House says it wants to keep investigating Trump for possible impeachable offenses – WICZ

By Katelyn Polantz, CNN

The House Judiciary Committee says it needs grand jury secrets from the Mueller investigation as soon as Friday, so it can keep investigating President Donald Trump for potentially impeachable offenses, even during the coronavirus shutdown, according to a new court filing.

The House told the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit on Wednesday the court shouldn't delay access to the Mueller material, which the appeals court previously decided the House could see.

The Justice Department has tried to keep the grand jury details from the House, asking last week to block the disclosure of the details because it wants to take the fight to the US Supreme Court.

Currently, the deadline to release the grand jury materials is Friday.

If the appeals court were to pause the release to allow for Supreme Court review, the high court may not even begin looking at the case until August.

"As the Committee informed this Court in December, its investigation into President Trump's misconduct is ongoing, and the grand-jury material will inform its determination whether President Trump committed additional impeachable offenses in obstructing Special Counsel [Robert] Mueller's investigation and whether to recommend new articles of impeachment," the House wrote to the appeals court on Wednesday. "This remains true today. The current pandemic notwithstanding, the Committee's investigation is not 'dormant."

The House has pledged it would take steps to keep the grand jury material secret as the committee reviews it. The Justice Department, however, had argued that if it turns over the material to the House Friday, it will "upset the status quo ... irreversibly breaching the secrecy of those materials."

The grand jury material due to the House essentially would reveal what's under sought-after redacted sections in the Mueller report and in transcripts and other evidence from the Mueller grand jury proceedings, including what convicted former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort said about the President in his secret testimony.

The House has especially raised questions about what campaign witnesses told Mueller versus what Trump said to Mueller in written answers -- saying he didn't recall conversations about attempts to reach WikiLeaks in 2016. The House has said it believes this material could support an impeachment case that the President obstructed justice.

Mueller, in his report and in federal court proceedings, documented extensive contact between Trump campaign officials and Russians in 2016, the campaign's interest in the release of Democratic documents that Russia had stolen, and efforts to try to reach WikiLeaks as it released the hacked documents. Mueller also found several instances where Trump tried to obstruct the Russia investigation after he became President. Mueller did not find evidence to prove coordination between the campaign and Russia to interfere in the election, and left the decision on whether to charge the President for obstruction up to Justice Department leadership.

Go here to see the original:
House says it wants to keep investigating Trump for possible impeachable offenses - WICZ

News from around the world – Newcastle Herald

news, world

Countries must ease lockdowns slowly: WHO Countries must lift lockdowns gradually while still being "on the look-out" for COVID-19 and ready to restore restrictions if the virus jumps back, the World Health Organisation says. -- UK hits testing target, death toll up 739 Britain has hit its target of carrying out 100,000 COVID-19 tests a day, health minister Matt Hancock says, stressing that the program was crucial to help ease the country's lockdown. -- UK doctors identify kids' syndrome British doctors have published a working definition of a rare inflammatory syndrome affecting children that may be linked to COVID-19, which they hope will help other physicians identify cases. -- Wall Street tumbles amid uncertainties Wall Street has sold off sharply after US President Donald Trump revived a threat of new tariffs against China in response to the COVID-19 pandemic which has brought global economies to a grinding halt. -- Assange fiancee urges his release WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange's fiancee has appealed for him to be freed to restore the public's faith in "mature democracy". -- Meghan loses first round of privacy claim The Duchess of Sussex has lost an early round in her privacy case against the Mail on Sunday over its publication of a letter to her estranged father. -- Biden says sexual assault 'never happened' Presumptive US Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden has denied that he sexually assaulted a former senate aide in 1993, in his first public remarks on the subject after he faced intense pressure to personally address the accusation. -- Canada bans assault-style weapons Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has announced an immediate ban on the use and trade of assault-style weapons in Canada. -- Australian Associated Press

https://nnimgt-a.akamaihd.net/transform/v1/crop/frm/silverstone-feed-data/972bcf6f-8086-4845-9359-d61949a58171.jpg/r0_74_800_526_w1200_h678_fmax.jpg

Countries must ease lockdowns slowly: WHO

Countries must lift lockdowns gradually while still being "on the look-out" for COVID-19 and ready to restore restrictions if the virus jumps back, the World Health Organisation says.

UK hits testing target, death toll up 739

Britain has hit its target of carrying out 100,000 COVID-19 tests a day, health minister Matt Hancock says, stressing that the program was crucial to help ease the country's lockdown.

UK doctors identify kids' syndrome

British doctors have published a working definition of a rare inflammatory syndrome affecting children that may be linked to COVID-19, which they hope will help other physicians identify cases.

Wall Street tumbles amid uncertainties

Wall Street has sold off sharply after US President Donald Trump revived a threat of new tariffs against China in response to the COVID-19 pandemic which has brought global economies to a grinding halt.

Assange fiancee urges his release

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange's fiancee has appealed for him to be freed to restore the public's faith in "mature democracy".

Meghan loses first round of privacy claim

The Duchess of Sussex has lost an early round in her privacy case against the Mail on Sunday over its publication of a letter to her estranged father.

