Cryptocurrency Regulation In Singapore: Challenges And Opportunities Ahead – Technology – Singapore – Mondaq News Alerts

In the recent years, Singapore has emerged as a global hubin technologies such as cryptocurrencies and blockchain.Simultaneously, the Monetary Authority of Singapore, has beentaking steps to actively regulate cryptocurrency business inSingapore. In this piece, we look at the Singapore government'sattitude towards cryptocurrency businesses, the new cryptocurrencyregulation and licensing regime, and the challenges andopportunities facing cryptocurrency businesses inSingapore.

Singapore offers a balanced regulatory and legal environment forcryptocurrencies. The Monetary Authority of Singapore(MAS), Singapore's financial regulatory body,believes in regulating the cryptocurrency ecosystem to monitor anyrisks associated with crypto activities, such as money launderingand terrorist financing, while also ensuring that it doesn'tstifle innovation. The statement given by Singapore's DeputyPrime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam in an interview, mostaccurately sums up Singapore's attitude towardscryptocurrencies: "We will continue to encourageexperiments in the blockchain space that may involve the use ofcryptocurrencies. Some of these innovations could turn out to beeconomically or socially useful. But equally, we will stay alert tonew risks."1 In line withthis, MAS has been working towards regulating cryptocurrencyexchanges operating in Singapore. Simultaneously, MAS has alsoissued warnings to investors and the public of the risks ofinvesting in crypto products.2Singapore has also been experimenting with blockchain technologyfor development of cryptocurrency and digital payments.3 Under Project Ubin, MAS ispartnering with blockchain technology company and financialinstitutions to make inter-bank payments using blockchaintechnology.4

Legally, Singapore offers a neutral regime for the growth oftransactions involving cryptocurrency. Singapore law is commonlyused as the governing law in cryptocurrency related contractsbecause of its advanced dispute resolution laws, and a reputationfor being an arbitral friendly and neutral regime.5 In addition, cryptocurrencies arelegal in Singapore and therefore, any contract involvingcryptocurrencies would not be considered illegal.6 This has been the main reason forSingapore to have emerged as the cryptocurrency hub in Asia.

In January 2020, the Payment Services Act (PSA)came into effect to regulate traditional as well as cryptocurrencypayments and exchanges. The intention behind introducing PSA was tostreamline payment services under a single piece of legislation,and calibrate regulations according to the risks such activitiespose by adopting a modular regulatory regime.7 The PSA provides a framework toobtain license to operate cryptocurrency business in Singapore andoutlines money laundering compliances to be met by cryptocurrencyoperators. We discuss a few relevant provisions below:

(1) Digital payments token: The PSA uses theterm "digital payments token" to refer to virtualcurrencies and defines it as any digital representation of valuethat:

a. is expressed as a unit;

b. is not denominated in any currency, and is notpegged by its issuer to any currency;

c. is, or is intended to be, a medium of exchangeaccepted by the public, or a section of the public, as payment forgoods or services or for the discharge of a debt;

d. can be transferred, stored or traded electronically;and

e. satisfies such other characteristics as MAS mayprescribe.8

A few Digital Payments Token (DPT) recognizedby MAS includes Bitcoins and Ether. The PSA further recognizesdigital payment token service as dealing in digital payment tokensand facilitating the exchange of digital payment token.9

(2) License: Any person carrying out digitalpayment token service has to obtain a payment institution license,unless exemptions apply.10 Astandard payment institution license applies to companies withpayment transactions up to $3million per month and a major paymentinstitution license has to be obtained by companies with paymenttransactions which exceed $3million per month. An application forboth these licenses has to be made by a company incorporated inSingapore or overseas, has its permanent place of business orregistered office in Singapore; and has at least one executivedirector who is a Singapore citizen or a permanent resident or is aperson belonging to a class of persons prescribed by the MAS.11

(3) Anti-money laundering (AML)/Countering thefinancing of terrorism (CFT): MAS has released a separatenotice on AML/CFT guidelines for DPT service providers. As per theNotice, DPT service providers are required to set up robustcontrols to detect and prefect money laundering and terrorismfinancing.12 All DPT paymentservice providers have to implement certain measures as a part oftheir internal AML/CFT policy which includes:

a. customer due diligence by verifyingtheir identities and businesses;

b. monitoring of customers' transactions for signsof money laundering and terrorism financing;

c. screening of customers against relevantinternational sanctions list by the United Nations; and

d. maintain detailed records of customers activitiesand out in place a process to report suspicious transactions toMAS.13

MAS also made the Securities and Futures Act(SFA) applicable for public offerings or issues ofdigital tokens and in May 2020, released a new Guide to DigitalToken Offerings. Offers or issues of digital tokens to the public(Offer) will be regulated by MAS if the digitaltokens are "capital market products".14 Capital market products under theSFA include securities, units in a collective investment scheme,derivatives contracts and spot foreign exchange contracts forpurposes of leveraged foreign exchange trading.15 MAS will determine whether adigital token, its characteristics and the rights attached to it,is a type of capital markets products.16

(1) Prospectus requirements and exemptions: Any offerof digital tokens to the public which constitutes securities,17 securities-based derivativescontracts or units in a collective investment scheme, requirescompliance with all the requirements under the SFA includingpreparation of a prospectus in accordance with the SFA andregistration of the offer with MAS.18 However, an Offer may be exemptedfrom these requirements if:

a. the Offer is a small personal offer not exceedingSGD 5 million, within any 12 month period;

b. the Offer is a private placement offer made to notmore than 50 persons within any 12-month period;

c. the Offer is made only to institutional investors(as defined under the SFA);

d. the Offer is made only to accredited investors (asdefined under the SFA).19

(2) Approved exchanges: Only an approvedexchange or a recognized market operator can establish or operate amarket.20 Normally, digital tokensare issued by primary platforms, a platform on which one or moreofferors of digital tokens may make primary offers or issues ofdigital tokens.21 Typically,persons operating a primary platform has to obtain a license fromMAS.

(3) Capital market services license under the SFA: If aperson is operating a primary platform in Singapore in relation todigital tokens which constitutes "capital marketproducts", it will be considered as a "regulatedactivity" under the SFA. Any person carrying on a business inany regulated activity under the SFA requires a capital marketservices (CMS) license. Such a license will onlybe granted if the applicant, which must be a corporation, meetsminimum financial and other requirements as prescribed by theMAS.22 The SFA also providescertain exemptions from the requirement to hold capital marketsservices license.23

In July, 2020, MAS proposed the introduction of a new set ofregulations to govern the financial sector in Singapore, which willalso have impact on the cryptocurrency industry. The intentionbehind the proposed regulations is to protect Singaporeans fromunsuitable entities who can increase the risk associated withcrypto businesses and to clamp down on financial crime in thecrypto ecosystem.24 MAS mainlyintends to introduce new provisions for putting in place thefollowing:

(1) A harmonized andexpanded power to issue orders: MAS has the power to issueprohibition orders to bar persons from conducting certainactivities or holding key roles in financial institutions for acertain period, in cases of serious misconduct.25 However, MAS derives this poweronly from the DFA and the Financial Advisers Act(FAA). MAS cannot issue prohibition orders topersons regulated under other Acts. Therefore, the new proposedlegislation will allow MAS to issue prohibitory orders againstcrypto businesses in case of misconduct.26

