Epstein was murdered Chelsea Manning RT World News

The pedophiles prison guards were likely involved, Manning said on a recent podcast

US Army whistleblower Chelsea Manning told podcast host Ethan Klein that Jeffrey Epsteins apparent suicide in a Manhattan jail cell was likely a prison murder that correctional officers allowed to happen.

Arrested in 2019 and charged with sex trafficking of minors, Epstein was found hanging in his cell in Manhattans Metropolitan Correctional Center a month later. His death was ruled a suicide. However, video cameras covering Epsteins cell malfunctioned and two guards falsified records stating that they had monitored the sex offender on the night of his death, generating public skepticism about the suicide story.

Epsteins death was murder, Manning said on an episode of Kleins H3 Podcast on Friday. Thats how a prison murder happens. I know when it happens.

You wanna get rid of someone in prison? Thats how you do it, she added, referring to the apparent switching off of the security cameras covering Epsteins cell.

Manning, who was born a man, served in the US Army as an intelligence analyst until her arrest in 2010 for leaking classified material to WikiLeaks. Some of this material depicted possible US war crimes in Afghanistan and Iraq. Charged with espionage, she was locked up at a Marine Corps brig in Virginia that year. Manning was later transferred to a military correctional facility in Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, and was sentenced in 2013 to 35 years there.

Mannings sentence was commuted in 2017 by outgoing President Barack Obama. However, she served another stint in jail in Virginia between 2019 and 2020 for refusing to testify to a grand jury against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.

Manning has spoken extensively about her time behind bars, and told Klein that in her experience, prison guards were responsible for most of the violence in correctional facilities.

They f**k with people, she said. Imagine youre sitting there and your job is to watch inmates for 12 hours. Of course youre gonna screw with us.

Time and time again, the most violent and dangerous people in prison are the prison guards, Manning said. Just endless amounts of fear and anxiety ofwhat a[Correctional Officer] or prison guard of any variety was going to do. It haunts me to think, I dont associate someone in a prison uniform with a threat, but I see the CO uniform and its different.

Epstein was a well-connected financier whose frequent contacts included former US Presidents Bill Clinton and Donald Trump, Microsoft CEO Bill Gates, and British royal Prince Andrew. While his death ensured that some details of these relationships would never be brought to light, it also resulted in the prosecution of Prince Andrew and of Epsteins long-term girlfriend and madam Ghislaine Maxwell. Andrew paid a settlement to a woman accusing him of sexual assault in March, and Maxwell was found guilty on five counts of sex trafficking involving a minor in December 2021.

You can share this story on social media:

Read more from the original source:
Epstein was murdered Chelsea Manning RT World News

Epstein was ‘murdered’ says US whistleblower Chelsea Manning

Chelsea Manning is in no doubt as to the fate of convicted sex-offender Jeffrey Epstein, and has used her own experiences of the American prison system to come to her conclusion.

Manning was speaking on the Jan 10th 'After Dark' episode of the H3H3 podcast to hosts Ethan and Hila Klein.

Prompted by Ethan, she was asked her opinion on the circumstances of Epstein's death based on her time as a fairly high-profile prisoner.

And Chelsea's answer was straight to the point.

"Murder, that's how a prison murder happens. I know. That stuff happens. Some of theses stories are in my book," said Manning in response.

"You wanna get rid of someone in prison? That's how you do it."

On August 10, 2019, Guards found Epstein unresponsive in his jail cell where he was awaiting a trail on sex-trafficking charges.

His death was ruled as suicide by hanging, but despite the official verdict, the incident has become a lightning-rod for conspiracy theories and a number of allegations, including Manning's.

Manning's answer was based on her experiences of the United States prison system, and in particularly the actions of guards.

"I just gotta' say, time and time again - the most violent people in the prison are the prison guards, every single time, just endless amounts of fear and anxiety of what a correctional guard of any variety was going to do. It haunts me to say, I don't associate the prison uniform with violence, but I see the CO uniform and it's different."

