Global Quantum Computing for Enterprise Market 2020 Report With Segmentation, Analysis On Trends, Growth, Opportunities and Forecast Till 2024 – News…

The Global Quantum Computing for Enterprise Market study report presents an in-depth study about the market on the basis of key segments such as product type, application, key companies and key regions, end users and others. The research report presents assessment of the growth and other characteristics of the Global Quantum Computing for Enterprise Market on the basis of key geographical regions and countries. The major regions which have good market in this industry are North America, Latin America, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Middle East Africa.

The end users of the Global Quantum Computing for Enterprise Market can be categorized on the basis of size of the enterprise. Report presents the opportunities for the players. It also offers business models and market forecasts for the participants. This market analysis allows industry manufacturers with future market trends. Also Report offers an in depth analysis on the basis of market size, revenue, sales analysis and key drivers. Study reports provides the information about the technological advancement, new product launches, new players and recent developments in the Global Quantum Computing for Enterprise Market.

Global Market By Type:

HardwareSoftware

Global Market By Application:

BFSITelecommunications and ITRetail and E-CommerceGovernment and DefenseHealthcareManufacturingEnergy and UtilitiesConstruction and EngineeringOthers

The research report of Global Quantum Computing for Enterprise Market offers the comprehensive data about the top most manufacturers and vendors which are presently functioning in this industry and which have good market region and country wise. Furthermore, study report presents a comprehensive study about the market on the basis of various segments such as product type, application, key companies and key regions, top end users and others. Furthermore, the study report provides the analysis about the major reasons or drivers that are responsible for the growth the Global Quantum Computing for Enterprise Market.

Make an enquirer of this report @ https://www.orbisresearch.com/contacts/enquiry-before-buying/4458782

About Us :

Orbis Research (orbisresearch.com) is a single point aid for all your market research requirements. We have vast database of reports from the leading publishers and authors across the globe. We specialize in delivering customized reports as per the requirements of our clients. We have complete information about our publishers and hence are sure about the accuracy of the industries and verticals of their specialization. This helps our clients to map their needs and we produce the perfect required market research study for our clients.

Contact Us :

Hector CostelloSenior Manager Client Engagements4144N Central Expressway,Suite 600, Dallas,Texas 75204, U.S.A.Phone No.: USA: +1 (972)-362-8199 | IND: +91 895 659 5155

Read the original post:
Global Quantum Computing for Enterprise Market 2020 Report With Segmentation, Analysis On Trends, Growth, Opportunities and Forecast Till 2024 - News...

The future’s bright for quantum computing but it will need big backing – The Union Journal

IT stakeholders throughout markets are delighted by the potential customers of quantum computing, but it will take a whole lot a lot more source to make sure both the technologys all set for a large swimming pool of customers, and also those very same customers prepare to release it.

Thats according to a brand-new study by the International Data Corporation (IDC) qualified Quantum Computing Adoption Trends: 2020 Survey Findings, which has actually assembled information and also end-user metrics from over 2,700 European entities associated with the quantum ball, and also the people managing quantum financial investments.

Despite the slower price of quantum fostering total( financial investments consist of in between 0 2 percent of yearly budget plans), end-users are confident that quantum computing will placed them at an affordable benefit, supplied that very early seed financial investment gets on hand.

The favorable overview adheres to the growth of brand-new models and also very early progression in markets such as FinTech, cybersecurity and also production.

Made up of those that would certainly look after financial investment in quantum in their organisations, participants pointed out far better company knowledge information event, enhanced expert system (AI) capacities, in addition to increased effectiveness and also efficiency of their cloud-based systems and also solutions, as one of the most amazing applications.

While the innovation itself still has a lengthy means to precede its practical for organisations, also when it is, IT directors stress over high prices refuting them accessibility, restricted expertise of the area, scarcity of essential sources in addition to the high degree of details entailed within the innovation itself.

However, with such large applications and also possibility of the technology, quantum area makers and also vendors are established on making the innovation readily available for as wide a swathe of customers as feasible that implies production it easy to use, and also readily available to business with even more restricted source, as cloud-based Quantum-Computing- as-a-Service (QCaaS).

According to Heather Wells, the IDCs elderly study expert of Infrastructure Systems, Platforms, and also Technology, Quantum computing is the future market and also facilities disruptor for companies wanting to make use of big quantities of information, expert system, and also artificial intelligence to speed up real-time company knowledge and also introduce item growth.

Many organizations from many industries are already experimenting with its potential.

These understandings more mention one of the most prominent applications and also methods of quantum innovation, that include cloud-centric quantum computing, quantum networks, facility quantum formulas, and also crossbreed quantum computing which takes in 2 or even more adaptions of quantum technological opportunities.

The future appears significantly encouraging for quantum computing mass fostering, nonetheless, those business creating should act rapidly to make its very early power easily accessible to organisations in order to protect the financial investment to drive the innovations real future possibility.

