How Russian censorship is impacting this Iowa family – Local 5 – weareiowa.com

A Russian-born Iowa native speaks about her family and friends' difficulties of getting access to information.

WEST DES MOINES, Iowa Last month, the Russian government passed stricter social media laws due to backlash from the war in Ukraine. Any speech opposing the government can result in five to 15 years in prison. U.S. leaders believe it's Russia's attempt to crack down on what they see as "fake news."

Dr. Anastasia Williams works at the University of Iowa. Before becoming a resident of the Hawkeye state, she was born and raised in Russia. That's where many of her family and friends still live.

Watching the Russian government's new laws affect them is traumatic for her.

"We are watching ourselves and what we say trying to sometimes euphemisms, just to talk about things," Williams said.

Being careful while talking over the phone isn't the only worry for Williams'. Her close friend is currently facing prosecution in Russia, for trying to spread anti-war sentiments.

"She went to a local store and she replaced the price tags with little stickers containing information about the war and numbers of people. And just a little snippet slogan, like stop the war or something like that," Williams said.

She's now facing up to five to 15 years in prison. Williams' mother supported her friend during her court hearings due to them being limited access to attending these hearings and the rules are strict.

"She was the only person who was able to pass her water and my friend Aleksandr didn't have a chance to drink of water for more than 48 hours at all. It's like very, you know, they're kind of types of torture, right, of not providing a person any food or water," Williams said.

Williams explains here in the U.S. it can be hard for us to understand where people in Russia stand on whether or not they support the war. She believes many Russians are finding it difficult to support anything at all

"They're so limited in what they can access. Now, even Facebook and Instagram are considered to be extremists in Russia. So, people just feel so limited in what they can do and what information they give they can get," Williams said.

According to Williams, Russian residents are still allowed to travel internationally but, Russia will deactivate the travelers' visas and credit cards, denying them access to their funds.

View post:

How Russian censorship is impacting this Iowa family - Local 5 - weareiowa.com

Netflix In India: From Censorship To Partnership With The Government – Benzinga

A year into facing firein India for controversial content,Netflix Inc's (NASDAQ: NFLX) has partnered with the country'scentral government to launch a short video series.

The series 'Azadi Ki Amrit Kahaniya,' is created by the Indian governmentincollaboration with Netflix to commemorate the 75 years of Indian Independence under a state initiative.

Bela Bajaria, Head of Global TV, Netflix, said the company is "proud to partner" with the governmentto "celebrate and acknowledge the evolution of India over the past 75 years by celebrating its beautiful art, culture, and storytelling."

See Also: Netflix May Soon Clamp Down On Password Sharing: Here's How It Is Going To Work

She further added that it was "in pursuance of this partnership Netflix has created a series of short videos based on real-life stories aimed to celebrate the achievement of people from all corners of India."

The first set of videos features seven women changemakers from across the country who will share their experiences.

Union Minister of Information and Broadcasting of India Anurag Thakursaid"this initiative aims to bring out inspiring stories of Indians, and these stories shall motivate and empower more people to achieve their goals."

This isn't the first time that Netflix is partnering with the Indian government. Earlier, the ott platform, with other Indian peers, partnered with the government for the state-owned 52nd International Film Festival of India.

This came after India last year announced a new set of rules and guidelines under the existing laws to regulate digital content by the OTT platforms amid the row of controversial content leading to legal heat against the platforms.

Read Next:'Nice Growth' In APAC: Netflix CEO Highlights Rising Subscription Numbers In Key Region

2022 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

View original post here:

Netflix In India: From Censorship To Partnership With The Government - Benzinga

What to know about Texas A&M’s censorship battles, including Draggieland show and The Battalion – Houston Chronicle

Texas A&M University is home to more than 70,000 students and 500,000 alumni many of whom hope to maintain the myriad traditions central to the institutions identity.

But rapid growth in A&Ms population means that change is occurring at the traditionally conservative university in College Station. Some students and faculty say several recent administrative decisions were unilateral and regressive, however, highlighting A&Ms struggle to weigh the desires of mounting liberal voices against those of a still-larger group of conservative students and alumni.

Heres what you should know about the latest conflict at A&M.