Biden says sexual assault 'never happened'

Presumptive US Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden has denied that he sexually assaulted a former senate aide in 1993, in his first public remarks on the subject after he faced intense pressure to personally address the accusation.

Canada bans assault-style weapons

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has announced an immediate ban on the use and trade of assault-style weapons in Canada.

Australian Associated Press

Original post:
News from around the world - Newcastle Herald

Israel mentioned in newly released FBI documents regarding Stone and Trump’s 2016 campaign – Haaretz

Weeks after Robert Mueller was appointed special counsel in the Russia investigation, Roger Stone, a confidant of President Donald Trump, reassured WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in a Twitter message that if prosecutors came after him, I will bring down the entire house of cards, according to FBI documents made public Tuesday.

Those records also include mentions of "Israel", "Jerusalem", "October surprise", and a "cabinet minister" who would supposedly meet Trump, although the redacted documents offer no clear details.

The documents FBI affidavits submitted to obtain search warrants in the criminal investigation into Stone were released following a court case brought by The Associated Press and other media organizations.

They were made public as Stone, convicted last year in Muellers investigation into ties between Russia and the Trump campaign, awaits a date to surrender to a federal prison system that has grappled with outbreaks of the coronavirus.

The documents include these key quotes:

One entry dated on or about August 12, 2016, reads: [NAME REDACTED] messaged STONE, Roger, hello from Jerusalem. Any progress? He is going to be defeated [sic] unless we intervene. We have critical intell. The key is in your hands! Back in the US next week. How is your Pneumonia? Thank you.[REDACTED] STONE replied, I am well. Matters complicated. Pondering. R.,[REDACTED] Thank You.

On August 20, 2016, CORSI told STONE that they needed to meet with [NAME REDACTED]to determine what if anything Israel plans to do in Oct." CORSI refers to Jerome Corsi, the right-wing American author, political commentator, and conspiracy theorist.

We've got more newsletters we think you'll find interesting.

Please try again later.

The email address you have provided is already registered.

On or about.June 21, 2016, [NAME REDACTED] messaged STONE, "RS: Secret I Cabinet Minister [NAME REDACTED] in NYC Sat. June 25. Available for DJT meeting [REDACTED]. " According to publicly-availabe information, during this time [NAME REDACTED] was a Minister without portfolio in the[REDACTED] cabinet dealing with issues concerning defense and foreign affairs.

It's not clear from the newly released court documents if the minister mentioned is indeed Israeli, whether the "October surprise" has anything to do with Israel and who initiated the contact with Stone and Trump Israel or another person and of what nationality.

The meeting with the minister did not apparently take place: "On or about June 25, 2016, [NAME REDACTED] messaged Stone, "Roger, Minister left. Sends greetings from PM. 5 When am I meeting DJT? Should I stay or leave Sunday as planned? Hope you are well.[REDACTED]"

On or about June 28, 2016, [NAME REDACTED] messaged STONE, RETURNING TO DC AFTER URGENT CONSULTATIONS WITH PM IN ROME.MUST MEET WITH YOU WED. EVE AND WITH DJ TRUMP THURSDAY IN NYC.

Netanyahu was indeed in Italyat the end of June 2016 on an official state visit - but it's unclear if the quotes in the document are related to the Israeli PM.

Assange and Stone

The records primarily reveal the extent of communications between Stone and Julian Assange, whose anti-secrecy website published Democratic emails hacked by Russians during the 2016 presidential election, and underscore efforts by Trump allies to gain insight about the release of information they expected would embarrass Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton.

In a June 2017 Twitter direct message cited in the records, Stone reassured Assange that the issue was still nonsense and said as a journalist it doesnt matter where you get information only that it is accurate and authentic.

He cited as an example the 1971 Supreme Court ruling that facilitated the publishing by newspapers of the Pentagon Papers, classified government documents about the Vietnam War.

If the US government moves on you I will bring down the entire house of cards, Stone wrote, according to a transcript of the message cited in the search warrant affidavit. With the trumped-up sexual assault charges dropped I dont know of any crime you need to be pardoned for best regards. R.

Stone was likely referring to a sexual assault investigation dropped by Swedish authorities. Assange, who at the time was holed up in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, was charged last year with a series of crimes by the U.S. Justice Department, including Espionage Act violations for allegedly directing former Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning in one of the largest compromises of classified information in U.S. history.

According to the documents, Assange, who is imprisoned in London and is fighting his extradition to the United States, responded to Stones 2017 Twitter message by saying: Between CIA and DoJ theyre doing quite a lot. On the DoJ side thats coming most strongly from those obsessed with taking down Trump trying to squeeze us into a deal.

Stone replied that he was doing everything possible to address the issues at the highest level of Government.

The records illustrate the Trump campaigns curiosity about what information WikiLeaks was going to make public. Former White House adviser Steve Bannon told Muellers team under questioning that he had asked Stone about WikiLeaks because he had heard that Stone had a channel to Assange, and he was hoping for more releases of damaging information.

