Exchange Deposits in Bitcoin Slide to Lowest Level in 3 Years – Coindesk

The number of bitcoin on-chain deposits has dropped sharply over the last six months, indicating a strong optimistic or HODLing, sentiment in the market.

The seven-day average of the number of transfers to exchange addresses, or unique daily exchange deposits, fell to 23,986 on Jan. 1. Thats the lowest level since November 2016 and comes after topping out at 58,925 at the end of June 2019, according to crypto analytics firm Glassnode. The number has since inched up to 27,289 as of Feb. 4.

Notably, the count of deposits dropped by 60 percent in the second half of 2019 even as prices collapsed from $13,800 to $6,425.

During violent price drops, investors usually move their coins to exchanges to sell them in the market. However, investors held onto their coins during the second half of 2019 despite the price slide.

It indicates increased HODLing, a sign of strengthening belief in the long-term viability of the cryptocurrency, according to Ashish Singhal, CEO and co-founder at CRUXPay and CoinSwitch.co.

HODLers are not in it for a get rich quick mentality and are now less fazed by micro factors that previously led to an exodus or panic sell, Singhal told CoinDesk.

Nicholas Pelecanos, advisor to NEM Ventures, sees the slowdown in trading and on-chain transaction volumes as indicative of a not-so-healthy market in the short-term.

A divergence between on-chain transaction volume and price appreciation has typically been a bearish signal, Pelecanos told CoinDesk.

Bitcoins price rallied by 30 percent in January, diverging higher from the the count of transfers to exchange addresses, which remained near multi-year lows hit on Jan. 1.

Although the number of transfers to exchanges declined, the number of transactions recently saw an upswing along with price. The seven-day average of transactions jumped rose from 290,200 on Jan. 6 to a three-month high of 324,745 on Feb. 3.

That investors hoarded coins in January amid a price rally suggests strong bullish sentiment among investors; if they had doubted the sustainability of the recent price gains, they would have moved their coins to exchanges to sell them at market price, leading to a rise in exchange deposits.

Exchange deposits may rise after halving

Bitcoin will undergo mining reward halving in May 2020. The process aims to curb inflation by reducing rewards per block mined by 50 percent. When it occurs, the block rewards will drop to 6.25 BTC from the current 12.5 BTC.

Bitcoin has picked up a bid ahead of the supply-cutting event. The cryptocurrency is currently trading at $9,400, representing a 46 percent gain on Decembers low of $6,425.

Connor Abendschein, crypto research analyst at Digital Assets Data, expects exchange deposits to rise should the price of the cryptocurrency continue to do so ahead of the halving and in the following months. Thats because some investors may decide to book profits, he said.

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

View original post here:
Exchange Deposits in Bitcoin Slide to Lowest Level in 3 Years - Coindesk

Stakes For Bitcoin Are Highest Since The 2017 Bubble – Forbes

Getty Images

Bitcoins chart is at a crucial area. Stuck between lower highs since 2017 but higher lowers in its long-term trend, and the heralded havening around the corner, bitcoin speculators expect King Crypto to be on the verge of a monster move higher. But if bitcoin serves the purpose that true believers think it will, the next big move is likely to be lower.

The most important debate around crypto is whether investors should think of bitcoin as a safe haven asset like gold and bonds. Its the question that matters most to true believers, who see bitcoin as the solution to global central banks undermining fiat currencies. But at least in the short-term, evidence from the global economy suggests central banks will be able to stay out of the picture. If bitcoin really is a safe haven, then it should resume its trend lower.

Theres no perfect box in which to put bitcoin, but bitcoins overall trend the last 12 months higher during spring and summer of 2019, lower highs until December does to a large degree match the trajectory of bonds and gold. And it makes a good bit of sense, if you accept that bitcoin trades on belief that it could be a potential store of value in a world awash with cheap money.

More specifically, bitcoin is best thought of as a *subset* of traditional safe-haven assets. Because bitcoin is viewed by enough of its investor base as a way to bet on excessive central bank activity that will one day undermine the value of fiat currencies, it moves in relation to expectations of central bank activity. Its rallied when the economic outlook looks rough, because right now, the market equates uncertainty to central bank activity.

