Chelsea Manning says she was trying to ‘do the right thing’ when she leaked classified military information – ABC News

Chelsea Manning said she leaked hundreds of thousands of classified military documents a move that would eventually lead her to serve the longest prison sentence of any leaker in U.S. history because she wanted to spark a public debate about our countrys military actions overseas.

My intention was to draw attention to this and do the right thing, Manning told ABC News' Juju Chang in an exclusive interview for a special edition of Nightline. And I struggled with that, but the intention was very much like, This is about improving the country. This is about improving our standing in the world, this is about improving everything. And maybe this can start a debate on that.

In the summer of 2013, Manning was convicted by a military tribunal under the Espionage and Computer Fraud and Abuse Acts and sentenced to 35 years in prison for releasing nearly three quarters of a million documents to WikiLeaks. Manning at that time was a 22-year-old United States Army private named Bradley Manning.

I was driven to stay in the military and to do my job, to do the best possible job I could. And then I found that everything was far more complicated and far messier than I ever imagined, Manning said. I was always willing to accept responsibility for those decisions my intentions were pure and clean.

At her court martial, Manning had pleaded guilty to some of charges, without the protection of a plea agreement. She was convicted of 17 of the 22 charges against her but acquitted of aiding the enemy. The latter charge is akin to treason and punishable by death or life without parole.

When asked if she regretted leaking classified information, Manning said, I don't want to retroactively impose things on me.

All I can say is that, you know, I accept a responsibility, she continued. I went through a decision-making process that I don't think I would have done anything differently if I went through and played it again because -- not because I'm retroactively imposing that on me, but because I would have been a different person. And I am a different person now.

David Hammond, who described himself in an interview with ABC News as the only lawyer that Chelsea did not choose to represent her but was assigned to her by the U.S. Army, also pushed back against labeling her as a traitor.

The military judge clearly didn't buy the prosecution's theory that she intended to aid the enemy, Hammond said. You could cry out that Chelsea Manning is a traitor [but] from a legal perspective it's flat out incorrect.

Manning served seven years at the at the U.S. Disciplinary Barracks at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, until President Barack Obama in January commuted the majority of her sentence after her appellate legal team, Nancy Hollander and Vince Ward, made the request the previous fall.

Manning told Nightline she found out about her commutation from a breaking news crawl on television in prison: It said, you know, President Obama commutes Chelsea Manning's sentence. And I'm like, OK ... I freaked out before I celebrated, because I'm like ... Is this really going to happen? Is this real? Am I imagining this?

Hollander recalled the moment she found out Mannings sentence was commuted.

I got this call from my receptionist, through my office phone saying, The White House is on the phone, Hollander said. The voice on the other end said ... This is the counsel for the president The president has commuted your client's sentence and is going to announce it in two minutes. And I just screamed. I screamed. Oh my God. I just screamed ... Does Chelsea know? And he said, We're getting the information to her now. You might want to turn on your television.

Even now, Manning claims she has nothing but utmost respect for the military adding that the people who are in the military work very hard, often for not much money, to make their country better and to protect their country. And I have nothing but respect for that. And you know, that's why I signed up.

Manning entered active duty status on Oct. 2, 2007. She was an intelligence analyst assigned to HHC, 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 10th Mountain Division at Fort Drum, New York.

At that time, she was living as an openly gay man.

By enlisting, she followed in her fathers footsteps, who joined the Navy at age 19 and was also trained as an intelligence analyst.

I would come home every day and I would see on the television, the surge in Iraq Iraq descending into chaos, she recalled. With these images from Baghdad every night, I felt like maybe I can do something. Maybe I can make a difference.

But while she felt a call to duty, she said she was also really struggling with gender.

In October 2009, Manning arrived at FOB Hammer, an isolated military base located 40 miles east of Baghdad, Iraq.

Were in a big, plywood box that's an office ... and it's dusty ... I've got 30 to 50 colleagues, all in this small, confined space, she said describing her work conditions.

They were flooded with data or as she put it, We're drinking from a fire hose. We're getting all this information from all these different sources and it's just death, destruction ... we're filtering it all through facts, statistics, reports, dates, times, locations.

And eventually ... I stopped seeing just statistics and information. And I started seeing people, she continued. And I started connecting that with, Oh my God, this is a country in which there's all this stuff happening.'

The classified files that Manning ultimate leaked indicated, according to one of the four briefs filed in Mannings appeal, U.S. authorities knew about widespread torture and ill-treatment of detainees by Iraqi forces, yet transferred thousands to Iraqi custody between early 2009 and July 2010, in violation of U.S. obligations under the U.N. Convention against Torture and other treaties. An order known as "Frago 242" issued in June 2004, barred coalition troops from investigating any violations committed by Iraqi troops against other Iraqis.

Manning specifically pointed to a video she leaked that eventually was dubbed by WikiLeaks as "Collateral Murder," as an example of something she felt needed should be made public.

It's everything that you need to know about warfare is right there in one spot, in one 47-minute video, said Manning. Counter-insurgency warfare is not a simple thing it's not as simple as, like, good guys versus bad guys. It is a mess.

There are thousands and thousands of videos like that, she added.

The video showed the July 12, 2007, Apache air strike killing of unarmed Iraqi civilians and two Reuters journalists as well as wounding school children. When WikiLeaks released the video in April 2010, it generated a cloud of suspicion due to the Pentagons unwillingness to release or confirm its existence despite Reuters repeated requests for two years under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Former infantryman Ethan McCord, who rescued the wounded children, would later publicly praise Manning as a hero. Manning told Nightline she leaked the video not only for the American public to see it but for history to have that.

Although Manning sent over 700,000 government documents to WikiLeaks, she was charged with leaking secret portions of only 227 documents under the Espionage Act. The information she disclosed included low level battlefield reports from Iraq and Afghanistan, evidence of civilian deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan, Guantanamo prison camp detainee profiles and U.S. diplomatic correspondence.

In Mannings 250-page appeal, which is still ongoing, her legal defense team compared her case with that of General David Petraeus -- one of the most decorated Army generals in American history and the former director of the CIA. Her team noted that Petraeus pleaded guilty to disclosing highly classified information to his former mistress and biographer. Her lawyers emphasized that Petraeus disclosed information that was far more sensitive than anything Manning leaked and yet he pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor offense and was sentenced to two years of probation.

Five years ago I made a serious mistake. I acknowledged it. I apologized for it. I paid a very heavy price for it, and I've learned from it," Petraeus said in an exclusive interview on ABC's "This Week in December 2016.

Rick Ledgett, former deputy director of the National Security Agency, defended Petraeus in a June 1 interview with "Nightline," saying he went through a criminal process, adding, One of the things that factored into that was the contributions that he had made over a career to the national security of the United States. I think that was factored in. I think that's appropriate to factor in.

Ledgett criticized Manning at the time for not pursuing legal options inside the system: She could have gone to her commander. She could have gone to the judge advocate general. She could have gone to the Department of Defense inspector general ... to her congressional representatives, either the Armed Services Committee or her home representative.

But Manning pushed back on that.

Everybody says that there's channels ... but they don't work, she said. We've seen for at least a decade now that when you have information and you see wrongdoing, you don't have safe channels to go to ... They exist on paper, but in practice time and time again, you've seen that these channels don't work.

In his interview, Ledgett also described Mannings actions as arrogant saying she couldnt not have possibly known the impact of her documents on national security due to A) from the amount of time she had to go through the documents, and B) from an experiential base to judge whether, in fact, there was going to be harm -- or not.

Mannings response to that is the information she leaked did not reveal sources, methods, current or future operations. She characterized it as historical data. She felt sure it would not impact national security because, as she put it, I work with this information every day.