Muellers investigation identified significant contact during the 2016 campaign between Trump associates and Russians, but did not allege a criminal conspiracy to tip the outcome of the presidential election.

In a statement Tuesday, Stone acknowledged that the search warrant affidavits contain private communication, but insisted that they prove no crimes.

I have no trepidation about their release as they confirm there was no illegal activity and certainly no Russian collusion by me during the 2016 Election, Stone said. There is, to this day, no evidence that I had or knew about the source or content of the Wikileaks disclosures prior to their public release.

Stone was among six associates of Trump charged in Muellers investigation. He was convicted last year of lying to House lawmakers, tampering with a witness and obstructing Congress own Russia probe.

A judge in February sentenced Stone to 40 months in prison in a case that exposed fissures inside the Justice Department the entire trial team quit the case amid a dispute over the recommended punishment and between Trump and Attorney General William Barr, who said the presidents tweets about ongoing cases made his job impossible.

Read the original post:
Israel mentioned in newly released FBI documents regarding Stone and Trump's 2016 campaign - Haaretz

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange fathered two children during seven years in embassy – National Post

LONDON WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange fathered two children with a lawyer who was representing him while he was holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy in London fighting extradition, the lawyer told a British newspaper on Sunday.

The Mail on Sunday said 37-year-old South African lawyer Stella Morris has been engaged to Assange since 2017. The couple have two sons, aged 1 and 2, both conceived while Assange was in the embassy and kept secret from media covering his case and intelligence agencies monitoring his activity, the paper said.

It showed pictures of Assange with a baby, identified as the older son, who it said had been smuggled into the embassy to meet him. Both of the children are British citizens, it said. Assange had watched the births on a video link.

I love Julian deeply and I am looking forward to marrying him

The Australian-born Assange was dragged out of the embassy last year after a seven-year standoff, and is now jailed in Britain fighting extradition to the United States on computer hacking and espionage charges. His supporters say the U.S. case against him is political and he cannot receive a fair trial.

Morris said she had chosen to speak out now because she was worried about his susceptibility to the coronavirus in jail.

I love Julian deeply and I am looking forward to marrying him, the paper quoted her as saying.

Over the past five years I have discovered that love makes the most intolerable circumstances seem bearable but this is different I am now terrified I will not see him alive again.

Reporting by Peter Graff. Editing by Frances Kerry

See the original post here:
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange fathered two children during seven years in embassy - National Post

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange fathered two children in embassy, partner says – NBC News

LONDON WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange fathered two children while he was living in London's Ecuadorian Embassy, their mother said Sunday as she pleaded with British authorities to release him from prison over fears for his health amid the coronavirus epidemic.

Stella Morris, who was a member of Assange's legal team, publicly revealed that Assange was a parent for the first time in a video interview WikiLeaks released on its social media channels.

Assange, 48, is being kept in London's Belmarsh high-security prison while he fights extradition to the U.S., where he faces 18 counts, including conspiring to hack government computers and violating an espionage law.

He was dragged out of the embassy and arrested by British police almost exactly a year ago after his asylum was revoked.

Morris said in the video that she first met Assange in 2011 but that their relationship started four years later, when he was living in the embassy. They deliberately chose to have children to ''break down the walls around him" and "imagine a life beyond prison," she added.

She said she was worried that Assange's life "might be coming to an end" as he remains in confinement amid the coronavirus outbreak.

Let our news meet your inbox. The news and stories that matters, delivered weekday mornings.

In a five-page witness statement, which has been seen by NBC News, Morris said she was going public in support of a bail application for Assange.

Assange's attorney Jennifer Robinson told NBC News in a statement Sunday that Morris had not made the decision to tell her story lightly, having fiercely protected her family's privacy for many years.

"She wanted to speak in support of Julian's bail application given the grave risk to his health in prison during the COVID pandemic and the judge refused her anonymity," Robinson said.

Assange's extradition hearing is scheduled to resume next month. Last month, he was denied bail after his attorneys said he should be released because he was highly vulnerable to the coronavirus.

Morris said she has gone to great lengths to shelter her children "from the climate that surrounds" Assange but felt that she needed to speak up because their lives are "on the brink" and she feared Assange could die in prison.

Download the NBC News app for breaking news and politics

In her statement, signed March 24, Morris said she had recently learned that Assange is in isolation "for effectively 23 out of each 24 hours and perhaps longer," adding that she cannot visit him in prison because of the coronavirus epidemic.

She said she has sensed "an increasing fear and panic" in her phone conversations with Assange about the coronavirus situation at the prison.

"I have feared with strong reason for a long time that I will lose Julian to suicide if there is no way in which he can stop his extradition to the U.S.," Morris wrote.

"I now fear I may lose him for different reasons and sooner to the virus," she added.

CORRECTION (April 12, 2020, 10:30 p.m. ET): A photo caption on an earlier version of this article misstated when Julian Assange was photographed arriving at Westminster Magistrates Court in London. The photo was taken in April 2019, not last month.

Yuliya Talmazan is a London-based journalist.

