Nine Years Ago: Assange And WikiLeaks Released The Guantnamo Files, Which Should Have Led To Prison’s Closure OpEd – Eurasia Review

Just over ten years ago, Pfc. Bradley Manning, stationed in Iraq as an intelligence analyst, undertook the largest leak in US history of classified government documents. These documents included 482,832 Army reports from theAfghanandIraq wars, 251,287US diplomatic cablesfrom around the world, andclassified military filesrelating to the prisoners at Guantnamo Bay, as well as the Collateral Murder video, which showed US military personnel killing civilians from helicopters and laughing about it.

Manning leaked the files to WikiLeaks, founded by Julian Assange, which published the documents in 2010 and 2011. The last releases were of theGuantnamo Files, on whichI worked as media partner, along with theWashington Post, McClatchy, theDaily Telegraph,Der Spiegel,Le Monde,El Pais,Aftonbladet,La RepubblicaandLEspresso.

WikiLeaks beganpublishing these filesnine years ago today, on April 25, 2011, introduced by an article I had written about their significance, WikiLeaks Reveals Secret Files on All Guantnamo Prisoners, posted on my own website that same day asWikiLeaks Reveals Secret Guantnamo Files, Exposes Detention Policy as a Construct of Lies.

As I explained when I publishedan article a year agocommemorating this anniversary, The files primarily revealed the extent to which the supposed evidence at Guantnamo largely consisted of statements made by unreliable witnesses, who told lies about their fellow prisoners, either because they were tortured or otherwise abused, or bribed with the promise of better living conditions.

As I also explained in my article a year ago, I had been working with WikiLeaks as a media partner for the release of the files for several weeks. I had been contacted by them as I wasrecovering from a grave illness, but we had to leap into action suddenly after theGuardianand theNew York Times, which oh, the irony had been leaked the files, suddenly began publishing them. I still stand by my introductory article, which I wrote in what I described as a few hours of turbo-charged activity after midnight on April 25, 2011, when I suddenly received notification of the imminent pre-emptive publication of the files by theGuardianandNew York Times.

Just one week after the files publication, the US government assassinated Osama bin Laden, a move that seems to have taken place in order to discredit the revelations in the Guantnamo Files, asa false narrative was propagated, originating from the CIA, claiming that it was torture and the existence of Guantnamo thathad led to bin Laden being located.

Despite my best efforts to expose the significance of the revelations in the Guantnamo Files, viaa million-word analysis of 422 prisoners files over 34 articles, no one in the US government has ever been held accountable for the crimes of torture and prisoner abuse after 9/11, including as the files so shockingly revealed at Guantnamo.

Instead, Bradley Manning now Chelsea Manning was charged, tried andconvictedin a court martial, and given a 35-year prison sentence (commutedby President Obama as he left office), while Julian Assange, after being given asylum in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London for nearly seven years, was arrested by the British authorities just over a year ago, on April 11, 2019, and imprisoned in the maximum-security Belmarsh prison, where he remains to this day, as he tries to prevent the British governments plans to extradite him to the US to face espionage charges relating to the publication of the files leaked by Manning.

As I have repeatedly explained over the last year, beginning witha Facebook post, and my article,Defend Julian Assange and WikiLeaks: Press Freedom Depends On It(and also seehere,hereandhere),the proposal to try Julian Assange for being a publisher ought to strike fear into the heart of anyone who cares about press freedom and freedom of speech.

As I put it in my Facebook post, his arrest ought to be of great concern to anyone who values the ability of the media, in Western countries that claim to respect the freedom of the press, to publish information about the wrongdoing of Western governments that they would rather keep hidden.

I also explained, Those who leak information, like Chelsea Manning who was subsequently imprisoned because of her refusal to testify in a Grand Jury case against WikiLeaks, andonly released last month, owing $256,000 in outrageously imposed fines need protection, and so do those in the media who make it publicly available; Julian Assange and WikiLeaks as much as those who worked with them on the release of documents theNew York Timesand theGuardian, for example.

I concluded my Facebook post by stating, If the US succeeds in taking down Julian Assange, no journalists, no newspapers, no broadcasters will be safe, and we could, genuinely, see the end of press freedom, with all the ramifications that would have for our ability, in the West, to challenge what, otherwise, might well be an alarming and overbearing authoritarianism on the part of our governments.

Unfortunately, the British government has shown no willingness to listen to the many powerful critics calling for Assanges extradition to be stopped. Instead, he remains imprisoned in Belmarsh, where his companions are convicted criminals regarded as dangerous, and where, like prisoners everywhere, sadly, including, of course,at Guantnamo he is at risk from the coronavirus that is tearing through all manner of detention facilities around the world.

In addition, the judge in his extradition case is determined to proceed with his extradition hearing next month, even though it is obvious that the entire system of court cases and witnesses is simply not feasible under the coronavirus lockdown. As WikiLeaks spokesperson Joseph Farrellexplained, Julians lawyers cannot prepare adequately, witnesses will not be able to travel, and journalists and the public will not have free, adequate and safe access to the proceedings. Justice will neither be done, nor seen to be done. Lawyers for Assange will be challenging this outrageous decision on Monday, but for now please think of Julian Assange and Bradley Manning, and the prisoners at Guantnamo on this anniversary.

For more on Assanges case, please check outthis new videopublished by theIntercept, featuring Glenn Greenwald speaking to the international human rights lawyer Jen Robinson, who has long represented Assange in this and other legal proceedings, and theWashington Posts media reporter Margaret Sullivan, who is one of the few major media figures to havedenounced the Assange indictment.

Please Donate Today Did you enjoy this article? Then please consider donating today to ensure that Eurasia Review can continue to be able to provide similar content.

Go here to read the rest:
Nine Years Ago: Assange And WikiLeaks Released The Guantnamo Files, Which Should Have Led To Prison's Closure OpEd - Eurasia Review

If Julian Assange is extradited, it’s the end of the rule of law in the West Eva Joly (Interview) – Pressenza

By Jrme Duval for MrMondialisation

Last March, one of our journalists had the opportunity to speak with Eva Joly, a lawyer and former Member of Parliament, about the details of the Assange case, as she herself knows the main protagonist personally. The subjects of their exchange included the hunt for the whistleblower, his revelations, his conditions of detention and his trial. And in parallel, the questions raised in terms of freedom of information, human rights and democracy. Exclusive interview.

Julian Assange has made a name for himself by exposing damning atrocities during the US invasion and war in Iraq and Afghanistan two wars fought with lies including the publication in April 2010 of the video Collateral murder, in which two Reuters reporters and several civilians were shot at from an American Apache helicopter. In the same year, WikiLeaks, of which he is the founder and spokesman, released hundreds of thousands of military and diplomatic documents relating to war crimes and acts of torture committed by the US military.

In order to protect himself from US prosecution behind a Swedish arrest warrant for rape charges that he has always denied, Julian Assange spent seven years in seclusion in the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where he took refuge in June 2012. The CIA spied on his every move, those of his relatives and defenders within the Embassy via the security company UC Global. On 11 April 2019, Ecuadorian President Lenn Moreno ended his right to asylum. He was arrested by British police the same day and has since been held in Belmarsh high security prison. Charged with espionage and 17 other charges, if the British justice system accepts the request for extradition to the United States, he faces 175 years in prison at the end of an extraordinary trial that began on 24 February.

One of the last images of Julian Assange at the time of his arrest in London

A former magistrate, Eva Joly made a name for herself during her career by investigating political and financial cases such as the Elf affair, which led to some thirty convictions, including that of Lok Le Floch-Prigent. She was an MEP for Europe Ecology-The Greens between 2009 and 2019 and is now a lawyer at the Paris bar.

Eva Joly, you have known Julian Assange for a long time, when you worked in Iceland with this young computer scientist on the project to transform Iceland into a paradise for journalism, for the protection of information. During an evening of solidarity with the whistleblower on 21 February at the Bourse du Travail in Paris, you alluded to a plane full of FBI agents landing in Iceland in 2011 on the pretext of an imminent computer attack against the government. Can you tell us more about this?

Eva Joly: The FBI was following Julian Assange, their agents knew he was in Iceland and they landed. They had contacted Interior Minister gmundur Jnasson, telling him that the Icelandic governments computer system was in danger and that the FBI was offering to help. But gmundur Jnasson understood the manoeuvre and he refused. It went unnoticed, but his testimony is still available on the Internet[i]. The fact that Julian Assange was under surveillance and that the United States wanted to get its hands on him very early on is a fact.

What is the situation of Chelsea Manning, convicted for the disclosure of the Collateral Murder video published by Wikileaks?

Eva Joly: We can see that the perpetrators of the war crime who appear in this video have not been prosecuted and yet they are easily identifiable. On the other hand, the whistleblower who showed this war crime is wanted. Chelsea Manning has been arrested and prosecuted. She is convicted of breaking into a computer system and disseminating confidential information. She was sentenced to 35 years in prison, then released by presidential pardon by Barack Obama on the last day of his presidency, she had already served seven years of her sentence. Paradoxically, she is still detained[ii], after being repeatedly convicted of contempt of court for refusing to testify before the Grand Jury against Assange. This shows that Julian Assange would not get a fair trial in the United States, which is one of the conditions for accepting extradition, since the requested country, in this case the United Kingdom, must be certain that the trial will be fair.

