Chelsea Manning About to Steal the Show as Cover Person for …

Society

20:04 12.02.2019Get short URL

Born Bradley Edward Manning, the whistleblower claimed to have a female gender identity in 2013 while doing time in prison for disclosing a trove of sensitive documents to WikiLeaks.

Famous whistleblower and 2018 US Senate candidate Chelsea Manning will be the cover star ofthe 2019 spring issue ofthe Dazed British style magazine, which will be dedicated to talking aboutthe global creativity and power ofLGBTQIA+ communities.

So far, Dazed has revealed only two other cover stars ofthis so called Infinity Identities issue besideManning, withLGBT rights activist and transgender model Hunter Schafer and Ariel Nicholson, a 17-year-old transgender "model ofthe hour", landing the features.

"Throughout this whole week, Dazed Digital will be running a campaign that explores LGBTQIA+ rights more broadly, throughthe personal and political," the magazines website announced.

However, a number ofsocial media users didnt seem toagree withthe magazines reasoning or approve ofMannings appearance.

Manning (born Bradley Edward Manning) spent seven years behindbars afterblowing the whistle onthe United States conducting extrajudicial killings inIraq and Afghanistan, turning over700,000 documents toWikiLeaks in2009 and 2010.

READ MORE: Everythings Gotten Worse: Chelsea Manning Slams Worsening Security State

While inprison, Manning released a statement in2013, claiming tohave a female gender identity sincechildhood and expressing his preference ofbeing known asChelsea Manning.

Manning's 35-year sentence was commuted bythen-US President Barack Obama atthe end ofhis term inJanuary 2017, leaving prison that May.

Read the original here:
Chelsea Manning About to Steal the Show as Cover Person for ...

why is bradley manning rotting in prison without going to …

Well first off he has been to the initial hearing to determine if he is to be court martial-ed... it was even in the news. (And they recently announced that he will be going to a full court martial.)

Second due to the severity of the crimes involved, (you are aware that one of the charges is "aiding the enemy" right? That can get you the death penalty in the military.) anyone charged with these crimes is not released prior to the trial. In a treason case the person would not be released, or any other criminal case that can grant the death penalty.

Manning was a low ranking member of the Army with clearance to help protect his unit. (Spent 12 hour shifts, with other analysts, in a secure room reading over classified documents.) He was a specialist who was getting ready to be dishonorably discharged from the military (demoted several times prior for multiple discipline issues including attacking a female soldier.) when they found out he had been leaking information to a foreign company. (He was turned in by a hacker he had been bragging too about this who asked people in the hacking community about it and everyone told him to turn Manning in... as even they felt what he was doing was wrong.)

His reasons for releasing the documents (per interviews) were because he felt he was not getting the respect he felt he deserved from the officers that were above him in the chain of command and to impress his boyfriends college friends. (Btw it was well known in his unit that he was gay/had gender identity disorder, but the funny thing is that no one really cared about that.) In addition, he did not just release records that showed wrongdoing on the part of the government itself... the first thing he released (the apache footage) was on an incident that had been known about for years, had been investigated, and even the footage he released (which was editted and had a large section removed from the middle of it) showed that the reporters (which were not wearing any identifying clothing or insignia, and insurgents would take cameras on attacks to film them as well) were with insurgents with RPG's and at least one assault rifle.

And the later files he released he did not even review what it was he was releasing, he just mass dumped over 500,000 classified documents. (That he used an automated program to gather) Which included such things as most vulnerable target lists for the U.S. infastructure, lists of villages/informants that helped the U.N. and Nato forces, methods people had used to escape countries like Iran (including a step by step route which would put the people who helped them in danger), and things of this nature... which have been published in the press since. (And the press cited they got the documents from Wikileaks)

The worst part is that there are channels he could have gone through if he had found actual criminal actions/or even questionable ones from the military. Due to the actions of Daniel Ellsberg back during the Vietnam war, there are now contact numbers (that are outside a persons chain of command, in some cases to another section of the government entirely, such as Congress) that every person with access to classified data are given. And they are required to report anything that is questionable. Manning did not do this... instead within a month of his assignment overseas, he started leaking files.

See the original post here:
why is bradley manning rotting in prison without going to ...

