Everything you need to know about the Open Metaverse – SecurityBrief New Zealand

Article by CENNZnet CEO, Nicole Upchurch.

Has anyone else had that feeling lately? The troubling creeping sense that the internet is being used against us? It's a disturbing thought.

One of the century's greatest inventions, designed as an open platform for creativity and communication, is now being wielded by a small number of global corporations hungry for your data and your dollars.

It's not a new feeling. Anyone involved in the Web 3.0 movement has always had reservations about the current iteration of the internet. But until very recently, the tools to break the tyrannous hold of the tech giants existed only as whiteboard sketches and passionate discussion.

Enter the age of the Metaverse.

Decentralised, trustless, community-owned and secure, the Metaverse has quickly presented itself as the real solution to realising a better internet.

What is the Metaverse?

The Metaverse is the next evolution of the internet and the digital economy. It's not one thing, but rather, it's many things grounded in two principles:

How is the Metaverse linked to Web 3.0 and blockchain?

Web 3.0, also known as the decentralised web, is a new iteration of the internet based on blockchain technology. It envisions an internet where people control their own data, and exciting creative content is open and available to everyone using a decentralised, community-driven system.

It's becoming increasingly apparent that the Metaverse is the natural UX of Web 3.0. It offers an appealing, gamified and tangible way for people to interact with a decentralised, blockchain-powered internet.

If it's so community-driven, how come Mark Zuckerberg is all over Metaverse?

The Metaverse offers a blend of the newest technologies alongside a much-needed return to community-driven communication, creativity and fun. It is the death knell of big tech's exclusive ownership of value on the internet. So naturally, all of the giants are clamouring desperately to own the Metaverse before the revolution totally undermines them.

Rather than pursuing an open, decentralised Metaverse, big tech is looking to simply expand their own tightly controlled assets, locking everyone into their offering and charging what they like for it.

What is the 'Open Metaverse'?

With big tech already crawling all over the concept of the Metaverse, the communities actually pursuing an open-source movement have had to define their niche. The open Metaverse (or the true Metaverse) is the genuine article, not to be confused with organisations like Meta who are simply making a walled garden extension of Facebook.

What's a blockchain bridge, and why are they important to Metaverse?

A blockchain bridge, often known as a token bridge, is a connection that allows the transfer of tokens and/or arbitrary data from one blockchain to another. What this means in practice is that two or more blockchains with different core protocols can interact with each other and interoperate securely and quickly. The bridges rely on one chain proving ownership of a token (or numerous tokens). They then relay this information to other connected blockchains, which can then be used to perform actions on another chain.

This is groundbreaking for Web3. It is the realisation of a technology that will allow a network of connected blockchains, each offering its own strength or speciality and all working together in a secure, decentralised state. Essentially it enables an internet that doesn't require the ownership of centralised servers that are controlled by a single person or entity. Instead, data is stored on a network of decentralised blockchains which are anonymous, secure and community-driven.

Bridging technology allows the open-Metaverse true scope. Metaverse content can now exist across multiple blockchains, utilising features from each to give their communities excellent experiences and the ultimate decentralised freedom. For example, chains with low gas fees act as a Layer 2 solution on top of bigger chains to increase scalability and efficiency.

How is CENNZnet helping to drive the Metaverse?

In case you can't tell, we are stoked about the development of the Metaverse and Web 3.0. Our focus has always been about enabling easy onboarding of users to web3 technology. CENNZnet has been optimised to allow developers to build user-friendly applications that can merge the user experience boundaries and enable people to own their content, identity and data.

View original post here:

Everything you need to know about the Open Metaverse - SecurityBrief New Zealand

Introducing the Wind River Linux Binary Distribution – Wind River

By Jay Kruemcke

Wind River is proud to announce a new member of the commercially supported Wind River Linux family, Wind River Linux Distro. Distro is a binary Linux distribution created from our source codebased Linux product.

Wind River, the leader in the IoT and embedded operating systems, has long provided customers with the ability to create their own purpose-built Linux operating system from source. Wind River starts with the Yocto Project and adds a significant amount of integration with semiconductor vendor SDKs to provide a commercially supportable Linux distribution builder for intelligent edge solution developers.

Wind River Linux is used in tens of thousands of telecommunications, industrial, aerospace and defense, and automotive embedded solutions, but we realized that not all customers need the flexibility of building a Linux operating system from source code.

Introducing the Wind River Binary Distribution

Distro is intended for intelligent edge solution developers who want to leverage the tremendous investment in embedded device hardware and open source software made by Wind River but want to avoid the time and effort of building Linux from source.

Distro provides multiple approaches for solution developers to create a purpose-built Linux OS from binary images. These approaches include micro-start self-deploying images, Linux Assembly Tool (LAT), dnf package feeds, a container base image on Docker Hub, and a software development kit (SDK).

Because bug fixes and security updates are important for security and stability, Distro provides OSTree updates that can be used to deliver fixes or even upgrade images to a new release. Solution developers can create their own images, containers, packages and package feeds, and even their own OSTree update feeds.

Hardware Support

One of the key advantages of using Wind River Linux has always been the support available for a wide variety of hardware platforms. Wind River takes the SDKs from semiconductor vendors and integrates them into the Wind River Linux Yocto Project source base. Unlike some other binary distributions, Distro is not limited to just upstream Linux hardware enablement, and we regularly update our hardware support from the latest semiconductor vendor SDK.

The Wind River Linux binary distribution has been available for several X86 and Arm hardware platforms as a free and unsupported download since 2021. With the launch of Wind River Linux LTS21 last year, we have made thousands of image downloads available.

With this announcement, we are now offering commercial support for some of the Distro hardware platforms.

Like the Wind River Linux source-based product, Distro does not require any paid subscriptions or royalties on deployed systems. Distro is sold on a per-project basis.

We will add commercial support for additional hardware platforms based on customer demand.

Choosing the Right Wind River Linux

Generally, the Wind River Linux source-based product provides the ultimate amount of flexibility and reproducibility and is particularly well suited to intelligent edge solution developers who require complex customization of Linux, including the kernel.

In contrast, Distro is the best choice for rapid prototyping and deployment when there is limited need for Linux kernel customization, and it generally requires significantly fewer resources than does our Yocto Projectbased source product.

Try It Out at No Cost

Anyone can try Distro for free. Go to https://www.windriver.com/products/linux/download, and after you register and choose your hardware platform, you will receive a link to the images and SDK.

The quick-start guide Distro Developers Guide can help you learn to use Distro tools such as the Linux Assembly Tool (LAT) and build your embedded solution on top of Distro.

Summary

Wind River Linux Distro is a true binary distribution of Linux that solution developers can use to quickly provide a Linux OS foundation for their intelligent edge solution. Solution developers can try out the free version of Distro knowing that commercial support is available when they deploy their solution.

Continue reading here:

Introducing the Wind River Linux Binary Distribution - Wind River

Meta Tries to Break the End-to-End Encryption Deadlock – WIRED

After years of tech companies and police fumbling and clashing over end-to-end encryption, Meta this week brandished a new tool in its arsenal that may help the social media giant resist government pressure to change course or weaken its plan to implement end-to-end encryption across its private communication services.

On Monday, Meta published a report about the human rights impacts of end-to-end encryption produced by Business for Social Responsibility, a nonprofit focused on corporate impacts. Meta, which commissioned the independent BSR report, also published its response. In a study that took more than two years to complete, BSR found that end-to-end encryption is overwhelmingly positive and crucial for protecting human rights, but it also delved into the criminal activity and violent extremism that can find safe haven on end-to-end encrypted platforms. Crucially, the report also offers recommendations for how to potentially mitigate these negative impacts.

Since 2019, Meta has said that it will eventually bring end-to-end encryption to all of its messaging platforms. The security measure, designed to box services out of accessing their users' communications, has already long been deployed on the Meta-owned platform WhatsApp, but the initiative would bring the protection to Facebook Messenger and Instagram Direct Messenger as well. Meta has said that its delay in fully deploying end-to-end encryption on these other services largely has to do with technical challenges and interoperability issues, but the company has also faced criticism about the plan from the United States government and other countries around the world over concerns that adding the feature would make it more difficult for the company and law enforcement to counter a range of threats, like child abuse and distribution of child sexual abuse material, coordinated disinformation campaigns, viral hate speech, terrorism, and violent extremism. The US government, and the FBI specifically, has long argued that comprehensive encryption that protects user data equally protects suspects from criminal investigations, thus endangering the public and national security.

I am glad to see BSRs report affirm the crucial role that encryption plays in protecting human rights, says Riana Pfefferkorn, a research scholar at the Stanford Internet Observatory who was not involved in the study. While its true that undesirable conduct occurs in encrypted contexts, most people arent criminals, whereas everyone needs privacy and security. Weakening encryption is not the answer.

The question for Meta and privacy advocates around the world has been how to develop mechanisms for stopping digital abuse before it starts, flagging potentially suspicious behavior without gaining access to users' actual communications, and creating mechanisms that allow users to effectively report potentially abusive behavior. Even very recent efforts to strike a balance have been met with intense criticism by privacy and encryption advocates.

For example, Apple announced plans in August to debut a feature that would scan user's data locally on their devices for child sexual abuse material. That way, the reasoning went, Apple wouldn't need to access the data directly or compile it in the cloud to check for abusive material. Researchers raised a host of concerns, though, about the potential for such a mechanism to be manipulated and abused and the risk that it wouldn't even accomplish its goal if the system produced a slew of false positives and false negatives. Within a month, Apple backed down, saying it needed time to reassess the scheme.

