Julian Assange supporters outnumber his critics. Who are they? – Al Jazeera English

The fate of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange will be decided on January 4, when the Old Bailey court will pronounce the judgement on whether he will be extradited to the United States from the United Kingdom.

The US has charged him with hacking government computers and espionage after he obtained and published hundreds of thousands of classified documents between 2010 and 2011, including the Afghanistan and Iraq war logs. The charges could lead to an unprecedented 175 years in jail for the Australian-born publisher.

He was arrested from the Ecuador embassy in London, in February 2019, where he had been given asylum seven years earlier.

Recently, calls to pardon him have grown louder, including from unlikely characters such as former US vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin, a Republican.

In September, 160 former and current world leaders and diplomats signed a letter demanding the UK government prevent his extradition.

Rights groups such as Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) have called for his release.

Increasingly, prominent media outlets, such as The Guardian, are also voicing their concern about the charges levelled against the jailed publisher.

Yet some continue to back the USs attempt to punish Assange.

Here are some highlights from world leaders, diplomats, academics and celebrities:

The Argentinian president, who has been described as a leftist, was one of the signatories of the September letter, which described the allegations against Assange as troubling.

We call on you to act in accordance with national and international law, human rights and the rule of law by bringing an end to the ongoing extradition proceedings and granting Mr. Assange his long overdue freedom freedom from torture, arbitrary detention and deprivation of liberty, and political persecution, the letter said.

The former Labour Party leader and current UK MP, a veteran socialist, has said possible extradition to the US should be opposed, and called for the rights of whistle-blowers and journalists to be upheld for the good of all of us.

The ex-Brazilian president has consistently demanded Assange be released. In September, he wrote a column for the UKs Guardian newspaper saying Assanges possible extradition to the US would be an outrage.

Linguist and political critic Noam Chomsky, one of the worlds leading intellectuals, claims extraditing Assange would be catastrophic for press freedom.

Assange is on trial for his journalism, for his principles, not his personality, he and writer Alice Walker said, in an op-ed for the UK-based paper The Independent.

The world-renowned artist has hailed the WikiLeaks founder, asserting that Assange represents a core value of why we are free a comment that referred to press freedom.

We need a lot of protesting, and it can take any form. Im an artist, if I cannot use my art, its very limited, then Id rather just be silent, he said at a pro-Assange rally in September.

The former Ecuador president has long been a supporter of the Australian, granting him asylum in 2012 at the countrys embassy in the UK.

After his successor and current President Lenin Moreno revoked Assanges asylum, leading to his arrest by UK authorities, Correa strongly condemned the decision.

Scoundrel and betrayal can be summarised in two words: Lenin Moreno, he said.

Earlier this month, former Republican vice presidential candidate Palin demanded Assange be pardoned.

I made a mistake some years ago, not supporting Julian Assange thinking that he was a bad guy, Palin said on social media. And Ive learned a lot since then He deserves a pardon.

Palin had previously been an ardent critic of Assange, who released private emails and photos of the former Alaska governor in 2008 during her election campaign.

The television and film actor took to social media in September and appealed to Trump to pardon Assange.

Anderson, who shot to stardom after starring in the popular 1990s TV series Baywatch, has long supported the WikiLeaks founder, visiting him in London before and after his arrest from the Ecuadorian embassy.

The Pink Floyd co-founder has been spotted in several protests over the years in support of Assanges release and against his extradition.

At a pro-Assange rally in September 2019, Waters sang the bands track Wish You Were Here in honour of the 49-year-old Australian. The song was originally written to pay tribute to another co-founder of Pink Floyd, the late Syd Barrett who died in 2006.

Democrat congresswoman and 2020 presidential candidate Gabbard has been one of the most vocal voices demanding Trump pardon Assange. She said the WikiLeaks founder acted in the public interest to expose lies and egregious abuses of power in our government.

Since youre giving pardons to people, please consider pardoning those who, at great personal sacrifice, exposed the deception and criminality of those in the deep state, Gabbard tweeted last month, in support of Assange and NSA whistle-blower Edward Snowden.

The US whistle-blower Snowden has called on Trump to pardon Assange, tweeting on December 3: Mr. President, if you grant only one act of clemency during your time in office, please: free Julian Assange. You alone can save his life. @realDonaldTrump.

British rapper MIA has described Assange as an icon on a scale weve never had, and has previously visited him at Belmarsh, a high-security prison where he is currently being held.

In an interview with Al Jazeera last year, the Sri Lankan born musician said, Persecuting him [Assange] wont solve any of the problems we have as humanity going forwards.

A renowned American whistle-blower, Ellsberg has said Assanges release of the Afghanistan and Iraq war logs were comparable importance to the Pentagon Papers a study on the American war Vietnam, which he leaked in 1971.

The former military analyst made the comments at Assanges trial in September.

It was clear to me that these revelations, like the Pentagon Papers, have the capability of informing the public that they had seriously been misled about the nature of war, progress in war, the likelihood of it ending at all, he told the court.

The Ecuadorian president was responsible for revoking Assanges asylum at the countrys embassy in London leading to his arrest.

Moreno accused the WikiLeaks publisher of spying during his stay at the embassy.

We cannot allow our house, the house that opened its doors, to become a centre for spying. This activity violates asylum conditions. Our decision is not arbitrary but is based on international law, Morena said, according to The Guardian.

Upon his arrest, Clinton said Assange must answer for what he has done.

I think it is clear from the indictment that came out its not about punishing journalism, it is about assisting the hacking of a military computer to steal information from the United States government, she said.

During the 2016 US presidential campaign, Assange and WikiLeaks published a series of hacked Democratic National Committee emails that proved to be a big embarrassment and source of criticism for Clinton and the Democrats.

The current US Senate majority leader has in the past been highly critical of Assange, calling him a high-tech terrorist in 2010.

