Edward Snowden Being Manipulated By Russian Intelligence, Ex-NSA Head Says

I think he is now being manipulated by Russian intelligence," Alexander, who also used to head the U.S. Cyber Command, told the Australian Financial Review in an exclusive interview."I just dont know when that exactly started or how deep it runs. But thats my speculation as an intelligence professional.

I suspect Russian intelligence [is] driving what he does," he said. "Understand as well that theyre only going to let him do those things that benefit Russia, or stand to help improve Snowdens credibility. Theyre not going to do things that would hurt themselves. And theyre not going to allow him to do it. So I wouldnt fall for the line that everything Snowden is doing is altruistic. The fact is, hes in Russia, and theyre not going to allow him do something that is detrimental to their interests. They are looking to capitalize on the fact that his actions are enormously disruptive and damaging to U.S. interests.

Alexander said Snowdens leaks compromise U.S. troops security and have negatively impacted morale at the NSA.

What really worries me is that much of the information that he touched, and probably took, has direct consequences for the safety and security of our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, and our ability to protect them, Alexander said.

The former NSA head defended the U.S. intelligence gathering methods and said Snowden, who was granted temporary asylum in Russia last year, mischaracterized the programs, including PRISM, that he exposed through leaks to the Guardian and other media outlets.

I think the biggest mistake global media have made is projecting the incorrect perception that the NSA is collecting the content of all Americans phone calls and emails, and reading this material, when we are doing neither of these things, he said. The reality is that under the FISA laws, the NSA must have a finding of probable cause and a warrant to target a specific Americans' communications for collection. The suggestion that we are collecting the content of all innocent peoples conversations is completely wrong, would be a grossly inefficient use of our finite intelligence resources, and would be absolutely inconsistent with the NSAs mandate.

Original post:
Edward Snowden Being Manipulated By Russian Intelligence, Ex-NSA Head Says

Edward Snowden being manipulated by Russian intelligence agencies: Ex-NSA chief

SYDNEY: Former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden, who revealed the US government's data collection programs, is now likely under the control of Russian intelligence agencies, according to former NSA Director, General Keith Alexander.

Alexander, who retired on March 31, made the comments in an interview with The Australian Financial Review newspaper to be published on Thursday, a transcript of which was made available to Reuters ahead of publication. Alexander, the longest-serving Director of the NSA, also spoke in favour of backing Japanese militarization to counter-balance China and warned that a lack of norms governing cyber-conflict could trigger a war between traditional foes like North and South Korea.

Civil libertarians in the United States and Washington's allies in Europe were shocked by the extent of US surveillance revealed by Snowden, and a handful of US congressmen have alleged that he was acting at the behest of a foreign government. Snowden, who fled to Moscow last year, has dismissed the allegations. He expects his temporary asylum status in Russia to be renewed before it expires in summer, according to his lawyer.

"I think he is now being manipulated by Russian intelligence. I just don't know when that exactly started or how deep it runs," Alexander said. "Understand as well that they're only going to let him do those things that benefit Russia, or stand to help improve Snowden's credibility. They're not going to do things that would hurt themselves. And they're not going to allow him to do it."

In the interview, Alexander described a traditional global security order that has been disrupted by rapid developments in offensive cyber technology, with the potential for unintended consequences rising as a result.

A 2012 cyber-attack on government oil company Saudi Aramco believed to have originated from Iran, he said, had been routed through servers in the United States and inadvertently almost disabled a major telecommunications company there. An attack on South Korea's banking system in 2013 that was believed to have originated in the North, he said, was an example where unintended consequences could accidentally have triggered a shooting war.

"I'm concerned there is a rising chance that individuals and/or nation states miscalculate because they don't know where the red lines are. And this problem of a lack of transparency on red lines, and agreed escalation protocols, is especially acute in cyber-space," he said.

Alexander, who was succeeded by US Navy Vice Admiral Michael Rogers, also signalled his concern over Chinese claims on the oil and gas-rich South China Sea that have increased tension in Asia, arguing that the US should back Japan as a counterbalance Beijing's rise. "If China continues to act aggressively, I believe we should welcome Japan's increased militarization," he said.

He praised Australia's decision last year to ban China's Huawei Technologies Co Ltd from bidding for work on the country's $38 billion National Broadband Network (NBN) over cyber-security concerns.

The US House Intelligence Committee last year described Huawei as a national security threat and urged American firms to stop doing business with the Shenzhen-based company. Huawei has denied the US allegations that its equipment could be used by Beijing for espionage. "I think what Australia did on the Huawei decision was tremendous," he said.

