What is Pizzagate? The fake news scandal involving Hillary Clinton and Wikileaks explained – and why its trending amid Epstein inquiry – The Scotsman

NewsPoliticsA new Sky documentary that investigates some of the most mind-boggling conspiracy theories of recent years has been shining a new light on some of the most baffling fake news stories to come out of the US

Wednesday, 10th June 2020, 4:06 pm

After Truth: Disinformation and the Cost of Fake News aired earlier this month, and surveys the effects of disinformation campaigns on social media and the impacts of well known conspiracy theories.

One of those theories is that of Pizzagate, and the film follows the growth of the story on forums like Reddit and 4chan, how it was fomented by the alt-right and Alex Jones, and then translated into a real-life dangerous situation.

Heres everything you need to know:

Pizzagate was a widely discredited news story which linked Hilary Clintons presidential campaign with a fictional human trafficking ring.

Its so-called because the alleged headquarters of the operation was the Comet Ping Pong pizzeria in Washington, D.C, which according to the conspiracy was also a meeting ground for Satanic ritual abuse.

It all began in March 2016, when the personal email account of John Podesta, Clinton's campaign manager, was hacked.

WikiLeaks published the emails later that year; conspiracy theorists claimed the emails contained coded messages that alluded to human trafficking and a child sex ring.

The emails contained multiple references to pizza and pizza restaurants, but there is no evidence that they are code or refer to anything else.

Had the claims been true, it would have implicated a number of high-ranking Democratic Party officials.

How was the story debunked?

The story has been widely debunked by a number of fact checking a news organisations from across the political spectrum even Fox News has said the story is completely false.

Theorists claimed that similarities between Comet Ping Pongs logo contained symbols linked to Satanism and paedophilia; the New York Times noted these similarities could be found in the logos of completely unrelated companies, if you looked hard enough.

Claims of a secret underground network beneath Comet Ping Pong were disproven by the fact the establishment has no basement, and evidence that John Podesta played a part in the kidnapping of Madeleine McCann were simply sketches of a suspect taken from the descriptions of two eyewitnesses.

No alleged victims have come forward and no physical evidence has been found.

Despite the theory having zero evidence to support it, that didnt stop those who opposed Hilary Clinton believing the story wholesale.

That included gunman Edgar Maddison Welch, who travelled down from South Carolina to confront the owners of Comet Ping Pong.

He entered the pizza restaurant in Washington D.C. packed with families on a Sunday afternoon and fired an automatic rifle.

Thankfully, no one was injured in the disturbance; Mr Welch told police he had driven from South Carolina to investigate the restaurant after reading online reports.

Why is Comet Ping Pong back in the news?

Though its been four years since the height of the Pizzagate story, the owners still have to deal with death threats and abuse.

As employees continue to search for a new rhythm [during the coronavirus pandemic], say the Washington Post, they still field calls from Pizzagate obsessors.

A few weeks ago, someone jammed the phone line for an entire day, frustrating customers who struggled to place orders. [Comet] has received almost 70 Pizzagate messages in recent weeks.

There also seems to be a renewed interest in the false story in the wake of news that US prosecutors want a face-to-face interview with Prince Andrew over the Jeffrey Epstein scandal.

The story has been trending on Twitter again, despite remaining completely untrue, with theorists linking Epsteins private jet the Lolita Express and his private Epstein Island with the restaurant.

There is no evidence to suggest any of it is true.

More:
What is Pizzagate? The fake news scandal involving Hillary Clinton and Wikileaks explained - and why its trending amid Epstein inquiry - The Scotsman

HSE takes action against man who leaked patient information to Wikileaks – Offaly Express

The HSE has secured High Court orders preventing an IT worker from distributing highly confidential and sensitive information about hospital patients. It is alleged that Neill Bradley had distributed confidential information he obtained from the HSE's computer servers during the course of his now former employment with a third party contracted by the HSE to perform certain IT services.

The information includes patient's personal data and medical databases allegedly sent by Mr Bradley to Wikileaks the non-profit organisation that publishes news leaks provided by anonymous source founded by Australian internet activist Julian Assange.

The orders were granted last week by Mr Justice Tony O'Connor, whosaid he was satisfied that Mr Bradley had gained access to private and sensitive data through his former employment, which he threatened to facilitate the dissemination of patients details and private records.

The judge noted that the defendant in one post on social media had referred to information he obtained, which Mr Bradley knew should be kept secure, as being "stolen. "

The HSE launched proceedings against Mr Bradley following a probe it commenced after becoming aware of a potentially serious data breach from posts on social media of screenshots of the HSE's internal servers.

The HSE claims the posts appeared on three twitter accounts it says were set up and controlled by Mr Bradley.

Through those accounts Mr Bradley allegedly sent messages to a senior official at the HSE, as well as posting to the social media accounts of Taoiseach Leo Varadkar, Ministers Simon Harris and Pascal Donohoe, media figures and Dr Tony Holohan.

In his communications, Mr Bradley made allegations of a cover-up and a scam by the HSE and said he would make public data from over a dozen Irish hospitals, it is claimed.

It is also claimed that he used various hashtags on his posts including #covid19 #lockdown ireland #notmytaoiseach #MAGA and #mediascum.

The HSE said during previous employment as a systems administration Mr Bradley was given access to its servers and patient databases to carry out tasks his previous employer was contracted to do.

That firm's role was to maintaining and servicing a 'smart' automated system used to dispense, record and manage medication given to patients at various hospitals called Omnicell.

The system is used in many hospitals throughout the state.

Since becoming aware of the situation the HSE, in co-operation with Mr Bradley's previous employer, who terminated his employment after learning of the HSE's concerns, have taken steps to secure the servers and prevent the information from being published.

These steps include having posts on thepastebin.comsite and links to the confidential material removed.

The HSE also sought and obtained court orders, including in junctions to prevent him from attempting to post more links to confidential information.

The injunction is to remain in place pending the outcome of any full hearing of the matter.

The application for the injunctions was initially heard in camera, meaning that the proceedings were in private. The Judge subsequently lifted the in camera ruling allowing the media to report on the case.

In its action the HSE, represented by Eoin McCullough SC, Joe Jeffers Bl instructed by Philip Lee solicitors sought the orders against Mr Bradley with an address at Carrigeen Hill, Conna, Co Cork. Mr Bradley had been informed of the application against him.

However he did not attend, nor was he represented during, the court hearings.

Mr Justice O'Connor in making the orders said Mr Bradley would be given the chance to advance a defence to the HSE's claims at a full hearing of the action.

The injunction restrains Mr Bradley and any person to whom he has communicated or may communicate the confidential information from disseminating publishing, communicating by any means, or using any of said information through specific twitter handles and email addresses attributed to him. The order also restrains the defendant, and anyone who received the confidential information from him, from destroying or deleting the information.

He must also deliver up all documents, records and devices containing the confidential information to the HSE's solicitors for forensic analysis.

The court further restrained Mr Bradley from leaving Ireland until he has complied with the order to deliver up the confidential information, and hand over his passport to An Garda Sochana, who will retain it until further order.

The HSE's solicitors were given permission to notify the Department of Foreign affairs, An Garda Sochana, authorities at all points of exit from the State about the court's orders.

Mr Justice O Connor said that Mr Bradley had said in another tweet that he had sold his house and was moving about Europe in a camper van to "ply my skills elsewhere."

The judge also noted the HSE's lawyers undertaking to give the Data Protection Commissioner, the Minister for Health and the Attorney General copies of the order and the documents put before the court during the application if requested by those parties.

Go here to see the original:
HSE takes action against man who leaked patient information to Wikileaks - Offaly Express

Anonymous Explained: Everything you need to know about the hacktivist group – The Indian Express

Written by Om Marathe, Edited by Explained Desk | New Delhi | Updated: June 9, 2020 9:34:41 am The worldwide group is believed to include anyone who wants to join; its members being referred to as anons. (Source: Wikimedia common)

As racial tensions in the US continue to make headlines, the hacktivist group Anonymous is back in focus with social media handles believed to be associated with it promising retribution for the death of George Floyd.

On May 28, in a video posted on an unconfirmed Facebook page, a speaker wearing Anonymouss signature Guy Fawkes mask accused the Minneapolis police of having a horrific track record of violence and corruption and threatened to expose its many crimes, TIME reported.

Since then, the group has been accused of carrying out a cyberattack on the websites of the city of Minneapolis and its police department, making them temporarily inaccessible. The webpage of a United Nations agency was also defaced, and replaced with a memorial carrying an Anonymous symbol that read Rest In Power, George Floyd!

The group has been described as a decentralised online collective with no particular political affiliation, that rallies around causes such as opposing censorship and government control and promoting freedom of speech. In the past, it has expressed support for the Occupy movement and Julian Assanges WikiLeaks. The worldwide group is believed to include anyone who wants to join; its members being referred to as anons.

A signature characteristic of Anonymous is the Guy Fawkes mask, portrayed in the dystopian novel and film V for Vendetta, in which an anarchist anti-hero wearing the mask fights against a fascist, white supremacist government. Even beyond the internet, sympathisers of the movement have sported the Guy Fawkes at rallies around the world.

Another attribute of the group is the use of voice changers or text-to-speech programmes that let anons mask their voice in video messages.

Anonymous does not use any verified social media handles, with multiple factions using portals such as the AnonNews website and Twitter account for disseminating the groups motives and campaigns.

The movement is believed to have started on imageboard websites such as 4chan in the early 2000s, and first became famous in 2008 when it unleashed cyberattacks on the Church of Scientology after the latter sought to remove from the internet a controversial video of filmstar Tom Cruisean outspoken Scientologist speaking about his religious beliefs.

In 2010, Anonymous was believed to be responsible for cyberattacks on Visa, MasterCard, and PayPal, after the financial services firms blocked donations to the controversial whistleblower WikiLeaks.

In 2011, Anonymous launched a tirade against the Westboro Baptist Church, a denomination known for its extreme opposition to homosexuality. Also that year, the group was alleged to have sabotaged electronics giant Sonys PlayStation network, after anons accused Sony of backtracking from providing an advertised feature. During the 2011 Arab Spring, it went after government websites in Egypt and Tunisia.

