Commentary: Twitter fast becoming a thought-policed sandbox – The Herald Journal

Country

United States of AmericaUS Virgin IslandsUnited States Minor Outlying IslandsCanadaMexico, United Mexican StatesBahamas, Commonwealth of theCuba, Republic ofDominican RepublicHaiti, Republic ofJamaicaAfghanistanAlbania, People's Socialist Republic ofAlgeria, People's Democratic Republic ofAmerican SamoaAndorra, Principality ofAngola, Republic ofAnguillaAntarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S)Antigua and BarbudaArgentina, Argentine RepublicArmeniaArubaAustralia, Commonwealth ofAustria, Republic ofAzerbaijan, Republic ofBahrain, Kingdom ofBangladesh, People's Republic ofBarbadosBelarusBelgium, Kingdom ofBelizeBenin, People's Republic ofBermudaBhutan, Kingdom ofBolivia, Republic ofBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswana, Republic ofBouvet Island (Bouvetoya)Brazil, Federative Republic ofBritish Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago)British Virgin IslandsBrunei DarussalamBulgaria, People's Republic ofBurkina FasoBurundi, Republic ofCambodia, Kingdom ofCameroon, United Republic ofCape Verde, Republic ofCayman IslandsCentral African RepublicChad, Republic ofChile, Republic ofChina, People's Republic ofChristmas IslandCocos (Keeling) IslandsColombia, Republic ofComoros, Union of theCongo, Democratic Republic ofCongo, People's Republic ofCook IslandsCosta Rica, Republic ofCote D'Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of theCyprus, Republic ofCzech RepublicDenmark, Kingdom ofDjibouti, Republic ofDominica, Commonwealth ofEcuador, Republic ofEgypt, Arab Republic ofEl Salvador, Republic ofEquatorial Guinea, Republic ofEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFaeroe IslandsFalkland Islands (Malvinas)Fiji, Republic of the Fiji IslandsFinland, Republic ofFrance, French RepublicFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaFrench Southern TerritoriesGabon, Gabonese RepublicGambia, Republic of theGeorgiaGermanyGhana, Republic ofGibraltarGreece, Hellenic RepublicGreenlandGrenadaGuadaloupeGuamGuatemala, Republic ofGuinea, RevolutionaryPeople's Rep'c ofGuinea-Bissau, Republic ofGuyana, Republic ofHeard and McDonald IslandsHoly See (Vatican City State)Honduras, Republic ofHong Kong, Special Administrative Region of ChinaHrvatska (Croatia)Hungary, Hungarian People's RepublicIceland, Republic ofIndia, Republic ofIndonesia, Republic ofIran, Islamic Republic ofIraq, Republic ofIrelandIsrael, State ofItaly, Italian RepublicJapanJordan, Hashemite Kingdom ofKazakhstan, Republic ofKenya, Republic ofKiribati, Republic ofKorea, Democratic People's Republic ofKorea, Republic ofKuwait, State ofKyrgyz RepublicLao People's Democratic RepublicLatviaLebanon, Lebanese RepublicLesotho, Kingdom ofLiberia, Republic ofLibyan Arab JamahiriyaLiechtenstein, Principality ofLithuaniaLuxembourg, Grand Duchy ofMacao, Special Administrative Region of ChinaMacedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic ofMadagascar, Republic ofMalawi, Republic ofMalaysiaMaldives, Republic ofMali, Republic ofMalta, Republic ofMarshall IslandsMartiniqueMauritania, Islamic Republic ofMauritiusMayotteMicronesia, Federated States ofMoldova, Republic ofMonaco, Principality ofMongolia, Mongolian People's RepublicMontserratMorocco, Kingdom ofMozambique, People's Republic ofMyanmarNamibiaNauru, Republic ofNepal, Kingdom ofNetherlands AntillesNetherlands, Kingdom of theNew CaledoniaNew ZealandNicaragua, Republic ofNiger, Republic of theNigeria, Federal Republic ofNiue, Republic ofNorfolk IslandNorthern Mariana IslandsNorway, Kingdom ofOman, Sultanate ofPakistan, Islamic Republic ofPalauPalestinian Territory, OccupiedPanama, Republic ofPapua New GuineaParaguay, Republic ofPeru, Republic ofPhilippines, Republic of thePitcairn IslandPoland, Polish People's RepublicPortugal, Portuguese RepublicPuerto RicoQatar, State ofReunionRomania, Socialist Republic ofRussian FederationRwanda, Rwandese RepublicSamoa, Independent State ofSan Marino, Republic ofSao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic ofSaudi Arabia, Kingdom ofSenegal, Republic ofSerbia and MontenegroSeychelles, Republic ofSierra Leone, Republic ofSingapore, Republic ofSlovakia (Slovak Republic)SloveniaSolomon IslandsSomalia, Somali RepublicSouth Africa, Republic ofSouth Georgia and the South Sandwich IslandsSpain, Spanish StateSri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic ofSt. HelenaSt. Kitts and NevisSt. LuciaSt. Pierre and MiquelonSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudan, Democratic Republic of theSuriname, Republic ofSvalbard & Jan Mayen IslandsSwaziland, Kingdom ofSweden, Kingdom ofSwitzerland, Swiss ConfederationSyrian Arab RepublicTaiwan, Province of ChinaTajikistanTanzania, United Republic ofThailand, Kingdom ofTimor-Leste, Democratic Republic ofTogo, Togolese RepublicTokelau (Tokelau Islands)Tonga, Kingdom ofTrinidad and Tobago, Republic ofTunisia, Republic ofTurkey, Republic ofTurkmenistanTurks and Caicos IslandsTuvaluUganda, Republic ofUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited Kingdom of Great Britain & N. IrelandUruguay, Eastern Republic ofUzbekistanVanuatuVenezuela, Bolivarian Republic ofViet Nam, Socialist Republic ofWallis and Futuna IslandsWestern SaharaYemenZambia, Republic ofZimbabwe