Fed cuts also support bond bulls and gold bulls. This is why bitcoin has been trending lower since the summer of last year as a U.S.-China trade deal came to fruition, the Fed was able to pause its cut cycle, and the global economy turned toward stability. Bonds and gold followed, but bitcoin had the most pronounced move, because it has the most riding on central bank cuts. If negative interest rates peaked last year, economies stabilize, and the existing financial system is not broken enough to demand a solution to fiat money, bitcoins use-case falters.

It doesnt have the same track record as gold, and bonds attract buyers for all kinds of reasons. Bitcoin has the most to prove, the biggest hype to live up to, and will swing the most as those interest-rate expectations change. One could loosely describe it as a high-beta haven trade, assuming the solution to economic risk means interest rate cuts. And so as coronavirus sent the odds of another Fed cut soaring this year, bitcoin, bond and gold all rallied.

Yet right now its looking weary next to its safe-haven peers. Gold broke out to a new 7-year high this year, bonds are the highest since early October, and bitcoin is struggling to break 10,000. Overhead pressure from bubble-buyers and whales likely remains, and U.S. economic data is crushing expectations. If this continues, the odds of a rate-cut will likely revert lower, and the trend lower in bitcoin should, according to this theory, resume downward too.

Or will it?

The exception to bitcoins trend as a safety asset is of course 2017. The epic bubble in crypto then looked a lot more like the melt-up in risk assets like stocks than anything in bonds or gold. So what do we conclude if it indeed explodes higher? Unclear, but unless it comes with a big deterioration in the economic outlook, its probably a sign of gross speculation gone AWOL once more. In that case, its best thought of as a risk asset more similar to stocks and thats not good for its long-term viability.

Read the original post:
Stakes For Bitcoin Are Highest Since The 2017 Bubble - Forbes

Bitcoin hit three big milestones this week – Decrypt

It's been a blinder of a week for Bitcoin. The pioneering cryptocurrency reached 500 million transactions, and now its daily transactions are hitting levels not seen in the past five months. To top it all off, BTC has wiped out over 45% of its 2019 sell-off in the space of just seven weeks.

The price of Bitcoin has been on an upward stride lately. In 2020 alone, BTC has managed to add over 40% to its price pointadvancing from a yearly low of just under $7000 to a current price of approximately $9800. Now, with a dual-month rally under its belt, Bitcoin has succeeded in writing off almost half of its 2019 losses.

Following a parabolic advance in April last yearwith Bitcoin topping out at around $13,8802019's price slump was unrelenting. The flagship crypto went from reclaiming the majority of its 2018 losses to a lowly base of $6,900 come November. Nevertheless, its triumphant rebound has all but erased the losses of last year, with Bitcoin on the threshold of breaking $10,000 once more.

It's not only Bitcoin's price that's been thrashing expectations of late. Key fundamentals have similarly positioned BTC into a sweet spot, with an increasing amount of digital gold exchanging hands.

Data from blockchain.com reveals that Bitcoin managed to surpass 368,604 daily transactions on February 5. The last time the network observed levels of that magnitude was back in September 2019.

Bitcoin's daily transactions hit a 5-month high (Source:

Although this wasn't the highest number of daily transactions ever, it's still indicative of market adoption. A record-breaking daily tx was recorded back in May 2019, when the network reached an all-time high of 452,646.

All this was underpinned by the news that Bitcoin network transactions had reached half a billion transactionsup from 250 million in 2017.

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed by the author are for informational purposes only and do not constitute financial, investment, or other advice.

Read the original:
Bitcoin hit three big milestones this week - Decrypt

Crypto Researcher Hasu Flags Attack That Could Bring ‘Purge’-Style Mayhem to Bitcoin – Coindesk

Pseudonymous researcher Hasu has discovered a new twist on a well-known potential attack on the bitcoin network.

The researcher posted a description of the attack, which he named "Purge" after the B-movie franchise, to the bitcoin developer email list last week. It's a variation on the so-called sabotage attack, in which malicious miners try to wreak havoc on bitcoin for the sake of wreaking havoc, rather than for profit.

Purge attacks probably dont constitute a bigger risk than other known forms of sabotage attacks, but seem like an interesting spin," he wrote.

In the dystopia of the "Purge" films, the U.S. government legalizes all crime for one night every year to unleash a sort of national catharsis. Hasu said he chose the name "because the attacker doesnt (primarily) steal money himself, he makes theft legal in the network for a short period of time."

