Choosing the right Bitcoin poker site – Yahoo Finance

Although still relatively undernourished compared to the behemoths of online gambling, Bitcoin poker sites are gaining in popularity.

Each one will have its advantages and disadvantages, ranging from the quality and quantity of the games plus the security of the site, which should remain a top priority for players.

There are numerous benefits to playing poker with Bitcoin, including the avoidance of FX fees, heightened anonymity and faster payouts.

Within Bitcoin poker sites there is a mixture of those that accept traditional fiat currencies along with Bitcoin and those that only accept Bitcoin itself.

Ignition Casino is an online gaming site licensed by the Kahnawake Gaming Commission established in 2016. They offer deposits in both Visa and Mastercard as well as Bitcoin. They also provide a variety of games including poker, slots and table games.

One of the biggest positives for Ignition is that they accept American customers, however this is also a drawback as well. European citizens are likely to find themselves blocked from accessing the site.

Using Bitcoin as a deposit method allows for higher limits $5,000 compared the the limit of $1,000 by credit card. Withdrawals are capped at $3,000 for both methods. They also offer typical welcome bonuses and refer-a-friend bonuses.

Being a regulated online gaming site provides some comfort knowing that your funds should be safe for both depositing and withdrawals, but the lack of access for those outside of the US means that this particular site is extremely limited.

Bet Online, unlike Ignition is available to many more nations worldwide. They offer a variety of games, from your typical online casino games and poker to live sports betting as well.

Payment options are also extensive compared to Ignition. Not only do they provide e-wallet services but the cryptocurrency deposits extend further than just Bitcoin. Bitcoin Cash, Litecoin and Ethereum are also options available as deposits.

One issue highlighted by users though is that the website is plagued by a wide range of bots within their poker services. Bots have become a real problem within the online poker industry both for major poker sites and the smaller ones.

Bet Online allowing for more nations worldwide to use the site along with further cryptocurrency deposits gives them the slight edge over Ignition Casino.

Nitrogen Sports is an online gaming site that only offers deposits and withdrawals in Bitcoin. There are no credit cards to be found here. Licensed in Costa Rica, the site offers poker, sports betting and your classic card games such as blackjack.

Much like Bitcoin only gaming sites Nitrogen Sports prides itself on provably fair software for their casino games. While for your typical user depositing and withdrawing in Bitcoin might be a little confusing there is one key advantage fast payouts. Instead of waiting 24 hours or longer in some cases, payouts from Nitrogen Sports can happen in a matter of hours.

The issue with using only Bitcoin as your deposit and withdrawal method though means that users then have to calculate consistently their betting value. Bets are still denominated in US dollars so some mental gymnastics are required.

For big fans of Bitcoin though, this site seems ideal.

These are but three of the best Bitcoin poker sites. There are many more and it would not be surprising that some of the major online gaming sites jump on the bandwagon sooner or later. Each gaming site even the major ones have their own nuances and issues. Playing across a few and finding which one suits you best is key for your own entertainment and enjoyment.

The post Choosing the right Bitcoin poker site appeared first on Coin Rivet.

Read more:
Choosing the right Bitcoin poker site - Yahoo Finance

Zero Chance Wikipedia Will Ever Use Bitcoin SV, Says Jimmy Wales – Cointelegraph

Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales has expressed skepticism regarding top-10 digital currency Bitcoin SV (BSV), claiming that the coin offers nothing for Wikipedia.

Wales made his statement right after the team behind the CoinGeek London conference which promotes Bitcoin SV to stakeholders announced his participation as a keynote speaker.

Until the emergence of Bitcoin SV (BSV) to reclaim Bitcoins original design, no blockchain had the scalability to power micropayments to efficiently reward better user information and handle the staggering amount of data Wikipedia carries, the speaker announcement read. However, Wales responded with a tweet on Feb. 7, saying:

Your marketing materials need to be updated immediately as people seem to be reading this as some kind of endorsement from me. I'm coming to speak my mind, which includes that BSV offers nothing for Wikipedia and that there is zero chance we would ever use it.

The tweet has been liked by over 1,000 people at press time and has aroused mixed reactions throughout the crypto community as some commentators questioned Waless intention to attend the conference.