Here is the original post:
Meta Tries to Break the End-to-End Encryption Deadlock - WIRED

WhatsApp gets ready to remind everyone why end-to-end encryption matters – iMore

Source: Harish Jonnalagadda / iMore

WhatsApp is readying an update that will remind people why end-to-end encryption is so important to them, according to a new report. A new screen will show what end-to-end encryption means and what benefits it offers.

The new WhatsApp screen is now being tested in beta form and was first spotted by beta watchers WABetaInfo. The page will appear when people tap another new addition the end-to-end encryption indicators that we reported on recently.

As you can see in this attached screenshot, a new security page shows up that gives some information about end-to-end encryption. The new page informs the user that text and voice messages, audio and video calls (including group calls), media, location sharing, and status updates are secured by end-to-end encryption, so your conversations are always private.

End-to-end encryption ensures that all communications are private, something that is vital to WhatsApp users and one of the reasons it's one of the best iPhone apps for private communications although there are plenty of WhatsApp alternatives available in the App Store.

This latest change is currently available to those on the WhatsApp TestFlight beta although it is surely only a matter of time before it is rolled out to everyone. WhatsApp continues to tweak its app via those beta releases before making the updates available via the App Store for all users. The Meta-owned instant messaging service is also testing a change that will add an ETA to file transfers, too.

Excerpt from:
WhatsApp gets ready to remind everyone why end-to-end encryption matters - iMore

The high price of free Wi-Fi: Here’s why you never connect to an insecure network – ZDNet

Later that day odd things begin to happen. Your phone isn't working exactly as expected and you start receiving a deluge of what appears like harmless spam.

Let me set the scene for you: You're on the go and you need to stop and get a coffee. You enter the coffee shop and the aroma is the first thing to entice you. Next, you see all the lovely people sitting around making deals, writing the great American novel, chatting, and just generally enjoying themselves. You then notice a sign that states, "Free Wi-Fi."

Score!

You pull out your phone, open the network connection app and notice the wireless connection doesn't have a password.

Even better.

You connect to the wireless network and order your quad long shot grande in a venti cup half caff double cupped no sleeve salted caramel mocha latte with 2 pumps of vanilla substitute 2 pumps of white chocolate mocha for mocha and substitute 2 pumps of hazelnut for toffee nut half whole milk and half breve with no whipped cream extra hot extra foam extra caramel drizzle extra salt add a scoop of vanilla bean powder with light ice well stirred.

While the barista brews your ridiculously complicated order, you sit down and start using all that free Wi-Fi. You send email, you communicate to team members on Slack, send SMS messages to friends and family, check-in on Facebook, and tweet the single most profound statement Twitter has ever beheld.

Life is good.

You get your drink and continue on as though nothing can touch you.

Eventually, you leave and think nothing of your experience (other than how delicious the coffee was and how on point your Twitter game is).

Later that day (or maybe the next day) odd things begin to happen. Your phone isn't working exactly as expected and you start receiving a deluge of what appears like harmless spam.

Okay, fineall in a day's existence, right?

But then you get a warning from your bank.

And you start seeing reactions to things you didn't post or send.

You check in on your bank account to find your balance is at zero.

Panic sets in.

What happened? You've always been so careful with your bank account credentials and you never share that kind of information with anyone.

This can't be real, can it?

It can and it most likely all started with you connecting to a simple password-less wireless network.

The truth is, you are not safe. Your information isn't safe, your identity isn't safe, your mobile devices aren't safe. Because of this, you have to take every precaution you can, which means never (ever, ever) connecting to an insecure network.

The simple truth is when you connect to insecure Wi-Fi, you open your device to anyone who is also connected to that same wireless network. But why is that so bad? So what if other people can see my device on the network?

Let me put this in simplest terms.

Not every application you use on your mobile device encrypts your data. That means you could be submitting usernames, passwords, and even text messages in plain text. What does that mean? Simple: When you use an app that works with encryption, any data you send or receive is encrypted in such a way that it's very difficult to read. So instead of sending the plain text "password" (which you should never use), it'll send something like this instead:

That, my friends, is encryption. And unless your applications are all using it, you're sending plain text over a network that anyone can access. Once connected, a bad actor could use a sniffer to intercept your plain-text data packets and read them. And the tools used to capture those packages are readily available to anyone.

You might think this is just a warning that can be ignored at will. To that point, you would be right. This is a warning but it's one you should heed. When you connect to insecure wireless networks, it's only a matter of time before someone intercepts your data and you fall prey to any number of nefarious doings.

The best mobile VPNs

Here's how to find an effective Virtual Private Network service for both iOS-powered iPhones and Android smartphones.

Read More

Here are the reasons why you should never connect to an insecure wireless network:

That's really the only bullet point you need. And although I'd like to sugar-coat this for you, the truth of the matter is the longer you ignore this advice, the more at risk you are.

You might find yourself in a situation where you absolutely must connect to an insecure wireless network (maybe you're out of data and have work to do). When you find yourself in such a situation, consider the possible options:

Let's break the above done. The absolute best path you can take is to invest in an unlimited data plan. Why? With an unlimited plan, you will never have a need to connect to an insecure wireless network (especially given how fast 5G speeds are). If, however, that's not an option, I would highly suggest, at a minimum, you use a VPN every time you connect to an insecure network, work with a more secure browser and enable end-2-end encryption on your SMS apps. As you can see, other than only using your data plan, there's no 1-step solution for this problem. And even when using your carrier data, you could up your security game by following the above advice.

The same thing holds true when using a laptop and is especially true when using a Windows-based laptop. If the location you're working in only offers an insecure network, your best bet is to tether your laptop to your mobile device and use the phone's data plan for connectivity.

I know the inclination is to roll your eyes at such warnings, but this is one you should take seriously. Do not connect to insecure wireless networks. Period. End. Of. Story. If you value your privacy and the security of your data, you will follow this advice to the letter.

Follow this link:
The high price of free Wi-Fi: Here's why you never connect to an insecure network - ZDNet

Microsoft Teams gets better search, and an encrypted ‘lockbox’ to protect your data – ZDNet

Microsoft has rolled out improved search features to Teams and a new customer "lockbox" that lets users control who has access to content.

The roughly 270 million people who frequently use Teams should notice a difference in the results when they search for things. There should be less clutter, better context in summary results, and more filters to choose from to find files, content and people across Microsoft's services, from OneDrive to Word.

Search isn't what Microsoft's is famous for, but the company has been trying to improve it in Windows 11 as forges the operating system into a more consumer-friendly product. It's also trying to make feature-heavy Teams more palatable for consumers though Windows 11 Teams chat integrations.

This month Microsoft also rolled out a new customer "lockbox" for Teams that lets users control when others can access their content to do things on the platform. Microsoft has has the lockbox concept for Office 365 customers for several years, which helps customers ensure that even Microsoft support engineers can't access the content of customers' communications on Microsoft services.

A Microsoft support page for Customer Lockbox says it supports others' requests to access data a user's in Exchange Online, SharePoint Online, OneDrive for Business, and Teams. The recently updated page suggests Microsoft has implemented end-to-end encryption (E2EE) for these services. Microsoft in December rolled out E2EE for customers on one-to-one Teams calls.

"Customer Lockbox ensures that Microsoft can't access your content to do service operations without your explicit approval. Customer Lockbox brings you into the approval workflow process that Microsoft uses to ensure only authorized requests allow access to your content," Microsoft states.

The lockbox covers content in email, Sharepoint, Skype for Business, instant messages and voice conversations, all text in Teams including person-to-person chats, group chats, shared channels, private channels, and meeting chats, videos, apps and bot data in Teams chats and channels, Teams activity feeds, SQL container data, and customer generated content.

On the list of Microsoft Teams updates throughout March, Microsoft also highlights that Teams meetings also gained a feature that helps organizers automatically send invites to meetings via calendars, as well as domain customization, and the ability for for users to see scheduled meetings on the Teams iOS and Android app.

iPhone users can now answer incoming meeting nudges or invites when their video is on. It's useful for the healthcare workers who may need to attend a virtual meeting, according to Microsoft.

Live captions are available for Teams users on Azure Virtual Desktop and Windows 365 on virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) .

Storage pain for admins from Teams meetings is also getting attention thanks to Microsoft's new automatic expiration policy .

Admins can disable auto-expiration but it is on by default. All new recordings automatically expire 60 days after they are recorded if no action is taken, Microsoft previously explained.

Read the original post:
Microsoft Teams gets better search, and an encrypted 'lockbox' to protect your data - ZDNet

Edward Snowden – Wikipedia

American whistleblower and former National Security Agency contractor

Edward Joseph Snowden (born June 21, 1983) is an American former computer intelligence consultant who leaked highly classified information from the National Security Agency (NSA) in 2013, when he was an employee and subcontractor. His disclosures revealed numerous global surveillance programs, many run by the NSA and the Five Eyes Intelligence Alliance with the cooperation of telecommunication companies and European governments, and prompted a cultural discussion about national security and individual privacy.

