Putin’s Deadliest Catch: Snowden Joins Navalny in Moscow

As Edward Snowden slipped into Moscow this afternoon, asylum documents in hand, he joined another recently freed man: Alexey Navalny. Russia now has two famous cyber-whistleblowers on its hands, and hasnt yet figured out what to do with either.

One thing is for sure, Putins planned meeting Obama on the sidelines of the G20 summit is now looking increasingly unlikely.

The similarities between Snowden and Navalny are striking. Both have become famous for exposing the corruption and abuses of power that underpin the power centres of their respective societies. Both are creatures of the internet. Both are idealists who have an (overinflated?) belief in the power of unfiltered information to protect freedom. Both are young, fearless and ready to give up their lives for the causes they believe in. Both are photogenic, eloquent and extremely media savvy. Interestingly also, they are both politically slippery: their ideological beliefs do not clearly or readily fit into established paradigms of left and right. Neither is without a dark side. For Navalny, it is the spectre of nationalism, the persistent reminders of the chauvinism and borderline racism for which he was once expelled from the liberal Yabloko party. He is also known to identify closely with neoliberalism, as Sean Guillory eloquently reminds us with his latest post. For his part, Snowden has been accused of hypocrisy in claiming to stand for freedom of information while seeking asylum in a country notorious for its state censorship and other civil rights abuses.

But perhaps the main thing that unites the two men is the threat they pose to the established order.

Navalnys revelations that Russias ruling party was a party of crooks and thieves unravelled Putins key argument that he was the only man who could rescue the country from corruption. The whistleblowers online campaign has made it impeccably clear that in fact, the reverse is true. Navalny is an existential threat to the Russian order because he has revealed not just what everyone already knew that the governments control is ultimately based on corruption but the mechanism by which it operates. Those kinds of revelations make it possible for people to take concrete actions. It is the agency that Navalny has made possible that scares the government.

Similarly, on one level, Snowdens revelations of U.S. cyber-surveillance merely confirmed what many have long suspected. However, by revealing the details of the specific operations and how they work, Snowden has not only exposed the hypocrisy of American claims to be guarantors of freedom, but also given people practical ideas as to how exactly to push back against the new surveillance state.

Its no wonder that Obama would like to do to Snowden what Putin is planning to do with Navalny: throw them in jail and lock away the key. The identical behavior of democratic America and authoritarian Russia in response to these respective existential threats proves that the two great powers have a lot more in common than they would like to admit.

Read more:
Putin’s Deadliest Catch: Snowden Joins Navalny in Moscow

Hillary Clinton: ‘Our technology companies are not part of our government’ – Video


Hillary Clinton: #39;Our technology companies are not part of our government #39;
Former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton discussed Edward Snowden, the NSA #39;s surveillance program and immigration during her appearance at the Nexenta OpenSDx Summit.

By: Network World

View post:
Hillary Clinton: 'Our technology companies are not part of our government' - Video

Chaos Computer Club unterstützt Edward Snowden mit 36.000 …

heise Developer Roslyn und C# Lange Zeit wurde spekuliert, ob auf der BUILD-Konferenz 2014, eine neue Version on C# vorgestellt wird. Das ist nicht passiert. Microsoft schenkte stattdessen einem anderen Projekt viel Aufmerksamkeit: Roslyn.

Neue Spiele im September Was haben Sherlock Holmes, Eisenbahnen und die FIFA gemeinsam? Sie alle buhlen im September um das Geld die Gunst der Spieler. Doch auch fr andere Geschmcker gibt es Nachschub.

TrueCrypt Die aktuelle Version der Verschlsselungs-Software TrueCrypt gilt als unsicher. Wir bieten daher weiterhin die Vorgngerversion zum Download an.

Firefox Firefox ist ein quelloffener Web-Browser, der sich ber zahlreiche Add-ons stark erweitern lsst.

Goat Simulator Im Goat Simulator sorgt man als bockige Ziege mit absurden Stunts fr Unruhe und Zerstrung.

WhatsApp Instant-Messaging-Dienst fr Smartphones; verschickt Nachrichten, Bilder, Sprachnotizen und Videos ber die mobile Internetverbindung

Flappy Bird - App fr Android (APK) Das Kultspiel Flappy Bird steht bei uns fr Android-Gerte weiterhin zum Download.

AdwCleaner AdwCleaner ist ein schlankes Werkzeug, das strende und gefhrliche Software wie Adware, Toolbars und Hijacker auf dem Rechner findet und entfernt.