In short, the attack opens the possibility that in very particular circumstances some users could spend their bitcoins more than once, something the unique technology behind bitcoin is supposed to prevent.

To be clear: The scenario is hypothetical, like many others bitcoin researchers have identified in their efforts to steel the network against real-world sabotage attempts. Anticipating the danger is a first step toward preventing or at least mitigating it.

In order to execute a purge attack, a rogue miner would replace an already accepted block with an empty one, pushing transactions that were previously seen as final back into the "mempool," which is like a waitlist for transactions. Then, anyone who sent a transaction during that time can spend the same coin twice.

The new type of sabotage could be used to "undermine trust in bitcoin's assurances," such as the assurance that transactions are after a time "final," meaning irreversible. "Possible attackers could include nation-states hostile to bitcoin as well as terrorist organizations," Hasu added.

Further, Purge is different from other sabotage attacks because the users who are suddenly allowed to double-spend could get incentive to go along with the attack.

"Because Purge gives normal users a way to benefit from the attack, the attacker hopes that it will be harder to coordinate a response quicklybecause whoever benefited from the attack has an incentive to defend the attack chain," Hasu told CoinDesk.

But while Purge is a new idea, its not necessarily worse than other known attacks. Hasu also points to a couple of lines of defense: One, the risk to the attacker of losing block rewards, which are expensive to win and could decline in value if the attack shakes confidence in bitcoin; and two, the strength of bitcoins pre-coordination.

The full report (on bitcoin futures exchange Deribit's blog) dives into much more detail.

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

Read more:
Crypto Researcher Hasu Flags Attack That Could Bring 'Purge'-Style Mayhem to Bitcoin - Coindesk

Bitcoin Starts Vertical Rally To $11.5K and $12K: Uptrend Isnt Over Yet – newsBTC

Bitcoin gained traction and recently climbed above the $10,000 mark against the US Dollar. BTC price is now in a strong uptrend and it could soon test $11,560 or $12,100.

This month, bitcoin started a strong upward move above the $9,000 resistance area. Earlier, BTC was able to settle nicely above the $8,800 pivot level and the 100-day simple moving average.

It cleared the path for more gains above the $9,200 and $9,250 resistance levels. More importantly, the bulls were able to push the price the main $9,500-$9,600 resistance area.

During the rise, there was a break above a crucial bearish trend line with resistance near $9,000 on the daily chart of the BTC/USD pair. Bitcoin even surpassed the 76.4% Fib retracement level of the last key decline from the $10,579 high to $6,423 low.

Bitcoin Price

The price is now showing a lot of positive signs and it recently climbed above the $10,000 level. The next resistance is seen near the $10,579 swing high.

However, the first key resistance for the bulls may perhaps be near the $11,560 level. It represents the 1.236 Fib extension level of the last key decline from the $10,579 high to $6,423 low.

Any further gains could lead the price towards the $12,100 resistance level. The main target for the current wave could be near $13,000 since it is close to the 1.618 Fib extension level of the last key decline from the $10,579 high to $6,423 low.

The recent break above $9,500 and $10,000 was significant. It has opened the doors for a larger rally towards $11,500 and $12,000.

Therefore, the chances of a downside correction are very less. An initial support is near the $9,600 area (the recent breakout zone). Any further losses may lead bitcoin price towards the $9,000 support area.

Technical indicators:

Daily MACD The MACD is slowly gaining momentum in the bullish zone.

Daily RSI (Relative Strength Index) The RSI for BTC/USD is now well above the 65 level.

Major Support Levels $9,600 followed by $9,000.

Major Resistance Levels $11,560, $12,100 and $13,000.

Read the rest here:
Bitcoin Starts Vertical Rally To $11.5K and $12K: Uptrend Isnt Over Yet - newsBTC

Is There Any Truth to the Tesla-Bitcoin Parallels? – CCN.com

Thanks to a significant uptick in Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) stock since the start of 2020, a new narrative has emerged: Tesla stock isapparentlythe new bitcoin. But is there any truth to this beyond a trivial analytic link?

The chronicle of Teslas price surgeand its kinship to BTCis being picked apart by nearly every analyst of late. One of the most recent speculators to highlight the quasi-relationship is Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Mike McGlone.

