Will Bitcoin Ever Run Out? – Yahoo Finance

Sheldon Cooper/SOPA Images/Shutterstock

Bitcoin has been around since 2009, but its only been the last few years where its been on the map of the average investor. Thats likely due to the fact that the price of Bitcoin has absolutely exploded. Even after dropping over 50% from its high in 2021, Bitcoin is still up over 250% over the last year, and over 32,500% since 2014. Whereas lots of investors have gotten excited over the prospect of becoming rich by investing in Bitcoin, not many people fully understand exactly what Bitcoin is or how it works. For example, you may have heard that the total number of Bitcoin allowed to exist is limited. But, how is that possible, and what does it mean? Will Bitcoin ever run out?

Check Out: What Is the Next Big Cryptocurrency To Explode in 2021?Consider: Is the Shiba Inu Coin the Cryptocurrency You Should Be Watching?

Heres a quick overview of how Bitcoin is produced, how it can be limited and what it all means for the future of the cryptocurrency.

While the mechanics of the operations can get a bit confusing, Bitcoin is produced by miners, but electronic miners rather than physical miners. The way it works is that Bitcoin miners record transactions on the blockchain, which is a decentralized ledger. To record a transaction, miners must solve complex algorithms using massive computer power. Once a transaction is recorded, which occurs about every 10 minutes on average, the miner is rewarded with Bitcoin. Currently, the reward for miners is 6.25 Bitcoin, but this amount is halved every four years. In 2009, when Bitcoin was first developed, the reward was 50 Bitcoin. Its estimated that the next halving will be in 2024, when the reward will drop to 3.125 Bitcoin.

Learn More: Where Does Cryptocurrency Come From?

Under the mining system, it might seem like there would be no limit to the amount of Bitcoin that could be produced. However, the way its source code is written, there can be no more Bitcoin produced once 21 million coins are in the system. The way the mining system is set up means that the final Bitcoin wont be mined until about 2140, however. So, although the production rate will slow, there will still be new Bitcoin coming online for over 100 years.

Story continues

See: If You Invested $1,000 in These Cryptocurrencies a Year Ago, Heres How Much Youd Have Now

Bitcoin will never run out, as there have already been over 18 million Bitcoin mined and there will ultimately be 21 million in the system. However, the introduction of new supply will eventually stop. This is one of the reasons Bitcoin bulls aggressively tout the cryptocurrency. In their opinion, increasing demand for Bitcoin will eventually overcome the limited supply, thereby driving up prices exponentially.

This could prove true, as more and more businesses and even countries are beginning to accept Bitcoin as a valid form of currency. El Salvador, for example, became the first country to accept Bitcoin as legal tender on June 9. However, the future demand for Bitcoin is still far from certain, which is part of the reason there are such wild swings in its price.

More From GOBankingRates

Last updated: July 29, 2021

This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: Will Bitcoin Ever Run Out?

Visit link:
Will Bitcoin Ever Run Out? - Yahoo Finance

What should Bitcoin investors do after the recent rally? – Moneycontrol.com

After the crash in its price during May, Bitcoin appears to be back in the reckoning. After a 53 percent fall between April 16 and July 21, Bitcoins price was up 32 percent just this past week. This sort of volatility is sure to unnerve many investors. But for those that track and invest in cryptocurrencies, it was just another day in office. We are bullish on the strong fundamentals of Bitcoin. Price fluctuations such as these are just signs of an early market and would stabilise once the market matures, says Avinash Shekhar, Co-CEO of ZebPay. When you look at a larger time frame, these small price fluctuations would be invisible, he adds.

Reasons for the recent upswing in price

Bitcoin rallied after Elon Musk said in an online event hosted by ARK invest that Tesla may allow bitcoin as payment once bitcoin mining hits the milestone of more than 50 percent green energy usage in near future. After this positive statement, Bitcoin prices rose, says Hitesh Malviya, founder of itsblockchain.com.

But experts caution that Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies are among the most volatile of all instruments. We might see heavy volatility in the markets soon, though not in the same proportion as earlier, says Gaurav Dahake, Founder and CEO of Bitbns.

Malviya points out that Bitcoins recent recovery was also due to some social media reports that speculated about Amazons plan of allowing bitcoin as a payment method.

Also read: Want to invest in Bitcoin, Dogecoin and Ethereum? Here's how you can dabble in cryptocurrencies

Lumpsum or SIPs in Bitcoin?

Now, Rs 1 lakh invested in Bitcoin in July 2020 would have grown to Rs 3.57 lakh by now. But is that reason enough to buy cryptocurrencies?

Not really. But crypto enthusiasts say there is a way to make this volatility work in your favour. They say that savvy investors should opt for systematic investment plans (SIPs). Some exchanges such as Bitbns, Unocoin, Vauld and Zebpay allow you to start an SIP in Bitcoin, Ethereum and other cryptocurrencies.

You can start with a minimum of Rs 100 and invest via daily, weekly and monthly SIPs. A SIP of Rs 10,000 in bitcoin started last year would have grown to Rs 1.97 lakh.

With the Automatic Investment Plans (AIPs, which works like SIPs) strategy, you can average out your buying price, says Darshan Bathija, CEO of Vauld. An SIP in a cryptocurrency saves you from big losses if the value of your coin were to suddenly crash.

But its not as straightforward as, say, a mutual fund SIP. An SIP (in bitcoin) can work wonders. However, in rising markets, investing via SIPs means that you will be sitting on lesser profits or may not be able to take advantage of a market crash, as your investments are spread out. Otherwise, investing via SIP is always a good idea, says Rishabh Parakh, a chartered accountant and founder of NRP Capitals.