Robert Gates, who was then Secretary of Defense, commented on the impact of her leaks at a Nov. 30, 2010, press briefing: Now, Ive heard the impact of these releases on our foreign policy described as a meltdown, as a game-changer, and so on. I think those descriptions are fairly significantly overwrought ... Consequences for U.S. foreign policy? I think fairly modest.

Manning claims that her mental and emotional struggles associated with gender dysphoria did not have an impact on her leaking. Yet, in her appeal, her lawyers state it as a mitigating factor. Manning dismisses that as a legal strategy stressing that she does not feel it was a significant factor.

However, while stationed in Iraq, Manning wrote an email dated April 24, 2010, to one of her commanding officers. She attached a picture of herself dressed as a woman and explained: This is my problem ... I thought a career in the military would get rid of it ... its not going away, its haunting me more and more as I get older. Now, the consequences of it are dire, at a time when its causing me great pain in itself.

A few weeks later, Manning was arrested in Iraq for disclosing information to WikiLeaks. After her arrest, she was transferred to a U.S. military base in Kuwait, and then to the Quantico Marine base in Virginia. After being held in solitary confinement at all three locations, Manning was then transferred to the medium-security military prison in Kansas to await her trial.

Mannings emotional and psychological turmoil was exacerbated by the 9 months of pre-trial solitary confinement. The U.N. special rapporteur on torture accused the U.S. government of cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment toward Manning. Her solitary confinement is one of the main bases of her ongoing appeal.

Our first appellate issue is the fact that Chelsea was held in solitary confinement ... while she was awaiting trial, said her attorney Vincent Ward. Another thing that gets lost is her treatment ... She was bullied and mistreated by the guards while she was in solitary confinement. She was made to do humiliating things, stand in front of the guards completely naked ... If she was reading a book and she took her eyes off the book they would take the book away from her.

Manning described her confinement to "Nightline" as a "mind game."

So you're sitting in a room by yourself, she said. I've got two Marines watching me at all times. I'm sitting up straight. I can't lay down from 5 a.m. until 7 p.m. I can't sit down, I can't lay down. I can't lean back on anything. I'm sitting upright. Sometimes have my glasses. I sometimes don't. I don't have much clothing. I hear every single sound in the entire place. The drips of water, the sounds people's footsteps, the sounds of- chit-chat in, off in the distance from the guards. It was a very empty prison.

Manning finally came out as a trans woman, Chelsea Elizabeth, on Aug. 22, 2013, the day after her sentencing. She sought hormone therapy as part of her transition during incarceration. The military denied her request. The ACLU, led by trans lawyer Chase Strangio, sued the Department of Defense in September 2014 over its refusal to provide Manning medical treatment for gender dysphoria. After over a year of litigation, the military relented and began Mannings treatment with hormone therapy. She made history, becoming the first person to receive health care related to gender transition while in military prison.

Manning told Nightline she fought for her hormone treatment behind bars because its literally what keeps me alive.

When asked to respond to those who feel that taxpayers should not be paying for these treatments, she said, Health care is something that prisoners have a right to, you know? They don't get to pick and choose whether or not you get this health care plan and this health care plan. It's provided to you by the prison. The prison has a responsibility to provide you with necessary health care, and trans health care is necessary ... because if we don't get our treatment, we die.

Ward, her appellate lawyer, explained to Nightline that Mannings litigation and her struggle for access to treatment at Fort Leavenworth was one of the major reasons that she eventually attempted suicide twice and made it urgent to petition Obama for clemency.

Leavenworth is a male prison, he said, but Chelsea's not male ... No one would refer to Chelsea as she or by Chelsea. Right? People would at best refer to [her] as Manning. It was like she wasn't a man or a woman.

Manning described the despair that drove her to try to take her own life more than once when she was behind bars.

You just want the pain to stop, she said. The pain of not knowing who you are or why you are this way. You just want it to go away ... you're just caught up -- so caught up in this dark blackness inside yourself that the rest of the world doesn't matter.

Chace Strangio, her ACLU lawyer who spearheaded her litigation, recalled his phone call with Manning after the military made its final decision to continue to subject her to the forced haircuts that she endured for her entire incarceration.

She was subjected to male standards, held in a male facility, even though she's a woman, he said, and she had, you know, this deep pain about what it felt like to exist day in and day out, not just in the physical prison of the USDB [the United States Disciplinary Barracks on Fort Leavenworth in Kansas], but in this world in which her dignity as a woman, as a human being, was constantly being attacked.

In transitioning to becoming a woman, Manning said the length of her hair in prison was very important to her.

It's the first thing that people see, she said. I wanted to have medium-length hair ... its not costing the government anything for me to grow my hair.

She credits the kindness of inmate barbers for making it easier.

I had an inmate barber that helped me get through that ... I had a couple of them, actually, over time, and he took care of me, she said. He shampooed my hair, he cut my hair with scissors, made it a relaxing process ... the inmates really made it less of a painful experience for me.

Manning said she plans to continue with her hormone therapy, which the military will not be paying for. I have a private health care plan, she said. The importance of affordable health care is a topic Manning has written about in op-eds as well as in her tweets.

Manning set up her Twitter account, and then an Instagram account, @xychelsea in response to the thousands of letters she was getting, especially from trans-children.

It was just to connect with people and make them realize that, you know, like, Hey, I'm getting your letters. I just can't write to, you know, 15,000 people, she explained.

Christina DiPasquale, founder and CEO of Balestra Media who started working with Manning three years ago, described how Manning would tweet from prison.

She would actually think of her tweets and dictate them over to the phone to a supporter or a volunteer, who would post them for her, and read to her some of the reactions, DiPasquale said. She would tell them to re-tweet someone or to look for a particular tweet or a comment.

Manning personally posted her first photo as a woman upon her release from military prison on Instagram.

Owning my identity ... ties into my value of dignity, she said. I think that every person has, you know, whether trans, you know, gay, straight, black, white, Asian, Hispanic, you know, we all have the right to define ourselves and to define who we are ... without any judgment or expectations placed on us.

Her definition of freedom is just being able to express myself for who I am," she said. "And there's no expectations on me. There's no rules that I need to follow. I can be who I want to be and I am who I am.

Manning has nearly 300,000 followers on Twitter and Instagram, but doesnt really see herself as a public figure.

I don't see it as celebrity, she said, Its just what I was doing on social media as a teenager, just scaled up by several orders of magnitude.

When asked about how she deals with hateful comments on social media, she said, I just remember that ... sometimes people have reasons of doing that that have nothing to do with the content. It's just, like, a part of ... their needs to be heard in the world and to have a connection to people, even if it's negative.

Manning has received financial support from donors who do not know her. Singer-songwriter Evan Greer organized an online benefit album, entitled Hugs for Chelsea, which was compiled by a group of prominent musicians to show their support and raise funds to cover Chelseas living expenses as she transitions out of prison. She said they have raised around $12,000 from the album plus $173,000 through Mannings GoFundMe that Strangio and Greer organized.

Manning said she is grateful for their support and said, It's incredible to have the opportunity to be able to defend myself.

It's incredible to have the opportunity ... to not have to worry about certain logistical things, she continued. And all of that is based upon just the fact that people are going outta their way. And it's usually small amounts. It's not like I have these major donors or anything. ... This is just enough to get through this process.

In an interview with ABC News, Greer emphasized the role activism played in freeing Manning: "President Obama commuted Chelsea's sentence, but it was grassroots activism that set her free -- and likely saved her life. Hundreds of thousands of people from across the political spectrum came together to fight for Chelsea because we could see that she was fighting for all of us. In the end, a scrappy band of activists with little more than laptops, online savvy, protest signs, press releases, creativity, and hope managed to change the course of human history. We refused to allow Chelsea Manning to disappear. By raising our voices together, we raised so much public awareness and built enough political power that the President of the United States felt like he had to respond. The story of Chelsea Manning's freedom is a story of ordinary people who have done extraordinary things, and that's a story that people need to hear now more than ever."

