Steps to perform when your machine learning model overfits in training – Analytics India Magazine

Overfitting is a basic problem in supervised machine learning where the model shows well generalisation capabilities on seen data but poorly performs on unseen data. Overfitting occurs as a result of the existence of noise, the small size of the training set, and the complexity involved in algorithms. In this article, we will be discussing different strategies to overcome the overfitting of machine learners while at the training stage. Following are the topics to be covered.

Lets start with the overview of overfitting in the machine learning model.

Model is overfitting data when it memorises all the specific details of the training data and fails to generalise. It is a statistical error caused by poor statistical judgments. Because it is too closely tied to the data set, it adds bias to the model. Overfitting limits the models relevance to its data set and renders it irrelevant to other data sets.

Definition according to statistics

In the presence of a hypothesis space, a hypothesis is said to overfit the training data if there exists some alternative hypothesis with a smaller error than the hypothesis over the training examples, but the alternative hypothesis with a smaller overall error than the entire distribution of instances.

Are you looking for a complete repository of Python libraries used in data science,check out here.

Detecting overfitting is almost impossible before you test the data. During the training, there are two errors: training error and validation error when the training is constantly decreasing but the validation error decreases for a period and then starts to increase but meanwhile the training error is still decreasing. This kind of scenario is overfitting.

Lets understand the mitigation strategies for this statistical problem.

There are different stages in a machine learning project where different mitigation techniques could be applied to mitigate the overfitting.

High dimensional data lead to model overfitting because in these data the number of observations is much less than the number of features. This will result in indeterministic answers to the problem.

Ways to mitigate

During the process of data wrangling, one can face the problem of outliers in the data. As these outliers increase the variance in the dataset and due to this the model will train itself to these outliers and will result in an output which has high variance and low bias. Hence the bias-variance tradeoff is disturbed.

Ways to mitigate

They either require particular attention or should be utterly ignored, depending on the circumstances. If the data set contains a significant number of outliers, it is critical to utilise a modelling approach that is resistant to outliers or to filter out the outliers.

Cross-validation is a resampling technique used to assess machine learning models on a small sample of data. Cross-validation is primarily used in applied machine learning to estimate a machine learning models skill on unseen data. That is, to use a small sample to assess how the model will perform in general when used to generate predictions on data that was not utilised during the models training.

Evaluation Procedure using K-fold cross-validation

The above is the process of K fold when k is 5 this is known as 5 folds.

This method is used to prevent the learning speed slow-down problem. Because of noise learning, the accuracy of algorithms stops improving beyond a certain point or even worsens.

The green line represents the training error, and the red line represents the validation error, as illustrated in the picture, where the horizontal axis is an epoch and the vertical axis is an error. If the model continues to learn after the point, the validation error will rise while the training error will fall. So the goal is to pinpoint the precise time at which to discontinue training. As a result, we achieved an ideal fit between under-fitting and overfitting.

Way to achieve the ideal fit

To compute the accuracy after each epoch and stop training when the accuracy of test data stops improving, and then use the validation set to figure out a perfect set of values for the hyper-parameters, and then use the test set to complete the final accuracy evaluation. When compared to directly using test data to determine hyper-parameter values, this method ensures a better level of generality. This method assures that, at each stage of an iterative algorithm, bias is reduced while variance is increased.

Noise reduction, naturally, becomes one study path for overfitting inhibition. Pruning is recommended to lower the size of final classifiers in relational learning, particularly in decision tree learning, based on this concept. Pruning is an important principle that is used to minimise classification complexity by removing less useful or irrelevant data, and then to prevent overfitting and increase classification accuracy. There are two types of pruning.

In many circumstances, the amount and quality of training datasets may have a considerable impact on machine learning performance, particularly in the domain of supervised learning. The model requires enough data for learning to modify parameters. The sample count is proportional to the number of parameters.

In other words, an extended dataset can significantly enhance prediction accuracy, particularly in complex models. Existing data can be changed to produce new data. In summary, there are four basic techniques for increasing the training set.

When creating a predictive model, feature selection is the process of minimising the number of input variables. It is preferable to limit the number of input variables to lower the computational cost of modelling and, in some situations, to increase the models performance.

The following are some prominent feature selection strategies in machine learning:

Regularisation is a strategy for preventing our network from learning an overly complicated model and hence overfitting. The model grows more sophisticated as the number of features rises.

An overfitting model takes all characteristics into account, even if some of them have a negligible influence on the final result. Worse, some of them are simply noise that has no bearing on the output. There are two types of strategies to restrict these cases:

In other words, the impact of such ineffective characteristics must be restricted. However, there is uncertainty in the unnecessary characteristics, so minimise them altogether by reducing the models cost function. To do this, include a penalty word called regularizer into the cost function. There are three popular regularisation techniques.

Instead of discarding those less valuable qualities, it assigns lower weights to them. As a result, it can gather as much information as possible. Large weights can only be assigned to attributes that improve the baseline cost function significantly.

Hyperparameters are selection or configuration points that allow a machine learning model to be tailored to a given task or dataset. To optimise them is known as hyperparameter tuning. These characteristics cannot be learnt directly from the standard training procedure.

They are generally resolved before the start of the training procedure. These parameters indicate crucial model aspects such as the models complexity or how quickly it should learn. Models can contain a large number of hyperparameters, and determining the optimal combination of parameters can be thought of as a search issue.

GridSearchCV and RandomizedSearchCV are the two most effective Hyperparameter tuning algorithms.

GridSearchCV

In the GridSearchCV technique, a search space is defined as a grid of hyperparameter values, and each point in the grid is evaluated.

GridSearchCV has the disadvantage of going through all intermediate combinations of hyperparameters, which makes grid search computationally highly costly.

Random Search CV

The Random Search CV technique defines a search space as a bounded domain of hyperparameter values that are randomly sampled. This method eliminates needless calculation.