Michele Neubert is a London-based producer for NBC News.She has been awarded four Emmy Awards, an Edward R. Murrow Award and an Alfred I. duPont Award for her work in conflict zones, including the Balkans, Afghanistan and Kurdistan.

See original here:
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange fathered two children in embassy, partner says - NBC News

Julian Assange: Judge refuses to grant Wikileaks founders partner anonymity in extradition case – The Independent

A judge has refused to grant legal anonymity to Julian Assanges partner after hearing claims the US had tried to obtain their childrens DNA.

Representatives of the Wikileaks founder submitted evidence to Westminster Magistrates Court claiming that American agencies had expressed interest in testing nappies discarded when Mr Assanges partner and children visited him at the Ecuadorian embassy.

District Judge Vanessa Baraitser found that, even if the allegation were true, there was no reason to believe US agencies meant toharm his young family.

Sharing the full story, not just the headlines

She referred to the claim while rejecting the bid to anonymise Mr Assanges partner, who the court heard wishes to live quietly with her young children away from publicity.

Following a submission by the Press Association news agency to the court, Judge Baraitser ruled that the womans right to a private family life was outweighed by the need for open justice.

Assange was arrested after Metropolitan Police officers were invited into the Ecuadorian embassy on April 11 2019. How did it come to this?

Ruptly TV

Assange shows the front page of the Guardian on July 26 2010, the day that they broke the story of the thousands of military files leaked by WikiLeaks

AFP/Getty

A warrant for Assange's arrest was issued in August 2010 for counts of rape and molestation in Sweden

AFP/Getty

The UK's Supreme Court ruled in 2012 that Assange should be extradited to Sweden to face trial

Getty

Following the ruling, Assange was given asylum by the Ecuadorian governement over fears that his human rights would be violated if he were extradited, he has since remained in the embassy in London

Getty

Friend Pamela Anderson delivers lunch to Assange at the embassy in October 2016. She has since spoken against his arrest

Getty

A UN panel found in 2016 that Assange had been arbitrarily detained and that he had not been able to claim his full right to asylum. It urged Sweden to withdraw the charges against him

Getty

Last year, the Ecuadorian embassy threatened to revoke Assange's internet access unless he stopped making political statements online and started taking better care of James, his pet cat. Assange accused Ecuador of violating his rights

Reuters

Assange was arrested on April 11 2019. Ecuador revoked his asylum status and invited the Metropolitan Police in to the embassy to arrest him.

Reuters

Assange was arrested after Metropolitan Police officers were invited into the Ecuadorian embassy on April 11 2019. How did it come to this?

Ruptly TV

Assange shows the front page of the Guardian on July 26 2010, the day that they broke the story of the thousands of military files leaked by WikiLeaks

AFP/Getty

A warrant for Assange's arrest was issued in August 2010 for counts of rape and molestation in Sweden

AFP/Getty

The UK's Supreme Court ruled in 2012 that Assange should be extradited to Sweden to face trial

Getty

Following the ruling, Assange was given asylum by the Ecuadorian governement over fears that his human rights would be violated if he were extradited, he has since remained in the embassy in London

Getty

Friend Pamela Anderson delivers lunch to Assange at the embassy in October 2016. She has since spoken against his arrest

Getty

A UN panel found in 2016 that Assange had been arbitrarily detained and that he had not been able to claim his full right to asylum. It urged Sweden to withdraw the charges against him

Getty

Last year, the Ecuadorian embassy threatened to revoke Assange's internet access unless he stopped making political statements online and started taking better care of James, his pet cat. Assange accused Ecuador of violating his rights

Reuters

Assange was arrested on April 11 2019. Ecuador revoked his asylum status and invited the Metropolitan Police in to the embassy to arrest him.

Reuters

But the judge delayed making the womans identity public until 4pm on 14 April, pending a possible judicial review at the High Court.

Mr Assange was previously denied bail amid concerns over the spread of coronavirus in British jails, and the application had been supported by the unnamed woman.

The 48-year-old is being held on remand at HMP Belmarsh, in south-east London, ahead of an extradition hearing on 18 May.

During the virtual hearing, the judge also rejected a bid to delay the hearing because of the coronavirus crisis.

Mr Assanges barrister, Edward Fitzgerald QC, said there were insuperable difficulties preparing his case because of the pandemic, and requested an adjournment until September.

No hype, just the advice and analysis you need

He told the court that he had not been able to see Mr Assange in jail and could see no viable way his client could be present in court to hear witnesses.

On Mr Assanges mental state, he told the judge: There are difficulties of the pandemic with the defendant himself. You are aware he has well documented problems of clinical depression.

Mr Assanges treatment was on hold during the lockdown and he had been unable to see his family.

Mr Fitzgerald said: In those circumstances, in his vulnerable condition, to force him to enter a full evidential hearing in May, we respectfully submit it would be unjust. We respectfully submit it would be oppressive.

Sweden discontinues Assange rape investigation

He stressed it was an exceptional circumstance, adding: This is not a case where second best will do, where we should just try to muddle through. The difficulties are insuperable in the current crisis.