"I would say that there's the rule of thirds. There are guards who care, they think they are doing a service and they try to be fair - it's a fast turnover rate. Then there are the guards who look the other way, treat it as a paycheck. Then there's the sadistic ones, the ones who play games and lie and cheat and steal, and get away with it. The other third who look the other way, don't do anything."

Manning's currently untitled memoir will release later this year.

See the article here:
Epstein was 'murdered' says US whistleblower Chelsea Manning

Chelsea Manning dodges question about rumoured relationship with Grimes

(DIRK WAEM/BELGA MAG/AFP / ANGELA WEISS/AFP / Getty Images)

Chelsea Manning has spoken candidly about keeping her personal life private, as she avoided answering any questions about her rumoured relationship with Grimes.

The 34-year-old former whistleblower, who was previously imprisoned for passing classified information to WikiLeaks, was asked if the dating rumours about her and the 34-year-old musician were true during a recent interview with The Daily Beast.

In response, Manning said that she was not going to discuss her dating life or the speculation around it, before acknowledging how she prefers to keep [her] private life private.

Im not gonna get into my dating life, she explained. Theres been a lot of speculation and a lot of news stories. I have not changed my perspective on this: I dont like speculation about my private life. I prefer to keep my private life private. I dont want to create a precedent either.

She also said that because she doesnt want people to think shes open to discussing her private life, she wont confirm or deny any rumours being spread about her.

Another concern that I have is I dont want to confirm or deny anything in my private life because I dont want to make it seem like Im open to having people digging into my personal life, real or imagined, she explained. I see a lot of people struggling with this, and I dont want to get sucked into celebrity-culture stuff.

However, Manning did address where her hometown is, detailing how she resides in New York when shes not travelling.

The one thing I will say is that I live entirely in New York, she added. I dont know where this idea came about that I would live remotely close to Texas. I travel a lot, but Im based in New York.

Last March, Page Six reported that, following her second split with Elon Musk, Grimes had begun dating Manning. The musician and Tesla founder share two children,X A-Xii, two, and Exa Dark Siderl, six months, together.

Theyre getting serious. They U-Hauled it, a source told the publication about Manning and Grimes. Theyve been living together in Austin.

Story continues

The pair were spotted interacting on Twitter that same month, as Grimes tweeted that she had been postponing her appearance on a YouTubers twitch stream, like ten times, because she kept not being in LA. In response, Manning tweeted: vouch.

Although neither Grimes and Manning have confirmed their relationship, The Daily Beast discussed how Elon Musk had tweeted transphobic memes at the time, when rumours first circulated about his exs new partner.

According to the publication Musks memes seemed like subtweets about Manning, as she is a transgender woman. In response, the security consultant expressed how the business magnates tweets, at the time, definitely seemed transphobic.

My response was a meme back, she explained. The one thing I will say is: he around that time definitely seemed transphobic, and rumour or speculation aside, thats off-limits. Im going to respond to it. Any transphobia in a transphobic environment is not OK.

Last April, Musk had shared a tweet that said: If our twitter bid succeeds, we will defeat the spam bots or die trying! And authenticate all real humans.

Mannings meme, in response to Musk, featured a cartoon girl, with pink hair, holding her hand up and frowning, as the text next to the photo reads: A billionaire occupying your mind rent free.

In the second part of the meme, that same girl could be seen smiling and wearing a shirt with the transgender flag on it, as the text reads: Occupying a billionaires mind rent free.

See more here:
Chelsea Manning dodges question about rumoured relationship with Grimes

Chelsea Manning dodges Grimes relationship questions

Chelsea Manning dodged questions about her relationship with musician Grimes by refusing to talk about her personal life.

The Daily Beast asked the famed whistleblower about her romance with the Genesis singer, and in response Manning drew a line in the sand.

Im not gonna get into my dating life. Theres been a lot of speculation and a lot of news stories. I have not changed my perspective on this: I dont like speculation about my private life, Manning told the publication.