Read the rest here:

Commentary: Twitter fast becoming a thought-policed sandbox - The Herald Journal

What the Trial of Alex Jones Revealed About His Finances – The New York Times

Alex Joness attempts to shield his fortune from legal threats drew a warning this week from a Texas judge and new revelations about the finances of his misinformation operation.

On Thursday, a jury in Austin decided that Mr. Jones must pay more than $4 million in compensatory damages in the first of several defamation cases brought by parents of Sandy Hook victims. Days earlier, the conspiracy theorist initiated Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings in Houston for Free Speech Systems, the parent company of his Infowars media network.

Lawyers for the victims families, who said they faced years of harassment after Mr. Jones falsely portrayed them as actors participating in a hoax, described the bankruptcy filing last week as a diversion tactic to delay other damages trials.

A lawyer for Scarlett Lewis and Neil Heslin, whose 6-year-old son Jesse Lewis died in the 2012 attack, presented records on Wednesday showing that Infowars made more than $800,000 a day at one point in 2018 (Mr. Jones said the amount stemmed from a particularly lucrative period during the Conservative Political Action Conference).

Bernard Pettingill, Jr., a forensic economist and former economics professor at the Florida Institute of Technology, testified on Friday that Mr. Jones is a very successful man and that his and Free Speech Systems combined net worth likely fell between $135 million and $270 million.

Mr. Joness lawyer, J. Federico Andino Reynal, said in his closing statement on Friday that we didnt get any evidence as to what Alex Jones actually has today, we didnt get any of what F.S.S. has today, what money they have, what assets they have to pay.

But Mr. Pettingills testimony on Friday, as well as the Free Speech Systems bankruptcy filing, yielded several key observations about Mr. Joness finances, including:

Since then, there has been a nice healthy increase in the companys revenue, including from sales of survivalist merchandise and supplements, and it brought in more than $64 million last year, he said.

At one point, Mr. Jones was paying himself an average of $6 million a year, Mr. Pettingill said.

In its bankruptcy filing, Free Speech Systems reported $14.3 million in assets as of May 31, with $1.9 million in net income and nearly $11 million in product sales.

Free Speech Systems also had nearly $79.2 million in debts, 68 percent of it in the form of a note due to PQPR Holdings, an entity that names Mr. Jones as a manager.

Last year, after Mr. Jones was ruled liable by default in the Sandy Hook cases, he began funneling $11,000 per day into PQPR, Mr. Pettingill said.

The gigantic loan from PQPR, a shell company without any employees, is actually Mr. Jones using that note as a clawback to pay himself back, Mr. Pettingill said, although Mr. Joness lawyer insisted that PQPR is a real company. Another note is set to mature when Mr. Jones is 74 years old (he is now 48).

Mr. Pettingill said he had managed to track nine private Jones-associated companies, but had to cobble together information in part because Mr. Joness team resisted discovery orders.

We cant really put a finger on what he does for a living, how he actually makes his money, he said.

His organization chart is an inverted T, which means everything flows to Alex Jones. Alex Jones made all the major decisions, and I think Alex Jones knows where the money is, Mr. Pettingill said. He can say hes broke, he has no money, but we know thats not correct.

The judge in the Austin case, Maya Guerra Gamble, chastised Mr. Jones in court on Wednesday for claiming under oath that he was bankrupt when the issue had yet to be adjudicated.

