7 Cryptocurrency Predictions From the Experts – Fortune

Fortune convened some top cryptocurrency entrepreneurs, venture capitalists, bankers, and others to chat about the future of digital money at Fortunes Brainstorm Tech conference in Aspen, Colo. last week. A select group met at the Aspen Institute for a breakfast roundtable discussion on Wednesday morning.

Headliners on the panel included Balaji Srinivasan , CEO and cofounder of 21.co, a cryptocurrency startup that has raised more in traditional VC funding than almost other one. Another was Peter Smith, CEO and cofounder of Blockchain, a U.K.-based cryptocurrency wallet company that recently raised $40 million from GV , the venture capital arm of Alphabet , parent company of Google ( goog ) . And Kathleen Breitman, CEO and cofounder of Tezos, a blockchain startup that this year raised more than $200 million in an initial coin offering, or ICO, and which counts celeb investor Tim Draper among its backers.

The crew of experts weighed in on everything from the longevity of Bitcoin, the original cryptocurrency and blockchain, or cryptographically secured public ledger, to the latest trend of hosting so-called token sales to fund projects, especially on Ethereum , a rival blockchain to Bitcoins, to the future of a decentralized web. Here are some of the predictions we heard.

Get Data Sheet , Fortunes technology newsletter.

Most people who are enthusiastic about cryptocurrency appear to agree that Bitcoin and its newer rival Ethereum have staying power, though they may be more bullish on one versus the other. "In terms of 5 to 10 years, Bitcoin and Ether will be around I bet," Balaji Srinivasan told the room of more than 70 people.

Peter Smith said his company, Blockchain, which was early to Bitcoin, has only just started to warm up to newcomer Ethereum. In contrast, Mike Cagney, CEO and cofounder of SoFi, a personal finance company, said during a separate session on the main stage that he was hotter on the latter technology .

Bitcoin "has some purpose but its application for commercial transaction is limited right now," Cagney said. "The blockchain and Ethereum, on the other hand, have absolutely fascinating infrastructure applications, he continued, mentioning the possibility to overhaul title insurance, which involves policies related to real estate, as one example.

Bitcoin and Ethereum may have stolen the show at this point, but the innovation wont end there. Expect more winners on the horizon.

Kathleen Breitman is hopeful that Tezos, her own blockchain bet, will fill a niche that solves problems with extant blockchains. In particular, she and her projects developers are designing Tezos to automatically push software updates out to the network, thus, in theory, avoiding the divisive feuding over upgrades that has wracked systems like Bitcoin over the past few years.

No one can say how many tokens and coins and blockchain protocols will eventually win out, but the experts seem to think theres room for a multitude. "Its likely that another one or two dominant ones we havent seen yet in the market," Smith projected. "Another really dominant coin could come out this year or next year.

For the time being, token sales might seem like a fantastic way to raise a lot of money quickly and with few questions asked. Will this lead to riches for some? Undoubtedlyindeed, it already has. And rip-offs for others? Almost certainly.

Smith said he presumes that market manipulation and insider dealing is rampant among purveyors of initial coin offerings. Were cautious about it in the short term, Smith said of his company. But you have to temper that with the idea that every new technology is going to be like that in the beginning.

Brad Garlinghouse, CEO of Ripple and a former executive at Yahoo , voiced his less forgiving concerns about the sector on a separate panel. Heavily regulated markets are typically heavily regulated for a reason, he said. Frauds are happening, people are going to jail.

The days of making a pilgrimage to the homes of the holders of purse strings are coming to an end. In a world where anyone can participate as an investor online, physical location matters much less.

It used to be you had to come to Silicon Valley, walk up Sand Hill Road, network with individuals, Srinivasan said about entrepreneurs seeking funding, often strolling up a strip to the west of Palo Alto that long has been associated with venture capital firms. ICOs change all that.

Projects are already getting funded this Kickstarter-like new way. Breitman said she that when she set up Tezos token sale, she aimed to get as many people who wanted to participate in the ecosystem to contribute. The company raised more than $200 million to date and, according to her, more than 30,000 Tezos wallets have been opened.

Elena Kvochko, chief information officer of the security division at Barclays, said that her bank has had talks with regulators about Bitcoin, blockchains, and their ilk. The rule-sticklers appear to be open to the idea as long as know your customer laws are obeyed, although its still early days.

Meanwhile, as governments settle on sets of rules of the road, countries like Switzerland, Singapore, and Estonia are jostling to develop frameworks that easily accommodate the new technology, Srinivasan said. Theyre seeking to displace geographic incumbents and become hubs for a new wave of business financing. If youre a U.S. person or business, you have a good deal to be concerned about, Smith said.

