US mulling bans to stunt Chinas quantum computing

Last November, IBM launched its 127-qubit Eagle, surpassing Chinas 113-qubit Jiuzhang to become the worlds fastest quantum computer. Now, China risks falling further behind in the quantum computing race as the United States reportedly weighs new export controls on the game-changing technology.

The new ban, if implemented, would target quantum computing, artificial intelligence software and other emerging technologies that could have security implications vis-a-vis China. The ban would mark a next salvo on the Biden administrations October 7 move to block high-end chips and advanced chip-making equipment exports to China.

Bloomberg reported that US industry experts are now weighing in on the potential parameters of the restrictions, which are still preliminary, and that US allies are being consulted. Analysts say any such ban would further antagonize China, which strongly protested the October 7 bans, and could put the two rivals on a dangerous collision course.

Chinese media commentators say the US aims to strengthen efforts to slow Chinas development in emerging technologies, where the two strategic rivals are racing to lead the way. The commentators suspect the US will not only aim to block China from obtaining key quantum computing parts and software but also force other countries to uphold the bans.

The US is making no secret of how it views the emerging and sensitive technology.

US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan said ina speech last monthon technology, competitiveness and national security that computing-related technologies, including microelectronics, quantum information systems and artificial intelligence as among developments set to play an outsized importance over the coming decade. He also noted the importance of export controls to maintain as large of a lead as possible over rivals.

Currently, Alphabets Google, Intel, Microsoft and IBM are all investing heavily in quantum computing projects. Other major players in the sector include US-based IonQ and Japans Fujitsu Ltd.

Quantum computers mark, well, a quantum leap over the speed and power of current supercomputers.

That means they will likely be able to crack and bypass the encryption technologies used to secure current computer communications. More broadly, the technology is expected to unleash waves of new innovation that will revolutionize industry, communications and, crucially, defense.

On September 15, US President Joe Biden signed an executive order urging the US Treasury DepartmentsCommittee on Foreign Investment into the US (CFIUS) to ensure more robust consideration of evolving national security risks.

What may otherwise appear to be an economic transaction undertaken for commercial purposes may actually present an unacceptable risk to US national security when conducted with foreign adversaries or countries of special concern, according to the Executive Order.

It said the committee should consider the transactions effect on US supply chain resilience and national security across the microelectronics, AI, biotechnology and quantum computing sectors.

The Biden administration is now working on an outbound investment review mechanism that would scrutinize money heading to certain Chinese technologies, and new quantum computing and artificial intelligence controls could be included, according to an anonymous source quoted by Bloomberg.

Biden has said the new curbs unveiled by the US Commerce Departments Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) on October 7 have already successfully blocked Chinas access to key US chip technologies. Thecurbshave also limited how US citizens and residents are allowed to work and collaborate with Chinese tech firms.

Secrss.com, a Shanghai-based research institute, noted in several articles this year that quantum computing can be applied in computing, communication, navigation, power and military defense industries. It said quantum computing had the potential to change the results of future wars.

One article said quantum computers can be used to initiate cyber warfare by decoding passwords and bypassing encryption used on current digital computers. It said quantum computing technologies can also be used to navigate drones and submarines.

Another article, citing a report in the European Physical Journal, said a quantum radar would be launched one day and used in space war.

China is making strong progress in the field in the current open trading environment. The 66-qubit Zuchongzhi 2, for instance, is reportedly 10 million times faster than Googles 55-qubit Sycamore.

In December 2020, a University of Science and Technology of China research team led by scientist Pan Jianwei launched Jiuzhang, a light-based or photonics quantum computer that can work at room temperature. It is said to be 10 billion times faster than Googles Sycamore.

In May 2021, Pan and his team launched Zuchongzhi 2, a superconducting quantum computer that needs to work at a temperature close to absolute zero. Jiuzhang and Zuchongzhi 2s details were published last November by the Physical Review Letters, a scientific journal of the American Physical Society.

