Open Streets Pop-Up Programming Coming To The Bronx & Queens In October – Gothamist

Back in the spring, the city passed legislation to ensure that the popular Open Streets program, which provides car-free outdoor space to New Yorkers where they live, continues well beyond the pandemic. As part of that legislation, the city committed to improving the way that Open Streets are managed, as well as create more of them in the underserved neighborhoods that need them most. To that end, the Department of Transportation (DOT) announced Tuesday that free public programming will be coming to some of those neighborhoods in the Bronx and Queens this month.

The pop-up programs, which include no-touch play areas for kids, plant giveaways, and musical entertainment, are coming to Astoria, Kingsbridge, South Bronx, and Mott Haven over the four remaining weekends in October. It's being done in partnership with Lyft, who will promote Citi Bike at the various locations and offer riders in these neighborhoods 50% off the cost of an annual membership.

Open Streets have fundamentally transformed the relationship New Yorkers have with their neighborhoods, said DOT Commissioner Hank Gutman. Were reclaiming space from cars while promoting educational and cultural activities and helping our neighbors embrace the bike boom in our city."

Local politicians, including Bronx Borough President Reuben Diaz Jr, Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer, State Senator Robert Jackson, and Congressman Adriano Espaillat, praised the programming and the city's continued efforts to expand and improve Open Streets for everyone.

"Bike safety is critical, by providing informative educational workshops I hope that well be able to give riders the confidence they need to continue riding their bikes more often, said Council Member Ydanis Rodriguez, Chairman of the Transportation Committee. He added that he would work toward continuing to bring these kinds of cultural and educational programs to other neighborhoods.

Check out the full list of programs below.

OCTOBER OPEN STREETS PROGRAMMING:

The Open Streets program was announced in April 2020 as a way to give pandemic-beleaguered New Yorkers more space to roam outdoors at a time when people were being asked to socially distance or stay indoors. There are now over 350 blocks, and over 70 miles, of fully or partial Open Streets in the cityyou can check out all the locations and hours of operation here.

The program has also spawned several complimentary spin-off initiatives, including Open Restaurants, Open Culture and Open Boulevards.

Continue reading here:
Open Streets Pop-Up Programming Coming To The Bronx & Queens In October - Gothamist

Best Predictive Analytics Software for 2021 – CIO Insight

Todays companies generate vast amounts of data, representing a valuable opportunity to become resilient, avoid mistakes, and more accurately address customers needs. Predictive analytics software turns data into insights companies can act upon, but not every solution fits each need.

Here are some useful tips for choosing the most appropriate predictive analytics solution for your business, as well as recommendations for tools to consider.

Predictive analytics software analyzes data to look for patterns and predict likely future outcomes. It can improve efficiency, detect fraud, or give companies an edge over competitors.

Software solutions typically work far faster than human data scientists, and can find connections they mightve missed.

Predictive analytics software can also help supply chain professionals deliver orders faster while avoiding sellouts, overstocks, and other unwanted events in an increasingly challenging market. A 2021 study of people in the supply chain sector found that 31% of respondents currently use predictive analytics software. Plus, 48% expect to utilize it within the next five years.

Software solutions typically work far faster than human data scientists, and can find connections they mightve missed. That makes predictive analytics tools ideal for helping companies learn more about their customers, determine the best time to enter a new market, and reach other critical business goals.

Read more: What Is Predictive Analytics?

SAP Analytics Cloud covers a vast range of data analytics tools in one cloud-based suite. For example, natural language processing working in the background lets you ask questions in a conversational format and get instant, data-driven answers.

Being on the cloud makes it easy to deploy and scale. Plus, advanced machine learning features streamline many otherwise time-consuming tasks and let you unlock previously hidden details. The Smart Discovery tool applies machine learning to selected data sets, showing relevant patterns and relationships without human bias. Also, you wont need the help of a data science professional to avail of this feature.

The Smart Insights capability brings context and clarification to your data. At the same time, intelligent algorithms running in the background suggest additional visualizations that make your information more actionable and easy to understand. Although SAP Analytics Cloud includes many advanced options, it remains easy to use and accessible.

Azure Machine Learning is a simple, well-laid-out predictive analytics tool that anyone can start using quickly. It supports coding and non-coding operations, giving businesses more flexibility.

The drag-and-drop machine learning algorithm builder streamlines the creation and publishing processes. You can use it to automate data labeling tasks, too. If youre worried about unintentionally introducing bias into the models, this tools disparity metrics help you spot and remedy such problems early. Security is another selling point of this product. It enables setting up role-based access control for access and resource usage.

Since this tool works with numerous development frameworks and programming languages, its a convenient option for minimizing your organizations predictive analytics learning curve. Youll also appreciate only paying for what you need, since this Azure product does not require upfront investments. The ability to set workspace and resource-level quotas help you manage spending, too.

SAS Visual Statistics lets users see data on a granular level, unlocking new insights faster and achieving competitive advantages over competitors. Set up the interface to allow multiple people to interact with the information, whether adding or changing variables or dealing with outliers. Users can also instantly learn how changes alter a models predictive capabilities.

This tool also has self-service cleaning features with built-in artificial intelligence. You can access, clean, and transform data from a single intuitively designed interface, making it easy to stay productive and make the most of your companys information.

This cloud-based product is also excellent for companies that have data professionals working across multiple locations. People can seamlessly share visualizations, keeping output levels high regardless of geographical distance. Model scoring and comparison tools also help users choose which models to use as new information becomes available.

Sisense Fusion Analytics caters to people of all coding backgrounds. Whether you prefer a no-code, low-code, or code-first approach, this product will meet your needs. Data can be filtered into dashboards with no tech expertise required.

This product comes with built-in machine learning models for predictive analytics. Therefore, its an ideal choice if you want to start using your data for better decision-making without the typical upfront time investment required. An artificial intelligence feature allows you to simply type a question to begin examining the information in new, powerful ways.

This tool also handles large amounts of complex data, making it a wise choice if you want a highly scalable option that can immediately benefit your business. Sisense Fusion Analytics connects to numerous third-party apps, facilitating the easy importation of information regardless of its type or source. The open API framework also supports customizing the tool for different applications.

The Alteryx Intelligence Suite enables choosing one of three modes automated, assisted or expert to create machine learning models that help you focus on your businesss future. You can build data analytics and machine learning models in minutes, shortening the time before you can start capitalizing on the associated new insights.