Julian Assanges lawyer, Edward Fitzgerald, said that on the first day of the trial, which opened in London on 24 February, his client had been stripped naked and searched twice, handcuffed 11 times and locked up five times in different holding cells. During his trial, Julian Assange was not seated with his lawyers as is customary, but was confined to the back of the courtroom, locked in a bullet-proof glass cage. Conditions that penalize the accused and seem unfair since they prevent him from following the proceedings, but which do not seem to bother the magistrate, Vanessa Baraitser. Is such a system unprecedented and is all this in accordance with the law?

Eva Joly: Here we see that the British are not treating Assange normally, because he was first sentenced to 50 weeks for breach of judicial supervision pronounced in 2012, when he was the subject of a Swedish extradition request. He had been allowed his liberty but forced to report regularly to the police. Julian Assange understood that he would be extradited to Sweden, he was convinced that it was a manoeuvre to hand him over to the United States, and he took refuge in the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where he was granted consular asylum. He stayed there for seven years. When Lenin Moreno, the President of Ecuador ended that asylum in 2017, the police took him out of the embassy in a very violent manner. He was taken to Belmarsh Prison, a maximum security prison. Now, Julian Assange is a multi-award winning journalist, he is not a terrorist. Especially since we know that the arrest warrant behind the Swedish extradition request had a very thin legal basis. We know that it was a manipulation. They sentenced Julian Assange almost to the maximum penalty for failure to comply with judicial supervision, 50 weeks, the maximum being 52, and they made him serve his sentence among those who detonate bombs and kill civilians. This is a signal sent by the United Kingdom, and it is unworthy of British justice. It is clear that the prison administration has instructions to execute his sentence first and then his pre-trial detention in the worst possible conditions.

Credit: John Englart | Support Wikileaks Free Julian Assange | (CC BY-SA 2.0)

In prison, he was placed in solitary confinement, and when he finished serving his sentence, he was remanded in custody, again awaiting trial. The solitary confinement ended only two or three weeks before the trial. There were also movements of prisoners who were sympathetic and asked that he be released from solitary confinement. All of this is abnormal. Julian Assange does not belong in a maximum security prison. The political situation is bad for Assange. We know that he was tortured and humiliated, and the UN rapporteur who assessed him has seen the impact of torture on his person.

At the hearing, when his lawyers requested that their client be allowed to sit next to them, the judge refused. The prosecutors office, representing the State, supported the lawyers request by justifying the customary nature of such a practice. Despite this, the judge opposed it. The whole situation is abnormal. According to the texts, it is the Westminster Magistrates Court that has to give an opinion, but the hearing is taking place at the Belmarsh Magistrates Court. In order to comply with the law, the Westminster staff and judges have been relocated so that Julian Assange does not have to be relocated. Are they open to attack on this aspect, or on the unfair conditions under which the trial was conducted?

Eva Joly: Yes, Assanges treatment is the treatment of a terrorist. He was refused his glasses for six months, which, along with the isolation, is bad treatment.

If the British justice system agrees to extradite him to the United States at the end of this trial, will Julian Assange risk the death penalty for espionage?

Eva Joly: There is a fundamental rule: you dont extradite to a country that practises the death penalty unless you have guarantees that the death penalty will not be requested or pronounced.

But you cant extradite people for political offences either

Eva Joly: Absolutely, its been more than a century since political prisoners were extradited. Otherwise you realize, we would have extradited the Chileans who were fleeing Pinochet, the Kurds who were fleeing Turkey, etc. The world is full of conflicts and political refugees who feel safe because if they get a visa, they know they cannot be extradited. It is true that, in this trial, the prosecution is trying to prove that, even if the offences of which Assange is accused are political, he could still be extradited.

Can extradition not be prevented by Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights[iii] which protects freedom of expression?

Eva Joly: All this should protect this multi-award winning journalist, but we see that it does not protect him, which makes us fear the worst for the future. The FBI has been following the case for a long time. Julian Assange was also being watched by a Spanish company working for the CIA while he was granted political asylum in the Ecuadorian embassy in London. If Julian Assange is extradited, it is the end of the rule of law in the West as we have built it for nearly a century. In the name of the fight against terrorism we are giving up many freedoms because we believe that security is a higher value. We have not understood that we are in fact going to sacrifice freedoms without having security. This trial sheds a stark light on what is happening.

Credit: Pamela Drew | Julian Assange Outside & Hillary Clinton Inside State

Concerning the rape charges against Julian Assange, the Swedish justice system dropped the charges due to lack of evidence. Are you surprised by this drop in charges?

Eva Joly: It was very costly for Julian Assange. We also know that the Swedish public prosecutor was keen to end the investigation earlier, but that she was encouraged to keep the investigation open by the Crown Prosecution Service [the service responsible for deciding on prosecutions in England and Wales]. We have evidence of that. We also have evidence of the FBIs involvement in the case, but the Swedish prosecutor, Marianne Ny, destroyed the e-mails she admits to having received from the FBI.

You criticized the media silence after some 60 international doctors tried to alert the world to Julian Assanges physical and psychological state of health in November, when they were seriously considering that he might die in prison. This silence came from a press that has made extensive use of and benefited from the revelations that Julian Assange and his team had brought to it about the abuses and war crimes committed by the allies in Iraq and Afghanistan. How do you explain such a change in attitude?

Eva Joly: Absolutely. The Guardian, the New York Times and Aftenposten[iv] have won prestigious awards for their work with WikiLeaks documents. Its important to understand that its the CIAs and the FBIs manipulations that have led to this reversal of opinion. The issue was no longer what Julian Assange had been able to prove, but whether or not he had raped someone.

Precisely, how can one sue Assange for his publications, while sparing the media that benefited and disclosed the content? Didnt these media act in the same way as WikiLeaks by disseminating information passed on by a third party?

Eva Joly: In the United States, American journalists enjoy the protection of the First Amendment. This was the case with the Pentagon papers, where the DOJ (Department of Justice) tried to prosecute whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg who had them published for espionage. The Supreme Court ruled that he had only been using freedom of speech and that he was entitled to protection under the First Amendment to the Constitution. We therefore know that citizens of the United States are protected by this amendment. However, foreign journalists are not. Julian Assange in the United States would therefore not be able to invoke the First Amendment and, logically, there would be a risk that European journalists could be prosecuted.

Nils Melzer, UN Special Rapporteur on Torture, says: This is not just about protecting Assange, but about preventing a precedent that could seal the fate of Western democracy. Are we going to turn Julian Assange into a martyr?

Eva Joly: If we accept the extradition of Julian Assange, we are admitting the de facto supremacy of US law over our own. In Europe, however, it is not forbidden to publish genuine news of general interest, journalists are protected by the European Convention on Human Rights. What Julian Assange published cannot therefore be described as espionage in the United Kingdom or elsewhere in Europe. Julian Assange cannot be extradited because of double jeopardy and because he would not get a fair trial in the United States. These are two more than sufficient reasons to oppose this extradition.

Source : https://mrmondialisation.org/si-julian-assange-est-extrade-cest-la-fin-de-letat-de-droit-en-occident-eva-joly-interview/

Notes:

[i] Ex-Icelandic Interior Minister: US Tried to FRAME Julian Assange in Iceland! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CmPQY7cXOIg, Jnasson: The Icelandic Minister who refused cooperation with the FBI, Marta Pacheco, Katoikos, 7 December 2016. http://www.katoikos.eu/interview/icelandic-minister-who-refused-cooperation-with-the-fbi-ogmundur-jonasson-in-an-interview.html

[ii] Chelsea Manning was released on March 12, 2020 after a suicide attempt the day before. The financial penalties imposed to force her to testify against Wikileaks and its founder Julian Assange remain in effect and she will have to pay $256,000 in fines.

[iii] A guide on the implementation of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. https://www.refworld.org/docid/49f17f3a2.html; European Convention on Human Rights: https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf

[iv] Conservative newspaper in Norway.

See original here:
If Julian Assange is extradited, it's the end of the rule of law in the West Eva Joly (Interview) - Pressenza

Rebel Without the Clothes – Jezebel

The front cover of Benjamin Mosers new biography of Susan Sontag doesnt have any words on it, just a photograph of Sontag, wearing a leather jacket. The jacket was as legible when the photo was taken as it is now: this is an image of a renegade. Sontags not wearing tweed or corduroy; shes not that kind of intellectual. Instead, with her leather jacket, she signifies that shes a kind of rebel intellectual that famously preferred erotics to hermeneutics. The jackets original association with motorcycle gangs gave it an aura of freedom and potential violence. While they seemed dangerous originally, those associations have become diluted over the years, so what would a contemporary writer wear to show that they are a cool renegade? Theres no obvious answer; in fact, its been a while since we had a new garment with the symbolic heft of the leather jacket.