The school had more than 73,000 students in fall 2021, compared to under 50,000 students in 2010.

The alumni population is similarly large. More than 550,000 people have attended Texas A&M University, and more than 505,000 of them are still alive. Thats because more people graduated from the school in the past 20 years than in the first 120 years of the institution combined, according to the Association of Former Students.

On HoustonChronicle.com: Texas A&Mclimate lab, other agreements ended in wake of questions over China ties

Students and faculty say they have noticed a trend over the past year, especially since President M. Katherine Banks took the helm in summer 2021. The former engineering dean has ushered in several new changes, and not all of them were made with student and faculty input, those stakeholders say.

Some of the overarching changes involve Banks attempts to reorganize the universitys academic structure. A&M last year commissioned a study to address organizational efficiency, and in response to the findings, Banks identified several areas that will see transformation. She called her response, "The Path Forward."

One of the biggest recommendations that the university accepted is the merging of the College of Liberal Arts, College of Science and the College of Geosciences into a new College of Arts and Science. Another is the reorganization of the provosts office despite faculty concerns that changes might impact their freedom to teach on topics they choose. And University Libraries will no longer serve as a tenure home for faculty.

The university is also working to align the management practices of student organizations, although it received markedly split feedback on the suggestion.

"We are pleased to hear from different voices, even though sometimes we all dont agree on the outcome of a decision," Kelly Brown, vice president of marketing and communications, said in a statement. "Texas A&M has 72,000-plus students, more than 1,200 student organizations and countless competing priorities."

"Earlier this year, President Banks commissioned 41 working groups to review and make recommendations related to the Path Forward," the statement continues. "She asked for the direct input of students, faculty, staff and former students. She is seeking other opinions and is most definitely listening. Hard decisions are being made based on whats best for the university and those decisions are arrived at through research, careful thought and input from all stakeholders. Not all decisions will be favorable to everyone, however, the administration is committed to continue working together and listening to all campus voices."

In the fall, the university moved the three-day summer camp for incoming freshmen under a new umbrella. Formerly an independently run student organization, it is now a student organization that supports a university program meaning student leaders report to the university. The selection of leaders and counselors also has to be approved by the vice president of student affairs.

A&M further changed the camps mission statement to remove a phrase about creating an accepting environment, head director Mikayla Slaydon said. The university then aligned Fish Camps official values with the A&Ms official values, resulting in the loss of a camp value stressing diversity.

Slaydon said she found out about these decisions after the fact.

The university disaffiliated from "Draggieland" in the fall without providing an explanation, students said.

Students formerly managed the drag show throughMSC Town Hall, a student organization supporting a university program that brings events to campus. That group held the money in a university coffer, so A&M's disaffiliation meant the show couldn't access its funding.

Several LGBT groups fundraised themselves and held the pageant to a sold-out crowd. They suspect conservative lobbying groups influenced the administration. Several organizations heavily protested the event in 2020 and 2021, even though it was still a rousing success those years.

Another controversial decision came when the university in February gave editors of the student newspaper The Battalion an ultimatum to stop printing immediately. If they didnt move to an online-only format, they would lose several resources including their building space and faculty adviser, the newspapers editor-in-chief previously told the Chronicle.

Several students said they feel that The Battalion has covered more contentious issues on campus this year, such as sexual assault at Fish Camp. The Battalion is a registered student organization, which means it doesnt report to university administration. The threat led students and faculty to immediately raise concerns about censorship.

After news of the decision went viral, administration walked back the ultimatum and formed a working group to determine the future of the publication. Vice President of Student Affairs Gen. Joe Ramirez also issued a formal apology about several decisions madeon campus without student input.

Continue reading here:

What to know about Texas A&M's censorship battles, including Draggieland show and The Battalion - Houston Chronicle

Dems Have Zilch To Offer So They’re Smearing, Censoring The Opposition – The Federalist

White House Chief of Staff Ron Klain offered an interesting insight into Democrats 2022 midterm election strategy on Sunday, musing about French President Emmanuel Macrons ability to win reelection despite a 36 percent approval rating, implying a similar possibility for U.S. President Joe Biden. Instead of trying to turn Bidens sinking approval ratings around by ditching failed policies, Democrats seem content with their underwater numbers so long as they can drive Republicans popularity even lower with smears and censorship.