Soon thereafter, IBMs Eagle surpassed Zuchongzhi 2 to become the worlds fastest superconducting quantum machine, underscoring the two sides budding rivalry in the filed.

Read: New US chip ban takes tech war to dire next level

Follow Jeff Pao on Twitter at@jeffpao3

Follow this link:
US mulling bans to stunt Chinas quantum computing

New code suggests Twitter is reviving its work on encrypted DMs – TechCrunch

  1. New code suggests Twitter is reviving its work on encrypted DMs  TechCrunch
  2. Elon Musk Tips End-to-End Encryption for Twitter DMs  PCMag
  3. Twitter DMs likely to get end-to-end encryption; Blue returning  9to5Mac
  4. Twitter starts working on end-to-end encryption for direct messages  The Weekend Leader
  5. Twitter seems to be working on end-to-end encryption for DMs again  Engadget
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

See the article here:
New code suggests Twitter is reviving its work on encrypted DMs - TechCrunch

Chronicles Magazine : A Magazine of American Culture

Putins Lack of a Grand Strategy

by Srdja Trifkovic

Vladimir Putin lacks the kind of grand vision and decisive temperament needed to make Russia a highly respected world power in the current global environment.

by Roger D. McGrath

California has been living off its legacy of water projects for the last several decades like a lazy, self-indulgent, trust-fund recipient.

by Edward Welsch

Just as a conquering army defaces the monuments of its defeated foes, Americas woke film industry has seized the opportunity in Rings of Power to have its way with the mythology of Tolkien's Men of the West.

by Jack Trotter

In her unguarded moments, South Carolina politician Krystle Mathews provided a glimpse into the philosophy and methods of racial intimidation used by some blacks to gain and maintain political power.

by Stanley G. Payne

One of the last great leftist myths of the 20th century is that the Spanish Civil War was a struggle of republican democracy against nationalist fascism. In reality, it was a violent mass-collectivist revolution put down by Spanish moderates and conservatives.

by Daniel McCarthy

Michael Oakeshott warned that rationalism in politics leads to rigid, rule-bound governance, and to the imposition of the state's enterprise over and against the free association of individuals.

by Stephen B. Presser

Gordon Wood shows how far we have drifted from the Founding Fathers' vision of a polity that would limit arbitrary power in order that the government might serve the people rather than tyrannize them.

Follow this link:

Chronicles Magazine : A Magazine of American Culture

PayPal’s ideological deplatforming spurs proposed UK amendment to stop …

The recent politically-tinted PayPal trouble in the UK does not seem to have died the same ignoble and (un)deserved in nature, anonymous death as so many cases over the recent years have when Big Tech and their subsidiaries/minions have been called to task, as essentially the agents to stifle whatever speech went against the Big Narrative.

The no reaction to accounts getting blocked for legitimate political reasons would have been happening due to, quite simply put, politics.

So is it okay to cancel a person’s PayPal account on account of their political stance in a democracy?

As far as UK legislators, it now looks like this conundrum seems to be getting close to a solution.

At the moment, there seems to be some positive political climate change in the UK at least, and adhering to the very bottom of the democratic low bar of free speech it would mean that it is not okay to simply cut off people from international payment systems, just because of their political stance.

In the UK, some questions about how this whole system of manufactured consent works started appearing a while back, not least when the Daily Sceptic, the Free Speech Union, and associated individual accounts started getting hit with the censorship hammer for things that just can no longer be discussed in a democracy (like Covid vaccines, Ukraine war, or any other kind of established by nature of corporate media narrative.)

It’s not all bad news, though MP Sally Ann Hart has put forward a Financial Services and Markets Bill amendment that would, if passed, allow UK-based customers to still use the PayPal system, even if the company dislikes it.

We obtained a copy of the amendment proposals for you here.

It’s included in the House of Commons NC15 point of the document to deal with refusal to provide services for reasons connected to (anti) freedom of expression.

