WhatsApp sets its sights on the US – The Verge

With more than 2 billion users, WhatsApp is already one of the most popular messaging apps in the world. But its largest markets are all outside of the US. Now, Facebook, the parent company of WhatsApp that recently rebranded to Meta, is hoping to change that.

Starting this weekend, Meta is kicking off the first-ever US marketing push for WhatsApp, focusing on the privacy offered by the apps encryption. The first TV ad will air Sunday during the AFC Championship Game, comparing unencrypted messages to a stranger opening your physical mail. Similar ads touting WhatsApps privacy will soon start appearing on billboards around the country and online.

The goal of the marketing push is to get more people in the US to switch to WhatsApp by highlighting the apps security relative to other texting methods like SMS, according to Metas head of WhatsApp, Will Cathcart. What were seeing in the US is that, especially over the last couple of years with COVID, people are doing much more of their life online, he tells The Verge. But there is a real gap in how much people are using services with end-to-end encryption in the US compared to everywhere else in the world.

There are more than 5 billion unencrypted SMS messages sent in the U.S. every day, according to a 2019 study by CTIA. Much of that volume is likely spam and promotional messages, but SMS is also the default texting method for a lot of Android phones, or used when someone on iMessage texts with an Android device. Google is starting to heavily push for the adoption of RCS, the long-awaited upgrade to SMS that adds features like read receipts and in some cases encryption. But Apple has shown no sign that it wants to add RCS compatibility to iMessage. Green bubbles be damned.

Cathcart thinks that WhatsApps availability on both iOS and Android is a selling point for those who are frustrated by the experience of texting across platforms. He says the company is working to let you easily sync your chat history from an iOS device to any Android phone and vice versa. And last year, WhatsApp rolled out fully encrypted backups something that Apple has yet to offer with iMessage.

Given how poorly Facebooks brand is perceived in the US versus other parts of the world, the fact that this marketing push is coming after the rebrand to Meta is certainly convenient for WhatsApp. Like the screen you see when you first open the app, the TV ad airing this weekend says that WhatsApp is from Meta and not Facebook. Cathcart insists that the Meta rebrand wasnt a factor in the timing of the US push; Im still skeptical.

Cathcart says the new Meta distinction will rather be more helpful in other countries. Outside of the US, I think it will be clarifying for a lot of people that we can now talk Meta the company versus Facebook the product, he says. Weve seen at times confusion from users, especially ones who are less sophisticated, [that] if you use the term Facebook, they think of the app and their friends seeing something.

As Meta knows from its own research, messaging apps tend to build strong network effects over time that can be difficult to compete with. Apps like Snapchat and iMessage, and even Facebooks own Messenger, are way more popular in the US than WhatsApp. Its unclear if a marketing push will change that.

While he acknowledges that SMS traffic moving to encryption thanks to RCS is a good thing, Cathcart says WhatsApp has no intention of adding RCS compatibility. Since RCS is an open standard, Cathcarts argument is that adding support would slow down the development of WhatsApp. Before joining Meta over a decade ago, he helped build early spam filtering technology for Gmail at Google, where he observed how hard it is to quickly iterate on the open standards that underpin email.

Certainly to offer the level of security and reliability and ease of use that weve prided ourselves in, I think it would be very hard, he says of adding RCS support. And so its not something were working on at the moment. Ill never say never. Its great to see SMS get better. But one of the challenges with a decentralized system like that is you cant really push the security, the ease of use, the reliability of that.

While its primarily used for one-on-one messaging, WhatsApp is working on additional features for larger groups to more easily communicate, potentially putting it in more direct competition with services like Discord and Reddit. I asked Cathcart about an unreleased feature recently spotted in WhatsApps code called Communities. It seems geared towards expanding large group chats to include sub-groups and more admin controls. According to Cathcart, WhatsApp is increasingly being used by groups of people like schools and religious groups that could benefit from such features.

You could imagine a principal wanting to be able to delete messages within the school that are being sent, he says. Is there a way to structure and give admin control to help communities like that? We think its an interesting area of product opportunity for us to make WhatsApp better given how much people have started using WhatsApp for this over the last couple of years.

Aside from competing with iMessage, WhatsApps biggest challenge to cracking the US market will likely be the relationship with its parent company. A privacy policy update last year that clarified how chats with businesses on WhatsApp could be stored on Facebooks servers, even though theyre still encrypted during transit, was met with fierce backlash.

The thing we learned is that really clear, simple, understandable communication about privacy policies is very important, Cathcart says. This stuff can be complicated to people. And we saw a ton of confusion where people thought we were changing something about the privacy of their messages, lots of people saying we were able to read their messages. None of that was true.

As Mark Zuckerberg hinted at last year, Meta intends to introduce a new umbrella account system so that users can manage their identity across WhatsApp, Instagram, Facebook, and its other products. Its part of a multi-year plan to eventually integrate the messaging architecture of WhatsApp, Messenger, and Instagram so that users can communicate across them.

The rollout of opt-in, encrypted messaging on Messenger this week is an early step towards the apps being more connected, Cathcart says. WhatsApp has so far thrived in huge swaths of the world while staying largely independent from its parent company. Now its a matter of whether it can do the same in the US even as it gets closer to the rest of Meta.

See more here:
WhatsApp sets its sights on the US - The Verge

Posted in Uncategorized

Global Enterprise Encryption Market 2021 Business Strategies, Product Sales and Growth Rate, Assessment to 2027 The Oxford Spokesman – The Oxford…

MarketQuest.biz has released new study named Global Enterprise Encryption Market, which includes regional and global market data and is expected to yield attractive pricing from 2021 to 2027, using 2020 as the base year and 2015-2019 as the prior year. This market is carefully examined in the research.