McConnell said Assange had done enormous damage to the US and its work with other nations.

Former national security adviser to US President Donald Trump, Bolton has previously said that US cyber-warfare people should use WikiLeaks for target practice.

The Republican politician was an ardent supporter of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq while serving in government during the George W Bush administration.

Read more here:

Julian Assange supporters outnumber his critics. Who are they? - Al Jazeera English

With His Pardons of Stone and Manafort, Trump Completes His Cover-Up – Mother Jones

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

By pardoning Paul Manafort and Roger Stone on Wednesday night, President Donald Trump concluded a four-year campaign to use his office to cover up his own wrongdoing in the Trump-Russia scandal. Trump aided and abetted Vladimir Putins attack on the 2016 electionwhich had the aim of helping Trump win the White Houseby denying this assault was real, while he simultaneously sought to exploit Moscows operation for his own political gain. Ever since, Trump has strived to keep this scandal from defining his presidential victory and his presidency, and he has endeavored to hide his own possible criminality. With these pardons, that effort, which has largely succeeded, is complete.

Stone and Manafort were among 26 pardons and three commutations Trump issued Wednesday, following a batch on Tuesday. This slew of pardons is collectively corrupt. While ignoring thousands of Americans who may deserve clemency but lack the political juice to win presidential assistance, Trump singled out for special dispensation war criminals, the powerful and the connected, friends of his allies, the father of his son-in-law, and corrupt former Republican congressmen. But Manafort and Stone are in a special category.

Their pardons are part of Trumps crusade to take revenge on Special Counsel Robert Mueller and his investigation that detailed the Russian attack that helped Trump win, that led to criminal convictions of Trump aides, and that provided evidence arguably showing that Trump had obstructed justice. But the pardons are more than that. They aim to help Trump himself.

Stone and Manafort were each involved in the Russia scandal as it proceeded in 2016, while reporting directly to Trump. Stone promoted the false story that Moscow was not behind the leaks targeting the Democratic Party and the Hillary Clinton campaign, as Trump tried to use him to gather inside information on the WikiLeaks-Russia operation. And throughout the campaign, Manafort was in covert communication with a former business associate, Konstanin Kilimnik, who was labeled a Russian intelligence officer in a recent Senate Intelligence Committee report. That report noted Kilimnik may have been connected to the [Russian intelligences] hack and leak operation targeting the 2016 U.S. election and that information gathered by the committee raised the possibility that Manafort himself was connected to this operation.

So top Trump lieutenants were part of the Russia business. Yet they subsequently lied to or refused to cooperate with investigators. They hid information from prosecutors and the public. They covered for Trump. Now he has rewarded them.

In 2016, Stone was seen by the Trump campaign as its access point to WikiLeaks, according to former senior Trump aide Steve Bannon, who testified during Stones 2019 trial. During the election, Stone gave the Trump campaign advance notice as WikiLeaks prepared to dump emails that Russian agents had stolen from the Clinton campaign and Democrats and passed to the transparency group. He was regarded within the top echelons of the campaign as a Trump operative who could gather inside information from WikiLeaks that the Trump team could exploit.

Other testimony at the trial showed that Stone, a self-described dirty trickster, conferred regularly with Trump during the campaign. Rick Gates, a former Trump campaign aide, testified that on July 31, 2016nine days after WikiLeaks had dumped tens of thousands of hacked emails from the Democratic National Committeehe witnessed Trump take a call from Stone. Gates said he couldnt hear what Stone told Trump but that after the call Trump indicated that more information would be coming. (Stone was convicted of lying to Congress, obstructing a congressional investigation, and witness tampering, and he was sentenced to 40 months in prison. Trump commuted that sentence before Stone started serving it.)

In 2018, Trump told Mueller in writing that he could not recall talking to Stone about WikiLeaks at all during the 2016 campaign. Gates testimony suggested that Trump lied to Muellerwhich could be a federal crime. Stone obviously could have cleared this up for investigators, but he refused to cooperate, and he lied to congressional investigators about his efforts to obtain information for Trump from WikiLeaks. He could have explained what Trump knew of his dealings with WikiLeaks and how the campaign sought to capitalize on the Russian attack. But he chose not to talk.

Manafort, who was sentenced to seven years in prison in 2018 for obstruction of justice, tax and bank fraud and violating foreign lobbying laws, ran Trumps campaign from late June to mid-August 2016. In that role, he kept tabs on Stones interactions with WikiLeaks, according to Gates. At the same time, he was in steady communication with Kilimnik. For reasons that remain murky, Manafort gave Kilimnik polling data to pass on to Ukrainian and Russian oligarchs, including Oleg Deripaska, a Russian aluminum magnate close to Putin. Manaforts high-level access and willingness to share information with individuals closely affiliated with the Russian intelligence services, particularly Kilimnik and associates of Oleg Deripaska, represented a grave counterintelligence threat, the Senate Intelligence Committee report said.

And there were other curious aspects to Manaforts relationship with Kilimnik. In a secret meeting in Manhattan on August 2, 2016, and in subsequent contacts that stretched into the following year, Kilimnik pressed Manafort to convince Trump to back a plan that would have handed Putin effective control of much of Eastern Ukraine, which Russia invaded in 2014. According to Muellers 2019 report, Kilimnik told Manafort in an email that the plan need only avery minor wink (or slight push) from [Donald Trump] to succeed.

Muellers investigators believed Russia hoped to obtain Trumps support for this so-called Ukraine peace plan as a payback for helping Trump in the election. In a book published this year, Andrew Weissmann, a top Mueller aid who oversaw the Manafort prosecution, called Trumps possible backing of the Ukraine plan a quo for all the elaborate quid that Russia had provided Trump in 2016.

