Ethereum: The great handshake – TechCrunch

Ashley TolbertContributor

Tarah WheelerContributor

Ethereum is the worlds most popular digital contract compiler, maintained by many but owned by none. Perhaps one of the most interesting factors behind its popularization is the future it paints one that transforms our current internet standards for ownership, value creation and, most importantly, privacy.

Not only can apps be written on top of Ethereum, but it allows any digital thing a picture, a music file, a video, your moms favorite pumpkin pie recipe to be uniquely owned, traded and stored for value, among many other possibilities that are created daily.

While many have predicted the future of the internet to be layered in bundles and levels of protection, it turns out that, paraphrasing Tim Berners-Lee, making the underlying technologies accessible to everyone supercharges its adoption and usefulness.

Ethereum and the emergence of Web 3.0 paint a shifting picture an internet not just private, but open and transparent by default.

In 2013, Vitalik Buterin conceived the idea of Ethereum, which would be developed and deployed two years later. The platform was built to allow anyone in the world with access to the internet to write permanent applications (known as decentralized apps or dApps) upon it, which anyone else can interact with but cannot change basically open source software with integrity to the nth degree. The bread and butter of these apps are called smart contracts a digital contract or intermediary.

Translated, that means financial and legal services no longer require a middleman. Ethereum basically substitutes an escrow agent, a notary, a bank teller who checks your ID, or a mortgage originator for an instant, digital transaction.

This invaluable function makes Ethereum one of the most recognized cryptocurrencies and blockchains in existence, with many contenders trailing. Bitcoin prices recently hit an all-time high, and the hype surrounding Ethereum remains in full swing.

Web 3.0, an associated concept, is an imagined future internet that uses these peer-to-peer blockchains to allow users to interact with data, value stores, entities, etc., all without a middleman.

As Ethereum becomes an underlying infrastructure for legal cases, financial deals, binding agreements and more, understanding its weaknesses and strengths will become a fundamental trait of property ownership and transfer.

Updating Stephen Hawkings words on how basic computer programming is an essential skill to learn, understanding the fundamentals of smart contracts such as those on Ethereum will become a basic legal and financial skill.

Today, the most booming applications on Ethereum are NFTs non-fungible tokens. While NFTs are relatively new, theyre catching on with consumers, artists and investors not only as a store of value but as an assertion of digital, unique ownership.

NFTs allow anything digital (any file) to be owned and traded on the internet because it cant be manipulated, changed or copied its non-fungible. Any social media hubbub surrounding Apes, Kittys or Punks are all in relation to the burgeoning fan-favorite phenomenon of luxury digital art.

We predict that one use case for this technology will be in interplanetary mining, as companies based on Earth will need to buy and sell mineral rights in asteroids that few if any of their human employees have ever actually visited or seen themselves.

Other predictions for use cases are mortgage lending, property purchasing, event ticketing, music festivals, file storage and gaming Axie Infinity, for example, is a testament to how players can make a decent living in an NFT-based gaming world.

The possibilities are endless and are being thought up by the curious and energized community more and more every day.

As regulation catches up to the power of this underlying technology, many wonder if well see attempts to control it. Much like the years-long debate in the Crypto Wars, which entailed requests to compromise or break encryption, changes to the assertions of Ethereums immutability could compromise its main valuable characteristic: its permanent integrity.

There may be a potential conflict between Ethereums immutability and its widespread adoption. It might mean that financial regulators will attempt to take some form of ownership or control over its deployment. We would be curious as to how those potential future regulators would answer the question: How can a widely connected sphere of nodes be cautiously governed while not compromising its true value decentralization itself?

Other challenges and limitations the technology is likely to face are performance sustainability fees to build on top of Ethereum called gas fees have gone up in recent years and the platform is known to be slowing in processing time. Ethereum 2.0 is anticipated to smooth inefficiencies, but how do we continue to maintain speed in a blockchain optimized for storing and computing each and every transaction?

Security also remains a challenge, with known Ethereum vulnerabilities existing though not widely exploited. Poly Network reported a hack this year that resulted from a vulnerability between contract calls.

Smart contracts are intricate and complex functions to write, so they require in-depth auditing before being deployed to a network. Ethereum security is also built on passwordless, asymmetric cryptography. Its entirely possible that quantum computing will eventually disrupt our asymmetric cryptography standards.

Were interested in how Ethereum and blockchains can be sustained, and were HODLing all the way through. Into the metaverse and beyond .

The views expressed here are those of Ashley Tolbert and Tarah Wheeler and not the views of their affiliations.

Read more from the original source:
Ethereum: The great handshake - TechCrunch

Akuity launches to be the Argo enterprise company for Kubernetes app delivery – VentureBeat

The Transform Technology Summits start October 13th with Low-Code/No Code: Enabling Enterprise Agility. Register now!