In the past century, eight decades each gave us at least one strong universally comprehensible symbol of naughtinessand then, in the last 20 years, the well ran dry. Fishnet stockings, leather jackets, sagging jeans, and then, for a long time, nothing. If a filmmaker had to dress a vampire boyfriend without 20th-century markers for his sexy badness, where would she even begin? The pussy and MAGA hats are simple declarations of group identity. Leather jackets dont suggest the wearer is actually part of a motorcycle gangthey just imbue the wearer with a renegade aura. Billie Eilishs decorated face mask from the 2020 Grammys is one of our first symbolic garments of the 21st century. Eilish wasnt actually trying to hide her identity from facial recognition software or attempting to avoid sharing germs with the other attendees. Instead, the mask makes visual reference to the many groups of people who do wear face masks to respond to modern surveillance technologies or modern epidemics. Without joining with any of those groups, she borrowed a bit of their aura to symbolize her rebellious feelings.

Its not just that theres no symbolically naughty clothing at the moment, either. In the 1990s, every style of jeans had a meaning. Ripped jeans suggested punk, embroidery on the thighs suggested hippie idealism; one shape of oversized jeans suggested hip-hop while another suggested skaters. There were the jeans Cindy Crawford would wear, and the kind that Anna Nicole Smith would wear, and the details of these differences conveyed auras of meaning onto whoever was wearing them. Sunglasses, too: if Peggy Olson walked out of her job at the end of Mad Men wearing John Lennon-style sunglasses, it would change the meaning of that scene. Same if Audrey Hepburn had worn aviators with mirrored lenses in Breakfast at Tiffanys. The sunglasses in the sunglasses emoji are the same style as Peggy Olson, Edward Cullen in Twilight, and Emma Stone in Easy A. Clothing and accessories used to have such fine-grained associations that theres a kind of sunglasses that mean, I know everyones watching me, and I dont care except that I feel pretty goodand then, we largely stopped making new ones. If someone wanted to signify coolness in an emoji, theres no updated symbol that could replace those sunglasses.

Our jeans still change styles, but those changes dont mean anything anymore. Low-waist jeans have been replaced by high-waist jeans, but neither has any meaning about the person wearing them. Contemporary ripped jeans are just an informal version of the same absence of meaning, and while embroidered flowers and peace signs might still suggest a kind of Coachella bohemianism, the association is increasingly commercialized. Nearly every major retailer sells festival clothes now. As fewer people learn to sew and more high-end stores sell hippie-inspired styles, boho increasingly means brands like Free People or Anthropologie rather than individual people who made their own new designs or adapted existing styles. Certain styles still maintain the meaning of their original reference, but the transgression of transgressive styles, and the idealism of idealistic styles are all waning. All those meanings are dissipating.

Yoga pants would be a natural heir to the meaningful jeans styles of yesterday because they have moved from the gym to being anywhere clothes. But despite trends in fabrics, patterns, and lengths, theres no difference between a person who wears floral leggings and someone who wears leggings with mesh patches. The brands signify group identityLululemon is famous for obnoxiously defending what kind of person, and what kind of body, fits into their leggingsbut almost all brands have clusters of customers, and the stylistic details themselves dont signify a set of beliefs or attitudes beyond group membership. Theres no symbolic way to wear Lululemon leggings or a MAGA hatif youre wearing those things, youre just very directly wearing the branding associated with the garments.

There are new clothing styles that make watered-down reference to old signifiersthe new mom jeans, the new prairie dresses, new hoodies, new yee-haw agenda cowboy outfitsbut no new meanings. Clothing can still signify levels of formality, it can still show a direct group allegiance, but our new styles arent designed to go any farther than that.

One obvious explanation for that change is the internet now, and personal branding takes different forms. But theres another layer to how the internet has changed the way we see each other, not only how we express ourselves.

In the past 20 years, mass culture hasnt established new countercultural icons to embody feelings people otherwise cant express. Law-abiding people still sometimes claim a symbolic connection with Bonnie and Clyde, whether its Serge Gainsbourg, Beyonce and Jay-Z, or anyone else who isnt a bank-robber but wants a little of their lawless bad-boy and bad-girl allure without actually claiming that banks ought to be robbed, but the new criminals we admire are usually admirable because they have done something worthy rather than because they symbolize something inexpressible like Bonnie and Clyde or a celebrity gangster. Someone might un-symbolically admire Chelsea Manning or Reality Winner for their civil disobedience, but thats not the way most people have admired Bonnie and Clyde for the way they symbolize insouciant rebellion. They feel countercultural without actually having done any literal civil disobedience that would affect the culture.

There are famous scammers now, and the stories of Elizabeth Holmes and Anna Delvey getting away with scams can symbolize regular peoples desire to be free of societys rules around money. As Ive encountered it, peoples admiration for these scammers seems more distant and ambivalent than the way that previous generations have admired their famous criminals. I havent heard anyone claim kinship with Elizabeth Holmes to express any kind of countercultural cool, for instance. It may be that in a few more years, movies like The Queen and Slim will take on the Fyre Festival impresarios as counter-cultural models instead of Bonnie and Clyde, but my sense is that the admiration for our current crop of scammers comes from a different place, more gawking and less symbolically freighted.

The change in how we relate to our criminals is why the disappearance of meaning from our clothes isnt only about a shift of personal branding from jeans to social media. Cool criminals have largely disappeared in the same years as the auras of our jeans. There are still plenty of violent people, even some good-looking ones like the Hot Felon, but as far as I can tell, people arent paying attention because they symbolize profound feelings. Theres no equivalent to Lord Byron or Sid Vicious, maybe not since 50 Cent spent 2000 talking about how he was shot nine times.

Since the internet has lowered the barriers to public speech, people those barriers formerly would have stopped can now speak for themselves, which makes them less appealing as symbols. People from nearly any category of marginalizationany kind of body, any experienceonce reduced to narrow symbols can now show what normal looks like from their perspective, and it never aligns with their supposed symbolic meaning. So one side of the change is that a lot of people have more avenues to resist being used as symbols for the feelings of others.

At the same time, social media is available to the people who, a generation earlier, might have idolized Christian Slater from Heathers to express their feelings of anger and alienation. There are more ways for people to say what they mean without having to triangulate with another persons clothing, identity, or crimes. Even where its not seen as offensive, as in the aura of the motorcycle jacket or the celebrity criminal, people dont seem to adopt other people or their clothing so easily as symbols, or to need to. This is a profound change in our culture of perception.

It will be interesting to see if masks like Eilishs become more broadly popular with a symbolic but not literal connotation of rebellion, or if people will continue using facial-recognition-baffling makeup and masks mainly when they are directly rebelling. Perhaps the mask will also be absorbed and stripped of any rebellious meaning, becoming instead a universal accessory of protection and care.

h/t Erica Nofi.

Catherine Nichols has written for Jezebel many times since 2015.

Go here to see the original:
Rebel Without the Clothes - Jezebel

Humans are terrible at being apart. Here’s why and what to do about it – Napa Valley Register

Help support our COVID-19 coverage

We're providing access to COVID-19 articles for free. Please help support our work by subscribing or signing up for an account. Already a subscriber? Log in.

In Tokyo, crowds have been congregating in parks each day to see the cherry blossoms at peak bloom. Some 6,000 miles away in Washington DC, people were doing the exact same thing.

Like so many people in so many countries, they are willfully ignoring government advice to stay at home and to keep well away from others, as the coronavirus spreads rapidly, killing thousands and already changing daily life as we know it.

But is it really just the cherry blossoms, or the beaches in Australia and California, or parks in central London that have inspired throngs of people to leave their homes during a pandemic? It's plausible. There's little else to do as cities around the world have all but shut down.

There is, however, something else highly appealing about going to these places, and it's the very thing that threatens to worsen the pandemic other people.

It seems that we humans just can't stay away from one another.

Even in Italy, the country with the most coronavirus cases and deaths in the world, 125,000 people have been fined for breaking rules on restriction of movement. Many of these violations were made by people trying to sneak away and meet with other people, Italian media reports.

The desire to be physically near others is human nature. We humans or our ancestor species, more precisely have been social creatures since the Stone Age. Many studies have shown that hunter-gatherers formed "bands" as they found it more efficient to find enough food for survival through joint efforts. They also found strength in numbers, fending off threats, whether animal or human, more effectively as a group.

Over a long evolutionary process, humans have developed highly sophisticated societies in which we cooperate to survive and better our lives, studies show.

A general view of Bondi Beach is seen on March 20, 2020 in Sydney, Australia. The Australian government has banned non-essential gatherings of 100 or more people indoors, along with outdoor gatherings of more than 500 people in a bid to contain the spread of COVID-19. Prime Minister Scott Morrison on Thursday announced Australia would be closing its borders to all visitors for six months. The travel ban will be placed on all people who are not Australian residents or their direct relations coming to the country from 9pm on Friday night. There are now 756 confirmed cases of COVID-19 In Australia while the death toll now stands at seven. (Photo by Jenny Evans/Getty Images)

Today, having consensual physical contact with other people and enjoying the company of others in in the flesh releases all sorts of chemicals in the brain and body endorphins, serotonin and oxytocin, for example that essentially give us feelings of happiness and even love.

