The House approved a one-week extension to government funding, as the bipartisan group behind the $908 billion – Business Insider India

The House on Wednesday voted 343-67 to approve a weeklong extension of government-funding negotiations as lawmakers continued to tussle over key details of a COVID-19 stimulus package.

The Senate is expected to approve the deadline extension on Thursday - averting a government shutdown on Friday.

Mnuchin announced the White House proposal just over a week after the bipartisan group unveiled its plan, and just as the bipartisan plan was gaining momentum on both sides of the aisle.

Advertisement

But there are significant disagreements to be resolved in the bipartisan proposal.

Negotiators have indicated that an agreement in time is still possible.

Rep. Josh Gottheimer, a Democrat behind the bipartisan negotiations, told The New York Times that the group would "be working around the clock until we solve the liability and worker protection issue."

Gottheimer also told CBS News, "We are literally on the five-yard line now."

Sen. Lisa Murkowski, a Republican also involved in the bipartisan talks, told The Times, "We are still working together on this," adding that "the possibilities are there to resolve this and to resolve this in a way that makes sense and gains support."

Original post:
The House approved a one-week extension to government funding, as the bipartisan group behind the $908 billion - Business Insider India

FBI gathered US website visitor logs under the post-9/11 PATRIOT Act – WSWS

An exchange of letters published on Thursday by the New York Times shows that the FBI has been using provisions of the USA PATRIOT Act to secretly collect information about visitors to specific US-based websites.

The three lettersone from Senator Ron Wyden, Democrat from Oregon, and two from Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffediscuss details of the permissions granted to the FBI under Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act, originally passed in the period following the terror attacks of September 11, 2001.

According to the original terms of Section 215, the government must apply to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) to gain access to tangible materials that assist in an investigation of international terrorism or other clandestine intelligence activities. The law specifically bars use of its provisions on US citizens.

However, following the revelations by Edward Snowden in 2013 that the US government was conducting unfettered electronic surveillance of everyone, Section 215 was reviewed and modified. In 2015, the new USA Freedom Act was voted on by Congress and signed by President Obama and all claimed that the illegal bulk data collection programs had been stopped even though the basic structure of Section 215 remained in place.

The letters between Wyden and Ratcliffe, which began in May of this year during congressional efforts to renew Section 215, show that the secret data collection activities of US law enforcement and intelligence have actually never stopped.

After the Senate voted 80 to 16 to extend the mechanisms that permit the US government to spy on people, including their internet browsing activity, Senator Wyden wrote to Ratcliffe asking a series of questions to clarify how US intelligence was monitoring the web search activity of a single targeted individual without also gathering information on others.

For example, Wyden asked, If the target or unique identifier is an IP address, would the government differentiate among multiple individuals using the same IP address, such as family members and roommates using the same Wi-Fi network, or could numerous users appear as a single target or unique identifier?

In electronic surveillance, a unique identifier is a mobile phone number or an email address connected with a specific individual or organization. While an Internet Protocol (IP) address is unique to a specific computer or node on the internet, it is more difficult to associate it with a specific user or person because IP addresses are frequently dynamically assigned by routers and other internet hardware and may be associated with more than a single individual user.

In his reply of November 6 (more than five months later), Ratcliffe wrote that Section 215 was not being used to collect internet search records. He also went on to disclose that in 2019 there were 61 orders issued last year under FISC involving and none of them, resulted in the production of any information regarding web browsing or internet searches.

However, according to the New York Times report, the paper pressed Ratcliffe and the FBI to clarify whether it was defining web browsing activity to encompass logging all visitors to a particular website, in addition to a particular persons browsing among different sites. The Times wrote that the next day, the Justice Department sent a clarification to Mr. Ratcliffes office, according to a follow-up letter he sent to Mr. Wyden on Nov. 25.

The second letter from Ratcliffe states that in fact one of the 61 orders, directed the production of log entries for a single, identified U.S. web page reflecting connections from IP addresses registered in a specified foreign country that occurred during a defined period of time.

In acknowledging his error, Ratcliffe wrote, I regret that this additional information was not included in my earlier letter. I have directed my staff to consult with the Department of Justice and advise me of any necessary corrective action, to include any amendments to information previously reported in the Annual Statistical Transparency Report required under Section 603 of the FISA.

Ratcliffe asking the Trump Justice Department to advise him of any necessary corrective action on the matter of the governments illegal gathering of electronic communications and data is absurd on its face. Attorney General William Barr is the godfather of the US governments bulk data collection program having helped to build the precursor to the present National Security Agency system while he served in the administration of George H. W. Bush in 1992.

Barr worked with his then-deputy Robert Mueller to erect a program under the direction of the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) that ordered the telecom companies to turn over the records of all phone calls from the US to countries labeled as centers of drug trafficking. This platform was used as the foundation of the PATRIOT Acts mass surveillance operation.

While the purpose of the New York Times report and release of the letters is to bolster the claim that the administration of President elect Joe Biden is preparing to revisit the ongoing violations of constitutionally protected rights against unreasonable searches and seizures embodied in the secret surveillance programs, no defense of democratic principles is forthcoming from the Democrats.

Far from it, the report in the Times shows that the blatant defenders of intelligence state surveillance within the Democratic Party worked with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi earlier this year to prevent Section 215 from being directly challenged in the House of Representatives. Pelosi worked with Representative Adam Schiff of California to water down language in an amendment from Representative Zoe Lofgren, also from California, that would bar the use of Section 215 to collect web browsing and search data.

The Times report says, While privacy advocates initially supported the compromise, they withdrew their backing after Mr. Schiff put forward an interpretation suggesting that it would leave the government, while investigating foreign threats, able to gather Americans data as long as that was not its specific intention.

The disingenuous maneuvering by the Democrats then opened the door for President Trump to intervene and posture about being against secret government surveillance, but only in relation to the Mueller investigation into the his campaigns supposed collaboration with the asserted but never proven Russian interference in the 2016 elections.

The Times report concludes, With support bleeding away from both the left and right flanks, Ms. Pelosi punted and sent the legislation to a House-Senate conference committee for further negotiations. ... permitting Section 215 to remain lapsed until negotiations resumed under a new president. Nothing different will come from a Biden-Harris administration.

Go here to see the original:
FBI gathered US website visitor logs under the post-9/11 PATRIOT Act - WSWS

Whistleblower Edward Snowden to Apply for Russian Citizenship – NPR

Edward Snowden, seen here in Hong Kong in 2013, is seeking dual Russian-U.S. citizenship. The former contractor for the U.S. National Security Agency revealed details of top-secret surveillance conducted by the NSA. The Guardian via Getty Images hide caption

Former National Security Agency contractor and whistleblower Edward Snowden announced Monday he plans to seek Russian citizenship, while also maintaining his U.S. nationality.

Snowden made the announcement on Twitter as he retweeted his wife, Lindsay's, message from Oct. 28 announcing the couple are expecting a baby. Snowden said they are seeking Russian citizenship to ensure they will be able to live with their future son.

"After years of separation from our parents, my wife and I have no desire to be separated from our son. That's why, in this era of pandemics and closed borders, we're applying for dual US-Russian citizenship," Snowden said in his tweet.