Let theOSS Enterprise newsletterguide youropensourcejourney!Sign up here.

A new commercial open source company is emerging from stealth today with $4.5 million in seed funding to provide Kubernetes-native application delivery software powered by Argo. Its funding was led by Decibel Partners, an early-stage venture capital firm backed by Cisco, with contributions from a slew of angel backers including Elastic cofounder and CEO Shay Banon.

Kubernetes has emerged as one of the worldsmost popular and powerful open source projects, helping companies enhance their software development velocity and agility by automating many of the resource-intensive processes involved in managing containerized applications. Containers are software packages that includeall the necessary components for an application to run across environments, from public and hybrid clouds to private datacenters.

Originally designed by Google before falling under the auspices of the Cloud Native Computing Foundation, Kubernetes is the orchestration platform that enables companies such as Box, IBM, Google, and Spotify to easily build, test, deploy, and scale their containerized applications.

As with just about any successful open source project, Kubernetes has created an ecosystem of complementary products and commercial companies, such as Kubernetes operations management platform Rafay which recently secured $25 million in funding. Similarly, Loft Labs, which last month raised $4.6 million in seed funding to bring self-service Kubernetes access to all developers, while Nirmata attracted $3.6 million to conquer Kubernetes complexity with an open source policy engine called Kyverno. There is even a startup accelerator and incubator that wants to serve as a Kubernetes product pipeline by nurturing and funding open source software development.

It is from that backdrop that Akuity launches today from the co-creators of Argo, an increasingly popular open source project for orchestrating Kubernetes-native application delivery used at major companies including Google, Tesla, GitHub, and Intuit.

Argo was developed and open-sourced back in 2017 by software engineers Hong Wang and Jesse Suen while at Applatix, a Kubernetes company that was acquired by Intuit the following year. The duo elected to leave Intuit earlier this year to focus all their efforts on developing and commercializing Argo under a new, standalone company.

Intuit will never be an Argo vendor since it is not part of Intuits business model, Wang told VentureBeat. Akuity aims to fill that void and become the Argo vendor, given our experience and deep expertise of the project.

Argo, essentially, is a collection of projects for managing clusters, running workflows, and getting more done with Kubernetes. It also provides all the supporting features that a developer might need, including a real-time user interface (UI), command-line interface (CLI), and APIs.

The platform constitutes Argo CD, a continuous delivery (CD) tool thats setting out to replace legacy CI/CD systems such as Jenkins, Circle CI, or Spinnaker, though its also similar to another Kubernetes-native open source project called Flux.

Elsewhere, Argo Rollouts is a Kubernetes controller that includes canary and blue-green deployment, which automates the release process for Kubernetes applications by gradually releasing new software versions incrementally. In addition to the rollouts are its features Argo Workflows and Events, which Wang said are designed for batch-scheduling and are most often compared to something like Apache Airflow.

But being Kubernetes-native is, arguably Argos, core selling point, as it helps companies bypass clunky legacy or home-grown solutions and transition to Kubernetes with purpose-built tooling.

The fact that it is Kubernetes-native is key because using existing tooling is like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole since they are always mapping to legacy concepts, Wang said. Argo does not abstract or hide anything away from developers, allowing them to leverage all the benefits of Kubernetes.

In terms of what the commercial Argo landscape looks like at Akuity, well, there will be two key offerings. Akuity Enterprise, which is available today, features every element of the Argo project with enterprise-grade support thrown into the mix alongside a suite of tools that make Argo even more useful and ready for the enterprise, according to Wang. These include disaster recovery (backup/restore), high availability, notifications, among other automation tools to manage multiple Argo CD applications.

In the future, Akuity will also launch a fully managedand hosted version of Argo CD, which is currently still in development.

Its worth noting that as an open source project, other commercial and open source projects are already leveraging Argo, such as open source machine learning platform Kubeflow which has components built on top of Argo Workflows, while RedHat launched the Argo CD-powered OpenShift GitOps back in February. This helps to highlight the growing pervasiveness of Argo across the software development spectrum, but Wang doesnt consider this becoming a problem from a competitive perspective. We dont think companies will have a singular focus on Argo like Akuity does, he said.

Moreover, Kubernetes is growing beyond its original purpose to run containerized applications, such as controlling, deploying, and managing cloud infrastructure, while its also being used as a large-scale compute grid to power myriad machine learning, AI, and data processing use cases. This puts commercial Kubernetes-focused companies such as Akuity in a strong position to grow.

All of these things require Kubernetes-native delivery tooling to help deploy, monitor, and manage these resources, and we feel Argo is uniquely positioned to facilitate this, Wang explained.