Manning said she has not yet spoken to Obama, but said she would to tell him thank you.

Ive been given a chance. Thats all I wanted, she said.

Her lawyer, Hollander, agreed.

You will always hear that the military says, We take care of our soldiers. We never leave a body on the ground. We never leave anyone behind. We take care of our soldiers, Hollander said. The only person in the entire military who ever took care of Chelsea was her commander-in-chief, President Obama, when he commuted her sentence. That was the first time anyone ever took care of her as a service member.

Manning, an avid reader and writer, is a Game of Thrones fan. However, there was one book, Wild by Cheryl Strayed, which she said helped her more than any other.

I'm not a perfect person. I've made mistakes. I've learned from stuff, Manning said. I relate with her [Strayed], because she just lays it all out there. It's raw.

As for what she plans for in the future, Manning said, I'm going to figure that out.

I'm going to find my place. I'm going to find out what I can do, what am I good at -- what's available as an option, she added. I haven't even moved into my apartment yet fully ... I don't know where this road's going to lead me ... I'm at a fork in the road right now and I haven't decided which path to take.

ABC News' Lauren Effron contributed to this report.

Original post:
Chelsea Manning says she was trying to 'do the right thing' when she leaked classified military information - ABC News

Chelsea Manning: Out of jail, talking about reason for leaks – The San Diego Union-Tribune

Chelsea Manning who as a U.S. soldier named Bradley Manning leaked 750,000 classified or sensitive U.S. documents is out of jail and spoke to ABC News about the motivation behind the breach of secrets.

Mannings 35-year sentence in 2013 for violations of the Espionage Act was commuted to seven years by President Barack Obama in January.

Some view Manning as a whistleblower; others see the former soldiers actions as a threat to national security.

The one-time Army intelligence analyst was released from federal prison at Fort Leavenworth on May 17. Now identifying as a woman, Manning goes by Chelsea.

In interviews being aired this week, Manning told ABC News that the decision to leak the documents which detailed the aftermath of fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, in addition to diplomat communications was prompted by a desire to draw the publics interest.

Welcome to The Intel, a blog examining the hot military news of the day

"We're getting all this information from all these different sources and it's just death, destruction, mayhem," Manning told ABC.

"We're filtering it all through facts, statistics, reports, dates, times, locations, and eventually, you just stop. I stopped seeing just statistics and information, and I started seeing people.

"I work with this information every day," Manning said. "I'm the subject-matter expert for this stuff. You know, we're the ones who work with it the most. We're the most familiar with it. It's not, you know, it's not a general who writes this stuff."

When asked why not air these concerns over the proper channels, Manning said, "the channels are there, but they don't work."

ABCs Nightline special edition, Declassified: The Chelsea Manning Story, airs Tuesday night. ABC began airing pieces of the interview on Friday.

Its Mannings first interview since leaving prison.

Some call Manning the most well-known transgender person to have served in the modern U.S. military.

The soldier enlisted in 2007. Prior to 2011, Manning could not have served openly as a gay person. Since June 2016, transgender troops can serve openly and get medical treatment, though July 1 is the deadline to begin allowing transgender recruits.

jen.steele@sduniontribune.com

Facebook: U-T Military

Twitter: @jensteeley

jen.steele@sduniontribune.com

Facebook: U-T Military

Twitter: @jensteeley

See the rest here:
Chelsea Manning: Out of jail, talking about reason for leaks - The San Diego Union-Tribune

Chelsea Manning explains why she leaked secret military documents, fought for transgender rights behind bars – ABC News

Chelsea Manning has been called a hero by some, a traitor by others, but when asked how she sees herself, she said, "I'm just me."

"It's as simple as that," Manning told "Nightline" co-anchor Juju Chang in an exclusive interview that will air in an upcoming special edition of "Nightline."

Manning, a transgender U.S. Army soldier, was in prison for seven years at the U.S. Disciplinary Barracks at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, after being convicted by a military tribunal under the Espionage and Computer Fraud and Abuse Acts and sentenced to 35 years in prison for releasing over 700,000 documents to WikiLeaks, of which only small amount of those documents ultimately lead to her conviction (some of them were published by The New York Times, The Guardian, and Der Spiegel).

When asked if she felt she owed the American public an apology, Manning said she has accepted responsibility for her actions.

"Anything I've done, it's me. There's no one else," she said. "No one told me to do this. Nobody directed me to do this. This is me. It's on me."

Manning at that time was a 22-year-old Army private named Bradley Manning. The information she disclosed included low level battlefield reports from Iraq and Afghanistan, evidence of civilian deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan, Guantanamo prison camp detainee profiles and U.S. diplomatic correspondence.

In referring to the military documents she was reviewing and what compelled her to risk her career and break the law by leaking them, Manning said, "We're getting all this information from all these different sources and it's just death, destruction, mayhem."

"We're filtering it all through facts, statistics, reports, dates, times, locations, and eventually, you just stop," she continued. "I stopped seeing just statistics and information, and I started seeing people."

Manning said she leaked the documents because she wanted to spark public debate. She said she didn't think leaking them would threaten national security.

"I work with this information every day," Manning said. "I'm the subject matter expert for this stuff. You know, we're the ones who work with it the most. We're the most familiar with it. It's not, you know, it's not a general who writes this stuff."

When asked why she, a low-level analyst, didn't raise her concerns up through the chain of command, Manning said, "the channels are there, but they don't work."

Manning pleaded guilty to some charges and was acquitted of the most serious charge brought against her: aiding the enemy. Her imprisonment was longer than any leaker in U.S. history. President Obama commuted her sentence to time served three days before he left office.

Days after Manning was sentenced, she came out as transgender on August 22, 2013. The military would not provide her with any treatment for her gender dysphoria, which she claimed resulted in her escalating distress. Her ACLU lawyer, Chase Strangio, filed a lawsuit on her behalf in September 2014. According to Strangio, Manning became "the first military prisoner to receive health care related to gender transition and was part of a shift in practice that lead to the elimination of the ban on open trans service in the military."

Fighting for hormone treatment was important for her, Manning said, because "it's literally what keeps me alive."

"[It] keeps me from feeling like I'm in the wrong body," she added. "I used to get these horrible feeling like I just wanted to rip my body apart and I don't want to have to go through that experience again. It's really, really awful."

Manning was released from prison on May 17 and has been documenting moments from her daily life on her Instagram and Twitter account, @xychelsea, from taking her first steps out of prison, to playing videos games to hanging out with friends.

Being on the outside, "it's a culture shock for anyone to go through any set of circumstances like that," Manning said.

When asked how she feels about the military today, Manning said, "I have nothing but utmost respect for the military."

"The military is diverse, and large, and it's public, it serves a public function, it serves a public duty," she continued. "And the people who are in the military work very hard, often for not much money, to make their country better and to protect their country. I have nothing but respect for that. And that's why I signed up."

Manning said she hasn't spoken to Obama since he commuted her sentence, but she would want to tell him thank you.

"I've been given a chance," she said. "That's all I asked for was a chance. That's it, and now this is my chance."

Excerpt from:
Chelsea Manning explains why she leaked secret military documents, fought for transgender rights behind bars - ABC News

Traitor And Genetic Male Bradley Manning Makes Excuses For His Crimes – The Daily Caller

Bradley Manning is a man. Hes also a traitor to his country. Turning him into a media darling isnt going to change that, and its only reminding everybody why the people who are doing so keep losing elections.

Lauren Effron and Nadine Shubailat, ABC News:

Chelsea Bradley Manning has been called a hero by some, a traitor by others, but when asked how she he sees herself himself, she he said, Im just me

In referring to the military documents she he was reviewing and what compelled her him to risk her his career and break the law by leaking them, Manning said, Were getting all this information from all these different sources and its just death, destruction, mayhem.