Manafort may never have told Trump about this phony peace plan. Mueller discovered no evidence he did. But Mueller found that Manafort, even after he agreed to cooperate with his probe, had lied excessively to prosecutors about the peace plan and other topics. Mueller terminated Manaforts cooperation deal as a result. According to Weissmann, prosecutors believed Manafort had decided to lie to prosecutors based on the hope that Trump would pardon him if he did not implicate the president in any wrongdoing.

Trump gave Manafort ample reason to believe this. During Manaforts 2018 trial, Trump praised him and Stone for their refusal to flip and cooperate with Mueller. This pardon dangling provided Manafort, Stone, and others incentive to adhere to a code of silence. What exactly Manafort was up to with Kilimnik and what Stone did with WikiLeaks remain mysteries. As does Trumps full knowledge of their activities related to Russias scheming.

Trump and his enablers will continue to claim falsely that the Russia scandal was a hoax. But the reports from Mueller and the Senate Intelligence Committee show this was a profoundly serious matter that included what appears to be significant wrongdoing on the part of Trumps campaign, his aides, and Trump himself. With these pardons, Trump made sure the public would not learn the full story about their recipientsor about his own suspicious actions. With this useor abuseof presidential power, Trump is not only protecting his henchmen; he is protecting himself. These pardons dont end the scandal; they are part of it.

Follow this link:

With His Pardons of Stone and Manafort, Trump Completes His Cover-Up - Mother Jones

CIA? How Dictator Museveni Betrayed Libya’s Quadafi and Zimbabwe’s Mugabe to the United States – Black Star News

Ugandan dictator Museveni betrayed Qadhafi and Mugabe to the U.S. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

[Speaking Truth To Power]

Uganda's dictator of 35 years in power Gen. Yoweri Museveni likes accusing leading presidential challenger Bobi Wine of being a Western tool yet Wikileaks documents show that he's always been so close to the U.S. that he even betrayed Libya's Qadhafi and Zimbabwes Robert Mugabe to the Americans.

The documents also undermine Musevenis public claims that hes a Pan-African nationalistin private he has behaved like an African turncoat in the mode of Mobutu, andMoise Tshombe , both of whom famously betrayed Patrice Lumumba and had him murdered in 1961.

Three years after Museveni told U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for Africa Jendayi Frazer thatQadhafi was a "problem" for Africa because he wanted to unite the continent under one president, the U.S. and NATO eliminated the problem by invading Libya and killing Qadhafi in 2011.In addition to betraying Qadhafi to the U.S.even though the Libyan had provided hundreds of millions of dollars to his regime and even supplied him with weapons while he was fighting for power in UgandaMuseveni also told the Americans the best way to undermine Mugabe was to attack him on his countrys economic performance.

The Wikileaks documents are the strongest indication that Gen. Museveni was possibly a CIA agent who ratted on other African leaders, much like Congolese dictator Mobutu did from 1960 to 1997 when he was deposed. Mobutu became a CIA agent in 1959, one year before Congo's independence from Belgium. The U.S. backed him for 37 years.

Museveni also asked the United States to provide him with international airspace protection during his overseas travels to prevent Qadhafi from having his plane shot down, the documents show."President Museveni said Libyan President Qadhafi is a problem for the continent and is pushing for the creation of a United States of Africa to be governed by one president. Museveni thought Qadhafi's plan is neither feasible nor desirable, given cultural and linguistic differences across the continent. Rather than the development of a unitary African state, Museveni said he is pushing Qadhafi and otherAfrican leaders to develop regional political federations and markets that support common objectives, the Wikileaks documents state.

Museveni, who is notorious for traveling around Uganda with brown bags stuffed with cash to buy votes and political and religious leaders, also complained to Frazer that Qadhafi continues to intimidate small African countries through bribes and other pressure. As a result of Libya's actions, small West African countries havebeen afraid to participate fully or speak out during international meetings at the United Nations, African Union, and other forums.

Museveni noted that tensions with Qadhafi are growing and as a result, and he worries that Qadhafi will attack his plane while flying over international airspace, the Wikileaks documents add. Museveni requested that the USG and GOU coordinate to provide additional air radar information when he flies over international waters.

Museveni also told Assistant Secretary Frazer that hed spoken with Mugabe by phone after the 2008 election when challenger Morgan Tsvangirai won 47.8% to Mugabes 43.2%, forcing him into a runoff, which the challenger abandoned, citing regime violence. During his call, Mugabe told Museveni he was confident he would win in the second round of elections. Mugabe told Museveni he did not want election monitors from countries that were hostile to Zimbabwe, but wouldn't mind observers from other countries, the Wikileaks documents continue. Frazer told Museveni that she believed thousands of monitors were necessary, especially in rural areas, to encourage people to vote, in Zimbabwe.

So the Ugandan dictator was discussing the possibility of sending thousands of monitors to Zimbabwe while he himself continues to oppose them in Uganda, including for the Jan. 14, 2021 vote when many political observers predict he will likely lose in a landslide to challenger Bobi Wine.

Museveni also had another suggestion for the U.S. about how to undermine Mugabes government. Museveni thought Zimbabwe's faltering economy andMugabe's poor understanding of the private sector were at the root of Zimbabwe's political problems, the Wikileaks documents said. He said a discussionof the economy would provide an entry point to tell Mugabe that he has failed and is embarrassing liberation leaders. He noted that Mugabe is unwilling to take calls from most African leaders saying they are not his age-mates.

The meeting between the Ugandan dictator and Assistant Secretary of State Frazer occurred on June 13, 2008 in Fort. Leavenworth, Kansas. Museveni had gone there to attend the graduation of his son Muhoozi Kaenerugaba from the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College. Kaenerugaba is today the regimes leading human rights abuser, commanding the notorious Special Forces Command (SFC). The SFC has been responsible for attacks on, and killings of unarmed Uganda civilians. It was also involved in a 2018 attack that led to the brutal beating and torture of Bobi Wine.