I prefer to keep my private life private. I dont want to create a precedent either. Another concern that I have is I dont want to confirm or deny anything in my private life because I dont want to make it seem like Im open to having people digging into my personal life, real or imagined.

Manning, 34, continued to explain that she doesnt want to get sucked into celebrity-culture stuff but acknowledged that shes based in New York.

Page Six broke the news in March that Grimes, 34, had started dating Manning after her relationship with Elon Musk ended for the second time. Grimes and the Tesla founder share two children.

Theyre getting serious. They U-Hauled it, a source told us of Manning and Grimes fast-paced nature of their relationship. Theyve been living together in Austin.

Our insider also noted that Manning still had her Brooklyn apartment, where she remains when not spending time with Grimes.

Neither Grimes nor Manning has publicly confirmed the relationship, but around the time that we published our exclusive report, 50-year-old Musk began tweeting seemingly transphobic memes. The Daily Beast speculated that they were directed at the couples relationship, as Manning is a transgender woman.

My response was a meme back. The one thing I will say is: he around that time definitely seemed transphobic, and rumor or speculation aside, thats off-limits, Manning told the outlet.

Im going to respond to it. Any transphobia in a transphobic environment is not OK.

See original here:
Chelsea Manning dodges Grimes relationship questions

Will Julian Assange be extradited to the U.S.? Where his case stands now – NPR

Stella Assange, wife of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, speaks in front of the U.K. Home Office in London as protesters demand Julian Assange's release on May 17. Home Secretary Priti Patel signed the extradition order on Friday. Dan Kitwood/Getty Images hide caption

Stella Assange, wife of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, speaks in front of the U.K. Home Office in London as protesters demand Julian Assange's release on May 17. Home Secretary Priti Patel signed the extradition order on Friday.

Julian Assange is another step closer to trial in the U.S., where he faces 18 federal counts related to his publishing classified diplomatic cables and sensitive military reports from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

On Friday, the British government formally ordered the WikiLeaks founder to be extradited but Assange has two weeks to appeal that order from the U.K.'s Home Office.

"This is disappointing news that should concern anyone who cares about the First Amendment and the right to publish," Assange's attorney, Barry Pollack, said. "The decision will be appealed."

U.K. authorities arrested Assange in April of 2019, as the U.S. unsealed an indictment accusing him of a criminal conspiracy resulting in "one of the largest compromises of classified information in the history of the United States."

A federal grand jury indicted Assange in the Eastern District of Virginia. If he loses his appeal and is extradited, his first court appearance would be in the Albert V. Bryan U.S. Courthouse in Alexandria, Va., just outside of Washington, D.C. The case is assigned to District Judge Claude M. Hilton.

If Assange is convicted, he could face up to 10 years in prison for each of the 17 most serious felony counts against him although the Justice Department notes, "Actual sentences for federal crimes are typically less than the maximum penalties."

The U.K. Home Office said British courts had not found extradition would be incompatible with Assange's "human rights, including his right to a fair trial and to freedom of expression."

"That last point is pretty crucial," London-based journalist Willem Marx told NPR. It's where legal experts believe Assange will focus his appeal, Marx says, adding "as well as on this really interesting potential political motivation his team allege [is] behind this extradition request."

The extradition fight has dragged on since Assange was jailed in the U.K. in 2019. A British magistrate ruled in Assange's favor in early 2021, saying he faced a high risk of suicide if he were sent into the U.S. justice system. But the U.S. appealed that decision and won.

In March, the U.K. Supreme Court ruled Assange couldn't appeal the lower court's ruling against him, saying his case "didn't raise an arguable point of law." One month later, another judge formally approved the U.S. extradition request, putting the next move in the hands of Home Secretary Priti Patel who then signed the extradition order.

Protesters gather outside the Home Office last month to demand Julian Assange's immediate release in London. Dan Kitwood/Getty Images hide caption

Protesters gather outside the Home Office last month to demand Julian Assange's immediate release in London.