Just recently, Bitcoin SV performed a scheduled upgrade named Genesis on Feb. 3, which resulted in a minor chain split where two versions of BSV exist at the time. Genesis changes many of the consensus rules for BSV to remove all remaining limitations.

The block size is now effectively unlimited. Instead of being hard-coded in the node software, the block size limit is now a parameter that miners can reduce manually. Many other limits were raised as well, such as the maximum size of a transaction or the number of owners for a multisig wallet.

While Bitcoin Cash is the first major hard fork of Bitcoin created back in August 2017, Bitcoin SV is a subsequent hard fork of Bitcoin Cash and associated with the self-proclaimed creator of Bitcoin, Craig Wright, who has recently been accused of confusing the ongoing trial proceedings.

Go here to read the rest:
Zero Chance Wikipedia Will Ever Use Bitcoin SV, Says Jimmy Wales - Cointelegraph

How the Long Tail of the Coronavirus Might Slow Bitcoin’s Hash Power Growth – Coindesk

The coronavirus outbreak in China may impose a longer-term impact on the bitcoin networks mining activity at a time when an estimated 65 percent of its computing power is located there.

While Chinese miner manufacturers see rising demand for new equipment ahead of bitcoins scheduled halving in May, they estimate the disease may limit growth in bitcoin mining power if the situation isnt resolved in the near future because it is difficult to expand or build new machines, according to Kevin Shao, general manager of Canaan Creative's blockchain arm.

Shao told CoinDesk that while there is little doubt miners can maintain the current level of computing power, there is a shortage of new mining machines.

So far, almost every bitcoin miner maker in China Bitmain, Canaan, MicroBT and InnoSilicon faces delays in production and delivery. Bitmain and Canaan, the worlds top two miner makers by market share, have published notices saying the delay of after-sale services until Feb. 10.

Customers want new, top-of-the-line mining models to expand existing mining facilities and replace older machines in anticipation of the bitcoin halving, currently expected to occur sometime in May 2020.

One of the most affected businesses is our mining machine production, Abe Yang, chief operating officer at PandaMiner, told CoinDesk.

Founded in 2013, the Shenzhen-based firm makes mining machines and provides computing power services with nine mining farms.

Not only us, most miner makers have been affected by the outbreak since their factories are based in cities like Dongguan and Shenzhen in Guangdong province, Yang said. During the extended vacation until Feb.10, almost all the production will be halted.

Meanwhile, the lockdown of the city of Wuhan has had a more direct impact on InnoSilicon, whose headquarters is located in the outbreaks epicenter.

The delay currently has not affected our businesses that much since the extension [of the holiday break] will only be several days, Shao said. However, the impact could be much more significant if the outbreak continues for a longer period of time.

According to data from BTC.com, bitcoins mining difficulty a measure of how hard it is to compete for mining rewards on the bitcoin network posted 6.57 percent and 7.08 percent growth on Jan. 2 and Jan. 15, respectively.

The growth rate dropped to 4.67 percent on Jan. 28 and is estimated to decline to 3 percent in about three days. Bitcoins mining difficulty adjusts itself about every 14 days it goes up or down in positive correlation to whether there are more or less participants racing on the network.

The coronavirus outbreak timespan overlaps with bitcoins halving event. The dual factors are apparently affecting the maintenance of mining equipment as well as the delivery of new miners, Wang Xin, marketing director of WhatsMiner maker MicroBT said in an interview. As such, the recovery of bitcoins hash rate growth will be delayed.

Rising demand

Hash power has more than doubled from around 50 EH/s compared to the same period of last year as bitcoins market price climbed over $9,000, according to Shao.

Second-hand miners [mostly older models like Bitmains AntMiner S9] that are aiming at a faster payback period, now have a larger risk as they enter a shutdown period ahead of the halving, compared to more powerful new models [like WhatsMiner M20 or AntMiner S17], said MicroBTs Wang.

Based on f2pools profitability index, models like the most widely used AntMiner S9 would have a 30 percent gross margin at bitcoins current price with an electricity cost of $0.05 per kWh.

However, a lower number of new miners could be good news for those that have already invested in mining equipment with facilities up and running.

Existing miners could see more steady mining rewards because there wouldnt be more competitors to enter the market due to the lack of new mining machines, Canaans Shao said.

