LIVE FOREVER? Julian Assange claims immortality is near by ‘DIGITISING BRAINS’ – Express.co.uk

GETTY

Speaking at the Meltdown Festival in London, the controversial computer programmer said that sources at Silicon Valley which is regarded as the tech capital of the world say they are close to creating an ultra-powerful AI.

He adds people will shortly begin uploading their brains to machines, essentially giving them immortality.

The 45-year old told festival goers via a video link from the Ecuadorian embassy: I know from our sources deep inside the Silicon Valley institution[s] that they genuinely believe that they are going to produce AI that's so powerful, relatively soon, that people will have their brains digitised, uploaded to these AIs and live forever in simulation, therefore have eternal life.

GETTY

Mr Assange added the development could lead to a lack of productivity, as there would no urgency as people will literally have forever.

He added: It's like a religion for atheists.

GETTY

And given youre in a simulation, why not program the simulation to have endless drug and sex orgy parties around you.

He continued by saying that this ridiculous quasi-religious model that's it all going to lead to nirvana.

Mr Assange is not the first to make these claims.

Russian billionaire Dmitry Itskov has said he will make it possible for humans to live forever in the next 30 years by uploading their brains onto a computer.

The 35-year-old Russian is the founder of the 2045 Initiative, which is an organisation working on making immortality a reality by scientists creating a feasible program which maps the brain.

Asus

1 of 9

Asus Zenbo: This adorable little bot can move around and assist you at home, express emotions, and learn and adapt to your preferences with proactive artificial intelligence.

It then transfers the mind onto a computer, which is put on a robot body or as a hologram.

Mr Itskov said in a BBC documentary titled The Immortalist: "Within the next 30 years, I am going to make sure that we can all live forever.

I'm 100 per cent confident it will happen. Otherwise I wouldn't have started it.

See more here:
LIVE FOREVER? Julian Assange claims immortality is near by 'DIGITISING BRAINS' - Express.co.uk

Future of humanity under threat from AI-controlled propaganda Assange (VIDEO) – RT

WikiLeaks editor Julian Assange predicts an impending dystopic world where human perception is no match for Artificial Intelligence-controlled propaganda and the consequences of AI are lost on its creators, who envision a nirvana-like future.

Assange spoke of the threat of AI-controlled social media via video link at rapper and activist M.I.A.s Meltdown Festivalin the Southbank Centre, London.

READ MORE: Assange wants support for NSA whistleblower as WikiLeaks offers $10k reward to expose reporter

Speaking about the future of AI, Assange told a panel including Slovenian philosopher Slavoj iek that there will be a time when AI will be used to adjust perception.

Imagine a Daily Mail run by essentially Artificial Intelligence, what does that look like when theres only the Daily Mail worldwide? That's what Facebook and Twitter will shift into, he said.

Assange referenced the apparent intense pressure Facebook and Google were under to ensure Emmanuel Macron, and not Marine Le Pen, won last months French presidential election runoff.

When asked by M.I.A. if AI and VR technology will make society more vulnerable to becoming apolitical, Assange replied: Yes, of course we can be influenced, but I dont see that as the main problem.

"Human beings have always been influenced by sophisticated systems of production, information and experience, [such as the] BBC for example.

The technologies just amplify the power of the ability to project into the mind, he added.

The main concern in Assanges eyes centers around how AI can be used to advance propaganda.

The most important development as far as the fate of human beings are concerned is that we are getting close to the threshold where the traditional propaganda function that is employed by BBC, The Daily Mail, and cultures also, can be encapsulated by AI processes, Assange said.

When you have AI programs harvesting all the search queries and YouTube videos someone uploads it starts to lay out perceptual influence campaigns, twenty to thirty moves ahead. This starts to become totally beneath the level of human perception.

Read more

Using Google as an example, and comparing the wit involved to a game of chess, he said at this level human beings become powerless as they cant even see it happening.

Admitting his vision was dystopian, he suggested that he could be wrong.

Maybe there will be a new band of technologically empowered human beings that can see this [rueful] fate coming towards us, [which] will be able to extract value or diminish it by directly engaging with it that's also possible.

Another insight offered by the WikiLeaks founder was his opinion that engineers involved in AI lack perception about what theyre doing.

I know from our sources deep inside the Silicon Valley institution[s] that they genuinely believe that they are going to produce AI that's so powerful, relatively soon, that people will have their brains digitized, uploaded to these AIs and live forever in simulation, therefore have eternal life.

It's like a religion for atheists, he added. And given youre in a simulation, why not program the simulation to have endless drug and sex orgy parties around you.

Assange said this vision makes them work harder and the dystopian consequences of their work is overshadowed by cultural and industrial bias to not perceiving it.

He concluded that the normal perception someone would have regarding their work has been supplanted with this ridiculous quasi-religious model that's it all going to lead to nirvana.

Read the original here:
Future of humanity under threat from AI-controlled propaganda Assange (VIDEO) - RT

Getting High on Cryptocurrencies – Bloomberg

There are now four times as many cryptocurrencies in circulation as fiat currencies.

That's amazing. And encouraging.

According to the Swiss Association for Standardization, which maintains the International Standards Organization database, there are 177national currencies currently in use. That list generously includes four precious-metals and four bond-market units (codes XBA to XBD, for the curious).

Number of digital currencies

753

TheCoinMarketCapwebsite lists 753 cryptocurrencies, all the way from Bitcoin and Ethereum down to StrongHands and Paccoin (current value: $0.00000014).