Also read: Millennials and cryptocurrencies: A story of missed profits, hard lessons and losses

Should you invest in the Bitcoin now?

Dont get swayed by last weeks price rise. First-time investors must be especially careful. Spend time understanding more about the Bitcoin before investing. If you choose to invest, deploy small amounts, as low as Rs 100, to try it out. And if you intend to invest significant amounts, you should use averaging strategies as no one can time the market, says Ajeet Khurana, a cryptocurrency expert and founder of Genezis Network.

Read more here:
What should Bitcoin investors do after the recent rally? - Moneycontrol.com

Bye-bye, bitcoin: It’s time to ban cryptocurrencies | TheHill – The Hill

Ive never quite understood why cryptocurrencies are worth anything. Of course, the untraceable payments are worth a lot to ransomware hackers, cyber criminals and money launderers. But dollars, euros and yen are backed by nations respective treasuries. If someone invents a cryptocurrency, any value is based solely on convincing others it has value. But is it a usable means of exchange? International banking officials say cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin are speculative assets, not sustainable, usable money.

Yet the epidemic of hugely disruptive ransomware attacks in recent months on JBS Foods, a major meat processor; on Colonial Pipelines, our critical infrastructure, causing gasoline shortages for weeks; and on 1,000 or more U.S. businesses on July 4 highlights the enormous risks. Moreover, hundreds of small towns, hospitals, school districts and small businesses have been hit by the ransomware epidemic all enabled by cryptocurrencies.

How should governments respond? Besieged with cyberattacks, the Biden administration has been struggling with this question of cybersecurity with few clear answers. Cyber offense still seems to beat cyber defense.

As the eminent economic analyst Martin Wolf outlined in a recent Financial Times essay, the risks and chaos of a wild world of unstable private money is a libertarian fantasy. According to a recent Federal Reserve paper, there are already some 8,000 cryptocurrencies. Its a new mom-and-pop cottage industry.

How should governments respond? Wolf argues that central banks (e.g., the U.S. Federal Reserve) should create their own official digital currencies central bank digital currencies (CBDC) and make cryptocurrencies illegal.

Ive been asking the same question: Who needs cryptocurrencies? Apart from the nasty uses and wild speculative value swings, data mining to produce bitcoin is a serious environmental hazard, using huge amounts of electricity by rows and rows of computers.

Governments should guarantee safe, stable and usable money. Already, according to the Atlantic Council GeoEconomics Center'sCBDC Tracker, 81 countries representing 90 percent of worldgross domestic product are at various stages of researching and exploring the adoption of digital currencies.

The four largest central banks the European Central Bank, the Bank of England, the Bank of Japan and the U.S. Federal Reserve are all exploring CBDCs, though the U.S. lags behind. Meanwhile, China is already digitizing its currency, the RMB, and allowing foreign visitors to use it for payments. Though China is still a long way from having an international reserve currency to rival the dollar, its digitized RMB is a step in that direction.

Nonetheless, caution is well advised, as there are important, complex issues that must be sorted out before launching an official digital currency. These issues include equity: Should the digital dollar be available to all or just used for certain business transactions? I would argue it must be for all. Should a U.S. CBDC augment cash or totally replace it, and would there be a transition period? Then there is the impact on private banks: Should individuals have bank accounts with the Fed rather than private banks? What should be the relation between private banks and the Fed with regard to currency? Should businesses have digital wallets? How would international payments work?

And not least, there is the question of privacy and surveillance. A digitized dollar would likely make it hard to dodge taxes with untraceable cash. But just how traceable would the public and Congress accept a CBDC to become? Would the fact of a CBDC making transactions safer, faster and cheaper be worth some trade-off?

Then there is the question of whether the worlds major powers would cooperate in outlawing cryptocurrencies and reach agreement on rules and regulations of CBDCs. China, always with an eye on control, has indicated skepticism, if not disdain, toward cryptocurrencies. Indeed, that was one driver in Beijings swift move to digitize the RMB. This could be an area of U.S.-China cooperation worth exploring.

If China were on board, the possibility of a U.N. Security Council resolution to ban cryptocurrencies could be in the cards. That would be a foundation for taking the issue to the Group of 20 to make it a global norm.

For now, there are a whole lot more questions than answers. But the insidious new industry of cyber hacking and ransomware is an unacceptable disruptive threat to American economic security. It is a problem that is growing, not subsiding. And the proliferation of do-it-yourself digital currencies is a serious and bad omen for global financial stability.

Yet amid an international order that is fraying and fragmenting, its an open question whether such threats are enough to catalyze sufficient international cooperation. I suspect that with a little U.S. leadership, jump-starting financial diplomacy would go a long way. Certainly, its a good test for President BidenJoe BidenBriahna Joy Gray: White House thinks extending student loan pause is a 'bad look' Biden to meet with 11 Democratic lawmakers on DACA: report Former New York state Senate candidate charged in riot MOREs efforts to align democracies.

Robert A. Manning is a senior fellow of the Brent Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security at the Atlantic Council. He was a senior counselor to the undersecretary of State for global affairs from 2001 to 2004, a member of the U.S. Department of State policy planning staff from 2004 to 2008 and on the National Intelligence Council strategic futures group from 2008 to 2012. Follow him on Twitter @Rmanning4.

View post:
Bye-bye, bitcoin: It's time to ban cryptocurrencies | TheHill - The Hill

From bitcoin to big banks, why America’s concentration of wealth is getting worse – MSNBC

Help us celebrate MSNBCs first 25 years by joining us every day for 25 days as our anchors, hosts, and correspondents share their thoughts on where we've been and where were going.