Ruling against him, Judge Baraitser said the extradition hearing was still five weeks away and it was expected courts would resume in a fortnight despite the continuing lockdown.

She added: I cannot assume the courts will not be operating normally by then.

Mr Assange is in custody and there is some urgency of this case being heard to its conclusion.

If there was a need for a third and final hearing after the hearing on 18 May, it will be held in July.

Mr Assange is fighting extradition to the US, where he would face 17 charges under the Espionage Act and conspiracy to commit computer intrusion, over the publication of hundreds of thousands of classified documents in 2010 and 2011.

He has been held in custody since being arrested at the Ecuadorian embassy in London almost exactly a year ago.

He sought asylum there in 2012 while wanted under a European Arrest Warrant for interview in a Swedish rape investigation which has since been dropped.

Additional reporting by PA

Read the original post:
Julian Assange: Judge refuses to grant Wikileaks founders partner anonymity in extradition case - The Independent

Before coronavirus, there was a ring of suspicion around Tablighis – Business Standard

WikiLeaks memos, based on the interrogation of al-Qaeda operatives detained at Guantanamo Bay, quoted them as saying that they used a New Delhi-based organisation, Tablighi Jamaat, as cover to obtain travel documents and shelter. The leaked memos said at least three detained persons stayed at the organisations facilities in Delhi and around.

The Tablighi Jamaat is in news recently after a congregation at its Nizamuddin Markaz in New Delhi led to a sudden rise in the number of positive coronavirus cases across India. Similar events in several countries in Southeast Asia led to many Covid-19 cases there.

The records revealed by WikiLeaks contain interrogation reports and analysis of 779 inmates of the US military prison in Cuba.

The US records identify the Jamaat Tabligh (as the name appears in the records; JT) as a proselytising organisation that willingly supports terrorists. Also, according to reports, al-Qaeda used the JT to facilitate and fund international travels of its members.

Tablighi Jamaat authorities denied the charge and said that their facilities were open to all. Questioning the authenticity of the WikiLeaks records, it said: It is known that such statements are forced to be made under duress.

What we know

When it started, the Tablighi Jamaat was neither engaged in supporting nor promoting Islamic radicalism. It was, in fact, a reformist organisation. Academics describe it as an apolitical devotional movement stressing individual faith, introspection, and spiritual development. But somewhere along the way, the organisation veered away from its original purpose.

We know that the Tablighi Jamaat was begun by prominent Deobandi cleric and scholar Maulana Muhammad Ilyas Kandhalawi (1885-1944) in 1927 in Mewat, not far from Delhi. Part of Ilyas impetus for founding the Tablighi Jamaat was to counter the inroads being made by Hindu missionaries. They rejected modernity as antithetical to Islam, excluded women, and preached that Islam must subsume other religions. Apart from the Quran, the only literature Tablighis are required to read are the Tablighi Nisab, seven essays penned by a companion of Ilyas in the 1920s.

A lesser-known fact about the Tablighi Jamaat is that its not a monolith: One subsection believes they should pursue jihad through conscience (jihad bin nafs), while a more radical wing advocates jihad through the sword (jihad bin saif), says Alexander R Alexiev, one of the best-known experts on the organisation. Why it captured the Islamic imagination (when it seems, superficially, to be no different from the Wahhabi-Salafi doctrine followed by most Sunnis) seems to have been its austerity, emphasis on conversion, and spirit of service. Saudi Arabia couldve seen the movement as a threat but instead co-opted it, funded it and praised its spirit, advising others to emulate it.

Jamaats growth and development

The real impetus the Tablighi Jamaat got was from ruling families in Pakistan, especially Nawaz Sharif, whose father was a big supporter of the organisation. Its facility at Raiwind, Pakistan, is a well-known recruiting ground for military training after the recruits finish their missionary training.

Alexievs interviews and research on the organisation reveals that the Tablighi Jamaat was instrumental in founding Harkat ul-Mujahideen. Founded at Raiwind in 1980, almost all the Harakat ul-Mujahideens original members were Tablighis. Infamous for the December 1998 hijacking of an Air India passenger jet and the suicide attack on a bus carrying French engineers in Karachi in 2002, Harkat members make no secret of their ties.

Alexiev claims perhaps 80 per cent of the Islamist extremists in France come from Tablighi ranks, prompting French intelligence officers to call Tablighi Jamaat the antechamber of fundamentalism. US counterterrorism officials share this view. We have a significant presence of the Tablighi Jamaat in the United States, the deputy chief of the FBI's international terrorism section said in 2003, and we have found that the al-Qaeda used them for recruiting now and in the past.

Little is known about the stewardship of the organisation, except all its leaders since Ilyas have been related to him by either blood or marriage. Upon Ilyas death in 1944, his son, Maulana Muhammad Yusuf (1917-65), assumed leadership of the movement, expanding its reach and influence. Yusuf and his successor, Inamul Hassan (1965-95), transformed the Jamaat into a truly transnational movement with a renewed emphasis on conversion of non-Muslims, a mission that continues to this day.

