Is open source culture the answer to our technology woes? – RTE.ie

Opinion: open source means to be open about the source of knowledge that enables anyone to make something

Eventually, we will all get bored of seeing technology being depicted as either the saviour or the Lucifer of our own existence. There are only so many articles on the wonders of technological progress one could possibly digest and only so many episodes of Black Mirror to tell us how messed up our lives could get in the near future. When that time comes, we will begin to seriously consider the fact that technology is not just a tool or a service, but a medium through which individual and social identities can shape and be shaped.

Butwhat remains unexplained for now is why such a shaping power is blindly handed over and over again to private corporations regardless of the number of times they have misused it.We also need to explain why we keep pointing the finger at big tech corporations for the way things are, while also expectingthem to solve the mess they enabled.

Delegating responsibilities to others will only perpetuate the problem, not resolve it. Pretending to solve the issue by addressing the psychosis of tech giants is likely to be a lost cause. We, on the other hand, could be better off addressing our own Stockholm syndrome.

From RT Lyric FM's Culture File, Open Source Aran Sweater is a project to create an archive of Aran knitting

For that, open source culture is likely to be the most effective, if not the only, therapy. Open source means to be open about the source of knowledge that enables anyone to make something. With regard to technology, one important element of that source, but certainly not the only one,is represented by the code used to generate a given piece of software, AKA the source code.

But you would be mistaken to think that the ability to read and write code is a necessary requirement to access this alternative technological world. In fact, open source should be understood in its broader sense of open knowledge. Should one wish, everyone can contribute in many ways such as by sharing, translating and editing instructions, creating tutorials andengaging with the ethical issues at stake in our technological society. Contrary to how things were 30 years ago, open source software is today as user-friendly and good-looking as any other proprietary and close-source counterpart. The ability to read and write code is certainly useful, but not necessary when using open source alternatives.

Realising that technology is a social endeavour makes its communal ownership and development a necessity. The alternative would be reading series like Black Mirror as prophecies rather than high quality entertainment (yes, I am a big fan of Black Mirror,just in case it was missed).

If education is about enabling individuals to grow as free thinkers and responsible citizens, the adoption of open source technology within universities is a must

Creating the fertile ground for the flourishing of such an open culture cannot be left to chance. It must be actively sought and defended by society at large. Educational institutions, from primary schools to universities, have a big responsibility in that regard.They should be guarantors for the accessibility and openness of knowledge and despise the idea of a "used-user". I leave you to judge if this is the case today. In my experience as an academic,universities are light-years away from even considering this as an issue, let alone considering their role in it.

There are no compromises here. If education is about knowledge and enabling individuals to grow as free thinkers and responsible citizens, the adoption of open source technology within universities is a must.The Humboltian model of holistic education comes once again to the fore as one of the most sensible to follow.

The International Conference on Live codingtakes place at theUniversity of Limerick from February 5th to 7th and is an example of how a community of artists shapes itself through the open source culture. Attendance is free of charge

The views expressed here are those of the author and do not represent or reflect the views of RT

Read more here:
Is open source culture the answer to our technology woes? - RTE.ie

Linus Torvalds, creator of the Linux operating system, warned developers not to use an Oracle-owned file system because of the company’s ‘litigious…

The renowned programmer Linus Torvalds has warned users of Linux, the popular open source operating system he built, not to use an Oracle file system because of possible legal actions, Phoronix's Michael Larabel first reported.

The file system, called ZFS, was built by Sun Microsystems, which has since been acquired by Oracle. Torvalds wrote in an online forumon Jan. 6that he does not feel "safe" in adding ZFS code to the Linux project because of Oracle's tendency to file lawsuits against other companies, including an ongoing legal brawl between Google and Oracle.

"Other people think it can be ok to merge ZFS code into the kernel and that the module interface makes it ok, and that's their decision," Torvalds wrote. "But considering Oracle's litigious nature, and the questions over licensing, there's no way I can feel safe in ever doing so."

Oracle's lawsuit against Google, which is over "stealing" Java technology for Google's Android system and could cost Google as much as $9 billion, is set to go to the Supreme Court this year. Google and its supporters in the case have argued that an Oracle victory in this case would have a chilling effect on software innovation.

Through that lens, Torvalds' comments highlight how Oracle's standing in the matter might affect its reputation in the open source software world, potentially steering programmers away from its products and services.