In 2013, Snowden was hired by an NSA contractor, Booz Allen Hamilton, after previous employment with Dell and the CIA.[1] Snowden says he gradually became disillusioned with the programs with which he was involved, and that he tried to raise his ethical concerns through internal channels but was ignored. On May 20, 2013, Snowden flew to Hong Kong after leaving his job at an NSA facility in Hawaii, and in early June he revealed thousands of classified NSA documents to journalists Glenn Greenwald, Laura Poitras, Barton Gellman, and Ewen MacAskill. Snowden came to international attention after stories based on the material appeared in The Guardian, The Washington Post, and other publications. Snowden also made extensive allegations against the GCSB, blowing the whistle of their domestic surveillance of New Zealanders and acts of espionage under John Key's government.[2][3]

On June 21, 2013, the United States Department of Justice unsealed charges against Snowden of two counts of violating the Espionage Act of 1917 and theft of government property,[4] following which the Department of State revoked his passport.[5] Two days later, he flew into Moscow's Sheremetyevo International Airport, where Russian authorities observed the canceled passport, and he was restricted to the airport terminal for over one month. Russia later granted Snowden the right of asylum with an initial visa for residence for one year, which was subsequently repeatedly extended. In October 2020, he was granted permanent residency in Russia.[6]

A subject of controversy, Snowden has been variously called a traitor,[7] a hero,[8] a whistleblower,[9] a dissident,[10] a coward,[11] and a patriot.[12] U.S. officials condemned his actions as having done "grave damage" to the U.S. intelligence capabilities.[13] Snowden has defended his leaks as an effort "to inform the public as to that which is done in their name and that which is done against them."[14] His disclosures have fueled debates over mass surveillance, government secrecy, and the balance between national security and information privacy, something that he has said he intended to do in retrospective interviews.[15]

In early 2016, Snowden became the president of the Freedom of the Press Foundation, a San Franciscobased nonprofit organization that aims to protect journalists from hacking and government surveillance.[16] He also has a job at an unnamed Russian IT company.[17] In 2017, he married Lindsay Mills. On September 17, 2019, his memoir Permanent Record was published.[18] On September 2, 2020, a U.S. federal court ruled in United States v. Moalin that the U.S. intelligence's mass surveillance program exposed by Snowden was illegal and possibly unconstitutional.[19]

Edward Joseph Snowden was born on June 21, 1983,[20] in Elizabeth City, North Carolina.[21] His maternal grandfather, Edward J. Barrett,[22][23] a rear admiral in the U.S. Coast Guard, became a senior official with the FBI and was at the Pentagon in 2001 during the September 11 attacks.[24] Snowden's father, Lonnie, was a warrant officer in the Coast Guard,[25] and his mother, Elizabeth, is a clerk at the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland.[26][27][28][29][30] His older sister, Jessica, was a lawyer at the Federal Judicial Center in Washington, D.C. Edward Snowden said that he had expected to work for the federal government, as had the rest of his family.[31] His parents divorced in 2001,[32] and his father remarried.[33] Snowden scored above 145 on two separate IQ tests.[31]

In the early 1990s, while still in grade school, Snowden moved with his family to the area of Fort Meade, Maryland.[34] Mononucleosis caused him to miss high school for almost nine months.[31] Rather than returning to school, he passed the GED test[14] and took classes at Anne Arundel Community College.[28] Although Snowden had no undergraduate college degree,[35] he worked online toward a master's degree at the University of Liverpool, England, in 2011.[36] He was interested in Japanese popular culture, had studied the Japanese language,[37] and worked for an anime company that had a resident office in the U.S.[38][39] He also said he had a basic understanding of Mandarin Chinese and was deeply interested in martial arts. At age 20, he listed Buddhism as his religion on a military recruitment form, noting that the choice of agnostic was "strangely absent."[40] In September 2019, as part of interviews relating to the release of his memoir Permanent Record, Snowden revealed to The Guardian that he married Lindsay Mills in a courthouse in Moscow.[18] The couple have a son born in December 2020.[41]

Feeling a duty to fight in the Iraq War to help free oppressed people,[14] Snowden enlisted in the United States Army on May 7, 2004, and became a Special Forces candidate through its 18X enlistment option.[42] He did not complete the training[20] due to bilateral tibial stress fractures,[43][44] and was discharged on September 28, 2004.[45]

Snowden was then employed for less than a year in 2005 as a security guard at the University of Maryland's Center for Advanced Study of Language, a research center sponsored by the National Security Agency (NSA).[46] According to the University, this is not a classified facility,[47] though it is heavily guarded.[48] In June 2014, Snowden told Wired that his job as a security guard required a high-level security clearance, for which he passed a polygraph exam and underwent a stringent background investigation.[31]

After attending a 2006 job-fair focused on intelligence agencies, Snowden accepted an offer for a position at the CIA.[31][49] The Agency assigned him to the global communications division at CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia.[31]

In May 2006, Snowden wrote in Ars Technica that he had no trouble getting work because he was a "computer wizard".[40] After distinguishing himself as a junior employee on the top computer team, Snowden was sent to the CIA's secret school for technology specialists, where he lived in a hotel for six months while studying and training full-time.[31]

In March 2007, the CIA stationed Snowden with diplomatic cover in Geneva, Switzerland, where he was responsible for maintaining computer-network security.[31][50] Assigned to the U.S. Permanent Mission to the United Nations, a diplomatic mission representing U.S. interests before the UN and other international organizations, Snowden received a diplomatic passport and a four-bedroom apartment near Lake Geneva.[31] According to Greenwald, while there Snowden was "considered the top technical and cybersecurity expert" in that country and "was hand-picked by the CIA to support the president at the 2008 NATO summit in Romania".[51] Snowden described his CIA experience in Geneva as formative, stating that the CIA deliberately got a Swiss banker drunk and encouraged him to drive home. Snowden said that when the latter was arrested for drunk driving, a CIA operative offered to help in exchange for the banker becoming an informant.[52] Ueli Maurer, President of the Swiss Confederation for the year 2013, publicly disputed Snowden's claims in June of that year. "This would mean that the CIA successfully bribed the Geneva police and judiciary. With all due respect, I just can't imagine it," said Maurer.[53] In February 2009, Snowden resigned from the CIA.[54]

In 2009, Snowden began work as a contractee for Dell,[55] which manages computer systems for multiple government agencies. Assigned to an NSA facility at Yokota Air Base near Tokyo, Snowden instructed top officials and military officers on how to defend their networks from Chinese hackers.[31] Snowden looked into mass surveillance in China which prompted him to investigate and then expose Washington's mass surveillance program after he was asked in 2009 to brief a conference in Tokyo.[56] During his four years with Dell, he rose from supervising NSA computer system upgrades to working as what his rsum termed a "cyber strategist" and an "expert in cyber counterintelligence" at several U.S. locations.[57] In 2010, he had a brief stint in New Delhi, India where he enrolled himself in a local IT institute to learn core Java programming and advanced ethical hacking.[58] In 2011, he returned to Maryland, where he spent a year as lead technologist on Dell's CIA account. In that capacity, he was consulted by the chiefs of the CIA's technical branches, including the agency's chief information officer and its chief technology officer.[31] U.S. officials and other sources familiar with the investigation said Snowden began downloading documents describing the government's electronic spying programs while working for Dell in April 2012.[55] Investigators estimated that of the 50,000 to 200,000 documents Snowden gave to Greenwald and Poitras, most were copied by Snowden while working at Dell.[1]

In March 2012, Dell reassigned Snowden to Hawaii as lead technologist for the NSA's information-sharing office.[31]

On March 15, 2013 three days after what he later called his "breaking point" of "seeing the Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, directly lie under oath to Congress"[59] Snowden quit his job at Dell.[60] Although he has said his career high annual salary was $200,000,[61] Snowden said he took a pay cut to work at consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton,[61] where he sought employment in order to gather data and then release details of the NSA's worldwide surveillance activity.[62]

At the time of his departure from the U.S. in May 2013, he had been employed for 15 months inside the NSA's Hawaii regional operations center, which focuses on the electronic monitoring of China and North Korea,[1] first for Dell and then for two months with Booz Allen Hamilton.[63] While intelligence officials have described his position there as a system administrator, Snowden has said he was an infrastructure analyst, which meant that his job was to look for new ways to break into Internet and telephone traffic around the world.[64] An anonymous source told Reuters that, while in Hawaii, Snowden may have persuaded 2025 co-workers to give him their login credentials by telling them he needed them to do his job.[65] The NSA sent a memo to Congress saying that Snowden had tricked a fellow employee into sharing his personal private key to gain greater access to the NSA's computer system.[66][67] Snowden disputed the memo,[68] saying in January 2014, "I never stole any passwords, nor did I trick an army of co-workers."[69][70] Booz Allen terminated Snowden's employment on June 10, 2013, the day after he went public with his story, and 3 weeks after he had left Hawaii on a leave of absence.[71]

A former NSA co-worker[72] said that although the NSA was full of smart people, Snowden was a "genius among geniuses" who created a widely implemented backup system for the NSA and often pointed out security flaws to the agency. The former colleague said Snowden was given full administrator privileges with virtually unlimited access to NSA data. Snowden was offered a position on the NSA's elite team of hackers, Tailored Access Operations, but turned it down to join Booz Allen.[68] An anonymous source later said that Booz Allen's hiring screeners found possible discrepancies in Snowden's resume but still decided to hire him.[35] Snowden's rsum stated that he attended computer-related classes at Johns Hopkins University. A spokeswoman for Johns Hopkins said that the university did not find records to show that Snowden attended the university, and suggested that he may instead have attended Advanced Career Technologies, a private for-profit organization that operated as the Computer Career Institute at Johns Hopkins University.[35] The University of Maryland University College acknowledged that Snowden had attended a summer session at a UM campus in Asia. Snowden's rsum stated that he estimated he would receive a University of Liverpool computer security master's degree in 2013. The university said that Snowden registered for an online master's degree program in computer security in 2011 but was inactive as a student and had not completed the program.[35]

