The government game of I Spy – Sharyl Attkisson

The following is an excerpt from Full Measure with Sharyl Attkisson. Watch the video investigation by clicking the link at the bottom.

We begin with an examination of one of the worst abuses of government power that could happen in our society. Illegal spying on U.S. citizens. Amid findings about egregious violations by our intelligence community, theres a criminal investigation. And the court that approves surveillance on U.S. citizens has instructed the FBI to implement new safeguards as of this week. As our intelligence agencies face what may be their biggest scrutiny in decades, we examine how we got here.

Our examination of government surveillance controversies begins in 2001. Under FBI Director Robert Mueller, new rules were imposed to address FBI abuses.

FBI Agents had repeatedly gotten caught submitting false information to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to justify wiretapping or spying on U.S. citizens.

The new protections called Woods Procedures were named for the FBI official who helped devise themMichael Woods. Hes seen here testifying to Congress.

Michael Woods: There is significant public concern about the impact of surveillance activities on the privacy and civil liberties of Americans.

The Woods Procedures require the FBI, all the way to the top, to strictly verify each fact in a wiretap application. Now, eighteen years later, those very rules are back in question. More on that later.

First, we go to Salt Lake City, Utah in 2002 and a National Security Agency whistleblower named Thomas Drake. Drake said the NSA was fine [tuning] a new scale of mass surveillance and secretly conducted blanket surveillance of virtually all electronic communications going into or out of the area during the Winter Olympics. Intel officials denied it.

In 2009, FBI whistleblower Shamai Leibowitz stepped forward and accused intel agencies of serious constitutional violations and illegal abuse of power.

As the government secretly expanded its surveillance powers in the name of national security there were shades of what was later to come in 2016.

Intelligence officials began to listen in on members of Congress sometimes political rivals speaking with American-Jewish groups and foreign officials including Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

A senior official confessed it raised fears [of]an Oh-[blank] moment,that the executive branch would be accused of spying on Congress.

Someone illegally leaked information about private calls made by Democrats Jane Harman and Dennis Kucinich and even leaked actual recordings of Kucinich calls with Libyan officials.

Saif Gaddafi: Hello

Dennis Kucinich: Yes sir.

Gaddafi: This is Saif speaking.

Kucinich: Yes. This is Dennis.

Journalists were targeted, too. Government agents initiated secret surveillance and subpoenas against then Fox News reporter James Rosen and 20 Associated Press reporters. They also secretly hacked into and monitored my computers while I worked at CBS News.

CBS News: Someone has been breaking into the computer of our investigative correspondent Sharyl Attkisson.

An internal email by a global intelligence firm laid some blame at the feet of then Homeland Security adviser John Brennan.

Brennan is behind the witch hunts of investigative journalists learning information from inside the beltway sources. There is specific tasker from the [White House] to go after anyone printing materials negative to the Obama agenda.

Brennan went on to head up the CIAwhere questions continued to build. In 2014, the CIA Inspector General revealed that under Brennan, five CIA officials had improperly searched through staff emails of the Senate Intelligence Committee. Brennan had denied it but apologized after the IG report.

John Brennan: But what I really want to do is to have as much dialogue as possible with you to have that trust can be built up.

Meantime, at a public hearing, Democrat Ron Wyden asked another top intel official, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, about mass surveillance on innocent U.S. citizens.

Sen Ron Wyden: Director Clapper, I want to ask you about what I asked you about a year ago. Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions, or hundreds of millions of Americans?

James Clapper: No, sir.

Wyden: It does not?

Clapper: Not wittingly.

Clappers testimony proved false. He later apologized saying hed misunderstood the question.

It was NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden in June 2013 who blew the lid off just how massive and intrusive the governments surveillance dragnet had grown.

Edward Snowden: You cant come forward against the worlds most powerful intelligence agencies and be completely free from risk because theyre such powerful adversaries that no one can meaningfully oppose them. If they want to get you, theyll get you in time.

President-elect Donald Trump received a similar warning from the Democrats Senate leader Chuck Schumer after Trump criticized sitting intelligence officials.

Sen. Charles Schumer: You take on the intelligence community they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you.

Sure enough, Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz recently concluded the FBI committed egregious errors in targeting Trump associates for investigation and surveillance during the 2016 campaign.

Donald Trump: Today is our Independence Day.

Michael Horowitz: We are deeply concerned that so many basic and fundamental errors were made by three separate, hand-picked investigative teams on one of the most sensitive FBI investigations.

On their way out, Obama officials secretly listened in on conversations between Trump officials and others including at Trump Tower.

They wiretapped former Trump campaign volunteer Carter Page as if a Russian spy.

To get the wiretap, an FBI lawyer allegedly doctored a document.

And the FBI used evidence that turned out to be unverified political opposition research bought by the Clinton campaign and delivered to the FBI and the media.

Less than two weeks before the 2016 election, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Courts lead judge Rosemary Collyer secretly slammed Obama intel officials over a series of surveillance violations shed just learned about. She accused the NSA of institutional lack of candora very serious Fourth Amendment issue and demanded fixes.

Intelligence officials deny doing anything wrong. They say their motivations were never political or to spy but to protect national security and that whenever theyve discovered issues, theyve taken steps to correct them.

In a speech and Congressional testimony, Trump FBI Director Christopher Wray claimed theres never been any abuses of surveillance authority known as 702 although the court has documented numerous examples.

Christopher Wray: Theres been no evidence of any kind of abuse of power under Section 702 despite all the oversight I mentioned before, with the three branches of government and quite a few years of experience now.

In the end, those who blew the whistle on alleged government abuses paid a price. The NSAs Thomas Drake was prosecuted for mishandling documents and made a plea deal. The FBIs Shamai Leibowitz was prosecuted for leaking to the media.

Snowden: Its a fear Ill live under for the rest of my life.

And Edward Snowden is charged with three felonies in his absence from the U.S.