Guantanamo Bay files leak – Wikipedia

The Guantnamo Bay files leak (also known as The Guantnamo Files, or colloquially, Gitmo Files)[1] began on 25 April 2011, when WikiLeaks, along with several independent news organizations, began publishing 779 formerly secret documents relating to detainees at the United States' Guantnamo Bay detention camp established in 2002 after its invasion of Afghanistan in 2001.[1] The documents consist of classified assessments, interviews, and internal memos about detainees, which were written by the Pentagon's Joint Task Force Guantanamo, headquartered at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base. The documents are marked "secret" and NOFORN (information that is not to be shared with representatives of other countries).[2]

Media reports on the documents note that more than 150 innocent Afghans and Pakistanis, including farmers, chefs, and drivers, were held for years without charges.[3][4][5] The documents also reveal that some of the prison's youngest and oldest detainees, who include Mohammed Sadiq, an 89-year-old man, and Naqib Ullah, a 14-year-old boy, suffered from fragile mental and physical conditions.[6] The files contain statements from Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the planner of the 9/11 attacks, who said that al-Qaeda possessed nuclear capacity and would use it to retaliate for any attack on Osama bin Laden.[3][7] The files also reveal the fate of wanted terrorist Mustafa Mohammed Fadhil, who had been quietly removed from the FBI's most wanted terrorists list in 2005.[8][9]

The New York Times said it received the documents from an anonymous source other than WikiLeaks,[10] and it shared them with other news outlets such as NPR and The Guardian. WikiLeaks suggested on Twitter that the source might be Daniel Domscheit-Berg, a former associate. WikiLeaks noted that "our first partner, The Telegraph, published the documents at 1:00 AM GMT, long before NYT or Guardian." Reuters speculated that the original source of the leak may have been Chelsea Manning, a United States soldier then known as Bradley Manning, who was detained for allegedly having leaked other material to WikiLeaks.[13][14] The Guardian reported that "the Gitmo files are the fifth (and very nearly the final) cache of data that disaffected U.S. soldier Bradley Manning is alleged to have turned over to the WikiLeaks website more than a year ago."[15] Before the time of Manning's alleged leak, WikiLeaks was already being reported and rumored to have these documents.[16]

The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) said the documents remained legally classified despite the leaks. It informed the lawyers who represent the prisoners in Guantanamo that they were not allowed to read the documents, which have been published by The New York Times and other major media outlets.[17]

The U.S. government issued a statement: "It is unfortunate that The New York Times and other news organizations have made the decision to publish numerous documents obtained illegally by WikiLeaks concerning the Guantanamo detention facility."[15] The documents seem to be "Detainee Assessment Briefs" (DABs) written between 2002 and 2009 and "may or may not represent the current view of a given detainee."[15]

The Guardian noted that, despite the government's claim of having detained dangerous militants, the files, which covered almost all the prisoners held since 2002, revealed an emphasis of holding people to extract intelligence. Although many prisoners were assessed as not posing a threat to security, they were nonetheless detained for lengths of time.[1]

The files showed that nearly 100 detainees had been diagnosed with depressive or psychotic illnesses. The United States tried to retain British nationals and legal residents, such as Jamal al-Harith and Binyam Mohamed, for intelligence value, although its agents knew neither were members of the Taliban or al-Qaeda, and Mohamed had been tortured, so any "evidence" he provided was suspect due to that fact.[1]

The Guardian noted that the files revealed that the U.S. relied strongly on evidence obtained from a relatively few number of detainees, most of whom had been tortured. One detainee made allegations against more than 100 other detainees, so many that his accusations should have been considered suspect. The U.S. issued guidance to its interrogators that was based on assumptions of threat based on flimsy associations through attendance at particular mosques, stays at certain guest houses in Pakistan and Afghanistan, and other elements.[1]

The Guantanamo Files revealed that Sami al-Hajj, an Al Jazeera journalist and cameraman, was detained from 2002 to 2008, allegedly in part so that U.S. officials could interrogate him about the news network. According to the file, he was detained "to provide information on ... the al-Jazeera news network's training programme, telecommunications equipment, and newsgathering operations in Chechnya, Kosovo and Afghanistan, including the network's acquisition of a video of UBL [Osama bin Laden] and a subsequent interview with UBL." He was considered to be "a HIGH risk, as he is likely to pose a threat to the US, its interests, and allies" and "of HIGH intelligence value."[18]

Sami al-Haji has said that he was beaten and sexually assaulted in detention. His lawyer Clive Stafford Smith, also legal director of the British organisation Reprieve, said that the U.S. had tried to force al-Haji to become an informant against his employers.[19]

