NSA spying law set to expire

The current law, due to expire on June 1, allows the NSA to collect bulk data on numbers called and the time and length of calls, but not their content.

Efforts by Congress to extend the law so far have proved fruitless, and Congressional aides said that little work on the issue was being done on Capitol Hill.

Read More Want to be invisible online? There's an app for that

There are deeply divergent views among the Republicans who control Congress. Some object to bulk data collection as violating individual freedoms, while others consider it a vital tool for preventing terrorist attacks against America.

Ned Price, a national security council spokesman, told Reuters the administration had decided to stop bulk collection of domestic telephone call metadata unless Congress explicitly re-authorizes it.

Some legal experts have suggested that even if Congress does not extend the law the administration might be able to convince the secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to authorize collection under other legal authorities.

But Price made clear the administration now has no intention of doing so, and that the future of metadata collection after June 1 was up to Congress.

Read MoreiPhone encryption 'petrified' NSA: Greenwald

Price said the administration was encouraging Congress to enact legislation in the coming weeks that would allow the collection to continue.

But Price said: "If Section 215 (of the law which covers the collection) sunsets, we will not continue the bulk telephony metadata program."

Follow this link:
NSA spying law set to expire

WorldViews: Allies spy on allies all the time. Did Israel do something worse?

On some level, the reports that Israel spied on Iran-U.S. nuclear talks don't come as a shock. Just last year, German newsmagazine Der Spiegel reported that Israel had eavesdropped on Secretary of State John Kerry during Middle East peace talks. Jonathan Pollard,who was arrested in November 1985 after passing secret documents to Israel while working as a civilian analyst for the U.S. Navy,has become a cause celebreamong some Israelis.

In fact, as we learned after the2013 revelation that the NSA was tracking German Chancellor Angela Merkel's phone, allies spy on one another all the time. "I have a word of advice for American allies outraged by alleged NSA spying on their leaders," conservative analyst Max Boot wrote in the New York Postafter that scandal broke. "Grow up."

Germany was angered by the NSA revelations, but it was soonembarrassed by reports that it wasitself spying on anally in this case, Turkey and had eveninadvertently intercepted calls made by Kerry and Hillary Clinton. AsBernard Kouchner, a formerFrench foreign minister, put it, the problem wasn't so much that nations spied on their allies it was that the United States was better at it.Lets be honest, we eavesdrop, too," Kouchner told a French radio station. "But we dont have the same means as the United States, which makes us jealous.

As such,it is tempting to look at these new reports and come back with simple schadenfreude: It seems as if theUnited States is just getting a taste of its own medicine. But there is something distinctabout the new allegations.It's not just that Israel wasallegedly spying on the U.S. talks with Iran. According to reports, it was then using the information gleamed from it to undermine U.S. foreign policy.

According to Adam Entous of the Wall Street Journal, Israel's surveillance of closed-door talks between Washington and Tehran was used to gather information that was then passed on toU.S. lawmakers. This detail is apparently what is causing the most anger within the White House.It is one thing for the U.S. and Israel to spy on each other," one unnamed U.S. official told the Journal. "It is another thing for Israel to steal U.S. secrets and play them back to U.S. legislators to undermine U.S. diplomacy."

Israel has denied the reports, though few people buy it. "I'd be more surprised if Israel did NOT spy on the Iran nuclear negotiations,"Steven A. Cook, a senior fellow at theCouncil on Foreign Relations, tweeted on Tuesday. And given the state of relations between the White House and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the idea that they passed on details to lawmakers seems distinctly plausible.

[Read: Obama says Netanyahu statements leave little room for serious peace talks]

Netanyahu, who was reelected as Israel's leader last week, caused a furor when heacceptedSpeaker John A. Boehners invitation to addressCongress this month. Although the Israeli prime minister denied reports that he would risk bipartisan U.S. support for Israel, many observers saw the speech as a direct appeal to President Obama's Republican rivals and an attempt to undermine a sittingU.S. president."The planned speech,"Chuck Freilich, a former deputy head of Israel's National Security Council, wrote, is "essentially an attempt to mobilize Congress against the administration."

Despite objections,Netanyahu went ahead with the speech. And then, to the surprise of many analysts, he was reelected last week. The Obama administration offered him a lukewarm note of congratulation at best, noting that Netanyahu's Likud Party had won a "plurality" of seats. Later, Obama said that the United States was reassessing its relationship with Israel after controversial comments made by the Israeli incumbent in the last few days before the election.

Theimpression given by all this is of a uniquelyduplicitous Israeli administration. And if the latest reports are true, they seem remarkable: It's hard to think of another instance when a nation spied on an ally and then shared information with the ally's domestic rivals. But then again, espionage is by its nature secret. And it's worth remembering that the only way these new reports came to light wasby an allyspying on its ally Entous reports thatofficials told him that "U.S. intelligence agencies spying on Israel intercepted communications among Israeli officials" featuring details that could have come only from confidential talks.

