Julian Assange Says He Will Provide Evidence … – pjmedia.com

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has offered to provide evidence that the Russian collusion narrative is false in exchange for a pardon from President Trump.

The president, apparently, has not yet gotten the message. On Saturday, President Trump told reporters that he has "never heard" of Assange's offer to make a deal.

Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.) told The Daily Caller that Trump is being blocked from knowing about the potential deal with Assange. I think the presidents answer indicates that there is a wall around him that is being created by people who do not want to expose this fraud that there was collusion between our intelligence community and the leaders of the Democratic Party, Rohrabacher said.

"The congressman spoke to chief of staff John Kelly two weeks ago about the potential deal with Assange," The Daily Caller reported. "The Wall Street Journalreportedthat Kelly told Rohrabacher to bring the information to the intelligence community."

This would have to be a cooperative effort between his own staff and the leadership in the intelligence communities to try to prevent the president from making the decision as to whether or not he wants to take the steps necessary to expose this horrendous lie that was shoved down the American peoples throats so incredibly earlier this year, Rohrabacher said.

Rohrabacher called the collusion narrative "a massive propaganda campaign" and "historic con job" meant to conceal the ideological conspiracy between the intelligence community and the Democrat party.

View original post here:
Julian Assange Says He Will Provide Evidence ... - pjmedia.com

Julian Assange says ‘proper war is just commencing’ after …

Julian Assange has signalled he will remain inside the Ecuadorian embassy in London despite the Swedish authorities suddenly dropping a seven-year investigation against him.

The WikiLeaks founder made a rare appearance on the balcony of the central London building to hail the decision by Swedens director of public prosecutions as an important victory.

He gave a clenched fist salute to his supporters, and scores of journalists and TV crews, before maintaining that a legal conflict with the United States and the UK continues.

The Australian, who has lived inside the embassy for almost five years, said the road is far from over, adding it was extremely regretful that he was still being threatened with arrest if he leaves the embassy.

Assange said he had spent seven years either under house arrest or living inside the embassy, without charge, as he faced sex-related allegations in Sweden, which he has always denied.

He had missed seeing his children growing up. That is not something I can forgive, or forget, he said, maintaining that he had been the victim of a terrible injustice.

Detention and extradition without charge had become a feature of the EU, but it was not something expected from the rule of law in the UK, he said.

Assange thanked the government of Ecuador for granting him political asylum despite intense pressure, as well as his legal team and others who had stood by him.

We have today won an important victory, but the road is far from over. The proper war is just commencing.

He pledged that WikiLeaks will continue distributing material about the activities of the CIA in the United States, and will accelerate its publications.

The claim that the UK has the right to arrest me for seeking asylum in a case where there have been no charges is simply untenable.

My legal staff have contacted the UK authorities and we hope to engage in a dialogue about what is the best way forward.

Assange said the UK had refused to confirm or deny whether there is a warrant from the US for his extradition, insisting he was happy to talk to the US Justice Department.

He returned into the building which has been his home for almost five years, without answering questions.

Continue reading here:
Julian Assange says 'proper war is just commencing' after ...

Chelsea Manning posts online that she was denied entry to …

OTTAWA, Ontario --Chelsea Manning said Monday she was denied entry into Canada because of her criminal record in the United States.

The transgender woman was known as Bradley Manning when she was convicted in 2013 of leaking a trove of classified documents. She was released after serving seven years of a 35-year sentence, which was commuted by President Obama in his final days in office.

On Monday, she posted a letter from Canadian immigration officials to her Twitter account that said she was not admitted because she was convicted of offenses deemed equivalent to treason in Canada. She had tried to cross at the official border office at Lacolle, Quebec, on Friday.

Manning apparently tried to cross into Canada at a New York-Quebec border crossing on Friday,CBS News partner BBC News reports. Manning said she would challenge the decision.

Canadian Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale suggested Monday that he would think hard before overruling a border officer's decision.

"No such request has been made to me with respect to that matter," Goodale said. "And, when a Canada Border Services officer has exercised appropriately within their jurisdiction the judgment that they are called upon to make, I don't interfere in that process in any kind of a light or cavalier manner."

People whose criminal records make them ineligible to enter Canada aren't necessarily out of luck. They can apply for what is known as a "temporary residency permit," either before trying to enter the country or at the border. To be eligible, the person has to prove their need to enter or stay in Canada outweighs any risk they might pose to Canadian society.