Other documents cited Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the planner of the 9/11 attacks, saying that if Osama bin Laden was captured or killed by U.S. allies, an Al-Qaeda sleeper cell would detonate a "weapon of mass destruction" in a "secret location" in Europe. He said it would be "a nuclear hellstorm".[3][7][20] By March 2003, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed had been waterboarded at least 183 times by the CIA, which held him in custody until September 2006, when he was transferred to Guantanamo.[21] No such attack has occurred following the killing of bin Laden in May 2011.[22] Al-Qaeda has vowed to retaliate.[23]

WikiLeaks has said that, as with previous releases, at least as important as the content of the published documents is that readers should note the reaction of each media news outlet. For instance, WikiLeaks suggested "[comparing] the first paragraph of these two stories about the same thing" by BBC and CNN.

The BBC version opened with the following statement:[25]

Wikileaks: Many at Guantanamo 'not dangerous' Files obtained by the website Wikileaks have revealed that the U.S. believed many of those held at Guantanamo Bay were innocent or only low-level operatives.

CNN stated:[26]

Military documents reveal details about Guantanamo detainees, al Qaeda Nearly 800 classified U.S. military documents obtained by WikiLeaks reveal extraordinary details about the alleged terrorist activities of al Qaeda operatives captured and housed at the U.S. Navy's detention facility in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

The contrast between foreign and United States media was noted by several journalists,[27][28] including Glenn Greenwald of Salon. He described the differences as "stark, predictable and revealing". He wrote, "Foreign newspapers highlight how these documents show U.S. actions to be so oppressive and unjust, while American newspapers downplayed that fact."[29]

The rest is here:
Guantanamo Bay files leak - Wikipedia

Amnesty for Edward Snowden? Might depend on what secrets he’s …

The question of whether Edward Snowden might one day win amnesty in the US or political asylum elsewhere may hang largely on whether a reported cache of 1.5 million still-unreleased top-secret documents exists and remains under wraps.

Nobody, not apparently even the National Security Agency, knows how many top-secret documents the former NSA contractor copied into his own encrypted archives. But an NSA official on CBSs 60 Minutes on Sunday would not deny that Snowden may have taken as many as 1.7 million documents.

If Snowden has released to the press between 50,000 and 200,000 documents, as NSA chief Gen. Keith Alexander said in October, that leaves some 1.5 million documents unaccounted for. More significantly, those documents are likely to be much more harmful to American security interests than what has been released so far, several cyber espionage experts say.

That means US officials might be more willing to consider amnesty or other nations might be open to Mr. Snowdens pleas for asylum if they can get their hands on Snowdens remaining stash.

Most of the revelations of Snowden so far are programs that foreign governments knew or suspected we were doing, so these revelations dont do much more than confirm their suspicions, says a former senior NSA official speaking on condition of anonymity in order to maintain good relations with former colleagues at the agency. But some specific revelations, if they surfaced from remaining documents, could embarrass people into shutting down relationships with the NSA. It would have an adverse operational impact.

On 60 Minutes, Richard Ledgett, who is under consideration to become the agencys top civilian, said hed at least consider amnesty for the return of the remaining documents if he could be convinced that the documents have not been released of perused by a third party.

My personal view is, yes, its worth having a conversation about, Mr. Ledgett said, acknowledging that his bar would be very high.

For its part, the Obama administration has disavowed the amnesty idea. Snowden faces felony charges here, he ought to be returned to the United States, again, where he will face full due process and protection under our system of justice, that we hope he will avail himself of, White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters Monday.

But if Snowden has more than a million additional documents, they could be of crucial importance to US intelligence operations.

For instance, one of the documents leaked by Snowden highlighted Xkeyscore, an NSA program that allows the agency to sift through the haystack of digital global communications to find the needle of terrorist activity. One particular document reported by The Washington Post and the Guardian in late July showed a world map with red dots denoting Xkeyscore nodes or collection points.

What was not revealed were specifics about those collection points.

Most of the red dots in the Xkeyscore map are probably countries that are cooperating with the US and the NSA, says James Bamford, an author who has spent most of his life investigating the NSA and written several books. But some may be covert operations where US has bribed someone to get bugged equipment into that location or the agency is tapping into it in a different way.

Indeed, the dots on the map indicate some international locations where the US wouldnt logically have any cooperative agreements, including countries like Brazil and Argentina, Mr. Bamford notes. Some dots may represent locations where they subverted workers at a telecommunications or other facilities.