Breitman added that until the rules are agreed upon, its best to be transparent about what one is doing.

As cryptocurrency prices fluctuate wildly, speculators have been having a field day. However, theres reason to believe the markets will become more stable, as Bitcoin gradually has over the past couple of years (despite its still big price swings), Smith said.

In order for these computer coins to catch on big-time, they need a use-case that beats traditional money. Ideally, this ought to be better than merely buying drugs, as Jeff John Roberts, Fortune reporter and the sessions moderator, noted.

Srinivasan proposed one possible scenario. Imagine that all your waking hours are spent in the Matrix, he said, referring to a virtual reality in which everyone is enmeshed in the future. As people from all over the world meet and interact, they will need a medium of exchange. To transact, you cant just hand over a dollar bill, Srinivasan said. You need an international currency for that.

It might take a while but theres going to be more of a need to transact across borders than there is today, he said.

Whenever a consumer swipes or dips a credit card, payment processors charge a fee.

Nicko van Someren, chief technology officer of the Linux Foundation, pointed out that the fee companies like Visa or Mastercard charge exceeds the cost to clear or settle transactions. These businesses can potentially process transactions quicker and cheaper, he contended.

One potential outcome of the adoption of alternate systems, like Bitcoin, is to provide companies with the impetus to improve their services. Bitcoin is good because it will make banks move toward the real cost of handling these transactions, van Someren said. (By extension, in Ethereum's case, one could imagine upstart companies built on it forcing giants like Amazon , Facebook , or Dropbox to reconsider or improve their respective offerings.)

Smith, meanwhile, was less optimistic about incumbents ability to adapt to such change. I dont think be lot of room for banks to simply adjust their price models, he said.

Follow this link:
7 Cryptocurrency Predictions From the Experts - Fortune

Bitcoin LIVE news: Cryptocurrency soars after fears of crash wobble … – Express.co.uk

GETTY

8pm: Universities join mass bitcoin giveaway

Fintech universities in 11 regions have agreed to participate in the upcoming Bitcoin Airdrop, organised by the Blockchain Education Network and bitJob.

The first giveaway event will take place on August 11 in Colombia, before moving to St Petersburg in Russia.

Several high schools will also be giving away bitcoin during the event, giving young adults the opportunity to learn about the cryptocurrency.

Dror Medalion, co-founder and CEO of bitJob, said that it is an honour to organise this years event.

bitJob shares a similar mandate with BEN to empower students and give them the necessary tools to compete in todays marketplace, he said in Bitcoin Magazine.

This years event is shaping up to be the largest ever as the popularity of Bitcoin and [b]lockchain [technology] continues to rise globally.

1.20pm: Bitcoin needs a few more 'swings' before trend continues

According to Sheba Jafari, head of technical strategy at Goldman Sachs, bitcoin will "need a few more swings" before the witnessed trend continues.

"Anything above 3,000 (Jun. 13th high) will suggest potential to have already started wave V, which again has a minimum target at 2,988 and scope to reach 3,691 (the latter being a preferred target as this assumes a new high)," Ms Jafari wrote in a note to clients.

11am: Bitcoin bounces back from price crash

Bitcoin has recovered from its recent crash, with the price of the cryptocurrency reaching $2,790 at 2.00am BST this morning before falling slightly to $2,691 as of 11.30am BST.

This is close to the high of $2,855 that was recorded on Sunday.

The price has stabilised after Bitcoin miners activated BIP91 a software update aimed at solving Bitcoins scalability problem.

On Saturday, BIP91 was activated after 93 per cent of miners signalled their support well above the 80 per cent threshold that was needed.

The Bitcoin market crashed between July 12 and July 16 amid fears that the update would not be accepted, which would have triggered a user-activated soft fork splitting the cryptocurrency into two assets.

Bitcoin's volatility is very high compared to the euro, the yen or even gold

Francisco Blanch, America Merrill Lynch

Andrew Lee, head of bitcoin-shopping startup purse.io, said: Were thrilled to get past this impasse.

In further good news, Bank of America Merrill Lynch has predicted that Bitcoin will go mainstream once banks start accepting it.

A crucial hurdle for the cryptocurrency will be whether institutions accept it as collateral, the banks commodity and derivatives strategist Francisco Blanch wrote in a report.

"But we are not aware of any major institution that takes cryptocurrency as collateral at the moment, he added.

Blanch detailed how currency has developed through the ages from salt and other commodities, to gold and finally to modern money.