(2) Anew Part to regulate virtual asset service providers forAML/CFT: MAS wants to introduce new standards toregulate virtual asset service providers on matters of moneylaundering and terrorism financing, based on the revisedinternational standards of the Financial Action Task Force, theglobal money laundering and terrorist financing watchdog.27 MAS also intends to haveregulatory oversight on entities based in Singapore conductingcrypto business outside of Singapore, for money laundering andterrorism financing related concerns.28

(3) A harmonised power to imposerequirements on technology risk management: MAS wantsto introduce a high maximum penalty for breaches of technology riskmanagement requirements.29 MASintends to introduce a power to issue directions to or makeregulations concerning any financial institution or class offinancial institution for management of technology risks, cybersecurity risks, deliverer of financial services and dataprotection.30

(4) Providing mediators, adjudicators andemployees of an operator of an approved dispute resolution schemewith statutory protection from liability: MAS wantsfinancial institutions to subscribe to a MAS approved disputeresolution scheme to provide the customers with an independent andaffordable avenue for resolving disputes.31

(1) Banking challenges: In the recent past,several start-ups operating cryptocurrency businesses in Singaporefaced operational issues with banks in Singapore. Banks ceaseddoing businesses with cryptocurrencies operators and arbitrarilyclosed their bank accounts.32Speculators believed that this was due to concerns surroundingmoney laundering and terrorism financing, especially due toincreasing initial coin offerings by cryptocurrency businesses,equivalent to initial public offerings in the crypto industry.33 However, to help boost its fintecheconomy, in 2018, MAS agreed to help crypto businesses set up bankaccounts in Singapore by strengthening crypto regulatory regime.34 As MAS started taking measures toregulate the cryptocurrency industry, few banks have startedallowing bank accounts to be opened by crypto businesses. Forinstance, Luno, a cryptocurrency exchange which halted itsactivities in 2017 owing to closure of its bank accounts, resumedoperations in Singapore towards the end of 2019 after its bankaccounts were opened.35 Havingsaid that, the woes of crypto businesses are far from over. Bankingcontinues to remain a challenge and different banks have differentapproaches. Businesses are subjected to extensive diligence beforethey are offered bank accounts, and many banks will outrightdecline such privilege to companies that have any touch points withcryptocurrency.

(2) Increased regulatory powers with MAS: Theproposed Omnibus Act gives MAS broad powers to issue prohibitionorders against crypto businesses and provides a high penalty forbreach technology risk management requirements. The enhancedregulatory powers with MAS may be a cause for concern for cryptobusinesses and especially start-ups looking for a more flexiblepenalty regime.

(3) Regulation of overseas crypto-firms: The biggestchange being proposed under the Omnibus Act is the regulation ofoverseas crypto businesses. This implies that virtual asset serviceproviders will have to ensure that their overseas operations meetthe same regulatory standards as their Singapore operations.36

(1) Crypto-friendly attitude: Singapore'scrypto-friendly attitude and flexible regulatory offers anenvironment to facilitate growth and innovation in the fintechindustry. MAS has been supportive of crypto start-ups and firmsexperimenting with cryptocurrency and blockchain technologies. Thisfriendly climate has been a magnet for several big cryptobusinesses from countries like Australia, Japan and China settingshop in Singapore.37

(2) Regulatory clarity and certainty: Stakeholders fromthe cryptocurrency industry welcomed some of the regulatory changesbrought by MAS, especially the licensing regime under the PSA.Major crypto businesses such as Japanese-based Liquid Group Inc.and London-based Luno have expressed their eagerness to apply for aMAS license, which offers regulatory clarity and certainty tocrypto businesses operating in Singapore.38

(3) Increased consumer confidence in licensedcrypto-operators: The licensing regime under the PSA will helpincrease consumer confidence in the crypto businesses operating inSingapore. Consumers will also be more comfortable in trustinglicensed crypto operators.

(4) Improved access to banking services: Thenew licensing regime under the PSA will facilitate easier access totraditional banking services to crypto businesses. In fact, theAssociation of Cryptocurrency Enterprises and Start-ups recentlyreleased a Code of Practice , under its Standardization of Practicein Crypto Entities (SPICE) initiative, with support from theAssociation of Banks in Singapore and the MAS to help cryptobusinesses apply for a license under the PSA.39 These measures will lead toincreased trust between crypto businesses and banks in Singapore,and improve their access to banking services.

(5) New AML/CFT provisions reduce risk of financialcrimes: The AML/CFT provisions under the PSA reduces the riskof financial crimes which can take place on a crypto platform. TheCode of Practice released by the Association of CryptocurrencyEnterprises and Start-ups also seeks to help crypto businesses putin place robust AML/CFT measures. The Code also promotes bestpractices, including Know-Your-Customer, to help crypto businessescomply with the new regulatory framework.40 While the regulatory regime isrisk-focused, it also offers a flexible framework for crypto-firmsto continue their businesses.

Footnotes

1. Bitcoin.com, No strongcase to ban crypto trading, Singapore says, 7 February, 2018,https://news.bitcoin.com/no-strong-case-to-ban-crypto-trading-singapore-says/.

2. Monetary Authority ofSingapore, Reply to Parliamentary Question on regulation of cryptoderivatives on Approved Exchanges, 6 January, 2020, https://www.mas.gov.sg/news/parliamentary-replies/2020/reply-to-parliamentary-question-on-regulation-of-crypto-derivatives-on-approved-exchanges.

3. Asia Times, Why Singaporeis emerging as global crypto leader, https://asiatimes.com/2020/10/why-singapore-is-emerging-as-global-crypto-leader/.

4. Coin Telegraph,Singapore's Government Blockchain Experiment is a Road toRegulatory Understanding, 20 February, 2018, https://cointelegraph.com/news/singapores-government-blockchain-experiment-is-a-road-to-regulatory-understanding.

5. Anthony Soh and Feei Sy Tham,Singapore: Why Singapore has become Asia's Cryptocurrencyand Blockchain Hub, 15 January, 2020, https://www.mondaq.com/fin-tech/883798/why-singapore-has-become-asia39s-cryptocurrency-and-blockchain-hub.

6. Id.

7. Han Ming Ho & JodephineLaw, Singapore, The Virtual Currency Regulation Review,Ed. 3, September 2020, https://thelawreviews.co.uk/edition/the-virtual-currency-regulation-review-edition-3/1230199/singapore.

8. Section 2, Payment ServicesAct, 2019, https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Acts-Supp/2-2019/Published/20190220?DocDate=20190220.

9. Part 3, First Schedule,Payment Services Act, 2019.

10. Section 5 and 6, PaymentServices Act, supra note 12.

11. Section 6, Payment ServicesAct, supra note 12.

12. Scorechain,Cryptocurrencies Regulatory Landscape in Singapore, https://blog.scorechain.com/cryptocurrencies-regulatory-landscape-in-singapore/.

13. Comply Advantage,Payment Services Act in Singapore, https://complyadvantage.com/knowledgebase/payment-services-act-singapore/.