The long and the short of the proposal is this:

No payment service provider providing a relevant service may refuse to supply that service to any other person in the United Kingdom if the reason for the refusal is significantly related to the customer exercising his or her right to freedom of expression.

Link:

PayPal's ideological deplatforming spurs proposed UK amendment to stop ...

Amazon accused of absurd and unacceptable censorship after book …

Author Ryan T. Anderson said his book, "When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Moment," has been removed from Amazon and critics pointed out that the online retailer has a history of censoring books that dont coincide with the companys liberal political views.

"I hope youve already bought your copy, cause Amazon just removed my book "When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Moment" from their cyber shelves.... my other four books are still available (for now)," Anderson tweeted.

ALEX BERENSON'S CORONAVIRUS BOOKLET HITS AMAZON AFTER ELON MUSK, OTHERS CALL OUT ONLINE RETAILER FOR 'CENSORSHIP'

"When Harry Became Sally," which has previously been on Amazons bestseller list, aimed to provide "thoughtful answers to questions arising from our transgender moment" and offered a "a balanced approach to public policy on gender identity, and a sober assessment of the human costs of getting human nature wrong."

Author Ryan T. Anderson said his book, "When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Moment," has been removed from Amazon. (Reuters)

A search of Amazon for "When Harry Became Sally" on Monday doesnt find Andersons book, instead suggesting books with the opposite view such as "The End of Gender: Debunking the Myths about Sex and Identity in Our Society," "Understanding Gender Dysphoria: Navigating Transgender Issues in a Changing Culture" and "Let Harry Become Sally: Responding to the Anti-Transgender Moment."

Amazon did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

"While you cant buy the book on Amazon, you can still get it (for now?) at Barnes and Noble. Given the aggressive push on trans policies coming from the Biden admin, now is a great time to read it. Buy it before you no longer can," Anderson added in a follow-up tweet.

Dispatch writer David French blasted the move as "absurd and unacceptable," while New York Times columnist Ross Douthatsuggested Amazon was "conducting an experiment in what they can get away with."

ATTEMPT TO CENSOR BOOK ON TRANSGENDER CRAZE BACKFIRED, CRITICS SAY: THIS IS THE SO-CALLED STREISAND EFFECT

Target also sparked an outcry amongcritics last year when the big box retailer announced it was pulling "Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters,"because oneTwitteruser deemed the book transphobic. Target reversed its decision amidbacklash.

Many others took to Twitter with their thoughts on the situation:

Last year,Alex Berensonsbooklet on coronavirus, "Unreported Truths about COVID-19 and Lockdowns: Part 1," became the No. 1 best seller inAmazons Kindle Storeafter the online retailer initially told Berenson it didnt meet the companys guidelines.

The former New York Times reporter quickly launched a protest on Twitter, calling the move "outrageous censorship from a company that gained hugely from lockdown" as millions wereforced to shop online. SpaceX CEO Elon Musk and other prominent journalists defended Berenson, and Amazon eventually allowed the book to be sold on its platform.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

Amazon told Fox News it was an "error" and the book shouldnt have been held up, but Berenson had his doubts.

"They didnt say to me that it was a mistake I do believe that Im not the only person who has run into this. They need to be clear what their position is on publishing controversial material on political issues," Berenson told Fox News at the time. "It doesnt seem to me that this was an error, but I dont know."

Brian Flood is a media reporter for Fox News Digital. Story tips can be sent tobrian.flood@fox.comand on Twitter: @briansflood.

See the original post here:

Amazon accused of absurd and unacceptable censorship after book ...

Quantum computing use cases–what you need to know | McKinsey

Accelerating advances in quantum computingare serving as powerful reminders that the technology is rapidly advancing toward commercial viability. In just the past few months, for example, a research center in Japan announced a breakthrough in entangling qubits (the basic unit of information in quantum, akin to bits in conventional computers) that could improve error correction in quantum systems and potentially make large-scale quantum computers possible. And one company in Australia has developed software that has shown in experiments to improve the performance of any quantum-computing hardware.