What's more, ZFS and Linux have different licenses, and according to an FAQ about ZFS on Linux, the combination of the two licenses could potentially cause problems and prevent users from using code exclusively available under one license with code exclusively available under the other.

Torvalds wrote that there is "no way" he can merge any ZFS code until he gets an official letter from Oracle signed by its main legal counsel, or by executive chairman and CTO Larry Ellison saying that it's fine to do so.

Torvalds said that if other users choose to add ZFS, "they are on their own," as he can't maintain it.

"Don't use ZFS," Torvalds wrote. "It's that simple. It was always more of a buzzword than anything else, I feel, and the licensing issues just make it a non-starter for me. The benchmarks I've seen do not make ZFS look all that great."

Oracle declined comment.

Got a tip? Contact this reporter via email at rmchan@businessinsider.com, Signal at 646.376.6106,Telegram at @rosaliechan, orTwitter DM at @rosaliechan17. (PR pitches by email only, please.) Other types of secure messaging available upon request. Youcan alsocontact Business Insider securely via SecureDrop.

The rest is here:
Linus Torvalds, creator of the Linux operating system, warned developers not to use an Oracle-owned file system because of the company's 'litigious...

Alteryx: Intuitive Data Analytics Solution Driven By Industry Tailwinds – Seeking Alpha

In recent years the volume of data being generated and stored globally has exploded and as companies with advanced analytic capabilities tend to outperform their peers across a broad range of metrics, analytics is now a required competency. Firms must improve their analytic capabilities and access to advanced tools to remain competitive, which is leading to rapid growth in areas like database, search and analytic software.

Figure 1: Analytic Capabilities and Performance

(source: Bain)

The amount and diversity of data (type, format, and source location) are rapidly increasing and this is driving the need for efficient tools to create and maintain data pipelines which convert raw data into monetizable insights. While there are now a wide range of opensource tools available, like Python and R, which have powerful and flexible analytic capabilities they require some knowledge of programming and are more commonly used by people with a background in computer science or data science. Alteryx offers easy to use and intuitive self-service analytic software, which is targeted at business analysts not data scientists and primarily aims to replace tools like spreadsheets, not specialized data science software. While there may be some trade offs in capabilities like flexibility this is more than made up for by its ease of use by non-specialists, allowing access to data insights to be democratized.

Traditional tools have a number of weaknesses for use as self-service analytics tools by business analysts, including:

Figure 2: Percentage of Organizations Using Data Analysis Tools

(source: HBR)

Self-service data preparation using spreadsheet software remains common today with approximately 8% of employees using spreadsheets for self-service analytics. There are an estimated 21 million advanced spreadsheet users worldwide, who on average spend 26 hours per week working on spreadsheets. These spreadsheets were not designed for modern big data requirements and as a result are inefficient, causing an estimated $60 billion of lost productivity in the U.S. every year by advanced spreadsheet users.

Table 1: Estimated Cost of Inefficient Use of Spreadsheets

(source: Created by author using data from Alteryx)

The global market for big data and analytics software is large and growing rapidly. IDC estimated the market size to be $49 billion in 2016 and projected it to grow at a rate of 10.5% annually through 2021. Within the big data and analytics software market Alteryx's software addresses the business intelligence and analytic tools, analytic data integration and spatial information analysis markets, which collectively represented approximately $19 billion in 2016 and were projected to grow at a rate of approximately 8.8% through 2021. Alteryx also estimates that there is an additional $10 billion opportunity their platform can address by replacing spreadsheets for advanced data preparation and analytics.

Alteryx (AYX) offers self-service data analytics software which is designed to improve the productivity of business analysts by bringing a fragmented data analytic pipeline into one service. The functionality of Alteryx's platform includes accessing various data sources, cleaning and preparing data, and performing a variety of analyses. The software aims to replace traditional tools by offering ease of use, speed, sophistication of analysis and an intuitive user interface with a visual workflow. Alteryx's ultimate goal is to make their platform as ubiquitous in the workplace as spreadsheets are today.

Alteryx promotes the following virtues of their platform:

The software can be licensed for use on a desktop or server, or it can be delivered through a hosted model. Subscription periods for the platform generally range from one to three years with fees typically billed annually in advance and revenue recognized ratably over the term of the contract. Revenue is also generated from professional services, including training and consulting.

Alteryx's platform includes:

Alteryx continues to achieve high revenue growth through increased customer numbers and expansion of revenue per customer. This revenue growth is yet to show significant signs of decline, indicating Alteryx still has significant room to grow before reaching market saturation. Alteryx's revenue growth rate is broadly in line with other SaaS companies which offer software related to data.