Snowden fled the U.S. in 2013 after leaking classified information on domestic and international surveillance programs carried out by the NSA where he worked as a contractor. He previously worked for the CIA from 2006 to 2009.

Snowden has lived in Russia since 2013, having initially been granted asylum. Last month, Russia approved an open-ended residency permit for him, according to Tass, a state-run Russian news agency that spoke with Snowden's attorney, Anatoly Kucherena.

He faces criminal charges in the U.S. including espionage and theft of government property related to the leak. The U.S. has long sought Snowden's extradition to prosecute him on those charges.

Snowden also faces other legal repercussions. Just last month, a federal court in Virginia said he must pay the U.S. government $5 million from book royalties and speaking fees stemming from his 2019 memoir, Permanent Record.

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia sided with U.S. officials who said that by not submitting the book for a pre-publication review, Snowden violated nondisclosure agreements he signed while working for the NSA and CIA.

Continue reading here:
Whistleblower Edward Snowden to Apply for Russian Citizenship - NPR

U.S. Government Privacy Watchdog Asked to Investigate Surveillance of Black Lives Matter – Gizmodo Australia

A group of Democratic lawmakers on Thursday urged the U.S. governments privacy and civil liberties watchdog to launch an investigation into claims of government surveillance at protests against police violence and racial inequality spurred this year by the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis police custody.

Citing concerns that U.S. federal agencies may have violated Americans rights during attempts to quell nationwide protests, Sen. Ron Wyden, Rep. Anna Eshoo, and Rep. Bobby Rush have called for an investigation by the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB), an independent panel whose five members hold security clearances and are charged with investigating surveillance abuse.

Protests have played an essential role in social change movements throughout our countrys history, including the movements for our countrys independence, womens suffrage, civil rights, and LGBTQ rights. Jacob Blake, George Floyd, and Breonna Taylor are only the most recent cases of Black Americans who have been brutally harmed by law enforcement officials in our country, a letter to the board says.

The letter outlines recent examples of surveillance, including Customs and Border Protection drones that logged, it says, 270 hours of aerial surveillance footage over 15 cities, including Minneapolis, New York City, and Detroit. It also cites the FBIs use of a Cessna 560 aircraft over protests in Washington, D.C., in June, noting the FBI has previously equipped such planes with devices capable of intercepting mobile phone data.

It further cites a BuzzFeed news report from June in which the Justice Department is said to have granted the Drug Enforcement Agency authority to conduct covert surveillance of protests prompted by Floyds death at the hands of police.

Some agencies have denied collecting information on protesters, even if they were asked to do so. The Federal Protective Service, a component of the Department of Homeland Security, for example, asked intelligence analysts at the department to break into phones seized from protesters. A House Intelligence Committee investigation later determined the request was not granted; however, the lawmakers have asked PCLOB to investigate whether the phones were illegally seized regardless.

The Air Force inspector general investigated seven flights over protests this year, the letter notes, but determined no information on U.S. persons was collected. The aircraft, flown by the U.S. National Guard, is equipped with various cameras and sensors capable of capturing protesters movements. The inspector general reported the flights did not collect U.S. person information.

The U.S. Marshals service, likewise, says it did not surveil a Portland protest aboard a single-engine Cessna during a June 13 flight; however, it has admitted to taking photographs of the demonstration in which, it says, protesters cannot be identified.

The lawmakers have asked the privacy board to investigate and enumerate the legal authorities under which federal agencies have observed protests and collected information on participants, as well as whether required processes have been followed for use of intelligence equipment on U.S. soil.

Government surveillance has a chilling effect on the constitutionally protected act of peacefully protesting. Downloads for encrypted messaging apps have spiked during recent demonstrations, showing a broad concern about surveillance among protesters, the letter states.

Representatives Eshoo and Rush are among 35 members of Congress who demanded federal agencies cease surveillance of protests in June. While the job of law enforcement is to protect Americans, limited actions may be necessary if a demonstration turns violent. However, this authority does not grant the agencies you lead to surveil American citizens or collect vast amounts of personal information, lawmakers wrote

Sen. Wyden, who hails from Oregon, has previously questioned DHS and the U.S. Marshals Service over reported surveillance in Portland. In a letter to DHS last month, Wyden said reports of high-tech surveillance technologies being deployed against protesters have raised serious concerns that Congress has a responsibility to investigate.

More here:
U.S. Government Privacy Watchdog Asked to Investigate Surveillance of Black Lives Matter - Gizmodo Australia

GUE/NGL awards its Journalists, Whistleblowers and Defenders of the Right to Information prize – The Parliament Magazine

Named in honour of the murdered Maltese investigative journalist, Daphne Caruana Galizia, the three award-winners were recognised for their work in what GUE/NGL, the left-leaning group in Parliament, calls exposing the truth and for their courage in risking their careers and personal freedom.

This years ceremony on Wednesday took place two days before the third anniversary of Caruana Galizias assassination. Her killers remain at large and the murder unresolved.

In 2019, Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, Nestl whistleblower Yasmine Motarjemi and Football Leaks Rui Pinto jointly won the award.

Manning is the whistleblower and former US Army intelligence analyst who passed on classified information and war logs to the international press, exposing alleged human rights violations.

Correctiv, meanwhile, are a group of investigators who helped expose, amongst others, the cum-ex scandal which is estimated to have cost EU taxpayers at least 55 billion.

These are the heroes of our time - whistleblowers and journalists who are fighting for the truth. This award, now in its third year, is firmly established as one of the key events at the European Parliament Stelios Kouloglou, GUE/NGL

The third winner was Greeces Novartis whistleblowers whose lives are said to still be in danger after exposing alleged high-level corruption by the pharmaceutical giant and senior members of the Greek government during the late 2000s/early 2010s.

Also nominated were Eileen Chubb, a British care home worker who exposed widespread elderly abuse at BUPA facilities; Glenn Greenwald, co-founder of The Intercept and one of the main forces behind the Edward Snowden leaks, and Omar Rojas Bolaos, a former Colombian national police colonel currently in exile after exposing the extrajudicial killings of thousands of men and women at the hands of the countrys police forces, army and government.

Commenting on the 2020 award, Greek GUE/NGL deputy Stelios Kouloglou said, These are the heroes of our time - whistleblowers and journalists who are fighting for the truth. This award, now in its third year, is firmly established as one of the key events at the European Parliament.

Further comment came from Portuguese GUE/NGL deputy Marisa Matias, who added, Rights and freedom have been massively eroded during the current pandemic.

This award is our groups humble contribution to honour those who are brave enough to put in practice the pillars of democracy, such as the right to information and the freedom of the press.

Those who have been honoured this year are exemplary of this fight, she added.

Rights and freedom have been massively eroded during the current pandemic. This award is our groups humble contribution to honour those who are brave enough to put in practice the pillars of democracy, such as the right to information and the freedom of the press Marisa Matias, GUE/NGL

Her Spanish group colleague Miguel Urbn said the three winners were all very worthy recipients, adding, With the COVID-19 pandemic, the Novartis case has shown how detrimental the privatisation of healthcare is, and why we must defend universal and public health systems.

In doing so, the collaboration of the media and journalists in exposing the big pharmas shady businesses is essential. The same applies to what Correctiv has carried out and its work underlines how essential it is for journalists and the media to support each other and for cross-border collaboration.