Post Views: 322

See the article here:
The future's bright for quantum computing but it will need big backing - The Union Journal

THE CORONAVIRUS’ EFFECT ON CRYPTOCURRENCY TRADING – Island Echo

The coronavirus pandemic continues to affect all walks of life, with everyone struggling to cope with what this means for what we think of as a normal way of life. Schools are suspended, most businesses closed until further notice, and governments all around the world are looking to both mitigate the spread while also lessening the fallout from the disease.

Within the financial world, Yahoo! Finance reports that insiders expect the global stock market to enter into a deep recession. This means that some are now looking to cryptocurrency as an alternative trading method, however crypto remains as volatile as ever. News outlets have either been praising cryptocurrencies rise or predicting its fall, and this news seems to change by the hour.

The rise of cryptocurrency

As of March 24, CNBC reports that the crypto prices have risento over 12 billion, which means their total value now amounts to about 155 billion. Bitcoin was up over 10%, while other cryptocurrencies such as Ethereum and XRP also rose. Cryptocurrency exchange expert Vijay Ayyar told the news outlet that investors are seeing this bullish rise as a positive, with investors gaining confidence and potentially seeing cryptocurrency as a safe haven amidst all the global stock market fears.

This rise comes hot on the heels of cryptocurrencys rough patch earlier this month. Just 11 days prior to this rise, cryptocurrency prices tanked as investors were trying to quickly sell off their stocks due to the coronavirus panic. Financial insiders used this time to bemoan cryptocurrencys role as a safe haven in the face of a global economic downturn, but this recent growth means that cryptocurrency may indeed be the economic haven that traders are searching for.

What this means for traders

The fall and subsequent rise of cryptocurrency at this time thus begs the question: What does this mean for traders? While cryptocurrencys volatility is what makes it exciting, beginner traders who are safely at home can use this time to better monitor its conditions. Plus500s trading platform was built to help mitigate cryptocurrencys extreme volatility by alerting users of any sudden price increases and drops. While no one will ever have a concrete hold on how cryptocurrency stocks move, such tools allow traders to manage their profits and losses. After all, understanding how to manage your risk is an extremely important lesson when it comes to cryptocurrency trading.

In line with this, Forekast News emphasises the growing numberof ordinary people who are now trying their hand at cryptocurrency investments. Tech writer and cryptocurrency trader Sumit Gupta suggests that while cryptocurrency does benefit large financial institutions, its decentralised nature also means that all kinds of traders can get in. This inclusion can then increase the purchasing power of the ordinary citizen.

Our post on decentralised hubs in the Isle of Wight speaks to just how far this tech has the potential to grow. As many people across the globe brace themselves for the virus worst effects, financial insiders will continue to monitor cryptocurrencys growth amidst all the panic.

Read this article:
THE CORONAVIRUS' EFFECT ON CRYPTOCURRENCY TRADING - Island Echo

Gaming Is About to Be Changed Forever by… – Coinspeaker

Many online gamblers are switching to cryptocurrency due to its much safer transactions than a bank account or PayPal can offer.

Cryptocurrencies appear ready to infiltrate almost every aspect of life and gaming is far from immune. In fact, cryptocurrency and its saturation in gaming could well be around the corner.

One aspect of the gaming industry where cryptocurrency appears to be making hay is in the gambling sector, where some of the best online slots UK platforms are already accepting crypto like Bitcoin and Litecoin as a payment method.

Many online gamblers are switching to cryptocurrency due to its much safer transactions than a bank account or PayPal. This is because of something called blockchain usage as well as the use of cryptography for validating and securing transactions.

But, just how will cryptocurrency affect gaming if it becomes mainstream?

Blockchain is the public transaction ledger of the Bitcoin cryptocurrency which enhances the security of its user. This is because the data in any given block cannot be altered retroactively without altering the blocks that follow. This alteration needs the agreement of the network majority.

But, if games began to use the same blockchain then gamers could use the same money in different games. This would not only give gamers a much greater degree of flexibility than different currencies for different games, it would also ensure the avoidance of credit cards.

Of course, credit cards are still how the majority of video games micro-transactions take place. Though most existing gamers already have credit card details saved on specific games, the implementation of cryptocurrency would expand the market beyond its current base.

Whilst gamers would benefit, gaming companies would experience anxiety. Cryptocurrency is rife with speculation and uncertainty and the enhanced possibility of the system crashing would harm companies long-term goals.

A developer may not be able to deal with the increasing complications. For example, their gaming currency may decline in worth as the number of players increases. That maneuverability would hinder companies ability to plan ahead. This is because ordinary people would have the capacity to take money away from the company, something which developers are keen to stay away from.

Developers have refused to implement cash-out options too because they fear that gamers will cash out and leave forever; keeping the money in the game increases the possibility of it being spent.

Real return on investments whether that be time, resources or money is one of cryptocurrencys main advantages. A small number of games do reward gamers with Bitcoin or others such as Litecoin and Monero already, but, expanding that could well be a way of spreading the benefit with the responsibility firmly in developers hands.