14. Monetary Authority ofSingapore, A Guide to Digital Token Offerings, 26, May 2020, https://www.mas.gov.sg/-/media/MAS/Sectors/Guidance/Guide-to-Digital-Token-Offerings-26-May-2020.pdf.

15. Section 2(1), Securities andFutures Act, 2001, https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/SFA2001.

16. Id.

17. As defined under Section2(1) SFA, this includes: (a) debentures or stocks issued orproposed to be issued by a government; (b) debentures, stocks orshares issued or proposed to be issued by a corporation or bodyunincorporated; (c) any right, option or derivative in respect ofany such debentures, stocks or shares; (d) any right under acontract for differences or under any other contract the purpose orpretended purpose of which is to secure a profit or avoid a loss byreference to fluctuations in - (i) the value or price of any suchdebentures, stocks or shares; (ii) the value or price of any groupof any such debentures, stocks or shares; or (iii) an index of anysuch debentures, stocks or shares; (e) any unit in a collectiveinvestment scheme; (f) any unit in a business trust; (g) anyderivative of a unit in a business trust; or (h) such other productor class of products as the Authority mayprescribe.

18. Sections 240 and 296,Securities and Futures Act, supra note 19.

19. Sections 272A, 302C, 274,304 and 305, Securities and Futures Act, supra note19.

20. Section 6, Securities andFutures Act, supra note 20.

21. Monetary Authority ofSingapore, A Guide to Digital Token Offerings, supra note18, at 2.8.

22. Section 82, Securities andFutures Act, supra note 19.

23. Section 99, Securities andFutures Act, supra note 19.

24. Blockchain News, MASproposes new regulations to tighten crypto businessactivities, 22 July, 2020, https://blockchain.news/news/mas-proposes-new-regulations-tighten-crypto-business-activities.

25. Monetary Authority ofSingapore, Consultation Paper on a New Omnibus Act for theFinancial Sector, at 5, 21July, 2020, https://www.mas.gov.sg/-/media/MAS/News-and-Publications/Consultation-Papers/2020-July-Consultation-on-FSMA/Consultation-Paper-on-a-New-Omnibus-Act-for-the-Financial-Sector.pdf(hereafter, MAS, Consultation Paper on a New Omnibus Act forthe Financial Sector).

26. Id.

27. Id. at6.

28. MAS, Consultation Paperon a New Omnibus Act for the Financial Sector, supranote 29, at 10.

29. Id. at18.

30. Id.

31. Id. at19.

32. Bitcoin.com,Singapore-based Bitcoin Startups Deal with Bank AccountClosures, September 26, 2017, https://news.bitcoin.com/singapore-based-bitcoin-startups-deal-with-bank-account-closures/.

33. Id.

34. The Star, Singapore willhelp crypto firms set up local bank accounts, October 10,2018, https://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2018/10/10/singapore-will-help-crypto-firms-set-up-local-bank-accounts.

35. The Business Times,Crypto firm Luno plans Singapore reboot after bank accountsopen, November 1, 2019, https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/banking-finance/crypto-firm-luno-plans-singapore-reboot-after-bank-accounts-opened.

36. Coindesk, Singapore mayextend crypto regulation to include overseas activities, 21July 2020, https://www.coindesk.com/singapore-mas-considers-extending-crypto-regulation-overseas-activities.

37. Lottie Wells, WhySingapore is Emerging as Global Crypto Leader, Asia Times,October 10, 2020, https://asiatimes.com/2020/10/why-singapore-is-emerging-as-global-crypto-leader/.

38. Bloomberg, New SingaporeLaw Allows Global Crypto Firms to Expand Locally, January 28,2020, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-01-27/singapore-launches-new-regime-for-cryptocurrency-payments-firms.

39. ACCESS, ACCESS rolls outCode of Practice to facilitate application of payment serviceprovider license under Singapore's Payment Services Act,August 13, 2020, https://www.access.org.sg/blogs/press-release/access-rolls-out-code-of-practice-to-facilitate-application-of-payment-service-provider-licence-under-singapore-s-payment-services-act.

40. Coindesk,Singapore's Central Bank backs new Code of Practice forcrypto companies, August 14, 2020, https://www.coindesk.com/singapores-central-bank-backs-new-code-of-practice-for-crypto-companies.

The content of this article is intended to provide a generalguide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be soughtabout your specific circumstances.

Read the original here:
Cryptocurrency Regulation In Singapore: Challenges And Opportunities Ahead - Technology - Singapore - Mondaq News Alerts

Openbase wants to be the Yelp for open source software packages – VentureBeat

Open source has eaten the world, evidenced by the myriad major deals that have gone down in open source town in recent times. In 2018, IBM snapped up enterprise-focused open source software maker Red Hat for an eye-popping $34 billion, while Salesforce bought Mulesoft for $6.5 billion. And just yesterday, Cockroach Labs, maker of the open source distributed SQL database CockroachDB, raised $160 million at a $2 billion valuation.

Most of the major technology companies these days not only use open source software, but actively contribute to the projects. They even open-source their own tools where it makes sense, as Facebook did with its React JavaScript library, which is now a prominent front-end development tool.

However, there are some 1.5 million JavaScript packages alone out there, making it difficult for developers to research and evaluate the quality of each one. And its against that backdrop that San Francisco-based Openbase is setting out to help developers choose from these millions of open source packages that serve as the building blocks of much of todays software.

Founded in 2019, Openbases raison dtre is to surface the best open source packages across hundreds of categories, displaying data on weekly downloads, monthly commits, and even GitHub stars. There are other search conduits that serve a similar function, for example GitHub itself and open source package registries such as NPM, PyPi, and Maven; however, Openbase goes further by offering granular categorization and search filters and deeper insights around development activity, popularity, and maintenance. But more than that, Openbase is also opening things up to user reviews. Think Yelp for open source, founder and CEO Lior Grossman told VentureBeat.

Above: Openbase: Reviews and ratings for Vue JavaScript framework

A graduate of Y Combinators (YC) summer 2020 program, Openbase today announced it has raised a $3.6 million in a seed round of funding led by Zeev Ventures, with participation from YC and 20 angel investors, including notable figures from the open source world such as Herokus former CEO Adam Gross, Docker cofounder Sbastien Pahl, and Netlify founders Mathias Biilmann and Christian Bach. Yelp CEO and cofounder Jeremy Stoppelman also participated in the round.

Openbase said that it currently supports all JavaScript packages, though it does also support additional languages (e.g., Python, Java, Go, and Rust) in beta, something that its fresh investment will help it go deeper on. In terms of how all the packages appear on Openbase, well, Grossman said that the process is 100% automatic and is always up-to-date. We use the APIs of package registries to make sure that all new packages appear immediately, and new versions of packages are scanned and updated within Openbase.

Above: How Facebooks React library looks on Openbase

The company said that it has grown its platform to more than 500,000 developers a month in just over a year, and hopes to build on that through its unique analysis and insights of packages that arent available elsewhere, according to Grossman. This includes displaying a packages star count evolution (i.e., has it improved or deteriorated?), the average time between major and minor releases, and how long it takes to resolve issues.

The issue of online reviews is something of a thorny subject across the online world, with review bombing and similar antics often used to nefarious ends. Indeed, many open source developers work completely for free in their spare time, so its entirely conceivable that a platform such as Openbase could deter developers if the review system is misused. Grossman said that the company takes reviews very seriously and has put measures in place to counter some of the potential downsides.

