Australia confirms Wikileaks’ Assange has valid passport …

SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia has confirmed that Julian Assange has a valid passport, a key development for the Wikileaks founder, who fears that Ecuador seeks to end his asylum in its London embassy and extradite him to the United States.

FILE PHOTO: Supporters of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange demonstrate in front of presidential palace regarding his Ecuadorian citizenship, in Quito, Ecuador, October 31, 2018, REUTERS/Daniel Tapia

The new passport, which would allow Assange, who is in failing health, to return to Australia, was issued in September last year but remained unreported until Saturday. His previous passport had expired.

Senior officials of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) on Thursday told a Senate estimates hearing that Assange had a valid passport, reiterating a statement from last October.

Senator Rex Patrick of minority party Centre Alliance, who has taken up Assanges cause in parliament, asked department officials if they had talked to the United States about safe passage for Assange if he left the embassy.

James Larsen, the departments chief legal officer, said he was not aware of any U.S. proceedings against Assange and so there was nothing to discuss.

I dont have a record before me of what our engagement with the United States is specifically concerning Mr Assange, he said.

We are not aware, on the Australian governments side, of any legal proceedings initiated within, or by, the United States, concerning Mr Assange.

U.S. officials have acknowledged that federal prosecutors launched a lengthy criminal investigation into Assange and Wikileaks, which published U.S. diplomatic and military secrets under him.

Assanges supporters remain convinced the United States will seek his extradition if he tries to leave the embassy.

Day 2998 of the unlawful and arbitrary detention of Julian Assange in the United Kingdom, the Defend Assange Campaign said in a message on social network Twitter on Thursday.

U.S. government continues to seek his arrest and extradition for publishing the truth about the war in Iraq. He has been nominated for the 2019 Nobel Peace Prize.

Assange first took asylum in the embassy in 2012, but his relationship with Ecuador has grown increasingly tense.

In December he was administered a series of medical tests, in line with new rules for his asylum at the embassy that prompted him to sue the government.

Reporting by Alison Bevege; Editing by Clarence Fernandez

See the article here:
Australia confirms Wikileaks' Assange has valid passport ...

Julian Assange reportedly nominated for Nobel Peace Prize

Julian Assange has been nominated for a 2019 Nobel Peace Prize, according to the legal campaign to defend him.

The Defend Assange Campaign tweeted a photo of Assange next to a Nobel coin on the morning of Feb. 18.

https://t.co/eTf6bNdj2J pic.twitter.com/riI8ESudHa

Defend Assange Campaign (@DefendAssange) February 18, 2019

Assange was apparently nominated by 1976 Nobel Peace Laureate Mairead Maguire. Former laureates are among the select group who can nominate others for the Peace Prize, which is awarded in Oslo, Norway.

Maguire, who won for her work promoting peace in Northern Ireland during that countrys religious clashes, wrote in the Irish Examiner in January of her decision to nominate Assange.

Julian Assange meets all criteria for the Nobel peace prize. Through his release of hidden information to the public we are no longer nave to the atrocities of war, we are no longer oblivious to the connections between big business, the acquisition of resources, and the spoils of war. As his human rights and freedom are in jeopardy the Nobel peace prize would afford Julian much greater protection from government forces.

An attempt to reach Maguire for comment was unsuccessful.

Nobel Peace Prize nominations are due by Feb. 1, when the Nobel Committee meets to review the nominations. This year, there are 304 candidates nominated for the prize, the fourth-highest number ever.

Assanges organization, WikiLeaks, was nominated by a Norwegian legislator in 2011, just after WikiLeaks leaked diplomatic cables and logs provided by whisteblower Chelsea Manning.

The Defend Assange Campaign did not respond to request for comment. The Nobel Committee did not return a request for comment. Attempts to reach WikiLeaks were unsuccessful.

Assange fears he faces extradition to the U.S. if he leaves the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where he has been living since 2012. WikiLeaks is reportedly under investigation by Robert Mueller for leaking emails from the Democratic National Committee in 2016, and a court error late last year increased speculation that Assange could be charged separately in U.S. courts, although it is unclear specifically what the charges are.