The report provides a comprehensive examination of the global Enterprise Encryption industry, as well as insight into anticipated future trends that could have a significant impact on market growth. Additional data is triangulated using top-down and bottom-up methodologies, as well as historical revenue and sales volume.

DOWNLOAD FREE SAMPLE REPORT: https://www.marketquest.biz/sample-request/59786

The product types covered in the report include:

The application types covered in the report include:

Market briefing:

The study aids us in acquiring data about the main companies revenue, profit, products, and growth. The global Enterprise Encryption market research also offers a critical evaluation of the customer experience to aid decision-makers in establishing an effective plan to integrate more target audience.

Our investigators employed a variety of methods in order to get trustworthy data for predicting market growth factors. The study reports statistics and numbers are presented in a thorough manner, with graphical and pictorial representations used to better comprehend the market.

The countries covered in report are:

The emerging market players include:

ACCESS FULL REPORT: https://www.marketquest.biz/report/59786/global-enterprise-encryption-market-2021-by-company-regions-type-and-application-forecast-to-2026

Significance of The Report:

Customization of the Report:

This report can be customized to meet the clients requirements. Please connect with our sales team (sales@marketquest.biz), who will ensure that you get a report that suits your needs. You can also get in touch with our executives on +1-201-465-4211 to share your research requirements.

Contact UsMark StoneHead of Business DevelopmentPhone: +1-201-465-4211Email: sales@marketquest.biz

Originally posted here:
Global Enterprise Encryption Market 2021 Business Strategies, Product Sales and Growth Rate, Assessment to 2027 The Oxford Spokesman - The Oxford...

Posted in Uncategorized

Edward Snowden, Nayib Bukele And Others Reacts To IMF Wanting El Salvador To Drop Bitcoin: ‘Somebody Soun – Benzinga

Former intelligence contractor Edward Snowden took aim at the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for dishing out advice to El Salvador on its use of Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) as legal tender.

What Happened: Snowden tweeted to his 5 million followers on Monday that Somebody sounds nervous while sharing a news story that covered IMFs urge that El Salvador removes Bitcoin as legal tender.

Snowdens post was retweeted 4,807 times and garnered 27,400 likes. It also attracted plenty of attention from cryptocurrency twitter.

See Also: How To Buy Bitcoin (BTC)

Why It Matters: On Tuesday, the IMF executive board members urged El Salvador to drop the use of Bitcoin as legal tender warning of large risks related to financial stability, financial integrity and consumer protection.

In June, El Salvador became the first country in the world to adopt the apex cryptocurrency as legal tender.

The Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele took his own dig at IMF on Twitter on Tuesday.

This is not the first time IMF has dished out advice to the Central American country. In a tweet in August, the international agency called Bitcoin an inadvisable shortcut while criticizing El Salvadors adoption of the private cryptocurrency.

Price Action: At press time, BTC traded 1.9% higher at $36,903.63 over 24 hours.

Read Next: Bitcoin May Be Plunging Hard, But Look Who's Buying The Dip

Photo: Courtesy of Gobierno Danilo Medina via Flickr

Read the rest here:
Edward Snowden, Nayib Bukele And Others Reacts To IMF Wanting El Salvador To Drop Bitcoin: 'Somebody Soun - Benzinga

Posted in Uncategorized

Europol, mass surveillance, and GDPR. More on US zero-trust architecture plans. – The CyberWire

At a glance.

SecurityWeek takes a look at Europols use of mass surveillance via a report by an international law professor. Europols bulk data mining has been determined to be a breach of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), resulting in the European Data Protection Supervisor ordering Europol to delete all stored data not related to a person with a known link to crime. Douwe Korff, an Emeritus Professor at London Metropolitan University, compares Europols recent issues with mass surveillance to the Edward Snowden scandal. The GDPR was instituted, at least in part, in response to Snowdens revelations regarding NSAs mass surveillance, leading some to view Europols behavior as hypocritical. As the Guardian put it, While Europol lags behind the US in terms of technological capacity, it is on the same path as the NSA. Korff writes, This is about the desire of Europol and EU Member States to collect, in a generalized manner, vast stores of personal data on overwhelmingly innocent people,

As we noted yesterday, the White Houses Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has released a memorandum setting out a zero-trust architecture adoption strategy for federal agencies. As CNN notes, the plan gives agencies until 2024 to implement the required benchmarks, and is an attempt to set cybersecurity policies that revolve around outcomes rather than checklists. "This strategy is a major step in our efforts to build a defensible and coherent approach to our federal cyber defenses," National Cyber Director Chris Inglis said in a statement.

Bleeping Computer adds that cybersecurity experts have been advocating for a zero-trust model for years, and in February of last year, the National Security Agency (NSA) and Microsoft recommended the approach for large companies and critical infrastructure. In the press release accompanying the memorandum, CISA director Jen Easterly explained As our adversaries continue to pursue innovative ways to breach our infrastructure, we must continue to fundamentally transform our approach to federal cybersecurity. Zero trust is a key element of this effort to modernize and strengthen our defenses. CISA will continue to provide technical support and operational expertise to agencies as we strive to achieve a shared baseline of maturity.

The Verge explains that now that the final strategy has been issued, agencies are expected to designate a strategy implementation lead within their organization in the next thirty days, and they have sixty days to submit their implementation plan to the OMB.

We received a number of comments from industry about OMB's memorandum.Tim Erlin, VP or strategy at Tripwire, sees the memorandum as an important advance in Federal cybersecurity:

The published memorandum represents a substantial step forward for cybersecurity across the US government. Moving the whole of government in a single, forward direction is incredibly difficult, and the efforts of OMB and all of the participating agencies should be applauded.

