Most Popular

WIKILEAKS founder Julian Assange will get into trouble, potentially a 35-year sentence in the United States, if he leaves the Ecuadorian embassy in London, which he says he would to mend his health and catch some healing sunlight. Regardless of what he might have done to offend powerful countries with his treasure trove of revelations, South Asians should be grateful to him for shining the light on key issues that are as relevant today as they will be in the future.

He exposed, for example, senior Indian leaders for their fawning connections with American diplomats contrary to public postures of aloofness. Everyone from journalists to BJP leaders to Rahul Gandhi bared their hearts to US interlocutors. Assange also traversed issues that threaten the security and prosperity of India.

Lets consider two. Prime Minister Modi last week alerted his military commanders about future threats his country faces. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, who has never been in any agreeable position to brief the military on vital issues, found an audience in former US ambassador Timothy Roemer during the latters tenure in Delhi. It took WikiLeaks to tell us how the worried Congress leader shared his perceptions of what threatens India.

The Congress scion, according to WikiLeaks, told Roemer that his fear for India came from right-wing Hindu groups. They posed an emerging challenge to Indias survival as a secular democracy. This is a view shared by other mainstream parties, for better or worse, chiefly the left.

Mr Modis unexplained reference to an invisible challenge, on the other hand, has been interpreted to mean various things from Pakistan to China, from cross-border terror groups to home-grown challenges he might have had in mind. Be that as it may, it should be strongly hoped that the invisible threat the prime minister spoke of took into account an invisible threat that has sent the US and President Barack Obama into a tailspin. We have already written about the incalculable threat South Asia faces from the intractable Ebola outbreak in western Africa, not by accident alone, which is the usual route of transmission, but by design.

Julian Assanges findings give a direr context to the threat. US diplomats were concerned, as their cables revealed in December 2010, that India could be the target of a biological terror attack.

In an unanticipated variation of the WikiLeaks revelations the Ebola virus, focus of military research for several decades in many countries, seems to have wormed its way into the United States, in fact, more worryingly than has been reported in our patch. Last week, the Chinese military reportedly sent vials of its purported antidote, which no one claims to know much about, to its citizens potentially exposed in western Africa.

According to WikiLeaks, a senior Indian diplomat told the US as early as in 2006 that concerns about biological weapons were no longer academic, adding that intelligence suggested terror groups were increasingly discussing bio-warfare. WikiLeaks cables confirmed this.

A recent link between Muslim terror groups eyeing the Ebola virus as a weapon unfolded cannily along the lines that WikiLeaks cables etched out. The Islamic State terrorists in Iraq have demanded that the US release a suspected Al Qaeda conduit who was arrested in Afghanistan with alleged plans to weaponise Ebola. IS links up with Al Qaeda which links up with Ebola in one stroke.

The Indian intelligence picked up chatter indicating jihadi groups are interested in bioterrorism, for example seeking out likeminded PhDs in biology and biotechnology, a cable presciently sent to Washington was quoted as saying in the 2010 trawl.

See the article here:
Most Popular

Pussy Riot Meet Assange in London: Russian protest group visits WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange – Video


Pussy Riot Meet Assange in London: Russian protest group visits WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange
After meeting Assange, Maria Alyokhina and Nadezhda Tolokonnikova said they had something in common with him "as characters". Julian Assange is the founder of whistleblowing website WikiLeaks.

By: UKRAINE TODAY

See more here:
Pussy Riot Meet Assange in London: Russian protest group visits WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange - Video

Julian Assange detention order upheld as WikiLeaks founder shelters in London embassy

STOCKHOLM A Swedish appeals court upheld the detention order on JulianAssangeon Thursday, dismissing a challenge by the WikiLeaks founder who is wanted by Swedish prosecutors in an investigation of alleged sex crimes.

Confirming a ruling by a lower court, the Svea appeals court said there is no reason to lift the detention order just because it cannot be enforced at the moment.

Assangehas avoided being extradited to Sweden by taking shelter in the Ecuadorean Embassy in London. The court also criticized the prosecutors, who have declinedAssange'soffer to be questioned in London, for not considering "alternative avenues" to move the investigation forward.

He hasn't been formally indicted in Sweden, but is wanted for questioning by police about allegations of sexual misconduct and rape involving two women he met during a visit to the Scandinavian country in 2010. He denies the allegations.