The remaining trove of documents could also detail specific sources and methods of code-breaking in potentially hostile nations.

With all thats been released so far about NSA activity in the US, there really hasnt been anything related to North Korea or Iran, Russia, Bamford says. This is what really worries the NSA having documents released that show specifically how were doing our spying on those countries.

Snowden has maintained that his primary intent has been to reveal mass surveillance directed at Americans and other Western democracies by the NSA, not to help Americas adversaries.

But if thats true, he might find it hard to publish the rest of his potential trove. He could release documents to media operations unlikely to reveal sources and methods indiscriminately. Or he could just sit on the remaining pile.

Complicating matters is the question of how much of the trove Snowden still controls exclusively. How much do journalists Glen Greenwald and Laura Poitras have? How secure is the rest, given that hes almost certainly under tight surveillance in Russia, where he has been granted temporary asylum?

The Russian FSB [intelligence agency] doubtless has him completely under their control, says James Lewis, a cyber conflict expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. If he tries to type in a password into a computer in his room, they will intercept it.

Whether the US eventually negotiates over the unreleased documents may depend on what officials think he has. If they think his documents imperil the many billions of dollars the NSA has spent during the past decade to develop its global surveillance networks, that could be a strong incentive to play ball.

We might have seen the political effect of these document leaks peak, while the operational effect might not have done so just yet, Mr. Lewis says. Ledgetts comment about amnesty might have been an effort to find out what he actually has left. Its a way of telling Snowden, OK, its your turn. You have to bid.

One thing is clear, the Obama administration has been the toughest administration in history when it comes to going after national security leaks using the Espionage Act, which can result in life in prison.

The White Houses options might also shift if Snowden gets into a bidding war. Snowden has been soliciting offers for permanent asylum. Earlier this year, he appealed to Germany, saying he would like to testify before parliament there, but couldnt so as long as he was threatened with arrest. On Monday, he published an open letter to Brazil in the Guardian.

Get the Monitor Stories you care about delivered to your inbox.

Documents Snowden released this fall show that Brazil was a top NSA target in Latin America. The agency was monitoring Brazilian President Dilma Rousseffs cellphone, as well as Petrobras, the national oil company.

In a letter released Tuesday, Snowden offered to help Brazil investigate NSA spying against it but needed political asylum, because the US government will continue to interfere with my ability to speak.

Read this article:
Amnesty for Edward Snowden? Might depend on what secrets he's ...

Cryptocurrency Was Their Way Out of South Koreas Lowest …

SEOUL, South Korea Kim Ki-won is keeping a secret from his parents.

It isnt just that he has bought and sold an immense number of digital coins. Mr. Kim, who is 27 and lives with his parents, once made so much money trading cryptocurrencies that he was spending $1,000 a month on whatever he wanted. He quit his job. He borrowed to buy more. He planned to buy a house.

Today he sits slumped over, at times hiding his eyes behind his hair. Which brings us back to Mr. Kims secret: He has lost a lot of money, perhaps tens of thousands of dollars.

I dont think its fair that people call it gambling, he said of his cryptocurrency obsession. But there are elements of truth here and there.

A generation of young South Koreans like Mr. Kim, looking for a way out of their dead-end prospects, has helped turn the country into a capital of the wild world of cryptocurrencies. Now that the market has virtually collapsed, many people young and old are mired in debt and losses. Still, many young South Koreans continue to see digital money as a way to break out.

South Korea remains the third-largest market for virtual currency, behind the United States and Japan. A total of $6.8 billion in cryptocurrencies changed hands in January, according to the data provider Messari. South Korea is a major trading hub for Bitcoin, the best-known cryptocurrency, as well as a wide variety of other virtual currencies that exist without the backing of any countrys central bank.

Cryptocurrencies have become a cultural phenomenon in the country.

Coffee shops print their own digital coins. A national television network made a game show called Block Battle, in which contestants one named Kimchi Powered battled to build a company based on cryptotechnology.

On a recent evening in Seoul, a group of women and men in their 60s and 70s gathered at an event lit by strobe lights for the start of a new digital coin.

But it was millennials like Mr. Kim who led the charge. Many call themselves dirt spoons, a reference in South Korea to economic and social status, with gold and silver spoons being the best off and dirt spoons being the worst.

Cryptocurrencies seemed to be a way to disrupt that social order.

There is no true opportunity in South Korea for the average young person, said Kim Han-gyeol, 23, who graduated from a vocational school and became a part-time software developer for an e-book company.