In 1996, women made up just 0.2 percent of Fortune 500 CEOs, compared to a record 8.1 percent in 2021. Unlike in 1996, or any time before, today the U.S. treasury secretary, speaker of the House and vice president are all women. A lot of progress has been made when it comes to power and influence in business and politics over the past 25 years. Or has it?

When it comes to the concentration of power and wealth, things actually seem to be getting worse, not better.

CEOs of the largest U.S. companies in 1996 made 154 times what their workers made on average. In 2020, the CEO-to-worker pay ratio ballooned to as high as 830 for some of the worst offenders. Weve put on conferences, led campaigns and certainly done a lot of talking. But when it comes to the concentration of power and wealth, things actually seem to be getting worse, not better. The big guy has continued to win big time.

This in turn has driven the economic and cultural divide wider as weve become a country that we often say is divided by red and blue. But it's also divided by green.

I started my career on Wall Street just shy of 25 years ago, at a time when so-called locker room talk was the status quo. It was also the early days of the internet, which would lead to the frenzied dot-com boom, meaning anything related to the internet was pure investing gold.

Between then and now, the dot-com bubble burst. The housing crisis devastated millions of homeowners, wiped out banks, crushed markets and sparked regulation aimed at protecting consumers. The government came to the rescue.

That rescue stabilized our financial system, and the continued support from the Federal Reserve and central banks around the world provided a safety net for markets. Investors were incentivized to take on bigger risks and got significantly richer. Individuals didnt always fare so well. Those who didnt have money in the markets didnt benefit from the Great Recessions Great Recovery. Meanwhile, things like the cost of college and deficit spending exploded, leaving younger generations less capable of pursuing the American dream than their parents.

In other words, as rich people have gotten richer, poor people have gotten poorer ... and angrier.

A lot of this anger stems from the fact that many of the perpetrators of the financial crisis didnt get the severe punishment lawmakers on both sides of the aisle demanded. E-commerce behemoths have steadily squeezed out brick-and-mortar small businesses, and professional investors bought up massive swaths of distressed real estate, outbidding families.

Somewhat ironically, anti-corporate America sentiment helped elect Donald Trump, the richest president in U.S. history, who flanked himself with senior staff and Cabinet members from Goldman Sachs and the hedge fund industry after attacking Wall Street on the campaign trail. (On his first international trip as president to Saudi Arabia, Trump was joined by Steve Schwarzman, CEO of private equity giant Blackstone.)

During Trumps presidency, the economy generally improved and the pro-business policies supercharged markets. But those overall gains were exponentially better for wealthy people.

During Trumps presidency, the economy generally improved and the pro-business policies supercharged markets. But those overall gains were exponentially better for wealthy people. The inequality divide deepened, and even though some business leaders have worked to transform corporate culture and promote "stakeholder capitalism," these efforts, too, have faced much criticism, with critics labeling the changes "woke economics."

In the markets, weve seen anti-establishment sentiment fuel the explosion of cryptocurrencies and meme stocks. Cryptocurrencies were born out of the desire to decentralize power and control in our financial systems. Meme stocks are part of a phenomenon where young people who mostly congregate and communicate online get together and buy up stocks of nearly bankrupt companies like AMC Theatres and GameStop, artificially driving up prices. Many of those same investors have redeployed their meme stock gains, buying cryptocurrencies and furthering their meteoric rise in value.

Its been extraordinary to witness from both financial and cultural perspectives a rebuke of the current establishment. But the establishment is buying in, too. Weve also seen more legacy, established businesses dive into crypto and meme stocks. These moves are less about politics and cultural movements and more about new ways the biggest players already in the game can gamble and win (which they have).

Those who truly understand the complexities of markets and the potential of decentralized digital currencies have already made tremendous amounts of money in these lanes. But as with so much about our financial system, the future for the little guy might not be quite as bright.

This has a lot to do with new Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Gary Gensler, who has remained mostly quiet on crypto but has deep knowledge of the tricks of the trade and is on a mission to kick many of those tricks to the curb. Gensler spent close to 20 years on Wall Street. Its like someone who grew up in a crime family becoming the chief of police: He knows where the bodies are buried and hes not afraid to dig.

We have no idea what's in store for this new wave of investing or the crypto craze. But when the SEC does step in, and I think it will, its the first-time investors who will be in the most trouble. The people who will make it out fine again will be the big, sophisticated investors who were already big and rich to begin with.

When the SEC does step in, and I think it will, its the first-time investors who will be in the most trouble.

Rich people will continue to get richer and poor people poorer, and inevitably attention will return (as it should) to Washington. Lawmakers will point fingers, call for hearings and excoriate business leaders. But if history is our guide, little will change.

Despite public outrage, for the richest Americans and our most powerful businesses, enjoying and exploiting loopholes is the law of the land in the United States of America. Regulation and tax policy seem to always find a way to favor the ones with the deepest pockets.

The future may be different. There may be a whole new set of winners and losers, new technologies and new visionaries. Or maybe the names will change but the story will stay the same.

Continue reading here:
From bitcoin to big banks, why America's concentration of wealth is getting worse - MSNBC

Bitcoin continues slide to end the week – Fox Business

CoinShares chief strategy officer Meltem Demirors and Defiance ETF CIO Sylvia Jablonski on the latest headlines surrounding Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies.

Bitcoin was trading more than 3% lower on Friday morning.

The price was around $37,934 per coin, while rivals Ethereum and Dogecoin were trading lower at around $2,356 and 30 cents per coin, respectively, according to Coindesk.