Ellen Ioanes is the FOIA reporter at the Daily Dot, where she covers U.S. politics. She is a graduate of Columbia Journalism School, and her work has appeared in the Guardian, the Center for Public Integrity, HuffPost India, and more.

Read more:
Julian Assange reportedly nominated for Nobel Peace Prize

John Pilger calls for participation in demonstrations to …

18 February 2019

Demonstrations have been called by the Socialist Equality Party in Sydney and Melbourne to demand that the Australian government intervene to secure the freedom of persecuted Australian citizen and WikiLeaks publisher Julian Assange.

John Pilger, journalist, filmmaker and outspoken opponent of militarism and injustice, will be one of the main speakers at the demonstration in Sydney, at Martin Place Amphitheatre at 2 p.m. on Sunday, March 3. Other speakers will include well-known retired academic and human rights advocate Professor Stuart Rees.

The demonstration in Melbourne will be at the Victorian State Library in Swanston Street, at 1 p.m. on Sunday, March 10.

For nearly seven years, Assange has been effectively imprisoned inside the small Ecuadorian embassy in London, where he was granted political asylum in June 2012 to escape the prospect of being extradited to the United States where he would face a show trial on charges of espionage or conspiracy for exposing American government war crimes and intrigues.

The Australian government has the power to compel Britain to allow Assange to leave the embassy and immediately return to Australia, with protection from any extradition to the US.

In his statement below, John Pilger calls on all people to support and join the demonstrations and demand that the government exercise that power.

The SEP appeals to WSWS readers and our members and supporters to circulate John Pilgers strong appeal as widely as possible via social media and other means.

*****

February 17, 2019

The miscarriage of justice against Julian Assange is epic in its meaning for a civilised, democratic way of life. The abuse of Julian on a daily basis is an abuse of us all, because it denies rights without which we descend into fascism.

That descent is vivid in the outrage of Julian's confinement, in the denial of international law in his case and in his casting as an outlaw by a collusive media.

This loss of freedom applies to us: in the extreme politics of everyday life, in the fraud of austerity and in a state of permanent war against refugees and false enemies.

Standing up for the rights of Julian Assange is standing up for freedom in its purest sense. That is why the SEP rallies on 3 March in Sydney and 10 March in Melbourne are so urgent.

Please join us.

John Pilger

Follow this link:
John Pilger calls for participation in demonstrations to ...

Julian Assange says that Hillary Clinton is committing …

Story.

WikiLeaks editor Julian Assange spoke during a live feed, prior to the Green Party nomination of Jill Stein.

Assange claims that Hillary is trying to "extort" votes from left-wing voters, by using the possibility of a Republican victory as fuel to scare them into voting for her instead as the lesser evil.

What the Clinton campaign is doing at the moment is trying to say, Well, OK, yes, maybe were committed to arms dealers and to Saudi Arabia, and yes, maybe we subverted the integrity of the Democratic primary, etc., etc., but youll just have to swallow that, youll just have to swallow that or else youll get Donald Trump, he said.

He told voters to vote based on their principals, rather than out of a desire to put the "lesser of two evils" in office by voting for Hillary.

Assange also said the following: Theres a cost to violating principles even if theres a cost to yourself, even if you dont like the risk, which seems to be getting very small, the risk that Donald Trump becomes president.

It is interesting that Assange is getting involved at this level, and I find it interesting that the Green Party chose him as a speaker, considering the things WikiLeaks has done in the past few years contrary to the interests of the US.

The Green Party appears to be going after Sanders voters that refused to switch to Hillary even after his endorsement of her, according to the article.

Extort may be a strong word, since many political campaigns resort to telling you how much the other guy will screw things up if they are elected already, but many people are using how bad they think the other guy will be in this election, with people against Trump saying that he would be too incompetent to run the country (among other things) and people against Hillary saying that she can't be trusted with sensitive information or that she will be too soft on potential terrorists.

Do you agree with Assange's claim that Hillary Clinton is trying to extort her way to a victory, or do you think that Assange is inaccurate in his statements?