Express Explainedis now onTelegram. Clickhere to join our channel (@ieexplained)and stay updated with the latest

A year later, after the US banned the popular file-storage website Megaupload, Anonymous shut down the websites of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Department of Justice. In April 2012, Time magazine named Anonymous in its Worlds 100 Most Influential People list.

Also in 2012, the hacking movement called for protesters across India to oppose what it considered growing government censorship of the internet after a Chennai court demanded 15 service providers to block access to file-sharing websites such as Pirate Bay.

Over the years, the group has targetted child pornography websites and recruiting portals for the Islamic State. It has also gone after government agencies such as the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the Pentagon in the US and the Scotland Yard in the UK.

This is not the first time that Anonymous has taken part in protests against racial discrimination in the US. In 2014, anons attacked the City Hall website of Ferguson, Missouri, after the fatal shooting of Michael Brown, and threatened cyber attacks against police and local government if protesters were harmed.

Anonymous is known to primarily employ what is known as Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks, in which hackers swamp a websites server with data that causes it to crash, making the website inaccessible.

Another tactic that it uses is defacement when the target websites pages are replaced with the hacktivists messages and graphics. A related method is redirection in which a change in the chosen web sites addressing causes its users to be redirected to another page.

The group also uses more serious methods such as doxing, in which private or sensitive information is stolen, destroying data using computer viruses, and phishing for extracting personal data.

Anonymous members have had several run-ins with the law, with government agencies making arrests for computer hacking, fraud, and cyber-stalking.

In 2017, American hacktivist James Robinson was sent to prison for six years after being convicted for carrying out DDoS attacks. Another hacker, Deric Lostutter, was sentenced to two years in prison after infiltrating the website of a high school sports team for exposing the alleged coverup of a 2012 rape case.

The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and stay updated with the latest headlines

For all the latest Explained News, download Indian Express App.

The Indian Express (P) Ltd

Follow this link:
Anonymous Explained: Everything you need to know about the hacktivist group - The Indian Express

Twitter: The false Pizzagate conspiracy explained debunked theory fuelled by social media! – HITC – Football, Gaming, Movies, TV, Music

If youve been searching through your Twitter feed recently then you may have seen the phrase #pizzagate trending.

Youre probably just as confused as everyone else is by this strange phrase that actually has nothing much to do with pizza at all.

The term actually refers to a completely false conspiracy theory relating to American politicians Hilary Clinton and John Podesta back in 2016.

The theory is now being resurfaced in light of the Madeleine McCann and Jeffrey Epstein cases, and everyone is talking about it on Twitter heres exactly what it means.

The debunked conspiracy refers to a news story that began back in 2016 that involved Hilary Clinton and John Podesta.

These false claims linked the American politicians with a highly advanced paedophile ring that was said to be run from a pizza restaurant in Washington DC called Comet Ping Pong, hence the name Pizzagate.

It all began when the personal email account of John Podesta, who at the time was in close contact with Hilary Clinton, were leaked.

The compromised emails were then posted onto Wikileaks and available online to the general public.

People started looking at the emails and thought that some of them seemed a bit strange. Conspiracy theorists pointed out some potential code words that they thought linked the politicians to this sex-trafficking system.

However, there is no actual evidence that this is the case.

The conspiracy has little factual evidence, and has mostly just been fuelled by social media.

Many of the claims were simply just public opinion, which has been escalated and widely shared online.

Fake news online is a big issue in our current society, with people believing things just because it has been written online.

It is your own choice whether you believe or debunk a conspiracy theory like this one, but you must remember that without real supporting evidence, it can never be deemed as the truth.

In other news, What does No Healthy Upstream mean on Spotify? Is there a fix?

See the original post here:
Twitter: The false Pizzagate conspiracy explained debunked theory fuelled by social media! - HITC - Football, Gaming, Movies, TV, Music

Russia’s 2020 plan – The Week

The Kremlin has been emboldened by its successful attack on the 2016 election, and is coming back for more. Here's everything you need to know:

Will Russia interfere again?It never stopped. The Russian trolls and military hackers who undermined U.S. democracy in 2016 have continued their efforts to confuse and divide Americans, all U.S. intelligence agencies agree. As November approaches, the Kremlin is engaged in a multi-front cyberattack. Russia deployed social media bots to boost Sen. Bernie Sanders' (I-Vt.) presidential campaign, U.S. officials said, and last week, the National Security Agency announced that a hacking group called Sandworm part of the Russian military unit that stole 50,000 Democratic National Committee emails in 2016 has launched a campaign to penetrate email servers in the U.S. Security experts were puzzled why Russia didn't wreak more havoc in 2016 after targeting election systems in all 50 states and penetrating Illinois' registration database. It was probably "reconnaissance," Michael Daniel, a cybersecurity expert, told Congress preparation for an even more ambitious future strike.

What's their objective? To sow chaos, inflame existing political divisions, and destroy public faith in elections and democracy. Dezinformatsiya, the tactic of pumping propaganda into rival nations, flourishes on social media, where Russians can easily pose as Americans. Russian deceit, however, is not limited to online activities: Russia infiltrated the National Rifle Association and evangelical groups in 2016 and organized at least 22 political rallies on U.S. soil. Russians tamper with election infrastructure and then exaggerate the success of their efforts, seeking to make Americans believe that election outcomes could be illegitimate. If Hillary Clinton won in 2016, Russia planned to spread the hashtag #DemocracyRIP.

What did Russia do in 2016?Four U.S. spy agencies, a GOP-controlled Senate committee, and Special Counsel Robert Mueller all concluded that Moscow ordered the attack in 2016 to spread disinformation and help elect Donald Trump. Russia's cyber operation, directly approved by Russian President Vladimir Putin, employed more than 800 people who created memes, fake accounts, and bogus news articles to stoke Republican fear and anger and to convince Sanders supporters and African Americans that Clinton was corrupt and a racist. The DNC emails Russia stole and selectively published via WikiLeaks showed that party officials wanted Clinton to win the primaries angering Sanders' supporters. In his 22-month investigation, Mueller did not find proof of an explicit criminal conspiracy between the Russians and the Trump campaign, but he did conclude that Russia had interfered "in a sweeping and systematic fashion" and that the Trump campaign had been "receptive" to Russia's help. Some 272 contacts between Trump's campaign and Russia-linked operatives were documented, with 38 in-person meetings. Trump aides overheard Roger Stone later convicted of obstructing the Mueller probe discussing coming WikiLeaks dumps with Trump. Trump's campaign manager, Paul Manafort, gave detailed state polling data to a Russian oligarch and later lied about it. Standing beside Putin at a summit meeting in Helsinki in 2018, Trump said, "I don't see any reason" why Russia would have interfered.

What's Russia's strategy this year?Disinformation campaigns will be more sophisticated. Russians often did a sloppy job imitating Americans in 2016, posting in broken English from accounts traceable to St. Petersburg. Now Russians are thought to be working from U.S. servers. An analysis of Russia-linked Facebook posts last fall found a focus on stirring up racial resentments, spreading fear of immigrants and Muslims, and inciting gun owners. The accounts targeted battleground states such as Michigan, Wisconsin, Ohio, Arizona, and Florida.

Are election systems vulnerable? The nation's nearly 8,000 local voting jurisdictions use a complex patchwork of websites, databases, and hardware, giving hackers countless potential targets. In the 2018 midterm elections, an estimated one-third of jurisdictions used voting machines that were at least 10 years old. Russia is clearly keen to exploit American weaknesses, and in February, an aide to Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire told Congress that Moscow will try to ensure Trump's re-election. Trump berated Maguire for the briefing and fired him days later. The new DNI, former Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Texas), is a fierce Trump defender who has questioned whether Russia really favored Trump in 2016.

How is the U.S. fighting back?Last year, Congress allocated $425 million to beef up the security of state elections systems. Many security experts say it's too late for states to implement major improvements by November. Still, intelligence services have toughened up U.S. defenses in some respects. On the day of the 2018 midterms, the U.S. military launched its first preemptive cyberattack against Russia, blocking internet access at the St. Petersburg troll farm. Nonetheless, 41 percent of Americans say the U.S. is not prepared to secure November's election. To succeed, Russia only needs Americans to doubt the results. "You don't actually have to breach an election system in order to create the impression that you have," said Laura Rosenberger, director of the Alliance for Securing Democracy. "Chaos is the point."

Targeting vote totalsElection officials have insisted for years that voting systems are not connected to the internet and therefore can't be hacked. But it would take only a second of online activity for those machines to be compromised, and last August, a group of cybersecurity experts discovered dozens of back-end election systems in 10 states that had been connected to the internet, some for over a year. Moreover, many counties use wireless modems, some embedded directly in voting machines, to transmit results quickly to state officials. Russia is preparing to exploit this technology, allegedly sending GRU operatives to Rio de Janeiro and other cities to conduct operations through "close-access hacking," which allows break-ins through Wi-Fi networks. Hackers could exploit components of the election hardware chain, including wireless-enabled printers, USB drives with registration rolls, or digital check-in tablets. Harri Hursti, a data security expert from Finland, believes tampering with vote counts is possible. "Once you understand how everything works," Hursti says, "you understand how fragile everything is."

This article was first published in the latest issue of The Week magazine. If you want to read more like it, you can try six risk-free issues of the magazine here.

Go here to read the rest:
Russia's 2020 plan - The Week

Explainer: ‘Anonymous’ unleashes Twitter storm with George Floyd claims, but who’re they? – The New Indian Express

Online Desk

"Activist/hacktivist collective" Anonymous has taken Twitter by a storm after the recent Minneapolis police brutality that led to the murder of George Floyd shook the world's conscience.

The group that has caused quite a stir, took to Twitter and other social media platformsa week ago to condemn the murder of 47-year-old Floyd, who died afteran officer knelt on hisneck even as he gasped for breath, sparkingwidespread protests across the US, curfews in major cities and also led to the US President Donald Trump taking refuge in a White House bunker as tensions escalated.

But, first things first.

What/whoexactly is 'Anonymous'?