U.S. prosecutors accuse Assange, 50, of helping Chelsea Manning, a former U.S. Army intelligence analyst who had a top-secret security clearance, to crack a password on Defense Department computers connected to the Secret Internet Protocol Network in 2010. The U.S. government uses the network to share classified information and material.

The charges against Assange have grown in number and detail, outlined in three separate indictments that were previously under a court seal. The most serious counts against him include conspiracy to obtain and disclose national defense information. The least serious charge Assange faces is the first one leveled against him: conspiracy to commit computer intrusion.

Assange has been fighting extradition for years, going so far as to jump bail and live in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London for seven years to elude the authorities. At the time, he was concerned both about U.S. espionage charges and also an extradition request over rape allegations in Sweden (which have since been dropped).

WikiLeaks has published a massive number of documents on its website and has also given information to journalists. The subjects include some 490,000 sensitive military reports from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, along with around 800 Guantanamo Bay detainee assessments and about 250,000 State Department cables.

By publishing unredacted sensitive documents, the U.S. says in court filings, Assange revealed the names of people who shared information or otherwise helped the U.S. despite potential repercussions not only in Iraq and Afghanistan, but also in China, Iran and Syria.

The initial federal charges focused on Assange's contacts with Manning. But in 2020, a new indictment alleged that Assange also recruited hackers from groups such as Anonymous, LulzSec and Gnosis to launch cyberattacks against government agencies, cybersecurity firms and other entities, hoping to compromise internal databases and gather sensitive documents.

Assange has insisted he was acting as a journalist, working for transparency and exposing secrets. But his critics, including the U.S. government, counter that he's attempting to use the First Amendment to shield himself from being held responsible for allegedly illegal actions.

Assange's defenders, including the American Civil Liberties Union, say the U.S. should drop the charges against him. For one thing, they note, the information he published was true.

A U.S. prosecution of Assange "would be unprecedented and unconstitutional," the ACLU's Ben Wizner said last December, "and would open the door to criminal investigations of other news organizations."

But the Justice Department says the charges against Assange aren't for receiving classified information, but for allegedly working to obtain that information through illegal hacking. It also says the charges aren't a response to him publishing U.S. secrets in bulk, but to revealing specific confidential information about people facing dangerous reprisals.

"Julian Assange is no journalist," said Assistant Attorney General for National Security John C. Demers, when he announced a raft of felony charges against Assange.

See original here:
Will Julian Assange be extradited to the U.S.? Where his case stands now - NPR

Spain’s High Court Demands Pompeo Testify on Alleged Plot to Kidnap or Kill Assange – Common Dreams

A judge on Spain's highest court has summoned former U.S. Secretary of State and Central Intelligence Agency Director Mike Pompeo to testify about an alleged Trump administration plot to kill or kidnap jailed WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to a report published on Friday.

Spain's ABC reports National High Court Judge Santiago Pedraz issued the summons, which compels Pompeo to testify as part of an investigation of alleged illicit spying on Assange by Spanish security firm U.C. Global while the Australian was exiled in the Ecuadorean Embassy in London.

Pompeo and former U.S. National Counterintelligence and Security Center Director William Evanina are also being called to testify about an alleged plot revealed last year by Yahoo! News to abduct or possibly murder Assange to avenge WikiLeaks' publication of the "Vault 7" documents exposing CIA electronic warfare and surveillance activities.

According to Yahoo! News' Zach Dorfman, Sean D. Naylor, and Michael Isikoff, discussions over kidnapping or killing Assange occurred "at the highest levels" of the Trump administration, with senior officials requesting "sketches" or"options" for assassinating him.

"They were seeing blood," one former Trump national security official told the reporters. "There seemed to be no barriers," said another.

U.C. Global whistleblowers allege company founder David Morales worked with the CIA to surveil Assange and Ecuadorean diplomats who worked at the London embassy. Former Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa had angered the Obama and Trump administrations by granting Assange asylum as he resisted going to Sweden to face sex crime allegations over fears he would be extradited to the United States.