Image source

Overfitting is a general problem in supervised machine learning that cannot be avoided entirely. It occurs as a result of either the limitations of training data, which might be restricted in size or comprise a large amount of data, or noises, or the restrictions of algorithms that are too sophisticated and need an excessive number of parameters. With this article, we could understand the concept of overfitting in machine learning and the ways it could be mitigated at different stages of the machine learning project.

See the article here:
Steps to perform when your machine learning model overfits in training - Analytics India Magazine

AdvoLogix squashes time and financial burden associated with manual data entry. Introduces cloud-based machine learning application that eliminates…

AdvoLogix introduces cloud-based machine learning application that eliminates friction and learns progressively.

"The legal industry has long been overburdened with paper trails and manual processes. Machine learning as an option for efficiency is quickly becoming a pillar of the Legal Technology industry." Dan Bellopede, CRO of AdvoLogix.

"The application learns progressively, so your investment in AdvoLogix is constantly maturing. The product offers compounding value, setting a new standard for tech products going forward. Machine learning products like The Document Caster are blazing a trail forward as the industry stretches and grows." Jonathan Reed, CEO of AdvoLogix.

AdvoLogix is looking for organizations with high volumes of unstructured invoice data and participants will gain early access and feature input. Organizations can sign up for more information and apply for the alpha program atwww.advologix.com, in the Newsletter and Resource Center, with a full beta release expected later this year.

The Legal Technology industry is navigating a shift from legacy norms to smart technology solutions. Dated practices are being examined with a critical eye, and the need to embrace change is clear. The solutions AdvoLogix produces offer a secure and welcoming path forward in an industry ripe for modernization. Companies and business owners alike will enjoy the ease-of-use of the technology AdvoLogix produces, along with the human touch that's delivered through superior customer service.

About AdvoLogixFounded in 2006, AdvoLogix is a leading enterprise legal management solution that helps law firms, general counsel and state and local governments automate processes and simplify legal matter management. The AdvoLogix cloud-based enterprise solution centralizes matter management, conforms to unique workflows and practice standards, and provides industry-leading security and reliability. AdvoLogix offers comprehensive configuration and integration with thousands of add-on applications to extend the solution to meet specific business needs. For more information, visit http://www.advologix.com and follow AdvoLogix on Twitter @AdvoLogix.

Media ContactAdam AspelinAdvoLogix/Marketing Coordinator[emailprotected]

SOURCE AdvoLogix

See the article here:
AdvoLogix squashes time and financial burden associated with manual data entry. Introduces cloud-based machine learning application that eliminates...

ValleyML is hosting AI Expo 2022 in August. The Premier AI and ML Industry Event! – PR Newswire

Valley Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence (ValleyML.ai)is excited to announce that AI Expo 2022 will be hosted at Santa Clara Convention Center, CA (In-Person) on August 9th-10th and virtually on August 16th-17th. Exhibitor, sponsorship, and speaking opportunities are now available.

SANTA CLARA, Calif., May 10, 2022 /PRNewswire/ --Valley Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence (ValleyML.ai)is organizing "AI Expo 2022" as a hybrid event; the in-person event will be held at Santa Clara Convention Center, CA on August 9-10 and the global virtual event on August 16-17.

ValleyMLis a cross-industry community of ML and AI companies, startups, data practitioners, executives, and researchers focused on advancing AI to empower people. It's the ideal platform for innovative engineers, marketing veterans, business leaders, decision makers, media analysts, and investors looking to generate buzz and network. ValleyML AI Expo is supported by the Conference Advisory Board, which helps grow our global AI community and contribute to the AI & ML ecosystem.

The in-person conference features keynotes, panel discussions, and exhibits from industry leaders and innovative startups. The virtual event has 8 program tracks: CxO Insights, AI Implementation, AI Healthcare, AI Finance, AI Retail, AI Operations, AI Robotics, and AI Hardware. This event is open to 500 in-person attendees and expected to draw 2,000+ combined attendees across the globe!

Global Call for SpeakersWe are looking for expert speakers from the pool of technical or management leaders in machine learning and artificial intelligence in different industry horizontals and verticals. Please Submit Your Proposal Here.

Call for Exhibitors and SponsorsPlease see the Exhibitor & Sponsorship Prospectus for the available packages and contact information. We have our leading Tech sponsors from Edge Impulse, Habana, an Intel Company, Efinix, and CogniFiber all confirmed, with more companies set to follow shortly. This helps us bring in a great enterprise audience that is investing in AI solutions.

Exclusive Premium Benefits for Sponsors

The "Startup Assistance Program" is available for Angel, Seed, Pre-A, and Series-A startups, which provides a 25~45% discount, with the largest discount reserved for Angel and Seed startups (Limited Availability. Details on Request).

For more information, visit https://www.valleyml.ai

SOURCE ValleyML

Originally posted here:
ValleyML is hosting AI Expo 2022 in August. The Premier AI and ML Industry Event! - PR Newswire

Youre Limiting a Persons Ability to Grow Joe Rogan About the Sneaky & Insidious Shadow-Banning That Allegedly Even Elon Musk Encountered -…

Theres always a lot of discussion about fighters pay in the UFC. Often its implied that it depends upon how many eyeballs one can bring in. Social media plays a big part in engaging with fans, but what would happen if the platforms restrict or limit ones audience? Joe Rogan shared his thoughts about the matter.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

The JRE podcast host had exciting UFC prospect, Khalil Rountree Jr., on the JRE MMA Show #124. In the episode, the TUF alumni unveiled a shocking fact that is typically overlooked.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Rountree said, Likes & replays and all that stuff is also a currency A lot of these companies that want to do business with me its like, how many followers do you have? Whats your Twitter engagement? Whats your Instagram engagement? Oh, this video only got 70,000 plays.'