Read more:
Julian Assange says that Hillary Clinton is committing ...

Australian students endorse rallies to free Julian Assange …

By our reporters 14 February 2019

Over the past days, dozens of students and young people have expressed support for rallies next month, called by the Socialist Equality Party (SEP) and the International Youth and Students for Social Equality (IYSSE), in defence of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.

Campaigners for the IYSSE, the youth wing of the SEP, have intervened at university orientation events, attended primarily by first year students, which began this week. They have found widespread hostility to escalating militarism and war, the growth of social inequality and the assault on democratic rights, including the US-led persecution of Assange.

The beginning of the university semester coincides with growing support for the campaign to free Assange, exemplified by a statement issued by acclaimed singer Roger Waters earlier this week, calling for the greatest attendance at the upcoming rallies.

The Australian government, however, with the support of the entire political establishment, has refused to take any action to defend Assange, an Australian citizen. The Greens, the corporate media and the pseudo-left have maintained a complicit silence on the vendetta against the WikiLeaks founder.

In Sydney, at the University of New South Wales (UNSW) orientation week, Andy, a computer science student, told IYSSE campaigners today: The first thing we should do is put pressure on the Australian government. Assange is still an Australian citizen and we have every right to demand his freedom.

Morally speaking he did the right thing in exposing government crimes. Assange didnt do anything illegal. He didnt steal documents, he just published them.

We have to protect everyones fundamental rights. This is the way to do it, to educate people and to rally them to action.

The government should fear their own citizens, the working class. If we get Assange back, there might be some backlash from Washington, but that backlash is nothing compared to the power of ordinary people. If we do this on an international scale, then both countries would have to listen to their citizens. That would be the ideal scenario.

Sabrine, an 18-year-old psychology student, said: What Assange did is good, because a lot of us were blind to the crimes that governments were committing behind our backs. Now that we know, we can start taking a stand and try to address the problem.

Governments function like dictators. They want to keep information secret. They dont want the general populace to know what is going on in the world. Because Assange and WikiLeaks released that sort of information, it has started the beginning of a movement. Hes an Australian citizen and a man for the people. Australian governments should have protected him, but they havent, which is wrong.

Cody, a first-year law student, expressed support for the protests. He noted a broader assault on democratic rights, commenting: Democracy is now run by money and big business. The media is run by moguls like Rupert Murdoch. Real democracy should be the free spread of ideas through a multitude of sources, not just from official sources.

The 18-year-old student condemned growing militarism: Capitalism thrives off war. Businessmen thrive off war, like Porsche and Grumman did during World War II in the 1940s. There is always a profit to be made. Those who are in power should be held accountable for their use of power and their abuse of power.

In Newcastle, a working class regional centre north of Sydney, Alyssa, a first-year law student said: The US government is scared of honest journalism and Julian Assange is a journalist. He hasnt done anything wrong.

Democratic rights are being stripped from everyone as a result of Assanges persecution. If honesty and truthfulness in the media arent allowed, then how are we supposed to know whats going on in the world and the reasons behind war? We need truthful media and Assange was willing to do that.

The Australian government should be held accountable for abandoning him. They are bowing to the US. These rallies are important because they will help people to learn more about the persecution of Julian Assange. Im going because I believe Assange should be set free and he should be defended. All people should go if they believe in democratic rights and if they are against the censorship of the internet.

Meghan, a journalism student at the University of Newcastle, stated: I think the vendetta against Assange is an imperialist one to hide abuses against human rights and persecute those who have revealed them.

It is changing the way journalism is supposed to be conducted. It used to be about holding people accountable, especially governments. What is happening now is totalitarian and scary. The Australian government is acting as an extension of the US state, seeking to impress its ally. It is sucking at Americas teat, instead of standing up for the rights of its citizens.

In Melbourne, the Inaugural General Meeting of the IYSSE club at Victoria University unanimously passed a resolution in support of the fight to free Assange.

It declared: As the publisher of WikiLeaks, Julian Assange has played a significant role in the political radicalisation of an entire generation of youth and students around the world. WikiLeaks has revealed US war crimes in the Middle East and imperialist machinations around the world.