We currently moderate each and every review that goes on the platform, to verify the authenticity, legitimacy, and quality of the review, and well keep doing that for the foreseeable future to ensure high quality of reviews, Grossman said. We have built an entire back-office system specifically for the purpose of moderating reviews.

Additionally, there is a flag button that allows users to report problematic reviews, with Openbase investigating each case by itself. Such a system might not be sustainable in the long run, though, which is why the company may delegate some of this responsibility to the community as it grows. Right now, most of this work is done internally, [but] over time we would like to involve the community more in these efforts by appointing community moderators, Grossman said.

While Openbase has yet to implement a business model, Openbase will be entirely free for developers to use. The company eventually plans to introduce a subscription model for vendors, so that companies spanning the API, SaaS, infrastructure, and developer tools space pay for more customization, enhanced call-to-actions, and to have their package promoted throughout Openbase.

Ultimately, Openbase could serve as a valuable inroad to qualified leads. Although it doesnt work with companies directly, it does claim to serve developers across the spectrum, from indies and freelancers to employees at Facebook, Google, and Amazon. With 500,000 developers visiting Openbase every month, were at the decision point for billions of dollars in IT spent, Grossman said.

Continued here:
Openbase wants to be the Yelp for open source software packages - VentureBeat

Open Source Software Leader the Eclipse Foundation Officially Transitions to EU-based Governance – GlobeNewswire

BRUSSELS, Belgium, Jan. 14, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Eclipse Foundation, one of the worlds largest open source software foundations, today announced the formal establishment of the Eclipse Foundation AISBL, an international non-profit association based in Brussels. The new Belgian entity launches with the support of founding members Bosch, Daimler TSS, IBM, and SAP. By moving its legal residence from the United States to Europe, the Eclipse Foundation has created a global institution that builds on its existing membership base, active developer community, and strong institutional relationships to enable collaboration and the free flow of open source software innovation throughout the entire world.

The Eclipse Foundation is already the largest open source software foundation in Europe in terms of staff, projects, developers, and members, so the formalization of our AISBL makes a great deal of sense for us and the EU, said Mike Milinkovich, executive director of the Eclipse Foundation. I firmly believe that establishing this new organization will help to accelerate the drive to digitization throughout the EU and provide a new engine for the development of innovative and open technologies across the continent and beyond.

The Eclipse Foundation already has more than 170 members and over 900 committers based in Europe. The formalization of the Eclipse Foundation AISBL non-profit association will enable it to leverage its EU presence and recent international growth to foster global industry collaboration on open source projects in strategic technologies, such as the cloud, edge computing, artificial intelligence, connected vehicles, telecommunications, and the Internet of Things.

Open source is proven to be the most viable way to deliver complex, sustainable technology innovation and adoption across industry sectors. As outlined in its new white paper, the Eclipse Foundation recognizes the important role open source will play in driving the digital and industrial transformations called for by the European Commission in its recent strategies. Contributions from a broad cross-section of European companies and governmental organizations to open source projects will be key to ensuring that these emerging technologies are fit for Europe, designed with consideration for the privacy and security of individuals and organizations, and have environmental impact in mind.

Supported by over 330 members globally, including adding more than 90 new members in 2020 alone, the Eclipse Foundation has an established international reach and reputation, and a track record of enabling co-innovation earned over more than 16 years. The Foundations more than 375 open source projects have resulted in over 240 million lines of code a more than 13 billion shared investment. The organizations members include industry leaders who value the Foundations open innovation processes and its unique Working Group governance model that makes it possible to share intellectual property without the threat of antitrust and regulatory challenges.

We have updated resources and information on our plans and how interested parties can get involved at eclipse.org/europe. Resources include:

Quotes from Members and Supporters

BoschIt is great that the Eclipse Foundation has finalized its transition to the EU, said Dr. Stefan Ferber, CEO of Bosch.IO. This move is going to serve as a catalyst for European organizations that want to leverage the potential of open source technologies to speed their own innovation and increase their competitive advantage.

Daimler TSSOpen source software underpins the most significant and widely used technologies today and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future, said Basem Vaseghi, Daimler TSS head of FOSS Competency Group. Were thrilled to join the Eclipse Foundation on this journey as we help to enable the next wave of open source adoption and contribution.

IBMIBM and the Eclipse Foundation have been working to expand the adoption of open source technology around the world for nearly two decades, said Todd Moore, vice president of Open Technology and Advocacy, IBM. We look forward to continuing to support the Eclipse Foundation, to enhance its international expansion, and to advance open hybrid cloud technologies.

SAP

If you peek behind the curtain of more recent innovations, you will often find a foundation that is built on open source contributions. As a founding and strategic member of the Eclipse Foundation, we know that it has been fostering open collaboration in the industry for more than a decade, said Juergen Mueller, chief technology officer and member of the Executive Board of SAP SE. This move will strengthen the foundation's world-wide communities and help to boost the use of open source technologies in Europe, enabling organizations to innovate faster and gain competitive advantages.

About the Eclipse Foundation

The Eclipse Foundation provides our global community of individuals and organizations with a mature, scalable, and business-friendly environment for open source software collaboration and innovation. The Foundation is home to the Eclipse IDE, Jakarta EE, and over 375 open source projects, including runtimes, tools, and frameworks for cloud and edge applications, IoT, AI, automotive, systems engineering, distributed ledger technologies, open processor designs, and many others. The Eclipse Foundation is an international non-profit association supported by over 330 members, including industry leaders who value open source as a key enabler for their business strategies. To learn more, follow us on Twitter @EclipseFdn, LinkedIn or visit eclipse.org.

Third-party trademarks mentioned are the property of their respective owners.

Media contacts Weber Shandwick BelgiumAnna ToburAccount Director, Public AffairsT +32 28949055 E atobur@webershandwick.com

Weber Shandwick GermanyMatthias WowtscherkAccount Director, Media RelationsT +49 30 20351245E mwowtscherk@webershandwick.com

Nichols Communications for the Eclipse Foundation, Inc.Jay Nicholsjay@nicholscomm.com+1 408-772-1551

View original post here:
Open Source Software Leader the Eclipse Foundation Officially Transitions to EU-based Governance - GlobeNewswire

Collaborating through open source to advance AI – TechRadar

Artificial intelligence is one of those hype phrases that comes with its fair share of baggage: will its potential ever be realized; will it enhance humans, or make them obsolete; is it really that revolutionary?

One area of the debate that is often overlooked - one of the more positive aspects of modern innovation in fact - is the way big tech companies like Google, Amazon, Facebook and Microsoft are working together to help progress AI. These companies have been the focus of much criticism over the last few years, consolidating their influence and dominating specific parts of our lives but when it comes to AI, something is different. That something is open source.

The sheer number of open source tools available to developers - from libraries to frameworks, IDEs, data lakes, streaming, model serving and inference solutions, and even the recent end-to-end tool aggregator, Kubeflow, means businesses can now harness all the knowledge they have accumulated over the years. In other words, open source has become that common ground for companies that would traditionally be seen as competitors. They are already working closer than many suspect, and it is the unique combination of AI and open source that will foster better relationships moving forward.