In his May 2014 interview with NBC News, Snowden accused the U.S. government of trying to use one position here or there in his career to distract from the totality of his experience, downplaying him as a "low-level analyst." In his words, he was "trained as a spy in the traditional sense of the word in that I lived and worked undercover overseaspretending to work in a job that I'm notand even being assigned a name that was not mine." He said he'd worked for the NSA undercover overseas, and for the DIA had developed sources and methods to keep information and people secure "in the most hostile and dangerous environments around the world. So when they say I'm a low-level systems administrator, that I don't know what I'm talking about, I'd say it's somewhat misleading."[24] In a June interview with Globo TV, Snowden reiterated that he "was actually functioning at a very senior level."[73] In a July interview with The Guardian, Snowden explained that, during his NSA career, "I began to move from merely overseeing these systems to actively directing their use. Many people don't understand that I was actually an analyst and I designated individuals and groups for targeting."[74] Snowden subsequently told Wired that while at Dell in 2011, "I would sit down with the CIO of the CIA, the CTO of the CIA, the chiefs of all the technical branches. They would tell me their hardest technology problems, and it was my job to come up with a way to fix them."[31]

During his time as an NSA analyst, directing the work of others, Snowden recalled a moment when he and his colleagues began to have severe ethical doubts. Snowden said 18 to 22-year-old analysts were suddenly

"thrust into a position of extraordinary responsibility, where they now have access to all your private records. In the course of their daily work, they stumble across something that is completely unrelated in any sort of necessary sensefor example, an intimate nude photo of someone in a sexually compromising situation. But they're extremely attractive. So what do they do? They turn around in their chair and they show a co-worker ... and sooner or later this person's whole life has been seen by all of these other people."

Snowden observed that this behavior happened routinely every two months but was never reported, being considered one of the "fringe benefits" of the work.[75]

Snowden has described himself as a whistleblower,[76] a description used by many sources, including CNBC,[77] The New Yorker,[78] Reuters,[79] and The Guardian,[80] among others.[81][82][83] The term has both informal and legal meanings.

Snowden said that he had told multiple employees and two supervisors about his concerns, but the NSA disputes his claim.[84] Snowden elaborated in January 2014, saying "[I] made tremendous efforts to report these programs to co-workers, supervisors, and anyone with the proper clearance who would listen. The reactions of those I told about the scale of the constitutional violations ranged from deeply concerned to appalled, but no one was willing to risk their jobs, families, and possibly even freedom to go to [sic] through what [Thomas Andrews] Drake did."[70][85] In March 2014, during testimony to the European Parliament, Snowden wrote that before revealing classified information he had reported "clearly problematic programs" to ten officials, who he said did nothing in response.[86] In a May 2014 interview, Snowden told NBC News that after bringing his concerns about the legality of the NSA spying programs to officials, he was told to stay silent on the matter. He said that the NSA had copies of emails he sent to their Office of General Counsel, oversight, and compliance personnel broaching "concerns about the NSA's interpretations of its legal authorities. I had raised these complaints not just officially in writing through email, but to my supervisors, to my colleagues, in more than one office."[24]

In May 2014, U.S. officials released a single email that Snowden had written in April 2013 inquiring about legal authorities but said that they had found no other evidence that Snowden had expressed his concerns to someone in an oversight position.[87] In June 2014, the NSA said it had not been able to find any records of Snowden raising internal complaints about the agency's operations.[88] That same month, Snowden explained that he has not produced the communiqus in question because of the ongoing nature of the dispute, disclosing for the first time that "I am working with the NSA in regard to these records and we're going back and forth, so I don't want to reveal everything that will come out."[89]

Self-description as a whistleblower and attribution as such in news reports does not determine whether he qualifies as a whistleblower within the meaning of the Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989 (5 USC 2303(b)(8)-(9); Pub. Law 101-12). However, Snowden's potential status as a Whistleblower under the 1989 Act is not directly addressed in the criminal complaint against him in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (see below) (Case No. 1:13 CR 265 (0MH)). These and similar and related issues are discussed in an essay by David Pozen, in a chapter of the book Whistleblowing Nation, published in March 2020,[90] an adaptation of which[91] also appeared on Lawfare Blog in March 2019.[92]The unclassified portion of a September 15, 2016, report by the United States House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), initiated by the chairman and Ranking Member in August 2014, and posted on the website of the Federation of American Scientists, concluded that Snowden was not a whistleblower in the sense required by the Whistleblower Protection Act.[93] The bulk of the report is classified.

The exact size of Snowden's disclosure is unknown,[94] but Australian officials have estimated 15,000 or more Australian intelligence files[95] and British officials estimate at least 58,000 British intelligence files were included.[96] NSA Director Keith Alexander initially estimated that Snowden had copied anywhere from 50,000 to 200,000 NSA documents.[97] Later estimates provided by U.S. officials were in the order of 1.7 million,[98] a number that originally came from Department of Defense talking points.[99] In July 2014, The Washington Post reported on a cache previously provided by Snowden from domestic NSA operations consisting of "roughly 160,000 intercepted e-mail and instant-message conversations, some of them hundreds of pages long, and 7,900 documents taken from more than 11,000 online accounts."[100] A U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency report declassified in June 2015 said that Snowden took 900,000 Department of Defense files, more than he downloaded from the NSA.[99]

In March 2014, Army General Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told the House Armed Services Committee, "The vast majority of the documents that Snowden ... exfiltrated from our highest levels of security ... had nothing to do with exposing government oversight of domestic activities. The vast majority of those were related to our military capabilities, operations, tactics, techniques, and procedures."[101] When asked in a May 2014 interview to quantify the number of documents Snowden stole, retired NSA director Keith Alexander said there was no accurate way of counting what he took, but Snowden may have downloaded more than a million documents.[102]The September 15, 2016, HPSCI report[93] estimated the number of downloaded documents at 1.5 million.

In a 2013 Associated Press interview, Glenn Greenwald stated:

"In order to take documents with him that proved that what he was saying was true he had to take ones that included very sensitive, detailed blueprints of how the NSA does what they do."[103]

Thus the Snowden documents allegedly contained sensitive NSA blueprints detailing how the NSA operates, and which would allow someone who read them to evade or even duplicate NSA surveillance. Further, a July 20, 2015 New York Times article[104] reported that the terror group Islamic State (ISIS or ISIL) had studied revelations from Snowden, about how the United States gathered information on militants, the main result is that the group's top leaders used couriers or encrypted channels to avoid being tracked or monitoring of their communications by Western analysts.

According to Snowden, he did not indiscriminately turn over documents to journalists, stating that "I carefully evaluated every single document I disclosed to ensure that each was legitimately in the public interest. There are all sorts of documents that would have made a big impact that I didn't turn over"[14] and that "I have to screen everything before releasing it to journalists ... If I have time to go through this information, I would like to make it available to journalists in each country."[62] Despite these measures, the improper redaction of a document by The New York Times resulted in the exposure of intelligence activity against al-Qaeda.[105]

In June 2014, the NSA's recently installed director, U.S. Navy Admiral Michael S. Rogers, said that while some terrorist groups had altered their communications to avoid surveillance techniques revealed by Snowden, the damage done was not significant enough to conclude that "the sky is falling."[106] Nevertheless, in February 2015, Rogers said that Snowden's disclosures had a material impact on the NSA's detection and evaluation of terrorist activities worldwide.[107]

On June 14, 2015, the London Sunday Times reported that Russian and Chinese intelligence services had decrypted more than 1 million classified files in the Snowden cache, forcing the UK's MI6 intelligence agency to move agents out of live operations in hostile countries. Sir David Omand, a former director of the UK's GCHQ intelligence gathering agency, described it as a huge strategic setback that was harming Britain, America, and their NATO allies. The Sunday Times said it was not clear whether Russia and China stole Snowden's data or whether Snowden voluntarily handed it over to remain at liberty in Hong Kong and Moscow.[108][109] In April 2015, the Henry Jackson Society, a British neoconservative think tank, published a report claiming that Snowden's intelligence leaks negatively impacted Britain's ability to fight terrorism and organized crime.[110] Gus Hosein, executive director of Privacy International, criticized the report for, in his opinion, presuming that the public became concerned about privacy only after Snowden's disclosures.[111]

Snowden's decision to leak NSA documents developed gradually following his March 2007 posting as a technician to the Geneva CIA station.[112] Snowden later made contact with Glenn Greenwald, a journalist working at The Guardian.[113] He contacted Greenwald anonymously as "Cincinnatus"[114][115] and said he had sensitive documents that he would like to share.[116] Greenwald found the measures that the source asked him to take to secure their communications, such as encrypting email, too annoying to employ. Snowden then contacted documentary filmmaker Laura Poitras in January 2013.[117] According to Poitras, Snowden chose to contact her after seeing her New York Times article about NSA whistleblower William Binney.[118] What originally attracted Snowden to both Greenwald and Poitras was a Salon article written by Greenwald detailing how Poitras's controversial films had made her a target of the government.[116]

