Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Healthcare Market expected to Witness a Sustainable Growth over 2019-2026 – Dagoretti News

Transparency Market Research, in its latest market intelligence study, finds that the global Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Healthcare market registered a value of ~US$ xx Mn/Bn in 2018 and is spectated to grow at CAGR of xx% during the foreseeable period 2019-2029. In terms of product type, segment holds the largest share, while segment 1 and segment 2 hold significant share in terms of end use.

The Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Healthcare market study outlines the key regions Region 1 (Country 1, Country 2), region 2 (Country 1, Country 2), region 3 (Country 1, Country 2) and region 4 (Country 1, Country 2). All the consumption trends and adoption patterns of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Healthcare are covered in the report. Prominent players, including player 1, player 2, player 3 and player 4, among others, account for substantial shares in the global Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Healthcare market.

Request Sample Report @ https://www.transparencymarketresearch.co/sample/sample.php?flag=B&rep_id=28343

market segments, analyzes various impacting factors including trends, drivers, and obstructions, and takes stock of the demand that can be expected out of different countries and regions. The report also contains a featured chapter on the competitive landscape.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Healthcare Market: Trends and Opportunities

Greater new possibilities with big data, ability of AI to enhance patient care, strong imbalance between the pool of patients and healthcare professionals, and possibilities of reducing medical costs are some of the key factors expected to augment the demand for AI in the healthcare sector. Additionally, growing importance of precision medicine, increasing number of cross-industry collaborations, consistent inflow of venture capital investments, and increasing geriatric population are some of the other factors that are expected to reflect positively over this market. On the other hand, reluctance of medical practitioners in adopting new technologies, strong lack of a preset and universal regulatory guidelines, lack of curated healthcare data, and concerns of data privacy are curtailing the market from attaining higher grounds.

Technology-wise, the artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare market can be segmented into querying method, deep learning, context aware processing, and natural language processing, whereas application-wise, artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare marketcan be bifurcated into wearables, virtual assistant, research and drug discovery, in-patient care and hospital management, medical imaging and diagnosis, precision medicine, lifestyle management and monitoring, and patient data and risk analysis.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Healthcare Market: Regional Analysis

The developed country of the U.S., which readily adopts new technology and houses a number of pioneering companies, is expected to maintain North America are the region with maximum demand potential, with little but significant demand added by Canada. While the European region is another key region for the vendors of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare market, emerging economies of Japan, South Korea, China, and India are expected to provide for decent demand over the course of the aforementioned forecast period.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Healthcare Market: Vendor Landscape

IBM Corporation, Welltok, Inc., Intel Corporation, Google, Inc., Next IT Corp., Microsoft Corporation, General Electric Company, Medtronic PLC, and Koninklijke Philips N.V. are some of the notable companies in artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare market.

The report offers a comprehensive evaluation of the artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare market. It does so via in-depth qualitative insights, historical data, and verifiable projections about market size. The projections featured in the report have been derived using proven research methodologies and assumptions. By doing so, the research report serves as a repository of analysis and information for every facet of the artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare market, including but not limited to: Regional markets, technology, types, and applications.

The study is a source of reliable data on:

The regional analysis covers:

The report has been compiled through extensive primary research (through interviews, surveys, and observations of seasoned analysts) and secondary research (which entails reputable paid sources, trade journals, and industry body databases). The report also features a complete qualitative and quantitative assessment by analyzing data gathered from industry analysts and market participants across key points in the industrys value chain.

A separate analysis of prevailing trends in the parent market, macro- and micro-economic indicators, and regulations and mandates is included under the purview of the study. By doing so, the report projects the attractiveness of each major segment over the forecast period.

Highlights of the report:

Note :Although care has been taken to maintain the highest levels of accuracy in TMRs reports, recent market/vendor-specific changes may take time to reflect in the analysis.

Request For Discount On This Report @ https://www.transparencymarketresearch.co/sample/sample.php?flag=D&rep_id=28343

The Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Healthcare market research answers important questions, including the following:

The Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Healthcare market research serves a platter of the following information:

RequestTOC For ThisReport @ https://www.transparencymarketresearch.co/sample/sample.php?flag=T&rep_id=28343

Why go for Transparency Market Research?

Transparency Market Research stays aligned with the fact the organization lands among the leading market research firms in India. Our analysts work irrespective of the time-zone, the result, we are being recognized worldwide. We abide by the notion that each client has his/her own set of requirements. With extensive primary and secondary research, our experts churn out the most accurate information regarding the desired the market.

About TMR

Transparency Market Research (TMR) is a global market intelligence company providing business information reports and services. The companys exclusive blend of quantitative forecasting and trend analysis provides forward-looking insight for thousands of decision makers. TMRs experienced team of analysts, researchers, and consultants use proprietary data sources and various tools and techniques to gather and analyze information.

Contact

Transparency Market ResearchState Tower90 State Street,Suite 700,Albany, NY 12207United StatesTel: +1-518-618-1030USA Canada Toll Free: 866-552-3453Email: [emailprotected]Website: http://www.transparencymarketresearch.com

View post:
Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Healthcare Market expected to Witness a Sustainable Growth over 2019-2026 - Dagoretti News

Illinois takes first step to combat bias in hiring decisions with Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act – Lexology

As the use of artificial intelligence in employment decisions grows, regulations on the practice will increase as well.Illinois has kicked off these regulations with theArtificial Intelligence Video Interview Act, which requires employers to disclose and job applicants consent before using artificial intelligence on candidate videos when used to assess an individuals fitness for employment.To prepare to comply with this law, and additional laws that we expect to follow, employers need to understand how their AI programs work and the underlying data on which it is based.The argument that AI removes bias from the interview and hiring processes by the use of objective standards is not necessarily true; other arguments suggest that this is not the case because implicit bias may be contained within the underlying data on which AI relies and can, therefore, result in disparate impact discrimination.For more information about this law, seehere.

More here:
Illinois takes first step to combat bias in hiring decisions with Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act - Lexology

Gabonese youth enthusiastic about the future prospects offered by Artificial Intelligence – India Education Diary

UNESCO, through its Information for All Programme (IFAP) and in collaboration with the World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology (COMEST), organized an awareness-raising workshop on Artificial Intelligence on 26 and 27 November 2019, in Libreville, Gabon.

Given the recent expansion of Artificial Intelligence, there is growing demand for a new vision of inclusive knowledge societies that emphasizes the importance of the creation, dissemination, preservation and use of information and knowledge using these emerging technologies.

The remarkable expansion of these technologies is leading to the rise in inventions that were once believed impossible. Computers and robots are now capable of learning, self-improvement and even decision-making evidently, through an algorithm lacking individual consciousness. Nevertheless, this feat provokes ethical questions. During the two days of the workshop, the participants analyzed the impact of artificial intelligence, as well as the ethical aspects. The discussion concerned issues in UNESCOs fields of competence of education, science, culture and communication, and furthermore, the ethical and global dimensions of peace, cultural diversity, gender equality and sustainability.

The World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology (COMEST) contributed to the debate on the impact of emerging issues, such as artificial intelligence and its relation to the Internet of Things or privacy in the digital age.

This debate prompted Gabon to take part in international discussions on the subject, and participants were able to explore both their confidence and reluctance in reducing the digital divide. This gap is more prominent in Gabon than in other countries such as South Africa, Kenya, Morocco, Nigeria and Rwanda, stressed Mr. Vincenzo Fazzino, UNESCO Representative in Gabon.

The workshop in Libreville thus allowed participants to learn and strengthen their knowledge on artificial intelligence. Moreover, the participants were able to understand the issues by taking into account the challenges and opportunities offered by AI and to contextualize AI in their country.

At the end of the workshop, the stakeholders committed to promote artificial intelligence throughout the national territory, encourage African regional cooperation, foster an ethical framework and set up a Gabonese Forum of Artificial Intelligence Associations.

In UNESCOs bookSteering Artificial Intelligence and Advanced ICT for Knowledge Societies, Artificial Intelligence is assessed within the wider ecosystem of Internet and other advanced ICTs including big data, Internet of Things, blockchains, etc. The publication shows that benefits and challenges particularly for communications and information can be usefully analysed in terms of UNESCOs Internet Universality ROAM principles. These principles urge that digital development be aligned with human Rights, Openness, Accessibility and Multi-stakeholder governance to guide the ensemble of values, norms, policies, regulations, codes and ethics that govern the development and use of Artificial Intelligence.