Bidens approval rating is at 40.9 percent, according to the RealClear aggregate, although a Quinnipiac poll has him as low as 35 percent and a CNBC poll has him at 38 percent. A February NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll reported that 56 percent of Americans thought Bidens first year in office was a failure, and the month before a mere 25 percent were satisfied with his administration.

The Biden administration has helped drive its own approval ratings into the ground with crisis after self-induced crisis. Democrat-led Covid lockdowns and ballooning federal spending have caused the worst inflationary crisis in decades, coupled with energy prices that were on the rise even before Russias invasion of Ukraine thanks to Bidens war on oil and gas. Destabilization in Ukraine and a botched withdrawal from Afghanistan may top the list of Bidens most deadly mess-ups, but theyre far from the only line items.

From a first-day executive order requiringthat schools ignore the biological differences between male and female students from the athletic field to the bathroom if they wish to continue receiving federal funding, and keeping those same schools closed for months, to bragging about working with Big Tech to silence dissent, exacerbating a record-setting crisis at the U.S. Southern border, ousting people from their jobs with medical mandates, encouraging kids to chop off their genitals, and colluding with the National School Boards Association to smear parents as domestic terrorists, the Biden team has done everything possible to alienate voters.

Meanwhile, Bidens radical legislative agenda has crashed and burned, leaving him with nothing to offer voters but a list of failures. Biden could choose to learn from these mistakes and respond by securing the border, unhampering American oil production, respecting parents and free speech, and protecting minors from predatory sex propaganda. But instead, the White House is tacitly admitting it doesnt care that Americans dont like its agenda.

How is that a workable election strategy? It isnt, unless you can convince voters to hate or fear your opposition even more. Democrats spent all four years of former President Donald Trumps presidency pushing the Clinton campaign-funded Russia collusion hoax, aided by propagandists in the legacy media. When The New York Post broke news of sensational and incriminating Biden family scandals in the weeks leading up to the 2020 election, Big Tech and big media collaborated to nuke the story and censor those who tried to share it.

Those are just two of the most explosive examples. There are countless more of tech companies censoring conservative perspectives (including a sitting president), journalists running cover for Democrat conspiracy theories while lying about Republicans, and even tech barons like Mark Zuckerberg funneling nearly half a billion dollars to take over local election offices.

In a fair system, a president with approval ratings that are underwater by double digits would be worried about his next election, and probably worried enough to be making some big changes. But Biden has done nothing but double down. That signals just how confident his people are in their ability to collude with the censorship regime to smear their opponents or keep their arguments from reaching voters entirely. Censorship is a powerful political tool, and its part of why the laptop class is so panicked at the idea that someone with slightly more respect for free speech than they now owns the Twittersphere.

All of Bidens disasters point to a Republican victory in the midterms this fall, but Democrats unwillingness to let nosedives in the polls budge their cultural battles should be a chilling reminder to Republicans that Democrats havent played by the rules for years. The collaborators in the Biden White House, in the legacy media, and in Big Tech are so confident in their backroom rigging that they dont think they need to listen to what American voters think.

This should put urgency and tangible political reforms behind the broad and bipartisan desire among Americans to ensure American election processes are beyond reproach.

Elle Reynolds is an assistant editor at The Federalist, and received her B.A. in government from Patrick Henry College with a minor in journalism. You can follow her work on Twitter at @_etreynolds.

The rest is here:

Dems Have Zilch To Offer So They're Smearing, Censoring The Opposition - The Federalist

Resident Evil 4 VR Executive Producer Defends Censorship: "It’s The Year 2022 And Some Of This Stuff Doesn’t Age Well" – Bounding Into…

Resident Evil 4 VR executive producer Tom Ivey recently defended the decision to censor the game pointing to the current year and claiming the censored and cut content didnt fit with the Resident Evil franchise these days.