This story ends today back at square one where it began. According to the Inspector Generals report last month, FBI officials violated the Woods Procedures when they wiretapped Trump campaign volunteer Carter Page repeating the very mistakes the Woods Procedures were set up to avoid 15 years before.

Theres news regarding Sharyls computer intrusions. A former government agent who admits he took part in the illegal surveillance operation against her has now stepped forward to provide information and implicate his colleagues. He says many US citizens were illegally spied on in the same way. And a former FBI Unit Chief has also publicly confirmed he initiated the original forensics that proved the government was involved. You can read more at SharylAttkisson.com.

Watch the report by clicking the link below:

http://fullmeasure.news/news/politics/i-spy

Support Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI

Here is the original post:
The government game of I Spy - Sharyl Attkisson

The role of Artificial Intelligence today – – VENTS Magazine

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is probably one of the branches of Computer Science that is experiencing more growth nowadays. Even though it was born more than 70 years ago, it is in a historical period where it has generated more interest because of the revolution it has caused on the market today.

Until very recently, there were limited computational capacities that made Artificial Intelligence produce very poor results on the problem being applied, which resulted in several periods of historical dissatisfaction in the industry and considerable reduction in both interests. In this case, discipline on the number of dedicated researchers.

However, in recent years Artificial Intelligence has gained enormous momentum, able to solve problems with computers that were previously thought to be impossible, reaching levels that had never been reached before. Even mobile devices benefit from research in this area, for example, through keyboard predictive text, fingerprint screen unlocking, or face detection on a frame taken by a camera.

Several reasons that have functioned as AI takeoff machines can be listed, but the democratization of computational capacity stands out with particular emphasis, especially since 2009 with the publication of the first scientific article about the massive parallelization of AI calculations using GPUs and others in 2010, to demonstrate their use in automatic recognition of handwriting, exceeding for the first time the capacity of humans in this task. In this way, Artificial Intelligence gets its name because of the ability of electronic devices to solve problems that require intelligence and that, in the traditional way (programming), cannot be solved on a computer.

Looking back, the birth of Artificial Intelligence occurred more than 70 years ago, in the hands of Alan Turing, considered the father of this discipline. In 1936 he compiled a computational model, which consisted of heads on an infinite long band that could read, write and scroll. This computational model is called a Turing machine, and it is possible to represent any computational operation, in other words, any computation can be reduced and represented by a Turing Machine. This raises the following question: If the brain exerts computational operations, can it be reduced and represented by the Turing Machine?

If this is possible, it means that operations that we consider to be intelligent can be carried out automatically, such as the detection of objects in an image, the classification of sounds, or even the proper functioning of brain awareness. We cannot assert that the latter may occur, however, there is progress in simulating or approaching intelligent behavior, which is why subfields have emerged in the fields of Artificial Intelligence such as Computer Vision (CV), Machine Learning (ML) and Natural Language Processing (NLP).

The Japans case: Matchmaking

In Japan, a country with a high level of technological development, AI has played a more important role in matchmaking. AI devices began to be used to provide a picture of a potential partner only through the touch of a hand. It seems that the intelligence will be a determinant factor in matchmaking, today and in the future. You can find more information here. It seems that Artificial Intelligence begins to have the maturity to be applied in solving problems which until a few years ago were deemed unsolvable by machines. And one important factor in this phenomenon is that AI systems can operate independently like living things. This system is able to regulate itself, act like thinking beings, and thats why the reason is called Artificial Intelligence.

In short, Artificial Intelligence is the future of humans. We as humans cannot escape this reality. All we can do is make sure it works according to human norms and ethics. Hopefully this article can provide an overview of our future.

Visit link:
The role of Artificial Intelligence today - - VENTS Magazine

Evolving Relationship Between Artificial Intelligence and Big Data – ReadWrite

Find the evolving relationship between big data and artificial intelligence. The growing popularity of these technologies offers engaging audience experience. It encourages newcomers to come up with an outstanding plan.

AI and Big Data help you transform your idea into substance. It helps you make full use of visuals, graphs, and multimedia to give your targeted audience with a great experience. According toMarkets And Markets, the worldwide market for AI in accounting assumed to grow. As a result, growth from $666 million in 2019 to $4,791 million by 2024.

The critical component of delivering an outstanding pitch is taking a step further with an incredible plan of assuring success. Big data and Artificial intelligence help you contribute to multiple industries bringing an effective plan. It can directly speak to investors and your targeted audience, covering essential aspects and representing your idea in a nutshell.

According to Techjury, The big data analytics market is set to reach $103 billion by 2023, and in 2019, the big data market is expected to grow by 20%.

From transformation to the phenomenal growth AI and Big data provide you with the accessibility of relevant information. Big data holds the data from multiple sources like social media platforms, search data, and others, which can be structured or unstructured. While artificial intelligence is intelligence demonstrated by machines with the rise of natural intelligence displayed by humans.

The most exciting thing for anyone to do is to identify the problem. So to know what prevents people from reaching their goal. From the product or service you wish to obtain the targeted audiences attention, it must solve the problem of the potential customers. There can be any problem from simple to complicated for which customers need a solution.

For every problem, there is a solution. Once you have understood the problem and willing to bring change, you can clearly solve the problem in the most defined ways. Artificial intelligence is a true reflection of technology advancement. With big data, you can make full use of vital information extracting the information you need.

For every problem, there is a solution. Once you have understood the problem and willing to bring change, you can clearly solve the problem in the most defined ways. Artificial intelligence is a true reflection of technology advancement. With big data, you can make full use of vital information extracting the information you need.

One can come with accurate solutions using AI and big data. It helps in introducing a low error rate compared to humans if appropriately coded. The AI takes the decision based on data and a set of algorithms, which decreases the chance of error. Big data and AI, when used together, can really help you solve the problem by answering the potential issues and bringing an effective solution.

To solve any kind of problem, one must know about the potential market. Divide your target market into segments from whom you expect to get a positive response. It helps you do what you need to. These advanced technologies have a strong foundation with outstanding capabilities to capture the potential market. One must learn and apply these technologies to get a better result in transforming the overall experience of customers.