As breakthroughs accelerate, investment dollars are pouring in, and quantum-computing start-ups are proliferating. Major technology companies continue to develop their quantum capabilities as well: companies such as Alibaba, Amazon, IBM, Google, and Microsoft have already launched commercial quantum-computing cloud services.

Of course, all this activity does not necessarily translate into commercial results. While quantum computing promises to help businesses solve problems that are beyond the reach and speed of conventional high-performance computers, use cases are largely experimental and hypothetical at this early stage. Indeed, experts are still debating the most foundational topics for the field (for more on these open questions, see sidebar, Debates in quantum computing).

Still, the activity suggests that chief information officers and other leaders who have been keeping an eye out for quantum-computing news can no longer be mere bystanders. Leaders should start to formulate their quantum-computing strategies, especially in industries, such as pharmaceuticals, that may reap the early benefits of commercial quantum computing. Change may come as early as 2030, as several companies predict they will launch usable quantum systems by that time.

To help leaders start planning, we conducted extensive research and interviewed 47 experts around the globe about quantum hardware, software, and applications; the emerging quantum-computing ecosystem; possible business use cases; and the most important drivers of the quantum-computing market. In the report Quantum computing: An emerging ecosystem and industry use cases, we discuss the evolution of the quantum-computing industry and dive into the technologys possible commercial uses in pharmaceuticals, chemicals, automotive, and financefields that may derive significant value from quantum computing in the near term. We then outline a path forward and how industry decision makers can start their efforts in quantum computing.

An ecosystem that can sustain a quantum-computing industry has begun to unfold. Our research indicates that the value at stake for quantum-computing players is nearly $80 billion (not to be confused with the value that quantum-computing use cases could generate).

Because quantum computing is still a young field, the majority of funding for basic research in the area still comes from public sources (Exhibit 1).

Exhibit 1

However, private funding is increasing rapidly. In 2021 alone, announced investments in quantum-computing start-ups have surpassed $1.7 billion, more than double the amount raised in 2020 (Exhibit 2). We expect private funding to continue increasing significantly as quantum-computing commercialization gains traction.

Exhibit 2

Hardware is a significant bottleneck in the ecosystem. The challenge is both technical and structural. First, there is the matter of scaling the number of qubits in a quantum computer while achieving a sufficient level of qubit quality. Hardware also has a high barrier to entry because it requires a rare combination of capital, experience in experimental and theoretical quantum physics, and deep knowledgeespecially domain knowledge of the relevant options for implementation.

Multiple quantum-computing hardware platforms are under development. The most important milestone will be the achievement of fully error-corrected, fault-tolerant quantum computing, without which a quantum computer cannot provide exact, mathematically accurate results (Exhibit 3).

Exhibit 3

Experts disagree on whether quantum computers can create significant business value before they are fully fault tolerant. However, many say that imperfect fault tolerance does not necessarily make quantum-computing systems unusable.

When might we reach fault tolerance? Most hardware players are hesitant to reveal their development road maps, but a few have publicly shared their plans. Five manufacturers have announced plans to have fault-tolerant quantum-computing hardware by 2030. If this timeline holds, the industry will likely establish a clear quantum advantage for many use cases by then.

The number of software-focused start-ups is increasing faster than any other segment of the quantum-computing value chain. In software, industry participants currently offer customized services and aim to develop turnkey services when the industry is more mature. As quantum-computing software continues to develop, organizations will be able to upgrade their software tools and eventually use fully quantum tools. In the meantime, quantum computing requires a new programming paradigmand software stack. To build communities of developers around their offerings, the larger industry participants often provide their software-development kits free of charge.

In the end, cloud-based quantum-computing services may become the most valuable part of the ecosystem and can create outsize rewards to those who control them. Most providers of cloud-computing services now offer access to quantum computers on their platforms, which allows potential users to experiment with the technology. Since personal or mobile quantum computing is unlikely this decade, the cloud may be the main way for early users to experience the technology until the larger ecosystem matures.