The tool also has a text analytics feature that works on PDFs and other typed materials. Use it to discover sentiment analysis within customer groups to better determine how theyll respond to upcoming campaigns. Run automated data health checks to cleanse the information before running it through your predictive models.

Drag-and-drop functionality within this product lets you quickly start using automated features while working with structured and unstructured data. Also, choose from more than 70 preengineered features to increase a models predictive capabilities. Its also easy to improve your results with prepared data packages from reliable sources, such as Experian, TomTom, and the U.S. Census.

IBM SPSS is a platform featuring two main products. SPSS Statistics is for locating specific answers in data, while SPSS Modeler is for visualizing those answers. Both programs integrate with IBMs Watson product, which makes deployment simpler for many existing customers. The intuitive interfaces help people start getting the most of these products without long learning periods.

The Modeler comes with more than 40 machine learning models ready for immediate use. There are also in-database performance capabilities that minimize the need to move the information before analyzing it.

SPSS Statistics enables better data management, letting users prepare the information and extract meaningful insights from it. The tool allows making categorical predictions and creating custom tables among its features.

H2O.ai uses open-source artificial intelligence, making it easy to create custom features on the platform. Numerous automation options accelerate processes such as validation and cross-validation. There are also various constraints and parameter controls. They help target and minimize bias, creating accurate, trustworthy results.

Multiple industry-specific templates help businesses start using predictive analytics sooner. Plus, the low-code application development framework enables people to reduce time spent on the important but time-consuming parts of building predictive algorithms and apps.

Anaconda Enterprise is primarily a tool for companies that have data scientists on their teams. It offers extensive controls, robust security features, and more than 1,500 packages in Python and R. It also features several sample templates for repeatable tasks. Those help users get started with their projects faster.

Anaconda is available on multiple platforms and can scale up easily. If you need additional help learning to use this product, schedule a Kickstart that allows you to meet with data professionals who know the features and their capabilities inside and out. The built-in security features and failover controls limit IT team hassles, too.

Making predictive analytics work as effectively as possible for your business requires understanding the available features and choosing what would be most valuable for your intended use cases. Here are some examples of frequently requested features.

Many company leaders consider real-time reporting a must-have feature. Thats especially true if theyre part of fast-moving or high-value industries like health care or manufacturing. In sectors like those, failing to spot an impending problem can have catastrophic consequences.

Many company leaders consider real-time reporting a must-have feature.

Additionally, a tool with built-in data preparation features could save time for company representatives and result in better accuracy. After all, even the most advanced predictive analytics software is only as reliable as the information it receives. If you have thousands of duplicate, incomplete, or inconsistently formatted records, theyll make your outcomes less trustworthy.

Selecting a tool with multiple visualization options is also a wise move for many businesses. Users may need to examine the data from several perspectives to grasp the associated insights. Also, certain ways of presenting the information may be easier to digest for board members or others without data science backgrounds.

Scalability is another characteristic you may want your predictive analytics tool to have. Consider your current needs and how they could change over the next three to five years. Is there a possibility a business expansion, merger, or another event could increase the data you need to analyze and the type of events you want to predict?

Every company has unique needs and goals for its predictive analytics operations. These options should provide something for every business, helping firms of all sizes, industries, and expertise capitalize on predictive analytics.

Before investing in one of these tools, take the time to understand what your company hopes to achieve with the solution. Doing that will set expectations and help you find the most appropriate and valuable product.

Read next: Top Big Data Tools & Software for 2021

Read more:
Best Predictive Analytics Software for 2021 - CIO Insight

Microsoft and Nvidia team up to train one of the worlds largest language models – VentureBeat

The Transform Technology Summits start October 13th with Low-Code/No Code: Enabling Enterprise Agility. Register now!

Microsoft and Nvidia today announced that they trained what they claim is the largest and most capable AI-powered language model to date: Megatron-Turing Natural Language Generation (MT-NLP). The successor to the companies Turing NLG 17B and Megatron-LM models, MT-NLP contains 530 billion parameters and achieves unmatched accuracy in a broad set of natural language tasks, Microsoft and Nvidia say including reading comprehension, commonsense reasoning, and natural language inferences.

The quality and results that we have obtained today are a big step forward in the journey towards unlocking the full promise of AI in natural language. The innovations of DeepSpeed and Megatron-LM will benefit existing and future AI model development and make large AI models cheaper and faster to train, Nvidias senior director of product management and marketing for accelerated computing, Paresh Kharya, and group program manager for the Microsoft Turing team, Ali Alvi wrote in a blog post. We look forward to how MT-NLG will shape tomorrows products and motivate the community to push the boundaries of natural language processing (NLP) even further. The journey is long and far from complete, but we are excited by what is possible and what lies ahead.

In machine learning, parameters are the part of the model thats learned from historical training data. Generally speaking, in the language domain, the correlation between the number of parameters and sophistication has held up remarkably well. Language models with large numbers of parameters, more data, and more training time have been shown to acquire a richer, more nuanced understanding of language, for example gaining the ability to summarize books and even complete programming code.

To train MT-NLG, Microsoft and Nvidia say that they created a training dataset with 270 billion tokens from English-language websites. Tokens, a way of separating pieces of text into smaller units in natural language, can either be words, characters, or parts of words. Like all AI models, MT-NLP had to train by ingesting a set of examples to learn patterns among data points, like grammatical and syntactical rules.

The dataset largely came from The Pile, an 835GB collection of 22 smaller datasets created by the open source AI research effort EleutherAI. The Pile spans academic sources (e.g., Arxiv, PubMed), communities (StackExchange, Wikipedia), code repositories (Github), and more, which Microsoft and Nvidia say they curated and combined with filtered snapshots of the Common Crawl, a large collection of webpages including news stories and social media posts.

Training took place across 560 Nvidia DGX A100 servers, each containing 8 Nvidia A100 80GB GPUs.

When benchmarked, Microsoft says that MT-NLP can infer basic mathematical operations even when the symbols are badly obfuscated. While not extremely accurate, the model seems to go beyond memorization for arithmetic and manages to complete tasks containing questions that prompt it for an answer, a major challenge in NLP.

Its well-established that models like MT-NLP can amplify the biases in data on which they were trained, and indeed, Microsoft and Nvidia acknowledge that the model picks up stereotypes and biases from the [training] data. Thats likely because a portion of the dataset was sourced from communities with pervasivegender, race,physical, and religious prejudices, which curation cant completely address.