But he added that one way the outbreak would affect existing miners is that many mining machine providers might not be able to offer timely post-sale services to fix malfunctioned devices.

Logistics issues

Wang said assembly factories have delayed their return-to-business schedule, citing the Chinese government's extension of the Lunar New Year. Businesses in the country have been ordered shut until at least Feb. 10.

This is not a crypto-specific issue either. Reuters reported Monday iPhone sales may take a hit because of the coronavirus, if the health emergency can not be contained in the near future.

Shao said one of his companys concerns is slowing logistics, adding, while we can make all the plans to prepare for the outbreak on our part, logistics is something we cant control.

Local infrastructure now prioritizes distributing necessities and supplies to those who are affected by the virus over less important deliveries, Shao said.

Therefore, some of the customers who pre-ordered miners might not be able to receive the machines on time, and it will take longer to deliver new orders if the outbreak continues, Shao said.

Even if employees all return to work, they cannot assemble miners unless their suppliers provide the necessary parts.

If the supplies can not be delivered on time, miner makers are not going to be able to assemble the production, Shao said.

One way companies can take advantage of their inventory is to run the machines themselves to offer computing power to their clients without selling the actual machines, Yang said. This assumes they have the necessary parts to complete assembling miners.

However, the service is not sustainable if the outbreak continues because we would eventually reach full capacity without new machines, creating a shortage in computing power, Yang said.

Mining farms

Mining farms remain unaffected for the moment, but existing quarantine controls and the possibility of an extended outbreak may soon take a toll.

Yang said PandaMiner is able to maintain operations for its existing farms, but there will be significant delays in constructing new farms.

Two-thirds of the companys employees did not go home for the Chinese New Year, and have instead been working at the mining sites. However, for those who did go home it will take weeks to return to work, Yang said.

Many cities now require a two-week quarantine for people coming back from other areas before letting them go back to work, he said.

For example, the Xinjiang autonomous region, an area that hosts a significant portion of mining farms due to its cheap electricity, has implemented strict policies to quarantine not only those coming back from the Hubei province, where Wuhan is located, but also any other province or region, Yang said.

We asked our employees to come back to Xinjiang as early as possible so that they can start the two-week quarantine and go back to work, Yang said, noting policies may vary among different areas in China.

The companys mining farm in Guizhou is subject to a stricter policy. We are allowed to let our employees work on site and can only keep a few people to maintain the operation, he said.

Sichuan province, which controls over 50 percent of bitcoins hashrate, also requires the two-week quarantine, according to Yang.

The lack of on-site staff has already negatively impacted the management of mining farms, Yang said.

Employees are responsible for ensuring mining machines are connected to the Internet and have a consistent supply of power. The employees would also need to fix broken circuit boards and other hardware to maintain operations, Yang said.

We usually have at least 10 people on staff to maintain a mining farm, Yang said. With much fewer employees, it is hard for us to keep as many machines running as before.

According to Yang, in some extreme cases where the local government prohibits all employees from working on site, companies need to negotiate with the government to leave two or three people on duty.

Wolfie Zhao contributed reporting.

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

More:
How the Long Tail of the Coronavirus Might Slow Bitcoin's Hash Power Growth - Coindesk

Ethereum vs Tron: Comparing Data, Defi and Stablecoins from Both Chains After Viral Tweet – Bitcoin News

On February 7, Cold Card and Opendime creator, Rodolfo Novak (also known as NVK), tweeted a picture of himself with Tron founder Justin Sun and Blockstreams CEO Adam Back. Novak said Ethereum was over and the three had a plan to move Tron to Liquid, a network that leverages the BTC chain. Whether the tweet was a joke or not, the picture got the crypto community fired up and it initiated heated debates about the legitimacy of both Tron and Ethereum.

Also Read: IOTA, EOS, XLM, ADA 4 Bitcoin Contenders With Zero Use Cases and Barely Any Infrastructure

One could consider the crypto networks Tron (TRX) and Ethereum (ETH) competitors within the cryptoconomy. While the ETH network is older than TRX, they both have similar goals and do similar things. As Ethereum strives to be a world computer, Tron aims to accomplish this feat as well, but with more of a focus on entertainment. They both leverage concepts like decentralized finance (defi), decentralized apps (dapps) and permissionless systems for token creation (ERC20 & TRC20).