View post:
Gabonese youth enthusiastic about the future prospects offered by Artificial Intelligence - India Education Diary

Witnesses testify that CIA spied on Assange and his lawyers – World Socialist Web Site

Witnesses testify that CIA spied on Assange and his lawyers By Mike Head 22 January 2020

Further detailed evidence has been produced in a Spanish court that the CIA systematically and illegally recorded conversations between WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and his lawyers, and all other visitors, while he was trapped inside Ecuadors London embassy before he was dragged out and arrested last April to face extradition to the US.

The Spanish newspaper El Pas yesterday reported that three people who worked for the Spanish security company UC Global S.L. have testified as protected witnesses in Spains High Court, the Audencia Nacional, that the companys head David Morales handed over the surveillance material to the CIA.

The testimony is another devastating exposure of the decade-long political conspiracy conducted against Assange by the American, British and Australian governments, and their collaborators in Sweden and Ecuador. US imperialism and its allies want to silence him for life for publishing hundreds of thousands of documents laying bare the war crimes and other criminal activities of the US and its allies around the world. They are equally desperate to prevent further damning leaks by courageous whistle blowers and journalists as they prepare new wars, assassinations and coups.

The witness statements also confirm the extraordinary extent to which these governments have trampled over Assanges legal and democratic rights, including the fundamental and precious protection of lawyer-client confidentiality. This evidence alone requires the US extradition case to be thrown out of court on the grounds of illegality.

According to the evidence provided by the witnessesvideos, audio tapes and dozens of emailsthe surveillance operation was extensive. In particular, Assanges meetings with his legal team were videoed and recorded in order to gain material to try to incriminate him and to identify the evidence and legal arguments they would marshal against any prosecution under the US Espionage Act.

Under Morales express orders, the security company photographed the passports of all of Assanges visitors, took apart their cell phones, downloaded content from their iPads, took notes and put together reports on each meeting. The Ecuadorian diplomats who worked in the London embassy were also spied on.

Morales, a former Spanish military officer, is being prosecuted in Spain, after being charged in October with privacy violation, bribery and money laundering. His company was officially employed by the Ecuadorian government to provide security at the embassy but that became a cover for a bugging operation against Assange.

According to El Pas, two of the witnesses confirmed that, in December 2017, Morales ordered workers to change the surveillance cameras in the embassy and replace them with others that could capture audio. From that moment on, they monitored conversations between Assange and his lawyers, even in the female toilet that Assange and his legal team used in attempt to avoid illegal bugging.

During these meetings with his lawyers, Assange prepared his legal defence. The Australian citizen faces trumped-up charges under the US Espionage Act that carry penalties of a total of 175 years in prison. While awaiting the extradition hearing, due to commence in the last week of February, he also has been sedated and denied adequate medical treatment, placing his life in danger.

El Pas reported that the three witness statements all described the phrases that Morales used with his most-trusted workers, referring to UC Globals collaboration with the US secret service. These included: We are playing in the first division, I have gone to the dark side, Those in control are the American friends, The American client, The American friends are asking me to confirm, The North American will get us a lot of contracts around the world, and US intelligence.

The recordings from the cameras installed in the embassy were extracted from the hard drive every 15 daysalong with recordings from microphones placed in fire extinguishersand delivered personally to Morales at the headquarters of UC Global, located in Jerez de la Frontera in the south of Spain.

Morales travelled to the US once or twice a month, allegedly to hand over the material to the Americans. Morales also had installed remote-operated computer servers that collected the illegally obtained information, which could be accessed from the United States.

The witnesses testified that the material on Assange was handed over to the CIA by a member of the security service of Sheldon Adelson, the owner of the casino and resort company Las Vegas Sands Corporation. Adelson is a friend of US President Donald Trump and a large donor to the Republican Party.

Last year, the Italian newspaper,La Repubblica, obtained files evidencing UC Globals spying operation, including on doctors, journalists, politicians and celebrities who visited Assange. UC Global compiled profiles on Assanges London-based lawyer Jennifer Robinson and the head of his legal team in Spain, Baltasar Garzon. The video and audio footage showed a half-naked Julian Assange during a medical check-up and two of his lawyers, Gareth Peirce and Aitor Martinez, entering the womens bathroom for a private conversation with their client.

The extradition and prosecution of Assange is an historic assault on basic democratic principles enshrined over hundreds of years in constitutional and common law, including in the US and Britain.

Assanges legal team has already submitted evidence showing the blatantly political nature of the persecution of Assange, including material relating to Chelsea Manning, the former soldier being imprisoned indefinitely to attempt to force her to testify against Assange. They have also submitted public statements by US politicians denouncing Assange and WikiLeaks that jeopardise any prospect of a fair trial, and evidence relating to abuse of due process, vindictive prison conditions and denial of medical treatment.

In any criminal proceeding, evidence that the prosecution had illegally recorded conversations between the defendant and his lawyers would result in a mistrial, the dropping of charges, the release of the defendant and the disbarring and possible prosecution of all those involved.

In 1973, whistleblower Daniel Ellsberglike Assangewas prosecuted under the Espionage Act for leaking documents to the New York Times and the Washington Post. The Pentagon Papers revealed how the US government had for years lied to the public in order to expand the Vietnam War, which led to the deaths of three million Vietnamese people and 55,000 US soldiers. Their publication triggered an explosion of public anger and fuelled anti-war protests.

During Ellsbergs trial, President Richard Nixons plumbers broke into the office of Ellsbergs psychiatrist and wiretapped his phone. In that case, Judge William Matthew Byrne ruled that the surveillance had incurably infected the prosecution and dismissed the charges, setting Ellsberg free.

But even more is at stake in Assanges case, because WikiLeaks has helped expose the much greater crimes being committed by the US and its partners, including Britain and Australia. Moreover, the trampling over legal and democratic rights has advanced far further since the 1970s as the US ruling class has increasingly resorted to military aggression to try to overcome the erosion and decay of the global economic hegemony it asserted after World War II.

Moral appeals to politicians will not halt this travesty, let alone the underlying drive by US imperialism. The fight to defend democratic rights and stop the global lurch toward dictatorship and war requires a mass movement. The new year has begun with the resumption of momentous struggles by the working class around the world against government austerity measures, social inequality, environmental catastrophe and war. This is the force that must be mobilised, against capitalism, in order to free Assange and Manning.

The author also recommends:

The prosecution of Julian Assange, the destruction of legality and the rise of the national security state [15 January 2020]

2019 has been a year of mass social upheaval. We need you to help the WSWS and ICFI make 2020 the year of international socialist revival. We must expand our work and our influence in the international working class. If you agree, donate today. Thank you.

See the rest here:
Witnesses testify that CIA spied on Assange and his lawyers - World Socialist Web Site

Glenn Greenwald says Brazil charges are part of a global trend to criminalize journalism – Thehour.com

Joseph Marks, The Washington Post

American journalist Glenn Greenwald says the Brazilian government's charges against him are the latest strike in a global campaign by governments across the world to use anti-hacking laws to punish and silence journalists.

"Governments [are] figuring out how they can criminalize journalism based on large-scale digital leaks," Greenwald told me.

Greenwald, who won a Pulitzer Prize for reporting on leaked documents from former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden in 2014, says the charges are baseless. "Even in democracies -let alone in the authoritarian world - there's a real struggle to make the law fit criminalizing leaks of this sort," he said.

Greenwald, who lives in Rio de Janeiro, is facing charges stemming from his reporting on leaked cellphone messages that raised doubts about a corruption investigation that aided the rise of Brazil's far-right President Jair Bolsonaro. Greenwald is accused of being part of a "criminal organization" that allegedly hacked into public officials' cellphones last year to copy messages that were published on his news site, the Intercept Brazil.

Greenwald compared the Brazilian charges against him to the Trump administration's controversial decision to prosecute WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange last year under the main U.S. anti-hacking law, the 1986 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

"I've been particularly concerned given the Bolsonaro government's subservience to and admiration for the Trump government that they'd look to the precedent the Trump government used to indict Julian Assange," he told me, "trying to concoct a dubious or tenuous theory that he went beyond passing information to participating in the crime itself."

