Microsoft: An Open Source Windows Is ‘Definitely Possible’

Microsofts software empire rests on Windows, the computer operating system that runs so many of the worlds desktop PCs, laptops, phones, and servers. Along with the Office franchise, it generates the majority of the companys revenues. But one day, the company could open source the code that underpins the OSgiving it away for free. So says Mark Russinovich, one of the companys top engineers.

Its definitely possible, Russinovich says. Its a new Microsoft.

Russinovich is sitting in front of several hundred people who spend their days running thousands of computers. He helped build Windows, and he carries one of the most respected titles at the worlds largest software company: Microsoft Technical Fellow. But here, on stage at a conference in Silicon Valley, hes perched in front of an audience whose relationship with Microsoft is, at best, complicated.

So many Microsoft customers now rely on open source code. That means Microsoft must embrace it too.

But this is what Russinovich expects. Thats the reality we live in today, he says. The tech world has changed in enormous ways. So many companiesso many Microsoft customersare now relying on open source code. And that means Microsoft must embrace it too. As Russinovich points out, the company now allows Linux on its Azure cloud computing service, a way of renting computers over the internet, and today, Linux is running on at least 20 percent of those computers.

Its quite a change for Microsoft, so long the bete noir of the open source community. But as Russinovich explains, its a necessary change. And given how popular Linux has become, Microsoft could go even further, not only allowing open source software on its cloud services, but actually turning Windows into open source software. Every conversation you can imagine about what should we do with our softwareopen versus not-open versus serviceshas happened, he says.

Certainly, Microsoft wont open source the thing tomorrowif ever. Windows is still such a big part of the Microsoft revenue stream. And as Russinovich says, open sourcing such a complex piece of code isnt easy. If you open source something but it comes with a build system that takes rocket scientists and three months to set up, whats the point? he asks. But Microsoft is already giving away one version of Windows for free (though not sharing the underlying code). And it has already open sourced other important pieces of its software empire. If nothing else, his very public comments showin stark fashionhow much the tech world has evolved. And how much Microsoft has evolved.

The future of tech lies not with for-pay software of the kind traditionally offered by Microsoft. Linux has moved into the massive computing centers that power the internet, and open source OSes such as Google Android are running so many of the worlds mobile phones, tablets, and other devices. The future, even for Microsoft, lies in selling other stuff, including cloud computing services such Microsoft Azure and all sorts of other apps and services that run atop the worlds operating systems.

If Microsoft does open source Windows, the operating system can still be a money maker in its own right.

Earlier this year, Microsoft open sourced a tool called .NET, a popular way of building online applications, and the hope is that this will expand the tools reach. Outside coders are even working to move the tool onto Linux machines and Apple Macs. In the end, Russinovich says, this will help Microsoft sell other stuff. Its an enabling technology that can get people started on other Microsoft solutions, he says of .NET. It lifts them up and makes them available for our other offerings, where otherwise they might not be. If theyre using Linux technologies that we cant play with, they cant be a customer of ours.

Go here to read the rest:
Microsoft: An Open Source Windows Is ‘Definitely Possible’

Wellington hosts NZ Open Source Conference

Wellington will be on the world stage on the 16th and 17th of April when it plays host to a collaboration between open source developers, democracy activists, government officials and digital tech heavyweights at the Open Source // Open Society (OS//OS) conference.

Building on the success of open source software in powering the growth of the internet OS//OS will explore developments in open government, open education, open data, and open business.

Alongside key international tech player, Github, the Wellington City Council is a major sponsor behind the event. Grow Wellington is another key backer and has played a crucial role in galvanising support for the conference.

The Enspiral based event organisers have been successful in bringing the worlds biggest repository of open source code to Wellington to co-host the event with Wellington based startups Loomio and Chalkle.

The world leading line up of speakers, from Brandon Keepers, head of open source at GitHub, Sascha Meinrath Founder at the Open Technology Institute, to Keitha Booth from the NZ Open Government Data Programme will shine new light on the question What is Open?"

"To have GitHub co-host their first conference outside of the US in Wellington is a strong endorsement of our tech capability. Open source approaches align well with the collaborative nature of the tech community here. Wellington companies like Catalyst IT, Silverstripe and Loomio have achieved international success using innovative open source models," says Gerard Quinn, Grow Wellingtons CEO.