Originally posted here:
Akuity launches to be the Argo enterprise company for Kubernetes app delivery - VentureBeat

Open Source Services Market with COVID-19 Impact, by Service Type, Vertical and Region – GlobeNewswire

Dublin, Oct. 08, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "Open Source Services Market with COVID-19 Impact, by Service Type (Professional Services and Managed Services), Vertical (Manufacturing, BFSI, Telecommunications, Healthcare and Life Sciences, IT & ITeS ), and Region - Global Forecast to 2026" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

The analyst estimates the global open source services market size is expected to grow at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 18.2% during the forecast period, to reach USD 50.0 billion by 2026 from USD 21.7 billion in 2021.

Key factors that are expected to drive the growth of the market are lower software licensing cost and simpler management, compelling need to adopt higher quality software offering more flexibility, agility, and reliability, and rising trend of open standards that support community and collaborative development. These factors are driving the demand for open source services market.

The COVID-19 Impact on the global open source services market

The pandemic has had a positive impact on the open source services market. The COVID-19 pandemic and the proliferation of remote work environments have created new complex barriers for businesses to overcome. Adopting new business strategies or implementing new technology is a proven route to growth. Increasingly, it's open source technology that is being chosen as organizations seek a competitive edge and the latest innovations. The percentage of open source software continues to rise with each passing year. The latest economic downturn is only accelerating a trend that was occurring long before the COVID-19 pandemic arrived.

The managed services segment is expected to grow at a higher CAGR during the forecast period

Based on services, the open source services market is segmented into two categories: professional and managed. The managed services segment for open source services is expected to grow at a higher CAGR as managed services provide all the required skillsets to maintain and upgrade solutions, which are of utmost importance in open source environments. Pre- and post-deployment questions and the needs of clients are taken care of through the managed services unit.

Healthcare and Life Sciences industry vertical to hold the highest market share in 2021

Healthcare and life sciences is one of the fastest-growing verticals with respect to the adoption of open source technologies and services due to advance clinical decision support (CDS). Using open source to advance CDS makes sense for a number of reasons. By its very nature, an open-source solution is easier to modify. Because the source code is accessible, clinicians and informaticists working together can design a CDS system that integrates organically with an organization's clinical workflow. Modifications are more difficult with proprietary systems, since the source code is not accessible, and the organization must hire the vendor to execute changes. In addition to the flexibility of open-source solutions, open source has the advantage of benefitting from the input of many contributing physicians and organizations, as opposed to being developed by a single vendor team.

APAC to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecast period

Asia Pacific has witnessed the advanced and dynamic adoption of new technologies and is projected to record the highest CAGR during the forecast period. In addition, the IT spending across organizations in the region is gradually increasing, which is projected to lead to a surge in the adoption of open source software solutions and services. China, Japan, and India are the leading countries in terms of the adoption of open source software solutions and services in the region. While the expenditure on technology solutions in APAC has increased, a setback is witnessed due to the recent COVID-19 pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic makes it more urgent for business leaders across APAC to increase their rate of cloud adoption and digital transformation. Also, the current pandemic has forced the government and public sector across APAC to shift toward digital innovation and meet regulatory compliance standards, which is driving huge market opportunities for open source services vendors.

Key Topics Covered:

1 Introduction

2 Research Methodology

3 Executive Summary

4 Premium Insights4.1 Attractive Growth Opportunities in the Open Source Services Market4.2 Market, by Vertical, 2021 Vs. 20264.3 Market: Regional Scenario, 2021-2026

5 Market Overview and Industry Trends5.1 Introduction5.2 Market Dynamics5.2.1 Drivers5.2.1.1 Lower Software Licensing Cost and Simpler Management5.2.1.2 Compelling Need to Adopt Higher Quality Software Offering More Flexibility, Agility, and Reliability5.2.1.3 Rising Trend of Open Standards That Support Community and Collaborative Development5.2.1.4 Simple Bug Removal and Tracking and Freedom from Vendor Lock-Ins5.2.1.5 Abundant Support from the Community and Open Source Service Vendors5.2.2 Restraints5.2.2.1 Vulnerability to Malicious Users Restricting the Adoption of Open Source Software Products5.2.2.2 Free Upfront Open Source Products May Later Call for Licensed Software, Thereby Adding to Hidden Costs5.2.3 Opportunities5.2.3.1 Boosting Innovation and Cultivating Better Learning5.2.3.2 Growing Inclination to Extend the Technical Support and Maintenance from Open Source Service Vendors5.2.3.3 Rising Adoption of Open Source Cloud Technology5.2.4 Challenges5.2.4.1 Open Source Software Products are Sometimes Not as User-Friendly as Commercial Versions5.2.4.2 Compatibility Issues with Current Applications5.3 COVID-19-Driven Market Dynamics5.3.1 Drivers and Opportunities5.3.2 Restraints and Challenges5.4 Ecosystem5.5 Technology Landscape