You may not tell this jury that you are bankrupt that is also not true, Ms. Gamble told Mr. Jones after admonishing him for lying that he had complied with discovery requirements.

Mr. Jones and associates such as the Genesis Communications Network, which helped syndicate his show for decades, have claimed to be down to the financial wire, using the defamation cases as an opportunity to beg fans for donations.

Mr. Jones has complained that his revenue plunged after he was barred from major social media platforms in 2018. Mark Bankston, a lawyer for the families, pushed back in court on Wednesday: Well, after your deplatforming, your numbers keep getting better, he said.

Mr. Pettingill concurred on Friday, saying that Mr. Joness rabid fans had helped keep his revenue constant even after he was removed from the platforms, in part through donation drives and merchandise sales during the Covid-19 pandemic. Wesley Ball, a lawyer for the family, noted later in his closing statement that his legal team had come across a text message showing that Mr. Jones had made almost $4 million in one week, years after he was kicked off his platforms.

Read more here:

What the Trial of Alex Jones Revealed About His Finances - The New York Times

Big Tech’s Ban on Alex Jones Fans the Flames of His Conspiracy Theories – Reason

In 2018, conspiracy theorist Alex Jones and his website, Infowars, were banned by YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, and Apple for violating these platforms' hate speech policies.Four years later, the largest social media platforms have prevented the promotion of a documentary about him as well.

Private companies are well within their rights to make the content moderation decisions they deem appropriate. Jones' belief system, which his millions of listeners must find compelling on some level, is predicated on the idea that there's some kind of totalitarian world government lurking in the shadows, either attempting to seize control or already in control of us. It's from this logic that Jones' skepticism of major tragedies and events stems. He has suggested, for instance, that 9/11 and the Sandy Hook school shooting might have been pre-orchestrated, designed by those in charge, and he subsequently faced defamation lawsuits from the parents of some of the shooting victims. Big Tech, the media, and each presidential administrationexcept Trump'sare all frequent targets of Jones' unrestrained ire and boundless grievances.

But when Big Tech firms uniformly decline to platform anything Jones-related, they may be fueling the flames of his paranoia. As the old saw has it, just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they're not out to get you.

I went to the movie premiere ofAlex's War last Saturday ahead of its release date, which is today, and walked away with a heightened appreciation for Jones' charisma but stronger disdain for his shoddily substantiated theories. Though he's forcefully asserted that the 2020 election was stolen from former President Donald Trump, Jones has provided meager evidence to back such claims up, and even admitted in the Q&A afterward that his stolen-election beliefs were somewhat pre-formed. But that didn't stop him from assembling with his acolytes at the Georgia Capitol where results were being certified, and at the January 6 rally in Washington which turned violent. (Jones left prior to the breach of the Capitol building.)

Still, when Big Tech platforms suppress Jones, and the work of those interested in Jones, like Alex's Wardirector Alex Lee Moyerwho made the Sundance and SXSW rounds via her first documentary, which explored the world of incelsthey lend credibility to his conspiracy theories and increase the illicit appeal of his views to the audiences who continue to seek him out, who may in fact be enchanted by the heightened allure.

For example, Instagram blocked Moyer and team from doing paid promotions for the documentary; TikTok removed theAlex's Wartrailer because it contained or promoted "hateful behavior"; Google Ads said the trailer was in violation of its policies, too, and warned Moyer not to try again; Meta said the trailer could not be promoted due to "inauthentic behavior or violations of our Advertising Policies and Community Guidelines," but failed to specify what those violations entailed.

These tech platforms are well within their rights to deplatform or suppress whoever they want; they deliberately set community standards, which are consented to by users, and sometimes, in content moderators' eyes, transgressed by conspiracy-mongers like Jones. But by deplatforming both Jones and those who critically engage with his ideas, they're unintentionally hyping his beliefs. By making them illicit, platforms are implying that they're dangerous, rather than laughable or uninteresting. Jones' whole point is that there are shadowy figures in power that are subjugating and manipulating us; he, like Trump, fixates on media malfeasance and double standards, which is a compelling message to his roughly 5 million followers (as of 2016, though such numbers are hard to pin down, especially as his feeds have been whack-a-moled out of existence). That message is plausibly made more compelling if Jones can lodge a fresh grievance against Big Tech.

There's no reason to believe such censorship will snuff Jones out. It may, in fact, do the opposite. He's a shrewd businessman, successfully hawking supplements ("Super Male Vitality" drops!), bulletproof vests, and other doomsday-prep materials; he maintains a huge audience; he's been on Joe Rogan's show repeatedly (which has outraged some Spotify employees); he's the subject of a new documentary. He knows how to parlay controversy into earned media for his kooky theories, and the result may be the very opposite of what those who would deplatform him are trying to achieve.

