WikiLeaks demands answers after Google hands staff emails to US government

Google took almost three years to disclose to the open information group WikiLeaks that it had handed over emails and other digital data belonging to three of its staffers to the US government, under a secret search warrant issued by a federal judge.

WikiLeaks has written to Googles executive chairman, Eric Schmidt, to protest that the search giant only revealed the warrants last month, having been served them in March 2012. In the letter, WikiLeaks says it is astonished and disturbed that Google waited more than two and a half years to notify its subscribers, potentially depriving them of their ability to protect their rights to privacy, association and freedom from illegal searches.

The letter, written by WikiLeaks New York-based lawyer, Michael Ratner of the Center For Constitutional Rights, asks Google to list all the materials it provided to the FBI. Ratner also asks whether the California-based company did anything to challenge the warrants and whether it has received any further data demands it has yet to divulge.

Related: The war on leaks has gone way too far when journalists' emails are under surveillance | Trevor Timm

Google revealed to WikiLeaks on Christmas Eve a traditionally quiet news period that it had responded to a Justice Department order to hand over a catch-all dragnet of digital data including all emails and IP addresses relating to the three staffers. The subjects of the warrants were the investigations editor of WikiLeaks, the British citizen Sarah Harrison; the spokesperson for the organisation, Kristinn Hrafnsson; and Joseph Farrell, one of its senior editors.

When it notified the WikiLeaks employees last month, Google said it had been unable to say anything about the warrants earlier as a gag order had been imposed. Google said the non-disclosure orders had subsequently been lifted, though it did not specify when.

Harrison, who also heads the Courage Foundation, told the Guardian she was distressed by the thought of government officials gaining access to her private emails. Knowing that the FBI read the words I wrote to console my mother over a death in the family makes me feel sick, she said.

She accused Google of helping the US government conceal the invasion of privacy into a British journalists personal email address. Neither Google nor the US government are living up to their own laws or rhetoric in privacy or press protections.

The court orders cast a data net so wide as to ensnare virtually all digital communications originating from or sent to the three. Google was told to hand over the contents of all their emails, including those sent and received, all draft correspondence and deleted emails. The source and destination addresses of each email, its date and time, and size and length were also included in the dragnet.

The FBI also demanded all records relating to the internet accounts used by the three, including telephone numbers and IP addresses, details of the time and duration of their online activities, and alternative email addresses. Even the credit card or bank account numbers associated with the accounts had to be revealed.

Continued here:
WikiLeaks demands answers after Google hands staff emails to US government

Google Surrendered WikiLeaks Staff’s Private Data To US

Provided by IBT US Google-WikiLeaks

Google handed over confidential data of WikiLeaks staff to the U.S. government, prompting the whistleblower organization to send a letter to both the search engine giant and the U.S. Department of Justice seeking an explanation.

WikiLeaks announced on its website on Monday that its investigations editor Sarah Harrison, section editor Joseph Farrell, and senior journalist and spokesperson Kristinn Hrafnsson have received a notice that Google had handed over all their emails and metadata to the U.S. government, which has issued warrants alleging conspiracy and espionage against the journalists. The charges carry a prison sentence of up to 45 years.

The US government is claiming universal jurisdiction to apply the Espionage Act, general Conspiracy statute and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act to journalists and publishers a horrifying precedent for press freedoms around the world, WikiLeaks said on its website.

In its letter to the justice department and the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, WikiLeaks lawyers also requested more details on the ongoing investigation, which is based on the data provided by Google.

We have reason to believe that these warrants were issued in violation of the Privacy Protection Act of 1980 ("PPA"), 42 U.S.C. 2200aa et. seq, which protects journalists and publishers from being forced to turn over to law enforcement their journalistic work product and documentary materials, the lawyers wrote in the letter.

They also demanded an explanation from Google over its failure to immediately notify the three journalists, which allegedly prevented them from protect[ing] their interests including their rights to privacy, association and freedom from illegal searches. Google took almost three years to disclose to WikiLeaks that it had provided the journalists private data to the U.S. government, the Guardian reported.

WikiLeaks has out endured everything the Obama administration has thrown at us and we will out endure these latest offences too, Julian Assange, WikiLeaks' editor-in-chief said.

More here:
Google Surrendered WikiLeaks Staff's Private Data To US

Wikileaks writes Google a letter about staff emails handed over to the FBI

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif., Jan. 25 (UPI) -- Wikileaks' lawyer, Michael Ratner, has sent Google a letter asking what information was provided to the FBI concerning Wikileaks staff members.