The charges come as officials in the United States and elsewhere have faced years of criticism for not updating decades-old hacking laws, which critics say are overly broad and can be used to criminalize innocuous work by anyone who deals with computer networks or large digital files including security researchers and journalists.

Brazilian prosecutors allege Greenwald crossed a line by encouraging his anonymous sources to delete their copies of stolen messages to evade detection. That explanation drew quick criticism from press freedom advocates in the United States and Brazil who said it criminalized reporters advising their sources on how to work securely. Greenwald told me he'd scrupulously followed Brazilian law and called the charges "an obvious attempt to attack a free press."

In the Assange case, meanwhile, U.S. prosecutors say he violated the law by offering to help then-military intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning decipher a password so she could get greater access to a military database and pass more secrets to WikiLeaks. Cybersecurity experts at the time criticized the Trump administration for stretching the 34-year-old CFAA law to fit a situation its authors never could have envisioned.

Press freedom advocates were less eager than Greenwald to draw a comparison between the charges against him and Assange. Gabe Rottman, technology and press freedom director at the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, said that Assange's offer to help a source crack a password could be deemed illegal under a reasonable reading of the CFAA, while Greenwald's alleged advice to sources on security does not violate ethical or legal principles. Rottman, who's written extensively about the Assange charges, says he takes this view even though he considers the CFAA so out of pace with modern technology that it can be applied in an unconstitutional manner in many cases.

Greenwald acknowledged there may be important distinctions between his actions and Assange's, but he described the two cases as on the same "slippery slope." Greenwald also warned they could lead to reporters being prosecuted for common journalistic practices such as urging sources to contact them using encrypted apps or accepting document leaks through online tools that anonymize the sender.

"There's a general aversion to defending Assange by press freedom groups because they don't see Assange as a journalist and they do see me as one," he said. "But there's no question the [Assange] indictment encourages governments to criminalize a person in the role of a journalist."

Greenwald added in a statement that he hasn't been detained and plans to keep publishing.

Though Greenwald has ruffled some feathers in Washington with his reporting on leaked information, he is getting strong support from many lawmakers.

Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., said the charges will have a "chilling effect" on journalism and said he's crafting legislation to protect journalists from prosecution.

Rep. Don Beyer, D-Va., called the charges "a step backwards that hurts Brazil."

"No journalist should face prosecution for reporting critical facts about the government or politicians," Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said in an emailed statement reported by the Intercept.

Advocacy groups also came to Greenwald's defense.

The American Civil Liberties Union called the charges an "outrageous assault on the freedom of the press."

The Electronic Frontier Foundation called them "a threat to democracy" that "discourages journalists from using technology to best serve the public."

Even some former intelligence community officials jumped in. Here's former NSA attorney Susan Hennessey, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution who runs the Lawfare blog:

House impeachment managers and President Donald Trump's defenders agreed early this morningon ground rules for his historic Senate impeachment trial. That trial's sure to delve into conspiracy theories the president embraced that cast doubt on Russia's hacking and disinformation campaign against the 2016 election and hacking threats facing 2020.

Continue reading here:
Glenn Greenwald says Brazil charges are part of a global trend to criminalize journalism - Thehour.com

This Week in Technology + Press Freedom: Jan. 19, 2020 – Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press

Heres what the staff of the Technology and Press Freedom Project at the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press is tracking this week.

Before we get to this weeks Top Story, we wanted to flag that the Reporters Committee and 57 media organizations sent aletterto Senate leadership, the Senate Sergeant at Arms, and the U.S. Capitol Police to opposerestrictionsfor journalists covering the upcoming Senate impeachment trial of President Donald J. Trump. Absent an articulable security rationale, [the Senate has] an obligation to preserve and promote the publics right to know, the letter said. The media coalition echoed concerns raised by the Senate Standing Committee of Correspondents in its ownletterdecrying the plans.Please share!

The Reporters Committee filed afriend-of-the-court brieflast week in the ongoing case concerning journalist Brian Karems White House hard pass, the credentials that facilitate reporters access to White House grounds.

Last August, the White House suddenly notified Karem of a 30-day suspension of his hard pass, citing the Playboy correspondents alleged failure to abide by basic norms of decorum and order, more than three weeks after Karem had analtercationwith former Trump aide Sebastian Gorka in the Rose Garden.

Karem immediately sought a preliminary injunction in federal court in the District of Columbia to get his credentials restored. The Reporters Committee filed afriend-of-the-court briefin support of Karem, emphasizing the well-established legal rule that the White House can deny hard passes only pursuant to basic due process that is, notice of the conduct that will result in denial of security credentials and an opportunity to challenge the denial. That rule set down in 1977 by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit inSherrill v. Knight requires the White House to articulate and publish an explicit and meaningful standard governing denial of press passes before doing so. The brief pointed out that the White House had not done so here and argued that whatever explicit standard is adopted must offer precision and guidance.

The district courtgrantedthe preliminary injunction, echoing many of the arguments presented by the Reporters Committee. The government appealed.

In its amicus brief on appeal, the Reporters Committee, joined by 44 press groups, again emphasized the importance of theSherrilldue process rule, and noted the medias critical role in holding the executive branch accountable, particularly in light of its ability to maintain greater secrecy over its actions than other branches. The brief also explained the importance of clear rules in this area, giving color to the district courts suggestion that a White House standard of decorum and order is too vague for journalists to be on fair notice about how to conform their behavior.

We jumped into the Karem case for many of the same reasonsthat theReporters Committee has engaged in issues involvingFirst Amendment retaliation against the press under the guise of executive branch regulatory actions.

In 2018, for instance, the Reporters Committee filed afriend-of-the-court briefin another case in the D.C. Circuit where the government appealed its unsuccessful challenge to the merger of AT&T and Time Warner (which owns CNN). The brief noted the presidents public and well-documented hostility toward CNN, and the importance of permitting limited discovery to determine the viability of a selective enforcement defense in cases where public criticism of an outlet suggests intent to retaliate against it.

The brief also highlighted examples of attempted press intimidation under administrations of both parties, including President Lyndon Johnsons demand for a literal letter of fealty from the publisher of the Houston Chronicle in exchange for authorizing a merger involving a bank owned by the publisher and President Richard Nixon using the threat of an antitrust lawsuit against the television networks in an attempt to sway coverage.

Ultimately, the issues at stake inKarem, the AT&T case, and the Johnson/Nixon episodes are similar. If the First Amendment means anything, its that the government cant use the levers of power to retaliate for coverage perceived as negative, be it a hard pass that permits a White House reporter to do his or her job, or economic regulations like antitrust that can hit a news organization where it may hurt most: the pocketbook.

Jordan Murov-Goodman

On Thursday, the New York Timesreportedthat federal prosecutors are investigating whether former FBI Director James Comey illegally provided classified information to reporters, marking the second time the Justice Department has focused on Comey for allegedly leaking information to the press. The first ended in a decision not to prosecute. Prosecutors in the U.S. attorneys office in the District of Columbia are now reportedly investigating whether the former director provided classified details about a Russian intelligence document to reporters for the Times and the Washington Post. Trump has previouslycalledComey a leaker on social media.

Last week, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange brieflyappearedin person in a U.K. court proceeding in which his lawyers argued they were not being given enough time to meet with their client. Assanges five-day extradition hearing is scheduled for late February. He has beenchargedby U.S. officials for violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and the Espionage Act.

Natalie Mayflower Sours Edwards, a former U.S. Treasury Department staffer accused of leaking confidential information to a reporter,pled guiltyin federal court last week to a count of conspiracy. Edwards waschargedwith makingunauthorized disclosures and with conspiracy to make unauthorized disclosuresof Suspicious Activity Reports, which document certain financial transactions that could indicate wrongdoing.

In the latest development in the debate over government encryption backdoors, Attorney General William Barr last week called onAppleto find a way to permit direct access to the encrypted phones of a Saudi aviation student who authorities saycarried out a terror attackat a Florida Navy base in December. The companyhas refusedto develop backdoors for law enforcement, arguing that there is no way to ensure that a built-in vulnerability for law enforcement wont be exploitable by bad actors. Some havenotedthat third-party vendors have developed cracks for iPhone encryption, which would not involve Apple being forced to build in a vulnerability for law enforcement access.

Lawmakers in the state of Washington have unveiled adata privacy billakin to the onerecently passedin California. This continues the trend of statestaking the leadin regulating the collection and use of consumer data.