When Novak tweeted about moving TRX to the Liquid network, lots of people considered it a joke, while others took the tweet very seriously. Despite what people think about Tron or Ethereum, news.Bitcoin.com decided to look at the two networks to see how they both compare as far as onchain data, market statistics, development, funds locked in defi, and both projects social media ratings. We want to let our readers decide which project is better by weighing the pros and cons of each crypto without all the opinions.

On February 7, 2020, Coin Metrics data shows the BTC chain processed roughly 333,000 onchain transactions. ETH saw a total of 626,000 transactions in the 24 hour period while TRX did around 816,000 on Friday. While ETH has been consistently above BTC transactions per day, TRX has also been consistently above ETHs daily average.

Both Ethereum and Tron have tokens that represent the stablecoin tether (USDT), but the ETH chain has a whole lot more. Statistics from Tronscan on Saturday show that theres 814 million USDT held on the Tron network. Todays data stemming from Etherscan indicates theres a whopping 2.2 billion USDT leveraging the ETH chain.

As far as stablecoin usage is concerned, Ethereum outpaces Tron by a long shot, as the chain also has other stablecoin tokens like PAX, USDC, and TUSD. But its true that both networks have seen more tethers migrate to each blockchain during certain periods of 2019. In fact, as far as funds locked into defi, Ethereum takes the cake when it comes to decentralized finance and centralized finance (cefi) applications as well, with projects like Maker, Compound, and Instadapp. Defi applications on ETH touched a milestone on February 6, when the total value locked (TVL) surpassed $1 billion.

Where market action and fiat value are the focus, tron (TRX) is trading for $0.02 per coin and the cryptocurrency is still down 92% from its all-time high (ATH) of $0.30. Ethereum (ETH) is swapping for $224 per coin at the time of publication, which is 84% down from its ATH of $1,431. Against USD over the last 12 months, TRX is down 18% and against BTC the crypto is down 69%. With ETH the crypto has gained 86% against the U.S. dollar in a year but against BTC it is still down 30%.

Trade volume data from Messari shows the reported volume for TRX is around $203 million in the last 24 hours, but Messaris real volume index indicates theres only been $49 million in TRX trades. As far as ETH is concerned, reported trade volume on Saturday is roughly $3.5 billion, but again Messaris real volume index shows less at $349 million. Tallying up the aforementioned statistics shows that ETH was a better investment over the last year, it has more liquidity, and trade volume as well.

As far as yearly Github activity, coincheckup.com data shows that Tron has outpaced ETH development during the last 12 months in regard to tallied commits. The Coindesk social media benchmark shows ETH has around 451,000 Reddit subscribers and the same number of Twitter followers giving the project a 23% social rating.

Trons Reddit community has about 71,000 subscribers and Tron has around 497,000 Twitter followers giving the project a 9.7% social rating. ETH has around 2,000 Github watchers and roughly 445 developers contributing to the ETH codebase. Tron has about 309 Github watchers and 118 developers that have contributed to the TRX Github repository. While there are 9,200 forks of Ethereum, there are only 673 Tron forks.

The Ethereum project got a head start and Tron is not as old of a blockchain in comparison. They both have influential leaders at the helm with Justin Sun and Vitalik Buterin who are both still around to weigh in with opinions, unlike Satoshi. Both projects have a lot of investors who believe that either ETH or TRX will be dominant and there are definitely those that think both will serve a purpose. Either way, both exist in prominent market positions today as ETH and TRX are in the top 15 largest market capitalization list and might be for quite some time.

What do you think about these two cryptocurrencies? Do you think Tron is better than Ethereum or vice versa? Let us know what you think about this subject in the comments section below.

Disclaimer: Price articles and market updates are intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered as trading advice. Neither Bitcoin.com nor the author is responsible for any losses or gains, as the ultimate decision to conduct a trade is made by the reader. Always remember that only those in possession of the private keys are in control of the money. Cryptocurrency prices referenced in this article were recorded on February 8, 2020.

Image credits: Shutterstock, Coin Metrics, Markets.Bitcoin.com, coincheckup.com, Coindesks social media benchmark, defipulse.com, Etherscan, Tronscan, Fair Use, and Pixabay.