Virtual goods are already doing the rounds on games in a bid to entice users, and, with the infiltration of cryptocurrency, as more companies jump on the bandwagon, more will follow. A decentralized cryptocurrency from which an ever-increasing number of virtual economies runoff would certainly shake up the gaming world, but its all about education.

Having obtained a diploma in Intercultural Communication, Julia continued her studies taking a Masters degree in Economics and Management. Becoming captured by innovative technologies, Julia turned passionate about exploring emerging techs believing in their ability to transform all spheres of our life.

You have successfully joined our subscriber list.

Read the original:
Gaming Is About to Be Changed Forever by... - Coinspeaker

Regulatory And Other Developments In Singapore On Cryptocurrency And Bitcoin Exchanges – Technology – Singapore – Mondaq News Alerts

To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In our earlier CNPupdate article published on 9 May 2018, we discussed theregulatory approach to cryptocurrency and bitcoin exchanges inSingapore. In this article, we look at the regulatory developmentsfollowing the commencement of the Payment Services Act 2019("PS Act") on 28 January 2020.

Along with the PS Act, the following key regulations relating tothe new payment services framework have also come into effect on 28January 2020:-

Entities who operate or intend to operate Cryptocurrency andBitcoin Exchanges in Singapore (collectively,"Exchange Operators") may be required tocomply with the licensing requirements for providing a"digital payment token service" and operating a"digital payment token exchange" under the PSAct.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (the"MAS") formed a new Payments Departmentin February 2020 to supervise the payment services industry inSingapore the ("PD"). The PD isresponsible for supervising the regulation of the payments industryin Singapore. The PD formulates policies on the regulation ofpayment services, and supervises payment services providers (e.g.cross-border money transfer service providers, digital paymenttoken service providers and money-changers) as well as paymentsystems (e.g. GIRO, FAST, NETS Electronic Funds Transfer atPoint-of-Sale). PD also supervises non-bank credit and charge cardissuers regulated under the Banking Act, and credit bureausregulated under the Credit Bureau Act.

Over recent months, there have also been some notabledevelopments in the cryptocurrency landscape in Singapore. iSTOX, adigitised securities trading platform, graduated from the MAS'Fintech Regulatory Sandbox on 1 February 2020 [link]. Intercontinental Exchange, an approvedexchange regulated by the MAS, launched the Bakkt bitcoincash-settled monthly futures contract in Singapore on 9 December2019 [link]. Xfers, a provider of e-money issuanceservice, announced on 7 November 2019 that it plans to issue theXSGD token (powered by Zilliqa), a Singapore-dollar backed andpegged "stablecoin" under the project nameStraitsX [link].

This update is provided to you for general information andshould not be relied upon as legal advice.

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Technology from Singapore

Ikigai Law

The nearly two-year long challenge by Indian cryptocurrency users, traders and exchanges, against the April 6, 2018 RBI circular[1], which cut off such users' access to the formal economy has come to a close.

ONC Lawyers

FinTech Comparative Guide for the jurisdiction of Hong Kong, check out our comparative guides section to compare across multiple countries

Go here to read the rest:
Regulatory And Other Developments In Singapore On Cryptocurrency And Bitcoin Exchanges - Technology - Singapore - Mondaq News Alerts

Bitcoin price hit by dramatic value fluctuations amid coronavirus panic buying and selling – The Independent

Bitcoin has experienced wild price swings in recent days as cryptocurrency markets respond to the global economic uncertainty sparked by thecoronavirus epidemic.

The cryptocurrency has swung between highs of $9,000 and lows of 4,000 since the start of March, representing the most severe price volatility since the market explosion and subsequent crash in late 2017.

Over the last week the value of one bitcoin has risen by more than $1,000 to its current price of $6,600.

Sharing the full story, not just the headlines

The latest price rise came after the US Federal Reserve announced unlimited quantitative easing measures to help reduce the economic impact of coronavirus.

This follows similar announcements from other central banks like the Reserve Bank of Australia and the European Central Bank to artificially increase the money supply.

Such drastic economic policy is seen by some analysts as a potential opportunity for investors, who may consider bitcoin as a safe-haven asset due to its decentralised nature.

The limited supply of bitcoin only 21 million will ever exist means it is also immune to quantitative easing and other emergency monetary measures that fiat currencies are susceptible to.

The US Federal Reserves announcement effectively pumps billions of dollars into the market, so some investors may be weary that the dollar will lose its value, and are moving back into bitcoin to hedge against inflation, Simon Peters, a cryptocurrency analyst at the online trading platform eToro, toldThe Independent.

Because the amount of new bitcoin that comes on to the market decreases over time, it is by design a deflationary asset when compared with a fiat currency like the US dollar. In theory the value per bitcoin should increase over time.

Other major cryptocurrencies continue to experience similar fluctuations, though the full extent of the impact the coronavirus outbreak has had on markets is yet to be fully realised.