Were filtering it all through facts, statistics, reports, dates, times, locations, and eventually, you just stop, she he continued. I stopped seeing just statistics and information, and I started seeing people.

ABC Breaking News | Latest News Videos

Wow, theyre really trying to make a heroine hero out of this gal guy. Sorry, ABC, but Bradley Manning isnt Wonder Woman. He doesnt qualify on either count.

Nor is he a victim. His narcissism and self-pity are nauseating.

Im not sure if the taxpayers are still funding Mannings transition. But all the softball TV interviews in the world wont make him any less of a disgrace to his uniform and his country.

He can call himself anything he wants. I will never comply. #Science

Read more:
Traitor And Genetic Male Bradley Manning Makes Excuses For His Crimes - The Daily Caller

Reality Winner? Really? – The Daily Caller

My job is to read as much news as I can in a day and then make it somewhat more entertaining for my reader(s). Some days are easy, and some days arent so easy. And then theres today, when the top story in America is about a leaker of Top Secret documents who is literally named Reality Winner. Im not sure yet what sort of day this is.

Chuck The Boss Ross reports:

The 25-year-old woman who stole Top Secret documents from the National Security Agency and leaked them to The Intercept appears to be a supporter of Bernie Sanders and other progressive icons, such as Bill Maher and Michael Moore.

Reality Leigh Winners apparent social media footprint also shows that she is a supporter of other liberal causes, including the Womens March and the Islamic Society of North America, the Muslim civil rights group

Winner was indicted in federal court on Monday after she allegedly stole classified documents from her employer, Pluribus International, a defense contractor that does work for the NSA from its offices in Augusta, Ga.

Some say we need to send all the millennials to Gitmo. This is a perfect example of why thats not such a bad idea. Weve raised an entire generation of Americans who think that rules and laws dont apply to them. Unfortunately for this young woman, her name is Reality Winner and not Hillary Clinton, so shes actually being charged with her very obvious crime.

But, because this is 2017, she will now be lionized by the left. Hell, if they can make a hero out of Bradley Manning, they can make a hero out of anybody. The same people who howled at a county clerk in Kentucky for following her Christian conscience on gay marriage will defend this young lady for following her conscience on their religion. She hates the same people and things they do, so shes one of them. No enemies on the left.

My advice to young Ms. Winner is to declare that shes now a man. Make everyone else change their pronoun usage at the drop of a hat. Then, just wait for another Democrat to get elected president and commute her sentence. Go with what works.

She wouldnt even have to change her name, like Manning did. As weve all learned, Reality knows no gender.

Go here to read the rest:
Reality Winner? Really? - The Daily Caller

Assange deserves stiff punishment for putting US in peril – Canada Free Press

Congress must strengthen whistleblower protections, direct our intelligence agencies to better secure sensitive and classified data and put in place a modern legal framework to prosecute those that leak and make available classified information

WASHINGTON, D.C. The United States may soon have the opportunity to request the extradition of Julian Assange to the United States.

The U.S. can then finally begin criminal proceedings against him for the crimes he has committed.

It is clear that Assange has a single-focused mission to cause momentous damage and harm to the United States by disclosing secret and highly classified information. Now he can finally be held accountable.

Lets put this in context. I am a strong supporter of exposing government corruption and wrongdoing.

I also believe the appropriate mechanism of last resort is through whistleblowers. When all other means have been exhausted whistleblowers have the responsibility to approach the proper authorities to expose illegal or unethical conduct.

Whistleblowers are an avenue for exposing government wrongdoing. While there needs to be increased protection for government whistleblowers, an imperfect process does exist that allows for the identification of abuses while protecting national security interests.

Whistleblowers in the intelligence community, including those working in the Defense Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency and the Central Intelligence Agency, have paths outlined in a precise manner.

That allows for the exposure of corruption, protects classified information, and insures that whistleblowers do not face retaliation. This is a balanced approach and protects all parties.

Those that operate outside of the process like Bradley Manning, Edward Snowden, the recent leakers at the CIA and those who leaked the information on Mike Flynn are criminals. They had broken the law and ignored avenues established for whistleblowers.

Accordingly, Manning was charged and convicted. Edward Snowden should be tried and convicted and the recent leakers on Mike Flynn and those at the CIA must be too.

These leakers have all assumed much larger roles than their jobs allowed. They perceived themselves to be the only morally correct people with the authority and the judgment to determine right and wrong, what information needed to be in the public domain or kept secret, and whether its exposure was warranted even though it was classified as secret.

No one gave the leakers these authorities or this 20/20 judgment. They assumed it for themselves. It in turn jeopardized the security of the country. They may also have risked the security of their colleagues by disclosing such sensitive information.

Julian Assange is no different. While he may not have actually stolen the information, Assange claimed possession of those stolen materials and published them for the world to see. His public comments and actions clearly outline his motives.

Julian Assange has an inherent desire to fundamentally damage and destroy the West with a focus and emphasis on the United States.

Assanges attacks, while considerably international, have focused primarily on the West, but more specifically, on the U.S. His actions have never included measures against Russia, China or other countries significantly less free and open than those in the West.

There will be thousands of pages of legal debate that will be written about Assange. The debate will discuss whether or not he should be protected from prosecution because his actions represent a new media and therefore is sheltered by free speech.

Im hopeful that the future for Assange is that he is criminally charged and convicted for his illicit behavior towards the United States. The courts and a jury will, in the end, determine his fate. It is crucial that the trial take place.

Julian Assange has done significant damage to our national security. That has been his expressed intent.

Todays legal framework should recognize this and find him guilty. And if a trial results in Julian Assange finding a safe haven to protect him from conviction, then we will need to recognize that our laws are inadequate and must be updated.

Edward Snowden demonstrated that Bradley Manning was not an anomaly. Manning was just the first. He represented a new wave of traitors that have caused significant damage through the availability of data in cyberspace.

As a result, we will inevitably come to realize that Julian Assange will only be the first of many to take mass quantities of data to the public.

Moving forward in this new era, Congress must strengthen whistleblower protections, direct our intelligence agencies to better secure sensitive and classified data and put in place a modern legal framework to prosecute those that leak and make available classified information. These measures will ultimately protect the United States and its citizens from traitors and individuals seeking its demise.

A former Chairman of the U.S. House Intelligence Committee, Pete Hoekstra is a senior fellow at the Investigative Project on Terrorism and a graduate of the University of Michigans School of Business. Readers may write him at IPT, 5614 Connecticut Ave. NW, Suite 34, Washington, D.C. 20015

See the article here:
Assange deserves stiff punishment for putting US in peril - Canada Free Press

Bradley Manning Chelsea Manning Support Network

Bradley Manning with self-made equality poster

In late May 2010, Private First Class Bradley Manning, an intelligence analyst with the US Army in Baghdad, was arrested, suspected of providing the Collateral Murder video to WikiLeaks.

On June 6, 2010, he was charged with violating the Uniform Code of Military Justice, including eight criminal offenses and four noncriminal violations of Army regulations. The full charge sheet is available at http://www.bradleymanning.org/3163/charge-sheet-html.

His arrest was precipitated by an alleged online chat confession to well-known hacker and journalist Adrian Lamo.

Manning is currently imprisoned in the brig at US Marine Corps Base Quantico in Quantico, Virginia, awaiting trial. If convicted, Manning faces up to 52 years in prison, dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and benefits and unspecified fines. Since his arrest, Bradley Manning has issued no formal public statements. Daniel Ellsberg, the famed whistle blower behind the Pentagon Papers, has heralded Pfc. Bradley Manning as a hero.