Read this article:
Before coronavirus, there was a ring of suspicion around Tablighis - Business Standard

The State Times Movie Screening and Brief Questionnaire, Community and COVID-19 Relief The State Times – The State Times

Catholic Charities of Fairfield

Published on the behalf of the State Times and their, now virtual, Open Forum Event:

Hello fellow red dragons! We are hoping you are all safe and in good health! While the semester has not gone as planned and many of us are in self-quarintine, the Oneonta community prevails. We would like to encourage your voice on our campus and to hopefully provide you with an escape for a few hours. The student-run newspaper has been keeping students up with the times since 1945, however, the print publication has since fallen behind modern advancements and the easy accessibility of technology.

This event consists of the film The Fifth Estate, a 2013 biographical thriller about the creation of the news-leaking website WikiLeaks and two ten question surveys that take less than two minutes each to complete. Regardless of your personal political views, we have all seen the use and misuse of the media and all of our opinions are worthy of recognition.The film is available for free on YouTube at:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U37pe1n6_Ik (2h15)Here is the official trailer if you so wish:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZT1wb8_tcYU(2m32)

Part 1 of the Survey (10 questions, approximately 2 minutes to complete):https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/BQRV5ZN

Part 2 of the Survey (10 questions, approximately 2 minutes to complete):https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/BQMJX77

On the final question of the second survey, please be sure to type your name as it appears on your degree works so that you can get LEAD credit for the event. The surveys will remain open from Monday, March 23, 2020 at 3:00 p.m. EST through Friday, March 27, 2020 at 3:00 p.m. EST.

Dr. Torosyan, a professor of journalism at SUNY Oneonta, has a statement to preface the showing and survey responses in addition to a closing statement and ultimate take aways.

Opening Statement:

Hello everyone. We are communicating under unusual circumstances today. While we are all working from home, wondering about the situation in major cities and small towns all over the world, we can take a moment to appreciate the work of journalists who bring credible, reliable news to us every day. Not every piece of information is trustworthy. Not every piece of information is open to the public either. Todays viewing of The Fifth Estate is dedicated to the questions of freedom versus loyalty, the citizens right to know versus the need to protect the nations secrets. We all know about WikiLeaks from their earlier revelations, and Julian Assange is often in the news up to this day, hiding in various embassies and facing extradition. Is he a hero or a criminal? A watchdog journalist or a betrayer of strategic secrets? We will return to these questions after we view the movie. It is remarkable that the entire motion picture is available on YouTube free of charge. If anything is to be free, it is the story of WikiLeaks. Please enjoy the movie, and join our forum for an online reflection through an online survey.

Closing Remarks:

We just watched a two-hour long movie about WikiLeaks and its founder Julian Assange. At a time when many question the relevance of journalism, it is important that we ask ourselves: who do we trust, the corporate media consolidated in the hands of a few corporations, or outlaws that feed on information leaks from government officials, military operatives and political figures. Let us share our reflections on the movie by participating in our two-part online survey. Each of the parts will take only two minutes to complete, but it will add an interactive dimension to our consumption of this particular media product, making our experience more like a multi-way street.

Thank you for joining us today in celebrating journalism, and keeping it alive through our excellent student newspaper, the State Times.If you are interested in following the State Times on social media, please continue to our handles below orcheck out our website at thestatetimes.com.

Snapchat /thestatetimes

Twitter @thestatetimes

Facebook /thestatetimes

Instagram @thestatetimes

The staff can be reached at:

[emailprotected] Editor-in-Chief and general [emailprotected] Culture and Business [emailprotected] Arts [emailprotected] Sports [emailprotected] Advertising Manager and claiming space in [emailprotected] Contribute Articles and inquire about leftover stories

For the remainder of the semester we will be publishing solely online. We will do our best to pass along leftover story ideas to members, however, without access to the campus or campus events these pitches will be limited and therefore we encourage you to contact us with your own!Write a news piece, write an opinion piece, write a tributewe want to hear from you despite the distance and unfortunate circumstances! Check back every Friday for new content!

We thank you all for your time and hope that this event gave you some relief from the day to day chaos that has been unfolding before our very eyes. Please remember that you have a friend at the State Times.

Chrystal Savage, Editor-in-Chief & News EditorAngelina Beltrani, Managing EditorJessica Kennedy, Culture & Business EditorErin Spicer, Arts EditorColin Maruscsak, Sports EditorMarcus Garnot, Copy EditorDavid DAnnibale, Staff WriterDaniella Fishman, Staff WriterZarina Sotero, Staff WriterCarli Marsh, Advertising ManagerGillian Stieglitz, TreasurerDr. Raul Feliciano, Faculty Advisor& last but certainly not least our special guest and moderator, Dr. Gayane Torosyan

Follow this link:
The State Times Movie Screening and Brief Questionnaire, Community and COVID-19 Relief The State Times - The State Times

What is WikiLeaks? – CNET

Recent US history is dotted with major government leaks. There's the Pentagon Papers, which revealed a secret bombing campaign led by the US during the Vietnam War. Then there's Deep Throat, a pseudonym for the government informant who leaked information about the Watergate Scandal and helped bring down the Nixon administration. (It was revealed 30 years later that Deep Throat was former FBI Deputy Director Mark Felt.)