Correctivs work helped expose well-established, international coordination between large European banks, insurance companies and investment funds. We need this kind of investigative work, and such international collaboration on exposing the truth is vital.

He added, Chelsea Manning has had to endure time in prison for defending the right to information with terrible consequences for her personal life. She was a key player in leaking thousands of secret US documents in 2010.

Like journalists, whistleblowers like Manning should be protected from retaliation, and not be persecuted for defending public interest.

Go here to see the original:
GUE/NGL awards its Journalists, Whistleblowers and Defenders of the Right to Information prize - The Parliament Magazine

The Government Sued the Author of an Embarrassing Melania Trump Book Because Christmas Ornaments Can Be State Secrets Too? – Slate

")), n = v(f[r.size_id].split("x").map(function (e) { return Number(e); }), 2), i.width = n[0], i.height = n[1]), i.rubiconTargeting = (Array.isArray(r.targeting) ? r.targeting : []).reduce(function (e, r) { return e[r.key] = r.values[0], e; }, { rpfl_elemid: s.adUnitCode }), e.push(i)) : g.logError("Rubicon: bidRequest undefined at index position:".concat(t), c, d), e; }, []).sort(function (e, r) { return (r.cpm || 0) - (e.cpm || 0); }); }, getUserSyncs: function getUserSyncs(e, r, t, i) { if (!R && e.iframeEnabled) { var n = ""; return t && "string" == typeof t.consentString && ("boolean" == typeof t.gdprApplies ? n += "?gdpr=".concat(Number(t.gdprApplies), "&gdpr_consent=").concat(t.consentString) : n += "?gdpr_consent=".concat(t.consentString)), i && (n += "".concat(n ? "&" : "?", "us_privacy=").concat(encodeURIComponent(i))), R = !0, { type: "iframe", url: a + n }; } }, transformBidParams: function transformBidParams(e) { return g.convertTypes({ accountId: "number", siteId: "number", zoneId: "number" }, e); } }; function _(e, r) { var t, i = 0 e.length) && (t = e.length); for (var r = 0, n = new Array(t); r '; var r, n; }; }; var a = function a(e) { var r = 0 = e && r.innerWidth r.length) && (e = r.length); for (var t = 0, n = new Array(e); t b ? a : b; } /** * Fast loop through watched elements */ function onScroll() { list.forEach(updateVisibility); } /** * updates seen property * @param {Visble} item * @param {{}} evt * @fires Visible#shown * @fires Visible#hidden */ function updateSeen(item, evt) { var px = evt.visiblePx, percent = evt.visiblePercent; // if some pixels are visible and we're greater/equal to threshold if (px && percent >= item.shownThreshold && !item.seen) { item.seen = true; setTimeout(function () { item.trigger("shown", new VisibleEvent("shown", evt)); }, 15); // if no pixels or percent is less than threshold } else if ((!px || percent = 0 && rect.left >= 0 && rect.bottom 1) { result += getLinearSpacialHash(remainder, Math.floor(stepSize / base), optimalK - 1, base); } return result; } /** * @param {ClientRect} rect * @param {number} innerHeight * @returns {number} */ function getVerticallyVisiblePixels(rect, innerHeight) { return min(innerHeight, max(rect.bottom, 0)) - min(max(rect.top, 0), innerHeight); } /** * Get offset of element relative to entire page * * @param {Element} el * @returns {{left: number, top: number}} * @see http://jsperf.com/offset-vs-getboundingclientrect/7 */ function getPageOffset(el) { var offsetLeft = el.offsetLeft, offsetTop = el.offsetTop; while (el = el.offsetParent) { offsetLeft += el.offsetLeft; offsetTop += el.offsetTop; } return { left: offsetLeft, top: offsetTop }; } /** * Create a new Visible class to observe when elements enter and leave the viewport * * Call destroy function to stop listening (this is until we have better support for watching for Node Removal) * @param {Element} el * @param {{shownThreshold: number, hiddenThreshold: number}} [options] * @class * @example this.visible = new $visibility.Visible(el); */ Visible = function Visible(el, options) { options = options || {}; this.el = el; this.seen = false; this.preload = false; this.preloadThreshhold = options && options.preloadThreshhold || 0; this.shownThreshold = options && options.shownThreshold || 0; this.hiddenThreshold = options && min(options.shownThreshold, options.hiddenThreshold) || 0; list.push(this); updateVisibility(this); // set immediately to visible or not }; Visible.prototype = { /** * Stop triggering. */ destroy: function destroy() { // remove from list list.splice(list.indexOf(this), 1); } /** * @name Visible#on * @function * @param {'shown'|'hidden'} e EventName * @param {function} cb Callback */ /** * @name Visible#trigger * @function * @param {'shown'|'hidden'} e * @param {{}} */ }; Eventify.enable(Visible.prototype); VisibleEvent = function VisibleEvent(type, options) { var _this = this; this.type = type; Object.keys(options).forEach(function (key) { _this[key] = options[key]; }); }; // listen for scroll events (throttled) $document.addEventListener("scroll", _throttle(onScroll, 200)); // public this.getPageOffset = getPageOffset; this.getLinearSpacialHash = getLinearSpacialHash; this.getVerticallyVisiblePixels = getVerticallyVisiblePixels; this.getViewportHeight = getViewportHeight; this.getViewportWidth = getViewportWidth; this.isElementNotHidden = isElementNotHidden; this.isElementInViewport = isElementInViewport; this.Visible = Visible;}]);}, {}];require=(function e(t,n,r){function s(o,u){if(!n[o]){if(!t[o]){var a=typeof require=="function"&&require;if(!u&&a)return a(o,!0);if(i)return i(o,!0);var f=new Error("Cannot find module '"+o+"'");throw f.code="MODULE_NOT_FOUND",f}var l=n[o]={exports:{}};t[o][0].call(l.exports,function(e){var n=t[o][1][e];return s(n?n:e)},l,l.exports,e,t,n,r)}return n[o].exports}var i=typeof require=="function"&&require;for(var o=0;o

Read more from the original source:
The Government Sued the Author of an Embarrassing Melania Trump Book Because Christmas Ornaments Can Be State Secrets Too? - Slate

Interview with John Cusack: ‘You Vote Out Trump and Then Fight’ – Progressive.org

Donald Trump has no critic more outspoken and consistent than John Cusack, the iconic actor who has starred in films including Say Anything . . . , The Grifters, Being John Malkovich, High Fidelity, and War, Inc. and is featured in a new web television series, Utopia.

Cusack has always been political. Hes been an outspoken defender of whistleblowers, serving as a board member of the Freedom of the Press Foundation, meeting with Edward Snowden, and co-authoring the book Things That Can and Cannot Be Said with author and activist Arundhati Roy.

As a foe of the Iraq War, Cusack decried the Bush-Cheney Administration as depressing, corrupt, unlawful, and tragically absurd. A sharp critic of corporate Democrats and the neoliberal agenda as it is expressed in both major parties, Cusack campaigned this year for Bernie Sanders. Now, like many progressives, he is supporting Joe Biden to end Trumps presidency. Cusack reflected on the election in several recent conversations, from which this interview is drawn.