He noted that in the last year, volatility in Bitcoin markets fell below levels witnessed in silver markets.

COIN.DESK

"Bitcoin's volatility is very high compared to the euro, the yen or even gold," he wrote, according to CNBC.

"But it fell twice last year below the volatility of silver, the world's currency for 400 years."

Bitcoins value has more than doubled since the start of the year and has soared almost 740 per cent in the past two years, according The Motley Fool.

The rest is here:
Bitcoin LIVE news: Cryptocurrency soars after fears of crash wobble ... - Express.co.uk

Start Your Hedging: LedgerX to Begin Trading Cryptocurrency … – CoinDesk

For the first time ever, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has given permission to a private company to exchange and clear any number of cryptocurrency derivatives.

After three years of work, New York-based startup LedgerX was today granted a rare derivatives clearing organization (DCO) license allowing it to clear and custody financial instruments backed by bitcoin, ether and any number of blockchain-based cryptocurrencies.

The instruments, designed to mitigate investment risk, are the latest signal that the cryptocurrency markets are maturing, with the total value of the asset class crossing $115bn earlier this year.

But the guidance from the agency in charge of ensuring the integrity of all futures and swaps markets in the US could have bigger implications than just letting a single company finally open for business.

LedgerX co-founder and CEO Paul Chou told CoinDesk:

"It means a lot, not just for the industry, but globally, because the CFTC will set the example of what a well-licensed clearinghouse and exchange based around digital currencies will look like."

As part of the DCO license, LedgerX will be required to surveil the institutional investors it works with and create increased transparency about those customers for the regulatory agency. Eligible participants include broker dealers, banks, futures commission merchants, qualified commodity pools and qualified high net worth investors.

With the granting of this license, these groups will now be able to enter into complex contracts with one another, with values derived from the underlying cryptographic asset.

As a result, Chou believes the creation of these assets will mark a pivotal moment for cryptocurrency markets, giving investors more sophisticated ways to hedge, and possibly, helping to stabilize long-volatile cryptocurrency prices.

"We have a lot of in-progress talks with customers that are looking to work with retail customers that want to buy derivatives on bitcoin, binaries, all these exotic options," he said.

Though frequently described as a bitcoin exchange and clearinghouse, LedgerX's license did not require an overly broad definition of cryptocurrency. Rather, the permission is open to any of a series of instruments derived from the cryptographic primitives used to build a number of protocols.

Similar to how G5 currencies are typically viewed as safe investments due to their relative stability, Chou imagines three to five cryptocurrencies will be deemed "viable" candidates for the exchange and clearinghouse, based on market capitalization and functionality.

Initial coin offering (ICO) tokens sold to raise funds will not likely be considered for inclusion on LedgerX, given their gray area between CFTC-regulated commodities and SEC regulated securities.

Rather than of having to reapply for each currency and each derivative contract LedgerX will "self-certify" that the new opportunity is compliant.

"Instead of evaluating different governments," as with the case of a G5 currency, said Chou. "Youll be evaluating different technologies or approaches underneath these digital currencies."

The CFTC decision comes at a time when many in the cryptocurrency industry have been anxiously awaiting clear guidance including other regulators.

In March, another lengthy cryptocurrency regulatory application was refused by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), citing among other things, a lack of "surveillance-sharing agreements," and a requirement that "markets must be regulated."

Currently under review by the SEC, the application would let Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss list a bitcoin-tied exchange-traded fund (ETF) on the BATS BTX Excahnge.

Given LedgerX's lengthy requirements to report on its customers and the regulatory body's history of co-regulating certain instruments, Chou believes today's decision could provide just the answer the SEC, and other agencies in Asia and Europe have been waiting for.

"I think the CFTC will set an example both for other regulators here in the U.S., but also globally as well," he said.

After years of working and waiting, progress had been moving swiftly leading up to today's news.

It was just earlier this month that the CFTC formally registered LedgerX as a swap execution facility (SEF) after operating with a temporary license for about two years, making the New York-based firm only the second cryptocurrency outfit to be regulated under the provision.

A close observer of the developing story might have even found a clue to the story back in May, when LedgerX announced it had raised an $11.4 million Series B led by Miami International Holdings and Huiyin Blockchain Venture Investments.

It turns out, the money for the startup that had already raised a $1.5 million seed round and an undisclosed Series A was intended to meet capital requirements implemented by the Dodd-Frank Act. In order to ensure agreements can be fulfilled in case of an emergency, the act requires that a DCO hold operating costs to run its business for a year.