She lives with her parents and works part time at Dunkin Donuts, studying English online at night.

At first, she made a lot of money investing in cryptocurrencies. She used a few thousand dollars she made to buy nice clothes for herself and her mother, and dreamed of starting a coffee shop with her loot. Then, she lost nearly all of it.

I felt a sense of shame when I lost money on my Bitcoin investments, not once but twice because of my greed to make a fortune in one go, she said. Even still, she added, shell stick to digital coins.

There is nowhere else to go to recover my losses anyway, she said.

Being young in South Korea can be defeating and stifling. To succeed is to get either a government position or a job at one of a small but powerful group of family-owned conglomerates that control most of the products Koreans use. This requires getting into one of a handful of exclusive universities, a feat that has become so difficult that many young people delay applying for several years.

Income inequality is among the worst in Asia. Youth unemployment is 10.5 percent and has hovered near that figure for the past five years even as overall unemployment is 3.4 percent.

Young Koreans are called the sampo generation, a portmanteau referring to the three things they have given up on: courtship, marriage and family.

Adding to their sense of disillusionment is a string of political scandals, including one that led to the impeachment of former President Park Geun-hye, that exposed the deeply entrenched ties between South Koreas powerful conglomerates and politicians.

When cryptocurrency came along, it set off discussions in chat rooms, weekly hangouts and even intellectual salons created just for digital coins: Could this new system uproot South Koreas rigid social order?

Buying digital coins was a lot easier than buying stocks or getting a loan to start a business. Kim Ki-won needed to invest only a small amount in the early days. It was an opportunity for me to make big money, he said, his eyes wide with excitement even now thinking about the prospect.

For Remy Kim, a 29-year-old who is host to several cryptocurrency channels on the social media app Telegram, digital money could mean nothing short of revolution.

Online he goes by Les Mis, after Les Misrables, the Victor Hugo tale of the poor rising up in revolution. Mr. Kim writes about Cryptopia, a future where everyone is equal and the social constructs that money creates dont exist.

Crypto played a role in shifting wealth from one group in society to another, he said. It has affected Korean society tremendously.

Mr. Kim discovered cryptocurrencies after his computer was hacked by a person who demanded Bitcoin in ransom. In the end, he paid the hacker 1.2 Bitcoins which at the time was worth nearly $800.

Soon he was buying digital coins for himself, riding a Bitcoin bubble that peaked at more than $19,000 for a single Bitcoin.

He made enough to buy himself a half-million-dollar navy blue Rolls-Royce. As far as he knows, Im the youngest person in Korea with a Rolls-Royce, he said.

Mr. Kim said he had since lost much of what he made, but he doesnt like to dwell on this. (He still has the Rolls.)

Last year, South Koreas government mulled shutting down virtual currency exchanges where investors buy and sell, saying that it was starting to look a lot like gambling.

At the time, some exchanges were processing transactions worth hundreds of millions of dollars. But the news caused an outcry, and the government merely barred cryptocurrency investors from opening new anonymous accounts linked to banks in an attempt to crack down on money laundering.

Even some former cryptocurrency evangelists warn that the best days are over. They include Kimchi Powered, the contestant on the Block Battle television show.

Kimchi Powered, whose real name is Jung Ki-young, made it all the way to the shows finals, in part by entertaining the judges with silly costumes. On the night of the final round, Mr. Jung, 36, wore a shimmering suit jacket.

He still invests in cryptocurrencies, but warns others that there arent as many opportunities to make money as before.

Many people are very depressed these days because the price of Bitcoin has dropped, he said in an interview. It was my intention to give people a reason to laugh rather than trying to win the competition.

Falling prices arent the only reason South Koreans cant make money as they did before.

Big companies increasingly overshadow small investors. Hyundai, a major conglomerate, created a blockchain platform called HDAC and advertised the technology at the World Cup. A unit of Lotte, a conglomerate that became embroiled in a corruption scandal in 2017, has worked with blockchain start-ups.

A number of South Koreans have also been hit by scams.

Koreans lack knowledge about finance, said Remy Kim, the investor who goes by Les Mis and who gives tips and information on how cryptocurrencies work. They are stingy at the store, but then they poured everything into cryptocurrencies.

Still, many dirt spoons hold on to the hope that cryptocurrencies will turn back around.

Kim Ki-won said he would tell his parents about his cryptocurrency obsession soon. But first, he wants to make enough to start a business. He is sure that the market will turn around.

