Conservative book censors and conspiracy theorists don’t even win in Boise The Nevada Independent – The Nevada Independent

Look, I was raised by Trekkies. I get it.

I understand what its like to follow a show religiously, to trace its ups and downs, and to debate endlessly with fans of other franchises over which franchise is better. I know what its like to dedicate ones time to arguing over whether the U.S.S. Enterprise could defeat an Imperial Star Destroyer (though I prefer Star Trek over Star Wars, not a chance Star Destroyers are simply too large). I know what its like to argue over subliminal, liminal and superliminal messages inserted into episodes by oft-harried writers. I know how much fun it can be to chew on plot inconsistencies or to debate the canonicity of various third-party sources.

At no point in my life, however, did I ever pretend I was doing politics by doing so. The same, regrettably, cant be said for the consumers of certain purveyors of conservative news commentary.

This is the only explanation I can give for why school board candidates the country over even in Washoe County are running on the same platform: Our nations schools need to be taken back from an ultra-left curriculum which teaches children various harmful theories (the label preceding each theory rotates depending on who the Big Bad is each week; the described content of each, however, is intentionally divorced from any recognizable epistemology). If you elect them, they promise to ban harmful books from our school libraries and fire if not prosecute anyone who disagrees.

Which schools specifically are teaching this? Why, our schools, of course all schools, whether theyre located within walking distance of the corner of Haight and Ashbury in San Francisco or the suburbs of southern Idaho, all share the same Marxist curriculum, library books and teachers. How do they know this? Well, they saw it on LibsofTikTok. Does that all sound very silly and ignorant to you? Then you might be a groomer.

To be blunt, this is all about as real as any piece of halfway immersive science fiction, which is a long winded way of saying its not real at all. There are, indeed, schools just as there are, indeed, recognizable bits of physics in the Star Trek universe. Past that, the connection between reality and fantasy is only as strong as the writers need it to be to advance each plot each plot and talking point being whatever is needed to keep viewers afraid enough to buy dodgy supplements, fake gold coins, and overpriced emergency survival supplies. Since each talking point is based on the news and a carefully curated collection of home videos instead of The Silmarillion or the Star Trek: The Next Generation Technical Manual, however, they feel real.

They are not, however, real enough to a large enough population to win general elections not even in comparatively conservative Boise.

Boise is both the capital of and largest city in Idaho, one of the most consistently conservative states in the country. Idahos voters are so conservative, in fact, that Donald Trump received a larger majority in Idaho in the last election than he received in Nevadas own Douglas County. Douglas County, for perspective, was the first, last, and thus far only constituency to elect Danny Tarkanian to something in a general election a decision they openly regretted because Danny and his wife were somehow too liberal (they refused to support some of the internet trolls running for statewide office under the Republican banner, in other words) for their sensibilities.

Now, Boise is admittedly a bit more liberal than the rest of the state, but its still no Democratic Party stronghold. If you flip Washoe Countys last election results on their head if, that is, you take the percentages President Biden (a bit over 50 percent) and Donald Trump (a bit over 46 percent) each received and give them to the opposing candidate youd end up with the most recent presidential election results in Boises home county, Ada (Boise, confusingly enough, is not located in considerably more conservative Boise County).

Put briefly, Boise may not be as ruby red as the rest of the Gem State, but its still more supportive than not of Republican candidates and causes and certainly more supportive of Republicans than any county of similar population in Nevada.

Unsurprisingly, then, incumbent politicians in Boise prefer to position themselves on the conservative side, culturally and politically speaking. Thats perhaps why, when Steve Schmidt an incumbent member of the Boise School Board received an endorsement from the Idaho Liberty Dogs, a hardline conservative group that previously gained notoriety by claiming libraries in neighboring Meridian were distributing smut-filled pornography, he opted first for nuance over outright denunciation.

Depending upon your personal beliefs, that (endorsement) may give you cause for concern or comfort, Schmidt wrote in a since-deleted Facebook post. I am not a member of their group and I dont represent them.

That, even in comparatively conservative Boise even for a widely respected incumbent who received the support of past superintendents and trustees, as well as the local teachers union wasnt anywhere near strong enough. Local leaders criticized both the endorsement and Schmidts reaction. The Idaho Liberty Dogs, demonstrating their character, responded by comparing an opposing rabbi to Hitler and claiming he supports groups that indoctrinate and groom our children. All of that led the Idaho Statesman to endorse his opponent: Shiva Rajbhandari, an 18-year-old Boise High student who pledged to take a gap year before college to complete his term if the rest of the school board couldnt find a suitable student to replace him after he graduates.

On September 7th, Boises comparatively conservative voters got their chance to weigh in.

The result? 56 percent of the voters in that election decided theyd rather have an 18-year-old high school student who might leave the position in a year or two than a previously respected incumbent who didnt have the sense or the spine to clearly distance himself from a bunch of rabid conservative propaganda junkies.

To be clear, Steve Schmidt didnt run as someone who would ban books or fight some esoteric sociological theory prepended with Marxist in the title for narrative effect. He ran as an establishment conservative the sort Nevada used to produce on the regular. He was, by many accounts, an excellent and professional school board member.

He was, in other words, a better candidate for school board than any of the candidates challenging the incumbents on Washoe Countys ballots.

But he still wasnt good enough. When given an opportunity to distance himself from a pack of overzealous fans living in political fantasy worlds, he refused to channel his inner William Shatner and tell them to get a life and that was all it took to lose him the election in Boise.

Not Reno. Not Las Vegas. Not San Francisco. Refusing to stand up against conservative medias most fervent, overzealous fans lost Schmidt the election in Boise.

It certainly must not have helped Schmidts cause that the rest of Idaho is ruby red enough for those same fans to seize political control from time to time. Nampa, one of Boises suburbs, recently banned 22 books from their schools libraries because they allegedly contained pornography, including Margaret Atwoods The Handmaids Tale. Meanwhile, the Idaho House (the states lowest legislative chamber in more ways than one) tried to pass a law House Bill 666, amusingly enough that would criminally charge librarians if a minor checked out a book that was considered harmful by that august body; that bill ultimately died in the state senate.

Additionally, since Idaho is so conservative, its also paradoxically a punching bag by the very same conservative media some of its residents love so much. After all, if even Idaho is teaching students porn literacy (its not, but dont let that get in the way of a good plotline), surely every other school in the country including the one in your neighborhood must be so much worse!

