This Anti-NSA T-Shirt Angered Some People At A Huge Computer Security Conference (EMC)

One of the world's largest conferences for computer security professionals took place last week in San Francisco, the RSA Conference. And it was held under the shadow of Edward Snowden's revelations of NSA spying. Emotions about the scandal were running high at this conference in particular. The computer security professionals that attend are the people trying to keep their companies safe from prying eyes. And the company for which the show is named, RSA, was found to be working with the NSA. RSA is a security unit owned by EMC that makes encryption technology, the kind of tech that is supposed to make your computer safe from hackers and spies. The NSA paid RSA $10 million to influence the default method of encryption used in a popular RSA product, documents leaked by Edward Snowden revealed. The implication is that the NSA could break into computers and read documents, even if the data was encrypted. During his keynote speech, RSAs executive chairman, Arthur Coviello Jr., went off-script to address the allegations, The Times' Nicole Perlroth reports. He said:

Has RSA done work with the N.S.A.? Yes. But the fact has been a matter of public record for nearly a decade."

There are many of us at AT&T who are disturbed by what weve been hearing about the N.S.A., this person said. But when you see that, he said, pointing to the T-shirts, a conversation becomes impossible.

Here is the original post:
This Anti-NSA T-Shirt Angered Some People At A Huge Computer Security Conference (EMC)

"UK media worse than the US!" – Freedom of the press in Britain under fire – Video


"UK media worse than the US!" - Freedom of the press in Britain under fire
Watch the full episode here: http://bit.ly/1cf3PLn Investigative journalist Russ Baker tells Going Underground host Afshin Rattansi why the UK will never get any answers on GCHQ and NSA spying...

By: goingundergroundRT

See the original post here:
"UK media worse than the US!" - Freedom of the press in Britain under fire - Video

Amazon’s Cloud Keeps Growing Despite Fears of NSA Spying …

When former government contractor Edward Snowden revealed that the NSA was conducting digital surveillance on a massive scale, many feared for the future of cloud computing. The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation estimated that Snowdens revelations could cost U.S. cloud companies $22 billion to $35 billion in foreign business over the next three years, and countless pundits predicted that American businesses would flee the cloud as well. People would prefer to run software and store data on their own computers, the argument went, rather than host their operations atop outside services potentially compromised by the NSA.

But it looks like the cloud industry is still growing. And in very big way.

The worlds largest cloud computing services services where you can run software and store data without buying your own hardware are run by Amazon, and according to a new study from independent researcher Huan Liu, Amazons operation grew by a whopping 62 percent over the past two years. Whats more, the study shows that growth has been steady since June 2013, when the Snowden revelations first hit the news. In fact, theres been a surge since December of last year.

Lius research does not look at services from Amazon rivals such as Google, Microsoft, or Rackspace. But Amazon is the best barometer for the market as a whole. Software running on Amazon Web Services may account for as much as 1 percent of North American traffic, according to data collected by DeepField Networks, and about one-third of all North American internet users visit at least one site hosted in the Amazon cloud each day.

Liu, the co-founder of a mobile fitness startup called Jamo, first looked into the size of Amazons cloud during his spare time two years ago. He says he did the study just for fun it feels good to be the first one to discover something, he says but his methodical approach provides a rare glimpse into the size and growth of Amazons empire.

Amazon doesnt disclose how many servers it runs, or how much money the service makes. Even in its quarterly earnings reports, cloud revenue is lumped in with money earned from other sources. But Liu noticed a pattern in the way Amazon organized its internet addresses that revealed which addresses were part of the same rack. Since the company publicly lists all its externally facing IP addresses, Liu could determine the total number of racks in the Amazon cloud. He says his method is limited to racks that actually include active applications, so any additional infrastructure that Amazon has installed but not yet used doesnt show up in the study. Liu was originally trying to measure the size of Amazons flagship Elastic Compute Cloud, but its possible that some of the racks are used by other services as well.

Two years ago, he estimated that Amazon had about 450,000 servers, based on an assumption of 64 servers in a rack. But even if we dont know the number of servers in each rack, knowing the number of racks helps us get a sense of the size of the Amazon cloud and its rate of growth.

Amazon runs data centers in several different geographical locations. Two years ago, Liu that the noticed that the U.S. eastern region was much larger than all other Amazon regions, and thats still true today. But the other regions are now growing faster. Oregon saw the biggest increase, growing from 41 racks to 904 in the same period. But Liu also sees growth outside the U.S. Brazil has been one of the most vocal critics of NSA surveillance, but Sao Paulo was Amazons second fastest growing region, ballooning from 25 racks to 122 between March 2012 and February 2014.

Certainly, there are good reasons for businesses to be wary of putting their software and data on such services either in the U.S. or on foreign soil. Hosting data on Amazon servers in Brazil rather in the states may help protect customers from some types of surveillance from the U.S. government, but it may not prevent all. And American companies operating on foreign soil such as Amazon in Brazil are still bound by the U.S. Patriot Act to hand over data if its requested by the government. People have been grappling with this conundrum for years. But there are also dangers in hosting software with foreign operations or even on your own servers. These cloud issue is hardly cut and dry.

What we can say is that the cloud is still growing despite the NSA.

Go here to see the original:
Amazon's Cloud Keeps Growing Despite Fears of NSA Spying ...