On 3 January, 2009, the genesis block of bitcoin appeared. It came less than a year after the pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto detailed the cryptocurrency in a paper titled 'Bitcoin: A peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System'

Reuters

On 22 May, 2010, the first ever real-world bitcoin transaction took place. Lazlo Hanyecz bought two pizzas for 10,000 bitcoins the equivalent of $90 million at today's prices

Lazlo Hanyecz

Bitcoin soon gained notoriety for its use on the dark web. The Silk Road marketplace, established in 2011, was the first of hundreds of sites to offer illegal drugs and services in exchange for bitcoin

On 29 October, 2013, the first ever bitcoin ATM was installed in a coffee shop in Vancouver, Canada. The machine allowed people to exchange bitcoins for cash

REUTERS/Dimitris Michalakis

The world's biggest bitcoin exchange, MtGox, filed for bankruptcy in February 2014 after losing almost 750,000 of its customers bitcoins. At the time, this was around 7 per cent of all bitcoins and the market inevitably crashed

Getty Images

In 2015, Australian police raided the home of Craig Wright after the entrepreneur claimed he was Satoshi Nakamoto. He later rescinded the claim

Getty Images

On 1 August, 2017, an unresolvable dispute within the bitcoin community saw the network split. The fork of bitcoin's underlying blockchain technology spawned a new cryptocurrency: Bitcoin cash

REUTERS

Towards the end of 2017, the price of bitcoin surged to almost $20,000. This represented a 1,300 per cent increase from its price at the start of the year

Reuters

On 3 January, 2009, the genesis block of bitcoin appeared. It came less than a year after the pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto detailed the cryptocurrency in a paper titled 'Bitcoin: A peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System'

Reuters

On 22 May, 2010, the first ever real-world bitcoin transaction took place. Lazlo Hanyecz bought two pizzas for 10,000 bitcoins the equivalent of $90 million at today's prices

Lazlo Hanyecz

Bitcoin soon gained notoriety for its use on the dark web. The Silk Road marketplace, established in 2011, was the first of hundreds of sites to offer illegal drugs and services in exchange for bitcoin

On 29 October, 2013, the first ever bitcoin ATM was installed in a coffee shop in Vancouver, Canada. The machine allowed people to exchange bitcoins for cash

REUTERS/Dimitris Michalakis

The world's biggest bitcoin exchange, MtGox, filed for bankruptcy in February 2014 after losing almost 750,000 of its customers bitcoins. At the time, this was around 7 per cent of all bitcoins and the market inevitably crashed

Getty Images

In 2015, Australian police raided the home of Craig Wright after the entrepreneur claimed he was Satoshi Nakamoto. He later rescinded the claim

Getty Images

On 1 August, 2017, an unresolvable dispute within the bitcoin community saw the network split. The fork of bitcoin's underlying blockchain technology spawned a new cryptocurrency: Bitcoin cash

REUTERS

Towards the end of 2017, the price of bitcoin surged to almost $20,000. This represented a 1,300 per cent increase from its price at the start of the year

Reuters

Bitcoin was launched in 2009in response to the financial crisis of the previous year, offering a revolutionary alternative to the traditional financial system.

The electronic cash system has failed to achieve mainstream adoption in the subsequent years, during which the global economy recovered and achieved sustained growth. Some experts believe that the advent of another economic collapse could be see a renewed interest in bitcoin as an alternative form of currency and store of value.

This is the first time the world has faced a financial crisis when there has been an alternative financial system, said Marcus Swanepoel, CEO of London-based cryptocurrency exchange Luno.

Cryptocurrencies are still very young, and at this stage in their development cannot replace fiat currencies, but as the problems global markets face increase we will see investors looking at digital assets as a way of distancing themselves from digital investments.

See the article here:
Bitcoin price hit by dramatic value fluctuations amid coronavirus panic buying and selling - The Independent

Chinas Cryptocurrency Is Closer Than Expected, Already Working On Legislation – CryptoPotato

Despite the delay, the Peoples Bank of China (PBC) is closer to launching its official digital currency. By working together with several large private companies, the nations central bank has finished the development process and is working on the proper legislation before the CBDC is released.

After the COVID-19 outbreak, the Chinese central bank digital currency (CBDC) was delayed indefinitely. However, as the country is portraying initial stages of recovering after the deadly virus, a new report informed that the CBDCs launch is closer than anticipated.

The Chinese central bank has completed the development process by collaborating with several local firms, including Huawei, China Merchants Bank, Tencent, and the tech giant Alibaba.

The latter has reportedly publicized five patents related to the future digital currency from January 21st to March 17th. The patents cover various areas of the digital currencys future usage. Those include issuance, digital wallets, transaction recording, anonymous trading support, and assistance in supervising and dealing with illegal accounts.

Aside from all patents, the digital currency has to comply with local legislation as well. This, according to the report, could raise issues, because the currency has to operate with banking and insurance regulators on supervision. This process could be quite lengthy. Therefore, the exact time of the CBDC launch cannot be determined yet.