The worst part, if youre a politician trying to build a constituency, is there frankly arent that many fans. Only three million or so people watch Tucker Carlson if you add up everyone in the country who watches cable news commentary at the same time, you reach a high water mark of around six million viewers out of a nation of over 330 million. Thats not even 2 percent of the population. Speaking as a now-former longtime member of the Libertarian Party, I know a thing or two about trying to win elections with only 1-2 percent of the electorate it doesnt work, especially when that 1-2 percent is more interested in demonstrating loyalty to their fellow fans than they are in getting outside, touching grass, and maybe talking to a neighbor or two.

Boises voters saw firsthand what happens when you let the fans take over the show. Its bad enough when it happens to a beloved media franchise (looking at you, The Rise of Skywalker). Its considerably worse when it leads to school board members bullying children because of their gender identity, books getting removed from school libraries, and politicians leading witch hunts against Marxist indoctrination from the capitol grounds because the fans favorite talking heads on television or social media showed them a 30-second viral video which proves there are luxury gay space communists infiltrating every branch of Idahos Idahos! government.

So they voted accordingly.

The rest of us, meanwhile, just wish these dorks who keep bringing guns to school board meetings, threatening to ban books, and driving our existing board members towards a mental health crisis would just go home and leave the families of Washoe County alone. Our schools have enough problems without candidates role playing as fourteenth-level Freedom Warriors fighting the Dark Lord of Marxism on the taxpayers dime.

David Colborne ran for office twice and served on the executive committees for his state and county Libertarian Party chapters. He is now an IT manager, a registered nonpartisan voter, the father of two sons, and a weekly opinion columnist for The Nevada Independent. You can follow him on Twitter @DavidColborne or email him at [emailprotected].

Conservative book censors and conspiracy theorists dont even win in Boise

Look, I was raised by Trekkies. I get it.

I understand what its like to follow a show religiously, to trace its ups and downs, and to debate endlessly with fans of other franchises over which franchise is better. I know what its like to dedicate ones time to arguing over whether the U.S.S. Enterprise could defeat an Imperial Star Destroyer (though I prefer Star Trek over Star Wars, not a chance Star Destroyers are simply too large). I know what its like to argue over subliminal, liminal and superliminal messages inserted into episodes by oft-harried writers. I know how much fun it can be to chew on plot inconsistencies or to debate the canonicity of various third-party sources.

At no point in my life, however, did I ever pretend I was doing politics by doing so. The same, regrettably, cant be said for the consumers of certain purveyors of conservative news commentary.

This is the only explanation I can give for why school board candidates the country over even in Washoe County are running on the same platform: Our nations schools need to be taken back from an ultra-left curriculum which teaches children various harmful theories (the label preceding each theory rotates depending on who the Big Bad is each week; the described content of each, however, is intentionally divorced from any recognizable epistemology). If you elect them, they promise to ban harmful books from our school libraries and fire if not prosecute anyone who disagrees.

Which schools specifically are teaching this? Why, our schools, of course all schools, whether theyre located within walking distance of the corner of Haight and Ashbury in San Francisco or the suburbs of southern Idaho, all share the same Marxist curriculum, library books and teachers. How do they know this? Well, they saw it on LibsofTikTok. Does that all sound very silly and ignorant to you? Then you might be a groomer.

To be blunt, this is all about as real as any piece of halfway immersive science fiction, which is a long winded way of saying its not real at all. There are, indeed, schools just as there are, indeed, recognizable bits of physics in the Star Trek universe. Past that, the connection between reality and fantasy is only as strong as the writers need it to be to advance each plot each plot and talking point being whatever is needed to keep viewers afraid enough to buy dodgy supplements, fake gold coins, and overpriced emergency survival supplies. Since each talking point is based on the news and a carefully curated collection of home videos instead of The Silmarillion or the Star Trek: The Next Generation Technical Manual, however, they feel real.

They are not, however, real enough to a large enough population to win general elections not even in comparatively conservative Boise.

Boise is both the capital of and largest city in Idaho, one of the most consistently conservative states in the country. Idahos voters are so conservative, in fact, that Donald Trump received a larger majority in Idaho in the last election than he received in Nevadas own Douglas County. Douglas County, for perspective, was the first, last, and thus far only constituency to elect Danny Tarkanian to something in a general election a decision they openly regretted because Danny and his wife were somehow too liberal (they refused to support some of the internet trolls running for statewide office under the Republican banner, in other words) for their sensibilities.

Now, Boise is admittedly a bit more liberal than the rest of the state, but its still no Democratic Party stronghold. If you flip Washoe Countys last election results on their head if, that is, you take the percentages President Biden (a bit over 50 percent) and Donald Trump (a bit over 46 percent) each received and give them to the opposing candidate youd end up with the most recent presidential election results in Boises home county, Ada (Boise, confusingly enough, is not located in considerably more conservative Boise County).

Put briefly, Boise may not be as ruby red as the rest of the Gem State, but its still more supportive than not of Republican candidates and causes and certainly more supportive of Republicans than any county of similar population in Nevada.

Unsurprisingly, then, incumbent politicians in Boise prefer to position themselves on the conservative side, culturally and politically speaking. Thats perhaps why, when Steve Schmidt an incumbent member of the Boise School Board received an endorsement from the Idaho Liberty Dogs, a hardline conservative group that previously gained notoriety by claiming libraries in neighboring Meridian were distributing smut-filled pornography, he opted first for nuance over outright denunciation.

Depending upon your personal beliefs, that (endorsement) may give you cause for concern or comfort, Schmidt wrote in a since-deleted Facebook post. I am not a member of their group and I dont represent them.

That, even in comparatively conservative Boise even for a widely respected incumbent who received the support of past superintendents and trustees, as well as the local teachers union wasnt anywhere near strong enough. Local leaders criticized both the endorsement and Schmidts reaction. The Idaho Liberty Dogs, demonstrating their character, responded by comparing an opposing rabbi to Hitler and claiming he supports groups that indoctrinate and groom our children. All of that led the Idaho Statesman to endorse his opponent: Shiva Rajbhandari, an 18-year-old Boise High student who pledged to take a gap year before college to complete his term if the rest of the school board couldnt find a suitable student to replace him after he graduates.

On September 7th, Boises comparatively conservative voters got their chance to weigh in.

The result? 56 percent of the voters in that election decided theyd rather have an 18-year-old high school student who might leave the position in a year or two than a previously respected incumbent who didnt have the sense or the spine to clearly distance himself from a bunch of rabid conservative propaganda junkies.

To be clear, Steve Schmidt didnt run as someone who would ban books or fight some esoteric sociological theory prepended with Marxist in the title for narrative effect. He ran as an establishment conservative the sort Nevada used to produce on the regular. He was, by many accounts, an excellent and professional school board member.

He was, in other words, a better candidate for school board than any of the candidates challenging the incumbents on Washoe Countys ballots.