Several members of Congress recentlyurgedthe Federal Communications Commission to require wireless carriers to do more to protect consumers from SIM swapping, a scheme in which bad actors dupe wireless carriers into transferring to their SIM cards the cell phone accounts of unsuspecting victims. Journalists should be especially concerned about being targets of SIM swapping, and can takestepssuch as enabling two-factor authentication to protect their accounts and data.

Claiming that a former government employee has stepped forward to divulge more details of the operation against her, former CBS news anchor Sharyl Attkisson isrenewing her attemptsto sue the government over alleged warrantless surveillance of her phones and computers nearly a decade ago. Her complaint claims that former Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein directed a team of four agents toconduct home surveillanceon her and other U.S. citizens during his time as the United States Attorney for the District of Maryland. This operation, she says, occurred while she reported on various controversies during the Obama administration, such as the Benghazi embassy attack.

Thirteen press secretaries spanning the administrations of Presidents George H.W. and George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and Barack Obamacalledon the Trump administration to resume regularly scheduled press briefings. They cited multiple benefits of the briefings, despite the ability of officials to communicate through social media, including keeping policy objectives on a timely schedule and avoiding the proliferation of misinformation by allowing the media to vet claims. The Trump administration has held fewer press conferences than past administrations, with current White House press secretary Stephanie Grishamrefusingto hold any since taking the position last July. Indeed, the last White House press briefing wasover 300 days ago, and counting.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recentlyruledin a First Amendment challenge against nondisclosure orders accompanying demands for data under the Stored Communications Act that such restraints on speech survive strict scrutiny. The court held that the governments interest in maintaining grand jury secrecy was compelling, that the use of nondisclosure orders was narrowly tailored, and that the nondisclosure orders were the least restrictive means to maintain grand jury secrecy thus meeting all three prongs of the constitutional test applied to such regulations. This case raises concerns similar to those of a recent case in which attorneys for the Reporters Committee filed anamicus briefin support of Microsoft.

Gif of the Week:Friendly reminder to enable two-factor paw-thentication on your devices.

Like what youve read?Sign up to get This Week in Technology + Press Freedom delivered straight to your inbox!

The Technology and Press Freedom Project at the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press uses integrated advocacy combining the law, policy analysis, and public education to defend and promote press rights on issues at the intersection of technology and press freedom, such as reporter-source confidentiality protections, electronic surveillance law and policy, and content regulation online and in other media. TPFP is directed by Reporters Committee Attorney Gabe Rottman. He works with Stanton Foundation National Security/Free Press Fellow Linda Moon and Legal Fellows Jordan Murov-Goodman and Lyndsey Wajert.

Follow this link:
This Week in Technology + Press Freedom: Jan. 19, 2020 - Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press

Red Hat Survey Shows Hybrid Cloud, AI and Machine Learning are the Focus of Enterprises – Computer Business Review

Add to favorites

The data aspect in particular is something that we often see overlooked

Open source enterprise software firm Red Hat now a subsidiary of IBM have conducted its annual survey of its customers which highlights just how prevalent artificial intelligence and machine learning is becoming, while a talent and skill gap is still slowing down companies ability to enact digital transformation plans.

Here are the top three takeaways from Red Hats customer survey;

When asked to best describe their companies approach to cloud infrastructure 31 percent stated that they run a hybrid cloud, while 21 percent said their firm has a private cloud first strategy in place.

The main reason cited for operating a hybrid cloud strategy was the security and cost benefits it provided. Some responders noted that data integration was easier within a hybrid cloud.

Not everyone is fully sure about their approach yet, as 17 percent admitted they are in the process of establishing a cloud strategy, while 12 percent said they have no plans at all to focus on the cloud.

When it comes to digital transformation there has been a notable rise in the amount of firms that undertaken transformation projects. In 2018; under a third of responders (31 percent) said they were implementing new processes and technology, this year that number has nearly doubled as 58 percent confirm they are introducing new technology.

Red Hat notes that: The drivers for these projects vary. And the drivers also vary by the role of the respondent. System administrators care most about simplicity. IT architects focus on user experience and innovation. For managers, simplicity, user experience, and innovation are all tied for top priority. Developers prioritize innovationwhich, overall, was cited as the most important reason to do digital transformation projects.

However, one in ten surveyed said they are facing a talent and skillset gap that is slowing down the pace at which they can transform their business. The skillset is being made worse by the amount of new technologies that are being brought to market such as artificial intelligence, machine learning and containerisation, the use of which is expected to grow significantly in the next 24 months.

Artificial intelligence, machine learning models and processes is the clear emerging technology for firms in 2019, as 30 percent said that they are planning to implement an AI or ML project within the next 12 months.

However, enterprises are worried about the compatibility and complexity of implementing AI or ML, with 29 percent stating they are worried about evolving software stacks.

One in five (22 percent) responders are worried about getting access to the right data. The data aspect in particular is something that we often see overlooked; obtaining relevant data and cleansing or transforming it in ways that its a useful input for models can be one of the most challenging aspects of an AI project, Red Hat notes.

Red Hats survey was created by compiling 876 qualified responses from Red Hat customers during August and September of 2019.

Continued here:
Red Hat Survey Shows Hybrid Cloud, AI and Machine Learning are the Focus of Enterprises - Computer Business Review

Looking at the most significant benefits of machine learning for software testing – The Burn-In

Software development is a massive part of the tech industry that is absolutely set to stay. Its importance is elemental, supporting technology from the root. Its unsurprisingly a massive industry, with lots of investment and millions of jobs that help to propel technology on its way with great force. Software testing is one of the vital cogs in the software development machine, without which faulty software would run amuck and developing and improving software products would be a much slower and much more inefficient process. Software testing as its own field has gone through several different phases, most recently landing upon the idea of using machine learning. Machine learnings importance is elemental to artificial intelligence, and is a method of freeing up the potential of computers through the use of data feeding. Effective machine learning can greatly improve software testing.

Lets take a look at how that is the case.

As well as realizing the immense power of data over the last decade, we have also reached a point in our technological, even sociological evolution in which we are producing more data than ever, proposes Carl Holding, software developer at Writinity and ResearchPapersUK. This is significant in relation to software testing. The more complex and widely adopted software becomes, the more data that is generated about its use. Under traditional software testing conditions, that amount of data would actually be unhelpful, since it would overwhelm testers. Conversely, machine learning computers hoover up vast data sets as fuel for their analysis and their learning pattern. Not only do the new data conditions only suit large machine learning computers, its also precisely what makes large machine learning computers most successful.

Everyone makes mistakes, as the old saying goes. Except, thats not true: machine learning computers dont. Machine learning goes hand in hand with automation, something which has become very important for all sorts of industries. Not only does it save time, it also gets rid of the potential for human mistakes, which can be very damaging in software testing, notes Tiffany Lee, IT expert at DraftBeyond and LastMinuteWriting. It doesnt matter how proficient a human being is at this task, they will always slip up, especially under the increased pressure put on them with the volume of data that now comes in. A software test sullied by human error can actually be even worse than if no test had been done at all, since getting misinformation is worse than no information. With that in mind, its always just better to leave it to the machines.

Business has always been about getting ahead, regardless of the era or the nature of the products and services. Machine learning is often looked to as a way to predict the future by spotting trends in data and feeding those predictions to the companies that want it most. Software is by no means an industry where this is an exception. In fact, given that it is within the tech sector, its even more important to software development than other industries. Using a machine learning computer for software testing can help to quickly identify the way things are shaping up for the future which means that you get two functions out of your testing process, for the price of one. This can give you an excellent competitive edge.

That machine learning computers save you time should be a fairly obvious point at this stage. Computers handle tasks that take humans hours in a matter of seconds. If you add the increased accuracy advantage over traditional methods then you can see that using this method of testing will get better products out more quickly, which is a surefire way to start boosting your sales figures with ease.

Overall, its a no-brainer. And, as machine learning computers become more affordable, you really have no reason to opt for any other method beyond it. Its a wonderful age for speed and accuracy in technology and with the amount that is at stake with software development, you have to be prepared to think ahead.