'Anonymous'claims to be a"decentralisedinternational hactivist movement"that originated in 2003 and has conducted many digitalexposes since then, much to the discomfiture of governments and influential people.

It has now re-emerged with a series of tweet threads and videos from its unverified Twitter handles, which were quick to go viral -- especially those on the George Floydcase wherein a figurewearing aGuy Fawkes mask,(portrayed in the popular dystopian novel and Hollywood film 'V for Vendetta') spoke about how racial inequality masked as police brutality has affected the United States for a long time.

Police brutality and murder is a widespread problem in the United States, which has undoubtedly infected nearly every jurisdiction in the country.

"But, the Minneapolis police department is among the worst and has a horrible track record of violence and corruption. This weeks brutal killing of George Floyd, which has sparked protests and national outrage, is just the tip of the iceberg in a long list of high-profile cases of wrongful deaths at the hands of officers in your state, they appeared saying.

The impact of the clip was far-reaching and it went on to garner over 37 million views despite being pulled down by social media sites multiple times. Word was quick to spread and netizens, who were already enraged and hadbeen incessantly protesting under the banner of 'Black Lives Matter',demanding accountabilitywere instantly intrigued.

But George Floyd's isn't the first cop brutality case to catch theireye.

In 2014, Anonymoushackedthe City Hall website of Ferguson, Missouri, after the fatal shooting of 18-year-old black teen Michael Brown, threatening more action if the protestors were hurt. They also releasedthe name of the officer they deemed responsible, a claim the police denied.

Later that year, Anonymous also released information on 12-year-old African-American teenager Tamir Rice's shooter.

This time too they did something similar by allegedly disablingthe Minneapolis police department website for a while andleaking the email addresses and passwords of the officers.

But, let's backtrack a bit.Is thisAnonymous' modus operandi? For that, a quick look at some of its past activities.

Claim to fame

Some of the most notable actionsthat grabbed eyeballs include:

Operation Chanology (2008) - In 2008, Anonymous attacked the Church of Scientology after a video of celebrity Tom Cruise surfaced online praising his faiththatthe Church wanted taken down. Viewing this as internet censorship, they adapted measures like distributeddenial-of-service attacks(DDoS)prank calls, and other means to disrupt the church's services such as investigating its tax exemption status in the US with the help of the Internal Revenue Service. Anonymous has also openly advocated against homophobia and lashed out at Churches that advocated it.

Operation Payback (2010) - Anonymous, which had openly pledged its support toWikiLeaks (an NPO that released classified data), was believed to be responsible for the attack onMasterCard andPayPal after they frozeWikiLeaks' accounts, shut down its servers and refused to engage in business with them as the US government raised objections. It had taken down both sites of MasterCard and Visa, declaring"war" on behalf of Jullian Assange (founder of WikiLeaks)that year.

Revolutionary movements across globe(2011-12)-The collective heavily supported protest movements in Tunisia (OpTunisia) when Arab Spring engulfed the nation with similar DDoS style attacks on government websites and by mobilising crowds after circulating relevant information.

Arrests of 'members' -Apart from this, many people, who claimed to plead allegiance to Anonymous have been arrested for alleged involvement in cyberattacks on behalf of them in countries like India, UK, Turkey, US, The Netherlands and Spain but no concrete links could ever be traced back to them.

OpParis (2015) - Anonymous attacked the Islamic State under its #OpParis campaignafter the Paris Charlie Hebdo terror massacre. On January 12, they brought down a website that was suspected to belong to one of these groups and claimed to shut down over1,000 Twitter accounts linked to the terrorist outfit in 2015.

Alright, but how do they recruit people andwhat is their ideology?

One doesn't really know. The collective has not endorsed any political ideology or stance although most of its activities point toward a revolutionary orientation. Mobilisation of people who can speak truth to power seemsto be the agenda - one that they seek to achieve via cyberwars and attacks.

Resurgence with George Floyd

Cut to June 2020, the collective seems to be focussed on providing updates and information to the protestors as they are still continuing their battle in various cities like New Yorkand other places across the globeeven as Floyd willbe buried on June 9 in Houston, Texas.

On Twitter, Anonymous' comebackwasenough to gainthe collective's multiple accounts over 5 million followers each, all in under two days, as more revelations were promised and accountability from authorities demanded.

There may be a slight calm now but with the storm that they havealready unleashed, it's certain that they aren'tgoing away any time soon.

Go here to read the rest:
Explainer: 'Anonymous' unleashes Twitter storm with George Floyd claims, but who're they? - The New Indian Express

Kayleigh McEnany just accidentally revealed the key difference between the media and the Trump White House – WICZ

Analysis by Chris Cillizza, CNN Editor-at-large

White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany thought she had scored a direct hit on the media's credibility during Thursday's press briefing.

Asked by CNN's Jim Acosta about Twitter's decision to append a fact-check to President Donald Trump's false claim that mail-in balloting is a Democratic attempt to rig the 2020 election, McEnany said this: "If you're going to get into the fact-checking business -- there's no one that should be fact-checked more than the mainstream media that has been continually wrong about a number of things."

She then went on to detail several instances -- including a 2017 CNN story in which we wrongly reported that Donald Trump and his son Donald Trump Jr. had received an email providing them access to hacked WikiLeaks emails before the public had access -- where mainstream media got reporting about Trump wrong.

"In 2017, your network, CNN, botched their WikiLeaks email exclusive and were forced to make on-air corrections," McEnany scolded Acosta.

Pay very close attention to those last few words from McEnany "make on-air corrections."

Yes! CNN did do that! And wrote an entire article about the initial article being wrong -- and detailed past errors we have made.

Because CNN is a big news organization that is ultimately just a lot of people trying to get it right. And because we are people, we don't always get it right. And when we get it wrong, we do our best to explain why and how -- and try to not make that same mistake again.

That's how journalists maintain credibility with audiences. Not by never making a mistake, because that is impossible. Rather, by doing everything we can to get the story right and, when we don't, admitting we didn't. The very fact that we issue public corrections -- in the most transparent way possible -- is a testament to our commitment to getting it right.

Now, contrast that approach to how President Trump and the White House operate.

Trump, according to The Washington Post's Fact-Checker blog has said more than 18,000 false or misleading things in his first 1,170 days in office -- an average of 15 incorrect claims every single day he has been president.

Many politicians, faced with being fact-checked and deemed to have gotten something wrong, have one of two reactions: 1) They apologize for the misstatement or 2) (and this one is more common) they simply stop repeating the falsehood. Trump doubles, triples and quadruples down on known falsehoods.

When pressed about Trump's incorrect claims on Thursday, McEnany said this: "I'm around the President. His intent is always to give truthful information to the American people."

Sure! Most people do try to tell the truth most of the time! But even if you try to tell the truth all of the time, you get stuff wrong. It happens. Because we are human.

So, how many times has Trump -- or a member of his senior staff -- admitted they simply got something wrong? Uh, so, well, not many? And that's being very, very generous.

In fact, Trump's default response when he is asked to apologize for getting something wrong is an I-am-rubber-you-are-glue defense, attacking and blaming the media. "Where is their apology to me for all of the incorrect stories??" Trump tweeted in June 2017.

In other words: Trump seeks to distract from his own comments and demands that he either retract or apologize for them by accusing someone else -- almost always the media -- of needing to apologize to him. It's sort of like this defense used by Al Pacino in "And Justice For All."

What McEnany's response to Acosta, which was celebrated by conservative media, proves is the exact opposite of what she was going for. It's not that journalists aren't willing to look in the mirror and admit their own mistakes. It's that the White House doesn't understand that journalists' willingness to publicly acknowledge their mistakes is a sign of strength, not weakness.

True weakness is pretending that you never screw anything up. And that weakness leads to never learning from your mistakes because, well, you don't think you've many any.

That's what McEnany revealed on Thursday -- even if she didn't mean to.

Read the original post:
Kayleigh McEnany just accidentally revealed the key difference between the media and the Trump White House - WICZ

Kayleigh McEnany just accidentally revealed the key difference between the media and the Trump White House – KTVZ

White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany thought she had scored a direct hit on the medias credibility during Thursdays press briefing.

Asked by CNNs Jim Acosta about Twitters decision to append a fact-check to President Donald Trumps false claim that mail-in balloting is a Democratic attempt to rig the 2020 election, McEnany said this: If youre going to get into the fact-checking business theres no one that should be fact-checked more than the mainstream media that has been continually wrong about a number of things.

She then went on to detail several instances including a 2017 CNN story in which we wrongly reported that Donald Trump and his son Donald Trump Jr. had received an email providing them access to hacked WikiLeaks emails before the public had access where mainstream media got reporting about Trump wrong.

In 2017, your network, CNN, botched their WikiLeaks email exclusive and were forced to make on-air corrections, McEnany scolded Acosta.

Pay very close attention to those last few words from McEnany make on-air corrections.

Yes! CNN did do that! And wrote an entire article about the initial article being wrong and detailed past errors we have made.

Because CNN is a big news organization that is ultimately just a lot of people trying to get it right. And because we are people, we dont always get it right. And when we get it wrong, we do our best to explain why and how and try to not make that same mistake again.

Thats how journalists maintain credibility with audiences. Not by never making a mistake, because that is impossible. Rather, by doing everything we can to get the story right and, when we dont, admitting we didnt. The very fact that we issue public corrections in the most transparent way possible is a testament to our commitment to getting it right.

Now, contrast that approach to how President Trump and the White House operate.

Trump, according to The Washington Posts Fact-Checker blog has said more than 18,000 false or misleading things in his first 1,170 days in office an average of 15 incorrect claims every single day he has been president.

Many politicians, faced with being fact-checked and deemed to have gotten something wrong, have one of two reactions: 1) They apologize for the misstatement or 2) (and this one is more common) they simply stop repeating the falsehood. Trump doubles, triples and quadruples down on known falsehoods.

When pressed about Trumps incorrect claims on Thursday, McEnany said this: Im around the President. His intent is always to give truthful information to the American people.

Sure! Most people do try to tell the truth most of the time! But even if you try to tell the truth all of the time, you get stuff wrong. It happens. Because we are human.