As the world is arguably entering the next, long-awaited, recession, most central banks are taking extreme measures to fight the economy curtail. The U.S. Fed, for example, cut the interest rates in an unprecedented manner and even announced unlimited quantitative easing.

Chinas approach for stabilizing its economy might differ substantially with the digital currency launch. Cao Yan, managing director of Digital Renaissance Foundation, believes that the PBC should accelerate the development of the CBDC.

He outlined two main merits; firstly, it would establish Chinas leadership position in this new digitally-oriented world. Secondly, a CBDC could be more efficient during times of uncertainty than simply lowering rates.

If there is a chance China is considering lowering its interest rate into negative territory as a final option and directing such policy to commercial loans and lending, a circulated digital currency rather than M0 will be able to achieve that. he explained.

Enjoy reading? Please share:

Click here to start trading on BitMEX and receive 10% discount on fees for 6 months.

Originally posted here:
Chinas Cryptocurrency Is Closer Than Expected, Already Working On Legislation - CryptoPotato

Central Bank of Russia Reveals New Amendments to Bill on Cryptocurrency – Coin Idol

Mar 25, 2020 at 10:15 // News

The Central Bank of Russia (BoR) has shared some important statements about proposed cryptocurrency legalisation, especially on their issuance and circulation.

The new amendments to the draft of the bill on digital financial assets prepared by the Central Bank indicate that the issuance and opening of cryptocurrency selling businesses in Russia have unjustified risk. The bill provides for a prohibition on the issuing and selling of bitcoin and any other form of altcoin in the Russian Federation and brings liability for infringement of the veto.

According to this new bill, specific guidelines explain how the banking institutions can apply the presumed 375-P protocol to address illicit activities associated with digital currencies, especially money laundering. The list of rules includes 100 signs which will enable banking institutions to regard cryptoassets activities as suspicious.

The drafting of the document has not yet been completed but that wont stop the Russian banks from prohibiting any form of transactions they mark suspicious or even close particular accounts of cryptoasset operators in the country in a lawful manner, as per the forexnewsnow report.

As revealed by Alexei Guznov, head of the legal dept of the BoR, the bank has reached an accord with other government agencies and market participants that take part in the debate. That agreement might be that nobody is going to forbid owning cryptoassets including Bitcoin.

Alexei Guznov stated:

Now weve approached consensus with other government bodies and market players that participate in the discussion. That consensus might be that nobody is going to ban owning cryptocurrencies.

Guznov further noted that no one will forbid cryptocurrency calling that absurd. But the bill is more likely to negatively affect the issuance of cryptoasset as these cause an unjustified risk.

A draft law on digital financial assets was issued by the Ministry of Finances on January 20, 2018, and then brought in the State Duma on March 20, the same year. Cryptocurrencies are categorised in the bill as property and are not regarded as legal tender. The bill doesnt authorise the exchange of digital assets for Rubles or other foreign money in Russia. But the exchange of cryptocurrencies for Rubles and foreign currency is actually allowed but if and only if is done via a licensed operator(s), according to an article from the Library of Congress. Moreover, it notes that cryptocurrency holders can actually trade in jurisdictions of the countries that allow cryptocurrency trading.

Despite long research and promises to ban cryptocurrency-related businesses, so far there is no exact definition on cryptocurrency in laws or guiding books in Russia.

According to the Russian Constitution - the Ruble is the only legal means of payment in the country. And the Federal Law on the BoR of 2002 indicates that Ruble is the only recognized national currency. Thus the issuance of any other means of payment can be considered prohibited.

So far, according to the report, legalizing the issuing, selling and trading of altcoins brings an irrational risk, and that is one of the reasons why the law is trying to put an embargo on supplying and arranging cryptocurrency-related business, and also sets the penalty for breaching the restrictions.

Cryptocurrency regulation has been a major topic that has been largely discussed by financial authorities, governments and other players in the cryptocurrency industry each and every year since the advent of bitcoin.

The BoR is still pro digital financial assets and blockchain technology implementation but against cryptocurrency businesses. In December 2019 it even carried out a pilot tokenization initiative in its regulatory sandbox.

Authorities in Russia are not trying to obstruct the creation and implementation of new innovative technologies such as blockchain, internet of things, cryptocurrency, smart contracts, artificial intelligence and others. So, the bill stands more chance of being embraced by different authorities.

Back in September 2018, as Coinidol reported, Dmitry Peskov, Vladimir Putins Special Representative on Digital and Technological Development revealed the issuing and circulating of cryptocurrencies cannot yet be allowed because it conflicts with the fundamental functions of government.

Read more from the original source:
Central Bank of Russia Reveals New Amendments to Bill on Cryptocurrency - Coin Idol

Snowden warns: The surveillance states were creating now will outlast the coronavirus – The Next Web

Governments around the world are using high-tech surveillance measures to combat the coronavirus outbreak. But are they worth it?

Edward Snowden doesnt think so.