Q: You campaigned for Bernie Sanders in the Democratic primaries, and you were quite critical of Joe Biden. Now, however, you find yourself arguing that a vote for Biden is urgent. Give me a sense of how youre thinking about the November election.

John Cusack: I think we vote for Biden and then, the very next day, we haunt him with every one of Bernies policy positions. We go: health care, living wage, student debt, green energy. We keep that pressure on him from day one.

We have to recognize that, as Noam Chomsky says, we are voting against neofascism, and yet we are also voting for more neoliberalism. After the election, we have to push the neoliberals back into the New Deal framework that the times demand. Theres going to have to be an FDR-like intervention.

There has to be a reckoning.

Its interesting that the Democrats want to bask in the glow of FDR, but they dont want to actually do any of his policies. I dont know why theyre not just saying, There will not be a permanent underclass that is in crippling debt with the Democrats in charge. We are going to make the billionaires pay, and were going to get economic justice coming in all across these various fields where we all know that needs to happen.

So what Im really saying is that, if you dont feel like you can vote for Joe Biden, then you vote against Trump. You vote out Trump and then fight.

Q: Youve talked about how frustrating it is that Democrats dont simply run as progressives. We both know that when the partys Wall Street wing frames the message, they never get through to a lot of disenfranchised and disenchanted voters.

Trump is a con man, but hes a bad one. I think hes more of a sociopath. Hes decided it doesnt matter what he lies about or how much he lies about.

Cusack: And they still cant, even in this era now, when you see Trump running to the left. I mean, hes of course lying about everything he says, but he still runs to the left of the Democrats on endless wars and all this stuff. Because he knows that that hypocrisy exists.

To me, if you dont do a living wage, if you dont take care of health care, if you dont take on the NRA, if you dont do medical and student debt relief, green energy, if you cant come out and say that the Democratic Party is not going to allow a permanent underclass, subject to the whims of neoliberal capitalism, its a problem. I dont know how they can think theyre going to win with the Rahm Emanuel playbook.

Q: Youre hitting on something important when you note that Trump has figured out the hypocrisy and how to talk about it.

Cusack: Hes going to say, Oh yeah, I know the swamp, I know all these people. They all do the same thing. And you know what? Hes a liar, but a con man always works with partial truths. The partial truth is that nobody did anything. The neoliberal establishment threw the working class under the bus thirty fucking years ago.

Q: You have been raging about Donald Trump since he came on the political scene. A lot of people treated him as a fool, but you took the threat he posed seriously from the beginning.

Cusack: In essence, I think that the pre-Trump landscape, neoliberalism, is the landscape that gave us Trump. So he is the logical kind of dark absurdist extension of that kind of savage, unchecked capitalism run amok.

We knew that this person had kind of a mobster or a gangster instinct in all these things, and he clearly doesnt have the temperament or any principles at all. He cant even understand the concept of service to other people. The idea of service in any way is something that confuses him. He doesnt understand anything that isnt just completely transactional.

But, studying history and the playwrights, we know that fascists are usually seen as clowns and buffoons, and then you look underneath and theres war paint behind the clown makeup.

As soon as Trump started ripping children from their mothers arms, he wasnt a fake fascist anymore. He wasnt a pretend fascist. It wasnt a reality TV show fascism. It was on. It was real.

I knew, I think from 2016 on, that this was not going to be anything benign. From the night he was elected, I thought democracy was peering over the abyss. We were under an existential threat, and now we see things that wed never imagined in our lives pretty much every week.

Q: Trump has relied on racism and xenophobia, so aggressively, so overtly. What does that tell us about him, and frankly what does that tell us about America?

Cusack: The pandemic has given us an X-ray machine to examine all the cruel injustices that pass for business as usual, right?

So Trump, whatever you can say about him, is not business as usual. Hes a chaos machine. But hes exploiting all that hypocrisy.

Ive been saying for a while: What we have here is the politics of Helter Skelter. We know what hes doing. Hes demonizing immigrants and people of color. Hes using the language of white supremacy and white nationalism, classic fascist language. Hes trying to create a politics that stirs such deep divisions that people really fear a race war. Then he wants to sweep in as the law-and-order guy, coming in to bring the clampdown.

Q: You speak a lot about how what was once unacceptable is now normalized.

Cusack: What Im saying is: Where is that sense of your father, my father? There was a sense of this fiduciary responsibility that people had in that World War II generation, which they always say was the greatest generation. I remember when you would talk to people who were lawyers or doctors or whatever they were, of a certain age, they had professional ethics.

Trump is really exposing the decadence of our institutions and our culture, and hes got a feel for that. Hes got a gangsters feel for it, for the weak spots, the soft underbelly. He understands where to hurt you.

Q: Well, youve played a grifter. You had to get your head around the grifters mind at one point. Doesnt it make sense that the grifter would, at this point in our history, go political?

Cusack: Yeah, although I dont quite like the analogy with Trump because hes not even a good grifter. Hes just a gangster.

I mean, with grifters, in a way there was an ethics to it. You know, you had a mark, there were rules to the game. It was a dark part of human nature, but there was still honor among thieves.

Trump is a con man, but hes a bad one. I think hes more of a sociopath. Hes decided it doesnt matter what he lies about or how much he lies about. If it gives him satisfaction in the moment or if it gets more people excited about him, he doesnt care. Hes beyond shame.

I do remember when I was playing a sociopath, a guy who was a serial killer in Alaska, and I couldnt figure out how to play the guy, right? I didnt understand why he did what he did. As I was doing it, my eyes kept betraying all of my sympathies, and my antipathies toward the behavior that he was doing.

I listened to the tapes [of him during] interrogation, and at one point, I heard his voice crack, and I realized it was really just about his ego.

Trump is the kind of person who isnt aware that he has a soul. I dont think theres any empathy, [or] sympathy, I dont think theres anything there.

I think hes having a great time. I think he gets all the attention on him. He gets to talk about himself. He gets to make up any reality he wants. He gets to impose, dominate, be punitive, be cruel. He gets to do those things that he likes to do.

So I dont see him as a Henry Gondorff in The Sting. I dont see him as a grifter. I see him as a sociopath.

Q: How did we get to this place, where somebody like Donald Trump is the President of the United States?

Cusack: Do you remember when Bernie Sanders went to meet The New York Times editorial board? This is, you know, The New York Times, right? Theyre supposed to be above all this depravity, chasing ratings from the gutters.

They cut like a reality-TV show. As Bernie said, Hey, you know, Im not your usual friendly guy. Im not going to call you on Thursday and tell you I love you. They cut to the very uncomfortable faces of the editorial board, and they had kind of reality show music.

I thought, Thats what it is, the whole culture. Its all show. Theres no more sense of professional ethics, fiduciary responsibility, or responsibility to other people on the highest level.

Day to day, on the streets, in communities, you see that everywhere. I think things have been transactional for so long that everybody just feels like, as long as they get theirs, what do they care?

It seems like theres been a sort of slow descent into this kind of madness.

Q: How do we get out of this mess?

Cusack: Usually everybody tells you you have to separate church and state. But I think the question we have to ask ourselves is: Do you believe you have a soul?