Going as far back as September 2015, former CFTC commissioner Mark Wetjen has been sitting on the board of LedgerX parent company Ledger Holdings, and since January 2016, Chou has served on the CFTC technology advisory committee.

In a statement, Wetjen said:

"These are exciting times to have a new digital asset class emerge. I hope that the effort LedgerX put forward in the U.S. can set the stage for a global approach to this new digital asset class."

By moving the trading and settling of cryptocurrency assets into one, heavily observed operation, Chou expects he'll be able to generate revenue from an entirely new source: data analytics to an unprecedented depth.

In addition to charging other exchanges for his service, Chou expects the CFTC's heavy surveillance requirements will result in cryptocurrency markets data that can be cross-referenced with points from previously existing data sets.

When the platform formally launches later this year, these services and more will only be available to eligible contract participants. But, Chou described his business model as "multi-stage," eventually serving those who were previously unable to afford such services.

"At first we're going to target a lot of institutional customers that want to invest in this asset class," said Chou, who added:

"Then later, pretty much everybody."

Flames on hot rod via Michael del Castillo

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is an independent media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. Have breaking news or a story tip to send to our journalists? Contact us at [emailprotected].

Continued here:
Start Your Hedging: LedgerX to Begin Trading Cryptocurrency ... - CoinDesk

PBoC States Bitcoin Isn’t Money, Cryptocurrency ICOs Need More Transparency – The Merkle

China always plays a critical role in the future of Bitcoin. Whenlocal exchanges suspend withdrawals, itsprice plummets. Now that the PBoC has rendered its latest verdict, the impact on the Bitcoin price remains to be determined. As was to be expected, the institution claimsBitcoin is not money. Theyalsofeel there is a growing need for cryptocurrency ICO transparency.

Contrary to what some people expected, the PBoC will not follow Japans plans when it comes to regulating cryptocurrency. Chinas national bank has no intention to categorizeBitcoin as money, and that situation will not change anytime soon. The PBoC feels Bitcoin is a string of code fundamentally different from gold and lacksany natural value. Virtual currency has acceptedvalue, which is a factor the bank will not dispute right now.

No one trulyexpected the Chinese government to officially recognize Bitcoin as money. That would have gone against everything the PBoC stands for and has planned for the future. China is one of multiple countries looking to issue itsown national digital currency in the future. Making Bitcoin legal, if only to a certain degree, would have countered those future plans before they wereeven set in motion. It is certainly possible that this situation will change in the future, but for now Bitcoin is not money in China.

That does not have to be bad news, since the value of Bitcoin will not be affected all that much as a result. China has always been a country known for doing its own thing, and Bitcoin is a significant threat to itsown financial ecosystem. Having a tool that provides real-time financial transparency would not be in the best interest of the Chinese government. However, the PBoCscomments were not all negative asit acknowledged the deflationary nature of Bitcoin wouldprovide economic development.

The PBoC also touched upon the concept of ICOs. As most users are well aware, cryptocurrency ICOs have become the new norm these days. Every project, whizzkid and herdog are raising money to build something new using powerful technology. Very few suchprojects have anythingto show for it, despite receiving millions of dollars in funding to date. Time is of the essence in this regard, as initial investors will not remain overly patient for much longer.

The ICO phenomenon has attracted the attention of the PBoC, which is both good and bad. On the positive side, it seems regulation of these fundraising efforts may be a lot more imminentthan we think. The bad side is thatthis will make it a lot more difficult to raise money in a decentralized manner moving forward. No specific regulatory measures have been proposed, but the central bank may implement appropriate regulation if the need arises.

The PBoC feels there is a lack of transparency when it comes to cryptocurrency ICOs, and that the disclosure of associated risks to potential investors needs to be improved upon. Without proper information disclosure standards, there are loopholes waiting to be exploited by people using this method of fundraising in a nefarious manner. The lack of continuous information after the money has been collected is another grave concern. All in all,the PBoC seems to have mixed feelings about cryptocurrencies as a whole.

