‘You want me arrested?’: Julian Assange tweets at France’s Macron over leaked emails – RT

Published time: 2 Aug, 2017 13:47 Edited time: 3 Aug, 2017 08:59

WikiLeaks Editor Julian Assange is daring Emmanuel Macron to call for his arrest, after the website released thousands of hacked emails from the French presidents election campaign.

After a tranche of emails associated with the French president was published in a searchable archive by WikiLeaks on Monday, Macrons political party released a statement saying a complaint had been filed with the authorities.

READ MORE: WikiLeaks releases 21,000 verified Macron campaign emails

En Marche will inform the public prosecutor of this new publication in the complaint already filed and under consideration for fraudulent access, fraudulent extraction of data, breach of correspondence and identity theft, a party statement said.

While the party did not specifically mention Assange or an arrest, the WikiLeaks editor has taken to Twitter to seemingly goad Macron, asking: You want my arrest?

Posting a Le Figaro article about En Marches statement, Assange, who has been taking refuge in Londons Ecuadorian embassy since 2012, suggested the French president should be clear about his end goal.

In another tweet linking to the same article, Assange implied that Macron was undermining press freedom.

On May 5, Macrons campaign team was the target of a massive hack two days before the final presidential vote. An investigation into the security breach is still underway.

READ MORE: Emails & docs from Frances Macron campaign leaked after massive hacking attack

The timing of the hack raised suggestions that it had been coordinated to influence the outcome of the election.

In the immediate aftermath, the French electoral commission warned the nations media not to publish details of the hack in the run-up to the vote.

Link:
'You want me arrested?': Julian Assange tweets at France's Macron over leaked emails - RT

cryptocurrency – observer.com

Do u kik? Jamie Squire/Getty Images

Kik is giving teenagers a wallet and an allowance.

For the unfamiliar, Kik is one of the largest messaging apps in the world, though tiny compared to services like WeChat, Facebook Messenger and WhatsApp. Anyone who has scrolled through the bikini-heavy corners of Instagram (dont look at me)have probably seen something like Kik: b1ancAAAHor ~kIk Me~ in user bios. Its an invitation to connect personally, for chatting in private. Kik today is what BBM was to young Gen Xers or old Millennials.

With someones Kik ID, the app gives users a way to chat, send GIFs or do whatever the kids do these days, as long as whoever sent themessageseems cool; otherwise, they get blocked. Simple.

Fred Wilson thinks Kik is cool. The Union Square Ventures partner has backed the company, which has now attained a valuation of over a billion dollars, putting it in the unicorn club. According to App Annie, the company has had 30 million downloads on iOS and Android, and Android users have consistently logged about 5 hours per month on Kik.

As weve previously reported, Wilson has long believed that cryptocurrency could kickoff the next great leap forward for the web by making money native to the internet. That said, I dont think many people were expecting the companys announcement today: Kik is creating a new cryptocurrency, called Kin, running on the Ethereum blockchain.

They are going to decentralize Kik and use a new cryptocurrency called Kin to build a business model around a decentralized Kik and, hopefully, attract other developers to build decentralized communities using Kin as well, Wilson wrote on his blog.

With Kin, developers could earn money when users actually pay for services. Today, developers kill themselves building apps for Facebook and Google, and generally they can only monetize users attention in the form of ads. It takes a huge hit to earn anything.

So, the Toronto-based companyis giving a cryptowallet to several million young people and developers a strong incentive to make up ways for them to spend money in that wallet. If the internet has digital money moving at high volume, there will be new ways for companies to earn money besides selling out their users to Google and Facebook.

Ted Livingston, Kik co-founder. Noam Galai/Getty Images

Digital advertising is a $72 billion market. It grew by 20 percent last year, and nearly the entirety of that growth went to Google and Facebook, as Fortune reported. The two companies already control nearly two-thirds of the market. In a lot of ways, advertising is the currency of the internet, so online its as if the Federal government retired the dollar in favor of the Facebeso and the Groogble.

As Kik put it in the Kin whitepaper:

The reliance on advertising for digital media revenue has resulted in advantages for companies whose products reach mass audiences. Such companies can leverage network effects and economies of scale to apply intense pressure to smaller competitors while also stifling competition by providing their services free of charge.

