NSA Whistleblower: Snowden Never Had Access to the JUICIEST Documents

NSA Spying On Congress, Admirals, Lawyers Content As Well As Metadata Cheney Was Running the Show

NSA whistleblower Russel Tice was a key source in the 2005 New York Times report that blew the lid off the Bush administrations use of warrantless wiretapping.

Tice told PBS and other media that the NSA is spying on and blackmailing top government officials and military officers, including Supreme Court Justices, highly-ranked generals, Colin Powell and other State Department personnel, and many other top officials:

He says the NSA started spying on President Obama when he was a candidate for Senate:

Many of Tices allegations have been confirmed by other government whistleblowers. And see this.

Washingtons Blog called Tice to find out more about what he saw when he was at NSA.

RUSSELL TICE: We now know that NSA was wiretapping [Senator] Frank Church and another Senator. [That has been confirmed.]

And that got out by accident. All the information the NSA had back then and probably many other senators and important people too, back in the 70s they shredded and they destroyed all of that evidence. As much as they could find, they destroyed it all. By accident, something popped up 40 years later.

And, in fact, they were asked 40 years ago whether NSA had bugged Congress. And, of course, they lied. They lied through their teeth.

Read the original here:
NSA Whistleblower: Snowden Never Had Access to the JUICIEST Documents

Government Ordered Again Not to Destroy Evidence in NSA Spying Case

San Francisco, CA - infoZine - The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) asked a judge today to schedule an emergency hearing, after learning that the government is apparently still destroying evidence of NSA spying despite a temporary restraining order (TRO) issued by the court in March. In an order issued in response this afternoon, U.S. District Judge Jeffrey S. White instructed the government not to destroy any more materials and file a brief responding to EFF's allegations by 12 p.m PT on Friday.

"In communications with the government this week, EFF was surprised to learn that the government has been continuing to destroy evidence relating to the mass interception of Internet communications it is conducting under section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act even though the court explicitly ordered it to stop in March," said EFF Legal Director Cindy Cohn. "Specifically, the government is destroying content gathered through tapping into the fiberoptic cables of AT&T."

EFF filed its Jewel v. NSA lawsuit in 2008. In recent weeks, declarations from the government in the Jewel case made it clear that the government has destroyed five years of the content it collected between 2007 and 2012, three years worth of the telephone records it seized between 2006 and 2009, and seven years of the Internet records it seized between 2004 and 2011, when it claims to have ended the Internet records seizures. In an emergency hearing last March over that evidence destruction, Judge White issued the current TRO, ordering the government to stop any further destruction of records or content until the matter could be sorted out.

"There can be no dispute that the government was aware of the broad scope of this TRO, and in his order this afternoon, Judge White confirmed that it reached materials gathered under Section 702," Cohn said. "We're asking Judge White to enforce the order and impose on the government whatever further measures are necessary to ensure that no further destruction of evidence occurs. It will be very interesting to see what the government says in its defense in its briefing tomorrow."

More here:
Government Ordered Again Not to Destroy Evidence in NSA Spying Case

Anarchast Ep. 131 Andrew Demeter: Anarcho-Teen Takes on Nancy Pelosi – Video


Anarchast Ep. 131 Andrew Demeter: Anarcho-Teen Takes on Nancy Pelosi
Jeff interviews Andrew Demeter about his recent questioning of Nancy Pelosi over the NSA spying and funding. Topics include: To question a US official is an act of rebellion sparking fears...

By: TheAnarchast

Originally posted here:
Anarchast Ep. 131 Andrew Demeter: Anarcho-Teen Takes on Nancy Pelosi - Video

Andreessen calls Snowden ‘traitor,’ blasts Obama for not countering leaks

While leading tech CEOs called on Congress to rein in the National Security Agency, one prominent Silicon Valley figure Thursday turned his ire toward a different target, calling former NSA contractor Edward Snowden a "traitor" for leaking government secrets.

"Obviously he's a traitor. ... He stole national security secrets and gave them to everybody on the planet," venture capitalist Marc Andreessen said in an interview with CNBC, while also blasting the Obama administration for not doing more to counter the Snowden leaks.

Andreessen conceded his view of Snowden isn't shared by many in Silicon Valley. But his comments and the tech leaders' call for tougher reforms illustrate how raw the NSA spying issue remains in Silicon Valley -- exactly one year after the first of many news reports appeared that were based on Snowden's leaks about agency efforts to collect phone records and Internet user data.