Thereafter, Rountree suggested that all these play a role in if a company would stick with an athlete. Upon hearing Rountrees concern, Rogan reflected on another identical issue.

The UFC color commentator said, Oh, thats why shadow-banning is so sneaky. Shadow-banning is so insidious because youre limiting a persons ability to grow. And they do that all the time with people.

As Rogan mentioned, the phenomenon is very common; Even Elon Musk, who took over Twitter courtesy of a massive $44 billion deal, had recently addressed the process.

The richest man in the world posted a meme about the former holder of the record, Bill Gates; The Tesla CEO, in continuation to the tweet to Gates, posted another meme & captioned it, shadow ban council reviewing tweet

DIVE DEEPER

Joe Rogan Once Got 2 Weeks of Explosive Diarrhea After Trying the MonotrophicDiet

4 months ago

However, as Musk now has authority over the company, he could change this scenario. Thus, it would be interesting to see if he takes any steps to ban the shadow-banning.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

On Joe Rogan Experience #1238, Brian Redban speculated whether shadow-bans were a real thing. To that, the JRE host pointed out the bigger question and expressed, Shadow-banning for what?

The former Fear Factor host showed curiosity about the reason behind not banning someone entirely from the platform and enforcing a restriction instead.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

WATCH THIS STORYUFC 274: Date, Time, Venue, Tickets, And Livestream

What do you think of the revelations about shadow-banning on the JRE podcast?

Read the original:

Youre Limiting a Persons Ability to Grow Joe Rogan About the Sneaky & Insidious Shadow-Banning That Allegedly Even Elon Musk Encountered -...

The shadow over solar- POLITICO – POLITICO

With help from Daniel Lippman.

Editors note:Morning Energy is a free version of POLITICO Pro Energys morning newsletter, which is delivered to our subscribers each morning at 6 a.m. The POLITICO Pro platform combines the news you need with tools you can use to take action on the days biggest stories.Act on the news with POLITICO Pro.

The Commerce Department's probe into Southeast Asian solar imports could keep fossil fuels on the grid longer, undermining President Joe Biden's climate goals.

CEQ Chair Brenda Mallory testifies before the Senate Wednesday.

House and Senate committees continue to examine Biden's budget requests this week, including for the Agriculture Department and DOE's science and energy programs.

WELCOME TO MONDAY! Im your host, Matthew Choi, still dragging my feet through Covid. Martin Edwards of Taft Advisors gets the trivia for knowing The Inn at Little Washington is the only restaurant in the D.C. area with three Michelin stars, but it was great to hear from so many foodies! For today: Which NSYNC member voiced Chip Skylark in The Fairly Odd Parents? Send your tips, trivia answers and restaurant recs to [emailprotected]. Find me on Twitter @matthewchoi2018.

Check out the POLITICO Energy podcast all the energy and environmental politics and policy news you need to start your day, in just five minutes. Listen and subscribe for free at politico.com/energy-podcast. On today's episode: How renewables can grow in fossil fuel-dependent states.

A SOLAR SHOWDOWN COULD LEAD TO A RENEWABLE SLOWDOWN: Solar power has enjoyed meteoric growth over the past 10 years, with lower-than-expected prices incentivizing development and even changing models away from fossil fuel baseload generation toward a more central role for renewables. But all that could change with a Commerce Department probe into the solar supply chain chilling investment in new projects, POLITICOs Kelsey Tamborrino and Catherine Morehouse report.

Its just the math, said Richard McMahon, senior vice president of energy supply and finance at the Edison Electric Institute. You need to maintain reliability on the grid and if you cant count on those solar projects coming online in a timely way, then you have to get the power from somewhere.

The tariff petition, brought on by small California solar manufacturer Auxin Solar over parts imported from Southeast Asia, already delayed the retirement of a coal plant in Indiana, and utilities, industry groups and analysts warn more fossil fuel generation could stay on line longer as well. Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm joined the chorus of concern, telling senators Thursday the country could miss President Joe Bidens goal of decarbonizing the electricity sector by 2035 if the probe isnt resolved quickly. The Solar Energy Industries Association forecasts that going through with the tariff petition could lead to an additional 364 million metric tons of carbon by 2035.

A Commerce Department spokesperson told Kelsey and Catherine that the probe doesnt take into account political considerations and Commerce is committed to holding foreign producers accountable to playing by the same rules as U.S. producers. And Auxin Solar CEO Mamun Rashid said in a statement that industry concern over the supply chain crystallizes the need to completely on-shore the solar supply chain and to stop putting our countrys clean energy future in the hands of the Chinese. Read more from Kelsey and Catherine here.

RELATED READ: Zooming out for a 10,000-foot view of the Biden administrations trade policy, POLITICOs Gavin Bade takes a deep dive into the shifting politics of global trade as the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the economic pain of pandemic supply chain disruptions turn past assumptions on trade on their head.

As Gavin puts it: Trumps election in 2016 transformed a pro-globalization GOP and shocked Democrats into refocusing on working class voters hurt by trade deals. Then, shortages of masks and medical gear early in the Covid pandemic revealed the danger of Americas reliance on China. The supply chain crunches and inflation of the late pandemic disproved the thesis that free trade always lowers consumer prices. And then Russia destroyed the postwar European peace that all the free trade was supposed to support ushering in a new era of world politics."

IN COMMITTEE: Welcome back to another busy week on the Hill. White House Council on Environmental Quality Brenda Mallory heads before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee on Wednesday to discuss the councils work over the past year. The oversight hearing comes as CEQ continues work on its Justice40 screener to determine communities eligible for greater environmental prioritization. The White House announced Jalonne White-Newsome would take charge of CEQ's environmental justice work Thursday.