With a retired basketball star promoting one such incarnation -- tied to marijuana -- on a recent trip to a repressive Asian nation lying to the north of South Korea, I'm tempted to call Peak Crypto.

But let's not kid ourselves: The madness is far from over. Bitcoin skeptics have been eating their words ever since the leading digital currency reached $1,000. January seems like such a long time ago now that Bitcoin is trading above $2,700.

Bruised Bears

Betting against Bitcoin when it reached $1,000 would have been a costly mistake

Source: Bloomberg

Although Bitcoin has climbed 300 percent in the past 12 months,giving its "coins" in circulation a value of $45 billion, Satoshi Nakamoto's brainchild is actually declining in relative importance. From more than 95 percent in late 2013, Bitcoin now accounts for 39 percent of the value of all cryptocurrency in circulation. Ethereum has caught up fast, from 3.9 percent at the start of the year to 31 percent of the total now, according to CoinMarketCap. Ripple is inthird place at around 8.8 percent after briefly overtaking Ethereum last month.

Virtual Value

Bitcoins in circulation are now worth more than $45 billion with Ethereum close behind

Source: CoinMarketCap

The other 20 percent of cryptocurrency value is unevenly distributed among the 750 wannabes alonga very long tail. It's possible some will rise to a level of legitimacy that will make them viable in the long term. Many are betting not on mass uptakebut on niche acceptance -- one pitches itself as thepayments platform for online games;another limits the amount of coinsto the number of kilometers between Earth and its moon; one seeks to be the official currency of a fictitious nation.

Market Force

Bitcoin remains the world's biggest cryptocurrency, but its dominance has waned

Source: CoinMarketCap

Yet Bitcoin itself remains so nichethat the WannaCry hackers reaped a minuscule harvestafter infecting more than 200,000 computers, because they insisted on being paid in the cryptocurrency.

Just because the boom is ridiculous doesn't mean it lacksmomentum -- it just tells you that consolidation also is inevitable. Not in the traditional M&A sense, but in the way that messenger apps like AIM,ICQ, Yahoo and MSN quietly gave way to WhatsApp and WeChat, which then led to the ubiquity of instant-messagingtechnology.

Morgan Stanley posited last week that government acceptance will be key to Bitcoin's continued rise, with the flipside being some kind of regulation of the currency. That's probably right, and if proponents of cryptocurrencies think they'll achieve widespread uptake without a nod from the authorities, they're probably smoking something.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Bloomberg LP and its owners.

To contact the author of this story: Tim Culpan in Taipei at tculpan1@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Paul Sillitoe at psillitoe@bloomberg.net

Here is the original post:
Getting High on Cryptocurrencies - Bloomberg

How cryptocurrency ethereum looks set to overtake bitcoin in one chart – MarketWatch

Just as Wall Street is paying more attention to bitcoin, a rival is increasingly threatening to become the top dog among cryptocurrencies.

Ethereums market capitalization is nearing bitcoins, as shown in the chart below from CoinMarketCap.

As of Wednesday, bitcoin BTCUSD, -0.93% (shown in orange on the chart) accounted for 39% of the combined market capitalization for all cryptocurrencies, down sharply from 87% on Feb. 25.

Blame the erosion on ethereum (shown in purple), which now makes up 31% of the total market cap, up from just 5% less than four months ago.

If ethereums market cap overtakes that of bitcoin, then The Flippening will have happened. That is the term that many people are using to refer to that shift, according to a post at the Flippening Watch blog.

Bitcoins market cap on Wednesday was around $45 billion and its price was just below $2,800, according to data from CoinDesk and CoinMarketCap. Ethereums market cap recently stood at $36 billion and its price at around $390.

Read more: Cryptocurrencies top $100 billion in market capitalization

Dont miss: 3 reasons why bitcoins surge may not be a bubble

By some metrics, ethereum already has eaten bitcoins lunch.

It has almost five times as many nodes in its network as bitcoin, meaning more people are using their computers to support it, a Motherboard report notes. Ethereum also has more transactions per day, the report adds.

Check out: Ethereum has soared but is it ready for prime time?

But some traders remain skeptical of ethereum:

In the screenshot in the above tweet, ICO refers to an initial coin offering, a new way to raise money. One startup reportedly raised nearly $150 million this week via an ICO.

As their prices have soared, cryptocurrencies increasingly have attracted the attention of Wall Streets analysts.

A Goldman Sachs technical analyst issued a bearish take on bitcoin earlier this week, leading the Zero Hedge financial blog to quip that probably means that bitcoin is set to make new all-time highs shortly.

Meanwhile, Morgan Stanley analysts have predicted that cryptocurrencies will not rally that much more unless they get governmental acceptance, including more regulations.

See the original post:
How cryptocurrency ethereum looks set to overtake bitcoin in one chart - MarketWatch

ATB Coin Cryptocurrency ICO Now Underway Across Globe – newsBTC

ATB Coin offers investors a unique opportunity with its ongoing ICO

With the wildly successful press reception of ATB oins U.S. introductory launch last Thursday, the companys Management Team is reporting over $12 million has been raised within the first fifteen minutes of the cryptocurrencys highly-anticipated ICO.

According to CEO Edward Ng, the companys technologically revolutionary cryptocurrency has already attracted excited investors from the United Stated, Canada, and China. Edward Ng further elaborated the company is pleased with such a high level of interest and optimism from investors; adding that the ICO will be ongoing for the next four weeks, with a targeted amount of $50 million.