Read the rest here:
PBoC States Bitcoin Isn't Money, Cryptocurrency ICOs Need More Transparency - The Merkle

WikiLeaks wants to ‘take down America any way they can,’ says CIA chief – Washington Times


Washington Times
WikiLeaks wants to 'take down America any way they can,' says CIA chief
Washington Times
WikiLeaks will take down America any way they can and find any willing partner to achieve that end, Mr. Pompeosaid Thursday at a security summit in Aspen, Colorado, where questions concerning the website's publications and the Trump administration's ...
CIA Director Pompeo's views on Wikileaks have apparently evolvedMSNBC
CIA director: 'I don't love' WikileaksThe Hill
Putin & Trump could have met many times at G20, gone to toilet together LavrovRT
The Guardian
all 286 news articles »

See original here:
WikiLeaks wants to 'take down America any way they can,' says CIA chief - Washington Times

Newsweek settles with Sputnik writer – The Hill

Newsweek has settled a libel complaint with a former Sputnik writer that included allegations of Newsweek's Kurt Eichenwald using bribery and threats to buy the editor's silence over a false story regarding Russia, President Trump and WikiLeaks that was later deleted.

Sputnik writer Bill Moran had written a piece that included a misattributed quote that Trump, then a presidential candidate, used in a speech that same day.

Upon realizing a mistake had been made, Moran took the story down, but not before Trump had read it and mentioned it at a rally in Pennsylvania.

But Eichenwald, a senior writer at Newsweek, had concluded the only way Trump could have learned about the "misattributed quote was purposeful collusion with the Russians, and that the Wikileaks documents themselves had been altered," according to Paste.

The 56-year-old Eichenwald, also an MSNBC contributor, offered "to either help [Moran] get a job at New Republic, in seeming exchange for silence, or update the piece with a paragraph naming him. This latter option came with a warning that aligning himself with Sputnik made him unhirable," according to Paste.

Eichenwald has since erased his employment at Newsweek from his Twitter bio. WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange noted the deletion in a tweet on Sunday.

Has Newsweek fired its "senior writer" @KurtEichenwald after libel complaint? Bio changed to remove 'Newsweek' https://t.co/jP6ZEcRe1r pic.twitter.com/H2QF26JoIb

The Hill has reached out to Newsweek for comment.

The lawsuit was settled amicably and to my satisfaction, Moran said. After the settlement, the stories were removed, the parties agreed not to speak about the terms of the settlement, so I cant talk to you about what the settlement entails.

Continue reading here:
Newsweek settles with Sputnik writer - The Hill

The Conservative Case for Universal Healthcare – The American Conservative

Dont tell anyone, but American conservatives will soon be embracing single-payer healthcare, or some other form of socialized healthcare.

Yes, thats a bold claim given that a GOP-controlled Congress and Presidentare poised to un-socialize a great deal of healthcare, and may even pull it off. But within five years, plenty of Republicans will be loudly supporting or quietly assenting to universal Medicare.

And thats a good thing, because socializing healthcare is the only demonstrably effective way to control costs and cover everyone. It results in a healthier country and it saves a ton of money.

That may seem offensively counterintuitive. Its generally assumed that universal healthcare will by definition cost more.

In fact, in every first-world nation that has socialized medicinewhether it be a heavily regulated multi-insurer system like Germany, single-payer like Canada, or a purely socialized system like the United Kingdom-it costs less. A lot, lot less, in fact: While healthcare eats up nearly 18 percent of U.S. GDP, for other nations, from Australia and Canada to Germany and Japan, the figure hovers around 11 percent. (Its no wonder that smarter capitalists like Charlie Munger of Berkshire Hathaway are bemoaning the drag on U.S. firm competitiveness from high healthcare costs.) Nor are healthcare results in America anything to brag about: lower life expectancy, higher infant mortality and poor scores on a wide range of important public health indicators.

Why does socialized healthcare cost less? Getting rid of private insurers, which suck up a lot money without adding any value, would result in a huge savings, as much as 15percent by one academic estimate published in the American Journal of Public Health. When the government flexing its monopsony muscle as the overwhelmingly largest buyer of medical services, drugs and technology, it would also lower prices-thats what happens in nearly every other country.

So while its a commonly progressive meme to contrast the national expenditure of one F-35 with our inability to afford single-payer healthcareand I hesitate to say this lest word get out to our neocon friendsthere is no need for a tradeoff. If we switched to single payer or another form of socialized medicine, we would actuallyhave more money to spend on even more useless military hardware.

The barrier to universal healthcare is not economic but political. Is profligate spending on health care really a conservative value? And what kind of market incentives are working anywayits an odd kind of market transaction in which the buyer is stopped from negotiating the price, but that is exactly what Medicare Part D statutorily requires: The government is not allowed to haggle the prices of prescription drugs with major pharmaceutical companies, unlike in nearly every other rich country. (Both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump pledged to end this masochism, but the 45th president has so far done nothing, and U.S. prescription drug prices remain the highest in the world.) Does anyone seriously think medical savings accounts with their obnoxious complexity and added paperwork are the right answer, and not some neoliberal joke?