I have nothing to lose, he said. I always wanted to be rich.

See the rest here:
Cryptocurrency Was Their Way Out of South Koreas Lowest ...

Julian Assange Is Still a Creep – POLITICO Magazine

AP Photo

Opinion

The WikiLeaks founder could score an invite to CPAC next year.

By RICH LOWRY

September 08, 2016

Rich Lowry is editor of National Review.

If Julian Assange plays this right, he just might score an invitation to CPAC next year.

The notorious WikiLeaks founder would have to attend the Conservative Political Action Conference remotely because he is still holed up in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, avoiding a rape investigation in Sweden and fearing extradition to the United States for his malicious exposure of state secrets. But, surely, the details could be worked out.

Story Continued Below

Assange is now treated as a respectable figure by some elements of the right because he despises Hillary Clinton and promises to torpedo her campaign with new email exposures. Never mind that he has done everything within his power to damage the interests of the United States, in league with his quasi-ally, Vladimir Putins Russia. Rarely has strange new respect" been stranger.

Its like conservatives embracing Kim Philby, the infamous British double agent who defected to the Soviet Union in the 1960s, if he promised to produce damaging information about LBJ before the 1964 election. Or welcoming Philip Agee, the anti-CIA activist from the 1970s who was allied with Russian and Cuban intelligence, if he demonstrated enough hostility to Jimmy Carter.

The enemy of my enemy (or more properly, my domestic political opponent) can still be a reprehensible creep, and thats what Assange is.

But Sean Hannity of Fox News has a newfound soft spot for the accused rapist and scourge of America. A couple of years ago, Hannity tore into the Obama administration for not doing more to capture the WikiLeaks founder, and sympathized with the contention that Assange was the equivalent of a terrorist. Now, the host says he was conflicted about Assange back then, and he had qualms about his work only because I believe in privacy.

This makes it sound as though WikiLeaks published a Hulk Hogan sex tape. Instead, Assange dumped, among other things, what the Defense Department called the largest leak of classified documents in its history. Hannity was outraged a few years ago that the leaks potentially endangered U.S. allies in Afghanistan the Taliban vowed to track down named U.S. informants but now hails Assange for exposing how corrupt, dishonest and phony our government is.

Assange puts his agenda in more starkly anti-American terms. He has a poisonous, Chomskyite view of the United States as a dastardly empire, bending the world to its will and persecuting brave dissidents like none other than Julian Assange.

When he started out, Assange was committed to exposing the worlds genuinely pernicious states. He said he was going to criticize highly oppressive regimes in China, Russia and Central Eurasia and warned a newspaper in Moscow of the damaging information he had acquired about Russia.

Assange is no longer in that line of work. He has fallen into the arms of Putin as he pursues his vendetta against the United States and its former secretary of state, whom, it so happens, Putin will never forgive for criticizing Russias 2011 parliamentary elections.

The not especially telegenic WikiLeaks founder somehow briefly landed an RT show, and it was his idea for National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden to seek refuge in Russia. The New York Times recently documented how Assanges leaks tend to track with Russian interests.

The avowed champion of transparency and free speech told the Times he doesnt go out of his way to criticize a Russian government that kills journalists because to do so is boring.

Interfering in a U.S. election is apparently much more interesting. U.S. officials believe that Russia was behind the hack of the Democratic National Committee that WikiLeaks used to such effect around the time of the Democratic convention. The promised additional WikiLeaks exposures may well be the handiwork of the Russians, as well.

It is Hillarys own fault that she is vulnerable to the likes of Assange. Her secrecy, corrupt practices and dishonesty make her an ideal target. Yet there is a world of difference between Tom Fitton, the head of Judicial Watch who has done so much through litigation in the U.S. courts to expose Clinton, and Assange, a certified America-hater whose work is likely enabled by Russian intelligence.

There was a time when everyone could see the distinction, but that was before 2016, a year of strange, not to say loathsome, bedfellows.

Go here to see the original:
Julian Assange Is Still a Creep - POLITICO Magazine

Roger Waters Condemns ‘Illegal Attacks’ on Julian Assange by …

World

15:11 11.02.2019Get short URL

Waters, 75, has never shied from speaking his mind, and has vocally questioned many Western government policies. Last week, he called US actions in Venezuela a "coup"; earlier he challenged Donald Trump on immigration and called for the boycott of this year's Eurovision in Israel.