6 Open Source Services Market, by Service6.1 Introduction6.1.1 Services: Market Drivers6.1.2 Services: COVID-19 Impact6.2 Professional Services6.2.1 Training and Consulting6.2.2 Support and Maintenance6.2.3 Implementation and Integration6.3 Managed Services

7 Open Source Services Market, by Vertical7.1 Introduction7.1.1 Verticals: Market Drivers7.1.2 Verticals: COVID-19 Impact7.2 It and Ites7.3 Transportation and Logistics7.4 Telecommunications7.5 Banking, Financial Services and Insurance7.6 Manufacturing7.7 Healthcare and Life Sciences7.8 Consumer Goods and Retail7.9 Other Verticals

8 Open Source Services Market, by Region

9 Competitive Landscape9.1 Introduction9.2 Market Share of Top Vendors9.3 Key Player Strategies/Right to Win9.3.1 Overview of Strategies Adopted by Key Open Source Services Vendors9.4 Historical Revenue Analysis of Top Vendors9.5 Competitive Scenario

10 Company Profiles10.1 Major Players10.1.1 IBM10.1.2 Suse10.1.3 Percona10.1.4 Mulesoft10.1.5 Wipro10.1.6 Accenture10.1.7 Evoke Technologies10.1.8 Cisco Systems10.1.9 Infosys10.1.10 Hpe10.2 Other Vendors10.2.1 Visolve10.2.2 Chetu10.2.3 Hashicorp10.2.4 Databricks

11 Appendix

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/6zvks7

Read more:
Open Source Services Market with COVID-19 Impact, by Service Type, Vertical and Region - GlobeNewswire

Appsmith raises $8M to take on the internal corporate app market with open source code – TechCrunch

Appsmith, which provides open source software that helps companies quickly build internal applications, announced an $8 million Series A round of funding this morning.

Unlike some upstart tech companies that we have seen in the internal application market, Appsmith doesnt sport a no- or low-code approach. Instead, Appsmith targets traditional developers with its service, which provides user-interface components that can be connected to business data sources. Those data-infused interface modules can be combined to build calendars, dashboards and other apps.

Before its Series A round of funding, Appsmith had raised $2.5 million. Canaan led the funding event. Accel and Bessemer participated, among other investors.

Asked why the startup selected that particular lead investor, co-founder and CEO Abhishek Nayak told TechCrunch that his company had been in touch with Canaans Joydeep Bhattacharyya since its early days and that the investor had experience with internal apps at Microsoft.

Why did Appsmith decide to raise capital now? Per Nayak, rising usage of its service and a desire to build out its platform to support more use cases things like mobile were the impetus.

Appsmith doesnt offer a paid product today. But as it currently offers a hosted version of its open source code, it isnt hard to see where it could turn on monetization. Enterprise-specific features would be another obvious method of generating revenue in time.

There has been a trend of startups that build open source technologies raising capital in recent quarters. Appsmith fits neatly into the group.

But thewhy is more interesting. The company told TechCrunch that its co-founders (Nayak and Nikhil Nandagopal) want Appsmith tech to become part of their customers technology stack, and that open source code is the way to achieve the goal. The logic there is simple: Open source code is at once less at-risk to the vicissitudes of startup viability and also easy to dig into. Good luck getting similar visibility into proprietary code.

Today, Appsmiths open source project has over 100 external contributors.

The Appsmith team stressed to TechCrunch that feedback from the open source community is useful to making development decisions. And the startup said that by offering a version of its service for free through open source channels, it can provide a service to public-good companies like nonprofits, which might not eventually become paying customers.

Speaking of which, who are the companys future customers?

In the startups view, its open source software is a good fit for smaller companies and developers. Its paid products will fit more neatly into midsize and larger companies once they are rolled out.

Well have eyes on how Appsmith tackles monetization and customer segmentation, two areas of open source business model formation that we find fascinating. Not only because its an interesting academic question in the case of the startup itself, but also because we want to better understand how the next generation of open source upstarts decides how to make money. Their choices will set the standard for the next cohort of companies building code in an open manner.

Appsmith has lots of competition in the market, with each rival company taking a different tack to the internal application issue. In brief, companies of every shape and size need internal software, and building it is at once tedious, often thankless and unexciting. So, methods that can short-circuit the process of building internal tooling are in demand.

Stacker, for example, wants to help non-developers build apps from spreadsheets. Unqork wants to help enterprise customers build no-code internal apps. UiFlow as well. The list goes on.

Well check back in with Appsmith when it turns on paid products, an event that it anticipates will occur before the end of Q1 2022. For now, the startup is flush and working in a growing market. Lets see what it can get done with its new capital.

Original post:
Appsmith raises $8M to take on the internal corporate app market with open source code - TechCrunch

Assessing the intersection of open source and AI – VentureBeat

The Transform Technology Summits start October 13th with Low-Code/No Code: Enabling Enterprise Agility. Register now!