Figure 3: Alteryx Revenue

(source: Created by author using data from company reports)

Figure 4: Alteryx Revenue Growth

(source: Created by author using data from company reports)

Alteryx is pursuing a number of growth strategies including:

Figure 5: Alteryx Customers

(source: Created by author using data from Alteryx)

Alteryx employs a "land and expand" business model which aims to increase revenue per customer over time. Customers are often offered a free trial which is then followed by an initial subscription to the platform. Alteryx then try to increase use of the platform across departments, divisions, and geographies of the organization as the benefits of the platform are realized. This can be seen in the customer cohort data where revenue for each cohort expands significantly over time.

Figure 6: Annualized Subscription Revenue by Customer Cohort

(source: Alteryx)

Figure 7: Alteryx Net Expansion Rate

(source: Created by author using data from company reports)

Figure 8: Alteryx Revenue per Customer

(source: Created by author using data from company reports)

Alteryx's gross profit margin is high, even by the standards of enterprise software companies and this is likely to lead to high operating profit margins as Alteryx continues to scale. Alteryx's ability to achieve and maintain such high gross margins is indicative of a strong competitive position in the market.

Figure 9: Alteryx Gross Profit Margin

(source: Created by author using data from company reports)

Alteryx has exhibited significant operating leverage in the past and are likely to achieve consistently positive operating profits going forward. Based on Alteryx's gross profit margin typical operating expenses for enterprise software companies Alteryx is likely to eventually achieve an operating profit margin of above 30% which along with Alteryx's high growth rate support current valuation multiples.

Figure 10: Alteryx Operating Profit Margin

(source: Created by author using data from company reports)

Most of Alteryx's operating leverage is being achieved through reduced sales and marketing expenses relative to revenue. This trend is likely to continue as Alteryx continues to grow and build a stable base of subscription customers. As a subscription software provider Alteryx's sales and marketing expenses should be expected to be a large burden as the company establishes a market presence, particularly while the company is growing rapidly.

Figure 11: Alteryx Operating Expenses

(source: Created by author using data from company reports)

Not only is Alteryx likely to achieve a high level of profitability as the business scales, it is also likely to generate significant free cash flow. Alteryx's business has relatively low capital expenditure requirements and in recent years Alteryx has exhibited the ability to consistently generate free cash flow despite their current high growth rate.

Figure 12: Alteryx Free Cash Flow

(source: Created by author using data from Alteryx)

Alteryx faces competition from a range of companies including incumbents offering traditional tools, specialized self-service data analytics software providers, open source software and cloud storage providers who will look to continue expanding their offerings to provide customers with holistic solutions.

Alteryx has been assessed by Gartner in the Data Science and Machine Learning Platforms Magic Quadrant, although there is overlap with the Analytics and Business Intelligence Platforms Magic Quadrant. Leaders in business intelligence include Microsoft (MSFT), Tableau (CRM) and Qlik whilst leaders in machine learning include KNIME, RapidMiner and TIBCO.

Figure 13: Gartner Magic Quadrant for Analytics and Business Intelligence Platforms

(source: Sisense)

Gartner rates Alteryx relatively low on completeness of vision as they are not a standout vendor in terms of automation, deep learning or the Internet of Things and they do not appeal to expert data scientists. This is a reflection of Alteryx's niche strategy, offering an intuitive and easy to use platform for non-experts. While reduced functionality may limit adoption amongst data scientists, Alteryx's strategy has the potential to help them reach a much broader base of users who place greater value on ease of use.

Figure 14: Gartner Magic Quadrant for Data Science and Machine Learning Platforms

(source: Alteryx)

The Forrester Wave assessment of the business intelligence and machine learning software markets is broadly similar to the Gartner assessment. Alteryx was not included in the Predictive Analytics and Machine Learning Solutions assessment as it is a data blending tool with the ability to run R scripts and does not have native machine learning capability.

Traditional Tools

Traditional tools like spreadsheets are likely to remain common for more basic applications but as software requirements increase specialized tools are likely to be more widely adopted.

Self-Service Data Analytics

There are a wide range of self-service data analytics tools available which are designed for different applications. Visualization tools like Tableau and Spotfire are designed primarily to allow users to visually explore datasets. Specialized self-service data analytics software like SAS are designed to allow powerful and flexible quantitative and visual analysis of data sets but tend to be less intuitive and have a steeper learning curve.