But he still wasnt good enough. When given an opportunity to distance himself from a pack of overzealous fans living in political fantasy worlds, he refused to channel his inner William Shatner and tell them to get a life and that was all it took to lose him the election in Boise.

Not Reno. Not Las Vegas. Not San Francisco. Refusing to stand up against conservative medias most fervent, overzealous fans lost Schmidt the election in Boise.

It certainly must not have helped Schmidts cause that the rest of Idaho is ruby red enough for those same fans to seize political control from time to time. Nampa, one of Boises suburbs, recently banned 22 books from their schools libraries because they allegedly contained pornography, including Margaret Atwoods The Handmaids Tale. Meanwhile, the Idaho House (the states lowest legislative chamber in more ways than one) tried to pass a law House Bill 666, amusingly enough that would criminally charge librarians if a minor checked out a book that was considered harmful by that august body; that bill ultimately died in the state senate.

Additionally, since Idaho is so conservative, its also paradoxically a punching bag by the very same conservative media some of its residents love so much. After all, if even Idaho is teaching students porn literacy (its not, but dont let that get in the way of a good plotline), surely every other school in the country including the one in your neighborhood must be so much worse!

The worst part, if youre a politician trying to build a constituency, is there frankly arent that many fans. Only three million or so people watch Tucker Carlson if you add up everyone in the country who watches cable news commentary at the same time, you reach a high water mark of around six million viewers out of a nation of over 330 million. Thats not even 2 percent of the population. Speaking as a now-former longtime member of the Libertarian Party, I know a thing or two about trying to win elections with only 1-2 percent of the electorate it doesnt work, especially when that 1-2 percent is more interested in demonstrating loyalty to their fellow fans than they are in getting outside, touching grass, and maybe talking to a neighbor or two.

Boises voters saw firsthand what happens when you let the fans take over the show. Its bad enough when it happens to a beloved media franchise (looking at you, The Rise of Skywalker). Its considerably worse when it leads to school board members bullying children because of their gender identity, books getting removed from school libraries, and politicians leading witch hunts against Marxist indoctrination from the capitol grounds because the fans favorite talking heads on television or social media showed them a 30-second viral video which proves there are luxury gay space communists infiltrating every branch of Idahos Idahos! government.

So they voted accordingly.

The rest of us, meanwhile, just wish these dorks who keep bringing guns to school board meetings, threatening to ban books, and driving our existing board members towards a mental health crisis would just go home and leave the families of Washoe County alone. Our schools have enough problems without candidates role playing as fourteenth-level Freedom Warriors fighting the Dark Lord of Marxism on the taxpayers dime.

David Colborne ran for office twice and served on the executive committees for his state and county Libertarian Party chapters. He is now an IT manager, a registered nonpartisan voter, the father of two sons, and a weekly opinion columnist for The Nevada Independent. You can follow him on Twitter @DavidColborne or email him at [emailprotected].

See more here:

Conservative book censors and conspiracy theorists don't even win in Boise The Nevada Independent - The Nevada Independent

Open source provides the building blocks for future technology innovation – Bizcommunity.com

Open source is by no means a new technology, but it has matured over the past 30-plus years and with the latest wave of digital transformation, its role has become increasingly prominent. In the everyday business sense, it is still a cost-effective option for operating systems, databases, and analytical tools. However, where the nature and benefits of open source are truly being realised is in the artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning spaces.

Sumit Sharma, enterprise architect and head of advisory services at In2IT | image supplied

The open, community-driven, and collaborative environment created by open source is the perfect ground for these new-age initiatives, fostering innovation while ensuring that there is no single entity driving the agenda around the technology that will shape our future.

Open-source solutions remain a viable option for organisations looking to reduce capital and operational expenses and work within increasingly tight budget constraints. The Covid economy has driven more businesses than before to consider these types of solutions.

The speed of innovation is also one of the appeals of open source, and the platform lends itself well to projects that require high levels of customisation. However, while the barrier to entry for proprietary software and systems is financial capital, there remains a barrier to entry around open source in the form of human capital.

While licensing costs are reduced and the source code is open so it can more easily be tailored and customised, open-source solutions are only free to a certain extent, and there are certain trade-offs. The skills required to develop and maintain software and systems using open source are not something that every business has or can afford to keep in-house.

For this reason, although the energy and technology sectors in Southern Africa are adopting open source, it is not the preferred solution in this region, or up into Africa, due to the well-known skills shortage and still-maturing market. There remains a lot of room for growth.

The high barrier to entry in terms of skills and knowledge is one of the main detractors for shifting to open-source solutions, especially in the South African context and through Africa in general. The decision of whether or not open source is a viable platform for any business depends on the needs and personality of the organisation.

A conservative organisation that appreciates the presence of the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) is not well suited to open source, nor is an enterprise that is looking to outsource the majority of the IT function. Your IT partner can assist with ensuring the correct decision is made around the right business solutions.

However, open source is providing the building blocks for future technology innovation. It is seeing a lot of development, major proprietary vendors are acquiring open source houses, and new technologies including AI, machine learning and blockchain innovations are being driven by open source.

The futuristic concept of Artificial General Intelligence or AGI is something that can only come from the collaborative environment of open source, as is the evolution of natural language processing to natural language understanding.

Open source is driving the future of technology. It is therefore an option that is worth exploring for many businesses. To really exploit the benefits, skills and experience in the code are critical, and where businesses cannot maintain these in-house, the right IT partner is the key. A specialised IT partner can also provide maintenance and support to ensure solutions continue to deliver as required.

Originally posted here:

Open source provides the building blocks for future technology innovation - Bizcommunity.com

Why You Need to Empower Your Developers – DevOps.com

In recent years, the demand for software developers worldwide has increased. However, in 2020, when the pandemic hit, many CIOs pulled back considerably on their IT spending. This trend has quickly reversed. In 2022, worldwide IT spending is expected to reach $4.4 trillion. Additionally, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, employment in software development is projected to rise by 22%.

Although organizations across several industries are increasing investment into IT, the supply of technology talent has struggled to keep pace. With the demand for creativity, developers understand their importance and can better dictate their terms including higher salary compensation and enhanced benefits. Organizations that dont meet these expectations risk losing coveted talent.

Remote work continues to be a top priority for many developers, along with great company culture. To create a positive work environment for developers, business leaders must offer a culture that makes tech employees feel a sense of belonging and purpose while working remotely. Many developers also want opportunities for growth and the ability to provide agile and innovative toolsets to help increase productivity and collaboration.

Lets discuss some of the ways modern organizations can still empower developers and how business leaders can build a workplace culture that attracts some of the best developers in the business.