ATB oins ambitious plans for global growth are already in place and are moving forward. This cryptocurrency is developed with the worlds most advanced protocols built-in such as SegWit, Lightning Network, and Smart Contracts. Borderless micro payment transactions are recorded in as little as microseconds. Our team is well-positioned to move forward with our intermediate goal of opening offices across the U.S., Canada, Latin America, and Asia, said Herbert W. Hoover III, ATB Coin co-founder.

Crowdfunding of ATB Coin tokens began June 12, 2017, and will continue for the next four consecutive weeks. Potential investors are offered bonuses up to 10%, which will motivate an investor for an additional capital investment. Altogether, the maximum tokens issued will number 333 million, of which 50 million will be assigned to the Crowdfunding ICO.

Information about ATB Coin and ATB Coin ICO can be found on the official website: https://atbcoin.com

Continued here:
ATB Coin Cryptocurrency ICO Now Underway Across Globe - newsBTC

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange: We have more material …

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange wont say whether Russia had any involvement in the emails his organization released on the eve of last weeks Democratic National Convention. But he says there are more leaks coming.

We have more material related to the Hillary Clinton campaign, Assange told CNNs Anderson Cooper on Friday night from the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where the 45-year-old Australia native has been living in exile for several years. That is correct to say that.

Assange admitted that last weekends release of the DNC emails which suggested that members of the partys national committee were plotting against Bernie Sanders in an effort to boost Hillary Clinton during their hard-fought primary was timed to coincide with the Monday start of the Democratic convention in Philadelphia.

Thats when we knew there would be maximum interest by readers, but also we have a responsibility to, Assange said. If we published after [the convention], you can just imagine how outraged the Democratic voting population would have been.

Bu he is refusing to disclose where he got those emails, which U.S. officials believe were obtained in a hack of the DNCs servers by Russian intelligence. The Republican nominee, Donald Trump, has staked out a relatively soft position against the Kremlin.

The difficulty that WikiLeaks has, of course, is that we cant go around speculating on who our sources are. That would be irresponsible, Assange said in an interview that aired Sunday on NBCs Meet the Press. I do think its an interesting question, of course, as to who our sources are. But as a source protection organization that many sources from across the world of many different types rely on to protect their identity, and their rights, to communicate the truth to the public. And thats what were talking about here, communicating the truth.

What I can say categorically is that we have published proof that the election campaign of Bernie Sanders was sabotaged in a corrupt manner by [former DNC Chair] Debbie Wasserman Schultz and others within the DNC, he added. We can say that categorically. We have published proof. But as for anything else, we can only speculate.

In comments that were widely reported in the wake of the leaked DNC emails, Assange told ITV last month that information WikiLeaks had accumulated on Clinton could proceed to an indictment. But those comments appear to refer to material that was published last week and not the material that WikiLeaks has yet to leak.

Assange said he has no interest in tipping the U.S. election in favor of any candidate, including Trump. But its clear Assange did not appreciate the Clinton campaigns response to the publication of the DNC emails.

In order to divert attention from proof that we published that the Sanders campaign was subverted within the DNC, Assange said on NBC, the Clinton campaign tries to take attention away from a very serious domestic allegation about election interference and try and bring in foreign policy.

And in the same interview with ITV, Assange criticized Clintons foreign policy and what he viewed as her attacks on the press.

We do see her as a bit of a problem for freedom of the press more generally, Assange said. She has a long history of being a liberal war hawk, and we presume she is going to proceed.

Original post:
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange: We have more material ...

As the Espionage Act Turns 100, We Condemn Threats Against Wikileaks – EFF

The federal law that is commonly used to prosecute leakers marks its 100th birthday today.

Signed into law on June 15, 1917, the Espionage Act 18 U.S.C. 792 et seq., was Congresss response to a fear that public criticism of U.S. participation in World War I would impede the conscript of soldiers to support the war effort and concerns about U.S. citizens undermining the war effort by spying for foreign governments. Although some parts of the law were repealed, many remain in effect 100 years later.

Most pertinent today, the law criminalizes both the disclosure and receipt of certain national security information. As a result, the Espionage Act remains the most common grounds upon which leakers of U.S. governmental information are prosecuted. Indeed, the recent charges against the alleged source of the NSA Russian Election Systems Phishing documents are based on the Espionage Act.

To date, however, the United States has never sought to prosecute a journalistic entity under the Espionage Act for either receiving secret government documents from a source or further disseminating the documents themselves or information from them in the course of reporting. There is nothing in the language of the law that prevents its use against a news organization, but it has been unofficially accepted that it should not apply to the press.

So it is alarming that the Justice Department is reportedly taking a serious look at bringing criminal charges against Wikileaks and Julian Assange for disclosing classified information . In so doing, the Trump administration is threatening to step over a never-crossed line applying the secret documents provisions of the Espionage Act to journalistic practices. The threat is greatly concerning in the context of prosecuting whistleblowers, and, more broadly, preserving a free press.

The threat is greatly concerning in the context of prosecuting whistleblowers, and, more broadly, preserving a free press.

Leaks are a vital part of the free flow of information that is essential to our democracy. And reporting on leaked materials, including reporting on classified information, is an essential role of American journalism. The US Supreme Court, in Bartnicki v. Vopper, recognized that those who lawfully obtain information pertaining to a matter of public interest have a near absolute right to publish it even if their source illegally obtained the information. Prosecuting Wikileaks for its role in this fundamental democratic process will undermine these vital protections.

In sections 793(d), (e) and 798 the Espionage Act criminalizes the unauthorized communication of both certain classified information and information connected with the national defense. Section 793(c) also prohibits merely obtaining national defense documents with intent or reason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the United States, or to the advantage of any foreign nation. Whether the principle of Bartnicki v. Vopper would bar a successful prosecution against a news organization under these provisions has never been tested.