The benefits of open source technology to IT development have been well documented over the years. The first open source program, the launch of Netscape Navigator in 1998, is said to be one of the initial starting points for this trend. The strategy Netscape chose was to emphasize the business potential of sharing the softwares source code. As with science, if all researchers kept their methods secret, progress and innovation would take place much more slowly. With developers racing to deliver the next big thing, secure and easy-to-deploy software frameworks are essential to supporting this.

However, there are numerous barriers for businesses looking to develop successful AI-based technologies. It is no secret that AI and machine learning development can be an expensive process. Not only that, but development requires significant computing power and data sets in place to build and train an advanced model. The open source community offers potential solutions to these challenges by encouraging collaboration as well as expertise and resource sharing. For example, open source software allows IT management teams to access frameworks, data sets, workflows, and software models in the public domain and as such reduces training costs. At the same time, the open source community is always monitoring the code for flaws and vulnerabilities - adding an extra layer of security and also making such concerns a common responsibility.

In another front, the rise of ops methodologies has greatly increased the efficiency of developers to bring solutions into production. As an example, Kubernetes - the open source platform which automates the deployment and management of containerized applications - has become a mainstream technology for enterprises to get into DevOps, and is now being extended to Machine Learning ops (MLops), allowing complicated AI workloads to be kept up to date.

It will come as little surprise that big tech companies have traditionally been private with their source codes, libraries and methodologies. Which poses the question as to what makes AI the differentiator for these giants to begin revealing methods from the core of their businesses and unleashing their own open source APIs?

Essentially, the progression of AI remains paramount, and big tech companies have made leaps and bounds in developing the technology over the past few years. Open source allows any developer or IT team to facilitate cheaper, faster, more flexible and secure deployment. Development through open source helps accelerate the adoption of numerous frameworks and software solutions through support from a large community of contributors. So, with big tech embracing open source, their work can then be further developed, explored, adapted and improved. Looking to the future where AI is expected to be ingrained into everyday life, open sourcing AI will foster innovation and reach maturity even sooner.

Google is one company leading the way, having made its popular machine learning framework, TensorFlow, open to the public. This subsequently led to the creation of TensorFlow Extended (TFX) which matured into Kubeflow, an open source project designed to enable using machine learning pipelines to orchestrate complicated workflows running on Kubernetes, all based on Googles internal method.

Meanwhile, Facebook has open-sourced DeepFocus, its AI-powered framework for rendering natural, realistic focus effects in virtual reality (VR), and the Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit has also embraced open source with the ultimate aim of training deep learning algorithms to function like the human brain.

Its also important to remember that all big tech companies are made up of people. In particular, the machine learning field has a long history of being very open and cooperative. Those running the ML labs inside of Google, Facebook and Microsoft have been pioneering the field for decades and have always worked fairly transparently and cooperatively. A key reason we have seen such major advancement is precisely that effective cooperation.

Ultimately, trust is the key factor here. Big tech companies have seen the trust in them dwindle because of the consolidation of personal data they hold, and the perceived notion of the unnecessary power and influence it allows them to hold. But now, these companies are becoming completely open as it relates to the development of this technology, which will form the backbone of our future.

Even over the past six months which have been typified by massive world change as a result of COVID-19, tech collaborations have emerged, such as Apple and Google jointly working on a contact tracing solution.

Going forward, these ongoing relationships will likely spark a new era whereby big tech and even public sector organizations work together in order to foster innovation and help overcome crises. And with such established tech companies betting so heavily on the openness of AI, it is clear that its development will continue to transform and flourish in the near future.

Link:
Collaborating through open source to advance AI - TechRadar

Open Source Software Industry Market Growth Projection from 2020 to 2025 – The Pinstripe Empire

Market Study Report has recently added a report on Open Source Software Industry Market which provides a succinct analysis of the market size, revenue forecast, and the regional landscape of this industry. The report also highlights the major challenges and current growth strategies adopted by the prominent companies that are a part of the dynamic competitive spectrum of this business sphere.

The Open Source Software Industry market research report is an elaborate analysis of this industry vertical that covers this business space with respect to numerous parameters like the industrial policy, macroeconomic policies, industrial layout characteristics, as well as the development trends over the projected timeline. The current status of the marketplace and how it will impact the potential investments in the industry, alongside a gist of the enterprise competition trends and the advantages and disadvantages of the enterprise products have also been elucidated in the report. In tandem, the study incorporates a pivotal scientific analysis on the industry downstream buyers, raw materials, etc.

Request a sample Report of Open Source Software Industry Market at:https://www.marketstudyreport.com/request-a-sample/2811492?utm_source=pinstripeempireny.com&utm_medium=Ram

How meticulously does the report categorize the Open Source Software Industry market with respect to the competitive landscape?

How will the reports segmentation of the regional analysis of the Open Source Software Industry market help potential investors?

Ask for Discount on Open Source Software Industry Market Report at:https://www.marketstudyreport.com/check-for-discount/2811492?utm_source=pinstripeempireny.com&utm_medium=Ram

How has the Open Source Software Industry market been segmented?

The Open Source Software Industry market research study also comprises details with respect to the manufacturing cost structure analysis further containing information about the manufacturing cost structure and the production process analysis. Information regarding the industry chain evaluation, latest players, SWOT analyses, and the constraints of the Open Source Software Industry market size have also been enumerated in the report.

For More Details On this Report:https://www.marketstudyreport.com/reports/covid-19-outbreak-global-open-source-software-industry-market-report-development-trends-threats-opportunities-and-competitive-landscape-in-2020

Related Reports:

1. Global Conversational AI Market Research Report with Opportunities and Strategies to Boost Growth- COVID-19 Impact and RecoveryRead More: https://www.marketstudyreport.com/reports/global-conversational-ai-market-research-report-with-opportunities-and-strategies-to-boost-growth-covid-19-impact-and-recovery

2. Global iGaming Platform and Sportsbook Software Market Research Report with Opportunities and Strategies to Boost Growth- COVID-19 Impact and RecoveryRead More: https://www.marketstudyreport.com/reports/global-igaming-platform-and-sportsbook-software-market-research-report-with-opportunities-and-strategies-to-boost-growth-covid-19-impact-and-recovery

Read More Reports On: https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/legal-marijuana-market-size-share-growth-strategies-analysis-and-forecast-by-2027-2021-01-12

Contact Us:Corporate Sales,Market Study Report LLCPhone:1-302-273-0910Toll Free:1-866-764-2150Email:[emailprotected]

Read the original post:
Open Source Software Industry Market Growth Projection from 2020 to 2025 - The Pinstripe Empire

O’Reilly Announces 2021 Superstream Series Lineup and Dates – Business Wire

BOSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--OReilly, the premier source for insight-driven learning on technology and business, today announced its 2021 Superstream Series lineup. Beginning this month, OReilly will present its most popular conference franchises Software Architecture, Infrastructure & Ops, Open Source Software (OSCON), Strata Data, and Artificial Intelligencein a multipart virtual format.

First introduced in 2020, the OReilly Superstream Series offers a collection of virtual conferences featuring expert speakers who deliver talks and training sessions on the most prominent subjects and emerging trends in technology. Each event addresses different topics, with unique sessions covered in half-day blocks. Suitable for participants of all levels, the Superstream Series is exclusive to OReilly members, and all events are recorded for future viewing on oreilly.com.

