"UMass Lowell Stands with First Amendment, for Now, in Row over Student Tied to Neo-Nazi Hate Group" – Reason

Prof. Richard Pelz-Steele at UMass Law (Dartmouth) has the details; an excerpt:

UMass Lowell seems, so far, to be taking a principled position in a controversy over a neo-Nazi student.

According toPatch, the University of Massachusetts Lowell sent a letter to students and faculty last week saying that it could not suspend a student tied to a neo-Nazi, hate group simply because of the association. At the same time, the university pledged to investigate specific threats, alleged crimes, or incidents of hate speech, and to enforce theStudent Code of Conduct.

The student in question appeared on a live-stream posted on Telegram, and re-posted to Twitter by a watch group, with the founder of "NSC-131," an organization founded in opposition to Black Lives Matter and identified as a hate group by the Anti-Defamation League,Patchreportedearlier this month.

A Change.orgpetition, with more than 11,000 signatures at the time of this writing, accuses UMass Lowell of being "blatantly permissive of not only racism and hate speech (which they state is protected under Freedom of Speech) but outright criminal activity and Neo-Nazism" in protecting the student. The petition accuses the student, by name, of having violated already the Student Code of Conduct and, through alleged participation in the January 6 Capitol riot, the statevandalism law.Patch reported the appearance of NSC-131 at the Capitol riot, but no personal involvement by the student.

Looks like the petitioners are partying like it's 1949, but the university is correctly resisting.

Read the original here:

"UMass Lowell Stands with First Amendment, for Now, in Row over Student Tied to Neo-Nazi Hate Group" - Reason

Eye on Education: Addressing First Amendment controversies in public schools – Fairfield Daily Republic

Stephen Davis: Eye on Education

Two hot-button issues have recently emerged in the ongoing debate surrounding academic freedom and free speech in public schools.

One issue centers on concerns related to the inclusion of critical race theory in American school curricula (e.g., systemic racial discrimination in society). The other centers on the U.S. Supreme Courts recent ruling in favor of a former high school cheerleader who was punished by her school for posting profane comments about the school on Snapchat while she was off school grounds.

Both examples contain important implications for how public schools manage controversial issues.

Before addressing the merits of each, it is important to note that academic freedom and free speech are closely related legal concepts that have somewhat different implications for universities and public schools. The modern concept of academic freedom which emerged from 19th century German universities rests upon a broad intellectual landscape of ideas unconstrained by narrow partisan or political interests.

The U.S. Supreme Court stated, Our nation is deeply committed to safeguarding academic freedom, which is of transcendental value to us all and not merely to the teachers concerned. . . . The First Amendment does not tolerate laws that cast a pall of orthodoxy over the classroom.

However, the application of academic freedom in public schools is less clear and continues to be a topic of debate practically, politically and in the courts. While the U.S. Supreme Court has largely avoided ruling on academic freedom cases in public schools, lower courts have provided considerable guidance. In general, lower courts have protected local school boards and their authority to make curricular decisions influenced by community values and needs.

Moreover, courts have ruled that public schools are subject to state legislative authority and must conform to the education laws and regulations enacted by the state.

Importantly, while cases relating to academic freedom typically focus on the behaviors and practices of professional educators, cases relating to freedom of speech (more generally) have rendered important implications for both educators and students. In recent years, court cases related to freedom of speech in public schools have leaned in favor of more student expression rather than less.

Nevertheless, this distinction is not razor-sharp, and the rights of public school students are not unlimited.

In the Supreme Court case involving the high school cheerleader, the content of the students speech was profane and objectionable. However, it did not rise to the level of a material disruption to the school. No one was threatened or slandered. Moreover, the student posted her comments from home on her personal computer on a widely used social network.

Justice Stephen Breyer wrote, . . . sometimes it is necessary to protect the superfluous in order to preserve the necessary. Breyers comment echoed the courts earlier ruling that, students do not shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.