For telling the truth, the ruling elite are seeking to silence Assange and make an example of him to intimidate other principled journalists and would-be whistle-blowers.

It concluded by resolving, to send the largest possible delegation to the March 10 rally, mobilising students and youth both on and off campus to wage a struggle against the attacks on freedom of speech and democratic rights.

Alma, originally from Chile, works in aged care. She told SEP campaigners in Melbourne: Assange speaks the truth first of all and reveals the lies of governments all over the world that have been hidden from us. Im going to try and come to the rally. I work on Sunday but if I can change my shift I will come.

Apollo, a retired engineer, said: Assange should get a Nobel Prize for exposing the corruption and coercion that governments dont want the average people to know about. Theres a lot of bad things the governments do, mainly for profits.

If you cant fight the argument, you fight the person. Thats why they have smeared Assange. He should be freed to pursue what hes doing and I congratulate him. The Australian government should back him 100 percent.

Asma, a PhD student working in renewable energy research, stated: Im interested in social justice issues. I read about Assange and I watched a series and did some Google research. Theyre definitely trying to shut him down because hes exposing what people dont want other people to know about. Im all for him.

They just want to shut him off further because hes exposing more truths. The Australian government have abandoned him and left him on his own. Its unfair and its against human rights. I was in Malaysia at the time and the government shut down access to the WikiLeaks site. Young people were curious about it.

Go here to see the original:
Australian students endorse rallies to free Julian Assange ...

Julian Assange Is Still a Creep – POLITICO Magazine

AP Photo

Opinion

The WikiLeaks founder could score an invite to CPAC next year.

By RICH LOWRY

September 08, 2016

Rich Lowry is editor of National Review.

If Julian Assange plays this right, he just might score an invitation to CPAC next year.

The notorious WikiLeaks founder would have to attend the Conservative Political Action Conference remotely because he is still holed up in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, avoiding a rape investigation in Sweden and fearing extradition to the United States for his malicious exposure of state secrets. But, surely, the details could be worked out.

Story Continued Below

Assange is now treated as a respectable figure by some elements of the right because he despises Hillary Clinton and promises to torpedo her campaign with new email exposures. Never mind that he has done everything within his power to damage the interests of the United States, in league with his quasi-ally, Vladimir Putins Russia. Rarely has strange new respect" been stranger.

Its like conservatives embracing Kim Philby, the infamous British double agent who defected to the Soviet Union in the 1960s, if he promised to produce damaging information about LBJ before the 1964 election. Or welcoming Philip Agee, the anti-CIA activist from the 1970s who was allied with Russian and Cuban intelligence, if he demonstrated enough hostility to Jimmy Carter.

The enemy of my enemy (or more properly, my domestic political opponent) can still be a reprehensible creep, and thats what Assange is.

But Sean Hannity of Fox News has a newfound soft spot for the accused rapist and scourge of America. A couple of years ago, Hannity tore into the Obama administration for not doing more to capture the WikiLeaks founder, and sympathized with the contention that Assange was the equivalent of a terrorist. Now, the host says he was conflicted about Assange back then, and he had qualms about his work only because I believe in privacy.

This makes it sound as though WikiLeaks published a Hulk Hogan sex tape. Instead, Assange dumped, among other things, what the Defense Department called the largest leak of classified documents in its history. Hannity was outraged a few years ago that the leaks potentially endangered U.S. allies in Afghanistan the Taliban vowed to track down named U.S. informants but now hails Assange for exposing how corrupt, dishonest and phony our government is.

Assange puts his agenda in more starkly anti-American terms. He has a poisonous, Chomskyite view of the United States as a dastardly empire, bending the world to its will and persecuting brave dissidents like none other than Julian Assange.

When he started out, Assange was committed to exposing the worlds genuinely pernicious states. He said he was going to criticize highly oppressive regimes in China, Russia and Central Eurasia and warned a newspaper in Moscow of the damaging information he had acquired about Russia.

Assange is no longer in that line of work. He has fallen into the arms of Putin as he pursues his vendetta against the United States and its former secretary of state, whom, it so happens, Putin will never forgive for criticizing Russias 2011 parliamentary elections.