Open Source Software

There are a wide range of open source tools available for data analytics including R, Python, Pytorch and TensorFlow. These tools are less intuitive and require a basic knowledge of programming which limits their widespread adoption. It is possible that these tools will be made easier to use over time increasing their adoption by general business analysts. It is also likely that a basic level of programming knowledge will become more common amongst knowledge workers leading to more widespread adoption.

Cloud Computing

The major cloud computing providers already offer an assortment of business intelligence and data analytics services and I expect these offerings to be expanded and more closely integrated with their cloud offerings in the future as these companies seek to offer customers holistic solutions. I believe Microsoft and Amazon (AMZN) are likely to be the most competitive in this area. Google (GOOG) is also likely to have a strong service offering but their weak enterprise DNA may continue to hold them back even if they have technically superior solutions.

For Alteryx to be successful as a specialized provider of self-service data analytic software it must offer customers a compelling value proposition where the ease of use and efficiency of the software justify the higher cost relative to traditional tools. Alteryx must also ensure that their software offers customers sufficient benefit to justify the cost and complexity of having an additional service provider when they could use a cloud computing vendor as a one stop provider of all services.

Despite Alteryx's high EV/S ratio I believe the company is significantly undervalued due to its strong prospects going forward. Both revenue and profit margins are likely to continue improving significantly in coming years which I believe will result in an increase in the share price despite the inevitable multiple contraction as growth slows. Based on a discounted cash flow I estimate an intrinsic value of $195 per share.

Disclosure: I am/we are long AYX. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Read more from the original source:
Alteryx: Intuitive Data Analytics Solution Driven By Industry Tailwinds - Seeking Alpha

Gates Foundation mobile money projects in developing world to go live this year – ComputerWeekly.com

Major mobile money projects in Africa and Asia being assisted by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation will go live as early as the middle of this year, giving some of the worlds poorest people access to financial services.

The foundation, set up by Microsoft founder Bill Gates and his wife Melinda, helps these projects in various ways. It provides philanthropic capital and technical assistance, as well as open source software in some cases.

Kosta Peric, deputy director of financial services for the poor at theBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, said projects in Pakistan, Tanzania and eight West African countries could go live as early as the middle of this year. These projects will this year move from deployment and development to actually serving the poor populations, he said.

For poor communities, access to financial services is vital to enable them to become economically active. For example, it can help farmers get paid for their produce, buy fertiliser and receive subsidies. Or a woman in Africa with a mobile phone could receive a salary payment, send money to other wallets, buy things, pay bills and receive social security.

These projects will generate an impact on hundreds of millions of people that will be able to connect to and use payments to improve their lives and integrate with the economy, said Peric.

The foundation has already supported the recent go-live for the bCashin Bangladesh. Mobile phones are a vital enabler, and Peric said that of the 1.7 billion unbanked people in the world, more than 90% have a simple mobile phone.

In mid-2020, a project to help create a national real-time payments platform in Pakistan is expected to go live, as is a platform in Tanzania. Later this year, a mobile project covering eight West African countries is expected to be rolled out.

Some of the projects use the Mojaloop open sourcesoftware developed by Ripple, Dwolla, ModusBox, Software Group and Crosslake Technologies for the Gates Foundation. This is great because it allows projects to kick-start development with something that already exists, said Peric. Other projects develop their own software.

Capital from the Gates Foundation de-risks projects and entices commercial players to get involved, with the aim for the projects to be self-sustaining.

The services that are already live are being run commercially, which means they can be sustained without external contributions. These have proved that it is possible to serve even the poorest people at a profit, said Peric.

Huge progress has already been made, he pointed out. In Africa alone, the mobile money projects that the Gates Foundation has supported will enable 200 million people to connect to financial services. The foundation wants to play its part in connecting all of the 400 million adults in Africa, said Peric.

Peric is a computer scientist by profession, and spent more than 23 years working for the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (Swift).

His last role at Swift was head of innovation in its Innotribe organisation, which innovates on behalf of the hundreds of banks that own it. He was the architect of the current Swift network, and first became interested in financial inclusion during his time at Innotribe.