Read the original:
Looking at the most significant benefits of machine learning for software testing - The Burn-In

Data Science and Machine Learning Service Market: Future Forecast Assessed on the Basis of How the Industry is Predicted to Grow 2019-2024 Dagoretti…

The report provides a detailed overview of the industry including both qualitative and quantitative information. It provides overview and forecast of the global Data Science and Machine Learning Service market based on product and application. It also provides market size and forecast till 2024 for overall Data Science and Machine Learning Service market with respect to five major regions, namely; North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Rest of the World, which is later sub-segmented by respective countries and segments. The report evaluates market dynamics effecting the market during the forecast period i.e., drivers, restraints, opportunities, and future trend and provides exhaustive PEST analysis for regions.

Also, key Data Science and Machine Learning Service market players influencing the market are profiled in the study along with their SWOT analysis and market strategies. The report also focuses on leading industry players with information such as company profiles, products and services offered.

Sample Copy of This Report with Full [emailprotected] https://www.alexareports.com/report-sample/53938

Top Most Key Players in Data Science and Machine Learning Service Markets: Mango Solutions, Fico, ZS, DataScience.com, Microsoft, LatentView Analytics, Google, International Business Machine, Bigml, Amazon Web Services, Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Development, At&T

Type of Data Science and Machine Learning Service Markets: Consulting, Management Solution

Application of Data Science and Machine Learning Service Markets: Banking, Insurance, Retail, Media & Entertainment, Others

Region of Data Science and Machine Learning Service Markets: North America: (U.S., Canada & Mexico), Europe: (Germany, UK, France, Russia, Italy & Rest of Europe), Asia-Pacific: (China, Japan, South Korea, India, Southeast Asia & Rest of Asia-Pacific), South America: (Brazil, Argentina, Columbia, South Africa & Rest of South America)

Table of Content:Chapter: 1 Industry OverviewChapter: 2 Industry Environment (PEST Analysis)Chapter: 3 Data Science and Machine Learning Service Market by TypeChapter: 4 Major Companies ListChapter: 5 Market CompetitionChapter: 6 Demand by End MarketChapter: 7 Region OperationChapter: 8 Marketing & PriceChapter: 9 Research Conclusion

TO BE CONTINUED

Discuss Our Expert [emailprotected] https://www.alexareports.com/send-an-enquiry/53938

Reasons to Buy the Report:This report focuses on various levels of analysisindustry trends, market ranking of top players, and company profiles, which together form basic views and analyze the competitive landscape, emerging segments of the rapid microbiology testing market, and high-growth regions and their drivers, restraints, challenges, and opportunities. The report will help both established firms as well as new entrants/smaller firms to gauge the pulse of the market and garner greater market shares.

Check Best Offer of This [emailprotected] https://www.alexareports.com/check-discount/53938

As the report further, it explains developing plans and policies, making processes, cost structures of Data Science and Machine Learning Service market as well as the leading players. It also concentrates on the aspects like company profile, product images, supply chain relationship, import/export details of Data Science and Machine Learning Service market, market statistics of Data Science and Machine Learning Service market, upcoming development plans, market gains, contact details, consumption ratio. Ultimately, the report includes an in-depth analysis of sub-segments, market dynamics, feasibility study, key strategies used by leading players, market share study and growth prospects of the industry. The report also evaluates the growth established by the market during the forecast period and research conclusions are offered.

*You can glance through the list of Tables and Figures when you view the sample copy of Data Science and Machine Learning Service Market.

Original post:
Data Science and Machine Learning Service Market: Future Forecast Assessed on the Basis of How the Industry is Predicted to Grow 2019-2024 Dagoretti...

Machine learning – Wikipedia

Scientific study of algorithms and statistical models that computer systems use to perform tasks without explicit instructions

Machine learning (ML) is the scientific study of algorithms and statistical models that computer systems use to perform a specific task without using explicit instructions, relying on patterns and inference instead. It is seen as a subset of artificial intelligence. Machine learning algorithms build a mathematical model based on sample data, known as "training data", in order to make predictions or decisions without being explicitly programmed to perform the task.[1][2]:2 Machine learning algorithms are used in a wide variety of applications, such as email filtering and computer vision, where it is difficult or infeasible to develop a conventional algorithm for effectively performing the task.

Machine learning is closely related to computational statistics, which focuses on making predictions using computers. The study of mathematical optimization delivers methods, theory and application domains to the field of machine learning. Data mining is a field of study within machine learning, and focuses on exploratory data analysis through unsupervised learning.[3][4] In its application across business problems, machine learning is also referred to as predictive analytics.

The name machine learning was coined in 1959 by Arthur Samuel.[5] Tom M. Mitchell provided a widely quoted, more formal definition of the algorithms studied in the machine learning field: "A computer program is said to learn from experience E with respect to some class of tasks T and performance measure P if its performance at tasks in T, as measured by P, improves with experience E."[6] This definition of the tasks in which machine learning is concerned offers a fundamentally operational definition rather than defining the field in cognitive terms. This follows Alan Turing's proposal in his paper "Computing Machinery and Intelligence", in which the question "Can machines think?" is replaced with the question "Can machines do what we (as thinking entities) can do?".[7] In Turing's proposal the various characteristics that could be possessed by a thinking machine and the various implications in constructing one are exposed.

Machine learning tasks are classified into several broad categories. In supervised learning, the algorithm builds a mathematical model from a set of data that contains both the inputs and the desired outputs. For example, if the task were determining whether an image contained a certain object, the training data for a supervised learning algorithm would include images with and without that object (the input), and each image would have a label (the output) designating whether it contained the object. In special cases, the input may be only partially available, or restricted to special feedback.[clarification needed] Semi-supervised learning algorithms develop mathematical models from incomplete training data, where a portion of the sample input doesn't have labels.

Classification algorithms and regression algorithms are types of supervised learning. Classification algorithms are used when the outputs are restricted to a limited set of values. For a classification algorithm that filters emails, the input would be an incoming email, and the output would be the name of the folder in which to file the email. For an algorithm that identifies spam emails, the output would be the prediction of either "spam" or "not spam", represented by the Boolean values true and false. Regression algorithms are named for their continuous outputs, meaning they may have any value within a range. Examples of a continuous value are the temperature, length, or price of an object.

In unsupervised learning, the algorithm builds a mathematical model from a set of data that contains only inputs and no desired output labels. Unsupervised learning algorithms are used to find structure in the data, like grouping or clustering of data points. Unsupervised learning can discover patterns in the data, and can group the inputs into categories, as in feature learning. Dimensionality reduction is the process of reducing the number of "features", or inputs, in a set of data.

Active learning algorithms access the desired outputs (training labels) for a limited set of inputs based on a budget and optimize the choice of inputs for which it will acquire training labels. When used interactively, these can be presented to a human user for labeling. Reinforcement learning algorithms are given feedback in the form of positive or negative reinforcement in a dynamic environment and are used in autonomous vehicles or in learning to play a game against a human opponent.[2]:3 Other specialized algorithms in machine learning include topic modeling, where the computer program is given a set of natural language documents and finds other documents that cover similar topics. Machine learning algorithms can be used to find the unobservable probability density function in density estimation problems. Meta learning algorithms learn their own inductive bias based on previous experience. In developmental robotics, robot learning algorithms generate their own sequences of learning experiences, also known as a curriculum, to cumulatively acquire new skills through self-guided exploration and social interaction with humans. These robots use guidance mechanisms such as active learning, maturation, motor synergies, and imitation.[clarification needed]

Arthur Samuel, an American pioneer in the field of computer gaming and artificial intelligence, coined the term "Machine Learning" in 1959 while at IBM.[8] A representative book of the machine learning research during the 1960s was the Nilsson's book on Learning Machines, dealing mostly with machine learning for pattern classification.[9] The interest of machine learning related to pattern recognition continued during the 1970s, as described in the book of Duda and Hart in 1973. [10] In 1981 a report was given on using teaching strategies so that a neural network learns to recognize 40 characters (26 letters, 10 digits, and 4 special symbols) from a computer terminal. [11] As a scientific endeavor, machine learning grew out of the quest for artificial intelligence. Already in the early days of AI as an academic discipline, some researchers were interested in having machines learn from data. They attempted to approach the problem with various symbolic methods, as well as what were then termed "neural networks"; these were mostly perceptrons and other models that were later found to be reinventions of the generalized linear models of statistics.[12] Probabilistic reasoning was also employed, especially in automated medical diagnosis.[13]:488

However, an increasing emphasis on the logical, knowledge-based approach caused a rift between AI and machine learning. Probabilistic systems were plagued by theoretical and practical problems of data acquisition and representation.[13]:488 By 1980, expert systems had come to dominate AI, and statistics was out of favor.[14] Work on symbolic/knowledge-based learning did continue within AI, leading to inductive logic programming, but the more statistical line of research was now outside the field of AI proper, in pattern recognition and information retrieval.[13]:708710; 755 Neural networks research had been abandoned by AI and computer science around the same time. This line, too, was continued outside the AI/CS field, as "connectionism", by researchers from other disciplines including Hopfield, Rumelhart and Hinton. Their main success came in the mid-1980s with the reinvention of backpropagation.[13]:25

Machine learning, reorganized as a separate field, started to flourish in the 1990s. The field changed its goal from achieving artificial intelligence to tackling solvable problems of a practical nature. It shifted focus away from the symbolic approaches it had inherited from AI, and toward methods and models borrowed from statistics and probability theory.[14] It also benefited from the increasing availability of digitized information, and the ability to distribute it via the Internet.