Both chambers continue to tackle the presidents budget request this week, with a Senate Appropriations subcommittee meeting Tuesday to go over the Department of Agricultures budget and a House Appropriations subcommittee meeting Tuesday for the Transportation Department's proposal.

The House Appropriations Energy and Water Development Subcommittee meets Wednesday to go over the budget request for the National Nuclear Security Administration and environmental management, and itll meet Thursday to go over DOEs science and energy programs.

Also on Thursday, the House Energy and Commerce Committee will dive into licensing reforms for hydropower, particularly proposals between environmentalists and the industry to create sustainable generation as waterways degrade from climate change.

On the legislation front: the House Natural Resources has a few subcommittee hearings this week including a Thursday Energy and Mineral Resources Subcommittee meeting on reforming the Mine Act of 1872. House Natural Resources Chair Ral Grijalva is leading legislation, The Clean Energy Minerals Reform Act (H.R. 7580), in the House to update hardrock mining legislation, particularly as elements such as copper, lithium and nickel grow in importance amid the clean energy transition. Sen. Martin Heinrich is leading companion legislation in the Senate.

The Water, Oceans and Wildlife Subcommittee and the Subcommittee on Indigenous Peoples also have legislative hearings on Thursday on a number of bills in their jurisdiction, including the WaterSMART Access for Tribes Act (H.R. 6238) to increase tribal water conservation grants and the Desalination Research Advancement Act (H.R. 7612) to promote desalination innovation. The National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands Subcommittee has a hearing on Wednesday on four recreation and forestry bills. The Senate Energy National Parks Subcommittee will also hear testimony on a series of national parks and federal lands bills Wednesday.

A message from ExxonMobil:

At ExxonMobil, were working to supply the energy the world needs today, while developing solutions for tomorrow. Heavy transportation needs big solutions. Innovations like renewable diesel made from plants could help reduce emissions from trucks by about 3 million metric tons per year, compared to conventional fuel. Learn more about how were helping society move toward a net-zero future at ExxonMobil.com/fuels.

BIDENS HOSTING AGENDA: Biden will host Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi at the White House on Tuesday to discuss both European sanctions on Russia (more on that in a bit) and ways to ensure European energy security. Before the invasion of Ukraine, Italy was one of Russias top natural gas customers. But it has since made moves to cut down on its reliance on Moscow, looking at other suppliers including Algeria.

Biden will also host ASEAN leaders at the White House for dinner Thursday, followed by a summit Friday at the State Department. ASEAN members Indonesia and Malaysia are among the worlds top natural gas producers.

RENEWED TSA CHIEF: Biden plans to nominate David Pekoske for another stint leading the Transportation Security Administration, the White House announced Friday. The agencys role in overseeing pipeline security has come under increased scrutiny since the Colonial Pipeline cyberattack last year and TSAs contentious cybersecurity standards earlier this year. Pekoske was first confirmed for the job in 2017, but left briefly for stints with the Department of Homeland Security, including serving as acting secretary and acting deputy secretary during the Colonial hack. POLITICOs Oriana Pawlyk has more.

THE CENTRAL EUROPEAN EXCEPTION: European negotiators are still working out a deal on sanctioning Russian oil without tanking the economies of some of their more Moscow-reliant states. Negotiators put forth a proposal that would give Hungary and Slovakia until the end of 2024 and the Czech Republic until the summer of 2024 to comply with the EU-wide sunset of Russian oil imports, POLITICOs Jacopo Barigazzi reports.

But negotiators couldnt reach a deal over the weekend after the Hungarian government continued to object. One diplomat told Jacopo and POLITICOs Leonie Kijewski: They want something like a total opt-out. But that's crazy. Talks are expected to resume today or Tuesday.

G-7 members who include EU members France, Germany and Italy committed to phasing out or banning the import of Russian oil during a meeting Sunday, the White House announced. The members met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and "committed to work together to ensure stable global energy supplies, while accelerating our efforts to reduce dependence on fossil fuels."

WARMING WARNING IN CALIFORNIA: Climate change could spell more power outages in California this summer, the California Energy Commission warned Friday. Increased demand for air conditioning brought on by heatwaves, wildfire damage to transmission and growing cost of natural gas could all spell outages and we have to be prepared for that, Mark Rothleder, senior vice president for the California Independent System Operator, said according to The New York Times. The states energy officials made the assessment during a presentation Friday, where they warned electric bills would likely shoot up, with the average Pacific Gas & Electric customer paying 9 percent more by 2025. Read more from the Times here.

Related: Electricity Shortage Warnings Grow Across U.S, via The Wall Street Journal.

Max Levy is now deputy digital director for fundraising at Stacey Abrams' Georgia gubernatorial campaign. He most recently was manager for partnerships and special projects at the EPA.

Billionaire George Kaisers Bank Drills Deeper Into the Oil Patch, via The Wall Street Journal.

Conservatives urge Ottawa to intervene in new threat to Enbridges Line 5 pipeline from Indigenous band in Wisconsin, via The Globe and Mail.

Canada in talks with Repsol, Pieridae Energy about LNG export terminals, via Reuters.

Energy Stocks Still Have Gas in the Tank, via The Wall Street Journal.

Giving old dams new life could spark an energy boom, via The Washington Post.

THATS ALL FOR ME!

A message from ExxonMobil:

Energy and innovation. Were producing both.

At ExxonMobil, were working to supply the energy the world needs and were committed to playing a leading role in societys transition to a lower-emission future.

With partners around the globe, were working to develop renewable diesel derived from plants, advanced biofuels made from wood waste, and eFuel made with hydrogen and captured CO2. One day, these engine-ready fuels could power cars, trucks, and even planes and ships with up to 85% fewer emissions compared to conventional diesel.

Learn more about how we are advancing climate solutions to keep society moving toward net zero atExxonMobil.com/fuels.