This is why, when we go to a concert or a football match, it's not just the athletes or the musicians that give us that sense of euphoria. Being with a lot of other people adds to the kick.

"Not everybody likes these situations, some people hate crowds. But for those that do, being with a lot of other people creates a physiological pleasure, endorphins, et cetera, go off," said Michael Muthukrishna, an assistant professor of Economic Psychology with the London School of Economics and Political Science.

After events like this, people say they feel more bonded to one another and that they feel part of something whole, he told CNN.

"It's a wonderful feeling to be part of a bigger thing. Cheering on your own isn't as good as cheering with a friend, and that's not as good as cheering in a large crowd chanting war cries. It physiologically creates a sense of the individual dissolving into the whole."

In these sophisticated societies we have developed, we rely heavily on one another to get by.

In hunter-gatherer days, one person or family may have been responsible for finding food, cooking it, building a home and making clothes. Now we rely on other people from all over the world, with their own sets of knowledge and skills, to carry out different functions essential to surviving,Muthukrishna explains.

"Our society is such that we have a division of labor, and a more complex whole world than even the smartest among us could possibly understand. Each of us understands a small sliver of the world, and the rest is socially acquired," he said.

"It's what we call the illusion of explanatory depths we assume we understand how the world works, but really we have a very poor understanding of most things. We're happy to trust in the people who do. For example, you believe in germs. You might have seen them under microscope, but really you believe in it because you trust people that know that germs exist, even though you don't actually have access to that information."

We also really like touching

The coronavirus and need to physically distance ourselves has put much of our lives online. We have work meetings by video conference, we Skype with friends and family we can't meet, and we watch Netflix instead of going out for dinner.

But anyone who has had a long-distance relationship or has friends and family in far-flung places knows that Skype just isn't the same.

Partly, it's because we really like to touch each other.

Giving someone a hug, handshake or a kiss releases those same chemicals in the brain and body that make us happy. This natural process develops right from the start of life touch is the first sense a baby develops in the womb.

Newborns are able see very little and their hearing is murky for some time after birth, so skin-to-skin contact is highly recommended between parents and babies to build bonds.

There are all sorts of health benefits too. Skin-to-skin contact between mothers and babies regulates the baby's heart rate and breathing, stimulates digestion, helps fend off infection, stimulates the release of hormones to support breastfeeding and reduces cortisol, a stress hormone that suppresses the immune system, numerous studies show.

The health benefits of human touch carry on through childhood, adolescence and adulthood, according to Tiffany Field, founder and director of the University of Miami's Touch Research Institute. Touch helps strengthens the immune system in fighting infections and plays a role in reducing mental health problems, Field has found in her research.

People in the United States, as in many other countries, are becoming less and less tactile with each other, she said.

Field is concerned that human health is suffering as we increasingly isolate ourselves physically and become engrossed in communicating via technology.

This "touch starvation" is evident in a growing industry of professional cuddlers, who offer safe spaces for people who need hugs and other forms of platonic touching.

Field has carried out several studies that show that touch-deprived children and teenagers show higher levels of aggression. In one, she compared teenagers hanging out at a McDonald's in Paris with some at a McDonald's in Miami.

"The kids in Paris, who were getting more touch and were touching each other more, were less physically and verbally aggressive toward each other," she told CNN.

Field is working on a new study observing people at airport gates, where she says there is a concerning lack of human contact.

"We're seeing that people are not touching each other. They're on their cell phones, which is a real problem. People are now used to not touching each other there's very little handshaking and hugging, there's very little touch going on," she said.

There are very few studies on humans for touch deprivation for ethical reasons, but the concept of human contact as a basic need developed in the 1950s and 1960s, when researcher Harry Harlow experimented with monkeys.

In a landmark study, he removed baby monkeys from their mothers and created wire-framed "mother" dummies. He consistently found that the monkeys deprived of touch showed serious behavioral problems. When given the choice, even when very hungry, the monkeys would choose a "mother" dummy covered in soft fabric to cuddle with over the plain wire-framed dummy offering milk.

Prisoners who have been kept in solitary confinement have often described a lack of physical human contact as torture. Chelsea Manning, for example, in 2016 wrote of what she called "no-touch torture" when kept in a cell alone for long periods of time.

Stay connected

It seems particularly perverse that human contact is so beneficial to health and fighting disease, yet during this pandemic, human contact is literally our biggest threat. But experts agree the benefits of social distancing far outweigh the risk of socializing.

So what can be done about it? Field is hoping that staying at home will actually mean more touching. Give your loved ones a back rub, Field suggests, and if you're living alone during this period, then touch yourself.

"We know that moving the skin is critical for health reasons. Moving the skin puts the body into a more relaxed state. The vagal activity in the brain increases, and that slows the heart rate and lowers stress hormones, and that can even in the long run kill bacterial, viral and cancer cells," she said.

"And someone giving a back rub will get just as much out of it as the recipient."

If you're living alone, do "self massage," Field says.

"Get a daily dose of it. You can reach most parts of your own body."

And on the social side, it's important to stay connected in non-physical ways, says Bianca Suanet, a sociologist from the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.

She said she was concerned about the impact of social distancing in the elderly, who may be more vulnerable to feelings of loneliness.

"This period of social distancing is likelymost difficult forolderadults that lack a partner and asocialsupportnetwork that looks after them," said Suanet.

"People that have a solid social support network might also miss face to face social contact, but if people have someone thatgives them a call once in awhileand can bring them groceries and other necessities if necessary, that solves already someof the problems," she said.

"Helping others is one of the best ways to feel connected to other people."

The-CNN-Wire & 2020 Cable News Network, Inc., a WarnerMedia Company. All rights reserved.

Sign up now to get the most recent coronavirus headlines and other important local and national news sent to your email inbox daily.

Here is the original post:
Humans are terrible at being apart. Here's why and what to do about it - Napa Valley Register

28 times trans and non-binary people made history and did truly incredible things in the last year – PinkNews

Chelsea Manning leaves the district courthouse in Alexandria, Virginia, on March 5, 2019. (Jahi Chikwendiu/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

On Trans Day of Visibility, we celebrate and honour the trans and non-binary communities around the world.

Visibility is a complex thing. For trans women of colour, visibility can increase the violence aimed at them.

For trans people with a public profile, it can lead to online abuse.

But visibility can be positive. Visibility of our community matters, because we matter.

In the last year, hundreds of positive examples of the power of trans visibility were published.

Here are some of PinkNews favourites.

Catholic college responds to trans man coming out with brilliant show of love and support.

Trans woman raised on boxing and bikes comes out to her bodybuilder dad and is overwhelmed by the support.

Trans woman makes history representing Pakistan at United Nations.

Iconic dating show Blind Date just welcomed its first trans contestant.

Brazilian dancer makes history as first openly trans woman at Carnival to take the prestigious role of godmother of the drummers.

Hungarys first-ever Trans Pride sees hundreds demand the right to change their names and legal gender.

Video game makes history with the first-ever playable transgender character from a major developer.

Pokemon GO just introduced its first-ever non-binary character.

Thousands of trans people take to the streets for first-ever National Trans Visibility March.

A Baptist church is making history with its first transgender pastor.

This astrophysicist could become the first non-binary person to lead a major political party in Canada.

Londons first ever Trans+ Pride march in pictures.

Chanel just hired its first-ever openly transgender model.

Victorias Secret hires first transgender model Valentina Sampaio.

Cuba: first transgender couple get married.

Bre Kidman is the first out non-binary person to run for the US Senate.

Japan elects first transgender assemblywoman.

Dad throws trans son a party to celebrate his transition and its the light we need in this dark, dark world.

Heartwarming video shows a dad cutting his trans sons hair ahead of a job interview.

New York will allow trans kids to change legal gender, after lawsuit from a brave 14-year-old.

This trans person sent 8,000 rainbow cards to LGBT+ people disowned by their families this Christmas.

Theres a record number of trans and non-binary people running for parliament in the UK general election.

Trans whistleblower Chelsea Manning has just been made a free woman.

New York state park to be renamed after trans pioneer Marsha P Johnson.

The long-awaited trans Pride flag emoji is finally coming to phones in 2020.

US linguists select singular they as word of the decade.

A transgender woman just made history in the ultra-conservative Muslim-majority Bangladesh.

Trans man and trans woman marry in beautiful Indian wedding ceremony.

The rest is here:
28 times trans and non-binary people made history and did truly incredible things in the last year - PinkNews

Chani Rising or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Astrology – Mother Jones

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis and more, subscribe to Mother Jones' newsletters.

Im munching nervously on this hotels gourmet gummy bears, and I keep wondering when shes going to do it. This is embarrassing. I dont know how to ask, and now things are weird. Im treading water, struggling with what to say next to Chani Nicholas, the sort-of-famous astrologer, whose impressively high cheekbones suggest that if the stars had aligned differently, she might have been an actress or a model. Instead, on this Friday in late January, she is posted across the table from me in a midtown Manhattan hotel lobby, talking to me about the zodiac.