The former CIA contractor, whose leaks exposed the scale of spying programs in the US, warns that once this tech is taken out the box, it will be hard to put it back.

When we see emergency measures passed, particularly today, they tend to be sticky, Snowden said in an interview with theCopenhagen International Documentary Film Festival.

The emergency tends to be expanded. Then the authorities become comfortable with some new power. They start to like it.

Supporters of the draconian measures argue that normal rules are not enough during a pandemic and that the long-term risks can be addressed once the outbreak is contained. But a brief suspension of civil liberties can quickly be extended.

Security services will soon find new uses for the tech. And when the crisis passes, governments can impose new laws that make the emergency rules permanent and exploit them to crack down on dissent and political opposition.

Take the proposals to monitor the outbreak by tracking mobile phone location data.

This could prove a powerful method of tracing the spread of the virus and the movements of people who have it. But it will also be a tempting tool to track terrorists or any other potential enemies of the states.

Artificial intelligence has become a particularly popular way of monitoring life under the pandemic. In China, thermal scanners installed at train stations identify patients with fevers, while in Russia, facial recognition systems spot people breaking quarantine rules.

The coronavirus has even given Clearview AI a chance to repair its reputation. The controversial social media-scraping startup is in talks with governments about using its tech to track infected patients, according to the Wall Street Journal.

A big attraction of AI is its efficiency by assigning probabilities to different groups of people. But too much efficiency can be a threat to freedom, which is why we limit police powers through measures such as warrants and probable cause for arrest.

The alternative is algorithmic policing that justifies excessive force and perpetuates racial profiling.

Snowden is especially concerned about security services adding AI to all the other surveillance tech they have.

They already know what youre looking at on the internet, he said. They already know where your phone is moving. Now they know what your heart rate is, what your pulse is. What happens when they start to mix these and apply artificial intelligence to it?

Its tough to strike a balance between security and privacy at the best of times, let alone during a global crisis.

Snowden doesnt dispute the severity of the pandemic. But he believes its a transient problem that will eventually be resolved by vaccines and herd immunity.

The consequences of the measures we introduce today, however, will be permanent. Thats why the tech we deploy now must be proportionate to each phase of the outbreak.Openness from governments and consultation with the public will ensure its within the rule of law and preserves our basic human rights.

Draconian measures may be tolerable if they get us through the pandemic. But we must also think about the world we want to live in once the coronavirus is contained.

Published March 25, 2020 15:37 UTC

Read the original here:
Snowden warns: The surveillance states were creating now will outlast the coronavirus - The Next Web

Coronavirus Is The Shock, Dictatorship Is The Doctrine – The Real News Network

This is a rush transcript and may contain errors. It will be updated.

Greg Wilpert: Its The Real News Network, Im Greg Wilpert in Arlington, Virginia. Recently, thousands of Israelis posted the cover of Naomi Kleins book The Shock Doctrine on their social media accounts without further comment. They were doing so because they had sensed that the book is a warning and that its becoming a reality before their very eyes. The crisis has shocked the population and this now allows the Israeli government to push forward with draconic and undemocratic policies.

All over the world, we are seeing how governments are declaring states of emergency because of the coronavirus pandemic and are undertaking extreme measures to stop the spread of the virus. However, other than perhaps China, no country in the world has gone as far as Israel in clamping down on civil liberties. First, prime minister Netanyahu closed the courts a few days before he was supposed to appear in court himself to face charges of corruption.

Then, as the opposition tried to elect a new chairman of the Knesset, Israels parliament, the ruling coalition that no longer has a majority decided to shut down the Knesset. Next and most alarming, the government used an executive order to grant unlimited powers of surveillance to the secret police, tracking the phones of every person in Israel at all times, supposedly to keep track of infected people and to prevent them from spreading the disease and to punish them if they break the curfew.

And finally, when thousands of Israelis wanted to protest these measures, the right to assembly was denied. Even a convoy of cars, in which everyone sits in their own car and does not interact with others, was forbidden. Heres how prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu presented the measures last week.

Benjamin Netany: [foreign language 00:01:42]. The government will approve tonight executive orders for a state of emergency to allow the use of digital measures to fight the coronavirus. These measures will help us very much to find the location of the virus and the location of the sick people and thus stop the spread of the virus. We discussed it yesterday at the cabinet meeting for six hours.

[foreign language 00:02:06]. Me, and I must say, almost all No, all the ministers. We wanted to ensure a meticulous supervision of this measure to prevent misuse. The legal council accepted our request and this evening we shall authorize the use of digital tools for a limited time of 30 days. Israel is a democracy. It must keep the balance between individual rights and the collective needs and we are doing that.

Greg Wilpert: Joining me now to discuss how governments are taking advantage of the pandemic is Antony Loewenstein. He is an independent journalist and author of the book, Disaster Capitalism: Making a Killing Out of Catastrophe. Thanks for joining us again, Antony.

Antony Loewenstein: Thanks for having me.