Last year, more than 1 million users registered for OReillys virtual events and live online training courses led by industry experts, including over 30,000 registrants for the Superstream Series. This year, OReilly separates the popular Strata Data & AI conference into two distinguished events designating focus on either data or AI, duly titled Strata Data and Artificial Intelligence.

With the rise of remote work, we were pleased to see the immediate popularity of OReillys live online learning and events, said Laura Baldwin, president of OReilly. We are excited to announce a new year of our Superstream Series, which will provide the OReilly community with virtual opportunities to accelerate knowledge in all facets of business and technology. This years lineup offers tailored sessions on the most notable topics and trends that will provide attendees with new insights and valuable skills from key innovators through live sessions and interactive tutorials.

Registration for the Superstream Series is now open. Dates and subject matter include:

Software Architecture

Infrastructure & Ops

Open Source Software (OSCON)

Strata Data (Sponsored by Intel)

Artificial Intelligence (Sponsored by Intel)

Sponsorship opportunities still exist for several of these events in 2021. For information on sponsoring a Superstream, please contact: sponsorships@oreilly.com.

For qualified journalists and analysts interested in joining a Superstream, and for all media queries, please contact: oreilly@famapr.com.

For more information about the OReilly Superstream Series or to learn more about OReilly online learning, visit: http://www.oreilly.com.

About OReillyFor 40 years, OReilly has provided technology and business training, knowledge, and insight to help companies succeed. Our unique network of experts and innovators share their knowledge and expertise through the companys SaaS-based training and learning solution, OReilly online learning. OReilly delivers highly topical and comprehensive technology and business learning solutions to millions of users across enterprise, consumer, and university channels. For more information, visit http://www.oreilly.com.

See the article here:
O'Reilly Announces 2021 Superstream Series Lineup and Dates - Business Wire

AirHop Communications Joins the Open Networking Foundation to Collaborate on 5G Near-Real-Time RAN Intelligent Controller – Business Wire

SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--AirHop Communications, a leader in 4G and 5G Network Intelligence software platforms and solutions, today announced it has become a member of the Open Networking Foundation (ONF), a non-profit operator led consortium driving transformation of access and edge network infrastructure and business models leveraging network disaggregation, open source software and software defined standards. As a member of the ONF, AirHop will join the Software Defined Radio Access Network (SD-RAN) project community which is comprised of leading operators and technology companies who are focused on building open source components for the open RAN space in compliance with the O-RAN architecture and specifications. A key deliverable of SD-RAN is the development of an open source near-real-time RAN Intelligent Controller (n-RT-RIC) along with a set of exemplar xApps for controlling the RAN.

AirHop solutions provide RAN intelligence using real-time coordination for performance optimization of 4G and 5G networks, delivering applications for automated configuration optimization, interference management, mobility optimization and extensibility for new customer driven optimization use cases.

We are pleased to welcome AirHop into the SD-RAN ecosystem, stated Timon Sloane, Vice President Marketing and Ecosystem, ONF. Open RAN is all about creating the ability to build multivendor solutions in the RAN space, and the SD-RAN community is committed to leveraging the open source ONOS-RIC platform as a unifying element to help build solutions combining RU/CU/DU elements with xApps from a mix of vendors. It is positive to see AirHop embracing this approach and their commitment to build xApps that are compatible with this vision in collaboration with the broader SD-RAN community of operators and vendors.

ONF is recognized as the leader of open source software solutions in SDN, NFV and Cloud technologies for telecom operators. We are excited to join ONF on the SD-RAN project, noted Joe Thome, Vice President of Business Development for AirHop. We share a common goal with the ONF community to bring O-RAN based open source n-RT-RIC solutions with mission critical, high value and commercial grade xApps to operators as quickly as possible.

About AirHop Communications

AirHop Communications is a leading network intelligence software company based in San Diego, California. AirHops flagship eSON near-real-time Self-Organizing Network (SON) system delivers coordinated optimization of network performance and end-user experience for 4G & 5G radio access networks. eSON is a fully virtualized cloud-native, massively scalable, high availability and commercially hardened platform supporting both traditional network architectures and Open RAN architectures and open interfaces. AirHops eSON360 Analytics solution is delivering ML and AI based network optimization applications that leverage data sources across the RAN and eSON platform. AirHops solutions are backed by a comprehensive portfolio of patents delivering flexible cloud-native deployments, scalable software and applications, and comprehensive APIs for multi-vendor support. For more information, please visit http://www.airhopcomm.com.

The rest is here:
AirHop Communications Joins the Open Networking Foundation to Collaborate on 5G Near-Real-Time RAN Intelligent Controller - Business Wire

What are Supply Chain Attacks, and How to Guard Against Them – Data Center Knowledge

Remediation of the fallout from the massive breach of SolarWinds network management tools which affected up to 18,000 organizations could cost companies billions.

In the breach, the attackers were able to compromise the update process of a widely used piece of SolarWinds software. In cybersecurity circles, this is referred to as a supply chain attack an especially devastating variety of cyber aggression. By compromising just one vendor, attackers may get access to all the vendors customers.

Related: The List of Known SolarWinds Breach Victims Grows, as Do Attack Vectors

US national security costs could also be significant, since the list of breached IT organizations included those of the Pentagon, the Department of State, and the Department of Homeland Security.

Four federal agencies the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), and the National Security Agency (NSA) issued a joint statement saying that the SolarWinds attack was "likely Russian in origin."

Related: What Data Center IT Security Pros Must Know About the SolarWinds Vulnerability

SolarWinds may be a seismic event in government cybersecurity, but it's not the first major supply chain attack we've seen. And its not the first one Russia has launched on a global basis.

In 2017, Russian actors compromised Ukrainian accounting software as part of an attack designed to target the country's infrastructure, but the malware spread quickly to other countries. NotPetya wound up doing more than $10 billion in damage and disrupted operations for multinational corporations such as Maersk, FedEx, and Merck.

Any tech company is a potential target. Nation state actors have the deep resources and skill sets necessary for supply chain attacks, able to penetrate even the most security-conscious firms.

Even security vendors can be targets. In the SolarWinds case, one of the higher-profile companies breached was FireEye, one of the most well-known cybersecurity vendors. FireEye said the attackers didn't get into customer-facing systems, and that they only got access to penetration tools used for security testing. But the fact that a company like FireEye got hit at all is worrisome.

Another example came in November 2020, when another leading cyber security company, Sophos, suffered a data breach that exposed some sensitive customer information.

This fall, security vendor Immuniweb said in a research report that 97 percent of the world's top 400 cybersecurity companies had data leaks or other security incidents exposed on the dark web and that 91 companies had exploitable website security vulnerabilities.

Supply chain attacks aren't a recent development. In 2011, RSA Security admitted that its SecurID tokens were hacked. One of its customers, Lockheed Martin, was attacked as a result.

If these vendors are potentially vulnerable, every vendor is.

Attacks like the SolarWinds one, which compromise commercial software vendors, are one of three types of supply chain attacks. The other categories are attacks on open source software projects and direct interference by nation states in the products their domestic vendors make (such as Chinas alleged leveraging of Huaweis global install base).