By putting digital money in the hands of lots and lots of its users, Kik thinks it can create a new way for developers to make a living off their talent, but the key is teaming up.

Any one app that tries to take on these behemoths is going to lose, Ted Livingston, Kiks co-founder says in the announcement video for the new currency. Cryptocurrency is decentralized. If Kin takes off, there will be no new center of gravity. Instead, there will just be a Kin economy.

Kin will create 10 trillion units that it will parcel out over time. It will have an initial coin offering where ten percent of all Kin will be distributed. This should establish an initial value for the coins. Then it will begin distributing coins out to users and developers. The incentives at the start will be geared toward generate turnover. The more people are actually exchanging Kin, the more they should be worth. The more they are worth, the more developers will build new apps to generate more turnover.

Every day, new Kin will be released, and they will be distributed proportionally to apps based on how much Kin they move. In a way, it makes the rich get richer, but it also creates a strong incentive for techies to make stuff that people want to pay for.

To keep money flowing, users will be able to earn Kin without putting real money into the system. Everybody will get a wallet in their app. This could be important, because it allows young people to get into the idea of digital currency and really start using it. In the future, users will be able to earn Kin by providing value to other members of the Kik digital community through curation, content creation, and commerce, the white paper explains. Its vague, but the basics are there.

If Kin gets to be worth enough, we might see people, for example, pay for their Spotify subscriptions using money they earned posting funny photos on Kiks inevitable Snapchat Stories ripoff. Thats real value.

The white paper lays out several use cases in a Kin-economy. Users might use Kin to pay for access to exclusive, members-only groups around a celebrity. They might use Kin to buy exclusive content from an artist, such as a song download. And, of course, users will be able to tip people they like in Kin, such as webcomic artists working in a mobile-friendly format.

So that all sounds pretty nice. It also sounds like a nice ecosystem for porn stars, but whos judging?

Kik permissions, from the Google Play store. Screenshot

Though both porn stars and developers will have the same question:how easy will it be to turn Kin earned into actual money? Developers arent going to have an incentive to build great services that earn Kin if they cant pay rent with their earnings. Only a small portion of the Kin supply will become liquid in the near future, as most of the Kin supply is reserved for the Kin Rewards Engine, the white paper states.

So for an entrepreneur, that leaves them uncertain about if people will use Kin, if volume will be high enough, if it will be worth anything in fiat money and when they will be able to sell Kin for real money. Thats too much uncertainty for teams to start putting new Kikapp ideas onto whiteboards just yet.

Privacy is another big question mark. I went to download Kik to my mobile, and it asked for every possible permission, from access to my contacts to access to my microphone and camera. In its privacy policy, the company admits that it uses data collectors like Google Analytics and Nielsen (though there could be more), and users should look at those companies privacy policies to find out what they do with information gathered inside Kik.

So until Kik manages to knock Google out of its placeat the helm of the digital economy, itsstill making dinner off scraps that fall from the Mountain View gravy train.

UPDATE: Added data from App Annie. May 25, 2017 6:16 PM.

View post:
cryptocurrency - observer.com

Cryptocurrency skeptics warn of another dot-com bubble, but remember: That’s where Amazon and Google started – CNBC

Oaktree's Howard Marks sounded a general alarm last week about the state of stock markets, private equity, credit markets and for good measure new digital currencies like bitcoin and ethereum. Essentially, he wrote in his letter to investors that everything is overvalued.

On the cryptocurrencies, he went further. He stated several times that they're "not real." Furthermore, he said, they are "nothing but an unfounded fad (or perhaps even a pyramid scheme)."

Cryptocurrencies may indeed be in the biggest valuation bubble since the dot-com era.

At the same time, there is undeniable excitement about their potential today among the top tier of venture capital investors.

