“Honey Encryption” Will Bamboozle Attackers with Fake Secrets

A new approach to encryption beats attackers by presenting them with fake data.

Ari Juels, an independent researcher who was previously chief scientist at computer security company RSA, thinks something important is missing from the cryptography protecting our sensitive data: trickery.

Decoys and deception are really underexploited tools in fundamental computer security, Juels says. Together with Thomas Ristenpart of the University of Wisconsin, he has developed a new encryption system with a devious streak. It gives encrypted data an additional layer of protection by serving up fake data in response to every incorrect guess of the password or encryption key. If the attacker does eventually guess correctly, the real data should be lost amongst the crowd of spoof data.

The new approach could be valuable given how frequently large encrypted stashes of sensitive data fall into the hands of criminals. Some 150 million usernames and passwords were taken from Adobe servers in October 2013, for example.

After capturing encrypted data, criminals often use software to repeatedly guess the password or cryptographic key used to protect it. The design of conventional cryptographic systems makes it easy to know when such a guess is correct or not: the wrong key produces a garbled mess, not a recognizable piece of raw data.

Juels and Ristenparts approach, known as Honey Encryption, makes it harder for an attacker to know if they have guessed a password or encryption key correctly or not. When the wrong key is used to decrypt something protected by their system, the Honey Encryption software generates a piece of fake data resembling the true data.

If an attacker used software to make 10,000 attempts to decrypt a credit card number, for example, they would get back 10,000 different fake credit card numbers. Each decryption is going to look plausible, says Juels. The attacker has no way to distinguish a priori which is correct. Juels previously worked with Ron Rivest, the R in RSA, to develop a system called Honey Words to protect password databases by also stuffing them with false passwords.

Juels and Ristenpart will present a paper on Honey Encryption at the Eurocrypt cryptography conference later this year. Juels is also working on building a system based on it to protect the data stored by password manager services such as LastPass and Dashlane. These services store all of a persons different passwords in an encrypted form, protected by a single master password, so that software can automatically enter them into websites.

Password managers are a tasty target for criminals, says Juels. He believes that many people use an insecure master password to protect their collection. The way theyre constructed discourages the use of a strong password because youre constantly having to type it inalso on a mobile device in many cases.

Juels predicts that if criminals got hold of a large collection of encrypted password vaults they could probably unlock many of them without too much trouble by guessing at the master passwords. But if those vaults were protected with Honey Encryption, each incorrect attempt to decrypt a vault would yield a fake one instead.

Visit link:
“Honey Encryption” Will Bamboozle Attackers with Fake Secrets

How App Developers Leave the Door Open to NSA Surveillance

U.S. and U.K. surveillance of smartphone users has been helped by mobile developersfew of whom bother to adopt basic encryption.

News that the National Security Agency has for years harvested personal data leaked from mobile apps such as Angry Birds triggered a fresh wave of chatter about the extent of the NSAs reach yesterday. However the NSA and its U.K. equivalent, GCHQ, hardly had to break much technical ground to hoover up that data. Few mobile apps implement encryption technology to protect the data they send over the Internet, so the agencies could trivially collect and decode that data using their existing access to Internet networks.

Documents seen and published by the New York Times and Guardian newspapers show that the NSA and GCHQ can harvest information such as a persons age, location, and sexual orientation from the data sent over the Internet by apps. Such personal details are contained in the data that apps send back to the companies that maintain and support them. This includes data sent to companies that serve and target ads in mobile apps.

This is evidence of negligent levels of insecurity by app companies, says Peter Eckersly, technology projects director for the Electronic Frontier Foundation. Eckersly says his efforts to persuade companies to secure Web traffic shows widespread disregard for the risks of sending peoples data over the Internet without protections against interception. Most companies have no legitimate reason not to secure that data, says Eckersly. Often the security and privacy of their users is so far down the priority list that they havent even thought about doing it.

A 2012 study of 13,500 Android apps by researchers in Germany found that only 0.8 percent used encrypted connections exclusively, and that 43 percent use no encryption at all. Last week mobile app security company MetaIntell reported that 92 percent of the 500 most popular Android applications communicated some data insecurely.

It is often difficult to tell whether an app is using encryption or not to transmit data. Web browsers show a padlock icon next to a sites Web address if it is using encryption, but there is no such equivalent for mobile apps. Manually checking whether a mobile app is securing data transfers involves inspecting network logs to examine how an app is connecting to servers.

The documents published on Monday single out Google Maps as leaking particularly useful data for surveillance purposes. Documents from both the NSA and GCHQ note how search queries intercepted from this app can reveal a persons movements. A 2008 document from GCHQ states that a system set up to intercept that data effectively means that anyone using Google Maps on a smartphone is working in support of a G.C.H.Q. system.