Originally posted here:
Gates Foundation mobile money projects in developing world to go live this year - ComputerWeekly.com

US Bioeconomy Is Strong, But Faces Challenges; Expanded Efforts in Coordination, Talent, Security, and Fundamental Research Are Needed – National…

Jan. 14, 2020

WASHINGTON The U.S. is a clear leader in the global bioeconomy landscape, but faces challenges from decentralized leadership, inadequate talent development, cybersecurity vulnerabilities, stagnant investment in fundamental research, and international competition, according to Safeguarding the Bioeconomy, a new report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. As a major driver of scientific discoveries, spanning fields from agriculture to pharmaceuticals, a vulnerable bioeconomy puts the countrys economy at risk. The report recommends steps the U.S. should take to mitigate these risks and sustain a strong bioeconomy, including forming a coordinating body within the Executive Office of the President to ensure coordination across the science, economic, regulatory, and security agencies.

While historical investments in the bioeconomy protect U.S. leadership in some areas, the report says maintaining that leadership will require careful analysis of policies and features that undergird the bioeconomy, continued commitment from the federal government to invest in science, and support for international cooperation and collaboration.

The bioeconomy is defined as economic activity that is driven by research and innovation in the life sciences and biotechnology, and that is enabled by technological advances in engineering and in computing and information sciences. An original analysis by the committee that authored the report values the bioeconomy at more than 5 percent of the gross domestic product, or more than $950 billion.

Americans benefit every day from the bioeconomy in terms of the food we eat, the health care we receive, and the products we buy, said committee chair Thomas M. Connelly, executive director and CEO of the American Chemical Society. With the right policies and coordination, we can keep the bioeconomy strong and maintain a competitive edge in the face of new threats and global challenges.

Establishing Bioeconomy Coordination

No one government agency currently has the mandate to monitor, assess, promote, or protect the bioeconomy. To make large-scale coordination possible, the report recommends the Executive Office of the President develop a government-wide strategic coordinating body to safeguard and realize the potential of the bioeconomy. This coordinating body which should develop and update strategies for sustaining and growing the sector should be presided over by senior White House leadership and include representation from science, economic, regulatory, and security agencies.

International Competition and Talent

The report says talent development at all levels should be a high priority for investment, and recommends attracting and retaining scientists from around the world. Inadequate funding for universities and training programs could diminish the countrys ability to develop and retain a skilled technical workforce. The report emphasizes that policies created to counter risks from foreign talent could actually adversely affect the bioeconomy, as historically the U.S. has benefitted from the ability to attract and retain international students and scientists to its universities and STEM workforce. The report recommends that any policies to mitigate possible risks posed by foreign researchers should be formulated with input from leading scientists.

While the United States remains among the worlds leaders in public investment in the biological sciences, federal investments have stagnated at a time when other countries, notably China and South Korea, are increasing theirs. To maintain competitiveness, the U.S. should place a high priority on investing in basic biological science, engineering, and computing and information sciences.

Global supply chains and reliance on single-sourced materials or components can disrupt bioeconomy value chains, the report says. The report also cites examples where non-domestic parties have invested in American companies with the goal of acquiring intellectual property. To guard against these risks, the report recommends, scientists and economists should work with the federal government to identify vital value chains and to assist the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States in assessing the national security implications of foreign transactions involving the bioeconomy.

Differences in how nations approach regulation of bioeconomy products, data sharing agreements and practices, and industrial mergers and acquisitions also pose risks, the report says. Government agencies should facilitate bilateral and multilateral discussions among countries in order to drive economic growth, reinforce governance mechanisms, and create a level playing field.

Cybersecurity and Data Access

Inadequate cybersecurity practices and protections expose the bioeconomy to significant risks, because the sector is reliant on open source software, large and potentially sensitive data sets, and Internet communications. For example, the report notes, open source software that underpins many bioeconomy applications may not have been designed with bioeconomy security requirements in mind. The report says all stakeholders should adopt best practices for securing information systems from digital intrusion, exfiltration, or manipulation. To protect the value and utility of biological information databases, government agencies should invest in their modernization, curation, and integrity.

Investments in Fundamental Research

Limits to the U.S.s ability to conduct fundamental research, either through inadequate funding, restrictive research regulations, or the inability to develop and attract a skilled workforce, can erode our ability to produce breakthrough scientific results that fuel the bioeconomy. Falling behind in life science applications of computational and informational science is a particular risk. The report says erosion in support for U.S. government investment in fundamental research is a concern that must be addressed.