Open source technology has been a driving factor in many of the most innovative developments of the digital age, so it should come as no surprise that it has made its way into artificial intelligence as well.

But with trust in AIs impact on the world still uncertain, the idea that open source tools, libraries, and communities are creating AI projects in the usual wild west fashion is creating yet more unease among some observers.

Open source supporters, of course, reject these fears, arguing that there is just as little oversight into the corporate-dominated activities of closed platforms. In fact, open source can be more readily tracked and monitored because it is, well, open for all to see. And this leaves us with the same question that has bedeviled technology advances through the ages: Is it better to let these powerful tools grow and evolve as they will, or should we try to control them? And if so, how and to what extent?

If anything, says Analytics Insights Adilin Beatrice, open source has fueled the advance of AI by streamlining the development process. There is no shortage of free, open source platforms capable of implementing even complex types of AI like machine learning, and this serves to expand the scope of AI development in general and allow developers to make maximum use of available data. Tools like Weka, for instance, allow coders to quickly integrate data mining and other functions into their projects without having to write it all from scratch. Googles TensorFlow, meanwhile, is one of the most popular end-to-end machine learning platforms on the market.

And just as weve seen in other digital initiatives, like virtualization and the cloud, companies are starting to mix-and-match various open source solutions to create a broad range of intelligent applications. Neuron7.ai recently unveiled a new field service system capable of providing everything from self-help portals to traffic optimization tools. The system leverages multiple open AI engines, including TensorFlow, that allow it to not only ingest vast amounts of unstructured data from multiple sources, such as CRM and messaging systems, but also encapsulate the experiences of field techs and customers to improve accuracy and identify additional means of automation.

One would think that with open source technology playing such a significant role in the development of AI that it would be at the top of the agenda for policy-makers. But according to Alex Engler of the Brookings Institution, it is virtually off the radar. While the U.S. government has addressed open source with measures like the Federal Source Code Policy, more recent discussions on possible AI regulations mention it only in passing. In Europe, Engler says open source regulations are devoid of any clear link to AI policies and strategies, and the most recently proposed updates to these measures do not mention open source at all.

Engler adds that this lack of attention could produce two negative outcomes. First, it could result in AI initiatives failing to capitalize on the strengths that open source software brings to development. These include key capabilities like increasing the speed of development itself and reducing bias and other unwanted outcomes. Secondly, there is the potential that dominance in open source solutions could lead to dominance in AI. Open source tends to create default standards in the tech industry, and while top open source releases from Google, Facebook, and others are freely available, the vast majority of projects they support are created from within the company that developed the framework, giving them an advantage in the resulting program.

This, of course, leads us back to the same dilemma that has plagued emerging technologies from the beginning, says the IEEEs Ned Potter. Who should draw the roadmap for AI to ensure it has a positive impact on society? Tech companies? The government? Academia? Or should it simply be democratized and let the market sort it out? Open source supporters tend to favor a free hand, of course, with the idea that continual scrutiny by the community will organically push bad ideas to the bottom and elevate good ideas to the top. But this still does not guarantee a positive outcome, particularly as AI becomes accessible to the broader public.

In the end, of course, there are no guarantees. If weve learned anything from the past, mistakes are just as likely to come from private industry as from government regulators or individual operators. But there is a big difference between watching and regulating. At the very least, there should be mechanisms in place to track how open source technologies are influencing AI development so at least someone has the ability to give a heads up if things are heading in a wrong direction.

Here is the original post:
Assessing the intersection of open source and AI - VentureBeat

Weighing The Hidden Costs Of Open Source – IT Jungle

February 15, 2021Alex Woodie

One of the perceived benefits of using open source software is cost. Its often free to obtain, and users can get technical support au gratis through community supported websites. But what is often missing from that equation are hidden costs associated with running that software in production environments. An IDC report commissioned from IBM seeks to put a number to those costs.

In production environments, where the risk of a business interruption due to IT issues is high, companies must make the conscious decision to dedicate some of its staffs time to supporting a given piece of open source software, according to the IDCs report, titled The Business Value of IBM Open Source Support.

The IT professionals must know how the open source software works, and what to do if there is a configuration or operational problem, according to IDC authors Al Gillen and Matthew Marden. These resources need to be available when the software is in use, and if it is supporting a 247 operation, it may be necessary to have technical expertise on call around the clock, the pair write in the report.

Version control is another cost that must be factored into the equation. New releases of open source software are issued frequently sometimes on a weekly basis, according to IDC and this software must be vetted to ensure that the fixes and new features they contain are compatible with existing software (not to mention ensuring that it doesnt contain viruses or other malware). Major upgrades are occasionally necessary to ensure the company can continue to benefit from the new features, and to ensure that it doesnt break other software.