Speaking on an episode of Charting Futures, McGlone observed that Teslas stock price seems to be mimicking its 2013 performancea year that witnessed TSLA explode from $32 to $190 in the space of nine months:

On the long-term chart, [TSLA] trades just like it did in 2013, which was one of the biggest years ever. And by the way, that was the biggest year ever for Bitcoin and it looks to me like youre seeing a little bit of Bitcoin catching up.

McGlone certainly isnt alone in his thinking. A variety of crypto (and some non-crypto) commentators have also noted the TSLA-BTC connection. Crypto trader Scott Melker even suggested that Tesla stock was imitating bitcoins infamous 2017 bull runprompting somewhat of a sell signal:

You cant blame people for drawing comparisons. TSLA has gone on a parabolic streak since late October, climbing from $254 to a peak of $887 in early February. That marks a massive 250% increase in a little over three months. Remind you of anything?

Given this integral turning point for Tesla, its understandable why many are making the bitcoin-Tesla connection.

According to McGlone, while the assets charts appear to be lining up, the primary correlation between the pair remains their disruptive nature:

Theyre different assets but theyre the worlds most significant disruptive technologies with name recognition all around the world.

McGlone is right. Tesla is an undoubtedly innovative company. Its intention to supersede outmoded gas guzzlers makes it a highly relevant disruptor, especially in the age of environmental awareness.

Rather than cornering the market, as disruptive innovations typically dooften by producing a cheap and effective productTeslas success has instead drawn in multiple competitors. For example, the Chevrolet Bolt, Hyundai Ioniq, and Nissan Leaf, among others, come in at a more palatable cost compared to the Tesla Model 3, with its lofty $39,490 price tag.

Nevertheless, there is unquestionably a demand for Tesla. Last year the firm managing to seize 16% of the electric vehicle market despite established competition.

As a world-renowned pioneer of the electric vehicle industry, Teslas demand will likely continue to grow.

And then theres bitcoin.

Once touted as the death knell for the traditional financial industry, bitcoins allure as a disruptor has all but dissipated in recent years. Despite being a pioneer of blockchain technology and digital payments, a deficiency in adoption has curbed bitcoins goal of financial dominance.

For the most part, Bitcoin losing its disruptor status arises from a trifecta of woes: regulation, innovation and categorization.

A lack of cohesive regulation has left BTC adoption staggered across multiple jurisdictions. In the U.S., while the SEC continues to debate over security classifications of specific cryptocurrencies, the IRS defines bitcoin as property for U.S. federal tax purposes,andthe CFTC considers digital assets commodities. All of which contribute to the confusion.

Constant disagreement as to its use case has similarly buckled bitcoinwith no real consensus as to whether its a store of value, a medium of exchange, or both. As a consequence, the markets have become saturated. The cryptocurrency markets are now chock-full of bitcoin derivatives, each touting a sounder use-case than the lastproviding further dilution in bitcoins mission toward disruption.

Perhaps most damning of all is the argument that blockchain is a better disruptor than bitcoin.

Bitcoin, not blockchain is an adage typically used by non-believers. From Goldman Sachs President Gary Cohnto U.S. defense agency DARPA, those who rank BTC lower than its underlying tech appear to be winning the debate.

Last April, Forbes released its Blockchain 50 lista round-up for billion-dollar companies employing blockchain tech. The list included big shots such as Amazon Web Services, BBVA (Spains second-largest bank), Citigroup and, of course, Facebook. All of which tend to turn a blind eye toward bitcoin itself.

At the end of it, despite what analysts say, bitcoins relationship with Tesla is negligible at best, and downright ridiculous at worst.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of CCN.com.

This article was edited by Sam Bourgi.

Last modified: February 7, 2020 3:19 PM UTC

Follow this link:
Is There Any Truth to the Tesla-Bitcoin Parallels? - CCN.com

Choosing the right Bitcoin poker site – Yahoo Finance

Although still relatively undernourished compared to the behemoths of online gambling, Bitcoin poker sites are gaining in popularity.

Each one will have its advantages and disadvantages, ranging from the quality and quantity of the games plus the security of the site, which should remain a top priority for players.

There are numerous benefits to playing poker with Bitcoin, including the avoidance of FX fees, heightened anonymity and faster payouts.