If you do believe you have a soul, then other people have a soul, then you have to start looking at being a different way. You have to start by not worshipping capitalism. You have to start to have different values.

The guy that I read and study, Rudolf Steiner, says that we live in an age of materialism, and our thinking is even materialistic, and we need to know spiritual truths and spiritual laws, and if we dont learn them or embrace them out of our own free will, we will have cataclysms.

Right now, we need to be shaken out of our materialistic, self-centered view of the world, where people are either customers or marks. Capitalism will sell you the rope to hang yourself with and then make you pay for the coffin and pass the debt onto your kids.

So people need to awaken to the fact that human beings have souls, and we have to treat each other with compassion and grace.

And by the way, youve gotta tax the billionaires! I mean, theyve gotta pay! Michael Bloombergs gotta pay! Right? All these guys gotta pay.

View original post here:
Interview with John Cusack: 'You Vote Out Trump and Then Fight' - Progressive.org

How to Stop Losing the Information Wars – Foreign Policy

On Oct. 14, Facebook and Twitter made the decision to remove a dubious New York Post story from their platformsprovoking heated debate in the internets various echo chambers. The article in question purportedly revealed influence peddling by Democratic presidential nominee Joe Bidens son Hunter Biden, and the social media giants suspected that the uncorroborated claims were based on hacked or fabricated correspondences. Weeks before the U.S. presidential election, Silicon Valleys swift and decisive action in response to disinformation is a stark contrast to its handling of hacked emails from Hillary Clintons presidential campaign four years ago.

A week prior, on Oct. 7, the U.S. Justice Department announced that it had seized nearly 100 websites linked to Irans Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). These sites had been engaged in a global disinformation campaign, targeting audiences from the United States to Southeast Asia with pro-Iranian propaganda. But it wasnt just the government engaged in countering adversaries online: One day later, Facebook and Twitter reported that they had taken down more than a dozen disinformation networks used by political and state-backed groups in Iran, Russia, Cuba, Saudi Arabia, and Thailand.

In the grand scheme of things, the events of Oct. 7 and 14 were hardly noteworthy. In recent years, private and public actors alike have had to ramp up their efforts against botnets, troll farms, and artificial intelligence systems that seek to manipulate the online information environment and advance certain strategic objectives. These actors came under unprecedented scrutiny in the aftermath of the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

But while cyberspace may be a new front in the fight against disinformation, disinformation in and of itselfas well as the societal discord it can sowhas been a national security concern for decades; the Cold War was largely waged by propagating competing versions of the truth. And much as the threat of fake news is nothing new, so too is the way policymakers deal with itor try to.

Therein lies the real problem. In countering disinformation emanating from the Kremlin, Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and IRGC, among others, the United States continues to rely on the same dated playbook that led to success against Soviet propaganda operations, known as active measures, in the 1980s. But this anti-disinformation strategy, like most else developed in the 1980s, has been rendered largely obsolete by an evolving media landscape and emerging technology.

Now, if the United States is going to have any hope of getting back on its front footand put a stop to adversaries attempts to sow confusion and cynicism domesticallyits going to have to seriously reconceive its old playbook.But that cant be done without Big Tech companies, which are the linchpin in the fight against disinformation.

Granted, some state-citizen reconciliation is needed to mend the fraught ties of the post-Snowden era. In 2013, the whistleblower Edward Snowden leaked documents exposing widespread cooperation between U.S. technology companies and the National Security Agency, triggering widespread backlash from technology companies and the public, who lamented the lack of personal privacy protections on the internet.

Since then, the chasm between Silicon Valley and the U.S. national security community has only widenedbut there are signs that the tide may be shifting: Companies like Facebook, Twitter, and Google are increasingly working with U.S. defense agencies to educate future software engineers, cybersecurity experts, and scientists. Eventually, once public-private trust is fully restored, the U.S. government and Silicon Valley can forge a united front in order to effectively take on fake news.

Disinformation crept onto the national security radar just as Ronald Reagan assumed the presidency in early 1981. After the CIA was publicly disgraced during the Church Committee hearingswhich exposed the CIAs controversial (and in some cases illegal) intelligence gathering and covert action against foreign leaders and U.S. citizens alikeReagan recruited William Casey to revamp the agency. On moving into his seventh-floor office at Langley, Casey, known to be a hawk, was dismayed to learn that the CIA was collecting almost no information on Soviet active measuresand doing even less to counter them.

Casey reorganized key offices within the CIAs Directorate of Intelligence to focus on better understanding Soviet active measures and instructed the Directorate of Operations to ramp up its collection of classified intelligence on Soviet propaganda. By mid-1981, the scale of the Soviets efforts became clear.In an August 1981 speech on Soviet disinformation campaigns against NATO, Reagan revealed that the Soviet Union had spent around $100 million to sow confusion in Western Europe after NATO developed the neutron warhead in 1979.

Of Moscows latest efforts, Reagan said he didnt know how much theyre spending now, but theyre starting the same kind of propaganda drive, which included funding front groups, manipulating media, engaging in forgery, and buying agents of influence. In 1983, for example, Patriot, a pro-Soviet Indian newspaper, released a story claiming that the U.S. military had created HIV and released it as a biological weapon. Over the next four years, the story was republished dozens of times and rebroadcast in over 80 countries and 30 languages.

By 1982, the CIA estimated that Moscow was spending $3 billion to $4 billion annually on global propaganda efforts. The Soviet Politburo and Secretariat of the Communist Party, which directed the active measures, made no major distinction between covert action and diplomacy; to the Kremlin, disinformation was a tool to advance the strategic goals of the Soviet Union in its competition with the West.

With the nation fixated on Soviet propaganda, senior leaders from across the Reagan administration came together to form what came to be called the Active Measures Working Group. Led by the State Departmentand including representatives from the CIA, FBI, Defense Intelligence Agency, and Defense and Justice departmentsthe national security bureaucracy quickly went on the offensive. Through the end of the Cold War, the group was effective not only in raising global awareness of Soviet propaganda efforts but also in undermining their efficacy. In fact, U.S. anti-disinformation campaigns were so successful that Soviet premier Mikhail Gorbachev in 1987 instructed the KGB to scale back its propaganda operations.

Clearly, those days are long gone. In stark contrast to the triumphs of the 1980s, the United States since the turn of the century has largely failed to counter disinformation campaigns by geostrategic competitors like Russia, China, and Iran.

The opening salvo of a new, digitized phase of state-level competition for influence occurred in 2014, when Russia seized Crimea from Ukraine. As he moved troops to the strategic Black Sea outpost, Russian President Vladimir Putin publicly claimed that those forces occupying Crimea could not possibly be Russian special forceslying outright to the global community. In the years since, the Kremlins disinformation campaigns have increased in volume, velocity, and variety.Today, state-level actors such as Russia, China, Cuba, Saudi Arabia, North Korea, and others employ armies of trolls and bots to flood the internet with false, misleading, or conspiratorial content to undermine Western democracy.

If Washington is still fighting the same enemy, then what went wrong?