His lawyers argued that the detention order that underlies Sweden's request for his extradition should be lifted, on the grounds that it cannot be enforced while he is at the embassy and because it is restrictingAssange'scivil rights.

"In the view of the Court of Appeal there is no reason to set aside the detention solely because JulianAssangeis in an embassy and the detention order cannot be enforced at present for that reason," the court said in a statement.

"The reasons for detention still outweigh the reasons to the contrary since JulianAssangeis suspected of crimes of a relatively serious nature and there is a great risk that he will evade legal proceedings or punishment if the detention order is set aside," the court added.

Assange'slawyer Per E. Samuelson said the defense team would appeal the decision to Sweden's Supreme Court.

More:
Julian Assange detention order upheld as WikiLeaks founder shelters in London embassy

Assange Loses Second Appeal to Cancel Swedish Detention Order

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange lost a second bid to overturn a Swedish arrest warrant in a sexual assault probe amid a fight to leave Ecuadors embassy in London where he sought asylum more than two years ago.

The Court of Appeal in Stockholm said in a statement today that Assange is suspected on probable cause of crimes including rape and that there is a great risk that he will evade legal proceedings or punishment.

Assange sought refuge with Ecuador in June 2012, after exhausting options in U.K. courts to avoid extradition to face questioning on allegations of rape and sexual molestation during a 2010 visit to Sweden. The Australian national, who says hes innocent and hasnt been charged with a crime, has refused to return to Sweden, citing risks he will be extradited to the U.S. over the release of secret documents by WikiLeaks.

There is no reason to set aside the detention solely because Julian Assange is in an embassy and the detention order cannot be enforced, the court said. The Court of Appeal considers that Julian Assanges stay at the embassy shall not count in his favor since he can himself choose to bring his stay there to an end.

Per E. Samuelson, a lawyer for Assange in Stockholm, said he would appeal the ruling to Swedens Supreme Court.

We are disappointed, but we see the light in the tunnel, Samuelson said in a phone interview.

Assange said on Aug. 18 that he is planning to leave the embassy soon. Assange, who risks arrest as soon as he steps outside the building, said the ordeal has caused him heart and lung problems and 7 million pounds ($11 million) in legal costs.

Assange is accused in Sweden of failing to use a condom with one woman and having sex with another while she was asleep. The women, both supporters of WikiLeaks, let him stay at their homes during a speaking tour in 2010.

The Court of Appeal also criticized the prosecutors, saying their failure to examine alternative avenues is not in line with their obligation -- in the interests of everyone concerned -- to move the preliminary investigation forward. The court said that the investigation into the suspected crimes has come to a halt.

Appellate Court Judge Niklas Waagnert said it is now up to the prosecutors to decide how to pursue the case.

See the original post here:
Assange Loses Second Appeal to Cancel Swedish Detention Order

Sweden court upholds Assange arrest warrant

A Swedish court has upheld an arrest warrant against Julian Assange,dismissing a challenge by the Australian founder of the WikiLeaks website who is wanted for questioning by Swedish prosecutors in an investigation of alleged sex crimes.

The Svea appeals court upheld a decision by a lower court on Thursday saying there was no reason to lift the detention order just because it cannot be enforced at the moment.

"In the view of the Court of Appeal there is no reason to set aside thedetention solely because Julian Assange is in an embassy and the detentionorder cannot be enforced at present for that reason,'' the court said in astatement.

"The fact is that Julian Assange can leave the embassy if he so wishes.This fact means that the restriction of his freedom cannot be equated with adeprivation of liberty."

The court said that "interviews must take place here in Sweden in view of the nature of the crimes and the investigation and the fact that a possible trial requires him to be in Sweden", dismissing Assange's claim that he is effectively under house arrest.

Assange's lawyers have argued that the detention ordershould be lifted, on the grounds that it cannotbe enforced while he is at the embassy and because it is restrictingon his civil rights.

No charges have yet been brought against Assange, 43, in Sweden but he is wanted for questioning by police over allegations of sexual misconduct and rape involving two women he met during a visit to the Scandinavian country in 2010.

A European arrest warrant has also been issued to support the Swedish move.

Assange, who has been holed up in the Ecuador embassy in London for two years, denies the allegations and has been fighting a legal battle against extradition since his arrest in Britain in December 2010.

The UK has refused to grant Assange safe passage out of the embassy so he can travel to Ecuador, despite Ecuador granting the Australian refugee status.