Whether Manning attempted to apply for such a permit is unknown.

Immigration lawyer Peter Edelmann said either the minister of public safety or immigration could also step into allow her to enter Canada, perhaps on humanitarian grounds. "Both ministers could make an exception if they wanted," he said.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was asked about the incident on Monday and said he had no comment, according to BBC News.

2017 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

More:
Chelsea Manning posts online that she was denied entry to ...

Chelsea Manning barred from travel in Canada due to US …

Chelsea Manning, the Army specialist whoserved seven years in prison for crimes related to leaking hundreds of thousands of military and diplomatic files to WikiLeaks, has been denied temporary entry to Canada, according to a letter she published on Twitter.

The letter appears to be the official Canadian denial of an application to visit the country. The letter states that Manning had sought tocross the border inSaint-Bernard-de-Lacolle, Quebec.

Manning is deemed "inadmissible" due to Canadian law barring those "having been convicted of an offense outside Canada that, if committed in Canada, would ... [be]punishable by a maximum term of imprisonable of at least 10 years."

"so, i guess canada has permanently banned me ?" tweeted Manning with a series of emojis appearing depict a Mountie denying her passage.

"@CitImmCanada denied entry b/c of convictions similar to 'treason' offense," she added.

so, i guess canada has permanently banned me ? @CitImmCanada denied entry b/c of convictions similar to "treason" offense pic.twitter.com/xp0JOEEOGd

In subsequent tweets, Manning wrote that she would challenge the decision on the grounds that laws for which she was convicted were not sufficiently similar to Canadian treason laws.

Manning was imprisoned in 2010 after leaking more than 700,000 documents to WikiLeaks, including diplomatic cables, a video of an airstrike in Baghdad and other files. She was sentencedto 35 years in prisonbut granted clemency by President Obama in 2016.

Read the original:
Chelsea Manning barred from travel in Canada due to US ...

Inside the Ecuadorean Embassy, an Artist Paints Epic Portraits of …

Among the few visitors permitted to see WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in the Ecuadorean Embassy in London, hisrefuge ofthe past five years, is the artist and filmmakerGeorge Gittoes, who has been painting portraits of the controversial computer programmer-turned-whistleblower since 2014.

Most recently, Gittoes entered an ambitious seven-foot-tall diptych of Assange, painted at the embassy, intothis yearsArchibald Prize, an esteemedannual award for portraiture in Australia,handed out by theArt Gallery of New South Wales. Although Gittoesdid not win,he has gone on tosubmita second version of the portrait toAustralias $150,000Doug Moran National Portrait Prize,where the workhas reached the contests semi-finalist stage.

Theportrait sessions were mentioned in a recent New Yorkerprofile of Assange, who became a fugitive in2010 afterpublishing classified military documents leaked by army soldier Chelsea Manning(then Bradley Manning) on WikiLeaks under the title Collateral Murder.More recently, the sites activities during the 2016 election, publishing emails and documents illegally obtained from the Democratic National Committee, have come under scrutiny for possibly having originated viahacks by the Russian government.

Artist George Gittoes with his paintings, including that of Julian Assange, on the roof of the Yellow House art center in Jalalabad, Afghanistan. Courtesy of the artist.

Assange first invited Gittoes, a fellow Australian, to visit the embassy in 2014. The artist initially worried thatany association with Assangecould inhibithis ability to work in war-torn countries. Arecipient of the 2015 Sydney Peace Prize, Gittoes runs theYellow Houseart centerin his current home of Jalalabad, Afghanistan, with his wife, Hellen Rose. (Gittoes also co-foundedthehistoric Sydney gallery and art collectiveof the same name in 1970.)Being linked to Julian when Im about to step back into the front line could be lethal, he wrote in his recently published autobiography,Blood Mystic.

Nevertheless, the artist accepted the invitation because, he said, I never question destiny. Gittoes brought his art supplies with him, and soon was hard at work on what would become the first ina series of portraits.

The recent diptych is meant to depict Assanges willingness to take risks, and to live as a true edgewalkerAssanges wordshowing him gazing over the edge of a mirrored precipice. The second panel repeats Assanges face over and over, as if seen on computer screens, in a commentary on the contradiction of his simultaneous digital omnipresence and physical containment.

George Gittoess painting of Julian Assange, painted at the Ecuadorean Embassy in London. Courtesy of the artist.