The United States counter-disinformation playbook has been predicated on two unspoken assumptions, neither of which is valid today: first, that shining light on lies and disinformation through official government communications is an effective tactic; and second, that Washington can keep up with the speed and scale of disinformation campaigns. In fact, debunking efforts by government officials do little to discredit propaganda, and the volume of threats vastly exceeds the U.S. governments ability to identify and counter them. These inferences take U.S. credibilityand technological prowessfor granted, which is hardly inevitable.

Broadly speaking, three factors have changed the disinformation game since the 1980sand rendered the assumptions that formed the bedrock of the United States campaign against Soviet active measures obsolete. First, the global media environment has become far more complex. Whereas in the 1980s most citizens consumed their news from a handful of print and broadcast news outlets, today, world events are covered instantaneously by a tapestry of outletsincluding social media, cable news, and traditional news channels and publications.

Second, U.S. adversaries have relied on bots to amplify fringe content and employed trolls to generate fake content to advance their strategic objectives.Finally, rising political polarization has accelerated consumers drive toward partisan echo chambers while increasing their suspicion of government leaders and expert voices. Against such a backdrop, the Active Measures Working Groupa relic of simpler timescan no longer be successful.

Indeed, in the early days of the coronavirus pandemic, U.S. efforts to stem Chinese disinformation about COVID-19 backfired; Beijings disinformation campaigns accelerated between March and May. By June, Twitter reported that it had removed 23,750 accounts created by the Chinese government to criticize protests in Hong Kong and to extol the CCPs response to COVID-19.

To complicate matters further, the one anti-disinformation campaign where the United States has been successful in recent years is hardly a generalizable case. The U.S.-led Operation Gallant Phoenix, fighting the Islamic State, was able to steadily erode the groups legitimacy by undermining its propaganda machine. From a multinational headquarters in Jordan, the coalition flooded the internet with anti-Islamic State content and hobbled the groups ability to broadcast its message globally.

But a campaign against the Islamic State is far from a viable blueprint for countering Russian, Chinese, and Iranian disinformation campaigns. The international communityprivate sector tech firms includedshares the broad consensus that the Islamic State must be defeated. This sort of political harmony hardly exists, for example, on how, or whether, to forcefully counter Chinese-led disinformation efforts related to COVID-19.

Its clear that the United States is losing the information wars, in part due to a lack of innovation among the key stakeholders in the executive branch.But not all is lost. The next administration can make the United States a viable competitor in the global information wars by developing a comprehensive counter-disinformation strategy that is predicated on three different pillars.

Before any decisive counter-disinformation strategy can be formulated, key constituencies will need to come to some sort of consensus about data ethics. A commission staffed by leaders from the executive branch and media organizations must first draft a set of first principles for how data should be treated in an open and fair society; philosophical rifts like those between Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg over the role of speech need to be overcome.Any effective campaign in pursuit of the truth requires a set of guiding principles to inform the types of speech should be permitted in digital town squares and when speech should be fact-checkedor, in extreme cases, removed entirely.

Once first principles are established, the White House can erect a policy framework to guide defensive actions and appropriate resourcing to counter foreign disinformation campaigns. In the spirit of the Active Measures Working Group, an effective counter-disinformation strategy will require a whole of government approach, likely anchored by the State Department and supported by the Pentagon, the intelligence community, and other key stakeholders.

Finally, though the U.S. government can and should do much more to counter disinformation campaigns, it should be clear-eyed about the fact that its ability to shape the information environment has eroded since the 1980s.A comprehensive counter-disinformation strategy would be smart to recognize the limits of government action given the speed and scale with which information moves across social media today.

Thus, its important to nest government-led counter-disinformation activities within a broader set of actions driven by the private sector. Playing the role of coordinator, the United States should encourage the creation of a fact-checking clearing house among social media platforms to rapidly counter suspected disinformation. Indeed, Facebook and Twitter have already begun adding fact-checked labels to potentially false or misleading poststo the ire of Donald Trump. This should be encouraged and expanded to operate at the speed and scale with which content is generated and disseminated across social media.

The government could also use innovative investment pathways such as the Defense Innovation Unit or Joint Artificial Intelligence Center to incubate the development of new AI technologies that media platforms could use to spot deepfake technologywhich can be used to create fake videos, new images, and synthetic textat work. Deepfakes are rapidly becoming an inexpensive, fast, and effective means by which actors can wage irregular warfare against their adversaries.

Regardless of the precise form it takes, the future incarnation of the Active Measures Working Group should seek out Silicon Valley leaders to not only help co-lead the initiative but to also staff other key posts across the executive branch. In the end, the pathway to U.S. preeminence requires mobilizing the countrys unique assets: its ability to innovate, marshal resources at scale, and to come together in times of distressas after 9/11. Only a response marked by bipartisanship within governmentas well as strong partnerships with actors outside of itcan give the United States the reality check it desperately needs.

See more here:
How to Stop Losing the Information Wars - Foreign Policy

Strong Crypto Again the Target of Western Governments – BankInfoSecurity.com

Encryption & Key Management , Endpoint Security , Governance & Risk Management

Stop me if you think that you've heard this one before: Some governments in the West and beyond are continuing to pretend that criminals will get a free pass - and police won't be able to crack cases - so long as legitimate services that offer end-to-end communications continue to safeguard them using strong encryption.

See Also: Live Webinar | Unlocking the Full Potential of Public Key Infrastructure

On Sunday, the Five Eyes intelligence alliance governments - Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States - as well as India and Japan, published a letter calling on technology companies to only use weak encryption.

The letter begins by stating the importance of strong encryption, noting that it "plays a crucial role in protecting personal data, privacy, intellectual property, trade secrets and cybersecurity," as well as "serves a vital purpose in repressive states to protect journalists, human rights defenders and other vulnerable people."

That is all true. But in a bait-and-switch move, the signatories say any system that uses encryption should allow for law enforcement access.

Cryptographers have a name for encryption systems that facilitate this so-called backdoor or "lawful" access: weak crypto. Here's another name: poor security.

The letter also overlooks another solid use case for strong encryption: to protect individuals from mass surveillance. Indeed, it's worth remembering that Apple and Facebook began building strong encryption into their products and services only after Edward Snowden's leaks revealed a massive U.S. surveillance dragnet, including taps on all of the big service providers' data centers. Captured information, including email content and phone metadata, was being shared across the Five Eyes partnership.

Only strong encryption - free from backdoors - offers the protection consumers and businesses alike require. That's because weak crypto can be easily cracked by everyone from unscrupulous business competitors and organized crime gangs to bored teenagers and unfriendly nation-states. Backdoor access also doesn't prevent malicious insiders - including individuals with law enforcement day jobs - from abusing such access.

For too long, encrypted communications have served as a straw man for governments, for example, when their intelligence services fail to prevent terrorist attacks. Rather than asking if inadequate funding, poor public services, inadequate information sharing or legacy intelligence silos might have been a culprit, it's easier to single out Apple, Facebook or WhatsApp for blame.

The same goes for online child exploitation, which governments often cite as a reason for why strong encryption should not be allowed to exist. Child abuse is horrible - full stop - but outlawing encryption won't magically allow police to identify and arrest every perpetrator.

Proportionality is also key. Just because criminals can abuse a system, does that mean it should be made unsafe for everyone in the name of making it easier for law enforcement agents to eavesdrop?