Former PayPal COO David Sacks, who was also an early investor in Airbnb, Facebook, Palantir, SpaceX and Uber, tweeted last week that cryptos are the best candidate we've had for the next big thing in Silicon Valley (Web 3.0):

When I read Marks' comments about bitcoin not being real, I thought back to an interview I did with the CEO of McEwen Mining four years ago:

Any currency exists only because at least two parties (a buyer and a seller) agree that it represents value. So, what constitutes money? On a South Pacific island, we might agree that chicken bones are a currency. In prison, we might agree that cigarettes are a currency. Today, while we all use fiat or paper currencies as money, a medium of exchange, there is a growing concern about the value of these pieces of paper.

I don't see why Bitcoin can't also grow and become another viable currency, an internet based currency. If enough people accept it, it will be used. It seems to have momentum behind it and it's intriguing how it's truly separate from any country or central banks' manipulation and control.

There will be growing pains, like the guy who lost money out of his electronic wallet because he left his computer on all night. Also, Bitcoin will spawn competitors, alternative digital currencies. I think it's a mistake to write off this currency as a bubble or fad.

Will it threaten gold? I don't think so. I think the two will grow in tandem as alternative currencies to fiat currencies.

In the dot-com era of the late '90s, there were many warning signs of a huge bubble that was about to pop including:

By contrast, few people are quitting their jobs to start cryptocurrency companies (yet). Day trading is rare. Taxi drivers aren't asking about bitcoin.

If cryptocurrencies are a bubble, we're still in the early innings.

But there are signs of frothiness:

Bitcoin in 2017 is as real as Amazon or Priceline was in 1999.

Both those great companies had their stocks get killed when the dot-com bubble burst, but they used the nuclear winter they faced in the next few years to make themselves more profitable and take market share that they would never give back.

Amazon dropped from $76 per share (in today's post-split share value) at the end of 1999 to less than $6 after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Amazon trades now over $1,000/share.

Priceline went from $283 a share at the end of 1999 to less than $8 three years later. Today, it trades above $2,000.

No doubt many of this year's batch of ICOs, as well as dozens of other existing cryptocurrencies, will disappear in the coming years as things settle out.

But if you listen to Marks' advice and tune out the crypto space, you'll miss the ICO equivalents of Amazon and Priceline. Will ethereum be the next Google? Or the next Lycos?

More importantly, what will be the magnitude of growth from here? Bitcoin has grown from nothing to nearly $3,000 today (after a big pullback when it first hit $1,000 a few years ago). But where will it be in five, 10 or 15 years from now? And will it pull back to below $1,000 again before it breaks out to new highs?

To discard all cryptocurrencies as Marks did in his letter would be a big mistake. There is real value in these digital currencies.

Commentary by Eric Jackson, sign up for Eric's monthly Tech & Media Email. You can follow Eric on Twitter @ericjackson .

Read the original post:
Cryptocurrency skeptics warn of another dot-com bubble, but remember: That's where Amazon and Google started - CNBC

Controversial US Sanctions Bill Calls for Cryptocurrency Research – CoinDesk

A foreign sanctions bill signed into law by U.S. President Donald Trump included a little-noticed provision on cryptocurrencies.

The U.S. Congress cleared thebill late last month imposing sanctions on Russia, Iran and North Korea. It was a politically controversial development, given ongoing investigations into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, and the stated opposition of the Trump administration to the legislation.

Trump ultimately signed the bill into law last week, though he sharply criticized the measure in an accompanying signing statement.

Notably for the blockchainindustry, however, is that the billincludes a mandate for the development of a national security strategy aimed at "combating the financing of terrorism and related forms of illicit finance."

One provision, which focuses on research into "illicit finance trends," mentions cryptocurrencies asan area of study.

The textcalls for:

"[A] discussion of and data regarding trends in illicit finance, including evolving forms of value transfer such as so-called cryptocurrencies, other methods that are computer, telecommunications, or internet-based, cybercrime, or any other threats that the Secretary may choose to identify."

The initial draft strategy is due to Congress within the next year, according to the bill's text, and is set to include input from US financial regulators, the State Department and the Department of Homeland Security, among others.

In some ways, the new billechoes anothersubmitted in May as part of a wider Department of Homeland Security legislative package.

That measure, as CoinDesk reported at the time, calls for research into the potential use of cryptocurrenciesby terrorists. Like the DHS bill, the new sanctions law doesn't constitute a shift in policy, but rather indicates that Congress is taking steps to explore the issue more closely.