Greenwald began working with Snowden in either February[119] or April 2013, after Poitras asked Greenwald to meet her in New York City, at which point Snowden began providing documents to them.[113] Barton Gellman, writing for The Washington Post, says his first direct contact was on May 16, 2013.[120] According to Gellman, Snowden approached Greenwald after the Post declined to guarantee publication within 72 hours of all 41 PowerPoint slides that Snowden had leaked exposing the PRISM electronic data mining program, and to publish online an encrypted code allowing Snowden to later prove that he was the source.[120]

Snowden communicated using encrypted email,[117] and going by the codename "Verax". He asked not to be quoted at length for fear of identification by stylometry.[120]

According to Gellman, before their first meeting in person, Snowden wrote, "I understand that I will be made to suffer for my actions and that the return of this information to the public marks my end."[120] Snowden also told Gellman that until the articles were published, the journalists working with him would also be at mortal risk from the United States Intelligence Community "if they think you are the single point of failure that could stop this disclosure and make them the sole owner of this information."[120]

In May 2013, Snowden was permitted temporary leave from his position at the NSA in Hawaii, on the pretext of receiving treatment for his epilepsy.[14] In mid-May, Snowden gave an electronic interview to Poitras and Jacob Appelbaum which was published weeks later by Der Spiegel.[121]

After disclosing the copied documents, Snowden promised that nothing would stop subsequent disclosures. In June 2013, he said, "All I can say right now is the US government is not going to be able to cover this up by jailing or murdering me. Truth is coming, and it cannot be stopped."[122]

On May 20, 2013, Snowden flew to Hong Kong,[123] where he was staying when the initial articles based on the leaked documents were published,[124] beginning with The Guardian on June 5.[125] Greenwald later said Snowden disclosed 9,000 to 10,000 documents.[126]

Within months, documents had been obtained and published by media outlets worldwide, most notably The Guardian (Britain), Der Spiegel (Germany), The Washington Post and The New York Times (U.S.), O Globo (Brazil), Le Monde (France), and similar outlets in Sweden, Canada, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Spain, and Australia.[127] In 2014, NBC broke its first story based on the leaked documents.[128] In February 2014, for reporting based on Snowden's leaks, journalists Glenn Greenwald, Laura Poitras, Barton Gellman and The Guardians Ewen MacAskill were honored as co-recipients of the 2013 George Polk Award, which they dedicated to Snowden.[129] The NSA reporting by these journalists also earned The Guardian and The Washington Post the 2014 Pulitzer Prize for Public Service[130] for exposing the "widespread surveillance" and for helping to spark a "huge public debate about the extent of the government's spying". The Guardian's chief editor, Alan Rusbridger, credited Snowden for having performed a public service.[131]

The ongoing publication of leaked documents has revealed previously unknown details of a global surveillance apparatus run by the United States' NSA[134] in close cooperation with three of its four Five Eyes partners: Australia's ASD,[135] the UK's GCHQ,[136] and Canada's CSEC.[137]

On June 5, 2013, media reports documenting the existence and functions of classified surveillance programs and their scope began and continued throughout the entire year. The first program to be revealed was PRISM, which allows for court-approved direct access to Americans' Google and Yahoo accounts, reported from both The Washington Post and The Guardian published one hour apart.[132][138][139] Barton Gellman of The Washington Post was the first journalist to report on Snowden's documents. He said the U.S. government urged him not to specify by name which companies were involved, but Gellman decided that to name them "would make it real to Americans."[140] Reports also revealed details of Tempora, a British black-ops surveillance program run by the NSA's British partner, GCHQ.[138][141] The initial reports included details about NSA call database, Boundless Informant, and of a secret court order requiring Verizon to hand the NSA millions of Americans' phone records daily,[142] the surveillance of French citizens' phone and Internet records, and those of "high-profile individuals from the world of business or politics."[143][144][145] XKeyscore, an analytical tool that allows for collection of "almost anything done on the internet," was described by The Guardian as a program that shed light on one of Snowden's most controversial statements: "I, sitting at my desk [could] wiretap anyone, from you or your accountant, to a federal judge or even the president, if I had a personal email."[146]

The NSA's top-secret black budget, obtained from Snowden by The Washington Post, exposed the successes and failures of the 16 spy agencies comprising the U.S. intelligence community,[147] and revealed that the NSA was paying U.S. private tech companies for clandestine access to their communications networks.[148] The agencies were allotted $52billion for the 2013 fiscal year.[149]

It was revealed that the NSA was harvesting millions of email and instant messaging contact lists,[150] searching email content,[151] tracking and mapping the location of cell phones,[152] undermining attempts at encryption via Bullrun[153][154] and that the agency was using cookies to piggyback on the same tools used by Internet advertisers "to pinpoint targets for government hacking and to bolster surveillance."[155] The NSA was shown to be secretly accessing Yahoo and Google data centers to collect information from hundreds of millions of account holders worldwide by tapping undersea cables using the MUSCULAR surveillance program.[132][133]

The NSA, the CIA and GCHQ spied on users of Second Life, Xbox Live and World of Warcraft, and attempted to recruit would-be informants from the sites, according to documents revealed in December 2013.[156][157] Leaked documents showed NSA agents also spied on their own "love interests," a practice NSA employees termed LOVEINT.[158][159] The NSA was shown to be tracking the online sexual activity of people they termed "radicalizers" in order to discredit them.[160] Following the revelation of Black Pearl, a program targeting private networks, the NSA was accused of extending beyond its primary mission of national security. The agency's intelligence-gathering operations had targeted, among others, oil giant Petrobras, Brazil's largest company.[161] The NSA and the GCHQ were also shown to be surveilling charities including UNICEF and Mdecins du Monde, as well as allies such as European Commissioner Joaqun Almunia and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.[162]

In October 2013, Glenn Greenwald said "the most shocking and significant stories are the ones we are still working on, and have yet to publish."[163] In November, The Guardian's editor-in-chief Alan Rusbridger said that only one percent of the documents had been published.[164] In December, Australia's Minister for Defence David Johnston said his government assumed the worst was yet to come.[165]

By October 2013, Snowden's disclosures had created tensions[166][167] between the U.S. and some of its close allies after they revealed that the U.S. had spied on Brazil, France, Mexico,[168] Britain,[169] China,[170] Germany,[171] and Spain,[172] as well as 35 world leaders,[173] most notably German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who said "spying among friends" was unacceptable[174][175] and compared the NSA with the Stasi.[176] Leaked documents published by Der Spiegel in 2014 appeared to show that the NSA had targeted 122 high-ranking leaders.[177]

An NSA mission statement titled "SIGINT Strategy 2012-2016" affirmed that the NSA had plans for the continued expansion of surveillance activities. Their stated goal was to "dramatically increase mastery of the global network" and to acquire adversaries' data from "anyone, anytime, anywhere."[178] Leaked slides revealed in Greenwald's book No Place to Hide, released in May 2014, showed that the NSA's stated objective was to "Collect it All," "Process it All," "Exploit it All," "Partner it All," "Sniff it All" and "Know it All."[179]

Snowden said in a January 2014 interview with German television that the NSA does not limit its data collection to national security issues, accusing the agency of conducting industrial espionage. Using the example of German company Siemens, he said, "If there's information at Siemens that's beneficial to US national interestseven if it doesn't have anything to do with national securitythen they'll take that information nevertheless."[180] In the wake of Snowden's revelations and in response to an inquiry from the Left Party, Germany's domestic security agency Bundesamt fr Verfassungsschutz (BfV) investigated and found no concrete evidence that the U.S. conducted economic or industrial espionage in Germany.[181]

In February 2014, during testimony to the European Union, Snowden said of the remaining undisclosed programs, "I will leave the public interest determinations as to which of these may be safely disclosed to responsible journalists in coordination with government stakeholders."[182]

In March 2014, documents disclosed by Glenn Greenwald writing for The Intercept showed the NSA, in cooperation with the GCHQ, has plans to infect millions of computers with malware using a program called TURBINE.[183] Revelations included information about QUANTUMHAND, a program through which the NSA set up a fake Facebook server to intercept connections.[183]

According to a report in The Washington Post in July 2014, relying on information furnished by Snowden, 90% of those placed under surveillance in the U.S. are ordinary Americans and are not the intended targets. The newspaper said it had examined documents including emails, message texts, and online accounts, that support the claim.[184]

In an August 2014 interview, Snowden for the first time disclosed a cyberwarfare program in the works, codenamed MonsterMind, that would automate the detection of a foreign cyberattack as it began and automatically fire back. "These attacks can be spoofed," said Snowden. "You could have someone sitting in China, for example, making it appear that one of these attacks is originating in Russia. And then we end up shooting back at a Russian hospital. What happens next?"[31]

Snowden first contemplated leaking confidential documents around 2008 but held back, partly because he believed the newly elected Barack Obama might introduce reforms.[1] After the disclosures, his identity was made public by The Guardian at his request on June 9, 2013.[119] "I do not want to live in a world where everything I do and say is recorded," he said. "My sole motive is to inform the public as to that which is done in their name and that which is done against them."[123]

Snowden said he wanted to "embolden others to step forward" by demonstrating that "they can win."[120] He also said that the system for reporting problems did not work. "You have to report wrongdoing to those most responsible for it." He cited a lack of whistleblower protection for government contractors, the use of the Espionage Act of 1917 to prosecute leakers and the belief that had he used internal mechanisms to "sound the alarm," his revelations "would have been buried forever."[112][185]