Read the original:

CIA? How Dictator Museveni Betrayed Libya's Quadafi and Zimbabwe's Mugabe to the United States - Black Star News

Donald Trump delivers an historic week of disarray from Americas Nihilist-in-Chief – USA TODAY

Edward Larson, Austin Sarat, and Dennis Aftergut, Opinion contributors Published 8:00 a.m. ET Dec. 28, 2020 | Updated 8:35 a.m. ET Dec. 28, 2020

As Trump enters his final days, he spent the past week pardoning, vetoing, and pointing fingers as he tries to leave chaos behind him.

When history looks back for a signature week of the Trump presidency, Christmas 2020 may win the prize.

There was a pattern, and likely foreshadowing of a chaotic month to come: Political disorder, norm demolition and unrelenting indifference to others from a truth-negating president.

Just look at the weeks five major events and Trumps responses:

1. Russias Cyber-Attack:

On December 19, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced that Russians were behind a massive cyber-attack on American government and business.

Trump promptly disagreed, saying without evidence, that the culprit might be China. This familiar dodgeprovided cover for the presidents refusal to retaliate against Putin.

What explains this stunning failure to defend America from Russias virtual declaration of war?"

Its the same reason Trump sided with Putin and against his own intelligence community at the July 2018 Helsinki summit, asserting that Russia was not responsible for 2016s presidential election interference: Naked self-interest.

Whether or not Putin has damaging information on Trump, a Moscow hotel has long been his dream. Today it surely plays an outsized role in his thinking about life after 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

Indeed, in October 2015, while running for president, he secretly signed a letter of intentto develop Trump Tower Moscow, to be the tallest building in Europe.

The deal never went through. Ultimately, Putin knew the value of keeping the carrot in front of the donkey.

If your lifelong ambition were to build a Moscow skyscraper with your name atop, would you attack the Russian president who controlled the permit?

No way.

2. The White House cabal.

On Dec. 22, Trump met in the White House with a cast of fringe characters including confessed criminal Michael Flynn, his lawyer, Sidney Powell, and former Overstock.com CEO Patrick Byrne.

President Donald Trump on Dec. 12, 2020, in Washington, D.C.(Photo: Patrick Semansky/AP)

Powell has distinguished herself by floating conspiracy theories so wild in Novembershe got droppedfrom Trumps legal team.

Byrne admitted in 2019 to an affair with Russian intelligence asset, Maria Butina, now expatriated to her homeland after serving federal time.

Flynn, freshly pardoned for lying and protecting Trump, advocates martial law like its commonplace. Martial law has been declared 64 times, he told Newsmax mid-December.

The still-tethered Mark Meadows and White House Counsel Pat Cipollone ended the meeting when it started heading in an alarming direction. Their concerns reverberated across an already shaken nation.

Waiting for Joe Biden: How to make it through the final, awful days of Donald Trump

3. COVIDrelief.

On Dec.22, Congress finally adopted a $908 billion COVIDstimulus package, including $600 payments to individuals earning under $75,000 per year. The White House signaled that the president would sign the bill.

Hours later, Trump pulled the rug out, tweeting that relief checks were too small. But any president who cared would have spoken up when it mattered while the bill was being debated.

Trump promptly flew to Mar-a-Lago, leaving a hot mess on a hurting nations porch until he finally signed it late Dec. 27th.

Why the unnecessary drama? Explanations center on revenge for Mitch McConnells telling Republicans not to contest President-elect Bidens win.

Same presidential character: Personal pique and pleasure watching those he felt had crossed him along with suffering citizens hang in the wind.

4. The $740 million Defense Authorization Act.

On Dec.23, Trump stirred more turmoil, vetoing the massive defense bill. Republican Senate Arms Services Committee Chair Jim Inhofe protested: The NDAA has become law every year for 59 years straight because its absolutely vital to our national security and our troops.

No matter to the president as he headed south to golf. As George Conway tweeted, He just wants to break stuff on the way out.

What better things to break than troops pay hikes and national security?

5. Christmas Pardon Giveaway.

On Dec. 22 and 23, Trump doled out 49 pardons and commutations. Per Harvard Law Professor Jack Goldsmith, Trump has upended the traditional criteria for clemency involving good conduct and remorse.

Economy: What the economy needs after COVID-19 (and what it won't get from Joe Biden)

Instead, Trump has rewarded the corrupt, the complicitand the cold-blooded. Trump granted mercy to:

Jared Kushners convicted father, who to blackmail his sister and her husband before their planned testimony against him hired a prostitute to seduce the husband, then sent the sex video-tape to the sister;

The Blackwater mercenaries who machine-gunned 17 Iraqi innocent civilians, including a 9-year-old boy in the back seat of his fathers car;

Roger Stone, who lied to Congress to cover up his 2016 campaign role as go-between for Trump and Wikileaks;

Former Republican Congressman Duncan Hunter and his wife, Margaret, following their 2019 convictions for spending campaign funds on family vacations and bar tabs.

As Professor Goldsmith put itin a tweet, Its the pardon power unleashed to serve private gratification, score-settlingand eye-poking.

That tweet perfectly summarizes the presidential week that was. In the days before Joe Bidens Jan.20 inauguration, expect arson from Americas nihilist-in-chief, thrilled to be watching the flames.

Edward Larson, a Pulitzer Prize winning historian and author of "The Return of George Washington: Uniting the States 1783-1789," is University Professor at Pepperdine University; Austin Sarat (@ljstprof)is associate dean of the faculty and William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College; Dennis Aftergut is a former federal prosecutor and Supreme Court advocate who writes on national affairs.