The Collateral Murder Video American Soldiers Gunning Down Unarmed Civilians, Journalists and Children

On April 4, 2010, whistle-blowing website WikiLeaks published a classified video of a United States Apache helicopter firing on civilians in New Baghdad in 2007. The video, available at http://www.collateralmurder.com, shows Americans shooting and killing 11 individuals who do not return fire. Two of those killed were Reuters employees, including 22 year old Reuters photojournalist Namir Noor-Eldeen and his driver, 40 year old Saeed Chmagh.

The video includes an audio recording of the internal commentary by the American soldiers before, during and after the shooting. The soldiers repeatedly request and are granted permission to open fire, encourage one another and joke about the dead and dying civilians. (Full transcript available here http://www.collateralmurder.com/en/transcript.html)

A total of 11 adults were killed. Two children, passengers in a van that arrived on the scene after the first bout of gunfire had ceased, were seriously injured when the Apache helicopter opened fire on their van.

In 2007, Reuters called for an investigation into the attack. In response, a spokesman for the multinational forces in Baghdad stated: There is no question that coalition forces were clearly engaged in combat operations against a hostile force.

The Armys report on the deaths of two Reuters employees and the wounding of the two children is here: http://tinyurl.com/yzbp83l

There was no investigation of the nine other deaths.

No charges have been filed against the American soldiers in the Apache helicopter who shot and killed the civilians in the video.

Wikipedia article on Bradley Manning

Read more from the original source:
Bradley Manning Chelsea Manning Support Network

Bradley Manning Trial FAQ – wikileaks.org

Who is Bradley Manning?

When is the trial?

How long is the trial?

What is Bradley Manning accused of?

What is the potential sentence?

What is the status of the federal investigation against Julian Assange and six other founders, owners or administrators of WikiLeaks?

What is the scope of the WikiLeaks/Manning investigation, which US officials have described as unprecedented both in its scale and nature

How does secrecy in the Manning trial compare to secret trials in Guantanamo Bay?

What legal actions has WikiLeaks taken in relation to BM?

How can Manning be charged with Aiding the Enemy?

What does the Manning trial mean for press freedoms?

Where can I find Bradley Mannings plea statement?

Twenty-five-year-old Bradley Manning is alleged to be the source of a trove of written and audiovisual material detailing, inter alia, war crimes, corruption, torture and human rights violations published by WikiLeaks. Manning is a Nobel Peace Prize nominee. He has won numerous prizes, including The Guardian "Person of the Year" award in 2012. The material concerned every country in the world. It detailed the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people (the majority civilians) in occupied Iraq and Afghanistan. Details of the execution of an Iraqi family and its cover-up ultimately precipitated the end of the Iraq War, after the Iraqi government refused to renew US immunity from prosecution. The material also revealed the existence of US death squads in Afghanistan. More

Manning was deployed as an army intelligence analyst in Iraq. He was arrested in May 2010 at the age of 23. For the first nine months the US army placed Manning in conditions of pre-trial punishment which the UN Rapporteur on Torture found to be inhuman and degrading, in violation of the UN Convention Against Torture. The military judge ruled in January 2013 that Manning had been subjected to unlawful pretrial punishment for 112 days at the Quantico marine brig.

The trial commenced on 3 June 2013. Pre-trial hearings began on 16 December 2011. http://www.bradleymanning.org/learn-more/bradley-manning

The trial is scheduled to last twelve weeks.

View the infographic comparing prosecutions charged dates versus the timeline set out by the Manning plea. Read the charge sheet here

The most serious charge against Bradley Manning is Aiding the Enemy, a capital offence. Although the prosecution has stated that they will seek a life sentence and not the death penalty, it is within the discretion of the court to pursue it nonetheless.

The criminal US investigation against WikiLeaks was most recently confirmed to be ongoing by the Department of Justice spokesman for the Eastern District of Virginia, Peter Carr, on the 26th March 2013. The federal investigation into the WikiLeaks publication and its Australian publisher Julian Assange in connection with Mannnings prosecution will establish a precedent. If successful these efforts will criminalise national security journalism.

The various limbs of the Manning/WikiLeaks investigation progress in parallel and inform one another. Prior to the recent confirmation, the US Attorney General, Eric Holder, spoke about the WikiLeaks investigation to the press here and here), as did the Department of Justice spokesman Dean Boyd.

More: http://justice4assange.com/extraditing-assange.html#WHATLAWS

WikiLeaks Grand Jury 10-GJ-3-793

The WikiLeaks Grand Jury empaneled in Alexandria, Virginia since 2010 is the mechanism through which the Obama administration is determining how to shape its criminal prosecution against Julian Assange and WikiLeaks in connection with the material allegedly leaked by Bradley Manning. The WikiLeaks grand jury has the number 10-GJ-3-793. "10" is the year it began, "GJ" stands for grand jury, "3" refers to a conspiracy statute, and "793" to the Espionage Act as encoded in US law.

The military prosecutors in the Manning case are using transcripts from 10-GJ-3-793 WikiLeaks grand jury testimony against Bradley Manning in the military trial. Bradley Mannings lawyer requested to view this evidence but was denied access to it.

Australian embassy cables describe the WikiLeaks grand jury thus: "active and vigorous inquiry into whether Julian Assange can be charged under US law, most likely the 1917 Espionage Act". US officials told the Australian embassy ["the WikiLeaks case is unprecedented both in its scale and nature". According to these diplomatic communications, the WikiLeaks grand jury casts the net beyond Assange to see if any intermediaries had been involved in communications between Assange and Manning".

Grand juries confer special powers on prosecutors and the rules of evidence are not as strict as in a trial. Witnesses to the grand jury can be compelled to testify because they cannot refuse to do so on grounds of self-incrimination. Australian diplomatic communications stated that Grand juries can issue indictments under seal, and that theoretically one could already have been issued for Assange. In this particular case, it would be more likely that an indictment would become known at the point of extradition proceedings, should these take place, in the UK or Sweden.

FBI Criminal investigation against WikiLeaks

As of a year ago, approximately 20% of the FBI classified investigation file into WikiLeaks pertained to Bradley Manning. 8,741 pages (636 documents) related to Bradley Manning out of 42,135 pages (3,475 documents) relating to WikiLeaks. The remaining FBI file involved at least eight civilians related to the WikiLeaks disclosures, including the founders, owners, or managers of WikiLeaks. The FBI investigation includes damage assessments.

The FBI conducted illegal operations as part of the WikiLeaks investigation. One unlawful FBI WikiLeaks operation became known to the public after WikiLeaks spokesman Kristinn Hrafnsson revealed the incident in a live interview on national television. The information was subsequently confirmed by Icelands Minister of Interior, Ogmundur Jonasson. A parliamentary inquiry took place in February 2013 in relation to the FBIs WikiLeaks activities in Iceland. The FBI agents and prosecutors were expelled from the country and Icelandic authorities formally suspended their collaboration with the FBI. The FBI had allegedly attempted to entrap WikiLeaks and its founder, Julian Assange. The operation in Iceland was conducted in secret. It involved six FBI officers and two US prosecutors, one of which was a prosecutor at 10-GJ-3-793, the WikiLeaks grand jury in Alexandria, Virginia. The unlawful methods of the FBI investigation should not come as a surprise given that they are led by Neil MacBride, whose prosecutorial tactics involves claiming that US criminal law applies in foreign jurisdictions.