In December 2013, upon learning that a U.S. federal judge had ruled the collection of U.S. phone metadata conducted by the NSA as likely unconstitutional, Snowden said, "I acted on my belief that the NSA's mass surveillance programs would not withstand a constitutional challenge, and that the American public deserved a chance to see these issues determined by open courts ... today, a secret program authorized by a secret court was, when exposed to the light of day, found to violate Americans' rights."[186]

In January 2014, Snowden said his "breaking point" was "seeing the Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, directly lie under oath to Congress."[59] This referred to testimony on March 12, 2013three months after Snowden first sought to share thousands of NSA documents with Greenwald,[113] and nine months after the NSA says Snowden made his first illegal downloads during the summer of 2012[1]in which Clapper denied to the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence that the NSA wittingly collects data on millions of Americans.[187] Snowden said, "There's no saving an intelligence community that believes it can lie to the public and the legislators who need to be able to trust it and regulate its actions. Seeing that really meant for me there was no going back. Beyond that, it was the creeping realization that no one else was going to do this. The public had a right to know about these programs."[188] In March 2014, Snowden said he had reported policy or legal issues related to spying programs to more than ten officials, but as a contractor had no legal avenue to pursue further whistleblowing.[86]

In May 2013, Snowden quit his job, telling his supervisors he required epilepsy treatment, but instead fled the United States for Hong Kong on May 10.[189] Snowden told Guardian reporters in June that he had been in his room at the Mira Hotel since his arrival in the city, rarely going out. On June 10, correspondent Ewen MacAskill said Snowden had left his hotel only briefly three times since May 20.[190]

Snowden vowed to challenge any extradition attempt by the U.S. government, and engaged a Hong Kong-based Canadian human rights lawyer Robert Tibbo as a legal adviser.[1][191][192] Snowden told the South China Morning Post that he planned to remain in Hong Kong for as long as its government would permit.[193][194] Snowden also told the Post that "the United States government has committed a tremendous number of crimes against Hong Kong [and] the PRC as well,"[195] going on to identify Chinese Internet Protocol addresses that the NSA monitored and stating that the NSA collected text-message data for Hong Kong residents. Glenn Greenwald said Snowden was motivated by a need to "ingratiate himself to the people of Hong Kong and China."[196]

After leaving the Mira Hotel, Snowden was housed for two weeks in several apartments by other refugees seeking asylum in Hong Kong, an arrangement set up by Tibbo to hide from the US authorities.[197][198]The Russian newspaper Kommersant nevertheless reported that Snowden was living at the Russian consulate shortly before his departure from Hong Kong to Moscow.[199] Ben Wizner, a lawyer with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and legal adviser to Snowden, said in January 2014, "Every news organization in the world has been trying to confirm that story. They haven't been able to, because it's false."[200] Likewise rejecting the Kommersant story was Anatoly Kucherena, who became Snowden's lawyer in July 2013 when Snowden asked him for help in seeking temporary asylum in Russia.[201] Kucherena said Snowden did not communicate with Russian diplomats while he was in Hong Kong.[202][203] In early September 2013, however, Russian president Vladimir Putin said that, a few days before boarding a plane to Moscow, Snowden met in Hong Kong with Russian diplomatic representatives.[204]

On June 22, 18 days after the publication of Snowden's NSA documents began, officials revoked his U.S. passport.[205] On June 23, Snowden boarded the commercial Aeroflot flight SU213 to Moscow, accompanied by Sarah Harrison of WikiLeaks.[206][207] Hong Kong authorities said that Snowden had not been detained for the U.S. because the request had not fully complied with Hong Kong law,[208][209] and there was no legal basis to prevent Snowden from leaving.[210][211][Notes 1] On June 24, a U.S. State Department spokesman rejected the explanation of technical noncompliance, accusing the Hong Kong government of deliberately releasing a fugitive despite a valid arrest warrant and after having sufficient time to prohibit his travel.[214] That same day, Julian Assange said that WikiLeaks had paid for Snowden's lodging in Hong Kong and his flight out.[215] Julian Assange had asked Fidel Narvez, consul at the Ecuadorian embassy in London, to sign an emergency travel document for Snowden. Snowden said that having the document gave him "the confidence, the courage to get on that plane to begin the journey".[216]

In October 2013, Snowden said that before flying to Moscow, he gave all the classified documents he had obtained to journalists he met in Hong Kong and kept no copies for himself.[112] In January 2014, he told a German TV interviewer that he gave all of his information to American journalists reporting on American issues.[59] During his first American TV interview, in May 2014, Snowden said he had protected himself from Russian leverage by destroying the material he had been holding before landing in Moscow.[24]

In January 2019, Vanessa Rodel, one of the refugees who had housed Snowden in Hong Kong, and her 7-year-old daughter were granted asylum by Canada.[217] In 2021, Supun Thilina Kellapatha, Nadeeka Dilrukshi Nonis and their children found refuge in Canada, leaving only one of Snowden's Hong Kong helpers waiting for asylum.[218]

On June 23, 2013, Snowden landed at Moscow's Sheremetyevo Airport.[219] WikiLeaks said he was on a circuitous but safe route to asylum in Ecuador.[220] Snowden had a seat reserved to continue to Cuba[221] but did not board that onward flight, saying in a January 2014 interview that he intended to transit through Russia but was stopped en route. He said "a planeload of reporters documented the seat I was supposed to be in" when he was ticketed for Havana, but the U.S. canceled his passport.[200] He said the U.S. wanted him to stay in Moscow so "they could say, 'He's a Russian spy.'"[73] Greenwald's account differed on the point of Snowden being already ticketed. According to Greenwald, Snowden's passport was valid when he departed Hong Kong but was revoked during the hours he was in transit to Moscow, preventing him from obtaining a ticket to leave Russia. Greenwald said Snowden was thus forced to stay in Moscow and seek asylum.[222]

According to one Russian report, Snowden planned to fly from Moscow through Havana to Latin America; however, Cuba told Moscow it would not allow the Aeroflot plane carrying Snowden to land.[202] The Russian newspaper Kommersant reported that Cuba had a change of heart after receiving pressure from U.S. officials,[223] leaving him stuck in the transit zone because at the last minute Havana told officials in Moscow not to allow him on the flight.[224] The Washington Post contrasted this version with what it called "widespread speculation" that Russia never intended to let Snowden proceed.[225] Fidel Castro called claims that Cuba would have blocked Snowden's entry a "lie" and a "libel."[221] Describing Snowden's arrival in Moscow as a surprise and likening it to "an unwanted Christmas gift,"[226] Russian president Putin said that Snowden remained in the transit area of Sheremetyevo Airport, had committed no crime in Russia, was free to leave and should do so.[227][226]

Following Snowden's arrival in Moscow, the White House expressed disappointment in Hong Kong's decision to allow him to leave.[228][229][214] An anonymous U.S. official not authorized to discuss the matter told the Associated Press Snowden's passport had been revoked before he left Hong Kong, but that a senior official in a country or airline could order subordinates to overlook the withdrawn passport.[230] U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said that Snowden's passport was canceled "within two hours" of the charges against Snowden being made public[5] which was Friday, June 21.[4] In a July 1 statement, Snowden said, "Although I am convicted of nothing, [the U.S. government] has unilaterally revoked my passport, leaving me a stateless person. Without any judicial order, the administration now seeks to stop me exercising a basic right. A right that belongs to everybody. The right to seek asylum."[231]

Four countries offered Snowden permanent asylum: Ecuador, Nicaragua, Bolivia, and Venezuela.[232] No direct flights between Moscow and Venezuela, Bolivia, or Nicaragua existed, however, and the U.S. pressured countries along his route to hand him over. Snowden said in July 2013 that he decided to bid for asylum in Russia because he felt there was no safe way to reach Latin America.[233] Snowden said he remained in Russia because "when we were talking about possibilities for asylum in Latin America, the United States forced down the Bolivian president's plane", citing the Morales plane incident. According to Snowden, "the CIA has a very powerful presence [in Latin America] and the governments and the security services there are relatively much less capable than, say, Russia.... they could have basically snatched me...."[234] On the issue, he said "some governments in Western European and North American states have demonstrated a willingness to act outside the law, and this behavior persists today. This unlawful threat makes it impossible for me to travel to Latin America and enjoy the asylum granted there in accordance with our shared rights."[235] Snowden said that he would travel from Russia if there was no interference from the U.S. government.[200]

Four months after Snowden received asylum in Russia, Julian Assange commented: "While Venezuela and Ecuador could protect him in the short term, over the long term there could be a change in government. In Russia, he's safe, he's well-regarded, and that is not likely to change. That was my advice to Snowden, that he would be physically safest in Russia."[236]

In an October 2014 interview with The Nation magazine, Snowden reiterated that he had originally intended to travel to Latin America: "A lot of people are still unaware that I never intended to end up in Russia." According to Snowden, the U.S. government "waited until I departed Hong Kong to cancel my passport in order to trap me in Russia." Snowden added, "If they really wanted to capture me, they would've allowed me to travel to Latin America because the CIA can operate with impunity down there. They did not want that; they chose to keep me in Russia."[237]

On July 1, 2013, president Evo Morales of Bolivia, who had been attending a conference in Russia, suggested during an interview with RT (formerly Russia Today) that he would consider a request by Snowden for asylum.[238] The following day, Morales's plane, en route to Bolivia, was rerouted to Austria and landed there, after France, Spain, and Italy denied access to their airspace. While the plane was parked in Vienna, the Spanish ambassador to Austria arrived with two embassy personnel and asked to search the plane but they were denied permission by Morales himself.[239] U.S. officials had raised suspicions that Snowden may have been on board.[240] Morales blamed the U.S. for putting pressure on European countries and said that the grounding of his plane was a violation of international law.[241]