Greg Wilpert: So, many countries that the coronavirus has hit, has hit them actually much harder than Israel, but they have not implemented such extreme measures as Israel. And so Israeli government officials argue that its precisely because of these extreme measures that Israel hasnt been hit so hard. However, there are many countries that slowed down the spread of the virus without taking such extreme measures. So the question is why Israel of all countries is reacting in such an extreme way to the coronavirus. What do you think?

Antony Loewenstein: Well theres a few reasons. I was living in Jerusalem until just recently. So I saw the beginning of this pandemic, but I left thankfully before it really accelerated or the shutdown happened, the lockdown. I think what youre seeing in Israel really is almost an inevitability. What I mean by that is for two reasons. One, Israel is a country that has spent decades occupying, monitoring, surveilling millions of Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza and in Israel proper and that now is coming home to roost.

What I mean by that is that they are using their technology which traditionally has been used on Palestinians, now on all citizens, which obviously includes Palestinians but also Israeli Jews. And it also of course is coming at a time where theres no actual government in Israel and Netanyahu claims to be prime minister, but in fact he hasnt won three elections. It has not been a legitimate government in Israel for close to 18 months. This is the reality in Israel and a weak and divided opposition. So the use and the and the technology and the ability of the Shin Bet, the internal security services to monitor all citizens, which I have to say is being claimed as a temporary measure should worry us deeply because these measures may well be loosened in time. We dont know, but the fact is we should not be trusting A the Israeli government or the Israeli security services historically have been known to very aggressively monitor and surveil Palestinians.

So the danger, which clearly is relevant to many other countries is, if you allow your government or your state to massively surveil and monitor the other, whether its Palestinians, all Muslims, whoever it may be. That technology will inevitably used on ourselves. And I think about Edward Snowden here when he talked about, hes released in about seven years ago and he was saying that yes, the US massively surveils the world. But they also surveil the Americans because that technology inevitably is used on our own. Thats whats happening in Israel today.

Greg Wilpert: Israeli member of parliament, Ahmad Tibi once said with regard to Israels Jewish population that Israel is a democratic state and regard towards Arab population, Israel is a Jewish state. Now we are seeing the last democratic protections of the Jewish population of Israel crumbling as well. What do you think this means for the Arab Palestinians population under Israeli control, which is nearly 7 million people? Are they being affected in the same way?

Antony Loewenstein: Well even more so. I mean obviously Gaza which has been under Israeli blockade now for much more than a decade has just recently seen two cases of the coronavirus and notably more will come and the health system has been collapsed for years, so thats a real potential catastrophe on Israels doorstep. The West Bank has essentially been locked down. The West Bank is on the complete Israeli control, military control. Bethlehem and many other cities are under complete lock down. People cant move in and out, which in some ways as many Palestinians say, this is in some ways the worst time the occupation. This is what normal life for many Palestinians is like all the time. Now obviously now its very extreme to be sure, but many Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza was saying to Israeli Jews, now you know what it often its like. Cant move from town to town. Cant send our kids to school. Cant live a daily life.

Thats not necessarily every single day. The occupation ebbs and flows in different areas depending on the particular political movement at the time, but what you see also within Israel itself where the recent election, the joint list, the third major political party received huge amounts of support mostly from Palestinians and Arabs, but also from a growing number of Israeli Jews. And its very clear that from the both major sides of Israeli Jewish politics, they have little to no interest in having any coalition with those, with that party. They express contempt and deep racism for that party, Netanyahu particularly. And I think it shows in some ways two things. One that the Palestinian Arab population in Israel proper and the West Bank and Gaza, who might not have no votes. And I think its important to say to viewers, just to be very clear, Israel is not a democracy if youre not Jewish.

There are literally 5 million Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza roughly, who cannot vote in any elections for the Israeli Knesset for a leader who will control their lives. So to say, Israel is a democracy has always been a lie. And its certainly a democracy if you are Jewish of sorts. And also I think its important for people to realize that the joint lists growing support shows a growing divide within Israeli society itself, where I think many Israeli Arabs and a growing number of Israeli Jews realized that a Zionist political movement, by definition cannot and will not bring democracy to all its citizens. It simply wants democracy for Jews only.

And although the joint list will not be in government, the joint list politically will have not huge amounts of power. Symbolically, its unbelievably powerful and theyll continue to grow as more and more people realize that Netanyahu although he could or even his main rival Benny Gantz is basically Netanyahu in drag. Theyre virtually exactly the same on the key issue of the occupation. Thats what really matters here, which is why the joint lists support and growing support. It is so important.

Greg Wilpert: I wonder though, based on what you just said, if perhaps this crackdown in light of the coronavirus might produce a silver lining in the sense that as you said, its awakening Israelis to the conditions of occupation. Obviously its not as serious as the occupation, but at least theyre getting some degree of taste of it and perhaps that might change their attitude towards it. What do you think?