Open source usage has increased significantly in the workplace and continues to be a formative resource for developers. The open source community provides many new technologies that developers seek and even require in order to work at the top of their abilities. For example, open source provides some of the most popular programming languages available, including Javascript, C+++, and Python. The presence of multiple languages makes it easier for developers to write code and produce high-quality work efficiently.

Open source communities help developers build their skills and allow them to customize their technology stacks, as a result allowing them to optimize their productivity and learn different techniques from other open source projects. There is little to no debate that open source is critical to the tech industry and developers. Embracing open source can increase satisfaction and create a better workforce overall.

In the past, office perks such as free food and collaborative social areas were used to attract new employees and retain current employees. However, in the remote work world, these can no longer remain a priority. Instead, business leaders should prioritize the holistic professional experience that their organization provides its employees. For developers, in particular, building this experience falls on CIOs and IT leaders to ensure they are providing workplace satisfaction, modern technology and flexible processes. To do so, they need to focus on tools that promote productivity and communication.

Most employees are familiar with the workflow software and collaboration tools that many workplaces provide. Without these offerings, remote workers would feel confused by their workload at the worst and adrift from their co-workers at best. For developers, however, these general collaboration tools wont cut it, as they are poorly suited for engineering workflows. General collaborative software doesnt offer the ability for deep customization, nor do they adapt natively to deploy on-prem or in the private cloud. As a result, developers have little to no use for these tools.

And that lacking sense of utility makes a crucial difference. Developer burnout is at an all-time high and inefficient workflows can keep teams from performing at their best. Or, worse, it can frustrate individual employees, leading to lower retention rates and less attractive offerings for prospective employees. Business leaders looking to offer developers an improved working environment should provide a more integrated, developer-oriented tech stack.

While the market has changed, for many developers, fragmented tools remain a top productivity challenge. Investing in modern tools and programming languages while also removing tech complexities are the keys to improving productivity and simultaneously creating a better developer experience. This is why organizations must implement open source applications so developers can have complete visibility and control over the entire stack.

With tool fragmentation causing a number of distractions, developers can become frustrated and spend time responding to every individual incident. This poses the threat of a developer losing their love of the work. By doing away with fragmentation from old technology and selecting relevant solutions, business leaders allow developers to do what they do best: Develop software.

When organizational leaders empower their developers, they in turn find their product teams are more productive and feel more tied to the organization as well as their customers and each other. Thus, what is best for developers is best for the organization at large.

Excerpt from:

Why You Need to Empower Your Developers - DevOps.com

Everything You Need to Know About Version Control – Spiceworks News and Insights

Version control is a system that tracks the progress of code across the software development lifecycle and its multiple iterations which maintains a record of every change complete with authorship, timestamp, and other details and also aids in managing change. This article details how version control in DevOps works, the best tools, and its various advantages.

Version control is defined as a system that tracks the progress of code across the software development lifecycle and its multiple iterations which maintains a record of every change complete with authorship, timestamp, and other details and also aids in managing change.

The process of monitoring and managing changes to software code is known as version control, also sometimes referred to as revision control or source control systems. Software technologies called version control systems assist software development teams in tracking changes to source code over time.

Version control systems enable software teams to operate more swiftly and intelligently as development environments have increased. They are beneficial for DevOps teams because they will allow them to speed up successful deployments and reduce development time.

Version control pinpoints the trouble spots when developers and DevOps teams work concurrently and produce incompatible changes so that team members can compare differences or quickly determine who committed the problematic code by looking at the revision history. Before moving on with a project, a software team can use version control systems to resolve a problem.

Software teams can understand the evolution of a solution by examining prior versions through code reviews. Every alteration to the code is recorded by version control software in a particular type of database. If an error is made, developers can go back in time and review prior iterations of the code to remedy the mistake while minimizing disturbance for all team members.

Collaboration among employees, keeping several iterations of information created, and data backup are just a few issues that any global organization may encounter. For a business to succeed, developers must overcome each of these issues. A version control system is then necessary for this situation.

The first version control system was mainframe-based, and each programmer used a terminal to connect to the network. The first server-based, or centralized, version control systems that utilized a single, shared repository were introduced on UNIX systems; later, these systems were made accessible on MS-DOS and Windows.

Versions can be recognized by labels or tags, and baselines can be used to mark approved versions or versions that are particularly important. Versions that have been checked out can be used as a branching point for code from the main trunk by various teams or individuals. The first version to check in will always win when versions are checked out and checked in.

Some systems may offer version merging if other versions are checked out so that one can upload new modifications to the central repository. Branching is a distinct approach to version control where development programs are duplicated for parallel versions of development while keeping the original and working on the branch or making separate modifications to each.

Each copy is called a branch, and the original program from where it was derived is known as the trunk, the baseline, the mainline, or the master. Client-server architecture is the standard model for version control. Another technique is distributed version control, where all copies are kept in a codebase repository, and updates are made by sharing patches or modifications across peers. Version control allows teams to work together, accelerate development, settle issues, and organize code in one place.

See More: What Is Jenkins? Working, Uses, Pipelines, and Features

Globally, version control systems comprise a multi-billion-dollar industry, poised to reach $716.1 million by 2023 (as per MarketsAndMarkets research). In this massive market, 13 tools stand out. They are:

Software that carries out software version control, configuration management, and change management tasks is known as Configuration Management Version Control (CMVC). This system was client-server based, with servers for several Unix flavors and command-line and graphical clients for many platforms. Even after renaming a file, it can track file history. This is because developers may alter the database filename and the filename on the disk was a number. Delegating power is possible thanks to its decentralized administration.

Git is among the most powerful version control programs now on the market. The creator of Linux, Linus Torvalds, created the distributed version control system known as Git. Its memory footprint is minimal and can follow changes in any file. When you add this to its extensive feature set, you get a full-featured version control system that can handle any project. Due to its simple workflow, it is employed by Google, Facebook, and Microsoft.

A version control system called Apache Subversion, which is free and open-source, enables programmers to manage both the most recent and previous iterations of crucial files. It can track modifications to source code, web pages, and documentation for large-scale projects. Subversions main features are workflow management, user access limits, and cheap local branching. Both commercial products and individual projects can be managed using Subversion, a centralized system with many powerful features. It is one of Apaches many open-source solutions, like Apache Cassandra.

You can utilize all Azure DevOps services or just the ones you require to improve your current workflow. A group of software development technologies you can use in conjunction is Azure DevOps Server, formerly Team Foundation Server (TFS). In addition to access controls and permissions, bug tracking, build automation, change management, collaboration, continuous integration, and version control are all elements of the source code management program known as Azure DevOps Server.

