest names on Wall Street.

The surge in interest from mainstream financial players hasn't just reformed bitcoin's image, it's also fomented a supply shortage.

"The basic reason for the two rallies are the same," Greenspan said. "It's a matter of digital scarcity. There is a strictly limited supply of bitcoin available in the market, so when everyone is buying and nobody is selling, it can cause tremendous upward pressure on the price. What's different this time are the players involved."

The 2017 rally was driven by retail speculation, and in 2020, it's the billionaires and corporations that are buying bitcoin en masse.

"When PayPal starts to sell bitcoin to its 350 million users, they also need to buy the bitcoin somewhere," said Taihuttu. "There will be a huge supply crisis, because there won't be enough new bitcoins mined everyday to fulfill the need by huge companies."

And that interest from institutional investors doesn't appear to be slowing down. Six out of 10 investors surveyed by Fidelity in June believe digital assets have a place in investment portfolios.

Mike Bucella, general partner at BlockTower Capital, told CNBC in a recent interview on "Power Lunch" that retail investors are actually the ones missing out on the bitcoin rally this year.

"If you dig a layer deeper in the derivatives market, you notice that most of that derivatives flow has transitioned from the crypto native exchanges of 2017 to institutional products, like the CME," said Bucella. "I think this really firmly indicates that retail actually missed out on this rally this year. It's been primarily and firmly an institutional bid."

But not all retail investors are missing out.

Taihuttu put a couple hundred thousand dollars into cryptocurrency in 2017, while the price of bitcoin was still trading lower, and he has mostly stayed all in on his investment.

Despite 2020's massive returns and all the recent bullish calls around bitcoin price targets, the fact remains, a speculative asset like bitcoin is prone to seismic price moves in a very short space of time.

In 2018, the massive sell-off in cryptocurrencies, including bitcoin, was swift, brutal and worse than the bursting of the dot-com bubble in 2000.

2020 may look different to 2017's rally, but as an asset, bitcoin behaves in a cyclical manner. Each successive high is higher, and the lows are not quite as low, but bitcoin is certainly not immune to another major correction.

Though for Taihuttu, the bitcoin play isn't all about making a profit. He's already given half of his money away to charity, and his family of five has spent the last four years traveling the world, in order to spread the gospel of decentralized digital currencies.

See the rest here:
This family bet everything on bitcoin when it was $900 and bought more when it crashed in 2018 - CNBC

Bitcoin Sees Record Number of Active Users as Price Almost Hits $20K – CoinDesk – CoinDesk

As bitcoin continues to set new price highs, its network is also seeing record-breaking user activity.

As of Tuesday, there were 432,451 active entities wallet clusters controlled by a single participant that sent or received funds in a 24-hour period. Thats an all-time high, according to data provided by blockchain analytics firm Glassnode. The previous peak of 410,972 was registered on Dec. 9, 2017.

The number of active entities has been increasing steadily since the halving and signifies a large increase in network adoption by participants, said Matthew Dibb, co-founder of Stack, a provider of cryptocurrency trackers and index funds.

Bitcoin underwent its third mining reward halving on May 11 of this year. Since then, the number of active entities has increased by 70% and bitcoins price has more than doubled to nearly $20,000.

The cryptocurrency printed a record high of $19,920,53 on Tuesday before falling back. Bitcoin was trading around $19,130 at time of writing, representing a 1.7% gain on the day.

While bitcoins price gains have been relatively sharp over the past eight weeks, the number of active entities has charted relatively steady growth. While the metric has breached highs not seen since 2017, it has done so gradually without bubble-like growth, Dibb told CoinDesk. We take comfort in this when correlating address clusters with forward-looking price action.

Analysts consider increased activity as a bullish sign. When theres greater usage, theres more demand for the cryptocurrency, and that drives the price up, Philip Gradwell, chief economist at blockchain intelligence firm Chainalysis, previouslytold CoinDesk.

The number of active entities rose to multi-month highs in early September, despite the multi-week sideways price action in the range of $10,000 to $12,500, signaling a continued increase in adoption and warning of a price breakout. The rise in activity to record highs suggests bitcoins rally is sustainable.

Our expectation is that this metric will continue to rapidly outpace previous highs as bitcoin breaches through $20,000, Dibb said.

Original post:
Bitcoin Sees Record Number of Active Users as Price Almost Hits $20K - CoinDesk - CoinDesk

Why one analyst says Bitcoin is on the cusp of busting through $20K – Cointelegraph

The market sentiment around Bitcoin (BTC) is mixed, as the BTC price dropped almost immediately by 10%right after hitting its previous all-time high at $19,892 on Dec. 1.