Continued here:

Big Tech's Ban on Alex Jones Fans the Flames of His Conspiracy Theories - Reason

A New Cloud Company Looking to Disrupt The Old Order – Digital Journal

Liberation Technology Services (LTS) is a wholly owned U.S. technology infrastructure company that provides clients with freedom from censorship, advanced security, and full ownership of their data.

In recent years, the information technology industry has been incredibly volatile. There have been increases in political censorship and cyber security breaches, including malware and ransomware attacks. This new development has triggered the search for an alternative platform that promotes freedom of speech and true ownership of data. This is where Liberation Technology Services comes in.

Liberation Technology Services is a full-service technology infrastructure company that specializes in high-availability private cloud hosting, web and app development, cutting-edge cyber security as well as management and protection of online assets. The company caters to companies, campaigns, and organizations that care about growing their business, while securing their online presence.

LTS is one of only a few U.S. cloud companies that offers a truly independent platform. This means that it fully owns and controls its entire infrastructure, in contrast to other so-called independent platforms that are merely resellers for companies engaging in data mining, censorship and de-platforming. Not surprisingly, this aligns with the companys vision of offering organizations a level of security and independence that cannot be found elsewhere.

LTS offers hosting services that come with faster loading speed, advanced security solutions and a 99% uptime guarantee, as well as numerous other services. To provide enhanced speed and security for the sites on its platform, the company uses a global CDN edge network. LTS also offers HyperSpeed, an option that can boost client hosting performance by up to ten times normal speeds. This feature puts LTS far ahead of other standard server software like Apache and Nginx.

In addition, LTS is focused on providing some of the best cyber-security for its customers and has partnered with several state-of-the-art cyber security technology firms to protect its clients data from ever-evolving threats. This military grade security is made up of customized and robust security protocols to ensure the protection of its clients sites on many levels.

One of LTS core value propositions is to be a one-stop shop for its clients every need. As a result, the company offers services like web development, marketing, and ecommerce. LTS also offers custom solutions such as WordPress hosting, mobile solutions, management, and ecommerce. All of these services are made possible thanks to the dedicated team of expert developers that the company has on stand-by to deliver customized solutions to its clients.

LTS is also building the first zero-knowledge freedom-focused edge cloud network that is expected to provide a near zero-latency experience. Users are expected to stay tuned for more news and updates on this exciting new technology.

Please visit liberationtek.com to learn more about LTS and its many offerings.

Media ContactCompany Name: Liberation Technology ServicesContact Person: Andrew RiddaughEmail: Send EmailCountry: United StatesWebsite: https://www.liberationtek.com

Read more:

A New Cloud Company Looking to Disrupt The Old Order - Digital Journal

Nazis try to get on the ballot in Massachusetts – but may not have collected enough signatures – Universal Hub

Dianna Ploss used to just be another screamy Trump crank, but now she's running for governor - as an independent - with a platform that calls for a crusade against Jews in Massachusetts.

Today's the deadline to file enough signatures statewide to get a place on the November ballot; Ploss said Sunday she doesn't think she'll have enough.

Her would-be lieutenant-governor candidate, Jim Rizoli, is a "proud" Holocaust denier who used to froth about Brazilian immigrants in Framingham but now concentrates on hating Jews and she's assisted by a woman she calls her "minister of Third Reich Advocacy."

In one video, Ploss said she'd keep bitching about the Jews until they hang her. But then, she continued, "they don't do that, that's too easy." Instead, she said, Jews punish their enemies by cutting open their stomachs, and reaching for their intestines, which they then tie to a pole and make the victims run around the pole.

"Maybe that's where they got the Maypole from," she said.

She won't come anywhere close to winning, of course, but worth remembering, perhaps: In 2018, virulent homophobe and forced-birth advocate Scott Lively got 98,214 votes in the Republican primary against Charlie Baker.

Link:

Nazis try to get on the ballot in Massachusetts - but may not have collected enough signatures - Universal Hub

Alexs War: A film about the de-platformed conspiracy theorist hits iTunes July 29 – BGR

For far-right figures whove been de-platformed everywhere else, Apples ecosystem is increasingly one of the last places left online where their popularity is nonetheless surging. Case in point: Alexs War, a film about Alex Jones from documentarian Alex Lee Moyer, which has surged on the iTunes pre-order chart ahead of its release later this month, on July 29.