A secret search warrant was sent to Google in March of 2012 from the FBI for information about three Wikileaks employees, but the company only informed Wikileaks last month. Now, Wikileaks wants to know what was provided at that time and if it has received any more requests since the original case. Google claims the FBI requested email content, metadata and more.

"We are astonished and disturbed that Google waited over two and a half years to notify its subscribers that a search warrant was issued for their records," the letter reads.

Google has so far informed Wikileaks that the information that was requested had to do with investigations editor of WikiLeaks, Sarah Harrison, their spokesperson, Kristinn Hrafnsson and senior editor Joseph Farrell.

Google claims it did not inform Wikileaks because of a gag order.

"Neither Google nor the US government are living up to their own laws or rhetoric in privacy or press protections," Sarah Harrison told The Guardian.

2015 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Any reproduction, republication, redistribution and/or modification of any UPI content is expressly prohibited without UPI's prior written consent.

Popular Photos

Notable deaths of 2014

Miss Universe Swimsuit Runway Show

More here:
Wikileaks writes Google a letter about staff emails handed over to the FBI

Wikileaks lashes out at Google for handing over staffers’ emails, data

BERLIN -- WikiLeaks on Monday criticized Google for failing to swiftly inform the secrets-spilling group about U.S. search warrants issued seeking emails and other personal information from three of its staff.

The warrants, issued in March 2012, required the Internet giant to hand over the phone numbers, IP addresses, credit card details, contents of all emails and other details for Google accounts used by Sarah Harrison, Kristinn Hrafnsson and Joseph Faerrell. The existence of the warrants, which cite an espionage, fraud and conspiracy investigation, was disclosed to WikiLeaks in December.

"We are astonished and disturbed that Google waited over two and a half years to notify its subscribers that a search warrant was issued for their records," WikiLeaks' lawyer Michael Ratner said in a letter to Google chairman Eric Schmidt that was published online Monday.

The letter adds that Twitter took legal action in order to alert WikiLeaks of a similar warrant in 2011.

Google didn't immediately respond to requests for comment.

"We don't know if Google tried to litigate it or not, but that's one of our requests to Google," Ratner, who is with the New York-based Center For Constitutional Rights, said during a news conference that was broadcast online.

Speaking at a news conference in Geneva, Baltasar Garzon, a Spanish former judge who now represents WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, said the warrants appeared to be part of a "fishing expedition" by U.S. authorities against the website. WikiLeaks has repeatedly published sensitive U.S. government documents ranging from classified diplomatic cables to Iraq and Afghanistan battlefield reports.

Harrison said that while the data handed over by Google wouldn't have included any internal communication between WikiLeaks staff, U.S. authorities would have been able to gather information about her private life from an old Gmail address.

WikiLeaks said it has requested U.S. prosecutors explain whether the three -- none of whom are American citizens -- are witnesses, subjects or targets of the investigation.

Go here to see the original:
Wikileaks lashes out at Google for handing over staffers' emails, data

WikiLeaks Blasts Google For Giving FBI Personal Data, Delaying Notification

Google reportedly delayed by two and a half years disclosure to WikiLeaks that it gave emails and other data from three of its staff to the FBI. This occurred after a federal judge issued a warrant.

Michael Ratner of the Center for Constitutional Rights, who is a lawyer for WikiLeaks, wrote a letter to Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt, telling him they are astonished and disturbed that Google waited over two and a half years to notify its subscribers that a search warrant was issued for their records.

Read the full letter here.

The three WikiLeaks staffers are Investigations editor Sarah Harrison, Section Editor Joseph Farrell and senior journalist and spokesperson Kristinn Hrafnsson. The warrant was related to charges of alleged conspiracy and espionage.

Importantly, the warrants reveal for the first time a clear list of the alleged offences the US government is trying to apply in its attempts to build a prosecution against Julian Assange and other WikiLeaks staff. The offences add up to a total of 45 years of imprisonment, WikiLeaks said in a press release. The US government is claiming universal jurisdiction to apply the Espionage Act, general Conspiracy statute and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act to journalists and publishers a horrifying precedent for press freedoms around the world. Once an offence is alleged in relation to a journalist or their source, the whole media organisation, by the nature of its work flow, can be targeted as alleged conspiracy.

Heres what it said specifically about Google:

WikiLeaks legal team has written to Google expressing its dismay that Google failed to notify the warrants targets immediately. The failure to notify has prevented the three journalists from protect[ing] their interests including their rights to privacy, association and freedom from illegal searches. The take everything warrants are unconstitutionally broad and appear to violate the Privacy Protection Act so would have a good chance of being opposed; however, Google handed everything over before that was possible.