Capturing the target audiences attention is as important as solving the problem. Once you know how big is your potential market is, and what your target audience wants, you can use these advanced technologies to pitch and get the desired result. That is only possible if you use your segment creatively and consider creating your own identity for targeting your customer while working on your business plan.

Every industry has its own competition with a particular set of competitors. One must invest in something that can really help people and bring the best solution for them with beneficial results and stand out in the real competition.

To stay in the market and promote your service, one must invest in providing customers with alternative solutions. These AI solutions can help you increase your customer base. Give your customers the reason to choose your solution over someone elses. That reason will be the identity that you will create in the market. Build a unique solution that can help you focus on growing your business and stay ahead in the competition.

Mark your presence in the market, accomplishing specific goals that you desire to achieve and have already accomplished. Make your business a reality setting realistic goals and perform better and notable milestones to achieve greater success. The core essence of running a smooth business and getting all that you desire is accomplishing set milestones.

Accomplishing set milestones can really help you get desired results and gain positive support from the trusted and reliable model. By doing this, you can strategies your small business plan with changing times and market demand. Gain an ideal position in the market with better results and in-depth data.

Achieving a milestone can be a tough task. However, with AI & Big data, it has become possible to get predictive analysis for better results and position of control. Consider all the options that make you stand out in the competition and help you grow your business.

AI can help you analyze consumer data patterns. It can predict what users would like to pay for with the help of big data. Both these technologies are compelling to present and provides a useful result that can boost your sales and increase business revenue.

Nitin Garg is the CEO and Co-founder of BR Softech Business Intelligence Software Company. Likes to share his opinions on IT industry via blogs. His interest is to write on the latest and advanced IT technologies which include IoT, VR & AR app development, web, and app development services.

See the article here:
Evolving Relationship Between Artificial Intelligence and Big Data - ReadWrite

Artificial intelligence needn’t be a barrier to gender parity if we use it smartly | Dr. Lamya Fawwaz – Gulf Today

The photo has been used for illustrative purposes.

2020 marks the start of a critical decade in achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). As the Fourth Industrial Revolution continues to transform just about every industry sector, and revolutionize the way we live and work, it is only natural that we look to leverage its benefits to drive greater sustainability.

The role of artificial intelligence in achieving renewable energy and sustainable targets was highlighted in a recent report; using AI for environmental applications could add USD 5.2 trillion to the global economy, while reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 4 per cent, according to PwC.

The benefits of AI in sustainability are manifold: it can support the deployment of self-driving vehicles to transform transportation systems, or better manage food purchasing to reduce wastage. Smart grid technology aligns energy production, distribution and usage more effectively, while water wastage can be tackled at source.

However, while AI and other emerging technologies will undoubtedly prove vital in addressing sustainability challenges, we need to be careful about how they are applied if we dont want to waste an even more vital resource women.

AIs gender bias issues have also come under the spotlight recently from claims that Amazon had to abandon an experimental hiring tool because it discriminated against female applicants, to concerns about the (over) use of womens names for virtual assistants think Siri, and Alexa.

The benefits of AI in sustainability are manifold: it can support the deployment of self-driving vehicles to transform transportation systems, or better manage food purchasing to reduce wastage.

Possible reasons for this perceived gender bias are not hard to determine. While women make up half the global workforce, they only represent 30 per cent of tech industry employees, and less than 10 per cent of clean-tech start-ups are women-owned. In cutting-edge disciplines like AI, the imbalance is even worse: only 12 per cent of AI researchers, and just 6% of software developers, are female.

Given that SDG 5 achieving gender equality and empowering females is central to reaching all the other SDGs, clearly there is still much work to be done in the tech sector.

And the potential is there. In the workplace, technology can help us break down some of the barriers to female inclusion, such as inadequate training, limited access to financing, inflexible work environments, and lack of engagement with decision makers.

Nor is it necessarily true that women dont want to work in tech-related fields. Here in the UAE, women make up 56 per cent of graduates in STEM disciplines. Further, women make up around a third of tech entrepreneurs in the Middle East.

The UAE is also actively promoting opportunities for women in its emerging high-tech sector, and the investment is paying off. Around 40 per cent of the team working on the UAEs Mars Mission are female, while 90 per cent of the scientists at the Mohammed Bin Rashid Space Centre are women.

The UAEs commitment to parity between men and women has seen the country climb 23 positions in the UNDP Gender Equality Index in the past year, rising to 26th place and becoming the highest ranked Arab country in the world.

But this commitment to gender equality hasnt come at the expense of technology expertise the UAE also leads the region in technology adoption, and we are also one of the most advanced nations in the world in the application of AI. The UAE was the first country to appoint a minister of state for AI, while Masdar City is set to host the Mohamed Bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence the worlds first graduate-level AI research institution.

The role AI and digitalization can play in sustainability and gender parity will be discussed in-depth at Women in Sustainability, Environment and Renewable Energy (WiSER) Forum, convening on January 14th at this years Abu Dhabi Sustainability Week.

The UAEs progress in both gender equality and in driving technology adoption is a clear demonstration that applied correctly technology can be a vital tool in empowering women. By giving women and girls equal opportunities, we can maximize our collective potential. Just ask Siri.

See more here:
Artificial intelligence needn't be a barrier to gender parity if we use it smartly | Dr. Lamya Fawwaz - Gulf Today

IDC unveils Top 10 Artificial Intelligence predictions 2020 and beyond for the Indian market – TelecomTV

New Delhi, January 7, 2020 International Data Corporation (IDC) has revealed predictions impacting the Artificial Intelligence (AI) investments for organizations in India for 2020 and beyond. In this data-driven era, AI is becoming a priority for organizations in India, driven by the need to automate, faster route to market, and agility. Organizations in India are warming up to leveraging AI when it comes to automating processes, deriving actionable insights, and prototyping with use cases to evaluate the implication of the technology.