Originally posted here:

The shadow over solar- POLITICO - POLITICO

If Roe falls, many in the Midwest will have to travel to access abortion – WFYI

Kentucky lawmakers have been hard at work to erode access to abortion in the state long before the leak of a draft opinion on May 2 indicating the U.S. Supreme Court might overturn Roe v. Wade and remove federal protections for abortion as early as June.

In April, the Republican-led legislature overrode Democratic Gov. Andy Beshears veto to pass a law that halted abortions statewide. The law was in place for more than a week before a federal judge stepped in to block the bill with a temporary restraining order.

People in Kentucky can now access abortion in one of the states two clinics that provide them. But many advocates for abortion rights fear the experience is a shadow of whats to come if Roe falls.

Were all staring down the barrel of how much more time do we even have left, said Stevie Benge, a medical receptionist at Planned Parenthoods Louisville health center.

While the Supreme Courts decision is not yet final, protests have erupted nationwide in the wake of the news, including in Kentucky, which is one of 13 states where a trigger law would ban abortion automatically if Roe falls. More than 200 people marched through the streets of downtown Louisville on May 4, protesting the potential end of Roe.

Roughly half of all states are certain or likely to ban or severely restrict access to abortion if given the chance.

That means most people in the Midwest wont have access in their states.

The inevitability is eventually that anyone that wants an abortion is going to have to go to Illinois, Benge said.

Thats because Illinois is likely one of the only states in the Midwest where abortion will still be allowed if Roe is overturned.

Illinois is getting ready hiring staff and opening more clinics, said Megan Jeyifo, director of the Chicago Abortion Fund, which provides financial, logistical and emotional support for people coming to Illinois for abortions.

The organization typically gets about 500 calls a month from people seeking help getting abortions in the state, which she said is roughly double what it was last year.

When access was cut off for that week in April in Kentucky, Jeyifo and her team saw an uptick in calls from people there.

The number of people traveling to Illinois from other states has steadily risen over the past five years to about 10,000 a year, according to data from Illinois public health department.

People are coming into Illinois from as far as Texas, from as far as Kentucky, just all across the nation right now, Jeyifo said.

Planned Parenthood of Illinois CEO and President Jennifer Welch told The Chicago Tribune she expects between 20,000 and 30,000 additional patients a year seeking abortions in the state if Roe is overturned.

Efforts to ban abortion in Kentucky date back years

The more than 70-page bill passed by the Republican-led legislature last month included restrictions on minors and abortion medication, and bans abortion at 15 weeks.

Kentucky state Sen. Stephen Meredith, one of 107 state lawmakers who voted to override the governors veto of that bill, spoke at a hearing in April, saying he wants to see the end of abortion.

This is a stain upon our country, he said. Its our greatest sin. It needs to be reversed.

Although the law doesnt specifically ban abortions, providers said they were forced to halt the service because they couldnt comply with new regulations not yet in place.

The federal judge who temporarily blocked the bill will soon consider its constitutionality.

In 2019, the Kentucky legislature passed a law that would automatically ban abortions if Roe is overturned, only allowing them if a pregnant patient is at risk of death or permanent impairment. That same year, the legislature passed a law banning abortion around six weeks, which is currently blocked in court.

In November, Kentucky voters will decide whether to pass a constitutional amendment, which would remove any protections for abortion in the state.

During the week abortions were blocked in Kentucky, Benge said many patients the Planned Parenthoods Louisville Center were not aware that their choices had shifted dramatically.

Most folks for that week and the following week had no idea that the law had passed, Benge said. And so they would walk in for their abortion consultation and we were the first person to tell them that they couldnt get an abortion in Kentucky.

She said reactions ranged from anger to hopelessness. Almost every patient they spoke with cried.

Working with Planned Parenthood clinics in Indiana, the Louisville provider tried to ease the burden by continuing to provide pre-abortion consultations in town so that people seeking an abortion wouldnt have to stay multiple days out of state.

Brenda Rosen, executive director at the Kentucky chapter of the National Association of Social Workers, which advocates for human rights and reproductive justice, said the leaked Supreme Court opinion has caused panic among clients.

Weve had an increase in calls from families and other social workers who are sharing that their middle schoolers and teenagers are terrified now of What will happen, Mom, if Im raped? Will I be forced to have the baby?

She said overturning Roe would be detrimental.

Its as if were taking 100 steps 100 years backward in our country right now, she said. And its terrifying. Its causing a great deal of anxiety.

Concerns about what the end of Roe could mean for the most vulnerable

Among the hundreds of people who gathered in downtown Louisville on May 4 to protest the potential end of Roe was Summer Dickerson, founder of Women of the Well Ministry, an organization that aims to raise awareness about human trafficking and domestic violence.

Dickerson said shes a survivor of human trafficking and had an abortion after learning she was pregnant by her trafficker.

I was protecting my baby, in my eyes, Dickerson said. And as much as that affected me, this telling me I cant have an abortion would have affected me more. I was a slave, I was sold and auctioned off to the highest bidder many times, and then after that trauma, I decide to make a judgement call for me and my child and then to be judged for that as well its not OK.

She said hearing the court could be set to overturn Roe blew her mind.

Theyre not going to stop anything; all theyre going to do is stop safe abortions, she said. That message time and time again is: If you have a uterus we dont care about you.

Being forced to travel across state lines to get an abortion will be difficult for many of the patients the Planned Parenthood clinic in Louisville serves, Benge said. Many are low income and may not have their own car.

They're trying to figure out how they can get to Bloomington or Indianapolis when they don't even have a physical means of transportation, she said. And then suddenly theyre thinking about having to have an abortion and then taking a bus home.

Providers say abortion bans that take effect in states like Kentucky in the wake of Roe will disproportionately affect young people and other already-vulnerable populations like people of color and those with low or no income.

They may not have funds to pay for an abortion, a way to travel or the freedom to take multiple days off work.