Assange is charged in the U.S. with violating the 1917 Espionage Act and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act for conspiring with whistleblower Chelsea Manning to publish classified documentswhich revealed U.S. and allied war crimes and other misdeeds in Afghanistan, Iraq, and around the worldon WikiLeaks over a decade ago.

According to the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, Assange has been arbitrarily deprived of his freedom since he was first arrested in London on December 7, 2010. Since then, he has been held under house arrest, confined for seven years in the Ecuadorean Embassy, and jailed in London's Belmarsh Prison, where he currently awaits his fate after a judge recently approved a U.S. extradition request.

A decision by U.K. Home Secretary Priti Patel on whether to extradite Assange to the U.S. is reportedly imminent. Press freedom, anti-war, and other advocacy groups have urged Patel to reject the U.S. government's request.

"Assange would be unable to adequately defend himself in the U.S. courts, as the Espionage Act lacks a public interest defense," 20 groups wrote in an April joint letter to Patel. "His prosecution would set a dangerous precedent that could be applied to any media outlet that published stories based on leaked information, or indeed any journalist, publisher, or source anywhere in the world."

Pompeo, who is also wanted in Iran for his role in the January 2020 extralegal assassination of Iranian Gen. Qasem Soleimani in Iraq, is widely considered to be a possible 2024 Republican presidential candidate.

Read more from the original source:
Spain's High Court Demands Pompeo Testify on Alleged Plot to Kidnap or Kill Assange - Common Dreams

Dogwoof Acquires Tribeca-Bound Documentary ‘XY Chelsea’ – Variety

Dogwoof has acquired international sales rights to Tim Travers Hawkins XY Chelsea, an intimate portrait of Chelsea Manning, the former U.S. Army intelligence analyst who was recently incarcerated after refusing to testify in the WikiLeaks case.

Manning was was sentenced to 35 years at a maximum-security prison for leaking classified military information to WikiLeaks in 2013. Four years later, then-President Barack Obama commuted Mannings sentence as one of the final acts of his presidency.

The documentary, which will have its world premiere at Tribeca, follows Manning as she prepares her transition to living life for the first time as a free woman. Hawkins was granted exclusive and intimate access to Manning after her release from military prison.

Produced by Pulse Films, XY Chelsea will air on Showtime in North America in June, following its release in the U.K. on May 24.

XY Chelsea is a challenging documentary that speaks to many troubling phenomena of our times, yet is also raw, intimate and human-scale, said Hawkins, who wrote the documentary with Mark Monroe, Enat Sidi and Andrea Scott.

The director said he started making the film based on written diaries that Manning mailed to him, as well as recorded calls over the heavily monitored prison line.

As we announce the release of the film, she is locked up once again, proving both the urgency of her story and her strength and uncompromising rebelliousness, added Hawkins.

XY Chelsea was co-financed by the BFI, with the backing of National Lottery funding, Field of Vision and Topic Studio. It was produced by Julia Nottingham, Isabel Davis, Thomas Benski and Lucas Ochoa, and executive produced by Laura Poitras, Charlotte Cook, Vinnie Malhotra, Mary Burke, Michael Bloom, Lisa Leingang, Sharon Chang, Christos V. Konstantakopoulos, Blaine Vess, Marisa Clifford and Ryan Harrington

Anna Godas, CEO of Dogwoof, described XY Chelsea as a current, intimate and highly cinematic portrait of a key figure of the 21st century.

View post:
Dogwoof Acquires Tribeca-Bound Documentary 'XY Chelsea' - Variety

Review: ‘Breaking The News’ The press, politics, and profit – Socialist Appeal

Since the invention of the printing press, the news has had the power to educate and mislead people in equal measure. In the British Librarys new exhibition, Breaking the News (open until 21 August), the lid is lifted on the tendentious history of the bourgeois press.