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/12/28/leading-up-christmas-trump-leaving-chaos-behind-him-column/4052924001/

Read more:

Donald Trump delivers an historic week of disarray from Americas Nihilist-in-Chief - USA TODAY

Harry warning: Fergies TV venture caused Westminster panic over ‘uncontrollable’ ex-royal – Daily Express

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry secure Spotify podcast deal

Sarah Ferguson, affectionately known as Fergie, is the ex-wife of Prince Andrew. Upon their divorce in 1996, she was allowed to keep the title of Duchess of York but was prevented from officially representing the Royal Family. The former couple are still amicable and live together at Royal Lodge, in Windsor Fergie is believed to have supported Andrew over the last year after he took early retirement from public life.

Fergie is now a private citizen, very much like Prince Harry and Meghan Markle who chose to leave working royal life earlier this year.

Fergie chose to move into the entertainment industry and co-produced a documentary for the BBC called In Search of the Spirit, as well as a handful of other programmes.

Harry and Meghan have recently announced they have similar plans, and have unveiled two historic multi-year deals with streaming giants, Netflix and Spotify.

Yet, they should heed the lessons from Harrys aunt, Fergie, after she found herself in hot water following the release of her particularly divisive documentary, Duchess and Daughters: Their Secret Mission.

It was released on ITV in 2008, and included footage of Fergie disguised in a black wig and headscarf.

She secretly filmed inside state-run orphanage institutions in Turkey, leaving the nations government to accuse her of a politically-motivated smear campaign to deter its attempts to join the EU when the programme aired.

WikiLeaks from 2011 revealed that then Foreign Secretary David Miliband had to step in to placate Turkeys foreign minister, Ali Babacan.

According to WikiLeaks, a diplomatic cable from the US embassy in Ankara, Turkey, in 2008 read: Duchess of York Sarah Fergusons undercover expose of Turkish orphanages dominated bilateral relations discussions.

Miliband underscored to Babacan that Ferguson was no longer a member of the Royal Family, and as a private citizen, her activities could not be controlled.

Babacan promised that the (Turkish government) would investigate the accusations, but chided the public invasion of the childrens privacy.

Fergie later apologised for any embarrassment she had caused the Turks.

However, she added: I stand by my words.

READ MORE:Sussexes bid for low-key security dismantled by Jeremy Clarkson

The WikiLeaks findings were reported by The Daily Telegraph in 2011.

It should be noted that Harry and Meghan are yet to release any programmes they have produced on either Spotify or Netflix.

They have explained that they intend to release animated series, documentaries, docu-series, feature films, scripted shows and childrens programming.

In a statement, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex said: Our focus will be on creating content that informs but also gives home.

As new parents, making inspirational family programming is also important to us.

They added that Netflixs unprecedented reach will help us share impactful content that unlocks action the platform has 193 million subscribers across the world.

DON'T MISSMeghan 'loved' her first royal Christmas: 'Family she never had'[INSIGHT]Kate and William move into Meghan and Harrys territory with TV bid[EXPLAINED]Meghan and Harry copying Kate with Spotify podcast move[EXPOSED]

The couple released a trailer for their Spotify podcast called Archewell Audio, and have promised that they will interview amazing people with different perspectives to find our common ground.

The couples focus is likely to be on womens empowerment and climate activism, as the pair are intensely passionate about these topics.

However, they were accused of interfering with international relations earlier this year when they spoke up in the lead-up to the US election.

Meghan is a US citizen who grew up in the States, and showed her interest in politics prior to becoming a working royal in 2018.

Although she and Harry no longer represent the Queen after their royal exit, there was a public uproar when they paired up to encourage the US public to vote.

They did not advocate for any particular candidate or party, but just by speaking out and pushing for change, critics saw the pair as pushing for the electorate to vote in President Donald Trumps opposition now president elect, Joe Biden.

As Harry is not a US citizen he could not vote in the presidential election, but Meghan could and did, making royal history.

Harry did urge the US electorate to reject hate speech before the election, which many took as a suggestion to vote against Mr Trump.

Buckingham Palace spoke out and distanced itself from his comments, noting that just as Mr Miliband did with Fergie that he is a private citizen now.

A Palace spokesman said: We would not comment. The Duke [of Sussex] is not a working member of the Royal Family and any comments he makes are made in a personal capacity.

Read more:

Harry warning: Fergies TV venture caused Westminster panic over 'uncontrollable' ex-royal - Daily Express

2021 will be the year open source projects overcome their diversity problems – The Next Web

As the 2020 StackOverflow survey pointed out, technology companies and many open source communities have a diversity problem. While the majority of developers currently come from a white, male background, the momentum is shifting to create more inclusive, diverse communities.

Research shows that diverse open source projects are more productive and make better decisions. This starts with creating teams that have a greater representation of gender, race, socioeconomic standings, ethnic backgrounds, and the like.

Many open source communities are recognizing the need for new initiatives and a cohesive focus to tackle the lack of diversity in their projects. I predict that in 2021, building off the momentum of this past years focus on social inequality and steps made by open source-minded companies and foundations, open source communities will continue to increase the diversity of their communities so that it becomes the rule and not the exception.

When people from different disciplines and backgrounds collaborate, innovation occurs. One of my favorite books, The Medici Effect, presents compelling research about how innovation occurs at the intersection of disciplines and industries. Ive noticed this cross-discipline diversity happening in various industries and projects, and Im excited about the innovation that will follow.

Examples include:

As open source becomes more mainstream and projects actively work to grow the diversity of their communities, my hope is that that increased diversity of culture, thought, and even discipline will bring unique perspectives and experiences that will further increase the rate and pace of innovation.

As noted, communities need to actively work to remove barriers to increasing diversity. Here are a few examples of such efforts. Some of these are by IBM which I of course have the most insight into but this goes far beyond us. I believe we need to see more of these everywhere!

In October 2020, IBM announced Call for Code for Racial Justice, which empowers individual developers, innovators, and social justice advocates to leverage open source technology to address racial injustice and inequality.