One of the first version control systems developed, CVS is a well-known tool for open-source and commercial developers. You can use it to check in and out the code you intend to work on. Teams can integrate their code modifications and add distinctive features to the project. CVS uses delta compression to effectively compress version differences and a client-server architecture to manage change data. In larger projects, it saves a lot of disk space.

See More: What Is Serverless? Definition, Architecture, Examples, and Applications

Developers and businesses adore Mercurial for its search capabilities, backup system, data import and export, project tracking and management, and data migration tool. The free source control management program Mercurial supports all popular operating systems. It is a distributed versioning solution and can easily manage projects of any size. Through extensions, programmers can quickly expand the built-in functionality. For software engineers, source revisioning is made simpler by its user-friendly and intuitive interface.

Software development teams may collaborate and keep track of all code changes using GitHub. You can keep track of code modifications, go back in time to correct mistakes, and collaborate with other team members. The most reliable, secure, and scalable developer platform in the world is GitHub. You receive the best resources and services to assist you in creating the most cutting-edge communities possible. The most reliable, secure, and scalable developer platform in the world is GitHub.

Private Git repositories are hosted by the managed version control system AWS CodeCommit. It smoothly integrates with other Amazon Web Services (AWS) products, and the code is hosted in secure AWS settings. Therefore, its a suitable fit for AWSs current users. Access to various helpful plugins from AWS partners is also made available through AWS integration, aiding in program development. You dont have to worry about maintaining or scaling your source control system when you use CodeCommit.

As a component of the Atlassian software family, Bitbucket can be connected with other Atlassian products like HipChat, Jira, and Bamboo. Some of Bitbuckets key features are code branches, in-line comments and debate, and pull requests. The companys data center, a local server, or the cloud can all be used for its deployment. With Bitbucket, you can freely connect with up to five people. This is advantageous because you can use the platform without spending any money.

RhodeCode is a platform for managing public repositories. RhodeCode offers a contemporary platform with unified security and tools for any version control system, in contrast to old-fashioned source code management systems or Git-only tools.

The platform is designed for behind-the-firewall enterprise systems that require high levels of security, sophisticated user management, and standard authentication. RhodeCode has a convenient installer, it may be used as a standalone hosted program on your server, and its Community Edition is unrestrictedly free.

CA Panvalet establishes and maintains a control library of source programs, centralizes the storage of the source, and offers quick access for maintenance, control, and protection against loss, theft, and other perils. Like Microsoft Visual SourceSafe for personal computers, Panvalet is a closed-source, proprietary system for controlling and versioning source code. Users check out files to edit and then check them back into the repository using a client-server architecture.

It offers the sole source of accuracy for all development. The company behind it is Perforce Software Inc. It is a networked client-server revision control tool. It supports several operating systems, including OS X, Windows, and Unix-like platforms. This tool is primarily used in large-scale development setups. Through the tracking and management of changes to source code and other data, it streamlines the development of complicated products. Your configuration changes are branched and merged using the Streams feature.

GNU Bazaar (formerly Bazaar-NG Canonical) is a command-line utility by the company that created Ubuntu, and it is a distributed and client-server revision control system. Numerous contemporary projects use it, including MySQL, Ubuntu, Debian, the Linux Foundation, and Debian. GNU Bazaar is truly cross-platform, running on every version of Linux, Windows, and OS X. High storage efficiency, offline mode support, and external plugin support are some of GNU Bazaars finest qualities. Additionally, it enables a wide range of development workflows.

Using a version control system, one can obtain the following benefits:

It goes without saying that team members should work simultaneously, but even individuals working alone can profit from being able to focus on separate streams of change. By designating a branch in VCS tools, developers and DevOps engineers can keep several streams of work separate while still having the option to merge them back together to ensure that their changes dont conflict.

Many software development teams use the branching strategy for every feature, every release, or both. Teams have various workflow options to select from when deciding how to use the branching and merging features in a VCS.

The development of any source code is continuous in the modern world. There are always more features to be added, more people to target, and more applications to create. When working on a software project, teams frequently have various main project clones to build new features, test them, and ensure they work before uploading this new feature to the main project. Due to the ability to develop several sections of the code concurrently, this could save time.

The team tasked with the project consistently generates new source codes and makes changes to the already existing code. These modifications are kept on file for future use and can be consulted if necessary to determine the true source of a given issue. If you have a record of the changes made in a particular code file, you and new contributors may find it easier to comprehend how a specific code section came to be. This is vital for working efficiently with historical code and allowing developers to predict future work with accuracy.

This refers to every modification made over time by numerous people. File addition, deletion, and content modifications are all examples of changes. The ease with which various VCS programs handle file renaming and movement vary. You should also include the author, the date, and written comments outlining the rationale behind each change in this history.

The ability to go back to earlier iterations allows for the root cause study of faults, which is essential when fixing issues with software that is more than a few years old. Nearly everything can be regarded as an earlier version of the software if it is still being developed.

Since pushing and pulling cannot be done using a distributed version control system without an internet connection, most development can be done on the go, away from home, or in an office. Contributors will make changes to the repository and can view the running history on their hard drives.

With more flexibility, the team can resolve bugs with a single change-set, increasing developers productivity. Developers can do routine development tasks quickly with a local copy. With a DVCS, developers can avoid waiting on a server to do everyday activities, which can impede delivery and be inconvenient.

See More: Top 10 DevOps Automation Tools in 2021

Whenever a contributor copies a repository using a version control system, they are essentially making a backup of the repositorys most recent version, which is probably its most significant advantage. We can protect the data from loss in the event of a server failure by having numerous backups on various workstations.

Unlike a centralized version control system, a distributed version control system does not rely on a single backup, increasing the reliability of development. Although its a widespread fallacy, having numerous copies wont take up much space on your hard drive because most development involves plain text files and most systems compress data.

An open line of communication between coworkers and teams results from version control because sharing code and being able to track past work results in transparency and consistency. It makes it possible for the different team members to coordinate workflow more straightforwardly. There are repercussions from this better communication.

Team members can operate more productively as a result of effective workflow coordination. They can more easily manage changes and work in harmony and rhythm. This presents the many team members as a single entity that collaborates to achieve a particular objective.

Management can get a thorough picture of how the project is doing thanks to version control. They know who is responsible for the modifications, what they are intended to accomplish when they are completed, and how the changes will affect the documents long-term objective. It helps management spot persistent issues that particular team members could bring on.

The accurate change tracking provided by version control is a great way to get your records, files, datasets, and/or documents ready for compliance. To manage risk successfully, keeping a complete audit trail is essential. Regulatory compliance must permeate every aspect of a project. It requires identifying team members who had access to the database and accepting accountability for any changes.