"Implementing a Zero Trust Architecture is a proven way to reduce cybersecurity risk, but it is by no means an easy solution. The OMB memorandum lays out a set of foundational steps that agencies must take in order to begin this journey to Zero Trust, but its just a beginning.

"Its unfortunate that this memorandum doesnt provide a clearer role for what NIST identifies as one of the key tenets for Zero Trust: integrity monitoring. Documents from both CISA and NIST include integrity monitoring as a key component of Zero Trust, but the OMB memorandum doesnt include similar treatment. Integrity monitoring is foundational to a successful Zero Trust Architecture.

"This memorandum includes substantial requirements and discussion around Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR), and in doing so, runs the risk of over-reliance on a specific technology. EDR is already evolving into Managed Detection and Response (MDR) and Extended Detection and Response (XDR). The cybersecurity technology landscape moves quickly, and theres a real risk that agencies will find themselves required to implement and run a superseded capability.

Troy Grubbs, Regional Director of Federal at CyberArk, also thinks the emphasis on zero trust is an important advance:

Fully embracing a Zero Trust approach to cybersecurity is a sea-change for much of the federal government, not only operationally, but also in mindset. As described in the OMB memo, the heart of the shift lies in protecting identity both in how users and applications access data and complete tasks. In particular, the compromise of privileged identities (identities that have elevated access to sensitive data), is increasingly a target of bad actors and poses one of the greatest cybersecurity risks. Damages cannot only be measured by the impact of public service disruptions, but also, by the risk of compromising national security and defense readiness and public safety.

"Our geopolitical environment is increasingly uncertain, and the tactics used by adversaries have significantly advanced. A Zero Trust approach, with securing identity at its core, is best suited to protect vital infrastructure and data and allow agencies to securely execute their IT modernization goals.

Michael Crandell, CEO at Bitwarden, thinks the guidance needs some expansion with respect to the storage of passwords:

"With todays news that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) released a Federal strategy to move the U.S. Government toward a zero trust approach to cybersecurity, there is a clear missing piece to the strategy, with the OMB offering no advice on how to generate and safely store strong and unique passwords.

"For instance, the strategy mentions that password policies must not require use of special characters or regular rotation. However, their advice to not rotate also comes with a need for people to use strong and unique passwords, an area where they offer no guidance.

"The federal strategy also covers the important matter of multi-factor authentication, which can stop hackers from guessing weak passwords or reusing passwords obtained from a data breach. But whats missing is how are people advised to avoid weak or re-used passwords? That question is left open and misses an opportunity to show people the value of a password generator, available for free both outside and inside password management products.

"When it comes to cybersecurity, we are all in this together. It helps all of us when the administration reinforces the message that cybersecurity is everybodys responsibility and gives the public guidance on the tools they need.What would make their guidance complete is simple: use a password manager.There are many available, including several free options, and experts, including NIST the National Institute of Standards recommend them. Password managers are a simple, practical solution that will help people avoid weak and re-used passwords, and instead create, save, and use strong and unique passwords to keep themselves safe online."

And Craig Mueller, of iBoss, sees an implicit mandate for cloud service providers:

Cloud Service Providers (CSPs) that cannot make all applications and resources private, including those in the cloud, will fail to reduce cyber risk and deliver on the Zero Trust model as outlined in the NIST Special Publication 800-207 mentioned in the memorandum. Cloud Service Providers will require a containerized cloud architecture to ensure cloud applications become completely isolated and only accessible specifically to trusted users. With a containerized architecture, the federal government can implement the goals of the memorandum and ultimately protect and isolate all resources, regardless of location, while granting access to those resources to trusted users working from anywhere.

See the article here:
Europol, mass surveillance, and GDPR. More on US zero-trust architecture plans. - The CyberWire

Posted in Uncategorized

The Privacy Boom Is Going to Change Everything – Yahoo Finance

Early this month, Hayley Tsukuyama was talking to an American legislator about digital privacy. Its one of the main topics of concern for the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), where she works as a legislative activist.

The unnamed legislator was eager not just to learn more about threats to privacy, but to share a disturbing story.

This article is part of CoinDesk's Privacy Week series.

The lawmaker had recently heard that Target, by using data gathered about the shopping habits of a teenage customer, had determined that she was pregnant. Target then sent flyers and coupons for maternity goods to the girls home where her parents were shocked to learn the joyful news from a massive corporate retailer.

To many, this will sound more unlucky than strange. For better or worse, weve gotten used to both massive, omnipresent data gathering and the swirl of uncanny targeted advertising from social media companies, online retailers and assorted attention merchants.

But heres the most notable thing about the Target story that so scandalized that lawmaker: It happened a full decade ago.

Tsukuyamas conversation encapsulates our slow awakening to the challenges and risks of digital surveillance: Were finally catching on to a problem that has been with us for a long time.

When Charles Duhig of the New York Times unmasked Targets newfangled data analytics methods in 2012, they still seemed mysterious, novel, maybe even exciting. Tech companies like Facebook were enjoying a public honeymoon period, celebrated as the Next Big Thing in the American economy.

But that nave optimism has been largely washed away by a slowly mounting techlash, as one controversy after another reveals just how much privacy weve lost to digital surveillance. An early turning point came in 2013, when Edward Snowden disclosed the National Security Agencys illegal spying program. The outrage that followed showed that Americans were no longer fully on board for the antidemocratic government security measures that prevailed for the decade after 9/11.

Story continues

Government spying wasnt the only problem, and maybe not even the biggest one. Expert warnings about online surveillance date back as far as the mid-2000s one of my own mentors, Mark Andrejevic, published an entire book on the subject in 2007. But the issue was abstract for many Americans until the presidential election in 2016.