The objections to socialized healthcare crumble upon impact with the reality. One beloved piece of folklore is that once people are given free healthcare theyll abuse it by going on weird medical joyrides, just because they can, or simply let themselves go because theyll have free doctor visits. I hate to ruin this gloating fantasy of lumpenproletariat irresponsibility,but people need take an honest look at the various health crises in the United States compared to other OECD(Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) countries. If readily available healthcare turns people hedonistic yahoos, why does Germany have less lethal drug overdoses than the U.S. Why does Canada have less obesity and type II diabetes? Why does the Netherlands have less teen pregnancy and less HIV? The evidence is appallingly clear: Among first-world countries, the U.S. is a public health disaster zone. We have reached the point where the rationalist santera of economistic incentives in our healthcare policies have nothing to do with people as they actually are.

If socialized medicine couldbe in conformity with conservative principles, what about Republican principles? This may seem a nonstarter given the pious market Calvinism of Paul Ryan and Congressmen like Reps. Scott Perry (R-Pa.) and Mo Brooks (R-Ala.), who seem opposed to the very idea of health insurance of any kind at all. But their fanaticism is surprisingly unpopular in the U.S. According to recent polling, less than 25 percent of Americans approve of the recent GOP healthcare bills. Other polls show even lower numbers. These Republicans arealso profoundly out of step with conservative parties in the rest of the world.

Strange as it may seem to American Right, $600 EpiPens are not the sought-after goal of conservatives in other countries. In Canada, the single-payer healthcare system is such a part of national identity that even hard-right insurgents like Stockwell Day have enthusiastically pledged to maintain it. None of these systems are perfect, and all are subject to constant adjustment, but they do offer a better set of problemsthe most any mature nation can ask forthan what we have in the U.S.

Andvirtually no one looks at our expensive American mess as a model.

I recently spoke with one German policy intellectual, Nico Lange, who runs the New York outpost of the German Christian Democrats main think tank, the Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, to get his thoughts on both American and German healthcare. Is socialized medicine the entering wedge of fascism and/or Stalinism? Are Germans less free than Americans because they all have healthcare (through a heavily regulated multi-payer system), and pay a hell of a lot less (11.3 percent of GDP) for it?

Mr. Lange paused, and took an audible breath; I felt like I had put him in the awkward spot of inviting him over and asking for his honest opinion of the drapes and upholstery. Yes, he said, we are less free but security versus freedom is a classic balance! National healthcare makes for a more stable society, its a basic service that needs to be provided to secure an equal chance for living standards all over the country. Even as Mr. Lange delineated the conservative pedigree of socialized medicine in GermanyYou can certainly argue that Bismarck was a conservative in founding this systemI had a hard time imagining many Democrats, let alone any Republican, making such arguments.

Indeed, the official GOP stance is perhaps best described as Shkrelism than conservatism, after the weasel-faced pharma entrepreneur Martin Shkreli, who infamously jacked up the price of one lifesaving drug and is now being prosecuted for fraud. (Though in fairness, this type of bloodsucking awfulness is quite bipartisan: Heather Bresch, CEO of Mylan corporation, which jacked up the price of EpiPens from $100 to $600, is the daughter of Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV), who defended his daughters choice.)

But GOP healthcare politics are at the moment spectacularly incoherent. Many GOP voters have told opinion polls that they hate Obamacare, but like the Affordable Care Act. And as the GOP healthcare bill continues to be massively unpopular, Donald Trump has lavished praise on Australias healthcare system (socialized, and eating up only 9.4 percent of the GDP there). Even in the GOP, this is where the votes are: Trumps move to the center on questions of social insuranceMedicare, Medicaid, Social Securitywas a big part of his appeal in the primaries. The rising alt-Right, not to hold them up as any moral authority, dont seem to have any problem with universal Medicare either.

It will fall on reform conservatives to convince themselves and others that single-payer or some kind of universal care is perfectly keeping with conservative principles, and, for the reasons outlined above, its really not much of a stretch. Lest this sound outlandish, consider how fully liberals have convinced themselves that the Affordable Care Acta plan hatched at the Heritage Foundation for heavens sake, and first implemented by a Republican governoris the every essence of liberal progressivism.