So, how many times has Trump or a member of his senior staff admitted they simply got something wrong? Uh, so, well, not many? And thats being very, very generous.

In fact, Trumps default response when he is asked to apologize for getting something wrong is an I-am-rubber-you-are-glue defense, attacking and blaming the media. Where is their apology to me for all of the incorrect stories?? Trump tweeted in June 2017.

In other words: Trump seeks to distract from his own comments and demands that he either retract or apologize for them by accusing someone else almost always the media of needing to apologize to him. Its sort of like this defense used by Al Pacino in And Justice For All.

What McEnanys response to Acosta, which was celebrated by conservative media, proves is the exact opposite of what she was going for. Its not that journalists arent willing to look in the mirror and admit their own mistakes. Its that the White House doesnt understand that journalists willingness to publicly acknowledge their mistakes is a sign of strength, not weakness.

True weakness is pretending that you never screw anything up. And that weakness leads to never learning from your mistakes because, well, you dont think youve many any.

Thats what McEnany revealed on Thursday even if she didnt mean to.

More:
Kayleigh McEnany just accidentally revealed the key difference between the media and the Trump White House - KTVZ

The Prophecies of Q – The Atlantic

If you were an adherent, no one would be able to tell. You would look like any other American. You could be a mother, picking leftovers off your toddlers plate. You could be the young man in headphones across the street. You could be a bookkeeper, a dentist, a grandmother icing cupcakes in her kitchen. You may well have an affiliation with an evangelical church. But you are hard to identify just from the way you lookwhich is good, because someday soon dark forces may try to track you down. You understand this sounds crazy, but you dont care. You know that a small group of manipulators, operating in the shadows, pull the planets strings. You know that they are powerful enough to abuse children without fear of retribution. You know that the mainstream media are their handmaidens, in partnership with Hillary Clinton and the secretive denizens of the deep state. You know that only Donald Trump stands between you and a damned and ravaged world. You see plague and pestilence sweeping the planet, and understand that they are part of the plan. You know that a clash between good and evil cannot be avoided, and you yearn for the Great Awakening that is coming. And so you must be on guard at all times. You must shield your ears from the scorn of the ignorant. You must find those who are like you. And you must be prepared to fight.

You know all this because you believe in Q.

To hear more feature stories, get the Audm iPhone app.

The origins of QAnon are recent, but even so, separating myth from reality can be hard. One place to begin is with Edgar Maddison Welch, a deeply religious father of two, who until Sunday, December 4, 2016, had lived an unremarkable life in the small town of Salisbury, North Carolina. That morning, Welch grabbed his cellphone, a box of shotgun shells, and three loaded gunsa 9-mm AR-15 rifle, a six-shot .38caliber Colt revolver, and a shotgunand hopped into his Toyota Prius. He drove 360 miles to a well-to-do neighborhood in Northwest Washington, D.C.; parked his car; put the revolver in a holster at his hip; held the AR-15 rifle across his chest; and walked through the front door of a pizzeria called Comet Ping Pong.

Comet happens to be the place where, on a Sunday afternoon two years earlier, my then-baby daughter tried her first-ever sip of water. Kids gather there with their parents and teammates after soccer games on Saturdays, and local bands perform on the weekends. In the back, children challenge their grandparents to Ping-Pong matches as they wait for their pizzas to come out of the big clay oven in the middle of the restaurant. Comet Ping Pong is a beloved spot in Washington.

That day, people noticed Welch right away. An AR-15 rifle makes for a conspicuous sash in most social settings, but especially at a place like Comet. As parents, children, and employees rushed outside, many still chewing, Welch began to move through the restaurant, at one point attempting to use a butter knife to pry open a locked door, before giving up and firing several rounds from his rifle into the lock. Behind the door was a small computer-storage closet. This was not what he was expecting.

Welch had traveled to Washington because of a conspiracy theory known, now famously, as Pizzagate, which claimed that Hillary Clinton was running a child sex ring out of Comet Ping Pong. The idea originated in October 2016, when WikiLeaks made public a trove of emails stolen from the account of John Podesta, a former White House chief of staff and then the chair of Clintons presidential campaign; Comet was mentioned repeatedly in exchanges Podesta had with the restaurants owner, James Alefantis, and others. The emails were mainly about fundraising events, but high-profile proDonald Trump figures such as Mike Cernovich and Alex Jones began advancing the claimwhich originated in trollish corners of the internet (such as 4chan) and then spread to more accessible precincts (Twitter, YouTube)that the emails were proof of ritualistic child abuse. Some conspiracy theorists asserted that it was taking place in the basement at Comet, where there is no basement. References in the emails to pizza and pasta were interpreted as code words for girls and little boys.

Shortly after Trumps election, as Pizzagate roared across the internet, Welch started binge-watching conspiracy-theory videos on YouTube. He tried to recruit help from at least two people to carry out a vigilante raid, texting them about his desire to sacrifice the lives of a few for the lives of many and to fight a corrupt system that kidnaps, tortures and rapes babies and children in our own backyard. When Welch finally found himself inside the restaurant and understood that Comet Ping Pong was just a pizza shop, he set down his firearms, walked out the door, and surrendered to police, who had by then secured the perimeter. The intel on this wasnt 100 percent, Welch told The New York Times after his arrest.

Welch seems to have sincerely believed that children were being held at Comet Ping Pong. His family and friends wrote letters to the judge on his behalf, describing him as a dedicated father, a devout Christian, and a man who went out of his way to care for others. Welch had trained as a volunteer firefighter. He had gone on an earthquake-response mission to Haiti with the local Baptist Mens Association. A friend from his church wrote, He exhibits the actions of a person who strives to learn biblical truth and apply it. Welch himself expressed what seemed like genuine remorse, saying in a handwritten note submitted to the judge by his lawyers: It was never my intention to harm or frighten innocent lives, but I realize now just how foolish and reckless my decision was. He was sentenced to four years in prison.

Pizzagate seemed to fade. Some of its most visible proponents, such as Jack Posobiec, a conspiracy theorist who is now a correspondent for the pro-Trump cable-news channel One America News Network, backed away. Facing the specter of legal action by Alefantis, Alex Jones, who runs the conspiracy-theory website Infowars and hosts an affiliated radio show, apologized for promoting Pizzagate.

Read: The lasting trauma of Alex Joness lies

While Welch may have expressed regret, he gave no indication that he had stopped believing the underlying Pizzagate message: that a cabal of powerful elites was abusing children and getting away with it. Judging from a surge of activity on the internet, many others had found ways to move beyond the Comet Ping Pong episode and remain focused on what they saw as the larger truth. If you paid attention to the right voices on the right websites, you could see in real time how the core premises of Pizzagate were being recycled, revised, and reinterpreted. The millions of people paying attention to sites like 4chan and Reddit could continue to learn about that secretive and untouchable cabal; about its malign actions and intentions; about its ties to the left wing and specifically to Democrats and especially to Clinton; about its bloodlust and its moral degeneracy. You could alsoand this would prove essentialread about a small but swelling band of underground American patriots fighting back.

All of this, taken together, defined a worldview that would soon have a name: QAnon, derived from a mysterious figure, Q, posting anonymously on 4chan. QAnon does not possess a physical location, but it has an infrastructure, a literature, a growing body of adherents, and a great deal of merchandising. It also displays other key qualities that Pizzagate lacked. In the face of inconvenient facts, it has the ambiguity and adaptability to sustain a movement of this kind over time. For QAnon, every contradiction can be explained away; no form of argument can prevail against it.

Adrienne LaFrance and Gillian White will discuss conspiracies and their place in America, live at 2 p.m. ET on May 28. Register for The Big Story EventCast here.

Subscribe to The Atlantic and support 160 years of independent journalism

Conspiracy theories are a constant in American history, and it is tempting to dismiss them as inconsequential. But as the 21st century has progressed, such a dismissal has begun to require willful blindness. I was a city-hall reporter for a local investigative-news site called Honolulu Civil Beat in 2011 when Donald Trump was laying the groundwork for a presidential run by publicly questioning whether Barack Obama had been born in Hawaii, as all facts and documents showed. Trump maintained that Obama had really been born in Africa, and therefore wasnt a natural-born Americanmaking him ineligible for the highest office. I remember the debate in our Honolulu newsroom: Should we even cover this birther madness? As it turned out, the allegations, based entirely on lies, captivated enough people to give Trump a launching pad.

Nine years later, as reports of a fearsome new virus suddenly emerged, and with Trump now president, a series of ideas began burbling in the QAnon community: that the coronavirus might not be real; that if it was, it had been created by the deep state, the star chamber of government officials and other elite figures who secretly run the world; that the hysteria surrounding the pandemic was part of a plot to hurt Trumps reelection chances; and that media elites were cheering the death toll. Some of these ideas would make their way onto Fox News and into the presidents public utterances. As of late last year, according to The New York Times, Trump had retweeted accounts often focused on conspiracy theories, including those of QAnon, on at least 145 occasions.

Read: The coronavirus conspiracy boom

The power of the internet was understood early on, but the full nature of that powerits ability to shatter any semblance of shared reality, undermining civil society and democratic governance in the processwas not. The internet also enabled unknown individuals to reach masses of people, at a scale Marshall McLuhan never dreamed of. The warping of shared reality leads a man with an AR-15 rifle to invade a pizza shop. It brings online forums into being where people colorfully imagine the assassination of a former secretary of state. It offers the promise of a Great Awakening, in which the elites will be routed and the truth will be revealed. It causes chat sites to come alive with commentary speculating that the coronavirus pandemic may be the moment QAnon has been waiting for. None of this could have been imagined as recently as the turn of the century.

QAnon is emblematic of modern Americas susceptibility to conspiracy theories, and its enthusiasm for them. But it is also already much more than a loose collection of conspiracy-minded chat-room inhabitants. It is a movement united in mass rejection of reason, objectivity, and other Enlightenment values. And we are likely closer to the beginning of its story than the end. The group harnesses paranoia to fervent hope and a deep sense of belonging. The way it breathes life into an ancient preoccupation with end-times is also radically new. To look at QAnon is to see not just a conspiracy theory but the birth of a new religion.