Top executives at Google, Facebook and other leading Internet companies have previously voiced outrage over programs revealed by those leaks, including NSA efforts to weaken encryption and intercept transmissions between the companies' overseas data centers. This week, the CEOs of nine leading companies published an open letter in several newspapers, urging the U.S. Senate to adopt tougher reforms than those contained in the so-called USA Freedom bill passed by the House of Representatives last month.

While the companies have beefed up security to guard users' data, "the government needs to do more," said the letter signed by Google's Larry Page, Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg and other top CEOs.

The same companies have complained that the NSA revelations will harm their business, which depends on users trusting them with often-sensitive information. The leaks are already having an economic impact, said Dean Garfield of the Information Technology Industry Council, which represents many of the companies, in testimony Thursday at a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the California Democrat who chairs the committee, has previously defended the NSA. But she said Thursday that she is open to tightening language in the House bill that tech companies and civil liberties groups have described as a potential loophole for continued bulk collection of Internet user data.

Despite the economic fallout, many in the tech industry see Snowden's actions as heroic. He was warmly received by an audience of tech professionals when he spoke, by video connection from Moscow, at the South by Southwest conference in Austin earlier this year. They applauded when Snowden's attorney read a message from Tim Berners-Lee, a respected computer scientist and Internet pioneer, who wrote that Snowden's leaks were "profoundly in the public interest."

While Snowden's defenders, including the American Civil Liberties Union, view his actions as those of a legitimate whistle-blower, Andreessen disagreed. The co-founder of Netscape, an early Web browser firm, he now leads the prominent tech venture firm Andreessen Horowitz and sits on the boards of Facebook, eBay and Hewlett-Packard.

Speaking on CNBC, Andreessen echoed earlier statements in which he said he wasn't surprised by the NSA spying. "I just thought that's what they were doing," he added. "I thought everybody knew that."

See the original post here:
Andreessen calls Snowden 'traitor,' blasts Obama for not countering leaks

65 Things We Know About NSA Surveillance We Didn’t Know a Year Ago

S

It's been one year since the Guardian first published the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court order, leaked by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, that demonstrated that the NSA was conducting dragnet surveillance on millions of innocent people. Since then, the onslaught of disturbing revelations, from disclosures, admissions from government officials, Freedom of Information Act requests, and lawsuits, has been nonstop. On the anniversary of that first leak , here are 65 things we know about NSA spying that we did not know a year ago:

1. We saw an example of the court orders that authorize the NSA to collect virtually every phone call record in the United Statesthat's who you call, who calls you, when, for how long, and sometimes where.

2. We saw NSA Powerpoint slides documenting how the NSA conducts "upstream" collection, gathering intelligence information directly from the infrastructure of telecommunications providers.

3. The NSA has created a "content dragnet" by asserting that it can intercept not only communications where a target is a party to a communication but also communications "about a target, even if the target isn't a party to the communication."

4. The NSA has confirmed that it is searching data collected under Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act to access American's communications without a warrant, in what Senator Ron Wyden called the "back door search loophole."

5. Although the NSA has repeatedly stated it does not target Americans, its own documents show that searches of data collected under Section 702 are designed simply to determine with51 percent confidence a target's "foreignness.'"

6. If the NSA does not determine a target's foreignness, it will not stop spying on that target. Instead the NSA will presume that target to be foreign unless they "can be positively identified as a United States person."

7. A leaked internal NSA audit detailed 2,776 violations of rules or court orders in just a one-year period.

8. Hackers at the NSA target sysadmins, regardless of the fact that these sysadmins themselves may be completely innocent of any wrongdoing.

View post:
65 Things We Know About NSA Surveillance We Didn’t Know a Year Ago

Germany Expected To Open Investigation into NSA Spying on …

Following widespread speculation that the move was imminent, German Federal Prosecutor Harald Range on Wednesday announced he is launching a formal investigation into allegations that the NSA spied on Chancellor Angela Merkel's mobile telephone communications.

SPIEGEL had reported on Monday that the federal prosecutor was close to opening formal proceedings. On Wednesday, Range informed the Legal Committee of the Bundestag, Germany's federal parliament, of the pending investigation.

The move marks the next significant chapter in the spying scandal surrounding America's signals intelligence authority, the National Security Agency. It is also the first formal act taken by a German government agency in response to the revelations made public by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden. The probe could further exacerbate trans-Atlantic relations that have been deeply burdened by the scandal.