Jeyifo, with the Chicago Abortion Fund, says existing restrictions already harm these groups by making abortion costly and clinics hard to reach.

This will just make it more excruciating than it already is, she said. Roe is the bare minimum. And it's just devastating to think that we're going to lose even that.

A final Supreme Court decision on Roe v. Wade is expected to come in June or July.

WFPL Reporter Ryan Van Velzer contributed reporting.

This story comes from a partnership between WFPL and Side Effects Public Media a public health news collaborative based at WFYI. Follow Aprile on Twitter @Aperoll27.

Original post:

If Roe falls, many in the Midwest will have to travel to access abortion - WFYI

High school softball: City and Southern Section playoff results and updated pairings – Los Angeles Times

CITY SOFTBALL

SOFTBALL

OPEN DIVISION

Quarterfinals, Wednesday, 3 p.m.

#8 Eagle Rock at #1 El Camino Real

#5 Wilmington Banning at #4 San Pedro

#6 Carson at #3 Birmingham

#7 Granada Hills Kennedy at #2 Granada Hills

DIVISION I

First round, Tuesday unless noted

#9 Palisades at #8 South Gate, Wednesday, 3 p.m.

Legacy 8, Sun Valley Poly 1

Bravo 5, Sylmar 3

Chavez 21, Chatsworth 0

Los Angeles Roosevelt 4, Fairfax 3

Quarterfinals, Thursday, 3 p.m.

#8 South Gate/#9 Palisades winner at #1 Los Angeles Marshall

#5 Legacy at #4 Bravo

#6 Chavez at #3 Venice

#10 Los Angeles Roosevelt at #2 San Fernando

DIVISION II

Play-in games, Tuesday

#17 Marquez at #16 Sherman Oaks CES, result not reported

Garfield 19, Grant 0

Harbor Teacher Prep 10, South East 6

North Hollywood 12, West Adams 1

First round, Thursday, 3 p.m.

Sherman Oaks CES/Marquez winner at #1 Port of Los Angeles

#9 Los Angeles Wilson at #8 Taft

#12 Los Angeles Hamilton at #5 Arleta

#13 Garfield at #4 King/Drew

#14 Harbor Teacher Prep at #3 Gardena

#11 Lincoln at #6 Cleveland

#10 Northridge at #7 Verdugo Hills

North Hollywood/West Adams winner at #2 Franklin

DIVISION III

Play-in games, Tuesday

#17 Monroe at #16 Lakeview, result not reported

Locke 17, Bright Star 6

#19 Reseda at #14 Valley Arts/Sciences, result not reported

Panorama 28, Sun Valley Magnet 18

First round, Thursday, 3 p.m.

Lakeview/Monroe winner at #1 Santee

#9 Jefferson at #8 Fremont

#12 Los Angeles University at #5 Contreras

#20 Locke at #4 Canoga Park

Valley Arts/Sciences/Reseda winner at #3 Alliance Smidt Tech

#11 Torres at #6 Triumph

#10 Orthopaedic at #7 Dorsey

#18 Panorama at #2 Mendez

DIVISION IV

Play-in games, Tuesday

CALS Early College 9, Los Angeles Jordan 8

Hawkins 30, Animo South Los Angeles 24

Central City Value 20, Washington 2

USC-Media Arts/Engineering 28, Dymally 2

First round, Thursday, 3 p.m.

#16 CALS Early College at #1 Bernstein

#9 Westchester at #8 East Valley

#12 Animo Robinson at #5 Camino Nuevo

#13 Hawkins at #4 Middle College

#19 Central City Value at #3 Maywood CES

#11 Manual Arts at #6 University Prep Value

#10 Angelou at #7 Belmont

#18 USC-Media Arts/Engineering at #2 Roybal

NOTES: Quarterfinals, (Div. II-IV), Monday, 3 p.m.; semifinals (Open Division and Div. I), May 17, 3 p.m.; semifinals (Div. II-IV), May 18, 3 p.m. Championships, May 20 at Birmingham (Div. IV at 3 p.m., Div. III at 3:30 p.m.) and May 21 at Cal State Northridge (Div. II at 9 a.m., Div. I at noon, Open Division at 3 p.m.).

SOUTHERN SECTION SOFTBALL

DIVISION 1

Second round, Tuesday

Oaks Christian 13, Chino Hills 3

Murrieta Mesa 12, Norco 8

Los Alamitos 1, Beaumont 0

Camarillo 3, Esperanza 2

Eastvale Roosevelt 3, La Mirada 0

Garden Grove Pacifica 2, South Torrance 1

Gahr 7, La Serna 5

Orange Lutheran 2, Villa Park 1

Quarterfinals, Thursday, 3:15 p.m.

#1 Oaks Christian at Murrieta Mesa

Los Alamitos at #4 Camarillo

Garden Grove Pacifica at #3 Eastvale Roosevelt

Gahr at Orange Lutheran

DIVISION 2

Second round, Tuesday

Corona Centennial 10, Royal 0

Warren 1, North Torrance 0 (8)

Millikan 6, La Habra 5

South Hills 6, Segerstrom 3

Torrance 2, Glendora 1

Yucaipa 9, Charter Oak 1

Don Lugo 2, Arcadia 1

Mission Viejo 3, Sonora 0

Quarterfinals, Thursday, 3:15 p.m.

#1 Corona Centennial at Warren

Millikan at #4 South Hills

Yucaipa at #3 Torrance

#2 Mission Viejo at Don Lugo

DIVISION 3

Second round, Tuesday

Bonita 5, La Palma Kennedy 0

Visit link:

High school softball: City and Southern Section playoff results and updated pairings - Los Angeles Times

With Womens Lives on the Line, a Senate Vote Today Will Expose Collins and Murkowski on Choice – Justia Verdict

The Senate votes today on codifying Roe v. Wade. While there are bipartisan proponents for the concept, window-dressing disagreements unrelated to womens rights dim the prospects for passage.