The study undertaken by the Committee on Safeguarding the Bioeconomy: Finding Strategies for Understanding, Evaluating, and Protecting the Bioeconomy While Sustaining Innovation and Growth was sponsored by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. The National Academies are private, nonprofit institutions that provide independent, objective analysis and advice to the nation to solve complex problems and inform public policy decisions related to science, technology, and medicine. They operate under an 1863 congressional charter to the National Academy of Sciences, signed by President Lincoln. For more information, visit nationalacademies.org.

Resources:Interactive HighlightsFollow us:Twitter @theNASEMInstagram @thenasemFacebook @NationalAcademiesFollow the conversation using: #bioeconomy

Contact:Megan Lowry, Media Relations OfficerOffice of News and Public Information202-334-2138; e-mail news@nas.edu

Read the original here:
US Bioeconomy Is Strong, But Faces Challenges; Expanded Efforts in Coordination, Talent, Security, and Fundamental Research Are Needed - National...

This Surprising Cryptocurrency May Hold Clues to Bitcoin and Ethereums Final Bottom – newsBTC

This week, the cryptocurrency market caught fire with Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and many others going on massive rallies and breaking through downtrend resistance, letting crypto investors breathe a collective sigh of relief that the bottom is likely in.

However, when looking at the charts of one of the top-performing crypto assets of the week, one particular altcoin had fallen to new lows after the December 2018 bottom. The chart also shares a striking resemblance to Bitcoin and Ethereums price charts, which could suggest that the two largest crypto assets by market cap havent reached their final bottom.

Following Bitcoins highly publicized meteoric rise to $20,000 in 2017, the cryptocurrency asset corrected, falling into an over year-long bear market.

Meanwhile, Ethereums massive rise to its all-time high fueled by the ICO boom also fizzled our, caused the asset to drop as much as 90% in value to lows around $80.

Related Reading | Ready for Liftoff: Altcoin Market Cap Breaks Out of Downtrend

Come December 2018, nearly a full year after the two assets set their peak prices on record, they fell to their bear market bottoms where they consolidated for months, then went on a powerful rally in early April.

These rallies topped out in late June 2019, sending the decentralized duo back into a downtrend that they only now may be breaking out from.

However, when looking at the price chart of the privacy-focused cryptocurrency Dash, the altcoin not only followed the same path as Bitcoin and Ethereums but Dash ultimately set a new, lower bear market low, before exploding into a massive, parabolic rally this week. When other crypto assets rallies ended, Dash kept right on going suggesting something else could be at play.

When applying Elliott Wave Theory to the price action, the cryptocurrency markets move up in April 2019 could be considered an ABC corrective wave, which would suggest that a new lower low at the C wave must be set before a new impulse wave upward can begin.

Elliott Wave Theory focuses on human emotions and psychology and how it applies to price action. According to the commonly used technical analysis theory, waves are broken into 5-wave impulse waves and 3-wave corrective waves.

Given the advance that cryptocurrencies had during their 2017 bull market, it would be considered an impulse wave upward. Following impulse waves, come corrective waves in the opposite direction, before another impulse wave upward can begin. Corrective waves trend down for A, up for B, then back down lower than A to the C low.

When looking back at past Bitcoin bear markets, an ABC correction can be seen during the 2014 downtrend, setting a new, lower low before ultimately going back on a bull run the bull run that put cryptocurrency on the map in the first place.

Related Reading | Elliott Wave Theory Suggests Bitcoin May Be Due For Biggest Correction Yet

Should history repeat itself, and it often does, Bitcoin and Ethereum would need to set a new, lower low, before the next impulse wave upward and bull market can begin again.

Read the rest here:
This Surprising Cryptocurrency May Hold Clues to Bitcoin and Ethereums Final Bottom - newsBTC

Investors Pumped $608 Million Into Bitcoin (BTC) and Cryptocurrency Funds in Record Year, Says Hedge Fund Giant Grayscale – The Daily Hodl

Wall Streets interest in the Bitcoin and cryptocurrency markets is booming, according to the digital asset manager Grayscale.

The firm says 2019 was its biggest year on record, with the yearly investment into its products reaching $607.7 million.

That number surpasses the cumulative investment from the last five years combined. The total investment across Grayscales products now stands at $1.17 billion.

Grayscale says its investor base expanded by about 24% in 2019, with new clients accounting for $146.9 million.

The firm offers exposure to Bitcoin through its flagship product, the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC). It also offers altcoin trusts, including Ethereum, XRP, Bitcoin Cash, Litecoin, Stellar, Zcash, Ethereum Classic and Horizen.

Grayscale says 36% of clients now have allocations to multiple products, with the remaining 64% invested in a single product.

