With Just ~20 Lines of Python Code, You can Do Retrieval Augmented GPT Based QA Using This Open Source Repository Called PrimeQA – MarkTechPost

With Just ~20 Lines of Python Code, You can Do Retrieval Augmented GPT Based QA Using This Open Source Repository Called PrimeQA  MarkTechPost

The rest is here:

With Just ~20 Lines of Python Code, You can Do Retrieval Augmented GPT Based QA Using This Open Source Repository Called PrimeQA - MarkTechPost

Open Definition & Meaning | Dictionary.com

not closed or barred at the time, as a doorway by a door, a window by a sash, or a gateway by a gate: to leave the windows open at night.

(of a door, gate, window sash, or the like) set so as to permit passage through the opening it can be used to close.

having no means of closing or barring: an open portico.

having the interior immediately accessible, as a box with the lid raised or a drawer that is pulled out.

relatively free of obstructions to sight, movement, or internal arrangement: an open floor plan.

constructed so as to be without cover or enclosure on the top or on some or all sides: an open boat.

having relatively large or numerous spaces, voids, or intervals: an open architectural screen; open ranks of soldiers.

perforated or porous: an open texture.

relatively unoccupied by buildings, fences, trees, etc.: open country.

not covered or closed; with certain parts apart: open eyes; open mouth.

without a covering, especially a protective covering; unprotected; unenclosed; exposed: an open wound; open electrical wires.

extended or unfolded: an open newspaper.

without restrictions as to who may participate: an open competition; an open session.

accessible or available to follow: the only course still open to us.

not taken or filled; not preempted; available; vacant: Which job is open?

ready for or carrying on normal trade or business: The new store is now open. The office is open on Saturdays.

not engaged or committed: Have you any open time on Monday?

accessible, as to appeals, ideas, or offers: to be open to suggestion.

exposed to general view or knowledge; existing, carried on, etc., without concealment: open disregard of the rules.

acting publicly or without concealment, as a person.

unreserved, candid, or frank, as persons or their speech, aspect, etc.: an open manner.

generous, liberal, or bounteous: to give with an open hand.

liable or subject: open to question; open to retaliation.

undecided; unsettled: several open questions.

without effective or enforced legal, commercial, or moral regulations: an open town.

unguarded by an opponent: an open wide receiver.

noting the part of the sea beyond headlands or enclosing areas of land: to sail on the open seas.

free of ice, as a body of water or a seaport.

free of navigational hazards: an open coast.

(of a seaport) available for foreign trade; not closed by government regulations or by considerations of health.

(of a microphone) in operation; live.

not yet balanced or adjusted, as an account.

not constipated, as the bowels.

free from frost; mild or moderate: an open winter.

Animal Husbandry. (of a female animal) not pregnant.

Textiles. (of a fabric or weave) so loosely woven that spaces are visible between warp and filling yarns.

Go here to see the original:
Open Definition & Meaning | Dictionary.com

529 Synonyms & Antonyms of OPEN – Merriam-Webster

How does the adjective open contrast with its synonyms?

Some common synonyms of open are exposed, liable, prone, sensitive, subject, and susceptible. While all these words mean "being by nature or through circumstances likely to experience something adverse," open stresses a lack of barriers preventing incurrence.

When could exposed be used to replace open?

The words exposed and open can be used in similar contexts, but exposed suggests lack of protection or powers of resistance against something actually present or threatening.

When can liable be used instead of open?

While in some cases nearly identical to open, liable implies a possibility or probability of incurring something because of position, nature, or particular situation.

When would prone be a good substitute for open?

While the synonyms prone and open are close in meaning, prone stresses natural tendency or propensity to incur something.

When might sensitive be a better fit than open?

The words sensitive and open are synonyms, but do differ in nuance. Specifically, sensitive implies a readiness to respond to or be influenced by forces or stimuli.

unduly sensitive to criticism

When is subject a more appropriate choice than open?

In some situations, the words subject and open are roughly equivalent. However, subject implies an openness for any reason to something that must be suffered or undergone.

all reports are subject to review

When is it sensible to use susceptible instead of open?