According to Rishu Sharma, Principal Analyst, Cloud and Artificial Intelligence, IDC India, "Indian organizations are looking at leveraging AI driven by the need for automation to increase the productivity. As we deal with large set of unstructured data being created in the digital era, AI will be the backbone when it comes to extracting valuable insights. Unsurprisingly, the primary reason holding the organizations back when it comes to implementing AI technology is - the trustworthiness of the data. Enterprises also cite unrealistic expectations, lack of skilled staff and unclear business case, as the reasons for failure of AI projects."

IDC India has listed the following ten predictions that would impact the technology buyers and suppliers in AI in India in 2020 and beyond:

#1 Outcomes as a Service: By 2025, AI will be integral to every part of the business in India, resulting in 20% of the overall spend on AI solutions as "outcomes as a service" that drives innovation at scale and superior business value.

#2 Worker Augmentation: By 2024, 50% of enterprises in India will invest in employee retraining and development, including third-party services, to address new skill needs and ways of working resulting from AI adoption.

#3 Digital Trust: By 2024, top 100 organizations in India will have formal programs to monitor their "digital trustworthiness" as digital trust becomes a critical corporate asset.

#4 Intelligent Process Automation: By 2024, 50% of enterprises in India will embed intelligent automation into technology and process development, using AI-based software to discover operational and experiential insights to guide innovation.

#5 AI is the New UI: By 2024, AI in India will become the new user interface by redefining user experiences where over 20% of user touches will be augmented by computer vision, speech, natural language, and AR/VR.

#6 Hyper-Personalization: By 2023, 10% of customer experience applications in India will be continuously hyper-personalized by combining a variety of data and newer reinforcement learning algorithms.

#7 AI Edge Applications: By 2025, 30% of computer vision and speech recognition models in India will run on the edge (including endpoints) and feature deep learning on convolutional and recurrent neural networks.

#8 Embedded AI: By 2025, at least 50% of new enterprise application releases in India will include embedded AI functionality, but truly disruptive AI-led applications will represent only about 5% of this total.

#9 AI Accelerated Chips: In 2023, technology buyer spending on semiconductors (GPUs, FPGAs, AI ASICs, and AI ASSPs) used specifically to accelerate AI training and inferencing will reach nearly $120 million in India.

#10 AI Edge Computing: By 2024, nearly 10% of servers that process AI workloads using AI-optimized processors and coprocessors in India will be deployed at the edge.

"Artificial Intelligence in India promises to develop advanced solutions that tackle organizational challenges and speed up strategic formulation. With the increasing availability of data, AI can be effective in multiple applications across various verticals including agriculture, transportation, finance, healthcare, retail and many more. India, being the key contributor in the global startup ecosystem, will play a crucial role in discovering the benefits of AI technology across varied sectors," says Swapnil Shende, Senior Market Analyst for AI at IDC India.

These strategic predictions for the India market are presented in full in the following report: IDC FutureScape: Worldwide Artificial Intelligence 2020 Predictions India Implications (IDC #AP45727419 ) and is part of India Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Services report series

IDC FutureScape reports are used to shape IT strategy and planning for the enterprise by providing a basic framework for evaluating IT initiatives in terms of their value to business strategy now and in the foreseeable future. IDC's FutureScapes are comprised of a set of decision imperatives designed to identify a range of pending issues that CIOs and senior technology professionals will confront within the typical three- to five-year business planning cycle.

International Data Corporation (IDC) is the premier global provider of market intelligence, advisory services, and events for the information technology, telecommunications, and consumer technology markets. With more than 1,100 analysts worldwide, IDC offers global, regional, and local expertise on technology and industry opportunities and trends in over 110 countries. IDC's analysis and insight helps IT professionals, business executives, and the investment community to make fact-based technology decisions and to achieve their key business objectives. Founded in 1964, IDC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of International Data Group (IDG), the world's leading tech media, data and marketing services company. To learn more about IDC, please visit http://www.idc.com. Follow IDC on Twitter at @IDC and LinkedIn. Subscribe to the IDC Blog for industry news and insights: http://bit.ly/IDCBlog_Subscribe.

Continue reading here:
IDC unveils Top 10 Artificial Intelligence predictions 2020 and beyond for the Indian market - TelecomTV

WikiLeaks reveals Bin Zayed’s opinion on Saudi royal family Middle East Monitor – The Union Journal

A brand-new telegram released on the WikiLeaks site, a global charitable site being experts in releasing personal files, disclosed the issues of the crown royal prince of Abu Dhabi, Mohammed Bin Zayed, over the judgment family in Saudi Arabia.

The telegram, additionally released by The New York Times, introduced in an extensive record that Bin Zayed had actually educated the United States ambassador, James Jeffrey, that he is afraid Wahhabism in Saudi Arabia and also intends to remove it.

The New York Times reported that the crown royal prince of Abu Dhabi: Considered the Saudi royal family during the reign of King Abdullah Bin Abdulaziz Al Saud as helpless; however, he was afraid that the alternative would be an authoritarian and Wahhabi state similar to ISIS. He additional specified: Anyone who replaces Al Saud will be a nightmare.

The telegram divulged that Bin Zayed quickly concentrated on the present crown royal prince, Mohammed Bin Salman: Who was impatient for introducing reforms in order to reduce Saudi Arabias attachment to radical Islam, and marketed his vision to the administration of US President Donald Trump.

In the very same prolonged record, qualified Mohammed Bin Zayeds Dark Vision of the Middle Easts Future, author Robert F. Worth incorporated talking to, profiling and also evaluating the crown royal prince of Abu Dhabi the de facto leader of the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

READ: Recording web links UAE crown royal prince to Malaysia PM corruption instances

The New York Times reported that Bin Zayed: Put much of his enormous resources into the counter-revolution, and he cracked down on the Muslim Brotherhood and built a hyper-modern security-based state, where everyone is monitored in search of the slightest whiff of Islamic inclinations.