Machine learning and data mining often employ the same methods and overlap significantly, but while machine learning focuses on prediction, based on known properties learned from the training data, data mining focuses on the discovery of (previously) unknown properties in the data (this is the analysis step of knowledge discovery in databases). Data mining uses many machine learning methods, but with different goals; on the other hand, machine learning also employs data mining methods as "unsupervised learning" or as a preprocessing step to improve learner accuracy. Much of the confusion between these two research communities (which do often have separate conferences and separate journals, ECML PKDD being a major exception) comes from the basic assumptions they work with: in machine learning, performance is usually evaluated with respect to the ability to reproduce known knowledge, while in knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD) the key task is the discovery of previously unknown knowledge. Evaluated with respect to known knowledge, an uninformed (unsupervised) method will easily be outperformed by other supervised methods, while in a typical KDD task, supervised methods cannot be used due to the unavailability of training data.

Machine learning also has intimate ties to optimization: many learning problems are formulated as minimization of some loss function on a training set of examples. Loss functions express the discrepancy between the predictions of the model being trained and the actual problem instances (for example, in classification, one wants to assign a label to instances, and models are trained to correctly predict the pre-assigned labels of a set of examples). The difference between the two fields arises from the goal of generalization: while optimization algorithms can minimize the loss on a training set, machine learning is concerned with minimizing the loss on unseen samples.[15]

Machine learning and statistics are closely related fields in terms of methods, but distinct in their principal goal: statistics draws population inferences from a sample, while machine learning finds generalizable predictive patterns.[16] According to Michael I. Jordan, the ideas of machine learning, from methodological principles to theoretical tools, have had a long pre-history in statistics.[17] He also suggested the term data science as a placeholder to call the overall field.[17]

Leo Breiman distinguished two statistical modeling paradigms: data model and algorithmic model,[18] wherein "algorithmic model" means more or less the machine learning algorithms like Random forest.

Some statisticians have adopted methods from machine learning, leading to a combined field that they call statistical learning.[19]

A core objective of a learner is to generalize from its experience.[2][20] Generalization in this context is the ability of a learning machine to perform accurately on new, unseen examples/tasks after having experienced a learning data set. The training examples come from some generally unknown probability distribution (considered representative of the space of occurrences) and the learner has to build a general model about this space that enables it to produce sufficiently accurate predictions in new cases.

The computational analysis of machine learning algorithms and their performance is a branch of theoretical computer science known as computational learning theory. Because training sets are finite and the future is uncertain, learning theory usually does not yield guarantees of the performance of algorithms. Instead, probabilistic bounds on the performance are quite common. The biasvariance decomposition is one way to quantify generalization error.

For the best performance in the context of generalization, the complexity of the hypothesis should match the complexity of the function underlying the data. If the hypothesis is less complex than the function, then the model has under fitted the data. If the complexity of the model is increased in response, then the training error decreases. But if the hypothesis is too complex, then the model is subject to overfitting and generalization will be poorer.[21]

In addition to performance bounds, learning theorists study the time complexity and feasibility of learning. In computational learning theory, a computation is considered feasible if it can be done in polynomial time. There are two kinds of time complexity results. Positive results show that a certain class of functions can be learned in polynomial time. Negative results show that certain classes cannot be learned in polynomial time.

The types of machine learning algorithms differ in their approach, the type of data they input and output, and the type of task or problem that they are intended to solve.

Supervised learning algorithms build a mathematical model of a set of data that contains both the inputs and the desired outputs.[22] The data is known as training data, and consists of a set of training examples. Each training example has one or more inputs and the desired output, also known as a supervisory signal. In the mathematical model, each training example is represented by an array or vector, sometimes called a feature vector, and the training data is represented by a matrix. Through iterative optimization of an objective function, supervised learning algorithms learn a function that can be used to predict the output associated with new inputs.[23] An optimal function will allow the algorithm to correctly determine the output for inputs that were not a part of the training data. An algorithm that improves the accuracy of its outputs or predictions over time is said to have learned to perform that task.[6]

Supervised learning algorithms include classification and regression.[24] Classification algorithms are used when the outputs are restricted to a limited set of values, and regression algorithms are used when the outputs may have any numerical value within a range. Similarity learning is an area of supervised machine learning closely related to regression and classification, but the goal is to learn from examples using a similarity function that measures how similar or related two objects are. It has applications in ranking, recommendation systems, visual identity tracking, face verification, and speaker verification.

In the case of semi-supervised learning algorithms, some of the training examples are missing training labels, but they can nevertheless be used to improve the quality of a model. In weakly supervised learning, the training labels are noisy, limited, or imprecise; however, these labels are often cheaper to obtain, resulting in larger effective training sets.[25]

Unsupervised learning algorithms take a set of data that contains only inputs, and find structure in the data, like grouping or clustering of data points. The algorithms, therefore, learn from test data that has not been labeled, classified or categorized. Instead of responding to feedback, unsupervised learning algorithms identify commonalities in the data and react based on the presence or absence of such commonalities in each new piece of data. A central application of unsupervised learning is in the field of density estimation in statistics,[26] though unsupervised learning encompasses other domains involving summarizing and explaining data features.

Cluster analysis is the assignment of a set of observations into subsets (called clusters) so that observations within the same cluster are similar according to one or more predesignated criteria, while observations drawn from different clusters are dissimilar. Different clustering techniques make different assumptions on the structure of the data, often defined by some similarity metric and evaluated, for example, by internal compactness, or the similarity between members of the same cluster, and separation, the difference between clusters. Other methods are based on estimated density and graph connectivity.

Semi-supervised learning

Semi-supervised learning falls between unsupervised learning (without any labeled training data) and supervised learning (with completely labeled training data). Many machine-learning researchers have found that unlabeled data, when used in conjunction with a small amount of labeled data, can produce a considerable improvement in learning accuracy.

Reinforcement learning is an area of machine learning concerned with how software agents ought to take actions in an environment so as to maximize some notion of cumulative reward. Due to its generality, the field is studied in many other disciplines, such as game theory, control theory, operations research, information theory, simulation-based optimization, multi-agent systems, swarm intelligence, statistics and genetic algorithms. In machine learning, the environment is typically represented as a Markov Decision Process (MDP). Many reinforcement learning algorithms use dynamic programming techniques.[27] Reinforcement learning algorithms do not assume knowledge of an exact mathematical model of the MDP, and are used when exact models are infeasible. Reinforcement learning algorithms are used in autonomous vehicles or in learning to play a game against a human opponent.

Self-learning as machine learning paradigm was introduced in 1982 along with a neural network capable of self-learning named Crossbar Adaptive Array (CAA). [28] It is a learning with no external rewards and no external teacher advices. The CAA self-learning algorithm computes, in a crossbar fashion, both decisions about actions and emotions (feelings) about consequence situations. The system is driven by the interaction between cognition and emotion. [29]The self-learning algorithm updates a memory matrix W =||w(a,s)|| such that in each iteration executes the following machine learning routine:

It is a system with only one input, situation s, and only one output, action (or behavior) a. There is neither a separate reinforcement input nor an advice input from the environment. The backpropagated value (secondary reinforcement) is the emotion toward the consequence situation. The CAA exists in two environments, one is behavioral environment where it behaves, and the other is genetic environment, wherefrom it initially and only once receives initial emotions about situations to be encountered in the behavioral environment. After receiving the genome (species) vector from the genetic environment, the CAA learns a goal seeking behavior, in an environment that contains both desirable and undesirable situations. [30]

Several learning algorithms aim at discovering better representations of the inputs provided during training.[31] Classic examples include principal components analysis and cluster analysis. Feature learning algorithms, also called representation learning algorithms, often attempt to preserve the information in their input but also transform it in a way that makes it useful, often as a pre-processing step before performing classification or predictions. This technique allows reconstruction of the inputs coming from the unknown data-generating distribution, while not being necessarily faithful to configurations that are implausible under that distribution. This replaces manual feature engineering, and allows a machine to both learn the features and use them to perform a specific task.