Its a very different vibe from Monday, when Chani (it rhymes with Annie) held the packed audience of the 92ndStreet Y in rapt attention. I dont think I looked at my phone for a full hour. But now Chani is the talentand also the subject. Gone is her control from Monday night, the popular high school art teacher vibes. In oversized black reading glasses she sat on stage in an oversized beige chair with a small stack of papers spilling across her lap, her shoulder-length brown curls bouncing excitedly as she shook her head in recognition, reading the astrological chart of her friend, the filmmaker and Womens March co-founder Paola Mendoza.

Shes swapped Mondays black satin jumper and strappy black flats for a red-and-black plaid shirt and some chunky black boots. Shes wearing hoop earrings with her hair pulled tightly back, giving off a faint chola vibe, minus her blue-and-green socks spotted with what look vaguely like vaginas. They are definitely queer socks, she later laughs.

In the lobby, shes predictably warm as she answers my questions about the book tour she just started for You Were Born for This: Astrology for Radical Self-Acceptance. We do a stilted whos-who guessing game of mutual friends, the small, overlapping worlds of queer Bay Area and Brooklyn. (Though shes based in Los Angeles, she, like me, spent a chunk of her young adulthood in San Francisco.)

Chani Nicholas reads the chart of filmmaker Paola Mendoza in January.

Courtesy 92Y

I had been struck on Monday night by how intimate the conversation was about Mendozas life, based on how the stars were aligned at the moment she took her first breath. Her life story, according to her chart, existed almost before she did. The two asteroids in her first house presaged the mother-daughter relationship that would be the focus of her first film; her sun being in Sagittarius and ruled by Jupiter helps explain the work shes done collecting migrant womens horror stories on the border. Her moon being in Leo and the fourth house means that she likely has had a hard time receiving attention and praise. And, wouldnt you know it, she studied acting in undergrad before finding a more comfortable spot behind the camera.

Id found myself nodding along. She was using the stars to describe the alignments of a personality. It turns out theres something about hearing about someones past that makes you more willing to show up for the collective present.

I share with Chani an observation that all of her public appearances to date have been astrological readings. Maybe its strategic? A way to change up the power dynamic between interviewer and subject?

She seems taken aback for a moment and then insists its her way of democratizing astrology for people, particularly those who may think of astrology as something just short of whitewashed witchcraft. Im hoping to use astrology as the context for the interview, she says, to see what story comes out when they get that prompt, because really our chart is a whole series of prompts.

I think about how her publicist actually promised my own astrological reading, and Im surprised at how embarrassed I am to admit that I really want it. Would it be too much of an imposition to ask for it? I wonder. Would it make me any less of a journalist? Why am I so desperate? Do I believe any of this? Why am I so scared? I already know Im a Leo, and I know all the tropes; Ive even jokingly deployed the Zora Neale Hurston quotehow can any deprive themselves the pleasure of my companyin conversation. But I (perhaps like Chani) actively avoid being the subject. And while I dont always prefer it, Im inclined to be somewhat solitary, at home with my animals (including my dog named, obviously, Zora).

Thats when our podcast producer, Molly, whos there with me, says with a smile: We thought you were gonna read Jamilahs chart. And then Chani responds like Ive asked her for a stick of gum. Oh! Why didnt you say anything? she laughs. Thats easy, let me get my phone.

She starts and matter-of-factly reads my chart. It takes only a few minutes before she breathes in and tells me my Leo is in a house associated with grief. And now Im like, Shit, did she Google me?

You probably live in one of two worlds: In one, youve literally never heard of Chani Nicholas. In the other, youve seen her everywhere over the past few months. In the New York Times, Vogue, Glamour. On Twitter, where she maintains a lively, favorite-aunt presence. On Spotify, for the legions who listen to her popular astrological playlists every month. With her first bookpart self-help workbook, part astrology 101 explainerout in January. Maybe you saw an Instagram post of hers, like the one earlier this month, put up the day after the coronavirus was deemed a pandemic, that gently implored people to Listen to and learn from folx that have lived with disability and chronic illness, and to Stay in touch with your loved ones, stay as relaxed as possible, stay in joy whenever and for however long you can, and to Wash your hands.

In this world, Chani is officially having her moment.

Of course, so is astrology. In the United States, astrology has gone through waves of popularity, most recently in the 1970s. It then receded a bit, as with most other things considered New Age, though astrology has come back in a serious way in the past decade. Still, with only a few well-known exceptions like Puerto Rican astrologer Walter Mercado, reading the stars has often been more closely confined to with witchy white women with decidedly apolitical stances.

Chani Nicholas is not that type of witchy white woman.

The day before we meet, she sat on a stage at the Brooklyn Museum with a filmmaker and queer activist named Tourmaline and read the charts of Marsha P. Johnson and Sylvia Rivera, two pioneering transgender activists whose contributions Tourmaline has helped unearth. Its just its so poetically potent in terms of the work that [Tourmaline] does, Chani tells me about doing those readings. Because it really is about working with folks that are left out of the system or incarcerated or criminalized because of who they are. And it has so much to do with that sense of being a different kind of woman or gender or representation or what have you.

This is the type of thing that makes me cringe a bit. It sounds nice, its certainly the right thing to say, but it also feels sopredictable. In fact, everything around astrology makes me roll my eyes sometimes; at a certain point it feels like a game of logical propositions (if this is true then this and this). But I have to say, it feels different with Chani. And maybe thats by designshe appeals to a very specific crowd. Its a crowd thats populated by coastal queer activist-types who likely saw one of her motivational quotes while scrolling through Instagram. They are optimistic but endlessly critical people, the kind who avoid saying Trumps name out loud like hes Voldemort (45 is fine) but are quick to point out that President Obama deported a record amount of people, too. They talk endlessly about the importance of chosen family, are in a constant negotiation with their historical trauma, and would rather you not use assigned gender markers with their children. Everything is a constructrace, class, genderand if you challenge this, they will probably instruct you to read Toni Morrisons Playing in the Dark: Whiteness and the Literary Imagination. In fact, they might even offer to loan you the worn copy that sits dusty but centrally located on their bookshelf. The current state of our countrys divisive and polarized and toxic political climate isnt an anomaly, they argue, but merely a predictable next chapter for a nation that has relied too heavily too often on piecemeal change. Yes, We Canbut if youre not asking why, youre not really doing any meaningful work.

If you cant already tell, I know these people well. They might just be me.

So I admit, after hearing about Chani and her socially conscious strain of star reading, I wanted to know more not just about her but about the brand shes built into something of a juggernautone that has apparently filled some unaddressed need, bringing together a notoriously fickle audience of activists and organizers and social justiceminded folks who agree on absolutely nothing, except, apparently, her. Her followers include Chase Strangio, the ACLU attorney who famously represented Chelsea Manning, along with Black Lives Matter co-founder Alicia Garza and MacArthur genius award winner Ai-jen Poo, who affectionately called her Chan-Chan on their new podcast. They also include plenty of frontline organizers Ive met over the years reporting on racial justice. Chanis rise represents the extent to which a generation raised on Obama-era platitudes has gone to reimagine hope. Its angry but actionable. And in an era when we cant stop talking about the importance of self-care but do very little beyond follow some (mostly white, affluent) influencers, Chanis work is now anchoring the hope, the motivations, and the work of (mostly young, progressive, Black and Brown) people who are reaching for something a little extra to get through the Trump presidency and all the ugliness and division, even on the left, thats come with it.

When I first connected with Chani, Id wanted to talk to her about these people, about how theyd found in her astrology a language for addressing their thwarted hope. A few months later, a pandemic gripped the world, and the questions at the heart of her work became more urgent, not just for the activist set but for everyone. How do you heal yourself without losing sight of all the things in the world that need healing?

I dont think theres an astrologer out there that didnt look at this year and swear under their breath a little bit, Chani tells me, because it is a year that is just stacked with one challenging astrological setup after another. Its Monday, and Chani is explaining just what in the possible hell this moment is that were living in.

One of the main themes of the year is Mars. The first part of the year and then the second half of the year, Mars is very highlighted in the astrology in a very challenging way. And Mars does things like create aggravation, is the god of war, is related to heat and inflammation and fears and things that get damaged from excessive temperatures. And so right now, whats happening is Mars is about to make a conjunction with Saturn. And Saturn is the opposite of that. Saturn is cold and withholding, and Saturn creates boundaries and barriers and structures and quarantines and isolation.

It feels eerie to be living at a moment that is about those two very things and those planets are making a conjunction on March 31, and so that seems to be us moving towards the most difficult point. Im not saying thats it, because Mars also makes really difficult aspects come September and October and Novemberhahaso I thought it was going to be much more about the election, which it still probably will be, but I didnt expect it to be this challenging up front.

Shes calm as she lays all this out for me, and in a weird way theres something hopeful about it. The story of our fates is plotted. The action will rise and then fall. Even if so many things arent in our control right now, in her telling there is at least a structure being obeyed.

From the start Chani was driven by a need to see something bigger than her immediate circumstance. She has said her father has one of those hillbilly stories and her mother was from the Bronx. Her childhood was a chaotic blur of addiction and sporadic violence, moving around a lot before landing in British Columbia. She was often alone and terrified. But a couple of chance encounters with astrologersarent they always by chance?showed her there were larger forces at play. But while she dreamed about the stars, that instability made her want to do something practical with her life.