ELON MUSK QUESTIONS ASSERTIONS BITCOIN IS SUSTAINABLE

Tesla CEO Elon Musk continues the Bitcoin debate, On Thursday he tried to refute claims that Bitcoin is "greener than critics say."

As part of a string of tweets Thursday, Bitcoin Magazine cited Kraken CEO Jesse Powell saying not only that the digital currency is green but that Musk who has recently questioned the digital currency's environmental impact "has some more studying to do."

"Based on what data," Musk replied.

To bolster their point, Bitcoin Magazine released a round of back-to-back tweets citing information from its latest article using data from The Cambridge Centre For Alternative Finance.

"The Cambridge Centre For Alternative Finance estimates that 76% of all miners use renewable energies as part of their mix. CoinShares estimates that total share of renewables may even be as high as 73%," the magazine tweeted.

In recent months, Musk has drawn attention to cryptocurrency, expressing concern over its mining process the process of creating the cryptocurrency. Bitcoin mining is done by solving mathematical puzzles on powerful computers that require large amounts of energy.

NRCC BEGINS ACCEPTING CRYPTOCURRENCY CAMPAIGN DONATIONS

The National Republican Congressional Committee, the financing arm for House Republicans, will become the first national party committee to begin acceptingcryptocurrency for campaign contributions.

"The NRCC is proud to lead the charge in acceptingcryptocurrency campaign contributions," NRCC Chairman and Republican Minnesota Congressman Tom Emmer said in a statement. "We are focused on pursuing every avenue possible to further our mission of stopping Nancy Pelosis socialist agenda and retaking the House majority, and this innovative technology will help provide Republicans the resources we need to succeed."

The NRCC will accept cryptocurrency contributions using payment service Bitpay, which will convert the donations into dollars prior to landing in the organization's account.

Axios, the first to report the story,

Visit link:
Bitcoin continues slide to end the week - Fox Business

Why this crypto CEO uses a simple and traditional investment strategy to build his bitcoin holdings – CNBC

Bitcoin has had a whirlwind few months, surpassing the $60,000 mark for the first time ever in March before promptly tumbling down near $30,000 in less than three months.

The volatility, stemming from a wide range of factors including Elon Musk's tweets and a FBI raid on Russian hackers, has pummeled the value of the digital token, which was drawing in waves of newcomers with its lightning-fast growth.

But despite the volatility of the coin, some investors have continued to steadily build their holdings. That includes Adam Traidman, CEO and co-founder of BRD, a popular crypto wallet with more than 7 million users. Traidman is a veteran of bitcoin's massive price swings, which is why he doesn't try to time the market.

Rather, Traidman uses a more conventional investment strategy: dollar-cost averaging.

To take advantage of dollar-cost averaging, you invest a fixed amount on a regular basis instead of buying a lump sum of stock all at once. This allows investors to avoid trying to time the market and takes the emotion out of investing.

For Traidman, that means buying a little bit of bitcoin every few days, no matter the price at the time. This, he says, helps him avoid the psychological stress of buying at, say, $60,000 only to see his investment lose 20% of its value in a day.

BRD Wallet CEO Adam Traidman

BRD

"Casual investors have a tendency to buy into the hype cycle and sell when the losses become a reality," Traidman tells CNBC Make It. "It's crazy, illogical thinking, but it happens all the time. Why would people buy high and sell low? Well, they don't want to, but they sell out of fear."

Although dollar-cost averaging is typically used for more traditional investments, like stocks and index funds, it makes sense to apply it to crypto too. Throughout its more than 10-year lifespan, bitcoin has seen several massive price rallies followed by steep drops. Each drop, however, has left bitcoin's floor price higher than it was before the rally.

"Before this run up, we were looking at bitcoin prices that were at $8,000, $9,000, $10,000," Traidman says. "Now we're upset when it's three times higher than that."

Before this run up, we were looking at bitcoin prices that were at $8,000, $9,000, $10,000. Now we're upset when it's three times higher than that.

Adam Traidman

CEO, BRD Wallet

Still, Traidman is quick to note that putting your money in alternative investments like bitcoin is akin to "professional gambling" and advises people to only invest money that they are willing to lose entirely.

He looks at bitcoin as a long-term investment, rather than a way to get rich quick. "I'm not letting [the price drop] bother me, because I'm confident that the price performance charts have shown that it's going to return in the long term."

Traidman has a portion of every paycheck converted to bitcoin, regardless of the price, and doesn't worry about whether he's buying at the top or bottom on a given day.

"Dollar-cost averaging ends up making sense in the long term," he says. "If you contribute a little bit every time, in the long term you end up with a pretty darn good return if you an weather all the ups and downs."

Sign up now: Get smarter about your money and career with our weekly newsletter

Don't miss: This couple retired in their 30shere's why they keep $80,000 in their savings account

Original post:
Why this crypto CEO uses a simple and traditional investment strategy to build his bitcoin holdings - CNBC

Bitcoin just got its first makeover in four years – CNBC

The first bitcoin upgrade in four years has just been approved by miners around the world. It is a rare moment of consensus among stakeholders, and crypto experts tell CNBC it's a pretty big deal for the world's most popular cryptocurrency.

The upgrade is called Taproot, and it's due to take effect in November. When it does, it will mean greater transaction privacy and efficiency and crucially, it will unlock the potential for smart contracts, a key feature of its blockchain technology which eliminates middlemen from even the most complex transactions.

"Taproot matters, because it opens a breadth of opportunity for entrepreneurs interested in expanding bitcoin's utility," said Alyse Killeen, founder and managing partner of bitcoin-focused venture firm Stillmark.