Amazon’s Cloud Keeps Growing Despite Fears of NSA Spying

When former government contractor Edward Snowden revealed that the NSA was conducting digital surveillance on a massive scale, many feared for the future of cloud computing. The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation estimated that Snowdens revelations could cost U.S. cloud companies $22 billion to $35 billion in foreign business over the next three years, and countless pundits predicted that American businesses would flee the cloud as well. People would prefer to run software and store data on their own computers, the argument went, rather than host their operations atop outside services potentially compromised by the NSA.

But it looks like the cloud industry is still growing. And in very big way.

The worlds largest cloud computing services services where you can run software and store data without buying your own hardware are run by Amazon, and according to a new study from independent researcher Huan Liu, Amazons operation grew by a whopping 62 percent over the past two years. Whats more, the study shows that growth has been steady since June 2013, when the Snowden revelations first hit the news. In fact, theres been a surge since December of last year.

Lius research does not look at services from Amazon rivals such as Google, Microsoft, or Rackspace. But Amazon is the best barometer for the market as a whole. Software running on Amazon Web Services may account for as much as 1 percent of North American traffic, according to data collected by DeepField Networks, and about one-third of all North American internet users visit at least one site hosted in the Amazon cloud each day.

Liu, the co-founder of a mobile fitness startup called Jamo, first looked into the size of Amazons cloud during his spare time two years ago. He says he did the study just for fun it feels good to be the first one to discover something, he says but his methodical approach provides a rare glimpse into the size and growth of Amazons empire.

Amazon doesnt disclose how many servers it runs, or how much money the service makes. Even in its quarterly earnings reports, cloud revenue is lumped in with money earned from other sources. But Liu noticed a pattern in the way Amazon organized its internet addresses that revealed which addresses were part of the same rack. Since the company publicly lists all its externally facing IP addresses, Liu could determine the total number of racks in the Amazon cloud. He says his method is limited to racks that actually include active applications, so any additional infrastructure that Amazon has installed but not yet used doesnt show up in the study. Liu was originally trying to measure the size of Amazons flagship Elastic Compute Cloud, but its possible that some of the racks are used by other services as well.

Two years ago, he estimated that Amazon had about 450,000 servers, based on an assumption of 64 servers in a rack. But even if we dont know the number of servers in each rack, knowing the number of racks helps us get a sense of the size of the Amazon cloud and its rate of growth.

Amazon runs data centers in several different geographical locations. Two years ago, Liu that the noticed that the U.S. eastern region was much larger than all other Amazon regions, and thats still true today. But the other regions are now growing faster. Oregon saw the biggest increase, growing from 41 racks to 904 in the same period. But Liu also sees growth outside the U.S. Brazil has been one of the most vocal critics of NSA surveillance, but Sao Paulo was Amazons second fastest growing region, ballooning from 25 racks to 122 between March 2012 and February 2014.

Certainly, there are good reasons for businesses to be wary of putting their software and data on such services either in the U.S. or on foreign soil. Hosting data on Amazon servers in Brazil rather in the states may help protect customers from some types of surveillance from the U.S. government, but it may not prevent all. And American companies operating on foreign soil such as Amazon in Brazil are still bound by the U.S. Patriot Act to hand over data if its requested by the government. People have been grappling with this conundrum for years. But there are also dangers in hosting software with foreign operations or even on your own servers. These cloud issue is hardly cut and dry.

What we can say is that the cloud is still growing despite the NSA.

More here:
Amazon's Cloud Keeps Growing Despite Fears of NSA Spying

Q&A: Schneier on trust, NSA spying and the end of US internet hegemony

Avere takes Edge-Core to the cloud

RSA 2014 Bruce Schneier is the man who literally wrote the book on modern encryption, publishing Applied Cryptography in 1994, and for the past 20 years has been an important and sometimes outspoken voice in the security industry.

He founded the firm Counterpane Internet Security (later sold to BT), and is also a board member of the Electronic Frontier Foundation and an Advisory Board Member of the Electronic Privacy Information Center.

More recently he's been working on documents released by Edward Snowden on NSA activities and presented his findings at this year's RSA conference in San Francisco. The Register took the opportunity of sitting down with Schneier at the event and chewing through the current state of security, privacy and government intrusion online.

The Reg: This conference opened with a statement from RSA chief Art Coviello regarding the use of the flawed NSA-championed Dual Elliptic Curve Deterministic Random Bit Generator in an encryption toolkit product.

Coviello said RSA did all it could to secure its software. What's your take on the affair?

Schneier: I believe that's true. When NIST came out with that RNG standard, it was one of four choices available, and those choices tracked other crypto suites. It made sense in a holistic way that there should be an elliptic curve in there. It was slower, it was kludgier, but some people thought that was a plus, not a minus.

By 2007 there was the first inkling that there might be a backdoor, but it was just guessing and it is part of the NIST standard. Any toolkit that says "we're compliant" [with a particular standard], which I'm sure is a requirement for all sorts of contracts, had to implement it.

My guess is that RSA didn't know anything was amiss and when a large customer comes in with technical changes that dont really matter you just do them. I think RSA was more a victim here, and I think it's been unfortunate that over the last couple of months they haven't been able to tell their story clearly.

It's hard to tease out who did what and when. Certainly, I didn't boycott the RSA conference I'm here for myself and the attendees, not for RSA and if I was going to list companies to boycott because of their NSA collaboration, RSA wouldnt even make the top 10.

Excerpt from:
Q&A: Schneier on trust, NSA spying and the end of US internet hegemony