Excerpt from:
Edward Snowden being manipulated by Russian intelligence agencies: Ex-NSA chief

Edward Snowden appears via video at Toronto debate

TORONTO (AP) - Edward Snowden, the former U.S. intelligence contractor who has been leaking information about government data collection programs, said Friday before a debate on state surveillance that entire populations, rather than just individuals, now live under constant surveillance.

Snowden, who appeared via video link at Torontos Roy Thomson Hall during a semi-annual Munk debate that state surveillance today is a euphemism for mass surveillance.

Its no longer based on the traditional practice of targeted taps based on some individual suspicion of wrongdoing, Snowden said in the brief video. It covers phone calls, emails, texts, search history, what you buy, who your friends are, where you go, who you love.

The video was screened as two of the debaters - former U.S. National Security Administration director General Michael Hayden and well-known civil liberties lawyer and Harvard law professor Alan M. Dershowitz - argued in favor of the debate statement: Be it resolved state surveillance is a legitimate defense of our freedoms.

In opposition were Glenn Greenwald, the journalist whose work based on the Snowden leaks won a Pulitzer Prize last month, and Alexis Ohanian, the co-founder of social media website reddit.

The Snowden documents, first leaked last June, revealed that the U.S. government has programs in place to spy on hundreds of millions of peoples emails, social networking posts, online chat histories, browsing histories, phone records, phone calls and texts. Nearly everything a typical user does on the Internet, in the words of one leaked document.

Greenwald opened the debate by condemning the NSAs own slogan, which he said appears repeatedly throughout its own documents: Collect it all.

What is state surveillance? If it were about targeting in a discriminate way against those causing harm, there would be no debate, said Greenwald. The actual system of state surveillance has almost nothing to do with that. What state surveillance actually is, is defended by the NSAs actual words, that phrase they use over and over again, collect it all.

Hayden and Dershowitz spent the rest of the hour and a half or so denying that the pervasive surveillance described by Snowden and Greenwald even exists and that the ongoing surveillance programs are necessary to prevent terrorism.

Collect it all doesnt mean collect it all! said Hayden, drawing laughs from the audience.

Excerpt from:
Edward Snowden appears via video at Toronto debate

Edward Snowden appears via video link at Toronto’s Munk Debates on state surveillance

TORONTO Edward Snowden, the former U.S. intelligence contractor who has been leaking information about government data collection programs, says entire populations, rather than just individuals, now live under constant surveillance.

Snowden appeared via video link at Toronto's Roy Thomson Hall during a Munk Debate about state surveillance Friday night.

Former U.S. National Security Administration director General Michael Hayden and well-known civil liberties lawyer and Harvard law professor Alan M. Dershowitz, argued in favor of the debate statement: "Be it resolved state surveillance is a legitimate defense of our freedoms."

Glenn Greenwald, the journalist whose work based on the Snowden leaks won a Pulitzer Prize last month and Alexis Ohanian, the co-founder of social media website reddit, were in opposition.

The debate ended with 59 percent of the audience siding with Greenwald and Ohanian.

View original post here:
Edward Snowden appears via video link at Toronto's Munk Debates on state surveillance

Snowden denied asylum in Germany for NSA testimony

Edward Snowden, the former NSA contractor turned leaker and whistleblower,won't be able to travel to Germany to testify about NSA surveillance, according to a report from The Guardian.

Snowden asked for asylum in Germany last summer, but his application was rejected because hedidn't file it from German soil. Theoretically, a trip to Germany could have been a second chance to file an application.Butplans for the trip broke down, with sharpdisagreement among German political parties about the propriety of allowingSnowden into the country.

Unnamed government officials wrote a letter to theparliamentary committee that invited Snowden, sayingthatthe invitation would "run counter to the political interests of the Federal Republic" and "put a grave and permanent strain" on relations between the US and Germany.The letter was obtained and published by Sddeutsche Zeitung, Germany's largest newspaper.

The German Left and Green parties had insisted that Snowden's personal appearance and testimony was key, "not least because of concerns that Russia would otherwise influence his testimony," wroteThe Guardian. But the dominant Christian Democratic Union and Social Democratic parties said that Snowden didn't need to appear in person; his written answers would suffice.

Green Party leader Simone Peter said her party will continue to fight over the issue."Merkel is displaying cowardice towards our ally America," said Peter. "We owe the Americans nothing in this respect. The government must at least make a serious effort to safely bring Snowden to Germany and let him give evidence here."

Snowden has been living in Russia since he gave top-secret documents to journalists last year. His one-year visa will run out this summer, but his lawyerJesselyn Radack said she expects the visa to be renewed.

This article originally appeared on Ars Technica

The rest is here:
Snowden denied asylum in Germany for NSA testimony