Unlike bitcoin's 2017 upgrade referred to as the "last civil war" because of the contentious ideological divide separating adherents Taproot has near universal support, in part because these changes are fairly incremental improvements to the code.

Bitcoin's makeover has to do with digital signatures, which you can think of as the fingerprint an individual leaves on every transaction they make.

Right now, the cryptocurrency uses something called the "Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm," which is created from the private key which controls a bitcoin wallet and ensures that bitcoin can only be spent by the rightful owner. Taproot will switch over to something known as Schnorr signatures, which essentially makes multi-signature transactions unreadable, according to Alejandro De La Torre, vice president at Hong Kong-headquartered major mining pool Poolin.

In practice, that means greater privacy, because your keys won't have as much exposure on the chain. "You can kind of hide who you are a little bit better, which is good," said Brandon Arvanaghi, previously a security engineer at crypto exchange Gemini.

It won't translate to greater anonymity for your individual bitcoin address on the public blockchain, but it will make simple transactions indistinguishable from those that are more complex and comprised of multiple signatures.

These souped-up signatures are also a game changer for smart contracts, which are self-executing agreements that live on the blockchain. Smart contracts can theoretically be used for practically any kind of transaction, from paying your rent each month, to registering your vehicle.

Taproot makes smart contracts cheaper and smaller, in terms of the space they take up on the blockchain. Killeen says that this enhanced functionality and efficiency presents "mind blowing potential."

Currently, smart contracts can be created both on bitcoin's core protocol layer and on the Lightning Network, a payments platform built on bitcoin, which enables instant transactions. Smart contracts executed on the Lightning Network typically lead to faster and less costly transactions.

"Lightning transactions can be fractions of a penny...while a bitcoin transaction at the core protocol layer can be much more expensive than that," explained Killeen.

Developers have already begun to build on Lightning, in anticipation of the upgrade, which will allow for highly specific contracts.

"The most important thing for Taproot is...smart contracts," saidFred Thiel, CEO of cryptocurrency mining specialist Marathon Digital Holdings. "It's already the primary driver of innovation on the ethereum network. Smart contracts essentially give you the opportunity to really build applications and businesses on the blockchain."

As more programmers build smart contracts on top of bitcoin's blockchain, there is also the potential for bitcoin to become more of a player in the world of DeFi, or decentralized finance, a term used to describe financial applications designed to cut out the middleman.

Today, ethereum dominates as the blockchain of choice for these apps, also referred to as "dapps."

Though the bitcoin community has agreed to the upgrade, the rollout itself won't happen until probably November. A lot of testing ahead of time will reduce the likelihood of something going wrong during an upgrade.

"Upgrades allow the extremely remote possibility of a bug entering the system, which would destroy confidence in the whole cryptocurrency system, effectively wiping it out a 'self-inflicted wound' if you like," said Jason Deane, an analyst at Quantum Economics.

Deane says this is why upgrade processes are so carefully tested, retested, and vetted, again and again, over very long periods of time, prior to being deployed.

Many also remember the disastrous migration of 2013, when an upgrade gone wrong resulted in bitcoin temporarily splitting in half.

"You don't want different clients or miners in the protocol out of sync. That's how catastrophic stuff happens," Nic Carter,founding partner at Castle Island Ventures, told CNBC. "Because we don't want a repeat of 2013, we have these extremely long lead times."

Read this article:
Bitcoin just got its first makeover in four years - CNBC

China is kicking out more than half the worlds bitcoin miners and a whole lot of them could be headed to Texas – CNBC

Technicians make repairs to bitcoin mining machines at a mining facility operated by Bitmain in Ordos, Inner Mongolia, China, on Friday, Aug. 11, 2017.

Qilai Shen | Bloomberg | Getty Images

China has long been home to more than half the world's bitcoin miners, but now, Beijing wants them out ASAP.

In May, the government called for a severe crackdown on bitcoin mining and trading, setting off what's being dubbed in crypto circles as "the great mining migration." This exodus is underway now, and it could be a game changer for Texas.

Mining is the energy-intensive process which both creates new coins and maintains a log of all transactions of existing digital tokens.

Despite a lack of reserves that caused dayslong blackouts last winter, Texas often has some of the world's lowest energy prices, and its share of renewables is growing over time, with 20% of its power coming from wind as of 2019. It has a deregulated power grid that lets customers choose between power providers, and crucially, its political leaders are very pro-crypto dream conditions for a miner looking for a kind welcome and cheap energy sources.

"You are going to see a dramatic shift over the next few months," said Brandon Arvanaghi, previously a security engineer at crypto exchange Gemini. "We have governors like Greg Abbott in Texas who are promoting mining. It is going to become a real industry in the United States, which is going to be incredible."

2021 data for the global distribution of mining power is not yet available, but past estimates have shown that 65% to 75% of the world's bitcoin mining happened in China mostly in four Chinese provinces: Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Sichuan and Yunnan. Sichuan and Yunnan's hydropower make them renewable energy meccas, while Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia are home to many of China's coal plants.

The drawdown in miners has already begun in Inner Mongolia. After failing to meet Beijing's climate targets, province leaders decided to give bitcoin miners two months to clear out, explicitly blaming its energy misses on crypto mines.

Castle Island Ventures founding partner Nic Carter says that while it's not totally clear how China will handle next steps, a phased rollout is likely. "It seems like we're going from policy statement to actual implementation in relatively short order," he said.

The way this exodus is measured is by looking at hashrate, an industry term used to describe the computing power of all miners in the bitcoin network.