TrueCrypt Die aktuelle Version der Verschlsselungs-Software TrueCrypt gilt als unsicher. Wir bieten daher weiterhin die Vorgngerversion zum Download an.

IrfanView Der erweiterbare Bildbetrachter IrfanView zeigt Fotos und spielt Multimedia-Formate ab.

Original post:
Chaos Computer Club unterstützt Edward Snowden mit 36.000 ...

Thomas Rid on Edward Snowden and the implications of the NSA leaks – Video


Thomas Rid on Edward Snowden and the implications of the NSA leaks
Thomas Rid, author of Cyber War Will Not Take Place, discusses Edward Snowden and the NSA leaks. http://global.oup.com/academic/product/cyber-war-will-not-take-place-9780199330638 Edward...

By: Oxford Academic (Oxford University Press)

See the rest here:
Thomas Rid on Edward Snowden and the implications of the NSA leaks - Video

Edward Snowden Speaks Out

This photo provided by The Guardian Newspaper in London shows Edward Snowden, who worked as a contract employee at the National Security Agency, on Sunday, June 9, 2013, in Hong Kong. (The Guardian via AP)

Not many people have seen Edward Snowden since he disappeared into the Moscow Airport Complex in June 2013, but journalist James Bamford has. Bamford traveled to Russia this year to interview the man who leaked hundreds of thousands of National Security Agency documents that revealed the agencys surveillance.

Snowden is living in Russia, where he has temporary asylum. Hes cant return to U.S. because he faces charges, but he says there will be more information emerging from the documents the government claims he took illegally. The question for us is not what new story will come out next. The question is, what are we going to do about it, Snowden told Bamford.

James Bamford joins Here & Nows Sacha Pfeiffer to talk about his interview with Edward Snowden.

Read this article:
Edward Snowden Speaks Out

Bush and Obama Spurred Edward Snowden to Spill U.S …

The whistleblower started out as an idealistic booster of the national-security state. Illegal and immoral behavior he witnessed on the inside turned him into an outsider.

Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP

Before Edward Snowden joined Daniel Ellsberg and Chelsea Manning in the annals of American whistleblowers, he was a young man who witnessed the attacks of September 11, 2001, and enthusiastically volunteered to join the national-security state. Back then, he believed in the wisdom of the War in Iraq, saw the National Security Agency as a force for good, and hoped to serve within the system. Since his first interview with Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras, we've known that he gradually lost faith in the federal government, believed it to be engaged in illegal, immoral acts, and decided to gather and leak some of its secrets.

One of the most comprehensive narratives of what specifically prompted his transition from insider to conscientious objector appears in the recently published interview he granted to James Bamford, author of several books on the NSA. Whether one believes Snowden's leaks to be salutary or deeply regrettable, it's useful to understand and grapple with what prompted him to act as he did, especially as the Obama administration works to make future leaks less likely. One method for preventing leaks that hasn't been discussed: Run a federal government that carries out fewer morally and legally objectionable actions in secret.

According to the interview, Snowden was disillusioned and influenced by what he saw during his time at the CIA and the NSA, as many Americans would've been:

Elsewhere, Snowden has noted his disillusionment at the treatment of previous NSA whistleblowers, as well as his amazement that James Clapper and Keith Alexander were allowed to lie or mislead in congressional testimony without consequences.

Snowden's account raises a question for Americans who want classified information kept secret. Would they rather have a national-security state run by employees who are inclined to speak out publicly when they witness years of immoral or illegal behavior? Or would they prefer them to keep quiet to avoid revealing sensitive information to adversaries? I submit that a system that conducts mass surveillance on Americans, tortures abroad, destroys the lives of innocents in intramural competitions to accrue CIA assets, ponders using pornography to discredit non-terrorists, and passes the private information of Americans to foreign governments is particularly dangerous if staffed entirely by people who are not sufficiently troubled by all that to let the public know what is going on.

George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and the most prominent members of their teams feel differently, of course, which helps explain why Snowden became a whistleblower in the first place. The national-security state is its own worst enemy, doing more to undermine its own legitimacy than its critics ever could.

More here:
Bush and Obama Spurred Edward Snowden to Spill U.S ...

Bush and Obama Spurred Edward Snowden to Spill U.S. Secrets

The whistleblower started out as an idealistic booster of the national-security state. Illegal and immoral behavior he witnessed on the inside turned him into an outsider.

Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP

Before Edward Snowden joined Daniel Ellsberg and Chelsea Manning in the annals of American whistleblowers, he was a young man who witnessed the attacks of September 11, 2001, and enthusiastically volunteered to join the national-security state. Back then, he believed in the wisdom of the War in Iraq, saw the National Security Agency as a force for good, and hoped to serve within the system. Since his first interview with Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras, we've known that he gradually lost faith in the federal government, believed it to be engaged in illegal, immoral acts, and decided to gather and leak some of its secrets.

One of the most comprehensive narratives of what specifically prompted his transition from insider to conscientious objector appears in the recently published interview he granted to James Bamford, author of several books on the NSA. Whether one believes Snowden's leaks to be salutary or deeply regrettable, it's useful to understand and grapple with what prompted him to act as he did, especially as the Obama administration works to make future leaks less likely. One method for preventing leaks that hasn't been discussed: Run a federal government that carries out fewer morally and legally objectionable actions in secret.

According to the interview, Snowden was disillusioned and influenced by what he saw during his time at the CIA and the NSA, as many Americans would've been:

Elsewhere, Snowden has noted his disillusionment at the treatment of previous NSA whistleblowers, as well as his amazement that James Clapper and Keith Alexander were allowed to lie or mislead in congressional testimony without consequences.

Snowden's account raises a question for Americans who want classified information kept secret. Would they rather have a national-security state run by employees who are inclined to speak out publicly when they witness years of immoral or illegal behavior? Or would they prefer them to keep quiet to avoid revealing sensitive information to adversaries? I submit that a system that conducts mass surveillance on Americans, tortures abroad, destroys the lives of innocents in intramural competitions to accrue CIA assets, ponders using pornography to discredit non-terrorists, and passes the private information of Americans to foreign governments is particularly dangerous if staffed entirely by people who are not sufficiently troubled by all that to let the public know what is going on.

George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and the most prominent members of their teams feel differently, of course, which helps explain why Snowden became a whistleblower in the first place. The national-security state is its own worst enemy, doing more to undermine its own legitimacy than its critics ever could.

View original post here:
Bush and Obama Spurred Edward Snowden to Spill U.S. Secrets

Bush and Obama Spurred Ed Snowden to Spill U.S. Secrets

The whistleblower started out as an idealistic booster of the national-security state. Illegal and immoral behavior he witnessed on the inside turned him into an outsider.

Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP

Before Edward Snowden joined Daniel Ellsberg and Chelsea Manning in the annals of American whistleblowers, he was a young man who witnessed the attacks of September 11, 2001, and enthusiastically volunteered to join the national-security state. Back then, he believed in the wisdom of the War in Iraq, saw the National Security Agency as a force for good, and hoped to serve within the system. Since his first interview with Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras, we've known that he gradually lost faith in the federal government, believed it to be engaged in illegal, immoral acts, and decided to gather and leak some of its secrets.

One of the most comprehensive narratives of what specifically prompted his transition from insider to conscientious objector appears in the recently published interview he granted to James Bamford, author of several books on the NSA. Whether one believes Snowden's leaks to be salutary or deeply regrettable, it's useful to understand and grapple with what prompted him to act as he did, especially as the Obama administration works to make future leaks less likely. One method for preventing leaks that hasn't been discussed: Run a federal government that carries out fewer morally and legally objectionable actions in secret.

According to the interview, Snowden was disillusioned and influenced by what he saw during his time at the CIA and the NSA, as many Americans would've been:

Elsewhere, Snowden has noted his disillusionment at the treatment of previous NSA whistleblowers, as well as his amazement that James Clapper and Keith Alexander were allowed to lie or mislead in congressional testimony without consequences.

Snowden's account raises a question for Americans who want classified information kept secret. Would they rather have a national-security state run by employees who are inclined to speak out publicly when they witness years of immoral or illegal behavior? Or would they prefer them to keep quiet to avoid revealing sensitive information to adversaries? I submit that a system that conducts mass surveillance on Americans, tortures abroad, destroys the lives of innocents in intramural competitions to accrue CIA assets, ponders using pornography to discredit non-terrorists, and passes the private information of Americans to foreign governments is particularly dangerous if staffed entirely by people who are not sufficiently troubled by all that to let the public know what is going on.

George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and the most prominent members of their teams feel differently, of course, which helps explain why Snowden became a whistleblower in the first place. The national-security state is its own worst enemy, doing more to undermine its own legitimacy than its critics ever could.

Read more here:
Bush and Obama Spurred Ed Snowden to Spill U.S. Secrets