The debate over critical race theory, also tethered to the First Amendment, is amplified most by differing political perspectives. Importantly, state legislatures and local school boards possess sole authority to determine what is taught and how. Individual schools, teachers, administrators and labor unions have no independent authority to ignore or modify state laws and local board policies.

The ideas that define critical race theory are not new. To varying degrees, states and local school districts have been addressing elements of the theory for nearly 50 years. There are important arguments made by advocates and opponents of the theory that ultimately must be processed through rigorous public debate and policy-making processes.

While I believe that to the extent possible, public schools ought to be included in the open marketplace of ideas, it is particularly important that students are not sheltered from controversial ideas that are based upon thoughtful arguments and alternative interpretations.

After all, a central mission of public education is to help students become independent, open-minded, ethical and creative thinkers.

Stephen Davis is a career educator who writes a column that publishes every other Wednesday in the Daily Republic. Reach him by email at[emailprotected].

Related

Read more from the original source:

Eye on Education: Addressing First Amendment controversies in public schools - Fairfield Daily Republic

Remember the 1st Minnesota Infantry Regiment, and what it did at Gettysburg – MinnPost

We are well into the season of summertime celebrations, community get-togethers that occur over the weekends in big cities and small towns across Minnesota. If you havent enjoyed one, especially some of the adorable small-town celebrations, I highly encourage a road trip. Explore Minnesota has a full rundown of festivals and events across Minnesota all summer long.

Sadly, theres another unfortunate tradition that will occur across the state this Independence Day weekend and throughout the summer. While the United States Stars and Stripes is by far the most common flag you will see across the state, occasionally youll witness the flying of the Confederate flag as well, the flag of the enemy of the United States, an insurrectionist army that attacked the United States in an effort to continue slavery as a way of life.

Let me be very clear. As a veteran of the U.S. Army, I do understand the First Amendment, and if you so choose to express your freedom of speech by flying that flag, thats your right. I wont respect you, but I do respect your right to display the flag of an enemy of the United States (fact). Ill proudly be flying the Stars and Stripes. The point of this essay is to express my concern over official vehicles (fire trucks, police cars, vehicles carrying local elected officials) that seem to pop up in some of these community celebrations/parades, proudly displaying the flag of the Confederacy.

In Minnesota, this is especially a heinous act when you look back at the bravery and sacrifice of the 1st Minnesota Infantry Regiment at Gettysburg on July 2, 1863.

Article continues after advertisement

Although this essay is about to become a history lesson, this isnt about debating critical race theory, or whether we should even mention the traditional Native American name for Fort Snelling (Bdote, which is cool!). This isnt about revisiting a white-centric cultural hero, like Christopher Columbus, whose undeniable negative checklist far outweighs his contributions. This is about whether the same people who claim to be proud Minnesotans can claim to be so if they embrace the flag of the Confederacy, and in turn ignore the near immeasurable sacrifice of the 1st Minnesota.

In the late afternoon of July 2, 1863, little more than five years after Minnesota had become a state, the Union had a major hole in its line on Cemetery Ridge at Gettysburg. The second day of fighting had been brutal, with the Confederacy looking to end the war once and for all by overrunning the Union line. As the Union troops were trying desperately to hold the hill, a major hole opened up and nearly 1,200 Confederate troops marched forward. The only unit that could stop them was the grossly outnumbered 1st Minnesota. They had 262 men.

They never hesitated. The 1st Minnesota charged into the fray. The chaos and insanity that unfolded in the next few minutes is hard to comprehend. Within five minutes, 215 of the 262 men of the 1st Minnesota fell. When the soldier carrying the Minnesota colors was killed, another dropped their weapon and grabbed the flag. Five times that happened IN FIVE MINUTES. Minnesotas brave, courageous and desperate sacrifice held until reinforcements arrived. The 82% casualty rate still stands as the U.S. Armys largest loss of life of any unit which still stood at the end of the battle. Minnesotas colors never were captured, and are on display at the Capitol in the rotunda. Most important, the Union line held for the day.