"Given the drop in hashrate, it appears likely that installations are being turned off throughout the country," continued Carter, who also thinks that probably 50% to 60% of bitcoin's entire hashrate will ultimately leave China.

Although China's announcement hasn't been cemented in policy, that isn't stopping miners like Alejandro De La Torre from cutting their losses and making an exit.

"We do not want to face every single year, some sort of new ban coming in China," said De La Torre, vice president of Hong Kong-headquartered mining pool Poolin. "So we're trying to diversify our global mining hashrate, and that's why we are moving to the United States and to Canada."

One of bitcoin's greatest features is that it is totally location agnostic. Miners only require an internet connection, unlike other industries that must be relatively close to their end users.

"The cool thing about bitcoin that is underappreciated by a lot of the naysayers is that it's a portable market; you can bring it right to the source of energy," said Steve Barbour, founder of Upstream Data, a company that manufactures and supplies portable mining solutions for oil and gas facilities.

That said, the exodus won't be instantaneous, in part, because it will take miners some time to either move their machines out of China or liquidate their assets and set up shop elsewhere.

Because miners at scale compete in a low-margin industry, where their only variable cost is typically energy, they are incentivized to migrate to the world's cheapest sources of power.

"Every Western mining host I know has had their phones ringing off the hook," said Carter. "Chinese miners or miners that were domiciled in China are looking to Central Asia, Eastern Europe, the U.S. and Northern Europe."

One likely destination is China's next-door neighbor, Kazakhstan. The country's coal mines provide a cheap and abundant energy supply. It also helps that Kazakhstan has a more lax attitude about building, which bodes well for miners who need to construct physical installations in a short period of time.

Didar Bekbauov runs Xive, a company that provides hosting services to international miners. Xive also sells the specialized equipment needed for mining.

Bekbauov says that he's stopped counting the number of Chinese miners who have called him to ask about relocation options, ranging from operations with 15 rigs to thousands.

"One miner told us that only government electricity plants have restricted mining and private ones will continue to service miners," Bekbauov told CNBC.

"But most of the electricity is generated by government power plants, so miners will have to move. That makes them uncertain and desperate to find other locations," he said.

Whether Kazakhstan is a destination or simply a stopover on a longer migration west remains to be seen.

Arvanaghi is bullish on North America and thinks the hashrate there will grow over the next few months.

"Texas not only has the cheapest electricity in the U.S. but some of the cheapest in the globe," he said. "It's also very easy to start up a mining company ... if you have $30 million, $40 million, you can be a premier miner in the United States."

Wyoming has also trended toward being pro-bitcoin and could be another mining destination, according to Arvanaghi.

There are, however, a few major limitations to the U.S. becoming a global mining destination.

For one, the lead time to build the actual physical infrastructure necessary to host miners is likely six to nine months, Carter told CNBC. "The U.S. probably can't be as nimble as other countries in terms of onshoring these stray miners," he said.

The move logistics may also prove difficult. There is a shipping container shortage, thanks to the tail winds of the Covid pandemic.

But perhaps the biggest question is the reliability of the Texas power grid. A storm that devastated large swaths of the state in 2021 has reignited a debate over whether Texas should winter-proof its systems, a potentially costly project that might affect taxes or other fees for those looking to tap into the state's power grid.More recently, ERCOT, the organization that operates Texas' grid, asked consumers to conserve energy amid what officials called an unusual number of "forced generation outages" and an upcoming heat wave.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk has bashed bitcoin mining, claiming that it is bad for the environment. It's not a new criticism.

For years, skeptics have maligned the world's most popular digital token for polluting the planet, while supporters have extolled the virtues of bitcoin and its role in accelerating the rise of renewable energy.

It is unclear whether the China mining exodus will make or break the case for bitcoin enthusiasts in the debate around the token's carbon footprint. The dominant narrative, to date, has been that much of the world's bitcoin is mined with Chinese goal.

"From a narrative perspective, it's definitely an improvement," said Carter. "But China also has the most abundant stranded hydro resources in the world."

The country offers significant energy vectors from wind, solar and especially hydropower in the south. Xinjiang's grid, for example, is 35% powered by wind and solar energy inputs.

If all the miners do end up leaving China, it will mean less fossil fuel-powered mining, but it will also mean that the network's share of renewable energy-powered mining will drop. This is why the question of where these migrant miners end up could prove critical to bitcoin's future. "It's the biggest story of the year for bitcoin," said Carter.

De La Torre says they're looking to expand operations using green energy, a trend that is already years in the making. He says that hydro plants are generally cheaper than fossil fuels in most parts of the world.

"Mining is price sensitive, so as to seek out the lowest cost power and the lowest cost power tends to be renewable because if you're burning fossil fuels .. .it has extraction, refinement and transport costs," explained Blockstream CEO Adam Back.

Each year, investment bank Lazard releases a breakdown of energy costs by source. Its 2020 report shows that many of the most common renewable energy sources are either equal to or less expensive than conventional energy sources like coal and gas. And the cost of renewable power keeps going down.

But there are limitations to running crypto mines purely on renewable energy.

Though solar and wind are now the world's least expensive energy sources, both power supplies face limitations at scale, so there is concern over the viability of miners turning exclusively to wind or solar energy.

For the time being, there isn't that much mining capacity worldwide that is ready to absorb the Chinese miner diaspora. While they scramble to find a new home, we could see hashrate go offline and stay offline.

In practice, that would mean all the remaining miners are more profitable for a period of time.

Having more geographic dispersion would even out the global balance of power, and it would also reduce the ability of any one sovereign nation to co-opt or control the network.