A strong defense of Wikileaks is not simply an anti-Trump position. As current events indicate, leaks are non-partisan: those on both sides of the aisle typically embrace leaks that are politically useful and condemn leaks that are politically damaging. President Donald Trump famously praised Wikileaks when disclosures of DNC emails benefitted him. He now threatens to bring the strong arm of the law down on it.

It can be difficult to separate rhetoric from a planned course of action with this administration. But there are strong signs this White House intends to follow through on its bluster.

First, CIA Director Mike Pompeo labeled Wikileaks a non-state hostile intelligence service, at an April 13, 2017 speech at the Center for Strategic And International Studies. The director then followed up by asserting his philosophical understanding, as opposed to a legal conclusion, that Wikileaks and Assange are not exercising First Amendment rights.

About a week later, Attorney General Jeff Sessions explained that his department was stepping up its efforts on all leaks with the goal being to put some people in jail.

President Trump also reportedly urged then-FBI director James Comey to prosecute and imprison journalists who published classified information. Comeys failure to prioritize this has been cited as the one of the reasons for his firing.

Moreover, the presidents reported initial first choice for FBI director, former Senator Joseph Lieberman, has a history of belligerence against both the news media broadly and Wikileaks in particular. In 2010, Lieberman called for an investigation of the New York Times and other news media for publishing Wikileaks documents, proposed an anti-Wikileaks Law that would have criminalized the disclosure of intelligence source names, and pressured Amazon and credit card processors to choke off funding for Wikileaks.

Many of the other threats the president and those speaking on his behalf have made against the news media both during the election and since he took office require legislative action by either Congress or the states. Unlike his threat to open up the libel lawswhich would require action by 50 state legislatures or otherwise be subject to Congressional oversightthe executive branch can initiate a federal criminal prosecution on its own.

We condemn the threats of prosecution of Wikileaks and call for all to speak out against the them.

One hundred years is long enough to let the threat of prosecution under the Espionage Act cast a shadow over our free speech and press freedom protections. Sign our petition, and tell U.S. lawmakers to reform this outdated and overbroad law.

Take Action

Read more about how the Espionage Act came to be and the law's murky legal history.

View original post here:
As the Espionage Act Turns 100, We Condemn Threats Against Wikileaks - EFF

Sly: The Wikileaks documents that show Brighton gunman was considered a ‘weakling’ – 3AW

The Brighton gunman was considered a weakling and potential police informant, according to a Wikileaks documents detailed by Sly of the Underworld on 3AW Breakfast.

Sly also revealedYacqub Khayre, who took a woman hostage, killed an innocent man and shot at police, was shot 37 times by police at the conclusion of the the siege.

Click PLAY above to hear Sly

The Wikileaks document was amemorandum from senior Australian diplomat to the CIA.

Khayre has travelled to Somalia and served as a groups liason with al-Shabaab, Ross read from the document.

Police characterised Khayreas a weakling who struggled with the harsh day-to-day life in Somalia and was not fully trusted by the other four men.

The AFPbelieve Khayremay be turned while in prison to serve as an informant in further cases.

Sly:So he clearly wasnt a high-profile terror suspect.

While he was at it, Sly also took aim at the Federal Government, especially Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, for shifting blame at the feet of the parole board.

Theyre wrong in fact, theyre wrong in spirit, he said.

Perhaps the Prime Minister would be better off showing some leadership with the Federal Police.

Perhaps if the Federal Police were properly resourced we couldve dealt with the matter instead of having to call in the Victoria Police.

Perhaps they could show a bit of leadership there.

Perhaps we could do a little bit more to get this wave of firearms off the streets.

Read more:
Sly: The Wikileaks documents that show Brighton gunman was considered a 'weakling' - 3AW

Chelsea Manning says she was trying to ‘do the right thing’ when she leaked classified military information – ABC News

Chelsea Manning said she leaked hundreds of thousands of classified military documents a move that would eventually lead her to serve the longest prison sentence of any leaker in U.S. history because she wanted to spark a public debate about our countrys military actions overseas.

My intention was to draw attention to this and do the right thing, Manning told ABC News' Juju Chang in an exclusive interview for a special edition of Nightline. And I struggled with that, but the intention was very much like, This is about improving the country. This is about improving our standing in the world, this is about improving everything. And maybe this can start a debate on that.

In the summer of 2013, Manning was convicted by a military tribunal under the Espionage and Computer Fraud and Abuse Acts and sentenced to 35 years in prison for releasing nearly three quarters of a million documents to WikiLeaks. Manning at that time was a 22-year-old United States Army private named Bradley Manning.

I was driven to stay in the military and to do my job, to do the best possible job I could. And then I found that everything was far more complicated and far messier than I ever imagined, Manning said. I was always willing to accept responsibility for those decisions my intentions were pure and clean.

At her court martial, Manning had pleaded guilty to some of charges, without the protection of a plea agreement. She was convicted of 17 of the 22 charges against her but acquitted of aiding the enemy. The latter charge is akin to treason and punishable by death or life without parole.

When asked if she regretted leaking classified information, Manning said, I don't want to retroactively impose things on me.

All I can say is that, you know, I accept a responsibility, she continued. I went through a decision-making process that I don't think I would have done anything differently if I went through and played it again because -- not because I'm retroactively imposing that on me, but because I would have been a different person. And I am a different person now.

David Hammond, who described himself in an interview with ABC News as the only lawyer that Chelsea did not choose to represent her but was assigned to her by the U.S. Army, also pushed back against labeling her as a traitor.