Donald Trump imagevia Shutterstock

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is an independent media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. Have breaking news or a story tip to send to our journalists? Contact us at [emailprotected].

Originally posted here:
Controversial US Sanctions Bill Calls for Cryptocurrency Research - CoinDesk

Hedge Funds Investing in Cryptocurrencies ‘Exploding’ 62 in Pipeline – Bitcoin News (press release)

With this years incredible gains in the price of bitcoin, the number of hedge funds with exposure to cryptocurrencies is exploding. Fund administrator MG Stover & Co, accounting firm Auther Bell, and law firm Cole-Frieman & Mallon alone have62 in the pipeline.

Also read:Hedge Funds Are Quietly Investing in Bitcoin

As the prices of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies skyrocket, a large number of traders are seeking to launch hedge funds investing in them. Hedge Fund Alert recently reported that the number of hedge funds investing in digital currencies is exploding. The publication quoted CPA Corey Mclaughlin, managing member at Auther Bell, who said:

Ive been in the hedge fund space since 1998, and Ive never seen anything like it in volume of launches in a particular area. Its just crazy.

Matt Stover, founder of MG Stover & Co,shared the sentiment. This is the first time I can remember where we have had a hard time keeping up with the sales calls, he said.

Institutional investors are surprisingly interested in cryptocurrencies, according to hedge fund lawyer Karl Cole-Frieman. I wasnt expecting so many institutional players to be interested in the asset class, he was quoted saying. Recently, news.Bitcoin.com reported that hedge funds are quietly investing in bitcoin. With this years explosive gains in the price of bitcoin, Hedge funds that offer cryptocurrency exposure are seeing windfall gains.

Among client funds administered by MG Stover & Co., 12 of them are running digital-currency strategies. The firm has also made agreements to service 25 more, the publication detailed. Arthur Bell is working with about 15 fund managers on cryptocurrency funds and expects to take on 20 more in the near future. Meanwhile, Cole-Frieman & Mallon has helped set up 7 cryptocurrency funds this year and has 17 more in the pipeline. Altogether, 62 new cryptocurrency hedge funds will be brought the market by these three firms alone.

Among the new entrants, there are both those simply taking long bets on bitcoinas well as those devising hedge fund-like strategies, such as capturing the arbitrage among various currencies, the publication conveyed. Bitcoins value has risen over 200% this year.

I think the majority of these cryptocurrency [funds] are trying to ride the opportunity du jour, noted Neal Berger, founder of investment advisory firm Eagles View Capital. Its an access point for people who cant buy it themselves or dont want to learn how to do it.Former Goldman Sachs executive Matthew Goetz, co-founder at Blocktower Capital, described:

Its a wildly inefficient market where alpha potential is abundant more than anything weve seen in our careers. We think its a rare opportunity for investors. Its not often theres a new capital market being born in front of you.

How do you think the many hedge funds entering the space will affect the price of bitcoin? Let us know in the comments section below.

Images courtesy of Shutterstock

Need to calculate your bitcoin holdings? Check our tools section.

Follow this link:
Hedge Funds Investing in Cryptocurrencies 'Exploding' 62 in Pipeline - Bitcoin News (press release)

Wikileaks is Now Accepting Zcash Donations – CoinDesk

Non-profit media group Wikileaks has announced that it is now accepting donations in the privacy-oriented cryptocurrency zcash.

The information sharing siterevealed that it would take the new payment optionin a tweet earlier today. The newsmakes zcash the third cryptocurrency Wikileaks willaccept for donations, joining bitcoin and litecoin.

Zcash was included as one of the options in a poll the nonprofit held on Twitter at the start of the month. Of the options presented monero, zcash and ethereum (misspelled as "etherium" ) zcash garnered 11 percent of the12,204 votes submitted, compared to 21 percent for monero and 45 percent for ethereum. Twenty-three percent opted for "other".

Wikileaks, which gained notoriety for its release of materials including footage from the Iraq War and the emails of Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, began accepting bitcoin back in 2011.