In case Im burying the lead, Minnesota saved the Union from the traitorous Confederates on July 2, 1863. Thats not just an opinion. Maj. General Hancock, who had ordered the 1st Minnesota into the Confederate line, considered them to be entitled to the rank of saviors of their country. Minnesota has a large memorial in Gettysburg describing their sacrifice. I wept openly in its shadow.

Matthew McNeil

When Ive seen a Confederate flag on an official vehicle or on an official display at a Minnesota festival, I dont go and try to rip in down. I dont scream about how the people who put it up are racist. I simply ask if the people flying the flag know anything about the 1st Minnesota. They always say no. I then inform them of whose side they are taking by flying the Confederate flag, usually as they clearly get more and more uncomfortable with their decisions.

Now that you know about the 1st Minnesotas history, its up to Minnesotans to determine if flying the Confederate flag is appropriate (although I can argue flying it around the United States Independence Day seems misguided). If you do fly a Confederate Flag in an official capacity in Minnesota, then do not tell me youre a proud Minnesotan. A proud Minnesotan would know their history and would always put the 1st Minnesota First, well ahead of the enemies of Minnesota and the United States.

MatthewMcNeilis the host oftheMattMcNeilshow, weekdays, 4 to 6 p.m., on AM950, KTNF.

If youre interested in joining the discussion, add your voice to the Comment section below or consider writinga letteror a longer-formCommunity Voicescommentary. (For more information about Community Voices, see ourSubmission Guidelines.)

More here:

Remember the 1st Minnesota Infantry Regiment, and what it did at Gettysburg - MinnPost

Opinion: If Dominions defamation suits go to trial, it could be good for America – The Denver Post

On June 24, a U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. heard arguments over whether three, billion-dollar defamation suits brought by Denver-based Dominion Voting Systems against Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell and Mike Lindell should go to trial.

The issue before Judge Carl J. Nichols was whether the defendants repeated claims of election fraud, including claims that Dominions software could somehow switch votes, were protected speech under the First Amendment and, therefore, not worthy of taking before a jury.

The bar for winning a libel or defamation suit is high, and trials are expensive, so it is typical for defendants to seek dismissal. But Judge Nichols must also weigh a bigger question: What is the harm in allowing this defamation case to proceed to trial and letting a jury weigh the evidence and decide?

That was the question before Denver District Court Judge John Coughlin in the mid-1990s in Smileys Too, Inc. v. Denver Post Corp., a suit brought over an article that described complaints against Smileys, a dry cleaner, on file at the Denver District Attorneys office. Because Chance Conner, a reporter working for me when I was the business editor at The Post, wrote the article, I became the point person on staff for our defense.

In the Dominion case, much will turn not just on whether the claims by Giuliani, Powell, Lindell and others are false. In all likelihood, they will have to be shown to have been produced with actual malice or reckless disregard for the truth, in other words, the defendants knew the statements were false and repeated them anyway.

This very high bar exists because the defense claims that Dominion Systems is a public figure, subject to a higher standard than a private citizen. Is Dominion Systems a public figure or simply a private company that happens to supply voting systems under contract to government entities? That, too, might be an important issue for a jury to weigh at trial.

In Colorado, the public figure rule also applies to matters of general public concern and in the case of Smileys, the question of this broad definition of a public figure in libel cases was before the court.

Another question for Judge Nichols is whether Dominion can demonstrate it was damaged by the false statements. It claims $1.3 billion in damages though the defense has argued that any possible damages are to its reputation and not to its bottom line, therefore not as clear cut as Dominion claims.

In the case of Smileys, Judge Coughlin decided that it was worth having a jury hear the evidence and decide whether public figure rules applied, whether our reporting was accurate and whether damages had occurred.

If Judge Nichols orders the case to trial, it will be up to Giuliani, Powell and Lindell to make the case for why their statements are backed up by the truth or why they deserve protection as opinion under the First Amendment. Dominion Systems will get a chance to collect evidence about what the defendants knew, when they knew it and what they did or didnt do with that knowledge.