Nicole Williams from Silverstripe New Zealand, based in Wellington and a sponsor of the event, says "Im keen to know what is possible when public and private sector teams view web development as open by default."

Open source development is based on the ideas of mass collaboration, transparency and meaningful participation and its principles are becoming increasingly important in all spheres of society.

Founder of Wiki New Zealand, Lillian Grace says, "Wiki New Zealand has benefited greatly from open source tools and so we are keen to be a part of and contribute back to the community that enabled us.

She adds, "Data is a language that empowers and emboldens, it allows people to participate in conversations and decision-making processes."

Read the rest here:
Wellington hosts NZ Open Source Conference

5 reasons we said YES to the first Open Source//Open Society

For two days in April, Wellington will be home to some of the biggest influencers in open source development and open society thinking. Building on the success of open source software in powering the growth of the internet Open Source // Open Society will explore developments in open government, open innovation, open education, open data, and open business.

We couldnt miss the opportunity to get involved so are sponsoring the first ever Open Source // Open Society (OS//OS) conference on the 16th and 17th April 2015. Heres just 5 of the reasons why we jumped at supporting OS//OS:

1. We love open source!

We believe in, and have experienced firsthand, the power of an open developer community. The best way to encourage and create better software is to have people contribute back to the main code base and share their work with others.

In November 2006, we released the SilverStripe CMS as a free, open source download, followed by the SilverStripe Framework in 2012. Open sourcing our software has been a far bigger success than we could have imagined. The global interest in SilverStripe the company, and SilverStripe the product has been astounding. We have seen strong growth in adoption of our software around the globe. In addition, many of our own customers are now developing unique and novel solutions on top of SilverStripe and are integrating our software deep into their own product offerings. These projects in turn feed back into the open source project to help drive innovation further.

2. We want Wellingtons vibrant open source community to keep growing

We think Wellington is a pretty cool place to live and work! Were proud to be part of the vibrant open source community that calls Wellington home, many of whom have jumped on board as fellow sponsors. Plus being the hub for NZ government creates huge opportunities for the local open source community to create value for our society as a whole. So its fitting that the first ever Open Source // Open Society conference will take place in Wellington. OS//OS is the perfect showcase for what is possible with an open approach to coding, data and democracy and were excited to see what comes out of the two days.

3. We want to help the government open source everything!

The amount that government invests in online channels is significant DIA conservatively estimates spending at least $40 million each year. However, website developments are usually treated as a one-off project, requiring unnecessary reinvestment in design, development, procurement and security. The functional requirements of most government websites are similar, yet agencies rarely leverage investments already made in technology components, designs and contracts.

From our involvement in the Common Web Platform weve seen how open source and open data can help the public sector deliver better solutions while saving taxpayer money. Greater sharing of code by government agencies and local councils means less money wasted on code that is replicated or poorly maintained. Were hopeful that the public sector will support OS//OS and use it as an opportunity to come together to shape the future of open source in government.

The rest is here:
5 reasons we said YES to the first Open Source//Open Society

Govt announces open source software policy

Govt announces open source software policy

New Delhi: The government has announced a policy for adopting open source software (OSS), making it mandatory that such software is considered along with proprietary products, as it looks to bring in transparency and lower total cost of ownership of projects.

The policy shall be applicable to Central government organisations and and those State governments that choose to adopt this policy, an official statement said.

"Under the overarching vision of Digital India, Government of India aims to make government services digitally accessible to citizens in their localities and to ensure efficiency, transparency and reliability of such services at affordable costs," it said.

It added that organisations worldwide have adopted alternative solutions to optimise costs by exploring avenues of OSS and the Policy will encourage the formal adoption and use of OSS in government organisations in the country.

Under the Policy, all government organisations, while implementing eGovernance applications and systems will have to include a specific requirement in Request for Proposal (RFP) for all suppliers to consider OSS along with closed source software (CSS) while responding.

Suppliers will have to provide justification for exclusion of OSS in their response, in case they do not do so.

"Government organisations shall ensure compliance with this requirement and decide by comparing both OSS and CSS options with respect to capability, strategic control, scalability, security, lifetime costs and support requirements," it said.

In certain specialised domains where OSS solutions are not be available, the concerned government organisation can consider exceptions "with sufficient justification", it said.