In fact, numerous law enforcement investigations succeed even when encrypted communications or other systems are in use. Witness the takedown of innumerable darknet marketplaces; busts of illicit narcotics buyers and sellers who interact using legitimate, encrypted messaging apps, such as Telegram, Discord, Jabber and Wickr; or takedowns of numerous encrypted communication systems - and arrests of their operators - which have been designed to serve criminals.

Focusing on how criminals might use strong, legitimate services also overlooks their ability to create their own encrypted communications systems or to choose from a multitude of off-the-shelf offerings produced outside the countries attempting to ban or otherwise curtail strong crypto.

Indeed, four years ago, a team of security experts conducted "A Worldwide Survey of Encryption Products" and found that 865 hardware or software products used encryption. Those products had been developed in 55 countries. Thus, any attempt to restrict the use of strong crypto by criminals or terrorists would fail, argued authors Bruce Schneier, Kathleen Seidel and Saranya Vijayakumar.

The signatories to the Sunday letter, which include U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr and U.K. Home Secretary Priti Patel, aren't just targeting end-to-end encrypted communications services but also "device encryption, custom encrypted applications and encryption across integrated platforms."

They write: "We challenge the assertion that public safety cannot be protected without compromising privacy or cybersecurity. We strongly believe that approaches protecting each of these important values are possible and strive to work with industry to collaborate on mutually agreeable solutions."

But here's the bottom line: Weakening security does not allow for strong security - even if politicians continue to pretend otherwise.

Yes, giving everyone access to strong encryption by default - which criminals will continue to access even when governments ban or otherwise restrict it - can complicate some police and intelligence investigations. But to maximize individuals' privacy and the security of their personal data and the systems they rely on, there is no good or acceptable alternative to strong encryption.

Read more:
Strong Crypto Again the Target of Western Governments - BankInfoSecurity.com

QAnon was on the fringe until this Citigroup executive came along – The Australian Financial Review

Even so, the movement had been contained mostly to the internets trollish fringes until around the time Gelinas came along. In 2018, while doing his job at Citi, he created, as an anonymous side project, a website dedicated to bringing QAnon to a wider audience soccer mums, white-collar workers and other normies, as he boasted.

A Citigroup executive helped turn an obscure and incoherent cult into an incoherent cult with mainstream political implications.

By mid-2020, the site, QMap.pub, was drawing 10 million visitors each month, according to the traffic-tracking firm SimilarWeb, and was credited by researchers with playing a key role in what might be the most unlikely political story in a year full of unlikely political stories: a Citigroup executive helped turn an obscure and incoherent cult into an incoherent cult with mainstream political implications.

In January the House of Representatives will almost certainly welcome its first QAnon supporter, Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene, whos running without serious competition in a district in north-west Georgia, and many other candidates for public office have professed support for aspects of the movement.

The Trump campaign has sometimes asked people not to display QAnon signs at rallies, but they show up all the time anyway. QAnon supporters were also ready with an easy spin on the biggest threat to the Presidents hold on power: his own COVID-19 diagnosis. Trump wasnt sick, the theory goes, he merely retreated from the public eye so that the Storm could begin.

Because its so much more involved than a typical conspiracy theory, QAnon has often been described as a religious movement and, like many religions, the core of the belief system stems from revelations in a foundational text. In this case, that text didnt appear on stone tablets handed down on a mountaintop or on golden plates buried in the ground in upstate New York, but through a series of cryptic postings on a website best known for racist memes and the manifestos of mass shooters. Ironically, for a movement obsessed with the evils of paedophilia, the site, 4chan, was also known as a place to download child pornography.

QAnon supporter, Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene, right, is running for a US House seat without serious competition in a district in north-west Georgia.AP

The revelation was delivered on October 28, 2017, and came from a user calling him or herself QAnon. This person, who claimed to be a government employee with top-secret q-level clearance (a real thing in the Department of Energy), said Clinton would be arrested in two days and that the event would set off massive organised riots.

At the time, 4chan was full of similar nonsense attributed to highly placed government officials. But QAnon or simply Q caught on in a way that competing accounts such as FBIAnon and CIAAnon didnt. The user became the narrator of a tale that cast Trump as the central hero in an epic global struggle, doling out the story in thousands of posts known as Q drops, first on 4chan, then on the even more outr 8chan and its successor site, 8kun.

The identity of Q has been a subject of speculation since the beginning. The theories are all over the place, variously suggesting that Q is Edward Snowden, or former national security adviser Michael Flynn, or the conspiracy-minded radio host Alex Jones, or even Trump himself. One self-published book, which Amazon includes free as part of its Kindle Unlimited subscription, claims to have used a mathematical model to determine that Q is former National Security Agency official Thomas Drake. Drake has denied this but Q would do that, wouldnt he?

If Qs drops are the new movements divine revelations, its rites involve the production and consumption of videos and social media posts often screenshots annotated with arrows and circles revealing hidden connections designed to interpret them. Digging deeper, Qs followers often call it.

Just a few minutes before 1pm on Fathers Day 2018, for instance, Q and Trump each posted a Happy Fathers Day message. Coincidence? Or how about this August, when Trump visited a Whirlpool plant in Ohio and posed in front of 17 washing machines? Q is the 17th letter of the alphabet. Surely this was the President signalling that Q was going to clean things up. Or maybe it had something to do with money laundering?

At first, the primary documents for Q were available only to the bravest of web surfers. Most regular people dont spend much time on 8kun, which is awful in terms of content and interface design. The need to spread the word beyond core users led to the creation of aggregator sites, which would scrape the Q drops and repost them in friendlier environs after determining authenticity. (The ability to post as Q has repeatedly been compromised, and some posts have had to be culled from the canon.) This task, Gelinas once told a friend, could be his calling from God.

On April 5, 2018, Q posted a short message drop No.1030 insinuating that a recent spate of military aircraft crashes was part of a silent war. Later that night, Gelinas registered QMap.pub. His intention, as he later explained on Patreon, the crowdfunding website widely used by musicians, podcasters and other artists, was to make memes, which are harder to police than tweets or Facebook text posts. Memes are awesome, Gelinas wrote. They also bypass big tech censorship. (Social media companies are, at least in theory, opposed to disinformation, and QAnon posts sometimes get removed. On October 6, Facebook banned QAnon-affiliated groups and pages from the service.)

Its times like these that cults can thrive. We have leadership that has tried very hard to change our relationship with reality.

Janja Lalich, sociologist

Gelinas raised thousands of dollars on Patreon each month, posting updates using his pseudonym, QAppAnon. Like many of you, I felt that something wasnt right in the world, that our country was headed in the wrong direction, he wrote. Then something magical happened in 2016 that defied expectations a complete outsider to the political establishment, Donald J Trump, won the presidential election! Amazing. A glimmer of light in the darkness. A few months into the Trump administration, Gelinas changed his party affiliation to Republican, and this spring he contributed $US200 ($280) to Trumps re-election efforts his first-ever political contribution, according to federal disclosures.