Cambridge Analytica served as a wakeup call and crystallized a lot of inchoate discontent, said Jay Stanley, a privacy expert with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). The U.K. firm allegedly misused Facebook data and systems on behalf of then-candidate Donald Trump.

The fact that it was tied to the 2016 election was a shock, Stanley continues. It was a demonstration of how much actual power and potential power big tech companies have, and just how sloppy they can be with our privacy.

The idea that Facebook helped hand the presidency to Trump was always something of a convenient dodge for the feckless Democratic Party but it also drew attention to real problems that the company, a half-decade later, still hasnt convincingly addressed. In fact, subsequent reporting only added to public outrage, for instance with findings that Facebook targeted users with negative content to drive clicks, despite its own research on the mental health harms of those practices.

Meanwhile, psychologists, sociologists and journalists have been uncovering even broader fallouts from the dizzying cocktail of surveillance and targeted advertising. Jean Twenge has documented the grim psychological effects digital echo chambers are having on teenagers. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, written by no less an establishment figure than Harvard Business School professor Shoshana Zuboff, has become a touchstone for critics of platforms exploitative data hoarding.

This wave of revelations has sharpened public distrust of internet companies that collect user data. In 2014, 24% of Americans still believed they could be securely anonymous online, according to Pew Research Center. By 2019, fully 62% believed they could not escape monitoring by private companies, not just online, but in their broader daily lives.

In a December 2021 poll by the Washington Post, a whopping 72% of U.S. internet users said they trusted Facebook not much or not at all to handle their data responsibly. (Those sentiments help explain why Facebooks parent company recently rebranded itself Meta Platforms, an evasion I try to avoid reinforcing.) Even Apple and Amazon, which performed best out of the companies in the survey, were distrusted by 40% of respondents.

Theres another index of privacy fears that is particularly emblematic of our era: the rise of conspiracy theories about digital surveillance. Tsukuyama of the EFF says she frequently talks to people certain that their smartphones or other devices are actively listening to their conversations and then delivering ads based on that spying. Tsukuyama and other third-party experts say thats not true but just because youre paranoid, it doesnt mean theyre not after you.

Your phones not listening to you, Tsukuyama says. But whats scary is that [companies] dont have to listen. They can infer who youre hanging out with, time of day, if youre looking for stuff, your age, all these kinds of things, from your search history.

They dont need to listen to you they just know anyway.

The EFF, ACLU and other organizations and activists have continued the hard democratic work of enshrining stronger privacy into law. But over the past few months, these fears have also bloomed into something Americans tend to be more enthusiastic about than major legal reform: a money-making pitch. This one is christened Web 3.

Web 3 is still ill-defined, capable of standing for almost any fantasy of the digital future. But a foundational pillar is the idea that blockchain-backed assets and decentralized data systems can help users regain control from big platforms like Facebook or YouTube.

Its still unclear exactly how that might work, and figures like Twitter founder and Block CEO Jack Dorsey have alleged Web 3 is just a hollow catch phrase promoted by venture capitalists. But however vague, the promises have generated a flood of media coverage and seized the attention of techies.

Even before Web 3, investment in privacy technology was rising steadily. According to Crunchbase, venture capital investments in privacy and security startups more than quintupled between 2011 and 2019, from $1.7 to $9.9 billion.

Those numbers exclude blockchain and crypto projects, but money is flowing into them, too - witness the recent $400 million infusion to the privacy-focused Secret Network. Crunchbase lists 207 privacy startups with $3.5 billion in funding raised, and an average founding date of October 2015. That makes them much younger than the average social media startup, founded in April 2009.

And there are strong signs of genuine user interest in privacy-oriented digital products and features.

DuckDuckGo, the search engine whose primary pitch is that it doesnt track users, now reportedly has larger market share on mobile than Microsofts Bing (a low bar, but still). Interest in the decentralized and open-source social media network Mastodon has grown steadily in recent years, though actual user numbers are hard to come by.

Perhaps most notably, encrypted messaging apps Telegram and Signal grew dramatically in 2021.

Rising anxiety about data tracking may portend a similar shift on an issue more obviously relevant to blockchain and crypto projects: financial privacy.

Some fintech startups have helped to erode peoples financial privacy (Im looking at you, Venmo). But the federal government has also been a major culprit, dating back at least to new international banking rules after 9/11.

And the Biden administration has accelerated the financial monitoring agenda to Ludicrous Speed.

In the summer of 2021, for instance, we saw a clumsy attempt to broaden reporting requirements for crypto wallet transactions, which generated such controversy that it briefly threatened Bidens first big spending bill. That provision was rumored to have been promoted behind the scenes by Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen.

Yellens Treasury Department was behind an even more extreme proposal, which would have granted the Internal Revenue Service the right to monitor individual bank accounts with more than $600 in transfers per year. The universal surveillance measure was rationalized as a way to increase tax revenue, despite the fact that the wealthiest 1% of Americans are responsible for a vastly disproportionate share of missing revenue (and are unlikely to use personal U.S. bank accounts to hide their wealth). The provisions threshold was raised to $10,000 in the face of pushback from Republicans and banks and was then ultimately withdrawn.

To its credit, the Biden administration did drop a sweeping proposal from its predecessor that would have required crypto exchanges to verify the identities behind crypto wallets their customers transacted with. Still, Yellens recurring case of legislative foot-in-mouth disease betrays a strange and disturbing openness to testing the boundaries of the right to privacy enshrined in the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Similar impulses have gone even further outside the U.S., as with Indias campaign to eradicate cash and Chinas heavily surveilled digital yuan.

These top-down efforts to reduce the freedom to transact could end with the same kind of backlash to mainstream finance that has permanently tarred Facebook. It is tempting to argue that this is already underway that the huge inflow of capital to cryptocurrency over the past two years was driven by real anxiety over rising financial controls.