In October 2020, the Linux Foundation announced a new Software Developer Diversity and Inclusion project to draw on science and research to deliver resources and best practices that increase diversity and inclusion in software engineering.

Following the age-old tenet that you cannot manage what you dont measure, the Hyperledger Diversity, Civility, and Inclusion (DCI) Working Group is focused on measuring and improving the health of our open source community.

In the OpenJS community, the Node+JS diversity scholarship program provides support to those from traditionally underrepresented or marginalized groups in the technology or open source communities who may not otherwise have the opportunity to attend the event for financial reasons.

At KubeCon + CloudNativeCon this year, The Cloud Native Computing Foundation announced The Inclusive Naming Initiative to help remove harmful, racist, and unclear language in software development. At IBM, we had a similar program underway, and we have joined the CNCF initiative to further the cause.

In the past fiscal year, GitHub invested $1.3 million to both emerging and persistent social issues with a strong racial equity lens.

The AI Inclusive initiative seeks to increase the representation and participation of gender minority groups in AI. They offer offers events, tutorials, workshops, and discussions to guide community members in their AI careers.

All of these different initiatives and more work to encourage diversity in open source communities, but we need your help within the communities themselves to do what you can to create an inclusive, friendly environment where people from different backgrounds are able to collaborate.

Its incredibly important that everyone that has any power at all in the open source space pushes for diversity the same goes for us at IBM.

This year, we announced the Equal Access Toolkit , a public set of guidelines that deliver phase-based guidance about accessibility to all members of a team creating an enterprise offering. We also contributed the Accessibility Checker, which is part of an open suite of automation tools that allows developers or auditors to evaluate a web-based component or solution for accessibility issues.

We donated our Trusted AI toolkits to the Linux Foundation AI Foundation, and encourage contributions from a wide audience of technologists to advance the mission of the foundation and its Trustworthy AI open source projects.

We award a quarterly Open Source Community Grant to promote nonprofits that are dedicated to education, inclusiveness, and skill-building for women, underrepresented minorities, and underserved communities. We engage the organizations and give them access to cloud credits, where they can get their development projects off the ground.

Now is listing all our initiatives just bragging? No, its meant to encourage anyone who can to lend a hand to making open source better and more diverse.

While we have a long way to go to see true equality in open source communities, I am hopeful about the changes Ive seen in open source communities in recent years towards creating more diverse communities.

If diversity and inclusion matter to you, I hope youll work to be an ally and push for them in the projects where youre working. Invite people who dont look or think like you to get involved, make sure that the environment is friendly and welcoming for everyone, and continue to push forward innovation that makes tech better for everyone.

Heres to a better and more diverse 2021!

Published December 28, 2020 09:00 UTC

Read more:

2021 will be the year open source projects overcome their diversity problems - The Next Web

Rocket.Chat: An Amazing Open-Source Alternative to Slack That You Can Self-host – It’s FOSS

Brief: Rocket.Chat is an open-source team communication application with features and looks similar to Slack. You are free to self-host it or opt for their managed service for a fee.

Slack is a useful and popular team communication app that potentially replaces emails for work. A lot of big and small teams use it, even we at Its FOSS relied on Slack initially.

However, we needed a good open-source alternative to Slack and thats when we came across Rocket.Chat. Sure, there are several other open-source slack alternatives, but we opted for Rocket.Chat for its similarity with Slack and ease of deployment.

Rocket.Chat is an open-source communication platform for team collaboration.

You get all the essential features to facilitate proper communication along with the option to get started for free, opt for hosted service by the Rocket.Chat team or deploy it on your server.

You can totally customize as per your requirements when deploying it on your server. No matter what you choose to do, the feature-set is impressive.

Let us take a look at what it offers.

Rocket.Chat is a powerful and flexible team communication tool. Heres what you can expect from it:

In addition to all the key points mentioned above, there are a lot of little nifty features that should come in useful in Rocket.Chat.

If you have a Rocket.Chat instance deployed or hosted by Rocket Chat itself, you can access it through web browser, desktop clients and mobile apps.

Cant self-host Rocket.Chat? Let us help you

Deploying open source applications and managing Linux servers takes some expertise and time. If you lack either but still want to have your own instance of open source software, we can help you out.With our new project, High on Cloud, you can leave the deployment and server management part to us while you focus on your work.

On Linux, Rocket.Chat is available as a snap and a Flatpak package. You can go through our guides on using snap or Flatpak on Linux to get started.

I would recommend installing it as a Flatpak (thats how I use it) to get the latest version. Of course, if you prefer to use it as a snap package, you can go with that as well.

In either case, you can explore the source code on their GitHub page if you need.

Ive been using Rocket.Chat for quite a while now (for our internal communication at Its FOSS). Even though I was not the one who deployed it on our server, the documentation hints at a swift process to set it up on your server.

It supports automation tools like Ansible, Kubernetes, etc and also gives you the option to deploy it as a docker container directly.

You will find plenty of administrative options to tweak the experience on your instance of Rocket.Chat. It is easy to customize many things even if you are not an expert at self-managed projects.

Personally, I appreciate the ability to customize the theme (it is easy to add a dark mode toggle as well). You get all the essential options available on smartphone as well. Overall, it is indeed an exciting switch from Slack and it should be a similar experience for most of you.

What do you think about Rocket.Chat? Do you prefer something else over Rocket.Chat? Let me know your thoughts in the comments below.

Like what you read? Please share it with others.

Excerpt from:

Rocket.Chat: An Amazing Open-Source Alternative to Slack That You Can Self-host - It's FOSS

Preventing Developer Burnout in the Age of Rapid Software Delivery – Security Boulevard

Burnout happens across all jobs and industries, especially tech. However, developers have always been particularly at-risk of falling victim to burning out, and the COVID-19 pandemic, and the resulting digital shift driven by software, has only escalated this problem. Just look at the trends, as 38% of developers are releasing software monthly or faster, up from 27% in 2018, creating a high-stress reality.