The film promises an examination of the rollercoaster career of Americas most infamous, charismatic, and divisive public figure. Jones, of course, has been de-platformed from just about every major, mainstream internet service. Hes persona non grata among the establishment media. And yet, theres Alexs War on the iTunes top pre-orders chart. Listed just behind Top Gun: Maverick, Elvis, and Where the Crawdads Sing.

Making the popularity of Alexs War all the more extraordinary? It seems to largely be word-of-mouth driving that preorder interest. Moyer, for example, has reportedly said Google wouldnt let the films team buy ads to promote it. Likewise, other major platforms like Facebook and TikTok are clamping down on publicity for the movie, which contains content that Facebook has said contains violations of its community guidelines.

Who is Alex Jones? reads the synopsis for Alexs War on iTunes. Looking past caricature and propaganda to a searching and human character study, Alexs War draws on twenty-five years of Infowars archives, unprecedented personal interviews, and months of backstage access, to examine the shattering of our shared national narrative through the rollercoaster career of one of Americas most infamous, charismatic and divisive public figures.

Divisive, indeed. Jones, to say the least, has a long history of making inflammatory statements and spreading conspiracy theories. Among other things, families of the Sandy Hook school shooting victims sued him after he made suggestions that the tragedy was staged. In an April deposition, Jones defiantly cited free speech as a defense.

If questioning public events and free speech is banned because it might hurt somebodys feelings, we are not in America anymore, Jones said, according to The Associated Press. They can change the channel.

Jones continued: They can come out and say Im wrong. They have free speech.

Along these same lines, former Trump aide Steve Bannon got his own ban from services like Twitter and YouTube. Yet his War Room podcast consistently ranks as one of the top shows on Apples podcasts chart. It was a comment during the War Room podcast, in fact, that resulted in the Bannon ban. Back in 2020, Twitter permanently suspended him after a flippant comment about beheading Dr. Anthony Fauci.

As for Jones, Moyer was present at the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, to shoot footage for Alexs War. She was one of a small handful of documentarians there that day.

Jones own de-platforming, meanwhile, came swiftly in 2018. Google and Facebook both started deleting content associated with Jones and his website Infowars. Apple followed suit, pulling multiple podcasts associated with Jones.

In a statement at the time to TechCrunch, Apple said its actions were in response to hate speech found in Jones content. We believe in representing a wide range of views, so long as people are respectful to those with differing opinions, the Apple spokesperson said.

Follow this link:

Alexs War: A film about the de-platformed conspiracy theorist hits iTunes July 29 - BGR

Meme Creators Want Instagram To Change Its Content Moderation Policies And Stop Deplatforming Them – BuzzFeed News

Instarrection's co-organizer Anjelica, a 32-year-old from Connecticut, told BuzzFeed News in a call that she and Ana bonded over the struggle to remain on the platform. She has created 10 different accounts over the years, but is best known as @hornymermaid, where she posts selfies and absurdist memes for her 20,000 followers.

In 2021, she shared a clothed selfie with the caption link in bio where there were links to her other social media profiles and her OnlyFans page. She said Instagram removed her account for sexual solicitation. Her followers then began encouraging her to leave Instagram for Twitter and Reddit, where nudity guidelines are less strict.

I dont even post nudity. I have an OnlyFans and I post memes because thats how I want to run my business, she said. I think people see the memes and gravitate toward my personality, and eventually check out my other link because they think Im funny. That attraction is part of why Im so successful, and I have to be able to do both.

Anjelica regained access to the account after having a meeting with Instagram in early July. She said that was a nice starting point but her goal is to have constant dialogue with the platform.

Revealing your face as a woman online will get you so much hate. Angry incels will mass report all our stuff, then it gets taken down or suppressed by the algorithm, Anjelica said. Why is it so hard for marginalized voices and women to express themselves? Were not hurting anybody.

Read the rest here:

Meme Creators Want Instagram To Change Its Content Moderation Policies And Stop Deplatforming Them - BuzzFeed News

Dozens of States Are Jumping on the Social Media Censorship Bandwagon – Gizmodo

Photo: Chip Somodevilla (Getty Images)

2022 may be remembered as a turning point for social media regulation, or maybe more aptly, failed social media regulation. Though Texas and Florida managed to dominate headlines recently for their constitutionally questionable deplatforming laws, theyre far from the only states trying to get creative with managing content on social media platforms.

A recent Politico analysis found 34 states, many conservative-leaning but not all, have proposed bills or passed laws vying to influence the way social media companies handle their users content. In conservative-led states, the dominating trend here follows the Texas and Florida mold. States ranging from Ohio to Mississippi are trying to write laws that would prohibit companies from removing or moderating users content based on their political viewpoint. A handful of these states are trying to make those laws a reality by attempting to designate large social media firms as common carriers, a designation that would have them look and feel more like telecoms.