Another hidden cost highlighted by the IDC is the time that the in-house IT expert will dedicate to the community around the open source project. While not every IT professional contributes to the upkeep and development of open source software (and some companies may prefer their employees not spend any time on it), many IT pros do spend not insignificant amounts of time on these endeavors. If nobody ever contributed any time, the open source community would likely cease to exist.

The IDC highlighted several situations where self-support of software could be less than ideal. For example, a newly found security vulnerability in an update, or a configuration issue in the software thats not easily resolved by onsite IT staff. These issues could potentially lead to downtime, and thus the company would seek to avoid such situations.

Some of the open source software projects that IBM supports.

There are commercial support packages available for many major open source products and projects. Red Hat, which IBM acquired for $34 billion in 2019, is perhaps the best example of the commercial open source business plan in action.

Linux is one of the most widely used open source projects in the world, and is installed on the majority of the worlds new servers. Customers are free to use whatever Linux distribution suits their fancy: Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Fedora, Nitrux, Kodachi, Puppy Linux, and CentOS, among dozens of other (colorfully named) distros.

But for organizations that want the peace of mind of having a vendor providing professional support, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is a popular option. (And following Red Hats decision to cease supporting CentOS, to the chagrin of organizations that had been expecting that support through 2029, RHEL may become even more popular.)

Whats the value of commercial support for open source software, and specifically, IBMs open source support package? IDC convened a panel of 11 folks from 11 large companies in the U.S., India, France, Spain, the UK, and Nigeria. The 10+ companies had an annual revenue of about $11 billion and about 38,000 employees (although the median figures were $1.6 billion and 12,250, respectively, which meant there were one or more really, really big firms driving the average up).

The companies in the panel told IDC there were multiple reasons for their decision to go with IBM open source support, including having the confidence in using a trusted vendor with deep practical and institutional knowledge of the technologies and how to support their IT organizations, IDC says.

The customers specific support needs varied with the types of types of software they were using. Some users stated they were afraid that the complexity of their systems would impact operating systems and databases, while others said they desired the confidence of having a vendor stand behind security and DevOps tools.

One customer with a support contract for an application runtime/database stated: We tested a workload without strict policies and what we learned is that without the policies associated with paid support from IBM, the project was not well-managed, and the housekeeping wasnt done. A vendors support team can keep your house in order . . . IBM helps provide that structure, according to the report.

Source: The Business Value of IBM Open Source Support

IDC calculated that IBMs support offering provided IT staff productivity benefits to the tune of $1.6 million per year, while risk mitigation and business productivity and IT infrastructure cost reductions amounted to around $200,000 each. When it added it all up, IDC found that the average IBM customer realized an annual benefit of $2.08 million per organization.

For IBM i shops considering adopting open source software, the availability of IBMs open source support program should give them peace of mind.

We stared back in 2006 by putting PHP onto the IBM i platform. We did that specifically because clients were telling us they needed it, Alison Butterill, the IBM i product offering manager for IBM, said during the recent IBM i Marketplace webinar hosted by HelpSystems.

The numbers have dramatically increased since then. We went from one language to 350-plus environments in open source, she said. On top of that we worked with the support team and now have a support offering for open source environments on IBM i.

Thats the biggest push that we have for getting adoption up on open source, she continued. Many clients were interested but without a support operation, they couldnt pass company audits. Now having a support contract for those open source languages and open source environments, they can get the benefits of open source and they can have a support contract to back it up.

You can download the IDC report here.

Open Source The Path To Software Riches For IBM i

The Impact On IBM i Of Big Blues Acquisition Of Red Hat

IBM Brings More Open Source to IBM i

Read the original here:
Weighing The Hidden Costs Of Open Source - IT Jungle

DARPA and the Linux Foundation Create Open Software Initiative to Accelerate US R&D Innovation, 5G End to End Stack – PRNewswire

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 17, 2021 /PRNewswire/ --The Linux Foundation (LF), the nonprofit organization enabling mass innovation through open source, today announced it has signed acollaboration agreement with the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) to create open source software that accelerates United States government technology research and development innovation.

Under the agreement, DARPA and the LF will create a broad collaboration umbrella (USGovernmentOpen Programmable Secure (USGOVOPS) that allows United States Government projects, their ecosystem, and open community to participate in accelerating innovation and security in the areas of 5G, Edge, AI, Standards, Programmability, and IOT among other technologies. The project formation encourages ecosystem players to support US Government initiatives to create the latest in technology software.

The project will launch as a standard open source project with neutral governance and a charter similar to other projects within the Linux Foundation. Additionally, the agreement enables collaboration with upstream and downstream communities such as LF Networking, LF Edge, and Zephyr, among others, to build on a secure code base for use by the US Government.