Did you know you can buy and sell BCH privately using our noncustodial, peer-to-peer Local Bitcoin Cash trading platform? The local.Bitcoin.com marketplace has thousands of participants from all around the world trading BCH right now. And if you need a bitcoin wallet to securely store your coins, you can download one from us here.

Jamie Redman is a financial tech journalist living in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since 2011. He has a passion for Bitcoin, open source code, and decentralized applications. Redman has written thousands of articles for news.Bitcoin.com about the disruptive protocols emerging today.

Visit link:
Ethereum vs Tron: Comparing Data, Defi and Stablecoins from Both Chains After Viral Tweet - Bitcoin News

XRP Is Beating Bitcoin in 2020 But This Crypto Whale Is Still Betting on BTC – The Daily Hodl

The CEO of crypto investment bank Galaxy Digital is clarifying his recent comments on XRP and Bitcoin.

At last weeks LINC 2020 conference in Orlando, Florida, Mike Novogratz said he believes Bitcoin will outperform XRP by a wide margin in 2020.

Now, Novogratz has unleashed a tweetstorm to explain his bearish call on the third-largest cryptocurrency. He admits that XRPs performance so far this year along with the altcoin market at large has taken him by surprise. At time of publishing, XRP is up 43% in 2020, while Bitcoin is up 36%. However, Novogratz says the institutional investors hes talking to remain focused on BTC.

This year the broader alt market, including XRP has outperformed BTC. This has surprised me. That said, I see more and more large accounts getting educated and set up to be accumulators of BTC and believe on a risk adjusted basis its the best place to bet on crypto.

Novogratz says Bitcoin has cemented its status in macro portfolios as a digital store of value, but investments in other cryptocurrencies are speculative in nature or venture bets. Some might be able to offer lasting value if they prove to be useful.

BTC has found a place as a weapon in macro portfolios as digital gold a hard asset. All other cryptos are venture bets and will only have lasting value if they become a product that is useful. Ethereum might be the trust level people build on. If it does, its a great bet.

However, the Galaxy Digital CEO points out that both Ethereum and XRP are still in the proving phase.

Novogratz ends his tweetstorm with a reminder that Ripple still owns more than half of the total supply of XRP. He says Ripple will have to distribute the XRP it owns sensibly while building a real-world use case.

The price of XRP will be determined like all prices. If there are more buyers than sellers (and the company has a lot of control here) the price will rise. The company needs to distribute in a rational way at the same time building a real and scalable use case. I hope they do.

Novogratz certainly has a track record as an investor in the world of crypto. The former hedge fund manager told Bloomberg he sold $250 million in Bitcoin and Ethereum before the 2017 bubble burst.

Link:
XRP Is Beating Bitcoin in 2020 But This Crypto Whale Is Still Betting on BTC - The Daily Hodl

There’s No Such Thing as Tainted Bitcoins – Bitcoin News

All bitcoins are created equal. But in the eyes of blockchain forensics firms, some bitcoins are more equal than others. If these companies are to be believed, coins that have been used in criminal transactions are tainted, destined to be forever linked with nefarious activity. The reality, however, is far different, for taint is solely in the eyes of the beholder and most beholders arent Chainalysis.

Also read: Chainalysis Report Sheds Light on Darknet Markets and the Need for Onchain Privacy

Its long been known that freshly minted bitcoins can command a premium because there is no transactional history attached to them. If you want true onchain anonymity, mine some coins and then lock them away. The fewer times those coins turn over onchain, the fewer clues there are pointing to their current owner. The notion that coins might acquire taint, however, that makes them undesirable or potentially even unlawful to receive is a wholly subjective phenomenon. Its one thing to flag a particular wallet address as being associated with phishing or hacking, as many block explorers do, but quite another to flag assets that pass through such wallets as being indelibly associated with criminality.

Just as offense to a risqu tweet is taken not given, the same is true of taint when applied to coins. It is an interpretation rather than an inherent characteristic. Despite this, blockchain forensics firms and their surveillance partners are desperate to advance a narrative that certain UTXOs are sullied through their past association with illicit deeds. By the same reasoning, that $20 bill in your wallet is tainted because three transactions ago, it was robbed from a 7/11.

Blockchain forensics software can map the number of hops a transaction is removed from one suspected of being criminal, such as an exchange hack. Proving that those coins are still in the hackers control, and havent been sold to an innocent third party, however, is virtually impossible.