The meanings of susceptible and open largely overlap; however, susceptible implies conditions existing in one's nature or individual constitution that make incurrence probable.

very susceptible to flattery

Read the original here:

529 Synonyms & Antonyms of OPEN - Merriam-Webster

Open Definition & Meaning – Merriam-Webster

1

2

3

: being an operation or surgical procedure in which an incision is made such that the tissues are fully exposed

4

5

of a head injury : marked by fracture or penetration of the skull

6

7

8

9

of a tone : produced by an open string or on a wind instrument by the lip without the use of slides, valves, or keys

10

11

: characterized by ready accessibility and usually generous attitude: such as

12

13

of an organ pipe : not stopped at the top

of a string on a musical instrument : not stopped by the finger

14

15

16

17

of punctuation : characterized by sparing use especially of the comma when possible without causing misinterpretation

18

mathematics

19

: being an incomplete electrical circuit

transitive verb

1

: to move (something, such as a door) from a closed position

: to make available for entry or passage by turning back (something, such as a barrier) or removing (something, such as a cover or an obstruction)

2

: to initiate access to (a computer file) prior to use

3

: to bring into view or come in sight of by changing position

4

6

: to commence action in a card game by making (a first bid), putting a first bet in (the pot), or playing (a card or suit) as first lead

7

: to restore or recall (something, such as an order) from a finally determined state to a state in which the parties are free to prosecute or oppose

intransitive verb

2

3

: to become enlightened or responsive

4

6

: to begin a course or activity

: to make a bet, bid, or lead in commencing a round or hand of a card game

7

: to provide the opening performance of a show before the main event

2

: open and unobstructed space: such as

3

: an open contest, competition, or tournament

4

: a public or unconcealed state or position

Subscribe to America's largest dictionary and get thousands more definitions and advanced searchad free!

Continued here:

Open Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster

8 Free/Open Source Code Review Tools for 2022 – SoftwareSuggest

Reading Time: 8 Minutes

Published : June 17, 2019

Last Updated: October 20, 2022

Code review is an integral part of the development process. It is used to find out bugs and errors at an early stage of development itself.

The code review tools are so designed that it automates the whole process of reviewing the application development process. Thus, it has become an important tool for the development team.

This code review process helps improve the quality of the software. To help you out, we have listed out the top eight free and open-source code review tools that you might want to take a look at.

The code review process is orderly testing of software to find and remove errors, bugs, buffer overflows, and other vulnerabilities found in the codes.

These code review processes are methodically documented and follow severe defect detection techniques from peers and technical experts. There are basically four, sometimes five participants who are involved in code creation and code inspection the author, the moderator, the reviewer, the reader, and sometimes an observant.

The code reviews are led by trained moderators and reviewers who are NOT the author of the coded program, and these reviews are performed without any management participation.

Since it is a quality assurance activity, reviewers scrutinize the codes written by the authors and prepare a report with a list of findings to be fixed.

There are many processes and techniques to perform a code review which usually involves a lot of meetings between the distinct roles mentioned above.

There are heavyweight inspection processes that go up to 6-7 steps involving everyone to work only when the code review comes on their plate and there are lightweight inspection processes that involve everyone to work simultaneously with each other.

Not many follow heavyweight inspection processes anymore, which means lightweight processes are trending more with the increase in the development of software applications across the globe.

Here are a few lightweight inspection techniques:

This code review process is the most informal and common. Over-the-shoulder means that a reviewer hovers over the author while the author displays the changes made in the code at their coding workstation.

The author is the person that leads the code review by sitting at their computer, explaining the changes he/she made in the code while going through multiple tools and files in the project.

If the reviewer finds any discrepancy, then they engage on the spot with the author (this engagement is called pair-programming) to fix the missed issues. If the changes are too significant, then the entire live code is taken off-line.

However, with modern desktop-sharing tools, this over-the-shoulder review has become remote and easy to implement over long distances.

This process of code review is prevalent and preferred by most open-source projects. Here, the entire file or changes in the code are packed up by the author and sent to the reviewers through email. Reviewers then examine the code data, ask relevant doubts and queries in the same thread to the authors.

In this method, it is easier to involve other developers through the email itself to ask for suggestions, changes in the code, expert advice, or even complete deferral.