Since then, the cryptocurrencyhas proven to be a popular donation mechanism for the group.As of press time, Wikileaks'bitcoin wallet, for example, has received more than 26,000 transactions to date.

The group and its founder Julian Assange have tapped the technology for other purposes as well.

During an Ask Me Anything session on Reddit in January, Assange (who has lived in the London-based embassy for Ecuador since 2o12), useddata from the bitcoin blockchain as a "proof of life" mechanism to effectively quash rumors that he was dead.

Disclosure:CoinDesk is a subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which has an ownership stake in Zerocoin Electric Company, the developer of zcash.

Wikileaks image viaGil C/Shutterstock.com

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is an independent media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. Have breaking news or a story tip to send to our journalists? Contact us at [emailprotected].

Original post:
Wikileaks is Now Accepting Zcash Donations - CoinDesk

WikiLeaks Now Accepts Selectively Transparent Zcash – ETHNews

News cryptocurrencies and tokens

The international nonprofit organization WikiLeaks, made famous by publishing secret information, will now accept the selectively transparent cryptocurrency Zcash, which incorporates advanced cryptography to hide information about the sender, receiver, or transaction amounts.

WikiLeaks has been accepting cryptocurrencies since 2011, when a banking blockade attempted to cut the nonprofit off from its revenue streams. This was an attempt by the powers of officialdom to destroy the unconventional publisher of secrets. Since that time, the nonprofit media organization has adapted its funding model significantly and now receives the majority of its donations via cryptocurrencies. It is altogether fitting for WikiLeaks to use currencies that perform outside government control.

Paige Peterson, who works in user education and communications at Zcash, told ETHNews: "Zcash is useful for people from different political factions because it is secure, reaches anywhere that the Internet reaches, and is a fully decentralized and open network like the Internet."

In an effort to continue capitalizing on this trend, WikiLeaks recently polled the public about implementing additional digital cash systems. The poll revealed strong support for Ethereum, which captured nearly half the backing of voters despite being misspelled as Etherium. Other cryptocurrencies received 23 percent support, Monero received 21 percent and was followed by Zcash, which represented 11 percent of voters opinions. WikiLeaks announced yesterday that Zcash donations would now be accepted.

Zcash employs a specific cryptographic methodology called a zk-Snark, a novel form of zero-knowledge cryptography, which allows the data of a transmission to be concealed. This means that people seeking to donate to WikiLeaks can send a transaction without anyone ever being able to see who sent it or how much, something that WikiLeaks may find advantageous to provide to supporters as time goes on.

Zcash is now the third cryptocurrency to be accepted by WikiLeaks behind bitcoin and Litecoin.

Jordan Daniell is a writer living in Los Angeles. He brings a decade of business intelligence experience, researching emerging technologies, to bear in reporting on blockchain and Ethereum developments. He is passionate about blockchain technologies and believes they will fundamentally shape the future. Jordan is a full-time staff writer for ETHNews.

Continue reading here:
WikiLeaks Now Accepts Selectively Transparent Zcash - ETHNews

WikiLeaks: CIA’s Dumbo project can hack webcams and corrupt recordings – BetaNews

WikiLeaks has published the latest installment of its cache of CIA documentation known as Vault 7. This time around we learn about Project Dumbo, a hacking tool which allows for the control of webcams and microphones.

Wired, Bluetooth and wireless devices can all be detected by Dumbo. In addition to this, Dumbo gives the CIA the ability to delete or corrupt recordings that have been made. WikiLeaks has published user guides for three versions of Dumbo, the most recent of which is dated June 2015.

SEE ALSO:

Like some of the other CIA exploits WikiLeaks has revealed so far, executing Dumbo requires not only physical access to a computer, but also administrator privileges. Rather than being used to gather evidence or carry out surveillance, the aim of Dumbo is to detect and wipe out recordings made by others. The documentation for Dumbo 3.0 includes the following description:

Dumbo runs on a target to which we have physical access, mutes all microphones, disables all network adapters, suspends any processes using a camera recording device, and notifies the operator of any files to which those processes were actively writing so that they may be selectively corrupted or deleted.