Most known use cases fit into four archetypes: quantum simulation, quantum linear algebra for AI and machine learning, quantum optimization and search, and quantum factorization. We describe these fully in the report, as well as outline questions leaders should consider as they evaluate potential use cases.

We focus on potential use cases in a few industries that research suggests could reap the greatest short-term benefits from the technology: pharmaceuticals, chemicals, automotive, and finance. Collectively (and conservatively), the value at stake for these industries could be between roughly $300 billion and $700 billion (Exhibit 4).

Exhibit 4

Quantum computing has the potential to revolutionize the research and development of molecular structures in the biopharmaceuticals industry as well as provide value in production and further down the value chain. In R&D, for example, new drugs take an average of $2 billion and more than ten years to reach the market after discovery. Quantum computing could make R&D dramatically faster and more targeted and precise by making target identification, drug design, and toxicity testing less dependent on trial and error and therefore more efficient. A faster R&D timeline could get products to the right patients more quickly and more efficientlyin short, it would improve more patients quality of life. Production, logistics, and supply chain could also benefit from quantum computing. While it is difficult to estimate how much revenue or patient impact such advances could create, in a $1.5 trillion industry with average margins in earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) of 16 percent (by our calculations), even a 1 to 5 percent revenue increase would result in $15 billion to $75 billion of additional revenues and $2 billion to $12 billion in EBIT.

Quantum computing can improve R&D, production, and supply-chain optimization in chemicals. Consider that quantum computing can be used in production to improve catalyst designs. New and improved catalysts, for example, could enable energy savings on existing production processesa single catalyst can produce up to 15 percent in efficiency gainsand innovative catalysts may enable the replacement of petrochemicals by more sustainable feedstock or the breakdown of carbon for CO2 usage. In the context of the chemicals industry, which spends $800 billion on production every year (half of which relies on catalysis), a realistic 5 to 10 percent efficiency gain would mean a gain of $20 billion to $40 billion in value.

The automotive industry can benefit from quantum computing in its R&D, product design, supply-chain management, production, and mobility and traffic management. The technology could, for example, be applied to decrease manufacturing processrelated costs and shorten cycle times by optimizing elements such as path planning in complex multirobot processes (the path a robot follows to complete a task) including welding, gluing, and painting. Even a 2 to 5 percent productivity gainin the context of an industry that spends $500 billion per year on manufacturing costswould create $10 billion to $25 billion of value per year.

Finally, quantum-computing use cases in finance are a bit further in the future, and the advantages of possible short-term uses are speculative. However, we believe that the most promising use cases of quantum computing in finance are in portfolio and risk management. For example, efficiently quantum-optimized loan portfolios that focus on collateral could allow lenders to improve their offerings, possibly lowering interest rates and freeing up capital. It is earlyand complicatedto estimate the value potential of quantum computingenhanced collateral management, but as of 2021, the global lending market stands at $6.9 trillion, which suggests significant potential impact from quantum optimization.

In the meantime, business leaders in every sector should prepare for the maturation of quantum computing.

Until about 2030, we believe that quantum-computing use cases will have a hybrid operating model that is a cross between quantum and conventional high-performance computing. For example, conventional high-performance computers may benefit from quantum-inspired algorithms.

Beyond 2030, intense ongoing research by private companies and public institutions will remain vital to improve quantum hardware and enable moreand more complexuse cases. Six key factorsfunding, accessibility, standardization, industry consortia, talent, and digital infrastructurewill determine the technologys path to commercialization.

Leaders outside the quantum-computing industry can take five concrete steps to prepare for the maturation of quantum computing:

Leaders in every industry have an uncommon opportunity to stay alert to a generation-defining technology. Strategic insights and soaring business value could be the prize.

Excerpt from:
Quantum computing use cases--what you need to know | McKinsey

Chelsea Manning: Why she leaked U.S. military secrets | CTV News

At 34 years old, Chelsea Manning, famed for leaking confidential U.S military documents, has released a 'tell-all' book on the incident.