The military judge clearly didn't buy the prosecution's theory that she intended to aid the enemy, Hammond said. You could cry out that Chelsea Manning is a traitor [but] from a legal perspective it's flat out incorrect.

Manning served seven years at the at the U.S. Disciplinary Barracks at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, until President Barack Obama in January commuted the majority of her sentence after her appellate legal team, Nancy Hollander and Vince Ward, made the request the previous fall.

Manning told Nightline she found out about her commutation from a breaking news crawl on television in prison: It said, you know, President Obama commutes Chelsea Manning's sentence. And I'm like, OK ... I freaked out before I celebrated, because I'm like ... Is this really going to happen? Is this real? Am I imagining this?

Hollander recalled the moment she found out Mannings sentence was commuted.

I got this call from my receptionist, through my office phone saying, The White House is on the phone, Hollander said. The voice on the other end said ... This is the counsel for the president The president has commuted your client's sentence and is going to announce it in two minutes. And I just screamed. I screamed. Oh my God. I just screamed ... Does Chelsea know? And he said, We're getting the information to her now. You might want to turn on your television.

Even now, Manning claims she has nothing but utmost respect for the military adding that the people who are in the military work very hard, often for not much money, to make their country better and to protect their country. And I have nothing but respect for that. And you know, that's why I signed up.

Manning entered active duty status on Oct. 2, 2007. She was an intelligence analyst assigned to HHC, 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 10th Mountain Division at Fort Drum, New York.

At that time, she was living as an openly gay man.

By enlisting, she followed in her fathers footsteps, who joined the Navy at age 19 and was also trained as an intelligence analyst.

I would come home every day and I would see on the television, the surge in Iraq Iraq descending into chaos, she recalled. With these images from Baghdad every night, I felt like maybe I can do something. Maybe I can make a difference.

But while she felt a call to duty, she said she was also really struggling with gender.

In October 2009, Manning arrived at FOB Hammer, an isolated military base located 40 miles east of Baghdad, Iraq.

Were in a big, plywood box that's an office ... and it's dusty ... I've got 30 to 50 colleagues, all in this small, confined space, she said describing her work conditions.

They were flooded with data or as she put it, We're drinking from a fire hose. We're getting all this information from all these different sources and it's just death, destruction ... we're filtering it all through facts, statistics, reports, dates, times, locations.

And eventually ... I stopped seeing just statistics and information. And I started seeing people, she continued. And I started connecting that with, Oh my God, this is a country in which there's all this stuff happening.'

The classified files that Manning ultimate leaked indicated, according to one of the four briefs filed in Mannings appeal, U.S. authorities knew about widespread torture and ill-treatment of detainees by Iraqi forces, yet transferred thousands to Iraqi custody between early 2009 and July 2010, in violation of U.S. obligations under the U.N. Convention against Torture and other treaties. An order known as "Frago 242" issued in June 2004, barred coalition troops from investigating any violations committed by Iraqi troops against other Iraqis.

Manning specifically pointed to a video she leaked that eventually was dubbed by WikiLeaks as "Collateral Murder," as an example of something she felt needed should be made public.

It's everything that you need to know about warfare is right there in one spot, in one 47-minute video, said Manning. Counter-insurgency warfare is not a simple thing it's not as simple as, like, good guys versus bad guys. It is a mess.

There are thousands and thousands of videos like that, she added.

The video showed the July 12, 2007, Apache air strike killing of unarmed Iraqi civilians and two Reuters journalists as well as wounding school children. When WikiLeaks released the video in April 2010, it generated a cloud of suspicion due to the Pentagons unwillingness to release or confirm its existence despite Reuters repeated requests for two years under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Former infantryman Ethan McCord, who rescued the wounded children, would later publicly praise Manning as a hero. Manning told Nightline she leaked the video not only for the American public to see it but for history to have that.

Although Manning sent over 700,000 government documents to WikiLeaks, she was charged with leaking secret portions of only 227 documents under the Espionage Act. The information she disclosed included low level battlefield reports from Iraq and Afghanistan, evidence of civilian deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan, Guantanamo prison camp detainee profiles and U.S. diplomatic correspondence.

In Mannings 250-page appeal, which is still ongoing, her legal defense team compared her case with that of General David Petraeus -- one of the most decorated Army generals in American history and the former director of the CIA. Her team noted that Petraeus pleaded guilty to disclosing highly classified information to his former mistress and biographer. Her lawyers emphasized that Petraeus disclosed information that was far more sensitive than anything Manning leaked and yet he pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor offense and was sentenced to two years of probation.

Five years ago I made a serious mistake. I acknowledged it. I apologized for it. I paid a very heavy price for it, and I've learned from it," Petraeus said in an exclusive interview on ABC's "This Week in December 2016.

Rick Ledgett, former deputy director of the National Security Agency, defended Petraeus in a June 1 interview with "Nightline," saying he went through a criminal process, adding, One of the things that factored into that was the contributions that he had made over a career to the national security of the United States. I think that was factored in. I think that's appropriate to factor in.

Ledgett criticized Manning at the time for not pursuing legal options inside the system: She could have gone to her commander. She could have gone to the judge advocate general. She could have gone to the Department of Defense inspector general ... to her congressional representatives, either the Armed Services Committee or her home representative.

But Manning pushed back on that.

Everybody says that there's channels ... but they don't work, she said. We've seen for at least a decade now that when you have information and you see wrongdoing, you don't have safe channels to go to ... They exist on paper, but in practice time and time again, you've seen that these channels don't work.