The paper explained that the separation of the Egyptian head of state, Mohamed Morsi, was the very first wonderful success of the Bin Zayed project, including: It appears that he was very confident in what could be done without American restrictions, and soon turned his attention to Libya, where he began providing military support to the former general, Khalifa Haftar, a tyrant who shares Bin Zayeds feelings towards Islamists.

The writer, pricing quote a United States mediator, worried that the clog enforced on Qatar because June 2017 has actually come to be a personal revenge issue for Bin Zayed.

It deserves additionally keeping in mind that in 2009 Bin Zayed decided that would considerably boost his capacity to task power past the UAE boundaries, when he asked Mike Hindmarsh, previous leader of Australias Special Air Service program, for aid in reorganising the Emirati military, assigning him at some point to lead the military.

He suggested that it is unthinkable to select a non-Arab authorities in such high army message in any kind of various other nation in the Middle East.

Read the original here:
WikiLeaks reveals Bin Zayed's opinion on Saudi royal family Middle East Monitor - The Union Journal

PayPal blocks donations to The Grayzone that mention Iran – The Grayzone

Small donations to The Grayzone were delayed and reversed by PayPal because they mentioned the word Iran in messages praising our coverage of the US conflict. At the same time, Facebook censored a factual Grayzone video reporting on Hezbollah, Iran and Trump.By Ben Norton

Following the US governments assassination of top Iranian general Qassem Soleimani, PayPal has delayed and blocked small donations to The Grayzone that mentioned this websites news coverage of Iran.

At the same time, social media giant Facebook has censored a Grayzone video reporting on the US governments escalation against Iran and its ally Hezbollah.

In 2010, PayPal froze donations to WikiLeaks, the whistleblowing journalism organization whose publisher Julian Assange is currently being imprisoned and tortured. The online banking company also permanently suspended WikiLeaks account.

Now independent journalism websites like The Grayzone are suffering from blockages imposed by PayPal that appear directly linked to Washingtons aggressive actions in the Middle East.

On January 3, a reader tried to make a donation of $10 to The Grayzone through PayPal. The small donor, a US citizen who lives in California, wrote the following message to accompany the donation: Thanks for all your excellent work and especially the Gray Zones coverage of the murder of Soleimani and war with Iran. You fellows are so insightful and brilliant.

The Grayzone promptly received an email from the tech company stating that the donation was pending. The message noted, To comply with government regulations, PayPal is required to review certain transactions.

The next day, the small donor notified The Grayzone that she had gotten an email from the PayPal Compliance Department demanding that they provide the following information:

An explanation of the reference to Iran.

The purpose of this payment, including a complete and detailed explanation of what is intended to be paid for.

A sales receipt or other documentation pertaining to this transaction.

Full name, address, and current location of the Beneficiary of the payment.

Then, on January 6, PayPal notified The Grayzone that the donation has been reversed.

I was so impressed with your coverage of the U.S. murder of Soleimani that I made a $10 donation to you via PayPal and made laudatory remarks about your coverage of Iran in the comments section, the small donor wrote to The Grayzone. Today, I got the following message from PayPal wanting me to go to their site and explain why I made a reference to Iran.

The supporter added, Really? Am I now subject to surveillance because I used the word Iran? Why do you continue to use PayPal which long ago proved itself to be yet another corporate totalitarian?

The donor said they decided to close their PayPal account, adding, I do not owe PayPal an explanation of why I used the word Iran.'

The incident was strange. But it was not the only time The Grayzone faced difficulties when receiving donations.

On January 5, The Grayzone received another message from a reader. This supporter said they had tried to give $25 to the news website, but the tech company froze their donation as well.

The company sent both the donor and The Grayzone a message reading, To comply with government regulations, PayPal is required to review certain transactions. The payment you sent is currently being reviewed and we will complete this process within 72 hours.

The donor commented, I have never before had paypal delay a payment or donation. So this seems to be targeted at you guys. The ACLU should be looking into this. Good luck!

The Grayzone asked the supporter if they used the word Iran in the message accompanying their small donation. They replied that they had.

I was praising the very informed, very rational two-hour videocast you guys broadcast, the donor said, referring to a Grayzone discussion of US policy on Iran and President Trumps murder of top general Qassem Soleimani.

While PayPal has been blocking small donations to The Grayzone that mention its Iran coverage, another Big Tech corporation is censoring the news websites reporting on Iran and Hezbollah.

On January 9, this reporter received a notice on Facebook that the company had censored a factual, journalistic video that featured public speeches given by Iranian supreme leader Ali Khamenei and Lebanese Hezbollah secretary-general Hassan Nasrallah, showing how they had called for protecting civilians, while US President Donald Trump warned that he would attack cultural sites inside Iran.

The video did not contain commentary or opinion. It simply presented video of world leaders speaking. But without any explanation. Facebook asserted that our video violated its Community Standards on dangerous individuals and organizations.

The Grayzone contacted both PayPal and Facebook with requests for comment. The companies have not replied, as of publication.

It appears that PayPal automates the process of reviewing donations to make sure that they conform with US government sanctions, highlighting particular keywords like Iran. Apparently, the companys dragnet is so wide it is now cracking down on independent journalists who report on Middle East affairs and rely on donations to sustain their work.

The Grayzone faced similar difficulties this August in Venezuela, which is enduring a US government economic blockade that has led to the deaths of tens of thousands of civilians.

When a The Grayzone reporter tried to pay a Venezuelan national using the money transfer app Zelle, they received an email from their banks sanctions compliance department requesting more information about the transaction even though it was a payment to a private Venezuelan civilian who had no relationship at all to the government.

These tightening, seemingly arbitrary restrictions by large tech corporations show how aggressive US government sanctions on foreign nations are stifling speech and threatening independent journalism at home.

Ben Norton is a journalist, writer, and filmmaker. He is the assistant editor of The Grayzone, and the producer of the Moderate Rebels podcast, which he co-hosts with editor Max Blumenthal. His website is BenNorton.comand he tweets at @BenjaminNorton.