Many people were reluctant to speak with me about QAnon as I reported this story. The movements adherents have sometimes proved willing to take matters into their own hands. Last year, the FBI classified QAnon as a domestic-terror threat in an internal memo. The memo took note of a California man arrested in 2018 with bomb-making materials. According to the FBI, he had planned to attack the Illinois capitol to make Americans aware of Pizzagate and the New World Order (NWO) who were dismantling society. The memo also took note of a QAnon follower in Nevada who was arrested in 2018 after blocking traffic on the Hoover Dam in an armored truck. The man, heavily armed, was demanding the release of the inspector generals report on Hillary Clintons emails. The FBI memo warned that conspiracy theories stoke the threat of extremist violence, especially when individuals claiming to act as researchers or investigators single out people, businesses, or groups which they falsely accuse of being involved in the imagined scheme.

Read: Instagram is full of conspiracy theories and extremism

QAnon adherents are feared for ferociously attacking skeptics online and for inciting physical violence. On a now-defunct Reddit board dedicated to QAnon, commenters took delight in describing Clintons potential fate. One person wrote: Im surprised no one has assassinated her yet honestly. Another: The buzzards rip her rotting corpse to shreds. A third: I want to see her blood pouring down the gutters!

When I spoke with Clinton recently about QAnon, she said, I just get under their skin unlike anybody else If I didnt have Secret Service protection going through my mail, finding weird stuff, tracking the threats against mewhich are still very highI would be worried. She has come to realize that the invented reality in which conspiracy theorists place her is not some bizarre parallel universe but actually one that shapes our own. Referring to internet trolling operations, Clinton said, I dont think until relatively recently most people understood how well organized they were, and how many different components of their strategy they have put in place.

On October 28, 2017, the anonymous user now widely referred to as Q appeared for the first time on 4chan, a so-called image board that is known for its grotesque memes, sickening photographs, and brutal teardown culture. Q predicted the imminent arrest of Hillary Clinton and a violent uprising nationwide, posting this:

And then this:

Clinton was not arrested on October 30, but that didnt deter Q, who continued posting ominous predictions and cryptic riddleswith prompts like Find the reflection inside the castleoften written in the form of tantalizing fragments and rhetorical questions. Q made it clear that he wanted people to believe he was an intelligence officer or military official with Q clearance, a level of access to classified information that includes nuclear-weapons design and other highly sensitive material. (Im using he because many Q followers do, though Q remains anonymoushence QAnon.) Qs tone is conspiratorial to the point of clich: Ive said too much, and Follow the money, and Some things must remain classified to the very end.

What might have languished as a lonely screed on a single image board instead incited fervor. Its profile was enhanced, according to Brandy Zadrozny and Ben Collins of NBC News, by several conspiracy theorists whose promotion of Q in turn helped build up their own online profiles. By now, nearly three years since Qs original messages appeared, there have been thousands of what his followers call Q dropsmessages posted to image boards by Q. He uses a password-protected tripcode, a series of letters and numbers visible to other image-board users to signal the continuity of his identity over time. (Qs tripcode has changed on occasion, prompting flurries of speculation.) As Q has moved from one image board to the nextfrom 4chan to 8chan to 8kun, seeking a safe harborQAnon adherents have only become more devoted. If the internet is one big rabbit hole containing infinitely recursive rabbit holes, QAnon has somehow found its way down all of them, gulping up lesser conspiracy theories as it goes.

From the September 2017 issue: How America lost its mind

In its broadest contours, the QAnon belief system looks something like this: Q is an intelligence or military insider with proof that corrupt world leaders are secretly torturing children all over the world; the malefactors are embedded in the deep state; Donald Trump is working tirelessly to thwart them. (These people need to ALL be ELIMINATED, Q wrote in one post.) The eventual destruction of the global cabal is imminent, Q prophesies, but can be accomplished only with the support of patriots who search for meaning in Qs clues. To believe Q requires rejecting mainstream institutions, ignoring government officials, battling apostates, and despising the press. One of Qs favorite rallying cries is You are the news now. Another is Enjoy the show, a phrase that his disciples regard as a reference to a coming apocalypse: When the world as we know it comes to an end, everyones a spectator.

People who have taken Q to heart like to say theyve been paying attention from the very beginning, the way someone might brag about having listened to Radiohead before The Bends. A promise of foreknowledge is part of Qs appeal, as is the feeling of being part of a secret community, which is reinforced through the use of acronyms and ritual phrases such as Nothing can stop what is coming and Trust the plan.

One phrase that serves as a special touchstone among QAnon adherents is the calm before the storm. Q first used it a few days after his initial post, and it arrived with a specific history. On the evening of October 5, 2017not long before Q first made himself known on 4chanPresident Trump stood beside the first lady in a loose semicircle with 20 or so senior military leaders and their spouses for a photo in the State Dining Room at the White House. Reporters had been invited to watch as Trumps guests posed and smiled. Trump couldnt seem to stop talking. You guys know what this represents? he asked at one point, tracing an incomplete circle in the air with his right index finger. Tell us, sir, one onlooker replied. The presidents response was self-satisfied, bordering on a drawl: Maybe its the calm before the storm.

Whats the storm? one of the journalists asked.

Could be the calmthe calm before the storm, Trump said again. His repetition seemed to be for dramatic effect. The whir of camera shutters grew louder.

The reporters became insistent: What storm, Mr. President?

A curt response from Trump: Youll find out.

Those 37 seconds of presidential ambiguity made headlines right awayrelations with Iran had been tense in recent daysbut they would also become foundational lore for eventual followers of Q. The presidents circular hand gesture is of particular interest to them. You may think he was motioning to the semicircle gathered around him, they say, but he was really drawing the letter Q in the air. Was Trump playing the role of John the Baptist, proclaiming what was to come? Was he himself the anointed one?

Read: Covfefe and the real meaning of a Trump typo turned meme

Its impossible to know the number of QAnon adherents with any precision, but the ranks are growing. At least 35 current or former congressional candidates have embraced Q, according to an online tally by the progressive nonprofit Media Matters for America. Those candidates have either directly praised QAnon in public or approvingly referenced QAnon slogans. (One Republican candidate for Congress, Matthew Lusk of Florida, includes QAnon under the issues section of his campaign website, posing the question: Who is Q?) QAnon has by now made its way onto every major social and commercial platform and any number of fringe sites. Tracy Diaz, a QAnon evangelist, known online by the name TracyBeanz, has 185,000 followers on Twitter and more than 100,000 YouTube subscribers. She helped lift QAnon from obscurity, facilitating its transition to mainstream social media. (A publicist described Diaz as really private and declined requests for an interview.) On TikTok, videos with the hashtag #QAnon have garnered millions of views. There are too many QAnon Facebook groups, plenty of them ghost towns, to do a proper count, but the most active ones publish thousands of items each day. (In 2018, Reddit banned QAnon groups from its platform for inciting violence.)

Adherents are ever looking out for signs from on high, plumbing for portents when guidance from Q himself is absent. The coronavirus, for instancewhat does it signify? In several of the big Facebook groups, people erupted in a frenzy of speculation, circulating a theory that Trumps decision to wear a yellow tie to a White House briefing about the virus was a sign that the outbreak wasnt real: He is telling us there is no virus threat because it is the exact same color as the maritime flag that represents the vessel has no infected people on board, someone wrote in a post that was widely shared and remixed across social media. Three days before the World Health Organization officially declared the coronavirus a pandemic, Trump was retweeting a QAnon-themed meme. Who knows what this means, but it sounds good to me! the president wrote on March 8, sharing a Photoshopped image of himself playing a violin overlaid with the words Nothing can stop what is coming.

From the March 2020 issue: The billion-dollar disinformation campaign to reelect the president

On March 9, Q himself issued a triptych of ominous posts that seemed definitive: The coronavirus is real, but welcome, and followers should not be afraid. The first post shared Trumps tweet from the night before and repeated, Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming. The second said: The Great Awakening is Worldwide. The third was simple: GOD WINS.

A month later, on April 8, Q went on a posting spree, dropping nine posts over the span of six hours and touching on several of his favorite topicsGod, Pizzagate, and the wickedness of the elites. They will stop at nothing to regain power, he wrote in one scathing post that alleged a coordinated propaganda effort by Democrats, Hollywood, and the media. Another accused Democrats of promoting mass hysteria about the coronavirus for political gain: What is the primary benefit to keep public in mass-hysteria re: COVID19? Think voting. Are you awake yet? Q. And he shared these verses from Ephesians: Finally, be strong in the Lord and in the strength of His might. Put on the full armor of God so that you will be able to stand firm against the schemes of the devil.

Anthony Fauci, the longtime director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, has become an object of scorn among QAnon supporters who dont like the bad news he delivers or the way he has contradicted Trump publicly. In one March press conference, Trump referred to the State Department as the Deep State Department, and Fauci could be seen over the presidents shoulder, suppressing a laugh and covering his face. By then, QAnon had already declared Fauci irredeemably compromised, because WikiLeaks had unearthed a pair of emails he sent praising Hillary Clinton in 2012 and 2013. Sentiment about Fauci among QAnon supporters on social-media platforms ranges from Fauci is a Deep State puppet to FAUCI is a BLACKHAT!!!the term QAnon uses for people who support the evil cabal that Q warns about. One person, using the hashtags #DeepStateCabal and #Qanon, tweeted this: Watch Faucis hand signals and body language at the press conferences. What is he communicating? Another shared an image of Fauci standing in a lab with Barack Obama, with the caption Obama and Dr. Fauci in the lab creating coronovirus [sic]. #DeepstateDoctor. The Justice Department recently approved heightened security measures for Fauci because of the mounting volume of threats against him.

Read: If someone shares the Plandemic video, how should you respond?

In the final days before Congress passed a $2 trillion economic-relief package in late March, Democrats insisted on provisions that would make it easier for people to vote by mail, prompting Q himself to weigh in with dismay: These people are sick! Nothing can stop what is coming. Nothing.