Source: Resident Evil 4 (2005), Capcom

RELATED: Grand Theft Auto V Expanded & Enhanced Edition Censors Allegedly Transphobic Content

As previously reported, Resident Evil 4 VR was discovered to have censored dialogue and more prior to its launch. The dialogue was typically flirtatious in nature, such as Leon flirting with Ingrid Hannigan, Luis comments on Ashleys ballistics, and Ashleys request for overtime at the end of the game.

Source: Resident Evil 4 (2005), Capcom

Another scene of Leon discovering the corpse of an impaled women was also changed, from Guess theres no sex discrimination around here, to I guess no ones safe here.

Source: Resident Evil 4 VR (2021), Capcom

Sources speaking to Peter Pischke ofThe Happy Warrior Substack claimed the alterations were (in Pischkes words) focused on removing any scenes and dialogue that the gaming news media and social justice crowd may deem misogynistic.

In a leaked video sent to Pischke tracking the alterations, Japanese text notes the changes were related to sexual harassment, sarcastic expressions, sexist conversations, and expressions that may be indirectly linked to them have been removed.

Source: Peter Pischke,The Happy Warrior Substack

RELATED: Resurfaced Interview Sees Skies Of Arcadia Translator Admit Localization Team Rewrote A Lot Of The Dialog Completely

The video also claims These were not unavoidably removed as part of the translation or porting process but were done by Armature Studio at the request of OculusVR and with the approval of CAPCOM.

Facebook later stated that the game also includes select changes to in-game dialogue and animations that we believe will update Resident Evil 4 for a modern audience.

Source: Resident Evil 4 (2005), Capcom

Amid Resident Evil 4 VR on Meta Quest 2 (the rebranded Oculus Quest 2) adding its Mercenaries mode in an update, Eurogamer spoke to Tom Ivey, the executive producer for developer Armature.

Eurogamer asked about the altered dialogue and scenes to which Ivey responded,Its the year 2022 and some of this stuff doesnt age well, and it doesnt fit with the Resident Evil franchise these days.

Source: Resident Evil 4 (2005), Capcom

RELATED: Activision Blizzards New Chief Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Officer To Ensure Diverse And Inclusive Perspectives In Game Design, Storytelling, And More

So the idea was that were keeping every aspect of the rooms and the creatures that you fight, and the story and how it progresses and the plot points of the story, Ivey explained.

But, you know, just kind of saying its the year 2022 does this fit with the way that Resident Evil should be presented in this day and age? Ivey reiterated. Thats the concept there.

I definitely agree with the changes we made to the game so were definitely on board with that, Ivey defended. We think its the right thing.

Source: Resident Evil 4 (2005), Capcom

Not only did Ivey defend the previous censorship of the game, but he also revealed the there are fundamental changes to Mercenaries.

He noted, All the gameplay from the original RE4, weve kind of cordoned off into one selection, which is called Classic mode. So you can play all the maps and characters, and the way that the timers work and the placement of the timers in the levels and all that is exactly the same.

But theres also things that are fundamental changes to the rules of Mercenaries, he revealed. Theres a mode called Time Rush, which is you start with a very, very limited amount of time. And we place two timers in random locations around the map so you have to look around really quick see that timer and think how am I going to get there while also killing guys while running to keep my combo going? And then I pick it up and I get maybe like 20 more seconds.

Source: Resident Evil 4

What do you think? Let us know on social media and in the comments below.

NEXT: Rumor: Microsoft Developing Their Own Monster Hunter After Finding Capcom Series Too Expensive To License For Game Pass

More:

Resident Evil 4 VR Executive Producer Defends Censorship: "It's The Year 2022 And Some Of This Stuff Doesn't Age Well" - Bounding Into...

Tucker Carlson called Kevin McCarthy a ‘puppet of the Democratic Party’ after leaked audio revealed the lawmaker had wondered if Twitter could censor…

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy was heard making the comments in leaked audio recordings obtained by The New York Times.Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

Tucker Carlson called House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy a "puppet of the Democratic Party."

The comment came after audio was leaked of McCarthy mulling Twitter censorship for some GOP lawmakers.

Carlson said that McCarthy is "a man who, in private, sounds like an MSNBC contributor."

Fox News host Tucker Carlson on Tuesday slammed House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, calling him a "puppet" of the Democratic Party.