Within Bitcoin poker sites there is a mixture of those that accept traditional fiat currencies along with Bitcoin and those that only accept Bitcoin itself.

Ignition Casino is an online gaming site licensed by the Kahnawake Gaming Commission established in 2016. They offer deposits in both Visa and Mastercard as well as Bitcoin. They also provide a variety of games including poker, slots and table games.

One of the biggest positives for Ignition is that they accept American customers, however this is also a drawback as well. European citizens are likely to find themselves blocked from accessing the site.

Using Bitcoin as a deposit method allows for higher limits $5,000 compared the the limit of $1,000 by credit card. Withdrawals are capped at $3,000 for both methods. They also offer typical welcome bonuses and refer-a-friend bonuses.

Being a regulated online gaming site provides some comfort knowing that your funds should be safe for both depositing and withdrawals, but the lack of access for those outside of the US means that this particular site is extremely limited.

Bet Online, unlike Ignition is available to many more nations worldwide. They offer a variety of games, from your typical online casino games and poker to live sports betting as well.

Payment options are also extensive compared to Ignition. Not only do they provide e-wallet services but the cryptocurrency deposits extend further than just Bitcoin. Bitcoin Cash, Litecoin and Ethereum are also options available as deposits.

One issue highlighted by users though is that the website is plagued by a wide range of bots within their poker services. Bots have become a real problem within the online poker industry both for major poker sites and the smaller ones.

Bet Online allowing for more nations worldwide to use the site along with further cryptocurrency deposits gives them the slight edge over Ignition Casino.

Nitrogen Sports is an online gaming site that only offers deposits and withdrawals in Bitcoin. There are no credit cards to be found here. Licensed in Costa Rica, the site offers poker, sports betting and your classic card games such as blackjack.

Much like Bitcoin only gaming sites Nitrogen Sports prides itself on provably fair software for their casino games. While for your typical user depositing and withdrawing in Bitcoin might be a little confusing there is one key advantage fast payouts. Instead of waiting 24 hours or longer in some cases, payouts from Nitrogen Sports can happen in a matter of hours.

The issue with using only Bitcoin as your deposit and withdrawal method though means that users then have to calculate consistently their betting value. Bets are still denominated in US dollars so some mental gymnastics are required.

For big fans of Bitcoin though, this site seems ideal.

These are but three of the best Bitcoin poker sites. There are many more and it would not be surprising that some of the major online gaming sites jump on the bandwagon sooner or later. Each gaming site even the major ones have their own nuances and issues. Playing across a few and finding which one suits you best is key for your own entertainment and enjoyment.

The post Choosing the right Bitcoin poker site appeared first on Coin Rivet.

Read more:
Choosing the right Bitcoin poker site - Yahoo Finance

Zero Chance Wikipedia Will Ever Use Bitcoin SV, Says Jimmy Wales – Cointelegraph

Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales has expressed skepticism regarding top-10 digital currency Bitcoin SV (BSV), claiming that the coin offers nothing for Wikipedia.

Wales made his statement right after the team behind the CoinGeek London conference which promotes Bitcoin SV to stakeholders announced his participation as a keynote speaker.

Until the emergence of Bitcoin SV (BSV) to reclaim Bitcoins original design, no blockchain had the scalability to power micropayments to efficiently reward better user information and handle the staggering amount of data Wikipedia carries, the speaker announcement read. However, Wales responded with a tweet on Feb. 7, saying:

Your marketing materials need to be updated immediately as people seem to be reading this as some kind of endorsement from me. I'm coming to speak my mind, which includes that BSV offers nothing for Wikipedia and that there is zero chance we would ever use it.

The tweet has been liked by over 1,000 people at press time and has aroused mixed reactions throughout the crypto community as some commentators questioned Waless intention to attend the conference.

Just recently, Bitcoin SV performed a scheduled upgrade named Genesis on Feb. 3, which resulted in a minor chain split where two versions of BSV exist at the time. Genesis changes many of the consensus rules for BSV to remove all remaining limitations.

The block size is now effectively unlimited. Instead of being hard-coded in the node software, the block size limit is now a parameter that miners can reduce manually. Many other limits were raised as well, such as the maximum size of a transaction or the number of owners for a multisig wallet.