In his interview, Ledgett also described Mannings actions as arrogant saying she couldnt not have possibly known the impact of her documents on national security due to A) from the amount of time she had to go through the documents, and B) from an experiential base to judge whether, in fact, there was going to be harm -- or not.

Mannings response to that is the information she leaked did not reveal sources, methods, current or future operations. She characterized it as historical data. She felt sure it would not impact national security because, as she put it, I work with this information every day.

Robert Gates, who was then Secretary of Defense, commented on the impact of her leaks at a Nov. 30, 2010, press briefing: Now, Ive heard the impact of these releases on our foreign policy described as a meltdown, as a game-changer, and so on. I think those descriptions are fairly significantly overwrought ... Consequences for U.S. foreign policy? I think fairly modest.

Manning claims that her mental and emotional struggles associated with gender dysphoria did not have an impact on her leaking. Yet, in her appeal, her lawyers state it as a mitigating factor. Manning dismisses that as a legal strategy stressing that she does not feel it was a significant factor.

However, while stationed in Iraq, Manning wrote an email dated April 24, 2010, to one of her commanding officers. She attached a picture of herself dressed as a woman and explained: This is my problem ... I thought a career in the military would get rid of it ... its not going away, its haunting me more and more as I get older. Now, the consequences of it are dire, at a time when its causing me great pain in itself.

A few weeks later, Manning was arrested in Iraq for disclosing information to WikiLeaks. After her arrest, she was transferred to a U.S. military base in Kuwait, and then to the Quantico Marine base in Virginia. After being held in solitary confinement at all three locations, Manning was then transferred to the medium-security military prison in Kansas to await her trial.

Mannings emotional and psychological turmoil was exacerbated by the 9 months of pre-trial solitary confinement. The U.N. special rapporteur on torture accused the U.S. government of cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment toward Manning. Her solitary confinement is one of the main bases of her ongoing appeal.

Our first appellate issue is the fact that Chelsea was held in solitary confinement ... while she was awaiting trial, said her attorney Vincent Ward. Another thing that gets lost is her treatment ... She was bullied and mistreated by the guards while she was in solitary confinement. She was made to do humiliating things, stand in front of the guards completely naked ... If she was reading a book and she took her eyes off the book they would take the book away from her.

Manning described her confinement to "Nightline" as a "mind game."

So you're sitting in a room by yourself, she said. I've got two Marines watching me at all times. I'm sitting up straight. I can't lay down from 5 a.m. until 7 p.m. I can't sit down, I can't lay down. I can't lean back on anything. I'm sitting upright. Sometimes have my glasses. I sometimes don't. I don't have much clothing. I hear every single sound in the entire place. The drips of water, the sounds people's footsteps, the sounds of- chit-chat in, off in the distance from the guards. It was a very empty prison.

Manning finally came out as a trans woman, Chelsea Elizabeth, on Aug. 22, 2013, the day after her sentencing. She sought hormone therapy as part of her transition during incarceration. The military denied her request. The ACLU, led by trans lawyer Chase Strangio, sued the Department of Defense in September 2014 over its refusal to provide Manning medical treatment for gender dysphoria. After over a year of litigation, the military relented and began Mannings treatment with hormone therapy. She made history, becoming the first person to receive health care related to gender transition while in military prison.

Manning told Nightline she fought for her hormone treatment behind bars because its literally what keeps me alive.

When asked to respond to those who feel that taxpayers should not be paying for these treatments, she said, Health care is something that prisoners have a right to, you know? They don't get to pick and choose whether or not you get this health care plan and this health care plan. It's provided to you by the prison. The prison has a responsibility to provide you with necessary health care, and trans health care is necessary ... because if we don't get our treatment, we die.

Ward, her appellate lawyer, explained to Nightline that Mannings litigation and her struggle for access to treatment at Fort Leavenworth was one of the major reasons that she eventually attempted suicide twice and made it urgent to petition Obama for clemency.

Leavenworth is a male prison, he said, but Chelsea's not male ... No one would refer to Chelsea as she or by Chelsea. Right? People would at best refer to [her] as Manning. It was like she wasn't a man or a woman.

Manning described the despair that drove her to try to take her own life more than once when she was behind bars.

You just want the pain to stop, she said. The pain of not knowing who you are or why you are this way. You just want it to go away ... you're just caught up -- so caught up in this dark blackness inside yourself that the rest of the world doesn't matter.

Chace Strangio, her ACLU lawyer who spearheaded her litigation, recalled his phone call with Manning after the military made its final decision to continue to subject her to the forced haircuts that she endured for her entire incarceration.

She was subjected to male standards, held in a male facility, even though she's a woman, he said, and she had, you know, this deep pain about what it felt like to exist day in and day out, not just in the physical prison of the USDB [the United States Disciplinary Barracks on Fort Leavenworth in Kansas], but in this world in which her dignity as a woman, as a human being, was constantly being attacked.

In transitioning to becoming a woman, Manning said the length of her hair in prison was very important to her.

It's the first thing that people see, she said. I wanted to have medium-length hair ... its not costing the government anything for me to grow my hair.

She credits the kindness of inmate barbers for making it easier.

I had an inmate barber that helped me get through that ... I had a couple of them, actually, over time, and he took care of me, she said. He shampooed my hair, he cut my hair with scissors, made it a relaxing process ... the inmates really made it less of a painful experience for me.

Manning said she plans to continue with her hormone therapy, which the military will not be paying for. I have a private health care plan, she said. The importance of affordable health care is a topic Manning has written about in op-eds as well as in her tweets.