Nevertheless, some analysts and fund managers anticipate the dominant cryptocurrency to rise past $20,000 in the short term. But others are adamant that there will be another correction first, as seen in previous bull cycles.

There are many compelling reasons to believe that a deeper Bitcoin correction is coming. In the past, multiple 30% to 40% pullbacks accompanied major uptrends such as in 2017. Thus, the current BTC correction of roughly 10% from the new all-time high is relatively minor by comparison.

Meanwhile, Mohit Sorout, the founding partner at Bitazu Capital, argues that Bitcoin could soon enter a bigger, multi-month rally. He emphasized that the medium-term outlook of BTC remains highly positive despite the price failing to break the key psychological $20,000 barrier upon its first attempt.

Bitcoin price was rejected right before $20,000 with a strong reaction from sellers across the spot market. As Cointelegraph reported, on-chain analysts attributed the drop to a combination of miners and whales selling.

The futures market took a hit as well followingthe initial spot-driven sell-off. The derivatives market was already overheated before the drop, reaching as high as $23,000 on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange alongside a surging BTC futures funding rate and a record-high Fear and Greed Index of 95.

Since the market was swayed toward buyers, this meant that if a minor drop occurs, the probability of a larger drop caused by cascading liquidations was high. This resulted in the drop that resulted in BTC bouncing off the $18,000 support area.

However, some analysts now expect BTC to break past $20,000 upon the next attempt.

Specifically, Sorout pinpointed the Relative Strength Index (RSI) of Bitcoins 1-month chart. It shows that in spite of the recent uptrend, the RSI is at 69, which is neutral. An asset becomes overbought if it surpasses 75 on the RSI indicator. He said:

Additionally, a pseudonymous cryptocurrency derivatives trader known as Flood echoed this sentiment. He said that a strong rally after a fakeout rally to the all-time high is not unlikely. He wrote:

Other traders, however, believe that the probability of a correction would continue to increase if Bitcoin consolidates under $19,000.

Michal van de Poppe, a full-time trader at the Amsterdam Stock Exchange, said that weakening momentum increases the likelihood of a pullback.

Technically, an argument could be made that the bull run of BTC is indeed overextended. After the past two minor pullbacks, lower time frame charts, like the four-hour and one-day charts, show Bitcoin treading closely above short-term moving averages, or MAs. This signifies that BTC is not overbought on lower time frames.

However, on the weekly and the monthly chart, Bitcoin is still significantly above short-term MAs, which indicates that a large correction could occur.

As Cointelegraph reported, some traders have said that a correction to around $13,000 should not come as a surprise for this reason as previous bull cycles have shown. If BTC drops further, the major support areas should be found at $13,000, $13,800 and above $15,000 on the high timeframe charts.

See the original post here:
Why one analyst says Bitcoin is on the cusp of busting through $20K - Cointelegraph

Bitcoin Price Hits All-Time High Above $19,000, Topping 2017 Record – The Wall Street Journal

Bitcoin surged on Monday to set its first fresh record in nearly three years, driven by a wave of new investors lured by the potential for big profits.

The digital currency rose as high as $19,834.93, according to CoinDesk, topping the previous intraday record of $19,783.21 set Dec. 18, 2017. Bitcoin has nearly tripled in 2020 and is up more than 90% since early September. It closed Monday at $19376.18, up 6.1%. The surge comes amid a wider rally across markets. The Federal Reserve and other central banks have injected trillions worth of liquidity into the capital markets, and a number of companies working on coronavirus vaccines are providing hope that the global pandemic will soon be brought under control.

With safe assets like government bonds yielding close to zero, investors have been more willing to place bets on risky assets in hopes of reaping big gains, and bitcoin is among the riskiest assets in the capital markets. You have the weakened dollar, enormous growth of central bank balance sheets and questions about whether it will or wont cause inflation, said Socit Gnrale forex strategist Kit Juckes. Its another beneficiary of the collapse in real yields.

Trading volume for bitcoin has surged in the past few months, to $50 billion a day from around $18 billion a day in September, according to data from research site Coingecko. Other cryptocurrencies have benefited from the interest as well. Ether is up 370% this year. XRP is up more than 234%.

Bitcoins gains have been fueled by both retail and professional investors, and a plethora of platforms that make it easy to trade cryptocurrencies.

Read the original post:
Bitcoin Price Hits All-Time High Above $19,000, Topping 2017 Record - The Wall Street Journal