Google made encryption the default for its Web search last September but does not publicize which of its mobile apps use encryption. A company spokesperson told MIT Technology Review that current versions of the Google Maps app use encryption to protect data sent back to the companys servers. That suggests intelligence agencies can no longer see the places people are searching for by intercepting Internet traffic.

The leaked documents also highlight how ad targeting technology built into many apps can leak personal information. Many app companies make use of technology from third party ad companies that collect and transmit ad-tracking and ad-targeting data (see Mobile-Ad Firms Seek New Ways to Track You and Get Ready for Ads That Follow You from One Device to the Next).

That data often contains profile data about a person, such as gender, approximate age, and location. A 2012 GCHQ report details technology designed to pluck such profiles from the data transmitted by the game Angry Birds. MetaIntells analysis of the current Android version of that app found that it sends unencrypted data to AdMob, the mobile ad company owned by Google. The 2012 report also singles out ad company Millennial, which compiles profiles that can also include a persons ethnicity, marital status, and sexual orientation. A spokesperson for Millennial told MIT Technology Review that the company only gets to see data that its partners have permission to collect from their users and that ads are not targeted based on sexual orientation.

Here is the original post:
How App Developers Leave the Door Open to NSA Surveillance

A Beginner’s Guide To Encryption: What It Is And How To Set It Up

Keep on hearing about encryption but still not sure what it involves? Heres a basic introduction to encryption, when you should use it, and how to set it up.

Images by Vector Icon (Shutterstock), Pixel Embargo (Shutterstock) and von_hedwig

Encryption is a method of protecting data from people you dont want to see it. For example, when you use your credit card on Amazon, your computer encrypts that information so that others cant steal your personal data as it is being transferred. Similarly, if you have a file on your computer you want to keep secret only for yourself, you can encrypt it so that no one can open that file without the password. Its useful for everything from sending sensitive information to securing your email, keeping your cloud storage safe, and even hiding your entire operating system.

Encryption, at its core, is similar to those decoder rings you played with when you were younger. You have a message, you encode it using a secret cipher, and only other people with the cipher can read it. Anyone else just sees gibberish. Obviously, this is an incredibly simplified explanation. The encryption in your computer is far more complex and there are different types of encryption that use multiple decoder rings but thats the basic idea.

There are also different levels of security when it comes to encryption. Some types, for example, are more secure but take longer to decode. Few, if any, encryption methods are 100 per cent foolproof. If you want a more detailed explainer on how encryption works, check out this article from the How-To Geek and this article from HowStuffWorks. They explain a few different kinds of encryption and how they keep you safe online.

The short answer: yes. Things can be stolen even if you dont share your computer. All someone needs is a few minutes in front of the keyboard to retrieve anything they want. A login password wont protect you, either breaking into a password-protected computer is insanely easy.

So should you encrypt your sensitive files? Yes. But theres a bit more to it than that. You have two big choices when it comes to encryption: do you just encrypt the important files , or do you encrypt your entire drive? Each has pros and cons:

We generally recommend against average users encrypting their entire drive. Unless you have sensitive files all over your computer, or have other reasons for encrypting the entire thing, its easier to encrypt the sensitive files and call it a day. Full disk encryption is more secure, but can also much more problematic if you dont put in the work to keep everything backed up safely (and then encrypt those backups as well).

That said, well show you how to do both in this guide. Well talk a bit more about each situation in their individual sections below.

If you need to keep just a few files safe from prying eyes, you can encrypt them with the free, open-source, cross-platform TrueCrypt. These steps should work on Windows, Mac and Linux. Note that if youre encrypting files to send them over the internet, you can also use this previously mentioned 7-Zip method.

Continue reading here:
A Beginner's Guide To Encryption: What It Is And How To Set It Up

Lavabit case highlights legal fuzziness around encryption rules

While privacy advocates may see Lavabit as bravely defending U.S. privacy rights in the online world, federal judges hearing its appeal of contempt-of-court charges seem to regard the now defunct encrypted email service as just being tardy in complying with government court orders.

Attorneys from both Lavabit and the U.S. government agreed that the legal issues between them could have been resolved before heading to court, though neither party seemed to have an adequate technical answer of how Lavabit could have successfully passed unencrypted data to a law enforcement agency in order to meet the governments demands.

Three judges from the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, on Tuesday heard Lavabits appeal of a contempt-of-court ruling, which it had incurred for not turning over to the government unencrypted data of a single user, presumably Edward Snowden.

Judges Roger Gregory, Paul Niemeyer and Steven Agee presided over the hearing.