Manning set up her Twitter account, and then an Instagram account, @xychelsea in response to the thousands of letters she was getting, especially from trans-children.

It was just to connect with people and make them realize that, you know, like, Hey, I'm getting your letters. I just can't write to, you know, 15,000 people, she explained.

Christina DiPasquale, founder and CEO of Balestra Media who started working with Manning three years ago, described how Manning would tweet from prison.

She would actually think of her tweets and dictate them over to the phone to a supporter or a volunteer, who would post them for her, and read to her some of the reactions, DiPasquale said. She would tell them to re-tweet someone or to look for a particular tweet or a comment.

Manning personally posted her first photo as a woman upon her release from military prison on Instagram.

Owning my identity ... ties into my value of dignity, she said. I think that every person has, you know, whether trans, you know, gay, straight, black, white, Asian, Hispanic, you know, we all have the right to define ourselves and to define who we are ... without any judgment or expectations placed on us.

Her definition of freedom is just being able to express myself for who I am," she said. "And there's no expectations on me. There's no rules that I need to follow. I can be who I want to be and I am who I am.

Manning has nearly 300,000 followers on Twitter and Instagram, but doesnt really see herself as a public figure.

I don't see it as celebrity, she said, Its just what I was doing on social media as a teenager, just scaled up by several orders of magnitude.

When asked about how she deals with hateful comments on social media, she said, I just remember that ... sometimes people have reasons of doing that that have nothing to do with the content. It's just, like, a part of ... their needs to be heard in the world and to have a connection to people, even if it's negative.

Manning has received financial support from donors who do not know her. Singer-songwriter Evan Greer organized an online benefit album, entitled Hugs for Chelsea, which was compiled by a group of prominent musicians to show their support and raise funds to cover Chelseas living expenses as she transitions out of prison. She said they have raised around $12,000 from the album plus $173,000 through Mannings GoFundMe that Strangio and Greer organized.

Manning said she is grateful for their support and said, It's incredible to have the opportunity to be able to defend myself.

It's incredible to have the opportunity ... to not have to worry about certain logistical things, she continued. And all of that is based upon just the fact that people are going outta their way. And it's usually small amounts. It's not like I have these major donors or anything. ... This is just enough to get through this process.

In an interview with ABC News, Greer emphasized the role activism played in freeing Manning: "President Obama commuted Chelsea's sentence, but it was grassroots activism that set her free -- and likely saved her life. Hundreds of thousands of people from across the political spectrum came together to fight for Chelsea because we could see that she was fighting for all of us. In the end, a scrappy band of activists with little more than laptops, online savvy, protest signs, press releases, creativity, and hope managed to change the course of human history. We refused to allow Chelsea Manning to disappear. By raising our voices together, we raised so much public awareness and built enough political power that the President of the United States felt like he had to respond. The story of Chelsea Manning's freedom is a story of ordinary people who have done extraordinary things, and that's a story that people need to hear now more than ever."

Manning said she has not yet spoken to Obama, but said she would to tell him thank you.

Ive been given a chance. Thats all I wanted, she said.

Her lawyer, Hollander, agreed.

You will always hear that the military says, We take care of our soldiers. We never leave a body on the ground. We never leave anyone behind. We take care of our soldiers, Hollander said. The only person in the entire military who ever took care of Chelsea was her commander-in-chief, President Obama, when he commuted her sentence. That was the first time anyone ever took care of her as a service member.

Manning, an avid reader and writer, is a Game of Thrones fan. However, there was one book, Wild by Cheryl Strayed, which she said helped her more than any other.

I'm not a perfect person. I've made mistakes. I've learned from stuff, Manning said. I relate with her [Strayed], because she just lays it all out there. It's raw.

As for what she plans for in the future, Manning said, I'm going to figure that out.

I'm going to find my place. I'm going to find out what I can do, what am I good at -- what's available as an option, she added. I haven't even moved into my apartment yet fully ... I don't know where this road's going to lead me ... I'm at a fork in the road right now and I haven't decided which path to take.

ABC News' Lauren Effron contributed to this report.

Original post:
Chelsea Manning says she was trying to 'do the right thing' when she leaked classified military information - ABC News

Edward Snowden Fast Facts – KRTV News in Great Falls, Montana – KRTV Great Falls News

CNN Library

(CNN) -- Here is a look at the life of Edward Snowden, who has admitted to leaking information about US surveillance programs to the press.

Personal: Birth date: June 21, 1983

Birth place: Elizabeth City, North Carolina

Birth name: Edward Joseph Snowden

Father: Lonnie Snowden, former Coast Guard officer

Mother: Elizabeth Snowden, federal court administrator

Other Facts: Dropped out of high school.

The Guardian reported that in 2009, Snowden got the first of several jobs with private contractors that worked with the National Security Agency (NSA).

Timeline: May 7, 2004 - Enlists in the Army Reserve as a Special Forces candidate.

September 28, 2004 - Is discharged from the Army Reserve without completing any training.

2013 - Works for Booz Allen Hamilton for less than three months, assigned to a team in Hawaii. Snowden is terminated on June 10, 2013.

May 16, 2013 - Snowden has his first direct exchange with Washington Post reporter Barton Gellman.

May 20, 2013 - Snowden leaves for Hong Kong.

May 24, 2013 - In an e-mail to Gellman, Snowden requests that the Post publish information about PRISM, a surveillance program that gathers information from Facebook, Microsoft, Google and others.

June 5, 2013 - The Guardian reports that the US government has obtained a secret court order that requires Verizon to turn over the telephone records of millions of Americans to the NSA.