The Federal Prosecutor's Office in Karlsruhe opened two "monitoring processes" last year to review the allegations. The first focused on the mass spying of Germans' data by the NSA and the second targeted allegations -- first reported by SPIEGEL in October -- that Merkel's mobile phone had been tapped.

Sources close to the federal prosecutor told SPIEGEL that Range has concluded that there are insufficient reasons for opening an official investigation into the mass spying, although the office still has the option of initiating proceedings at a later date.

Massive Criticism

Chancellor Merkel is said to still be furious about the tapping of her phone and she complained directly to US President Barack Obama. That complaint helped convince prosecutors that the allegations of spying on her phone are credible. In addition, following a visit with Keith Alexander -- who was NSA chief at the time -- in Washington, Elmar Brok, a German member of the European Parliament with Merkel's conservative Christian Democratic Union (CDU), said that when he asked if the chancellor's mobile phone was being spied on, Alexander responded, "Not anymore." Merkel also appears in the NSA's Nimrod database, which contains the names of important NSA targets. SPIEGEL itself provided a copy of the entry to the German government in October.

Range has been the subject of massive criticism in recent weeks because the Sddeutsche Zeitung and public broadcasters NDR and WDR reported that he would not launch a formal investigation into the NSA scandal. Range did, however, face massive internal resistance to the initiation of proceedings after suggesting early on that he would likely pursue an investigation.

Range's own staff experts on espionage expressed skepticism about taking on the case because they didn't believe in prospects for success in any proceedings against the NSA for its mass surveillance practices. They argued internally that the US would not cooperate with a request for mutual legal assistance and that the effort would prove futile. Besides, there are open questions about who would even be the focus of the investigation? Obama? Or would it be Snowden himself, who told Germany's Stern magazine last week that he had been "personally involved with information stemming from Germany." Evidence had been stronger for pursuing allegations of spying against Merkel.

But German Justice Minister Heiko Mass of the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD) said no pressure had been exerted on Range. "From the very beginning, I placed great importance on the federal prosecutor, as the head of the investigative authority, making this decision on his own -- properly and according to law," Mass told German public broadcaster Deutschlandfunk on Wednesday morning. The minister added he was certain Range would do that.

Read the rest here:
Germany Expected To Open Investigation into NSA Spying on ...

Five dumbest defences for NSA spying

CINDY COHN AND NADIA KAYYALI

DEBUNKED: How often are the NSA's defenders going to repeat the same talking points?

Over the past year, as the Snowden revelations have rolled out, the US Government and its apologists have developed a set of talking points about mass spying that the public has now heard over and over again. From the President, to Hilary Clinton to Representative Mike Rogers, Senator Dianne Feinstein and many others, the arguments are often eerily similar.

But as we approach the one year anniversary, it's time to call out the key claims that have been thoroughly debunked and insist that the NSA apologists retire them.

So if you hear any one of these in the future, you can tell yourself straight up: "this person isn't credible," and look elsewhere for current information about the NSA spying. And if these are still in your talking points (you know who you are) it's time to retire them if you want to remain credible. And next time, the talking points should stand the test of time.

1. The NSA has Stopped 54 Terrorist Attacks with Mass Spying

The discredited claim: NSA defenders have thrown out many claims about how NSA surveillance has protected us from terrorists, including repeatedly declaring that it has thwarted 54 plots. Representative Mike Rogers says it often. Only weeks after the first Snowden leak, US President Barack Obama claimed: "We know of at least 50 threats that have been averted" because of the NSA's spy powers. Former NSA Director General Keith Alexander also repeatedly claimed that those programs thwarted 54 different attacks.

Others, including former Vice President Dick Cheney have claimed that had the bulk spying programs in place, the government could have stopped the 9/11 bombings, specifically noting that the government needed the program to locate Khalid al Mihdhar, a hijacker who was living in San Diego.

Why it's not credible:These claims have been thoroughly debunked. First, the claim that the information stopped 54 terrorist plots fell completely apart. In dramatic Congressional testimony, Senator Leahy forced a formal retraction from NSA Director Alexander in October, 2013:

"Would you agree that the 54 cases that keep getting cited by the administration were not all plots, and of the 54, only 13 had some nexus to the US?" Leahy said at the hearing. "Would you agree with that, yes or no?"

Read more here:
Five dumbest defences for NSA spying