The Posts defense in Smileys was to assume that the higher standard would not apply and stand by our story. The jury found our reporting was a fair and accurate report of the DAs complaints and exonerated The Post.

And yes, the jury agreed that a persons laundry was a matter of general public concern. Twenty-five years ago, on June 27, 1996, a Colorado appellate court affirmed the jury verdict, effectively ending the matter.

The Dominion case has drawn national attention and the trial will take place with millions paying attention. But the basic issues remain the same. Were the statements truthful? Were they protected as opinion? Is Dominion a public figure? Were there material damages?

I came away from the Smileys experience with great respect for the jury system. Trials in First Amendment cases should be rare, but in matters of vital national interest especially when the integrity of elections are the issue letting 12 citizens decide could be good for America.

Henry Dubroff is a former Denver Post business editor who now owns the weekly journal for the Central Coast of California and divides his time between Denver and the West Coast.

View original post here:

Opinion: If Dominions defamation suits go to trial, it could be good for America - The Denver Post

From Iceland RVK Newscast #113: Siggi The Hacker, Wikileaks And The Lost American – Reykjavk Grapevine

In this episode we report that the FBIs star witness in the case against Wikileaks founder, Julian Assange, has admitted lying in his evidence.The story, published in Icelandic news magazine Stundin, was written by Bjartmar Alexandersson a journalist who will be familiar to The Grapevines audience as co-host of our show, The Icelandic Perspective. (link to the article: https://stundin.is/grein/13627/key-witness-in-assange-case-admits-to-lies-in-indictment )

In other news an American tourist got lost at the volcano site, but luckily was found safe and well the following day.

And finally the biggest news of the year! Iceland has now lifted all domestic restrictions in connection with COVID-19.

Newscast supported by Einstk BeerWant to buy an Icelandic wool sweater?

Note: Due to the effect the Coronavirus is having on tourism in Iceland, its become increasingly difficult for the Grapevine to survive. If you enjoy our content and want to help the Grapevines journalists do things like eat and pay rent, please consider joining ourHigh Five Club.

You can also check out ourshop, loaded with books, apparel and other cool merch, that you can buy and have delivered right to your door

Also you can get regular news from Icelandincluding the latest notifications on eruptions, as soon as they happenby signing up to ournewsletter.

The rest is here:

From Iceland RVK Newscast #113: Siggi The Hacker, Wikileaks And The Lost American - Reykjavk Grapevine

Extradition case against WikiLeaks founder falls apart – The News International

LONDON: One of the main witnesses in Julian Assanges extradition case has admitted he made false claims against Assange in exchange for immunity from prosecution, a bombshell revelation that could have a major impact on the WikiLeaks founders fate.

Assange faces up to 175 years in prison if brought to the U.S., where he was indicted for violations of the Espionage Act related to the publication of classified documents exposing U.S. war crimes.

According to a new article in the Icelandic newspaper Stundin, the convicted hacker Sigurdur Siggi Thordarson falsely claimed he was a prominent WikiLeaks representative instructed by Assange to carry out hacking attacks, but he was in fact only tangentially involved with the organization.

The article suggests the U.S. Justice Department collaborated with Thordarson to generate the indictment for Assange that was submitted to the British courts. This is just the latest revelation to demonstrate why the U.S. case should be dropped, says Jennifer Robinson, a human rights attorney who has been advising Assange and WikiLeaks since 2010. The factual basis for this case has completely fallen apart.

Read the original here:

Extradition case against WikiLeaks founder falls apart - The News International

WikiLeaks draws liberal ire after it compares Tucker Carlson to Assange as Fox host accuses NSA of SPYING on him – RT

WikiLeaks came under fire after tweeting in solidarity with Foxs Tucker Carlson, who recently aired a segment claiming that the NSA had illegally spied on him, as supporters demanded an investigation into the claim.