The seamless progress of the project is ensured by version management. Teams can collaborate to simplify complex processes, enabling increased automation and consistency and progressive implementation of updated versions of these complex procedures. The updated versions allow programmers to revert to a previous version when errors are found. Testing is simpler if you go back to an earlier version because bugs are caught sooner and with less user impact.

Having many outdated versions of the same document can be prevented with version management. Errors brought on by information displayed inconsistently across different papers will therefore be diminished. One should convert absolute versions of documents to a read-only state after the evaluation is complete. It will restrict the possible modifications and leave little possibility for mistakes in the future.

See More: DevOps vs. Agile Methodology: Key Differences and Similarities

Version control systems are a vital component of modern-day software development. It helps maintain a reliable source code repository and ensures accountability no matter who works on the code. It also makes finding and addressing bottlenecks easier by simplifying the root cause analysis process. Ultimately, version control enables a single pane of glass for collaborative and iterative application development in short release cycles.

Did this article tell you all you needed to know about version control? Tell us on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn. Wed love to hear from you!

Read this article:

Everything You Need to Know About Version Control - Spiceworks News and Insights

Bitcoin analysts give 3 reasons why BTC price below $20K may be a ‘bear trap’ – Cointelegraph

Bitcoin (BTC) recovered above the $19,000 mark on Sept. 20, a day after falling to its lowest level in three months.

On the daily chart, the BTC price rose from $18,255 to $19,650. This 7.5% price rebound mirrored similar rebound moves witnessed in the stock market, suggesting that investors have been coming to terms with another significant rate hike by the Federal Reserve expected on Sept. 2021.

However, opinions differ on the longevity of Bitcoin's rebound. Independent market analyst Jonny Moe stressed that BTC's ongoing price action is similar to its sideways consolidation moves at the beginning of this year.

In other words, Bitcoin's current price rebounds around the $20,000 mark do not make a long-term bull case.

Rudy Takala, former Fox News executive and opinion editor at Cointelegraph, also warns crypto traders to prepare for more "dark times" due to worsening economic conditions globally.

On the other hand, some analysts believe Bitcoin is staring at a strong bullish reversal in the times ahead. Let's take a closer look at the three optimistic market outlooks.

Bitcoin's Sept. 20 candlestick is a bullish hammer, which suggests weakening downside momentum, according to pseudonymous analyst Trader Tardigrade.

A bullish hammer candlestick forms when the asset drops significantly lower from its opening value but recovers to close near the same level. Traders see the hammer as a sign of bearish rejection, given its history of preceding market bottoms.

Trader Tardigrade applies the same theory to Bitcoin's recovery move on Sept. 20, noting that its bullish hammer may usher in a reversal.

Another technical signal that anticipates Bitcoin to rebound sharply is the Pi-Cycle bottom.

Specifically, the open-source indicator tracks twolong-term simple moving averages (SMAs): the 471-day SMA and the 150-day EMA. History shows that Bitcoin price bottoms out for the market cycle when the 150-day SMA crossed below the 471-day SMA.

Meanwhile, the price heads for a strong bullish reversal in the days leading up to and after the 150-day SMA closes above the 471-day SMA. Pseudonymous analyst, Titan of Crypto, highlighted that Bitcoin is eyeing a 150-471 SMA bullish crossover sometime by 2023.

"1st cross occurred in July," he noted, adding:

Aurelien Ohayon, the CEO of investment strategy firm XOR Strategy, anticipates Bitcoin to reach $45,000 by early 2023, arguing that BTC price has been following the popular Wyckoff Cycle pattern.

Related:FED sledgehammer will further batter BTC, ETH prices Bloomberg analyst

A Wyckoff Cycle has four phases:accumulation, markup, distribution and markdown. After the markdown phase, the cycle repeats with the accumulation phase, which, as Ohayon points out, is the case with Bitcoin's ongoing price rebound.

"Bitcoin is entering the Final Bullish Phase of the Wyckoff Cycle," the analyst concludes.

The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph.com. Every investment and trading move involves risk, you should conduct your own research when making a decision.

Read the original post:
Bitcoin analysts give 3 reasons why BTC price below $20K may be a 'bear trap' - Cointelegraph

Turning point for the crypto community? Where bitcoin goes from here – CNBC

It's been a strenuous year for the crypto business. After hitting a high of more than $68,000 in November 2021, bitcoin has plunged to hover around $20,000.

But for long-term ETF investors, some experts advise to take crypto's comedown in stride.

"If you're going to do this right, then what's been happening in the past nine months is totally irrelevant," Ric Edelman, founder of Edelman Financial Services, told Bob Pisani on CNBC's "ETF Edge" on Monday.

"If you're investing for the next five to 10 years, this is just an ordinary blip in the marketplace, and you ignore it," he added.

But with bitcoin coming off a nearly two-year low, the short-term temperaments are being met with a mix of positive and negative factors that are guiding where the crypto community goes from here.

"It's a really dynamic moment in the market," Matt Hougan, CIO of Bitwise Asset Management, told Pisani on Monday.

A massive technical upgrade in ethereum is a constructive force for the future of the world's second-largest blockchain, Hougan said. A wave of institutional investors coming into the market, and an influx of venture capital activity are also forward-looking indicators for crypto's future.

On the flipside, regulatory pressures from the Federal Reserve and the Securities and Exchange Commission are working against it.

"That's creating this volatile market where crypto is going up and down and can't quite figure out which way to go," Hougan said. "And I think we're probably stuck there, at least through September."

Edelman explained that for institutional investors to engage with Wall Street firms, endowments and pension funds, regulatory and legislative rules need to be in place.

"The adults in the room recognize that regulation is a good thing," Edelman said. "Right now, we have 1% engaging in crypto. You're not going to get the other 99% until they have clarity on what the rules of the road are.

"We're seeing new rules coming out from the Treasury, IRS, FINRA and from the Fed," he said. "And from the SEC and CFTC. We've got over 50 bills in Congress right now. And all of this is very healthy."

SEC Chair Gary Gensler has said the agency should have a major enforcement role in crypto, particularly for tokens. In a speech this month, Gensler sounded a warning signal to organizations he believes are violating existing securities laws, asking staff to possibly "fine-tune compliance for crypto security tokens and intermediaries."

"I think there was a pretty direct threat against crypto trading venues large-scale entities like Coinbase," Hougan said. "They're clearly on his horizon."

In July, shares of the crypto firm tumbled after it was announced that it was facing an SEC probe into whether the platform offered unregistered securities.