The not especially telegenic WikiLeaks founder somehow briefly landed an RT show, and it was his idea for National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden to seek refuge in Russia. The New York Times recently documented how Assanges leaks tend to track with Russian interests.

The avowed champion of transparency and free speech told the Times he doesnt go out of his way to criticize a Russian government that kills journalists because to do so is boring.

Interfering in a U.S. election is apparently much more interesting. U.S. officials believe that Russia was behind the hack of the Democratic National Committee that WikiLeaks used to such effect around the time of the Democratic convention. The promised additional WikiLeaks exposures may well be the handiwork of the Russians, as well.

It is Hillarys own fault that she is vulnerable to the likes of Assange. Her secrecy, corrupt practices and dishonesty make her an ideal target. Yet there is a world of difference between Tom Fitton, the head of Judicial Watch who has done so much through litigation in the U.S. courts to expose Clinton, and Assange, a certified America-hater whose work is likely enabled by Russian intelligence.

There was a time when everyone could see the distinction, but that was before 2016, a year of strange, not to say loathsome, bedfellows.

Go here to see the original:
Julian Assange Is Still a Creep - POLITICO Magazine

Roger Waters Condemns ‘Illegal Attacks’ on Julian Assange by …

World

15:11 11.02.2019Get short URL

Waters, 75, has never shied from speaking his mind, and has vocally questioned many Western government policies. Last week, he called US actions in Venezuela a "coup"; earlier he challenged Donald Trump on immigration and called for the boycott of this year's Eurovision in Israel.

Roger Waters, the founding member ofPink Floyd and an avowed social justice activist, has endorsed the upcoming demonstrations insupport ofJulian Assange and demanded that the whistle-blower be given a safe haven inhis native Australia.

In a letter toAustralia's Socialist Equality Party, published on the World Socialist Web Site, Waters lauded Assange asa "real hero", whose WikiLeaks project "helped expose tothe world the hidden machinations ofthe real criminals inour society: the oligarchs, who intheir insatiable quest formore and more wealth, would destroy the fragile planet we call home".

Waters, who left Pink Floyd in1985 topursue a successful solo career, said Assange needs protection from "unwarranted and illegal attacks" fromthe Western countries, who are "determined todestroy" the truth-seeker.

The Socialist Equality Party is set toorganise rallies inSydney on3 March and inMelbourne on10 March tocall onthe Australian government forimmediate action tosecure the freedom ofJulian Assange.

READ MORE: 'Stop Trump Coup': Roger Waters Slams US Actions inVenezuela as 'Insanity'

"I unreservedly support and applaud the demonstrations called bythe Socialist Equality Party inAustralia todemand that the Australian government takes immediate action tosecure the freedom oftheir citizen, Julian Assange, fromhis nearseven-year house imprisonment inthe Ecuadorian embassy inLondon," Waters wrote.

"At least untilrecently, the Ecuadorian presidency was solid inits promise ofasylum, butthe new president ofEcuador is showing himself tobe more susceptible toinsidious US pressure. Julian's situation is dire."

In November, Roger Waters travelled toEcuador tourge the country's government not togive upAssange tothe UK and the US "and all the other acolytes ofthe evil empire incarcerate this great man and kill him, which is what they will do".

AP Photo / Kirsty Wigglesworth

The 47-year-old WikiLeaks founder has been locked upinthe Ecuadorian Embassy inLondon since2012. He has repeatedly noted he feared extradition tothe United States overleaking thousands ofclassified documents.

His defence team has cited media reports suggesting that Ecuador's president Lenin Moreno had sought toreach an agreement withthe United States onhanding Assange overto Washington inexchange for "debt relief".

Moreover, inNovember, WikiLeaks and a number ofUS media outlets published what they claimed was a court filing inan unrelated case including some sealed charges that used Assange's name inan "apparent cut-and-paste error". The outlets then suggested that the existence ofthese files meant the existence ofcharges brought againstAssange bythe US authorities. Washington has refused todeny or confirm the rumours.