The House has already adopted a bill that would preserve Roe and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. Senatorial give-and-take to preserve the right to choose would be easy if Republicans Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski were truly committed to womens right to choose.

Two competing Senate bills afford an opportunity for compromise to protect Roe and Casey. Those settled Supreme Court decisions are in imminent jeopardy, as was confirmed by the leak last week of a draft majority opinion by Justice Samuel Alito overturning them.

The dueling bills contain two differences in language with no real-world consequences. Underlying the conflict is a more real disagreement: the filibuster. More on that after looking at why the variations in language are so superficial.

One Senate bill is sponsored by Collins and Murkowski. It expressly incorporates the Supreme Courts standard in Casey: A State may not impose an undue burden on the ability of a woman to choose whether or not to terminate a pregnancy before fetal viability.

The Democrats proposal invalidates any abortion ban or restriction before viability. The differing Collins-Murkowski language, Democrats argue, would allow the Supreme Court to permit abortions to be restricted after only 15 weeks, as Mississippis statute does, rather than the current viability standard of approximately 24 weeks.

But wait. Without congressional legislation, the Supreme Court is about to allow states to ban all abortions. And Democrats have not been paying attention if they think their bills language would prevent the Court from upholding Mississippi-type statutes. Why fight over next to nothing?

The second difference is that the Collins-Murkowski bill includes an express provision shielding medical providers with religious objections to abortion: Nothing in this Act shall be construed to have any effect on laws regarding conscience protection.

Collins says she wont support the Democrats bill because it does not protect . . . Catholic hospitals. Schumer says that any assertion that his bill jeopardizes their rights is false.

Goodness, with or without the Collins-Murkowski language, this Supreme Court majority is certain to allow Catholic medical providers to refuse to perform abortions. In the last year, the Court has upheld the constitutional rights of Catholic Philadelphia foster agencies to refuse to provide services to LGBTQ couples and struck down California COVID-19 crowd size restrictions against those conducting religious services.

Again it looks like the two sides are shadow-boxing.

That brings us to the real disagreement: Collinss and Murkowskis apparent opposition to creating a carve-out in the filibuster, which requires 60 votes to pass a measure.

Such a carve-out would not, as Collins has said previously, irreparably harm the Senate any more than the Senate was harmed by more than 100 previous carve-outs.

A Collinss spokeswoman announced last week that the Senator has not changed her position. If that is the case for her and Murkowski, Democrats have no incentive to compromise. Even if they wholly accepted the Republican senators bill, it would not become the law.

Notwithstanding research showing that banning abortion would raise pregnant womens deaths by more than 20%, it looks like reproductive freedom is not important enough for the two Republican senators to make an exception. If it were, they have a ready explanation.

Lets start with Collins. Following the Alito opinion leak, she was the subject of severe, renewed criticism for having voted to confirm Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh. Collins defended herself by suggesting that she got hoodwinked. She stated that the draft decision is completely inconsistent with what [they] said in their hearings and in our meetings.

Collins going all-in on legislation codifying Roe would prove wrong her skeptics who say she doesnt put her vote where her pro-choice mouth is.

Murkowski is in a similar boat. She stated that the draft decision overturning Roe was not . . . the direction that I believed that the court would take based on statements that have been made about Roe being settled and being precedent.

Murkowski, too, has reason to prove that her support for womens reproductive freedom is more than a fig leaf. Her vote for Amy Coney Barrett came despite the now-Justice having said in her confirmation hearings that Roe is not a case that everyone has accepted, having joined lower court dissents that signaled her antipathy to abortion, and having signed a letter advocating the end of Roe.

These facts have created an enormous credibility gap for Murkowski and Collins. Their votes for a filibuster carve-out would close the gap and ensure that Roe and Casey remain the law of the land, regardless of what Democratic filibuster-supporters Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema do, especially with Democratic Pennsylvania Senator Bob Casey just announcing that he would support Schumers bill.

Unless Collins and Murkowski are willing to codify Roe and vote to exempt the bill from the filibuster, the Republican senators claims that Supreme Court nominees misled them will look as hollow as a drum banged a few hundred times too many. Their votes today will likely tell us that they care more about staying in step with McConnells Marching Band than about protecting womens reproductive freedom.

Go here to see the original:

With Womens Lives on the Line, a Senate Vote Today Will Expose Collins and Murkowski on Choice - Justia Verdict

Online Privacy Will Be Critical If roe Vs Wade Is Overturned | Mint – Mint

About 10 years ago, a story about Targets uncanny ability to detect a customers pregnancy made waves. An angry man had gone into a Target store in Minneapolis, demanding to speak to a manager and flashing coupons that his teenage daughter had received in the mail for baby clothes and cribs. Are you trying to encourage her to get pregnant?" he asked. It turned out his daughter was already pregnant and Target had figured this out before he had.

Data mining has improved since then, but fortunately so have our tools for protecting privacy. A leaked draft ruling suggests the US Supreme Court may overturn Roe vs Wade, the landmark 1974 decision that gave women the right to abortion. This would make online privacy more critical than ever for women and health-care providers, as secrecy over abortion would become integral not just for personal reasons but to avoid legal ramifications or blowback from vigilantes. Its unclear who would be legally liable for an abortion in close to a dozen or more US states that may ban it. But many women would want to hide their online activity out of caution. Democratic Senator Ron Wyden warned on Tuesday that every digital recordfrom web searches, to phone records and app datawill be weaponized in Republican states as a way to control womens bodies."