On July 28, 2010, one month after Pfc. Bradley Manning was arrested in Iraq, the FBI opened an official criminal investigation into the editor and chief of WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, partnering with the joint investigation of the US Defense Department and the US Department of States Diplomatic Security Service. The investigation then grew into a whole of government investigation, involving interagency coordination between the Department of Defense (DOD) including: CENTCOM; SOUTHCOM; the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA); Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA); Headquarters Department of the Army (HQDA); US Army Criminal Investigation Division (CID) for USFI (US Forces Iraq) and 1st Armored Division (AD); US Army Computer Crimes Investigative Unit (CCIU); 2nd Army (US Army Cyber Command); Within that or in addition, three military intelligence investigations were conducted. Department of Justice (DOJ) Grand Jury and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Department of State (DOS) and Diplomatic Security Service (DSS). In addition, Wikileaks has been investigated by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), Office of the National CounterIntelligence Executive (ONCIX), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA); the House Oversight Committee; the National Security Staff Interagency Committee, and the PIAB (Presidents Intelligence Advisory Board).

Source: Bradley Manning pre-trial hearing

Trials of accused terrorists in Guantanamo Bay are more transparent than the Manning trial. In the case of offshore trials in Guantanamo Bay, the military court committed to providing journalists with contemporaneous access to the material filed in court. Where information has been withheld at Guantanamo Bay proceedings, journalists can challenge the decision to keep the information secret. By contrast, the overwhelming majority of court records filed in the Manning case have been kept secret by the court and attempts to make them public have been dismissed. Although journalists have been been able to access portions of his pre-trial proceedings, the government refuses to provide its existing official court transcript of these public portions to the public. Instead, independent journalists have had to collect, piece together and report the trial in the absence of the governments compliance with the right of public access to criminal proceedings. These efforts are not funded by the US tax payer, but paid instead by donations. The most exhaustive record of Mannings court proceedings and the investigation against WikiLeaks is independent journalist Alexa OBriens site.

The Freedom of the Press Foundation is crowd-funding donations so that a court stenographer can be hired to take transcripts of the trial. Donations are tax-deductable in the US. https://pressfreedomfoundation.org/

The right of public access to the Manning hearings is protected by the First Amendment. Bradley Mannings lawyer was denied access to documents used by the prosecution. Journalists have not been allowed to view the documents filed in the proceedings.

WikiLeaks and Julian Assange have filed several petitions and complaints to the military court in relation to access in the Manning trial.

If Manning is convicted of the aiding the enemy offence, it would set a precedent that disclosing classified information to a publication is akin to communicating with Al Qaeda. The prosecution will call several operatives involved in the summary execution of Osama bin Laden to testify in secret. The prosecution has stated to the court that they would be pursuing this charge even if Manning was alleged to have submitted the information to The New York Times instead. Numerous prominent lawyers and journalists have opposed the pursual of this charge, including the spokesman for the US State Department under Hillary Clinton, PJ Crowley.

The charges against Manning and the potential or existing sealed indictment against Julian Assange carries with it the criminalisation of the news-gathering process and a calculated crippling of the First Amendment. The aiding the enemy charge implies that any press organisation, and any editor, anywhere in the world can be prosecuted for espionage, that is for divulging information that may be read by a person that the US has designated as an "enemy". In practice, this means that any information that is made available by a publisher on the Internet which the US government deems to be harmful to its national security can trigger the criminal prosecution of the publisher, even if it is a foreign publisher.

The US governments attempts to establish that the alleged WikiLeaks source and its publisher engaged in a conspiracy has been re-employed in the case of the US governments espionage subpoena of FOX news reporter James Rosen. The Manning trial and the WikiLeaks investigation marked the beginning of the sharp decline of press freedoms under Obama.

It can be found here.

Read more here:
Bradley Manning Trial FAQ - wikileaks.org

U.S. Intelligence Analyst Arrested in Wikileaks Video …

Skip Article Header. Skip to: Start of Article.

Federal officials have arrested an Army intelligence analyst who boasted of giving classified U.S. combat video and hundreds of thousands of classified State Department records to whistleblower site Wikileaks, Wired.com has learned.

PFC Bradley Manning, 22, of Potomac, Maryland, was stationed at Forward Operating Base Hammer, 40 miles east of Baghdad, where he was arrested nearly two weeks ago by the Armys Criminal Investigation Division. A family member says hes being held in custody in Kuwait, and has not been formally charged.

Manning was turned in late last month by a former computer hacker with whom he spoke online. In the course of their chats, Manning took credit forleaking a headline-makingvideo of a helicopter attack thatWikileaks posted online in April. The video showed a deadly 2007 U.S.helicopter air strike in Baghdad that claimed the lives of several innocentcivilians.

He said he also leaked three other items to Wikileaks: a separate videoshowing the notorious 2009 Garani air strike in Afghanistan that Wikileakshas previously acknowledged is in its possession; a classified Army document evaluatingWikileaks as a security threat, which the site posted in March; and apreviously unreported breach consisting of 260,000 classified U.S.diplomatic cables that Manning described as exposing almost criminal political back dealings.

Hillary Clinton, and several thousand diplomats around the world are going to have a heart attack when they wake up one morning, and find an entire repository of classified foreign policy is available, in searchable format, to the public, Manning wrote.

Wired.com could not confirm whether Wikileaks received the supposed 260,000 classified embassy dispatches. To date, a single classified diplomatic cable has appeared on the site: Released last February, it describes a U.S. embassy meeting with the government of Iceland. E-mail and a voicemail message left for Wikileaks founder Julian Assange on Sunday were not answered by the time this article was published.

The State Department said it was not aware of the arrest or the allegedly leaked cables. The FBI was not prepared to comment when asked about Manning.

Army spokesman Gary Tallman was unaware of the investigation but said, If you have a security clearance and wittingly or unwittingly provide classified info to anyone who doesnt have security clearance or a need to know, you have violated security regulations and potentially the law.

Mannings arrest comes as Wikileaks has ratcheted up pressure against various governments over the years with embarrassing documents acquired through a global whistleblower network that is seemingly impervious to threats from adversaries. Its operations are hosted on servers in several countries, and it uses high-level encryption for its document-submission process, providing secure anonymity for its sources and a safe haven from legal repercussions for itself. Since its launch in 2006, it has never outed a source through its own actions, either voluntarily or involuntarily.

Manning came to the attention of the FBI and Army investigators after he contacted former hacker Adrian Lamo late last month over instant messenger and e-mail. Lamo had just been the subject of a Wired.com article. Veryquickly in his exchange with the ex-hacker, Manning claimed to be the Wikileaks videoleaker.

If you had unprecedented access to classified networks 14 hours a day 7 days a week for 8+ months, what would you do? Manning asked.

From the chat logs provided by Lamo, and examined by Wired.com, it appears Manning senseda kindred spirit in the ex-hacker. He discussed personal issues that got himinto trouble with his superiors and left him socially isolated, and said hehad been demoted and was headed for an early discharge from the Army.

When Manning told Lamo that he leaked a quarter-million classified embassy cables, Lamo contacted the Army, and then met with Army CID investigators and the FBI at a Starbucks near his house in Carmichael, California, where he passed the agents a copy of the chat logs. At their second meeting with Lamo on May 27, FBI agents from the Oakland Field Office told the hacker that Manning had been arrested the day before in Iraq by Army CID investigators.

Lamo has contributed funds to Wikileaks in the past, and says he agonized over the decision to expose Manning he says hes frequently contacted by hackers who want to talk about their adventures, and he has never considered reporting anyone before. The supposed diplomatic cable leak, however, made him believe Mannings actions were genuinely dangerous to U.S. national security.

I wouldnt have done this if lives werent in danger, says Lamo, whodiscussed the details with Wired.com following Mannings arrest. He was in a war zone and basically trying to vacuum up as much classified information as he could, and just throwing it up into the air.

Manning told Lamo that he enlisted in the Army in 2007 and held a TopSecret/SCI clearance, details confirmed by his friends and family members. He claimed to have been rummaging through classified military and government networks for more than a year and said that the networks contained incredible things, awful things that belonged in the public domain, and not on some server stored in a dark room in Washington DC.