Trumps candidly favorable view of Australian-style socialized healthcare is less likely a blip than the future of the GOP. Republican governors who actually have to govern, like Brian Sandoval and John Kasich, and media personalities like Joe Scarborough, and the Rock, will be soon talking up single-payer out of both fiscal probity, communitarian decency, and the in-your-face evidence that, ideology aside, this is what works. Even the Harvard Business Review is now giving single-payer favorable coverage. Sean Hannity and his angry brigade may be foaming at the mouth this week about the GOP failure to disembowel Obamacare, but Seans a sufficiently prehensile fellow to grasp at single-payer if it seems opportunejust look at his about-face on WikiLeaks. And though that opportunity has not arisen yet, check again in two years.

The real obstacle may be the Democrats. As Max Fine, last surviving member of John F. Kennedys Medicare task force, recently toldthe Intercept, Single payer is the only real answer and some day I believe the Republicans will leap ahead of the Democrats and lead in its enactment, he speculated, just as did Bismarck in Germany and David Lloyd George and Churchill in the UK. For now, an invigorating civil war is raging within the Democrats with the National Nurses Union, the savvy practitioner-wonks of the Physicians for a National Health Program, and thousands of everyday Americans shouting at their congressional reps at town hall meetings are clamoring for single-payer against the partys donor base of horrified Big Pharma executives and affluent doctors. In a few years there might even be a left-right pincers movement against the neolib/neocon middle, whose unlovable professional-class technocrats are the main source of resistance to single payer.

I dont want to oversell the friction-free smoothness of the GOPs conversion to socialized healthcare. Our funny country will always have a cohort of InfoWars ooga-boogas, embittered anesthesiologists and Hayekian fundies for whom universal healthcare is a totalitarian jackboot. (But, and not to be a jerk, its worth remembering that Hayek himself supported the socialized healthcare of Western Europe in one of his most reasonable passages from the Road to Serfdom.)

So even if there is some banshee GOP resistance at first, universal Medicare will swiftly become about as controversial as our government-run fire departments. Such, after all, was the trajectory of Medicare half a century ago. You read it here first, people: Within five years, the American Right will happily embrace socialized medicine.

Chase Madar is an attorney in New York and the author of The Passion of Bradley Manning: The Story Behind the Wikileaks Whistleblower.

Read more:
The Conservative Case for Universal Healthcare - The American Conservative

Soon-to-launch communications network said to be ‘unhackable’ – Newser


Newser
Soon-to-launch communications network said to be 'unhackable'
Newser
These aren't real people, but rather the names commonly used in scenarios describing quantum cryptography, a type of technology surpassing traditional encryption in terms of keeping communications networks safe from hackers. It's a technology that ...
China's New Quantum Communication Network Will Be UnhackableFuturism
Unhackable Chinese Communication Network Launches SoonEdgy Labs (blog)
China To Launch 'Unhackable' Quantum Computer NetworkLADbible (blog)
Livemint -International Business Times UK -News4C
all 11 news articles »

Excerpt from:
Soon-to-launch communications network said to be 'unhackable' - Newser

iCloud Keychain encryption bug exposes iOS passwords, credit card numbers – TechRepublic

A largely unreported iOS security flaw undermined iCloud's end-to-end encryption capability, and could have allowed attackers to steal passwords, credit cards, and any other information on file, according to security firm Longterm Security.

iCloud Keychain enables users to store passwords and credit card numbers across all of their devices, while iCloud Keychain Sync allows users to share this information securely between devices. The security flaw was found in iCloud Keychain Sync's custom Off-The-Record (OTR) implementation, Longterm Security co-founder Alex Radocea wrote in a blog post.

"The bug we found is exactly the kind of bug law enforcement or intelligence would look for in an end-to-end encryption system," Radocea told ZDNet.

The flaw was addressed in the iOS 10.3 updatedemonstrating again why it's important to stay on top of updating your device.

SEE: Learn Website Hacking and Penetration Testing From Scratch (TechRepublic Academy)

iCloud Keychain's OTR encryption protocol uses key verification to protect a user's devices by ensuring information can pass securely between multiple devices. Radocea was able to bypass the signature verification process via a man-in-the-middle attack. He was also able to intercept traffic from devices, and modify OTR packets in transit to deliberately get an invalid signature, ZDNet reported. After this, he was able to get a device approved.

"We could see everything [in the Keychain] in plain-text," Radocea told ZDNet. Making matters more dangerous, "it's completely silent to users," he said. "They wouldn't have seen a device being added."

Weak, reused, and leaked passwords are a primary method of entry for cybercriminals, Radocea wrote in the blog post, making password hygiene critical for enterprise users. In 2016 alone, more than 500 million credentials surfaced publicly from mass-hack password dumps, combined with poor password storage practices, he added.