One of the first things many women in need of an abortion do is seek advice online. That wont change. But if they happen to live in one of 22 states that would probably outlaw abortion, theyd be wise to hide their browsing history and use encrypted messaging apps to talk to others about their plans. Should abortion pills also be outlawed, women may turn to the Dark Web to procure themsomething they already do, according to one study. Women may also turn to VPNs to stop mobile network providers and search engines from seeing their browsing habits. Theyll clear their web histories, use incognito windows or use more privacy-focused browsers like Firefox.

Such tools, normally associated with political dissidents in autocratic regimes, could become far more important for American women in a post-Roe vs Wade world. A tech news site reported that a location-data firm has already been selling information on visits to abortion clinics, by tracking apps on groups of phones.

The internet presents risk, but also help, such as telemedicine services that offer abortion medication. Many women in the US have flocked to services like Aid Access to acquire such medication; the website Women on Web offers services to women around the world. Depending on the location, pills can cost about $90, versus $600 or more to get the procedure done in a clinic, prohibitively expensive for many of the women who need abortions.

Online collectives like the Auntie Networks of Facebook will also become increasingly important. These are pages run by people offering a spare room in US states where abortion is legal, for women who need the procedure. A 2019 report in the Washington Post described how some Auntie Network pages suggested taking selfies at local landmarks as proof" that the trip was just a vacation. One host in Iowa said theyd be happy to mail you a birthday card" which contained birth control, a Plan B pill or a pregnancy test. Well-meaning as these initiatives are, this is sensitive information being hosted by a social-media company thats already being used by third parties, in this case advertisers.

In the meantime, a forthcoming law in the EU that reins in the power of large tech firms may have the unintended consequence of making peoples data in the US more vulnerable to surveillance. The EUs Digital Markets Act, which will come into effect in the next few years, forces the worlds biggest digital companies to make their products compatible with those of competitors. That means messaging apps like WhatsApp will need to co-exist with less-secure services like SMS. But some cryptography experts say that making these tools interoperable will break their encryption standards, which could put women seeking an abortion at greater risk.

Social-media and search platforms have for years been exploited by the surveillance advertising industry. How much will they resist future government efforts to enforce abortion bans? What happens if state prosecutors order Facebook or Google to identify women who are breaking the rules? Given the libertarian ethos of many Silicon Valley billionaire founders and the legal fallout from whistleblower Edward Snowden, its hard to see such firms giving in to government demands to break their encryption and hand over such details. But put enough financial pressure on a business and anything can happen. For now, encryption and online privacy tools are a sacred right for women seeking an abortion. They mustnt turn into a luxury.

Parmy Olson is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering technology.

Subscribe to Mint Newsletters

* Enter a valid email

* Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter.

More here:
Online Privacy Will Be Critical If roe Vs Wade Is Overturned | Mint - Mint

6 Other Leaks That Rocked Washington – Washingtonian

Politicos publication of a draft Supreme Court opinion that signals the end Roe v. Wade has hit Washington like a thunderbolt, triggering protests outside the Supreme Court, generating blowback for pro-choice Republican Senators who supported Trumps nominees for the bench, and sparking an investigation to determine how the sensitive materials ended up in the hands of reporters Josh Gerstein and Alexander Ward. Because of the profound consequences that the draft opinion portends for abortion access in America, its publication is among the most significant leaks in Washingtons history. Here are six other bombshell leaks that rocked the nations capital.

In 1971, the military analyst Daniel Ellsberg sent copies of the top-secret Pentagon Papers to reporters at the Washington Post and the New York Times. The revelations about how badly the Vietnam war was going for American forces stunned the public, and the episode also led to a landmark Supreme Court ruling affirming that the newspapers had the right to publish the material.

At the start of the 1970s, a high-ranking FBI official,Mark Felt, reinvented himself as Deep Throat, the anonymous source who provided the Washington Posts reporting duoBob Woodward and Carl Bernsteinwith the secret information they needed for their historic Watergate scoops. The bombshell revelations would push Nixon out of the White House, inspire a Hollywood movie, and endow the Washington Post with its romantic mystique.

In 2003, Richard Armitage, the then deputy secretary of state, disclosed the identity of a CIA officer to the conservative columnist Robert Novak. Though Armitage would later insist that hed made the disclosure inadvertently, the outing of Valerie Plame as a CIA operative would trigger a federal investigation into the source of the leak, embroil the Bush administration in controversy, and lead to the conviction of Dick Cheneys former chief of staff, Scooter Libby, on obstruction of justice and other charges. Armitage didnt reveal himself to be Novaks original source until 2006, according to CNN.

Ex-intelligence contractor Edward Snowden in 2013 provided information to journalists at the Guardian and the Washington Post that exposedclassified government surveillance programs that harvested telecommunications data of millions of citizens. After American law enforcement authorities filed espionage charges against Snowden, he fled to Russia.

In July of 2016, Wikileaks released an embarrassing cache of roughly 20,000 emails that had been sent and received by senior figures in the Democratic Party. The emailswhich had been hacked by Russian operativesshowed top DNC officials disparaging Bernie Sanders,led to the resignation of Debbie Wasserman Schultz as DNC chairand stirred discord inside the Democratic Party.

After former President Trump fired him in May 2017, former FBI director James Comey used the assistance of a friend to leak the contents of a memo that,among other things,contained his recollection of a discussion in which Trump suggested that the bureau scrap its probe into Michael Flynn, according to NBC News.A subsequent report by the Department of Justices Office of Inspector General concluded that Comeys actions broke FBI policy,but the DOJ declined to prosecute him.

Join the conversation!

Senior Writer

Luke Mullins is a senior writer at Washingtonian magazine focusing on the people and institutions that control the citys levers of power. He has written about the Koch Brothers attempt to take over The Cato Institute, David Gregorys ouster as moderator of NBCs Meet the Press, the collapse of Washingtons Metro system, and the conflict that split apart the founders of Politico.

Read more:
6 Other Leaks That Rocked Washington - Washingtonian