The anti-secrecy group took to Twitter on Monday to share a section of Carlsons show from earlier in the evening, adding the caption: Spying on and coercing journalists is not a new [phenomenon] #Assange #TuckerCarlson.

In the segment, the Fox pundit alleged that a government whistleblower had contacted his team to relay a warning that the NSA is monitoring our electronic communications, and is planning to leak them in an attempt to take this show off the air.

Carlson said that the whistleblower, whose name or position were not given, also passed along information about a story he is currently working on, which he argued could only have come directly from his own texts and emails.

The NSA captured that information without our knowledge and did it for political reasons. The Biden administration is spying on us. We have confirmed that, Carlson said, adding: Spying on opposition journalists is incompatible with democracy.

WikiLeaks designation of Carlson as a journalist, however, did not go over well with his mostly liberal critics, who shot back that the Fox host is more of an entertainer than a factual reporter of news.

Some detractors went even further, labeling Carlson a purveyor of not mere entertainment, but white supremacy propaganda, though they left that term undefined. Another netizen asked whether he could be considered comparable to WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange, who was mentioned alongside Carlson in the groups tweet.

Conservatives leaped to defense of the Fox talent, arguing that the NSAs alleged spying on the popular host proves Carlsons journalistic bona fides.

Theyre going after Tucker Carlson because hes one of the last people on TV actually exposing the powerful, the Columbia Bugle, an anonymously run conservative commentary account, tweeted.

Republican Representative Lauren Boebert (Colorado) called on the HouseOversight and Reform Committee to thoroughly and immediately investigate the claim.

If this is indeed true, criminal charges should be brought on those who have violated this private citizens rights, she tweeted.

Another high-profile conservative and former New York City police commissioner Bernard Kerik called on the GOP leadership to raise the issue at the highest level.

While Carlson noted that Fox had contacted the NSA and submitted a Freedom of Information request about the purported spying as a formality, he said they dont expect to hear much back, and that true accountability could only be achieved by lawmakers.

Earlier on Monday, meanwhile, Senator Ron Wyden (D-Oregon) introduced legislation seeking to protect reporters from government surveillance, though not related to the Carlson debacle. He cited abuses under the Donald Trump administration, in which the Department of Justice targeted journalists from CNN, the Washington Post and the New York Times with probes while looking into official leaks.

Like this story? Share it with a friend!

Go here to see the original:

WikiLeaks draws liberal ire after it compares Tucker Carlson to Assange as Fox host accuses NSA of SPYING on him - RT

Tara Reade: Assanges shameful treatment shows just how the US exploits fear to silence dissent as I found out, too – RT

1 Jul, 2021 15:01

ByTara Reade, author, poet, actor and former Senate aide, author ofLeft Out: When the Truth Doesn't Fit In.Follow her on Twitter@readealexandra

As Julian Assange turns 50 in a UK prison cell, its a stark reminder how America treats those who legitimately question its activities. The aim is to silence people even those reporting the crimes of established politicians.

There are a handful of political prisoners who have really captured the attention of our generation, and Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, is among the most prominent. His intentions have always been noble. By bringing out into the public domain how human institutions actually behave, we can understand frankly, to a degree, for the first time the civilization that we actually have, he has said.

Alongside others like Edward Snowden and Chelsea Manning, Assange an Australian citizen has been persecuted for making known to the public things America wants to keep quiet, such as details of war crimes and the countrys surveillance state.

He will spend his 50th birthday, on July 3, in prison in London where he has been since 2019 when the asylum status hed been granted by Ecuador was revoked facing the threat of being prosecuted by the US under the Espionage Act. The alleged violations of the Espionage Act could mean imprisonment for life.

Assanges treatment has led to a serious conversation of what will be left of freedom for the media to expose state corruption. What is democracy if it is not functioning from a place of self-critical analysis to address corruption? If democratic states only act in self-interest to maintain authority and the status quo, is it even democracy at all?