Carlson's statements came after The New York Times published a bombshell report detailing how McCarthy was concerned about GOP lawmakers like Rep. Matt Gaetz and their potential for inciting violence following the January 6 Capitol riot.

The Times also highlighted how McCarthy, in leaked audio recordings obtained by the outlet, had mulled the possibility of censoring GOP lawmakers.

"Can't they take their Twitter accounts away, too?" McCarthy was heard saying on a call, likely referring to how former President Donald Trump was permanently banned from Twitter after the riot.

During his show on Tuesday, Carlson criticized McCarthy for what the lawmaker said on the call.

"Kevin McCarthy of California told his close friend, Liz Cheney, that he hoped the social media companies would censor more conservative Republicans in the Congress," Carlson said, adding that Trump had been "silenced by those companies" during his presidency.

Carlson noted McCarthy had also expressed a desire to have "tech oligarchs" take more steps to "force disobedient lawmakers off the internet."

Commenting on McCarthy's suggestion to remove some parties from Twitter, Carlson said: "Those are the tape-recorded words of Congressman Kevin McCarthy, a man who in private turns out sounds like an MSNBC contributor."

The Fox News host also warned that McCarthy or "one of his highly liberal allies" would likely become Speaker of the House if conservatives didn't "get their act together right away."

Story continues

"And that would mean we will have a Republican Congress led by a puppet of the Democratic Party," Carlson added.

Last week, The Times reported that McCarthy had told House GOP members he planned to ask Trump to resign after the Capitol riot. McCarthy had earlier denied making those comments, both in response to multiple media outlets and in a statement posted on his Twitter account.

Read the original article on Business Insider

See more here:

Tucker Carlson called Kevin McCarthy a 'puppet of the Democratic Party' after leaked audio revealed the lawmaker had wondered if Twitter could censor...

Conservative ‘That Show Tonight’ Latest Victim of Big Tech Censorship – Hollywood in Toto

Comedy shouldnt be this hard in 2022.

We just watched one of stand-ups biggest starsget slapped for telling the wrong joke during the 94th Oscars gala. Thats on top of the woke gestapo deciding how and why we can laugh.

Just ask Dave Chappelle.

Big Tech similarly threatens anyone who tells jokes outside the approved topic list.

Comedians like Ryan Long and Tyler Fischer found this out the hard way. The same is true for The Babylon Bee, which faces the double threat of fabulist fact checksalong with Big Tech censorship.

That Show Tonight is relatively new to the scene, but it swiftly joined the ranks of censorship victims. Why? Telling jokes about the current administration isnt approved by the powers that be, according to the fledgling troupe.

The series, spearheaded by comedian Michael Loftus, offers right-leaning satire for those exhausted by mainstream comedys hard-left agenda. The showcase features stars like Jim Breuer and guitar slinger Brian Haner cracking wise about President Joe Biden, COVID-19 mandates and more.

The shows TikTok account, launched in September, had more than 15K followers as of a few days ago. That Show Tonight clips generated hundreds of thousands of views, according to the show, including one video that boasted more than 400K views.

TikTok pulled down one video from the account, Coma Man, but quickly restored it following an appeal.

That was the only sign of trouble from the Chinese platform. No warnings, no clues that the channel ran afoul of TikTok culture. Nor did the comedy troupe post anything adult in nature, be it upsetting visuals or coarse language.

None of the above stopped TikTok from removing That Show Tonights account, presumably for good.

It isnt the only Big Tech interference the group has endured.

A representative of the troupe says YouTube and Facebook routinely block attempts to boost content parodying the Biden administration or the Left in general.

The group tried to circumvent this by attempting to promote a video featuring sad puppies, as harmless a clip as one can imagine, to make a point.

That strategy worked, but it only highlighted the content discrimination it faces.

Right-leaning comedians cant promote their work through the typical channels. Late night shows wont let them grace their couches.

Publications such as Variety and The Hollywood Reporter rarely give them precious space on their sites.

Social media can be the great equalizer, letting rebellious talent thrive without corporate filters. Digital stars like Tim Dillon, Tom MacDonald, Buddy Brown and Chrissie Mayr have done just that.

Thats increasingly not the case, though, and its not funny for comedians trying to survive in a biased media landscape.