In a paper, the Middlebury Institute of International Studies Center on Terrorism, Extremism, and Counterterrorism claim that GPT-3 and similar models can generate informational and influential text that might radicalize people into far-right extremist ideologies and behaviors. A group at Georgetown University has used GPT-3 to generate misinformation, including stories around a false narrative, articles altered to push a bogus perspective, and tweets riffing on particular points of disinformation. Other studies, like one published by Intel, MIT, and Canadian AI initiative CIFAR researchers in April, have found high levels of stereotypical bias from some of the most popular open source models, including Googles BERT, XLNet,andFacebooks RoBERTa.

Microsoft and Nvidia claim that theyre committed to working on addressing [the] problem and encourage continued research to help in quantifying the bias of the model. They also say that any use of Megatron-Turing in production must ensure that proper measures are put in place to mitigate and minimize potential harm to users, and follow tenets such as those outlined in Microsofts Responsible AI Principles.

We live in a time [when] AI advancements are far outpacing Moores law. We continue to see more computation power being made available with newer generations of GPUs, interconnected at lightning speeds. At the same time, we continue to see hyper-scaling of AI models leading to better performance, with seemingly no end in sight, Kharya and Alvi continued. Marrying these two trends together are software innovations that push the boundaries of optimization and efficiency.

Projects like MT-NLP, AI21 Labs Jurassic-1, Huaweis PanGu-Alpha, Navers HyperCLOVA, and the Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligences Wu Dao 2.0 are impressive from an academic standpoint, but building them doesnt come cheap. For example, the training dataset for OpenAIs GPT-3 one of the worlds largest language models was 45 terabytes in size, enough to fill 90 500GB hard drives.

AI training costs dropped 100-fold between 2017 and 2019, according to one source, but the totals still exceed the compute budgets of most startups. The inequity favors corporations with extraordinary access to resources at the expense of small-time entrepreneurs, cementing incumbent advantages.

For example, OpenAIs GPT-3 required an estimated 3.1423^23 floating-point operations per second (FLOPS) of compute during training. In computer science, FLOPS is a measure of raw processing performance, typically used to compare different types of hardware. Assuming OpenAI reserved 28 teraflops 28 trillion floating-point operations per second of compute across a bank of Nvidia V100 GPUs, a common GPU available through cloud services, itd take $4.6 million for a single training run. One Nvidia RTX 8000 GPU with 15 teraflops of compute would be substantially cheaper but itd take 665 years to finish the training.

Microsoft and Nvidia says that it observed between 113 to 126 teraflops per second per GPU while training MT-NLP. The cost is likely to have been in the millions of dollars.

A Synced report estimated that a fake news detection model developed by researchers at the University of Washington cost $25,000 to train, and Google spent around $6,912 to train a language model called BERT that it used to improve the quality of Google Search results. Storage costs also quickly mount when dealing with datasets at the terabyte or petabyte scale. To take an extreme example, one of the datasets accumulated by Teslas self-driving team 1.5 petabytes of video footage would cost over $67,500 to store in Azure for three months, according to CrowdStorage.

The effects of AI and machine learning model trainingon the environmenthave also been brought into relief. In June 2020, researchers at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst released a report estimating that the amount of power required for training and searching a certain model involves the emissions of roughly626,000 pounds of carbon dioxide, equivalent to nearly five times the lifetime emissions of the average U.S. car. OpenAI itself has conceded that models like Codex require significant amounts of compute on the order of hundreds of petaflops per day which contributes to carbon emissions.

In a sliver of good news, the cost for FLOPS and basic machine learning operations has been falling over the past few years. A 2020 OpenAI survey found that since 2012, the amount of compute needed to train a model to the same performance on classifying images in a popular benchmark ImageNet has been decreasing by a factor of two every 16 months. Other recent research suggests that large language models arent always more complex than smaller models, depending on the techniques used to train them.

Maria Antoniak, a natural language processing researcher and data scientist at Cornell University, says when it comes to natural language, its an open question whether larger models are the right approach. While some of the best benchmark performance scores today come from large datasets and models, the payoff from dumping enormous amounts of data into models is uncertain.

The current structure of the field is task-focused, where the community gathers together to try to solve specific problems on specific datasets, Antoniak told VentureBeat in a previous interview. These tasks are usually very structured and can have their own weaknesses, so while they help our field move forward in some ways, they can also constrain us. Large models perform well on these tasks, but whether these tasks can ultimately lead us to any true language understanding is up for debate.

See the original post here:
Microsoft and Nvidia team up to train one of the worlds largest language models - VentureBeat

Starting a health technology company in Baltimore? Here are 43 resources to know – Technical.ly

The digital health sector was growing rapidly. Then the pandemic came.

In this case, it was a story of growth.

Following distancing requirements and loosening regulations, telemedicine became the name of the game for many healthcare systems across the nation. It was an area where Baltimore startups could add value, whether it was the digital front door of b.well Connected Health or Tissue Analytics work with healthcare institutions to remotely monitor woundcare patients.

Now, healthcare leaders are learning from the shifts of 2020, and planning for how theyll keep the useful technology that was implemented during the pandemic in place. Going forward, hospitals, clinics and healthcare providers will keep seeking out ways to modernize systems, and adopt new methods of care. So its a good bet that entrepreneurs will be building tools to help them.

In Baltimore, entrepreneurs will find an existing network of resources for healthcare-focused startups that are growing around the citys university-focused healthcare institutions. It has helped to nurture new software and data-powered tools under the umbrella of digital health. There are also resources focused on the hardware that goes into medical devices, and the diagnostics and therapeutics that help to detect and prevent disease.

Drawing on nearly a decade of Technical.lys reporting in the city, weve compiled a look at resources for startups looking to break in at the intersection of health and tech:

These monthly health tech-centered Zoom sessions are a great way to meet those further along in the entrepenuer journey, whether its featured panelists or other attendees.

The next event is on Oct. 20 at 5 p.m., and will be led by Kelliann Wachrathit. She will share her unique perspectives from integrating her background in bioengineering, regulatory research at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, regulatory consulting, assessing intellectual property and nursing.

An initiative of the John Hopkins Technology Innovation Center, this network is raising a flag for digital health throughout the region. Its connecting key players, building a knowledge base, directly supporting young ventures and investing in the talent pipeline with CEO roundtable events, innovation labs and workshops. It is funded by a a three-year, $1.3 million grant from the U.S. Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration,

Coming up in November, Chesapeake DHX is organizing a five-day innovation lab on cancer data with cancer researchers, biologists and imaging scientists.