While Bitcoin Cash is the first major hard fork of Bitcoin created back in August 2017, Bitcoin SV is a subsequent hard fork of Bitcoin Cash and associated with the self-proclaimed creator of Bitcoin, Craig Wright, who has recently been accused of confusing the ongoing trial proceedings.

Go here to read the rest:
Zero Chance Wikipedia Will Ever Use Bitcoin SV, Says Jimmy Wales - Cointelegraph

How the Long Tail of the Coronavirus Might Slow Bitcoin’s Hash Power Growth – Coindesk

The coronavirus outbreak in China may impose a longer-term impact on the bitcoin networks mining activity at a time when an estimated 65 percent of its computing power is located there.

While Chinese miner manufacturers see rising demand for new equipment ahead of bitcoins scheduled halving in May, they estimate the disease may limit growth in bitcoin mining power if the situation isnt resolved in the near future because it is difficult to expand or build new machines, according to Kevin Shao, general manager of Canaan Creative's blockchain arm.

Shao told CoinDesk that while there is little doubt miners can maintain the current level of computing power, there is a shortage of new mining machines.

So far, almost every bitcoin miner maker in China Bitmain, Canaan, MicroBT and InnoSilicon faces delays in production and delivery. Bitmain and Canaan, the worlds top two miner makers by market share, have published notices saying the delay of after-sale services until Feb. 10.

Customers want new, top-of-the-line mining models to expand existing mining facilities and replace older machines in anticipation of the bitcoin halving, currently expected to occur sometime in May 2020.

One of the most affected businesses is our mining machine production, Abe Yang, chief operating officer at PandaMiner, told CoinDesk.

Founded in 2013, the Shenzhen-based firm makes mining machines and provides computing power services with nine mining farms.

Not only us, most miner makers have been affected by the outbreak since their factories are based in cities like Dongguan and Shenzhen in Guangdong province, Yang said. During the extended vacation until Feb.10, almost all the production will be halted.

Meanwhile, the lockdown of the city of Wuhan has had a more direct impact on InnoSilicon, whose headquarters is located in the outbreaks epicenter.

The delay currently has not affected our businesses that much since the extension [of the holiday break] will only be several days, Shao said. However, the impact could be much more significant if the outbreak continues for a longer period of time.

According to data from BTC.com, bitcoins mining difficulty a measure of how hard it is to compete for mining rewards on the bitcoin network posted 6.57 percent and 7.08 percent growth on Jan. 2 and Jan. 15, respectively.

The growth rate dropped to 4.67 percent on Jan. 28 and is estimated to decline to 3 percent in about three days. Bitcoins mining difficulty adjusts itself about every 14 days it goes up or down in positive correlation to whether there are more or less participants racing on the network.

The coronavirus outbreak timespan overlaps with bitcoins halving event. The dual factors are apparently affecting the maintenance of mining equipment as well as the delivery of new miners, Wang Xin, marketing director of WhatsMiner maker MicroBT said in an interview. As such, the recovery of bitcoins hash rate growth will be delayed.

Rising demand

Hash power has more than doubled from around 50 EH/s compared to the same period of last year as bitcoins market price climbed over $9,000, according to Shao.

Second-hand miners [mostly older models like Bitmains AntMiner S9] that are aiming at a faster payback period, now have a larger risk as they enter a shutdown period ahead of the halving, compared to more powerful new models [like WhatsMiner M20 or AntMiner S17], said MicroBTs Wang.

Based on f2pools profitability index, models like the most widely used AntMiner S9 would have a 30 percent gross margin at bitcoins current price with an electricity cost of $0.05 per kWh.

However, a lower number of new miners could be good news for those that have already invested in mining equipment with facilities up and running.

Existing miners could see more steady mining rewards because there wouldnt be more competitors to enter the market due to the lack of new mining machines, Canaans Shao said.

But he added that one way the outbreak would affect existing miners is that many mining machine providers might not be able to offer timely post-sale services to fix malfunctioned devices.

Logistics issues

Wang said assembly factories have delayed their return-to-business schedule, citing the Chinese government's extension of the Lunar New Year. Businesses in the country have been ordered shut until at least Feb. 10.

This is not a crypto-specific issue either. Reuters reported Monday iPhone sales may take a hit because of the coronavirus, if the health emergency can not be contained in the near future.

Shao said one of his companys concerns is slowing logistics, adding, while we can make all the plans to prepare for the outbreak on our part, logistics is something we cant control.