Have we as citizens all already lost the war to keep our freedoms while we continue to delude ourselves and fight smaller battles?

As Glenn Greenwald points out, the very Western journalists who would be impacted by the Assange case maintain silence as if trepidatious of drawing the attention and attracting the ire of the American government. Fear is used as a vehicle to create an atmosphere of measured silence.

Edward Snowden once said, I would rather be without a state than without a voice. The American empire uses different tactics to silence the dissent. It is now somehow accepted that dissent be criminalized and the individuals called traitors.

And this extends to even the reporting of individual crimes of established American politicians, as in my case. Joe Bidens machine counted on my fear to come forward. After I was attacked in the media, they banked on my silence. However, the ugly arrogance of Biden and his machine overestimated his ability to silence me.

In larger cases of dissent, the silencing tactics remain quite similar and more severe. The Western media have vilified Assange and then ignored him, as well as the human rights violations he suffers for everyone to see. The American empire wanted to set an example of what happens if you speak out.

Amazingly, US politicians, including Biden, pound their chests at Russia and China, shouting about human rights violations and the lack of press freedom, while stepping on the necks of their own citizens to quash any voices that even dare to question whats going on.

Hypocrisy is a political art form in America.

The most recent round of public silencing has been the shutting down of foreign media websites. Last week, 33 sites critical of US policies in the Middle East and supportive of Palestine were seized. Richard Medhurst rightly called out the actions of the Justice Department and the hypocrisy of the American government around censorship.

It is no easy task to expose the crimes of the US empire and colluding Western states, and there are usually consequences. As Snowden remains in Russia unable to come back to America, Assange is imprisoned at Belmarsh in London under dire conditions. He is in a cell for 23 hours a day, and for one hour is taken to another for exercise.

According to Misty Winston, an American activist and podcast host, the conditions are deplorable.

It is ghoulish to comprehend that we are watching in real time the American empire overreach its boundaries again by abusing its power to slowly torture a publisher to death. Citizens of the world are trying to push back against the corporate elites and their war machines. Their protests are met with silence or force.

As July 3 is Assanges 50th birthday, the best present we could give him and to ourselves is to support him publicly and call for his release from illegal imprisonment. How ironic it falls a day before July 4, the celebration of Americas freedom, as we collectively watch the US government allow our freedom of speech and press to die a public, political death on the world stage.

We need to honor the few heroes of our generation, like Assange, who are trying to keep us all truly informed and free.

If you like this story, share it with a friend!

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

See more here:

Tara Reade: Assanges shameful treatment shows just how the US exploits fear to silence dissent as I found out, too - RT

Algorithmia Machine Learning Operations Selected for Use by Raytheon Technologies Homeland Security Today – HSToday

Algorithmia, a provider of enterprise machine learning operations (MLOps) software, has been selected by Raytheon Intelligence & Space, a Raytheon Technologies (NYSE: RTX) business to support the teams development of the U.S. Armys Tactical Intelligence Targeting Access Node (TITAN) program. TITAN is a tactical ground station that finds and tracks threats to support long-range precision targeting.

Algorithmia, along with other leaders in artificial intelligence and machine learning, will enable Raytheon TechnologiesTITAN team to deliver easily digestible data to Army operators. TITAN will ingest data from space and high-altitude, aerial and terrestrial sensors to provide targetable data to defense systems. It also provides multi-source intelligence support to targeting, and situational awareness and understanding for commanders.

Algorithmias MLOps platform has been used by over 130,000 data scientists in a wide range of organizations. Its customers include large and midsize enterprises, Fortune 500 companies, the United Nations and multiple government intelligence agencies. The companys momentum is a product of growing interest in AI-based applications and the need organizations have to efficiently manage cost and security for machine learning models.

Machine learning significantly accelerates the process by which organizations can uncover important data points and respond to critical issues, said Diego Oppenheimer, CEO of Algorithmia. Our platform streamlines the deployment of machine learning models into production while providing important oversight, including review for ethical standards, to ensure models operate when and how they should, which makes Algorithmia a natural fit for sensitive applications. We are excited to join Raytheon in supporting its work with the U.S. Army.