On the other hand, legislators in Democratically led states like New York and California are attempting to forward legislation that would encourage social media companies to take a heavier-handed approach to moderating certain types of content deemed harmful. Though the implications arent equivalent in effect, both strategies have drawn the attention of tech industry groups like NetChoice and first amendment scholars who say the bills could diverge fundamentally from precedents around how tech companies operate. Some of these proposals, experts say, are almost certainly violations of the first amendment.

Here are a few of the states with proposals attempting to shake up social media.

Read the original post:

Dozens of States Are Jumping on the Social Media Censorship Bandwagon - Gizmodo

Amid fears of election subversion, DeSantis’ handpicked secretary of state will oversee his race – Salon

Democrats and election experts have sounded the alarm for months about the growing risk of election subversion as conspiracy theorists backed by former President Donald Trump run for secretary of state in key swing states. But with little fanfare or media attention, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis earlier this year hand-picked a right-wing ally who refuses to acknowledge President Joe Biden's 2020 victory to oversee his re-election race.

Around the country, Republicans pushing Trump's "Big Lie" about the 2020 election are running to win jobs overseeing the next election. Trump loyalist Jim Marchant, who baselessly claims that elections have been illegitimate for more than a decade, recently won the Republican nomination for secretary of state in Nevada. The Michigan Republican Party is backing Kristina Karamo, who has pushed ludicrous conspiracy theories about the 2020 race being stolen. Trump has also endorsed Mark Finchem as Arizona's next secretary of state after he attended the Jan. 6 Capitol rally and introduced a bill to decertify 2020 election results.

But Florida, like Texas, allows the governor to appoint the state's election chief. After Secretary of State Laurel Lee resigned to run for a U.S. House seat this spring, DeSantis simply handed his right-wing ally the job.

DeSantis in May appointed controversial state Rep. Cord Byrd to oversee elections in the state, touting him as an "ally of freedom and democracy." DeSantis won his first election by less than half a percentage point against Democrat Andrew Gillum, the former mayor of Tallahassee.

"I look forward to his successes ensuring Florida's elections remain safe, secure and well-administered," DeSantis said in a statement. A news release from DeSantis' office praised Byrd as "a staunch advocate for election security, public integrity, the fight against big tech censorship and the de-platforming of political candidates."

In his own statement, Byrd vowed to ensure that "Florida continues to have secure elections and that we protect the freedom of our citizens in the face of big-tech censorship and ever-growing cybersecurity threats."

Byrd has refused to acknowledge Biden's win over Trump, citing unspecified "irregularities" in the 2020 election.

"He was certified as the president. He is the president of the United States," Byrd said after he was appointed. "There were irregularities in certain states. I'm not the secretary of state of Wisconsin or Pennsylvania or Arizona. That's up to their voters. We in Florida had a successful election in 2020. And that's what I want to continue to have in 2022."

There is no evidence of any issues in the states Byrd cited that may have improperly swayed the election.

Byrd said Florida's election was "successful and accurate" but added that "we also know that people want to interfere and sow chaos," defending a spate of new voting restrictions, some of which a federal judge later ruled unconstitutional because they disenfranchised Black voters.

Byrd and his wife Esther, who was appointed by DeSantis to the State Board of Education, quit Twitter last year after she tweeted about "the coming civil wars" during the Capitol riot.

"In the coming civil wars (We the People vs the Radical Left and We the People cleaning up the Republican Party), team rosters are being filled. Every elected official in DC will pick one. There are only 2 teams With Us [or] Against Us," Esther Byrd tweeted as the Capitol was under siege. "We the People will NOT forget!"

She also appeared to defend the rioters in another post she wrote on Facebook.

"ANTIFA and BLM can burn and loot buildings and violently attack police and citizens," she wrote, according to Florida Politics. "But when Trump supporters peacefully protest, suddenly 'Law and Order' is all they can talk about! I can't even listen to these idiots bellyaching about solving our differences without violence."

She also made "comments supportive of QAnon after the couple was photographed on a boat flying a QAnon flag," the outlet reported.

Cord Byrd dismissed criticism of his wife's comments last year, arguing that "people talk about civil wars in the Republican party."

"There are factions. People believe different things. It was a figure of speech and that's how it was intended," he told WJXT-TV.

Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.

Byrd, who will ultimately require confirmation by the Republican-led state Senate, will oversee the state's upcoming elections and the implementation of its new voting restrictions, including the creation of a new office in the Department of State to investigate allegations of irregularities. Democrats have pushed to hold confirmation hearings but have been ignored by Republican leaders.