"It's a coming-of-age story," Manning told CTV's Your Morning on Monday. "The trials and tribulations of really a young person these sort of the events that transpired and my childhood and my upbringing."

Manning, who was a U.S army intelligence analyst during the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, leaked thousands of military and diplomatic records to WikiLeaks in 2010. This is regarded as the largest classified records breach in American history.

One of the documents included a battlefield video showcasing soldiers mistaking civilians and a journalist for insurgents.

"This was obviously something that I had thought about doing and really wanted," Manning said. "I'd spent basically the previous two weeks trying to reach out to the Washington Post and The New York Times."

Her book, "README.txt" starts with the moments leading up to the leak.

"There was this blizzard, and I had to dig a car out of the snow," Manning said.

Without power at her aunt's house, she made the treacherous journey to a Starbucks where she uploaded the documents online.

"I just thought about just giving up right then and there, and abandoning the entire thing and just saying, 'You know this is just not meant to be,'" Manning said.

In August 2013, she was sentenced for six Espionage Act violations and 14 other offences for leaking more than 700,000 documents. She was initially sentenced to 35 years.

Manning's book details her time in prison where she came out as a transgender woman. In 2017 then-U.S. President Barack Obama used his clemency powers to cut Manning's sentence 30 years ahead of schedule.

Since being released, Manning explains in her book how she navigates the world.

"They (people in prison) treated me as a human being but now I needed to navigate a larger world with this new identity," she said. It's a struggle, to sort of live and to learn, because I'm essentially learning how to be an adult in my 30s, as opposed to my 20s."

Watch the full interview with Chelsea Manning by clicking the video at the top of this article.

Follow this link:
Chelsea Manning: Why she leaked U.S. military secrets | CTV News

nypost.com

A little-noticed federal lawsuit, Missouri v. Biden, is uncovering astonishing evidence of an entrenched censorship scheme cooked up between the federal government and Big Tech that would make Communist China proud.

So far, 67 officials or agencies including the FBI have been accused in the lawsuit of violating the First Amendment by pressuring Facebook, Twitter and Google to censor users for alleged misinformation or disinformation.

Victims of the Biden-Big Tech censorship enterprise include The Post, whose Hunter Biden laptop expos was suppressed by Facebook and then Twitter in October 2020 after the FBI went to Facebook, warning it with great specificity to watch out for a dump of Russian disinformation, pertaining to Joe Biden, with an uncanny resemblance to our stories.

We allege that top-ranking Biden administration officials colluded with those social media companies to suppress speech about the Hunter Biden laptop story, the origins of COVID-19, the efficacy of masks, and election integrity, is how the lawsuit was summarized by intrepid Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt, who is leading the action.

The censorship related to alleged misinformation about pandemic lockdowns, vaccines and COVID-19, and included material from the esteemed infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists associated with the Great Barrington Declaration, which proved over time to be correct and eventually much of which was adopted as official policy by the CDC.

Defendants include FBI special agents Elvis Chan and Laura Dehmlow, who gave Facebook that detailed disinformation briefing right before The Post was censored; White House press secretaries, current and former, Karine Jean-Pierre and Jen Psaki; Dr. Anthony Fauci, the presidents chief medical adviser, and former White House senior COVID-19 adviser Andrew Slavitt; counsel to President Biden Dana Remus; the DHS over the disbanded Disinformation Governance Board; the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency; the FDA; the State Department; and the US Election Assistance Commission.

Last month a federal judge ordered a reluctant Fauci and Jean-Pierre to hand over their records, so the case is progressing nicely.

This civil action by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, in partnership with such red-pilled lawyers as Jenin Younes at the New Civil Liberties Alliance, overlaps with a separate lawsuit by former New York Times reporter Alex Berenson, whose legal victories so far have forced Twitter to reinstate his account after he was banned (although the cat-and-mouse game continues as he is currently suspended again).