(Visited 147 times, 1 visits today)

Original post:
Algorithmia Machine Learning Operations Selected for Use by Raytheon Technologies Homeland Security Today - HSToday

From Socrates to machine learning: Arts and Sciences fellows spend the summer on research projects – URI Today

KINGSTON, R.I. July 1, 2021 Was Socrates a man or a god? How can you remove societal biases from machine learning? How should solitary confinement in prisons be reformed?

Those are just a few of the 11 research projects being tackled this summer by College of Arts and Science Fellows at the University of Rhode Island.

The summer fellowship program funds undergraduates in an Arts and Sciences major to participate in research, scholarly or creative projects under the supervision of a faculty member for up to 10 weeks. This year, the program is awarding $28,000 in stipends supporting approximately 2,400 hours of research for students majoring in such fields as criminology and criminal justice, political science, computer science, and philosophy.

In addition to support from the College of Arts and Sciences RhodyNow Fund and its Deans Excellence Endowment, the fellowship program is supported by a generous gift from Bob and RenamarieDiMuccio in honor of President David M. Dooley. As President Dooley retires at the end of July, the DiMuccios wished to recognize his leadership in transforming URI over the last 12 years with a gift to support undergraduate research experiences that visibly impact students and build a pathway for their future success.

Hannah Beaucaire 22, a political science and criminology and criminal justice major from Gardiner, Maine, will spend the summer researching solitary confinement practices in U.S. prisons. Working with Assistant Professor Natalie Pifer, Beaucaire will examine large-scale reforms that her home state is enacting to determine if the reforms should be adopted nationally.

One of the reasons I was interested in studying solitary confinement was the extreme physiological consequences it has been known to cause, she said. For such an extreme practice, I find solitary confinement to be under-regulated.

The end result of her research will be an online platform that will include short videos providing a history of solitary confinement, its consequences and the reforms Maine is attempting. She plans to use social media to attract interest in the site, which she hopes will serve as an educational and advocacy tool.

Without the monetary award I would have spent most of my time working a summer job, she said, but now I get to use that time to study something I find really exciting.

For John Mancini 22, the summer will be spent reading the dialogues of the ancient Greek philosopher Plato to determine if Plato viewed fellow contemporary philosopher Socrates as a god or a mortal. Plato, who lived from about 428 to 348 B.C., wrote about 35 dialogues. Socrates was a main character in many.

How do you determine someones divinity?

Mancini, a philosophy and political science major from Westerly, will look at Platos writings to determine what he considered gods and the characteristics of his Forms, his theory of the metaphysical structure of the universe. He will also look at secondary sources to answer what makes a person divine, godlike, or a Form.

The Forms are what make things the way they are and so explain what things are in themselves, he said. For example, the Form of Beauty is responsible for all things that contain beauty; the Form of Tallness is the reason that some things are considered tall. Platos theory basically answers the why question: I am beautiful because I partake in the Beautiful; I am tall because I partake in Tallness.

Mancini will conduct research and discuss his conclusions with Professor Doug Reed, who specializes in ancient philosophy, and plans to write a paper explaining his findings.

When my findings are published, other philosophers will be able to offer me pushback and constructive criticism, he said. This will allow me to better develop my positionshould I need to. Philosophy is very much a discussion, and after drawing my conclusions, someone is bound to disagree with me. I welcome any opposition so philosophers can gain a fuller understanding of Platonic dialogues.

This summer, Jacob Afonso 22, a computer science major, will be researching fairness and bias in machine learning models, under the supervision of Assistant Professor Sarah Brown. The goal of the project is to test and find ways to eliminate biases from the models.

In the data used to create machine learning models, societal biases are often present, said Afonso, who lives in Smithfield. When using biased data, the resulting model used for any sort of predicting will have those underlying biases.