WikiLeaks explains a little about the contents of the documentation:

Dumbois a capability to suspend processes utilizing webcams and corrupt any video recordings that could compromise a PAG deployment. The PAG (Physical Access Group) is a special branch within the CCI (Center for Cyber Intelligence); its task is to gain and exploit physical access to target computers in CIA field operations.

Dumbocan identify, control and manipulate monitoring and detection systems on a target computer running the Microsoft Windows operating sytem. It identifies installed devices like webcams and microphones, either locally or connected by wireless (Bluetooth, WiFi) or wired networks. All processes related to the detected devices (usually recording, monitoring or detection of video/audio/network streams) are also identified and can be stopped by the operator. By deleting or manipulating recordings the operator is aided in creating fake or destroying actual evidence of the intrusion operation.

Dumbois run by the field agent directly from an USB stick; it requires administrator privileges to perform its task. It supports 32bit Windows XP, Windows Vista, and newer versions of Windows operating system. 64bit Windows XP, or Windows versions prior to XP are not supported.

You can read through the Dumbo documentation over on WikiLeaks' Vault 7 pages.

Image credit: Piotr Adamowicz / Shutterstock

The rest is here:
WikiLeaks: CIA's Dumbo project can hack webcams and corrupt recordings - BetaNews

The strange case of Fox News, Trump and the death of young Democrat Seth Rich – The Guardian

In the early hours of Sunday 10 July 2016, Seth Rich, a 27-year-old digital campaigner with the Democratic National Committee, was walking home after a long night at his favorite Washington sports bar, Lous City. He was in no hurry, chatting for more than two hours on the phone to his girlfriend. At 4.19am, he told her he was almost at his door and had to go.

Seconds later, gunshots rang out. A minute after that, police arrived to find Rich lying on the ground just a block from his apartment, still alive but fading fast, with two bullet wounds in his back. He died in hospital a few hours later.

It was the tragic end to the life of a popular man with strawberry blond hair and a taste for wearing stars and stripes shirts on the Fourth of July. But it was only the beginning of an even more tragic afterlife: the ruthless exploitation of his death for political purposes by the hard right, from Fox News, Breitbart, and Roger Stone to Newt Gingrich, along with Julian Assange of WikiLeaks and the farther flung reaches of the internet.

Last week, the conspiracy theory that conservatives draped around Richs lifeless neck that he was the source of the hacked DNC emails released by WikiLeaks at the height of the 2016 presidential race, and not Russia, as US intelligence insists was revealed to have received a boost from the highest quarter. The former White House press secretary Sean Spicer, and allegedly even Donald Trump himself, were revealed to have been given advance notice of a sensational Fox News story that blamed Rich for the hack, and implied he had been murdered by Clinton acolytes as payback.

The only problem with the Fox story: it wasnt true.

The blockbuster revelation that Fox News made pre-publication contact with the White House over a malicious and false story blaming a murdered young man for the DNC emails spells potential trouble for both parties. For Fox News, it revives the charge made over many years that its owner, Rupert Murdoch, is prepared to be cavalier with journalistic ethics if it suits his political or corporate interests.

It has also resurfaced memories of the phone-hacking of missing schoolgirl Milly Dowler by the News of the World, Murdochs UK tabloid flagship that was closed in the wake of the scandal. The allegations are toxic at a time when 21st Century Fox is awaiting the British governments decision on its 11.7bn ($15.3bn) takeover of satellite broadcaster Sky.

For Trump, the disclosures threaten to punch a hole in one of the central pillars of his presidency: his assault against the fake news of the mainstream media. Here he stands, charged with egging on Fox News to publish a fabricated story in order to draw public attention away from his own travails over Russia.

Douglas Wigdor, the New York-based lawyer behind the bombshell lawsuit from which this weeks revelations come, points to key evidence contained in the complaint involving Ed Butowsky, a Fox News contributor and wealthy Texan Republican donor. Butowsky had taken it upon himself to investigate the death of Rich, and much of the lawsuit deals with what he said in text messages and audio recordings about his dealings with the White House.

Assuming that what Butowsky said was true, the president has been involved in creating fake news, and that would be very significant and troubling, Wigdor told the Guardian. You have the US president helping the media to shape a narrative that wasnt true thats reminiscent of Soviet-type state control of the media.