Read the rest here:
Sweden court upholds Assange arrest warrant

WikiLeaks founder claims rape allegations are false, politically motivated

(CNN) -

A Swedish appeals court on Thursday denied WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange's latest request to dismiss an arrest warrant for alleged rape and molestation -- cases that he says are false and politically motivated.

Assange, 43, has been living in London's Ecuadorian Embassy for more than two years to avoid extradition to Sweden, where prosecutors want to question him about 2010 allegations that he raped one woman and sexually molested another.

Assange, who has not been charged, denies the allegations and says he fears Sweden would extradite him to the United States, where he could face the death penalty if he is charged and convicted of publishing government secrets through WikiLeaks.

The Australia native has argued the warrant should be dismissed because, in part, Swedish authorities refuse to interview him at the Ecuadorian Embassy, thereby prolonging a preliminary investigation that he says should have concluded long ago.

The appellate court nodded to this argument, agreeing that "the failure of the prosecutors to examine alternative avenues is not in line with their obligation ... to move the preliminary investigation forward."

But it concluded that, in balance, the arrest warrant must remain in effect because the crimes alleged are serious and because "there is a great risk that he will flee and thereby evade legal proceedings if the detention order is set aside."

"In the view of the court of appeal, these circumstances mean that the reasons for detention still outweigh the intrusion or other detriment entailed by the detention order," appellate judges wrote in Thursday's ruling.

Another appeal expected

Michael Ratner, a U.S. attorney for Assange, expressed dismay over the ruling.

Read more:
WikiLeaks founder claims rape allegations are false, politically motivated

WikiLeaks Assange awaits Swedish appeal verdict

November 20, 2014

STOCKHOLM: A Swedish appeals court will rule Thursday on whether to uphold an arrest order for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange who is wanted for questioning over alleged sex crimes.

The Australian, who has been holed up in the Ecuador embassy in London for two years to avoid extradition to Sweden, could be able to leave the building if the court rules in his favour.

In August he said we would leave soon, amid reports that he was suffering from a heart condition and other ailments.

A European arrest warrant was issued to enable Swedish prosecutors to question Assange about accusations of rape and sexual molestation brought against him by two women in their 30s when he visited the country in 2010. Assange denies the claims.

Last month he said he was confident of winning the appeal.

We will win because the law is very clear. My only hope is that the court is following the law and is not pressured politically to do anything outside of the law, Assange said via a video link screened at a human rights film festival in Barcelona.

His lawyer in Sweden Per Samuelsson refused to comment ahead of the verdict Thursday.

Assange fears extradition to Sweden could lead to him being transferred to the United States to face trial over WikiLeaks publication of classified US military and diplomatic documents.

Continue reading here:
WikiLeaks Assange awaits Swedish appeal verdict

Assange loses appeal in sex case

Assange speaks from a window of the Ecuadorian Embassy in London on December 20, 2012.

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

(CNN) -- A Swedish appeals court on Thursday denied WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange's latest request to dismiss an arrest warrant for alleged rape and molestation -- cases that he says are false and politically motivated.

Assange, 43, has been living in London's Ecuadorian Embassy for more than two years to avoid extradition to Sweden, where prosecutors want to question him about 2010 allegations that he raped one woman and sexually molested another.

Assange, who has not been charged, denies the allegations and says he fears Sweden would extradite him to the United States, where he could face the death penalty if he is charged and convicted of publishing government secrets through WikiLeaks.

The Australia native has argued the warrant should be dismissed because, in part, Swedish authorities refuse to interview him at the Ecuadorian Embassy, thereby prolonging a preliminary investigation that he says should have concluded long ago.

The appellate court nodded to this argument, agreeing that "the failure of the prosecutors to examine alternative avenues is not in line with their obligation ... to move the preliminary investigation forward."

But it concluded that, in balance, the arrest warrant must remain in effect because the crimes alleged are serious and because "there is a great risk that he will flee and thereby evade legal proceedings if the detention order is set aside."

"In the view of the court of appeal, these circumstances mean that the reasons for detention still outweigh the intrusion or other detriment entailed by the detention order," appellate judges wrote in Thursday's ruling.