In April 2015, Bolivia's ambassador to Russia, Mara Luisa Ramos Urzagaste, accused Julian Assange of inadvertently putting Morales's life at risk by intentionally providing to the U.S. false rumors that Snowden was on Morales's plane. Assange responded that "we weren't expecting this outcome. The result was caused by the United States' intervention. We can only regret what happened."[242][243]

Snowden applied for political asylum to 21 countries.[244][245] A statement attributed to him contended that the U.S. administration, and specifically thenVice President Joe Biden, had pressured the governments to refuse his asylum petitions. Biden had telephoned President Rafael Correa days prior to Snowden's remarks, asking the Ecuadorian leader not to grant Snowden asylum.[246] Ecuador had initially offered Snowden a temporary travel document but later withdrew it,[247] and Correa later called the offer a mistake.[248]

In a July 1, 2013 statement published by WikiLeaks, Snowden accused the U.S. government of "using citizenship as a weapon" and using what he described as "old, bad tools of political aggression." Citing Obama's promise to not allow "wheeling and dealing" over the case, Snowden commented, "This kind of deception from a world leader is not justice, and neither is the extralegal penalty of exile."[249] Several days later, WikiLeaks announced that Snowden had applied for asylum in six additional countries, but declined to name them, alleging attempted U.S. interference.[250]

After evaluating the law and Snowden's situation, the French interior ministry rejected his request for asylum.[251] Poland refused to process his application because it did not conform to legal procedure.[252] Brazil's Foreign Ministry said the government planned no response to Snowden's asylum request. Germany and India rejected Snowden's application outright, while Austria, Ecuador, Finland, Norway, Italy, the Netherlands, and Spain said he must be on their territory to apply.[253][254][255] In November 2014, Germany announced that Snowden had not renewed his previously denied request and was not being considered for asylum.[256] Glenn Greenwald later reported that Sigmar Gabriel, Vice-Chancellor of Germany, told him the U.S. government had threatened to stop sharing intelligence if Germany offered Snowden asylum or arranged for his travel there.[257]

Putin said on July 1, 2013, that if Snowden wanted to be granted asylum in Russia, he would be required to "stop his work aimed at harming our American partners."[258] A spokesman for Putin subsequently said that Snowden had withdrawn his asylum application upon learning of the conditions.[259]

In a July 12 meeting at Sheremetyevo Airport with representatives of human rights organizations and lawyers, organized in part by the Russian government,[260] Snowden said he was accepting all offers of asylum that he had already received or would receive. He added that Venezuela's grant of asylum formalized his asylee status, removing any basis for state interference with his right to asylum.[261] He also said he would request asylum in Russia until he resolved his travel problems.[262] Slovenian correspondent Polonca Frelih, the only journalist, who presented at the July 12 meeting with Snowden, reported that he looked like someone without daylight for long time but strong enough psychologically while expressing worries about his medical condition. [263] Russian Federal Migration Service officials confirmed on July 16 that Snowden had submitted an application for temporary asylum.[264] On July 24, Kucherena said his client wanted to find work in Russia, travel and create a life for himself, and had already begun learning Russian.[265]

Amid media reports in early July 2013 attributed to U.S. administration sources that Obama's one-on-one meeting with Putin, ahead of a G20 meeting in St Petersburg scheduled for September, was in doubt due to Snowden's protracted sojourn in Russia,[266] top U.S. officials repeatedly made it clear to Moscow that Snowden should immediately be returned to the United States to face charges for the unauthorized leaking of classified information.[267][268][269] His Russian lawyer said Snowden needed asylum because he faced persecution by the U.S. government and feared "that he could be subjected to torture and capital punishment."[270]

Snowden married Lindsay Mills in 2017.On April 16, 2020, CNN reported that Edward Snowden had requested a three-year extension of his Russian residency permit.[271]

In a letter to Russian Minister of Justice Aleksandr Konovalov dated July 23, 2013, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder repudiated Snowden's claim to refugee status and offered a limited validity passport good for direct return to the U.S.[272] He stated that Snowden would not be subject to torture or the death penalty, and would receive a trial in a civilian court with proper legal counsel.[273] The same day, the Russian president's spokesman reiterated that his government would not hand over Snowden, commenting that Putin was not personally involved in the matter and that it was being handled through talks between the FBI and Russia's FSB.[274]

On June 14, 2013, United States federal prosecutors filed a criminal complaint[275] against Snowden, charging him with three felonies: theft of government property and two counts of violating the Espionage Act of 1917 (18 U. S. C. Sect. 792 et. seq.; Publ. L. 65-24) through unauthorized communication of national defense information and willful communication of classified communications intelligence information to an unauthorized person.[4][272]

Specifically, the charges filed in the Criminal Complaint were:

Each of the three charges carries a maximum possible prison term of ten years. The criminal complaint was initially secret but was unsealed a week later.

Stephen P. Mulligan and Jennifer K. Elsea, Legislative attorneys for the Congressional Research Service, provide a 2017 analysis[276] of the uses of the Espionage Act to prosecute unauthorized disclosures of classified information, based on what was disclosed, to whom, and how; the burden of proof requirements e.g. degrees of Mens Rea (guilty mind), and the relationship of such considerations to the First Amendment framework of protections of free speech are also analyzed. The analysis includes the charges against Snowden, among several other cases. The discussion also covers gaps in the legal framework used to prosecute such cases.

Snowden was asked in a January 2014 interview about returning to the U.S. to face the charges in court, as Obama had suggested a few days prior. Snowden explained why he rejected the request:

What he doesn't say are that the crimes that he's charged me with are crimes that don't allow me to make my case. They don't allow me to defend myself in an open court to the public and convince a jury that what I did was to their benefit. ... So it's, I would say, illustrative that the president would choose to say someone should face the music when he knows the music is a show trial.[59][277]

Snowden's legal representative, Jesselyn Radack, wrote that "the Espionage Act effectively hinders a person from defending himself before a jury in an open court." She said that the "arcane World War I law" was never meant to prosecute whistleblowers, but rather spies who betrayed their trust by selling secrets to enemies for profit. Non-profit betrayals were not considered.[278]

On September 17, 2019, the United States filed a lawsuit, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-1197-LO-TCB, against Snowden for alleged violations of non-disclosure agreements with the CIA and NSA.[279]The two-count civil complaint alleged that Snowden had violated prepublication obligations related to the publication of his memoir Permanent Record. The complaint listed the publishers Macmillan Publishing Group, LLC d.b.a. Henry Holt and Company and Holtzbrink, as relief-defendants.[280]The Hon. Liam O'Grady, a judge in the Alexandria Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia found for the United States (Plaintiff) by summary judgement, on both counts of the action.[281] The judgment also found that Snowden had been paid speaker honorariums totaling $1.03million for a series of 56 speeches delivered by video link.[17]

On June 23, 2013, Snowden landed at Moscow's Sheremetyevo Airport aboard a commercial Aeroflot flight from Hong Kong.[282][206][283] After 39 days in the transit section, he left the airport on August 1 and was granted temporary asylum in Russia for one year by the Federal Migration Service.[284]

Snowden had the choice to apply for renewal of his temporary refugee status for 12 months or requesting a permit for temporary stay for three years.[285] A year later, his temporary refugee status having expired, Snowden received a three-year temporary residency permit allowing him to travel freely within Russia and to go abroad for up to three months. He was not granted permanent political asylum.[286] In 2017, his temporary residency permit was extended for another three years.[6][287]

In December 2013, Snowden told journalist Barton Gellman that supporters in Silicon Valley had donated enough bitcoins for him to live on "until the fucking sun dies."[288] (A single bitcoin was then worth about $1,000.[17]) In 2017, Snowden secretly married Lindsay Mills.[289] By 2019, he no longer felt the need to be disguised in public and lived what was described by The Guardian as a "more or less normal life." He was able to travel around Russia and make a living from speaking arrangements, locally and over the internet.[289]

His memoir Permanent Record was released internationally on September 17, 2019, and while U.S. royalties were expected to be seized, he was able to receive an advance[289] of $4.2million.[17] The memoir reached the top position on Amazon's bestseller list that day.[290] Snowden said his work for the NSA and CIA showed him that the United States Intelligence Community (IC) had "hacked the Constitution", and that he had concluded there was no option for him but to expose his revelations via the press. In the memoir he wrote, "I realized that I was crazy to have imagined that the Supreme Court, or Congress, or President Obama, seeking to distance his administration from President George W. Bush's, would ever hold the IC legally responsible for anything".[291] Of Russia he said, "One of the things that is lost in all the problematic politics of the Russian government is the fact this is one of the most beautiful countries in the world" with "friendly" and "warm" people.[289]

On November 1, 2019, new amendments took effect introducing a permanent residence permit for the first time and removing the requirement to renew the pre-2019 so-called "permanent" residence permit every five years.[292][293] The new permanent residence permit must be replaced three times in a lifetime like an ordinary internal passport for Russian citizens.[294] In accordance with that law, Snowden was in October 2020 granted permanent residence in Russia instead of another extension.[6][295]