We may also see special crypto economic zones pop up in the next few months.

"You will see jurisdictions adopting a very favorable stance and creating the equivalent of special zones to encourage miners to host locally," said Carter. "We're seeing it at the state level here. You're also going to see it at the country level, you might even see subsidized electricity for mining."

Correction: A storm devastated large swaths of Texas in 2021. An earlier version misstated the year.

Originally posted here:
China is kicking out more than half the worlds bitcoin miners and a whole lot of them could be headed to Texas - CNBC

Bitcoin and the wealthy – Financial Times

Ten years ago, Sandra Ro was working in finance in London when some currency-trading friends told her about bitcoin. The cryptocurrency had been released only a couple of years previously and was still far from a global phenomenon.

Bitcoin was only really known in geeky tech circles and eventually currency traders in London found out about it around 2010, says Ro. She invested in the cryptocurrency, made a substantial fortune and is now chief executive of the Global Blockchain Business Council, a Swiss non-profit organisation that promotes the technology behind cryptocurrencies.

With a background in markets at global banks such as Deutsche Bank and Morgan Stanley, Ro was quick to grasp blockchains revolutionary potential. What really piqued my interest was whether the tech could disintermediate financial markets. I thought, what the heck? she recalls. Bitcoin was trading at a couple of hundred bucks at the time and I bought a bunch thinking, what if it works? And guess what? It did!

Today, bitcoin and its digital peers are becoming mainstream. The hype reached new heights this year after the cryptocurrency gained 600 per cent in value in 12 months. The mania has swept up not only retail investors but also very wealthy people. Ultra-high-net-worth individuals (UHNWs people with assets of $30mormore) such as Paul Tudor or Stanley Druckenmiller were among the earliest backers of bitcoin,the biggest cryptocurrency, and are prominent in the market today.

Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are also gaining traction as a store of value for financial institutions. Banksare queueing up to compete Goldman Sachs is trading cryptocurrencies while Citigroup is considering providing trading, custody and financing services. Billionaire investors openly discuss their cryptocurrency-related investments, while some large publicly listed companies, such as software company MicroStrategy, hold billions of dollars worth of bitcoin on their balance sheets.

Neither the sharp sell-off that hit cryptocurrencies last month nor the surrounding turmoil should obscure the fact that these are now huge markets, with a combined value of $1.6tn. That is big enough as an investment pool for even the richest private investors and largest family offices.

But bitcoin still divides opinion. For some it is an obsession,for others a speculative bubble. Yet financial industry analysts say that few people really understand how it works. To make life more complicated, it has spawned scores of other cryptocurrencies, all based on complex computer-driven calculations but with different levels of liquidity and transparency. We have seen UHNW individuals and family offices looking into cryptocurrencies and becoming interested in allocating some portion of their investments into crypto, says Calvin Koo, a Hong Kong-based lawyer at Kobre & Kim. But its important to make sure investors dont inadvertently step into a minefield.

Clearly, what makes the crypto field tempting are the stories of those who have struck gold. Ro is reluctant to say how much she is worth as a result of her bitcoin punt, as she has been targeted by scammers and has received death threats after talking about the subject. But she was able to leave full-time banking in 2017 the year of bitcoins first significant rally, when prices rose from just above $800 to almost $20,000. Bitcoins surge to $63,000 earlier this year increased Ros fortune.

Lets just say, I have done very well. I have gone from being a banker to working at a non-profit, says Ro, who studied at Yale and Columbia universities. Getting in early because the tech seemed really cool also worked out as an investment, so thats also pretty cool. Being an early investor meant she has had to try a dozen exchanges, suffered hacks and been locked out of investments. Her friends have also done well from her foray, as she recalls giving them bitcoin just to test out how it works.

I wasnt surprised by bitcoin doing well, but there were always a lot of risks. There were hacks, regulatory risks and exchanges going bust, she says. Crypto used to be messy. Now there are multimillion-dollar companies being built.

Another early believer is Olivier Janssens, a Belgian-born entrepreneur who states his profession on LinkedIn as an investor in bitcoin since 2010. He is also proudly self-educated with an attraction to libertarian and voluntarist ideas and forged a career as a software entrepreneur. In 2014, when bitcoin was trading at around 600, he became the first person to pay for a flight by private jet with the cryptocurrency. He settled the bill for the trip from Brussels to Nice with, he estimates, 15 bitcoin in hindsight, a pretty costly trip. [That] would be worth about 400,000 today, he says.

Crypto used to be messy. Now there are multimillion-dollar companies being built

Janssens has also realised actual losses in the volatile world of cryptocurrencies, notably in the saga of the collapsed exchange Mt. Gox, one of the largest crypto-linked financial failures.

More recently, the huge gain in the price has left early investors like Janssens dealing with the problem of having too much bitcoin as a proportion of their overall portfolio. Some bitcoin investors who vow never to sell their cryptocurrencies are known as hodlers (holding on for dear life). I sometimes rebalance my portfolio when it becomes 50 per cent of my assets. Im smart enough to sell sometimes Im not a hardcore hodler, says Janssens.

Seven years after the Belgians historic trip, paying for private charters by bitcoin is not quite mainstream but no longer newsworthy. More than one in 10 flights were settled with bitcoin in January at jet-hire company PrivateFly, where the share of cryptocurrency revenues grew to a fifth of the total. Denison, a US luxury yacht charter company, published a list of its 372-strong fleet in February with prices in bitcoin.

However, Janssens is slightly disappointed in bitcoins evolution from a peer-to-peer means of payment to a perceived store of value, which he says is completely against the original aim of the cryptocurrency. Its interesting to see big companies buy bitcoin as a digital gold, but I have personally shifted my focus to currencies like ethereum, he says.