Painting the work was a challenge under the circumstances.I thought that it could annoy the embassy staff to take oil paints, with their smell of turpentine, into such a small and un-ventilated space, Gittoes wrotein an email to artnet News. Not wanting to make Julians tenancy any more difficult, he used gesso insteadnot his typical medium.

The artists 2017 Archibald bid, along with that of seven other competitors, is the subject of a four-part Australian documentary seriesThe Archibald, from Mint Pictures. (Like any good reality show, each star gets an introductory catchphrase. Gittoess is I dont think theres anyone youd ever want to paint that youd take a bullet forbut Id take one for Julian.)

Artist George Gittoes with Julian Assange at the Ecuadorean Embassy in London. Courtesy of the artist.

The production limited some of Gittoessplans for the painting. Originally, he planned to take the work with him to Afghanistan, where he would incorporate oil paint into it. The film company lawyers were not prepared to take the risk of the painting being lost or damaged in transit to and from Afghanistanalso, of me being killed, he recalled.

Butit was thematically and conceptually important to both the artist and the subject to finish the piecein Afghanistan, so Gittoes went on to repainta near duplicate version of it on the roof of the Yellow House in Jalalabad, which is in the flight path of US combat helicopters and unmanned drones, he said.

Someone must have told the US intelligence that I was there doing the painting and so helicopters began hovering over our rooftop while the crews took photos of the large face and figure of Julian as it emerged on canvas, Gittoes added.I imagined Julian would like this story as it meant that crews like the ones who had done the callus and undisciplined shooting in Iraq [disclosed in WikiLeakss Collateral Murder leak] were now seeing the portrait.

George Gittoess second painting of Julian Assange, painted on the roof at the Yellow House art center in Jalalabad, Afghanistan. Courtesy of the artist.

Asked to choose a favorite between the two versions of the composition, Gittoes demurred: Both have special qualitiesone for being painted from life with Julian and the other for being painted in an active war zone.

Back in London, there was much talk of how the artists sessions with Assange would be portrayed in the television series. There cannot be an image of Julian Assange looking at himself in a painting. Thats madnessabsolute madness, Assange insisted in theNew Yorker. He also refused to compliment the work, claiming that would be vain.

Gittoes seemedsurprised that the Archibalds 11-person board of trustees did not select his portrait of Assange as one of the 104 finalists (from 822 entries).I have been hung many times in the Archibald, so it is very unusual for the portrait not to be hung, said Gittoes, who was previously a finalist in 1997, 1995, 1994, 1993, and 1991/92. This is my second attempt to get a portrait of Julian hung in the Archibald. The first version, a couple of years ago, was also rejected.

Artist George Gittoes with Julian Assange at the Ecuadorean Embassy in London. Courtesy of the artist.

The gallery is not privy to the reason why Georges work was not selected this year, a spokeswoman for the Art Gallery of New South Wales told artnet News in an email. George is well known in Australia for his socially engaged and highly political paintings, drawings, prints, and film works, made since the late 1960s. His work is held in the gallerys permanent collection and works we have demonstrate his political engagement.

Artist George Gittoes with Julian Assange at the Ecuadorean Embassy in London. Courtesy of the artist.

Gittoes readily acknowledges that theres a legitimate reason that Assange is such a polarizing figure. The reason why I support Julian and see him as an inspiration is very simple, he told the New Yorker. He proves that one individual can still stand up against the powers we all feel oppressed by.

Excerpt from:
Inside the Ecuadorean Embassy, an Artist Paints Epic Portraits of ...

Encryption Definition – Tech Terms

Encryption is the process of converting data to an unrecognizable or "encrypted" form. It is commonly used to protect sensitive information so that only authorized parties can view it. This includes files and storage devices, as well as data transferred over wireless networks and the Internet.

You can encrypt a file, folder, or an entire volume using a file encryption utility such as GnuPG or AxCrypt. Some file compression programs like Stuffit Deluxe and 7-Zip can also encrypt files. Even common programs like Adobe Acrobat and Intuit TurboTax allow you to save password-protected files, which are saved in an encrypted format.

Encryption is also used to secure data sent over wireless networks and the Internet. For example, many Wi-Fi networks are secured using WEP or the much stronger WPA encryption. You must enter a password (and sometimes a username) connect to a secure Wi-Fi network, but once you are connected, all the data sent between your device and the wireless router will be encrypted.