Local infrastructure now prioritizes distributing necessities and supplies to those who are affected by the virus over less important deliveries, Shao said.

Therefore, some of the customers who pre-ordered miners might not be able to receive the machines on time, and it will take longer to deliver new orders if the outbreak continues, Shao said.

Even if employees all return to work, they cannot assemble miners unless their suppliers provide the necessary parts.

If the supplies can not be delivered on time, miner makers are not going to be able to assemble the production, Shao said.

One way companies can take advantage of their inventory is to run the machines themselves to offer computing power to their clients without selling the actual machines, Yang said. This assumes they have the necessary parts to complete assembling miners.

However, the service is not sustainable if the outbreak continues because we would eventually reach full capacity without new machines, creating a shortage in computing power, Yang said.

Mining farms

Mining farms remain unaffected for the moment, but existing quarantine controls and the possibility of an extended outbreak may soon take a toll.

Yang said PandaMiner is able to maintain operations for its existing farms, but there will be significant delays in constructing new farms.

Two-thirds of the companys employees did not go home for the Chinese New Year, and have instead been working at the mining sites. However, for those who did go home it will take weeks to return to work, Yang said.

Many cities now require a two-week quarantine for people coming back from other areas before letting them go back to work, he said.

For example, the Xinjiang autonomous region, an area that hosts a significant portion of mining farms due to its cheap electricity, has implemented strict policies to quarantine not only those coming back from the Hubei province, where Wuhan is located, but also any other province or region, Yang said.

We asked our employees to come back to Xinjiang as early as possible so that they can start the two-week quarantine and go back to work, Yang said, noting policies may vary among different areas in China.

The companys mining farm in Guizhou is subject to a stricter policy. We are allowed to let our employees work on site and can only keep a few people to maintain the operation, he said.

Sichuan province, which controls over 50 percent of bitcoins hashrate, also requires the two-week quarantine, according to Yang.

The lack of on-site staff has already negatively impacted the management of mining farms, Yang said.

Employees are responsible for ensuring mining machines are connected to the Internet and have a consistent supply of power. The employees would also need to fix broken circuit boards and other hardware to maintain operations, Yang said.

We usually have at least 10 people on staff to maintain a mining farm, Yang said. With much fewer employees, it is hard for us to keep as many machines running as before.

According to Yang, in some extreme cases where the local government prohibits all employees from working on site, companies need to negotiate with the government to leave two or three people on duty.

Wolfie Zhao contributed reporting.

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

More:
How the Long Tail of the Coronavirus Might Slow Bitcoin's Hash Power Growth - Coindesk

Ethereum vs Tron: Comparing Data, Defi and Stablecoins from Both Chains After Viral Tweet – Bitcoin News

On February 7, Cold Card and Opendime creator, Rodolfo Novak (also known as NVK), tweeted a picture of himself with Tron founder Justin Sun and Blockstreams CEO Adam Back. Novak said Ethereum was over and the three had a plan to move Tron to Liquid, a network that leverages the BTC chain. Whether the tweet was a joke or not, the picture got the crypto community fired up and it initiated heated debates about the legitimacy of both Tron and Ethereum.

Also Read: IOTA, EOS, XLM, ADA 4 Bitcoin Contenders With Zero Use Cases and Barely Any Infrastructure

One could consider the crypto networks Tron (TRX) and Ethereum (ETH) competitors within the cryptoconomy. While the ETH network is older than TRX, they both have similar goals and do similar things. As Ethereum strives to be a world computer, Tron aims to accomplish this feat as well, but with more of a focus on entertainment. They both leverage concepts like decentralized finance (defi), decentralized apps (dapps) and permissionless systems for token creation (ERC20 & TRC20).

When Novak tweeted about moving TRX to the Liquid network, lots of people considered it a joke, while others took the tweet very seriously. Despite what people think about Tron or Ethereum, news.Bitcoin.com decided to look at the two networks to see how they both compare as far as onchain data, market statistics, development, funds locked in defi, and both projects social media ratings. We want to let our readers decide which project is better by weighing the pros and cons of each crypto without all the opinions.