Feature learning can be either supervised or unsupervised. In supervised feature learning, features are learned using labeled input data. Examples include artificial neural networks, multilayer perceptrons, and supervised dictionary learning. In unsupervised feature learning, features are learned with unlabeled input data. Examples include dictionary learning, independent component analysis, autoencoders, matrix factorization[32] and various forms of clustering.[33][34][35]

Manifold learning algorithms attempt to do so under the constraint that the learned representation is low-dimensional. Sparse coding algorithms attempt to do so under the constraint that the learned representation is sparse, meaning that the mathematical model has many zeros. Multilinear subspace learning algorithms aim to learn low-dimensional representations directly from tensor representations for multidimensional data, without reshaping them into higher-dimensional vectors.[36] Deep learning algorithms discover multiple levels of representation, or a hierarchy of features, with higher-level, more abstract features defined in terms of (or generating) lower-level features. It has been argued that an intelligent machine is one that learns a representation that disentangles the underlying factors of variation that explain the observed data.[37]

Feature learning is motivated by the fact that machine learning tasks such as classification often require input that is mathematically and computationally convenient to process. However, real-world data such as images, video, and sensory data has not yielded to attempts to algorithmically define specific features. An alternative is to discover such features or representations through examination, without relying on explicit algorithms.

Sparse dictionary learning is a feature learning method where a training example is represented as a linear combination of basis functions, and is assumed to be a sparse matrix. The method is strongly NP-hard and difficult to solve approximately.[38] A popular heuristic method for sparse dictionary learning is the K-SVD algorithm. Sparse dictionary learning has been applied in several contexts. In classification, the problem is to determine the class to which a previously unseen training example belongs. For a dictionary where each class has already been built, a new training example is associated with the class that is best sparsely represented by the corresponding dictionary. Sparse dictionary learning has also been applied in image de-noising. The key idea is that a clean image patch can be sparsely represented by an image dictionary, but the noise cannot.[39]

In data mining, anomaly detection, also known as outlier detection, is the identification of rare items, events or observations which raise suspicions by differing significantly from the majority of the data.[40] Typically, the anomalous items represent an issue such as bank fraud, a structural defect, medical problems or errors in a text. Anomalies are referred to as outliers, novelties, noise, deviations and exceptions.[41]

In particular, in the context of abuse and network intrusion detection, the interesting objects are often not rare objects, but unexpected bursts in activity. This pattern does not adhere to the common statistical definition of an outlier as a rare object, and many outlier detection methods (in particular, unsupervised algorithms) will fail on such data, unless it has been aggregated appropriately. Instead, a cluster analysis algorithm may be able to detect the micro-clusters formed by these patterns.[42]

Three broad categories of anomaly detection techniques exist.[43] Unsupervised anomaly detection techniques detect anomalies in an unlabeled test data set under the assumption that the majority of the instances in the data set are normal, by looking for instances that seem to fit least to the remainder of the data set. Supervised anomaly detection techniques require a data set that has been labeled as "normal" and "abnormal" and involves training a classifier (the key difference to many other statistical classification problems is the inherently unbalanced nature of outlier detection). Semi-supervised anomaly detection techniques construct a model representing normal behavior from a given normal training data set and then test the likelihood of a test instance to be generated by the model.

Association rule learning is a rule-based machine learning method for discovering relationships between variables in large databases. It is intended to identify strong rules discovered in databases using some measure of "interestingness".[44]

Rule-based machine learning is a general term for any machine learning method that identifies, learns, or evolves "rules" to store, manipulate or apply knowledge. The defining characteristic of a rule-based machine learning algorithm is the identification and utilization of a set of relational rules that collectively represent the knowledge captured by the system. This is in contrast to other machine learning algorithms that commonly identify a singular model that can be universally applied to any instance in order to make a prediction.[45] Rule-based machine learning approaches include learning classifier systems, association rule learning, and artificial immune systems.

Based on the concept of strong rules, Rakesh Agrawal, Tomasz Imieliski and Arun Swami introduced association rules for discovering regularities between products in large-scale transaction data recorded by point-of-sale (POS) systems in supermarkets.[46] For example, the rule { o n i o n s , p o t a t o e s } { b u r g e r } {displaystyle {mathrm {onions,potatoes} }Rightarrow {mathrm {burger} }} found in the sales data of a supermarket would indicate that if a customer buys onions and potatoes together, they are likely to also buy hamburger meat. Such information can be used as the basis for decisions about marketing activities such as promotional pricing or product placements. In addition to market basket analysis, association rules are employed today in application areas including Web usage mining, intrusion detection, continuous production, and bioinformatics. In contrast with sequence mining, association rule learning typically does not consider the order of items either within a transaction or across transactions.

Learning classifier systems (LCS) are a family of rule-based machine learning algorithms that combine a discovery component, typically a genetic algorithm, with a learning component, performing either supervised learning, reinforcement learning, or unsupervised learning. They seek to identify a set of context-dependent rules that collectively store and apply knowledge in a piecewise manner in order to make predictions.[47]

Inductive logic programming (ILP) is an approach to rule-learning using logic programming as a uniform representation for input examples, background knowledge, and hypotheses. Given an encoding of the known background knowledge and a set of examples represented as a logical database of facts, an ILP system will derive a hypothesized logic program that entails all positive and no negative examples. Inductive programming is a related field that considers any kind of programming languages for representing hypotheses (and not only logic programming), such as functional programs.

Inductive logic programming is particularly useful in bioinformatics and natural language processing. Gordon Plotkin and Ehud Shapiro laid the initial theoretical foundation for inductive machine learning in a logical setting.[48][49][50] Shapiro built their first implementation (Model Inference System) in 1981: a Prolog program that inductively inferred logic programs from positive and negative examples.[51] The term inductive here refers to philosophical induction, suggesting a theory to explain observed facts, rather than mathematical induction, proving a property for all members of a well-ordered set.

Performing machine learning involves creating a model, which is trained on some training data and then can process additional data to make predictions. Various types of models have been used and researched for machine learning systems.

Artificial neural networks (ANNs), or connectionist systems, are computing systems vaguely inspired by the biological neural networks that constitute animal brains. Such systems "learn" to perform tasks by considering examples, generally without being programmed with any task-specific rules.

An ANN is a model based on a collection of connected units or nodes called "artificial neurons", which loosely model the neurons in a biological brain. Each connection, like the synapses in a biological brain, can transmit information, a "signal", from one artificial neuron to another. An artificial neuron that receives a signal can process it and then signal additional artificial neurons connected to it. In common ANN implementations, the signal at a connection between artificial neurons is a real number, and the output of each artificial neuron is computed by some non-linear function of the sum of its inputs. The connections between artificial neurons are called "edges". Artificial neurons and edges typically have a weight that adjusts as learning proceeds. The weight increases or decreases the strength of the signal at a connection. Artificial neurons may have a threshold such that the signal is only sent if the aggregate signal crosses that threshold. Typically, artificial neurons are aggregated into layers. Different layers may perform different kinds of transformations on their inputs. Signals travel from the first layer (the input layer) to the last layer (the output layer), possibly after traversing the layers multiple times.

The original goal of the ANN approach was to solve problems in the same way that a human brain would. However, over time, attention moved to performing specific tasks, leading to deviations from biology. Artificial neural networks have been used on a variety of tasks, including computer vision, speech recognition, machine translation, social network filtering, playing board and video games and medical diagnosis.