According to Sonatype's 2020 State of the Software Supply Chain report, supply chain attacks targeting open source software projects are a major issue for enterprises, since 90 percent of all applications contain open source code and 11 percent of those have known vulnerabilities.

For example, in the 2017 Equifax breach, which the company said cost it nearly $2 billion, attackers took advantage of an unpatched Apache Struts vulnerability.

And 21 percent of companies said they had experienced an open source-related breach in the previous 12 months.

But attackers don't have to wait around for a vulnerability to surface in open source software. Over the last few years, they've begun creating their own vulnerabilities, deliberately compromising the open source development and distribution process. It's been effective.

According to the Sonatype survey, these kinds of next-generation attacks increased 430 percent over the previous year.

Why bother to hack into a software company when you can just order it to install malware in its products?

That's not so much of an option for Russia, not a major technology exporter. For China, it is.

"Compromised electronics in US military, government and critical civilian platforms give China potential backdoors to compromise these systems," said US Senators Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) and Mark Warner (D-Virginia) in a statement announcing the bipartisan 2019 MICROCHIPS act.

"Almost all nation states, industries, and enterprises are overexposed to, for example, China and other low-cost supply sub-chains," said Steve Wilson, VP and principal analyst at Constellation Research.

The interconnectedness of software is impossible to unravel, he told DCK. "You should be wary of third-party providers."

So, what can data center security managers do?

"The harsh reality is that the state of our software supply chain is mediocre at best, partially due to the overwhelming complexity of the software supply chain itself," said Liz Miller, VP and principal analyst at Constellation.

But there are some steps that companies can take, she told DCK.

To start with, they can ask their technology vendors for a "bill of materials that lists all the code components that they use, she said. This can help identify potential vulnerabilities related to open source component vulnerabilities.

"Organizations with high aversion to risk can consider the additional step of conducting a code audit prior to implementation," she said. One tool that helps companies do that is Synopsys' Black Duck, she said.

One lesson data centers should not take away from the SolarWinds breach is that installing supplier patches is a bad idea.

The attack did compromise the automated software update system, but it's a lot more dangerous to leave known vulnerabilities in your systems, said Tsvi Korren, field CTO at Aqua Security. "It requires some painstaking work to compromise the internal systems of a company," he said.

By comparison, exploiting a known vulnerability is quick, easy, and appealing to attackers of all ability levels. "Leaving vulnerabilities out there is something we want to avoid," Korren told DCK.

Security managers can ask their vendors for some assurances, however. "It's reasonable to demand to know what their internal chain of custody is," he said. "How do they ensure the integrity of their process all the way from writing a line of code to the packaging and distribution?"

Unfortunately, there's no industry standard that specifically covers security of vendors software development process, he said. "But I could see a set of standards emerging that come out of this incident, and that would be a good thing."

An organization working on this task is the Consortium for Information and Software Quality, a special interest group under the technology standards body Object Management Group.

"One of the standards we're working on is a software bill of materials," said executive director Bill Curtis. "It will tell you if there are known vulnerabilities." It's expected to be released in the spring, he said.

Curtis suggested that software buyers ask their vendors to audit their software for vulnerabilities. "Most vendors won't like that idea and will fight it," he said.

A lot of the work is being driven by the federal government, he said.

"The Department of Defense has gotten royally fed up with secrets being stolen for our weapons," he said. "They realized that the problem is in the supply chain. One of the contractors that's weak gets penetrated, and they'll work their way up the supply chain."

The defense sector is already asking for more from their software suppliers, said Joe McMann, CSO and cyber strategy lead at Capgemini North America.

The defense sector is mandating the Cyber Maturity Model Certification, he said.

Shimon Oren, VP of research at Deep Instinct, said data centers can also ask their vendors if they have SOC-2 certification, where outside auditors check if a vendor has adequate security in place. And there is also an ISO standard specifically focused on software development.

"Software vendors that have those two are more likely to be better protected in general," he told DCK, though it's no guarantee. "It doesn't make them immune."

It may be too late to save the business, but SolarWinds is now going to implement some of the security practices that experts are recommending customers start asking for.

In a statement, incoming CEO Sudhakar Ramakrishna promised that the company is beefing up its security controls, with a particular focus on software development environments, resetting all user credentials and enforcing multi-factor authentication.

SolarWinds will also add more automated and manual checks to make sure that compiled releases match the source code, expand its vulnerability management program, and perform penetration testing on its software using third-party tools to analyze source code for vulnerabilities.

These are all steps that every software vendor should take, before they become the next SolarWinds.

Go here to see the original:
What are Supply Chain Attacks, and How to Guard Against Them - Data Center Knowledge

The First Amendment doesn’t guarantee you the rights you think it does – CNN

That's it. That's the entirety of our Constitution's First Amendment, the central tenet of our American way of life that gets dragged out every time someone's banned from Twitter.

There's a lot going on in those few sentences, and it's important to know when and how it applies to common situations -- and, equally as important, when it doesn't.

Let's look at some common First Amendment arguments, illuminated and debunked by constitutional experts.

This is not a First Amendment issue, though plenty of people think it is.

This scenario illustrates one of the biggest misconceptions people have about the First Amendment. Bottom line: It protects you from the government punishing or censoring or oppressing your speech. It doesn't apply to private organizations, like Twitter and Facebook, so those companies can ban speech the First Amendment would otherwise protect.

However, while it's not unconstitutional, if private platforms outright ban certain types of protected speech, it sets an uncomfortable precedent for the values of free speech.

If you work for a private company, it's probably not a First Amendment issue.

As citizens, employees have the right to express themselves and exercise their First Amendment. But those rights don't translate to the private workplace, Gutterman says.

If you're a government employee, it's complicated.

Institutions like police departments, public schools and local government branches can't restrict employee's free speech rights, but they do need to assure that such speech doesn't keep the employee from doing their job, Nott says. It's definitely a balancing act, and the rise of social media has made it harder for such institutions to regulate their employee's speech in a constitutional manner.

If it's a private institution, it's probably not a First Amendment issue.

If it's a public institution, the lines can get blurry.

"If you invite someone to speak on your campus and are a public university, you have to respect their First Amendment rights," Nott says. That doesn't mean you can't put regulations on a speech, like dictating the time, place, venue and suggestions for subject matter. It just means you can't do so in a way that discriminates against a certain point of view.

If students protesting play a hand in moving or canceling a speaker, that presents a different free speech challenge.

"If a speaker were to take legal action for being blocked from speaking, they can't do it against the students. You can't take constitutional action against a group of private citizens," she adds.

Such a complaint would have to go against the school, for allowing the constitutional breach to happen.

Definitely a First Amendment issue.

But, like pretty much everything in law, there are exceptions and nuances.

"It's definitely unconstitutional, unless you are trying to incite people to violence with your speech," Nott says. Even then, it needs to be a true threat -- one that has immediacy and some sort of actual intent.

It's a private company, so it's not a First Amendment issue.

There's that refrain again: Private companies, like social media sites, can do whatever they want. Users agree to a site's terms of service when they join.

But whether blocking content -- even offensive or violent content -- is within the spirit of free speech is another issue, Gutterman says.