Read more from the original source:
PayPal blocks donations to The Grayzone that mention Iran - The Grayzone

Germany: Response to satirical children’s video exposes self-censorship of the media – World Socialist Web Site

Germany: Response to satirical childrens video exposes self-censorship of the media By Dietmar Gaisenkersting 11 January 2020

The week before Christmas, German broadcaster WDR posted an online video of a childrens choir singing an updated version of a satirical song Meine Oma fhrt im Hhnerstall Motorrad (My grandmother rides a motorcycle in the chicken coop), which was then made the subjected of a hysterical media storm.

In earlier versions, the grandma possesses many strange and wonderful things, such as a radio in her hollow tooth, glasses with curtains, a cane with a taillight or has a revolver in her garter. The chorus runs, My grandma is a very smart woman (meine Oma ist ne ganz patente Frau). The song and an English translation of the lyrics can be found here.

In the on-demand video WDR put online, the broadcasters Dortmund childrens choir sings a new version of the satirical song, which ends in the chorus Meine Oma ist ne alte Umweltsau (My grandma is an old environmental sow).

It is a harmless satire, which, according to its authors, is intended to use exaggeration and humour to target the conflict between the generations. The children sing about the discount meat-eating, SUV-driving and cruise ship travelling grandma. At the end of the video, a girl quotes Greta Thunberg saying, We will not let you get away with this.

The way the West German Broadcasting Corporation (WDR) then dealt with the so-called Umweltsau video is a prime example of how the media censors itself under the slightest pressure from the right and spreads the ideology of the far-right.

Spiegel Online, based on a Twitter survey by social media analyst Luca Hammer, has shown how right-wing trolls unleashed a tirade against the video.

His evaluation shows that the first accounts tweeted against the video on December 27, the article says. However, the first tweets about it hardly get any attention. But then the spark jumps over accounts that are too wide-reaching to be assigned to the right-wing spectrum. Many tweets complain about an instrumentalisation of children or speak derogatorily of state broadcasters. Starting from here, the outrage spreads quicklyuntil it finally reaches right-wing conservative multipliers and the first media reports appear.

Granny Gate is a typical example of right-wing outrage and mobilisationboth in terms of structure and in terms of issues and arguments, Patrick Stegemann, author of a book on Right-wing mobilisation, told Spiegel Online. Environmental issues have become insanely popular in right-wing mobilization lately, Greta [Thunberg] is the enemy personified of the right.

The Umweltsau song, according to Stegemann, is not an isolated case. Right-wing influencers and groups have tried again and again to provoke outrage. A lot of bait is thrown outand as soon as something catches, the machine really goes off, then it goes around.

The right wing did not stop at this Twitter tirade. On December 28, about one hundred right-wingers demonstrated in front of the broadcasters building in Cologne. Further demonstrations followed, which had been called by those around such neo-Nazi outfits as the Brotherhood of Germany, the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) and the extreme nationalist Identitarian Movement.

Choirmaster Zeljo Davutovic was accused of instrumentalising the singing children, AfD associations called him a child molester and tweeted his telephone number. The right-wing blogger Jrgen Fritz published the names and photos of members of the production team on his Facebook page. Some WDR employees received death threats, which should be taken seriously in view of the extreme right-wing murders of recent yearsfrom the neo-Nazi National Socialist Underground (NSU) to the murder of leading Christian Democrat Walter Lbcke, to the attack on the synagogue in Halle.

But instead of standing up and protecting the WDR journalists and defending the freedom of press, opinion and satire, the broadcasters management, the state government and other media outlets stabbed them in the back.

WDR quickly removed the video from all its internet platforms. WDR director-general Tom Buhrow, who has also been chairman of the ARD, a joint organisation of Germanys regional public service broadcasters, since the beginning of the year, apologized explicitly. On the evening of 28 December, WDR broadcast a special radio program in which Buhrow himself apologized without ifs and buts for the video.

North Rhine-Westphalias state premier Armin Laschet (Christian Democratic Union, CDU) personally joined in, tweeting that the debate on the best forms of climate protection was being escalated by WDR into a generational conflict. Never should children be instrumentalized by adults for their own purposes. With the song, WDR had crossed the boundaries of style and respect for older people. In a guest article for the weekly newspaper Zeit, Laschet wrote, In these times, we urgently need a strong public broadcasting service that serves social cohesion, corresponding to its mission statement.

Deputy state premier Joachim Stamp (Free Democratic Party, FDP) also condemned the video, Perhaps we should make a joint effort for the new decade not to describe people in general as sows, pigs etc.

In the tabloid Bild, the editor-in-chief personally spoke out against the video, its makers and WDR. The paper quoted Bundestag (federal parliament) Vice President Wolfgang Kubicki (FDP) saying, The fact that a childrens choir is being abused to denounce and re-educate speaks against the TV makers and is a fatal reminder of the failed former East Germany.

In an open letter to Buhrow, more than 40 TV authors have expressed their solidarity with the makers of the video, demanded it be immediately reposted and accused the WDR director of falling into the trap set by right-wing trolls and abandoning his staff. Among the signatories of the solidarity declaration are authors of programmes such as Neo Magazin Royale, Dark and the heute Show.

The dispute over the song lacks any rational basis,, the letter says. Even the word satirical freedom seems inappropriate when the threshold of indignation is so low that it is ruptured by every other pop song. A (!) fictional grandmother discriminates against an entire generation just as little as the alcoholic father from Papa Was a Rollin Stone does not mean all men are unfit for marriage.

Writing about Tom Buhrow, the letter goes on to say, A media manager whose handling of modern, right-wing propaganda shows so much naivete and awkwardness and who is not able to defend his staff on the simplest questions of freedom of the press and freedom of opinion, endangers precisely these freedoms. He should draw the consequences.