On February 7, 2020, Coin Metrics data shows the BTC chain processed roughly 333,000 onchain transactions. ETH saw a total of 626,000 transactions in the 24 hour period while TRX did around 816,000 on Friday. While ETH has been consistently above BTC transactions per day, TRX has also been consistently above ETHs daily average.

Both Ethereum and Tron have tokens that represent the stablecoin tether (USDT), but the ETH chain has a whole lot more. Statistics from Tronscan on Saturday show that theres 814 million USDT held on the Tron network. Todays data stemming from Etherscan indicates theres a whopping 2.2 billion USDT leveraging the ETH chain.

As far as stablecoin usage is concerned, Ethereum outpaces Tron by a long shot, as the chain also has other stablecoin tokens like PAX, USDC, and TUSD. But its true that both networks have seen more tethers migrate to each blockchain during certain periods of 2019. In fact, as far as funds locked into defi, Ethereum takes the cake when it comes to decentralized finance and centralized finance (cefi) applications as well, with projects like Maker, Compound, and Instadapp. Defi applications on ETH touched a milestone on February 6, when the total value locked (TVL) surpassed $1 billion.

Where market action and fiat value are the focus, tron (TRX) is trading for $0.02 per coin and the cryptocurrency is still down 92% from its all-time high (ATH) of $0.30. Ethereum (ETH) is swapping for $224 per coin at the time of publication, which is 84% down from its ATH of $1,431. Against USD over the last 12 months, TRX is down 18% and against BTC the crypto is down 69%. With ETH the crypto has gained 86% against the U.S. dollar in a year but against BTC it is still down 30%.

Trade volume data from Messari shows the reported volume for TRX is around $203 million in the last 24 hours, but Messaris real volume index indicates theres only been $49 million in TRX trades. As far as ETH is concerned, reported trade volume on Saturday is roughly $3.5 billion, but again Messaris real volume index shows less at $349 million. Tallying up the aforementioned statistics shows that ETH was a better investment over the last year, it has more liquidity, and trade volume as well.

As far as yearly Github activity, coincheckup.com data shows that Tron has outpaced ETH development during the last 12 months in regard to tallied commits. The Coindesk social media benchmark shows ETH has around 451,000 Reddit subscribers and the same number of Twitter followers giving the project a 23% social rating.

Trons Reddit community has about 71,000 subscribers and Tron has around 497,000 Twitter followers giving the project a 9.7% social rating. ETH has around 2,000 Github watchers and roughly 445 developers contributing to the ETH codebase. Tron has about 309 Github watchers and 118 developers that have contributed to the TRX Github repository. While there are 9,200 forks of Ethereum, there are only 673 Tron forks.

The Ethereum project got a head start and Tron is not as old of a blockchain in comparison. They both have influential leaders at the helm with Justin Sun and Vitalik Buterin who are both still around to weigh in with opinions, unlike Satoshi. Both projects have a lot of investors who believe that either ETH or TRX will be dominant and there are definitely those that think both will serve a purpose. Either way, both exist in prominent market positions today as ETH and TRX are in the top 15 largest market capitalization list and might be for quite some time.

What do you think about these two cryptocurrencies? Do you think Tron is better than Ethereum or vice versa? Let us know what you think about this subject in the comments section below.

Disclaimer: Price articles and market updates are intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered as trading advice. Neither Bitcoin.com nor the author is responsible for any losses or gains, as the ultimate decision to conduct a trade is made by the reader. Always remember that only those in possession of the private keys are in control of the money. Cryptocurrency prices referenced in this article were recorded on February 8, 2020.

Image credits: Shutterstock, Coin Metrics, Markets.Bitcoin.com, coincheckup.com, Coindesks social media benchmark, defipulse.com, Etherscan, Tronscan, Fair Use, and Pixabay.

Did you know you can buy and sell BCH privately using our noncustodial, peer-to-peer Local Bitcoin Cash trading platform? The local.Bitcoin.com marketplace has thousands of participants from all around the world trading BCH right now. And if you need a bitcoin wallet to securely store your coins, you can download one from us here.

Jamie Redman is a financial tech journalist living in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since 2011. He has a passion for Bitcoin, open source code, and decentralized applications. Redman has written thousands of articles for news.Bitcoin.com about the disruptive protocols emerging today.

Visit link:
Ethereum vs Tron: Comparing Data, Defi and Stablecoins from Both Chains After Viral Tweet - Bitcoin News