While serving in the state House, Byrd co-sponsored the voting restrictions legislation and several other controversial bills, including a 2021 measure that imposed stiff criminal penalties in protests that turn violent after mass demonstrations following the Minneapolis police killing of George Floyd.

"We can act before it's too late. We do not need to have Miami or Orlando or Jacksonville become Kenosha or Seattle or Portland," Byrd said at the time. "We have the ability under House Bill 1 to act now to say you can protest peaceably but you cannot commit acts of violence, you cannot harm other people, you cannot destroy their property, you cannot destroy their lives."

Byrd also co-sponsored Florida's controversial "Don't Say Gay" bill, a 15-week abortion ban, a bill to ban schools from discussing race, and anti-trans and anti-immigrant legislation, according to the ACLU of Florida. Byrd also supported DeSantis' congressional map, which was adopted by the legislature and subsequently challenged in court for reducing the number of majority-Black districts in the state.

"Our main concern around this office is that there is no guardrail to ensure that under any administration it couldn't become a political tool," Abelilah Skhir of the ACLU of Florida told NPR.

During a debate on the state's 15-week abortion ban, Byrd clashed with Black lawmakers on the House floor, calling them "fucking idiots," according to the Orlando Sentinel.

State Rep. Angie Nixon said at the time that she was "disgusted" by Byrd's behavior.

"Byrd is unhinged," she tweeted, accusing him of "antagonizing and cussing at Black Caucus members." He "clearly has biases & lacks composure," she wrote.

Byrd's office later denied the report.

After Byrd's appointment, Nixon slammed DeSantis' choice, arguing that the top election official "should be a consensus builder whose sole focus is running free and fair elections for every citizen of our state."

"Cord Byrd is not that person," she said in a statement. "He is unqualified in both his credentials and his temperament, has proved time and again he will put partisanship ahead of good policy, and is unfit to lead the elections department of a diverse state of more than 20 million people."

Byrd said in a statement to NPR that he has "always advocated for the rule of law, and now serving as Florida's Secretary of State, that will not change."

The secretary of state's office said the allegations that Byrd would politicize the department "are simply not true and have been repeatedly addressed."

"This is a false narrative that appears to be perpetuated by inaccurate or incomplete news stories and by partisan political attacks," the office said. "The Secretary of State's office is nonpartisan and will not respond to those allegations."

DeSantis defended Byrd during a press conference in May, touting him as a champion of "election integrity."

"We are not going to have to worry in Florida about Zuckerbucks infiltrating our elections with Cord as secretary of state," the governor said, echoing a litany of election conspiracy theories. "We're not going to have to worry about ballot harvesting with Cord as secretary of state. We're going to make sure that the elections are run efficiently and transparently. But we are not going to allow these external influences to come in and to corrupt the operations. And we're certainly not going to allow political operatives to harvest all these votes, and then dump them somewhere."

So far, Democratic calls for a state Senate vote on Byrd's confirmation have fallen on deaf ears. State Sen. Randolph Bracy, a Democrat, said in a statement that Byrd "must be thoroughly vetted and confirmed by the full Senate body before he is able to preside over the upcoming midterm elections.

"He is taking over at a critical juncture and will be the first to oversee a new election security force which has unprecedented authority to hunt election and voting violations," Bracy said.

State Rep. Carlos Smith, a fellow Democrat, said Byrd may be DeSantis' "most frightening appointment to date."

"Florida now has a QAnon conspiracy theorist and promoter of the big lie overseeing our state elections and DeSantis' election police," he said. "We need a Secretary of State whose top priority is free and fair elections, not a hyper-partisan GOP loyalist who takes orders from Ron DeSantis. Our right to vote is sacred and I worry about what this could mean for our democracy."

Democrats running to challenge DeSantis have already asked for the Justice Department to keep a close eye on the secretary of state's new election police, citing Byrd's involvement.

Rep. Charlie Crist, D-Fla., a former Florida governor (and former Republican) who is running for the office again, sent a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland asking the Justice Department to "consider using all available authorities and resources to protect the rights of Florida voters."

Agriculture Commissioner Nikki Fried, another Democratic gubernatorial candidate, also cited Byrd when she asked the DOJ to keep tabs on the state.

"Due to these seriously concerning actions, it is imperative that the U.S. Department of Justice closely monitor the election-related actions of Florida officials and take appropriate federal action if necessary," she wrote, adding that the"collective measures" by DeSantis and the Florida legislature were "not isolated threats, but deliberate attempts to circumvent or override democratic norms. Discriminatory congressional maps, new voter suppression measures, and a Secretary of State with radical far-right views is a dangerous combination for Florida voters and the integrity of our elections."

