ABQ attorney to represent Chelsea Manning
ABQ attorney to represent Chelsea Manning.
By: KRQE
The rest is here:
ABQ attorney to represent Chelsea Manning - Video
ABQ attorney to represent Chelsea Manning
ABQ attorney to represent Chelsea Manning.
By: KRQE
The rest is here:
ABQ attorney to represent Chelsea Manning - Video
Army Private Chelsea Manning was sentenced to 35 years in prison in August for leaking hundreds of thousands of government files, and now her appeals lawyer is speaking out, calling the punishment out of proportion to the offense.
"It's a very long sentence compared to other sentences for similar kinds of situations that I'm aware of, or even dissimilar situations like rape and murder," attorney Nancy Hollander told The Associated Press this week.
Others who have leaked government secrets to the media have only received two and a half years or less, Hollander pointed out.
Urgent: Do You Approve Or Disapprove of President Obama's Job Performance? Vote Now in Urgent Poll
Manning's trial lawyer, David Coombs, said that she could be released as early as 2020 for good behavior.
In total, the 26-year-old from Oklahoma was convicted of 20 crimes in July. Those crimes included six violations of the Espionage Act. Manning was not convicted of the most serious crime she was accused of aiding the enemy.
She reportedly leaked over 700,000 classified files, battlefield videos, and diplomatic cables to the anti-secrecy outfit WikiLeaks, which was founded by Julian Assange.
Last week, Coombs published an open letter stating that he felt his client did not receive a fair trial. His last act as her representative before the appeals process, he wrote, was to file for clemency.
"Yesterday, I filed PFC Mannings clemency matters. This filing marks the end of my representation of PFC Manning for her court-martial. Since being retained to represent her on July 16, 2010, I have fought to ensure that she received a fair trial and a just result. Unfortunately, I do not believe that she received either," Coombs' statement read.
Commenting specifically on the length of the sentence he wrote, "Anyone familiar with this case would agree that a 35-year sentence is excessive for PFC Mannings conduct."
Originally posted here:
Chelsea Manning Sentence Harsher Than Others For Similar ...
Edward Snowden's revelations about the National Security Agency's (NSA) data collection practices have eroded the public's trust in major technology companies -- and in the Internet, a Harris Interactive survey found.
Harris polled over 2,000 U.S. adults for their opinions on surveillance, data gathering, Internet privacy and trust in a post-Snowden era.
About 85% of those polled were at least somewhat familiar with Snowden's leaks about government surveillance and some 80% wanted Congress to implement new laws for curbing the NSA.
Despite that, over half believed that mass surveillance helps prevent terrorism and an almost equal number felt that Internet companies should cooperate with the government's efforts in this regard.
Somewhat paradoxically though, two out of three survey respondents also felt betrayed because ISPs and other online companies are working secretly with the government to collect and monitor the communications of private citizens. About 60% are less trusting of ISPs and other technology companies than before the revelations.
The results reflect mixed emotions among Internet users said Stephen Cobb, a senior security researcher at security vendor Eset, which commissioned the Harris Interactive survey.
"People clearly are thinking more about the relationship between privacy and security. What the Snowden revelations have done is to surface the unresolved tension over this issue," he said. "People would like, on the one hand, to think the surveillance is necessary. But there is push back against unnecessary surveillance."
There is little doubt that Snowden's revelations about major Internet companies like Google, Microsoft and Yahoo secretly handing over customer data to intelligence agencies have shaken consumer confidence. "The feeling of betrayal is considerable and understandable," Cobb said.
One result is that people appear to be scaling back their Internet use. Nearly half of the respondents have become more cautious about what they say, where they go and what they do on the Internet. About 25% are less inclined to use email these days because of the same reason.
Though the survey sample is relatively modest, the results are significant, Cobb said.
Continued here:
Snowden leaks erode trust in Internet companies, government
On March 19, we posed a question that's fed conversation at dinner tables, Sunday morning talk shows, and more Capitol Hill cocktail parties than you can shake a stick at:
Is Edward Snowden, who made off with classified files and leaked them to reporters, a hero, a traitor, or something in between?
For anyone who might need a refresher, Snowden is the former National Security Agency contractor who made off with a vast trove of classified files, fed them to hungry journalists, turned up in Moscow, and now faces espionage charges by the U.S. government.
Snowden recently turned up -- via robot camera -- at a TED talk, which you can read about here.
Well, the votes are in. But the polls much like elections in Turkey, Iraq and Cambodia remain open to debate.
Be our guest. Vote here. If we get enough votes, we'll publish the results again.
To date, the voting was much more lopsided than any of us here at Snowden Central could have imagined. You be the judge:
He's a hero for revealing that the NSA collected phone data on millions of ordinary Americans. 55.08% (363 votes)
He's a traitor who stole classified files and fled to Moscow, and he should be prosecuted. 30.96% (204 votes)
He's somewhere in the middle. We don't know enough, yet, about who he gave the files. 13.96% (92 votes)
Excerpt from:
Edward Snowden poll results (hero, traitor, or someting else) are in!
The Snowden affair has made the industry wary of government interference. That is why I emphasise to the industry that they should treat child abuse images as a separate case from anything else, Mr Green said, after a speech at a conference organised by the NSPCC.
John Carr, chairman of the Childrens Charities Coalition on Internet Safety, told the conference that the fight against child pornography had been hugely complicated by the Snowden affair.
There was a great degree of suspicion of any scheme designed to root out online paedophiles, and some firms were fearful of appearing to be just another branch of the CIA or GCHQ, Mr Carr said.