Many websites and other online services encrypt data transmissions using SSL. Any website that begins with "https://," for example, uses the HTTPS protocol, which encrypts all data sent between the web server and your browser. SFTP, which is a secure version of FTP, encrypts all data transfers.

There are many different types of encryption algorithms, but some of the most common ones include AES (Advanced Encryption Standard), DES (Data Encryption Standard), Blowfish, RSA, and DSA (Digital Signature Algorithm). While most encryption methods are sufficient for securing your personal data, if security is extremely important, it is best to use a modern algorithm like AES with 256-bit encryption.

Updated: November 11, 2014

This page contains a technical definiton of Encryption. It explains in computing terminology what Encryption means and is one of many technical terms in the TechTerms dictionary.

All definitions on the TechTerms website are written to be technically accurate but also easy to understand. If you find this Encryption definition to be helpful, you can reference it using the citation links above. If you think a term should be updated or added to the TechTerms dictionary, please email TechTerms!

See original here:
Encryption Definition - Tech Terms

The war on WikiLeaks and why it matters – Salon.com

All of this has made WikiLeaks an increasingly hated target of numerous government and economic elites around the world, including theU.S. Government.As TheNew York Times put it last week:"To the list of the enemies threatening the security of the United States, the Pentagon has added WikiLeaks.org, a tiny online source of information and documents that governments and corporations around the world would prefer to keep secret." In 2008, theU.S. Army Counterintelligence Center prepared a secret report -- obtained and posted by WikiLeaks -- devoted to this website and detailing, in a section entitled"Is it Free Speech or Illegal Speech?", ways it would seek to destroy the organization.It discusses the possibility that, for some governments, not merely contributing to WikiLeaks, but "even accessing the website itself is a crime," and outlines its proposal for WikiLeaks' destruction as follows(click on images to enlarge):

As the Pentagon report put it: "the governments of China, Israel, North Korea, Russia, Vietnam and Zimbabwe"have all sought to block access to or otherwise impede the operations of WikiLeaks, and theU.S. Government now joins that illustrious list of transparency-loving countries in targeting them.

It's not difficult to understand why the Pentagon wants to destroy WikiLeaks. Here's how the Pentagon's report describes some of the disclosures for which they are responsible:

The Pentagon report also claims that WikiLeaks has disclosed documents that could expose U.S. military plans in Afghanistan and Iraq and endanger the military mission, though its discussion is purely hypothetical and no specifics are provided. Instead, the bulk of the Pentagon report focuses on documents which embarrass the U.S. Government: information which, as they put it, "could be manipulated to provide biased news reports or be used for conducting propaganda, disinformation, misinformation, perception management, or influence operations against the U.S. Army by a variety of domestic and foreign actors." In other words, the Pentagon is furious that this exposing of its secrets might enable others to engage in exactly the type of "perception management" which the aforementioned CIA Report proposes the U.S. do with regard to the citizenry of our allied countries.

More:
The war on WikiLeaks and why it matters - Salon.com

Wikileaks releases documents it claims detail Russia mass …

Wikileaks has released a new cache of documents which it claims detail surveillance apparatus used by the Russian state to spy on Internet and mobile users. Its the first time the organization has leaked (what it claims is) material directly pertaining to the Russian state.

As ever, nothing is straightforward when it comes to Wikileaks. And founder Julian Assange continues to face charges that his radical transparency organization is a front for Kremlin agents (charges that stepped up after Wikileaks released a massive trove of hacked emails from the DNC last year at a key moment in the U.S. presidential election).

So its entirely possible Wikileaks/Assange is here trying to deflect from such charges by finally dumping something on Russia.

Safe to say the Twitter arguments are already breaking out (e.g. see this tweet comment thread).

And its not possible at this point to verify the veracity and/or value of the documents Wikileaks is releasing here.

Spy Files Russia

Writing a summary of the cache of mostly Russian-language documents, Wikileaks claims they show how a long-established Russian company which supplies software to telcos is also installing infrastructure, under state mandate, that enables Russian state agencies to tap into, search and spy on citizens digital activity suggesting a similar state-funded mass surveillance program to the one utilized by the U.S.s NSA or by GCHQ in the U.K. (both of which were detailed in the 2013 Snowden disclosures).