As the site 6102bitcoin.com notes, a tainted coin is only such because the address of the scammer is known to the analyst. Suppose that the analyst doesnt know this vital piece of information, would the coin still be tainted? It should be clear that the degree to which coins can be classified as tainted depends on the level of information available to the person doing the classifying.

Despite the fact that bitcoin cannot be intrinsically tainted, that hasnt prevented KYC-kissing companies from discriminating on those grounds. As a result, bitcoiners using these firms are unable to send and receive coins through mixers with impunity. For so long as cryptocurrency gatekeepers flag coins as pure or dirty, users will be forced to jump through hoops in order to appease them.

One of the great ironies about the taint game is that to clean ones coins involves passing them through a mixer, only to be discovered having used one is to risk having your funds frozen by centralized exchanges. Because there is no practical way for bitcoiners to verify how coins that come into their possession were used in the past, they are powerless to contest forensics software that decrees their UTXOs to be dirty.

In Dr Seusss The Sneetches, half of the creatures on an island have a green star on their bellies that marks them out as privileged. Then an entrepreneur named Sylvester McMonkey McBean shows up with a machine that can add and remove stars at will. Pretty soon, the islanders cant tell who had stars to begin with and who didnt.

Even for bitcoiners who dont use centralized services, increasing the fungibility of ones coins is desirable. If everyone routinely used mixing services such as Coinjoin and Cashshuffle, blockchain forensics firms would lose the ability to flag all such transactions as suspicious. The more coins that pass through mixing machines, the harder it will be for anyone to discriminate.

Do you think taint is a genuine classification that can be applied to bitcoins? Let us know in the comments section below.

Op-ed disclaimer: This is an Op-ed article. The opinions expressed in this article are the authors own. Bitcoin.com is not responsible for or liable for any content, accuracy or quality within the Op-ed article. Readers should do their own due diligence before taking any actions related to the content. Bitcoin.com is not responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any information in this Op-ed article.

Images courtesy of Shutterstock.

Did you know you can verify any unconfirmed Bitcoin transaction with our Bitcoin Block Explorer tool? Simply complete a Bitcoin address search to view it on the blockchain. Plus, visit our Bitcoin Charts to see whats happening in the industry.

Kai's been manipulating words for a living since 2009 and bought his first bitcoin at $12. It's long gone. He's previously written whitepapers for blockchain startups and is especially interested in P2P exchanges and DNMs.

Continue reading here:
There's No Such Thing as Tainted Bitcoins - Bitcoin News

US Marshals Will Auction $40M in Bitcoin This Month – Coindesk

The U.S. Marshals Service is auctioning nearly $40 million in bitcoin, the first such auction since the end of 2018.

The Marshals will auction "approximately" 4,040 bitcoin, worth $37.7 million at press time, according to CoinDesk's Bitcoin Price Index, to registered bidders on Feb. 18, the press release said. Potential bidders must register by Feb. 12.

"The auction will take place during a six-hour period Feb. 18. Bids will be accepted by email from pre-registered bidders only," the release said.

Bidders will also be required to make a $200,000 deposit before being able to bid. Participants who do not win their bids will receive these back.

The bitcoin will be sold in four lots, with 2,500, 1,000, 500 and 40.54069820 bitcoin each. The first three lots are further split into blocks, each with their own set number of bitcoin.

The bitcoin for this month's auction come from more than 50 administrative forfeitures and legal cases, according to the Marshals' website.

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

Visit link:
US Marshals Will Auction $40M in Bitcoin This Month - Coindesk

Lightning Labs Raises $10M Series A to Be the ‘Visa’ of Bitcoin – CoinDesk

Lightning Labs has raised $10 million in Series A financing as it gears up to launch its first paid service for merchants looking to accept bitcoin payments.

Craft Ventures led the round, with Managing Director Brian Murray joining Lightning Labs board of directors. Other investors include Slow Ventures, former Goldman Sachs co-head of securities David Heller, Avichal Garg of Electric Capital and Ribbit Capital.

The funding round suggests some investors see the San Francisco-based startup as one of the few protocol-oriented firms with a prospective business model.