These days, one of the biggest leakers of classified information in the world is WikiLeaks.

Over the past 11 years, the group claims to have released over 10 million secret government documents through its website. The leaks range from a video showing an American Apache helicopter in the Iraq War shooting and killing two journalists to emails from the Democratic National Committee exposing alleged misconduct during the 2016 presidential campaign.

On March 7, 2017, the organization released thousands of documents that allegedly detail the methods and tools that the CIA uses to break into phones, TVs and cars, including how key software from the world's top tech companies, including Apple, Google and Microsoft, could be breached by the CIA.

While the authenticity of these documents has yet to be confirmed or denied by the CIA, a spokesman said, "It is [the] CIA's job to be innovative, cutting edge and the first line of defense." All this raises questions about what devices and software the CIA could break into.

But what about WikiLeaks? What is it? How does the group work? What is its motivation for leaking supposed classified material? Details about the group are tightly controlled, but here's what we know.

WikiLeaks didn't immediately respond to CNET's request to comment for this article.

WikiLeaks is an international nonprofit organization founded in 2006. Its purpose is to vet and publish first-source, restricted documents. As of this writing, WikiLeaks claims to have released over 10 million documents, but the organization hasn't revealed how many more documents it has in its possession.

One of the most high profile releases was a video of a US military helicopter gunning down journalists and civilians in Iraq in 2007. An outside source revealed that the leak came from former US Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning (formerly known as Bradley).

Think of WikiLeaks as a middleman. As opposed to a whistleblower leaking information directly to the press, someone instead gives it to WikiLeaks, which then vets and distributes the information. Sources are kept anonymous, with WikiLeaks protecting the whistleblower from retaliation.

WikiLeaks' website states, "Although no organization can hope to have a perfect record forever, thus far WikiLeaks has [been] perfect in document authentication and resistance to all censorship attempts."

WikiLeaks publisher Julian Assange speaks from the Ecuadorian embassy in London.

The site's publisher is Julian Assange, 45, from Australia. Assange has said that before WikiLeaks, he worked as a computer programmer and as an activist -- he avoids the label "hacker."

In 2006, he helped found WikiLeaks. During its early years, Assange toured the world giving lectures and interviews fashioning himself as the face of the organization. His story was turned into the 2013 film "The Fifth Estate," with Benedict Cumberbatch playing Assange.

Four years ago, Assange sought asylum in the Ecuadorian embassy in London to avoid extradition to Sweden, where he was accused of rape. Assange hasn't been formally charged and he's denied the allegation. Other charges against him have since been dropped because of statutes of limitation. He has been holed up in the embassy since June 19, 2012.

On February 24, 2011, a British court agreed to honor Sweden's request for Assange's extradition. If Assange leaves the embassy, he would immediately be taken into custody by British police and extradited.

During a 2013 press conference, President Obama addressed the topic of Assange and WikiLeaks, saying that leaks related to national security put people at risk. "I make no apologies and I don't think the American people will expect me as commander in chief not to be concerned about information that might compromise their missions or get them killed."

Assange said that he fears Swedish officials will extradite him to the US to face prosecution over leaked government and military documents -- even though there's been no public request for extradition from the US.

In a tweet posted to the WikiLeaks Twitter account on January 12, 2017, Assange offered to agree to extradition to the US if President Obama released Chelsea Manning, who was serving a 35-year sentence for leaking thousands of US Army classified documents.

Five days later, President Obama commuted Manning's sentence. Shortly after, in a press conference streamed on Periscope on January 19, Assange said he was willing to hold up his end of the bargain, but hasn't settled on a date. Manning is expected to be freed on May 17, 2017.

This is where things get tricky. On its website and social media pages, WikiLeaks states, "We open governments."

Certainly the publication of classified documents, emails and videos does give an unusual inside look into a government's dealings and actions. And while this has made WikiLeaks popular among some open government advocates, not everyone is convinced WikiLeaks' intentions are pure.

Critics like documentary maker Alex Gibney question WikiLeaks' motivation, especially when the organization released emails from the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign manager John Podesta, apparently to hurt Clinton's campaign. In an interview with ITV on June 12, 2016, Assange said, "We do see her as a bit of a problem for freedom of the press."

There's the possibility WikiLeaks could have been given these documents by the Russian government in order to affect the outcome of the 2016 US presidential election. In a combined report released on January 6, 2017, the CIA, FBI and NSA said Russian hackers used WikiLeaks to distribute documents and emails from the DNC.

"WikiLeaks sources in relation to the John Podesta emails and the DNC leak are not members of any government," Assange said in response shortly after.

So far no one has been able to publicly corroborate Assange's statement.

We don't.

As much as WikiLeaks aims to bring transparency to government, the organization itself is not transparent about its own processes and procedures. It's still up to news organizations to verify and authenticate any documents released.

In WikiLeaks' early years, Assange refused to redact any information, including names that would have normally have been redacted by most news organizations. The New York Times reported that when it collaborated with WikiLeaks alongside The Guardian and Der Spiegel on the Afghanistan war logs -- a collection of internal US military logs from that conflict -- Assange disagreed with the paper's decision to redact the name of an Afghan informant.

