DiskCryptor Easy Windows System Drive Encryption Tutorial ( Truecrypt Alternative ) – Video


DiskCryptor Easy Windows System Drive Encryption Tutorial ( Truecrypt Alternative )
In this tutorial I show you how to install DiskCryptor and easily encrypt your windows system drive to protect your desktop or laptop running Microsoft Windows. Download link: https://diskcryptor....

By: TutsTeach

Read the original here:
DiskCryptor Easy Windows System Drive Encryption Tutorial ( Truecrypt Alternative ) - Video

Julian Assange costs Britain £6m in policing costs | Mail …

Guarding London building has cost 5.9m, including 1m overtime bill Met has stationed officers outside embassy since he entered in June 2012 Police would arrest him if he left and then have him sent to Sweden for trial He lives in small room in the embassy containing a bed and a treadmill

By Martin Robinson

Published: 07:55 EST, 25 April 2014 | Updated: 09:47 EST, 25 April 2014

2,164 shares

155

View comments

Shocking: Julian Assange speaks from the balcony of the Equador embassy in Knightsbridge in 2012 and police say guarding the building has now cost 6m

Guarding the Ecuadorian embassy in London where Julian Assange has claimed asylum has now cost taxpayers almost 6million, it was revealed today.

Metropolitan Police officers have been standing outside the Knightsbridge building since the WikiLeaks founder took refuge there in June 2012 - a vigil costing 11,000 per day.

The 42-year-old is wanted in Sweden after allegedly sexually assaulting two women in Stockholm in 2010.

Read more here:
Julian Assange costs Britain £6m in policing costs | Mail ...

How the Espionage Act of 1917 Became a Law Against …

Yesterday's verdict in the Bradley Manning court martial was a partial victory, but mostly a resounding defeat. Again, the United States government wieldedtheEspionage Act, a law written to stop legit spies in the employ of foreign governments or agents,against a whistleblower working in the best interest of America.

That this law was used so successfully in the prosecution of a whistleblower is particularly troubling. It sets a dangerous precedent not just for defense employees, but intelligence agents, or anyone who comes into possession of classified documents. The US government, protecting what it believes to be its defense and intelligence interests, once again placed the whistleblower in the same legal arenaas the double agent. In the future, whistleblower cases will only be easier to prosecute.

With that in mind, we should take a look at the law that streamlines the US government'sprosecution ofwhistleblowers. Call it "ABrief History of the Espionage Act of 1917."With a clearer picture of the act's intent and evolution, perhaps we can start to ask the question of whether,after nearly 100 years, it needs some amending. If the same effort applied to fighting legislation like SOPA andPIPAor in defunding the NSA were used in changing the Espionage Act, there might yet be legal place for the whistleblower in America.

Origins

The tale of the Espionage Act really begins in the early 20th century. US legislators, essentially playingcatch-up with other nations that already had anti-espionage laws, began to lobby for such a law. Technically, the USmay have been enjoying apre-WWI Pax Americana, but our military was embroiled in a war in the Philippines. After defeating Spain in the Spanish-American war, we set our sites on thePhilippines, and took the country by force. At home, politicians were crafting an act entitled "An Act to prevent the disclosure of national defense secrets."

The debate culminated inthe Defense Secrets Act of 1911;which, by today's standards, featured pretty lax punitive measures. Those convicted of trading in defense secrets were to be imprisoned "not more than ten years." Child's play, really. As Europe descended into the chaos of World War I, it seemed vital to some that the US government needed strongeranti-espionage lawsa wider net with more punishment.

In his December 7, 1915 State of the Union, President Woodrow Wilson delivered the following words:

"There are citizens of the United States, I blush to admit, born under other flags but welcomed under our generous naturalization laws to the full freedom and opportunity of America, who have poured the poison of disloyalty into the very arteries of our national life; who have sought to bring the authority and good name of our Government into contempt, to destroy our industries wherever they thought it effective for their vindictive purposes to strike at them, and to debase our politics to the uses of foreign intrigue...

I urge you to enact such laws at the earliest possible moment and feel that in doing so I am urging you to do nothing less than save the honor and self-respect of the nation. Such creatures of passion, disloyalty, and anarchy must be crushed out. They are not many, but they are infinitely malignant, and the hand of our power should close over them at once. They have formed plots to destroy property, they have entered into conspiracies against the neutrality of the Government, they have sought to pry into every confidential transaction of the Government in order to serve interests alien to our own. It is possible to deal with these things very effectually. I need not suggest the terms in which they may be dealt with."

See more here:
How the Espionage Act of 1917 Became a Law Against ...

NSA releases Edward Snowden e-mail exchange – CNN.com

From Shimon Prokupecz, CNN

updated 10:13 AM EDT, Fri May 30, 2014

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

Washington (CNN) -- The NSA has released an e-mail exchange between Edward Snowden and the agency's general counsel's office, countering a claim the former contractor made in an interview this week.