Read the original here:
WorldViews: Allies spy on allies all the time. Did Israel do something worse?

NSA Spying Through Angry Birds, Google Maps, Leaked Documents Reveal 720p – Video


NSA Spying Through Angry Birds, Google Maps, Leaked Documents Reveal 720p
I am just a middleman trying to spread the word FAIR USE NOTICE: This video may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for entertainment purposes only. This constitutes...

By: Timothy anon

Read more here:
NSA Spying Through Angry Birds, Google Maps, Leaked Documents Reveal 720p - Video

Reports of NSA spying on Canadian companies fuel calls for more transparency

Critics say a crisis of transparency surrounds modern spying methods in Canada after revelations that a close ally the U.S. National Security Agency has been looking at the communications traffic of at least two Canadian corporations.

There are people from the NSA working inside of CSE as we speak, said NDP defence critic Jack Harris, referring to U.S. intelligence analysts embedded inside the Communications Security Establishment, the NSAs Canadian counterpart.

Mr. Harris said he has many questions about the extent of Canadas close surveillance partnerships with the United States, but Parliamentarians are not authorized to get answers.

Were reaching a crisis point on this, he said in an interview, pointing out that the Conservative government faces several spying controversies.

The Globe and Mail reported on Tuesday that a leaked NSA document from 2012 includes Royal Bank of Canada and Rogers Communications Inc. on a list of global firms whose private communication networks the U.S. agency appeared to be interested in mapping.

The document which The Globe obtained from a confidential source suggests the agency was describing efforts to identify and analyze computer networks controlled by corporations.

Markings on the document, a presentation for intelligence officers, indicate it may have been shared with Ottawa nearly three years ago. Rogers and RBC told The Globe they had no idea the NSA had any interest in their networks, which they insist are secured against intruders.

The NSA has said it will not discuss allegations about its intelligence activities.

There is no indication the NSA went as far as getting at any data inside individual computers or reading communications related to the Canadian companies. However, the presentation suggests the agency went further in using its mapping techniques to look at the computer systems controlled by a Chinese telecom giant.

The name of Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. appears in the presentation, and the NSA appears to have had a keen interest in isolating the corporations data channels. These links are likely to carry Huawei traffic, reads one slide.

View post:
Reports of NSA spying on Canadian companies fuel calls for more transparency

5 ways to thwart NSA spying

SAN FRANCISCO More than half of Americans are worried about the U.S. governments digital spies prying into their emails, texts, search requests and other online information, but few are trying to thwart the surveillance.

Thats according to a new survey from Pew Research Center, released Monday. A main reason for the inertia? Pew researchers found that a majority of those surveyed dont know about online shields that could help boost privacy or believe it would be too difficult to avoid the governments espionage.

The poll questioned 475 adults from Nov. 26 to Jan. 3 about a year-and-a-half after confidential documents leaked by former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden revealed the U.S. government has been monitoring a broad range of online communications for years as part of its efforts to diffuse terrorist threats.

It all boils down to people sort of feeling like they have lost control over their data and their personal information, Mary Madden, a senior researcher for Pew, told The Associated Press. But at the same time, when we asked them if they would like to do more, folks expressed that as an aspirational goal.

Here are five steps you can take to be more private online.

Dont want a digital dossier of your personal interests to be stored and analyzed? Wean yourself from the most popular search engines Google, Bing and Yahoo. All of them collect and dissect your queries to learn what kinds of products and services might appeal to you so they can sell advertising targeted to your interests. Just because that trove of data is meant to be used for commercial purposes doesnt mean snoopers such as the NSA couldnt vacuum up the information, too, to find out more about you. A small search engine called DuckDuckGo has been gaining more fans with its pledge to never collect personal information or track people entering queries on its site.

Just 10 percent of those participating in Pews survey said they use a search engine that doesnt track their searching history.

Encryption programs such as Pretty Good Privacy, or PGP, can make your email appear indecipherable to anyone without the digital key to translate the gibberish. This can help prevent highly sensitive financial and business information from getting swept up by hackers, as well as a government dragnet. Yet only 2 percent of the people surveyed by Pew used PGP or other email encryption programs.

A privacy tool called Blur, made by Abine, enables its users to surf the Web without their activities being tracked. It also masks passwords and credit card information entered on computers and mobile devices so they cant be lifted from the databases of the websites that collect them. Blur charges $39 annually for this level of protection. Privacy Badger from the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a digital rights group, offers a free way to block tracking of browsing activity.

Only 5 percent of the Pew respondents used these kinds of tools.

View original post here:
5 ways to thwart NSA spying