"DARPA's use of open source software in the Open Programmable Secure 5G (OPS-5G) program leverages transparency, portability and open access inherent in this distribution model," said Dr. Jonathan Smith, DARPA Information Innovation Office Program Manager. "Transparency enables advanced software tools and systems to be applied to the code base, while portability and open access will result in decoupling hardware and software ecosystems, enabling innovations by more entities across more technology areas."

"We are eager to ally with DARPAand its intent to accelerate secure, open source innovation and US competitiveness across breakthrough technologies," said Arpit Joshipura, general manager, Networking, Edge, & IOT, the Linux Foundation. "This partnership enables transformational change across open software and systems, leveraging the best shared resources across the ecosystem."

The new USGOVOPS umbrella will include the Open Programmable Secure- 5G (OPS-5G) program as its first project, currently in formation with the help of DARPA, the US Navy and additional performers. The goal of OPS-5G is to create open source software and systems enabling secure end to end 5G and follow-on mobile networks. OPS-5G will create capabilities to address feature velocity in open source software, mitigating large scale Botnet of Things (BoT), network slicing on suspect gear, and adaptive adversaries operating at scale.

DARPA's Dr. Jonathan Smith will be presenting at the upcoming Open Networking and Edge Executive Forum(ONEEF) a virtual event taking place March 10-12. This special Executive Edition of Open Networking & Edge Summit, the industry's premier open networking & edge computing event, will feature executive leadership across the networking and edge ecosystems sharing their visions with a global audience in the Telco, Cloud and Enterprise verticals.

To learn more about USGOV OPS and OPS-5G, please visit http://www.usgovops.org.

About the Linux FoundationFounded in 2000, the Linux Foundation is supported by more than 1,000 members and is the world's leading home for collaboration on open source software, open standards, open data, and open hardware. Linux Foundation's projects are critical to the world's infrastructure including Linux, Kubernetes, Node.js, and more. The Linux Foundation's methodology focuses on leveraging best practices and addressing the needs of contributors, users and solution providers to create sustainable models for open collaboration. For more information, please visit us at linuxfoundation.org.

The Linux Foundation has registered trademarks and uses trademarks. For a list of trademarks of The Linux Foundation, please see our trademark usage page:https://www.linuxfoundation.org/trademark-usage. Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds.

Media Contact:Jill LovatoThe Linux Foundation[emailprotected]

SOURCE The Linux Foundation

http://www.linuxfoundation.org

Visit link:
DARPA and the Linux Foundation Create Open Software Initiative to Accelerate US R&D Innovation, 5G End to End Stack - PRNewswire

Open Source Software Market is Thriving Worldwide with Surprising Transition During 2021-2026 Atlantic Financial Management – Atlantic Financial…

The latest survey on Global Open Source Software Market is conducted covering various organizations of the industry from different geographies to come up with a 100+ page report. The study is a perfect mix of qualitative and quantitative information highlighting key market developments, challenges that industry and competition are facing along with gap analysis and new opportunity available and trend in the Open Source Software Market.

Our Exclusive Report Offers:

Get Sample Copy of Report with Complete TOC @ https://www.in4research.com/sample-request/2054

Research Coverage of Open Source Software Market:

The market study covers the Open Source Software market size across different segments. It aims at estimating the market size and the growth potential across different segments, including application, type, organization size, vertical, and region. The study further includes an in-depth competitive analysis of the leading market players, along with their company profiles, key observations related to product and business offerings, recent developments, and market strategies.

A detailed study of business strategies for growth of the Open Source Software Market with Leading players

Based on product type, the Open Source Software market is segmented into:

Based on application, the critical illness market is segmented into:

For more Customization, Connect with us at https://www.in4research.com/customization/2054

Impact of COVID-19:

Open Source Software Market report analyses the impact of Coronavirus (COVID-19) on the Open Source Software industry.Since the COVID-19 virus outbreak in December 2019, the disease has spread to almost 180+ countries around the globe with the World Health Organization declaring it a public health emergency. The global impacts of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are already starting to be felt and will significantly affect the Open Source Software market in 2020.

The outbreak of COVID-19 has brought effects on many aspects, like flight cancellations; travel bans, and quarantines; restaurants closed; all indoor events restricted; emergency declared in many countries; massive slowing of the supply chain; stock market unpredictability; falling business assurance, growing panic among the population, and uncertainty about future.

COVID-19 can affect the global economy in 3 main ways: by directly affecting production and demand, by creating supply chain and market disturbance, and by its financial impact on firms and financial markets.

Get the PDF to understand the CORONA Virus/COVID19 impact and be smart in redefining business strategies: https://www.in4research.com/impactC19-request/2054

Geographically, this report is segmented into several key Regions along with their respective countries, with production, consumption, revenue, and market share and growth rate of Open Source Software in the following regions:

Lastly, this Open Source Software Market report provides Industry intelligence in the most comprehensive way. The report structure has been kept such that it offers maximum business value. It provides critical insights into the market dynamics and will enable strategic decision-making for the existing market players as well as those willing to enter the Open Source Software Market.