"Due to the risk of future mass dumps, passwords alone are just no longer a strong defense mechanism for sensitive data," Radocea wrote. "It is a very good idea for organizations to further harden access to any important personal information."

Current best practices include multi-factor authentication and end-to-end encryption, such as OTR, Radocea wrote.

Longterm Security will present more information on the issue in a session at Black Hat on Wednesday.

Image: iStockphoto/Wachiwit

1. A security flaw undermined iCloud's end-to-end encryption capability, and could have allowed criminals to steal passwords and credit cards, according to Longterm Security.

2. The flaw was addressed in the iOS 10.3 update, so users should update if they haven't done so.

3. Enterprises shouldn't rely on passwords alone to protect sensitive data, and should use multi-factor authentication and end-to-end encryption.

Continued here:
iCloud Keychain encryption bug exposes iOS passwords, credit card numbers - TechRepublic

Encrypted electronic communications: How will Australia regulate access? – Lexology (registration)

The Australian Government is proposing to introduce legislation this year to impose an obligation on communications and technology companies to assist law enforcement agencies to access encrypted messages, in the event that voluntary cooperation is not provided by those companies.

Background

The Australian Government has taken a strong stand in relation to the need for law enforcement agencies to access encrypted messages, sent over systems such as WhatsApp, Viber and Telegram. This has been evidenced by the positions taken by the Government on the international stage, including the recent Five Eyes and G20 meetings.

Five Eyes: A voluntary solution?

At the 26 June 2017 Five-Eyes intelligence talks in Ottawa a hot topic was how to seek cooperation from internet service providers (ISPs) and device makers to access encrypted messages sent using the systems of those ISPs. The governments of all of the Five-Eyes members (the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand) argued that the inability of law enforcement agencies to access encrypted messages significantly impedes the investigation of serious crimes, particularly terror related offences, and therefore undermines public safety.

The joint communique issued by the five governments following the Ottawa meeting stated that:

encryption can severely undermine public safety efforts by impeding lawful access to the content of communications during investigations into serious crimes, including terrorism. To address these issues, we committed to develop our engagement with communications and technology companies to explore shared solutions while upholding cybersecurity and individual rights and freedoms.

Australias positon at the G20

The Australian Prime Minister continued to push this theme, including the need for international cooperation, at the G20 meeting held in Hamburg in early July 2017. The G20 leaders statement on countering terrorism, issued in Hamburg, supported the need for access to be obtained to encrypted messages. That statement provided in part that the G20 leaders encourage collaboration with industry to provide lawful and non-arbitrary access to available information where access is necessary for the protection of national security against terrorist threats.

The way forward: Following the UK

The Attorney-General has acknowledged that Australia already has regulation, included in the Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth) and the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), requiring telecommunications companies to provide assistance to law enforcement agencies to access communications. However, the view of the Government is that this legislation has not kept up with technological advancements and needs to be updated.

Legislation dealing with access to encrypted messages is already in place in the United Kingdom and New Zealand. The Attorney-General has stated that Australias new laws will be guided by the UK legislation, specifically the Investigatory Powers Act 2016. Under that UK Act, there is an obligation on regulated entities to do whatever they reasonably can be expected to do to enable law enforcement agencies to inspect messages that are the subject of encryption or to inspect devices, where a technical capability notice is issued with the approval of a judicial commissioner.

Encrypted messages are difficult to access because the providers of the services do not hold the keys necessary to decrypt messages, these are held by users. This has caused entities potentially subject to the UK legislation, such as Facebook, Google and the like, to raise a concern that the UK legislation and potentially the legislation proposed in Australia will require backdoors to be installed in encryption systems software.

A backdoor refers to a flaw in a software system for encrypted messaging that would allow access to encrypted messages notwithstanding that the encryption keys are not held. Concern has been expressed that if a backdoor is included in encrypted messaging software that is able to be used by law enforcement agencies then that backdoor may also be used by hackers or others to access legitimate encrypted messages for criminal purposes. The Australian Government has insisted it will not require the use of backdoors. Instead, the Government has said it is the responsibility of technology companies that provide end-to-end encryption services to work out a way that encrypted messages may be accessed, where required by law enforcement.

Next steps in Australia

A draft of the proposed Australian legislation is not yet available, but it is intended to be introduced to Parliament during the Spring 2017 Parliamentary sittings, which commence on 8 August 2017. It remains to be seen how closely that draft legislation will follow the UK Investigatory Powers Act and whether it will address concerns regarding the security of encrypted messages sent for legitimate purposes.

Read more here:
Encrypted electronic communications: How will Australia regulate access? - Lexology (registration)