People generally associate this technique of code review with Extreme Programming (XP) because it incorporates a continuous code analysis. In pair-programming, two developers produce code from a single workstation, with only one authoring the code and the other person freely discussing any changes and suggestions needed as a reviewing developer.

Pair-programming has shown to be very useful in finding bugs as well as promoting knowledge transfer.

However, this process poses a controversial issue about whether it is better or worse or equivalent to more standard reviewing methods because the reviewing developer is continually being a critique polishing the code.

At the same time, the author might get frustrated and keep losing his/her chain of programming the code every time in between writing and listening for suggestions.

A code review done with the help of specialized tools that helps in processes like collecting files, commentary, transfer, and displaying data, collecting metrics, etc., is called a tool-assisted review.

Tool-assisted reviews can allow product managers and administrators to exercise some control over the workflow. Such type of review process is mostly preferred in commercial software, open-source projects, or home-grown scripts.

Either way, it requires a lot of money to be invested in specialized tools to create a better code review environment.

These code review processes help improve the quality of the software. To help you out, we have listed out the top eight free and open-source code review tools that you might want to take a look at.

Codebrag is one of the best open-source code review tools that are quite simple to use. It is mainly used to review inline comments and likes, smart email notifications, non-blocking code, and more.

It is a light-weight review tool that makes the whole process of review entertaining and structured. Furthermore, it offers an agile code review that helps deliver a high-quality application.

Features

Pros

Cons

Gerrit is another free and open-source code review tool that can help you review code on a web browser. It is a self-hosted and light-weight solution. It enables all the committers on a project to keep track of all the changes made.

The most significant advantage is that it gives you the chance to review the changes before accepting the codebase. Besides, the change facilitator can open conversations about the changes by leaving comments and notes.

Features

Pros

Cons

Reviewable is one of the best open-source code review tools in terms of both functionality and appearance. It offers a clean and interactive UI that enables you to perform advanced functionality with ease. Using the device, you can perform actions like comparing the diffs of any two revisions of a file or installing customizable logic that enables you to know if the review of code is complete or not.

Features

Pros

Cons

ReviewBoard is a simple yet powerful free code review tool that makes the whole process of reviewing thoroughly. It provides functionalities like diff and the ability to make comments.

Besides, it is relatively easy- and- quick to learn and provides a clean interface. ReviewBoard is the best option for developers who are looking for a no-frills code review. It has 1.2K GitHub stars and 369 GitHub forks.

Features

Pros

Cons

Phabricator Differential is a free code review tool that enables you to download and install it on your own hardware or launch a hosted instance with them. It is considered the best code review tool amongst the top open-source code review tool.

Whats more, you can use it HG, Git, and SVN. And if that wasnt enough, this free code review tool also allows for easy team discussion, planning, testing, and coding. The plus point is that it is scalable to multiple servers.

Features

Pros

Cons

Rhodecode is a popular open-source code review tool that makes it easy to handle code management. It is well protected, enterprise source code management system that serves as an integrated tool for Mercurial, Git, and Subversion.

It offers two editions. The first one is licensed per user named Enterprise Edition, and the other is Community Edition a free and open-source version.

Features

Pros

Cons

The last on our list is Codestriker, which is an open-source code review tool. Using the device, you can easily record issues, leave comments, and notes in a database. It supports reviews of traditional documents and diffs generated by an SCM system and plain unidiff patches. There is a plug-in architecture for supporting issue tracking systems.

Whats more, it minimizes paperwork and provides a clean interface for performing code inspections.

Features

Pros

Cons

SmartBear has automated software, Collaborator, to help you with your code quality instantly. It supports most of the version control systems like Subversion, CVS, TFS, Perforce, and Git.

This Smartbears software allows reporting and analysis of key metrics along with reviewing design documents related to your code review process. With SmartBear, you can reduce your rework and get answers quickly.

Features

Pros

Cons

Conclusion

So, these were the top 8 open-source code review tools from us which are mostly used by developers all across the globe.

Which one have you so far been working within your company? Tell us your review in the comment section below.

Sharad Bhardwaj is a content analyst at SoftwareSuggest. He loves to advise and help people. In leisure time he likes to be involved in sports activities and listening to music.

Read the original here:

8 Free/Open Source Code Review Tools for 2022 - SoftwareSuggest