Read more

about DeSantis' assault on voting

See the original post here:

Amid fears of election subversion, DeSantis' handpicked secretary of state will oversee his race - Salon

What is Mike Lees TEAM Act and how would it reform Big Tech? | Opinion – Deseret News

Conservatives across the country have grown increasingly distrustful of large online platforms. From content suppression during COVID-19 to the deplatforming of Parler to large-scale data breaches, high-profile incidents have led many on the center-right to question Big Techs influence over our lives.

With Republicans poised to gain seats in Congress in November, lawmakers should be looking ahead to the 118th Congress to address constituents concerns with Big Tech platforms without giving the Biden administration overreaching authority. Utah GOP Sen. Mike Lees Tougher Enforcement Against Monopolies Act, also known as the TEAM Act, should be a rallying point for lawmakers.

America is facing a panoply of competition concerns, not just in Big Tech, but across the entire economy. We need a holistic approach that benefits all consumers in every industry, Lee said on the Senate floor when introducing the legislation. We need to deal with all the monopolists hurting competition. The TEAM Act avoids the black-and-white pronouncements of other legislative proposals and instead updates the mechanics of how the antitrust laws are applied to address the enforcement gaps of recent decades.

Indeed, the act takes a comprehensive approach to reforming federal antitrust laws to hold Big Tech and other companies accountable and to promote competition, while codifying the consumer welfare standard, which has been the foundational principle of American antitrust law for decades.

Federal Trade Commission Commissioner Christine Wilson outlined this principle at the George Mason Law Review Annual Antitrust Symposium in 2019. Under the consumer welfare standard, business conduct and mergers are evaluated to determine whether they harm consumers in any relevant market. Generally speaking, if consumers are not harmed, the antitrust agencies do not act, she said.

In order to determine if consumers are harmed by a business practice, antitrust enforcers at the FTC and Department of Justice use objective economic analyses to identify actual or potential harms. They then conduct a cost-benefit analysis to determine whether the benefits of the business practice outweigh the harms to consumers. Finally, when the harms are determined to outweigh the benefits, antitrust enforcers seek legal remedies to correct the markets in question and punish offenders.

While antitrust enforcers can consider other market effects, consumer welfare is their north star.

It is clear that there are some instances where Big Techs business practices harm consumers. In fact, the FTC has taken dozens of actions against tech companies like Google, Twitter and Facebook for privacy violations. Most recently, the FTC filed suit against Facebook (now Meta) alleging that the company is illegally maintaining its personal social networking monopoly through a years-long course of anticompetitive conduct.All of these cases are based on the consumer welfare standard. In the case of Facebook, the FTCs revised complaint argues that the primary harm of Facebooks monopoly is that it deprives users of personal social networking in the United States of the benefits of competition, including increased choice, quality and innovation.

In many instances, antitrust law already offers a way for the government to step in and correct markets gone awry. Unfortunately, the advent of new business models like those of free online services makes antitrust enforcement more difficult than it is for traditional markets. Historically, one of the best methods used by antitrust enforcers to demonstrate consumer harm has been examining the cost of goods and services. But this calculus becomes more complex (if not impossible) when examining a free service like Facebook or Google Search.

To address these challenges, the TEAM Act would, among other things, codify the consumer welfare standard that currently only exists as a product of case law. This would clarify that courts can only consider consumer harms like price, quality of products, reduced choice and impact on innovation. Furthermore, it would specify that courts can only consider benefits that are in-market and likely to benefit consumers. Introducing such clarifications into statute should make it easier for antitrust enforcers to bring cases while weeding out frivolous enforcement actions not based in consumer welfare.

The TEAM Act is not perfect. Lawmakers should take steps to refine the legislation ahead of the next Congress. One issue that antitrust enforcers regularly face when handling online platforms and services is the question of market definition. For example, in its current case against Facebook, the FTC alleges that Facebook has effectively no competition in the market of personal social networking services. Facebook disagrees, arguing that it has lots of competition, including Snapchat, TikTok and other social media platforms. While case law will ultimately determine how certain markets should be defined, guidance from Congress could simultaneously aid enforcement agencies and simplify compliance.

With Congress now considering bills that would go much further in expanding the governments ability to regulate competition in ways that will have unintended consequences, lawmakers should consider prudent solutions to update existing antitrust laws to promote competition consistent with the principles of American law. Lees bill is a good place to start.

Luke Hogg is policy manager at the Lincoln Network, a nonprofit that focuses on the intersection of technological innovation and public policy.

Original post:

What is Mike Lees TEAM Act and how would it reform Big Tech? | Opinion - Deseret News