He first contacted Wikileaks Julian Assange sometime around late November last year, he claimed, after Wikileaks posted 500,000 pager messagescovering a 24-hour period surrounding the September 11, 2001 terror attacks.I immediately recognized that they were from an NSA database, and I feltcomfortable enough to come forward, he wrote toLamo. He said his role with Wikileaks was a source, not quite a volunteer.

Manning had already been sifting through the classified networks for monthswhen he discovered the Iraq video in late 2009, he said. The video, laterreleased by Wikileaks under the title Collateral Murder, shows a 2007Army helicopter attack on a group of men, someof whom were armed, that the soldiers believed were insurgents. The attackkilled two Reuters employees and an unarmed Baghdad man who stumbled on thescene afterward and tried to rescue one of the wounded by pulling him intohis van. The mans two children were in the van and suffered seriousinjuries in the hail of gunfire.

At first glance it was just a bunch of guys getting shot up by ahelicopter, Manning wrote of the video. No big deal about two dozenmore where that came from, right? But something struck me as odd with thevan thing, and also the fact it was being stored in a JAG officersdirectory. So I looked into it.

In January, while on leave in the United States, Manning visited a close friend inBoston and confessed hed gotten his hands on unspecified sensitiveinformation, and was weighing leaking it, according to the friend. Hewanted to do the right thing, says 20-year-old Tyler Watkins. That wassomething I think he was struggling with.

Manning passed the video to Wikileaks in February, he told Lamo. After April 5 when the video was released and made headlines Manning contacted Watkins from Iraq asking him about the reaction in the United States.

He would message me, Are people talking about it? Are the media saying anything? Watkins said. That was one of his major concerns, that once he had done this, was it really going to make a difference? He didnt want to do this just to cause a stir. He wanted people held accountable and wanted to see this didnt happen again.

Watkins doesnt know what else Manning might have sent to Wikileaks. But in his chats with Lamo, Manning took credit for a number of other disclosures.

The second video he claimed to have leaked shows a May 2009 air strike near Garani village in Afghanistan that the local government says killed nearly 100 civilians, most of them children. The Pentagon released a report about the incident last year, but backed down froma plan to show video of the attack to reporters.

As described by Manning in his chats with Lamo, his purported leaking was made possible by lax security online and off.

Manning had access to two classified networks from two separate securedlaptops: SIPRNET, the Secret-level network used by the Department of Defenseand the State Department, and the Joint Worldwide IntelligenceCommunications System which serves both agencies at the Top Secret/SCIlevel.

The networks, he said, were both air gapped from unclassified networks, but the environment at the base made it easy to smuggle data out.

I would come in with music on a CD-RW labeled with something like Lady Gaga, erase the music then write a compressed split file, he wrote. No one suspected a thing and, odds are, they never will.

[I] listened and lip-synced to Lady Gagas Telephone while exfiltratingpossibly the largest data spillage in American history, he added later.Weak servers, weak logging, weak physical security, weakcounter-intelligence, inattentive signal analysis a perfectstorm.

Manning told Lamo that the Garani video was leftaccessiblein a directoryon a U.S. Central Command server, centcom.smil.mil, by officers whoinvestigated the incident. The video, he said, was an encrypted AES-256 ZIPfile.

Mannings aunt, with whom he lived in the United States, had heard nothing about hisarrest when first contacted by Wired.com last week; Debra Van Alstyne said she last saw Manning during his leave in January and they had discussed his plans to enroll in college when his four-year stint in the Army was set to end in October 2011. She described him as smart and seemingly untroubled, with a natural talent for computers and a keen interest in global politics.

She said she became worried about her nephew recently after he disappeared from contact. Then Manning finally called Van Alstyne collect on Saturday. He told her that he was okay, but that he couldnt discuss what was going on, Van Alstyne said. He then gave her his Facebook password and asked her to post a message on his behalf.

The message reads: Some of you may have heard that I have been arrested for disclosure of classified information to unauthorized persons. SeeCollateralMurder.com.

An Army defense attorney then phoned Van Alstyne on Sunday and said Manningis being held in protective custody in Kuwait. He hasnt seen the case file, but he does understand that it does have to do with that CollateralMurder video, Van Alstyne said.

Mannings father said Sunday that hes shocked by his sons arrest.

I was in the military for five years, said Brian Manning, of Oklahoma. I had a Secret clearance, and I never divulged any information in 30 years since I got out about what I did. And Brad has always been very, very tight at adhering to the rules. Even talking to him after boot camp and stuff, he kept everything so close that he didnt open up to anything.

His son, he added, is a good kid. Never been in trouble. Never been on drugs, alcohol, nothing.

Lamo says he felt he had no choice but to turn in Manning, but that hes now concerned about the soldiers status and well-being. The FBI hasnt told Lamo what charges Manning may face, if any.

The agents did tell Lamo that he may be asked to testify against Manning. The Bureau was particularly interested in information that Manning gave Lamo about an apparently-sensitive military cybersecurity matter, Lamo said.

That seemed to be the least interesting information to Manning, however. What seemed to excite him most in his chats was his supposed leaking of the embassy cables. He anticipated returning to the states after his early discharge, and watching from the sidelines as his action bared the secret history of U.S. diplomacy around the world.

Everywhere theres a U.S. post, theres a diplomatic scandal that will be revealed, Manning wrote. Its open diplomacy. World-wide anarchy in CSV format. Its Climategate witha global scope, and breathtaking depth. Its beautiful, and horrifying.

Update: The Defense Department issued a statement Monday morning confirming Mannings arrest and his detention in Kuwait for allegedly leaking classified information.

United States Division-Center is currently conducting a joint investigation says the statement, which notes that Manning is deployed with 2nd Brigade 10th Mountain Division in Baghdad. The results of the investigation will be released upon completion of the investigation.

View post:
U.S. Intelligence Analyst Arrested in Wikileaks Video ...

Bradley Manning Trial FAQ – WikiLeaks

Who is Bradley Manning?

When is the trial?

How long is the trial?

What is Bradley Manning accused of?

What is the potential sentence?

What is the status of the federal investigation against Julian Assange and six other founders, owners or administrators of WikiLeaks?

What is the scope of the WikiLeaks/Manning investigation, which US officials have described as unprecedented both in its scale and nature

How does secrecy in the Manning trial compare to secret trials in Guantanamo Bay?

What legal actions has WikiLeaks taken in relation to BM?

How can Manning be charged with Aiding the Enemy?

What does the Manning trial mean for press freedoms?

Where can I find Bradley Mannings plea statement?

Twenty-five-year-old Bradley Manning is alleged to be the source of a trove of written and audiovisual material detailing, inter alia, war crimes, corruption, torture and human rights violations published by WikiLeaks. Manning is a Nobel Peace Prize nominee. He has won numerous prizes, including The Guardian "Person of the Year" award in 2012. The material concerned every country in the world. It detailed the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people (the majority civilians) in occupied Iraq and Afghanistan. Details of the execution of an Iraqi family and its cover-up ultimately precipitated the end of the Iraq War, after the Iraqi government refused to renew US immunity from prosecution. The material also revealed the existence of US death squads in Afghanistan. More

Manning was deployed as an army intelligence analyst in Iraq. He was arrested in May 2010 at the age of 23. For the first nine months the US army placed Manning in conditions of pre-trial punishment which the UN Rapporteur on Torture found to be inhuman and degrading, in violation of the UN Convention Against Torture. The military judge ruled in January 2013 that Manning had been subjected to unlawful pretrial punishment for 112 days at the Quantico marine brig.

The trial commenced on 3 June 2013. Pre-trial hearings began on 16 December 2011. http://www.bradleymanning.org/learn-more/bradley-manning

The trial is scheduled to last twelve weeks.