Although Google claims that it was at some stage under a gag order from the US government, there is no indication that Google fought the gag and it is unlikely that the gag just happened to expire the day before Christmas. Similar gags for warrants against WikiLeaks journalists have been successfully fought by Twitter in much shorter time-frames.

While WikiLeaks journalists, perhaps uniquely, do not use Google services for internal communications or for communicating with sources, the search warrants nonetheless represent a substantial invasion of their personal privacy and freedom. The information handed over to the US government included all email content, metadata, contacts, draft emails, deleted emails and IP addresses connected to the accounts. Google redacted the search warrants before sending them to WikiLeaks staff.

The Guardian shares comment from Google:

See the original post here:
WikiLeaks Blasts Google For Giving FBI Personal Data, Delaying Notification

Former Swiss Banker Found Guilty in WikiLeaks Trial, Avoids Jail – Video


Former Swiss Banker Found Guilty in WikiLeaks Trial, Avoids Jail
A former Julius Baer banker found guilty on Monday of breaching Swiss banking secrecy laws by handing over data about offshore clients to WikiLeaks will avoid jail time. The trial of Rudolf...

By: WochitGeneralNews

Continue reading here:
Former Swiss Banker Found Guilty in WikiLeaks Trial, Avoids Jail - Video

Kwa de 9? – Episode 19 : Afrileaks, Un Wikileaks Africain | CAN 2015 – Video


Kwa de 9? - Episode 19 : Afrileaks, Un Wikileaks Africain | CAN 2015
Dans cette dition de Kwa de 9?, nous couvrons les sujets suivant: - CAN 2015: Denis Sassou Nguesso donne la route aux Diables Rouges - Le film, Epicura, du jeune ralisateur congolais,...

By: DoveTV

See the original post here:
Kwa de 9? - Episode 19 : Afrileaks, Un Wikileaks Africain | CAN 2015 - Video

WikiLeaks Banker Convicted of Breaching Swiss Financial Secrecy

A Swiss banker who faced more than three years in prison for providing WikiLeaks with confidential details of his former employers offshore activities walked out of a Zurich courtroom a free man on Monday.

Rudolf Elmer, 59, was given a suspended fine of 16,800 Swiss francs ($19,397) for violating Swiss bank secrecy laws under a system that allows courts to convert prison time into a financial penalty. The district court in Zurich said that if Elmer commits another offense in the next three years, he may have to pay the fine, which represents four months in prison.

Prosecutors had sought a prison term of three and a half years for Elmer, saying in their closing arguments last week that he repeatedly betrayed the bank under the guise of humanitarian goals. They had also sought a ban on him working as a banker, which the court also denied.

Elmer, a former senior banking executive in the Caribbean for Zurich-based Julius Baer Group Ltd., has described himself as a whistle-blower who wanted to raise awareness of the use of Swiss bank accounts for tax evasion and other illegal activity. Countries including the U.S., the U.K. and Germany have used testimony from former Swiss bankers or stolen client data to pursue offshore tax dodgers.

Elmer wasnt surprised by the verdict, said Ganden Tethong, his lawyer. I already told him beforehand that he need not worry about the three and a half years.

Elmer was found guilty of providing data on Julius Baer client accounts that was published on the anti-secrecy website in 2008. But the court said it lacked evidence to convict him of handing similar information to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange at a news conference in London in 2011. Swiss law prohibits bankers from revealing confidential details about their clients.

Elmer was also convicted of forging a letter that falsely accused German Chancellor Angela Merkel of having a Swiss bank account. He was acquitted on another charge of offering data to the German government in 2009.

The verdict didnt appear to satisfy either side. Tethong said she would appeal, calling the ruling unconvincing. The statute of limitations has run out one of the counts used to convict Elmer, she said.

Prosecutor Peter Giger said he would await the courts full explanation, expected later this year, before deciding whether to challenge the decision.

While such cases are not uncommon in Switzerland, where for almost a century the principle of bank secrecy has been enforced by laws that carry prison terms for offenders, Elmers trial attracted more attention than most. Thats partly because it involved a website that has come under fire from the U.S. and other governments around the world for publishing confidential documents under an avowed commitment to increased transparency.

View original post here:
WikiLeaks Banker Convicted of Breaching Swiss Financial Secrecy

Wikileaks collectors demand bankruptcy for Valitor

Two companies, handling the collection of the funding for Wikileaks, have demanded that Valitor, which handles VISA in Iceland, should be made bankrupt due to an unpaid claim for damages, amounting to about 10 billion kronas (approx: 75 million dollars) with interests.