At the heart of the case is the 16 May article published by Fox News under the headline: Seth Rich, slain DNC staffer, had contact with WikiLeaks. By that time the Rich conspiracy was flying high on the internet, fueled in no small part by the teasing innuendos of Assange, who for his own perhaps Clinton-hating reasons offered a $20,000 reward for information on the murder, and by the Republican dirty tricks-meister Roger Stone, who proclaimed without producing evidence that Rich had been killed on his way to meet the FBI.

But the Fox News article, which the broadcaster retracted a week later, took the conspiracy to a new level by claiming to have solid intelligence pointing to Rich as the source of the WikiLeaks DNC emails.

That intelligence purportedly came from a former Washington DC detective, Fox contributor Rod Wheeler. He has now turned against the network and is the plaintiff in Wigdors lawsuit. He alleges that quotes put in his mouth in the Fox News article were fabricated.

Two quotes in particular Wheeler alleges were entirely made up, both of them key to the articles message. In them he claims to have knowledge of contact between Rich and WikiLeaks, and that Clinton associates blocked the inquiry into the young mans murder.

After the lawsuit was lodged in a New York federal court on Tuesday, Fox News issued a defense in which it said we have no evidence that Rod Wheeler was misquoted. The Guardian invited Fox to turn that on its head: did they have any evidence that Wheeler had been correctly quoted?

The reply came swiftly: Fox News has retained outside counsel on the matter. Given that this is pending litigation, there will be no further comment.

David Folkenflik, the NPR media correspondent who broke the story of the lawsuit, said he detected shades of Milly Dowler here, with the distinction that News of the Worlds phone hacking of the teenager had been motivated by paper sales while the Seth Rich affair is far more political. Either way, he said: Rupert Murdoch has been in this place before, where he has to decide how much he wants his outlets to be serious news organisations or not.

Folkenflik, a Murdoch biographer, added that the lawsuit exposed a degree of interaction between Fox News and the White House that was highly irregular. They seemed to be riding a motorcycle and side-car strapped together for the trip, he said.

Wigdors lawsuit makes extremely uncomfortable reading for Trump. Spicer, the presidents former press secretary who resigned last month, confirmed to NPR that he was informed about the Fox story a month before it was posted, undercutting his own statement to the press on the day of publication that he was not aware of the story.

We now know Spicer had a meeting in the White House with Wheeler and Butowsky in April, which is exceptional in itself. But the lawsuit goes further, allegedly implicating Trump himself.

Page one of the suit reproduces a text from Butowsky to Wheeler. The president just read the article, it reads. He wants the article out immediately.

Butowksy claims he was joking, and the White House has denied any involvement. But the sequence of events is certainly curious.

The fabricated Fox News story was published two days after Butowsky sent that text about Trump wanting the article out immediately. That week, the president was being assailed on all sides about his relations with Russia.

The day before publication, it was revealed that Trump had spilled classified secrets about Islamic State to the Russian ambassador in the Oval Office. A memo by then FBI director James Comey emerged in which Trump pressured him to close the investigation into his former national security adviser Michael Flynn. And the Russia probe was reported to have its fangs into a serving official in the White House, later disclosed to be Trumps son-in-law Jared Kushner.

If ever there was a week to release fake news deflecting the DNC hack away from Russia and Trump and on to the shoulders of an uninvolved, innocent and dead young man, then this was it.

One of the emerging themes of the Trump era has been the thickening bond between the president and Murdoch. Though the now 86-year-old media tycoon was wary of Trump in the early days of the 2016 race preferring more traditional conservatives such as Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio he ditched any qualms as soon as the reality TV celebritys ascendancy was certain. He is reported to have conferred with the president regularly.

Fox News has also carved out an ample path to the White House. Last week the channels star commentator, Sean Hannity, a champion of the Seth Rich conspiracy theory, dined with Trump, fellow Fox anchor Kimberly Guilfoyle, former Fox News executive Bill Shine and then White House communications chief Anthony Scaramucci. (It was the leak of that encounter, incidentally, that so incensed the Mooch that he made the foul-mouthed tirade that contributed to his being fired just 10 days into the job.)