Another appeal expected

See the rest here:
Assange loses appeal in sex case

Russell Brand, Oliver Stone, Other Celebs Co-Sign Statement in Support of Snowden

A few A-list actors, artists, and celebrities have joined together with Nobel laureates to co-sign a statement in support of Edward Snowden and Chelsea Manning. Two names worth highlighting here are Oliver Stone, who is currently making a movie about Snowden, and Russell Brand, an actor-turned-revolutionary of sorts whos been speaking out on politics more and more this year.

The statement, from the Courage Foundation, shows strong support for whistleblowers like Snowden, who risk their lives and careers to stand up for truth and justice. The statement also singles out Daniel Ellsberg, the man behind the infamous Pentagon Papers, and the website Wikileaks; in the case of the latter for its fearless dedication in defending these sources and publishing their truths.

Musician Tom Morello and clothing designer Vivienne Westwood also put out statements of their own in support of these whistleblowers.

And heres a partial list of other people who co-signed the statement:

[image via screengrabs]

Follow Josh Feldman on Twitter: @feldmaniac

The rest is here:
Russell Brand, Oliver Stone, Other Celebs Co-Sign Statement in Support of Snowden

Amnesia review Peter Carey turns to hacktivism in his diffuse 13th novel

WikiLeaks? It all started in 1975 Peter Carey, photographed in London, 2014. Photograph: Sarah Lee

Peter Careys new novel tells the story of Felix Moore, a leftwing Australian journalist at work on a biography of a wanted hacker whose virus has infected a corporation responsible for securing prisons in the United States. Felixs commission comes with exclusive access to his subject, Gaby Baillieux, but working conditions are less than ideal; at one point hes beaten up and taken to a secret location in the boot of a car. Bankrolled by a shady tycoon who knows that Felix once hung out in the same radical circles as Gabys actress mother, the job represents a lifeline for a man who has just lost a defamation suit and whose specialist subject is the history of ill will between Australia and America.

That overlooked history is what Amnesias title nods to; although the novel might not have taken this form had WikiLeaks and Anonymous not come to prominence, you feel its themes have long preoccupied Carey. Recent interviews with him offer an idiosyncratic take on why WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange exposed the civilian cost of Americas invasion of Iraq: Careys emphasis on Assanges Australian nationality places WikiLeaks in a tit-for-tat geopolitical narrative that dates back to 1975 and the CIAs suspected role in unseating Australias Labour prime minister Gough Whitlam as payback for his withdrawal from Vietnam.

Viewed in that light, Amnesias interest in hacktivism is more symbolic than anything, and the novel doesnt aim to compete with the abundance of thriller-like journalism on the topic. Little is said about the mechanics of the cyber attack for which Gaby risks extradition; what material there is about computers mostly concerns how she got into hacking in the 1980s after hanging out with a boy who plays the text-based adventure game Zork.

Careys main concern is for what Australia looked like during the second world war and after: we read in particular about the hardships of Gabys grandmother in 1940s Brisbane, when local women were prey to the Australian and American soldiers who fought each other in the streets.

What makes the novel so unwieldy is our uncertainty about the status of what were reading. Its filtered through Felixs consciousness, but not straightforwardly: we toggle between Felixs transcription of Gabys audio-tape memories and his first-person speculative recreation of what she and her mother and grandmother thought and felt during various episodes in their lives. Some of the jerkiness seems designed to be true to the nature of Felixs shiraz-fuelled composition under virtual house arrest, but why does Carey refer to him interchangeably as the fugitive, the hermit, the writer, as well as Felix, sometimes in the space of a paragraph or two? Gaby, as transcribed by Felix, says freakerated and disgustitude but talks too about the contrails of my thoughts, which sounds more like Felix, who describes his body as a human envelope.

With sub-threads about ecology, in-fighting among the Australian left, and race (Gabys Samoan classmate winds up as the fall guy for one of her early hacks), the splintered focus can give the impression that there are several novels fighting to get out of Amnesia. Felixs encounter with Gaby gives rise to a reflection on how the targets of activism have shifted over time: where he goes after governments, she easily saw that the enemy was not one nation state but a cloud of companies, corporations, contractors, statutory bodies whose survival meant the degradation of water, air, soil, life itself. The problem is that Carey ends up having to spell all of this out: maybe the form he needs right now is the essay. Amnesia is published by Faber (18.99). Click here to buy it for 15.19

Read more from the original source:
Amnesia review Peter Carey turns to hacktivism in his diffuse 13th novel