More here:
Edward Snowden affair made tech firms 'wary' of tackling child pornography, says minister
The United States Constitution. (ARCHIVES.GOV)
What if the National Security Agency (NSA) knows it is violating the Constitution by spying on all Americans without showing a judge probable cause of wrongdoing or identifying the persons it wishes to spy upon, as the Constitution requires? What if this massive spying has come about because the NSA found it too difficult to follow the Constitution?
What if the Constitution was written to keep the government off the peoples backs, but the NSA and the president and some members of Congress have put the NSA not only on our backs, but in our bedrooms, kitchens, telephones and computers? What if when you look at your computer screen, the NSA is looking right back at you?
What if the NSA really thought it could keep the fact that it is spying on all Americans and many others throughout the world secret from American voters?
What if Congress enacted laws that actually delegate some congressional powers to elite congressional committees -- one in the Senate and one in the House?
What if this delegation of power is unconstitutional because the Constitution gives all legislative powers to Congress as a whole and Congress itself is powerless to give some of its power away to two of its secret committees?
What if the members of these elite committees who hear and see secrets from the NSA, the CIA and other federal intelligence agencies are themselves sworn to secrecy?
What if the secrets they hear are so terrifying that some of these members of Congress dont know what to do about it?
What if the secrecy prohibits these congressional committee members from telling anyone what they know and seeking advice about these awful truths?
What if they cant tell a spouse at home, a lawyer in her office, a priest in confessional, a judge when under oath in a courtroom, other members of Congress or the voters who sent them to Congress?
Read the original here:
NSA spying: What if secrecy trumps the Constitution? | Fox ...
With every new leak from Edward Snowdens bottomless trove of pilfered documents, it gets harder to keep track of all the bizarre ways the National Security Agency has cooked up to spy on people and governments. This may help.
Data in Motion NSAs spies divide targets into two broad categories: data in motion and data at rest. Information moving to and from mobile phones, computers, data centers, and satellites is often easier to grab, and the agency sucks up vast amounts worldwide. Yet common data such as e-mail is often protected with encryption once it leaves a device, making it harderbut not impossibleto crack.
Data at Rest Retrieving information from hard drives, overseas data centers, or cell phones is more difficult, but its often more valuable because stored data is less likely to be encrypted, and spies can zero in on exactly what they want. NSA lawyers can compel U.S. companies to hand over some of it; agency hackers target the most coveted and fortified secrets inside computers of foreign governments.
Where the Data Goes Much of the data the NSA compiles from all these efforts will be stored in its million-square-foot data center near Bluffdale, Utah. It can hold an estimated 12 exabytes of data. An exabyte is the equivalent of 1 billion gigabytes.
Link:
The NSA Spying Machine: An Interactive Graphic - Businessweek
Summary: 85 percent of adult Americans are somewhat aware of NSA spying and many have already changed their online behavior. And the Snowden revelations continue. Where will this end?
A new Harris poll commissioned by security software maker ESET (not available online; reported on here) found that 47 percent of respondents have changed their online behavior and think more about the sites they visit, what they say, and what they do.
Twenty-six percent say that they are now doing less online banking and shopping. More worrying: the 18-34 age group is doing less online.
Twenty-four percent are less inclined to use email. Among 18-34 year olds in households making less than $50,000, a year the the percentage rises to 32.
OK, all the big e-commerce sites may be quaking, but the NSA not so much. Why?
While two-thirds believe technology companies have violated the trust of users by working with the Feds, 57 percent believes that mass surveillance helps prevent terrorism. Really?
I asked Stephen Cobb, Senior Security Researcher at ESET, author of the article about the survey and a long-time security geek, about the disparity between concern about security and support for surveillance.
The NSA revelations brought to the surface concerns that a lot of people had in the area of data privacy. People are now debating with themselves the balance between privacy and security.
People's feelings are becoming more nuanced. People want better oversight, new laws, because people see value in surveillance.
But is the concern temporary or long term?
View post:
New Harris poll finds NSA spying affecting online commerce
With every new leak from Edward Snowdens bottomless trove of pilfered documents, it gets harder to keep track of all the bizarre ways the National Security Agency has cooked up to spy on people and governments. This may help.
Data in Motion NSAs spies divide targets into two broad categories: data in motion and data at rest. Information moving to and from mobile phones, computers, data centers, and satellites is often easier to grab, and the agency sucks up vast amounts worldwide. Yet common data such as e-mail is often protected with encryption once it leaves a device, making it harderbut not impossibleto crack.
Data at Rest Retrieving information from hard drives, overseas data centers, or cell phones is more difficult, but its often more valuable because stored data is less likely to be encrypted, and spies can zero in on exactly what they want. NSA lawyers can compel U.S. companies to hand over some of it; agency hackers target the most coveted and fortified secrets inside computers of foreign governments.
Where the Data Goes Much of the data the NSA compiles from all these efforts will be stored in its million-square-foot data center near Bluffdale, Utah. It can hold an estimated 12 exabytes of data. An exabyte is the equivalent of 1 billion gigabytes.
Read the original here:
Interactive Graphic: The NSA Spying Machine
Concept: Double Precision LOG Encryption
SYMBOLS USED: Ln = Natural Logarithm (Base e) ! = Single Precision Floating-Point Number Variable (7-digits precision) # = Double Precision Floating-Point Nu...
By: artmaker43
Read more from the original source:
Concept: Double Precision LOG Encryption - Video