In April 2020, an amendment to Russian nationality law allowing foreigners to obtain Russian citizenship without renouncing a foreign citizenship came into force.[296] In November 2020, Snowden announced that he and his wife, Lindsay, who was expecting their son in late December, were applying for dual U.S.-Russian citizenship in order not to be separated from him "in this era of pandemics and closed borders."[297]

Snowden has said that, in the 2008 presidential election, he voted for a third-party candidate, though he "believed in Obama's promises." Following the election, he believed President Barack Obama was continuing policies espoused by George W. Bush.[298]

In accounts published in June 2013, interviewers noted that Snowden's laptop displayed stickers supporting Internet freedom organizations including the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and the Tor Project.[299] A week after publication of his leaks began, Ars Technica confirmed that Snowden had been an active participant at the site's online forum from 2001 through May 2012, discussing a variety of topics under the pseudonym "TheTrueHOOHA."[300] In an online discussion about racism in 2009, Snowden said: ''I went to London just last year it's where all of your muslims live I didn't want to get out of the car. I thought I had gotten off of the plane in the wrong country... it was terrifying.''[301][302][303][304] In a January 2009 entry, TheTrueHOOHA exhibited strong support for the U.S. security state apparatus and said leakers of classified information "should be shot in the balls."[305] However, Snowden disliked Obama's CIA director appointment of Leon Panetta, saying "Obama just named a fucking politician to run the CIA."[306] Snowden was also offended by a possible ban on assault weapons, writing "Me and all my lunatic, gun-toting NRA compatriots would be on the steps of Congress before the C-Span feed finished."[306] Snowden disliked Obama's economic policies, was against Social Security, and favored Ron Paul's call for a return to the gold standard.[306] In 2014, Snowden supported a universal basic income.[307]

In response to outrage by European leaders, President Barack Obama said in early July 2013 that all nations collect intelligence, including those expressing outrage. His remarks came in response to an article in the German magazine Der Spiegel.[308]

In 2014, Obama stated, "our nation's defense depends in part on the fidelity of those entrusted with our nation's secrets. If any individual who objects to government policy can take it into their own hands to publicly disclose classified information, then we will not be able to keep our people safe, or conduct foreign policy." He objected to the "sensational" way the leaks were reported, saying the reporting often "shed more heat than light." He said that the disclosures had revealed "methods to our adversaries that could impact our operations."[309]

During a November 2016 interview with the German broadcaster ARD and the German paper Der Spiegel, then-outgoing President Obama said he "can't" pardon Edward Snowden unless he is physically submitted to US authorities on US soil.[310]

See the rest here:
Edward Snowden - Wikipedia

Julian Assange is dealt a legal blow as he fights extradition to the U.S. : NPR

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange greets supporters from a balcony of the Ecuadorian embassy in London in 2017. Britain's top court on Monday refused WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange permission to appeal against a decision to extradite him to the U.S. to face spying charges. Frank Augstein/AP hide caption

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange greets supporters from a balcony of the Ecuadorian embassy in London in 2017. Britain's top court on Monday refused WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange permission to appeal against a decision to extradite him to the U.S. to face spying charges.

LONDON Britain's top court on Monday refused WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange permission to appeal against a decision to extradite him to the U.S. to face spying charges.

The court said it refused because the case "didn't raise an arguable point of law."

Assange, 50, has sought for years to avoid a trial in the U.S. on a series of charges related to WikiLeaks' publication of a huge trove of classified documents more than a decade ago.

The case is now expected to be formally sent to British Home Secretary Priti Patel, who will decide whether to grant the extradition.

A British district court judge had initially rejected a U.S. extradition request on the grounds that Assange was likely to kill himself if held under harsh U.S. prison conditions. U.S. authorities later provided assurances that the WikiLeaks founder wouldn't face the severe treatment that his lawyers said would put his physical and mental health at risk.

In December, the High Court overturned the lower court's decision, saying that the U.S. promises were enough to guarantee that Assange would be treated humanely.

Monday's news narrows Assange's options, but his defense team may still seek to take his case to the European Court of Human Rights. Nick Vamos, the former head of extradition at the Crown Prosecution Service, said Assange's lawyers can also seek to challenge other points that he had lost in the original district court decision.

Barry Pollack, Assange's U.S.-based lawyer, said Monday that it was "extremely disappointing" that Britain's Supreme Court is unwilling to hear the appeal.

"Mr. Assange will continue the legal process fighting his extradition to the United States to face criminal charges for publishing truthful and newsworthy information," he said.

Assange's British lawyers, Birnberg Peirce Solicitors, said they can make submissions to the Home Secretary within the next four weeks, ahead of her making any decision.

American prosecutors say Assange unlawfully helped U.S. Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning steal classified diplomatic cables and military files that WikiLeaks later published, putting lives at risk.

But supporters and lawyers for Assange argue that he was acting as a journalist and is entitled to First Amendment protections of freedom of speech for publishing documents that exposed U.S. military wrongdoing in Iraq and Afghanistan. They argue that his case is politically motivated.

If convicted, Assange's lawyers say he could face up to 175 years in jail in the U.S., though American authorities have said the sentence was likely to be much lower than that.

Assange has been held at Britain's high-security Belmarsh Prison in London since 2019, when he was arrested for skipping bail during a separate legal battle. Before that, he spent seven years inside the Ecuadorian Embassy in London to avoid extradition to Sweden to face allegations of rape and sexual assault.

Sweden dropped the sex crimes investigations in November 2019 because so much time had elapsed.

Assange's partner Stella Moris, who has two young children with him, said Sunday they have been given permission to marry in prison later this month.

Read the original here:
Julian Assange is dealt a legal blow as he fights extradition to the U.S. : NPR

Julian Assange Denied Permission to Appeal Extradition to US by UK’s Top Court …

Britain's top court on Monday refused WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange permission to appeal against a decision to extradite him to the US to face spying charges.

The court said it refused because the case didn't raise an arguable point of law.

Assange, 50, has sought for years to avoid a trial in the US on a series of charges related to WikiLeaks' publication of a huge trove of classified documents more than a decade ago.

The case is now expected to be formally sent to British Home Secretary Priti Patel, who will decide whether to grant the extradition.

A British district court judge had initially rejected a US extradition request on the grounds that Assange was likely to kill himself if held under harsh US prison conditions. US authorities later provided assurances that the WikiLeaks founder wouldn't face the severe treatment that his lawyers said would put his physical and mental health at risk.

In December, the High Court overturned the lower court's decision, saying that the US promises were enough to guarantee that Assange would be treated humanely.

Monday's news narrows Assange's options, but his defense team may still seek to take his case to the European Court of Human Rights. Nick Vamos, the former head of extradition at the Crown Prosecution Service, said Assange's lawyers can also seek to challenge other points that he had lost in the original district court decision.

Barry Pollack, Assange's US-based lawyer, said Monday that it was extremely disappointing that Britain's Supreme Court is unwilling to hear the appeal.

Mr. Assange will continue the legal process fighting his extradition to the United States to face criminal charges for publishing truthful and newsworthy information, he said.

Assange's British lawyers, Birnberg Peirce Solicitors, said they can make submissions to the Home Secretary within the next four weeks, ahead of her making any decision.

American prosecutors say Assange unlawfully helped US Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning steal classified diplomatic cables and military files that WikiLeaks later published, putting lives at risk.

But supporters and lawyers for Assange argue that he was acting as a journalist and is entitled to First Amendment protections of freedom of speech for publishing documents that exposed U.S. military wrongdoing in Iraq and Afghanistan. They argue that his case is politically motivated.

If convicted, Assange's lawyers say he could face up to 175 years in jail in the US, though American authorities have said the sentence was likely to be much lower than that.

Assange has been held at Britain's high-security Belmarsh Prison in London since 2019, when he was arrested for skipping bail during a separate legal battle. Before that, he spent seven years inside the Ecuadorian Embassy in London to avoid extradition to Sweden to face allegations of rape and sexual assault.

Sweden dropped the sex crimes investigations in November 2019 because so much time had elapsed.

Assange's partner Stella Moris, who has two young children with him, said Sunday they have been given permission to marry in prison later this month.

Read the original here:
Julian Assange Denied Permission to Appeal Extradition to US by UK's Top Court ...

It’s been three years since Julian Assange was imprisoned. Advocates say it’s time to let him go – SBS News

The 50-year-old Australian was dragged from London's Ecuador Embassy on 11 April 2019 to face extradition to the United States on espionage charges over WikiLeaks' release of confidential US military records and diplomatic cables.

He has since been held at a high-security prison in Belmarsh, southeast of London, and last month

The union, of which Mr Assange has been a member since 2009, argues the scope of the US charges could imperil any journalist around the world who writes about its government.

"Julian Assange's work with WikiLeaks was important and in the public interest: exposing evidence of war crimes and other shameful actions by US soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan," MEAA Media federal president Karen Percy said on Monday.

"The stories published by WikiLeaks and its mainstream media partners more than a decade ago were picked up by news outlets around the world. The charges against Assange are an affront to journalists everywhere and a threat to press freedom.

In December, the UK's High Court overturned a ruling the publisher should not be extradited to the US as his mental health problems meant he would be a suicide risk.

He was then denied permission to launch an appeal but could still challenge the decision by judicial review once the UK government ratifies his extradition.

WikiLeaks was awarded the Walkley Award for Most Outstanding Contribution to Journalism in 2011, one of Australia's most prestigious media prizes.

Continue reading here:
It's been three years since Julian Assange was imprisoned. Advocates say it's time to let him go - SBS News