Alongside joining the Maryland Business Innovation Association itself, entrepreneurs were given the opportunity in 2021 to participate in the challenge and work with companies from the local corporate community, like CareFirst innovation arm Healthworx, on problem-solving. It offered a chance to create new professional relationships while testing product solutions on the market.

Organized jointly by Johns Hopkins Technology Ventures and the University of Maryland, Baltimore, this event series gathers local entrepreneurs and investors regularly to learn about all of the resources the city can provide, and offer networking. The next event is set for October 21, and centers around building equitech in Baltimore with accelerator network Techstars and local ecosystem builder Upsurge Baltimore as the featured organizations.

Technical.ly (hi!) has an online community providing space for technologists and entrepreneurs across the cities we cover, including Baltimore, DC, Philly, Delaware and Pittsburgh. In the Slack, youll not only get to connect with fellow entrepreneurs but get an opportunity to contribute to reporting engaging with the Technical.ly community.

This recently-launched incubator from LifeBridge Health and Carefirsts Healthworx is seeking companies that are beyond the idea stage, with a full-time team, a product or model that solves a key healthcare challenge and traction like an MVP, early customers or financing. The program offers investment of up to $100,000 for each selected company, with each partner contributing up to $50,000. Its currently in the midst of its first cohort.

This Loyola University Marlyand program accepts applications from companies across Baltimore, which can include healthcare-focused startups. It offers a chance to connect with mentors, partake in programming to build a business, and grow a network in Baltimore.

ETC (Emerging Technology Centers) opened the citys first seed accelerator program in 2012. With support from the Abell Foundation, it has supported a variety of companies since, including plenty building healthcare technology.

Applications are currently open for this accelerator through December 5. The program is looking for five startups that want to solve some of the citys most pressing challenges. Businesses that are chosen for the 13 week program receive $50,000 in seed funding.

With a focus on medical device manufacturing, the medtech venture center inside Port Covingtons City Garage doubles as a coworking space and incubator to guide companies from start to launch. Led by longtime Maryland healthcare ecosystem leader Bob Storey, it has emerged as a base for companies that are ready to exit the incubator, and move into production.

Drawing on a model built at the National Science Foundation, I-Corps is designed to help scientists and engineers as they move from a discovery to a company. The multi-week program offers a chance to identify valuable product opportunities that can emerge from academic research, and gain skills in entrepreneurship through training in customer discovery and guidance from established entrepreneurs. Its offered at no cost, and provides a $2,880 grant to participants that complete the program. Upcoming sessions are expected to start October 28, January 2022 and April 2022.

Located downtown on West Pratt Street, this startup studio supports medical device inventors who want to move their ideas beyond the lab into the marketplace. Entrepreneurs that work with the studio can expect a lot of hands-on development from the organization as they take an idea to minimum viable product with the studios internal team of surgeons, neurologists and engineers. Think of it as a place that helps build startups by loaning a team of employees that are experts in their field.

Billing iself as Marylands only hospital-based bioincubator, the Sinai Hospital facility offers lab space for growing startups, with the added benefit of being connected to resources and the network of LifeBridge Health.

Located at the universitys hospital campus in East Baltimore, this space has both offices and wet labs for early-stage companies. Opened in 2017, it has become a nexys of activity for emerging local companies in life sciences and digital health.

Located across from the University of Maryland, Baltimore campus west of downtown Baltimore, the 14-acre biomedical research park is home to a cluster of companies working on new products in various areas of healthcare. It has served as a home both for companies that grow out of work in the city, or others looking to open an office in Baltimore. In 2017, UMB added to its offerngs by opening its innovation hub, called The Grid, to serve as a connecting point for entrepreneurs and the community on campus.

The Pigtown-based venture studio works with researchers to start new companies that commercialize discoveries inside the states institutions. Among many companies in its portfolio are a pair of ventures focused on computer-aided drug design. The company opened production space in Pigtown last year.

The Johns Hopkins Center for Bioengineering Innovation and Design offers masters level training and a chance to explore where healthcare needs solutions. Students work side-by-side with clinicians to understand problems and develop ideas to solve them. It has resulted in the launch of many new startups that called Baltimore home, such as the aforementioned Tissue Analytics.

The Rockville-based organization has long had a statewide presence growing the work that turns discoveries made in the lab into the key technologies that power commercial companies. It connects the community through events, as well as assisting inventors with promising IP as they connect with investors and other key resources.

This searchable AI-powered site to aims to connect the state ecosystem with info on the many accelerators, incubators, funds and mentors that startup founders can turn to for support. In 2021,TEDCO, the Maryland Department of Commerceand theUniversity System of Maryland teamed up to launch this resource, which was built by Baltimore-based EcoMap Technologies.

Baltimore is part of the DMV-wide chapter for this group bringing women in the BioHealth Capital Region together. It has regular events, a mentoring group and more.

The life sciences-focused arm of the Maryland Tech Council, this trade group has a host of activities connecting companies among its membership, and works on advocacy efforts to advance the industry. It also stages 20 events during the year, like the recently-completed Bio Innovation Conference.

Dubbed Americas seed fund, the federal government provides non-dilutive research and development grants to companies working to commercialize technologies. The program has been a prime source for early funding at many Maryland startups working in healthcare. Marylands TEDCO and Rockville-based OST Global Solutions host an SBIR Proposal Lab to help companies prepare an application.

The state-backed agency is an active funder of early-stage healthcare ventures through a variety of its funds. The Maryland Stem Cell Research Fund provides grants and loans for research work. The Maryland Innovation Initiative funds efforts to commercialize technology coming from the states universities. For companies ready for venture capital, TEDCO also operates pre-seed, seed and venture funds.

Early-stage businesses seek venture funding to grow. Drawing from a Technical.ly article that listed 75+ venture capital firms in the DMV area, here are local firms that seek to fund healthcare-focused tech companies:

An open source server for Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources also known as FHIR (pronounced fire) which is the server patients use to access records. The Annapolis Junction-based companys technology won the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information TechnologysSecure FHIR Server Challengebecause of its focus on security measure and design to accommodate multiple types of systems.