The exhibition opens with video interviews with the residents of Grenfell Tower who, five years on, have seen precious little in the way of justice. Though the mainstream media were quick to descend on the community for interviews and features after the tragedy struck, victims concerns relating to corruption and safety violations were sidelined.

You are the mouthpiece of this government, one former resident said: You are the people who make this possible. You are the ones who validate it. You are just as culpable.

This neatly encapsulates the burning anger many feel towards not just the political establishment, but their lackeys in the mainstream media.

Though journalism is often presented as a noble crusade to speak truth to power, the exhibition reveals how profit is the bottom line motivating those in charge of the media monopolies.

The carefully curated spin of the press means that the coverage of big stories in fact lands further from the truth.

Though Britain makes a great song and dance about free speech, in contrast to declared pariahs such as Russia, the exhibition lays bare this assertion.

The press was and remains a tool in the arsenal of the ruling class, through which political censorship has been used in order to defend its own interests.

For example, in 2013, Edward Snowden leaked top-secret intelligence documents to the Guardian, detailing extensive mass surveillance. Despite the fact that the information had already been shared, the British state insisted on a purely symbolic act of intimidation, demanding that the computers which had been used to store the data were destroyed.

The damaged memory disks and hard drives, displayed in the Library, communicate the message beyond a doubt that the free press is only free so long as it doesnt undermine the interests of the ruling class.

Of course, this was only a symbolic gesture. Far more nefarious is the way Snowden, Chelsea Manning, Julian Assange, and many other whistleblowers, were pursued and prosecuted by the US state for their leaks of confidential information detailing US war crimes, privacy violations, and the like.

The exhibition, to its credit, does not present this as simply a one off. Though the means may have changed, the aims to censor and subvert ideas that threaten the status quo have precedence.

For instance, the 19th-century Chartist movement brought with it a huge proliferation of workers newspapers. Affordable papers and pamphlets carried the political slogans of the Chartists to the masses. To prevent this, the government introduced an increased taxation on papers.

Far from preventing the spread of the workers press, however, it simply accelerated it, as illegal papers were printed en masse. Some printers tried all sorts of ways to get around the increased tax.

Unfortunately, Breaking The News does not exhibit any of the Chartist papers. But it does display one pamphlet, the Political Handkerchief, printed on cloth to get around the stamp tax.

Eventually, the government was forced to renege their decision, realising that their efforts were in vain. Much to their dismay, it had become impossible to ban the revolutionary ideas of the Chartists and the class anger they contained.

The exhibition also exposes the role of the press in influencing elections, sometimes through outright fabrications.

The 1992 cover of The Sun proudly proclaiming Rupert Murdochs contribution to the Conservative victory over Kinnocks Labour is a major feature of the exhibition. The headline declares: Its The Sun Wot Won It.

Less known, but perhaps even more scandalous, is the 1924 Zinoviev letter, published by the Daily Mail four days before the 1924 election.

This false document, supposedly written by Zinoviev, the head of the Communist International at the time, claimed that Anglo-Soviet relations under a Labour government would be used to incite a revolution in Britain.

The front cover of the Mail read Civil War Plot by Socialists Masters. The Conservatives decisively won the election.

Displayed next to the Daily Mail is a telegram from Zinoviev, which describes the letter as a gross falsification and a clumsy election manoeuvre. But as they say in the business: Why let the facts spoil a good story?

We need not over-emphasise the power and sway of the press, however. Under the white-hot heat of the class struggle, the rejection of the mainstream medias official line and falsifications begins to assume a mass character.

Nothing proves this more than the experience of the English Revolution. The growing revolutionary mood in society was often expressed through radical religious ideas, which were proliferated through thousands of political pamphlets.

As state censorship grew weaker in the early years of the English Civil War, more and more unofficial printing presses sprung up, reflecting the thirst for ideas capable of changing the world.

The truth is that every newspaper is partisan. The bourgeois papers, however, shamefacedly attempt to conceal their real agenda beneath a thin veneer of impartiality.