A recent report from Charles Schwab found that Grayscale Bitcoin Trust is the fifth most-held equity holding by its millennial investors, ahead of Disney and Netflix.

Featured Image: Shutterstock/LevLev

Read this article:
Investors Pumped $608 Million Into Bitcoin (BTC) and Cryptocurrency Funds in Record Year, Says Hedge Fund Giant Grayscale - The Daily Hodl

Cryptocurrency Market Update: Bitcoin bulls hit the pause button, altcoins follow the lead – FXStreet

Cryptocurrency bulls need some rest after a sharp rally that took some coins to multi-months highs. Bitcoin and major altcoins have been under pressure on Thursday; however, the move can still be qualified as a natural correction from overbought levels. The cryptocurrency market capitalization decreased to $239 billion, while an average daily trading volume reduced to $130 billion from $176 billion this time on Wednesday. Bitcoin's market dominance is jumped to to 66.5%.

The largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization retreated from the recent high of $8,900 on Wednesday and retreated to $8,737 by press time. The coin has stayed mostly unchanged on a day-to-day basis and since the beginning of the day. Despite the retreat, BTC/USD is still trading above critical $8,500, which means that the upside momentum maybe resumed after a short pause. The short-term trend remains bullish, however, the volatility is low

Ethereum hit $171.67 on Wednesday only to drop back to $163.00 by the time of writing. The strong downside move was caused by technical correction on the market. ETH/USD has lost about 2% since the beginning of the day. From the short-term perspective, the coin is moving within a bullish trend amid low volatility.

Ripple retreated to $0.2270 after a short-lived move above $0.2400. The third-largest digital asset has been losing ground after the support of $0.2300 gave way. XRRP/USD has lost over 3% since the beginning of Thursday, moving in sync with the market. The short-term trend is bullish.

View original post here:
Cryptocurrency Market Update: Bitcoin bulls hit the pause button, altcoins follow the lead - FXStreet

$1.4B in illicit Bitcoin was laundered via Binance and Huobi last year, report says – The Next Web

Blockchain researchers traced $2.8 billion in illicit Bitcoin BTC believed to be laundered on cryptocurrency exchanges in 2019 with over 50 percent ($1.4B) washed through major trading hubs Binance and Huobi.

Binance and Huobi lead all exchanges in illicit Bitcoin received by a significant margin, said cryptocurrency analysis unit Chainalysis. That may come as a surprise given that Binance and Huobi are two of the largest exchanges operating, and are subject to KYC regulations.

[Read:Greece suspends extradition of alleged launderer for Bitcoin stolen from Mt Gox]

Chainalysis found more than 300,000 individual accounts on those exchanges had touchedBitcoin sent from criminal sources last year, and manually identified a list of the top 100 rogue over-the-counter (OTC) cryptocurrency brokers they believe to be money launderers.

[] A small segment of these accounts is extremely active. The 2,196 accounts in the three highest-receiving buckets received a total of nearly $27.8 billion worth of Bitcoin in 2019, said the firm.

The amount of illicit cryptocurrency touched by the Rogue 100 is no joke: they reportedlyreceived more than $3 billion worth of Bitcoin in 2019, and accounted for as much as 1 percent of all Bitcoin activity in any given month.

OTC brokers serve as middle men for those looking to transact away from public exchanges. They typically facilitate clients by negotiating trades for larger amounts of cryptocurrency for set price.

Chainalysis described OTC brokers as a crucial source of liquidity in the cryptocurrency market, citing evidence provided by data firm Kaiko that estimates theyre actually involved in the majority ofall cryptocurrency trade volume.

Theres a multitude of reasons for enlisting OTC brokers, many legitimate. Market makers andwhales with fat stacks of digital cashoften trade in this way to avoid influencing the overall cryptocurrency market with their big movements.

Some OTC brokers specialize in laundering money for criminals drawn to their services as they can have much lower know-your-customer requirements than online exchanges, Chainalysis explained.

Seventy of the top 100 addresses linked to OTC brokers laundered Bitcoin exclusively though Huobi. In total, those 70 brokers reportedly received more than $194 million from criminal entities last year.

Researchers however posited it could be possible that some had additional accounts on Binance or other exchanges.

Keep in mind, the Rogue 100 only represents OTC brokers weve manually identified as money launderers over the course of our investigations on behalf of Chainalysis clients, said the firm. We think its extremely likely that some percentage of the other highly-active Binance and Huobi accounts taking in illicit funds also belong to corrupt OTC brokers weve yet to identify.