June 6, 2013 - The Guardian and the Washington Post disclose the existence of PRISM, a program they say allows the NSA to extract the details of customer activities -- including "audio and video chats, photographs, e-mails, documents" and other materials -- from computers at Microsoft, Google, Apple and other Internet companies.

June 9, 2013 - The Guardian and Washington Post disclose Snowden as their source for the intelligence related leaks.

June 9, 2013 - Booz Allen Hamilton releases a statement confirming that Snowden has been an employee of their firm for almost three months.

June 12, 2013 - The South China Morning Post publishes an interview with Snowden in which he says that US intelligence agents have been hacking networks around the world for years.

June 17, 2013 - During a live online chat, the person identified as Snowden by Britain's Guardian newspaper insists that US authorities have access to phone calls, e-mails and other communications far beyond constitutional bounds.

June 18, 2013 - Testifying before the House Intelligence Committee, FBI Deputy Director Sean Joyce argues that the PRISM program has helped stop a number of alleged terrorist attacks.

June 21, 2013 - Federal prosecutors unseal a complaint filed in US District Court in Virginia on June 14, 2013, charging Snowden with espionage and theft of government property.

June 22, 2013 - A senior US administration official says the United States has contacted authorities in Hong Kong to seek the extradition of Snowden.

June 23, 2013 - Snowden flies to Moscow from Hong Kong. Russian President Vladimir Putin later verifies that Snowden is in the transit area of Moscow's Sheremetyevo International Airport.

June 23, 2013 - A source tells CNN that the US government has revoked Snowden's passport.

June 30, 2013 - German news magazine Der Spiegel reports that classified leaks by Snowden detail NSA bugging of European Union offices in Washington and New York, as well as an EU building in Brussels.

July 12, 2013 - Snowden meets with human rights activists and lawyers. He says he is requesting asylum from Russia while he awaits safe passage to Latin America.

July 16, 2013 - Russian lawyer Anatoly Kucherena tells CNN that Snowden has applied for temporary asylum in Russia. If his request is granted, Snowden would be able to live in Russia for at least a year.

July 24, 2013 - Russian news media reports that Russia has approved documents that would allow Snowden to enter the rest of the country while his temporary asylum request is considered.

August 1, 2013 - Kucherena tells CNN that Snowden's application for political asylum for a year has been approved and he has left the Moscow airport.

October 31, 2013 - Snowden's attorney Kucherena tells CNN that his client has been hired by an unnamed Russian website.

November 3, 2013 - A letter, purportedly written by Snowden, is published in the German magazine Der Spiegel. The letter, titled "A Manifesto for the Truth" says, "mass surveillance is a global problem and needs a global solution."

December 17, 2013 - Snowden posts an open letter to Brazil, offering to help investigate US surveillance of Brazilian citizens.

January 23, 2014 - Attorney General Eric Holder says, "If Mr. Snowden wanted to come back to the United States and enter a plea, we would engage with his lawyers." Snowden says in an online chat the same day that," (a return to the US is) unfortunately not possible in the face of current whistle-blower protection laws."

March 10, 2014 - Snowden speaks via teleconference from Russia to an audience of thousands at the South by Southwest Interactive Festival in Austin, Texas, urging the audience to help "fix" the US government's surveillance of its citizens. The event marks the first time Snowden has directly addressed people in the United States since he fled the country with thousands of secret documents last June.

May 28, 2014 - NBC News airs an interview with Snowden in which he claims, "I was trained as a spy in sort of the traditional sense of the word -- in that I lived and worked undercover, overseas, pretending to work in a job that I'm not -- and even being assigned a name that was not mine." In an interview with Wolf Blitzer, National Security Adviser Susan Rice denies that Snowden was ever a US spy.

August 7, 2014 - Snowden's attorney announces that Snowden has been granted an extension to stay in Russia for three more years.

February 23, 2015 - NSA Director Adm. Michael Rogers says that Snowden's surveillance leaks have had a "material impact" on the agency's ability to prevent and detect terror plots.

June 4, 2015 - In response to President Barack Obama signing the USA Freedom Act that will limit our nation's surveillance on private citizens, Snowden publishes an op-ed piece in The New York Times saying "ending the mass surveillance of private phone calls under the Patriot Act is a historic victory for the rights of every citizen..."

July 28, 2015 - The White House rejects a petition to pardon Snowden and maintains its position that Snowden should return to the United States. The petition contains over 167,000 signatures supporting Snowden.

September 29, 2015 - Snowden joins Twitter and gains over 110,000 followers in less than an hour after posting his first tweet. Snowden only follows the NSA.

October 5, 2015 - According to Snowden, he is willing to go to prison if he is allowed to return to the United States. Snowden and his lawyers are waiting to discuss a deal with the US government.

May 30, 2016 - Former US Attorney General Eric Holder says Snowden performed a "public service" by triggering a debate over surveillance techniques, but still must pay a penalty for illegally leaking a trove of classified intelligence documents.

September 16, 2016 - The film "Snowden," directed by Oliver Stone, opens in US theaters.

December 22, 2016 - Congress releases a report saying Snowden has been in contact with Russian intelligence officials since arriving in Russia. Snowden immediately takes to Twitter following the report's release to dispute the accusations, writing "they claim without evidence that I'm in cahoots with the Russians."

January 17, 2017 - Russia extends Snowden's asylum until 2020.

TM & 2017 Cable News Network, Inc., a Time Warner Company. All rights reserved.

Read the rest here:
Edward Snowden Fast Facts - KRTV News in Great Falls, Montana - KRTV Great Falls News