Roger Waters, the founding member ofPink Floyd and an avowed social justice activist, has endorsed the upcoming demonstrations insupport ofJulian Assange and demanded that the whistle-blower be given a safe haven inhis native Australia.

In a letter toAustralia's Socialist Equality Party, published on the World Socialist Web Site, Waters lauded Assange asa "real hero", whose WikiLeaks project "helped expose tothe world the hidden machinations ofthe real criminals inour society: the oligarchs, who intheir insatiable quest formore and more wealth, would destroy the fragile planet we call home".

Waters, who left Pink Floyd in1985 topursue a successful solo career, said Assange needs protection from "unwarranted and illegal attacks" fromthe Western countries, who are "determined todestroy" the truth-seeker.

The Socialist Equality Party is set toorganise rallies inSydney on3 March and inMelbourne on10 March tocall onthe Australian government forimmediate action tosecure the freedom ofJulian Assange.

READ MORE: 'Stop Trump Coup': Roger Waters Slams US Actions inVenezuela as 'Insanity'

"I unreservedly support and applaud the demonstrations called bythe Socialist Equality Party inAustralia todemand that the Australian government takes immediate action tosecure the freedom oftheir citizen, Julian Assange, fromhis nearseven-year house imprisonment inthe Ecuadorian embassy inLondon," Waters wrote.

"At least untilrecently, the Ecuadorian presidency was solid inits promise ofasylum, butthe new president ofEcuador is showing himself tobe more susceptible toinsidious US pressure. Julian's situation is dire."

In November, Roger Waters travelled toEcuador tourge the country's government not togive upAssange tothe UK and the US "and all the other acolytes ofthe evil empire incarcerate this great man and kill him, which is what they will do".

AP Photo / Kirsty Wigglesworth

The 47-year-old WikiLeaks founder has been locked upinthe Ecuadorian Embassy inLondon since2012. He has repeatedly noted he feared extradition tothe United States overleaking thousands ofclassified documents.

His defence team has cited media reports suggesting that Ecuador's president Lenin Moreno had sought toreach an agreement withthe United States onhanding Assange overto Washington inexchange for "debt relief".

Moreover, inNovember, WikiLeaks and a number ofUS media outlets published what they claimed was a court filing inan unrelated case including some sealed charges that used Assange's name inan "apparent cut-and-paste error". The outlets then suggested that the existence ofthese files meant the existence ofcharges brought againstAssange bythe US authorities. Washington has refused todeny or confirm the rumours.

Read the rest here:
Roger Waters Condemns 'Illegal Attacks' on Julian Assange by ...

WikiLeaks Julian Assange promises significant leak on U.S …

BERLIN - WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange promisedsignificant disclosures on subjects including the U.S. election andGoogle in the coming weeks as the secret-spilling group marked its 10thanniversary on Tuesday.

Assange said WikiLeaks plans to start publishing newmaterial starting this week, but wouldnt specify the timing and subject.Speaking by video link to an anniversary news conference in Berlin, he said theleaks include significant material on war, arms, oil, internetgiant Google, the U.S. election and mass surveillance.

WikiLeaks hopes to be publishing every week for thenext 10 weeks, Assange said.

Assange had promised an October surprise,which he hinted could prove devastating to theClinton campaign

Trump surrogate Roger Stone tweeted at the timethat Hillary Clinton would be donefollowing the disclosure of the WikiLeak findings.

Well, it could be any number of things, Stone said in August. I actually have communicated with Assange. I believe the next tranche of his documents pertain to the Clinton Foundation but theres no telling what the October surprise may be.

WikiLeaks, which released Democratic National Committeeemails days before the partys national convention earlier this year, wouldntsay who or what campaign would be affected by the upcoming U.S. election leaks.Assange said speculation that he or WikiLeaks intend to harm Democratic nomineeHillary Clinton is false.

Asked whether he feels any personal affinity with ClintonsRepublican rival, Donald Trump, Assange replied: I feel personal affinityreally, I think, with all human beings.

I certainly feel sorry for Hillary Clinton and DonaldTrump, he added. These are two people that are tormented by theirambitions in different ways.

Sweden is seeking Assanges extradition in a rape investigation. He hasnt left the Ecuadorean Embassy in London since 2012.Assange denies the rape allegation and says he fears being extradited to theU.S. to face espionage charges if he leaves.