The documents which Wikileaks has published (there are just 34 base documents in this leak) relate to a St. Petersburg-based company, called Peter-Service, which it claims is a contractor for Russian state surveillance. The company was set up in 1992 to provide billing solutions before going on to become a major supplier of software to the mobile telecoms industry.

Wikileaks writes:

The technologies developed and deployed by PETER-SERVICE today go far beyond the classical billing process and extend into the realms of surveillance and control. Although compliance to the strict surveillance laws is mandatory in Russia, rather than being forced to comply PETER-SERVICE appears to be quite activelypursuing partnership and commercial opportunities with the state intelligence apparatus.

As a matter of fact PETER-SERVICE is uniquely placed as a surveillance partner due to the remarkable visibility their products provide into the data of Russian subscribers of mobile operators, which expose to PETER-SERVICE valuable metadata, including phone and message records, device identifiers (IMEI, MAC addresses), network identifiers (IP addresses), cell tower information and much more. This enriched and aggregated metadata is of course of interest to Russian authorities, whose access became a core component of the system architecture.

One of Wikileaks initially stated media partners for the release, the Italian newspaperLa Repubblica, (which has since been removed from the media partners list and replaced with a different Italian publications name so, er, working with Assange must surely be a lol a minute ) reports that the documents cover an extended timespan from 2007 to June 2015, and describes the contents as extremely technical.

It also has a few caveats, noting the documents do not mention Russias spy agency, the FSB, but rather speak only of state agencies, a formula it asserts certainly includes law enforcement, who use metadata for legal interception.

It also says the documents do not clarify what other state apparatus accesses those data through the solution of the St. Petersburg company.

Wikileaks says that under Russia law operators must maintain a Data Retention System (DRS), which can store data for up to three years. La Repubblica reports that Peter-Services DRS stores telephone traffic data and allowsRussian state agencies to query the database of all stored data in search of information which it specifies can include calls made by a certain telephone companys customer; payment systems used; the cell phone number to which a user is calling.

The manuals published by WikiLeaks contain the images of interfaces that allow you to search within these huge data fields, so access is simple and intuitive, it adds.

According to Wikileaks, Peter-Services DRS solution can handle500,000,000 connections per dayin one cluster. While the claimed average search time for subscriber related-records from a single day is ten seconds. State intelligence authorities use theProtocol 538adapter built into the DRStoaccess stored information, it adds.

Peter-Service has also apparently developed a tool called TDM (Traffic Data Mart) which allows the database to be queried to determine where users data traffic is stored in order to understand visited sites, forums, social media, as well as how much time is spent on a certain site and the electronic device used to access it.

Wikileaks describes TDM as a system that records and monitors IP traffic for all mobile devices registered with the operator,and says it maintains alist of categorized domain names which cover all areas of interest for the state. These categories include blacklisted sites, criminal sites, blogs, webmail, weapons, botnet, narcotics, betting, aggression, racism, terrorism and many more.

Based on the collected information the system allows the creation of reports forsubscriber devices(identified by IMEI/TAC, brand, model) for a specified time range: Top categories by volume, top sites by volume, top sites by time spent, protocol usage (browsing, mail, telephony, bittorrent) and traffic/time distribution, it adds.

Wikileaks points to a 2013 Peter-Serviceslideshow presentation(it says this also appears to be publicly available on the companys website), which it claims is targeted not at telco customers but at state entities such as Russias FSB and Interior Ministry (despite this document apparently being in the public domain) in which the company focuses on a new product, calledDPI*GRID; which it says is a hardware device for Deep Packet Inspection that takes the form of black boxes apparently able to handle 10Gb/s traffic per unit.

The national providers are aggregating Internet traffic in their infrastructure and are redirecting/duplicating the full stream toDPI*GRIDunits, writes Wikileaks. The units inspect and analyse traffic (the presentation does not describe that process in much detail); the resulting metadata and extracted information are collected in a database for further investigation. A similar, yet smaller solution called MDH/DRS is available for regional providers who send aggregated IP traffic via a 10Gb/s connection to MDH for processing.

Wikileaks also makes a point of noting that the presentation was written just a few months after Edward Snowden disclosed the NSA mass surveillance program and its cooperation with private U.S. IT-corporations such as Google and Facebook.

Drawing specifically on the NSA Prism program, the presentation offers law enforcement, intelligence and other interested parties, to join an alliance in order to establish equivalent data-mining operations in Russia, it adds sticking its boot firmly back into U.S. government mass surveillance programs.