But despite the fact that the whole exhibition reveals this, the British Library cannot resist one exhibit entitled the partisan press.

The exhibit is printed to show how so-called extreme political newspapers can distort the truth to suit their own agendas. This reveals the liberal limitations of the exhibition itself.

Far from Marxists needing to obscure the truth from workers, it is our duty to tell the truth.

As Leon Trotsky once wrote: The truth is always revolutionary. To lay bare the truth of their position before the oppressed is to lead them to the highroad of revolution.

From the English Revolution to the Chartists, the masses always seek to find their own political expression; their own independent class voice. The more this reflects the struggle of the working class, and formulates the tasks ahead, the more it will reverberate and find a wider echo.

As the crisis of capitalism deepens, we must make haste in building the revolutionary press, capable of acting as a tribune of the people.

Click here to subscribe to Socialist Appeal. The best way to undermine the bourgeois press is to build the workers press!

Read the original post:
Review: 'Breaking The News' The press, politics, and profit - Socialist Appeal

Grimes Will Donate Dune-Inspired Met Gala Accessories To Ukraine Relief – The Blast

Grimes wants to do some good to help Ukraine amid its ongoing war with Russia.

The singer made a big announcement Tuesday about how she wants to help BIPOC families in the war-torn country.

In an Instagram post shared on Tuesday, May 17, Grimes uploaded a photo of her look from the 2021 Met Gala, alongside up-close shots of the head-turning accessories she wore for the prestigious fashion event.

As The Blast previously, the Canadian musician dropped heads at the event where she walked the red carpet with her then-boyfriend billionaire Elon Musk.

The Genesis songstress donned a blue metallic outfit custom-made by Iris van Herpen of liquid silicone and hand-pleated silk.

Grimes outfit was Dune-inspired as part of a promotional for the science fiction film which was to be released the following month. The gown which reportedly took 900 hours to make was paired with a futuristic silver metal face mask, a giant silver sword, and lace-up platform boots from Marc Jacobs.

The mind-blowing sword accessory was allegedly made from unwanted automatic rifles that were liquefied.

Now, months after the 2021 Met Gala, Grimes wants to auction pieces from her iconic look to help Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) families that are still trapped in Ukraine.

In the accompanying caption of her post, the Shinigami Eyes star wrote, Hey guys Im auctioning stuff from my Met gala look last year to raise money to help get BIPOC families out of Ukraine since theyre having trouble exiting at the border.

She continued, explaining that stylist Turner in collaboration with HVW8 Gallery exhibited the works of 50 distinguished artists who aim to support Emergency Response & BIPOC families (black, indigenous, and people of color) in and out of Ukraine.

Each piece offers a unique interpretation of the theme resistance,' Grimes shared. The work will simultaneously be auctioned online via the Artsy exchange. All proceeds will go to Diaspora Relief and Razom, which will use the funds to provide food, shelter, and evacuation support to those in need.

Bidding for Grimes accessories would take place exclusively on Artsy and be closed on May 26.

In the comments section, fans cheered the wonderful initiative with several beautiful messages. One fan wrote, Ahhhh this is so amazing while another added, This is such an important thing your doing thank you Claire.

Per reports, the Chris Habana hard-shell facial is worth $1,200 while the elven ear cuffs by Sofia Pavlova are estimated at $1,500.

As you might know, Grimes, whose real name is Claire Elise Boucher, was in a relationship with Musk from 2018 to February 2022.

The pair first made headlines when they walked the 2018 Met Gala red carpet and are parents to two children, X A-Xii and daughter Exa Dark Siderl Musk, whom they secretly welcomed via surrogate after they had split.

However, it seems the 34-year-old singer has wasted no time in moving on. As The Blast previously covered, Grimes is suspected of being in a relationship with hacker Chelsea Manning.

Speculations surfaced after grimes referred to Manning as her boyfriend in her pregnancy announcement. The rumored couple is reportedly moving at a fast pace as sources claim that are already living together in Austin.