Communications and IT Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad had said CSC codes, which are proprietary, used to be monopolistic as there is not only a lockin but vendors also charge heavily for maintenance and subsequent updates.

Original post:
Govt announces open source software policy

How open source can bring NHS IT back to the future

Open source has the power to revolutionise the NHS, but it's an issue of confidence

In many respects open source software is not really understood within healthcare. A lot of people hear about it and imagine a teenager who downloaded a piece of code off the Internet. The lack of control and ownership of the code is seen as a risk to clinical safety. And they would be right if that were the case.

But the open source approach in the NHS is not new. In the 80s and early 90s, the health service used to write its own software, just as open source programmers are doing now. In-house programmers spoke to clinical and administrative colleagues, and developed software that would help them deliver more efficient care.

Back then, teams ran a fully-integrated suite of systems. These were well-received, and are still used today by some organisations. I recall the South West Information Team writing a patient administration system (PAS) for the whole of the South West of England imagine the time, effort and cost associated with that type of project today.

> See also: Making the paperless NHS a practical reality

Somewhere along the line the NHS lost confidence and belief that it could do this in-house and began contracting out IT development. The start of the 21st century saw software suppliers working alongside clinicians but this approach had its limitations. Any IT functionality developed would be sold back to individual trust by suppliers rather than shared for the wider benefit of the NHS. The result? IT costs soar and trusts are unable to combine or promote best practice of technology projects.

Same problems, different solutions

As a taxpayer and an NHS employee I realise that every penny is precious. Healthier lifestyles and better drugs means our population lives longer, and we do not have sufficient funding to help manage long-term complex conditions. We either need more investment, or have to make better use of current resources.

IT is just one area of healthcare that needs more money. What can we do as an IT department to overcome this challenge? Think outside the box. PAS systems from the mid-90s worked for a fraction of the cost compared with todays market. They were affordable systems that delivered results. How can we achieve this now?

Funding bids can help with purchasing technology, but the recent Integrated Care Digital Record bid process highlighted some downsides. Having been through a bidding process and advised that the open source programme was one of the key priorities for the NHS, we then heard nothing for months which makes it very hard for trusts to plan their finances in already difficult circumstances. But thanks to the affordability of open source, we can still press ahead with our open source EPR project.

Read the original:
How open source can bring NHS IT back to the future

Prostrate yourself before the GNU, commands Indian DEITY

The best-acronymed government department in the world India's Department of Electronics and Information Technology (DEITY) has laid out a new policy (PDF) commanding the nation's government to use only open source software.

The policy statement is rather blunt:

Government of India shall endeavour to adopt Open Source Software in all e-Governance systems implemented by various Government organizations, as a preferred option in comparison to Closed Source Software (CSS). The Open Source Software shall have the following characteristics:

Compliance with the policy is mandatory and applies to all central government agencies for state agencies when they replace or upgrade e-governance software.

There's an out if an agency needs software that isn't readily available as open source, but the policy insists on calling for only open source products in all future RFPs.

When the UK government adopted open document format, Microsoft made its displeasure known. The Reg's trawl of the web has turned up no such reaction this time, from Redmond or others. That may be because India's still a smallish market, in terms of sales.

There's also lots of wriggle room in the definition of e-governance, which DEITY says is A procedural approach in which the Government and the citizens, businesses, and other stakeholders are able to transact all or part of activities using Information and Communication Technology tools.

Between that loose definition and the get-out clause for apps that aren't easily found as FOSS, it looks like India's not blocking proprietary software entirely, but is making it plain it prefers open source whenever possible.

Sponsored: Designing and building an open ITOA architecture

Read more here:
Prostrate yourself before the GNU, commands Indian DEITY

India backs open source software for e-governance projects

India has said it will use open source software in all e-governance projects, though it did not rule out the use of proprietary software to meet specialized requirements.

A policy document released by the federal government over the weekend makes it mandatory for all new e-governance projects and upgrades of existing legacy systems by federal agencies and participating states to first consider free and open source software (OSS) alternatives.

Federal and state agencies must make it mandatory for suppliers to give OSS a preference over proprietary or closed source software while responding to requests for proposals. Suppliers shall provide justification for exclusion of OSS in their response, according to the policy statement posted to the website of the Ministry for Communication & Information Technology.