On a bone-cold Thursday in early January, a crowd was swelling in downtown Toledo, Ohio. By lunchtime, seven hours before the start of Trumps first campaign rally of the new year, the line to get into the Huntington Center had already snaked around two city blocks. The air was electric with possibility, and the whole scene possessed a Jimmy BuffettmeetsMichigan Militia atmosphere: lots of white people, a good deal of vaping, red-white-and-blue everything. Down the street, someone had affixed a two-story banner across the top of a burned-out brick building. It read: president trump, welcome to toledo, ohio: who is q military intelligence? q+? (Q+ is QAnon shorthand for Trump himself.) Vendors at the event were selling Q buttons and T-shirts. QAnon merchandise comes in a great variety; online, you can buy Great Awakening coffee ($14.99) and QAnon bracelets with tiny silver pizza charms ($20.17).

I worked my way toward the back of the line, making small talk and asking who, if anyone, knew anything about QAnon. One womans eyes lit up, and in a single fluid motion she unzipped and removed her jacket, then did a little jump so that her back was to me. I could see a Q made out of duct tape, which shed pressed onto her red T-shirt. Her name was Lorrie Shock, and the first thing she wanted me to know was this: Were not a domestic-terror group.

Shock was born in Ohio and never left, a lifer, as she put it. She had worked at a Bridgestone factory, making car parts, for most of her adult life. Real hot and dirty work, but good money, she told me. I got three kids through school. Today, in what she calls her preretirement job, she cares for adults with special needs, spending her days in a tender routine of playing games with them and helping them in and out of a swimming pool. Shock came to the Trump rally with her friend Pat Harger, who had retired after 32 years at Whirlpool. Hargers wife runs a catering business, which is what had kept her from attending the rally that day. Harger and Shock are old friends. Since the fourth grade, Harger told me, and were 57 years old.

Now that Shocks girls are grown and shes not working a factory job, she has more time for herself. That used to mean reading novels in the eveningshe doesnt own a televisionbut now it means researching Q, who first came to her notice when someone she knew mentioned him on Facebook in 2017: What caught my attention was research. Do your own research. Dont take anything for granted. I dont care who says it, even President Trump. Do your own research, make up your own mind.

Read: Trump needs conspiracy theories

The QAnon universe is sprawling and deep, with layer upon layer of context, acronyms, characters, and shorthand to learn. The castle is the White House. Crumbs are clues. CBTS stands for calm before the storm, and WWG1WGA stands for Where we go one, we go all, which has become an expression of solidarity among Q followers. (Both of these phrases, oddly, are used in the trailer for the 1996 Ridley Scott film White Squallwatch it on YouTube, and youll see that the comments section is flooded with pro-Q sentiment.) There is also a Q clock, which refers to a calendar some factions of Q supporters use to try to decode supposed clues based on time stamps of Q drops and Trump tweets.

At the height of her devotion, Shock was spending four to six hours a day reading and rereading Q drops, scouring documents online, taking notes. Now, she says, she spends closer to an hour or two a day. When I first started, everybody thought I was crazy, Shock said. That included her daughters, who are very liberal Hillary and Bernie supporters, Shock said. I still love them. They think Im crazy, but thats all right.

Harger, too, once thought Shock had lost it. I was doubting her, he told me. I would send her texts saying, Lorrie.

He was like, What the hell? Shock said, laughing. So my comment to him would be Do your own research.

And I did, Harger said. And its like, Wow.

Taking a page from Trumps playbook, Q frequently rails against legitimate sources of information as fake. Shock and Harger rely on information they encounter on Facebook rather than news outlets run by journalists. They dont read the local paper or watch any of the major television networks. You cant watch the news, Shock said. Your news channel aint gonna tell us shit. Harger says he likes One America News Network. Not so long ago, he used to watch CNN, and couldnt get enough of Wolf Blitzer. We were glued to that; we always have been, he said. Until this man, Trump, really opened our eyes to whats happening. And Q. Q is telling us beforehand the stuff thats going to happen. I asked Harger and Shock for examples of predictions that had come true. They could not provide specifics and instead encouraged me to do the research myself. When I asked them how they explained the events Q had predicted that never happened, such as Clintons arrest, they said that deception is part of Qs plan. Shock added, I think there were more things that were predicted that did happen. Her tone was gentle rather than indignant.

Harger wanted me to know that hed voted for Obama the first time around. He grew up in a family of Democrats. His dad was a union guy. But that was before Trump appeared and convinced Harger that he shouldnt trust the institutions he always thought he could. Shock nodded alongside him. The reason I feel like I can trust Trump more is, hes not part of the establishment, she said. At one point, Harger told me I should look into what happened to John F. Kennedy Jr.who died in 1999, when his airplane crashed into the Atlantic Ocean off Marthas Vineyardsuggesting that Hillary Clinton had had him assassinated. (Alternatively, a contingent of QAnon believers say that JFK Jr. faked his death and that hes a behind-the-scenes Trump supporter, and possibly even Q himself. Some anticipate his dramatic public return so that he can serve as Trumps running mate in 2020.) When I asked Harger whether theres any evidence to support the assassination claim, he flipped my question around: Is there any evidence not to?

Peter Beinart: Trumps fantasy world got him into this

Reading Shocks Facebook page is an exercise in contradictions, a toggling between banality and hostility. There she is in a yellow kayak in her profile photo, bright-red hair spilling out of a ski hat, a giant smile on her face. There are the photos of her daughters, and of a granddaughter with Shirley Temple curls. Yet Q is never far away. On Christmas Eve, Shock shared one post that seemed to come straight out of the QAnon universe but also pulled in an older, classic conspiracy: X marks the spot over Roswell NM. X17 Fifth Force Particle. X + Q Coincidence? That same day, she shared a separate post suggesting that Michelle Obama is secretly a man. Someone responded with skepticism: I am still not convinced. She shows and acts evil, but a man? Shocks reply: Research it. There was a post claiming that Representative Adam Schiff had raped the body of a dead boy at the Chateau Marmont, in Los AngelesHarger shows up here, with a huh?? in the commentsand a warning that George Soros was going after Christian evangelicals. In other posts, Shock playfully taunted libs and her Trump-hating friends, and also shared a video of her daughter singing Christmas carols.

In Toledo, I asked Shock if she had any theories about Qs identity. She answered immediately: I think its Trump. I asked if she thinks Trump even knows how to use 4chan. The message board is notoriously confusing for the uninitiated, nothing like Facebook and other social platforms designed to make it easy to publish quickly and often. I think he knows way more than what we think, she said. But she also wanted me to know that her obsession with Q wasnt about Trump. This had been something she was reluctant to speak about at first. Now, she said, I feel God led me to Q. I really feel like God pushed me in this direction. I feel like if it was deceitful, in my spirit, God would be telling me, Enoughs enough. But I dont feel that. I pray about it. Ive said, Father, should I be wasting my time on this? And I dont feel that feeling of I should stop.

Arthur Jones, the director of the documentary film Feels Good Man, which tells the story of how internet memes infiltrated politics in the 2016 presidential election, told me that QAnon reminds him of his childhood growing up in an evangelical-Christian family in the Ozarks. He said that many people he knew then, and many people he meets now in the most devout parts of the country, are deeply interested in the Book of Revelation, and in trying to unpack all of its pretty-hard-to-decipher prophecies. Jones went on: I think the same kind of person would all of a sudden start pulling at the threads of Q and start feeling like everything is starting to fall into place and make sense. If you are an evangelical and you look at Donald Trump on face value, he lies, he steals, he cheats, hes been married multiple times, hes clearly a sinner. But you are trying to find a way that he is somehow part of Gods plan.

You cant always tell what kind of Q follower youre encountering. Anyone using a Q hashtag could be a true believer, like Shock, or simply someone cruising a site and playing along for a vicarious thrill. Surely there are people who know that Q is a fantasy but participate because theres an element of QAnon that converges with a live-action role-playing game. In the sprawling constellation of Q supporters, Shock and Harger seem prototypical. They happened upon Q and something clicked. The fable plugged neatly into their existing worldview.

Q may be anonymous, but leaders of the QAnon movement have emerged in public and built their own large audiences. David Hayes is better known by his online handle: PrayingMedic. In his YouTube videos, he exudes the even-keeled authoritarian energy of a middle-school principal. PrayingMedic is one of the best-known QAnon evangelists on the planet. He has more than 300,000 Twitter followers and a similar number of YouTube subscribers. Hayes, a former paramedic, lives in a terra-cotta-roofed subdivision in Gilbert, Arizona, with his wife, Denise, an artist whom he met on the dating site Christian Mingle in 2007. Both describe themselves as former atheists who came to their faith in God, and to each other, late in life, after previous marriages. Hayes has been following Q since the beginning, or close to it. Q Anon is pretty darn interesting, he wrote on his Facebook page on December 12, 2017, six weeks after Qs first post on 4chan. That same day, he wrote about a sudden calling he felt:

Hayes is a superstar in the Q universe. His video Q for Beginners Part 1 has been viewed more than 1 million times. Some of the people who follow Q would consider themselves to be conspiracy theorists, Hayes says in the video. I do not consider myself to be a conspiracy theorist. I consider myself to be a Q researcher. I dont have anything against people who like to follow conspiracies. Thats their thing. Its not my thing.

Read: The reason conspiracy videos work so well on YouTube

Hayes has developed a following in part because of his sheer ubiquity but also because he skillfully wears the mantle of a skepticIm not one of those crazies. Hayes is not a QAnon hobbyist, though. Hes a professional. There are income streams to be tapped, modest but expanding. On Amazon, Hayess book Calm Before the Storm, the first in what he says could easily be a 10-book series of Q Chronicles, sells for $15.29. Hayes writes in the introduction that he and Denise have devoted their attention full-time to QAnon since 2017. Denise and I have been blessed by those who have helped support us while we set aside our usual work to research Qs messages, he wrote. He has published several other books, which offer a glimpse into an earlier life. The titles include Hearing Gods Voice Made Simple, Defeating Your Adversary in the Court of Heaven, and American Sniper: Lessons in Spiritual Warfare. Hayes registered Praying Medic as a religious nonprofit in Washington State in 2018.