The lovebirds have been conversing online via Twitter for months, with Manning often seen responding to interactions that involve her.

Such was the case when comedian Hasan Minhaj shared a tweet about Grime promising to be a guest on his show to which Manning replied, Vouch.

Its unsure what he meant, but fans believe that is the start of a romantic relationship between the pair. Neither Grimes nor Manning have publicly denied or confirmed the rumors of a romance.

Read more:
Grimes Will Donate Dune-Inspired Met Gala Accessories To Ukraine Relief - The Blast

On Censorship and Disinformation – LA Progressive

The best way to combat disinformation is with more and better information. Censorship isnt the answer.

The Biden administration has reached a different conclusion, creating a Disinformation Governance Board under the Department of Homeland Security. This board is headed by Nina Jankowicz, an unelected official and an apparent partisan hack. One example: she dismissed the infamous Hunter Biden laptop story as a fairy tale involving a laptop repair shop; its now been confirmed that Hunters laptop was real, and so too was that repair shop.

Democrats, of course, dont have exclusive rights to censorship. Republicans always seem to be calling for books to be banned or education to be policed. But the real problem is much larger than partisan hackery and bickering. Efforts at censorship are all around us, couched as a way of protecting us from harmful lies and other forms of disinformation. Yet, as the comedian Jimmy Dore points out, the government isnt that concerned about protecting you from lies; it is, however, deeply concerned with denying you access to certain truths, truths that undermine governmental authority and the dominant narrative.

As a retired U.S. military officer and as a historian, the most insidious lies and disinformation Ive encountered have come from the government. Consider the lies revealed by Daniel Ellsberg and his leak of the Pentagon Papers. Consider the war crimes revealed by Chelsea Manning, aided by Julian Assange and Wikileaks. Consider the lies revealed in the recent Afghan War Papers. Consider the lies about the presence of WMD in Iraq, lies that were used to justify the disastrous Iraq War. The government, in short, is a center of lies and disinformation, which is precisely why we need an adversarial media, one that is willing to ferret out truth. Instead, were being offered a governmental Ministry of Truth in the form of a Disinformation Governance Board.

All things being equal, a democratic society thrives best when speech is as free as possible, trusting in the people to sort fact from fiction, and sound theories from blatant propaganda. And theres the rub: trusting in the people. Because the government doesnt trust us (remember Hillary Clintons comment about all those irredeemable deplorables), even as the government is often at pains to mislead and misinform us. As maverick journalist I.F. Izzy Stone said, all governments lie. Its truly nonsensical, then, to allow the government to police what is true and what is disinformation.

But dont we need some censorship in the name of safety or security or mental health or whatever? Sorry: censorship is rarely about safety, and it most certainly doesnt serve the needs of the vulnerable. Instead, it serves the needs of the powerful, those who already possess the loudest megaphones in the public square.

But doesnt someone like Donald Trump deserve to be censored because he spreads disinformation? Which is the bigger problem: Trump or censorship? I happen to think Trump is a divisive con man, but it was a bad precedent for Twitter to have banned him from tweeting. The bigger problem wasnt Trumps tweets but the medias obsessive coverage of them in pursuit of ratings. The way to combat a blowhard like Trump is to ignore him, and to correct him when needed. To combat his lies with the truth. We dont need a governmental Ministry of Truth to police the tweets of a former president. Not when the government is often the biggest liar.

The solution isnt censorship but an active, engaged, and informed citizenry, assisted by a fourth estate, the press, that is truly independent and adversarial to power. But the weakening of education in America, combined with a fourth estate that is deeply compromised by the powerful and often in bed with the government, means that these democratic checks on power are less and less effective. Hence calls for quick yet dangerous solutions like censorship, where the censors (governmental boards, private corporations) are opaque and almost completely unaccountable to the people.

Unless your goal is to give the already powerful a monopoly on speech, censorship is not the answer.

CrossPosted from Bracing Views.

Go here to see the original:
On Censorship and Disinformation - LA Progressive