Nothing quite fit. Not the domestic violence counseling she tried in San Francisco, or the waitressing and acting she did in LA. She dropped out of three masters programs, taught yoga. She balked at being part of what she calls in her book the Yoga Industrial Complexthink Lululemon-clad white women bowing and saying namaste atop hundred-dollar slip-proof yoga mats. That was around 2013, when she decided to give professional astrology a shot after fighting it for years. She offered paid readings and wrote horoscopes on her personal blog. It started small.

But these werent the horoscopes you might remember from Seventeen magazine back in the day. The key was connecting attributes of a persons chart to what was happening in the world politically. For instance, part of my chart, she tells me, is similar to that of Frida Kahlo, who used personal tragedy to shift peoples political perceptions through art. Its these types of models, and the stories she writes about them, that have drawn people in.

Around this time, she also fell in love with a woman named Sonya Passi, whom she met and married within the span of two months. Passi, a feminist activist who now runs an anti-domestic violence organization called FreeFrom, is a pragmatist with an eye for detail. Before long, the two began building out a business, with Passi editing every horoscope and Instagram caption. They created a series of guided online workshops. An early workshop, one in late October 2016, was called, Awaken Your Witch: Rituals for the New Moon in Scorpio.

Days after the workshop began, Donald Trump was elected president. That event caused nothing short of a generational stampede into a world that is alternately called wellness or Just Trying to Figure This Shit Out. Its hard to quantify exactly how many people have turned to astrology for solace in recent years, but apps like Co-Star and Sanctuary are part of a billion dollar investment in what venture capitalists call the mystical services market.

It also created a boom in business for Chani. In 2017, the Los Angeles Times estimated her annual income as well into the six-figure range; its almost certainly grown since then. Shes moved on from posting horoscopes on Blogspot. Now they go on her sleek personal website, which, she has said, has over 1 million regular readers. Last year, she teamed up with Spotify to create monthly astrological playlists and host a series of live events; at one she gave Lizzo a reading. Chanis typical Instagram posts have also became more streamlined: clean white backgrounds with inspirational quotes, easy to screenshot and share widely. They often have meanings that could work in both personal and collective contexts. Take this, from mid-January:

Then there was her first horoscope for 2020: Jupiter and Saturn will come together for the first time in 20 years, and since the 1800s this convergence has happened in earth signs. Thanks to the institutionalization of white-supremacist, patriarchal, colonialist capitalism that set the stage for this age, excessive waste has been celebrated up until now, Chani wrote. Though shes now become a brand, Chani considers herself first and foremost a writer, and thats how she still spends the bulk of her days: writing horoscopes and pondering.

This all resonated with Candace Kita, the cultural strategy director at the Asian Pacific Islander Network of Oregon. Kita was originally skeptical of astrology, but she reconsidered it after the political upheaval of 2016. Chani offered a new way to look at the internal narrative that I had fashioned around who I was, what my role was in the world and how I should be, she tells me. That really helped build a community for me, not only in terms of people, but also with folks who shared my values.

I hadnt seen anyone else pair astrology with social justice, she adds. The apolitical nature of astrology didnt appeal to me.

Kita got so into Chanis work and astrology more broadly that she has actually became a professional astrologer. She now runs Astroradicals, a business that offers astrological readings that cultivate liberation, empowerment, and radical possibility.

Jasmine Brock also started following Chani shortly after Trumps election. At the time she was a second-year law student. Today, as a public defender in Brooklyns family court system, her work often involves parents who are fighting for custody of their children. I get really wrapped up into things, she says, but [astrology] reminds me to take care of myself because the truth is that if Im not in a good place, theres no way that I can help any parent that Im working with.

Lizzo and Chani Nicholas speak onstage during the Spotify Cosmic Playlist launch event in January 2019 in Los Angeles

Frazer Harrison; Getty

Chanis book tour for You Were Born For This drives home how significant a player she has become in the market of astrology-curious or -devoted activists: Not long after the event with Tourmaline in Brooklyn, she was in Oakland, co-hosting a reading slash book event with Fania Davis, a well-respected restorative justice activist who is also Angela Davis sister. She knows her crowd.

Now, in this moment, Chani is doing her best to channel this knowledge into serving her audience in a new way: walking the line between what might be helpful in this age of fresh uncertainties, and what might just add to everyones peaking anxieties.

Sometimes when we frame things astrologically, were also framing them in a time frame, Chani tells me. A beginning, middle, and end. So to remember that this is just a moment, and we will get through it, and we will be changed by it, but it wont be forever.

I press Kita to understand what about Chanis work and the larger field of astrology really, deep-down appealed to her. It started to make sense to me, she says, that astrology was a way that I would rewrite and re-examine the story Id been telling about myself.

And thats when something clicked for me.

What I want isnt the Chani story, but my own. Thats what I was so embarrassed about before Molly stepped in. Of course, selfishness is always at play somewhere in our work, but wemillennials, journalists, queer people of color who dabbled in community organizingare not conditioned to acknowledge it. Instead, we look at the collective. The team. The community. What of my story can be of service to others?

But selfishness and self-awareness are two different things. Sometimes its okay to want a space thats all our own.

Right now medical professionals and, increasingly, local governments are telling people to stay home in order to stay safe. Even if youre not showing symptoms, the fact that you could pass along the virus to someone else for whom it could prove deadly is a wake-up call unlike any weve seen in modern history. Now, taking care of yourself, creating your own space, isnt just a social luxury. Its a matter of public safety.

While we can be so focused on the world outside ourselves, Chani provides the opportunity to look in, and at each other, and realize were not alone. And while theres much we cant change, its how we respond to the worldwhether its a healthy one, an infected one, an uncertain onethat matters.

I of course do not realize any of this on that January Friday in the lobby, when Chani finally takes out her phone and pulls up my chart on her website. She tells me Im a Capricorn rising with a sun in Leo, which means, in short, that I work hard and want to be acknowledged for it. I nod. I find great satisfaction in making lists. Its what makes me feel seen. I make them before bed and when I wake up. When Im on the train to work and once I get to the office. Its a small thing that Id never paid all that much attention to until recently.

Then Chani takes that pause and she tells me that my Leo is in a house associated with loss, grief, and anguish. And I dont just feel seen. I feel exposed.

I laugh, because thats what I do when Im uncomfortable. Its true that in one decade nearly half of my family died. A shooting, a fire. A bad heart. A bad breast. Ive often carried the cumulative grief of those losses like an overstuffed bag on the beach of life. Everyones running around in the sand, weightless. And then theres me, lugging around all my dead. I can trace my desire to be a writer back to high school, when my mother was featured on the front page of my hometown newspaper, urging witnesses to come forward with information in a family members murder. That was part of the story, I thought then. But there was a different story to tell, too, of people who were always the subjects but never protagonists.

Chani tells me that societies once dealt better with death, but weve since sanitized it. Your chart speaks to remembering or knowing it in a way, she says. And so something about your work brings that knowledge through and is so necessary and needed.

Im not sure if thats what I wanted to hear, but I did feel a helluva lot less alone listening to it.

Visit link:
Chani Rising or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Astrology - Mother Jones

Extra! Extra!: Chelsea Manning Will Be Free, and More News Amid This Strange Week – Autostraddle

So many things feel like theyve come to a standstill because of the Coronavirus, but, in the words of Anais Mitchell, the sun just goes on rising. This weeks Extra! Extra! Covers US election interference, two articles from opposite sides of the world sharing the challenges facing immigrants and refugees and Chelsea Mannings recent release from jail.

A reminder that for right now, were putting news about COVID-19 in its own roundup that can be found here!

Justice Department Drops Plans for Trial over Russian Interference in 2016 U.S. Election

Natalie: Its been amazing to see what Republicans across the country are doing while our collective attentions are monopolized by coronavirus.

In Kentucky, the legislature continues to meet (so much for social distancing!) and just passed a voter ID law thatll govern this falls election. In Idaho, where one county has been forced to shelter in place due to a community outbreak of coronavirus, legislators are focused instead on anti-trans legislation..

And in DC, theres this: while Congress is consumed with finding a suitable relief package, the Attorney General of the United States is trying to eliminate the possibility that there will be any accountability for the attack on American democracy in 2016. Once again, the Trump presidency will be shielded from being exposed for the fraud that he is.

Its all just a reminder we need to be vigilant about staying engaged on issues beyond coronavirusbecause, as the saying goes, the Devil never sleeps.

Anchor Babies: The Ludicrous Immigration Myth That Treats People as Pawns

Somewhere Like Home: Uighur Kids Find A Haven At Boarding School In Turkey

Himani: Around the world, people continue to be dehumanized for being different, for being other. America has long positioned itself as the country of immigrants, the melting pot, the place where people from around the world could go to find solace. Of course, that was always a lie.