"That says, if you are an internet company and you have some way for people to post or leave comments, you are not liable for what they do," Nott says. This covers things like obscenity, violence and threats.

The problem is, this protection often butts up against the enforcement of basic community standards.

"Facebook is under enormous pressure to take down, not just violent and illegal content, but fake news," Nott says. "And the more it starts to play editor for its own site, the more likely it is to lose that Section 230 protection."

A First Amendment issue -- usually.

You are fully within your rights to record the police doing their job in public. And if you get arrested while doing so, your constitutional rights are being violated.

This is, unless you were doing something unlawful at the time of your arrest.

In a heated situation with police, that can also become a gray area. Physical assault or threats could obviously get you arrested, but what about if you were just yelling at the police while recording, say, to get them to stop an act or to pay attention?

"That's tough," Nott says. "If you were disturbing the peace, you can get arrested for that, or for other things. But the bottom line is it's not a crime to record police activities in a public space."

A version of this story was first published in 2017.

Original post:

The First Amendment doesn't guarantee you the rights you think it does - CNN

Trump’s Suspended Twitter, Hawley’s Canceled Book and the First Amendment – The New York Times

WASHINGTON When Simon & Schuster canceled its plans this week to publish Senator Josh Hawleys book, he called the action a direct assault on the First Amendment.

And when Twitter permanently banned President Trumps account on Friday, his family and his supporters said similar things. We are living Orwells 1984, Donald Trump Jr. said on Twitter. Free-speech no longer exists in America.

The companies decisions may have been unwise, scholars who study the First Amendment said, but they were perfectly lawful. That is because the First Amendment prohibits government censorship and does not apply to decisions made by private businesses.

It is certainly possible to violate the values embodied in the First Amendment without violating the First Amendment itself. But the basic legal question could hardly be more straightforward, said RonNell Andersen Jones, a law professor at the University of Utah. And, she said, it should not have been lost on Mr. Hawley, who graduated from Yale Law School and served as a law clerk to Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.

Its become popular even among those who plainly know better to label all matters restricting anyones speech as a First Amendment issue, she said. But the First Amendment limits only government actors, and neither a social media company nor a book publisher is the government. Indeed, they enjoy their own First Amendment rights not to have the government require them to associate with speech when they prefer not to do so.

But many in the legal community were nonetheless uneasy about the developments, which underscored the enormous power of a handful of social media companies that are largely insulated from accountability and may change positions on what speech is acceptable as executives come and go.

I want a wide range of ideas, even those I loathe, to be heard, and I think Twitter especially holds a concerning degree of power over public discourse, said Gregory P. Magarian, a law professor at Washington University in St. Louis.

But Professor Magarian said the president and Mr. Hawley were in particularly poor positions to complain.

The First Amendment doesnt require any private forum to publish anyones speech, he said. Neither Twitter nor Simon & Schuster has any obligations under the First Amendment. He added: Any suggestion that people like Trump and Hawley, and the viewpoints they espouse, will ever lack meaningful access to public attention is ludicrous. We should worry about private power over speech, but presidents and senators are the last speakers we need to worry about.

The American Civil Liberties Union, too, said the free speech interests involved in suspending Mr. Trumps Twitter account were complicated.

We understand the desire to permanently suspend him now, but it should concern everyone when companies like Facebook and Twitter wield the unchecked power to remove people from platforms that have become indispensable for the speech of billions, said Kate Ruane, an A.C.L.U. lawyer. President Trump can turn to his press team or Fox News to communicate with the public, but others like the many Black, brown and L.G.B.T.Q. activists who have been censored by social media companies will not have that luxury.

Mr. Hawleys book, titled The Tyranny of Big Tech, was to have been published in June. In canceling it, Simon & Schuster said that it will always be our mission to amplify a variety of voices and viewpoints but that Mr. Hawley had crossed a line in light of the disturbing, deadly insurrection that took place on Wednesday in Washington.

We take seriously our larger public responsibility as citizens, the company said, and cannot support Senator Hawley after his role in what became a dangerous threat to our democracy and freedom.

The publisher was free to make that decision, legal experts said, but that does not mean it was the right one.

As it happens, the Supreme Court may decide as soon as Monday whether to hear a case about Mr. Trumps Twitter account, one that nicely illustrates some of the distinctions raised by the recent developments. Lower courts have ruled that Mr. Trump violated the First Amendment by blocking users from his account.

Since Mr. Trump is a government official who used the account to conduct official business, a unanimous three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in New York, ruled in 2019 that the account was a public forum from which he was powerless to exclude people based on their viewpoints.

We conclude that the evidence of the official nature of the account is overwhelming, Judge Barrington D. Parker wrote for the court. We also conclude that once the president has chosen a platform and opened up its interactive space to millions of users and participants, he may not selectively exclude those whose views he disagrees with.

Had the account been private, Judge Parker wrote, Mr. Trump could have blocked whomever he wanted. (For instance, the user who observed that the same guy who doesnt proofread his Twitter handles the nuclear button.)

But since he used the account in his official role as a government official, he was subject to the First Amendment, which prohibits discrimination based on viewpoints.

Jameel Jaffer, the executive director at the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, which sued Mr. Trump over his handling of his account, explained the distinction.

We sued the president, not Twitter, and this makes all the difference, legally, he said. Government actors have to comply with the First Amendment, but private corporations dont.

As a result, Mr. Jaffer said, the president cant block people from his social media accounts based on their political views, but Twitter can ban people from its platform for pretty much whatever reasons it wants to. Reasonable people can disagree about whether Twitter was right to ban Trump, but theres no question it was legally entitled to do it.

Internet platforms should voluntarily embrace First Amendment values, he said, and generally allow citizens to assess the statements of politicians for themselves. But there are limits, he said, and incitement to violence is among them.

To take an account down in these circumstances is not an affront to free speech, as some have suggested, Mr. Jaffer said. To the contrary, its the responsible exercise of a First Amendment right.

Twitters permanent suspension of Mr. Trump may make the pending case moot, leaving Supreme Court jurisprudence in this area a work in progress.

In 2017, for instance, the court considered the constitutionality of a North Carolina law that barred registered sex offenders from using Facebook, Twitter and similar services in Packingham v. North Carolina. When the case was argued, the justices discussed just how thoroughly social media had transformed American civic discourse.

Justice Elena Kagan said that Mr. Trump, every governor and every member of Congress had Twitter accounts.

So this has become a crucially important channel of political communication, she said. And a person couldnt go onto those sites and find out what these members of our government are thinking or saying or doing.

Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. said, a little incredulously, I know there are people who think that life is not possible without Twitter and Facebook.

In the end, the court unanimously struck down the law, though the justices could not agree on a rationale. Writing for the majority in his characteristically cryptic manner, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, who retired in 2018, said the internet was poised to transform First Amendment jurisprudence.

While we now may be coming to the realization that the cyberage is a revolution of historic proportions, we cannot appreciate yet its full dimensions and vast potential to alter how we think, express ourselves and define who we want to be, he wrote. The forces and directions of the internet are so new, so protean and so far-reaching that courts must be conscious that what they say today might be obsolete tomorrow.

See the rest here:

Trump's Suspended Twitter, Hawley's Canceled Book and the First Amendment - The New York Times