View the infographic comparing prosecutions charged dates versus the timeline set out by the Manning plea. Read the charge sheet here

The most serious charge against Bradley Manning is Aiding the Enemy, a capital offence. Although the prosecution has stated that they will seek a life sentence and not the death penalty, it is within the discretion of the court to pursue it nonetheless.

The criminal US investigation against WikiLeaks was most recently confirmed to be ongoing by the Department of Justice spokesman for the Eastern District of Virginia, Peter Carr, on the 26th March 2013. The federal investigation into the WikiLeaks publication and its Australian publisher Julian Assange in connection with Mannnings prosecution will establish a precedent. If successful these efforts will criminalise national security journalism.

The various limbs of the Manning/WikiLeaks investigation progress in parallel and inform one another. Prior to the recent confirmation, the US Attorney General, Eric Holder, spoke about the WikiLeaks investigation to the press here and here), as did the Department of Justice spokesman Dean Boyd.

More: http://justice4assange.com/extraditing-assange.html#WHATLAWS

WikiLeaks Grand Jury 10-GJ-3-793

The WikiLeaks Grand Jury empaneled in Alexandria, Virginia since 2010 is the mechanism through which the Obama administration is determining how to shape its criminal prosecution against Julian Assange and WikiLeaks in connection with the material allegedly leaked by Bradley Manning. The WikiLeaks grand jury has the number 10-GJ-3-793. "10" is the year it began, "GJ" stands for grand jury, "3" refers to a conspiracy statute, and "793" to the Espionage Act as encoded in US law.

The military prosecutors in the Manning case are using transcripts from 10-GJ-3-793 WikiLeaks grand jury testimony against Bradley Manning in the military trial. Bradley Mannings lawyer requested to view this evidence but was denied access to it.

Australian embassy cables describe the WikiLeaks grand jury thus: "active and vigorous inquiry into whether Julian Assange can be charged under US law, most likely the 1917 Espionage Act". US officials told the Australian embassy ["the WikiLeaks case is unprecedented both in its scale and nature". According to these diplomatic communications, the WikiLeaks grand jury casts the net beyond Assange to see if any intermediaries had been involved in communications between Assange and Manning".

Grand juries confer special powers on prosecutors and the rules of evidence are not as strict as in a trial. Witnesses to the grand jury can be compelled to testify because they cannot refuse to do so on grounds of self-incrimination. Australian diplomatic communications stated that Grand juries can issue indictments under seal, and that theoretically one could already have been issued for Assange. In this particular case, it would be more likely that an indictment would become known at the point of extradition proceedings, should these take place, in the UK or Sweden.

FBI Criminal investigation against WikiLeaks

As of a year ago, approximately 20% of the FBI classified investigation file into WikiLeaks pertained to Bradley Manning. 8,741 pages (636 documents) related to Bradley Manning out of 42,135 pages (3,475 documents) relating to WikiLeaks. The remaining FBI file involved at least eight civilians related to the WikiLeaks disclosures, including the founders, owners, or managers of WikiLeaks. The FBI investigation includes damage assessments.

The FBI conducted illegal operations as part of the WikiLeaks investigation. One unlawful FBI WikiLeaks operation became known to the public after WikiLeaks spokesman Kristinn Hrafnsson revealed the incident in a live interview on national television. The information was subsequently confirmed by Icelands Minister of Interior, Ogmundur Jonasson. A parliamentary inquiry took place in February 2013 in relation to the FBIs WikiLeaks activities in Iceland. The FBI agents and prosecutors were expelled from the country and Icelandic authorities formally suspended their collaboration with the FBI. The FBI had allegedly attempted to entrap WikiLeaks and its founder, Julian Assange. The operation in Iceland was conducted in secret. It involved six FBI officers and two US prosecutors, one of which was a prosecutor at 10-GJ-3-793, the WikiLeaks grand jury in Alexandria, Virginia. The unlawful methods of the FBI investigation should not come as a surprise given that they are led by Neil MacBride, whose prosecutorial tactics involves claiming that US criminal law applies in foreign jurisdictions.

On July 28, 2010, one month after Pfc. Bradley Manning was arrested in Iraq, the FBI opened an official criminal investigation into the editor and chief of WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, partnering with the joint investigation of the US Defense Department and the US Department of States Diplomatic Security Service. The investigation then grew into a whole of government investigation, involving interagency coordination between the Department of Defense (DOD) including: CENTCOM; SOUTHCOM; the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA); Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA); Headquarters Department of the Army (HQDA); US Army Criminal Investigation Division (CID) for USFI (US Forces Iraq) and 1st Armored Division (AD); US Army Computer Crimes Investigative Unit (CCIU); 2nd Army (US Army Cyber Command); Within that or in addition, three military intelligence investigations were conducted. Department of Justice (DOJ) Grand Jury and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Department of State (DOS) and Diplomatic Security Service (DSS). In addition, Wikileaks has been investigated by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), Office of the National CounterIntelligence Executive (ONCIX), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA); the House Oversight Committee; the National Security Staff Interagency Committee, and the PIAB (Presidents Intelligence Advisory Board).

Source: Bradley Manning pre-trial hearing

Trials of accused terrorists in Guantanamo Bay are more transparent than the Manning trial. In the case of offshore trials in Guantanamo Bay, the military court committed to providing journalists with contemporaneous access to the material filed in court. Where information has been withheld at Guantanamo Bay proceedings, journalists can challenge the decision to keep the information secret. By contrast, the overwhelming majority of court records filed in the Manning case have been kept secret by the court and attempts to make them public have been dismissed. Although journalists have been been able to access portions of his pre-trial proceedings, the government refuses to provide its existing official court transcript of these public portions to the public. Instead, independent journalists have had to collect, piece together and report the trial in the absence of the governments compliance with the right of public access to criminal proceedings. These efforts are not funded by the US tax payer, but paid instead by donations. The most exhaustive record of Mannings court proceedings and the investigation against WikiLeaks is independent journalist Alexa OBriens site.

The Freedom of the Press Foundation is crowd-funding donations so that a court stenographer can be hired to take transcripts of the trial. Donations are tax-deductable in the US. https://pressfreedomfoundation.org/

The right of public access to the Manning hearings is protected by the First Amendment. Bradley Mannings lawyer was denied access to documents used by the prosecution. Journalists have not been allowed to view the documents filed in the proceedings.

WikiLeaks and Julian Assange have filed several petitions and complaints to the military court in relation to access in the Manning trial.

If Manning is convicted of the aiding the enemy offence, it would set a precedent that disclosing classified information to a publication is akin to communicating with Al Qaeda. The prosecution will call several operatives involved in the summary execution of Osama bin Laden to testify in secret. The prosecution has stated to the court that they would be pursuing this charge even if Manning was alleged to have submitted the information to The New York Times instead. Numerous prominent lawyers and journalists have opposed the pursual of this charge, including the spokesman for the US State Department under Hillary Clinton, PJ Crowley.

The charges against Manning and the potential or existing sealed indictment against Julian Assange carries with it the criminalisation of the news-gathering process and a calculated crippling of the First Amendment. The aiding the enemy charge implies that any press organisation, and any editor, anywhere in the world can be prosecuted for espionage, that is for divulging information that may be read by a person that the US has designated as an "enemy". In practice, this means that any information that is made available by a publisher on the Internet which the US government deems to be harmful to its national security can trigger the criminal prosecution of the publisher, even if it is a foreign publisher.

The US governments attempts to establish that the alleged WikiLeaks source and its publisher engaged in a conspiracy has been re-employed in the case of the US governments espionage subpoena of FOX news reporter James Rosen. The Manning trial and the WikiLeaks investigation marked the beginning of the sharp decline of press freedoms under Obama.

It can be found here.

View original post here:
Bradley Manning Trial FAQ - WikiLeaks