There are hundreds if not thousands of alternative coins with varying characteristics. Like bitcoin, all are created by computers solving complex mathematical equations, churning out digital code. Some, known as shitcoins, are created purely as get-rich-quick schemes.

Janssens is among wealthy investors who think ethereum, launched in 2015 and now the second-most traded cryptocurrency, could be bigger than its erstwhile peer. Supporters say it could rewire the financial infrastructure. Billionaire financiers Mike Novogratz, Peter Thiel and Alan Howard are among investors who recently announced their backing of a venture that relies on ethereum.

Bitcoin might drop 20% in a day but its still up 85% this year; its about how far out you see the big picture

While bitcoin is just a piece of digital code, ethereum acts as a store of data and a marketplace for assets as well. It can perform the tasks of brokers, exchanges and other intermediaries, with the help of so-called embedded smart contracts. These ensure transaction details are correct, funds are paid and assets change hands as set out in a preprogrammed piece of code.

Ethereum is also behind most non-fungible tokens, which are digital representations of things, people or concepts that investors can buy in the form of units of data stored on a secure computer ledger artworks, for example. Christies, the UK auction house, is preparing for the sale of digital tokens created around the works of American artist Andy Warhol. Digital art is gaining momentum, says Emma Cunningham, a Christies spokesperson.

But not everyone is convinced the future is bitcoin-shaped. The cryptocurrencys volatility might be attractive to investors seeking fortunes. Those who are already wealthy, though, often avoid the rough and tumble. Our clients have already created substantial wealth, so theyre in preservation mode and only a very small proportion of clients have the high risk tolerance required for crypto, says Mohammed Kamal Syed, head of asset management at Coutts, the UK bank.

That does not mean UHNW individuals will ignore the siren call of extreme profits, says Syed. All clients have Fomo [fear of missing out], all the time. But with crypto, if anything, theyre bewildered; they dont understand why its gone up or down because no one knows, he says.

Sky-high valuations this year have raised fears of a bubble an outcome some hedge funds backed by wealthy investors are betting on. I believe we have passed the point of peak speculation crypto and bitcoin have this glamorous image, but that will get questioned ultimately, says Barry Norris, chief executive and fund manager at Argonaut Capital, a London-based equity specialist. He has started shorting crypto exchange Coinbase and software company MicroStrategy, a corporate holder of bitcoin.

Cryptocurrencies also face broader challenges. A growing concern is their environmental impact a Cambridge university study suggests the computers used to generate bitcoin consume more electricity than Sweden.

Meanwhile, governments in the US, China and the EU are raising questions about the sectors potential instability and lack of transparency. Criminal investigators say cryptocurrencies can be used for financing terrorism or other illegal activities, while tax inspectors are focusing on investors huge capital gains. Koo at Kobre & Kim says that despite a reputation for anonymity, cryptocurrency transactions are a lot more traceable than most investors think. Many UHNW individuals value privacy for different reasons, so they often have to make a choice between privacy and security, he says.

But despite these concerns, the potential returns keep the investors coming, including family offices. You cant find alpha like this in any other asset class, says Kevin Kang, founding principal of New York-based cryptocurrency hedge fund BKCoin, whose clients include rich individuals. Kang and his co-founder, Carlos Betancourt, manage $50m of assets in the fund they established in 2018.

Among the better-known individual cryptocurrency enthusiasts is Derrick Brown, a former NBA basketball player. Now chief executive of US venture company Free Fenix, he says he is an investor first and foremost, who also happened to play sports in the past. He adds that were he starting his sporting career now, he would ask for part of his pay to be in crypto.

Brown first invested in cryptocurrencies partly through an allocation in specialist hedge fund BlockTower. I look at everything from a diversification standpoint, he says, noting that less than 5 per cent of his portfolio is allocated to cryptocurrency. Bitcoin might drop 20 per cent in a day, but year to date its still up 85 per cent; its about how far out you see the big picture, he adds.

Ro agrees. This is a market at an experimental stage and this is what happens, she says. Im a typical hodler. I believe in crypto in the long run, but Im not going to put all my life savings in it. I have stocks, real estate, jewellery, art...its about diversification.

This article is part ofFT Wealth, a section providing in-depth coverage of philanthropy, entrepreneurs, family offices, as well as alternative and impact investment

For the latest news and views on fintech from the FTs network of correspondents around the world, sign up to our weekly newsletter #fintechFT

Sign up here with one click

Go here to see the original:
Bitcoin and the wealthy - Financial Times

Bitcoin Fund Outflows Slow as Investors Exit Ethereum – CoinDesk – CoinDesk

Money being pulled out of digital-asset investment funds slowed somewhat last week. However, while net redemptions from bitcoin-focused funds shrank, some investors seem to be souring on ether.

Overall, digital-asset funds experienced net outflows of $21 million during the week ending June 11, down from $94 million pulled out of funds the prior week, according to a Monday report by CoinShares.

The decline in outflows might be an early sign of bearishness has peaked.

Investors have been pulling money from bitcoin funds in recent weeks as the price of the largest cryptocurrency by market value traded below $40,000, down from the all-time high near $65,000 reached in April.

Funds focused on altcoins including ether, the native cryptocurrency of the Ethereum blockchain, as well as XRP had been favored over the past month as investors diversified from bitcoin funds. The latest data suggests that trend might be starting to shift.

Go here to read the rest:
Bitcoin Fund Outflows Slow as Investors Exit Ethereum - CoinDesk - CoinDesk