"I'm happy to say it again and again: we are confident that our rigorous diligence process a process the SEC has already reviewed keeps securities off our platform," said Coinbase's chief legal officer Paul Grewalon Twitter.

Proposals for more SEC oversight of the crypto community are likely to be met with hostility from the community itself, although the agency has already taken steps to enforce its regulatory agenda.

In February, the SEC charged BlockFi Lending with failing to register the offer and sale of its retail crypto lending product. The firm agreed to settle the charges, paying a $50 million penalty and ceasing unregistered offers and sales of the lending product.

"A year from now, the large trading venues will be in the process of registering with the SEC," Hougan said. "I think individual tokens, it's a much longer term."

Although the speculative assets have a challenging path forward, Edelman said the number of people who own cryptocurrencies continues to be a steadily rising figure.

"What's interesting is that, despite the fact that [Coinbase is] down 70% from its high, the number of people who own it is unchanged," he said. "Which means that those who wanted are not fazed by this."

Beyond the crypto community, rates of adoption from large investment firms demonstrate that digital currencies are being embraced by Wall Street, Hougan said.

"Blackrock and Schwab coming in reinforces to everyday investor that bitcoin is not going away," Hougan said. "I think that's now been settled. It's now how big is that future."

Original post:
Turning point for the crypto community? Where bitcoin goes from here - CNBC

Ethereum, Bitcoin Slide Further Through The Weekend – Decrypt

The sugar high of the Ethereum merge on Thursday led into a dour weekend of red for both the newly miner-free ETH and top crypto Bitcoin.

Ethereum is down from its pre-merge perch of $1,580 to $1,335 as of this writing, following a steep drop of 6% within hours of the merge and down 15% overall late Sunday.

Bitcoin, meanwhile, fell to $19,414 on Friday, and saw a brief rally take it above $20,000 on Saturday. The boost was shortlived, however, with the largest cryptocurrency by marketcap returning to its Friday lows as the weekend drew to a close.

Ethereum was down 22% for the week, and Bitcoin was down 10%. The declines echo a similarly down previous week in which overall economic metricsranging from the Consumer Price Index to traditional market indicators Nasdaq and the S&P 500also fell.

But Ethereum's sinking fortunes following the merge belies some analysts' assertions immediately following the upgrade that the impact of the merge on the value of ETH had already been priced into the market.

Prior to the conversion, some had even predicted a "merge surge," But the momentary jump in the price of ETH quickly evaporated. Prominent crypto Twitter commentator Doctor Profit announced today that he had sold all of his Ethereum.

The weekend also brought reports of the first "replay attack" targeting the Ethereum and the recently hardforked EthereumPoW blockchains. As with the invalid blockchain setting that briefly delayed the launch of ETHW, this exploit was caused by the failure to verify the chainlink ID to determine on which blockchain a transaction was taking place.

As for Bitcoin, its total market cap was headed back toward its six-week low of $18,661 on Sept. 6, territory it hasn't touched since the end of June. Bitcoin's total market cap was back below $375 billion on Sunday, a threshold last breached on Sept. 6 and not since July 13 before that.

For his part, Doctor Profitwhose main claim to fame is predicting $18,000 as the "ultimate bottom" for Bitcoin as early as April 2021said that "the bottom is being formed" with a likely prince range of $18,000 to $25,000 through next March.

But a lot hinges on the next move announced by the U.S. Federal Reserve, he warns. While Doctor Profit feels Bitcoin's price can withstand a 0.75 basis point increase in interest rates, a full 1 basis point will mean "we see blood."

"Once the FED decides the great reset, all of us will be fkd," he tweeted.

The last Federal Reserve meeting in July yielded a 0.75% increase. The next meeting, set for Sept. 21, will likely bring another increasethe main question being how big an increase. Some are expecting Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell to announce a full percent hike.

Stay on top of crypto news, get daily updates in your inbox.

Read more:
Ethereum, Bitcoin Slide Further Through The Weekend - Decrypt

Join The Permissionless Bitcoin Community – Bitcoin Magazine

This is an opinion editorial by Mickey Koss, a West Point graduate with a degree in economics. He spent four years in the infantry before transitioning to the Finance Corps.

Much like my writing contributor role at Bitcoin Magazine, I found Bitcoin indirectly and by accident. I was in a command position at the time, when one of my communications soldiers told me about a GPU miner he had been earning passive income with.

I found a helpful eBay seller who premade GPU rigs and helped you set them up with a profit switching software nice guy. Ive been cloud mining shitcoins for anons in exchange for bitcoin with NiceHash ever since.

Soon after, the COVID-19 lockdowns and stimulus packages began to flow. All in all, my wife and I went from zero bitcoin to essentially all-in in the span of about 3 months. And the rest as they say, is history.

For a while I had been feeling unfulfilled at work. I have a largely bureaucratic job that tends to wear on me from time to time. So I decided it was time to have something to look forward to.

During my lunches and free time I began trolling through LinkedIn using Bitcoin as the search criteria. I had no idea there were so many companies. Eventually I stumbled on one in particular that sounded interesting: Bitcoin Venture Capital (not the company name). Why pick one company when you can work with a bunch of em.

I emailed them. Why the hell not? The worst they could do was ignore me. And to my astonishment, they did not. Unbelievable considering what I sent them:

Hey Im stuck in the Army for a few years but I think Bitcoin is cool and would like to help you guys out if I can. (Not verbatim but you get the point).

I still speak with one of the guys there, almost weekly. He has selflessly and enthusiastically linked me up with every veteran related Bitcoiner in his Rolodex. Ive spoken to CEOs, Podcast Hosts, founders, and other VCs.

Not only have I made a valuable connection with someone who wants to help me get a job when I get out, I also made a friend. One of the few friends I have who understands bitcoin, and who shares common and deeply held values.

All this, because I got bored one day and decided I was tired of it.

I am not special. Just a normal guy who likes bitcoin. I actually stumbled on the article submission link for Bitcoin Magazine when trying to find their customer service information. I took a chance and sent an email, and a dozen plus articles later, here I am, still having fun.

I consider this my proof of work resume for a proof of work community. I would tell you that its not easy, but much of the time it actually kind of is because its fun and I enjoy doing it. All of my articles except the first have been written on my cell phone in the Google Docs app. A nontrivial portion has been written on the couch with the kids while watching Bluey. Several have been written in less than an hour. Some have taken days or weeks of thought to get them to the point where I want to submit.

Ive had several rejected. The first time immediately following my first article. It doesnt feel great, but I enjoy the puzzle of articulation, so I just kept going. Why the hell not?

One article in particular even went a little viral on Twitter because apparently they didnt like it too much. I stand by my claims.

Link to embedded Tweet.