PHP is an open source scripting language for web development that offers easy data integration. If youre worried about viability, major companies like Facebook, Slack and Lyft use it in their tech stack. But any coding language is just as good it just depends on where your company is specializing to release its client. If IOS user is your goal may be Swift is the way to go

This cross-platform video editing platform comes in handy. In the digital age, you need to be able to engage on multiple platforms and video is the perfect way to garner interests. The main benefit of this software is its free. If youre early stage with little funding but trying to add video elements to a pitch deck or product showcase, this might be the software for you.

Whod we miss? Let us know at baltimore@technical.ly.

Originally posted here:
Starting a health technology company in Baltimore? Here are 43 resources to know - Technical.ly

Developer jobs: When it comes to building diverse teams, employers are still missing the mark – ZDNet

Companies must the tools at their disposal to build diverse teams.

The tech industry has been facing increasing scrutiny over diversity, equity and inclusion issues in recent years. Even though having a policy aimed at hiring a diverse team can bring employers a greater range of talent to improve just about every business outcome, progress in this area remains disappointingly slow.

According to a report by hiring platform Hiretual, organizations are doing little to boost diversity within their software teams. Analysis of candidate searches made via its platform between January 1st and July 31st this year found that just 15% of searches applied a diversity, equity and inclusion (DE&I) filter to find developers from Black, Hispanic, Asian or Native American backgrounds.

In the US tech hub of San Francisco, just 9% of searches were for Black software engineers, 7% for Hispanic or Latinx candidates, 6% for Native American, and 3% for candidates from Asian backgrounds, the company's data found.

See also:IT strategy: How an investment in diversity can boost your business.

Hiretual's report included searches from the US cities where search volume for software engineers was highest: San Francisco, CA; Seattle, WA; New York, New York; Boston, MA; Washington DC; Atlanta, GA; Los Angeles CA; Chicago, IL; and Denver, CO.

The highest volume of searches for Black, Hispanic/Latinx, Native American and Asian candidates came from Washington DC 17%, 14%, 13% and 10%, respectively.

Women were equally underrepresented in candidate searches, the data found: again, just 15% of searches on the platform were for female candidates specifically. Washington once again proved the most progressive here, with 26% of the total search volume accounting for women.

"The technology is there to help find and hire diverse candidates," said Steven Jiang, CEO at Hiretual. "Companies have the option to make a difference -- there are no more excuses."

According to the US Labor Department, job openings hit 10.1 million by the end of June 2021, up from 9.5 million in May.

Developers and software engineers have been amongst the most coveted tech workers throughout 2020 and 2021, owing to a boom in the demand for digital services and application development caused by the pandemic. Hiretual found some companies are now paying their talent up to 13.2% more than the national average, with 55% of US companies paying software engineers an average salary of $90,000 to $150,000 per year.

According to Hiretual's data, there are currently 1.2 million professionals with a software engineer title, and some 170,000 job postings for software engineers. It also found that 12% of professionals have changed jobs within the past 12 months, while 7% of professionals have changed jobs within the past six months.

The fact there are twice as many software engineer job postings compared to software engineers moving jobs supports the claims that tech companies are having a difficult time filling open roles, and that the demand for talent exceeds the supply, said Hiretual.

See also: Digital transformation: Two CIOs explain how to make it work

Opening up job vacancies to a more diverse talent pool, therefore, seems like an obvious step in addressing existing skills gaps, as well as boosting an organization's overall success.

"Job candidates have a lot of leverage and options to consider right now. So, companies looking for the best talent need to be trying to make the strongest impact from the very first impression, which requires an understanding for what candidates find value in today: things like building more diverse and inclusive teams, offering competitive pay and more flexible location options," Jiang told ZDNet.

"The data shows that companies willing to do that stand to fill more jobs, but many are missing the mark."

Hiretual's report also analysed the software skills most frequently searched for by recruiters. Python programming was the most in-demand proficiency, it found, followed by Java, C++, C# and object-oriented programming (OOP). Rounding out the top 10 skills were JavaScript, distributed systems, Microservices, C/C++, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and GoLang.

More:
Developer jobs: When it comes to building diverse teams, employers are still missing the mark - ZDNet

The Fifth Estate (2013) – IMDb

As I walked into the theater with my wife, she asked me again what this film was about. I said, its about Wikileaks. I told her about Assange and the mission of Wikileaks. I had already had my own formed opinions about Assange, but refrained from sharing it with her. I was curious to see what her reaction was and what her opinion of Wikileaks and Assange was after the film.

The film was not bad. It was sort of an attempt to make a Facebook style film about Wikileaks and although it nowhere measured up to the quality of "Social Network." Its attempt was commendable and all-in-all, it was not a waste of the 18 Euros we spent to see it.

However, what really bothered me throughout the entire film was Cumberbatch's portrayal of Assange. I could see he was trying very hard to mimic Assange to the best of his ability, but I either don't think he had it in him or he was purposely playing Assange a lot crazier than he appears in real life. I have seen lots of interviews with Assange, who in my mind, comes across a bit like a mixture between a politician and professor. Cumberbatch, on the other hand, came across as a sort of eccentric nut.

The next thing that bothered me is where the film decided to stop. Basically, it skimmed over the current scandals, making Assange sound like more of nut than Cumberbatch's portrayal. The last five minutes especially sunk into me the feeling that the film unfairly portrayed Assange.

And my suspicions were confirmed. I asked my wife what her opinion of Assange was as a good or bad guy, and she seemed to indicate she was leaning towards bad. The last few minutes of the film, basically sunk that message in loud and clear.

My conclusion is, that, this film is a good example of the new way of being critical. Pretend to be fair and at the last minute, throw up a bunch of negative facts.

I believe that combining the positive portrayal of the U.S. state department with the crazy portrayal of Assange, was neither fair nor accurate. History will probably judge this film as just another propaganda piece of the corrupt powers that be.

If I were to write this film, I think it would have been much more interesting to concentrate on the incidents of human rights abuses rather than on the Assange himself. It would have also had the positive effect of encouraging, rather than discouraging whistle-blowers. This film does not seem to inspire anything.

Assange was right about the film.

Visit link:
The Fifth Estate (2013) - IMDb

The Plot to Kill Julian Assange & Destroy Wikileaks – Liberation

This interview is an episode of The Socialist Program with Brian Becker, a podcast providing news and views about the world for those who want to change it. You can follow the show on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

On todays episode, Brian and Lee Camp discuss the latest revelations about the CIAs attempts to take revenge on Wikileaks for exposing the secret crimes of the U.S. government. This went as far as planning to assassinate Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, who was at that point confined to the Ecuadorian embassy in London. Now in prison, the fight to free Assange continues.