Deep learning consists of multiple hidden layers in an artificial neural network. This approach tries to model the way the human brain processes light and sound into vision and hearing. Some successful applications of deep learning are computer vision and speech recognition.[52]

Decision tree learning uses a decision tree as a predictive model to go from observations about an item (represented in the branches) to conclusions about the item's target value (represented in the leaves). It is one of the predictive modeling approaches used in statistics, data mining and machine learning. Tree models where the target variable can take a discrete set of values are called classification trees; in these tree structures, leaves represent class labels and branches represent conjunctions of features that lead to those class labels. Decision trees where the target variable can take continuous values (typically real numbers) are called regression trees. In decision analysis, a decision tree can be used to visually and explicitly represent decisions and decision making. In data mining, a decision tree describes data, but the resulting classification tree can be an input for decision making.

Support vector machines (SVMs), also known as support vector networks, are a set of related supervised learning methods used for classification and regression. Given a set of training examples, each marked as belonging to one of two categories, an SVM training algorithm builds a model that predicts whether a new example falls into one category or the other.[53] An SVM training algorithm is a non-probabilistic, binary, linear classifier, although methods such as Platt scaling exist to use SVM in a probabilistic classification setting. In addition to performing linear classification, SVMs can efficiently perform a non-linear classification using what is called the kernel trick, implicitly mapping their inputs into high-dimensional feature spaces.

Regression analysis encompasses a large variety of statistical methods to estimate the relationship between input variables and their associated features. Its most common form is linear regression, where a single line is drawn to best fit the given data according to a mathematical criterion such as ordinary least squares. The latter is oftentimes extended by regularization (mathematics) methods to mitigate overfitting and high bias, as can be seen in ridge regression. When dealing with non-linear problems, go-to models include polynomial regression (e.g. used for trendline fitting in Microsoft Excel [54]), Logistic regression (often used in statistical classification) or even kernel regression, which introduces non-linearity by taking advantage of the kernel trick to implicitly map input variables to higher dimensional space.

A Bayesian network, belief network or directed acyclic graphical model is a probabilistic graphical model that represents a set of random variables and their conditional independence with a directed acyclic graph (DAG). For example, a Bayesian network could represent the probabilistic relationships between diseases and symptoms. Given symptoms, the network can be used to compute the probabilities of the presence of various diseases. Efficient algorithms exist that perform inference and learning. Bayesian networks that model sequences of variables, like speech signals or protein sequences, are called dynamic Bayesian networks. Generalizations of Bayesian networks that can represent and solve decision problems under uncertainty are called influence diagrams.

A genetic algorithm (GA) is a search algorithm and heuristic technique that mimics the process of natural selection, using methods such as mutation and crossover to generate new genotypes in the hope of finding good solutions to a given problem. In machine learning, genetic algorithms were used in the 1980s and 1990s.[55][56] Conversely, machine learning techniques have been used to improve the performance of genetic and evolutionary algorithms.[57]

Usually, machine learning models require a lot of data in order for them to perform well. Usually, when training a machine learning model, one needs to collect a large, representative sample of data from a training set. Data from the training set can be as varied as a corpus of text, a collection of images, and data collected from individual users of a service. Overfitting is something to watch out for when training a machine learning model.

Federated learning is a new approach to training machine learning models that decentralizes the training process, allowing for users' privacy to be maintained by not needing to send their data to a centralized server. This also increases efficiency by decentralizing the training process to many devices. For example, Gboard uses federated machine learning to train search query prediction models on users' mobile phones without having to send individual searches back to Google.[58]

There are many applications for machine learning, including:

In 2006, the media-services provider Netflix held the first "Netflix Prize" competition to find a program to better predict user preferences and improve the accuracy on its existing Cinematch movie recommendation algorithm by at least 10%. A joint team made up of researchers from AT&T Labs-Research in collaboration with the teams Big Chaos and Pragmatic Theory built an ensemble model to win the Grand Prize in 2009 for $1million.[60] Shortly after the prize was awarded, Netflix realized that viewers' ratings were not the best indicators of their viewing patterns ("everything is a recommendation") and they changed their recommendation engine accordingly.[61] In 2010 The Wall Street Journal wrote about the firm Rebellion Research and their use of machine learning to predict the financial crisis.[62] In 2012, co-founder of Sun Microsystems, Vinod Khosla, predicted that 80% of medical doctors' jobs would be lost in the next two decades to automated machine learning medical diagnostic software.[63] In 2014, it was reported that a machine learning algorithm had been applied in the field of art history to study fine art paintings, and that it may have revealed previously unrecognized influences among artists.[64] In 2019 Springer Nature published the first research book created using machine learning.[65]

Although machine learning has been transformative in some fields, machine-learning programs often fail to deliver expected results.[66][67][68] Reasons for this are numerous: lack of (suitable) data, lack of access to the data, data bias, privacy problems, badly chosen tasks and algorithms, wrong tools and people, lack of resources, and evaluation problems.[69]

In 2018, a self-driving car from Uber failed to detect a pedestrian, who was killed after a collision.[70] Attempts to use machine learning in healthcare with the IBM Watson system failed to deliver even after years of time and billions of investment.[71][72]

Machine learning approaches in particular can suffer from different data biases. A machine learning system trained on current customers only may not be able to predict the needs of new customer groups that are not represented in the training data. When trained on man-made data, machine learning is likely to pick up the same constitutional and unconscious biases already present in society.[73] Language models learned from data have been shown to contain human-like biases.[74][75] Machine learning systems used for criminal risk assessment have been found to be biased against black people.[76][77] In 2015, Google photos would often tag black people as gorillas,[78] and in 2018 this still was not well resolved, but Google reportedly was still using the workaround to remove all gorillas from the training data, and thus was not able to recognize real gorillas at all.[79] Similar issues with recognizing non-white people have been found in many other systems.[80] In 2016, Microsoft tested a chatbot that learned from Twitter, and it quickly picked up racist and sexist language.[81] Because of such challenges, the effective use of machine learning may take longer to be adopted in other domains.[82] Concern for fairness in machine learning, that is, reducing bias in machine learning and propelling its use for human good is increasingly expressed by artificial intelligence scientists, including Fei-Fei Li, who reminds engineers that "Theres nothing artificial about AI...Its inspired by people, its created by people, andmost importantlyit impacts people. It is a powerful tool we are only just beginning to understand, and that is a profound responsibility.[83]

Classification machine learning models can be validated by accuracy estimation techniques like the Holdout method, which splits the data in a training and test set (conventionally 2/3 training set and 1/3 test set designation) and evaluates the performance of the training model on the test set. In comparison, the K-fold-cross-validation method randomly partitions the data into K subsets and then K experiments are performed each respectively considering 1 subset for evaluation and the remaining K-1 subsets for training the model. In addition to the holdout and cross-validation methods, bootstrap, which samples n instances with replacement from the dataset, can be used to assess model accuracy.[84]

In addition to overall accuracy, investigators frequently report sensitivity and specificity meaning True Positive Rate (TPR) and True Negative Rate (TNR) respectively. Similarly, investigators sometimes report the False Positive Rate (FPR) as well as the False Negative Rate (FNR). However, these rates are ratios that fail to reveal their numerators and denominators. The Total Operating Characteristic (TOC) is an effective method to express a model's diagnostic ability. TOC shows the numerators and denominators of the previously mentioned rates, thus TOC provides more information than the commonly used Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) and ROC's associated Area Under the Curve (AUC).[85]

Machine learning poses a host of ethical questions. Systems which are trained on datasets collected with biases may exhibit these biases upon use (algorithmic bias), thus digitizing cultural prejudices.[86] For example, using job hiring data from a firm with racist hiring policies may lead to a machine learning system duplicating the bias by scoring job applicants against similarity to previous successful applicants.[87][88] Responsible collection of data and documentation of algorithmic rules used by a system thus is a critical part of machine learning.

Because human languages contain biases, machines trained on language corpora will necessarily also learn these biases.[89][90]

Other forms of ethical challenges, not related to personal biases, are more seen in health care. There are concerns among health care professionals that these systems might not be designed in the public's interest but as income-generating machines. This is especially true in the United States where there is a perpetual ethical dilemma of improving health care, but also increase profits. For example, the algorithms could be designed to provide patients with unnecessary tests or medication in which the algorithm's proprietary owners hold stakes in. There is huge potential for machine learning in health care to provide professionals a great tool to diagnose, medicate, and even plan recovery paths for patients, but this will not happen until the personal biases mentioned previously, and these "greed" biases are addressed.[91]

Software suites containing a variety of machine learning algorithms include the following:

The rest is here:
Machine learning - Wikipedia