Read the rest here:
Roger Waters Condemns 'Illegal Attacks' on Julian Assange by ...

Julians situation is dire: Roger Waters issues rallying …

Pink Floyd-founder and political activist Roger Waters has endorsed upcoming political demonstrations in support of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange to take place in March in the latters native Australia.

Waters, 75, decried Assanges almost seven-year imprisonment in the Ecuadorian embassy in London as dire while referring to the publisher as a national treasureof immense influence and significance on the world stage.

Pro-Assange rallies are scheduled to be held in Sydney on March 3 and in Melbourne on March 10.

In the letter to Australia's Socialist Equality Party, Waters labelled Assange a real hero while praising the Wikileaks founder for his work exposing misdeeds by western governments adding that he, scares the sh*t out of them."

There are widespread fears among the activist community that Assange would be extradited to the US for leaking thousands of classified documents relating to US activities in Iraq and Afghanistan, should he step outside the embassy.

Waters continued that WikiLeaks helped expose to the world the hidden machinations of the real criminals in our society: the oligarchs, who in their insatiable quest for more and more wealth, would destroy the planet we call home.

He further asserted that Assange needs protection from unwarranted and illegal attacks from Western governments determined to destroy him. He also took aim at Ecuadorian President Lenn Moreno whom he claimed is showing himself to be more susceptible to insidious US pressure.

Waters has been heavily involved in political activism for many years and is a known advocate for Palestinian human rights, as well as a critic of US imperialism and intervention in foreign conflicts, recently referring to the recent affairs in Venezuela as Trumps coup.

Like this story? Share it with a friend!

Original post:
Julians situation is dire: Roger Waters issues rallying ...

WikiLeaks Julian Assange promises significant leak on U.S …

BERLIN - WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange promisedsignificant disclosures on subjects including the U.S. election andGoogle in the coming weeks as the secret-spilling group marked its 10thanniversary on Tuesday.

Assange said WikiLeaks plans to start publishing newmaterial starting this week, but wouldnt specify the timing and subject.Speaking by video link to an anniversary news conference in Berlin, he said theleaks include significant material on war, arms, oil, internetgiant Google, the U.S. election and mass surveillance.

WikiLeaks hopes to be publishing every week for thenext 10 weeks, Assange said.

Assange had promised an October surprise,which he hinted could prove devastating to theClinton campaign

Trump surrogate Roger Stone tweeted at the timethat Hillary Clinton would be donefollowing the disclosure of the WikiLeak findings.

Well, it could be any number of things, Stone said in August. I actually have communicated with Assange. I believe the next tranche of his documents pertain to the Clinton Foundation but theres no telling what the October surprise may be.

WikiLeaks, which released Democratic National Committeeemails days before the partys national convention earlier this year, wouldntsay who or what campaign would be affected by the upcoming U.S. election leaks.Assange said speculation that he or WikiLeaks intend to harm Democratic nomineeHillary Clinton is false.

Asked whether he feels any personal affinity with ClintonsRepublican rival, Donald Trump, Assange replied: I feel personal affinityreally, I think, with all human beings.

I certainly feel sorry for Hillary Clinton and DonaldTrump, he added. These are two people that are tormented by theirambitions in different ways.

Sweden is seeking Assanges extradition in a rape investigation. He hasnt left the Ecuadorean Embassy in London since 2012.Assange denies the rape allegation and says he fears being extradited to theU.S. to face espionage charges if he leaves.

Assanges most recent shakeup-- the release of nearly20,000 internal emailsthat pointed to possible Clinton favoritismby the Democratic National Committee duringthe primary process -- caused some upheaval during the Democratic Convention in Philadelphia. The partys chairwoman resigned, and Bernie Sanders supporters booed when the Vermont senatorurged themto vote for Clinton instead. Assange has sincepromised torelease documentsthat could have a significant impact on the looming general election.

The rest is here:
WikiLeaks Julian Assange promises significant leak on U.S ...