They also discuss the case of Steven Donzinger, an international environmental lawyer who took on Chevron and won but has now been sentenced to prison in a case of retaliation that has drawn global outrage. They also discuss the political right turn made by Tulsi Gabbard.

Lee Camp is the host of the TV show Redacted Tonight and author of the book Bullet Points & Punch Lines. Check out his work at http://www.LeeCamp.com

Read more from the original source:
The Plot to Kill Julian Assange & Destroy Wikileaks - Liberation

Deathly Silence: Journalists Who Mocked Assange Have Nothing to Say About CIA Plans to Kill Him – FAIR

Yahoo! News (9/26/21) reported that discussions over kidnapping or killing Assange occurred at the highest levels of the Trump administration.

Yahoo! News (9/26/21) published a bombshell report detailing the US Central Intelligence Agencys secret war plans against WikiLeaks, including clandestine plots to kill or kidnap publisher Julian Assange while he took refuge in the Ecuadorian embassy in London.

Following WikiLeaks publication of the Vault 7 files in 2017the largest leak in CIA history, which exposed how US and UK intelligence agencies could hack into household devicesthe US government designated WikiLeaks as a non-state hostile intelligence service (The Hill, 4/13/17), providing legal cover to target the organization as if it were an adversarial spy agency.

Within this context, the Donald Trump administration reportedly requested sketches or options for how to kill Assange, according to the Yahoo! expose (written by Zach Dorfman, Sean D. Naylor and Michael Isikoff), while the CIA drew up plans to kidnap him. (Assange was expelled from the embassy in 2019 and has since then been in British prison, fighting a demand that he be extradited to the US to face charges of espionageFAIR.org, 11/13/20.)

Shortly after publication, former CIA director Mike Pompeo (Yahoo! News, 9/29/21) seemed to confirm the reports findings, declaring that the former US intelligence officials who spoke with Yahoo! should all be prosecuted for speaking about classified activity inside the CIA.

Patrick Cockburn (Independent, 10/1/21): The scoop about the CIAs plot to kidnap or kill Assange has been largely ignored or downplayed.

It would seem that covert plans for the state-sanctioned murder on British soil of an award-winning journalist should attract sustained, wall-to-wall media coverage.

The news, however, has been met by Western establishment media with ghoulish indifferencea damning indictment of an industry that feverishly condemns attacks on press freedom in Official Enemy states.

BBC News, one of the most-read news outlets in the world, appears to have covered the story just oncein the Somali-language section of the BBC website (Media Lens on Twitter, 9/30/21).

Neither the New York Times or Washington Post, two of the worlds leading corporate news organizations, have published any articles about Assange since July 2021.

To its credit, since the story first broke on September 26, the Guardian has reported twice on the CIA-led conspiracy to kill or kidnap Assange. But to offer perspective, during the week after Russian opposition figure Alexei Navalny was reported to have been poisoned by the Russian government, the Guardian published 16 separate pieces on the issue, including video reports and opinion pieces.

Similarly, a Nexis search of British newspapers for the word Navalny brings up 288 results from August 2025, 2020. The same search for Assange between September 26October 1, 2021, brings up a meager 29 resultsone of which, a notable exception, was a Patrick Cockburn piece in the Independent (10/1/21).

Aaron Mat (PushBack, 9/30/21) interviews Yahoo!s Michael Isikoff about the CIAs plans to assassinate Assange.

As is typical of stories that embarrass the Western intelligence services, independent media provided crucial relief to the backdrop of chilling indifference, with the Grayzones Aaron Mat (YouTube, 9/30/21) conducting a rigorous interview with one of the reports authors, Michael Isikoff.

Indeed, the Grayzone (5/14/20) was the first outlet to provide evidence of a CIA-linked proposal to kidnap or poison Assange in May 2020. The story, however, was almost universally ignored, suggesting that, as Joe Lauria wrote in Consortium News (10/2/21), until something appears in the mainstream media, it didnt happen.

One thing the corporate media cannot be accused of with regards to Assange, however, is inconsistency. After a key witness in the Department of Justices case against the publisher admitted to providing the US prosecution with false testimony, a detail that should ordinarily turn a case to dust, the corporate media responded by ignoring the story almost entirely. As Alan MacLeod wrote for FAIR.org (7/2/21):

The complete uniformity with which corporate media have treated this latest bombshell news raises even more concerns about how fundamentally intertwined and aligned they are with the interests of the US government.

Even after it was revealed that the UC Global security firm that targeted Assange had also spied on journalists at the Washington Post and New York Times, neither outlet mounted any protest (Grayzone, 9/18/20).

Perhaps most remarkably, UK judge Vanessa Baraitser relied on a falsified CNN report (7/15/19) to justify the CIAs spying operation against Assange (Grayzone, 5/1/21). Now, CNNs website contains no reports on the agencys plans to kill or kidnap Assange.

The prevailing silence has extended into the NGO industry. Amnesty International, which refused in 2019 to consider Assange a prisoner of conscience, has said nothing about the latest revelations. Likewise, Index on Censorship, which describesitself as The Global Voice of Free Expression, hasnt responded to the story.

The establishment medias dismissal of Assange supports Edward Herman and Noam Chomskys framework of worthy and unworthy political dissidents, with Assange situated firmly in the latter camp.

This James Ball column (Guardian, 1/10/18) has not aged well.

The present circumstances become even more deplorable upon consideration of the corporate journalists who arrogantly diminished, or even delighted in, Assanges concerns for his own safety.

The Guardians James Ball (1/10/18) published a now infamous article headlined, The Only Barrier to Julian Assange Leaving Ecuadors Embassy Is Pride. The WikiLeaks founder is unlikely to face prosecution in the US, the subhead confidently asserted. The column concluded:

Assange does not want to be trapped in Ecuadors embassy, and his hosts do not want him there. Their problem is that whats keeping him trapped there is not so much the iniquitous actions of world powers, but pride.

In a later article (3/29/18), Ball insisted that Assange should hold his hands up and leave the embassy.

Ball, at least, has written somethingon the latest revelations, but his article in the London Times (10/03/21) remains typically scornful of Assanges persona.

The Guardians Marina Hyde (5/19/17) took a similar angle. Under the headline The Moral of the Assange Story? Wait Long Enough, and Bad Stuff Goes Away, Hyde wrote that Captain WikiLeaks will get out of pretend-jail eventually. More than four years later, Assange is in Belmarsh prison, the closest comparison in the United Kingdom to Guantnamo, according to the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee. Hyde has said nothing of the very real plans to murder or kidnap him.