If bitcoin is going to reach its potential as a viable global currency, its going to need to scale beyond the base layer, Murray said. Similar to how Visa relieves banks from handling all fiat currency traffic, Lightning relieves the base bitcoin chain from handing all transactions, thus bring more speed and fee efficiency to the network.

Stepping back, Lightning Labs released a beta version of the scaling solution LND in 2018 and previously raised $2.5 million in a seed round from investors including Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, Square executive Jacqueline Reses, litecoin creator Charlie Lee and former PayPal COO David Sacks. Lightning Labs also launched a mobile wallet app in June 2019, and as of today the company is offering a paid service called Lightning Loop.

Loop aims to help merchants manage their payment channels more effectively. Lightning payment channels need to have bitcoin in them in order to stay open, which is a problem for those who actually use these channels without a perfectly balanced in-and-out flow.

Loop in helps people put funds into their existing channel kind of like a prepaid debit card for a lightning account, Lightning Labs CEO Elizabeth Stark said. Loop out is currently the most popular product because it allows people to continue receiving funds on lightning.

This service, which will charge a small percentage of each full loop, helps merchants and exchanges maintain liquidity in the channels.

With nearly a dozen lightning startups sprouting up over the past two years, Stark said her startup will distinguish itself by becoming an infrastructure provider to other startups.

The first Lightning Conference in Berlin attracted 500 participants in 2019, so there may initially be a small pool of developers and service providers willing to pay for back-end support. The way I see it, there will be an aggregate of financial services, of which Loop is one, and you can batch all of those, Stark said. The blockchain becomes an anchor layer for other Layer 2 services on lightning.

One example might include the shopping app Fold, which processed roughly 1,600 lightning payments during the 2019 holiday shopping season.

"Were growing fast and Lightning Labs loop service makes it simple to manage our lightning nodes liquidity, letting our team focus on building out great user experiences that bring lightning to the world," Fold's Will Reeves told CoinDesk.

Infrastructure spending

Beyond Loop, Stark said her startup will focus on options for larger payment channels in 2020, both opt-in channels that can individually hold more than $1,500 and Atomic Multi-Path Payments, which break payments into smaller parts and are able to return the whole amount if all the small parts dont promptly arrive at the same recipient.

River Financial CEO Alexander Leishman said his exchange startup, which uses LND to offer users lightning liquidity and trading functions, said Lightning Labs and ACINQ are the only two startups in the space focused on the nitty gritty of protocol development.

If it allows us to support larger amounts [of bitcoin] off-chain, it improves the experience for our users. Weve already had users that are frustrated with the [Lightning Networks] limits, Leishman said. Services that would make [lightning transactions] easy for us are definitely of interest.

Stark, who is an adviser to Leishmans exchange, said her goal for Lightning Labs is to enable automated services so the network will just work without clients needing to tamper with channel allocation and flows. The peer-to-peer messaging app Sphinx also uses LND, which Murray said is only possible because of what Lightning Labs is building.

Lightning Labs is building the channels for bitcoin to fulfill its promise as a medium of exchange, a means of micropayment, as remittance infrastructure, and much more," investor Jill Carlson of Slow Ventures said in a press release.

Murray agreed, adding he strongly believes the infrastructure behind popular mobile apps will take a different shape over the next decade because it will enable direct payments between peers instead of reliance on a third-party provider that monetizes user data.

In the meantime, Stark is optimistically curious about the ability to send small amounts of data and have payments attached to them.

Speaking more broadly of the batched services Lightning Labs will offer by this time in 2021, she concluded: These are lightning-native financial services that help improve the network.

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

Read the original here:
Lightning Labs Raises $10M Series A to Be the 'Visa' of Bitcoin - CoinDesk

Bitcoin Starts Convincing Rally To $10K After Short Term Correction: Here Are Key Hurdles – newsBTC

Bitcoin price remained well bid above $9,000 and rallied to a new 2020 high against the US Dollar. BTC is now trading nicely above $9,500 and signaling a strong increase to $10,000.

Recently, there was a downside correction in bitcoin from the $9,600 area against the US Dollar. BTC traded below the $9,400 and $9,300 levels, before the bulls took a stand above $9,000.

A swing low was formed near $9,079 and the price started a fresh increase above the $9,200 resistance area. The bulls gained pace and pushed the price above the 100 hourly simple moving average and the $9,500 resistance area.