To complete the Fox News-Oval Office lovefest, Shine, who was forced out over the handling of the networks sexual harassment allegations, is reportedly in the running to replace Scaramucci.

It seems the lawsuit released last week exposing the cosy relationship between Fox News and the White House in the creation of fake news might have hit a nerve. Whether Trump and Murdoch heed its warning remains to be seen.

See more here:
The strange case of Fox News, Trump and the death of young Democrat Seth Rich - The Guardian

Chelsea-Mannings-DNA-spawns-lifelike-3D-portraits – Story | WTAJ – WTAJ

30 lifelike 3D portraits of Chelsea Manning's face hang from the ceiling in the Fridman Gallery in Manhattan. 30 lifelike 3D portraits of Chelsea Manning's face hang from the ceiling in the Fridman Gallery in Manhattan. Related Content

NEW YORK (CNN) - For years, we only had one photo of Chelsea Manning: that iconic black and white mugshot she sent to her therapist.

It was made public by the Army in 2013 and remained the only photo portraying her as a woman until her release from prison in 2017 -- other photos were prohibited while she was in custody.

It's strangely fitting, then, that 30 lifelike 3D portraits of her face now hang from a ceiling in the Fridman Gallery in Manhattan.

They are part of a project called "A Becoming Resemblance," by Heather Dewey-Hagborg, who created them from computer-generated images made using Manning's DNA.

"This is a sampling of thirty possible faces that could be produced algorithmically reading Chelsea's DNA data," said Dewey-Hagborg during the exhibition's private view.

"They represent a wide range of the diversity that exists within Chelsea's genome, a diversity in which that same DNA data can be read."

Manning spent seven years in prison for leaking government documents to WikiLeaks. During that time, she had gender transition surgery.

Originally sentenced to 35 years when she was still known as Bradley Manning, she was pardoned in January 2017 by then President Obama -- on his third-to-last day in office -- and then released on 17 May.

The DNA samples were recovered from cheek swabs and hair clippings that were part of a correspondence between Manning and Dewey-Hagborg.

It's a similar process to Dewey-Hagborg's groundbreaking 2012 project "Stranger Visions," which used random bits of DNA found on cigarette butts and other litter to create portraits of strangers.

"In 2015 I received an email more or less out of the blue from Paper magazine. She couldn't be visited and photographed at that time and so they reached out to Chelsea and asked if she'd be interested in having a DNA portrait made."

A handful of letters were exchanged over the next two years through an intermediary.

"Chelsea was excited about the idea, but also concerned the she might appear too male in a portrait generated just based on her DNA," said Dewey-Hagborg.

"I'm hoping that people will take away the idea that genetics is not destiny and a kind of push for self-determined identity and a push against efforts to inscribe identities into us, or for external forces to tell us who we are rather than listening to us say this is who I am."

Ruddy Shrock, the curator of the exhibition, defined it as a "a poetic investigation Heather took into issues of identity and ownership of oneself."

Around 250 people were in attendance at the opening. Manning arrived accompanied by friends and her agent, but declined to speak with the media.

She was followed around by the documentary team for "Chelsea XY," which will be released at Sundance Film Festival in January 2018.

She did engage with fans and supporters and took photos with them.

"To have Chelsea out, in a dress, creating art, on this wonderful journey with other activists and people in the media, it's really moving," said Suzie Glbert, one of the attendees.

Jeff Seelbach, a fan of Chelsea and producer at the company funding her documentary, said: "The thing that fascinates me about it is the very unique and terrible situation she was in, that her identity and her ability to have an image and a representation was completely suppressed by the government and by our legal system."

Artist Heather Dewey-Hagborg also got to meet Chelsea in person for the first time after their mail exchange.

"It was both totally amazing and then completely normal. I mean we had brunch, avocado toast, you know, your typical New York thing. But then it was also just completely stunning to see someone you've pictured in your head," she noted.

"She's [Chelsea] really excited about it, this is her kind of art debut."

Continue reading here:
Chelsea-Mannings-DNA-spawns-lifelike-3D-portraits - Story | WTAJ - WTAJ