In a statement, the WDR editors office also supported the producers of the video and sharply criticized Buhrow. We are stunned, it says, that the program director of WDR 2 has a video with a satirical childrens song deleted, and above all about the fact that director Tom Buhrow gives in so easily to a shitstorm apparently orchestrated by right-wing extremists, hastily distances himself editorially and not only apologizes in person, but also publicly (and repeatedly) in the process, (live on WDR 2, among others), instead of backing them up in the face of staged outrage against WDR and the other public broadcasters. According to the editors representatives, the internal freedom of broadcasting had thus been violated.

On Tuesday, a private meeting of editors took place at WDR, where Buhrow faced the criticism of about 700 employees. About 30 speakers made emotional contributions, one participant told the news magazine Der Spiegel. For some, the question arose as to whether it would be possible to employ satire at all in the future. Although Buhrow had stressed that everyone should continue as before, he had also said in principle that he would do the same again.

The WDRs self-censorship in the case of the Umweltsau video is symptomatic of the ruling elites shift to the right. In the face of growing social tensions, they are arming themselves both internally and externally and are no longer prepared to tolerate criticism and dissenting opinionseven if only in the form of satire.

Those who do not adhere to self-restraint and censorship are to be intimidated and attacked. The persecution of Julian Assange and Chelsea Manning, who are in prison for having exposed war crimes, sets an international precedent for this development. It is not the perpetrators of crimes and grievances who are being prosecuted, but those who expose and criticise them.

2019 has been a year of mass social upheaval. We need you to help the WSWS and ICFI make 2020 the year of international socialist revival. We must expand our work and our influence in the international working class. If you agree, donate today. Thank you.

Read this article:
Germany: Response to satirical children's video exposes self-censorship of the media - World Socialist Web Site

UN rapporteur Nils Melzer condemns Britain’s criminal role in the torture of Julian Assange – World Socialist Web Site

UN rapporteur Nils Melzer condemns Britains criminal role in the torture of Julian Assange By Oscar Grenfell 10 January 2020

United Nations official Nils Melzer has publicly released a powerful letter he addressed to the British government on October 29, documenting the criminal culpability of the countrys authorities, including its political leadership, in what he condemned last year as the psychological torture of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.

Melzers letter, published online on December 31, was a response to earlier correspondence from the British authorities, in which they blithely dismissed his finding that Assange was subject to ongoing psychological torture. This resulted in part from his almost seven-years of effective detention in Ecuadors London embassy, enforced by British threats to arrest him if he set foot outside the building, and his imprisonment since April 2019 in the maximum-security Belmarsh Prison.

Melzer had addressed a series of queries to the British government over the conditions of Assanges incarceration, including why he was being held in conditions of virtual solitary confinement and denied the necessary means to prepare his defence for US extradition hearings in February.

The British government had blandly declared its opposition to torture, while claiming that it was upholding Assanges legal rights. It answered none of Melzers specific questions and dismissed his call for the WikiLeaks founder to be released from prison, despite warnings from medical professionals that his health has deteriorated to the point that his life is at risk.

In his latest document, Melzer stressed the scientific rigor of the assessment that Assange had been tortured, which was based on a four-hour consultation in Belmarsh Prison involving the UN rapporteur and two medical experts. The diagnosis stemmed from medically-verifiable evidence and conformed to The Istanbul Protocolthe international standard for identifying the symptoms of torture.

Melzer pointed to the implications of Britains rejection of these findings, stating that the conduct of Your Excellencys Government in the present case severely undermines the credibility of the UKs commitment to the prohibition of torture and illtreatment, as well as to the rule of law more generally.

Melzer bluntly wrote: The official findings of my mandate, supported by two experienced medical experts specialized in the examination of torture victims, unquestionably provide reasonable ground to believe that British officials have contributed to Mr. Assanges psychological torture or ill-treatment, whether through perpetration, or through attempt, complicity or other forms of participation.

Under Art. 12 of the Convention against Torture, British authorities do not have the political discretion to simply reject these findings, but have a clear and non-derogable treaty obligation to conduct a prompt and impartial investigation into these allegations and, if confirmed, to prosecute the perpetrators and provide redress and rehabilitation to Mr. Assange.

The UN rapporteur documented that Britain had similarly stymied his calls for a judicial investigation into its involvement in the US-led torture programs associated with the wars in Iraq and Afghanistanwhich WikiLeaks and Assange have done so much to expose. This, he noted, gives the impression of a broader policy of impunity, which would be incompatible with the UKs legal obligations and would seriously undermine the credibility of its commitment to human rights and the rule of law.

Melzers detailed letter outlined Britains involvement in the attempted frame-up of Assange on sexual misconduct allegations by Sweden, its collaboration with the US attempts to conduct what can only be described as an extraordinary rendition operation against the WikiLeaks founder and its persistent denial of his rights to due process over the past 12 months.

The UN officials conclusion demonstrates that Assange is being subjected to a lawless attempt to silence him and to destroy WikiLeaks. Melzer wrote: I am of the considered opinion that recurring and serious violations of Mr. Assanges due process rights by UK authorities have rendered both his criminal conviction and sentencing for bail violation and the US extradition proceedings inherently arbitrary, to the point even of rendering any legal remedies a pointless formality devoid of prospect.

Melzer demanded the abandonment of the extradition proceedings, Assanges freedom and a criminal investigation into those responsible for his persecution.

Melzer also drew attention to reports that Assanges health has continued to deteriorate. Last year, dozens of eminent doctors wrote twice to the British authorities, as well as to the Australian government, voicing their fears that Assange could die in prison. Their calls for him to be moved to a university teaching hospital and provided with urgent medical treatment have been ignored.

The latest testimony concerning Assanges health situation was provided by British journalist Vaughan Smith, who tweeted that Assange had called his family on New Years Eve. Smith wrote: He told my wife and I how he was slowly dying in Belmarsh where, though only on remand, he is kept in solitary confinement for 23 hours a day and is often sedated.

Meanwhile, disturbing new indications have emerged of the conditions at Belmarsh, a facility designed to hold those convicted of the most serious crimes, including murder and terrorism offenses.