But we all know that interpretation would be self-indulgent. While still potentially enhancing privacy for informed users, crypto has become largely unmoored from one of its clearest real applications, eroded by wave after wave of speculative manias in which rising numbers are all that really matter. Whether some of those speculators will pick up actual insights about data privacy as they throw a quadruple-leveraged long on Floki Inu Coin is, at best, uncertain.

There is a broader problem with focusing on products and services that enhance privacy, whether were talking about cryptocurrency or a OnePassword subscription: Not everyone can afford them. Even as anxiety over privacy continues to rise, a purely market-based approach would likely create a world in which your access to privacy depends on your ability to pay for it.

Thats why were very much in favor of federal privacy legislation, said Samir Jain, policy director for the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT) That legislation should have protections that dont involve paying money, but are basic rights applying to everyone regardless of your ability to pay.

The prospects for privacy legislation at the federal level are surprisingly bright, according to Jain, especially given the partisan dysfunction that has reigned in Washington for going on two decades. Its a rare topic where there is a lot of bipartisan agreement, he said. There are Republican and Democratic proposals.

At the state level, California, Colorado, and Virginia have enacted broad privacy regulations, some modeled on Europes data protection act, GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation). The appearance of a patchwork of state laws can sometimes make federal regulation nearly inevitable, as the regulated companies themselves eventually start wishing for simple uniformity. Unfortunately, according to many experts, companies often aim to subvert the process by proposing intentionally toothless legislation.

But there are models for effective federal regulation. At the minimum, good laws would limit what data companies can collect and retain to what they need for their operations and give the public the right to review data gathered about them. But there are more radical provisions on the table.

One of the most important would close a major loophole in data available to the federal government. There are, at least in theory, strict limits on the governments freedom to surveil its citizens. The protections against unreasonable search and seizure in the Fourth Amendment were expanded and clarified by a 1967 Supreme Court case to include electronic communications. The Privacy Act of 1974, passed partly in response to abuses by the Central Intelligence Agency during its campaign of terror against the civil rights movement, further narrowed what the U.S. government can do with data about citizens.

But the data brokers keep dossiers on everybody, and the government has contracts with the data brokers, the ACLUs Stanley said. So its a complete end run around privacy protections.

This end run is possible because of whats known as the third-party doctrine, a U.S. legal standard according to which citizens can claim no reasonable expectation of privacy regarding any data voluntarily turned over to a third party. That includes banks, internet service providers, social media companies or effectively any other nongovernmental entity. One effect of the doctrine is that government agencies have the right to freely buy data about citizens that they would be prohibited from gathering directly without a court-issued warrant.

This nightmarish loophole has led to a variety of abuses, such as police departments buying license plate camera surveillance data from private firms. In April, a large and bipartisan group of U.S. senators introduced The Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act, a bill to close the loophole.

Thats a genuine bright spot, and theres more where that came from.

I think American legislators are pregnant with privacy regulations, Stanley said. Its not clear when theyll give birth or what those will look like.

But the truly nuclear solution to privacy is unlikely to ever catch on with Congress: banning targeted advertising.

Advertising is what makes data worth money, as Stanley succinctly puts it, what ultimately motivates much of the data gathering by private companies. Its why Facebook prioritizes outrage over more positive feelings and why Instagram pummels teen girls with alluring but psychically toxic imagery. But a legal ban on programmatic advertising, or even heavy regulation of it, is extremely unlikely to gain traction in the U.S., the home of the worlds biggest data monetizers.

That brings us back to Web 3 not the fantastical VC fable of infinite non-fungible token widgets, but a simpler and more grounded vision that merely integrates cheaper, automated, customizable payments into Web-based services.

In a best-case scenario, that would enable a much broader set of business models, instead of making so much of the web dependent on advertising and, in turn, user data. Its one scenario for the eventual decline of data hoarding as a business model.

However events unfold, Stanley said the rise of digital surveillance is a fast-moving land grab based on the ability of innovation to outpace regulation. If history is any lesson, norms and regulations will eventually catch up to this early wave of digital privacy looters.

We saw this in the 18th century, even in Europe, he says. It was common for the monarchies to be reading everyones mail, and there was a lot of pushback on that. Over the decades and centuries, nearly every European country stopped doing that.

It can be very slow moving, Stanley concluded. But theres a long arc towards privacy.

Link:
The Privacy Boom Is Going to Change Everything - Yahoo Finance

Posted in Uncategorized

Jimmy Fallon might be in trouble for showing off his $200k Bored Ape NFT to Paris Hilton – MSN UK

Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are all the rage for celebrities and wealthy individuals right now. Everyone from Edward Snowden to Lil Nas X is getting involved in the blockchain-backed illustrations. And host of The Tonight Show, Jimmy Fallon, revealed his NFT this week, sparking debate.

Tuesday night's episode of the show featured a plethora of awkward exchanges between Fallon and guest Paris Hilton about NFT that led to the multi-millionaires sharing their most notable NFTs, a customized bored ape from Bored Ape Yacht Club.

Fallon's bored ape features a cream-colored ape wearing heart-shaped sunglasses, a striped shirt, and a sailor's hat. "It reminded me of me a little bit," Fallon said.

But Fallon may have made a mistake sharing his NFT with the whole world via his talk show.

According to the Los Angeles Times, Fallon likely bought his bored ape for nearly $216,000. But if Fallon's on-air promotion of his bored ape increases its value, then it could financially benefit Fallon which would violate NBC's workplace policy.

Video: It can be toxic: Paris Hilton opens up on the pressures of social media (Bang Showbiz)

It can be toxic: Paris Hilton opens up on the pressures of social media

Click to expand

UP NEXT

The policy states employees should, not let outside interests or activities interfere with [their] business judgment or responsibilities to the company" and "disclose and obtain approval for all outside work, financial interests and other personal activities/relationships that may create or appear to create a conflict".