The Indian government has outlined its Digital India program that aims to make government services accessible online to citizens in their localities. The need to expand these services quickly at a low cost has likely prompted the decision in favor of open source in the country.

The government has also cited strategic control over its e-governance applications and systems from a long-term perspective as one of the reasons it was backing open source.

It is a well drafted policy though policy researchers will always have possible improvements, said Sunil Abraham, executive director of the Centre for Internet and Society, a research organization in Bangalore. Instead of coming up with a new definition for free and open source software, the policy should have used the definitions available at the Free Software Foundation and Open Source Initiative websites and adopted licenses approved by these organizations, he added.

The policy should also require that the software be made available on a public code repository except in cases where there are some security concerns, Abraham said.

The federal government had previously declined to take a stand in favor of open source, leaving the choice to its agencies, but the National Policy on Information Technology, 2012 had mentioned the promotion of open source and open technologies as one of its objectives.

Some states have backed open source software on ideological grounds or to cut costs. Kerala, for example, had decided to promote free and open-source software in education as way back as 2006.

The government in its new policy has, however, provided for exemptions in certain specialized domains for which OSS may not be available, or if there isnt expertise in the particular area in open source. The requirement for OSS may also be waived if the deployment is strategic and urgent.

More:
India backs open source software for e-governance projects

Don’t Let Apple Scare You Away From Open Source

Earlier this week, Ben Kepes reported here on Forbes that Apple Appleacquired enterprise database startup FoundationDB. As often happens in these situations, FoundationDB stopped accepting new customers for its paid services. But the companys code repository was also emptied or made private, leaving third party developers dependent upon open source code associated with this database with no official place to get it. Some have been quick to suggest this is a good reasonnot to build products or services that rely upon open source software. It would be a mistake to believe them.

When companies get acquired, their new owners often change the way that products and other assets are made available to others. When Apple acquired Siri back in 2010, the existing iPhone app disappeared. Apples version of Siri didnt see the light of day for over a year. Wal-Mart bought a startup called Luvocracy last year. They had half a million members, and Wal-Mart shut them down. Business intelligence startup DataPad was also acquired last year. They had almost $2 million in VC funding, and users, and buyer Cloudera shut them down. The list goes on, and on, and on. Acquisitions cause popular commercial products to disappear. Acquisitions make much-liked tools morph in ways that loyal users rarely like. Acquisitions lead to open source projects closing down. But acquisitions also give popular but under-funded solutions the fresh injection of cash, enthusiasm or talent they need to reach the next level. And acquisitions may push small and notionally open projects, setting them free from a parent company, gifting them to a more stable open source home (like the Apache Software Foundation, for example),and pushing sponsorship dollars at nurturing a community of enthusiasts and champions. Acquisitions arent all bad.

Open source software is certainly not the only choicefor powering an enterprise application or workflow, but it is an increasingly important way to benefit cost-effectively from the work of a broad community you cant afford to directly employ. Open source operating system Linux successfully challenged the dominance of Solaris, Windows and various commercial variants of Unix, at least in the data center. Open source web server Apache powers over half of the worlds active websites, according to Netcraft. But, far more important than these complete solutions, open source tools, components, and collections of functionality provide developers with a rich and expansive toolkit for building and maintaining their own applications.

FoundationDBs core productwasnt open source. Itwas freely available for download and use (within some constraints), but it was licensed under FoundationDBs own license.

The license or contract under which a piece of software is made available doesnt reallysay much about the likelihood that the company behind it will continue to provide and support whatever it is they wrote. But, as Ben notes in his post, the growth of open sourcecommunities (like the Apache Software Foundation, the OpenStack Foundation, Higher Educations Apereo Foundation, and others) offers some degree of comfort. No one vendor can pull the plug on a project, or remove all of the code from public view. While there is interest and value in the outputs from the community, theres scope for it to survive and even thrive.

There are many reasons for choosing one product over another. Fitness for purpose, cost, adoption, roadmap, community, and more. In most cases, the fact that a product or solution is backed by an open source license and an open source community should be considered positively, not negatively.

Dont let mis-reporting of this story lead you to dismiss open source, next time youre searching for a solution.

See the article here:
Don't Let Apple Scare You Away From Open Source