This increased pace and immense pressure surrounding software development have made burnout an even bigger reality than before, at a time when developers couldnt be more essential to maintaining business continuity. The negative consequences of this trend have mental and physical health implications for developers who are finding themselves in a constant cycle of aggressive productivity. The telltale signs of burnout, like missing key deadlines, lack of motivation, last-minute sick days, and careless mistakes, should serve as major red flags for leadership. And, while burnout clearly impacts developers, their corresponding organizations are also more likely to experience side effects such as elevated security risks due to attention lapses.

If youre seeing these signs, its important to take a moment to evaluate the conditions your developers are working under and provide the necessary resources to address burnout accordingly. Heres how.

One of the most effective tactics in preventing burnout is to ramp up secure coding education and training. While this might feel counterintuitive as if its adding yet another task to developers plates, when done right, these initiatives can have lasting effects that help them become more aware of common security issues and capable of remediating them in a timely manner.

Where many training programs often fall flat is that theyre boring, forced, and take developers out of their usual routines and workflows, all big reasons why they often get a bad rap. In order to really break through to developers and make a real impression and in turn, drive real change with how security is implemented into software development training initiatives should take a more gamified approach to keep developers engaged and entertained.

For instance, these training modules can be turned into tournaments, which promotes friendly competition. You can add fun prizes or (virtual) events for folks to come together and learn while having a little fun. I also recommend delivering lessons in short, frequent bursts to keep security top-of-mind in their daily operations without the draining stigma associated with half or full-day training sessions. These integrated bite-size, relevant training modules can be inserted directly into a developers daily routine so that developers do not have to endure hours of out-of-context training sessions.

If you provide your developers with the proper training to think about security from the beginning stages, you have the ability to curb stress later on by minimizing the chance of major vulnerabilities.

Theres a common misconception that security is the responsibility of developers and developers alone. Not only is it untrue, but its also an inadequate mindset given todays evolving threat landscape. It takes a village when it comes to security and there needs to be concrete alignment between DevOps and AppSec teams and employees in other departments to create a comprehensive security program.

I recommend having the AppSec team lead the strategy around security procedures, with input from the developers who are on the frontlines executing it in the wild. If there are apparent gaps in security protocols, developers should advocate for the tools and resources they need to achieve a strong security posture. The application security testing (AST) space is made up of many different solutions, with one goal in common to secure software. Generally, static application security testing (SAST) and software composition analysis (SCA) are two of the better known and used solutions. Though, in the last few years, weve seen more attention on Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST) as well.

Regardless of the AST tool your organization invests in, ensure it aligns with your overall AppSec strategy and fits seamlessly into your existing workflows and CI/CD pipelines. Nothing will make developers resent the idea of security more than trying to fit a square peg in a round hole when it comes to testing solutions. Remember that the end goal is to alleviate their workload and optimize their coding processes in a secure manner.

Many functions in the world have become automated to make our lives and jobs easier. Just as self-driving cars are no longer an abstract thought of the future, key functions within the developer role and the AST tools they use are now being automated to make security simpler. In fact, 30% of DevOps leaders are prioritizing software development life cycle (SDLC) automation in 2021, according to an analyst study.

Its no hidden secret that developers often view security as a burden as part of their day-to-day coding processes. However, more often than not, this scenario plays out because they dont have access to tools that make embedding security into their CI/CD pipelines seamless and easy.

By implementing automated security testing tools especially those that cover proprietary and open source code scans can be automatically triggered, with results prioritized based on severity. With this ability, developer workflows are streamlined and theyre able to find and fix flaws more confidently without compromising speed and security, ultimately allowing them to do what they do best and love most coding.

Modern automation tools create a seamless way for developers to catch and fix vulnerabilities during the earliest coding phase. In turn, developers can easily address and remediate security bugs and functional flaws while reducing the overhead of manually opening, validating, and closing security tickets. This alone saves countless hours for developers.

Providing the right training and automation tools is just the tip of the iceberg. Alleviating some of the aforementioned burdens on developers doesnt automatically mean they are less stressed. If youre in a leadership role or are tasked with managing a development team, check-in with them frequently. Having a constant pulse on the morale of your employees and their stress levels will empower you to make the necessary changes before it reaches a point of burnout.

Yes, software needs to be built and delivered faster, but this shouldnt come at the expense of developers mental and physical health. Collaborate with leadership and encourage an open-door policy so that developers can come to you to talk about issues they are facing in their day-to-day work environment. This will ensure less burnout and turnover, while also boosting morale and leading to greater software integrity, quality, and security.

This article originally appeared in the The New Stack.

Recent Articles By Author

*** This is a Security Bloggers Network syndicated blog from Blog Checkmarx authored by James Brotsos. Read the original post at: https://www.checkmarx.com/2020/12/28/preventing-developer-burnout-in-the-age-of-rapid-software-deployment/

See the original post here:

Preventing Developer Burnout in the Age of Rapid Software Delivery - Security Boulevard

The Future of Screens – Embedded Computing Design

At the end of 2019, Apple, Amazon, Google, and the Zigbee Alliance announced they were joining forces to develop and promote the adoption of a new IP-based connectivity standard for the smart home. Since then, the focus on a unified, open source platform has attracted more stakeholders from a wide range of categories in the smart home market. This includes HVAC, lighting, appliances, locks and TVs, which some experts predict will eventually serve as the hub of home connectivity.

There is no question the TV screen has become a focal point of the home. It's not surprising, considering the abundance of entertainment, news, and information available round the clock today. Arguably, it was cable that brought TV to a whole new level and consumers to a new era of choice in what they could consume.

