Google boosts Chrome encryption amid email warning

Summary: The Internet giant tries to convey to users that many emails are not secure once it leaves Google's hands.

Google routinely publishes reports to establish transparency into how often responds to data requests from law enforcement agencies, but its latest update pertains more to industry competitors.

The Internet giant issued a memo on Tuesday -- a reminder to some and maybe a heads-up to others -- that while Google might promise to keep emails encrypted within its bounds, it can't say the same when messages float beyond its digital grasp.

In fact, Google estimated that between 40 and 50 percent of emails sent between Gmail and other email providers arent encrypted at all.

Brandon Long, the tech lead for the Gmail Delivery Team, offered a real world comparison in a blog post on Tuesday to nail home the point for Internet users of all proficiency levels:

When you mail a letter to your friend, you hope shell be the only person who reads it. But a lot could happen to that letter on its way from you to her, and prying eyes might try to take a look. Thats why we send important messages in sealed envelopes, rather than on postcards.

Email works in a similar way. Emails that are encrypted as theyre routed from sender to receiver are like sealed envelopes, and less vulnerable to snoopingwhether by bad actors or through government surveillancethan postcards.

While acknowledging other email providers to encrypt their emails too (albeit without naming names), Long noted a few public service announcements intended to nudge others to do the same.

That starts with a new section in Google's Transparency Report dedicated to promoting safer email infrastructures.

Google also has a few other security-minded announcements this week, including End-to-End, a new Chrome extension powered by OpenPGP, an open standard touted to be supported by existing encryption tools.

Read more:
Google boosts Chrome encryption amid email warning

Related Posts
This entry was posted in $1$s. Bookmark the permalink.