Antony Loewenstein: If only that was true. Look, maybe, and I guess we should talk in three or six months to see, but as Gideon Levy, the great journalist for Arabs. The Israeli newspaper said in a column recently. Yes, Israeli Jews and now on the lockdown, but its nothing like what Palestinians go through. Israeli Jews and not being raided in their houses, theyre not being dragged from their homes, theyre not being shot dead in the streets for protesting. Yes, theyre not being allowed to protest, but theyre not being shot dead for protesting. So yes, Israeli Jews maybe have a tiny taste of what Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza goes through. But I think sadly, having lived in Jerusalem, East Jerusalem for many, many years, what you really see over time is a hardening of hearts. And what I mean by that is that there is little to no empathy by the majority of Israeli Jews towards what is happening down the road in the occupation.

Now Im not saying old Jews in Israel, Im saying the majority of Jews. And you know that because most of them dont talk about it. Dont write about it. Dont vote in any way that reflects that theyre upset about it. And the media, to its eternal shame only really reports on the West Bank and Gaza with a few notable exceptions in the context of a security threat. There are not stories generally about what life is actually like in the occupation down the road from Israel. So Id like to think that this would maybe make Israeli Jews more reflective of the kind of regime theyve created for Arabs on their doorstep and therefore be more sympathetic towards them. But the evidence so far for that is quite minimal. And I hope that changes, but I not that optimistic.

Greg Wilpert: Now, turning to the larger picture, both your book Disaster Capitalism and Naomi Kleins The Shock Doctrine, argue that disasters or shocks are unpopular policies that the government hopes to impose when people are in shock or facing disasters and cannot properly resist. Now do you think that Israel is perhaps the proverbial canary in the coal mine and that other countries may also start surveilling the population and shutting down political dissent all in the name of fighting the coronavirus?

Antony Loewenstein: Well, the short answer is yes. I feel that a great deal and one of the things that Im really worried about at the moment and something Im looking into is Israel has perfected the art of the ethno state. The ethno state being of course a Jewish state that dominates non Jews and to the use of technology and surveillance often through public but also private companies for decades. Theyve mastered from their perspective an ability to control millions of Palestinians. That technology and that ideology is now being exported globally. Think of what India wants to do in Kashmir, Sri Lanka in the Tamil areas in the North. China in parts of the weaker areas. And thats not all because of Israel to be sure, but Israel provides both an inspiration ideologically, but also the ease of technology and surveillance. And the fear that I have is that although the coronavirus will at some point taper down or minimize six months, three months, a year, we dont know. Soon, it wont be forever.

But the fear is that therell be an appeal by many governments to maintain either tight controls and the monitoring of civilians and citizens without reducing them. And Israel in some ways is the model of that because Israel has done it for decades and they get away with it. Now, yes that monitoring is principally of Palestinians. But as were seeing now, its inevitably turning to Israeli Jews as well. And lets be honest, after Edward Snowdens revelations in 2013. In the US there were protests and there were minor changes through Congress. Were there hundreds of thousands of people marching through the streets in the US opposing what was happening? No. Snowdens documents revealed clearly that the US had an apparatus, both Republican and Democrat, to monitor and surveil every single citizen. And yes, some people were upset about that and they protested. But in general, thats continued. And I would argue different and we dont even really know whats happening during the Trump administration in terms of that. Theres been not that much reporting or leaks about what Trump has been doing in terms of messily ramping up internal state surveillance.

So Im really concerned as someone whos written for a decade now about disaster capitalism, apart from the obvious examples of people trying to charge more for hand sanitizer and face mask, which is terrible and that should be condemned. But the bigger picture here is what this means longer term. The States that are very keen not just to make money from it, but this one real quick example. The NSO group, which is an Israeli surveillance company that was used by Saudi Arabia to monitor friends of Jamal Khashoggi recently, last couple of years. Its a surveillance company which is populated by former Israeli military. Theyve been announcing the last while technology to help so they say, fight the coronavirus. Now this technology may well be helpful. We dont know at this stage, but my point is that you have this really worrying blending of the surveillance state and surveillance companies with people who claim to be helping those in society.

And yes, we need to fight the coronavirus and stop it or at least massively arrest its increase. But Im really concerned that there are going to be a lot of private companies, private military companies, surveillance companies, technology companies, utilizing this opportunity to say to a state we can help keep out unwanted people. That could be high walls or borders or surveillance. And were seeing that in much of Europe now as well for that matter. So the fear is that many governments that are utilizing this technology, I call these Israelification almost of the world. And although theres push back against that in certain places, its not a given that itll happen. I think there needs to be a lot more discussion and push back against it because otherwise it becomes business as normal and that is not the society I think that most people want to live in.

Greg Wilpert: Well on that note, unfortunately, were going to have to leave it there. I was speaking to Antony Loewenstein journalist and author of the book Disaster Capitalism. Thanks again, Antony, for having joined us today.

Antony Loewenstein: Thanks for having me, Greg,

Greg Wilpert: And thank you for joining The Real News Network.

Go here to see the original:
Coronavirus Is The Shock, Dictatorship Is The Doctrine - The Real News Network