Original post:

Conservative 'That Show Tonight' Latest Victim of Big Tech Censorship - Hollywood in Toto

Under the Wire: Evading Censorship & Protecting Sensitive Information – Security Boulevard

Troubled Times

In times of trouble, citizens can feel a sense of deep helplessness. With war, famine, or political unrest raging outside of their window, many feel compelled to help or somehow make a difference, but may not understand how their position is valued.

The organization Reporters Without Borders is a consultant for the United Nations and aims at defending freedom of press and information. They have been active in filing complaints to the International Criminal Court regarding the Russian military attacks on journalists and in assisting with reporting the tragedies in Ukraine more generally. Journalists with jobs as dangerous as this use a wide variety of tools to release data, but they are not inaccessible to the public.

Availability of communications (and basic services) is one of the first major concerns limiting speech in times of crisis. This may be an attempted shutoff from communications outside the country or simply an issue with delivery of services. Either way, this problem must be addressed before any other.

Ukrainians continue to face a crisis of the availability of basic utilities and tools for freedom of communication. This starts with internet access. Connections to primary ISPs in Ukraine are down a massive amount since the start of the invasion, to the point of showing a notable dip on monitoring maps.

However, Ukraine also has deep complexity in their smaller independent internet providers, unlike some countries which may rely on only a few larger monopolies. This creates a situation in which censorship by government entities becomes far more difficult to perform and utilities have more stability. Ukraine has faced censorship in the past, but there is some hope in satellite communications, which require far less infrastructure on the ground than traditional cable or fiber.

Starlink, which uses advanced satellites in low orbit, has been providing internet access to citizens who may not otherwise be able to access cable infrastructure due to damage or dangerous conditions. Though it is not the only option to evade censorship, it is likely quite appreciated by citizens in dire need or with less technical prowess.

In the world of cybersecurity, we have a lot of tools for evading censorship. The most traditional such as VPNs or Virtual Private Networks are a method of subverting prying eyes of internet providers or possible eavesdroppers on the local network.

Tor browsers are another option, being easily downloadable from the internet. They allow a user to connect into a vast network of open-source nodes that bounce around a users communications and make it harder to track them. Both common solutions allow users to access items that would otherwise be banned, dodging censorship, tracking, and monitoring by all forms of bad actors.

A step up from this is eliminating digital fingerprint. An example is through flashing an image of Tails (a Linux distribution specifically aimed towards privacy and security, famously used by Edward Snowden) to a flashdrive and using it to disseminate information, something recommended for use by Reporters Without Borders.

Over the years, weve also seen increasing popularity in applications like Signal, which provide end-to-end encryption on messages in an easily accessible mobile app. End-to-end encryption is vital when service providers cant be trusted to keep their eyes off of communications, because only the end users (the senders and recipients) are privy to the unencrypted data.

Some applications are very close to end-to-end encryption or have options for it, such as Telegram. These can be equally good options for everyday use, but those looking for a private pipeline for communications should use caution and ensure their level of privacy is what they desire. The risk of using applications like this is usually low, and to most, readily available.

As the war in Ukraine continues to devastate the country, it is vital that citizens and journalists under siege are able to access and transmit critical and accurate information. With cities and townships under almost constant bombardment, the ability to intercept or receive information or timely warnings can help keep people safe.

Journalists and media workers risk their lives to provide war coverage, as well as document evidence of atrocities. Using these tools and techniques can help at-risk journalists and civilians stay connected to critical emergency services, utilities, and life-saving information.

###

LogicHub harnesses the power of AI and automation for superior detection and response at a fraction of the cost. From small teams with security challenges, to large teams automating SOCs, LogicHub makes advanced detection and response easy and effective for everyone.

*** This is a Security Bloggers Network syndicated blog from Blog | LogicHub authored by Tessa Mishoe. Read the original post at: https://www.logichub.com/blog/under-the-wire-evading-censorship-protecting-sensitive-information

Excerpt from:

Under the Wire: Evading Censorship & Protecting Sensitive Information - Security Boulevard

Algospeak: The Simplest Way To Bypass Censorship on Social Media – The Quint

Algospeak is also often used in harmful or radical communities.