Hayes tells his followers that he thinks Q is an open-source intelligence operation, made possible by the internet and designed by patriots fighting corruption inside the intelligence community. His interpretation of Q is ultimately religious in nature, and centers on the idea of a Great Awakening. I believe The Great Awakening has a double application, Hayes wrote in a blog post in November 2019.

Q followers agree that a Great Awakening lies ahead, and will bring salvation. They differ in their personal preoccupations with respect to the here and now. Some in the QAnon world are highly focused on what they perceive as degeneracy in the mainstream media, a perception fueled in equal measure by Q and by Trump. Others obsess over the intelligence community and the notion of a deep state. An active subsection of Q followers probes the Jeffrey Epstein case. There are those who claim knowledge of a 16-year plan by Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama to destroy the United States by means of mass drought, weaponized disease, food shortages, and nuclear war. During the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, some Q followers promoted the idea that Trump was secretly working with Robert Mueller, and that the special counsels report would both exonerate Trump and lead to mass arrests of members of the corrupt cabal. (The eventual Mueller report, released in April 2019, neither exonerated Trump nor led to mass arrests.)

These divergent byways are elemental to QAnons staying powerthis is a very welcoming belief system, warm in its tolerance for contradictionand are also what makes it possible for a practical man like Hayes to play the role that he does. QAnon is complex and confusing. People from all over the internet seek guidance from someone who seems levelheaded. (Hayes was quick to respond to my emails but declined requests for an interview. He complained to me that journalists refuse to see QAnon for what it really is, and therefore cannot be trusted.)

The most prominent QAnon figures have a presence beyond the biggest social-media platforms and image boards. The Q universe encompasses numerous blogs, proprietary websites, and types of chat software, as well as alternative social-media platforms such as Gab, the site known for anti-Semitism and white nationalism, where many people banned from Twitter have congregated. Vloggers and bloggers promote their Patreon accounts, where people can pay them in monthly sums. Theres also money to be made from ads on YouTube. That seems to be the primary focus for Hayes, whose videos have been viewed more than 33 million times altogether. His Q for Beginners video includes ads from companies such as the vacation-rental site Vrbo and from The Epoch Times, an international pro-Trump newspaper. Q evangelists have taken a publish everywhere approach that is half outreach, half redundancy. If one platform cracks down on QAnon, as Reddit did, they wont have to start from scratch somewhere else. Already embroiled in the battle between good and evil, QAnon has involved itself in another battlebetween the notion of an open web for the people and a gated internet controlled by a powerful few.

Any new belief system runs into opposition. In December 2018, Matt Patten, a veteran SWAT-team sergeant in the Broward County Sheriffs Office, in Florida, was photographed with Vice President Mike Pence on an airport tarmac. Patten wore a patch on his tactical vest that bore the letter Q. The photograph was tweeted by the vice presidents office and then went viral in the QAnon community. The tweet was quickly taken down. Patten was demoted. When I knocked on his door on a gloomy day in August, no one answered. But as I turned to leave, I noticed two large bumper stickers on the white mailbox out front. One said trump, and the other said #qanon: patriots fight.

Late last summer, Q himself lost his platform. He had migrated from 4chan (fearing that the site had been infiltrated) to the image board 8chan, and then 8chan went dark. Three days before I stood on Pattens doorstep, 22 people had been killed in a mass shooting at a Walmart in El Paso, Texas, and police revealed that the alleged killer had posted a manifesto on 8chan just before carrying out the attack. The episode had eerie similarities to two other shootings. Four months earlier, in April 2019, the suspected shooter in a murderous rampage at a synagogue in Poway, California, had posted an anti-Semitic letter on 8chan. Weeks before that, the man who killed 51 worshippers at two New Zealand mosques had posted a white-supremacist manifesto on 8chan.

After El Paso, 8chans owner, Jim Watkins, was ordered to testify before the House Committee on Homeland Security. Watkins had bought the site four years earlier from its founder, Fredrick Brennan, now 26, who eventually cut all ties to 8chan. Regrettably, this is at least the third act of white supremacist extremist violence linked to your website this year, wrote Representatives Bennie Thompson, a Democrat from Mississippi, and Mike Rogers, a Republican from Alabama, when they summoned Watkins to Capitol Hill. Americans deserve to know what, if anything, you, as the owner and operator, are doing to address the proliferation of extremist content on 8chan.

8chan had already lost crucial services, which had forced it to shut down. The CEO of Cloudflare, which had helped protect the site from cyberattacks, explained his decision to drop 8chan in an open letter after the El Paso shooting: The rationale is simple: They have proven themselves to be lawless and that lawlessness has caused multiple tragic deaths. Watkins promised to keep the site off the internet until after his congressional appearance. He is a former U.S. Army helicopter repairman who got into the business of websites while he was still in the military. Among other things, in 1997, he launched a successful porn site called Asian Bikini Bar. On his YouTube channel, where he posts under the username Watkins Xerxes, he frequently sings hymns, reads verses from the Bible, praises Trump, and touches on themes underlying QAnonwarning against the deep state and reminding his audience members that they are now the actual reporting mechanism of the news. He also shows off his fountain-pen collection and practices yoga. When he arrived on Capitol Hill, in September 2019, Watkins wore a bulbous silver Q pinned to his collar. His testimony was behind closed doors. In November, 8chan flickered back to life as 8kun. It was sporadically accessible, limping along through a series of cyberattacks. It received assistance from a Russian hosting service that is typically associated with spreading malware. When Q reappeared on 8kun, he used the same tripcode that he had used on 8chan. He posted other hints meant to verify the continuity of his identity, including an image of a notebook and a pen that had appeared in earlier posts.

Rene DiResta: The conspiracies are coming from inside the house

Fredrick Brennans theory is that Jim and his son Ron, who is the sites administrator, knew 8kun needed Q to attract users. I definitely, definitely, 100 percent believe that Q either knows Jim or Ron Watkins, or was hired by Jim or Ron Watkins, Brennan told me. Jim and Ron have both denied knowing Qs identity. I dont know who Q is, Ron told me in a direct message on Twitter. Jim told an interviewer on One America News Network in September 2019: I dont know who QAnon is. Really, we run an anonymous website. Both insist that they care about maintaining 8kun only because it is a platform for unfettered free speech. 8kun is like a piece of paper, and the users decide what is written on it, Ron told me. There are many different topics and users from many different backgrounds. But their interest in Q is well documented. In February, Jim started a super PAC called Disarm the Deep State, which echoes Qs messages and which is running paid ads on 8kun.

Brennan has long been feuding with the Watkinses. Jim is suing Brennan for libel in the Philippines, where they both lived until recently, and Brennan is actively fighting Jims attempts to become a naturalized citizen there. They kept Q alive, Brennan told me. We wouldnt be talking about this right now if Q didnt go on the new 8kun. The entire reason were talking about this is theyre directly related to Q. And, you know, I worry constantly that there is going to be, as early as November 2020, some kind of shooting or something related to Q if Trump loses. Or parents killing their children to save them from the hell-world that is to come because the deep state has won. These are real possibilities. I just feel like what they have done is totally irresponsible to keep Q going.

The story of Q is premised on the need for Q to remain anonymous. Its why Q originally picked 4chan, one of the last places built for anonymity on the social web. Ive often related Q to previous figures like John Titor or Satoshi Nakamoto, Brennan told me, referring to two legends of internet anonymity. Satoshi Nakamoto is the name used by the unknown creator of bitcoin. John Titor is the name used on several message boards in 2000 and 2001 by someone claiming to be a military time traveler from the year 2036.

QAnon adherents see Qs anonymity as proof of Qs credibilitydespite their deep mistrust of unnamed sources in the media. Every faction of QAnon has its own hunches, alliances, and interpersonal dramas related to the question of Qs identity. The theories fit into three broad groups. In the first group are theories that assume Q is a single individual who has been posting all alone this entire time. This is where youll find the people who say that Trump himself is Q, or even that PrayingMedic is Q. (This category also includes the possibility, raised by people outside of QAnon, that Q is a lone Trump supporter who started posting as a form of fan fiction, not realizing it would take off; and the idea that Q began posting in order to parody Trump and his supporters, not anticipating that people would take him seriously.) The second group of theories holds that the original Q posted continuously for a while, but then something changed. This second category includes Brennans idea that the Watkinses are now paying Q, or are paying someone to carry on as Q, or are even acting as Q themselves. The third group of theories holds that Q is a collective, with a small number of people sharing access to the account. This third category includes the notion that Q is a new kind of open-source military-intelligence agency.

Read: I was a teenage conspiracy theorist

Many QAnon adherents see significance in Trump tweets containing words that begin with the letter Q. Recent world events have rewarded them amply. I am a great friend and admirer of the Queen & the United Kingdom, Trump began one tweet on March 29. The day before, he had tweeted this: I am giving consideration to a QUARANTINE. The Q crowd seized on both tweets, arguing that if you ignore most of the letters in the messages, youll find a confession from Trump: I am Q.

In a Miami coffee shop last year, I met with a man who has gotten a flurry of attention in recent years for his research on conspiracy theoriesa political-science professor at the University of Miami named Joseph Uscinski. I have known Uscinski for years, and his views are nuanced, deeply informed, and far from anything you would consider knee-jerk partisanship. Many people assume, he told me, that a propensity for conspiracy thinking is predictable along ideological lines. Thats wrong, he explained. Its better to think of conspiracy thinking as independent of party politics. Its a particular form of mind-wiring. And its generally characterized by acceptance of the following propositions: Our lives are controlled by plots hatched in secret places. Although we ostensibly live in a democracy, a small group of people run everything, but we dont know who they are. When big events occurpandemics, recessions, wars, terrorist attacksit is because that secretive group is working against the rest of us.

QAnon isnt a far-right conspiracy, the way its often described, Uscinski went on, despite its obviously pro-Trump narrative. And thats because Trump isnt a typical far-right politician. Q appeals to people with the greatest attraction to conspiracy thinking of any kind, and that appeal crosses ideological lines.