Follow this link:
Wikileaks releases documents it claims detail Russia mass ...

WikiLeaks releases files that appear to offer details of …

WikiLeaks, a secret-sharing organization accused of playing a key role in Russianattempts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election, has released documents that it claims offerdetails ofhow Moscow uses state surveillanceto spy on Internet and cellphone users.

The release, dubbed Spy Files Russia, appears to mark a shift for an organization that has long been accused of a reluctance to publish documents that could be embarrassing for the Russian state.

As Edward Snowden,a former National Security Agency contractor who now lives in Russia, put it in a tweet: Plot twist.

However, other experts are less impressed. I don't think it's a real expose, said Andrei Soldatov, a Russian investigative journalist and co-author of theThe Red Web: The Struggle Between Russia's Digital Dictators and the New Online Revolutionaries. It actually adds a few details to the picture, [but] it's not that much.

The documents released by WikiLeaks on Tuesday appear to show how a St. Petersburg-based technology company called Peter-Servicehelped state entities gather detailed data on Russian cellphone users, part of a national system of online surveillance calledSystem for Operative Investigative Activities (SORM).

This system [SORM] has been known for some time, though the documents seem to provide additional technical specifications, said Ben Buchanan, apostdoctoral fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School's Belfer Center and author of the book The Cybersecurity Dilemma.

Buchanan added, however, that he was intrigued that WikiLeaks would release it at all. I'm curious if there is more to come, he said.

Although WikiLeaks has shared secrets from a variety of other governments, it has been accused of refusing to publish leaks on the Russian government. WikiLeaks also has been publicly critical of the Panama Papers a leak about offshore banking entities that is believed to haveembarrassedRussian President Vladimir Putin.

In interviews, WikiLeaks founderJulian Assange has suggested that because his organization lacks Russian speakers, whistleblowers prefer to leak to local media.

The latest leak is unlikely to dispel the impression that WikiLeaks turns a blind eye to Moscow's failings, said Andrew Weiss, a vice president for studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. It's very hard for WikiLeaks to somehow exonerate itself or remove the very clear pattern of cooperation with Russian authorities, Weiss said.

This looks like a classic attempt to change the subject, he added.

Perhaps the most intriguing part of the documents is whom they were leaked by a detail WikiLeaks generally refuses to discuss. Soldatov said that they may well have been leaked by someone who understood the lack of major revelations they contained.I would say it's coming from the company, sent by people who obviously understand it doesn't constitute a state secret, so it's safe, he said.

However, although the release wasn't a bombshell, it could still prove to be a positive force, some observers said. If it prompts people to talk about SORM, so be it, Soldatov said.

More on WorldViews

Putin saw the Panama Papers as a personal attack and may have wanted revenge, Russian authors say

See the original post here:
WikiLeaks releases files that appear to offer details of ...

Chelsea Manning Archives – Washington Free Beacon

Former U.S. Army soldier Chelsea Manning complained on Twitter Monday that she had been banned from entering Canada as a result of her conviction of espionage.

Former acting CIA Director Michael Morell resigned his non-resident Senior Fellow position at Harvard on Thursday in protest of convicted military leaker Chelsea Manning joining the Kennedy Schools Institute of Politics.

The John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University has named convicted felon and transgender activist Chelsea Manning as a visiting fellow at its Institute of Politics for the 2017-18 academic year.

Chelsea Manning went after MSNBC host Joy Reid on Tuesday for defending Democratic Sen. Kamala Harris (Calif.) on Twitter.

A featured moment on Twitters Moments section described convicted military leaker Chelsea Manning as a U.S. Army whistleblower on Thursday.

Chelsea Manning, a transgender activist and former Army intelligence analyst who was imprisoned for leaking hundreds of thousands of classified U.S. documents, showed up to the White House on Thursday morning to protest President Donald Trumps decision to ban transgender people from serving in the military.

Chelsea Manning, the former Army intelligence analyst who was imprisoned for leaking hundreds of thousands of classified documents, could be featured in an upcoming issue of flagship fashion magazine Vogue.

Chelsea Manning, the former Army intelligence analyst convicted of leaking troves of U.S. secrets, was released from prison on Wednesday after former President Barack Obama commuted her sentence in January.

Read more from the original source:
Chelsea Manning Archives - Washington Free Beacon