Some anti-vaccination groups on Facebook changed their names to euphemisms like Dance Party or Dinner Party, and began using code words to avoid getting banned Facebook, according to NBC News.

Phrases like "dancing or drinking beer mean getting the vaccine, while 'pizza' and 'Moana' are used to refer to vaccine-makers Pfizer and Moderna.

Pro-eating disorder and pro-anorexia communities, which encourage members to adopt unhealthy eating habits, have also used algospeak to continue operating undetected on social media platforms.

A study from the School of Interactive Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, found that the "pro-ED community has adopted non-standard lexical variations of moderated tags to circumvent these restrictions.

"In fact, increasingly complex lexical variants have emerged over time," it said, adding, "Despite Instagrams moderation strategies, pro-ED communities are active and thriving."

(With inputs from The Washington Post, NBC News, and MIT Technology Review)

View original post here:

Algospeak: The Simplest Way To Bypass Censorship on Social Media - The Quint

Off the Shelf: Reckoning with a challenged author in times of censorship – Kenai Peninsula Online

As states throughout the union mull calls to ban books, now seemed as good a time as any to revisit the debut novel of one of Americas most-challenged authors.

Toni Morrisons 1970 The Bluest Eye, which received the Nobel Prize in Literature, tells the story of Pecola Breedlove, a young Black girl growing up during the Great Depression who wishes to have blue eyes. Across its roughly 200 pages, Morrison explores themes of race, sexual assault and incest through haunting prose and compelling characters.

Born out of a conversation Morrison had with a girl in grade school, who was Black and wished for blue eyes, Morrison describes the novel as a response to what she calls racial self-loathing and how race affects self-image.

Like other works challenged because of their content, Morrisons novel masterfully stirs in readers questions about themselves and the world around them. They discuss uncomfortable topics that challenge the way people lead their lives. Morrison herself acknowledges that her novel is a terrible story about things one would rather not know anything about.

However, its contemporary relevance is clear.

The Bluest Eye made national headlines in February, after a school board in Wentsville, Missouri, near St. Louis, rescinded their vote to remove the book from school libraries within the district after it was challenged by parents. Board members reversed the decision after pushback and a class action filed by two students represented by the American Civil Liberties Union of Missouri, as reported by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.

Book banning, though seemingly on the rise in communities around the United States, has, in my experience, somewhat of a Streisand effect, meaning the attempt to hide or remove information inadvertently draws more attention to it. That theory played out earlier this year in Tennessee, when Maus, a Pulitzer-prize-winning graphic novel about the Holocaust, became a bestseller on Amazon after being removed from school curriculum by the McMinn County School Board.

The Bluest Eye made the American Library Associations Top 10 Most Challenged Books of 2021 list, though Morrisons work frequently appears on lists of challenged materials.

In an afterword written in 1993 that is included with my edition of The Bluest Eye, Morrison offers a candid reflection on what her goals were in writing the book and how well she did and did not achieve those goals. She breaks down her deliberate use of language, both to present writing that is indisputably black and to evoke certain reactions from readers.

Implicit in her desire was racial self-loathing, Morrison writes. And twenty years later I was still wondering about how one learns that. Who told her? Who made her feel that it was better to be a freak than what she was?

Though first published in 1970, the contemporary relevance of The Bluest Eye is clear. The notion of representation as interrogated by Morrison in the novel is one still actively questioned today, as evidenced through use of hashtags such as #RepresentationMatters, which is affixed to more than one million posts on the social media app Instagram.

I focused, therefore, on how something as grotesque as the demonization of an entire race could take root inside the most delicate member of society: a child; the most vulnerable member: a female, Morrison writes in her afterword.

Toni Morrison was an award-winning American novelist and died in 2019 at the age of 88. Her first novel, The Bluest Eye was originally published by Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc, in 1970.

Ashlyn OHara can be reached at ashlyn.ohara@peninsulaclarion.com.

Off the Shelf is a bimonthly literature column written by the staff of The Peninsula Clarion that features reviews and recommendations of books and other texts through a contemporary lens.

Go here to read the rest:

Off the Shelf: Reckoning with a challenged author in times of censorship - Kenai Peninsula Online