Last month, Hard Fork reported thatPlusToken, a Chinese Ponzi scheme worth some $2.6 billion, may have been responsible for keeping the Bitcoins price down. Chainalysis noted that many of theRogue 100played a substantial role in the scam.

As for what Binance is doing to mitigate exposure to money-laundering OTC brokers, spokesperson assured the firm that it was aware of the growing trend and movements of illicit funds, and that its platform is compliant with KYC requirements in each jurisdiction in which it operates.

While Chainalysis did clarify that criminally-connected cryptocurrency represents a small fraction of total amountreceived by Binance and Huobi, the amount is still significant, with thetop 31 suspicious accounts alone exposed to more than $163 million in Bitcoin linked to dodgy sources.

Published January 16, 2020 14:00 UTC

Read the original:
$1.4B in illicit Bitcoin was laundered via Binance and Huobi last year, report says - The Next Web

Most Awaited Indian Cryptocurrency Case Turns Optimistic – Cryptocurrency Regulation – Altcoin Buzz

After a series of adjournments, the Indian Crypto vs Reserve Bank Of India (RBI) case is being heard by a fresh 3-judge bench. The hearing started on 14th January as the Supreme Court of India resumed the session post the winter break. Unlike the last couple of hearings, judges want to take their time.

Today happens to be the third day of the cryptocurrency trial, the start of which was slightly disappointing.The Crypto Vs RBI Case was supposed to be the first matter to be discussed on 14th Jan. But it was pushed down the queue.

The dismayed crypto enthusiasts speculated about a new hearing date. To everyones surprise, the Crypto Vs RBI case hearing started in the second half of the day. The judges pointed out that this is due to the fact that the trial is a lengthy one. Thus, it could have blocked other important matters. To avoid such a scenario, the case was pushed to the afternoon session.

IAMAI counsel Ashim Sood opened the case by pointing out the drawbacks of the draft bill presented to the Government of India. He explained the concept of blockchain to the panel. Additionally, he explained how the new technology is becoming common in the banking sector.

He also emphasized that the usage of the term currency with virtual currencies is being misunderstood as a threat to the Indian monetary system.

Counsel Sood strongly questioned the RBIs power to ban crypto.

To remind, the RBI has been pointing fingers at the price volatility of the cryptocurrency and claims that consumer rights are at risk. To counter this Mr. Sood bought the panels attention to the design of the stock market, which exhibits similar volatility.

According to Sood, crypto price volatility should be the SEBIs concern, not the RBIs. Likewise, the tax invasion issues need to be brought up by the CBDT.

Furthermore, he stated that crypto is a commodity, and the RBI has no power in this realm. Thus the RBI does not have enough authority to execute a crypto ban.

The RBIs plea to ban crypto seems to be turning baseless. As per the counsel, it has no material at hand to form such a strong opinion against crypto.

Furthermore, the counsel strongly questioned the basis which the RBI relied on when enforcing the Banking Regulation Act. To remind, the act restrained Indian Banks from operating deposit/withdrawal accounts for crypto exchanges.

Counsel Sood argued the RBI should have attempted to regulate crypto instead of placing a ban. Furthermore, he completely disagrees with the RBIs statement that its impossible to do it. He supports his point of view by citing examples of countries like Japan, Australia, Germany and Italy that have been successful in regulating crypto.

The panel questioned counsel whether crypto threatens the monetary system that the RBI protects. It seems he was ready to face the question. Accordingly, he completely negated the chances of crypto threatening the Indian Monetary system in the near future.

He added that IAMAI is defending the case of de-anonymous crypto, which always requires KYCs. Hence the chances of funding terrorism and money laundering are remote.

The counsel was cornered by some questions posed by the panel of judges. According to the judges, cryptocurrency is both a commodity and a medium of exchange, as per its definition. If thats so, then how does it not interfere with the monetary system?

The panel also questioned the utility of cryptocurrencies like BTC as a commodity. Counsel Sood is yet to answer these questions in detail.

Judging by the running of the trial, it seems IAMAI has a strong case, and we might soon hear some good news.

Previously, we explained how to buy cryptocurrency in India and what is happening with blockchain in India.

Stay tuned to get the latest of the Crypto Vs RBI Case.

Here is the original post:
Most Awaited Indian Cryptocurrency Case Turns Optimistic - Cryptocurrency Regulation - Altcoin Buzz