For the proceedings, the judges actively listened to and questioned the arguments of both sides, though they seemed wary of turning the case away from the specifics of why Lavabit did not comply with court orders to turn over data on one of its users, and towards the larger issues that Lavabit raised in its highly publicized defense of what scope the government should have over those parties who hold SSL (secure socket layer) keys to encrypted data.

The case had been blown out of proportion with all these contentions, particularly around the use and possible misuse of the SSL keys, Niemeyer said. Theres such a willingness to believe that the keys will be misused and that the government will spy on everyone, he said.

Gregory had stated that the encryption issue was a red herring, one that drew attention away from Lavabits non-compliance.

The judges had noted that the case revolved around the validity of court orders, rather than the statutes that provide the basis for the court orders.

In June of last year, secure email service Lavabit was issued a court order to set up a U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation pen trap in order to collect all routing data for one of its customers, thought to be Snowden. Snowden had just come to international attention for leaking classified documents from the U.S. National Security Agency. According to reports, he had used the service to alert the media of a press conference he was about to hold.

A pen trap is software that records all routing, addressing or signalling information between electronic communications, in this case email. Before the judges, Lavabit attorney Ian Samuels argued that Lavabit founder Ladar Levison agreed to set up the pen trap; the company had complied to at least one other similar court order in the past.

Link:
Lavabit case highlights legal fuzziness around encryption rules

Townsend Security Release First Encryption Key Management Module for Drupal

Olympia, WA (PRWEB) January 27, 2014

Townsend Security, a leading authority in data privacy solutions, today announced that they have released the first encryption key management module for the Drupal content management system (CMS). With Key Connection for Drupal, administrators are now able to keep their encryption keys secure and meet compliance regulations by storing them outside of the Drupal database and only using them when encryption/decryption happens.

Drupal developers who need to protect sensitive data know that storing their encryption keys within the CMS puts their data at risk for a breach. Additionally, almost every business must adhere to data security regulations set forth by industry standards groups. Anyone who is using Drupal to collect and store sensitive data (email addresses, personally identifiable information, e-commerce checkout process, etc.) needs to make sure this data is held safely to help prevent costly data breeches.

Key Connection for Drupal, combined with Townsend Securitys FIPS 140-2 compliant Alliance Key Manager, enables Drupal users to easily protect their sensitive data in the cloud or on an external virtual or physical appliance. For organizations that need to meet compliance requirements, this means they are provably meeting industry standards and best practices.

Townsend Security has partnered with Cellar Door Media as the premier provider of encryption and key management integration within Drupal. Chris Teitzel, Founder and CEO, commented, More complex e-commerce and enterprise sites are built using Drupal than ever before. Because these sites often collect and use sensitive user information, these businesses have a responsibility, and often a compliance mandate, to encrypt it. The first module of its kind available within Drupal, Key Connection for Drupal brings the high level of security that Townsend Security is known for to a rapidly growing platform.

Key Connection for Drupal makes the process of enterprise level encryption quick and easy, allowing developers to spend less time worrying about their data and more time creating the exciting products their customers desire. The open source Drupal community has done great work and we are glad to help extend this work to enterprise users of Drupal, said Patrick Townsend, CEO of Townsend Security.

Key Connection for Drupal and Alliance Key Manager are available for a free 30-day trial.

---

About Alliance Key Manager and Key Connection for Drupal By deploying the no-cost Key Connection for Drupal module, organizations can access Townsend Securitys Alliance Key Manager. The solution is FIPS 140-2 compliant and allows enterprises to properly manage their encryption keys while meeting security requirements in less time and at a lower cost. Additionally, Alliance Key Manager supports on-appliance encryption and decryption services so that your encryption key is always kept separate from the data it protects. The encryption key manager is available in the cloud or as a hardware security module (HSM).

About Townsend Security Townsend Security creates data privacy solutions that help organizations meet evolving compliance requirements and mitigate the risk of data breaches and cyber-attacks. Over 3,000 companies worldwide trust Townsend Securitys NIST-validated and FIPS 140-2 compliant solutions to meet the encryption and key management requirements in PCI DSS, HIPAA/HITECH, FISMA, GLBA/FFIEC, DIACAP, SOX, and other regulatory compliance requirements. Learn more at http://www.townsendsecurity.com.

The rest is here:
Townsend Security Release First Encryption Key Management Module for Drupal

aes tutorial, cryptography Advanced Encryption Standard AES Tutorial,fips 197 – Video


aes tutorial, cryptography Advanced Encryption Standard AES Tutorial,fips 197
Computer Security, Cryptography Advanced Encryption Standard AES,fips 197 The Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) specifies a FIPS-approved cryptographic algo...

By: Zariga Tongy

Go here to see the original:
aes tutorial, cryptography Advanced Encryption Standard AES Tutorial,fips 197 - Video