QMap developed into a central place for fans to read the drops, to plot and to commiserate on the sites Where We Go One We Go All Prayer Wall. The site wasnt just a repository of QAnon posts; Gelinas served as an active co-author in the movements growing mythology. The clean, minimalist site was designed around tiles dedicated to each Q drop, which Gelinas titled to make them easier to understand. Tabs across the top enabled users to sort by theme or tags, and the hidden players and themes were explicated along the left side with a series of icons a few chess pieces, a globe, a skull. Brief descriptions sorted players by category. (French President Emmanuel Macron and New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman are in the Traitor/Pawn category; Senator Ted Cruz is a Patriot.)

QMap also had a tab for suspicious deaths. John McCain didnt die from brain cancer, according to QMap. One theory is that he was secretly tried [by] military tribunal and sentenced to death, the site said. Q had never made these claims explicitly; they were insinuated by his posts, then interpreted by QMap. It was all laid out in a way where someone could easily start to believe its all true, says Joe Ondrak, a researcher for Logically.ai, a fact-checking website that follows the movement. It was like a red pill factory. (Red pill is a reference to the movie The Matrix, in which characters who want to see the world as it actually is take a tablet of that colour. Its been adopted by right-wing activists to connote the conversion of new believers.)

One young QAnon supporter encouraged QMap to annotate posts with supporting evidence and links to additional reading materials, providing background info for the uninformed so that even his grandma could understand whats going on, Gelinas wrote approvingly on Patreon in the summer of 2018. What a great idea. Its hard to jump into Q if you havent been following it closely.

On Patreon, he laid out a plan to add a team, which he hoped would be staffed by disaffected software developers. Facebook devs: how mad are you. Youve been lied to, Gelinas wrote on Twitter in March 2019. Your talents have been used/abused for evil purposes. Lets build a new platform for the GOOD of Humanity.

By this point, Gelinas claimed he was the No. 2 figure in the movement, behind only Q, according to a friend, and began to dream about turning his QAnon hobby into his main gig. Who knows, maybe QMAP becomes the media platform of the future one day? 🙂 he mused in early September.

By now, QMaps growth had attracted an enemy. Frederick Brennan, a 26-year-old polymath with a rare bone disease, had decided to unmask the person behind QMap. Brennan was a reformed troll. Hed created 8chan, but had a change of heart after the man responsible for the 2019 mass shootings at two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, posted his manifesto on the forum in advance and inscribed 8chan memes on the weapons he used to kill 56 people.

Brennan had come to believe that Jim Watkins, an American entrepreneur whod taken over 8chan and its successor site, 8kun, was somehow involved in QAnon. The mixture of regret over what the sites hed started had become and the grudge against Watkins, who runs 8kun from his pig farm in the Philippines, had sent Brennan on a mission to bring down the site and QAnon. Watkins did not respond to a request for comment.

Brennan started by trying to figure out which companies were operating servers that hosted 8chans content. Then he would post public messages, on Twitter and elsewhere, urging the companies to cut ties with the site. After 8chan was dropped by the cybersecurity company Cloudflare, which protected it from denial of service, or DDoS, attacks, it found safe harbour in a new US-based DDoS protection company, VanwaTech, which had taken an extremely permissive attitude towards controversial content. If its legal, I dont care, says 23-year-old chief executive officer Nick Lim.

This summer, Gelinas also moved his site to VanwaTech. This made him a target of Brennan, who also began pressuring Patreon to block Gelinas site. He referred to QMap in a tweet as the main vector for Q radicalisation. QMap, Brennan explains in an interview, helped turn this anonymous format into a way people can be notified immediately.

Patreon never banned QMap, and Gelinas took down all his posts on the crowdfunding site after he was identified as QMaps owner. In messages exchanged over WhatsApp, he told Bloomberg Businessweek that he has no connection to Watkins and has never met him. He said he began using VanwaTech because it protected QMap from frequent DDoS attacks.

Ondrak, the fact-checker, and Nick Backovic, another Logically.ai researcher, joined Brennans hunt. It took Ondrak and Backovic only a few days to trace an email address associated with Patriot Platforms, which had been listed as the publisher of a QMap mobile app in Googles Android app store, to a post office box in Berkeley Heights, New Jersey.

The next day, the pair published a story outing Gelinas as the operator of QMap. Public records show that Gelinas is the sole employee associated with Patriot Platforms, and New Jersey business records obtained by Bloomberg Businessweek list the companys address as a house in the same town, a few miles from the post office box.

On the morning of September 10, a reporter drove to the house. It was a beautiful day in suburban New Jersey. Gelinas, in shorts and an American flag cap, was in the front yard, filling up a wheelbarrow with cut-up tree stumps.

Gelinas is tall and fit at age 43. He clearly didnt want to talk. He paced around his yard, mostly evading questions, while the reporter stood in the grass. He first said he wasnt Q, though he did allow that he was familiar with QAnon, which he described as a patriotic movement to save the country. Finally, his wife opened the front door and rescued him with a vague request for technical assistance. I dont want to get involved, I want to stay out of it, Gelinas said before he disappeared into the house and, rather than asking the reporter to leave, called the authorities. A few minutes later, after the reporter had left the property, two police SUVs showed up.

That afternoon, QMap.pub and the social media profiles of Gelinas and his wife disappeared from the internet. Within days, Citi had put him on administrative leave and his name was removed from the companys internal directory. He was later terminated. Mr Gelinas is no longer employed by Citi, the company says in a statement. Our code of conduct includes specific policies that employees are required to adhere to, and when breaches are identified, the firm takes action.

In the weeks after he was outed, Gelinas mostly ignored reporters calls and text messages, though he did acknowledge he was the only developer for QMap and clarified several other points. Im not going to talk about my own story right now, he said. When the time is right, it will come out.

QMaps disappearance has been a significant but temporary setback for the QAnon movement. Its not going to be a death blow to the QAnon community, but it is a disruption, says Travis View, a conspiracy theory researcher who hosts a podcast dedicated to QAnon. QMap popped back online a few days later, but it now consists entirely of links to other QAnon aggregator websites.

Google has tried to make it harder to find such QAnon sites by keeping them from showing up in searches, and Facebook and Twitter have blocked links to them, though posts about Q are easy to find on Facebook and other social networks such as Telegram. Followers also sometimes spread the word about Q-related sites by writing their URLs on signs and holding them up at Trump rallies.

Meanwhile, Gelinas project of bringing the gospel of Q to the mainstream is alive and well. Late this northern hemisphere summer and early this autumn, Q supporters organised a wave of in-person rallies, ostensibly to combat human trafficking, many of them under the social media hashtag #SaveTheChildren. Some established anti-trafficking groups, including the real Save the Children, a 101-year-old British non-profit, complained they were being co-opted in dangerous ways.

Janja Lalich, a professor emerita of sociology at California State University at Chico whos studied cults for decades, says internet movements such as QAnon have grown at an alarming rate, because of a political debate thats become increasingly unmoored from a set of universally agreed-upon facts. Its times like these that cults can thrive, she says. We have leadership that has tried very hard to change our relationship with reality, and people are grasping at straws. The last four years have been precedent-setting in creating an atmosphere of disbelief.

Returning from that collective delusion, Lalich insists, wont be easy. Its very daunting, she says. You have to give up everything you believed in and decide what to believe again.

Bloomberg Businessweek

See the rest here:
QAnon was on the fringe until this Citigroup executive came along - The Australian Financial Review