"If an Afghan civilian helps coalition forces, he deserves to die," Assange allegedly told the Guardian's Nick Davies.

WikiLeaks still doesn't appear to redact names or information. Last year's DNC email leak included social security numbers and credit card information. Assange claims deleting such info would harm the integrity of the archive.

The organization didn't respond to a request for comment about its practices.

DNC Chairperson Debbie Wasserman Schultz, attending a campaign rally a day before she resigned.

WikiLeaks has been both praised and criticized for the work it does. Releasing classified documents violates national security laws.

Classified documents also contain sensitive information that could endanger people. There's no evidence that any of WikiLeaks' disclosures have led to anyone's death so far.

But there are numerous examples of the disclosures hurting reputations. Former DNC Chairperson Debbie Wasserman Shultz, for example, resigned after the party's emails were released and showed her alleged bias against Clinton's primary opponent, Senator Bernie Sanders.

According to its website, WikiLeaks has a staff of over 100 people working for it around the world. It doesn't specify whether those people are paid or volunteers, nor does it say what roles they serve.

Edward Snowden's leak of classified information revealed numerous global surveillance programs.

No. Edward Snowden, 33, a former US government contractor and CIA employee, leaked thousands of classified NSA documents detailing surveillance programs to reporters Glenn Greenwald, Ewen MacAskill, Laura Poitras and Barton Gellman. This is is documented in Poitras' film "Citizenfour."

Yes, sometimes. On its website, WikiLeaks names dozens of news and research organizations as "partners," including the Associated Press, Rolling Stone, The New York Times, The Guardian, The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal.

WikiLeaks also says it has contractual relationships and secure communications paths to more than 100 major media organizations around the world. "This gives WikiLeaks sources negotiating power, impact and technical protections that would otherwise be difficult or impossible to achieve."

When Manning was an intelligence analyst for the US Army, she anonymously leaked classified information to WikiLeaks. Manning confided what she had done to an online acquaintance, who then reported her to the FBI. She was later convicted of espionage as well as theft, and sentenced to 35 years in prison. In January, President Obama commuted Manning's sentence.

No. Though the WikiLeaks website was initially set up as a wiki, a communal publishing service, the platform was abandoned by the organization in 2010 when the website went dark for a fundraising drive.

According to its website, WikiLeaks is funded by "its publisher, its publication sales and the general public."

WikiLeaks has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize six times (hundreds of people and organizations are nominated each year). It's received humanitarian and journalism awards including:

CNET Magazine: Check out a sampling of the stories you'll find in CNET's newsstand edition.

Special Reports: All of CNET's most in-depth features in one easy spot.

The rest is here:
What is WikiLeaks? - CNET

Just Like Bitcoin Before It, Cardano Is Banned From Wikipedia – Cointelegraph

On March 24, Cardano (ADA) founder, Charles Hoskinson, streamed a YouTube video titled On Wikipedia, in which he berated Wikipedia for applying arbitrary commercial censorship against Cardano.

Censorship of cryptocurrency projects is as old as the industry itself. Back in 2010, even Satoshi Nakamoto was frustrated with Wikipedias editors for removing Bitcoins wiki entry several times.

After PayPal severed ties with WikiLeaks, one of Bitcoins supporters suggested that becoming the site's new source of donations would generate enough publicity to gain entry into Wikipedia. Satoshi strongly opposed WikiLeaks adoption of the cryptocurrency, but it was too late:

No, don't "bring it on". The project needs to grow gradually so the software can be strengthened along the way. I make this appeal to WikiLeaks not to try to use Bitcoin. Bitcoin is a small beta community in its infancy. You would not stand to get more than pocket change, and the heat you would bring would likely destroy us at this stage.

Hoskinson states that he does not know the rationale behind Wikipedias hostility towards his project, despite it being the most cited of all of the peer reviewed coins:

We don't know why there's hostility where coins like SpankChain can have an article on Wikipedia. A lot of other cryptocurrencies and top 15, top 20 apparently have articles and that's perfectly fine. But then we're not allowed to have an article for some reason, even though we've been mentioned by the U.S. Congress.

Cointelegraph could not find a Wikipedia article for SpankChain (SPANK). Other projects like Dogecoin (DOGE), GridCoin (GRC), and PotCoin (POT) do have one, however. Most of the top ten projects, including Bitcoin Cash (BCH), have one too.

Source: Cointelegraph

Hoskinson confirmed to Cointelegraph that the censorship comes exclusively from Wikipedias English language editors, noting that there are Cardano wiki entries in German, Estonian, Italian, Japanese, Dutch, Portuguese, Romanian and Russian.

Crypto censorship has recently been on the rise. In Wikipedias case, it is an especially surprising move, considering that the site accepts Bitcoin to help fund its mission of providing a free online encyclopedia, created and edited by volunteers around the world

Read this article:
Just Like Bitcoin Before It, Cardano Is Banned From Wikipedia - Cointelegraph