Berensons legal discovery unearthed internal Twitter documents and Slack conversations showing Biden administration officials instructed the social media company to de-platform him because he was dissenting from the official line on school lockdowns and the efficacy of vaccines.

He was viciously attacked for tweeting that schools should be opened: people called me a ghoul a lot. [But] Twitter and Facebook prevented a real debate and discussion about the value of school closures Is there anyone who thought we did the right thing in fall of 2020 and 2021 by allowing teacher unions and Democrats to keep schools closed?

His evidence-backed view that school lockdowns were being driven by teacher unions, not data, and would do long-term harm to children, has been proven correct. Similarly, his view was correct that vaccines were not stopping the transmission of COVID and thus mandates were pointless. Yet he was silenced, and no debate was allowed.

Whether Im right or wrong you have to have an open discussion. The First Amendment protects even lies. Thats how it should be on these platforms. The efforts to regulate speech and call something disinformation is demonizing folks and saying theyre un-American [for dissenting], he said. What I have is evidence that I was specifically targeted in private communications because I was being an ahole on Twitter.

In a White House meeting in April 2021, Twitter representatives were asked one really tough question about why Alex Berenson hasnt been kicked off from the platform, a Twitter employee wrote.

Slavitt, then with Bidens COVID response team, complained specifically about Berenson, even though Twitter said he had broken no rules.

They really wanted to know about Alex Berenson, the Twitter employee wrote on Slack.

Andy Slavitt suggested they had seen data [visualization] that had showed he was the epicenter of disinfo that radiated outwards to the persuadable public, the employee wrote. Ive taken a pretty close look at his account, and I dont think any of its violative.But over the next four months, as opposition to vaccine mandates grew, the Biden administration ratcheted up the pressure.

Berenson identifies as the final blow a public statement by Biden on July 16, 2021, that social media companies were killing people by encouraging vaccine hesitancy.

A few hours after Bidens comment, Twitter suspended my account for the first time. On August 28, 2021 Twitter banned me for a tweet that it has now acknowledged should not have led to my suspension, he said. My argument is that the White House turned these companies into extensions of the state. By putting explicit pressure on Twitter, they made it an extension of the state, whether willingly or not.

The Biden administration violated my First Amendment rights.

Last month, the federal Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Twitter and other social media platforms dont have an unlimited right to discriminate against speech they dont like.

The Platforms are not newspapers. Their censorship is not speech, the court said. The First Amendment protects speech: it generally prevents the government from interfering with peoples speech.

Berenson has another lawsuit afoot, against the Biden administration, vaccine manufacturer Pfizer, and Pfizer board member Scott Gottlieb, the former head of the FDA who was instrumental in getting him banned, as documents from his legal discovery show.

This month, Berenson published on his substack an email that Gottlieb wrote to Twitter in August 2021, complaining about his various tweets criticizing Fauci, and claiming, This is why Tony needs a security detail.

But nothing Berenson said about Fauci would create any need for extra security. He just called Fauci arrogant, a skilled courtier and mocked his claim that attacks on me, quite frankly, are attacks on science.

Berenson was hardly alone in criticizing Fauci. At least half the country felt the same way. In any case, he was entitled to voice his opinion, so hes suing Gottlieb.

Gottlieb has not denied Berensons claims in his frequent TV appearances. Just this Sunday he was interviewed on the CBS flagship program Face the Nation, to break down the false claims being spread online about COVID vaccine mandates for children.

But CBS never disclosed that Gottlieb is a member of Pfizers board, earning close to $400,000 for his trouble. That is more relevant than his past FDA employment. Of course, Pfizer is a big advertiser, so maybe CBS didnt want to draw attention to the fact that its favorite vaccine expert is compromised.

These lawsuits are the only obstacle between Americans and a frighteningly pervasive new federal censorship scheme on behalf of shadowy interests, using disinformation as a catchall excuse.

More here:

nypost.com