Speaking to NBC News in an interview that aired Wednesday, Snowden claimed that he'd reached out to the office while working as an National Security Agency contractor to report what he saw as an abuse of power by the agency.

"I reported that there were real problems with the way the NSA was interpreting its legal authorities," he told NBC's Brian Williams.

In the e-mail exchange released by the NSA Thursday, Snowden requests clarification about training material he'd received, asking whether executive orders can override federal laws.

The general counsel's office responded to Snowden's e-mail, saying that executive orders have the "force and effect of law" but cannot override a statute.

"Please give me a call if you would like to discuss further," the e-mail concludes.

In his interview with NBC, Snowden said that after raising concerns, he essentially was told to "stop asking questions."

View post:
NSA releases Edward Snowden e-mail exchange - CNN.com

Edward Snowden analysis: Inside the mind of the man who …

It is a highly unusual propaganda battle that was reignited last week with an interview given by Mr Snowden to NBC News. He had asserted that he had worked as a fully fledged spy for the NSA rather than as an analyst and, more crucially, that he had decided to hand over the secret materials only after he had tried to raise his concerns about the snooping practices with his superiors but to no avail.

While not quite calling him a liar, the NSA said it had found only one email from Mr Snowden before he absconded and that it had been limited to a narrow question to the agencys legal office about the standing of presidential executive orders vs established law. The email did not raise allegations or concerns about wrongdoing or abuse, the NSA flatly said in a statement.

Thus the matter is quickly devolving into a he-says, she-says stand-off that is unlikely to clarify anything. In another statement published yesterday by The Washington Post, Mr Snowden, 30, suggested that the NSAs presentation of the records was incomplete or tailored, implying that the agency is either withholding other emails or missives he directed towards his bosses or hasnt done enough to find them.

This was the first time the NSA had deemed it necessary to make public any internal communications between itself and Mr Snowden before he fled on 20 May last year to Hong Kong. But while the outcome of this struggle clearly matters to the agency, the stakes for Ms Snowden are much higher if he hopes ever to emerge from hiding in Russia and seek vindication rather than imprisonment in the United States.

While Mr Snowden has tricky public relations concerns, so too might the journalists who received the materials from him and put them in the public sphere. They have been rewarded with a shared Pulitzer Prize. But Glenn Greenwald, formerly of The Guardian, found himself the target of withering opprobrium in a New York Times book review last week for his just-published account of the leaks, No Place to Hide.

Written by the veteran commentator Michael Kinsley, the review not only accused Mr Greenwald of coming across as unpleasant but also took him to task for assigning to journalists a right to publish government secrets regardless of the consequences.

I cant see how we can have a policy that authorises newspapers and reporters to chase down and publish any national security leaks they can find, Mr Kinsley wrote. This isnt Easter and these are not eggs. Someone gets to decide and that someone cannot be Glenn Greenwald.

Thus was sparked a subplot to the wider drama with other media voices standing up for Mr Greenwald, including The New York Timess own readers advocate, Margaret Sullivan. Theres a lot about this piece that is unworthy of the Book Reviews high standards, she said. The sneering tone about Mr Greenwald, for example; he is called a go-between instead of a journalist and is described as a self-righteous sourpuss.

For the US government, the job of countering Mr Snowdens assertions last week fell first to John Kerry, the Secretary of State, who gave him no margin. He should man up and come back to the United States if he has a complaint about whats the matter with American surveillance, he told CBS News. Come back here and stand with our system of justice and make his case.

And Mr Kerry sought to remind Americans of the governments view that Mr Snowden is not just a traitor but one whose actions have had serious consequences. The fact is he has damaged his country, very significantly, in many, many ways, he said. He has hurt operational security. He has told terrorists what they can now do to be able to avoid detection, and I find it sad and disgraceful.

Read more from the original source:
Edward Snowden analysis: Inside the mind of the man who ...

Snowden: Obama broke vow

Edward Snowden says that while he was inspired by President Obama's election, he's disappointed that Obama "embraced" or "extended" the surveillance policies of President Bush.

In his exclusive interview with "NBC Nightly News" anchor Brian Williams, Snowden would not say if he voted for Obama, arguing that should be kept private.

"Whether or not I voted for President Obama, I was inspired by him. He gave me courage, he gave me hope. I really believed that he would be a positive force for the country," Snowden said.

"And I still hope he will be."

It has come to our attention that the browser you are using is either not running javascript or out of date. Please enable javascript and/or update your browser if possible.

Snowden said Obama has failed to carry through on a pledge to reverse some of the policies of his predecessor.

"He's embraced the policies and he's extended the policies," the former NSA contractor said.

"He's not Bush. He's his own president. But the consonance in the policies should be concerning for a lot of Americans because he was a candidate that promised that he would give the public back its seat at the table of government.

"And he still has time to do so."

For his first American television interview, Snowden met for about five hours last week with Williams at a hotel in Moscow, where Snowden is living in exile while facing U.S. felony charges.

Excerpt from:
Snowden: Obama broke vow