Inside Julian Assange’s Alleged Plot to Steal The Fifth …

The time: January 2011. The location: Ellingham Hall, an elegant mansion northeast of London. The scene: Julian Assange sits in front of a fire, entertaining a visitor from America. The conversation is light at first, but as it turns serious, they stop talking and start passing messages jotted on pages torn from a notepad, tossing each in the fire after reading.

Assange is worried about something. Its not his court battle to avoid extradition to Sweden. Its not WikiLeaks continuing rollout of 250,000 State Department diplomatic cables. Its not even the fate of his source, Bradley Manning (now Chelsea), locked in a Marine brig in Virginia under oppressive conditions. At this moment, Assanges preoccupation is a tell-all book being penned by his former second-in-command, Daniel Domscheit-Berg, titled WikiLeaks: My Time with Julian Assange at the World's Most Dangerous Website one of the two books that form the basis of the new movie The Fifth Estate.

The visitor was David House, a Boston computer scientist, a friend of Mannings and a co-founder of the Private Manning Support Network. On this, his first visit with Assange, he was hoping to open a channel of communication between WikiLeaks and Manning supporters, and to try to secure a significant role for himself inside the secret-spilling organization.

Instead, he found Assange was mostly interested in talking about Domscheit-Bergs betrayal of WikiLeaks.

He had started to talk more and more about Daniel during those few days, telling anecdotes, and it was clear that it was bothering him, House says. In front of the fireplace, Assange finally got to his point, House says. Assange wanted House to protect the future of WikiLeaks by obtaining access to a corpus of lies, or something like that, House says.

In a follow-up conversation later, Assange got more explicit, House says.

He wanted me, and in fact told me, to get to Berlin ... and obtain access to Daniel Domscheit-Bergs apartment and to get access to the manuscript of the book that was being published, and to take this manuscript with me back to the London so he could see it before it came out, says House, publicly discussing his experience for the first time.

What followed, by Houses account, was one of the more bizarre sideshows in the WikiLeaks drama: a feigned attempt by House to steal the manuscript and satisfy Assange of his loyalty.

Assanges preoccupation with his public portrayal is not in doubt. In the week leading up to yesterdays U.S. opening of The Fifth Estate, the WikiLeaks Twitter feed became a steady stream of negative reviews of the film. In September, Assange even posted a leaked copy of the screenplay, with pages of scathing commentary. A similar campaign accompanied last springs unauthorized documentary on WikiLeaks, We Steal Secrets. But the allegation that Assange solicited a burglary is something new.

You know, Julian referred to me once as his adversary, so it might make sense in his little world of games to do something like that, Domscheit-Berg says. Its a new low.

Reached by phone Friday, WikiLeaks representative Kristinn Hrafnsson said he would ask Assange about the allegation, but by press time WikiLeaks had no response. (Update: WikiLeaks denies the plot).

The allegations might seem preposterous, except that they come from one of the most important supporters of WikiLeaks biggest source: Manning.

David House met Manning casually in January 2010 at a party at Boston Universitys hacker space. After Manning was arrested four months later as the WikiLeaks leaker, House began visiting Manning in jail and publicly campaigning for the Army privates release; he co-founded the Private Manning Support Network, which ultimately raised $1.4 million for Mannings defense, spoke at rallies around the country, made numerous media appearances, and was first to alert the press to Mannings harsh confinement conditions at Quantico.

He did really great media, especially while Manning was being subjected to the torture-like conditions at Quantico, says Jeff Patterson of the Private Manning Support Network. Having someone in front of the TV camera saying, I personally saw this man and what they were doing to him was invaluable.

Houses connections to Manning made him a target himself, and in November 2010, U.S. Customs officials detained him at the airport as he returned from a vacation to Mexico, seizing his computer, cell phone and digital camera (With the ACLUs help, House later sued the government and won a settlement last May that forced the U.S. to delete the files it had taken from his computer.)

After the airport incident, House began privately pressing WikiLeaks for a face-to-face meeting with Assange, arguing that WikiLeaks and Manning supporters should coordinate their efforts. Houses insistence on a personal meeting made at least one WikiLeaks activist wary, according to internal chat logs previously leaked to WIRED, and Assange was advised against the meeting.