On Wednesday, RT reported that Liridon Saliuka, a 29-year-old prisoner at Belmarsh, was found dead in his cell on January 2. According to RTs sources, the death was the third fatality in less than a year at the prison. The British authorities claim that Saliuka was a victim of self-inflicted wounds, but this has been disputed by his family.

RT wrote: Saliukas family claim there have been delays to the postmortem. His sister, Dita, revealed that her brother was involved in a car crash two years ago that left him requiring major reconstructive surgery. He was given metal plates that made it hard for him to walk or stand for long periods of time. A report by a surgeon, commissioned by his defense lawyer, had determined that he should be considered as permanently disabled. However, his family say he had recently been transferred from a special cell to a standard one.

A 2009 report by the Chief Inspector of British Prisons noted an extremely high amount of force used against prisoners at Belmarsh. A number of detainees reported they had been intimidated, threatened or assaulted by staff. The inspectors 2018 report said many recommended improvements at the facility had not been embedded and in some areas we judged outcomes to have been poorer than last time.

That Assange, a journalist on remand, is being held in such a facility, demonstrates that the British state, no less than its American counterpart, is seeking nothing less than his physical and psychological destruction. While doing everything they can to facilitate Assanges extradition to the US, the British are seeking to replicate, on their own soil, the conditions that he would confront in a CIA prison in America.

The extraordinary assault on Assanges democratic rights is a stark symptom of a broader turn to authoritarianism, directed against the working class and the growing emergence of mass social and political opposition. This underscores the necessity for all defenders of civil liberties to do everything possible to prevent Assanges extradition to the US and secure his freedom.

2019 has been a year of mass social upheaval. We need you to help the WSWS and ICFI make 2020 the year of international socialist revival. We must expand our work and our influence in the international working class. If you agree, donate today. Thank you.

View post:
UN rapporteur Nils Melzer condemns Britain's criminal role in the torture of Julian Assange - World Socialist Web Site

Hollywood Is Using Artificial Intelligence To Pick Its Next Blockbuster – Forbes

Hollywood-based film studios are increasingly using AI as part of the decision-making process when ... [+] commissioning and producing new films. (Photo by Valery SharifulinTASS via Getty Images)

For anyone who's ever thought Hollywood's output is formulaic and tired, the movie industry may be about to get worse. Major studio Warner Bros. has signed a deal with Cinelytic, which has developed an AI-powered system that can predict the likelihood of a film's success based on such factors as actors, budget and brand.

Predictably enough, Warner Bros. will be using Cinelytic's software as part of the research process it undergoes when deciding which movies to commission. Cinelytic's platform can determine the 'value' (i.e. profitability) of an actor in any major territory and also calculate how much money a film is likely to earn in cinemas and through supplementary merchandising (e.g. DVDs).

While it obviously can't measure how good a film will be artistically, Warner Bros. will likely use it during early production phases to separate ideas likely to succeed from those that most likely aren't. This follows a run of several years during which the studio has suffered a number of high profile losses on such titles asJustice League and Pan, as well as a few instances where its output hasn't performed as well as hoped (e.g. Batman v. Superman).

And it would seem that Warner Bros. won't be the only film studio integrating AI into its decision-making processes. In fact, AI has already received a modest amount of use by studios up until now, so Warner Bros. entry is likely to open the floodgates even further.

For example, 20th Century Fox has been using a system called Merlin for several years now. In contrast to Cinelytic's platform, Merlin uses AI and machine learning (as well as big data) to match particular films to particular genres and audiences. It does this by using a computer vision system to generate a frame-by-frame analysis of movie trailers. After labelling objects and events within each trailer, it then takes the data it has gathered for one film and compares it against data for other films. It might find, say, that a given trailer most resembles films x, y and z, which were popular with female teenagers.

By comparing datasets, Merlin helps 20th Century Fox identify the ideal demographic(s) for any given film. It also helps the studio decide how it should be advertising and classifying that film, insofar as Merlin links a films trailer to genres.

Aside from Warner Bros. and 20th Century Fox, it's likely that other film studios and production companies have already turned to AI, without being open about it. For instance, Belgium-based ScriptBook uses AI to analyze a film's script and arrive at an estimation of the revenues that film is likely to earn. Not only that, but ScriptBook's platform can also provide likability scores for a film's characters, profiles of its target audience, and even its likely IMDB rating.

According to the company's CEO, Nadira Azermai, ScriptBook is already at a stage where the financial forecast it provides for each film has an 86% accuracy rate. In other words, it's already working with clients in the film industry, even if it hasn't gone public with the names of any studio or company.

ScriptBook was founded in 2015, but it's probable that other companies will emerge in the coming years, since research into the use of AI-based film prediction is still ongoing. In August, researchers from Sungkyunkwan University in South Korea revealed that they had used deep learning to train a bot to forecast the likelihood of a film's success, based this time on a textual summary of its plot. They trained this bot on 42,306 film plot summaries, in the end finding that it was best at predicting which films would be unsuccessful.

That the bot was better at weeding out 'stinkers' rather than classic films is encouraging. Because while the influx of AI into the film industry might imply that Hollywood could become even more self-plagiarizing in the future, it's possible that studios might restrict the use of artificial intelligence specifically to making sure they don't end up commissioning flops. This would potentially leave space for human decision-making and creativity to get involved in choosing between ideas more likely to succeed commercially.

And to play devil's advocate, it's possible that the use of AI might make Hollywood's output less homogenous. To take a simplified and hypothetical example, the massive success of a superhero film could conceivably create a situation where human producers end up commissioning a series of other superhero movies, even though each entry in this series goes on to enjoy diminishing returns. By contrast, an AI-based platform trained on masses of regularly updated data might be able to determine that, rather than making the next Batman or Superman film, a different kind of movie now has a chance of greater success.

That is, an AI platform might force a studio to change its artistic or stylistic direction sooner than it would have done otherwise. If this is the case, then moviegoers and cinephiles probably don't have anything to fear from AI's invasion of cinema.

Read this article:
Hollywood Is Using Artificial Intelligence To Pick Its Next Blockbuster - Forbes