I wanted to research this because I believe this is one of the largest areas of machine learning that makes people skeptical of its effectiveness, he added. It is also important for the future of equality of all groups of people as the use of machine learning continues to grow.

Afonsos research will include reading papers on the topic and learning code libraries, which hold the code for the different machine learning algorithms. He will use those to create and test fair models. Eventually, the outcome of his research will provide different ideas for removing biases, along with an analysis of the best and worst of them, he said.

Other 2021 Arts & Science Fellows are:

Mia Giglietti 23, of West Hartford, Connecticut, who is majoring in political science and economics with a minor in Spanish, will analyze economic literature over the 20th century to look at the elite interconnections among corporate boards and their links with governmental bodies to see how those connections benefit those corporations.

I wanted to participate in this because Ive always wanted to learn more about how corporations and economic/political corruption work to maintain the power of major corporations and the wealthy, said Giglietti, who is working with Assistant Professor Nina Eichacker. I think it is crucial to understand those concepts in the era of severe income inequality that we are currently living through.

Samantha Murphy 22, of Cumberland, who is studying applied economics with a minor in music, will work with Associate Professor Smita Ramnarain to compare public health disasters with other types of disasters, looking at how health disasters, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, interact with other crises and social inequalities, and how they have gendered impacts.

I wanted to do this research project because of my growing interest in heterodox economics, said Murphy. The fellowship is giving me the opportunity to do research under the guidance of a faculty member who is well-versed in the fields that I am interested in further studying after my undergraduate time at URI.

Jason Phillips 23, of Barrington, Illinois, who is majoring in English, journalism and writing and rhetoric, will be looking at how aware students are of the way colleges and universities treat adjunct faculty. Phillips plans to interview students around the country over the summer on their understanding and feelings about the issues with plans to publish a research paper.

I chose to research this because, for a large part, adjunct faculty are treated poorly, yet students do not often understand the problem, said Phillips, who is working with Professor Carolyn Betensky. I am passionate about understanding how students truly feel about how their professors are treated at their universities.

Abigail Dodd 22, of Wakefield, Rhode Island, a history and gender and women studies major, will identify primary sources from URI Distinctive Collections to document the changing role of womenstudents and facultyat URI between 1950 and 1980. Her research will create a content module on women that will be used in the course The URI Campus: A Walk Through Time. Faculty mentor: Senior Lecturer Catherine DeCesare, with assistance from Karen Morse, director of Distinctive Collections.

Kevin Hart 22, of Wakefield, Massachusetts, who is majoring in political science and history with a minor in economics, is researching right-wing terrorism in the U.S. and the motivation behind it. I wanted to research the topic because it is an under-researched case of political violence but an important one with important implications, he said. Working with Assistant Professor Brendan Skip Mark will give me the guidance and experience I need to develop a worthwhile and academically sound project.

Sierra Obi 21, of Danville, New Hampshire, who is majoring in computer science and Spanish, is working on a project exploring computer authentication difficulty faced by people with upper extremity impairment part of National Science Foundation-funded research being conducted by Assistant Professor Krishna Venkatasubramanian. Obi is working to understand the reasons and circumstances around who people with the impairment share their personal computing devices and credentials with in an effort to improve login security.

Alfred Timperley 23, of East Greenwich, who is majoring in computer science and data science, will be working on a project to develop a novel tool that will enable future research into program classification source code authorship, plagiarism detection, malware identification, and others. Faculty mentor: Assistant Professor Marco Alvarez.

Ethan Wyllie 22, of North Kingstown, who is majoring in political science and Spanish, is researching racial inequality in welfare participation. He will track participation rates by different groupsWhites, Blacks, Hispanics, and immigrantsat the state level over the past 20 years to determine racial disparity in U.S. social safety net coverage. Faculty mentor: Associate Professor Ping Xu.

Original post:
From Socrates to machine learning: Arts and Sciences fellows spend the summer on research projects - URI Today