An NBC spokesperson said Fallon did not violate any rules as hosts are allowed to promote outside projects such as books and movies. But it's unclear whether showing off his own bored ape could be considered a conflict of interest if Fallon chose to sell his NFT.

Regardless of NBC policy, Fallon's decision to reveal his $200,000+ Bored Ape seemed to reveal a new gray area in crypto's lack of regulations.

Go here to read the rest:
Jimmy Fallon might be in trouble for showing off his $200k Bored Ape NFT to Paris Hilton - MSN UK

Posted in Uncategorized

Why Is Ethereum-Based Polygon Buoyant Today? – Benzinga – Benzinga

Polygon (CRYPTO: MATIC) traded 10% higher at $1.59 over 24 hours leading up to late night Tuesday.

Polygon, In Numbers:

Why Its Moving? On Tuesday, Ryan Wyatt, head of gaming at Alphabet Incs (NASDAQ:GOOGL) (NASDAQ:GOOG) video streaming platform YouTube said that he will be leading Polygon Studios, which has the mandate to develop a Polygon-based entertainment ecosystem.

Co-founder of Polygon Sandeep Nailwal commented on Wyatts joining Polygon Studios and said Let that sync in!MATIC, the Ethereum (CRYPTO: ETH)-based token associated with the blockchain scalability platform, was seen trending on CoinMarketCap at press time.

See Also: How To Buy Polygon (MATIC)

Polygon Chatter: Polygon Studios tweeted Always gamers first in a Twitter thread that touched on Wyatts appointment as CEO.

Read Next: Edward Snowden, Nayib Bukele And Others Reacts To IMF Wanting El Salvador To Drop Bitcoin: 'Somebody Sounds Nervous'

Go here to see the original:
Why Is Ethereum-Based Polygon Buoyant Today? - Benzinga - Benzinga

Posted in Uncategorized

China Censored These 5 American Movies, Offering an Alternative Ending – Al-Bawaba

Censorship in China has made it to American-made movies, including the 1999 Brad Pitt film, Fight Club, stirring wide reactions.

Despite the shocked reactions of online users, commentators who are familiar with Chinese policies highlighted a routine practice by censors in the country, where films that involve law enforcement figures are always modified to avoid any hint that they could be on any side but the right one.

According to Vice, "Its unclear if the ending was altered out of self-censorship or by government order."

On Twitter, people shared a screenshot from the alternative ending offered by China to Fight Club, inspiring many users to take similar screenshots from other films, where censorship served the same purpose.

Snippets from censored films have been posted on Twitter under the hashtag#ChinaEditChallenge, with a number of well-known people making their own contributions, includingformer American computer intelligence consultantEdward Snowden.

Amongst the films that have been highlighted for changes made to their endings by China areLord of War, Star Wars,Falling Down,Mission Impossible, and others.

Read the rest here:
China Censored These 5 American Movies, Offering an Alternative Ending - Al-Bawaba

Posted in Uncategorized

Joe Rogan: How the cage fighting commentator and dirty stand-up comedian became the king of podcasting – The Independent

At 54 years of age, martial artist, sitcom actor, comedian, Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) pundit, psychedelics advocate and eat-what-you-kill moose hunter Joe Rogan finds himself the biggest podcaster in the world - and an increasingly divisive figure.

The Joe Rogan Experience, a meandering discussion show interrogating conspiracy theories and blending libertarian political chat with celebrity interviews, was named Spotifys most-heard podcast of 2021, a little over a year after the host signed an exclusive $100m (82m) deal with the audio streaming giant.

Leaked data acquired by Business Insider last summer revealed that the podcast accounted for 4.5 per cent of all shows heard on the platform during its debut month of September 2020, cornering 14.9m hours of total global listening time.

A spokesperson for the service said The Joe Rogan Experience had been its number one podcast every month since and that its audience had only grown in the interim - and the show was already a huge hit beforehand, its bullet-headed host claiming a whopping 190m downloads per month during an interview with Aubrey Marcus in April 2019.

The calibre of Rogans guests is a central reason for the pods popularity, welcoming everyone from a famously-stoned Elon Musk to Kanye West, Neil DeGrasse Tyson, Lance Armstrong, Mike Tyson, Jack Dorsey, Dave Chapelle, Kevin Hart, Miley Cyrus, Matthew McConaughey and Edward Snowden.

Whether he is in conversation with renegade scholars about astrophysics, ancient civilisations, drugs, survivalism or scientology, joshing with raconteur friends like Uncle Joey Diaz or Duncan Trussell or, more controversially, hearing out right-wing denizens of the intellectual dark web like Alex Jones, Jordan Peterson, Ben Shapiro and Milo Yiannopoulos, Rogan offers everybody an equal opportunity to state their case without being shouted down, for better or worse.

That is no small gesture in a tangled American media ecosystem so often defined by poisonous hostility and confrontation in post-Trump 2022.

But The Joe Rogan Experiences transfer to Spotify has coincided with the onset of the coronavirus pandemic and seen the broadcaster entertain even more dubious and potentially harmful propositions than usual.

Most recently, a New Years Eve episode in which his guest Dr Robert Malone likened contemporary American society to that of Nazi Germany in the 1930s and espoused the theory that mass formation psychosis was leading people to accept Covid-19 vaccines without question was taken down by YouTube but is still live on Spotify.

That has prompted 270 scientists and members of the medical community to write an open letter to the company saying that Rogan allowing Malones claims to pass unchecked could damage public trust in scientific research and sow doubt in the credibility of data-driven guidance offered by medical professionals.