The case started in October, 2010, when a contract was made that the company DataCell would take care of running the payment gateway for Sunshine Press Production, the operator of the whistleblowing site Wikileaks, in order to receive funding from the patrons of Wikileaks. Valitor closed the payment gateway on the 8th of July, 2011, without any notice when funding for Wikileaks starting to flow through the gateway.

By ruling of the supreme court from 24th of April 203, it was recognized that it had been an illegal decision of Valitor to close the payments to Wikileaks without any notice and the company was obliged to re-open the gateway, subject to daily fines.

The companies, Data Cell and Sunshine Press Productions, hired Sigurjn Th. rnason, former CEO of Landsbankinn, to calculate the alleged loss due the decision of Valitor and the outcome of Sigurjn's calculations was that the loss might be in the range of 1-8 billion kronas while the gateway was closed.

In Article 65 of the Act on bankruptcy, there is an authorization for demanding bankruptcy of the debtor's estate if he has not responded to a notification to pay a debt by a statement of solvency.

A notification to pay a debt was sent to Valitor on the 18th of June 2013, but the company didn't respond to it and a notification to pay on the basis of the Act on bankruptcy was sent on the 15th of December last year. Then the company was urged to pay the claim within three weeks. At the same time, the company was urged to declare within the same time limit that the company was able to pay the claim, otherwise it might be expected that a bankruptcy claim would be filed against the estate of the company.

The owner's equity of Valitor according to the latest public annual accounts of the company from 2013 amounts to 7,5 billion kronas .The claim for damages of the two companies amounts to 10,3 billion kronas with interests, but this is a full claim due to an expected loss. Therefore, it is evident that the claim is considerably higher than Valitor's own equity. In a claim for bankruptcy it says: "Bankruptcy petitioners assume that a claim for bankruptcy against the estate of the company is inevitable, as it is clear the limited company Valitor is not able, in the light of existing evidence, to pay its debt to their bankruptcy petitioners, in due course."

There are no known examples here in Iceland that a bankruptcy claim has been filed against a payment gateway like Valitor and it is not clear what effect such a claim has on the operation of the company.

In addition to a claim for bankruptcy, Datacell has subpoened Valitor for the payment of the damages and there will be a court hearing on Thursday

Not able to show any income during the period of alleged loss Sigurur G. Gujnsson, the lawyer of Valitor, says that the company has not received any valid claim for damages. Therefore, Valitor has not been willing to negotiate, even though there is a verdict stating that the company was not authorized to close the payment gateway. "The annual accounts of Data Cell and Sunshine Press Productions for the period Data Cell served Valitor do not reveal that the company had any income at that time. Sunshine Press Productions, alleged operators of Wikileaks, has never had any income. It is very interesting that companies that have never had any income, even at the time when the payment gateway was open, had suffered a loss, amounting to billions of kronas, " Sigurur says. He also says that there is a difference of opinion on the claims assessor to be called upon in the case.

More here:
Wikileaks collectors demand bankruptcy for Valitor

Ex-Swiss banker Rudolf Elmer found guilty in WikiLeaks trial, avoids jail

Found guilty of breaching secrecy laws ... Former Swiss private banker Rudolf Elmer arrives before a trial at the high court in Zurich. Photo: Reuters

Zurich: A former Julius Baer banker found guilty on Monday of breaching Swiss banking secrecy laws by handing over data about offshore clients to WikiLeaks will avoid jail time.

The trial of Rudolf Elmer, 59, a self-described "Gandhi of Swiss tax law", comes as banking secrecy in Switzerland is crumbling under international pressure from countries trying to recoup lost tax revenue.

The former senior executive at Zurich-based Baer's Cayman Islands office was accused of passing confidential information to WikiLeaks on two occasions, one in 2008 and another in 2011.

Elmer was found guilty of the charges relating to 2008 but not guilty in relation to 2011. He was also found guilty of forging a letter from Baer to German Chancellor Angela Merkel in 2007.

Advertisement

He was ordered to pay costs towards the trial and was given a three-year suspended fine of up to 45,000 Swiss francs ($63,052). The prosecution had sought a three-and-a-half-year prison sentence, while Elmer's lawyer Ganden Tethong had argued for her client to be acquitted.

"The rationale from the court today has not convinced me," Tethong told reporters after the verdict. "I find (the prosecution) did not bring forward anything that would contradict what I argued."

Tethong said she would appeal the ruling.

During the trial, which began in December but was halted when Elmer collapsed outside the Zurich courtroom, Tethong argued that Elmer had not broken any Swiss laws because he had not obtained the information as an employee of a Swiss bank.

View post:
Ex-Swiss banker Rudolf Elmer found guilty in WikiLeaks trial, avoids jail