Ironically, the same article they shat on is the same article that got me an unsolicited job offer from a Bitcoin startup founder and CEO. Its crazy how the world works sometimes.

One of my favorite Jordan Peterson phrases is that if youre bored by a conversation with someone its probably your fault. I find most people endlessly fascinating. Im sure you are too. If youre unhappy or bored or ready for a change, why not go for it. Email some people. Write some articles. You cant change your life if you dont make a change. Put yourself out there and build your own proof of work portfolio. Whats the worst that can happen?

This is a guest post by Mickey Koss. Opinions expressed are entirely their own and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc. or Bitcoin Magazine.

The rest is here:
Join The Permissionless Bitcoin Community - Bitcoin Magazine

Bitcoins fragility of the moment has affected this BTC HODLer motto the most – AMBCrypto News

Bitcoin [BTC] can be considered as one of the worst hit tokens since the Ethereum [ETH] Merge last week. The token even dived to its three-month lows since last week as it crashed to below $18,500. However, at the time of writing, BTC did witness a major uptick as the price surged by 4.7% to stand at $19,400. Despite climbing back above $19,400, the sentiment around BTC looks negative.

As per Santiment, social trends in the last week have taken a major turn. Cryptocurrencies such as ETH and Cardano [ADA] have seen a massive uptick related to their respective upgrades.

However, one of the fatalities of this narrative has been Bitcoin, as it saw a sharp decline of 17.5% in social volume. Historically, a higher social trend has always appreciated Bitcoins prices in the short-run at least.

One of the major bearish remarks for Bitcoin is the fading of buy the dip calls in the market. As Santiment reported, traders were earlier bragging about buying the dip but the situation has changed since. The update also claimed there is polarization in the market.

As reported earlier, the sell-off has been expected in the market after heavy coin inflows into exchanges. Between 7 September and 14 September, 1.69 million BTC that stood to be worth $33.5 billion was sent to exchanges. According to Santiment, this was the highest BTC volume moved since October 2021.

However, another factor is beginning to open the cracks in Bitcoin. Per a recent Glassnode update, Median Transaction Volume (7d MA) just reached a two-year low of $469.39. This showed a reducing trend around Bitcoin favouritism in the crypto market. For any major upturn in fortunes, there is now a desperate need for Bitcoin to ramp up volume.

Furthermore, crypto enthusiast and co-founder of Reflexivity Research, Will Clemente, provided an overdue optimistic update for the Bitcoin community. He stated that despite a major 60% fall in prices since last year, 65% of Bitcoins supply did not move in same period.

This has further incentivized the sentiment regarding Bitcoin to curb the bearish influences. This means that BTC long-term holders still believe in the token since they are yet to exit their positions.

Perhaps, the future of Bitcoin is the biggest mystery in the crypto market at the moment.

Read the original post:
Bitcoins fragility of the moment has affected this BTC HODLer motto the most - AMBCrypto News

Top 3 Price Prediction Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple: The Interminable Bottom – FXStreet

The Cryptocurrency market has wiped out a majority of liquidity established during the summer. Still, the sell-off leaves trails of optimism despite the loss of market value.

Bitcoin price has investors on edge as the peer-to-peer digital currency has fallen below $20,000. The recent breach established a new low for September at $18,271 and wiped out all of the previous swing lows dating back to July 2022.

Bitcoin price currently auctions at $19,224. The bulls were able to print a hammer candle on the 2-day chart, which is an optimistic gesture during the downtrend. A Fibonacci retracement tool surrounding the previous 20% uptrend in September shows the hammer closing below the 61.8% retracement level.

BTC USDT 2-Day Chart

Closing beneath the key Fib level could be a warning for bullish traders not to get too ambitious aiming for higher targets. The Volume Profile indicator compounds the need for caution as the hammer candle shows low volume compared to the previous June 18 candle, which induced the 40% summertime rally. Hammers also generally should be followed by a green candle with a positive close for confirmation which does not look to be the case at the time of writing.

In the short term, BTC could re-route north into $21,200 and $21,600 based on the price projections of the recent 2-day candle. A breach above the 61.8% Fib level at $20,059 could be a signal for a sidelined trader to enter the market. A stop loss could be placed beneath the new low at $18,271, although the safest invalidation would be the June 18 swing low at $17,592.

In the following video, our analysts deep dive into the price action of Bitcoin, analyzing key levels of interest in the market. -FXStreet Team

Ethereum price is enticing sidelined investors to begin entering the market. On September 19, the bears successfully breached the previous swing low established in August and the June 26 swing low at $1,352.The bears forged a new low for September at $1,280. Shortly after the liquidity hunt, the bulls retraced half of the decline, leaving investors puzzled as to what might occur next,

Ethereum price currently auctions at $1,349, A Fibonacci Retracement indicator surrounding the largest upswing within the clients summertime rally shows the recent sell-off as just a 61.8% retracement. The Relative Strength Index hovers in the ideal territory for a market bottom. Still, it has a few ticks of space left to fall based on previous bottoms throughout Ethereum's trading history. The Volume Profile Indicator remains relatively low amidst the sell-off adding further weight to the idea that the downtrend is a correction that will eventually get reversed.

ETH USDT 2-Day Chart

Still, the Ethereum price has space to fall. The safest invalidation of the uptrend thesis at the current time is a breach below the June 12 swing low at $1006. This provides enough wiggle room for investors to avoid any last-minute liquidity hunts before the next anticipated Ethereum bull run takes place.

In the following video, our analysts deep dive into the price action of Ethereum,analyzing key levels of interest in the market. -FXStreet Team

Ripple's XRP price is on the brink of glory or destruction. The digital remittance token has rallied 20% since its previous decline during September 12's CPI release. Still, the uptrend has not been easy as it has produced strong pullbacks with large influxes of volume along the way.

XRP price currently hovers above a broken parallel channel surrounding the first impulsive rally of September. The gesture is very wave-3-like, which could prompt a sharp move towards $0.45 if $0.41 were to get tagged. Still, the current price action is in its early stages, which bears a serious risk if incorrect.

XRP USDT 2-Day Chart

The bearish scenario suggests the current uptrend is an ABC correction of a previous leading diagonal, Thus the $0.041 origin point of the diagonal is the line in the sand to invalidate the bearish scenario.

A buy stop could be placed at $0.41. If the bulls breach this level, an impulsive rally should occur, with the first target at $0.45. Such a move would result in a 20% increase from the current XRP price.

In the following video, our analysts deep dive into the price action ofRipple, analyzing key levels of interest in the market. -FXStreet Team

Go here to see the original:
Top 3 Price Prediction Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple: The Interminable Bottom - FXStreet