The letter continues: This is not only a scientific or medical concern; it is a sociological issue of devastating proportions and Spotify is responsible for allowing this activity to thrive on its platform.

The Independent has contacted Spotify for comment.

This is hardly the first time Rogan has courted controversy during the Covid era.

He caused a major storm in April last year when he suggested on air that healthy young people do not need to get a vaccine, earning him a rebuke from Dr Anthony Fauci, chief medical adviser to US president Joe Biden, and forcing him to backtrack and insist: Im not an anti-vax person.

Im not a doctor, he continued. Im a f***ing moron and Im a cage fighting commentator whos a dirty stand-up comedian. We just told you Im drunk most of the time and I do testosterone and I smoke a lot of weed. But Im not a respected source of information even for me!

While that disclaimer largely shrugged off responsibility for his considerable influence, Rogan did, to his credit, subsequently invite Dr Rhonda Patrick back onto the show to explicitly debunk prevalent vaccine-denier falsehoods.

I really appreciate that Joe is willing to have conversations with people with whom he disagrees and that hes respectful in his discussions. Its refreshing! one YouTube commenter wrote beneath a clip of their exchange, as clear an insight into his appeal as you could wish for.

Rogan has since raised eyebrows by suggesting that ID cards containing proof of vaccination status take America one step closer to dictatorship and by announcing that he had taken ivermectin, a deworming medicine also used to treat livestock, when he himself contracted Covid in September, subsequently attacking CNNs chief medical correspondent Dr Sanjay Gupta over the networks coverage of his actions.

Joe Rogan confronts Sanjay Gupta over CNN 'lies'

The ivermectin spat even earned him a telling off from celebrated shock jock Howard Stern, the provocative American radio host and perhaps Rogans most obvious forerunner.

Recent appearances by Dr Peter McCullough and the aforementioned Dr Malone, two men with a track-record of pushing improbable theories concerning the pandemic and its origins, have raised further questions about how Rogan wields his power, given the immense popularity of his show.

The host has come a long way since he first launched The Joe Rogan Experience with friend Brian Redban way back on Christmas Eve 2009.

He was born in Newark, New Jersey, in August 1967 and is of Italian-Irish stock, his parents separating when he was a child and Rogan subsequently relocating with his mother first to San Francisco, California, then to Gainesville, Florida, and finally to suburban Boston, Massachusetts, as a teenager.

Speaking to Rolling Stones Erik Hedegaard in 2015, Rogan remembered his policeman father as a very violent, very scary guy, who, the host contends, would have turned his son into a psychopath had he continued to play a role in raising him, hence the adult Rogans decision never to seek to re-establish contact.

The podcaster describes suffering from an unshakeable sense of alienation as a youth, despite never wanting for friends, and took up first karate and then taekwondo after a humiliating encounter with a bully in high school, which prompted him to vow never to be unable to defend himself again.

I was terrified of being a loser, he told Rolling Stone. Superterrified of being someone who people just go, Oh, look at that f***ing loser. You know? I was always thinking that the other kids were going to turn on me at any moment. I was weird. I just f***ing drifted.

By the time he retired from competitive martial arts at 21 for a brief stint at Boston University, Rogan had won the US Open Championship taekwondo tournament as a lightweight and been full-contact state champion for four consecutive years, also instructing others in the discipline.

Persuaded by friends to try his hand at stand-up comedy, Rogan took to the stage at the notorious Stitches club in Boston in 1988, enjoyed it and commenced a career as a comic, taking inspiration from the likes of Lenny Bruce, Richard Pryor, Bill Hicks and Sam Kinnison, betraying a taste for convention-baiting even then.

His brash, incredulous, wild-eyed stage persona, tackling subjects from Bigfoot to self-satisfied vegans and the inherent weirdness of attempting to enact the role of human being on a vast rock hurtling through infinity, is a world away from the relaxed manner he adopts during his podcast recordings, sat back in a Cypress Hill T-shirt against a brick wall bearing pictures of Elvis Presley and Jimi Hendrix.

Taking odd jobs to make ends meet - delivering newspapers, working as a chauffeur for a private eye who had forfeited his driving licence - Rogan eventually moved to New York City and then Los Angeles in the early 1990s in order to fully commit to a career at the mic, attracting notice with a set on MTVs Half-Hour Comedy Hour.

That led to him winning the lead in the nine-episode Fox baseball sitcom Hardball in 1994 and, in turn, a regular role in NBCs NewsRadio between 1995-1999, on which he replaced Ray Romano and befriended the tragic but great sketch comic Phil Hartman, who would later be murdered by the wife whom Rogan says he advised his friend to leave.

His passion for martial arts made him a natural for UFC punditry - although he initially resisted the industrys overtures, preferring to watch the bouts from the stands in peace - before eventually taking a job as a backstage interviewer in 1997 and moving on to become a colour commentator, where his flare for verbal invention made him an instant hit.

Joe Rogan serving as a ring announcer at a UFC bout in Las Vegas, Nevada, last summer

(Getty)

Thereafter, he set up his own blog at the turn of the millennium, Joe.Rogan.net, foreseeing the potential of the web as a forum for mass communication, andpresented the gross out game show Fear Factor on NBC between 2001 and 2006.

Retraining his focus on stand-up, Rogan went viral in 2007 when a video of him confronting fellow comic Carlos Mencia at The Comedy Store in Hollywood over a stolen joke began to circulate, an incident that saw him banned from the venue and dropped by his agents but which won respect from his fellow professionals.

Then came the podcast, with Rogan again proving himself to be ahead of the curve by daring to try something new and embarking on what would become the defining project of his eccentric and itinerant career.

Thirteen years on, there are more than 1,760 episodes of The Joe Rogan Experience out there, with three more landing every week, each one commonly more than two hours in length, rendering it near-impossible to become a completist - or even find an entry point for the uninitiated.