Table of Content

Chapter 1. Research Objective

Chapter 2. Executive Summary

Chapter 3. Strategic Analysis

Chapter 4. Open Source Software Market Dynamics

Chapter 5. Segmentation & Statistics

Chapter 6. Open Source Software Market Use case studies

Chapter 7. KOL Recommendations

Chapter 8. Investment Landscape

Chapter 9. Competitive Intelligence

Chapter 10. Company Profiles

Chapter 11. Appendix

Buy Exclusive Report at https://www.in4research.com/buy-now/2054

For More Details Contact Us:

Contact Name: Rohan

Email: [emailprotected]

Phone: +1 (407) 768-2028

See more here:
Open Source Software Market is Thriving Worldwide with Surprising Transition During 2021-2026 Atlantic Financial Management - Atlantic Financial...

Open Source: It’s The Little Things – Hackaday

I use open source software almost exclusively; at least on the desktop the phone is another matter, sadly. And I do a lot of stuff with and on computers. Folks outside of the free software scene are still a little surprised when small programs are free to use and modify, but theyre downright skeptical when it comes to the big works of professional software. Its one thing to write xeyes, but how about something to rival Photoshop, or Altium?

Of course, we all know the answer mostly. None of the big software packages work exactly the same as their closed-source counterparts, often missing a few features here and gaining a few there, or following a different workflow. Thats OK, different closed-source programs work differently as well. Im not here to argue that GIMP is better than Photoshop, but rather to point out what I really love about open software: it caters to the little guys and gals, the niche users, and the specialists. Or rather, it lets them cater to themselves.

I just started learning FreeCAD for a CNC milling project, and its awesome. Ive used Fusion 360, and although FreeCAD isnt the same as Fusion 360, it has most of the features that I need. But its the quirky features that set it apart.

The central workflow is to pick a workbench where specific tasks are carried out, and then you take your part to each bench, operate on it, and then move to the next one you need. But the critical bit here is that a good number of the workbenches are contributed to the open project by people who have had particular niche needs. For me, for instance, Ive done most of my 3D modelling for 3D printing using OpenSCAD, which is kinda niche, but also the language that underpins Thingiverses customizer functionality. Does Fusion 360 seamlessly import my OpenSCAD work? Nope. Does FreeCAD? Yup, because some other nerd was in my shoes.

And then I started thinking of the other big free projects. Inkscape has plugins that let you create Gcode to drive CNC mills or strange plotters. Why? Because nerds love eggbots. GIMP has plugins for every imaginable image transformation things that 99% of graphic artists will never use, and so Adobe has no incentive to incorporate.

Open source lets you scratch your own itch, and share your solution with others. The features of for-pay, closed-source software are driven by the masses: is this a feature that enough of our customers want? The features of open-source software are driven by the freaky ideas of nerds just like me. Vive la diffrence!

Continued here:
Open Source: It's The Little Things - Hackaday

Elastic delivers blow to AWS with open source licensing change – TechRadar

Open source software maker Elastic will soon make things quite difficult for AWS as the company is moving its source code from the Apache 2.0-license to the Server Side Public License (SSPL) and the Elastic License.

Elastic is known for its open source search and analytic engine Elasticsearch and its data visualization dashboard Kibana which are used in the cloud by Netflix, LinkedIn, Walmart and many other large companies.

While larger organizations will likely be affected by the licensing change, Elastic CEO Shay Banon explained in a blog post that the majority of its users won't be impacted, saying:

This change in source code licensing has no impact on the overwhelming majority of our user community who use our default distribution for free. It also has no impact on our cloud customers or self-managed software customers.

Instead of having contracts with Elastic itself, many large corporations instead use Amazon Elasticsearch Service for analytics and application integration.

AWS isn't the only cloud computing provider that offers Elasticsearch though as the analtyics engine is also available on Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud. However, there is a big difference as both Microsoft and Google have a business relationship with Elastic while AWS does not.

In a more recent blog post, Banon explained that Elastic is changing how it licenses its source code in order to prevent AWS from offering its products as a service, saying:

They have been doing things that we think are just NOT OK since 2015 and it has only gotten worse. If we don't stand up to them now, as a successful company and leader in the market, who will? Our license change is aimed at preventing companies from taking our Elasticsearch and Kibana products and providing them directly as a service without collaborating with us.

In order for cloud providers to offer Elasticsearch services under the SSPL, they need to agree to open source their hosting cloud's infrastructure. While most AWS software is already open source, Amazon will likely never agree to open source all of it.

Businesses that use Elasticsearch and Kibana could soon see their cloud computing costs increase as a result of the licensing changes made by Elastic.

Via ZDNet

View post:
Elastic delivers blow to AWS with open source licensing change - TechRadar