In the same vein, journalist Suzanne Moorewho had previously publicly mocked Assange on a number of occasionswrote in the New Statesman (4/12/19) after Assanges arrest:

We are all bored out of our minds with Brexit when a demented-looking gnome is pulled out of the Ecuadorian embassy by the secret police of the deep state. Or the met, as normal people call them.

Moore, winner of the Orwell Prize for journalism in 2019, was not the first of her colleagues to ridicule WikiLeaks and its supporters as paranoid about an increasingly powerful state security apparatus. A column by the Guardians Nick Cohen (6/23/12) offered supporters of Julian Assange as a definition of paranoia:

Assanges supporters do not tell us how the Americans could prosecute the incontinent leaker. American democracy is guilty of many crimes and corruptions. But the First Amendment to the US constitution is the finest defense of freedom of speech yet written. The American Civil Liberties Union thinks it would be unconstitutional for a judge to punish Assange.

And, in any case, Britain has a notoriously lax extradition treaty with the United States.

Nils Melzer (Medium, 6/26/19): Once telling the truth has become a crime, while the powerful enjoy impunity, it will be too late to correct the course.

It is of little surprise, then, that the Guardian, among other news outlets, refused to publish the words of UN special rapporteur on torture Nils Melzer, who wrote in June 2019:

In the end, it finally dawned on me that I had been blinded by propaganda, and that Assange had been systematically slandered to divert attention from the crimes he exposed. Once he had been dehumanized through isolation, ridicule and shame, just like the witches we used to burn at the stake, it was easy to deprive him of his most fundamental rights without provoking public outrage worldwide.

The Assange case once again demonstrates that when erroneous reporting falls on the right side of the US and UK foreign policy establishment, editorial standards are set aside, and journalistic failures are met with zero accountability.

As such, its important to remember those journalists who watched on, pointing, laughing, comfortable in the knowledge that their work would never produce the impact nor risk of WikiLeaksand then said nothing as the right to a free press was removed in broad daylight.

FAIRs work is sustained by our generous contributors, who allow us to remain independent. Donate today to be a part of this important mission.

Originally posted here:
Deathly Silence: Journalists Who Mocked Assange Have Nothing to Say About CIA Plans to Kill Him - FAIR

Investigation Exposes CIA Plot to Kidnap or Kill WikiLeaks’ Founder Julian Assange – Between The Lines

A new Yahoo News investigation has revealed that the CIA, under Donald Trump, had discussed detailed plans at the highest level in 2017 to kidnap or assassinate WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange who had taken refuge in Ecuadors embassy in London five years earlier. Sources for the story included a senior U.S. counter-intelligence official and more than 30 other U.S. officials eight of whom confirmed details of the abduction plan.

According to these officials, the plan discussed breaking into Ecuadors embassy, which is protected by diplomatic immunity and forcibly taking Assange out. One informant recounted a meeting in the spring of 2017 at which President Trump had asked if the CIA could assassinate Assange and provide options about how this could be done. Trump has denied the story.

Mike Pompeo, whom Trump appointed CIA director in January 2017, said publicly that targeting Julian Assange and WikiLeaks was the equivalent of taking action against a hostile intelligence service. Top U.S. intelligence officials wanted to grant themselves the power to determine who is, and who is not a journalist and label some reporters they believed were agents of a foreign power as information brokers. Between The Lines Scott Harris spoke with Kevin Gosztola, managing editor of the news website ShadowProof.com who discusses the significance of this story on the CIA plot targeting Assange and the ominous threat to press freedom.

KEVIN GOSZTOLA: Whats important to say now more than a week after this story was published is theres not a single report you can point to pushing back on the things that these government officials, former government officials said to the Yahoo News reporters, which is that all the way up to the highest levels, there were discussions about extreme measures that could be employed against Julian Assange and other staff within WikiLeaks, as well as associates who may have been working on publication and materials.

Theres over 30 former intelligence officials, as well as Trump administration officials. And it even says eight of them describe the kind of plots that were being discussed within the CIA to these Yahoo News reporters. Just to say, this is a fairly solidly reported article, making significant allegations against former CIA Director Mike Pompeo that he was entertaining discussions about plotting to assassinate Julian Assange, seeking to find out if there was any legal authority for which he could order such an assassination operation.

But then I think more plausibly, trying to figure out if they could conduct a kidnapping or a rendition operation to snatch Julian Assange from the Ecuador embassy and put him on a plane and bring him back to the United States. Then it discusses how they could take offensive operations against WikiLeaks or the way they categorized WikiLeaks as a hostile entity, which we knew that was something that the CIA had wanted to do. We just didnt know what that label meant because in his first public remarks, CIA Director Mike Pompeo said to the world that they considered WikiLeaks a non-state hostile intelligence agency. But again, we didnt know what kind of policy or what that meant.

SCOTT HARRIS: The CIA and the U.S. government had differentiated between journalism and Julian Assange, calling him an information broker. Also in that category was Glenn Greenwald, one of the founders of the Intercept. (Also,) former Guardian columnist Laura Poitras, award-winning film documentary maker. What is the threat to journalism here as this CIA plot to kidnap or kill Julian Assange is exposed?

KEVIN GOSZTOLA: I think the threat is very severe, first off, because we arent seeing any political outrage. I mean, we havent really heard a peep from any representative or senator in Congress who read this report. I mean, wheres the alarm, wheres the shock that this is what is being considered? I mean, think about, we read a report that says agents of the CIA were plotting to kill a journalist or seriously ask themselves, would this be legal to kill a journalist? Which you know, is not a question that should even be contemplated.

Theres no outrage. So what does that say? Does that give a green light to the security services of other countries to plot their own operations against journalists? I mean, were always quick to condemn the countries we see as adversaries for how they mistreat and abuse journalists. But do we really have any credibility to lecture any other country when this is what we did to Julian Assange and hes, you know, hes still in jail and these charges have not been dropped by the Biden administration?

I mean, I think whats really at stake here is, is the fact that there are tremendous problems in countries around the world with press freedom and the U.S. cant really speak to them right now without authoritarians or tyrants saying, Well, I dont have to listen to you. Julian Assange is in jail. Hes being held in a British jail cell.