The hosts curiosity about his guests often oddball positions is never less than sincere and he does not usually allow nonsense to go unchallenged, frequently getting into heated debates with interviewees, memorably sparring with jiu jitsu flat-earther Eddie Bravo, for instance, or with Candace Owens over a flip remark she made about not believing in climate change.

However, the Dr Malone affair suggests he does not always go far enough.

Writing about that episode, The Independent columnist Noah Berlatsky took the broadcaster to task for abusing the misplaced trust he enjoys from his fans, saying: Rogans audience is a mix of people who distrust establishment media, people who distrust the left, and people who seek out alternative, scientifically unproven health advice. Not surprisingly, this is a perfect stew for disinformation about a public health crisis that has been intensely politicised by reactionaries.

Before the pandemic, Devin Gordon of The Atlantic also sought to pin down the essence of Rogans appeal, particularly among men, and defined his principal audience as: Guys who get barbed-wire tattoos and fill their fridge with Monster energy drinks and pre-ordered their tickets to see Hobbs & Shaw.

Making a point of sampling the mushroom coffee and other supplements Rogan advertises on his show, Gordon is reasonably sympathetic and writes: The hard truth for some of Rogans critics in the media is that he is much better at captivating audiences than most of us, because he has the patience and the generosity to let his interviews be an experience rather than an inquisition.

He is a tireless optimist, Gordon argues, as well as driven, inexhaustible, and an honest-to-goodness autodidact but carries the fatal weakness of showing too much compassion for bad actors.

The democratic value of making his considerable platform available to the likes of such pseudo-intellectual provocateurs-for-pay and division-stokers as Jones, Peterson, Shapiro, Yiannopoulos and Owens is not a given, even if his intentions are honourable.

While Rogan does not identify as a Republican and resists political labels, he certainly shares some of the rights anxieties about the shifting role of traditional masculinity in the 21st century, recently ranting somewhat hysterically that: You can never be woke enough, thats the problem. It keeps going. It keeps going further and further and further down the line and if you get to the point where you capitulate, where you agree to all these demands, itll eventually get to straight white men are not allowed to talk.

Joe Rogan claims straight white men arent allowed to talk

Heated opposition to wokeness and cancel culture is actually a relatively conventional stance among conservative-leaning comedians, who see both phenomena as antithetical to the radical free speech most comics endorse for the sake of their livelihoods.

But is Rogan conservative-leaning? His refusal to overtly align with either side of the aisle permits him space to pursue pet issues like the above, cannabis legalisation or gun rights without being committed to any one set-menu ideology.

However, it can also look like plain indecision on his part.

He briefly endorsed Democratic outsider Tulsi Gabbard for president in 2020, before changing horses and opting for Bernie Sanders, only to ultimately cast his vote for Libertarian candidate Jo Jorgensen, all the while promoting baseless Trumpian lines questioning Bidens mental fitness for the Oval Office given his advanced years.

Since Bidens inauguration, he has continued to dabble, recently advising Michelle Obama to run for the Democratic nomination in 2024, despite the former first ladys stated resistance to seeking political office, and joining Gettr, a new right-wing alternative to Twitter founded by Donald Trumps former campaign manager Jason Miller, seemingly a protest against populist congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greenes exile from mainstream social media.

Anti-fascist podcaster Jim Stewartson has gone so far as to brand Rogan Steve Bannons gimp, getting himself booted off Twitter temporarily for his trouble, but that is surely too reductive and unfair to the man.

Perhaps the hosts own explanation of the impact psychedelic drugs have had on shaping his psyche and singular social outlook is the real key to his character.

You know what you figure out in the middle of a trip? he asked Rolling Stone. That all these assumptions and preconceived notions of who you are, theyre all bulls***. Youre just an organism who is trying to find normalcy by repeating patterns.

Joe Rogan is not interested in even trying to be consistent because he is smart enough to know that allowing ones opinions to become set in stone means an end to personal growth, a death of sorts, and so keeps his mind open at all times, unafraid to take soundings from all quarters, always prepared to be convinced and never shutting himself off from the possibility of new horizons and new ideas, however absurd.

Learn, learn, learn, ladies and gentlemen, he tells his audience. Thats what Im getting out of this. I think its very important to continue to challenge your mind.

Which is more than fine, but perhaps a little more discrimination here and there wouldnt hurt.

Follow this link:
Joe Rogan: How the cage fighting commentator and dirty stand-up comedian became the king of podcasting - The Independent

Posted in Uncategorized

The Celebrities We’ve Lost to NFTs – Gizmodo

Photo: Ronald Martinez (Getty Images)

Paris Hilton is no stranger to trying any sort of business venture, questionable or otherwise. The heiress has at least one failed fashion line, a music career that tanked after producing a single album, and more B-grade acting roles than you can probably count. So it shouldnt be too surprising that when NFTs became the new hot thing in the middle of last year, Hilton jumped on the trend faster than you could say The Simple Life, selling her first collection in April of last year.

If the phrase Paris Hilton NFT Collection doesnt make your head spin, then maybe the names of some of these pieces might; theres Hummingbird In My Metaverse, which is just an image of a pink hummingbird splashed against a pink Lisa Frank-esque background. Theres also Legendary Love, which features a statue of Hiltons iconic dog, Tinkerbell, that died back in 2015, and another named Iconic Crypto Queen, featuring a glossy, robotic recreation of Hilton herself.

While those first two pieces sold out pretty quickly, the Crypto Queen artwork is still being auctioned off, and currently sits at the low, low price of about $2.5 million dollars.

View original post here:
The Celebrities We've Lost to NFTs - Gizmodo

Posted in Uncategorized