My personal opinion is somethings fishy about this. All of a sudden when you are being hunted he wants to meet with you? wrote WikiLeaks activist Sigurdur Thordarson, who, ironically, would later become an FBI informant. What do you think?

I think he's legit, Assange replied. Too weird not to be.

House finally made it to Ellingham Hall in early January 2011 while on a fundraising trip to Europe for Mannings defense. He arrived from Berlin, where hed attended the annual Chaos Communications Congress, a hacker gathering. House hoped to ingratiate himself with Assange and shape WikiLeaks from the inside. At the time I really believed that they were fighting for human rights, he says. I wanted a seat at the table.

Assange, though, had his own objective, House says. He was dismayed by Assanges proposal, but he agreed to try and steal Domscheit-Bergs manuscript, and together he and Assange picked out a flight from London to Berlin.

House says he had no intention of going through with the caper, but he wanted to make it look to Assange as though hed made a serious effort. That meant hed have to visit Domscheit-Berg and act suspicious. Its important to go through the motions in a case like this.

He made it to Berlin the same day and began looking for the German hacktivist. Hed met Domscheit-Berg briefly at the Chaos Communications Conference, but he hadnt exchanged contact information. On this trip he took a train and then walked to the Berlin hacker space called the C-Base and asked around. A hacker gave him directions to the Chaos Computer Club, where he finally met up with someone who knew Domscheit-Berg personally. That person took House to Domscheit-Bergs apartment.

I went in and had a lovely dinner with him and his wife, says House, who says he's writing a book about his experiences. And the apartment was quite nice.

Without initially sharing Houses story, I asked Domscheit-Berg if hed ever met David House. He volunteered that House unexpectedly dropped by the apartment he shared with his wife, Anke, in January 2011.

Someone from Berlin just dumped him at our apartment without asking me about it in the first place which resulted in a little awkward visit of half an hour or an hour, he says. We had tea, and he was asking me a lot of questions about things that are way beyond what I speak about, and some strange stuff about my apartment and living situation, if I had a dog or pets, and stuff like that.

Slightly suspicious questions, certainly, but on the other hand also way too obvious to be taken as an attempt at anything, he says. It certainly was one of the more bizarre encounters.

After I told Domscheit-Berg about Houses claims, he elaborated. While Domscheit-Berg was in the bathroom, House took the opportunity to start showing himself around. He got up and started walking around as if he wanted to see the apartment, he says. Anke went after him and stopped him in the living room. Which is where I found them.

House never was alone, he adds. And on top of that, the manuscript for the book never was in this apartment in the first place.

House says he needed to be able to describe the apartment to Assange upon his return to Ellingham Hall. That meeting did not go well.

Hey man, I tried, but I couldnt get it, House allegedly told Assange. It wasnt going to happen.

Assange simmered with rage, House says. He got pretty red in the face and started to talk pretty quickly and then left the room, House says. He came back later and started yelling about the book.

Despite Houses utter failure as a thief, Assange agreed to pay him for press strategy advice and other work for WikiLeaks, House says. He made House sign a non-disclosure agreement (an agreement he has obviously now violated), then handed over $5,000 in cash and gave House an encrypted cell phone so they could stay in touch. House had the phone nearby when he later pleaded the fifth in front of the governments WikiLeaks grand jury in Alexandria, Virginia.

House continued his advocacy for Manning as well, but his visibility lessened when, in March 2011, Manning abruptly took House off the jail visitors list. In November 2012, Manning spoke of House during court testimony, complaining that House had been making media appearances over Mannings objections.

I just wanted somebody to talk to, you know, a friend, Manning said, not somebody to take advantage of that, or use it as a soap box.

House severed his relationship with the Support Network after the rebuke and later unloaded a two-day diatribe on Twitter, airing a list of grievances about Assange and the activist community. House took it a little more personally than he needed to, Patterson says. He was dropped at the same time that I was dropped, but I kept working for the Support Network.

House says he continued to visit Assange and perform various work for WikiLeaks until October 2011, but was never again asked to commit a burglary.

Continued here:
Inside Julian Assange's Alleged Plot to Steal The Fifth ...