In America, Republicans and the Trump administration keep spreading dangerous myths about immigrants. This isnt new: the notion of anchor babies has been around for at least two decades and the 1996 immigration law arguably created the inhumane situation that exists in the US today. Now were at a point where the US has resettled the lowest numbers of refugees in the last three decades, people in situations like the Uighars in China who face violence and persecution.

What these two articles reminds us is that the vast majority of immigrants face countless challenges when they make the difficult decision to uproot their lives. Thats true whether were talking about Latinx people seeking a better life for their family in the US or Uighars trying to find safety and security for their children in Turkey. People dont make decisions like this out of malice. They dont just have children because that will somehow give them security. (In fact, they sometimes have children because the hUS has made contraceptive care so difficult to access.) And those children even if they are more fortunate than the ones who were left behind dont, by any means, have it easy.

But the other thing that connects these two stories, for me, is the hope these communities create for each other and their dedication to the fight to improve the lives of others in situations like their own.

Immigrant rights group and Microsoft workers blast ICE raids amid coronavirus crisis: The way ICE is operating is reckless

Thousands of ICE detainees at high risk amid coronavirus pandemic

Yudith is a wife and mother of six children whose husband has been detained by ICE.

Rachel: Given the context that only essential jobs and orgs are supposed to be operating normally right now, its become even more glaringly clear that this administration views ICE raids, family separation and deportation as essential raids have continued, including on quarantined homes and in hospitals where people are seeking treatment. In at least one (anecdotal) case, its reported that ICE agents posed as doctors to gain access to a home where they wanted to arrest someone. While of course ICEs actions are always harmful and violent on a personal and structural level, right now its incredibly clear that theyre also willfully contributing to the spread of a pandemic and potentially condemning those who they detain to infection ICE detention centers are crowded and have always been severely lacking in hygiene and sanitation resources, even before they became in short supply. In addition to demanding our elected officials work to release and distribute the necessary resources to healthcare workers and to individuals, we need to demand that they stop expending state resources on an institution that now more than ever serves only to harm.

Rachel: As many of us know and have been following, whistleblower Chelsea Manning has been detained indefinitely in solitary confinement essentially as punishment and coercion for refusing to testify before a grand jury against Julian Assange and WikiLeaks. She was initially jailed for her cooperation with WikiLeaks, and had her sentence commuted in 2017 by Obama; she was then subpoenaed to appear before a grand jury and once again jailed when she refused to testify. In addition to her incarceration, Chelsea was fined exorbitant amounts, $1000 per day, as a repercussion for her refusal to cooperate. Incarceration is always harmful, and hers has been no different; this week, news broke that Chelsea had attempted suicide while in prison, her third attempt over the long course of her multiple incarcerations. She survived, and was treated in the hospital.

The good news is that shortly after her hospitalization, a federal judge actually ordered Chelseas release he announced that her testimony was no longer needed before the grand jury, and so coercive measures werent necessary any longer. Its unclear whether this was a genuine announcement Judge Trenga was already scheduled to issue a ruling or whether the court was motivated to wrap up the issue and Chelseas incarceration by her suicide attempt.

While Chelsea will be freed, her fines remain, totaling over $250,000 obviously Chelsea hasnt been able to earn income while incarcerated. A friend has organized a GoFundMe for supporters to help contribute toward paying the cost.

+ Chelsea Manning attempted suicide while in jail for refusing to testify against WikiLeaks

+ Chelsea Manning Is Ordered Released From Jail

New Challenge to Transgender Military Ban Filed by Naval Officer

Dousing the Glim: Reflections on Shutting Down Canada

Tribunal Orders Canada to Compensate Parents Who Lost Children in Care

A Sneaky Attempt to End Encryption Is Worming Its Way through Congress

More here:
Extra! Extra!: Chelsea Manning Will Be Free, and More News Amid This Strange Week - Autostraddle

Chelsea Manning hospitalized after suicide attempt, legal …

Chelsea Manning, the former US army intelligence analyst who leaked hundreds of thousands of secret documents to WikiLeaks in 2010, tried to kill herself in a Virginia jail on Wednesday, legal representatives said.

According to the Alexandria sheriffs department, officials at the Alexandria adult detention center responded to an incident at 12.11pm.

It was handled appropriately by our professional staff and Ms Manning is safe, Sheriff Dana Lawhorne said.

No other details of the incident were immediately made available.

The news came days before a hearing regarding Mannings request to be released.

Manning has been held on grounds of civil contempt since May last year, for refusing to testify in front of a grand jury investigating WikiLeaks, which disseminated the cables and files leaked by Manning to outlets including the Guardian in 2010.

Manning served six years in military prison for the 2010 leak, until Barack Obama commuted her 35-year sentence. While in jail, for long stretches in solitary confinement and while completing gender realignment, Manning attempted suicide twice. She also mounted a hunger strike.

In a statement on Wednesday, Mannings representatives said she has previously indicated that she will not betray her principles, even at risk of grave harm to herself.

Her actions today evidence the strength of her convictions, as well as the profound harm she continues to suffer as a result of her civil confinement.

In court in 2019, after an initial spell behind bars over the contempt issue and before being returned to prison, Manning told a judge she would rather starve to death than testify.

In 2018, Manning ran for the US Senate in Maryland. The attempt to unseat the longtime Democratic senator Ben Cardin failed and later that year, Manning told the Guardian the experience had driven her closer and closer to being on the edge of really deep, dark depression.

She also said she had been exhausted when, in May 2018, she tweeted a picture apparently showing her standing on a ledge outside a window several floors from the ground, shortly before telling followers she was OK.

In February this year, Manning petitioned for release. In a letter to Judge Anthony J Trenga, she compared her experience with the Trump administrations attitude towards congressional subpoenas.

The attorney general was in contempt of a congressional subpoena but faced no consequences, Manning wrote. The president has been instructing his associates not to comply with grand jury subpoenas and witness subpoenas for at least two years, and has even fired people for their compliance with subpoenas.

It is clear that the rules are different for different people.

In fact, though the Trump administration has fought congressional subpoenas, officials refusing to appear in front of federal or state grand juries would still face punishment for contempt of court.

Manning also wrote that she had been separated from my loved ones, deprived of sunlight, and could not even attend my mothers funeral.

It is easier to endure these hardships now, she wrote, than to cooperate to win back some comfort, and live the rest of my life knowing that I acted out of self-interest and not principle.

A hearing on her petition was scheduled for Friday.

An extradition hearing for Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, is in process in London. In the US, he is charged with violating the Espionage Act.

In the UK and Ireland, Samaritans can be contacted on 116 123 or emailjo@samaritans.org. In the US, the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline is 1-800-273-8255. In Australia, the crisis support service Lifeline is 13 11 14. Other international helplines can be found at http://www.befrienders.org

Read the original here:
Chelsea Manning hospitalized after suicide attempt, legal ...

Chelsea Manning was stung with massive court fines but her supporters bailed her out in just two days – PinkNews

Supporters of Chelsea Manning have raised the entire cost of her court fines in just two days, after a judge ordered the activists release in prison.

In a ruling on Thursday, US district judge Anthony Trenga freed Manning a former intelligence analyst best known for exposing US war crimes by leaking classified documents but ordered her to pay a staggering $256,000 in fines.

Manning has spent nearly a year in prison for contempt of court after refusing to testify before a federal grand jury investigating WikiLeaks and has little means to pay the steep fines by herself.

However, online supporters rallied round the activist, and raised the entire amount in just two days.

A crowdfunding campaign set up by Mannings friend Kelly Wright after the ruling had reached its full goal by Saturday.

Wright said: Thank you so much for helping us reach our goal of $256,000 and 100 per cent of that money will be held in trust to pay Chelseas court fines.

Chelsea will actually be able to pay these cruel fines and move on with her life and much sooner than expected.

A separate fund to help Manning with living expenses after her release from prison has raised a further $50,000.

Wright said: She is completely exhausted from this ordeal. She lost her apartment, was forced to put all of her belongings in storage, and was unable to earn any income whatsoever over the course of the past year.

Chelsea really appreciates how fast you came through for her. It will take a while, but we believe she is on the road to recovery.

Just days before the ruling to free her,Manning was rushed to hospital after trying to kill herself while in jail.

Her lawyers confirmed the incident, condemning the profound harm she continues to suffer due to her confinement.

It was the third time she had attempted to take her own life while behind bars.

If you are in the US and are having suicidal thoughts, suffering from anxiety or depression, or just want to talk, call theNational Suicide Prevention Lineon1-800-273-8255. If you are in the UK, you can contact Samaritans on 116 123 or email [emailprotected]

View post:
Chelsea Manning was stung with massive court fines but her supporters bailed her out in just two days - PinkNews

Chelsea Manning Released But Still Faces Massive Fine – The Real News Network

Greg Wilpert: Its The Real News Network. Im Greg Wilpert in Arlington, Virginia. If federal judge ordered the release of whistleblower Chelsea Manning on Thursday after having been in prison for a full year, the judges order came one day after Manning had attempted suicide while in prison. The reason for the release is that the grand jury that is investigating WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has been dismissed, and so Mannings testimony is no longer needed.