Many of the people most prone to believing conspiracy theories see themselves as victim-warriors fighting against corrupt and powerful forces. They share a hatred of mainstream elites. That helps explain why cycles of populism and conspiracy thinking seem to rise and fall together. Conspiracy thinking is at once a cause and a consequence of what Richard Hofstadter in 1964 famously described as the paranoid style in American politics. But do not make the mistake of thinking that conspiracy theories are scribbled only in the marginalia of American history. They color every major news event: the assassination of John F. Kennedy, the moon landing, 9/11. They have helped sustain consequential eruptions, such as McCarthyism in the 1950s and anti-Semitism at any moment you choose. But QAnon is different. It may be propelled by paranoia and populism, but it is also propelled by religious faith. The language of evangelical Christianity has come to define the Q movement. QAnon marries an appetite for the conspiratorial with positive beliefs about a radically different and better future, one that is preordained.

Read: The paranoid style in American entertainment

That was part of the reason Uscinskis mother, Shelly, 62, was attracted to QAnon. Shelly, who lives in New Hampshire, was tooling around on YouTube a couple of years ago, looking for how-to videosshe cant remember for what, exactly, maybe a tutorial on how to get her car windows sparkling-cleanand the algorithm served up QAnon. She remembers a feeling of magnetic attraction. Like, Wow, what is this? she recalled when I spoke with her by phone. For me, it was revealing some things that maybe I was hoping would come to pass. She sensed that Q knew her anxietiesas if someone was taking her train of thought and actually verbalizing it. Shellys frustrations are broad, and directed primarily at the institutions she sees as broken. Shes fed up with the education system, the financial system, the media. Even our churches are out of whack, she said. One of the things that resonated most with her about Q was his disgust with the fake news. She gets her information mostly from Fox News, Twitter, and the New Hampshire Union Leader. In my lifetime, I guess, things have gotten progressively worse, Shelly said. She added a little later: Q gives us hope. And its a good thing, to be hopeful.

Shelly likes that Q occasionally quotes from scripture, and she likes that he encourages people to pray. In the end, she said, QAnon is about something so much bigger than Trump or anyone else. There are QAnon followers out there, Shelly said, who suggest that what were going through now, in this crazy political realm were in now, with all of the things that are happening worldwide, is very biblical, and that this is Armageddon.

I asked her if she thinks the end of the world is upon us. It wouldnt surprise me, she said.

Read: The normalization of conspiracy culture

Joseph Uscinski is disturbed by his mothers belief in QAnon. Hes not comfortable talking about it. And Shelly doesnt quite appreciate the irony of the familys situation, because she doesnt believe QAnon is a form of conspiracy thinking in the first place. At one point in our conversation, when I referred to QAnon as a conspiracy theory, she quickly interrupted: Its not a theory. Its the foretelling of things to come. She laughed hard when I asked if she had ever tried to get Joseph to believe in QAnon. The answer was an unequivocal no: Im his mom, so I love him.

Watchkeepers for the End of Days can easily find signs of impending doomin comets and earthquakes, in wars and pandemics. It has always been this way. In 1831, a Baptist preacher in rural New York named William Miller began to publicly share his prediction that the Second Coming of Jesus was imminent. Eventually he settled on a date: October 22, 1844. When the sun came up on October 23, his followers, known as the Millerites, were crushed. The episode would come to be known as the Great Disappointment. But they did not give up. The Millerites became the Adventists, who in turn became the Seventh-day Adventists, who now have a worldwide membership of more than 20 million. These people in the QAnon communityI feel like they are as deeply delusional, as deeply invested in their beliefs, as the Millerites were, Travis View, one of the hosts of a podcast called QAnon Anonymous, which subjects QAnon to acerbic analysis, told me. That makes me pretty confident that this is not something that is going to go away with the end of the Trump presidency.

QAnon carries on a tradition of apocalyptic thinking that has spanned thousands of years. It offers a polemic to empower those who feel adrift. In his classic 1957 book, The Pursuit of the Millennium, the historian Norman Cohn examined the emergence of apocalyptic thinking over many centuries. He found one common condition: This way of thinking consistently emerged in regions where rapid social and economic change was taking placeand at periods of time when displays of spectacular wealth were highly visible but unavailable to most people. This was true in Europe during the Crusades in the 11th century, and during the Black Death in the 14th century, and in the Rhine Valley in the 16th century, and in William Millers New York in the 19th century. It is true in America in the 21st century.

The Seventh-day Adventists and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are thriving religious movements indigenous to America. Do not be surprised if QAnon becomes another. It already has more adherents by far than either of those two denominations had in the first decades of their existence. People are expressing their faith through devoted study of Q drops as installments of a foundational text, through the development of Q-worshipping groups, and through sweeping expressions of gratitude for what Q has brought to their lives. Does it matter that we do not know who Q is? The divine is always a mystery. Does it matter that basic aspects of Qs teachings cannot be confirmed? The basic tenets of Christianity cannot be confirmed. Among the people of QAnon, faith remains absolute. True believers describe a feeling of rebirth, an irreversible arousal to existential knowledge. They are certain that a Great Awakening is coming. Theyll wait as long as they must for deliverance.

Trust the plan. Enjoy the show. Nothing can stop what is coming.

This article appears in the June 2020 print edition with the headline Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming.

Original post:
The Prophecies of Q - The Atlantic

This Week in Technology + Press Freedom: May 24, 2020 – Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press

Heres what the staff of the Technology and Press Freedom Project at the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press is tracking this week.

The Reporters Committee recently published aspecial analysisdiscussing a difficult legal case that could have serious repercussions for newsgathering, especially for national security reporters.

Thecaseoriginated with a now-retracted story published by Fox News about Seth Rich, a data director at the Democratic National Committee who was murdered in 2016 in Washington, D.C.

The May 2017 story quoted a retired D.C. homicide detective and Fox News contributor who was investigating the case for the Rich family. The detective was quoted as saying that his inquiry showed some degree of email exchange between Rich and WikiLeaks. The reporter wrote that she had corroborated that detail through an unnamed federal investigator. However, many officials disputed the former detectives statement, and, within 24 hours, the former detectivesaidhe had no evidence of an exchange. Fox retracted the article.

Seth Richs family sued Fox, a case that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit allowed to proceed last September. Meanwhile, Seth Richs older brother, Aaron Rich, filed a defamation lawsuit against three others for statements purporting to connect Aaron to the debunked WikiLeaks conspiracy theory. A discrete but serious First Amendment issue has come up in that case.

The plaintiff served a third-party subpoena to depose the Fox reporter who wrote the May 2017 story, seeking, among other things, testimony on the decision to retract the article.

Fox News and the reporter filed a motion for a protective order barring the deposition, arguing, in part, that the discussions concerning the retraction are part of the editorial process, which are protected by the First Amendment and New Yorks newsgathering privilege. In April, a federal judge denied the motion, stating that discussions around the retraction of a story do not involve newsgathering.

As TPFP Director Gabe Rottman explains in his special analysis, the district courts holding in this case is deeply troubling and could, if widely adopted, lead to serious consequences for all media outlets, not just the entities involved here. The courts ruling is especially concerning for national security reporters. Indeed, such reporters may occasionally have to rely on incomplete information due to the secrecy surrounding their stories, and with such high stakes, outlets tend to be under even more pressure to expediently address inaccuracies with corrections or retractions.

[C]onstitutional or statutory protections that allow news outlets to self-correct without fear that doing so will lead to legal liability or, in this case, scrutiny into the decision-making processes, are important for an independent press, Rottman notes.

Read more of the special analysishere.

Lyndsey Wajert

TheUSA FREEDOM Reauthorization Actis back to the House after the Senate passed an amendment to the bill we detailed in last weeksnewsletter.The House isexpectedto take up the bill on May 27, and will also reportedly vote on a second amendment that would bar the warrantless search of a targets internet and web-browsing history, which failed in the Senate by just one vote.

A U.S. prosecutor told a federal judge last week that the Justice Department intends to retryex-CIA employee Joshua Schulte after a jury in New York federal court deadlocked on espionage-related charges. The jury found Schulte, who is accused of leaking agency hacking tools to WikiLeaks in 2017, guilty of lying to the FBI and contempt of court.

According to emails obtained by theTampa Bay Times, officials in Florida directed a top state Department of Health data manager to remove a column of data from public view that showed Floridians reported symptoms of COVID-19 before cases were officially announced. The following day, the data manager was removed from her role, but not before warning via a COVID data users listserv that her replacements could be less transparent with data about the disease.

The Reporters CommitteejoinedThe Internet and Television Association in filing a friend-of-the-court brief last week inWashington League for Increased Transparency and Ethics v. Fox News, a case in which the nonprofit group asserts that Fox violated state consumer protectionlaws during its early coverage of COVID-19. The brief discusses a discrete issue raised in the case that could have serious implications for all forms of content (including, by extension, blog posts online): Whether content providers enjoy First Amendment protection when they distribute their programming over a cable television system.

The FBI isreportedlyinvestigating a computer programmer in Arkansas who discovered that he could access sensitive information on a state unemployment site by changing the web address, and, after trying to alert the state to the vulnerability, notified the press. As the Reporters Committee has repeatedlyexplained, accessing publicly available information online (which, based on the reporting, this was) is not hacking, and not a crime.

Smart read

A smart read, or listen, for this week is aninterviewNPR conducted with Neil Johnson, a physics professor at The George Washington University, in which he discusses hisstudy on the spread of scientific misinformationabout COVID-19 on social media.

Gif of the Week:For Memorial Day.

Like what youve read?Sign up to get This Week in Technology + Press Freedom delivered straight to your inbox!

The Technology and Press Freedom Project at the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press uses integrated advocacy combining the law, policy analysis, and public education to defend and promote press rights on issues at the intersection of technology and press freedom, such as reporter-source confidentiality protections, electronic surveillance law and policy, and content regulation online and in other media. TPFP is directed by Reporters Committee Attorney Gabe Rottman. He works with Stanton Foundation National Security/Free Press Fellow Linda Moon and Legal Fellows Jordan Murov-Goodman and Lyndsey Wajert.

Continued here:
This Week in Technology + Press Freedom: May 24, 2020 - Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press