Leaving aside the excuses for the moment. The fact is these are secrecy laws that apply to U.S. citizens typically, people who sign nondisclosure agreements who work for the U.S. government and none of that applies to Julian Assange. Hes never worked at a U.S. government agency. Hes never been a contractor for a U.S. government agency. Hes not a U.S. citizen, so he should not have to follow any of these espionage laws. Yet, here we are. Were still talking about this.

For more information, visit Shadow Proof News website at ShadowProof.com.Kevin Gosztola is also co-host of the weekly podcast, Unauthorized Disclosure, at shadowproof.com/category/dissenter/unauthorized-disclosure.

Originally posted here:
Investigation Exposes CIA Plot to Kidnap or Kill WikiLeaks' Founder Julian Assange - Between The Lines

Why Is CIA Plot to Kidnap or Kill Julian Assange Routinely Ignored? – LA Progressive

Three years ago, on 2 October 2018, a team of Saudi officials murdered journalistJamal Khashoggiin the Saudi consulate in Istanbul. The purpose of the killing was to silence Khashoggi and to frighten critics of the Saudi regime by showing that it would pursue and punish them as though they were agents of a foreign power.

It was revealed this week that a year before the Khashoggi killing in 2017, the CIA had plotted to kidnap or assassinateJulian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, who had taken refuge five years earlier in the Ecuador embassy in London. A senior US counter-intelligence official said that plans for the forcible rendition of Assange to the US were discussed at the highest levels of the Trump administration. The informant was one of more than 30 US officials eight of whom confirmed details of the abduction proposal quoted ina 7,500-word investigation by Yahoo Newsinto the CIA campaign against Assange.

The plan was to break into the embassy, drag [Assange] out and bring him to where we want, recalled a former intelligence official. Another informant said that he was briefed about a meeting in the spring of 2017 at which President Trump had asked if the CIA could assassinate Assange and provide options about how this could be done. Trump has denied that he did so.

The Trump-appointed head of the CIA, Mike Pompeo, saidpublicly that he would target Assange and WikiLeaks as the equivalent of a hostile intelligence service.

The Trump-appointed head of the CIA, Mike Pompeo, saidpublicly that he would target Assange and WikiLeaks as the equivalent of a hostile intelligence service. Apologists for the CIA say that freedom of the press was not under threat because Assange and the WikiLeaks activists were not real journalists. Top intelligence officials intended to decide themselveswho is and who is not a journalist, and lobbied the White House to redefine other high-profile journalists as information brokers, who were to be targeted as if they were agents of a foreign power.

Among those against whom the CIA reportedly wanted to take action were Glenn Greenwald, a founder of theInterceptmagazine and a formerGuardiancolumnist, and Laura Poitras, a documentary film-maker. The arguments for doing so were similar to those employed by the Chinese government for suppressing dissent in Hong Kong, which has been much criticised in the West. Imprisoning journalists as spies has always been the norm in authoritarian countries, such as Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Egypt, while denouncingthe free press as unpatriotic is a more recent hallmark of nationalist populist governments that have taken power all over the world.

It is possible to give only a brief precis ofthe extraordinary story exposed by Yahoo News, but the journalists who wrote it Zach Dorfman, Sean D Naylor and Michael Isikoff ought to scoop every journalistic prize. Their disclosures should be of particular interestin Britain because it was in the streets of central London that the CIA was planning an extra-judicial assault on an embassy, the abduction of a foreign national, and his secret rendition to the US, with the alternative option of killing him. These were not the crackpot ideas of low-level intelligence officials, but were reportedly operations that Pompeo and the agency fully intended to carry out.

This riveting and important story based on multiple sources might be expected to attract extensive coverage and widespread editorial comment in the British media, not to mention in parliament. Many newspapers have dutifully carried summaries of the investigation, but there has been no furor. Striking gaps in the coverage include the BBC, which only reported it, so far as I can see, as part of its Somali service. Channel 4, normally so swift to defend freedom of expression, apparently did not mention the story at all.

In the event, the embassy attack never took place, despite the advanced planning. There was a discussion with the Brits about turning the other cheek or looking the other way when a team of guys went inside and did a rendition, said a former senior US counter-intelligence official, who added that the British had refused to allow the operation to take place.

But the British government did carry out its own less melodramatic, but more effective measure against Assange, removing him from the embassy on 11 April 2019 after a new Ecuador government had revoked his asylum. He remains in Belmarsh top security prison two-and-a-half years later while the US appeals a judicial decision not to extradite him to the US on the grounds that he would be a suicide risk.

If he were to be extradited, he would face 175 years in prison. It is important, however, to understand, that only five of these would be under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, while the other 170 potential years are under the Espionage Act of 1917, passed during the height of the patriotic war fever as the US entered the First World War.

Only a single minor charge against Assange relates to the WikiLeaks disclosure in 2010 of a trove of US diplomatic cables and army reports relating to the Iraq and Afghan wars. The other 17 charges are to do with labeling normal journalistic investigation as the equivalent of spying.

Pompeos determination to conflate journalistic inquiry with espionage has particular relevance in Britain, because the home secretary, Priti Patel, wants to do much the same thing. She proposes updating the Official Secrets Act so that journalists, whistle-blowers and leakers could face sentences of up to 14 years in prison. A consultative paper issued in May titledLegislation to Counter State Threats (Hostile State Activity)redefines espionage as the covert process of obtaining sensitive confidential information that is not normally publicly available.

The true reason the scoop about the CIAs plot to kidnap or kill Assange has been largely ignored or downplayed is rather that he is unfairly shunned as a pariah by all political persuasions: left, right and centre.

To give but two examples, the US government has gone on claiming that the disclosures by WikiLeaks in 2010 put the lives of US agents in danger. Yet the US Army admitted in a court hearing in 2013 that a team of 120 counter-intelligence officers had failed to find a single person in Iraq and Afghanistan who had died because of the disclosures by WikiLeaks. As regards the rape allegations in Sweden, many feel that these alone should deny Assange any claim to be a martyr in the cause of press freedom. Yet the Swedish prosecutor only carried out a preliminary investigation and no charges were brought.

Assange is a classic victim of cancel culture, so demonized that he can no longer get a hearing,even when a government plots to kidnap or murder him.

In reality, Khashoggi and Assange were pursued relentlessly by the state because they fulfilled the primary duty of journalists: finding out important information that the government would like to keep secret and disclosing it to the public.

Patrick CockburnCounterpunch

View post:
Why Is CIA Plot to Kidnap or Kill Julian Assange Routinely Ignored? - LA Progressive