Manning was imprisoned and fined $256,000 when she refused to testify against Assange, whom the United States is currently trying to extradite from Britain. The U.S. government is arguing that Assange have helped Manning to copy databases of information about the Wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as the state departments internal communications. Manning, though, always denied that she received help from anyone.

Joining me now to discuss Mannings release is Kevin Gosztola. He is a writer and publisher for the website shadowproof.com, and co-hosts a weekly podcast called Unauthorized Disclosure. He has been covering Manning and the Assange cases for a long time now. Thanks for joining us again, Kevin.

Kevin Gosztola: Thanks. Its good to talk to you.

Greg Wilpert: So lets start with Chelsea Mannings suicide attempt. What can you tell us about what happened and what led up to the suicide attempt?

Kevin Gosztola: Well, what we know is that around the time that she attempted suicide, the grand jury had apparently ramped up its effort to try and coerce her into providing testimony to the grand jury. Her lawyers had challenged a summons that was issued to bring her before the grand jury on March 10th, and it appears that the grand jury was going to intensify its effort to coerce her into testifying.

So far, they had failed to break her in such a way that she begged for mercy and came back to them and agreed to provide testimony about her involvement and what she did with the disclosures. Again, these disclosures that were talking about are the most well known disclosures that WikiLeaks published. This is the collateral murder video, this is the Iraq and Afghanistan war logs, the U.S. diplomatic cables, which numbered around 250,000.

Theyre the Guantanamo detainee files, and they wanted her to speak about how They were hoping they could get testimony that would show Julian Assange solicited these leaks from her. They were hoping she would speak about him helping her to crack a password, allegedly, and this goes back to the allegations that she has faced that Julian Assange is facing in his extradition case, and ultimately, if hes brought to United States, it would be during his trial.

So, this ever had ramped up and we already know that she was going through a lot of trauma and struggling with what we can call psychological torture because of the fact that she was in jail. She was released almost exactly a year after this all started, that the grand jury subpoenaed her, and then she was jailed for civil contempt. I should add that this isnt the first time that she has tempted suicide in confinement. When she was serving her military sentence at Fort Leavenworth in Kansas in September 2016, and maybe August, September 2016, she was going through an ordeal and was actually punished because she attempted suicide.

So rather than giving her help with her mental health, she received 14 days of solitary confinement for attempting suicide. She had books that the military didnt want her to have. There were other materials that they confiscated from her. So they accused her of these violations, and then there were also the fact that she attempted suicide. So this has happened before. Shes somebody who people have been concerned about with their mental health.

And, of course, after she had her sentence commuted, there were times in which people who were her supporters were concerned that she might be having suicidal ideations. So, its clear that the release comes, for her, at an important time because this was escalating these issues with her suicidal thoughts were escalating.

Greg Wilpert: I want to get into the issue of what this release means for the trial also against Assange, but first I want to ask, now the federal judge, Anthony Trenga, who released Manning, said that she still must pay the $256,000 fine that had accumulated during her imprisonment. Now, according to U.S. law, the imprisonment and the fine are there to coerce her testimony, not meant as a punishment. However, now that the grand jury has been disbanded, there doesnt seem to be any reason to coerce her anymore. So, why is she being required to pay the fine if she cant be coerced for anything?

Kevin Gosztola: That is a good question, and I think thats for Judge Trenga to answer, thats for the court to answer, thats for the United States government to answer because it is, as you say, supposed to be coercive and if they dont need her testimony, which by the way, in my view, they never her testimony. They were able to issue indictments against Julian Assange without getting testimony from Chelsea Manning.

And so, all along, and obviously, as this WikiLeaks grand jury has been dismissed, what I have said all along is proven that what they were doing was punishment, it was abusive, and it served no legitimate purpose to keep her in jail for all of these months. And in fact, thats what her legal team argued, that there was no legitimate purpose for keeping her in jail to provide testimony.

When they issued the indictments, she should have been released because at that moment they were in a position where they needed to put her on the list of prosecution witnesses and simply wait until Julian Assange was brought to the United States and put on trial, if that were to happen. So, the fact that these fines, which is $256,000, exist, that she is still expected to pay is cruel. And, to be clear, for most of the time that she was in jail, she was being fined $1,000 a day. For 30 of those days, she was fined $500 per day, and thats how it all added up.

And she leaves jail essentially in destitution and a complete state of poverty. She had lost her home or apartment, she had most of her items and possessions in a storage locker. She is fortunate to have such a good support network of people who have looked after her, but she leaves, in this moment, and she has to entirely rebuild her life with next to no money in her own account. And the court never conducted a basic assessment of whether she had the financial ability to pay these fines. What they presumed is because she has so many people who support her around the world in what shes doing to stand up on principle, theyve presumed that she can just launch a GoFundMe account and raise the money.

And so, because she could easily do this, then she can be fined this incredible amount, this amount that its not quite there, but its approaching what corporations are fined in order to coerce them into cooperating with federal grand juries. Its probably on par with the way someone would charge people who were wealthy and powerful in order to make them bend to a government prosecution. Its not the way to treat somebody like Chelsea Manning who has a low income, but they never wanted to respect this fact that she really doesnt make that much money being Chelsea Manning.

Greg Wilpert: Now, I just want to dig a little bit into the background. I mean, why did Manning actually refuse to testify? And what role would her testimony have played in the Assange extradition, which is still going on in Britain? And then, finally, what does the jury disabandonment mean for the governments case against Assange?

Kevin Gosztola: Chelsea Manning, in her resistance, essentially what she was doing was making it hard for the government to turn her against Julian Assange and she understood that what they wanted to do was, as her legal team called it, get her in a perjury trap, but also what they wanted to do was impeach her credibility and make it seem like the statement that she had given to the military corps about the timeline of events was not credible.

And the reason why the prosecutors want to make her statement to the court seem not credible is because it doesnt match up with the theory of the case that theyre bringing against Julian Assange. Essentially, she says that, Independently, I decided to disclose all of these documents to WikiLeaks. I went around, I tried to first go to The New York Times, I contacted wanting to contact the Washington post, but they didnt want my disclosures, and so I went and submitted documents to WikiLeaks.

On the other hand, what the government is trying to say, and so why they need to break Chelsea Manning and bend her in such a way that they get testimony thats useful to them, they wanted to say Julian Assange recruited Chelsea Manning to work on behalf of WikiLeaks and that she was inside the military going around on the network, the secret network, going through databases, finding sets of documents and picking them out because WikiLeaks told her that they wanted these particular sets of documents to be disclosed to the world.

And that doesnt match up, unless youre able to show that what she said to the military court isnt the truth. So, going forward here, we know that the WikiLeaks grand jury was dismissed. It resulted in not only Chelsea Manning being released, but Jeremy Hammond, who had been subpoenaed to appear before this grand jury, was released and he was serving a federal prison sentence related to the Stratfor hack and then the leak of that information that was published by WikiLeaks, and he returns, hes going to be completing his prison sentence.

However, had he not been subpoenaed, he would have been released from prison back in December 2019. So, he goes back to prison and its obviously a much more Its a crisis moment now because all of these prisons and everyone inside of them are hugely vulnerable to the spread of the coronavirus. And so, its something to consider here that, had the grand jury not subpoenaed him, he would not be in the situation right now where hes vulnerable to the spread of this virus. But going forward here, the critical issue is the grand jury is no more. It could have continued on. It was not done with its term, they have 18-month terms.

In fact, Chelsea Manning, last year, was in jail, the grand jury elapsed. She was out for a week and then they subpoenaed her again and she re-entered jail, and so this time, it was dismissed. The grand jury just ended. That suggests to me that there are no further indictments. That means theres no additional charges against Julian Assange. Theres no charges against any other associates or staffers of WikiLeaks, no individuals who were related or involved to any of this involved with any of these leaks. And so, that suggests to me that if youre a part of WikiLeaks and the legal team representing WikiLeaks, that you might breathe a sigh of relief.

And for people who are concerned about the implications for press freedom that Julian Assanges case poses, you breathe a sigh of relief that it isnt expanding to other people who were involved in this work in publishing the information. But you know that the focus now becomes this extradition case in the United Kingdom and upcoming, we have this hearing for three weeks where witnesses will be called for the defense and for the prosecution or for the people and the crown prosecution service that are going to be arguing for the extradition and that they are going to have this major hearing.

And so, all of the focus now has to be on a Julian Assanges case and whats at stake for press freedom and journalists throughout the world as the United States government, even though Chelsea Manning is out of jail, even though Jeremy Hammond is out of jail, even though they may have abandoned the grand jury investigation that they are still pressing onward with this case that has dangerous implications for press freedom.

Greg Wilpert: Okay. Well, were going to leave it there for now. Of course, we always continued to follow this story. I was speaking to Kevin Gosztola, writer and publisher for the website, shadowproof.com.

Thanks again, Kevin, for all of this information and for having joined us today.

Kevin Gosztola: Thank you.

Greg Wilpert: And thank you for joining The Real News Network.

Speaker 3: Thanks a lot for watching. Appreciate it. But do us one more solemn favor. Hit the Subscribe button below. You know you went to. Stay up on new videos

Visit link:
Chelsea Manning Released But Still Faces Massive Fine - The Real News Network