But, while the multitude of viewing options for consumers has expanded dramatically over the decades, cable platforms historically have offered a poor user experience. Most everyone with cableor anyone who has stayed in a hotel roomhas had the displeasure of scrolling through guides and channels ad nauseum to find something suitable to watch. That's because the platform was sold by manufacturers as one big monolithic solution, which included the backend, hardware, and the software that runs on that hardware and the user interface (UI). Things began to change in 2012, however, when Comcast introduced RDK (Reference Design Kit), which started out as a cable-focused platform for video set-top boxes.

Essentially a middleware, RDK allowed Comcast to build an open source platform enabling an innovative consumer experience on top. In the process, it has enabled other manufacturers, vendors, software developers, system integrators and service providers to customize their UIs and appsas long as their hardware is compliant with the software development kit (SDK). With more players and competitive pricing, this not only drives down cost but also enables them to create a singular, innovative UI.

RDK also paved the way for Comcast's Xfinity X1, a TV and entertainment service set up through a set-top box with DVR. The interface allows users to consolidate whatever they want to watchfrom news to sports and everything in betweenmaking it searchable with voice controls from one place. It can also connect to home security systems. Comcast is now syndicating that product to big multiple-system operators (MSOs), such as Cox and Rogers Communications in Canada, allowing them to multi-source their vendors, buying from Arris, as well as Broadcom and Technicolor, for example.

Currently, hardware manufacturers are creating devices with on-board cameras. The cameras feature bi-directional voice and video capabilities, which could enable RDK-powered solutions like home video conferencing to keep family members connected from any device. Because the SDK is not tightly coupled to the middleware, experiences could potentially become more flexible to include things like gaming, as well as cloud streaming and eventually being able to control everything connected in a smart home from the largest device.

Undoubtedly, companies in the hardware space are struggling to stay competitive with industry disruptors like Google and Android TV. This has created pressure to reach "super aggregation," where as many over-the-top (OTT) services as possible are folded into one platform that can bubble up the best recommendations and live feeds for the subscriber. Whether it's a Hulu or Netflix movie, real-time updates for a specific sporting event, news or a twitter alert. Voice activation and identity is a big part of this. Imagine multiple users in one household able to voice their preferred content or experience on whichever screen or device they are using, with personal preferences and recommendations recognized instantly when using Bluetooth.

RDK for video helps manage complex video functions such as stream management, tuning, conditional access, and DRM. With a common framework for developing STB software, RDK-V incorporates features such as IP video and media streaming/DLNA while allowing for the operator's UI control and development. When it comes to next-gen video products and services, RDK not only accelerates the deployment of these products but also simplifies any customization of the application and user experience. RDK for video distinguishes itself in multiple ways, including:

Today, while RDK has evolved into an open source software solution that standardizes core functions used in broadband (RDK-B), smart media devices and video services (RDK-V) and connected cameras (RDK-C) presen a challenge. Multi-channel video programming distributors (MPVDs) retain the UI. To stay competitive, however, they will need to offer flexible services. That's where RDK bridges the gap. It not only gives them the ability to create a more immersive user experience that brings subscribers in and keeps them but also accelerates time to market.

The need to create a fluid consumer experience is clear, but with the home currently command central for millions working, learning, recharging and unwinding, there has never been a better time to rethink and determine how devices, screens and applications can be integrated with open-source, RDK-based solutions enabling better experiences that make life easier and more enjoyable for everyone.

Read the original:

The Future of Screens - Embedded Computing Design

Why web scraping is vital to democracy – The Next Web

The fruits of web scraping using code to harvest data and information from websites are all around us.

People build scrapers that can find every Applebees on the planet or collect congressional legislation and votes or track fancy watches for sale on fan websites. Businesses use scrapers to manage their online retail inventory and monitor competitors prices. Lots of well-known sites use scrapers to do things like track airline ticket prices and job listings. Google is essentially a giant, crawling web scraper.

Scrapers are also the tools of watchdogs and journalists, which is why The Markup filed an amicus brief in a case before the U.S. Supreme Court this week that threatens to make scraping illegal.

The case itselfVan Buren v. United Statesis not about scraping but rather a legal question regarding the prosecution of a Georgia police officer, Nathan Van Buren, who was bribed to look up confidential information in a law enforcement database. Van Buren was prosecuted under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), which prohibits unauthorized access to a computer network such as computer hacking, where someone breaks into a system to steal information (or, as dramatized in the 1980s classic movie WarGames, potentially start World WarIII).

In Van Burens case, since he was allowed to access the database for work, the question is whether the court will broadly define his troubling activities as exceeding authorized access to extract data, which is what would make it a crime under the CFAA. And its that definition that could affect journalists.

Or, as Justice Neil Gorsuch put it during Mondays oral arguments, lead in the direction of perhaps making a federal criminal of us all.

Investigative journalists and other watchdogs often use scrapers to illuminate issues big and small, from tracking the influence of lobbyists in Peru by harvesting the digital visitor logs for government buildings to monitoring and collecting political ads on Facebook. In both of those instances, the pages and data scraped are publicly available on the internetno hacking necessarybut sites involved could easily change the fine print on their terms of service to label the aggregation of that information unauthorized. And the U.S. Supreme Court, depending on how it rules, could decide that violating those terms of service is a crime under the CFAA.

A statute that allows powerful forces like the government or wealthy corporate actors to unilaterally criminalize newsgathering activities by blocking these efforts through the terms of service for their websites would violate the First Amendment, The Markup wrote in our brief.

What sort of work is at risk? Heres a roundup of some recent journalism made possible by web scraping:

This article was originally published on The Markup and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

Read next: Learn to sell on Alibaba, Amazon, and eBay as your new side hustle for 2021

See the rest here:

Why web scraping is vital to democracy - The Next Web