Finally, there was a break above the $9,600 resistance area and the price traded to a new 2020 high at $9,764. Bitcoin is currently correcting lower below the $9,700 level.

It traded below the 23.6% Fib retracement level of the recent rally from the $9,076 low to $9,764 high. However, the previous resistance near the $9,500 and $9,520 levels is acting as a strong support area.

More importantly, there is a major bullish trend line forming with support near $9,460 on the hourly chart of the BTC/USD pair. On the upside, there are short term hurdles near the $9,700 and $9,750 levels.

Bitcoin Price

A successful break above the $9,750 level is likely to set the pace for a larger upward move. The main target could be $10,000, followed by $10,200.

On the downside, there are many key supports for bitcoin bulls near the $9,500 area. The next key support is seen near the $9,420 level. It coincides with the 50% Fib retracement level of the recent rally from the $9,076 low to $9,764 high.

Any further losses may perhaps lead the price towards the $9,340 level and the 100 hourly SMA, where the bulls are likely to take a stand.

Technical indicators:

Hourly MACD The MACD is about to move back into the bullish zone.

Hourly RSI (Relative Strength Index) The RSI for BTC/USD is currently rising and it is well above the 55 level.

Major Support Levels $9,500 followed by $9,420.

Major Resistance Levels $9,700, $9,750 and $10,000.

Read the rest here:
Bitcoin Starts Convincing Rally To $10K After Short Term Correction: Here Are Key Hurdles - newsBTC

Bitcoin is Going to Dump Hard, Prominent Analyst Warns – newsBTC

Bitcoin is down by more than 2.5 percent this week and one analyst believes it is due to face additional losses.

Prominent crypto trader Mac warned that the cryptocurrency could dump hard in the remainder of this week, stating that bitcoin futures linked to CME left a huge gap in the $8,500 range. The cryptocurrencys spot rate typically revisits the unfilled gaps, which prompted Mac to predict a crash towards the $8,500 level.

Bitcoinis gonna dump hard this week and over $100M in longs will get wiped, he stated.

The statement followed bitcoins explosive price rally in January 2020, wherein it surged 34.25 percent to $9,619.50. Nevertheless, the cryptocurrency went through a small downside correction heading February, mostly driven by profit-taking sentiment.

Imminent potential moves on bitcoins daily chart | Source: Mac

Mac noted that bitcoin needed to reclaim its local swing high above $9,600 to maintain its medium-term bullish bias. Else, the cryptocurrency would most likely move lower to fill the futures gap as shown in the chart above.

There is a 95 percent probability in favor of bitcoin filling the CME gap pointed out by Mac. As NewsBTC covered earlier, traders have left the gaps unfilled only 5 out of 100 times. That is because 50 percent of the unfilled positions get filled the next day and 37 percent, the next week.

The longer the gap is left behind, the lesser is the probability of traders filling it.

The $8,500 gap was formed on January 24. That is why Mac thinks the ongoing week is crucial.

Other prominent analysts also warned about a similar price dump. NebraskanGooner, known for his accurate prediction about bitcoin surging to $9,500, said bitcoin could fall either towards early $8,000 or late $7,000s if it breaks below $8,900. Nevertheless, the analyst didnt explain why $8,900 was such a bias-defining level.

Ezy Bitcoin, another top crypto analyst, meanwhile reminded traders of a technical bearish formation known as Rising Wedge. The traditional indicator hinted a potential bitcoin breakdown to as low as $6,300. Ezy coupled the Wedge with a bearish divergence formation to further strengthen his downside sentiment.

At the same time, bitcoins diminishing market dominance also hinted that traders within the crypto space are moving into altcoins. It fell to 65.48 percent on Wednesday. Earlier in January, the dominance was near 68 percent.

Bitcoin was trading in positive territory on Wednesday, rising 3.03 percent as of post-noon European trading session.

Bitcoin registering intraday gains ahead of US session open | Source: TradingView.com, Coinbase

The cryptocurrency is more likely to retest the Wedge resistance before the next pullback. The blued 200-daily moving average could offer support and an ideal accumulation sentiment for traders to refuel their upside strategies. The next bull target is $10,000.

Read more:
Bitcoin is Going to Dump Hard, Prominent Analyst Warns - newsBTC