Assanges most recent shakeup-- the release of nearly20,000 internal emailsthat pointed to possible Clinton favoritismby the Democratic National Committee duringthe primary process -- caused some upheaval during the Democratic Convention in Philadelphia. The partys chairwoman resigned, and Bernie Sanders supporters booed when the Vermont senatorurged themto vote for Clinton instead. Assange has sincepromised torelease documentsthat could have a significant impact on the looming general election.

The rest is here:
WikiLeaks Julian Assange promises significant leak on U.S ...

Julians situation is dire: Roger Waters issues rallying …

Pink Floyd-founder and political activist Roger Waters has endorsed upcoming political demonstrations in support of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange to take place in March in the latters native Australia.

Waters, 75, decried Assanges almost seven-year imprisonment in the Ecuadorian embassy in London as dire while referring to the publisher as a national treasureof immense influence and significance on the world stage.

Pro-Assange rallies are scheduled to be held in Sydney on March 3 and in Melbourne on March 10.

In the letter to Australia's Socialist Equality Party, Waters labelled Assange a real hero while praising the Wikileaks founder for his work exposing misdeeds by western governments adding that he, scares the sh*t out of them."

There are widespread fears among the activist community that Assange would be extradited to the US for leaking thousands of classified documents relating to US activities in Iraq and Afghanistan, should he step outside the embassy.

Waters continued that WikiLeaks helped expose to the world the hidden machinations of the real criminals in our society: the oligarchs, who in their insatiable quest for more and more wealth, would destroy the planet we call home.

He further asserted that Assange needs protection from unwarranted and illegal attacks from Western governments determined to destroy him. He also took aim at Ecuadorian President Lenn Moreno whom he claimed is showing himself to be more susceptible to insidious US pressure.

Waters has been heavily involved in political activism for many years and is a known advocate for Palestinian human rights, as well as a critic of US imperialism and intervention in foreign conflicts, recently referring to the recent affairs in Venezuela as Trumps coup.

Like this story? Share it with a friend!

Original post:
Julians situation is dire: Roger Waters issues rallying ...

Judge: NSA spying almost Orwellian, likely unconstitutional

In a stinging rebuke to President Barack Obamas surveillance policies, a federal judge on Monday branded the National Security Agencys mass collection of Americans telephone data almost Orwellian and likely a violation of the Constitution. Former NSA contractor Edward Snowden cheered the ruling.

Appeals Court Judge Richard Leon invoked Founding Father James Madison and the Beatles in a frequently scathing ruling. Leon, appointed by then-President George W. Bush, ordered the government to halt bulk collection of so-called telephony metadata and destroy information already collected through that program. But he suspended his order as the case works its way through the courts.

I cannot imagine a more indiscriminate and abitrary invasion than this systematic and high-tech collection and retention of personal data on virtually every single citizen for purposes of querying and analyzing it without prior judicial approval, Leon wrote.

The judge also dealt a blow to the governments argument that such surveillance programs

a source of controversy ever since Snowden revealed their reach in a series of unauthorized disclosures

are necessary to thwarting terrorist plots.

The Government does not cite a single instance in which analysis of the NSAs bulk metadata collection actually stopped an imminent attack, or otherwise aided the Government in achieving any objective that was time-sensitive in nature, he wrote.

Leon said Founding Father James Madison would likely be aghast at the NSAs activities

but also conjured up a Beatles-themed image to rebut the governments suggestion that it does not collect Verizon metadata.

To draw an analogy, if the NSAs program operates the way the Government suggests it does, then omitting Verizon Wireless, AT&T, and Sprint from the collection would be like omitting John, Paul, and George from a historical analysis of the Beatles. A Ringo-only database doesnt make any sense, and I cannot believe the Government would create, maintain, and so ardently defend such a system, he wrote in footnote 36 on page 38.

Among Leons other flourishes, he warned that the so-called war on terrorism realistically could be forever! He expressed concerns about the almost Orwellian technology that enables the Government to store and analyze the phone metadata of every telephone user in the United States. And he said modern-day surveillance tactics would have been the stuff of science fiction at the time a precedent ruling was issued.

The White House had no immediate response to the ruling.

But Snowden, in a statement distributed by independent journalist Glenn Greenwald, cheered.

"I acted on my belief that the NSA's mass surveillance programs would not withstand a constitutional challenge, and that the American public deserved a chance to see these issues determined by open courts," Snowden said. "Today, a secret program authorized by a secret court was, when exposed to the light of day, found to violate Americans' rights. It is the first of many."

Continued here:
Judge: NSA spying almost Orwellian, likely unconstitutional